Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Is Chuck Schumer trying to turn Hegseth’s Senate hearing into a ‘circus’? Bartiromo" video.

  1. @ he was known for delivering on his promises during his first term. that's a big part of why he was re-elected.
    10
  2.  @walterburgon-c8e  "YA like trump serves the people.. Its all about him and his rich buddys, do you really think he cares about you.." do you honestly not understand what this man has sacrificed for his country and the citizens thereof??? HONESTLY????
    9
  3.  @michaeltillotson3711  "So you were against Republicans fighting bidens picks?" "fighting" his picks? saying that he himself needed to be "held accountable"?? YES!
    4
  4. started to happen in November..
    4
  5. @ dude, the lawfare did not work.. let it go. did you learn absolutely nothing in november??? lost the house... the senate... the white house... the electoral college... and the popular vote.... and all you can do is double down on what got you there???????? good grief.......
    4
  6. @ 81 million 🤣😂😆
    3
  7. we have term limits
    2
  8. @ absolutely not. if anyone was simply "fighting" biden nominations, simply because they were "biden nominations" , I would be against that. when the next democrat is elected president, I will be against it then. and I am against "fighting trumps" nominations simply because they are "trumps nominations" today. seems to be a pretty consistent position. maybe you should go review the definition of hypocrisy before continuing this argument.....
    1
  9. @ google??? what on earth was wrong with that post?????????? this is getting to be ridiculous! you simply will not allow conservatives to defend themselves on this platform...... I explain how my position has been consistent, and you delete the post....... good grief.
    1
  10. @ thou shall NOT make anyone on the left look bad on this platform!
    1
  11.  @michaeltillotson3711  "not sure who "you delete the post" is meant to be." the googies.... and.......... it's hard for me to speak freely on this platform, but let me see how I can word this........ my position on "fighting nominations", simply based on who nominated them, has, and will never change. how is that hypocritical?
    1
  12.  @michaeltillotson3711  do you understand the definition of the word hypocrisy? google? is this question too mean??
    1
  13. @ "so you supported Biden getting his nominations without a fight and same for trump?" good grief, you are not getting the point...... let's back up and start over and be very sure that we understand each other. will you please define "fight" as you are using the term in this context. maybe I'm misunderstand how you are using the term. please define and clarify.
    1
  14. @ if you are going to try to drag me down a rabbit hole regarding "fighting" nominations, define the term "fighting".
    1
  15. @ ok, I'm assuming that you are using the term as a synonym for "oppose" or "opposition".. if ANY senator "opposed" ANY of clinton's nominees, SIMPLY BECAUSE A MAN NAMED CLINTON nominated them, I believe that would be wrong, and would not have supported that "opposition". if ANY senator is "opposing" ANY of trump's nominees, SIMPLY BECAUSE A MAN NAMED TRUMP nominated them, I believe that would be wrong, and will not support that "opposition". if ANY senator, EVER in the future, "opposes" a president's nominee, SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DISLIKE THE PRESIDENT WHO NOMINATED THEM, DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN, I believe that would be wrong, and will not support that "opposition".
    1
  16. @ now, please explain the "hypocrisy" of my position regarding "fighting" or "opposing" nominees?
    1
  17. @ "so you supported Biden getting his nominations without a fight and same for trump?" if the "fight" is simply because of hatred of the nominating president, YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1
  18. @ but please, keep reminding us that we did the right thing in November... oh loser of the house.... the senate... the white house... the electoral college... and the popular vote.........
    1
  19.  @jefffentross6932  really...?
    1
  20.  @jefffentross6932  yes! drunk and garbage!!! MAGA!
    1
  21.  @jefffentross6932  what google? we can call him a drunk, but not garbage? interesting...
    1
  22. @ do you know who owns youtube? WAKE UP!
    1
  23. already have them...
    1