Comments by "life is a carnival" (@lifeisacarnival1359) on "CNN shows how Tucker Carlson attempted to 'sanitize' new Jan. 6 footage" video.

  1. Did you mis the people busting out doors , scaling the Capitol, and beating up outnumbered cops? The fact that cops escorted this guy doesn't change any of that.
    2
  2. The joke is Carlson trying to say there was no violence when the whole world saw it.
    1
  3. Check the facts on 1000 arrested and hundreds already pleading guilty.
    1
  4.  @gideonthejudge9036  Rest assured, Judge(lmfao, what a pretentious pompous ass you are; judge of who or what?), I know how to use a hyphen. I've used that phrase "Trump- loving thugs" many times on YouTube, because I like it and I think it fits. I just happened to omit the hyphen in that comment. For most poorly educated Trumpers, the missing hyphen wouldn't have mattered. They can't seem to grasp the difference between "your" and "you're" or "then and "than". Actually, "Trump loving thugs", without the hyphen, seems okay too, when you think about it. Trump called those thugs" patriots", "peaceful people", "tremendous people". and watched them for 3 1/2 hours on TV without intervening. He told McCarthy when that POS pleaded for help that apparently "those people care more about the election than you do". Trump relished every second of what they did. Now that we're past your hyphen distress, I still don't know what you say the media are lying about. They based their coverage on what was shown live on Jan. 6th and the videos seen numerous times since then. Carlson is the one lying, as many Republicans in Congress have pointed out, when he uses a few clips of people being escorted by cops to imply that the whole thing was peaceful. Funny, I got no response from you regarding the video evidence, much of it right here on YouTube, of the violence that did occur. Why can't you talk about that instead of a missing hyphen? BTW, it's "en masse", as long as we're correcting other people's writing.
    1
  5. If the cops were opening all the doors why were people breaking out doors and windows and crawling through them?
    1
  6.  @brettpereira4406  So the left lies more than the right? What did you do, take a survey? Go away. You're ridiculously biased.
    1
  7.  @brettpereira4406  Ratings have nothing to do with the violence on Jan. 6th. If you want to deny it happened because of Tucker's bs, search "Violence on Jan. 6th" right here on Youtube and you can see plenty of video proof. Intolerance? Of what? Beating up cops and attacking the Capitol? Damn right many people are intolerant of that, and so is the justice system.
    1
  8.  @brettpereira4406  How do CNN's ratings make a difference in the violence of Jan. 6th? How can live coverage of what happened be biased or slanted? BTW, much of what Rogan said on his podcast is false. Ivermectin does not cure covid, and the covid vaccine does not alter a person's genes. FYI, Pfizer is a major sponsor of Fox. Didn't Trump take that evil vaccine? If he took Pfizer's, he took the one that he and the US government had nothing to do with developing.
    1
  9.  @brettpereira4406  You opened the thread speaking about CNN's "narrative" on this video, which deals with Carlson's Jan. 6th footage. .That's why I keep asking you what you find wrong with their Jan. 6th coverage. If your problem wasn't with their Jan. 6th coverage, , as you say now, why did you open the thread saying nothing about their "narrative" is to be believed? YOU said you find their coverage somehow false or inaccurate. Then when asked what's wrong with that coverage, you spin off into generalities about CNN's intolerance blah blah blah. Apparently, as you're saying now, your opening comment was not what you meant. So why post it?. You DON"T have a problem with CNN's Jan. 6th "narrative", so why post that you do?
    1
  10. By MAGA fools criticizing CNN for reporting on Carlson's dishonest portrayal of Jan. 6th.
    1
  11. Lmao, "only shows the violent footage"? The non-violent footage means no violence happened, as Carlson implies? There were non-violent people at BLM riots too. Does that mean there was no violence there?
    1
  12.  @trailersfromhell2539  Did Fox show non-violent people at the BLM protests and say "See not everyone there was violent".?
    1
  13.  @trailersfromhell2539  My side? You don't know what side I'm on. It's the side that opposes BLM rioters as well as thugs attacking the Capitol. I saw people standing around observing and not doing violence on both Jan. 6th and at BLM riots. People were standing around at 911 too after the first plane hit.. It's pretty much expected that networks would show the violence more.
    1
  14. CNN is bad for reporting on Carlson's misleading and dishonest coverage of Jan. 6th, implying that there was no violence because there were non-violent people there?
    1
  15. How does any footage of people stro0llign through the Capitol take away from the actual violence that millions watched as it occurred live? What narrative does it change, that Jan. 6rth had no violence?
    1
  16. 85%? Did you take a survey or watch every minute of CNN coverage for the past 6 years? If you're not blind you saw the live coverage of the violence on Jan 6th. Just because not everybody was violent doesn't mean that hundreds weren't, and the vast majority of those hundreds have pled guilty and admitted to doing what they were charged with.
