Comments by "Screen Apple" (@screenapple1660) on "ABC News"
channel.
-
25
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
12
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Why USA have to protect Taiwan? It's this famous part
On September 21, 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson addressed a letter to the Secretary General of the United Nations explaining the US government's policy toward Taiwan and certain offshore islands, like the Penghus. He began by citing the December 1, 1943, Cairo declaration stating Formosa would be returned to “Republic of China.” Thereafter, the July 1945 Potsdam declaration confirmed Cairo's terms and in General Order No. 1 the Japanese forces in Formosa were ordered to surrender to “Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek.” From 1945 onward, the Republic of China retained administrative control over Formosa, the Penghus, plus a number of other offshore islands. On April 28, 1952, Japan signed a peace treaty renouncing its claim to Formosa and the Penghus, although “in whose favor Japan was renouncing was not stipulated.” Thereafter, Japan and the ROC signed their own peace treaty, effective August 5, 1952, where Japan repeated this renunciation, but again without saying which state it was ceding its rights to.
While title over Formosa and the Penghus might be vague, the ROC had occupied these areas continuously since 1945: “There is no question that the Republic of China is today and at all times since the effective date of the Japanese Peace Treaty, has been in effective possession of and exercising administrative control over Formosa and the Pescadores.”
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason they got layoff... IRS employees didn't build AI technology to detect dementia, people disabilities, disadvantages who can't file tax report or tax return. So, American suffrage can get tax refunds. IRS suppose to make AI technology or AI revolutionary technology like ChatGPT, Deepseek, etc.. Same with Banks. to check for fraud or people taking advantage of people with memory lost, dementia, disability, etc. it is IRS, federal reserve, banks job to fix the issues. not addressing or telling people how to avoid scams. You are not helping. You addressing DIY.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Stop wasting time trolling and complaining—your job is to work, not to push political grievances. If you have serious issues with the president’s executive orders, that doesn’t mean you can ignore responsibilities or drag others down. Your duty is to get the job done, just like any other committed worker.
If there’s a problem in the workplace, it might not be about politics—it could be about accountability. Maybe an employee isn’t part of the teamwork, or someone caught a mistake you made. Perhaps someone noticed misconduct or fraud. Instead of blaming others or using politics as an excuse, take responsibility and do your part.
Workplaces run on discipline, professionalism, and productivity—not distractions or personal agendas. Focus on doing the job right, working with your team, and staying accountable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Trump administration's decision to lay off millions of federal workers was part of a broader agenda to streamline government operations and reduce federal spending. This initiative targeted various agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), where hundreds of support staff were dismissed shortly after a fatal plane collision in Washington, D.C. This move raised concerns about aviation safety due to reduced staffing levels. The layoffs were often communicated abruptly, with some employees receiving late-night emails from unofficial addresses, leading to questions about procedural fairness and transparency.
President Trump signed several executive orders aimed at overhauling federal hiring practices, emphasizing a return to "merit-based" hiring and requiring loyalty from federal employees. One of the more controversial moves included placing all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) staff on leave, as the administration argued these programs constituted "discrimination." In addition, 17 independent inspectors general were dismissed without the advance notice typically required by federal law, prompting legal challenges and debates about the legality of these actions.
The administration's aggressive restructuring approach sparked widespread debate and legal scrutiny. Critics argued that the mass terminations, especially those without clear cause, violated federal employment laws and protections. Legal experts questioned the administration's push to consolidate executive power, including attempts to challenge the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which historically limits presidential authority over federal spending.
The situation became more complicated when factions within the government resisted the changes. Some government employees and agencies openly refused to comply with the new executive orders, leading to accusations of insubordination and political defiance. This resistance was interpreted by some as an infringement on presidential power, while others viewed it as a necessary check against executive overreach.
Adding to the controversy were allegations that certain separatist factions within the government were ideologically tied to communist principles, further polarizing the political landscape. This narrative contributed to heightened political tensions and debates over constitutional authority, the separation of powers, and the role of ideology in governance.
