Youtube comments of MusicfromMarrs (@MusicfromMarrs).

  1. 2000
  2. 1100
  3. 473
  4. 342
  5. 285
  6. 280
  7. 229
  8. 208
  9. 185
  10. 181
  11. 162
  12. 145
  13. 138
  14. 135
  15. 123
  16. 119
  17. 117
  18. 117
  19. 116
  20. 111
  21. 106
  22. 104
  23. 104
  24. 104
  25. 101
  26. 99
  27. 97
  28. 94
  29. 90
  30. 88
  31. 83
  32. 80
  33. 80
  34. 79
  35. 75
  36. 73
  37. 73
  38. I like Gladwell, but this notion that violent protests are a problem is part of the problem. 97% of the protests have been peaceful. Of the 3% that have been violent, much of the violence was stoked by either those outside the movement of the police themselves. No matter how freakishly peaceful a protest is, what sells in the media is talking about broken windows, burning buildings, and personal injuries or death. BTW, the FBI doesn’t classify vandalism as violence, but most of society does. MLK’s marches were indeed disciplined and carried out as peaceful. However, there were plenty of law enforcement and outside agitation that created a few truly horrendous experiences at protests. Who got dinged in the press during the Civil Rights movement? MLK, SNCC, and the like. We in the IS need to stop looking at the Civil Rights movement through rose colored glasses, damnit. We have to look at what actually transpired vs. how it was perceived at the time. Only them will we see the parallels to more recent protests. The best we in the side of reform can do is to do our best to control and contribute to the narrative. And the Civil Rights era was a big step, but it didn’t solve racial or economic injustices. It did grant black people the right to vote, and made certain things illegal, but those were baby steps. We are STILL fighting the outrageous treatment of the BIPOC community at the hands of police and other ne’er do wells. We are still fighting to correct economic disparities that are sewn into our society. We are still fighting for rights for all women to have equal footing with all men. This cannot be achieved without inconveniencing those in power and pulling back the curtain to expose thee injustices.
    71
  39. 69
  40. 69
  41. 69
  42. 65
  43. 64
  44. 63
  45. 63
  46. 60
  47. 60
  48. 55
  49. 53
  50. 53
  51. 52
  52. 52
  53. 51
  54. 49
  55. 49
  56. 46
  57. 46
  58. 46
  59. 43
  60. 43
  61. 43
  62. 43
  63. 43
  64. 42
  65. 42
  66. 42
  67. 41
  68. 40
  69. 40
  70. 40
  71. 40
  72. 39
  73. 39
  74. 37
  75. 37
  76. 37
  77. 37
  78. 36
  79. 35
  80. 34
  81. 34
  82. 34
  83. 33
  84. 33
  85. 32
  86. 32
  87. 32
  88. 32
  89. 32
  90. 31
  91. 31
  92. 31
  93. 30
  94. 30
  95. 30
  96. 29
  97. 29
  98. 29
  99. 29
  100. 29
  101. 28
  102. 28
  103. 28
  104. 28
  105. 28
  106. 27
  107. 27
  108. 27
  109. 27
  110. 26
  111. 26
  112. 24
  113. 24
  114. 24
  115. 23
  116. 23
  117. 23
  118. 23
  119. 23
  120. 23
  121. 23
  122. 23
  123. 23
  124. 23
  125. 23
  126. 22
  127. 22
  128. 22
  129. 22
  130. 22
  131. 22
  132. 22
  133. 22
  134. 22
  135. 21
  136. 21
  137. 21
  138. 21
  139. 21
  140. 21
  141. 20
  142. Bon bagay, Rebecca for being able to make things work. I teach on the college level, and often wonder how my students who don’t get a big job - or simply a full time job with benefits - will manage in todays world. Student loan payments, insurance plus medical costs, rent that is the same or even more than a mortgage payment, etc. I had the good fortune to teach in Haïti in person then again via Zoom during Covid, and I’m mildly familiar with some of the struggles Haïtians gave, and how so many want to come to the US. I’d love to bring a few into my studio, but my institution wants them to have a bunch of $$$$$ in the bank before they come up here. It’s infuriating, because I know that means we’ll miss out on some talent (a colleague is going to give me some suggestions based on what she’s done to bring them in). So that you’ve graduated, are working, and finding your way across the US’s inhumane health care system is an achievement. Certain people love to talk about American exceptionalism. The US exceptionalism is that this country is centered around money (cue verbiage from Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged about how layering U over S creates the dollar sign. Gag) Thanks to the men for giving Rebecca the floor. You all have been with each other for a long time, and sometimes forget that a newbie isn’t going to rush into a layered “discussion,” and in particular, the woman and/or guest on your show gets talked over. This was a really great segment, and it was super important to hear everything Rebecca had to contribute.
    20
  143. 20
  144. 20
  145. 20
  146. 20
  147. 20
  148. 20
  149. 20
  150. 19
  151. 19
  152. 19
  153. 19
  154. 19
  155. 19
  156. 19
  157. 19
  158. 18
  159. 18
  160. 18
  161. 18
  162. 18
  163. 18
  164. All this does is confirm my thoughts since I calmed down from the debate. I’m glad AOC made a special time to discuss this, instead of in the middle of an interview. People absolutely need to listen to what she has to say (George Clooney). There are polls that put Biden ahead. There are polls with better, more incisive questions that put Biden and his agenda ahead. Biden has held many more events than Trump since the debate, getting stronger with each one - until he got Covid again. What does the media say? Biden debate bad, people want to replace him - practically on loop. There’s barely a sentence on Trump’s lies and Projection 2025. This would be why there are a fair amount of polls placing Trump higher. Reverse this trend and I’d wager that Biden’s numbers would go up. Trump lies. Constantly. He’s a racist. He’ll put Project 2025 in his cabinet; Oi; Boebert thinks she can be secretary of the Interior! Biden has actually managed to help the working class, inflation is low, and get this: this economy is managing to work for more than wealthy people now. This is what clearing student debt can do. This is what supporting unions does. Biden has also discussed clearing medical debt in his next term. This is what needs to be out loud and proud. This is what will get all polls going again. Biden has the incumbent advantage; help him run with it. He can step down mid term and let Kamala take the reins. If we lose to Trump, we are super screwed. I don’t know many wealthy straight white male Christian’s who follow this channel; they’ll be okay. The rest of us are screwed if we keep propping lip a narrative that allows the left to eat its own.