    1
  17. Thanks for watching.
    1
  18. No need to fact check the live footage everybody saw on Jan. 6th.
    1
  19. Was that the police station the Boogaloo Boys burned down in Minneapolis trying to put the blame on Antifa?
    1
  20. Why didn't he show "protesters" climbing the Capitol walls and attacking police with bear spray and flagpoles?
    1
  21. Did the cops open ALL the doors?
    1
  22. The live coverage seen by millions on Jan 6th as it happened doesn't lie either, genius.
    1
  23. Lmfao, so you didn't see the videos of people busting out doors and windows and climbing through them?
    1
  24.  @kriskeel2753  I watched it live. They showed police taking down barriers and letting people in doors. They also showed people busting out doors and windows, scaling the Capitol walls, attacking cops, and searching through the Capitol for members of Congress. Carlson is a POS. He's trying to convince people that there was NO violence with selected footage where there isn't any. Unfortunately but not surprisingly, he has convinced a lot of the same people who believed his lies about the election being stolen, the same lies he admitted in texts that he didn't believe himself. Yeah, trust him.
    1
  25. What exculpatory evidence? Though it's nice to you earned a new phrase from the shaman's lawyer. There is no exculpatory evidence in his case. He was charged with obstructing a federal proceeding and pled guilty to it . He even apologized and said his behavior was inexcusable. 25 years? The maximum penalty for what he was charged with is 51 months. He got 41. Stop lying. No prosecutor is gonna get away with asking for a sentence of 25 years on that charge. Federal sentencing guidelines have to be followed.
    1
  26.  @MrPheelingphine  No, genius, he wasn't charged with trespassing. He was charged with obstructing a federal proceeding, which he did and which he admitted to and apologized for. Federal sentencing guidelines for that offense carry a maximum of 51 months, so he got less than the max. After that he can go back to living with Mommy.
    1
  27.  @MrPheelingphine  2 minutes in that dork is doing an ad for some bs product. No thanks.
    1
  28.  @jonathanreed5139  1)He wasn't charged with doing anything violent. He was charged with obstructing a federal proceeding, which he admitted to and apologized for. 2)The penalty under federal guidelines for that offense is up to 51 months, so he got less than the maximum. After he and his horns serve their time, they can go back to living with Mommy.
    1
  29.  @jonathanreed5139  Disprove what? He committed the crime he was charged with and plead guilty to.
    1
  30.  @jonathanreed5139  Trump's own acting secretary of defense says there is no record of Trump requesting National Guard troops. Such a request has to be made through the Pentagon; there's no evidence of it. So the rioters attacked the Capitol only because security was weak? You're saying that they were cowards who wouldn't have attacked if they hadn't had the cops outnumbered? By your logic, BLM is not responsible for their riots. The blame lies on mayors and police chiefs who didn't provide enough security. Choke on that.
    1
  31. So Carlson is being truthful here?
    1
  32. Because 1000 Trump lovers were arrested for Jan. 6th?
    1
  33. Yeah, the same guy with integrity who told you the election was stolen then texted his Fox buddies that he didn't believe any of it and Trump's lawyers were insane liars.
    1
  34. Don't forget all the Republicans who criticized him for being dishonest.
    1
  35. If you watched Jan 6th live like millions did you don;t need any media outlet to tell you anything. Tuckers bs footage only fooled the same morons who believed his admitted lies about the stolen election.
    1
  36. How did you like the fake videos of thugs busting out doors and windows and beating up outnumbered cops? What I'd really like is videos of the hundreds who plead guilty so far.
    1
  37. But you believed Tucker when he told you the election was rigged then said in his texts that Trump's people saying that were insane liars.
    1
  38. I believe the footage of Hawley running was usually coupled with him raising his fist in support of the "protesters" then running like hell when they got into the Capitol.
    1
  39. After 3 1/2 hours of rioting. And the word is "shaman". it's only been in print a billion times. Pea brain didn't register it?
    1
  40. Yeah, like you can't outlie the live footage of Trump loving thugs scaling Capitol walls, beating up cops and busting out doors and windows. No cops were escorting them were they?
    1
  41. Here's one: millions of people watched the violence and vandalism of Jan 6 as it happened. No bs from Carlson change that, anymore than it can do away with the hundreds of guilty pleas entered by the thugs who did it.
    1
  42.  @brettpereira4406  So zero cops died that day and it wasn't the worst attack in history. That makes it okay? And it's okay for Carlson to show a few seconds of footage of the shaman being escorted by cops as if that excuses all the violence. 141 cops were injured. The fact that none died is no excuse for any of it, and Carlson is a disgusting POS for trying to dismiss it as peaceful. Go the fuck away.
    1
  43.  @brettpereira4406  Maybe I'm misunderstanding your position. If so I apologize and would like you to clarify it for me. Carlson showed footage of the shaman being quietly escorted by cops around the Capitol. It seemed to me that he was using that footage to somehow minimize or mitigate the actual violence and damage to people and property that did occur. Many people agreed with me, , including several Republicans, saying Carlson was being dishonest.(Shocker). You stated that zero cops were killed and it was not the worst attack in history, so I took that to mean you agree with Carlson that what happened wasn't that bad. What false narrative are you talking about CNN and other media using? The attacks on the Capitol and the police were shown live. What part of their narrative is false, and how is Carlson's distorted version of events not false?