Overall, the Trump administration's sweeping actions to downsize the federal workforce, combined with the pushback from dissenting government factions, highlighted significant challenges in balancing executive authority with legal and constitutional constraints. The long-term implications for governance, public safety, and political stability remain a topic of national debate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
President Trump is on a mission to eliminate wasteful spending from the government, tackling what experts are now calling the 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Spending.' By day, the budget is lean and efficient, a true man of fiscal discipline. But come nightfall, it transforms into a wild, unpredictable woman of excessive, unnecessary spending. It's like a government budget going through a late-night identity crisis. In other news, USAID just made headlines for their 'trans mice' experiment – and no, this isn't a joke. Yes, you heard that right. They're exploring ways to, quite literally, transform the male and female body. Don't worry, these mice won't be filing for gender reassignment anytime soon... but hey, who knew that mice were part of the modern-day trans revolution?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
:face-blue-wide-eyes:Yikes.....The shadow government’s campaign to erase the truth behind COVID-19 is brutal and unwavering. Universities and research labs across the world have been ransacked, their funding pulled, and critical data on COVID-19—genetic research, DNA sequences, and experimental findings—destroyed. Entire research papers, including Chinese COVID publications, were thrown into trash fires, wiped from existence. This is not a conspiracy theory—it’s 100% true. As the bodies of scientists and politicians pile up, the death toll grows higher, with many killed under mysterious circumstances to keep them silent. Assassinations are routine. Men in black suits—agents of the shadow government—are actively hunting anyone who knows too much. Inside U.S. government agencies like USAID, CDC, and the Department of Education, all traces of COVID-19 research are being erased. The narrative is controlled. The truth is hidden. And anyone who dares to speak out becomes the next target.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why is US eager to protect Israel more than Iran, China, the nations? because Israel is birth of religion. Judaism and christian. Moses ,Jesus , sons of abharm, David, John, Luke, parry, Mathew, the names of bible which ancient ancestors foresaw the war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tightening Academic Access for Chinese Students Amid Growing U.S.-China Tensions
Access to top-tier U.S. universities such as Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Brown, NYU, etc. is becoming increasingly difficult for Communist Chinese students, particularly in law programs. Recent incidents have raised serious concerns about academic integrity and security, further straining the already tense relationship between the United States and China.
Law professors at these prestigious institutions recently uncovered multiple cases of academic dishonesty involving Chinese students. Some were caught using smartwatches, like Apple and Huawei devices, to cheat during Juris Doctor (JD) exams. Others were found copying answers from high-performing classmates. These cases highlight growing concerns over fairness, academic integrity, and potential political interference within U.S. educational institutions.
This academic misconduct mirrors broader geopolitical challenges. In Hong Kong, the Chinese government has systematically removed pro-democracy lawyers and judges from the judiciary, violating the Sino-British Joint Declaration—a treaty that was supposed to guarantee Hong Kong's autonomy under the "one country, two systems" framework. The arrests of 47 prominent pro-democracy activists have drawn international condemnation, underscoring the erosion of legal independence in the region.
Additionally, Chinese-linked cyberattacks have targeted U.S. politicians and university networks, raising national security concerns. These attacks have been interpreted as efforts to infiltrate and influence American academic and political systems.
In response, U.S. immigration policies have tightened, with stricter scrutiny placed on Chinese students applying for visas to study at American universities. Critics argue that these measures reflect broader political tensions, with some policymakers viewing Chinese students as potential security risks rather than purely academic applicants.
As the U.S. seeks to balance academic openness with national security, universities are now at the crossroads of navigating complex issues of integrity, cybersecurity, and geopolitical influence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In 2025, the US government is expected to introduce a new, highly secure AI-driven technology tailored for national security and intelligence operations. This advanced tool, likely named Culper, would be modeled after the historic Culper Spy Ring, which played a pivotal role in gathering intelligence during the American Revolutionary War. The Culper AI would serve as a modern version of this intelligence network, providing the government with cutting-edge capabilities for cybersecurity, counterintelligence, and intelligence gathering.
Unlike public-facing AI tools such as ChatGPT and Google AI, which are accessible to anyone with an internet connection, the Culper AI would be available exclusively to authorized branches of the US government, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the Department of Defense. This private government AI would be far more powerful and sophisticated than the versions available to the public, offering advanced data analysis, pattern recognition, and security protocols to address complex national security threats.
The Culper AI would be built with top-tier encryption, ensuring that all sensitive government communications and intelligence operations remain fully secure and inaccessible to foreign adversaries. Unlike public ChatGPT, which is designed for general use and can be accessed by users worldwide, the Culper AI would operate within a highly protected, closed environment, keeping the most vital information and operations shielded from external threats, including espionage or cyberattacks from countries like China and Russia.
The government's private ChatGPT would be specifically designed to assist with tasks like tracking foreign espionage activities, neutralizing cyber threats, and helping the US intelligence community stay ahead of geopolitical risks. With its higher levels of security and specialization, the Culper AI would allow government agencies to process classified data at unprecedented speed and accuracy, all while ensuring that no sensitive information is exposed.
In summary, while ChatGPT and Google AI are publicly available tools used by individuals and businesses for general purposes, the Culper AI would be a specialized, encrypted system designed solely for the US government to defend the nation, protect its citizens, and safeguard critical information from foreign interference. The Culper AI would serve as a modern, high-tech equivalent of the Culper Spy Ring, providing the government with the tools needed to stay one step ahead of any emerging threats.
1
-
1