Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "Chapo Asks Tulsi If She's Anti-Imperialist. She Can't Say Yes." video.

It's not a smear when it's the truth. And since when does Bernie need Tulsi's 1% in the polls?
5
Tulsi was always bad. Anybody who pays any attention to her record knows it. Those who think that only her endorsement of Bernie in 2016 matters will refuse to see it.
3
@Eyoballin The truth by definition cannot be a smear.
2
@Kickbackand Relax There's nothing anti-imperialist about Tulsi Gabbard. Her foreign policy is paleoconservative. She's against regime change wars, but she's all in favor of wars to help prop up pro-America dictators.
2
Why do you insist that telling the truth about Tulsi is "lies"?
1
Tulsi worshipers are the morons. She's literally the worst candidate for the nomination. Not even Biden is as terrible as she is.
1
"Shady" qualifying process? The only thing shady about the debate qualifying process is that donors are a consideration at all. Nobody should be able to buy their way onto the debate stage. Only candidates who poll high enough to have a legitimate shot at winning the nomination should be in the debates.
1
No, just truth.
1
@chrisroberts6089 That and because she approves of the right-wing dictatorships that are currently in place. If Tulsi simply didn't want more regime change wars, I'd be fine with that. Even if it's not on the basis of morality that she opposes those wars, she still opposes them. The problem is that she doesn't oppose wars for the purpose of supporting the existing right-wing dictatorships. When a civil war breaks out, she things that the US should send not only weapons but actual American soldiers to prop up the dictator.
1
@edwardvasquez4968 So you're tired of oppressed people rising up to overthrow dictatorships? And you think that Assad and Putin's mass murder of civilians in Syria is "crushing al-Qaeda"? Yeah, you're a Russian troll.
1
@fgsaramago I'm not talking about "aided by the US", I'm talking about people doing it on their own. Like in Tunisia .
1