    1
  44. Carlson is showing people supposedly taking a tour of the Capitol on Jan. 6th? Wasn't the Capitol closed to visitors that day because Congress was certifying the election? Doesn't that mean that Carlson is yet again deceiving viewers by showing tour footage taken before Jan. 6th?
    1
  45.  PUREBLOODS shall inherit the Earth  I guess they're awaiting trial after being arrested for trespassing. How many cops did they beat up, and what did they vandalize?
    1
  46. Well, asking for it three years ago wouldn't have done much good would it, genius?
    1
  47. So the videos of Trump loving thugs busting out doors and windows and attacking outnumbered cops -- all that is false?
    1
  48.  @cobaltusa  99%? How do you get that? Did you count them? Nobody was supposed to be walking around taking selfies. It doesn't matter what you call it. Show you people beating cops? If you didn't see video of thugs beating cops you're either lying or live under a rock. 141 cops were treated for injuries. Were they lying?
    1
  49.  @cobaltusa  Are you seriously continuing to argue that NO rioters attacked police? The fact that some didn't doesn't change the fact that many did, and dozens if not hundreds have been charged and plead guilty to assaulting a police officer. Again, the attacks were shown live to millions of people on Jan. 6th. How can you deny they occurred? As far as the lack of security, you appear to be calling the rioters cowards, if they wouldn't have attacked had there been more security. Regardless, it's a ridiculous excuse for what they did. By your logic, the Antifa and BLM rioters weren't responsible for what they did; it was the police chiefs' and mayors' faults in those cities for not having enough security.
    1
  50.  @cobaltusa  Stop being ridiculous. The video of cops being attacked was shown live all over the world. 141 cops injured, verified. Did they injure themselves? How many people have already plead guilty for attacking cops? You're a totally delusional idiot. If there was proper security it wouldn't have happened. So I guess the Antifa/BLM riots were the fault of the police chiefs and mayors who didn't have enough cops on hand. How does that sound? It also means the rioters were cowards who wouldn't have attacked cops if they hadn't outnumbered them. Yeah, blame security, not the thugs who assaulted police.
    1
  51. So if there was no violence why were 1000 people arrested and why have hundreds plead guilty? Why did that idiot ask Trump for a pardon? For what?
    1
  52. Why would Trump lovers obey FBI "orders" to break windows and doors?
    1
  53. Yeah, just look at how they attacked the Capitol.
    1
  54. There were no "clips" when the rioting was shown live while it was happening.
    1
  55. The attack on the Capitol was shown LIVE, genius. There was no cherry picking that day.
    1
  56. Downplayed it? Trump is the one who downplayed covid, genius. WTF are you babbling about?
    1
  57. Scapegoats who pled guilty?
    1
  58. Nah, just hours of live footage on Jan. 6th.
    1
  59.  @JohnDoe-rs7gh  Uh, no I mean the 3 1/2 hours of violence I watched live on TV on Jan. 6th, as it happened. So did millions of other people, including Trump. Lawyers defending thugs who are on video committing violent crimes aren't gonna get any benefit from footage of OTHER people not being violent, idiot. Some of their clients were even stupid enough to video and photograph themselves committing crimes. Italking The buffoon apologized when he pled guilty and said his actions were inexcusable.
    1
  60.  @JohnDoe-rs7gh  Tell the 141 cops who were injured there was no violence. Bear spray, flagpoles and baseball bats are weapons in the hands of thugs like that. There was no violence because nobody was killed except the stupid woman who disobeyed an order not to climb through a busted out door? Who busted that door out, the cops? Pelosi? Trump lovers are all over the place busting out doors and windows. The cops weren't escorting them around. They were breaking in. You're a delusional fool.
    1
  61.  @JohnDoe-rs7gh  Well, I can see that YOU'RE too ignorant to know the difference between "your" and "you're". Did you know they teach that inn first grade? Since you didn't make it that far, you probably didn't know that, or the difference between "then" and "than". WTF is "PDSD? Lmfao. Do you mean PTSD? Sure, you're a retired cop, not knowing what PTSD is. Retired mall cop maybe. The injuries to cops on Jan 6 included concussions, cracked ribs, and a lost eye. Let me know when you'd like to find out how any of those feel. As far as bear spray, if it's so harmless, I'll be glad to try that on you too, tough guy. Those charged with trespassing were legitimately charged with it because the Capitol(not Captiol) was off limits to any visitors that day. Others, like that stupid "shaman" were charged legitimately with obstructing a federal proceeding. He and the others charged weren't supposed to be there at all. The cops didn't try to stop anybody? I guess you missed the footage of them pushing and shoving protesters away from the barriers, even though they were outnumbered. And you might also note that many of these thugs pled guilty to what they were charged with, and a number of them apologized and said they regretted doing what they did for Trump. I watched plenty of footage of doors and windows being busted out, people scaling walls, and otherwise vandalizing government property. One stupid woman was justifiably shot to death for disobeying an order not to climb through a busted out door. Good riddance. Eff off, you delusional loser.
