Comments by "Screen Apple" (@screenapple1660) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
9
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump and Harris, despite their differing political affiliations, both firmly refuse to do business with the Hong Kong government due to its crackdown on freedoms. In response, China has allegedly taken actions such as hacking Trump. Both Trump and Harris have even removed government contact information in reaction to Hong Kong being economically sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury, which operates independently from other branches and manages the Federal Reserve.
Meanwhile, prominent American politicians, including Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, have signed agreements emphasizing that the Chinese Communist Party must respect individual rights. However, China reportedly retaliated against them several years ago, underscoring lingering tensions. Today, Trump and Harris remain resolute, condemning Hong Kong’s government actions.
Harris had once considered exchanging Linda Sun for Jimmy Lai, the pro-democracy activist and freedom of press advocate in Hong Kong who is seen as a figure akin to Nelson Mandela. Both Trump and Harris publicly support Lai’s mission. However, due to some missteps in New York, Harris’s strategy was hindered. Now, both leaders have one message for Hong Kong’s authorities: Don't talk to us... 😯🤷♂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Elon Musk's groundbreaking ventures, such as Tesla and SpaceX, are propelling the United States into a new era of technological innovation. His work not only revolutionizes industries but also generates employment opportunities, underscoring the transformative power of private enterprise.
In the realm of public policy, President Donald Trump's administration has taken steps to influence the direction of American innovation. Notably, in January 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14179, titled "Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence." This order aims to strengthen U.S. leadership in AI by revoking certain policies and establishing a plan to promote AI development free from ideological bias or social agendas.
However, some of the administration's actions have raised concerns within the scientific community. Critics argue that certain policies may undermine American scientific research by reducing essential funding and support. For instance, significant cuts to the National Science Foundation's budget have been proposed, and communication from health agencies has been restricted. These measures could potentially stifle medical innovation and diminish the United States' global leadership in science.
In summary, while figures like Elon Musk drive technological advancements through private enterprise, the role of public policy in fostering or hindering innovation remains pivotal. The interplay between visionary entrepreneurs and supportive governmental policies will significantly shape America's future as a leader in technological innovation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Microsoft could purchase Tiktok and Require Data Transfer. This means Microsoft engineers, security director, and software engineers have scan the entire Tiktok software if the software or source code was changed or modited; cover up against committee. it's like college professor grading chinese student exam.. It's scary though...Getting caught is jail sentence. TIktok employees and this guy is scare like hell; Tik Tok Employees could go to jail for U.S national security breach; they could get arrest by FBI, U.S marshal, INS, U.S homeland security, U.S border and custom have to scan the codes -- that's mess up.
They have to enter Tiktok employees house to collect home computers. It is a federal crime for TIKTOK collect data and transfer to overseas for military reasons and re-write source code to coverup such as suicides, cyberbullies, etc. Can this CEO go to jail for security breach? Depends what kind of data breach. there's different branches. Asset breach,, healthcare breach, etc. no store what data they were collecting and hiding against US government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don’t cross the line. The shadow government controls everything—finances, leaders, and secrets. They froze USAID’s assets to silence those who threaten them. Top scientists, from China to Russia, are mysteriously dead—strangled, poisoned, shot, or hacked. It’s no accident. They eliminate anyone who uncovers the truth. Knowledge is power, and they won’t let it slip. Once you’re on their radar, there’s no escape. It’s not a theory. It’s real. And if you dig too deep, they’ll make sure you disappear.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
US bans Ukraine student studying bio technology in US university because Zelensky refuse to negotiate peace. --- Why the U.S. Restricts Certain Foreign Students from Sensitive Fields? --- The U.S. enforces restrictions on students from specific countries in fields like bio-science and bio-technology due to national security concerns. These measures are necessary to prevent intellectual property theft, protect sensitive research, and stop potential misuse of advanced technology by foreign governments. A major reason is the lack of transparency from certain nations. For example, China did not fully cooperate in sharing COVID-19 research with U.S. universities, raising concerns about scientific integrity and security. Countries like North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Syria, and others also pose risks due to their history of espionage, unauthorized technology transfers, or adversarial relations with the U.S. By blocking access to critical research areas, the U.S. aims to prevent sensitive advancements from being exploited by nations that do not share its interests or values. Just as diplomacy requires careful negotiation—like interactions between Zelenskyy and Trump—scientific collaboration must also be managed to avoid potential threats. These restrictions are not about targeting individuals but ensuring that U.S. scientific and technological progress remains secure and beneficial to national and global stability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Republicans blames Social media is to blame for screwing up current age right after industrial, computer age, internet, information, etc. Let's focus Age of A.I (ChatGPT)..... Now, We are nowhere...... So, who is blame for scrambling the future?
YouTube, Tiktok, etc. I don't think it's Biden or Trump age. It's somebody who to scare take "manifest destiny "futures. is Social media blame for ruining Civilization age. YEAH. because demonization, social media bans, too much hate speech, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
President Donald Trump's recent proposal to redesign the $100 bill has sparked significant controversy both domestically and internationally. The administration argues that introducing a new design will combat counterfeiting, especially from overseas sources, and protect U.S. financial interests. However, critics contend that the plan lacks transparency and could have unintended consequences.
Concerns Over Counterfeiting and National Security
The administration asserts that the current $100 bill is susceptible to sophisticated counterfeiting, particularly by foreign entities. They claim that counterfeit U.S. currency funds illicit activities abroad, including money laundering and the strengthening of foreign military capabilities. To address this, the proposed redesign aims to incorporate advanced security features to deter counterfeiters and safeguard the integrity of U.S. currency.
Domestic Opposition and Legislative Hurdles
The proposal has met resistance from Democratic lawmakers and some bipartisan groups. Concerns center around the involvement of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in the redesign process. Critics argue that Musk's access to sensitive Treasury systems and his influence over federal financial operations raise constitutional and security issues. Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Maxine Waters have urged financial regulators to resist any directives from DOGE that might facilitate unconstitutional actions - WSJ.COM
Additionally, legal challenges have emerged. A federal judge recently issued a temporary restraining order blocking DOGE from accessing Treasury payment systems, though this order does not apply to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other Senate-confirmed officials - REUTERS.COM
. These legal battles highlight the contentious nature of the proposed currency changes and the broader debate over executive authority and oversight. International Implications Internationally, there is apprehension that the sudden introduction of a new $100 bill could disrupt global markets and economies that heavily rely on U.S. currency reserves. Foreign governments have expressed concerns about the potential devaluation of their dollar holdings and the logistical challenges of transitioning to new currency notes. The lack of clear communication and collaboration with international stakeholders has exacerbated these concerns, leading to strained diplomatic relations.
While the intention behind redesigning the $100 bill is to enhance security and curb counterfeiting, the approach has ignited a complex debate involving national security, constitutional authority, and international economic stability. As the administration moves forward, it faces significant legal, legislative, and diplomatic challenges that must be navigated carefully to achieve a balanced and effective outcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1