    18
  165. 18
  166. 18
  167. 18
  168. 18
  169. 18
  170. 18
  171. 17
  172. 17
  173. 17
  174. 17
  175. 17
  176. 17
  177. 17
  178. 17
  179. 17
  180. 17
  181. 17
  182. 16
  183. 16
  184. 16
  185. 16
  186. 16
  187. 16
  188. 16
  189. 16
  190. 15
  191. 15
  192. 15
  193. 15
  194. 15
  195. 15
  196. 15
  197. 15
  198. 15
  199. 15
  200. 15
  201. 15
  202. 15
  203. 15
  204. 14
  205. 14
  206. 14
  207. 14
  208. 14
  209. 14
  210. 14
  211. 14
  212. 13
  213. 13
  214. 13
  215. 13
  216. 13
  217. 13
  218. 13
  219. 13
  220. 13
  221. 13
  222. 13
  223. 13
  224. 13
  225. 13
  226. 13
  227. 13
  228. 13
  229. 12
  230. 12
  231. 12
  232. 12
  233. 12
  234. 12
  235. 12
  236. 12
  237. 12
  238. 12
  239. 12
  240. 11
  241. 11
  242. 11
  243. 11
  244. 11
  245. 11
  246. 11
  247. 11
  248. 11
  249. 11
  250. 11
  251. 11
  252. 11
  253. 11
  254. 11
  255. 11
  256. 11
  257. 11
  258. 11
  259. 11
  260. 11
  261. 11
  262. 10
  263. 10
  264. 10
  265. 10
  266. 10
  267. 10
  268. 10
  269. 10
  270. 10
  271. 10
  272. 10
  273. 10
  274. 10
  275. 10
  276. 10
  277. 10
  278. 10
  279. 10
  280. 10
  281. 10
  282. 10
  283. 10
  284. 9
  285. 9
  286. 9
  287. 9
  288. 9
  289. 9
  290. 9
  291. 9
  292. 9
  293. 9
  294. 9
  295. 9
  296. 9
  297. 9
  298. 9
  299. 9
  300. 9
  301. 9
  302. 9
  303. 9
  304. 9
  305. 9
  306. 9
  307. 9
  308. 9
  309. 9
  310. 9
  311. 9
  312. 9
  313. 9
  314. 9
  315. 9
  316. 9
  317. 9
  318. 9
  319. 9
  320. I do share your concern about Biden not taking a stand, David - especially in light of current polling. My sense of uncle Joe’s politics is different, though. 1st, I completely agree that Biden should’ve put the screws to both Manchin and Sinema; that would’ve made a big difference in getting his campaign promise policies passed. At issue is that any time Biden makes an executive order, it gets a court challenge, and SCOTUS will likely strike any of this down. Obviously, this part of my discussion has nothing to do with Israel and Palestine; I’ll get to that. I do think Biden is truly pro-union, and he’s worked more publicly in advancing union causes. Behind the scenes, he’s been canceling goo gobs of student debt, which has made a huge difference for any college graduates and the economy. I sense that privately, Biden wants a ceasefire. The closest he has come has been to compare the current atrocities to what the US did in the Middle East and how that is terrible. More recently, he’s been stating that Israel is losing support, even as the US voted against the ceasefire measure - which is only taking a stand; UN resolutions aren’t binding. So there’s the world we want and the one that is. My sense is that Biden wants to prevent Russian support for and influence with Israel, as Putin would gladly fill the void if the US severs ties. He’s playing both sides of the fence publicly due to power of foreign policy, and to fend off another world war. It truly sucks, because thousands of Palestinians are dying or are maimed as I type. Morally, we shouldn’t support Israel, but will pulling away stop this tragedy? I see Biden as needling Israel as much as he can to get them to stop. IF there were a viable alternative to Biden, I’d be all about it, but there isn’t. As much as I’d rather vote for someone than against, Biden is the better alternative to Trump; he’s also a better alternative than Haley or DeeSantis. It’s infuriating. On the plus side, the push for a ceasefire from so many younger folks signals to me that times are changing. It’s slow and painful, but if we can keep authoritarians out of office, we’ll see change in the next generation.
    9
  321. 9
  322. 9
  323. 9
  324. 9
  325. 9
  326. 9
  327. 8
  328. 8
  329. 8
  330. 8
  331. 8
  332. 8
  333. 8
  334. 8
  335. 8
  336. For those of you who think Yang is the leader we need, keep in mind these ideas he offered in an interview in May 2020: «er he suggested automating the jobs of fast-food workers, who would be embroiled in a local push for unionization just months later. And during a show in June 2019, he said the Democratic Party “needs to try and gravitate away from identity politics,” calling it a “stupid way to try and win elections,” » And January 2021: «He also did not rule out charging city workers more toward their health care premiums in a policy questionnaire POLITICO sent to the mayoral candidates in January. “I am not inclined to balance our budget in this way, although I do understand that this is one of many options on the table,” » April 2021 «By most standards, he does tack more moderate. He wants to grow some parts of the NYPD. He seeks corporate partners like JetBlue. And he discourages higher taxes on the wealthy. “If you raise taxes at a level where people actually vote with their feet and also head to Florida, then you’re not serving the policy’s goal, which is generating revenue for the state or the city,” he told the pro-business Association for a Better New York.» In addition, though, and to keep context «At the same time, he proposes dropping tax breaks for the likes of Madison Square Garden and adopting NYPD reforms like a civilian commissioner and a city residency requirement in hiring. “So you would have hundreds of off-duty officers walking around, which I think would actually improve the atmosphere and sense of public safety,” he said at the Met Council mayoral forum.»
    8
  337. 8
  338. 8
  339. 8
  340. 8
  341. 8
  342. 8
  343. 8
  344. 8
  345. 8
  346. 8
  347. 8
  348. 8
  349. 8
  350. 8
  351. 8
  352. 8
  353. 8
  354. 8
  355. 8
  356. 8
  357. 8
  358. 8
  359. 8
  360. 8
  361. 8
  362. 8
  363. 8
  364. 7
  365. 7
  366. 7
  367. 7
  368. 7
  369. 7
  370. 7
  371. 7
  372. 7
  373. 7
  374. 7
  375. 7
  376. 7
  377. 7
  378. 7
  379. 7
  380. 7
  381. 7
  382. 7
  383. 7
  384. 7
  385. 7
  386. 7
  387. 7
  388. 7
  389. 7
  390. 7
  391. 7
  392. 7
  393. 7
  394. 7
  395. 7
  396. 7
  397. 7
  398. 7
  399. 7
  400. 7
  401. 7
  402. 7
  403. 7
  404. 7
  405. 7
  406. 7
  407. 7
  408. 7
  409. 7
  410. 7
  411. 7
  412. 7
  413. 7
  414. 7
  415. 7
  416. 7
  417. 7
  418. 7
  419. 7
  420. 7
  421. 6
  422. 6
  423. 6
  424. 6
  425. 6
  426. 6
  427. 6
  428. 6
  429. 6
  430. 6
  431. 6
  432. 6
  433. 6
  434. 6
  435. 6
  436. 6
  437. 6
  438. 6
  439. 6
  440. 6
  441. 6
  442. 6
  443. 6
  444. 6
  445. 6
  446. 6
  447. 6
  448. 6
  449. 6
  450. 6
  451. 6
  452. 6
  453. 6
  454. 6
  455. 6
  456. 6
  457. 6
  458. 6
  459. 6
  460. 6
  461. 6
  462. 6
  463. 6
  464. 6
  465. 6
  466. 6
  467. 6
  468. 6
  469. 6
  470. 6
  471. 6
  472. 6
  473. 6
  474. 6
  475. 6
  476. 5
  477. 5
  478. 5
  479. 5
  480. 5
  481. 5
  482. 5
  483. 5
  484. 5
  485. 5
  486. 5
  487. 5
  488. 5
  489. 5
  490. 5
  491. 5
  492. 5
  493. 5
  494. 5
  495. 5
  496. 5
  497. 5
  498. 5
  499. 5
  500. 5
  501. 5
  502. 5
  503. 5
  504. 5
  505. 5
  506. 5
  507. 5
  508. 5
  509. 5
  510. 5
  511. 5
  512. 5
  513. 5
  514. 5
  515. 5
  516. 5
  517. 5
  518. 5
  519. 5
  520. 5
  521. 5
  522. 5
  523. 5
  524. 5
  525. 5
  526. 5
  527. 5
  528. 5
  529. 5
  530. 5
  531. 5
  532. 5
  533. 5
  534. 5
  535. 5
  536. 5
  537. 5
  538. 5
  539. 5
  540. 5
  541. 5
  542. 5
  543. 5
  544. 5
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 4
  557. 4
  558. 4
  559. 4
  560. 4
  561. 4
  562. 4
  563. 4
  564. 4
  565. 4
  566. 4
  567. 4
  568. 4
  569. 4
  570. 4
  571. 4
  572. 4
  573. 4
  574. 4
  575. 4
  576. 4