    1
  62. Did you see the videos of Trump loving thugs busting out doors and windows and attacking outnumbered cops?
    1
  63.  @dseelbach80  So Ray Epps directed thousands of people to attack the Capitol? In one video, the "protesters" identify him as a fed and shout that at the top of their lungs. You must have missed the dozens of videos where Trump lovers who plead guilty said they were there for Trump. Show me a video where any protester says "Ray Epps made me do it."
    1
  64.  @dseelbach80  Why didn't ONE of the thugs who was arrested say "Ray Epps made me do it"? You're ridiculous.
    1
  65. Why do you post so many replies to my comments then delete them? So I can't kick your ass more than I already did? Nobody told any of the thugs who plead guilty that they'd spend eternity in prison. You have no proof of that because it didn't happen. Many are on video saying they were guilty of what they were accused of, and that they were there for Trump ,not Ray Epps, not the FBI, not anybody but Trump..
    1
  66. He didn't get a trial. He pled guilty and apologized for what he did, which is what he was charged with-- obstructing a federal proceeding.
    1
  67.  @partsmaven  Have you ever witnessed a guilty plea? A judge, by law, is required to ask the person pleading guilty if they're doing so of their own free will. Pretty tough to appeal that, especially when he said his actions were "inexcusable". What difference would the Carlson video make to a judge? The shaman was charged with obstructing a federal proceeding. He wasn't charged with anything violent. The maximum penalty for that is 51 months. He pled guilty to what he was charged with and apologized for doing it. He got 41. Let him serve it then he can go back to living with Mommy and sleeping with his horns at night.
    1
  68.  @partsmaven  Don't hold your breath.
    1
  69. Showing some people not being violent Jan 6th doesn't mean that none were. There is no "narrative". The footage of people attacking the Capitol and beating up cops was shown live. There were non-violent people at BLM riots too. That doesn't mean there wasn't violence done at both . The vast majority of people charged for Jan 6th were released on bail. Most serving time now plead guilty and admitted what they did, including the shaman.
    1
  70. I believe the Jan 6 violence I watched live.
    1
  71. Thanks for watching, loyal viewer.
    1
  72. You believe the hundreds of guilty pleas by Trump lovers?
    1
  73.  @tatogratacos2503 Where's your proof that people were threatened with "decades in prison"? Tucker tell you that? Play guilty? Many of these idiots took videos of themselves while they were committing crimes. Brilliant. Speaking of videos, many of these same people have appeared making apologies for their actions, admitting they were wrong and stupid and expressing regret that they did what they did for Trump. BTW, it's these", not "this". Be careful calling other people idiot when you can't write basic English.
    1
  74. So why have 1000 people been arrested and hundreds plead guilty?
    1
  75.  @jeffhanson6844  Lmfao, millions of people WATCHED the attack on the Capitol live, idiot. There was no hiding that evidence. This crap from Carlson doesn't change what has already been seen, crimes which hundreds have already plead guilty to because they did it. Some were even stupid enough to video themselves.
    1
  76.  @jeffhanson6844  Lmfao, "selected video". What do you call that crap Tucker showed? Even republicans gave him shit about his dishonesty. The "selected video: I watched included 3 1/2 hours of thugs attacking outnumbered cops. 141 cops injured, verified. It also showed millions of dollars in damage to the Capitol. What in Tucker's cherry picked crap can change any of that?
    1
  77.  @jeffhanson6844  Nancy Pelosi is not responsible for deploying the National Guard, fool. It's up to the Capitol Police to request them through the military and they waited too late. Trump says he offered there troops. His acting secretary of defense at the time says there is no record of any offer of the NG by Trump, which would have to have been set up through the Pentagon. If you're saying that there would have been no rioting and violence if there had been more troops, you're 1)calling the rioters cowards because you're saying they wouldn't have done what they did if there had been more security and they hadn't had the cops outnumbered 2)by your logic, the Antifa and BLM riots were not their fault; it was the fault of mayors and police chiefs for not having enough cops on hand. Is that what you're saying? As far as Ray Epps, not ONE protester has mentioned his name and said "Ray Epps made me do it". However, many have said they were there for Trump, not for the FBI or anybody else. Ther was no insurrection after the 2016 election. An insurrection is designed to overthrow an elected government. Protesters in 2016 didn't storm the Capitol while congress was trying to certify the election, or threaten to hang Mike Pence if he didn't go along with them. Just what is it you think Carlson's video showed or proved? That not everybody at the Capitol rioted or attacked police? Nobody said everybody did, but over 1000 have been arrested. That just doesn't matter since not everybody in the crowd rioted? Idiot.
    1
  78. Lies about what? The live footage on Jan. 6th showed people standing around observing and not engaging in violence. Just because Buffalo Boy was escorted part of the way by cops doesn't mean there wasn't any violence, genius. As far as that buffoon, he wasn't charged with any violence and plead guilty to what he was charged with.
