Comments by "" (@nightmareTomek) on "The Diary Of A CEO" channel.

  1. 63
  2. 35
  3. 18
  4. 18
  5. 13
  6. 11
  7. 9
  8. 9
  9. 8
  10. 7
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. ​ @ReflectionRF  Yes, I can, if I don't expect people to read a novel. If you need an example, you could ask nicely for one instead of being a d and telling me what I'm supposed to do according to your crappy opinion. But fine, I'll give you one, just let me watch that video for 5 minutes... Erm, well ok, 2 minutes was enough to stumble upon the first nonsense. 1:04:30 - host asks him specifically a question that is from his books. So I assume he gives the same answer that he wrote in the books. He says that babies have the skill to read body language and when we grow older we lose it because we use words. Then he says that imposters hate being around children because children see through them. This is such random bullsh_t pulled out his ass there, unbelievable. Even more unbelievable how you people fall for this. And yet even more unbelievable is that he wrote that in a book and is making money off of it. There are NO studies WHATSOEVER to support his claims, frankly because it's bullsh_t. When you google "babies" and "bodylanguage", the things that are popping up are tips how to read the babies bodylanguage as a parent, suggesting the exact opposite being the case from what Mr. Greene said, namely that grown-ups in fact can read body language at least from their children. One study says that babies don't sleep well when the mother, while breast-feeding, doesn't pay attention to her baby, but her phone instead. If mothers talk to or caress the babies, they sleep better, often the mothers calming voice is enough, even if she reads an adult book to the child (since it doesn't understand a thing anyway, it's just her voice that's important). This does suggest that babies don't understand the calmness of the mother being on her iphone. It's not how the brain works anyway. The brain learns through experience, and if the knowledge gets deeprooted into the brain it doesn't unlearn it as easy either. Babies aren't born with the knowledge of body language, they have to watch people first, parents, caretakers, other babies, etc.. When that's learned and proves to be used on a daily basis, the person never forgets. Another the thing with learning is that it's coupled to a persons attentiveness and thus IQ. The more attentive you are, the more you see and learn. And that's why smart people are indeed very good at reading body language, gifted people can be insanely finetuned in this, and people who start paying attention consciously get a boost in learning, too. Not only can they read body language better, but also manipulate and control their own, if they for example want to hide their condition. They notice variations in someone's behavior that the normal folk just doesn't notice, not to mention the dumb ones. And what's that about the impostor? I have no idea, it really sounds like random crap. Is he talking about someone that dressed up like someone else, or what? If so, then I guarantee you that any adult will spot this 1000x faster than a baby. If you can actually mimic a behavior that the baby is used to seeing, you can actually sooth and fool it way easier and blend in easier. So an "impostor", whatever that may be, usually worries less about children. Throughout the video Mr. Greenes explainings were highly imprecise if not completely made up. Is this enough for you?
    1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74.  @aimee9478  Your advise sounds of course reasonable. And in real life I am behaving quite reasonable. But against the internet? I've tried it and it didn't work. People are angry and can hide behind it's anonymity. If you don't share their opinion to begin with, posting a "varying opinion" is like stepping in a toxic waste puddle. They aren't angry on this channel, but if I wouldn't have been confrontational, nobody would have read the comment. So I have just two choices: say nothing or be confrontational. Honestly, in some other places some people are so dumb they can't be reasoned with. Ever argued with a flat earther? You know the quote "don't argue with a pig, he drags you down and beats you with experience"? Or the quote (as good as I can translate it) "opponents will assume they refute us by repeating their arguments and ignoring ours". The way that I found works is establishing at the very beginning that their argument is based on stupidity. If I can explain their stupidity, then it probably has more to do with the truth than me being an a-hole. And really, if people feel bad and step back and change something about themselves, is it really such a bad thing that I made them feel bad? Besides, I insulted broadly a mass of people here, noone individually. Even Einstein said people are stupid and his quote is probably the most used the quote in history. If I see people being reasonable, I will treat them reasonably. But did anyone here say "ok, maybe it is a bit much praise, but Africa is still an amazing person"? She is. And it is. Just don't overlook someone else deserving praise because you used it all up on her.
    1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1