General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Manosphere Highlights Daily
comments
Comments by "" (@nightmareTomek) on "Manosphere Highlights Daily" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Except when the other one was in love with the guy. Then it happens.
18
She's so entitled talking like this, not understanding he's doing it for her so she can spend time with the children. She talks like the divorce card was on her hand the whole time waiting to be played. I'd probably break up over this.
16
2:35 this one talks like divorce was on her todo list since the wedding. They have kids!
15
@Ella_1567 typical female response. Yeah, they talk about the average here.
14
They always did everything they could to make themselves immune to criticism. Even now many men's channels or men's role models aren't saying the full truth because they have a girlfriend who would be angry.
13
They indirectly made even the AI on the platform work for them to have issues with comments with too much criticism. Pearl likes to say that they are policing speech.
8
They love spending beauty currency just like normal currency. 80% of consumer buying decisions.
8
That's how they always do it, not with facts but with a disrespectful misuse of language. Interruptions, talking over others, shaming and dodging the topic.
5
@tomaszszupryczynski5453 better a permanent chameleon than a boss b
4
Don't think they know what loyality is. Women simply fall out of love, nothing that can be done against it.
3
Patriarchy accusation is used with the same intent as wives getting angry when their husbands take a nap.
3
This is just a dystopian film. In 40 years probably humans won't react this way towards robots, neither the police nor that guy crying.
3
manipulating whole society.
2
And the best part, they don't complain 24/7.
2
This also explains why schools rewards diligence more than intelligence. The teachers, even the male ones, didn't work smarter, but harder, so they want you to as well. That's why smart pupils who cut work get worse grades than even the dumbest pupils.
2
They fall in love with the relationship, not the man they have the relationship with.
1
It just means that the girls were cheap in a different way 20 years ago. That they threw themselves at Chad doing everything for him, while he realized it's fake. The thing they do differently today is that instead of cooking for him they go to bed.
1
I think it's because she knows that in order to compete for chad she has to throw herself at him.
1
Maybe her script is for women, I think they'll eat it up. There are a bit more than 3000 billionaires in the world, it's unlikely she ever even saw one. Also does anyone know for certain she isn't married to just a normal dude that makes above average?
1
By interviewing them. I think this was the only woman on the planet that interviewed men before writing about them. The big BUT is that women will misinterpret the book anyway.
1
Women have always made themselves immune to criticism. Even now many men's channels or men's role models aren't saying the full truth because they have a girlfriend who would be offended.
1
I've been saying for years that they're on a grand scale manipulating society.
1
They manipulate society, I've been saying that for years.
1
I read that book 20 years ago, also for educational purposes. I don't remember much, but what I can say is this: - the title is ABSOLUTELY misleading. (some article told me right now: the title refers to what women think but don't say) - the author said many things that red pill channels are saying to this day, due to being the one and only author that interviewed men before writing it. It's not the typical dating advice book. - don't know how much she got wrong, but I always recommended the book to women. - women often simply misinterpreted the book and that was it for the advice inside. - I'm going my own way for over 20 years, from when I was young and before it was popular. Refused nearly everyone that fell in love with me. And this book is the only dating advice book I ever finished reading. As he said, read it for educational purposes. You can still disagree afterwards.
1
She would have been anyway, 50% divorce rates.
1
@metallboy25 No, it's not. It's a misleading and probably ill-picked title, that's all. Barely has any resemblence with the content.
1
Lemme guess what the girl in the beginning meant. The competition for Chad pressures her into throwing herself at him, thus she cannot love in a way which for us is rational.
1
I think it's even worse than Esthar Vilar translates it.... I would translate it differently. But I'm not a woman.
1
Because they can't avoid misinterpreting it. This is one of these books which can't be summarized by a woman, it'll be complete rubbish.
1
Women aren't actually that complicated, the only obstactle to understanding them is that they're never honest. But biologically everything they do makes sense. And that... caused me to refuse dating and relationships already 20 years ago, before it became popular...
1
Well, that touching advice was for the 10% visible men.
1
And because the conditioning works they're withholding praise more and more as time goes on, and they get seemingly unhappier.
1
@inconnu4961 I read it 20 years ago, and I'm going my own way since 20 years, before it was popular. Yes, it was worth it. It's the only dating book I ever read past the first chapter, probably because she was the only author ever that interviewed men before writing about men. The title is absolutely misleading, borderline wrong compared to the content. And also women just misinterpret it, you can't get an accurate summary from them. Only way to get an accurate picture is to read it yourself.
1
@nobodyknows3180 Ye, that quote is below every video....
1
@ruudvanderzanden8013 can't you say that after reading it? Or would you? I think it's the only book on the planet where a woman interviewed men before writing about men. The first dating advice book that I read past the first chapter. Even if you end up disagreeing, it would give you some insights. Or you know, just be butthurt. Also, two things, first the title is ABSOLUTELY misleading, boderline wrong. Second is to not expect an accurate summary from a woman, I think they can't go without misinterpreting it.
1
Actually women do what they always do, they misinterpret it and only hear what they wanna hear, which is what's written in a common dating advice book.
1
Actually they do what they always do, which is misinterpreting it and only hearing what they wanna hear. Which is what's written in a common dating advice book.
1
You didn't read it, did you.
1
I'd love to have one, too.
1
2:35 this woman talks like divorce was a card in her hand waiting to be played. If it weren't, nothing she said would make sense. I wonder if I would divorce her on the spot. 6:30 doubt it about what she says as well, she probably assumes it is the reason, but I think in reality it's about who has more income. If he hasn't, he receives no respect.
1
@chrisolson84 She was probably the only woman on the planet that interviewed men before writing dating advice. The only book on dating advice that I have ever finished reading. I searched for a book excerpt and landed on the sequel, and within 30 seconds she said that men see how the bridemaids go crazy at weddings and understand one thing, that women love weddings and need a man to fill the role, and not that they love the man. Which makes men not want to marry anymore. Is she wrong? It's worth a read, if only for educational purposes, even if you disagree with everything. Your choice to use this info to your advantage or detriment.
1
Not because of the book, she would most likely have turned out this way anyway, just look at clichées of old couples, she's always nagging and pushing him around. I actually don't believe a woman will ever interpret the book correctly.
1
Women fall in love with what they require.
1
@GundamChief They're not being honest today either.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All