Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "FBI agent Peter Strzok passionately defends himself at fiery House hearing" video.

  1. The only candidate hurt by FBI bias, was Clinton. If only Strzok had been the guy they make him out to be, and had let the American public know about the investigation of Trump's treasonous activities.
    5
  2. I watched the full hearing, until they had to quit for a vote. The Republican behavior was horrible. They did not apply the rules of order to themselves, giving themselves extra time to speak but cutting the Democrats off. They would ask a very misleading question, then not allow Strzok to answer. They claimed his not answering a question, because it pertained to an ongoing investigation, was lying. They misrepresented facts, but would not let the truth out. The only interruptions by the Democrats were constant pleas to maintain the rules of order. But the Republican chair was not going to allow a fair hearing. He was there to preside over a kangaroo court, and so he did.
    3
  3. The truly irritating thing about the Benghazi investigation, is the whole incident was the result of Republican Representatives reducing funding for embassy protection.
    2
  4. Yes, the Russian people must be so proud of how he ruins America.
    2
  5. Strzok's assertion that he made have had a personal (and perceptive) bias against someone with a web of Russian connections, yet did not act on it, is proven by the fact he did not break FBI rules and report the investigation to the public. Comey's breaking of those rules to report that the investigation of Senator Clinton's emails was reopened, by finding duplicate emails on Weiner's laptop, may have been the action that defeated Hillary Clinton. Trump and his cabinet continue the use of private email, yet that is what tarnished her candidacy. However, if the FBI had treated Trump equally, and revealed the investigation of his Russia assistance, we might now have a competent head of state who does not distress our allies.
    1