Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "FOX 32 Chicago" channel.

  1.  @mattt5006  "Trump will go down as an American legend like Billy the kid. Democrats of today will go down alongside the old East Germans or the Salem witch trials weirdos." agreed... democrats are turning trump into a folk hero, a living legend.. and one of the most popular presidents in history!
    3
  2. crazy people? you mean the "fundamental transformationalists"?
    3
  3.  V.P.N.....  "We're not in South America" agreed... we live in the land of stupidity!
    3
  4. go home!
    3
  5. arrested, set free, arrested, set free, arrested, set free, arrested, set free....
    3
  6. geeze google, where have all my posts gone?? <shakes head>
    3
  7.  @Norp-i7m  "explain why you like Trump." lower taxes... more secure border... lower inflation... no wars.... no spy balloons... lower crime rates... lower energy costs... no little rocket man shooting off rockets... fewer fentanyl deaths.. better performing schools...
    3
  8.  Josh M  "Who? They both did the same bad thing." and what was that?
    3
  9.  @JuanHughJorgan  "How long of a list would you like for Trump to get locked up?" just one with actual evidence of a crime is all it would take...
    3
  10.  @jondickinson6830  "Yes, again. He went down in 2020 and he will go down again." so you're talking about losing an election again?
    2
  11.  @jondickinson6830  "Trump went down in 2020 by losing his reelection and will go down again by not getting elected in 2024. Not dumbing it down any further for you." so I was correct the first time when I referenced the elections???? good grief... you seem to have spun yourself into a stupor...
    2
  12.  @_PEACE-FIRST_  "The fact that individual armament is not prevented makes weapons easily accessible in society. Even children can easily access weapons." which is why god almighty gave us the right to defend ourselves... do you even know why the bill of rights was written?? not when, or who.. but why?? can you explain that?
    2
  13.  @WelroyDmello  "man, when you say “right to defend yourself”, i don’t get it, you possibly cant react faster than someone who is prepared to shoot you when you don’t know its going to happen. Unless ofc you have spidey sense. So who do you want protection against ?" yea, i don't stand a chance.. that justifies destroying our constitutional rights... good grief.
    2
  14. hell...
    2
  15. the gestapo is investigating the guy who LOST the election.... not allegations of election fraud, but investigating the man who lost... think about that.
    2
  16. are you referring to stormy, who had to pay trump??
    2
  17. why trump? he was actually a good president.
    2
  18. why would that be excellent news?
    2
  19. stop picking on liz haley! I mean nicki cheney
    2
  20. ones that make it illegal for juveniles to possess firearms!! oh wait... ones that make it illegal to discharge firearms at large public gatherings!! oh wait.... ones that make it illegal to shoot people with firearms!! oh wait....
    2
  21.  @JuanHughJorgan  "Tax fraud, tax evasion, stealing classified documents, over valuing and under valuing his properties to manipulate the price for sale and for tax purposes, Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, Campaign Finance manipulation, plus that little one, trying to overturn an election. Those are just off the top of my head, there are many more he is facing. Oh did you say just one? My bad." no, I said just one you have evidence of... reading comprehension not so good? if you have evidence of guilt for any of these allegations, PLEASE contact your local fbi office. I'm sure they would LOVE to talk to you...
    2
  22. our society is absolutely in decline....
    1
  23.  @jondickinson6830  "Don't be obtuse. Going down doesn't just mean losing reelection." not intentionally being obtuse... perhaps you are? when you referenced 2020 I thought perhaps you were referring to the election loss. I guess I was incorrect. when you say that trump "went down" in 2020, what the hell are you talking about? maybe you could be a little less obtuse, no???
    1
  24.  @MadDragon76  you are really good at asking questions... answering them, not so much.................
    1
  25.  @Imnottapinata  "What was the question he failed to answer?" what evidence was ever presented that any sexual assault/abuse took place? how can someone be held civilly liable if no evidence was ever presented?
    1
  26.  @Imnottapinata  did you not see my post..?? "What was the question he failed to answer?" what evidence was ever presented that any sexual assault/abuse took place? how can someone be held civilly liable if no evidence was ever presented?
    1
  27.  @Imnottapinata  "What was the question he failed to answer?" what evidence was ever presented that any sexual assault/abuse took place? how can someone be held civilly liable if no evidence was ever presented?
    1
  28.  @Imnottapinata  of course.. are you aware of any evidence presented by anyone that there was any sexual assault/abuse that took place? if so, I'm politely asking you what that evidence was. thanks in advance.
    1
  29.  @Imnottapinata  well I guess I'll add you to the list of the other 8 billion people on the planet who saw absolutely no evidence of any sexual assault...
    1
  30.  @Imnottapinata  "He lost the case, so whateverrrrrrrr" hence my second question. how can someone be found liable for a crime for which absolutely no evidence was ever presented? does that make sense to you? what could the judgement POSSIBLY be based on? hatred? politics? certainly wasn't evidence.... hmm..... if this was anyone else on planet earth, it would be a mystery, but I think we all know what happened here... what a pathetic people we have become to do this to a former president.
    1
  31. geee, stop attacking people morons....
    1
  32.  @WelroyDmello  "how would anyone fight with guns against something that has nuclear arsenal. 😅" veitnam, afghanistan........... maybe our right to defend ourselves should not be so restricted??