    1
  79.  @gideonthejudge9036  Well, the things you mention were shown live on Jan. 6th. If that wasn't enough for you, there are multiple videos right here on YouTube of the thugs attacking cops and yes, scaling walls. Just search "Jan. 6 violence". Delusional Idiot. Thumping that Bible didn't make you honest, did it?
    1
  80. So hundreds of people have plead guilty to staged violence? Why didn't they explain to the authorities that it was all staged?
    1
  81. What CNN paid in the Sandmann case was never disclosed. CNN did show the video of the shaman saying what Trump said-- after watching the rioting for 3 1/2 hours. If his lawyers want to use the Carlson video and appeal his guilty plea, they can. It doesnt change the fact that he was in the Capitol when he wasn't supposed to be, which he admitted to and apologized for.
    1
  82. Tucker's about to die?
    1
  83. So there are no videos of Trump loving thugs busting out doors and windows and beating up cops?
    1
  84. We've already seen footage of Trump loving thugs vandalizing the Capitol and beating up outnumbered cops. How does Carlson's footage change that?
    1
  85.  @scottbigler9182  The live coverage of the attack on the Capitol doesn't lie either. You missed the cops getting beaten up, and the doors and windows being busted out? What did the hundreds of Trump lovers plead guilty to, taking a tour of the Capitol? BTW, the Capitol was CLOSED to visitors that day, because Congress was engaged in certifying the vote. There were no tours. What Carlson is showing is footage taken before Jan. 6th. How stupid are you to contend that no violence occurred when millions saw it happening live?
    1
  86.  @scottbigler9182  Sullivan is the ONLY Antifa member identified as being there. Many of the thugs who plead guilty admitted they were there for Trump, and didn't mention Ray Epps or anybody else being to blame for what they did except themselves. Nobody was charged with insurrection. How many were charged with assaulting police officers?
    1
  87. Did Pelosi provide them with baseball bats and bear spray and give them the rope and equipment to scale the Capitol walls?
    1
  88. But you can omit video of the violence that hundreds of Trump overs pled guilty to, and imply that it didn't happen because the shaman was escorted by police.
    1
  89.  @Fierysaint1 Sounds like you don't know what the eff you're talking about. There's no record of Trump ordering National Guard troops to the Capitol. His own acting secretary of defense said there's no record of it. Pelosi is not in charge of security at the Capitol. The Capitol Police are. Are you saying the thugs wouldn't have attacked the Capitol if there had been more security? Then you're calling them cowards who attacked it only because they had the cops outnumbered. By your logic, the BLM rioters aren't responsible for what they did; the mayors and police chiefs were responsible for not having enough cops on hand. You have no evidence that undercover agents overturned barriers. Hundreds of Trump lovers pled guilty to that and attacking cops, and many are on video admitting they did it, apologizing and saying they regretted it. The Capitol cops arrested him for being inside the Capitol and obstructing a federal proceeding. He pled guilty to it, apologized and said his behavior was inexcusable. Maybe they should have hit him with bear spray or a flagpole.
    1
  90. If the cops let in all the protesters, why were so many of them seen on any video busting out doors and windows and climbing through them, and why did hundreds plead guilty to that?
    1
  91. How does that change the attacks on cops and the vandalism done by the 1000 people who have plead guilty?
    1
  92. So no vandalism was done to the Capitol and141 police officers weren't injured? What have over 900 people plead guilty to, sightseeing?
    1
  93.  @aaronlarsen7447  So a typical criminal caught red handed taking a plea. What else is new. Was he one of the idiots who videotaped himself committing crimes? I guess he meant his life was upended for nothing because Trump wasn't worth it. The loser got what he deserved, and it has nothing to do with Biden's government being bad.
    1
  94.  @aaronlarsen7447 I believe my own eyes, since I watched the vandalism and the attacks on police live, as they happened. Was I hallucinating, along with millions of others who watched it live? The hundreds who have plead guilty apparently believed the "government narrative" too, because they admitted what they did. Even the shaman, who Carlson is trying to use to excuse the violence because cops walked him around for a few minutes, said at his guilty plea "I was wrong for entering the Capitol. I have no excuse. My behavior was indefensible.."
    1
  95.  @aaronlarsen7447 And you know BLM was disguised as MAGA how?>Because Tucker told you that? ONE member of Antifa was identified as being there, Sullivan, and even Antifa has questioned whether he's actually a member. So.. hundreds of Trump supporters, who hate Pelosi, hate the government, hate Antifa and BLM, were persuaded by these people they hate to attack the Capitol. Very believable. And all the Trump supporters who plead guilty haven't said one word about doing what they did because the FBI, Ray Epps, or anybody else convinced them to do it. They've all said they did it for Trump, in support of Trump.
