Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Trump’s case ‘rises and falls’ on Cohen’s credibility: Fmr Trump attorney" video.

defending him from what? this court case??? he needs no defense... there is no crime.
4
@psongman9536 "PLenty, have you followed his testimony the past few years!" yes, he had so much credibility that he was convicted of a crime for his testimony....
3
@The00Dude the trial is about perjury?? no wonder no one understands what is going on...
3
@Stuckinthemiddle3 yea... then why if I ask a very simple questions, what evidence of a crime have you seen?? you attack me like a petulant child instead of simply giving me an example of evidence of a crime that you have seen?? why is that???? you will spend hours insulting me, calling me names and explaining how you dont have the time to answer my question... kind of ironic, no??
2
@psongman9536 34 county of "falsifying business records". 2 weeks into the prosecution's case, and you still can't tell me what "business records" were falsified.. were they contracts? tax forms? more property appraisals? what "business records" were falsified?
2
@psongman9536 for what crime? no one even knows what the crime is... falsifying some business records, that don't exist...
2
@jasonbarnett7747 "You already tried that on January 6th" are you talking about the tour of the capital?
2
@gregbors8364 well they had better get to the part where they disclose evidence of a crime pretty quick...
1
@gregbors8364 "The jury will decide. Russian trolls have no say in this matter" decide what??? to this point, no evidence of a crime has been presented to the jury.... correct? what evidence of a crime are you aware of??
1
@gregbors8364 "You don’t even know how an American trial works. Take a seat, Yuri" well I think that when the prosecutions presents their case, that's when they are supposed to present evidence of a crime, no..??? what evidence of a crime have you seen??
1
@FunnyBoneBob what crimes...?
1
@FosterTravis1071 "Let's see, recordings, transcripts, receipts, legal papers, it's one hell of a paper trail." that all lead to what crime...????
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 good grief... I'm not allowed to respond...
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 hey! something got through.. let's see how much they let me post.... I will be very short, sorry about that...
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "Illegal misuse of campaign funds." that is NOT the charge! am I allowed to say that much? it's a fact! it's reality!!!
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "Falsifying records etc etc" ok, etc etc is really a strange legal term when listing crimes, but anyway... ok, falsifying "business" records is the charge, yes? 2 weeks into the prosecution's case now. can you tell me what business records were falsified? loan applications? contracts? more property appraisals? 2 weeks in, and you STILL don't know????
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "you do know you can very easily go read the charges in the indictment." I have read the indictment.. 34 counts: "falsifying business records". 2 weeks into the trial now, do you know what business records were falsified? were they loan applications? contracts? more property appraisals? nobody knows!!! including... YOU!
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "he used illegal funds to pay off a lady." "using "illegal" funds" is NOT what he is on trial for... (whatever that even means) have you read the indictment you keep telling people is so readily available??? using "illegal funds" is NOT on the list of charges... you made that up!!!! if this was such an easy case, why are you making stuff up and trying to confuse everyone?
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 what business records were falsified??? DO YOU KNOW???
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 what "business records" have been falsified? do you know???
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "he mad a shell company to pay off his mistress. It's nowhere near as confusing as you're trying to make it" first of all, that is NOT what he is on trial for... secondly, what's the name of this "shell company"? or are you just making this up as you go along??? you, along with the prosecution team, seem to be searching for a crime as you go....... what a clown show...
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 "the funds were illegal because he lied about where they came from and he didn't use his own money." whose money did he use???
1
@Stuckinthemiddle3 much like this prosecution team, you are running yourself in circles, desperately trying to find something to call a "crime".....
1
@andrelotscher280 "At least I didn't hire Cohen. Like Trump" at least trump isn't relying on cohen for a conviction... this is going to be a huge F A I L !!!
1
@brianlynch6935 what evidence of a crime have you seen so far?
1
@lisathompson5048 "An audio recording of Trump and Cohen discussing the necessity of setting up a shell company to disguise the payment." ahhh... so he labeled the payments "legal fees", but they were actually for something else. is this the crime? finally, someone that knows something about this case... now I will try to make you aware of something you do not know, and that the google mods also do not want you to know, so I will try this in a series of short, broken pig-latin type of posts....
1
@lisathompson5048 "An audio recording of Trump and Cohen discussing the necessity of setting up a shell company to disguise the payment." I'm not allowed to reply.
1
@lisathompson5048 oh, I can say that much? ok... let's see if I can expand a bit... I am not allowed to inform you.
1
@lisathompson5048 you are claiming that payments were mislabeled as legal fees when they were for something else, correct?
1
@lisathompson5048 this exact same situation occurred in the 2016 election campaign. are you aware of that??? do you know what the legal remedy was?
1
@lisathompson5048 the FEDERAL elections commission (FEC) fined a candidate and political party committee for doing this exact same thing.
1
@lisathompson5048 please educate yourself about that situation, then ask yourself, why do you think this same action is being handled so very differently now?
1
@lisathompson5048 "Not allowed?" umm... ok? please try to communicate in complete sentences. I do not understand your question. what is "not allowed"? and what is your question to me about it?
1
@lisathompson5048 "Not allowed or not able?" once again, I do not know what you are referring to. please try to communicate in complete sentences. thanks.
1
@lisathompson5048 "This further litigation directly relates to the campaign violation that Cohen plead guilty to. Individual #1 was not prosecuted" ummm... ok, I guess. I don't know what that means or why you chose my name to post this to. are you suggesting that this trial is about a campaign violation?? first of all, that was a FEDERAL campaign. secondly, campaign violations are NOT listed in the indictment. what are you even talking about???
1
@lisathompson5048 much like this prosecution team, you are running yourself in circles, desperately trying to find something to call a "crime".....
1