Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "DOJ subpoenas election officials in states Trump disputed" video.

@justinthor again??
4
@JuanHughJorgan "How long of a list would you like for Trump to get locked up?" just one with actual evidence of a crime is all it would take...
3
@jondickinson6830 "Yes, again. He went down in 2020 and he will go down again." so you're talking about losing an election again?
2
@jondickinson6830 "Trump went down in 2020 by losing his reelection and will go down again by not getting elected in 2024. Not dumbing it down any further for you." so I was correct the first time when I referenced the elections???? good grief... you seem to have spun yourself into a stupor...
2
the gestapo is investigating the guy who LOST the election.... not allegations of election fraud, but investigating the man who lost... think about that.
2
@JuanHughJorgan "Tax fraud, tax evasion, stealing classified documents, over valuing and under valuing his properties to manipulate the price for sale and for tax purposes, Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, Campaign Finance manipulation, plus that little one, trying to overturn an election. Those are just off the top of my head, there are many more he is facing. Oh did you say just one? My bad." no, I said just one you have evidence of... reading comprehension not so good? if you have evidence of guilt for any of these allegations, PLEASE contact your local fbi office. I'm sure they would LOVE to talk to you...
2
@jondickinson6830 "Don't be obtuse. Going down doesn't just mean losing reelection." not intentionally being obtuse... perhaps you are? when you referenced 2020 I thought perhaps you were referring to the election loss. I guess I was incorrect. when you say that trump "went down" in 2020, what the hell are you talking about? maybe you could be a little less obtuse, no???
1
the gestapo is investigating the guy who LOST the election.... not allegations of election fraud, but investigating the man who lost... think about that.
1
lol how funny that you people think the doj is on your side...
1
so the government is spending time investigating the guy that lost an election?? good grief...
1
@JuanHughJorgan "There is evidence for everything I listed." ok, so why do you believe that no one wants to prosecute trump? everyone wants to investigate him, but when they find evidence of crimes, they choose not to prosecute? do you actually believe that?
1
@JuanHughJorgan "Generally until your case is fully made and ready for court, you don't prosecute anyone. Especially a former President." oh, so you have the "precedent" of indicting former presidents all figured out do ya?? it's never been done before in the history of our country... former presidents home raided, never before done... 2 failed impeachments, never before done... stupid people think this makes trump look bad. by the way, did you see the new information musk released just yesterday?? not that anything will ever happen because the cabal is... well, the cabal... but if you look at the depth and breadth of conspiracy and collusion against trump and conservatives in this country, it is astounding!!! given all I have laid out here I must ask, who are the fascists again??
1
@JuanHughJorgan "Are you a special kind of stupid or just regular stupid but your mom dropped you as a child?" "Both impeachments found him guilty in congress." you ask questions like this, then say things like that??? the senate determines guilt or innocence in an impeachment process. both times, innocent. you are uneducated. (obviously) and that's not a personal attack or insult, a simple observation. you do not understand the impeachment process. who would have guessed... "And no I have not seen what Elon Musk had to say about anything. If it was relevant to this conversation than you should have just said what he said." he provided evidence of collusion and conspiracy between the dnc, the fbi and big tech to interfere with a presidential election. but you will simply stick your fingers in your ears yelling LALALALALA until the day you die..
1
@JuanHughJorgan "So you were dropped on your head. It is very clear to me now. BOTH congress and Senate have to find him guilty. It cannot proceed to the Senate if he was not found guilty by Congress." first of all, why the personal attacks and adolescent name calling? anyway, regarding impeachment... Under Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the “sole Power of Impeachment.” In other words, only the House can pass a resolution of impeachment ALLEGING THAT A PRESIDENT HAS COMMITTED “high Crimes and misdemeanors.” Such a resolution, which requires only a simple majority vote, is similar to a criminal indictment by a grand jury— IT IS AN UNORIVEN LIST OR CHARGES that a president has engaged in actions that warrant his impeachment. If the House passes such an impeachment resolution, then the process moves to the Senate. Under Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution, the Senate has the “sole Power to try all impeachments.” The Senate, in essence, becomes a trial court with all of the senators sitting as the judge and jury. Based on historic practice, members of the House can act as prosecutors. It is important to note, however, that it is entirely up to the Senate to decide whether to hold a trial. There is no obligation under the Constitution to do so. If the Senate decides to hold an impeachment trial, the Constitution says the chief justice of the Supreme Court shall preside over the proceeding. It takes a vote of “two-thirds of the Members present” in the Senate to convict any federal officer subject to an impeachment charge, including the president. If a federal officer is convicted by the Senate, it is not a criminal conviction. The Constitution states that impeachment “shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.” NOW, TRUMP WAS never CONVICTED by ANYONE for ANYTHING! do you not remember him releasing pictured standing in the oval office holding newspaper with the front-page headline of "TRUMP ACQUITTED"?? google the word acquit. neither chamber found him guilty of ANYTHING! have a nice week!🙂
1
@JuanHughJorgan "BOTH congress and Senate have to find him guilty." this is completely false and inaccurate juan! you now know that! you're welcome...