    1
  96.  @aaronlarsen7447  There is no evidence of FBI involvement except for Ray Epps being there undercover. I'm sure there were other undercover agents there, as there are at any major event where trouble is possible. Oher than John Sullivan, neither is there any evidence of Antifa or BLM members being there posing as MAGA people. Please tell me you're not trying to say, as many idiots are, that NONE of the thousands of Trump lovers who attacked the Capitol wouldn't have done so if undercover FBI agents hadn't persuaded them to? Did the FBI agents also supply them with bear spray, flagpoles and baseball bats to attack cops? Did they give them the equipment they needed to scale the Capitol walls?
    1
  97.  @aaronlarsen7447  Yes, I saw it too. And the crowd was shouting "dont listen to him he's a Fed". That was the night before Jan.6th and they already knew he was undercover. Yuu still actually still believe that ONE MAN, Ray Epps, incited all those people to attack the Capitol? Tell me, did Ray Epps also sup-ply them with flagpoles, bear spray and baseball bats to attack the cops, and rope and equipment to scale the Capitol walls? or were they already prepared for the attack?
    1
  98.  @aaronlarsen7447  A good number of those who were arrested and pled guilty have said that they were there for one reason- to support Trump. None of them mentions the FBI or Ray Epps. They mention Trump, and most of them say they regret doing what they did for him. Now go away. You're much too dense for me to waste any of my time.
    1
  99.  @aaronlarsen7447 One guy out of hundreds of guilty pleas. Did the guy do what he was accused of or not? When somebody pleads guilty the judge asks them and their attorney in open court if they are doing so willingly. If the guy for some reason felt he couldn't fight the federal government and he stated that to the judge as the reason for pleading guilty, the judge should have asked what I asked at the beginning: "Did you do what you're accused of or not?" If the guy said he DIDN'T do it but felt helpless against the government, the judge should have said "Then I can't accept your guilty plea, if you say you're not guilty. I'm setting the case for trial and you can present evidence of your innocence then." That's if he actually has evidence exonerating himself. If his attorney didn't want to present that evidence for whatever reason, the guy should have told the judge and asked for time to get a new lawyer. If there was no evidence of innocence, now layer would go to trial, which goes back to the original question: Was he guilty of what he was charged with, or was he innocent and had evidence to prove his innocence? If he was just spouting bs about going up against the big bad federal government, and is guilty of what he was charged with, he ultimately did the right thing and entered a guilty plea. Courts are for deciding guilt or innocence, not allowing guilty people to vent their feelings about the government. What I'm describing is similar to what happened with the case of a guy who goes by "Baked Alaska". He said he was innocent and was only pleading guilty because the prosecutors threatened to charge him with a felony. The judge responded that if that was why he was pleading guilty, he couldn't accept the guilty plea, and set the case for trial. What's the name of the man you're talking about who said he didn't want to fight the government so he was pleading guilty? I'd like to read the facts on that. If it's Baked Alaska, he screwed himself because he's on video doing what he's accused of. If it's somebody else give me his name so I can research it myself.
    1
  100.  @aaronlarsen7447  What guy are you talking about? Try answering some questions instead of ranting and perhaps attacks. As I already stated, if he has proof that he was innocent of doing anything, proof you say you saw, why didn't he present that proof in court instead of pleading guilty? Only a fool or someone who has a fool for a lawyer would plead guilty when there is evidence that exonerates him. If he's n jail it's the fault of him and his attorney, not the Left. If there is evidence showing him to be innocent, he can appeal. Idiot. The Left hardly used one man to produce a false narrative. Hundreds are on video attacking cops and desecrating the Capitol. You're delusional. Now who is the innocent man you're referring to? Name him.
    1
  101.  @aaronlarsen7447  For the `1000th time, what man are you talking about? What is his name? Jesus, how hard is that? Everybody is presumed innocent until proven guilty. But if you PLEAD guilty, you're considered guilty. Why didn't the man subpoena any video that showed him to be innocent? Sounds like he was lazy and incompetent and just didnt do his job. Even now, if the video evidence exonerates the man, as you say the evidence does, he can appeal the conviction. What is the man's name you are referring to?
    1
  102.  @KaiserBlade  The cop being crushed in a door by protesters didn't throw a grenade. Why were any cops throwing grenades, because none of those thugs was supposed to be there and they were attacking cops?
    1
  103.  @crystalhoskins1655  WTF is "choas"? They wouldn't have been gassed if they hadn't been breaking the law by being there, and beating up cops. I didn't see anybody being pushed forward or gassed when they were busting out doors and windows or scaling the walls. Go back to Delusion Land where you live.
    1
  104.  @crystalhoskins1655  What truth are you talking about? Millions of people watched as the rioters attacked police and the Capitol. The fact that some just milled around, even though they weren't supposed to be there at all, doesn't change the fact that hundreds DID break the law. Many of those have plead guilty to what they did and said they were there for Trump. Not one said Pelosi or the FBI or anybody else "made them do it".. What truth?
    1
  105. Nol, we're buying the video evidence of thugs vandalizing the capitol and beating up outnumbered cops.
    1
  106. Doesn't hurt the hundreds of Trump lovers who plead guilty for what they did.
    1
  107. Rewrite history? So Carlson showing non-violent footage means no violence happened on Jan. 6th?
    1
  108. Right. So because cops walked the shaman a few feet through the Capitol, there was no violence or vandalism and no cops were hurt. Not everybody at the BLM riots was violent. Does that mean nobody was?
