Comments by "id Usher" (@id_Usher) on "T-14 Armata Main Battle Tank - Good Or Bad Tank?" video.

  1. WHAT you're saying about a glancing blow to the tower, and it's kind of a flaw, what's going to happen in Abrams ' huge and poorly defended tower? When is the charger contused? When are all those huge sights that are sticking out of Abrams ' roof going to fly off? You start talking about flaws, not about the same flaws in others. For example, the French Leclerc breaks down from overheating. But nobody talks about it.
    1
  2. I will say that you absolutely do not understand the doctrine of the USSR and Russia and the reasons for it. In the global war is absolutely the most important guarantee of victory is the NUMERICAL advantage!!! This is proved by the second world war. And the USSR (on land and air) and the US (in the air and on sea) won thanks to NUMERICAL advantage!!! The very quality of technology affects tactically, but not strategically. Ultra-modern and expensive Tigers and Panthers of Nazi Germany could not turn the war. And won a weaker but simple and numerous T-34 and Sherman. Super cool Me-262 and FW-190 could not win against simple and numerous Mustangs, cobras, Yak-3, La-5. Soviet tanks are lighter, better armored and easier than Western ones. The weapons are comparable. Conclusion? Who wins if they fight 100 Abrams or 100 Леопардов2 vs 300 T-72 or T-80. I think 300 T-72 and T-80 will win. Yes, even 200 or 150 T-72 and T-80 win. Since the experience of local yn shows that the survivability of Western tanks is greatly overestimated, and the survivability of Soviet/Russian tanks is underestimated
    1