Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Scientists call out Spotify for misinformation on Joe Rogan's podcast" video.

  1.  @Broglesby  Since your son's chances of any negative event is much higher if he gets infected, than from vaccination, your advice was terrible. And the reason that vaccine development was so rapid was many steps were done in parallel, rather than series, and more funding. Usually, with vaccine or drug development, there's years of animal studies on rodents. Then, if positive, there is a longer period where money is raised, and then NHP are done. Then more money raising. Then a first clinical trial. More money raising. An expanded second clinical trial. More money raising. A third clinical trial. More money is raised to apply for a license. Years pass while the FDA reviews the data. And only after approval is manufacture begun. With the Covid vaccines, after success in the first clinical trials, manufacture began. So when approval was granted, the vaccines could be shipped. That parallel process, and the lack of waiting for money, is why these vaccines were developed more rapidly. They actually were the most researched vaccines ever released, not the least.
    3
  2.  @VIi726  Liking or not liking tonal music are different viewpoints. Disagreeing with proven scientific knowledge, and pushing quack cures, is lying to a vulnerable public. That's the thing about science, hypothesis must be proved, data is more important than feelings or beliefs. Claiming that proven safe and effective vaccines are dangerous or useless, while pushing dangerous and useless quack cures, when all data proves you wrong, should not be allowed. It harms the public good.
    3
  3. Vincent Racaniello PhD has been trying, for months, to get on Rogan's podcast, to debunk all the BS and disinformation he's been spreading. As a professor of virology at Columbia University, he is well versed on all the scientific papers and research on Covid-19. But, Rogan won't let him on, he's afraid of talking to a real expert, because he knows the garbage, he's been spreading, is pure manure.
    3
  4. Rogan is afraid to have any real experts on. He won't let Vincent Racaniello PhD on, because he knows that virology expert will verbally destroy him.
    2
  5. You don't have the right to misinform people, especially when it endangers them. Yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater is a common example of unprotected speech, because it endangers people. Pushing disinformation and lies, about a disease that has killed over 5.5 million people globally, also endangers people, so is not protected. Further, as a private company, Spotify can toss anyone they want, for any reason they want.
    1
  6. That's funny, I guess you haven't read the numerous scientific papers demonstrating Ivermectin has a detrimental affect on survival. Maybe Trump forced the DOD to use this useless and dangerous treatment, but that has been discontinued.
    1
  7. So get the Moderna jab. Pfizer is making a lot more money off of its antiviral, than the vaccines. If it were really about money, they encourage staying unvaccinated and vulnerable.
    1
  8.  Sara Mill  They are running clinical trials in poor unvaccinated countries now, because in rich countries, all the intelligent people are already vaccinated. The only naive subjects in rich countries are the ones too stupid to be vaccinated. Do you think those idiots will volunteer for a clinical trial?
    1
  9. Censorship of dangerous lies, like Rogan's, is like preventing yelling 'fire; in a crowded theater.
    1
  10. Science already debates information, but only those qualified to comment are allowed to. Rogan, and the quacks he touts, are not qualified.
    1