Comments by "Shakey" (@shakey3306) on "Wisecrack" channel.

  1. Respectfully disagreeing is not enough
    3
  2. How the hell?
    3
  3. You’re being sarcastic right?
    2
  4. Bad thing no one can replace them… you sure have the answer for everything right?
    2
  5. Are you the kind of people that burn others in sticks?
    2
  6. The entire video is simply inherently hypocritical, he acuses ben shapiro of name calling name calling him after name calling jordan peterson and portraying as some stupid representation of the decadence of intellectualism, worst even is that it’s not usual name calling, he just spit a softened rethoric style insult and show the person in video, he falls completely in the tin he criticises of ted-like popularised speech, which is not rigid bit rather funny as to be attractive to the masses and that’s exactly what he does since the beginning of the video being angry, don’t like shapiro and i don’t worship peterson, but peterson says a lot of things i think are right and a few i disagree, so in other words this whole video is bullshit of bullshit and the guy completely lacks self awareness and questioning whether he’s right or not, which is the only thing that keeps bullshit away as well as obnoxious levels of arbitration…
    2
  7. There’s a lot of slave mentality going on around people, the christian vices of greed and lust are subverted today, the highly democratic morals of our societies keeps destigmatising sex and sex before marriage as something evil and wrong, while enforcing wealth as inherently evil, the masses are just led by pleasure seeking just like most wealthy, but since wealth is harder to get and they are unable about it, they fault it, not their sex, if we want to reinstate actual morals we need to figure it out again or readopt christianism, only them i would go against wealthy
    1
  8. What’s the relevance of your comment? You’d shut up if you knew how annoying you are…
    1
  9. I would they do that? And why would you think that? From socrates and aristotle, to Nietzsche, all of them talk about politics
    1
  10. Violence is just the antithesis of sex the same way killing is the antithesis of giving birth, so if one is okay the other is naturally okay for a natural balance, cowards hate violence, love sex, hate giving birth, hate killing. Stop the hysteria against violence, society would be better if some people were beaten more often
    1
  11. No
    1
  12. Politically biased cheap “intelectual” just like the guy in this video…
    1
  13. I say disgrace tyson, but i think that’s ok
    1
  14. Deixa de retardado cara eu hein
    1
  15. You’re really dumb aren’t you?
    1
  16. Just don’t expect people to be like you, many don’t want to live inside their houses their whole lives
    1
  17. If you’re not free enough, if you can’t do what you want is because you’re not powerful enough, people talk of freedom as something someone else should give them, ridiculous, that’s not freedom. People worked harder and in worst circumstances throughout the entirety of civilisation and you’re the one complaining about it yet you can’t live on your own, and you obviously can do whatever you want through many mean, it’s an open world
    1
  18. Hahahaahha
    1
  19. Are you out of your mind?
    1
  20. The guy called himself a philosopher lost credibility
    1
  21. You just agree with him, this video is just bullshit as he defined it
    1
  22.  @philjed5178  dude why are you so hypocritical?
    1
  23. The problem is the population, a few people(intellectuals) speaking what they think, wrong or not cannot be the problem, it seems you want all of them to be right about everything.
    1
  24. How about sex? Have you seen how many views porn videos have? our society encourages all vices
    1
  25. People operate with a certain level of abstraction, we tend to pay attention to people after they die, there’s a part in the video where he didn’t want to say a part of a quotation from william james saying “bare manhood” which goes against his political leanings and makes james sounds like jordan peterson, but still this guy quotes him just omitting the part he doesn’t like
    1
  26. Ours whose?
    1
  27. No, we cannot agree, i think you’re doing what you’re accusing him of, it seems everyone that uses the word conspiracy against someone is being conspirational, the wokes are based on that, anyone who disagrees are called nazis, racists, rapists, etc. Although that’s a small generalization, i think it’s also probable that you will think i’m a fan of him, define first what is philosophy, then we can talk about it, otherwise you are just saying that he is giving his opinions based on his interpretation in a very bad and conspirational way, seriously, you’re sounding too much conspirational.
    1
  28. Read your comment again, you’ll see who seems insane…
    1
  29. Ex militar ou ex presidiário?
    1
  30. Just as much as to agree with him
    1
  31. Yeah, calling this video bullshit
    1
  32. Yeah, i saw that, that would sound more like jordan peterson kkkkk
    1
  33. And who the hell understands postmodernism? It’s something not supposed to be understood, it’s even ridiculous to compare it with quantum physics, but it’s even less understandable that quantum mechanics, it has no basis, it’s nothing, it’s everything, it’s so much freedom that it becomes a vaccuum
    1
  34. This guy too
    1
  35. Would it be moral to let 700 children die every hour if you’re poor? You’re trying to make poverty moral, like you’re good because you’re poor, and you’re poor because you want to
    1
  36. There’s not only thing he said that doesn’t make him a complete hypocrite
    1
  37. What are you talking about?
    1