    1
  33.  @WelroyDmello  "constitution has been amended 27 times. Gotta look around what’s happening and change and adapt accordingly. Holding on to old relics like its some sort of bible that can never be changed no matter what is not the logical way.. Just my opinion" agreed, so then change the constitution!!! passing unconstitutional laws is something VERY DIFFERENT!
    1
  34.  @Kevo6492  "We still have one of the highest incarceration rates in the world." no more bail... less incarceration.. and crime rates do what??
    1
  35. why not hillary clinton?
    1
  36. not gonna happen... democrats are allowed to have lawyers, paid to protect them, conduct searches on behalf of the doj.
    1
  37.  @bartbullock9742  "Serving a warrant is not a raid" why no warrant for biden? why do you think his personal lawyers, who are paid to protect him, are the ones allowed to conduct these "searches"?
    1
  38. "tried"??? 🤣😅😆😁😂🤣
    1
  39.  @stephenspencer2121  "well I just looked it up and that’s how it used" my point is that they won't be tried.. for anything.... they will be on the streets doing this same thing again by thursday.
    1
  40. unfortunately, I fear for the man's life at this point.... they can't stop him with policy debate... they can't even stop him with our gestapo doj at this point!! what's next?
    1
  41. @@thenutsonyourchin "Why didn't you just watch the trial like the rest of us did? If you had watched the trial, you wouldn't be asking these silly questions and looking super ignorant right now." well then you can answer my question... if there was never evidence or sexual assault presented, how can a person be found liable for said sexual assault? there was an accusation, that's it!! that is NOT evidence! example! YOU are a child molester! that's an accusation, but it certainly is not evidence that you have done anything inappropriate. see how that works? now, are you aware of evidence of sexual assault? if so, where did you see it?
    1
  42.  @BobBoberts-n3e  "literally look up the court case and read through it. Then you will be shown all of the evidence. Why are you acting so incompetent?" if it's that simple to see evidence he committed this crime, then why is his orange arse not in a prison cell???
    1
  43.  @MadDragon76  "Heresay includes witness testimony," no it is not.... sworn eyewitness testimony is absolutely evidence, and is admissible as such in a court of law. hearsay, on the other hand, is not admissible, as it is not considered legitimate evidence. christ, you even posted this information yourself! I'm going to politely ask you one more time. are you aware of any evidence, ever presented in any court, criminal or civil, of sexual abuse? if so, may I politely ask you to kindly tell me what that evidence was?
    1
  44.  @jbird452  "hhhb your comment makes too much sense. Obviously there was no merit behind the verdict; it was in New York and he was found guilty based on emotion not evidence. Everyone knows the political motivation behind it. Even Bragg’s campaign promise was to go after Trump regarding the “hush money.”" seems to be the case... I keep asking anyone to tell me what evidence they have seen, and all they do is attack me. I understand the difference between criminal and civil court, and the differing burdens of proof, but if there was never, ever any evidence of any kind presented anywhere, then how the hell is someone found liable?? even civilly?? it makes no sense! it almost looks like they were just out to get this guy!!! (almost..)
    1
  45.  @MadDragon76  "Are you seriously suggesting that a witness testifying in court is not evidence?" there was no witness testimony skippy..... at this point, you seem to have confused yourself.
    1
  46.  @MadDragon76  "I'm gonna ask you politely for the 15th time, why do you continue to say there is no evidence when we have continuously produced said information for you? " "WE"??? no one has told me of ANY evidence, of any kind....
    1
  47. "After he became president she said he did this to her. He said she's lying. She sued him for him saying she's lying. A jury decided she was telling the truth and awarded her 5 million dollars." the jury decided she was telling the truth based on what evidence??? did they simply flip a coin? decide they "liked" her more than they "liked" him?
    1
  48.  @MadDragon76  here, let me put this another way... if he could be found liable, with absolutely no evidence.. what is to stop her from suing you, or me for that matter, and winning the same case against us?
    1
  49.  @phocarrot  "A witness saying that their friend told her someone sexual assaulted her is not hearsay. They were telling their firsthand account" you seem confused, I'll try to help. when you say "a witness saying that their friend told them something..." what "witness" are you referring to? witness wĭt′nĭs noun 1- One who can give a firsthand account of something seen, heard, or experienced. 2 - One who is called on to testify before a court. 3 - One who is called on to be present at a transaction in order to attest to what takes place. this "witness" that are referring to is NOT telling a first-hand account of something seen, heard or experienced, but merely telling of a story that someone else told them. that is called hearsay, not witness testimony. the "witness" that you are referring to didn't actually witness anything, just heard some stories about something that maybe night have happened.... your statement "They weren't testifying that they saw the act happen, only that she talked with them about it afterwards." is a perfectly accurate description of hearsay, NOT witness testimony. two VERY different things... this person didn't witness ANYTHING!
    1
  50.  @phocarrot  "Hearsay is testifying on something you have no personal knowledge of." correct, like me telling you that your mother sexually assaulted me last night.. you have no personal knowledge of such a thing... correct? you didn't witness anything, did you? my telling you such a thing does not turn you into an actual "witness", just a person who heard a story from someone....
    1