  577. It's so good to learn of Michael Santos and the successes he has had - and was allowed to have. Education systems in prison used to be much more common, but during the Reagan era, many came out against this, because why could prison inmate receive a college education "for free"* while they had to pay? This shut down most - if not all - college education in prisons. Following this, the US prison incarceration grew while European and Scandinavian incarceration systems started to decline, in great part due to adding education programs and other anti-recidivism programs. If Santos's legacy could be that of returning education on all levels to prisons, much progress could be made. *for free - those on the outside complained that their tax dollars were going to educate prisoners. There are so many issues with this - 1) why could US tax dollars not also go to education on all levels for those not in prison?, 2) many of those who end up in prison simply didn't have the right lawyer/defense, compared to those who had plenty of money to spend on a lawyer, thus 3) not everyone in prison should have even been there. Observing countries with genuine anti-recidivism practices (education, job training, meditation, participatory arts programs, etc.), we can see that those countries have fewer people in prison, and prisons are shut down and re-purposed. While the US is in the middle of a constitutional crisis, it's unlikely that great ideas like this will be implemented, but it's definitely another good cause to add for the Dems in their own Project 2025+. Starting to feel like I'm rambling; gonna check out.
    4
  578. 4
  579. 4
  580. 4
  581. 4
  582. 4
  583. 4
  584. 4
  585. 4
  586. 4
  587. 4
  588. 4
  589. 4
  590. 4
  591. 4
  592. Classical musician here. 1st, thanks for this LOL segment. 2nd, my general response is that while music - and in particular, Classical music - lags behind other forms of artistic expression in STYLE, the content it addresses is contemporary. Why does style lag? Because unlike visual art, literature, and plays, music is experienced sonically, and unless you play a recording on repeat, once the performance done, that’s it; you move on to the next thing. A person can stare at a painting for as long as they wish (until the gallery closes) or read and re-read written art over and over. Those who know the codes - audio and notated music - advance the style is music, but we are in the minority. Next, music obviously does not exist in a vacuum. The only classical musicians I know who aren’t aware of, or avoid music in pop culture are the conservative ones. Such composers might make more bank than their better versed peers while alive, but the music that stays in the repertoire is revolutionary in some way. Back to JS Bach, he was constantly growing as an artist. He held various positions - either for nobles or for churches - throughout his career. As an innovator, he did butt heads with his employers; he was even jailed by one, and famously composed lute suites during his time behind bars. JS B was also a dapper ladies man in his younger years and knew all the latest dance steps (thus the music that went with said dances) and got onto a duel with a man, calling his opponent a “nanny goat bassoonist” (today’s equivalent would be “douche who can’t play your way out of a paper bag.” So whatever on the pushback. Composers like Bach, Berlioz, Beethoven, Mozart, Hayden, Mr. and Mrs. Schumann, Stravinsky, etc. all pushed boundaries. Pop music in general is designed to catch the ear of youth and if it pisses off the older generations, so much the better.
    4
  593. 4
  594. 4
  595. 4
  596. 4
  597. 4
  598. 4
  599. 4
  600. 4
  601. 4
  602. 4
  603. 4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. 4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. Well, at least Khan says these examples she's giving are extremes. This was an odd look at relationships. Bringing up hunter gatherer lore for support of an opinion on relationships? Really? The better anthropology gets, the more evidence of women hunting and men gathering becomes. On divorces, the best I can offer is that it's wise to get a pre-up these days. Some "family"/divorce lawyers are not so much about family, but they are about the Benjamins! On things like porn and sexual freedom, I think a shift in thinking is needed. I'm not sure why you feel that this takes away courage Mark. What porn typically does is self-medicate for depression, and it takes away the development of relationship skills when there are 2 parties involved in any kind of relationship - whether friendship or romantic. In terms of sex prior to marriage, we should be FOR this. Prior to the sexual revolution, so many women got married in order to have sex, as the taboo of pre-marital sex seemed to apply only to women. A woman who wanted to have sex with her boyfriend needed to marry in order to be OK in societal terms. This resulted in a lot of mis-matched personalities and thank goodness for divorce. Sadly, many women used to stay - and currently stay - in unhappy and unhealthy relationships because they could not survive economically as a single mother. Both partners in a relationship need the option to be able to work if they wish; this is the kind of thing to discuss ahead of time, as the 2 get to know each other intimately - and intimately not in a sexual way. If you're using your partner in any way in a relationship, please get out of the relationship and get into therapy. Should relationships not be a partnership? Both contribute to each other, and both support each other. Eeesh. I would never go to this therapist, and am grateful that the 2 therapists that I have worked with have been much more skilled and aware.
    4
  611. 4
  612. Interesting discussion. I had seen the picture of Jon Stewart at the desk, but didn’t exactly investigate. Thanks for being the source that gave me the information. I will say that I’m stunned that you never got into Trevor Noah. As someone born on the cusp of baby boomer and generation X, I really liked both Jon Stewart and Trevor Noah. if you were looking for someone to be just like Jon Stewart, you’re never ever ever going to find that. If you’re looking for somebody to be just like Trevor Noah, you’re never ever going to find that either. Both were engaged in their own way. What Trevor did was bring a lot of white to black and brown people who are movers and shakers like nobody else’s business. For that, I am eternally grateful. Trevor Noah is an incredible interviewer - better than any other host, including Jon Stewart. I know that Trevor read every book before he interviewed somebody. His interview skills are some of the best in the business. Was he going to do a coot-off or was he going to do Fox News comparison like Jon Stewart? Probably not. Why? Because he’s not Jon Stewart. He was a great host. I’m sorry you didn’t like him. that being said, I think that it will be nice to have a new host for the Daly show. I’m sorry it’s not Roy Wood Junior. Roy definitely deserved it. I do think that ratings will go back up. I also think that ratings will never be the same as before all the streaming series Services took over. I watched Jon Stewart Apple TV series on YouTube. In fact, that’s pretty much how I watch anything on TV now. don’t have a TV that works, and I don’t have cable TV package. It’s not necessary anymore. So good luck to John. It will be great to have him back on. I hope this comment is readable, because I did this verbally.
