Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "9NEWS" channel.

  1.  @leveljoe  No, it's absolutely not constitutionally possible. It's completely forbidden by the Constitution.
    4
  2.  @UOYABAYOU  "Sabotaged" meaning that the the opposition party...actually opposed him? You MAGA types are insane.
    3
  3.  @christopherjay4500  47% is a good approval rating?
    2
  4.  @jakeplayzyt5220  That's unconstitutional because the 12th Amendment says "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." Have any of you Trump supporters ever even read the Constitution?
    2
  5.  @craig8638  Martial law wouldn't change the fact that Trump's term ends on January 20, 2029, and he can't have a 3rd term.
    1
  6.  @YOUTUBEDOESNTLIKETRUTH  No, they most certainly cannot be argued to be unlawful or illegitimate.
    1
  7.  @tymillerdaddy  That's the opposite of the lesson Trump is giving. The lesson is to never elect businessmen.
    1
  8.  @leebard9335  It takes a special kind of stupid to believe that "you can't bribe a billionaire". No one is easier to bribe than a billionaire, because the only way you get to be a billionaire is by having unlimited greed.
    1
  9.  @YOUTUBEDOESNTLIKETRUTH  How do you think billionaires become billionaires? By stealing from everyone else, that's how.
    1
  10.  @YOUTUBEDOESNTLIKETRUTH  Yes. Every billionaire did.
    1
  11.  @tymillerdaddy  No, it's Traitor Trump to me.
    1
  12.  @tymillerdaddy  And he's still a traitor.
    1
  13.  @tymillerdaddy  That's rich, given that it's Trump supporters who are guzzling the Kool-Aid.
    1
  14. @ No, he can't. The 12th Amendment prohibits anyone who's ineligible to be President from running for Vice President. Trump can't have a 3rd term. There are no loopholes to bypass the 22nd Amendment.
    1
  15. @ The MAGA cult barely even make a pretense of supporting the Constitution anymore.
    1
  16.  Alien_isolationist  Anyone who's ineligible to be President is also ineligible to be Vice President.
    1
  17.  @jot8000  No such loophole exists.
    1
  18. Resigning has no bearing on what prison time he gets.
    1
  19. @Ironworker69 Trump is the one who's on the Epstein flight logs and the Epstein island guest logs.
    1
  20.  @py120  GOP = Grope-y Old Pedophiles
    1
  21.  @georgefriedman1615  I remember exactly why the 22nd Amendment was enacted in the first place: Republicans were butthurt over losing to FDR four times in a row.
    1
  22.  @georgefriedman1615  Theodore Roosevelt actually did come back 4 years later and ran for a third term in 1912, but lost. And declining to run for reelection in 1908 was less about upholding tradition and more about keeping his word. TR had promised in 1904 that he wouldn't run again in 1908, so he didn't. Prior to that, in 1880 Ulysses S. Grant ran for a 3rd term after having been out of office for 4 years (and reputedly having strongly considered running for reelection to a 3rd term in 1876), but narrowly failed to win the Republican nomination. Similarly, Grover Cleveland ran for a 3rd term in 1896 (and his 4th bid for the presidency overall, having won in 1884, lost in 1888, and won again in 1892), but despite being the incumbent President failed to get the Democratic nomination. And Woodrow Wilson had openly intended to run for a 3rd term in 1920, but his stroke in 1919 made that impossible. Though he probably would've lost badly even if he had been able to run, given the major economic collapse in 1920.
    1
  23. @ The proposed amendment has absolutely no chance of passing.
    1