Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Jim Jordan raises concerns with DOJ over special counsel Smith's 'impartiality'" video.

@mfh6982 lol right!!???? you would have better luck talking quantum physics with your patio furniture than you would talking common sense to these cultists..
4
lol I would want more time to produce a solid defense and put all of the exculpatory evidence together. but then again, I'm sane....
2
@johnohara7590 "Where's the EDVIDENCE?" the DOJ/FBI has it!! hell, I heard there is so much of it that they re-hired peter strzok and lisa page to help out...
1
"The law is the law. Jordan is just reaching for reasons to get Trump off" then why do we not prosecute democrats?
1
fox is a bunch of never trumpers..
1
@GentlemanJack705 "If you're innocent, there really shouldn't be much "evidence" to suggest criminality. No?" in a sane world, yes... however, trump is not facing sane people... lisa page - doj: "trump isn't going to become president, right? right??" peter strzok - fbi: "no! no he won't, we'll stop it! that was 2016..... 7 YEARS LATER the doj/fbi are indicting him on everything they possibly can, and still can't convict him of ANYTHING??? phony Russian collusion hoaxes…. multiple special councels… phony impeachments…. multiple indictments… over 90 counts!! Over 600 years of potential sentencing!!! 250 years without a former president being indicted, now the same president has been indicted 4 times in 200 days??? yet in 7 years they can’t convict him of ANYTHING!?? at this point, how many functioning brain cells does it take to see that the man is being politically persecuted?? 6...??? 8 maybe???
1
@GentlemanJack705 kind of see what the guy is up against jack...?
1
@GentlemanJack705 I didn't make a suggestion. I gave a lot of factual information as to how the doj/fbi has been politically biased towards trump, and then I asked you a couple of questions. when you ask about my suggestions, wtf are you referring to?
1
@GentlemanJack705 good grief skippy... the doj/fbi being politically biased is not a suggestion. my factual information to illustrate this is the text messages: lisa page - doj: "trump isn't going to become president, right? right??" peter strzok - fbi: "no! no he won't, we'll stop it! if you are simply going to deny these are real, I'm wasting my time. how about the russian collusion hoax I mentioned? that was debunked by TWO special counsel investigations!! falsified information to obtain warrants! no evidence that these investigations should ever have been opened! people were charged with crimes for altering emails that went before the fisa court to obtain warrants! let me guess, none of this is real either?? THIS IS ALL FACTUAL INFORMATION TOADSTOOL!
1
let me guess... you live in an alternate reality, where none of this is real, and I'm wasting my time, yes??
1
@GentlemanJack705 so now we move on to personal criticism.... <shakes head> you're a useful tool jack..... literally. you are being subjugated along with the rest of us, you just don't seem to be smart enough to understand what is happening to you. we the people are supposed to get to choose our president, not lisa page and peter strzok!! (the doj/fbi) phony russian collusion hoaxes to interfere with elections.. collusion with the media to call the laptop russian disinformation, 51 intel/former intel folks signed off on that, when they knew it was real... to interfere with yet another election. and now, will al the information I provided, the doj/fbi is interfering with yet another election.. your freedom, liberty and ability to choose your own president is being taken from you!!!! do you honestly not see or understand that??? WAKE UP!
1