Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Texas judge hears case that could end nationwide access to an abortion pill" video.

  1. So, based upon the idea that Mifepristone was originally developed for a different purpose, this judge would forbid it being used to terminate pregnancies? How about Rogaine, Cialis and Viagra? They were originally developed for the treatment of blood pressure irregularities. This ruling should prevent their ever being prescribed to treat male pattern baldness or impotency. Gabapentin was originally developed to prevent seizures, yet is routinely used for pain management. Should all those suffering people continue to suffer? Some antidepressants are used to treat addiction and PTSD. Won't be able to do that anymore. You or a friend or family member, have probably been prescribed a drug for an off-label use. Even if you don't care about women's bodily autonomy, this ruling should frighten you.
    35
  2. It's fine for judges to have whatever religion, or lack thereof, they want. The problem comes when they base rulings on their religion, rather than the law.
    14
  3. This regulation won't save lives, but cost them, as women who have a dead fetus rotting away, inside of them, will either die, or lose their uterus.
    10
  4. True, but that has nothing to do with this situation.
    1