Comments by "William Cox" (@WildBillCox13) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
12
-
3
-
1
-
Good look at the idea. Each fighting art evolved over time to meet changing philosophical criteria. Some were meant from the start as compensation for debility, or lack of weapon or size, or were directed over time into specialties unforeseen by their creators. No martial or fighting art is a direct lineage, for, if the student does not improve on his master's lessons, experiment by testing them against other schools, and goes on to teach the improved form*, no change takes place and the forms stagnate and become stylistic, rather than retaining utility for modern situations. Ju-Jutsu or Jiu-Jutsu(called Jiujitsu or Jujitsu in the west) was taught as self defense in japan during WW2 and came to America through a Dutch emigre and police self defense instructor who codified it into a number of pamphlets in the '50s and '60s. I got my first taste of the fighting arts through those pamphlets, around 1960.
^The Martial Dialectic is as follows: Hypothesis/Style > Antithesis/Guy who gives you a rough time, Synthesis/Solution the changed "lineage form" reflecting practical realities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm with you on that. I tell you in advance that I am an old hippy, too, so I am chiming into a convo I might not be appreciated for. I have worked out with poetry, blogging (google me), songwriting, novel writing, studied Shorin Ryu, re-invented myself with WuShu variations, watched college lectures in a dozen subjects, read philosophy, practiced with bokuto, katana, and jian (and piano and guitar, pen and Mark One Eyeball), all through my adulthood, just to keep my edge; I don't consider myself capable of fighting experts or educating professionally. I know about the difference between dojo fights and street fights, and I have won fights in some cases simply by being the more willing to mix it up. I am all about cross training between body, mind, and soul. My specific interest is not about competing for females (or shemales, if that's your deal) by physical perfection . . . or about scaring pure posers away from my harem . . . it's about being a well rounded man. I want to be able to understand what learned folks are talking about, I want to be able to audit and discuss great lessons in philosophy, art, and fighting technique. AND I want to help struggling folks with everyday difficulties-hold doors, offer to carry packages . . . all that boy scout stuff . . . because it's the Right Thing to Do. Rock's a great guy and all, but he's specialized too well and is leaving behind that well rounded paradigm in favor of more physical appeal. If asked by him for advice (don't laugh: rich guys seek philosophical advice from poor men all the time-that's what trainers are: philosophers; whether they like it or not), I would suggest that he has peaked; all that remains if he goes on is an enlarged heart and organ failure. He won't make himself younger or prettier. Believe me, I've tried. Great listening to you talk, Joe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Conor showed his mettle. Floyd showed his experience. Conditioning on the two men has, perhaps, emphasized slightly different balances of qualities. That would be understandable, given the difference in nature of the two arts. Floyd did play Conor, winning every clinch, but one, which surprised me, until I decided that the reason was Conor is canny on the ground, whereas Floyd is canny upright; he never has to consider the prone game at all. Floyd also used the rules of boxing-and its tricks-extremely effectively, amusing all the experts, as they hoped he would. Those elbows were mean. I am still amazed Conor did not expect them. Consider that MMA is all about crossing the GAP to reach the clinch, whereas a lot of boxing technique is about lightning counterstrikes launched as the referee separates you after the clinch. MMA wants to close the GAP, but the boxing Ref wants to reset the GAP . . . weird and counterintuitive. Anyway, in my view, Floyd and his team analyzed the situation, set this up, worked it like a con, and won the prize: public perception that Boxing stands up as valid against other violent contact sports and fighting arts. We all know how important that pop is. On the other side, who is going to disrespect Conor after a great showing against the "best in the world"? I'm pretty sure everyone won this time,especially the fans.
1