Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Nadler willing to take Mueller report to Supreme Court" video.

  1. You can't call the game before you know the score.
    2
  2. Russian trolls rate lower.
    2
  3. Really? The results of the 2018 elections were a loss of power for the Republicans. When everyone was saying Muller would be done in 2017, I knew he would wait until the House was firmly in Democratic control so that investigations could continue. and he did. Nadler is ready and waiting to take the baton from Mueller. And he now has the power.
    1
  4. Right after the GOP rebates us for Benghazi and White Water.
    1
  5. Until we know that we have enough evidence to sway the Senate, it is too early.
    1
  6. Since the president cannot be indicted, the Congress needs all the information gathered in order to determine if impeachment is in order. As to normal functioning of the government, that has been impossible since Trump and his band of crooked cronies took power.
    1
  7. Considering all the indictments, it is money well spent. Not like the Benghazi investigation or White Water.
    1
  8. No, he is not. He is concerned that Barr will hide important evidence and making plans to make sure justice prevails.
    1
  9. You want him to invent facts like Trump does? He hasn't even seen Barr's synopsis yet.
    1
  10. Are you hallucinating? All he said was he received the report and it is comprehensive.
    1
  11. Mueller cannot release the report. He was required to give it to Barr, and has done so. The question is now, how conflicted is Barr. Will he be honest, or try and shield Trump?
    1
  12. The comment section is full of fools gloating and saying that the Mueller investigation, despite all the indictments, found nothing. Yet, not even Congress has seen the report. Only the partisan, Barr, has. Nobody commenting here a clue of what the report contains.
    1
  13. Perhaps not. But not because they lack evidence, but because they know the Senate GOP will put party over country.
    1
  14. How swallow are you?
    1
  15. Shallow much?
    1
  16. Why, for stating what is evident?
    1
  17. Wow, you here what isn't there. That explains a lot.
    1
  18. The GOP has overworked that field. It is well past time to explore the crimes of the current denizen of the Oval Office.
    1
  19. I heard it said it is significant that Donald Jr. et. al. were not indicted. I think the significance is not their innocence, but rather Trump's constant threats to pardon his cronies worrying Mueller. By not indicting Trump's family himself, but rather giving the evidence to indict to state courts, he prevents both a pardon and accusation of double jeopardy.
    1
  20. He's far more like a dalek.
    1
  21. Too bad for you that that day has not come. Do you know what is in the report when Congress doesn't.
    1