Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "Co2 Levels Hit Three Million Year High - What Does It Mean? (w/ Dr. Michael Mann)" video.

  1. Yes, the hockey stick graph that's been proven entirely accurate, no matter how many oil and coal-funded propagandists say otherwise.
    2
  2.  @roberthicks1612  You also have the not-so-rare ability to think you understand what you're reading when you actually don't.
    1
  3. Maybe "trees will love you" if you increase the CO2 level to 1600 ppm. But humans won't, because we'll be extinct. 1600 ppm would result in temperatures too hot for human life.
    1
  4. There's no such thing as climate alarmism.
    1
  5.  @Hulkenbreak  TG&D. Ratcliffe might not be a potted plant, but he's as dumb as one.
    1
  6. 3 million years ago was before humans existed. Humans have never lived with CO2 levels this high before. And as a result, we're on pace to hit the highest global average temperatures humans have ever experienced within 30 years, and potentially much sooner. The issue isn't whether Earth will survive the higher temperatures. Of course it will. Earth will still exist for about 7 billion years, until an expanding sun in its red giant phase consumes it. The issue with global warming is whether Earth will remain suitable for human life over the next century.
    1
  7. Why are temperatures falling? There's a really simple answer to that: they're not.
    1
  8.  @touchtoomuch1000  You do realize that "super heated mantle plumes" are not what's melting the ice, don't you? Oh, I suppose you don't realize that.
    1
  9. The models in fact have been right.
    1
  10. When exactly was CO2 approaching 150 ppm?
    1
  11. ​ @tangobayus  Back in the Cretaceous Era, temperatures also would've been too hot for human life. And you're also ignoring the fact that the sun has gotten hotter over the 145 million years between the start of the Cretaceous and the modern era. It no longer requires 1000 ppm of CO2 for Earth to get too hot for human life, because there's more heat coming in to be trapped by it in the first place.
    1
  12.  @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869  People living there does not make the cyclones more powerful.
    1
  13. You mean the heat wave of 1936 that only existed in parts of the United States, constituting less than 1% of Earth?
    1
  14. Actually, the the elites don't specifically "want" climate change. They simply don't care because of their greed. They know their money and power will allow them to insulate themselves from the repercussions for a while, and expect to be dead of old age before that ceases to be the case.
    1
  15. That's one of the favorite lies of the global warming denial crowd.
    1
  16. Global warming denial is what's all junk science.
    1
  17.  @roberthicks1612  There absolutely are already climate refugees.
    1
  18.  @roberthicks1612  Given that the climate change we're experiencing is man-made, you're wrong as usual. Quit lying.
    1
  19.  @roberthicks1612  Just because you ignore the proof that it's man-made doesn't make that proof go away.
    1
  20.  @roberthicks1612  Can't ignore what doesn't exist.
    1
  21.  @roberthicks1612  It's been firmly established for over a century that increased CO2 levels mean increased heat retention. That's a basic physical property of CO2. We also know that the increased CO2 levels are the result of humans burning fossil fuels, because we can study the different carbon isotopes found in the CO2. The CO2 that comes from burning oil, coal, and natural gas contains fewer carbon-13 atoms than the CO2 that occurs naturally in the atmosphere.
    1
  22.  @roberthicks1612  You see, that's the problem. You think you can just refute the facts by lying.
    1
  23.  @roberthicks1612  You don't have facts, you have fact-free assertions. The stratosphere has not cooled, and Antarctica was not covered in ice 40 million years ago. 34 million years ago was when the glaciation of Antarctica began.
    1
  24.  @roberthicks1612  There aren't. You're simply repeating the lies that you've been told.
    1
  25. No, it's absolutely not a natural cycle that we're experiencing right now.
    1
  26.  @roberthicks1612  No, the fact is that self-described "climate skeptics" never display even the tiniest bit of skepticism. You're knee-jerk scoffers at the actual science, while blindly believing any psuedoscientific alternative explanations. Even mutually contradictory alternative explanations.
    1
  27.  @roberthicks1612  No, the fact is that global warming denial is what's based on falsified data and fake scientific procedures. And a healthy dose of projection.
    1
  28.  @roberthicks1612  And again you lie. The FACTS prove that CO2 has always been a key factor in climate.
    1
  29.  @nomorewar4189  Water vapor levels aren't increasing. CO2 levels are. Idiot.
    1
  30.  @nomorewar4189  CO2 is CO2, regardless of what source it's coming from. The atmosphere doesn't care where the CO2 came from. It has the same effects on climate either way. And the current increase in CO2 is being driven by human activity.
    1
  31.  @nomorewar4189  And when Earth gets too hot to support human life, I suppose you'll enjoy that too.
    1
  32.  @nomorewar4189  The sun has gotten significantly hotter since then, so it doesn't take anywhere near that much CO2 to make Earth too hot anymore. And we're not talking about what's good for "life" in general, we're talking about what's good for human life. All of us are humans in this conversation, so one would think that you'd be interested in that.
    1
  33.  @nomorewar4189  Ironically, you're the one being bamboozled by a scam to believe that.
    1