Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "Trump Supports Kyle Rittenhouse, Because of Course He Does" video.

  1. There isn't a shred of "evidence that he did nothing wrong".
    1
  2.  @petarmiletic997  No he didn't. Don't believe every lie the right-wingers on Twitter and various fake news blogs tell you about Rittenhouse's victims being "convicted felons".
    1
  3.  @otisjacksonjunior9795  Bullshit. He was lying his ass off when he claimed it was his "job" to protect a business in Kenosha. It would be illegal hire a minor as an armed security guard anyway.
    1
  4.  @WAEVOICE  Something he had no legal right to do. He "volunteered" to murder protesters, something he'd openly fantasized about doing for months in advance.
    1
  5. Trump's reasons for supporting Rittenhouse are complete and utter bullshit. How was was Rittenhouse being aggressive? By aiming his rifle at unarmed protesters, that's how. And backing up while still pointing a rifle at people is not the same thing as "running away". The reason people were trying to take the rifle away from is that there's no way to subdue an active shooter while letting him keep his gun.
    1
  6.  @georgewahogo7568  How do you "keep a safe distance" from a person with a rifle? An AR-15 has an effective range over around 300 yards. It kind of takes a while to get that far away from a shooter, and you can't outrun a bullet. And they had no reason to think he would stop shooting if they fled from him.
    1
  7. No, "most people" don't feel like this is self-defense. Only Trump cultists feel that way. Also, the assertion that the people he shot were felons is a lie. Only one of them had a felony conviction. Apparently that guy was convicted of sexual contact with a minor. But he was 18 himself at the time, and apparently the conviction was for having sex with a 16 year old girl. In many states, there's an exception to statutory rape for cases with such small age difference, but in Arizona there isn't. The other guy killed and the guy who was wounded have misdemeanor convictions, not felonies.
    1
  8.  @WAEVOICE  Doesn't change the fact that Rittenhouse was the actual aggressor all three times. They were trying to defend themselves against him.
    1
  9. It is illegal to cross state lines for the purpose of committing a crime. Dumbfuck.
    1
  10.  @tommystudmuffin  He was charged with 1st degree murder and attempted murder.
    1
  11.  @voooduvooodu6032  What's sick is that you right-wing lunatics claim he was defending himself.
    1
  12.  @voooduvooodu6032  Crossing state lines to cause violence and destruction is precisely what Kyle Rittenhouse did.
    1
  13.  @PolarBearSushi  No it's not. It's illegal for minors to to open carry in WI, except for the purpose of hunting. And no, hunting humans does not count.
    1
  14.  @PolarBearSushi  Only for the purpose of hunting.
    1
  15.  @voooduvooodu6032  He was there to kill, and he did. He was the rioter.
    1
  16.  @worsethanjoerogan8061  They weren't felons, moron. Don't believe everything somebody tells you on Twitter.
    1
  17.  Spliffer45  No, those are FAKE "police reports" and "court documents" that Twitter trolls have been circulating.
    1