Comments by "" (@nightmareTomek) on "PsycHacks"
channel.
-
30
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I think you're forgetting "DUMB". I'm binge-watching him today, a few videos have good messages, but most are just dumb, and way too long for their dumbness.
Just let me point you to what he said at 8:30, so you can really envision the stupidity of that what you're praising here.
"Eventually your red pill days will be characterized by relationships with women. Everything is completely different and yet nothing has changed. ... Women will be part of our lives in one way or another. In a way the red pill allows to have relationships with women in a way that makes sense for the particular individuals involved. Women are not the enemy."
And then envision divorce r4pe. How men can lose everything, job, house, children, to a woman who became a bit unhappy and is full of spite towards her ex husband because in her eyes he's at fault she has to divorce.
And Orion is saying a bunch of nothing, or that no matter our knowledge nothing will change and what is happening is going to be ignored. How is that not stupid?
No, actually women's behavior is abnormally destructive and needs to be addressed and fixed, the way you'd try to correct a bad behavior of a child. Divorce r4pes need to stop, PERIOD. Many other things need to stop as well. The red pill points this out, there's no stupid enlightment in this, it's knowledge that can either be used or ignored, and he talks about it like it can only be ignored. And that's from someone with a psychology profession. Aboslutely idiotic!
Think it through.
3
-
@NormanGreenwood-s2o "technically"??? So if "Reality is one and it is you who seems to be having problems coping with it" isn't technically an ad hominem, then "just another vvoman being mad", which was my very next response, wasn't one either. You're picking favorites and judging sides differently based on your liking.
When I said what I said, albeit it wasn't nice, she wasn't questioning why I think this way, no, her immediate response was to jump to blame my opinion on an incorrect assumptions about my life circumstances. She's gonna sit on that opinion. Even if she didn't, from experience I know that you can't talk to them normally again after they've been mad once.
And I'm not gonna read the rest what you wrote. Are you her alt account or something, because I used the block feature? Can do the same with you. Like, immediately!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sadiegodwin205 How are you expecting something constructive after coming to me with only ad hominems and empty claims? Bring something constructive yourself. You want me to show you what you overlooked or tried to gloss over?
You said to me, "you had agreed to avoid all women due to toxicity, despite your poor attempt to explain not completely on a level of toxicity alone.....how nonsensical"
Now let's ignore for a moment that this was already your SECOND ad hominem in this short and first comment directed at me, as well as an attack on the statement itself, and also lets ignore your grammer. What explanation, where's the explanation? I said,
"yes, all of them. Some labeled toxic, some not, but it's in their nature and they're doing these things subconsiously."
There is no explanation. Open your eyes, I made an empty claim there myself. I could explain it, but I haven't done so yet, yet you, because the claim made you angry, decided to attack the nonexistent explanation. With 2 ad hominems and once attacking the claim directly. You never cared to find out what you couldn't make sense of.
That is how you derive amusement in conversations? How fantastic. Just like the other gal, I suppose. Time to block.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@soleil7259 These are sweet, but empty words. I'll give you an example.
It's said that communication is needed for a good relationship. So does this advice tell you, why or how communication breaks down, which causes the downfall of relationships? No, it doesn't. Why not? Because if it did, someone would be offended, and that someone threatens people with being hurt to avoid hearing he or her is the problem, also known as victim mentality.
And my next question is, which gender loves doing the silent treatment, when angry? What do you think that does? It breaks the communcation. But does that advice that communication is needed ever tell you not to use the silent treatment? No, it doesn't.
That's why your words are so empty, although technically what you say is correct, use say it just for the purpose to shift our perception of who's to blame from women onto men. If that doesn't work, the next step that women often do is calling others misogynist, and if that doesn't work either, next step would be tears and crying.
Same thing with responsibility, you're trying to blame men although in reality men usually take most, if not all of the responsibility (and blame) for the problems in the relationship, even those caused by women. I can give you an example here, too. What does society often say, if he cheats? It's because he's an a-hole. If she cheats? Because he didn't give her what she needed. He gets blamed both times (thus he has the responsibility put on him to make her happy).
This is societal manipulation, women are good at that. Unless women stop seeing things from an emotional, judgemental and narcissistic perspective (or we go back to patriarchy), things in society won't improve. You want equality? Then start being actually objective and fair (and studies show that in stressful situations (and you could call hearing criticism as a stressful situations) women's fairness goes out the window; also studies show that children from single mother households have disadvantages in life, like greater chance to fail at school, do drugs, suicide and be criminal. But the studies can't yet explain that it's actually the emotional unfairness of women from stressful situations that causes it, but just wait a few decades and there probably will be something showing you that I was right all along). Own your feelings, or fk your feelings, one or the other, or these unfair judgements will just cause disdain.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CeceliPS3 I haven't read the whole conversation, but I agree with you.
"Best to always be stoic, indifferent, detached, calm, etc. No one but you should have power over you." sounds like a meaningless phrase. She has power through how society sees women as more important (I mean, there are studies on this!), or laws being skewed towards women. If you get put into that situation, you can be stoic all you want, you can not care about it but you gonna be seen as the bad guy anyway. They shouldn't have power over you, but they collectively judge you.
And how about if she accuses you of harassment?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1