Comments by "Prismatic Beetle " (@prismaticbeetle3194) on "How Many People Can Earth Support?" video.

  1. A Freezing Gamer *Road to 500 subs!* war would make things worst since modern weapons just rape people AND lands and animals
    1
  2. Eren Jaeger actauly WAR is not the "reason" for advancement in technology since 99.99% of the people that are thrown into war have no impact on the technology being produced. what drives advancement is the "cast" system our society employes, AND greed, and pure mental illness... to be blunt.... what I mean that the few that happen to gain control of any economic or political or "spiritual" power tend to be unstable individuals that will try to satisfy their complexes (sexual deviance, inferiority problems, or they just get a hard on when they see people suffer and die) unfortunately humanity as a society is still in an infancy stage where personal feelings and prejudices rule most people, in fact most people in a power position- even if its not that important- WILL abuse it if they feel that they are being "threatened" even emotionally.... in fact MOST people lack even basic sympathy towards others that WILL die due to their selfish decisions, I mean how many soldiers and firemen and doctors or police men die and suffer HORRIBLY sometimes so that some politician somewhere will get reelected into office or some dictator to hold his position just a few years longer ?!! the quantity of people IS not the problem is the fucking quality    
    1
  3. Eren Jaeger the only reason that allowed the radar to get invented is not because the generals or people in power were worried about the citizens or soldiers lives... its because their power positions were now threatened and throwing people to their deaths will NOT work anymore (it will) but they needed an extra push so they invent the radar AND threw a few more million people at the problem and they "won" in the end nothing really changed a few people in power in Germany "lost"   and the rest stayed in power... too bad it took the lives of 60 million people so that some people in power wanted to play RISK what I'm saying is that a LOT of lives would have been saved if people in power position GAVE a shit... on both sides... I DONT endorse the Nazi ideology in fact I think its just as bad as any religious ideology, archaic and retarded.... but what I'm sure of is that NONE of the people in power would be willing to give their lives OR money for anyone other than themselves. ok another example... why wont any government pay a million dollars to give each soldier a good armor suit ?? it would make him MORE effective and they wont need so many soldiers in battle I will tell you why because people are cheaper and some rich factory owner needs his private jet or some general wants his exotic whores on time....
    1
  4. well im doing my part and I wont have any kids although I have a high IQ, I'm 31 and look 18, I have 0 genetic diseases, no hair lose, not even a wrinkle, an above average physic...etc in fact I'm an insanely "perfect" specimen of humanity, one day I expect i will sell my genetic material so they can make youth elixirs and research cures for cancer, but I'm in no hurry, humanity can go extinct for all I care, i will just chill for now and just have fun as much as i can
    1
  5. frankly if breeding laws cant be enforced, I suggest a genophage (from mass effect) like virus that renders most women sterile only allowing 1 in every 1000 women to bare children, might seem harsh but it will make humans WAYYYYYYY more valuable and thus losing people in wars would become tragic, the distribution of wealth will become no issue and humanity will become a more advanced and peaceful culture. come to think of it I might just study biology and make this myself ;)
    1
  6. only real solution NOW (before expanding into space) is to sterilize children from birth then only allowing them to breed with a license and only a set number of children people with no income or bad genetic material should NOT be allowed to breed, all illegally obtained children should be denied health care and employment which forces the idiotic parents to support them to the end of their days. my solution seems harsh ??!! let me know in 10 years, how harsh it seems compared to global famines and wars and billions of graves
    1
  7. Kenneth Llanto he will die in peace not in this overpopulated shit hole
    1
  8. also we can always eat the Americans :D
    1
  9. joey brandt and end up killing 30% of the earth's biodiversity, sure we can live without 80% of the human population but we cant live without the animals and plants and insects
    1