Comments by "" (@Iain1962) on "History Debunked"
channel.
-
344
-
162
-
99
-
40
-
23
-
20
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Having changed the meaning of many words they have changed the meaning of "Democracy". Old democracy, that antiquated notion of the people voting for their representatives and then holding them to account has been replaced by new democracy. New democracy is a collective of wise socialists and a collection of "institutions", the courts, the NGO's the ECHR, the UN, the WEF all of course run by radical lefties.
Voting for your leaders by majority is now called populism, and evil, whereas kowtowing to left wing ideology is democracy.
Easy really. That's why Biden talks about Trump being a "threat to democracy", and von der Leyen talks about EU democratic values, despite no-one being able to vote for any of the legislators in the EU. That really is the new democracy in action, (it may also be called "the rules based international order").
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
Much of what you say is true however you seem to be missing the point. Hitler is called a fascist, but he was a socialist a National Socialist, he was obsessed with getting revenge for WWI, for that he needed the people to fight for him, to do that he needed to bring them along with him. Hence the socialism all the benefits and handouts that Germans had never had before, the social organisations, the paid holidays, Strength Through Joy. For Germans only of course, only they would be fighting for him, everyone else was disposable, and of course in time even the Germans were disposable.
It was all financed by financial trickery. Did you never wonder how they went from being broke in the Weimar Republic to being an industrial powerhouse by WWII? All of it was financed through a secondary economy with Bonds that were used to pay for all the industry. These bonds had to become Reichsmarks real money by 1939 and he didn't have enough Reichmarks, so he had to plunder.
The debt was created to fund the war, and the bills were paid by looting the conquered countries. There was no way for Hitler to carry on peacefully, his trickery would have come to light and it would have been all over. Once he started on the path there was only one possible destiny...War.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The fundamental problem is how it is financed. The money comes from the top down, this is the opposite of how it should be. The NHS starts with a budget let's say for hip replacements, as each operation is carried out the money is used up, when all the money is close to being used up doctors have to pick who gets treatment and who has to wait for the next budget allocation. So they have to start rationing.
Now if the money went the other way, the more operations you did the more money came in, the budget would always be there for the next patient. So this would require a complete overhaul of the system so the money goes where the demand is, rather than some guy with a spreadsheet deciding how much we are going to need for hip operations in three years time.
It should all be privatised, we also have the ludicrous situations when things go wrong. Let's say a Hospital employs a bad doctor, so the taxpayer pays his salary, then the taxpayer compensates his patients for his mistakes, then the hospital is fined ( so the state fines a state run hospital- literally fining itself) and then the Hospital runs out of money and needs bailed out, so the state fines itself, and then bails itself out. And all paid for by the taxpayer, the guilty parties are promoted or transferred, and nobody is actually held accountable.
What happened in the wake of the Lucy Letby situation for example? Anybody fired? Anybody held accountable for allowing it to go on? The people who get sacked are most often the whistleblowers. What kind of message does that send?
It's useless, I stay away unless I have no alternative.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The 1924 Labour government didn't last long, we had National coalition governments from 1929 to 1945.
Then Attlee destroyed our industry by nationalising everything and the Labour/Tory ping pong managed our decline until Thatcher grabbed the bull by the horns and turned the country around, since then we have seen the advent of globalism and Politicians are now working not for the people but for the Globalist bosses.
People though are fed up. We don't want the WEF, the UN, the ECHR, and the Corporations and NGOs to be in charge, we want the people we elect to work for us...not these global masters.
Switching from one major party to the other isn't going to change that which is why people are voting for the "upstart parties". Le Pen in France, Wilders in the Netherlands, Meloni in Italy, AfD in Germany...and Reform in the UK.
In the UK came to this realisation a bit late, we thought we could trust the Tories to get Brexit sorted, instead they deliberately fudged it and then they started behaving like Socialists.
Nobody wants Labour and the MSM have been on a concerted campaign to undermine Reform with all their dirty tricks.
Maybe not this time, but next time Reform are going to be a force to be reckoned with, and the MSM is dead after this.
1
-
I have to disagree with you here Simon.
I lived in France for a long time, I never heard anybody criticise the Brits and Americans for bombing France during the war, I didn't feel any resentment at all due to that. In fact they were grateful, and knew very well that Britain was targeting the Nazis not the French, indeed often the French Resistance would help guide in the bombers so they could hit their targets. Not even a cheep about Mers-el-Kébir.
The French don't dislike us they are jealous, they could never beat us, we always ended up beating them, the may have won a battle or two but never the war, that's what annoys them.
They have monuments to Napoleon and he is still celebrated, even though if you think about it he was not dissimilar to Hitler, and yet the Germans celebrating Hitler would be unthinkable, yet the French love their Tyrant Emperor, well it was the only time they had a few victories, so you take what you can get I suppose.
1
-
1
-
I disagree, there are some similarities, but then don't most wars begin along these lines, a territorial dispute, a linguistic or religious or ideological affiliation.
However Hitler was out for revenge, he had a plan from the moment he came to power, he started building a war machine immediately and everything he did was about building a massive military, from building roads and buildings, Cruise ships that could be converted to troop ships in a moment, tanks and guns and planes were designed and manufactured in secret, all Political moves were designed to advance the cause.
War was the goal, Lebensraum the objective, but really it was all about avenging the defeat of 1918. I don't see this with Putin at all.
It seems to me he was reticent to go to war, and he has been restrained, he has moved very slowly, indeed it seems to be WWI style trench warfare (with drones and satellites and sophisticated weaponry) rather than fast moving Panzer groups encircling and advancing at tremendous speed. IN WWII the lines in Russia would move hundreds of miles in a month, in Ukraine they have been fighting over a couple of km's for years.
I am no fan of Putin, but I am also no fan of Zelensky, he's a bit of a dictator himself, and let's face it he's a puppet, he is entirely dependent on continued support from the West and to ensure that he has to do as he is told.Putin should not have invaded but there is more to all this than we know...that's for sure.
It didn't start as a Proxy war, but it has turned into one, and of course it's the young men in both countries and the civilians on the front line who bear the brunt of it all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hallowe'en is an ancient act to scare away evil spirits. The first of November is All Hallows Day, or All Saints day if you prefer.
In order to make sure that the Saints were not disturbed by evil spirits on their day, people would try and scare them away by dressing up in costumes on the Hallow's eve, hence Hallowe'en.
We all used to do it when I was young, and we would knock on all doors not just people we knew. But you didn't just stand at the door and get a handout, you had to go in the front room and perform something, a poem, or sing a verse of a song, or recite something or other, otherwise no sweeties !!
There were other traditions, dooking for Apples, which involved leaning over the back of a chair, holding a fork in your teeth with which you tried to let go and stab apples floating in a bucket or a tin bath.
Now they just do this trick or treat thing, which came from the USA, nothing to do with our traditions. All the effort has been removed as usual in the modern world, just gimme the sweets !!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The right believe in freedom of the individual, the left believe in Collectivism, so logically, speaking far right would be extreme freedom, hardly any government or perhaps even no government, Anarchy even.
The far left on the other hand believe on extreme collectivism, centralisation of power, lots of regulations and taxes, no free enterprise (you might get rich, and we can't have that, that would mean inequality).
If I had to choose, I certainly wouldn't choose communism. Far right in media speak basically means you don't want to be assimilated into the collective and go along with their phoney narrative, which makes you a bad boy/girl/They-them.
1