    1
  109.  @funkfamily4165  So what was it? It wasn't a riot that did millions of $ in damage to the Capitol, injured 141 cops, and attempted to keep Congress from certifying the election? There were people at the BLM rots who didn't get violent. Does that mean nobody at the BLM riots got violent?
    1
  110. A break for what? Carlson being dishonest as usual?
    1
  111.  @american538 Uh, no, Fox argued that nothing Carlson says is to be taken as true while Trump was president.
    1
  112. "shawman" lmfao. Another poorly educated Trumper. Tucker didn't need to show the hundreds of people busting out doors and windows and attacking cops. We all saw that live. Except idiots like you want to believe it didn't happen.
    1
  113. Millions of people saw the attack on the Capitol live. No cherry-picking pbs by Carlson can change that, anymore than it can change the hundreds of guilty pleas already entered by those thugs.
    1
  114. The live coverage while it was happening already spoke volumes.
    1
  115. I saw doors and windows being busted out.
    1
  116.  @shhhnowlisten7461  He wasn't charged with an act of violence and he didn't plead guilty to one. He was charged with and pled guilty to obstruction of a federal proceeding, which he is on camera doing. Federal guidelines call for punishment of up to 51 months. He got less than the maximum, and apologized for what he did , saying it was "inexcusable".
    1
  117.  @shhhnowlisten7461  You really wasted your time with that comment. I'm quite aware nobody was charged with insurrection, including the shaman goof. I don't care what it was called, as long as the thugs who did the crimes, especially the most violent, are appropriately punished.
    1
  118.  @shhhnowlisten7461  Why do you put "not" in quotation marks. It's unnecessary and a sign of basic illiteracy. Search "Jan 6 defendants say they were there for Trump. You'll find many stating under oath that they were there for him and some even said he "sent" them there. That's how nuts some of them are. Nothing was manufactured. Those idiots did what they did because they wanted to. Nobody forced them or instigated them to do something they didn't want to do already. Why did so many of them bring weapons, -- bear spray, baseball bats etc. and equipment to climb the Capitol walls, ropes and other gear, if they didn't plan to unlawfully go inside the Capitol?
    1
  119.  @johnjacobjinglehimerschmit3075  A fake bot account with hundreds of videos in his favorites playlist? Right. Funny you can't explain all the guilty pleas.
    1
  120.  @johnjacobjinglehimerschmit3075  That doesn't explain the hundreds of guilty pleas, during which many of the rioters said that they were guilty of what they did, and were there for Trump; none said that the FBI or anybody else put them up to it.
    1
  121. So you didn't see the live footage of the attack on Jan. 6th. One person being non-violent doesn't mean thousands weren't, as has been seen by millions.
    1
  122. Did they gaslight the live footage of the attack on the Capitol?
    1
  123. Tucker to you: "The election was stolen. It was rigged." Tucker texting his Fox cronies: "Trump and his lawyers saying the election was stolen are insane liars. I hate Trump."
    1
  124. The evidence watched live by millions on Jan 6th is not true? How does Tucker's cherry picked footage change any of that?
    1
  125.  @RealYoutube33 What does how old my account is have to do with Carlson being dishonest and you falling for it? Nothing like a fool in denial. That would be you. Tucker lied to you about the election being stolen, and you're still swallowing his lies.
    1
  126.  @RealYoutube33  What trail? A hiking trail?
    1
  127.  @RealYoutube33  What trial are you talking about ?
    1
  128. Where can I see that?
    1
  129.  @JohnB3363  Lmfao, TWO people changing clothes in an unidentified location? Very convincing. I don't see them scaling walls or beating up cops.
    1
  130.  @JohnB3363  Lmfao, you don't even have any evidence that took place at the Capitol. TWO people changing clothes? How many admitted Trump lovers attacked the Capitol, scaled the walls, beat up cops and took shits inside? Hundreds of them have pled guilty for what they did, saying they were there for Trump, and many were stupid enough to video themselves doing what they did.
    1
  131.  @JohnB3363  So I guess you gave up defending your bs, meaningless video. I hope that means you're also dropping the ridiculous idea that Antifa and BLM members were responsible for or instigated the Jan 6th violence by Trump lovers. That's as absurd as saying the Democrats wanted it to happen and arranged the whole thing. Equally ridiculous is using the defense that "it wasn't as bad or as costly as some of the BLM riots or other attacks on the Capitol". It was bad, and inexcusable, as were the BLM riots in my opinion.