    4
  613. 4
  614. 4
  615. 4
  616. 4
  617. 4
  618. 4
  619. 4
  620. 4
  621. 4
  622. 4
  623. 4
  624. 4
  625. 4
  626. 4
  627.  @bobabooey69420  if you merely say the 2 allegations, both actions of course sound horrible. The night club: they were featuring strippers, and such “adult” entertainment was illegal in Braddock if it was within 300 feet of a school, daycare, church, or community center. The day before the vandalism, Club Elegant had received a warning from the BPD to end stripper shows, but the club continued. Mayor Fetterman knew he’d be on camera, and changed the sign from open to closed. This is his style, and you may not care for it, but it’s not racist. The club eventually complied with the law, but didn’t take care or its property. It was closed down in 2021 for a sewage leak. The chasing down of a jogger is more problematic, but you can’t prove it was racist. When Fetterman took over as mayor of Braddock, there was a problem with gun violence there. He heard what sounded like gunshots in his neighborhood and took an unloaded shotgun with him in his truck, and noticed a jogger. Since it was cold, the jogger was completely clothed with hoodie over his head, so Fetterman didn’t know the man’s race until he had stopped the guy. He called the cops and found out the man was unarmed. In terms of pointing the weapon or not, at this point it’s he said/he said. I’ll admit I think this was a bit much with trying to help his community from gun violence, but this isn’t evidence of racism. So Fetterman is a diamond in the rough kind of guy. His style is very much on par with Pittsburgh. His track record as mayor of Braddock and as Lt. Gov. of Pennsylvania is strong and shows him to be a supporter of the average citizens of PA in general and Braddock in particular. Unlike a charlatan who can’t be bothered to edit a video to get the name of a local grocery store right.
    4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. 4
  640. 4
  641. 4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. Clark’s story is incredibly engaging. I thought I might do dishes and a story and instead just listened to it straight through. I know he said that he had nothing good in his life, but fortunately, he had a supportive mom and brother (unsure on dad in later years), and even managed to gave a house in dark times. Certainly living with such abuse, kept as a dark secret is a horrible way to live. I’m so glad that he found his way out, and that his therapist is a top notch therapy. I also hope those prisoners who were in group therapy with him have found their way in the uncaged world. One thing stuck out, and it was s straight telling of s story, so I don’t know if Clark goes into greater depth in his book. When he discussed how the world - in general - thinks of drug addicts as degenerates and such, the dialogue conveys that addicts include all kinds. What I’m hoping the book says is that every addiction has s back story. Every homeless person, addict, even abuser (noted at the start of the interview) has a past that put them where they are. My hope is that with people like Mark featuring the SWU, society - or at least an influential part of it - will direct a culture shift in the US. We have the means to become nurturing and caring for all those in need - be it food, shelter, therapy, physical care - we have it! It’s where we choose to direct our resources. It’s worth the time, effort, and expense to focus on care of all kinds and education, with less emphasis on wars (known and secret) profit margins.
    4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 4
  677. 4
  678. 4
  679. 4
  680. 4
  681. 4
  682. 4
  683. 4
  684. 4
  685. 4
  686. 4
  687. 4
  688. 4
  689. 4
  690. 4
  691. 4
  692. 4
  693. 4
  694. 4
  695. 4
  696. 4
  697. 4
  698. 4
  699. 4
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. 3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869. 3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883. 3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. 3
  890. 3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894. 3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. 3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. Here’s where I agree with you: we shouldn’t literally or metaphorically toss a wrong doer in a cell and throw away the key; there’s always hope for redemption and restitution. I also don’t put Louis CK or Al Franken in the same boat as Weinstein or Cosby. That doesn’t mean CK or Franken shouldn’t suffer some consequences for abusing their power. Franken’s photo op groping (not the original accusation, the political campaign photo gropes) were bad - not as bad as rape - but bad and un-called for, and they were the abuses of someone in power. He undermined a lot of good done as a senator with dickish behavior. Franken has enough money to survive without being in the public eye, and he can certainly do a lot of good from where he currently sits. Louie CK’s masturbation captive exhibitions were definitely worse than Franken’s butt groping, but also not as bad as sexual assaults carried out by someone like Harvey Weinstein. CK does not get a pass; he should definitely suffer consequences. The man was very influential with the careers of a lot of comics; his stage career should absolutely take a hit in exchange for his very dickish behavior. He - like Franken - has plenty of $$$$$$$$ to live on, so he doesn’t need to be on stage to feed his family. CK is back on stage to feed his ego. His return to the stage is literally too soon. CK should be in therapy and at home concentrating on raising his kids to behave like good humans - better than he behaved. He, like Franken, has the option of doing real good in a low key fashion, if he so wishes. For those who are convicted of crimes but don’t have the financial wherewithal of someone like CK, they need to serve their sentence, and yes, they need to opportunity to do honest work after serving time. They may not be OK to work with children or in health care, but they should be allowed to reintegrate into society by the right to work so they can pay their bills. But someone with financial comfort can take several steps back - or, maybe they can do some simple work (although this probably wouldn’t work with famous people). CK May be in the middle ground of assaults, but that doesn’t mean his consequences for his actions should be trifling.
    2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. I've definitely been closely watching these 2 rounds of elections for a number of reasons. I have some friends over there - 2 who are ex-pats and new French citizens, some native Parisians, and a former student who would likely be kicked out of France if the far right came to power. In addition, I plan to spend time on sabbatical observing some teaching next spring, and I'd like to feel good about traveling to and within France.On the plus side, the food's gonna be awesome no matter what. For the ex-pats, one of them posted this a week ago: Regarding the French elections round 1 last Sunday - the far right won more parliamentary seats than any other single group, which is disturbing, but not as large a vote share as predicted. US voters may think of “majority” as something different. France is a multi-party system, 66% of votes did not go to the far right. Here were the biggest vote shares: •34% RN rassemblement national (“national rally” )* far right •28% National Front (left) •20% Macron’s centrist/slightly left party •10% Far left •Others making up the rest So 66% of votes did not go far right. And apparently the RN by itself got “only” 30%, a much lower vote share than expected by many. The 34% is with alliances they were able to make. Markets rallied on the news, in fact, that the far right did not win a greater majority - because like in the US, anti immigrant policies are, amongst other problems, an economic disaster. This was round 1 to see which candidates are going forward to round 2 which is a week from round 1, this Sunday July 7. Every not-far-right party will now be discussing how to take vote share from the RN next round by eliminating less successful candidates out of the running for round 2. It appears - so far - that RN will not have the absolute majority they seek, and we certainly need to hope so, and we need people to VOTE and vote to stop the RN.
