Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "The Humanist Report" channel.

  1. The majority of voters have complete amnesia about Trump's first term.
    5
  2. Gabbard is to the right of Biden, yet she still bamboozles people into thinking she's a progressive.
    4
  3. Imprison ICE.
    3
  4. There is limit to how evil Republicans are. Yes, all Republicans.
    2
  5. I'm pretty sure Bernie wasn't polling at 1% like Tulsi is.
    2
  6. Trump was visibly confused about what the question even was, and had to have it explained to him twice. And then he immediately pulls a number out of his ass of the amount of money the US has supposedly spent on food for Gaza, and claiming that no other country gave anything. That's awfully an specific lie about a subject that he didn't even know existed until the question was explained to him twice.
    2
  7. @HKZ P You're a fool if you don't believe that any Democrat would be better than Trump.
    1
  8. How can they be "cherry picking" polls when they announced before any polls were conducted which pollsters would be acceptable? Also, Gabbard is polling at 1%. It makes perfect sense for her to be excluded from the debate.
    1
  9. Why is it so hard for so many people to recognize that Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Israel's invasions of Palestine and Lebanon are both evil? Imperialism is bad regardless of which "side" is doing it. Whether it's all the two-faced American politicians who back Israel without question while condemning Russia for doing the same thing, or the self-proclaimed "anti-imperialists" who condemn America and Israel but suddenly think imperialism is cool when Russia does it, none of these idiots see the obvious contradiction in their positions. But then, it's like George Carlin said. "Think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are stupider than that."
    1
  10.  @LosFace24  What's mind boggling is progressives supporting a conservative like Gabbard.
    1
  11. Gabbard and Ojeda are both conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats.
    1
  12. @Rock'on Superdelegates are a non-issue. The reality is, Gabbard is the Republican Party's favorite Democrat, which is not something that would play well in Democratic primaries.
    1
  13. Tulsi Gabbard shouldn't even be in the House. She's got one of the most conservative voting records among Democrats.
    1
  14. In what way is she one of the better Democrats?
    1
  15.  @demi-fiendvideos9207  But she actually isn't. Her criticism of Obama on the war in Syria was that he wasn't doing enough bombing. And this very video was about her, at best, being soft on Medicare for All.
    1
  16. Who else called it that the "nonprofit health insurance provider" he worked for in Michigan was Blue Cross Blue Shield? (Most people who didn't call it probably just didn't realize it was possible for a half-trillion dollar insurance company to designated itself as a "nonprofit".)
    1
  17. Gabbard isn't a progressive. Check her voting record, it's much more conservative than Pelosi's.
    1
  18. And remember, before he was released from the NDA, Pete described Blue Cross Blue Shield as "a nonprofit health insurance provider". Which those who aren't already familiar with the corruption of the insurance industry would be shocked to learn is actually what BCBS of Michigan is registered as being, despite clearly operating on a for-profit basis. Because if you hire enough lobbyists and pay out enough legalized bribes, you can get nonprofit tax status despite making billions in profits.
    1
  19.  @rogbrogb5341  62% of Americans want "a 3rd party", but when shown any of the parties that currently exist the vast majority say "no, not that one."
    1
  20.  @rogbrogb5341  I'm referring to the fact that even though polls show a large majority of Americans "want a 3rd party", almost nobody votes for candidates in the existing 3rd parties. What it comes down to is, all of the people who'd like a 3rd major party to exist in US politics don't agree at all about what that 3rd party should stand for.
    1
  21.  @brothersandsistersofvalhalla  Having lots of political parties brings its own problems. For example, it's a major part of why the far-right is able to dominate in Israel despite not having a majority. It's why the Tories in the UK were able to get an absolute majority of seats in Parliament in 2015 despite only having 36% of the vote. And here in the US, the presence of a significant 3rd-party candidate pretty much always favors the far-right Republicans.
    1
  22.  @brothersandsistersofvalhalla  Brexit isn't the only thing that matters in the UK. If the left wasn't split into multiple parties, Corbyn could be PM right now.
    1