Comments by "Screen Apple" (@screenapple1660) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1. 34
  2. 26
  3. 24
  4. 16
  5. 11
  6. 8
  7. 8
  8. 6
  9. 5
  10. 5
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. Why U.S. Colleges Should Prioritize Fairness and Equality in Legal Education In today’s globalized world, universities in the United States play a crucial role in shaping the next generation of legal professionals. However, as the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is essential for U.S. institutions to maintain a balanced and fair approach when considering applicants, especially those from regions where legal systems may not uphold fundamental human rights and democratic values. A key concern is ensuring that legal education remains rooted in fairness, justice, and the protection of individual rights, rather than being influenced by systems that may support coercion or injustice. One example of this challenge is the recent political climate in Hong Kong. The Chinese government has been criticized for undermining the city’s once-independent legal system, particularly after the arrest of 47 pro-democracy activists. Many of these individuals were denied their right to choose their own legal counsel, with the state instead assigning them government-selected attorneys. This not only raises concerns about the fairness of legal processes but also highlights how the lack of a balanced judicial system can severely impact citizens’ rights to a fair trial. In contrast, the United States, through its legal institutions, has long been committed to the principle of providing all individuals with the right to a fair trial and equal representation. This was most notably emphasized in landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. This decision, along with others in U.S. history, reinforced the notion that equality and fairness should guide legal systems, regardless of race, gender, or background. These principles must be maintained, not only within the United States but also within the global context of legal education. When universities in the U.S. admit students from countries with repressive legal systems, they face the challenge of balancing the need for international cooperation with the imperative to uphold the values of fairness and justice. U.S. colleges should ensure that students from all backgrounds, including those from authoritarian regimes, receive equal opportunities to learn, practice, and advocate for justice within a system that upholds these ideals. At the same time, it is crucial that the universities remain vigilant against the possibility of these students using their education to further the interests of systems that perpetuate injustice. U.S. educational institutions are uniquely positioned to be a force for positive change, not only through the academic knowledge they impart but also by fostering an environment that promotes democratic values and human rights. By emphasizing these core values, colleges can help shape future leaders who will advocate for equality and justice worldwide, ensuring that the principles of fairness and the right to a fair trial remain at the forefront of legal education. Ultimately, U.S. universities must continue to evolve, ensuring that their admissions policies, curricula, and teaching methods reflect a commitment to fairness and equality for all. This commitment will ensure that future generations of legal professionals are equipped to challenge injustice, both in the United States and abroad, and to promote a world where legal systems truly serve all people, regardless of their political or cultural background.
    1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. Trump administration crack down gang activities or Chinese triad activities run by state sponsored Chinese government. The United States has intensified its efforts to counteract illicit activities linked to China, focusing on intellectual property (IP) theft, economic espionage, and the influx of counterfeit goods. Revocation of Diplomatic Immunity While there have been discussions about holding foreign diplomats accountable for financial crimes and IP theft, there is no public evidence that the U.S. has officially revoked diplomatic immunity for Chinese officials in such cases. Diplomatic immunity is a cornerstone of international relations, and any changes to its application would require significant legal and diplomatic considerations. Legislative Measures Against IP Theft To combat IP theft, U.S. lawmakers have introduced bills aimed at imposing sanctions on individuals and entities involved in significant IP theft from U.S. persons. For instance, legislation proposed by Senator Curtis seeks to sanction those engaged in patterns of substantial IP theft and to implement broad visa and immigration restrictions on Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and government officials until meaningful steps are taken by China to curb such activities. CURTIS.SENATE.GOV Crackdown on Counterfeit Goods U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has ramped up operations to intercept counterfeit goods entering the country, many of which originate from China. Initiatives like Operation Mega Flex have been pivotal in detecting and seizing illicit items arriving in small parcels from China. These counterfeit products pose significant threats to consumer safety and the U.S. economy. CBP.GOV Recent enforcement actions include the seizure of nearly 162,000 counterfeit "forever" stamps at a Chicago mail facility, shipments that violated trademark laws and had an estimated genuine value of over $118,000. NYPOST.COM Additionally, more than 3,000 fake Gibson guitars were confiscated at the Los Angeles port, with genuine counterparts valued at $18 million. APNEWS.COM The U.S. government has also targeted e-commerce platforms facilitating the entry of counterfeit goods. The elimination of the "de minimis" tariff exemption for imports valued under $800 aims to curb the influx of low-cost, potentially counterfeit items from China. This policy change has significant implications for companies like Shein, which have relied on this exemption to import goods into the U.S. market. FT.COM These concerted efforts underscore the U.S. commitment to protecting its economic interests and national security by addressing illicit activities associated with China.
    1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. Communist Chinese Party is expected to capture Carrie Lam's end of career and put her to death. The reason why she extended her career term is to avoid Xi and Li's death penalty. She had to use triads toĀ stop hong kong riots and use COVID to attack China. Her passport is confiscated by PRC and in addition. She failed to adopt the early resignation given by the Western world. She refuses to resign as chief executive of Hong Kong. Carrie Lam plans to denounce the Chinese Communist Party and Seeking to convert to Catholicism and ask for forgiveness. Carrie Lam's son's passport is also confiscated by CCP. She wanted to apologize to the people of hong kong for having china install national security law in Hong Kong after getting a heated argument with Li and Xi Jinping. Is Carrie Lam going to be executed by the Chinese Communist Party? Yes. Failure to remove extradition bill. The people of hong kong were so nice and tried to remove the extradition bill. Carrie Lam refuses. She could've listened to the people of Hong Kong. She didn't. This is why Carrie Lam will be put on death sentence by Xi Jinping after violating the Chinese Communist Party for having extended family. China's one-child policy has been unchanged. China will release Joshua wong and put carrie lam to death. Is this true? Carrie Lam could've resigned to save herself. Now, china betrayed her. You might say the Chinese communist party is correct about executing Carrie Lam. She failed to trust the people of hong kong then join the Chinese communist party. How does China find out Carrie Lam started COVID? They already knew.
    1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1