Comments by "ub2bn" (@ub2bn) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
17
-
10
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@alishanty "there’s no reason to think children would be any different."
Excellent point. Vaxxing children will not decrease asymptomatic/mild infection among them. Nor will it decrease Infectiousness among them. And seeing as children are not prone to serious infection or severe disease, anyway, there is nothing to protect them from.
If anything, the vax may very well interfere with the child's natural immune system... especially the mRNA/Viral-Vector vaccines... not to mention the more immediate vaccine-related health risks.
I'm near 60, and given the choice, I would go for Natural Infection and Early Treatment, above all. But seeing as the Health Authorities have taken it upon themselves to make Early Treatment all but unavailable, I am considering getting an Inactivated-Virus Vaccine, like Sinopharm. But living Canada, that may not ever be possible, either.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seeibe There is little to no evidence of children infecting adults. Contract tracing showed breakouts among school staff, for example, began with an infected staff member, not a student.
And besides, the vaccines offer a level of protection for the vaxxed, not the un-vaxxed. The narrative that my vax protects you, and your vax protects me, (or, in other words, the unvaxxed need to be vaxxed in order to protect the vaxxed), is absolute non-sense. Vaxxed or not, one can still be infected. The vax is to help prevent serious illness, not the spread.
While it is true the vax appears to shorten the length of time one is infectious, peak viral load is not lessened, thus an infected, vaxxed person is just as infectious, as an unvaxxed person, but for a shorter period of time.
1
-
1