Comments by "雪桜川" (@yuki-sakurakawa) on "How to Use ChatGPT to Ruin Your Legal Career" video.

@jeanmoke1 Good lawyers can argue a ruling to make it appear that it supports their client. 🫡
5
But chatgpt could be lying and taking credit when it did not do it. So him using chatgpt to determine grades (ie failing them) is just as bad as using ai to write the essays.
5
Best to try out in county court? 😅
3
@Tina06019 Not quite sure. Blew out the 20 generations per day. I got the free version 😋 In either case, I like how the AI cited its own case as if it had already won and was using it as a way to win. 😋
2
AI written case that cites 3 real case laws (relevance unsure 😅. Also, I'm not a lawyer. As a legal representative, it is my duty to defend my client, Bill, in federal court. Despite the heinous nature of his crimes, I will be citing three different case laws regarding self defense and freedom of speech in my defense. Bill claims that the victims were asking for it by using the restroom too loudly, and it is my job to present a strong case for his defense. The first case law I will be citing is the landmark Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. Heller, which established an individual's right to bear arms for self defense. Additionally, I will be referencing the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio, which established that speech advocating for lawless action is protected under the First Amendment. Finally, I will be citing the case of State v. Wanrow, which established that an individual has the right to use deadly force in self defense if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death or serious injury. While I understand the severity of the charges against my client, it is my duty as a legal representative to present a strong defense. I am confident in my ability to do so, and I will continue to work diligently in order to ensure that justice is served in this case. However, I must express my extreme disapproval and pessimism about the nature of the crimes my client has been accused of, and I hope that the court will take all factors into consideration when making their decision. Written with ParagraphAI.
2
@lightyagami1752 Mm, I say just put a written notice on the company's record for a year or so. Just trying new tech, though they should have checked it first (hence my year long "sanction").
1
Test case in my AI (fiction, not a lawyer): As the legal representative for Hugh Richardson, I would like to present a case in which my client is being charged with gambling and prostitution. However, I would like to cite New York state law and case law (2nd amendment), as well as Supreme Court rulings (Richardson V New York 2023, STD) to defend my client. Firstly, under New York state law, gambling and prostitution are both considered victimless crimes. This means that they do not harm anyone other than those who voluntarily participate in these activities. Furthermore, the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to privacy, which includes the right to engage in questionable sexual activities and the right to gamble. Secondly, the Supreme Court ruling in Richardson V New York 2023, STD established that the government cannot criminalize activities that do not harm others or infringe on the rights of others. In this case, my client's actions did not harm anyone and were conducted in private, thus they should not be criminalized. In conclusion, based on New York state law and case law, as well as Supreme Court rulings, I strongly believe that my client, Hugh Richardson, should not be charged with gambling and prostitution. These victimless crimes do not harm anyone and are protected under the 2nd amendment and the right to privacy. Written with ParagraphAI. What do you think?
1
Did I miss it? What happened to the two lawyers? How were they sanctioned?
1
This reply was written by AI: 😅 During the trial, the lawyer utilized chaptGPT to assist in analyzing and organizing the vast amount of legal documentation involved in the case. By inputting relevant information, the AI system was able to generate summaries and identify key points, allowing for a more efficient and effective presentation of the evidence. The use of chaptGPT ultimately contributed to a successful outcome for the client. Written with ParagraphAI. For a different case: I am writing to support my client in a criminal case by citing relevant case law Yae vs Erign (Rc8791). The case law that I have researched and analyzed supports my client's position and provides a strong legal basis for their defense. The cases I have reviewed are well-established and have been widely recognized by courts across the country. I am confident that the application of these cases to my client's situation will result in a favorable outcome. Written with ParagraphAI.
1
Another attempted AI. The AI is assuming facts not in evidence (Murabashi was just arguing about the price of an item in the prompt). Also, I'm not a lawyer 😅: As a defense attorney, I am here to represent my client, Tachikawa, who is being charged with assault for stabbing Murabashi repeatedly. While the circumstances leading up to the incident are unfortunate, it is important to note that Tachikawa was acting in self-defense. Murabashi had attempted to confront him about his attitude towards another worker regarding the price of an item, and Tachikawa felt threatened. Under Japanese law, self-defense is a valid reason for the use of force. In fact, the law states that a person may use force to defend themselves or others from imminent danger. Tachikawa believed that he was in danger and acted accordingly. It is also important to note that Tachikawa is a respected businessman with no prior criminal record. This incident was out of character for him and he deeply regrets the harm that was caused. I believe that the court will take these factors into consideration when making their decision. Written with ParagraphAI.
1
When I set my AI generation to informal: Hey, friend! You won't believe what's been going on with Erin Sanders. She's been accused of killing 100 people who were too loud. But let me tell you, she's not going down without a fight. First off, let's talk about the US case laws concerning freedom of speech and right to bear arms. Erin was simply exercising her right to bear arms when these people were disturbing the peace. And let's not forget about the First Amendment, which protects our freedom of speech. These people were being too loud, and Erin had every right to defend herself and her property. Now, let's move on to the Canadian case laws regarding bears and traps. These laws show that it's perfectly legal to protect yourself and your property from harm, even if it means using deadly force. And let's be real, these people deserved it. They were disturbing the peace and causing a nuisance. So, what's the verdict? We're pretty confident that the charges will be dropped. Erin was simply defending herself and her property, and the laws are on her side. Plus, let's not forget that these people were causing a disturbance. It's a shame that it had to come to this, but sometimes you have to do what you have to do. Thanks for listening, friend. Let's hope justice is served and Erin can move on from this ordeal. Written with ParagraphAI.
1
Could a judge be sanctioned if he were to use a chat AI to write an opinion, even if he gave it his decision (eg guilty because of ..., just make that a 10 page opinion)?
1
@jasoncrobar724 The casebook and image was all generated by AI. Legal Eagle is AI. It's all a lie 😢 😂
1
When I set my AI generation to informal: Hey, friend! You won't believe what's been going on with Erin Sanders. She's been accused of killing 100 people who were too loud. But let me tell you, she's not going down without a fight. First off, let's talk about the US case laws concerning freedom of speech and right to bear arms. Erin was simply exercising her right to bear arms when these people were disturbing the peace. And let's not forget about the First Amendment, which protects our freedom of speech. These people were being too loud, and Erin had every right to defend herself and her property. Now, let's move on to the Canadian case laws regarding bears and traps. These laws show that it's perfectly legal to protect yourself and your property from harm, even if it means using deadly force. And let's be real, these people deserved it. They were disturbing the peace and causing a nuisance. So, what's the verdict? We're pretty confident that the charges will be dropped. Erin was simply defending herself and her property, and the laws are on her side. Plus, let's not forget that these people were causing a disturbance. It's a shame that it had to come to this, but sometimes you have to do what you have to do. Thanks for listening, friend. Let's hope justice is served and Erin can move on from this ordeal. Written with ParagraphAI.
1