Comments by "FingerPrint" (@fingerprint8479) on "'NATO Expansion' Has Never Been the True Reason for Russia to Attack Ukraine" video.

The Soviets pushed the Americans to the limit by installing missiles in Cuba but backed down to avoid a nuclear war. If American led NATO do not back down on their objective to bring Ukraine and Georgia into the alliance with the intent of militarizing both at the Russian border the resulting thermonuclear war will end life on this Planet. And, by the way, one does not need to be a Russian supporter to understand where this disaster of western foreign policy is heading!
1
When Ukraine gained its independence from the Soviet Union, they promised, written into their constitution, that they would be neutral and never try to join a military bloc to threaten Russia. They broke their commitment and are paying for their unreliability and betrayal of trust reposed in them. The Russian action is completely legitimate and Moscow will use nuclear weapons if necessary to make the Ukrainians honor their commitment! The west is naive if they believe they can move their NATO troops, military bases and offensive military hardware to Russia doorsteps with impunity. End of story!
1
The Soviets pushed the Americans to the limit by installing missiles in Cuba but backed down to avoid a nuclear war. If American led NATO do not back down on their objective to bring Ukraine and Georgia into the alliance with the intent of militarizing both at the Russian border the resulting thermonuclear war will end life on this Planet. And, by the way, one does not need to be a Russian supporter to understand where this disaster of western foreign policy is heading!
1
The Soviets pushed the Americans to the limit by installing missiles in Cuba but backed down to avoid a nuclear war. If American led NATO do not back down on their objective to bring Ukraine and Georgia into the alliance with the intent of militarizing both at the Russian border the resulting thermonuclear war will end life on this Planet. And, by the way, one does not need to be a Russian supporter to understand where this disaster of western foreign policy is heading!
1
@lordssundee7047 After 2014 Ukraine became a de facto NATO member receiving NATO training, weapons and even participating in NATO exercises in Ukrainian territory. There was no "formal" NATO bases in Ukraine but that was only lack of formality because NATO personal were already using Ukrainian military bases both for training and to coordinate the Ukrainian attacks against their own people in Dombas. Check the internet for NATO military exercises in Ukraine before the war. And even with all this investment in training, expensive western weapons and money Russians are demolishing Ukraine that is closer and closer to complete collapse. Your western sources are feeding you rubbish!
1
@lordssundee7047 Choice? Russians wanted no war. Before they Invaded the Kremlin sent letters request diplomatic negotiation to Biden and NATO and was ignored. Putin have been saying for decades that NATO coming to ukraine and bringing troops, military bases and weapons, including missiles that could reach the Kremlin in minutes was as acceptable as Soviet troops, military bases and missiles installed in Cuba and that could reach US territory in minutes was acceptable to Washington. The Soviets accepted to negotiate with JF Kennedy and war was avoided but NATO and Biden refused to negotiate and pushed the Russians to a corner and left them no choice but speak in the only dialect this people understand... And the west is "helping" Ukraine by having the Ukrainian people killed and their country and society destroyed. So sad indeed!
1
@lordssundee7047 The 3 days military operation was disrupted by Boris Johnson and a message to keep fighting from Washington not by military means. And some weapons might be old but it is in fact the best technology the west have available like glide bombs, atacms, himars, satélite and drone surveillance, Internet guided drones and the like. GPS guided artillery and the like. Not to mention latest technology european weapons. Washington is feeding rubbish information! Hahaha hahaha Russia is demolishing Ukraine with ww2 bombs with glide kits not even the latest american technology can intercept. Hahaha hahaha Comic!
1
@lordssundee7047 Wrong! Old weapons but latest western technology in most cases. Please list old weapons with obsolete technology the Russians are smashing in Ukraine. Hahaha hahaha Thanks
1
@lordssundee7047 It would have been a 3day operation, as it was unfolding in negotiations in Turkey if not for Boris Johnson's visit to Kiev with a warmonger order from Biden not to negotiate with Russia. The war profiteers could not let go such a profitable opportunity go away that easy! Result, the Ukrainian people captured on the streets and sent to die at the front and a ruined country who will inevitably loose a good part of its territory. Another human catastrophe driven by American selfishness and thirsty for geopolitical dominance!
1
@lordssundee7047 Most weapons dumped by the west in Ukraine may be old but are latest technology the west has available. Please list weapons dumped by the west with obsolete technology that are been vaporized by Moscow. Hahahaha Hahahaha... Your sources are fooling you son!
1
@lordssundee7047 By the way, it is irrelevant to talk about what weapons the sides are using, it does not matter as what really matters is the result of the fight and in that domain Ukraine is been torn apart by Moscow and although the west can provide more money, Zelensky can send this money to his bank account in Switzerland but not to the front, there you need more soldiers that Ukraine do not have and more artillery and very expensive air defenses that the west do not have or do not want to to send to an increasingly certain lost war. No one can fool reality, even with all the "help" of the west Ukraine is technically already defeated! Enjoy reality! Hahahaha Hahahaha
1
@lordssundee7047 Wrong again! The proposal discussed in Turkey included new territories gained after 2022 keeping only Russian speaking Crimea and Ukraine's neutrality. Zelensky even went on TV to say that "neutrality would not be so bad after all" and negotiations included the total retreat of Russian forces, again except for Crimea. That was until Washington shot down negotiations and ordered the comedian to keep fighting. My friend, you are not equipped for this talk, you only repeat what the media and Washington says and in that environment they will always be the good guys. Try to listen to specialists as the ones below for your own interest: Professor John Mearsheimer from Chicago University, Professor Jeffrey Sachs from Columbia University. Also Glenn Diesen professor at South Eastern University in Norway. Also Dr. Andrew Latham, professor of international relations and political theory at Macalester College in Saint Paul, Minnesota to mention just a few you can find on interviews right here.
1
@lordssundee7047 You keep repeating Washington's nonsense. Help yourself with the american scholars some listed in my previous post that will help you understand the reality of the matter.
1