Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "" video.

  1. That's literally never happened. Having a child on US soil does not and never has protected the mother from being deported.
    16
  2. It's not a complicated issue at all. The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to everyone born in the United States. It couldn't be more simple.
    9
  3.  @AngelaSalatino1  It is in fact what the 14th Amendment guarantees. If you don't like it, the only legitimate way to change it is with a new amendment.
    8
  4. No, it was implemented for all persons. There's not a single mention of slaves in the 14th Amendment.
    7
  5.  @Brisco1  You're the one who deliberately pretends to not understand what it means, because you wish it meant something else. All persons means all persons.
    5
  6. Neither Europe nor Australia is bound by the US Constitution. They can do things however they please, but the United States is required to abide by its own Constitution.
    5
  7.  @commonsense6967  The 14th Amendment doesn't merely "allow" birthright citizenship, it mandates it. And I suppose you want to pretend that Canada isn't a developed country? The United States is, contrary to Trump's constant lies, not the only developed country with birthright citizenship.
    4
  8.  @angusmcpherson  And a baby born in the United States does not owe allegiance to anyone else. Whatever allegiance the mother might owe is not transferred to the child.
    3
  9. Idiotic arguments like that are exactly why no one who argues against birthright citizenship should ever be taken seriously. There is no such thing as "abuse" of birthright citizenship.
    2
  10.  @Sandy-r3t4w  No, it's not "just one interpretation". It's the only possible interpretation. Those who claim that it refers to freed slaves are simply lying.
    1
  11.  @commonsense6967  Everything you said is false.
    1
  12.  @R0NIN_1987  There's nothing to "fix". It was always meant to apply to everyone born in America.
    1
  13.  @R0NIN_1987  If it was meant to apply only to the children of slaves, it would've said so. Instead, it says "all persons". The actual text of the amendment is what matters, not trying to read tea leaves about what the writers of the amendment had in mind.
    1
  14.  @R0NIN_1987  It's not a loophole. And Republicans are the ones have zero credibility.
    1
  15.  @TuckerFromKentucky  Not "all the world's people", MAGAt. Just the people in the United States.
    1