Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "Russian Intel Planted Entire Seth Rich Conspiracy (Which Fox Fell For)" video.

  1.  @Antman4656  Jimmy Dore is the Alex Jones of the left.
    10
  2. Also, somehow Hillary Clinton has this squad of assassins who can make anybody "disappear", but only uses them to kill random people who are tangentially linked to her at best, rather than killing her actual enemies and political rivals.
    4
  3.  @mattheww797  The police never investigated the murder? Complete and utter nonsense. And no, Seth Rich did not leak anything to Wikileaks or to anything else. And Hillary's private email server is completely irrelevant to this. Her private email server was not the DNC email server. Those are separate things. And Seth Rich didn't have any access to either of those servers. Meaning it would be impossible for him to have leaked anything to Wikileaks even if he had been inclined to do so. Which there's absolutely no evidence he was inclined to do.
    3
  4. The reason those people (like Donald Trump) didn't say anything about Epstein's criminality is that Epstein knows all about their criminality.
    2
  5. Assange insists that Wikileaks will always protect the confidentiality of their sources. So whenever he hints at a leaker's identity, he's clearly lying. At best, this would be to misdirect away from the actual source. More likely, in the case of Seth Rich it was to keep a conspiracy theory alive.
    2
  6.  @thierry1026  If Hillary was having people assassinated to clear her path to power, why didn't her assassins kill Trump or Comey? Or even Anthony Weiner?
    2
  7. There's nothing strange about the circumstances, though. Crime is a major problem in DC, with a murder happening every 2-3 days. And what do you mean by "the police didn't persuade the investigation"?
    1
  8.  @thierry1026  The idea that Seth Rich was somehow a "threat" to any "elites" is nonsensical, though.
    1
  9.  @mroctober3583  Seth Rich wasn't their source. Quit spreading lies.
    1
  10. There is not a shred of evidence of Seth Rich leaking any information. And if the Clintons are having people killed, why wouldn't they have offed the likes of Anthony Wiener?
    1
  11.  E Fox  The fact that Assange was hinting so hard that Seth Rich was the source should be seen as evidence that he was not the source. Especially since Rich had no access whatsoever to DNC email servers.
    1
  12.  E Fox  So are you seriously trying to claim that any old staffer would have access to the servers?
    1
  13.  E Fox  You don't seem to grasp the essential factor here: Assange is a liar. When a known liar says something, the most logical conclusion is that they're lying. And Rich's job was developing an app to help new voters register and find find polling stations. Why would that give him access to the email servers?
    1
  14. If the Clintons have the ability to assassinate their enemies, why are none of their enemies dead?
    1
  15. It's an absolute certainty that Seth Rich wasn't the source of the DNC email leaks. He had no access to the DNC servers. And Jimmy Dore is a kook. He's the Alex Jones of the left, presuming he's even actually on the left at all at this point and not pulling a Dave Rubin.
    1
  16.  @mccollumparkfarmersmarket7836  Where do you get the idea that his murder was never investigated?
    1
  17. Julian Assange, who's a known Russian asset.
    1