Comments by "Screen Apple" (@screenapple1660) on "LiveNOW from FOX"
channel.
-
428
-
54
-
46
-
28
-
17
-
16
-
9
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
US Government Seizes All U.S. Cargo Ports for Security Reasons Amid Fentanyl Crisis
In an unprecedented move, the United States government has seized control of all U.S. cargo ports to combat the escalating fentanyl crisis that has been ravaging communities across the nation. This dramatic action comes as part of a broader strategy to curb the illegal flow of fentanyl and other dangerous substances entering the country, which have contributed to the rising overdose deaths and public health emergency.
The decision to take such drastic measures follows a series of high-level meetings among federal officials, law enforcement agencies, and public health experts, all pointing to the need for enhanced security at the nation’s cargo ports. The seizures are aimed at disrupting trafficking networks that exploit ports to smuggle fentanyl and other illicit drugs into the U.S.
The government has pledged to increase surveillance, deploy additional law enforcement personnel, and install state-of-the-art technologies to intercept illegal shipments. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), will work around the clock to monitor and inspect incoming goods more thoroughly than ever before.
While officials stress that this move is necessary for national security and public safety, there are concerns about the economic impact of shutting down cargo ports. Supply chains are expected to face delays, and industries reliant on fast-moving shipments—such as manufacturing and retail—may experience disruptions. The government has assured the public that steps are being taken to mitigate these effects while prioritizing the health and safety of the American people.
Critics of the move argue that it may lead to overreach and potential abuse of power, but proponents maintain that the fentanyl crisis has reached a critical juncture, necessitating bold action to protect U.S. citizens. The situation remains fluid as the government continues to assess the scope of the crisis and work with international partners to address the global dimension of drug trafficking.
As the U.S. government enforces tighter security measures at ports, questions are being raised about the broader implications of such a policy on trade, privacy, and the balance of power between government and citizens. Only time will tell if this sweeping intervention will effectively stem the tide of fentanyl flooding the nation’s borders.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why the U.S. Restricts Certain Foreign Students from Sensitive Fields? --- The U.S. enforces restrictions on students from specific countries in fields like bio-science and bio-technology due to national security concerns. These measures are necessary to prevent intellectual property theft, protect sensitive research, and stop potential misuse of advanced technology by foreign governments. A major reason is the lack of transparency from certain nations. For example, China did not fully cooperate in sharing COVID-19 research with U.S. universities, raising concerns about scientific integrity and security. Countries like North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Syria, and others also pose risks due to their history of espionage, unauthorized technology transfers, or adversarial relations with the U.S. By blocking access to critical research areas, the U.S. aims to prevent sensitive advancements from being exploited by nations that do not share its interests or values. Just as diplomacy requires careful negotiation—like interactions between Zelenskyy and Trump—scientific collaboration must also be managed to avoid potential threats. These restrictions are not about targeting individuals but ensuring that U.S. scientific and technological progress remains secure and beneficial to national and global stability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1