Comments by "ub2bn" (@ub2bn) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@charlesweaver9297 To my knowledge, the topic of debate was whether one should just accept what Authority figures say, or should one do his or her own homework. And more specifically, Fauci's and the CDC's flip flopping on masks, etc..
Apparently Seder would be taking the first position, arguing we can trust people like Fauci. I, for one, would love to hear Seder's argument in favour of this, seeing as I'm one of those who does his homework, and knows for a fact, Fauci is a liar and a flip flopper.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sleepykittyH A proper debate requires proper ground rules, adherence to those rules, and a proper setting. If this is even possible, given Seder's behaviour/tactics, I would love to see these 2 debate... especially on the Topic originally agreed upon.
That said, I can easily see why Crowder is not interested in giving this guy the time of day. Seder did himself no favours, if in fact he indeed thinks he is capable of winning such a debate, as he may have slammed that door of possibility closed forever. On the other hand, if he knows, deep down, he can only win by playing games, then he's better off taking his recently acquired spoils; in the form of content which he obviously has no problem twisting, editing and spinning, to suit his needs; and be on his way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@EmpireGamingWynter Feel free to peruse the Lancet article I posted, and show me how and where their conclusions are mistaken.
BTW, the "vast, vast number of Scientists" you speak of have neither done such experiments, nor conducted any analysis, let alone any meta-analysis of the data. Sadly, experts are only human, and thus prone to being misled, just like the rest of us. Worse, much of "Scientific Consensus" has come about in such a manner.
Apparently, many modern day Scientists share Ethan's view, and thus fail to do their own inquiry, simply accepting so-called peer review as legitimate, when in many cases, it's "buddy review", and selective editing by Journal Editors. Cosmology is a great example of this.
And no, there is no evidence masks made any appreciable difference in the spread of SARSCoV2. It appears you too are a victim, willing or otherwise, of the narrative.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1