1
@JuanHughJorgan "I should have said "adopted an article of impeachment" instead of "guilty" to make you happy" no...... you should have said "adopted an article" to be accurate, honest and truthfull..
1
@JuanHughJorgan "Either way, they are still determining whether they "believe" he is guilty or innocent to be put forth to the senate. So label the outcome as you like." trump was acquitted in the senate BOT times... that's REALITY. I'm sorry you dont like this reality... but it is what it is.
1
@JuanHughJorgan "it would never pass a 50/50 senate when needing a 2/3's vote. It has nothing to do with him miraculously being found not guilty by the "evidence"." if the senate found him guilty by the evidence, they would have voted to convict. they did not do so. trump was never found guilty of anything! certainly not in the sham impeachments... and never in a court of law that I'm aware of.. you live in an alternate reality juan. put the crack pipe down!
1
@JuanHughJorgan "Please show me where I ever that he wasn't found not guilty by the Senate. I'll wait." what?? I can't even understand you at this point juan... you're unhinged. you never said that he was found guilty in the senate (if that's your question) nor did I ever say that you made such a claim. you don't (or didn't, I hope you do now) know how the impeachment process even works, so you claimed that the house found him guilty. are you going to deny that?? you're wasting my time.... here, one more time, this is what you said... "BOTH congress and Senate have to find him guilty. It cannot proceed to the Senate if he was not found guilty by Congress."" THIS IS INACCURATE!!! it DID proceed to the senate. however, "congress" (assuming you mean the house) did NOT find him guilty first!! that is not their place (the house) to determine guilt or innocence. nor is that a prerequisite to get the impeachment hearing to the senate chamber. you don't know what you're talking about, and YES!!! YOU DID SAY THAT THE HOUSE (CONGRESS) FOUND HIM GUILTY THAT IS PATENTLY FALSE!
1
@JuanHughJorgan "If it is likely that he is guilty by the votes in congress, than it is moved forward to be prosecuted on in the senate" that is NOT what you said in your previous posts... you said that "BOTH congress and Senate have to find him guilty." you also said "It cannot proceed to the Senate if he was not found guilty by Congress." both are untrue stupidity! you have spun yourself into a complete stupor and are wasting my time!
1
@JuanHughJorgan "You literally keep quoting this "you said that "BOTH congress and Senate have to find him guilty." Which I tried to appease your small brain by replying with the following. QUOTE "It seems the word you have a problem with is the word "guilty"." I don't have a problem with the "word" guilty... the word isn't stupid.... now what I do have an issue with is this nonsense definition of the word "guilty": a bendy word at best to describe the outcome of Congress. wtf? where did you get this from? how can I have an intelligent and rational debate or argument when you make crap like this up?? guilty gĭl′tē adjective Found to have violated a criminal law by a jury or judge. where did you get this "a bendy word at best to describe the outcome of Congress." definition from?
1
@JuanHughJorgan "I should have said "adopted an article of impeachment" instead of "guilty" to make you happy. " no... you should put the dope down for a few days, and try using words as they are defined in published dictionaries... not to make me happy, but so that you can carry on rational conversations like an adult. don't use phrases or words to make someone happy, simply speak the truth! the truth is that congress, the house nor the senate found trump guilty of anything!!! why did you even brig that word into the conversation?? are you not very well educated? are you intentionally trying to be obtuse? are you intentionally trying to confuse the conversation? trump was not found guilty for any part of any impeachment by any part of our government. TRUTH! see how simple that is...
1
@JuanHughJorgan only the House can pass a resolution of impeachment alleging that a president has committed “high Crimes and misdemeanors.” Such a resolution, which requires only a simple majority vote, is similar to a criminal indictment by a grand jury—it is an unproven list of charges that a president has engaged in actions that warrant his impeachment. I assume you don't know what a grand jury does either... nooooo... a grand jury does not recommend prosecution based on likelihood of guilt. it only makes recommendation that enough evidence exists to proceed with a trial. it has nothing to do with a subjective opinion of guilt or innocence. it has seen absolutely NO defense statements or evidence... it only decides if they believe there is enough evidence to move to trial. THAT'S IT! how the hell would a reasonable person make the decision of guilt prior to ANY defense??? what you're saying is... DUMB!
1