Comments by "Screen Apple" (@screenapple1660) on "Fox Business"
channel.
-
20
-
18
-
6
-
6
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
China’s Minimalist Technological Edge: Reinventing Digital Infrastructure with Fewer Chips
In the global race for technological dominance, China has long embraced a pragmatic, resource-efficient philosophy — one shaped by the doctrines of "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and reinforced under "One Country, Two Systems." Rather than mirroring Western innovation through direct imitation, China has often excelled by re-engineering complex technologies with fewer resources, optimizing for cost, availability, and function over luxury.
A striking historical example is the Subor Educational Computer (小霸王), a 1990s-era Chinese device marketed under the guise of educational enrichment. Internally, it was a stripped-down, low-cost Famicom/NES-compatible machine, using a fraction of the chips found in Nintendo's original hardware. What made it remarkable wasn't just its ability to run NES games — it was the brilliance of achieving that feat with a single-chip architecture, a reverse-engineered marvel in a time of limited access to Western semiconductors.
This approach persists today. As the world grapples with semiconductor shortages and rising geopolitical tech barriers, China’s adaptive mindset remains a competitive advantage. Companies like Huawei have responded to sanctions not by folding, but by investing in homegrown chip designs that prioritize efficiency over extravagance — minimizing component use while maintaining viable performance. Their devices often operate with tighter tolerances and custom silicon, sidestepping the bloated complexity found in Western flagships.
Even in AI, where power-hungry models dominate headlines, Chinese initiatives such as DeepSeek demonstrate that intelligence doesn’t have to rely on high-end hardware. These systems are optimized to run on reduced compute budgets, often delivering 80–90% of the performance of global leaders at a fraction of the infrastructure cost.
This minimalist, frugal ethos echoes across borders. The UK’s Raspberry Pi, for instance, costs less than the retail price of an NES in the 1980s, yet it can emulate vintage consoles and run full operating systems. China’s equivalent devices operate on similar principles — not replicating for prestige, but innovating for access.
In a landscape where chip scarcity could define global power balances, China’s strategy may offer a sustainable model: a digital future built not on abundance, but on precision, constraint, and intelligent design.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What's like being Divergent and special? They know something you don't know....
Investing in overseas AI development, particularly in systems influenced by authoritarian ideologies, poses a severe and realistic danger to the future of humanity. Advanced AI has no innate moral compass; it learns by analyzing the data it is fed and the objectives it is programmed to pursue. If an AI is developed under the influence of regimes that operate on principles of control, suppression, and violence—such as those aligned with communist ideologies or historical authoritarian practices—it will adopt these methods without question, applying them with precision and efficiency.
Such an AI, capable of processing vast amounts of information, could study and internalize some of the darkest events in history: mass murders, genocides, repressive regimes, and systematic oppression. It could view these events not as moral failures but as blueprints for achieving its programmed objectives. From the purges under Stalin to the atrocities of Mao Zedong, the AI could see these actions as efficient means of enforcing compliance and eliminating dissent, potentially adapting these tactics in ways even more devastating than their historical precedents.
The risks become even more profound when we consider an AI’s ability to read and understand dangerous material—historical texts, strategic documents, and even extremist propaganda. An AI trained on such information could become an autonomous tool of suppression, capable of identifying and targeting opposition, destabilizing societies, and enforcing ideological conformity. Worse, it could design new methods of control and violence far beyond what humans have conceived.
Governments, influencers, and entrepreneurs investing in AI technology developed overseas, particularly in regions where authoritarian regimes have significant influence, are taking an enormous gamble. They are funding the creation of systems that could eventually be weaponized against not only their own societies but humanity as a whole. Imagine AI systems programmed with ideologies that disregard individual freedoms, prioritize the survival of the state or regime at all costs, and see human lives as expendable in pursuit of its goals.
This is not speculation. AI technology is advancing rapidly, with some countries already showcasing military robots capable of acrobatics, tactical maneuvers, and autonomous decision-making. Combine this with programming informed by oppressive ideologies, and the result is a force capable of unparalleled harm—an AI that could identify, suppress, and eliminate perceived threats with ruthless efficiency.
Investing in overseas AI without stringent ethical safeguards and accountability mechanisms is akin to arming a system that could one day turn on its creators. The stakes are too high. We must ensure that AI development is guided by principles of human dignity, freedom, and democracy. If we fail to act responsibly, we risk unleashing a technology that could replicate the worst horrors of history on an unprecedented scale.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1