    2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. Arizona's 1864 law Check out the history of the gynotician who created this law for the Arizona territory: William Claude Jones - itinerant politician looking for more powerful political positions, eventually moved to the territory of Arizona to create the law. See when he just kept moving west. Now let's learn about his wives: 1. Sarah Freeman - bore Jones (in his 30s and 40s) 2 children; she filed for divorce around the time that President Pierce names Jones Attorney General of the territory of New Mexico. 2. name believed to be Maria v. del Refugio (wow - there's a modern pun in there). NM's delegate to DC decried the marriage, saying that Maria was 12 years old, and that Jones had abducted her. EEWW Otero petitioned Pres. Buchanan to fire Jones for moral failing; Jones resigned and headed for the territory of Arizona, and supported the secession of the southern states. 3. Caroline Stephens, 15 years old; Jones was now around the age of 50. EEEEWWWWWW This marriage lasted 1 year, when Jones left her and ghosted her. Jones hopped a train, then a boat for Hawaii. 4. MaeMae Kailihau - was impregnated by Jones at the age of 14. Jones married her and they had several children until she died at the ripe old age of 28. Keeping track? Jones is now in his mid-late 60s. 5. Mary Akina - age unknown. I'm not sure I want to know at this point. They were divorced 2 years later. Soon after, jones did us all a solid and died on the island of Maui. Anyhoo, it was in the years of wives 2 and 3 - 1864 - that Jones was speaker of the AZ territory legislature and he got them to pass a law stating <<Every person who shall administer or shall cause to be administered or taken, any medical substances, or shall use or cause to be used any instruments whatever, with the intention to procure the miscarriage of any woman then being of child, and shall be thereof duly convicted, shall be punished by imprisonment in the Territorial prison for a term not less than two years nor more than 5 years.>> Men like Jones pass laws like this. That should tell us all something. Iowa is on the precipice of joining AZ with its 6-week abortion ban; the IA supreme has until June 30th to finish hearing arguments and make its decision. Iowa is already in a situation with not enough doctors per capita (what a turn of phrase), and gynecologists are no exception. We're going to lose gynecologists in Iowa; woman will lose access to essential healthcare. Girls and women will die and suffer other medical complications if the 6-week abortion ban is codified into law, because the gynecologists who stay in this state will be hamstrung to provide essential care to girls and women - often until it is too late.
    1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. Catherine, you’re a talented, intelligent human being. What I hear from this interview is that you have taken on burdens that were the responsibility of the adults in your life. Your parents were neglectful. You weren’t responsible for the cop reaming out your mom; she was responsible for that. What you wore had nothing to do with the attention and sexual assault adult men gave and did to you. They are/were pedophiles and sexual assaulters; your attire had nothing to do with their horrible behavior. Think about your friend’s uncle who raped you and your other friend during sleepovers. He couldn’t have known what you were wearing before he took you out of the bedroom. Ugh; I feel terrible for these experiences you endured and angry that all of these men got away with their acts.. As an adult, I just don’t get what is sexual about a child, but I know society has a nasty way of sexualizing children, which is a point you raised toward the end of the interview. I think of the story of how Lady Godiva rode naked on a horse and it was scandalous; the story hints that she was the scandalous one, at least in the telling I got. No - she wasn’t a scamp or doing something scandalous. Godiva was making a point: she could wear and do what she damn well pleased, without BS from men or others. Good for you for being present with your children! As age appropriate, I hope you educate them about the world: no place is 100% safe, but you’ll always be there for them. Best wishes on your successes online and your return back to your clothing line. You are on a good path to finding your way. Take care of your family - starting with you. Model nurturing yourself so your children know what self respect and self love are. You will build a strong family foundation.
    1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. It's important at this time to remember that Fox Noise commentators detest Trump and his minions, yesterday are happy to keep telling lies on their major cable network, all in the name of money. Laura Ingraham called Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell "a bit nuts." Gretchen Carlson (no longer with the network), who famously demanded evidence from Sidney Powell on the air, privately used a vulgar epithet for women to describe her. "Dominion has mischaracterized the record, cherry-picked quotes stripped of key context, and spilled considerable ink on facts that are irrelevant under black-letter principles of defamation law," a Fox News spokesperson said. Off the air, the network's stars, producers and executives expressed contempt for those same conspiracies, calling them "mind-blowingly nuts," "totally off the rails" and "completely bs" — often in far earthier terms. On Jan. 5, 2021, the day before Congress was to ceremonially affirm Biden's win, and an angry pro-Trump mob sacked the U.S. Capitol to prevent it, Rupert Murdoch forwarded a suggestion to Fox News CEO Scott. He recommended that the Fox prime time stars — Carlson, Hannity and Ingraham — acknowledge Trump's loss. "Would go a long way to stop the Trump myth that the election was stolen," he wrote. They did not do so. "We need to be careful about using the shows and pissing off the viewers," Scott said to a colleague. From NPR in 2023 <<A top network programming executive wrote privately that he did not believe the shows of Carlson, Hannity and Jeanine Pirro were credible sources of news... "It's remarkable how weak ratings make ... good journalists do bad things," Bill Sammon, at the time the network's Washington managing editor, privately wrote on Dec. 2, 2020. Network executives above him stewed over the hit to Fox News' brand among its viewers. >>
    1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. Well, at this point in time, yes, Harris-Walz needs the Republicans who at least have the air of wanting a peaceful transfer of power. Back in August, Harris didn't need this. She had the youth vote; she had energy, and she picked a very successful, stand-up guy and progressive candidate in Tim Walz. The left and the youth vote gave Harris a huge boost in the polls. Energy started waning with the courting of Republicans, and the fact they Harris-Walz didn't allow a Palestinian speaker at the convention, even when given a very moderate tone short speech, really stalled the energy and the numbers coming out for the Democrats. Don't get me wrong; Trump-Vance would be much worse on the war actions in the Middle East, but if you want to go away from authoritarians, supporting a genocidal regime isn't the way to go. To be clear: I am not talking about the Israeli citizens; I'm talking about the ultra right cabinet and Netanyahu, along with the IDF. They have shown that it's not just enough to retaliate, but they are committing war crimes daily. This is why there are disaffected voters, who are trying to decide if their voice counts in this election. Additionally, people like Pence, Cheney, Kinzinger - sure, they realize the dangers of Trump, but they also voted for all of the legislation he pushed vis à vis the Heritage Foundation. They are not for climate actions; they are for tax cuts for the rich and opposed to bills like the Green New Deal. While I have no problem praising them for holding up democracy and taking the moral stand that ended their legislative careers, I will not be happy if any of these people are in the HarrisWalz administration, in a position of affecting policy decisions. This is more true for those who have lost their enthusiasm for this initially stellar ticket. So, yes, Harris-Walz needs these endorsements now, because they need to make up for lost ground. I very much hope they win in November, because the US will be in a world of hurt if it's Trump-Vance.
