Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Secret Service chief had 'encrypted communications' with White House" video.

  1. she's not a conservative or a republican... relax.
    11
  2. exactly the reason the encrypted phones are being used in the first place...
    11
  3.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  what google? "what gives you the right to encrypted, government communications?" where the hell are you from?? we are not ruled subjects here in america.. our government employees are just that, employees of the people.... we the people own the phones.. AND THE INFORMATION! can I say that much??
    4
  4.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  "what gives you the right to encrypted, government communications?" where the hell are you from?? we are not ruled subjects here in america.. our government employees are just that, employees of the people.... we the people own the phones.. AND THE INFORMATION! please stay in n. korea, or china, or wherever the hell you live...
    1
  5.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  "sure… would you like the launch codes? A list of our deep cover assets overseas? You’re either obtuse or naive… which one is it?" give us a break... do you seriously NOT know that members of the house, who have oversight authority, have security clearances in order to do their jobs on our behalf? you don't seem to understand how our system of government even functions.. nobody is asking for "launch codes".. talk about a red herring......
    1
  6.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  again, you don't seem to understand the US constitution and form of government... when I used "we" I was speaking as a citizen, and yes "WE" citizens are entitled to the information those who work for us in our government generate, including phone calls and text messages. "they" (those who work for we the people) are NOT entitled to use encrypted messaging systems to conduct "state" business..... stick to your own country skippy, again, you OBVIOUSLY do not understand how our system of government works...
    1
  7.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  google...... good grief what on earth was wrong with my reply to this?????
    1
  8.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  "then be more succinct in your posts… you said “we”… which implies that you are entitled to said information. It’s not my fault that you lack clarity." going to have to reply sentence by sentence, as google doesn't like somethi8ng that I said....... ok, first, you obviously do not understand our (american) constitution and form of government.
    1
  9.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  when I used the term "we" I was speaking as a US citizen.
    1
  10.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  and YES, we citizens are entitled to the information generated by our employees (politician's) while conducting "state" business"
    1
  11.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  those who work for "us" (citizens) are NOT entitled to use encrypted messaging tools while doing OUR business (which we pay them to do)
    1
  12.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  stick to your own form of government, you obviously do not understand our constitution or form of government..
    1
  13.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  google FOIA
    1
  14.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  google, why cant I say that our elected representatives work for us, and are not entitled to use encrypted forms of communication to conduct government business???
    1
  15.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  censorship is in overdrive on this platform this year....
    1
  16.  @Zatoichiisimmortal35  "then be more succinct in your posts… you said “we”… which implies that you are entitled to said information. It’s not my fault that you lack clarity." we citizens ARE entitled to the information.... but thanks for playing.
    1