Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "Nevada Democrats Screw Over Bernie Supporters  (VIDEO)" video.

  1. Fred Fredrickson What "fraudulent practices" would those be? Millions more people voting for Clinton than for Sanders is not a fraudulent practice. Turns out that drawing thousands of people in crowds doesn't decide the outcome of primaries where hundreds of thousands or millions of people vote. Pissedoff Progressive Caucuses are voter suppression. And claiming that primaries are "rigged" just because you don't like the outcome is bullshit. And you seem to be believing false reports about what the exit polls showed.
    3
  2. Ron Ryan What part of voting is decided by numbers rather than volume don't you understand?
    2
  3. It's not "screwing over Bernie supporters" by refusing to allow them to steal delegates. And trying to boo over the voice vote is not a valid vote.
    2
  4. 295Phoenix Trump is the most hated candidate from any party in history.
    2
  5. John Moran "Often winning"? More like usually losing. Most states where independents could vote, Sanders lost.
    1
  6. Calum Matheson I don't know, how do I sign up?
    1
  7. ping oh' How's that? By not handing Sanders "wins" in states where the voters say he lost?
    1
  8. Christina Bent And what exactly do you base that claim on?
    1
  9. 295Phoenix There's more like a 200% difference between Democrats and Republicans. Lunatics who think there's no difference between the parties are a joke. BTW, single-payer is not the only way to achieve universal health care. France is considered to have the best health care system in the world, and it's not single-payer. It includes private health insurance, but mandates that it be non-profit, and splits the cost between individuals and government agencies. In other words, something like what would be accomplished by further expansion of the Affordable Care Act. And the two-party "system" exists solely because there are two parties that between them get the overwhelming majority of votes. There's nothing other than voters' choices that make it that way.
    1
  10. 295Phoenix Since when does a no-fly zone require ground troops? That's right, it doesn't. Hell, immediately after making that claim you brought up Libya...where a no-fly zone involved absolutely no ground troops. And you are delusional if you think Clinton is opposed to campaign finance reform, when she's been advocating and voting for her entire political career. The wingnuts on SCOTUS simply overturned the campaign finance laws she voted for.
    1
  11. Pragmatus You're also #NeverIntelligent
    1