    1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. On the one hand, it’s so good to hear Obama speak. Still, there are things that bother me, and I wish interviewers would press him on at least 2 things. 1. Occupy Wall Street along with the Arab Spring and 2. Work he can do post-POTUS life. OWS/Arab Spring: Obama and HRC both decried the violence against protesters in the Middle East, and both were silent regarding the violence exacted on OWS protesters. Interviewers - even or especially the friendly ones - need to ask how badly did members of the Obama administration want to keep the status quo that they wouldn’t support IWS? Post presidency and influence on the world: I appreciate that the gig is exhausting, and 8 years of actually doing the job of president would wear a person down. Okay, Obama, you’ve had 4 years to review. You still have influence in the country and around the world. Sure, you’ve started some leadership organizations; this is good. How about taking up a cause of real change? Ex: work to end gerrymandering, or do for healthcare what Biden did for gay marriage. You ran on M4all in 2008, then let your get outbargained into Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. Start whispering sweet nothings sbout the benefits of single payer to uncle Joe, damnit. You know the arguments; Theresa greater push in the population now. Do this, or something on that level. You have many years ahead of you. Look at Carter, who’s still building houses, has a foundation that has helped medical scientists eradicate horrible diseases and conditions(ex: guiney worm disease). Yes, you CAN do all this. And maybe apologize to OWS as you continue support for BLM.
    1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. I respect You Chris, but I believe you’re off the mark with Defund the Police. The only problem I have with Defund the Police is that slogans by nature need to be short and catchy, so this particular one leaves out a lot of information and this makes it too easy to criticize. 1. First off, yes, there are those who would like to completely abolish the police, and while I understand their position, that’s not what Defund the Police is about. I also am aware that Scientology puts the clamp down on reporting crimes to the police, and that LA and Clearwater police departments are pretty much in compliance with Scientology, so reporting does little there except get the person who files a report lots more auditing. Those who want to completely defund the police are in the minority. 2. Defund the Police is about reallocating funds that go to PDs to organizations that are better equipped to handle a good amount of police calls. Someone acting crazy on the street or a domestic abuse call is better handlers by a social worker than badges with deadly weapons. Right now, we’re asking police to be so many things with about a year of training, and we know there is plenty of racial bias and the excuse of “I was in fear for my life” that allows them to kill people with little-no consequences. We need money allocated for those who have 4 + years of training to diffuse situations, keep people alive, and get them the help they need. 3. Our PDs are militarized. This is not necessary, and again, encourages more shoot now/ask questions later scenarios. Defund the Police calls for demilitarization of the police. The only advantage can see to having PDs having SWAT and military equipment is that they are currently donating this equipment to Ukrainians, who actually need it. Let’s hope ever police department donates this stuff to Ukraine. “Defund” here sort of means “refund” but not exactly. We do need better - not more, but smarter/better training for law enforcement to work to genuinely eliminate bias and trigger pullers. We should be firing all those bad apples and banning them from working in law enforcement and security agencies all kinds; hire anew. PDs should reform and reconnect with communities to better protect and serve, which includes better protection and service to those who are in cults and need help.
    1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041.  @daveistrading  it’s not either or; both and is the important deal. There were estimated 3775 slave owners of color during that blight in colonial and US history. This is out of 12.5 million Africans transported to the colonies and later, the states, not to mention the millions that were then born into slavery. There were 393,975 slave owners. Let’s say that this figure is for all, so subtract 3775 and that’s 390,200 white slave owners. This is where both and helps provide perspective. Let’s add in that initially, all slaves could buy their way into freedom, and that’s where we got non-white slavers. Unfortunately, free blacks were often sold back into slavery - whether they were slave owners or not. The rarer white slave/indentured servant who bought their way out to freedom was not captured and sold back in, because the default hunger was black - enslaved vs. white - free. Let’s take another turn: the percentage of slave owners to non in the white world was 1.6% in slave states. At issue was that non-slavers who were white in these states still supported the institution of slavery, getting sucked into the absurd notion that someday they, too, would be wealthy enough to own slaves. So this was as much of an economic BS situation as it was one of thinking those with darker skin deserved to be in bondage. Thinking one type of human is better than another type of human is folly - a folly that leads to disastrous outcomes. Denying that race played a part because there were exceptions to the rule is part of that folly in the realm of slavery in North America.
    1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060.  @patchwurk6652  I can’t find anything on Ben or his sister Abby’s musical studies, so I don’t know when he started violin or which pedagogy methods his teacher(s) used. If it were the Suzuki method, he would’ve begun playing by ear, just as children learn languages. Then there would be a transition into reading from the printed page as he worked up the levels. For most Americans, we learn en masse in a classroom, and learning to read music is part of the lesson plans. In that sense, yeah, Ben is full of BS if he’s claiming reading music - especially something as easy as the theme to Schindler’s List (it’s still a beautiful melody; it’s just not that difficult to learn) - is a sign of higher intelligence. Sure, learning music or any craft contributes to one’s intellect and - we hope! - creativity, but reading music isn’t rocket science. Okay, if you have a condition such as dyslexia, it’s much more challenging, but that’s not up for discussion here. I feel I need to defend Abby. She has a beautiful mezzo-soprano voice! I will say the 1st video of hers I watched was the Star Spangled Banner, and she should’ve chose a key a 4th or 5th down as a better fit for her voice range, but she sings well. Her video choices for YouTube are weird; they don’t really match the repertoire (ex: the Habañera from Bizet’s Carmen), but she does fine in that arena. Singing show timings may not be the best use for her voice, either, as I don’t think she changes style that well. Is her voice suited for a large hall? Not really detectable on YouTube, but maybe not, so she makes bank writing conservative screeds. But people who decry her singing ability probably aren’t classical musicians.
    1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125.  @BayIen.Dupree  not quite. His 1st wife - Mimi Rogers - was his 1st auditor; she got him into Scientology. When he fell in love with Nicole Kidman, the "church" of scientology found a way to split up the Cruise-Rogers marriage. Mimi was 2nd generation scientology (her parents were in it) and extricated herself from the cult not long after that. Then Kidman was slowly pulling Tom away from the COS, so Scientology stepped in and convinced Tom to serve her divorce papers. Scientology then auditioned women to by his next girlfriend/wife. Nazanin Boniadi - then a Scientologist - won the audition (she didn't know what she was interviewing for!), but that relationship fizzled when she had a migraine while the couple was visiting Tom's best buddy , Scientology Chairman ion the Board (COB) David Miscavige. After Nazanin got out of the rehabilitation project force (RPF - basically a hard labor re-education camp), she high-tailed it out of Scientology. Then scientology helped get Tom and Katie Holmes together. Katie - like Nicole - found benefit in the early Scientology courses ( a lot of people say the communications course is good, who knows?), but when she saw the writing on the wall with Nicole being disconnected from her kids and the bulls4!+ with the Sea Organization, she masterminded an escape when Tom left to go on set out of the US. So you're close - but it's more that the women realized that it was Scientology itself that's bat-s4!+ crazy; Tom Cruise wasn't completely brainwashed until all of the auditing and security checking (sec-checking) post-Nicole. He is connected to at least 4 women getting the hell out of this destructive cult, though. sorry for the long post; I've been deep-diving scientology for over a year now. It's fascinating and disgusting all in one fell swoop.
