Comments by "Elections are coming yt full censorship mode" (@Cryaboutmyhandle) on "What to do if you lost or damaged your COVID-19 vaccine card" video.

@EddieMachetti nowhere in the usa are vac mandated. Tell us you arent out if mums basement some more. Exemptions from state or local requirements may apply to some children. All states and the District of Columbia allow a medical exemption. A medical exemption is allowed when a child has a medical condition that prevents them from receiving a vaccine. All states offer nonmedical exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw you still lying about jacob vs mass? Ccp muppet come on. I already proved this month's ago when you went nuts and even used a second account in same thread. Nowhere did it give the gov rights to force vac. Here's the ruling. "the board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and revaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars." An exception is made in favor of "children who present a certificate, signed by a registered physician that they are unfit subjects for vaccination
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw so still same bs lies for the ccp eh? I posted the ruling, no matter how much you lie and avoid it. This guy is a paid poster and uses multiple accounts to push his lies. As we can see. Here's the ruling again proving hes lying. "the board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and revaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars." An exception is made in favor of "children who present a certificate, signed by a registered physician that they are unfit subjects for vaccination
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw religious exemptions are protected. That alone tells us you aren't american again and have see idea what is protected here. You are literally posting the same gd lies, you have been for months now and it's very telling daddy xi owns you. Exemptions from state or local requirements may apply to some children. All states and the District of Columbia allow a medical exemption. A medical exemption is allowed when a child has a medical condition that prevents them from receiving a vaccine. All but states offer nonmedical exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons..
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw so like i said no ruling and just " I say that's wrong" ? Thanks kid same bs diff day. Clownshoes. That's the ruling, the case wasn't about a mandate. Tell us again you have no idea what you are talking about. It was about someone already vac/ immunity not wanting to take another.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw thanks you for PROVING you have no idea. That law you listed, is the ruling I posted. Dumbass. Its after the SCOTUS case and uses the same words. Welcome to post otherwise but you never will. The Revised Laws of that commonwealth, chap. 75, § 137, provide that 'the board of health of a city or town, if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety, shall require and enforce the vaccination and revaccination of all the inhabitants thereof, and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit $5.' An exception is made in favor of 'children who present a certificate, signed by a registered physician, that they are unfit subjects for vaccination.' § 139.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw you just tanked tour entire account again Muppet. Read the laws you want to claim in full.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw The case was then continued for the opinion of the supreme judicial court of Massachusetts. Santa F e Pacific Railroad Company, the exceptions, sustained the action of the trial court, and thereafter, pursuant to the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of $5. And the court ordered that he stand committed until the fine was paid.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw so post the one where it says. They can, you are ten posts deep with no proof child. Just like last time. I already proved he wasn't force to vac.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw I dont need to try anything. You got proven to lie amd are trying to strawman a way out like last time. Post the ruling or keep posting lies proving me right ... Its that simple, when you don't like last time, that's the last one i need to prove. You didn't post anything, you made a edited post and that was it. Just like last time.. LMFAO Dude at least find a diff mo. You are word for word same bs as last time. Gd bot.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw thats a word salad not a ruling. Keep proving me right muppet..gahahahahahahahahajahahha, I posted even the final outcome below.. The case was then continued for the opinion of the supreme judicial court of Massachusetts. Santa F e Pacific Railroad Company, the exceptions, sustained the action of the trial court, and thereafter, pursuant to the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of $5. And the court ordered that he stand committed until the fine was paid..
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw lmao, it says YOU CAN ASK AND ONLY PAY A FINE. NOT FORCED TO VAC. Nowhere does it say you can force vac or removes right to use society. take the l ccp muppet, you got smoked again.
2
@UnKnown-sf9vw habahabahahhahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahah the irony. Keep trying ccp. You arwnt dojng exactly like I said do.
2
@EmergenC1000 ok coward incel.
2
@480bronco6 what is it like, to lick your daddy xi boot, as he switches talibidens diaper ?
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw kid, shut it. This sad child will do nothing but lie and strawman anything you say. Then once backed into corner, will bring in another account to try and help himself. He's one of the biggest incels on yt.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw if the gov was able to force vac, your daddy Biden wouldnt have needed to try it and get ahole handed to him by scotus like you are doing here by me like last time. Just like last time I'll wait for you to post the jacob ruling that says the gov can force vac. Again you won't post it like last time and just reeeeeeeeeee in ccp.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw so again just word salad and no ruling? Its just like last time, where all you did was lie and never be able to prove it. Huh why is that? O I know! Its because you can't just like last time. Keep proving my point Muppet..
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw thanks for letting me prove you are a paid to post Muppet again. Jacobson believed that his family may have some sort of hereditary condition that made the smallpox vaccine particularly dangerous. Because of his refusal to get vaccinated, Jacobson was prosecuted and fined $5 (about $150 in 2020 dollars
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw what's it like licking xi boot, as he switches talibidens diaper?
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw show us where Jacob was forced to vac. As you claim he was. If your next post dont include it. You prove my point. Because so far we can see you are wrong and cant provide anything showing jacob was forced to vac or the ruling saying it was ok..
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw hahahaha i wondered how long it would be till use your fav words. You going to copy pasta that ten times and bring in your other account try and help you? Clownshoes child.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw sorry but where does the law state it can be anything but a fine as we see? Please provide that law you just claimed, again we see you cant provide proof of anythung and just spew b.s. lies and strawmans into next thing. Thanks muppet!
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw so again you cant provide any laws backing your claims? Jacob wasnt force to vac and the state can only issue fines as we see. What are you doing here other than proving you are a muppet? Seriously kiddo go touch grass , it's done. Peace.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw taking a small snippet of a dissent isnt a ruling kiddo or a outcome. Let us know when you can provide any to backup your claims. Because again as we see, you are 40 posts deep into it and cant do anything. You got smoked again by an actual American and facts. Enjoy licking the boot some more. Im out!
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw its right here. Learn to read Muppet. That's the outcome to the case you claimed. It toasts you and your b.s. entirely. Jacobson believed that his family may have some sort of hereditary condition that made the smallpox vaccine particularly dangerous. Because of his refusal to get vaccinated, Jacobson was prosecuted and fined $5 (about $150 in 2020 dollars.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw lol! Look at him try and strawman into some other bs. So you are saying the usa gov, can enforce whatever it wants onto its citizens eh? Tell us im right and you are a ccp poster some more. Peace ccp!
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw thanks again for showing us you arent american. None of what you said is true. Peace ccp ! America owns you and always will.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw you arent gaining ground Muppet. You are arguing in circles and trying to strawman a way out. I proved you are wrong and you been stuck on repeat since. Look at your post clownshoes. Keep digging you are doing wonderful. I own you and America always will.
1
@UnKnown-sf9vw again you are stuck on repeat , Someone needs to fix your scripts. You have yet to provide one law or ruling proving anything you have said. I've posted tons. Its easy to see you are a clownshoes paid poster and this is exactly what you did word for word last time. Peace.
1