Comments by "" (@JohnDoe-ew3xt) on "Breaking down SCOTUS decision to overturn Roe v. Wade" video.

killing an innocent child, and killing a convicted murderer are two entirely different things.. at least to rational people.
5
"make it easier for women to get fixed"??? by that you mean, force others to pay for it against their will, correct...???
4
LETS GO BRANDON!
4
yes she did, she was not a complete idiot. abortion is not mentioned in the constitution, nor the bill of rights, or any of the amendments. there is no constitutional "right" to abortion... that's precisely what was wrong with roe v wade. yet if you turn on cnn or msnbc right now, every 4th word is "right"..... you have no right to an abortion maroons...
2
@TravisWayne254 tell us you're a maroon, while telling us you're a maroon... are you honestly telling me that you believe that killing a convicted murderer is the same as killing an innocent child?? PS - I'm more "pro-abortion" than you are... go ahead, ask me to explain skippy....
2
@10thletter40 no.. I think he's referring to when the progressive left bombed the capitol on november 7, 1983.
2
@rraptor158 poor ryan.... you got WORKED in this thread.......
2
you seem to be a confused penguin.... it takes the power from a centralized federal government, and puts it back in the hands of the people, and their local/state representatives. do you watch msnbc by chance?
1
raise your own damned children....
1
@arthurcheater3359 ""if you don't adopt my baby I'll kill them!" this isn't a hostage negotiation" correct...... it's "lunacy"!!
1
@trehenry413 "and what if financial support from the government is needed to raise these children? "Pro life" seems to stop as soon as the child is born. But, does nothing for the family to be able to actually take care of them." if you are too pathetic to support a child, don't have a child. and what do you mean "financial support from the government"??? you mean you want to force me and other citizens to support your child against our will, correct? I'll say it again tre.... if you are too pathetic to support a child, don't have a child.
1
@trehenry413 "as far as I'm concerned, if a government is going to force pregnancies on its citizens, it should also provide financial support" and I actually agree tre... IF a government is going to FORCE pregnancies on its citizens... but of course I would NEVER accept my government FORCING pregnancies on it's citizens to begin with..... but that's a rather radically crazy concept there tre.... what do you want to discuss now? little grey aliens from outer space impregnating citizens?
1
@trehenry413 "also, if you are too ignorant to think on your own, I would suggest some reading in your spare time. Helps greatly with comprehension." why can't you libtards refrain from personal attacks and insults?? why not just argue your position?
1
@trehenry413 "1st off, I don't have kids. So not sure why you keep assuming I do." I never assumed you did have kids... go back and re-read my posts.... S L O W L Y this time.....
1
@trehenry413 "there is also no point in "argue my position" when it feels like talking to an echo chamber. Why not think for yourself and offer an actual reason why you think this isn't forcing a pregnancy on women in these impacted states?" wow tre, you really aren't that bright, are you...? I suggest you stop clicking on the reply button after this.. first of all, it seems we don't agree much at all, so why you feel like you're talking to an "echo chamber" is completely bizarre... do you even know what the term "echo chamber" means??? I suggest you google it before you try to use that term again... secondly, this ruling isn't forcing anyone to become pregnant!! you don't even seem to understand how women become pregnant! go ask your mommy to explain how women become pregnant, then come back to me and explain how you believe this ruling forces pregnancy on women. (again, at this point, I would simply stop clicking on the reply button... you're making yourself look like... well, like a liberal...)
1
@arthurcheater3359 these people are lunatics... especially this tre guy.....
1
why would sending abortion regulation back to the people and the states start a war? wtf is wrong with you people....
1
how about those who created the child?
1
@ianalan4367 "What law? What lie?" agreed, it isnt about any law... it was supposedly about a "right", which was the lie.....
1
@inwalters "So if congress passes an unconstitutional law, we just ignore it?" actually, yes. and challenge it in the courts. thats how the checks and balances between the branches of government is supposed to work. “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
1
of course, liberals are violent lunatics.
1
Your mother was promiscuous and hated you, so you blame conservatives..???? <shakes head>
1
@UCcNMN24C4ApFq-lkWD-8A5A "then they aren’t pro-life." can I be pro-life and want to keep a convicted murderer in a cage until he/she dies? where do you draw the line? what's the difference between the death penalty, and life without parole? PS - just so you know, I'm more "pro-abortion" than you are.... I'll explain if you wish.
1
@PumpkinAbbey "going to be cheaper than all of the food and medical expenses, not to mention the crime that will come from the next generation of unwanted children and broken families." so you want to force me to pay for your abortion, or force me to pay for your pathetic child's life..??? get bent....
1
@TravisWayne254 travis, if you are too pathetic to support a child, don't have children. it's that simple son.
1
no babies are sentenced to death in america skippy.... chirst, you people are lunatics.
1