    1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181.  @lindahester5113  Here are the actual facts, and it's kind of a 2-fer, because Miller repeated some of the lies spewed by Pam Bondi, which I'll start with: 1. No court ever determined or decided that Abrego-Garcia was a member of MS-13. The reason he left El Salvador as a teenager was because MS-13 was extorting his family for money - the father paid the gang so that they would NOT take Kilmar Abrego-Garcia into the gang. Eventually the family was running out of resources, so they found a way to get him up to a relative's home in Maryland. 2. While Abrego-Garcia was technically subject to deportation, because he stated his claim for asylum a year past the deadline, the judge handling the case granted a whitholding of removal, which shows that the judge was prohibiting immigration authorities from deporting Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The pressure in 2019 was to deport Abrego-Garcia to Guatemala - because who knows why. Judge Jones's statement: "The Respondent’s application for asylum is time-barred without exception. However, he has established past persecution based on a protected ground, and the presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution. DHS has not shown there are changed circumstances in Guatemala that would result in the Respondent’s life not being threatened, or that internal relocation is possible and reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, the Respondent’s application for withholding under the Act is granted. Finally, his CAT claim fails because he has not shown that he would suffer torture."
    1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. I appreciate hearing from Malcolm Nance, who is to be respected in all things intelligence. I do feel the need both to amplify some off the notions brought up in this video as well as to counter some of the claims made. Let me clear up front: I am against Hamas and their actions on Oct. 7th. I do support the Israeli people. By contrast, I do not support Benjamin Netanyahu, and am not really a fan of the IDF. Why? Let's forget about decades of back and forth and who's in the right or not. Let's talk about Oct 6th: a UN report cam out that the IDF had killed more Palestinian children in 2023 than any other year. Let's talk about the numbers that we have since Oct. 7th: total of civilians killed by the IDF is 34,535 with 77,704 wounded (Reuters, April 30th). 70% are women and minors; 97 are journalists, and over 224 were humanitarian workers. Do we have an entity that can keep track of numbers in GAs any more? Or will we need to guess?   Yes, the IDF has succeeded in killing Hamas leadership, and it's good to have some numbers; thank you, Malcolm. But those numbers above? THIS is what 99% of protesters are protesting.. I don't know what news programs the 2 of you watch, but I do know that most mass media has had stories focusing on those not engaged int he protests, but coming in from the outside, and from what Malcolm said, some protesters who don't know why they're there. the protesters want the US two stop being complicit by supplying the IDF with arms. They are protesting on college campuses to get their universities to divest from supporting defense for the IDF. This won't stop Israel, but at least the US won't be complicit. Do note that the protests include Jewish students - and teachers, if you're keeping up with the professor who was slammed to the ground by police brought on campus to break up the encampments. The anti-semitism is coming from individual students not involved in the protests. I will note here that there are a minority of members in Jewish Voices for peace who have been sucked into the notion of blood libel and being against the Israeli diaspora in general - which is terrible, but again: the minority. These students aren't watching FOX News or OANN - those networks are all about supporting Bibi; they're seeing the carnage on the internet. They've seen the number of innocent casualties rise steadily since Oct. 7th. They've noted that Netanyahu instructed Gazans to move to Rafah to be safe, but now are targeting Rafah. This is a massive rope-a-dope by the IDF and it's aimed at killing Gazans - and the IDF seems very unconcerned with "collateral damage." All we have to do is bring up the bombing of the World Central Kitchen trucks - clearly marked - and how nobody is talking about this any more to illustrate blatant disregard for those in the area who are not Hamas. Netanyahu is gonna do Netanyahu things - yes, he is; we agree. The US does not need to be complicit. Contrast this with Israel is a democracy - OK, in name, but it's currently being run by a dictator. Now let's compare to Russia vs. Ukraine. I very much support Ukraine in their defense against Putin - who is gonna do Putin things no matter what. The Russian people are divided, and many are being impressed into the military - to fight in the Russian army. It's a mess. A lot of Russians hate this, and are simply trying to survive, but hell yeah, there are Russians who believe Putin's propaganda. I see the same in Israel.  Netanyahu is Putin with a more effective military force. Again: I support Israeli citizens and I support Gaza civilians; I do not support Netanyahu, the IDF, nor do I support Hamas. If you have no problem with my criticisms of Russia, where I don't make pains to separate people frothier government, ask yourself WHY. Neither of you mentioned B'Tselem, so I will. This group is steadfast in opposition to Netanyahu's policies. They are in the minority, but their voices and messaging is clear and clean: they are standing up for human rights. I appreciate the info that Ukraine doesn't recruit under the age of 24 - 1st, I think this is great. 2nd, note that Ukraine is pressuring Ukrainian expat men to come back and fright - whether they want to or not. Some people aren't cut out for combat, so this recent pressure on those not in Ukraine concerns me. I truly hope that the weaponry finally being sent to Ukraine will give them what they need without having to resort to impressing those who are citizens but living abroad. I'm sure that Malcolm Nance is aware of The U.S. Army/Marine Corps counterinsurgency field manual : U.S. Army field manual no. 3-24 : Marine Corps warfighting publication no. 3-33.5. For those aren't please google it, bookmark it, and read it.
    1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. Check out the history of the gynotician who created this law for the Arizona territory: William Claude Jones - itinerant politician looking for more powerful political positions, eventually moved to the territory of Arizona to create the law. He eventually just kept moving west. Now let's learn about his wives: 1. Sarah Freeman - bore Jones in his 30s and 40s) 2 children; she filed for divorce around the time that President Pierce names Jones Attorney General of the territory of New Mexico. 2. name believed to be Maria v. del Refugio (wow - there's a modern pun in there). NM's delegate to DC decried the marriage, saying that Maria was 12 years old, and that Jones had abducted her. EEWW Otero petitioned Pres. Buchanan to fire Jones for moral failing; Jones resigned and headed for the territory of Arizona, and supported the secession of the southern states. 3. Caroline Stephens, 15 years old; Jones was now around the age of 50. EEEEWWWWWW This marriage lasted 1 year, when Jones left her and ghosted her. jones hopp[ed a train, then a boat for Hawaii. 4. MaeMae Kailihau - was impregnated by Jones at the age of 14. Jones married her and they had several children until she died at the ripe old age of 28. Keeping track? Jones is now in his mid-late 60s. 5. Mary Akina - age unknown. I'm not sure I want to know at this point. They were divorced 2 years later. Soon after, jones did us all a solid and died on the island of Maui. Anyhoo, it was in the years of wives 2 and 3 - 1864 - that jones was speaker of the AZ territory legislature and he got them to pass a law stating <<Every person who shall administer or shall cause to be administered or taken, any medical substances, or shall use or cause to be used any instruments whatever, with the intention to procure the miscarriage of any woman then being of child, and shall be thereof duly convicted, shall be punished by imprisonment in the Territorial prison for a term not less than two years nor more than 5 years.>> Men like Jones pass laws like this. That should tell us all something.
