Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Schumer wants McConnell to allow these witnesses to testify in Senate impeachment trial" video.

  1. It's legal. Do you want a law that says the family of Congress members may not hold jobs? Or just jobs that pay well? Most rich kids benefit from their family connections.
    5
  2. A witness for someone who knows nothing. That would be weird.
    3
  3.  @Zomby_Woof  Bolton is steamed, he might tell the truth and sink Trump.
    3
  4. Where's Ivanka? You want to find kid's benefiting from their parent's role in government. Start with the one whose aid is illegal.
    2
  5. Biden didn't get his kid the job. The company put all sorts of prominent people, and those related to such people, on their board. Since Biden was clearly fighting corruption, they thought his son would look good for them.
    1
  6. But their is missing testimony due to Trump's obstruction.
    1
  7. The Republicans did call witnesses in the House. It turned out badly for them, because they confirmed Trump's crimes.
    1
  8. I do.
    1
  9.  @louisamato8667  So you want to break the laws protecting whistleblowers? Everything the whistleblower warned us of has already been confirmed. The only reason to make the whistleblower come forward is to put him in danger. And that is why it is illegal. And can you blame people for wanting to remove a president who only won through illegal means?
    1
  10.  @Jackie-cw3yw  Why don't we let Trump's 5th grad teach testify as well? If you want to bring in extraneous witnesses, go all the way.
    1
  11.  @Rich-xb3xk  Please show me the company board that does not have people who are only there through connections.
    1
  12.  @Insulindependantfati  No, the reasons for impeachment were Trump's illegal behavior in regards to Ukraine. Rudy Guiliani was involved in Trump's illegal scheme, neither Biden was.
    1
  13.  @dmtudder  Everything you wrote was an out and out lie. No wonder you like Trump, you seem to be allergic to truth.
    1
  14.  @sandeshroberts9780  Please look up the word parody. Schiff never lied.
    1
  15.  @saturngrad8883  Lt. Col. Vindmand was on the call. First hand evidence. Ambassador Sondland talked to Trump many times and said their was a quid pro quo. First hand evidence. Also, most trials don't rely on first hand evidence. Your objection is moot.
    1
  16. Help Amy McGrath take his seat.
    1
  17. False. The GOP called witnesses, but didn't like they told the truth.
    1
  18. You mean getting to call witnesses, like the republicans did in the House? Good. Because that is not what McConnell says he'll do.
    1
  19. They aren't setting the rules.
    1
  20. Keep the witness list to those who were privy to Trump's illegal behavior, that's what it looks like.
    1
  21. One has no evidence, the other is protected by law. Trust Republicans to break more laws.
    1
  22. We gave most of our freedoms up in the 80's, because of the stupid war on drugs. The data the government keeps on us pales in comparison to the data big business acquires. Do you have a card with Shopper's or Safeway? Do you shop online? Then they have your data too.
    1