General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Deborah Freedman
CNN
comments
Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "Hear Cheney's question to GOP about Trump during her closing statement" video.
@JaysSavvy 1. NAFTA did not end, it was just renamed. 2. Ending our involvement in TPP did not prevent an agreement between other Pacific countries. We just weren't included, which helped China. 3. Ending our involvement in the Paris Accords was stupid, and detrimental to our country and the world. 4. There only "peace treaty" between Israel and the Arabs occupying Judah and Shomron, was Oslo. 5. We still need to reform immigration policy. 6. The only bail reform was local, not federal. 7. Prescription drug prices were not lowered.
2
But, what if Democrats put up a lying demagogue, every bit as dangerous and anti-democratic as Trump, but less crass? If Democrats ran a person, who had ever espoused the state seizing and running the means of transportation, production and banks, who had been a member of the Communist party, and never met a left leaning autocrat they did not love, it would be hard to choose between two evil people. I think that is his point.
2
How about we just do away with the Senate, as it is a non-democratic body, or reduce it's power, as Canada, Australia and the UK (Lords) have done.
2
@squidlesfiddles He wasn't supporting him. He just said that he was a loyal Republican, and would rather vote for a better Republican candidate, and might vote for the Democrat, only if that candidate were not as bad as Trump.
2
Considering the state of the Republican party, she is not going to win her primary for reelection. Do you seriously think, those who still remain in that party, would choose her as a candidate? She might have a good run as an independent, as she'd probably get a lot of the Independent vote, as well as disaffected Republicans and Democrats. But, she'd probably be like Ross Perot. She'd affect the outcome, but can not win.
1
Intelligent people can disagree. Name calling is not a persuasive argument.
1