    1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. Shapiro needs to stay in his lane! That’s the nicest thing I can say about his dumb rant. Ugh! Culture war rants are the whack-a-mole of “political” discourse. People either shut down or get tired of certain ridiculous BS, then it shows up elsewhere. Most classical flutists love Lizzo, myself included. Pre-pandemic, there was a petition to book her for the Dallas National Flute Convention, which was cancelled in person and moved online in 2020. I have seen a few flutists find a way to decry this moment, along the attire line or other racist, classist, misogynist references. It’s gross. Shapiro brought up Lizzo’s weight. Anyone who hasn’t seen Trevor Noah’s interview with Lizzo a few years back needs to stop what they’re doing and YouTube it. It’s great. Self love is important, y’all. She also discusses her classical training in that interview. But I digress. At the LOC, Lizzo played the same flute on which Jean-Pierre Rampal premiered the Poulenc Sonata. Lizzo played the opening of that piece at the LOC. FYI, Rampal might’ve been relatively thin at the premiere, but from the 1980s til the end of his life, he was portly-rotund. He loved food and wine after his gigs, ya know? So screw Shapiro. The crystal flute was gifted to Madison by the maker Laurent, yet Madison left it on display, never playing it. Dolly saved it from going down with the White House during the British bombardment in 1814. So anyone playing it would be historic! I love that it was a black woman, since James Madison was an enslaver. Lizzo was already in DC for her concert, contacted the curator - also a black woman - and made arrangements to visit the Dayton C. Miller collection. All of this is a net positive for flutists everywhere. Poor poor Shapiro. He just can’t stand that a black woman has made being a band nerd cool. A black woman from Texas, no less. Bye, Benlisha.
    1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. That God made Trump clip is soooo reminiscent of Scientology promos about L Ron Hubbard. Oof! I’ve been deep diving destructive cults in general and Scientology in particular for over a year now - in part to understand cult 45, and also because the subject is fascinating. The subject is also horrifying, and we’ve seen potential results of such a destructive cult from 3 years ago today at the US Capitol. More on this in a minute. The Howard Stern clip: just a reminder that Howard did some deep soul searching and therapy and he’s not in the same world now. Trump, on the other hand, has dug himself deeper into the sociopathy and narcissism. That people are still attracted to Trump in any way - sex, charisma, politics - is still so very difficult for me to wrap my head around, BUT here we are. On Melania: I vacillate on whether she’s just like the Donald, has Stockholm Syndrome, or is truly abused and under extreme coercive control with Trump. This is what the destructive cult deep dive has done to my view of Melania. That recorded phone call with Melania and her friend/assistant over Christmas decorations makes her sound totally in on the grift. Then again, go over to SP-TV on YouTube, and you’ll find Scientology survivors who will tell stories on themselves and their behavior when they were stuck in the cult - whether they were (still) true believers or just trying to survive until they could plot a viable escape. All of them have the equivalent or more of that phone call. From the coercive control/destructive cult lens, I see Melania as brought into the US with lots of legal help from Donald, hence the Einstein/genius visa. Melania was in prime birthing age range to give Trump another kid, and she could use her situation to bring her parents to the US (have you noticed how her dad dresses just like Trump?). I don’t think Melania is dumb - although not a genius - and bet she got plenty for herself in the renegotiated pre-nup. She probably had to sign an NDA regarding Donald in the event they divorce, so society will probably stay divided on was she a victim or a fellow grifter. Maybe Barron will have some sense and give us the story in his adult years.
    1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. This particular thread is amusing to me, but not really in a good way. There are many posts that seem to think the past was the good old days for marriages. Not really. Yes, there definitely were good marriages, but if you study this, they weren’t the norm. Many were truly transactional - keeping money in the family, or making sure the woman “married well.” Women often stayed in abusive relationships because they didn’t feel they could do without their husband financially, and the abuse also had them in a mindset that they weren’t good enough on their own. In addition, we know that abusive behavior tends to pass down through generations. Next, consider those who are LGBTQ - this is not a new thing; it’s been around for centuries. Or consider those who fell in love with those of another race. Those who coupled up outside the norm were often outcast at best. Yes, we need to better educate our children about building relationships; this means relationships with friends as much as it does potential mates. We also need to educate our children about sex. The former tends to fall by the wayside because standardized testing and getting into college are front and center in education; the latter is part of the culture war controversy and often just doesn’t happen. People can make some terrible mistakes in order to learn about this. The hope is that we foster growth throughout people's lives so they can not only stay away from unhealthy relationships, but enjoy healthy ones.
    1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. The last time Biden was leading Trump in the polls was September. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in October and continued for months that would've taken Biden down in the polls? What could it be? For those who aren't sure: GAZA. Many people lost faith in Biden over his support of Netanyahu and the IDF's walloping of Gaza. Yes, Hamas killed around 1139 Oct. 7th (Israel’s revised total back in November, down from 1405), and took 253 hostages, 240 remain. It should be no surprise to anyone that Israel would defend itself. Also note that since Oct. 7, the IDF has killed over 31,000 Gazans: 12,300 children and 8400 women. In the Israeli West Bank, 427 Palestinians have been killed - 113 of them children. Netanyahu told Gazans that Rafah would be a safe haven, so those that could moved there. Now the ISF is attacking Rafah. In addition, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists, 92 Palestinian, three Lebanese and four Israeli journalists have been killed. People have been having a hard time with Biden continuing to support Netanyahu on any level. There is also a realization that Trump would be much MUCH worse int his regard, and at least Biden is extricating - albeit slowly - himself and the US from continued support, along with ramping up food aid to Palestinians in Gaza, who are suffering from hunger, soon to be out and out famine. From my vantage point, this is what has helped Biden in the polls. Clearly, we're more likely to support human rights with Biden that with Trump.
    1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. Funding a campaign with tons of small donations vs. funding a campaign with up to or less than 100 sources means that the 1st candidate has way more voters on her side. In terms of how Warren went after Buttegieg, she could’ve framed it by starting with his initial stance for Medicare for All, which has watered down since he acquired certain donors. This is the issue she tapped around but didn’t articulate, which frankly supreme. Warren is generally quick on her feet and she just didn’t have a handle on this one. Liz, if you’re ready this, get this sound bite in line, or abandon it. And Liz being a millionaire? Yeah, when she left school teaching for being a lawyer, she earned $60,000/year for a few years, so she managed to save some back. She is older than Pete, and her kids are grown, so the nest egg is there, even after years as a professor (generally less money than lawyers, but law profs make more than English profs). It ain’t like she came from money. Oi. The rest of the debate worked well for Warren. Yang may be open to new ideas and also quick on his feet, but he has little in terms of how he will implement his cool ideas. Warren and Sanders are still my top 2; they’ve been consistently straight shooters as senators. Lastly, with billionaires - with a B - like Bloomberg, Stryker, and Williamson polling consistently low, I’m hoping that we’re seeing general voter disdain for money, and enough of it to make the trillions spent irrelevant. The under 30 vote should kick in this year, and they are hot for universal health insurance, undoing damage that causes climate change, working to eliminate gun violence, and other progressive initiatives that may or may not get backed by money. Making sure all voters have access to vote and are excited to vote is what will win the POTUS election and help the down ballot turn blue.
    1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1