    1
  132.  @JohnB3363  Which is it, this was worse than 2020 or 2020 was worse? You're giving me a headache.,
    1
  133.  @JohnB3363  Pelosi's not in charge of security. I am really sick of you uninformed people believing that. Think about what you're saying. What happened on Jan, 6th wouldn't have happened if there had been more security, so it's the fault of the people in charge of security, not the rioters? 1)By your logic, BLM wasn't responsible for their riots. The blame falls on the mayors and police chiefs of the cities where the riots occurred, because they didn't have enough security on hand, 2)if the rioters wouldn't have done what they did had there been more security, you're calling them cowards because you're saying they only attacked the Capitol because they had the cops outnumbered. I'm really tired of people like you trying to blame everybody but the thugs who did this. Did Pelosi also supply them with baseball bats, bear spray and rope to climb the capitol walls?
    1
  134.  @JohnB3363  The only confusing thing is why you enjoy being humiliated with facts so much. Do you like spankings too? I'm not available BTW. I do verbal humiliations only and it's so easy with you it's gotten boring. See ya..
    1
  135. Who needs an AK 47 when you have flafgpoles and bear spray? Idiot.
    1
  136. Is this the same Tucker Carlson who told his viewers the election was stolen then privately texted other Fox employees to say it wasn't stolen, and that Trump and his lawyers were insane liars for saying it was?
    1
  137.  @richardbrout2242  And the video doesn't take away from all the violence and vandalism that millions saw live. What is he trying to prove, that that didn't happen?
    1
  138.  @richardbrout2242  A propaganda piece? 1000 people have been arrested and hundreds have pled guilty. They vandalized the Capitol and beat on outnumbered cops for 3 1/2 hours while Trump watched on TV. What did all those people plead guilty to, sightseeing? YOU want to tell me that because every single person wasn't violent on Jan. 6th that nobody was? There were non-violent people at BLM riots too. Does that mean the violent ones didn't do any destruction and hurt people? Bullshit.
    1
  139.  @richardbrout2242  No, I didn't see that because it didn't happen. The vast majority of those arrested were released on bail. Only those committing the worst offenses were kept confined, for a reason. Your comment is a propaganda piece. Actually it's just a lie. Ther shaman could have gotten 51 months. He didn't get four years. He got 41 months. And he agreed to the sentence, said he was sorry and that his conduct was inexcusable.
    1
  140. Did you miss the coverage of Jan. 6th when it was shown live?
    1
  141.  @frodobaggins1505  Explain how live coverage is "selectively edited", idiot. Explain why hundreds of Trump lovers have pled guilty, many of their crimes captured on video or in their own stupid selfies. Even the buffoon shaman is on video doing what he was charged with and plead guilty to? What exculpatory evidence are you talking about? Name the people who pled guilty who weren't, and what evidence proves them not guilty?
    1
  142. No response, Frodo? Why do you idiots post bs anybody can check and see is false?
    1
  143. Good. Stay stupid. You forgot to thank him for lying about the stolen election that he himself didn't believe was stolen.
    1
  144. Wow lots of Fox loving Jan 6th deniers watching this video. Nothing new. You dopes who claim to hate CNN can be found here every day.
    1
  145. Have you ever busted out doors and windows at the Capitol like hundreds of Trump lovers did, and pled guilty to??
    1
  146. Did you watch Jan 6 live when it happened?
    1
  147. Fake how?
    1
  148. You might be if you think cops walking the shaman around means there was no violence and vandalism that day.
    1
  149. Enough live footage and video after was shown for hundreds of those thugs to have already plead guilty.
    1
  150. So why have hundreds of Trump lovers pled guilty and said they regret doing what they did for Trump? The shaman said there was no excuse for what he did .
    1
  151.  @shhhnowlisten7461  When a person enters a guilty plea, the judge is required by law to ask them if they understand what they're pleading guilty to and if they are doing so willingly. Many of the thugs who pled guilty are on video apologizing for what they did and accepting responsibility. Many of these say they regret doing what they did and going to jail for Trump. The shaman is one of them.
    1
  152.  @shhhnowlisten7461  The majority of the people who were arrested weren't in prison, genius. They were out on bail.. You don't; have to be charged with insurrection to be guilty of assaulting cops and vandalizing government property. Mahy of those, contrary to being forced to plead guilty, admitted their guilt publicly and apologized for what they did. Taht includes the shaman. I have facts so I don't need clues. And I haven't deleted a single reply. Lie some more. I have more comments on this thread than you do, so eff off.
    1
  153. Why did that goofball plead guilty and apologize?
    1
  154.  @kevinpowers3815  So that quote is your "speculation", without any evidence, and nothing more. The factual information I've seen says that both he and his attorney signed the guilty plea agreeing to the sentence. The only grounds for appeal is on ineffective counsel by his attorney. That means if justice wasn't done, it's on his incompetent attorney, not the government. If he was promised that a guilty plea would result in conviction for a misdemeanor, why did he and his attorney sign a plea for a felony? Why did they not tell the judge in open court" This is not what was promised." If the prosecutor promised one thing and Chansley pled guilty to another, 1)they had every opportunity to object to the judge instead of signing and 2)the prosecutor would have been guilty of misconduct and the guilty pleas would not have been accepted.
    1
  155. What's fake is Carlson's bs'ing that this was peaceful.
    1