General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dr Ben Miles
comments
Comments by "" (@nightmareTomek) on "Dr Ben Miles" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Explains it wrong, too.
2
The speed of light isn't the problem. The problem is that measuring the particle means interacting and thus changing it.
1
@1SpudderR You mean wannabe physicists.
1
Wow, this is such a convoluted explanation. Reality is rather simple, and unfortuantely not mystic at all (which is probably why most people have a problem with it). In quantum physics they don't know the exact location and properties of a particle, so in order to make calculations possible they have a wave function that represents the possible states of it. If they measure the particle, the wave function collapses. This has nothing to do with God or magic or the universe narrowing or any other spiritual bullsh_t. It just means that they gained knowledge about the particle. Unfortunately, measuring a particle also means interacting with it and thus changing it. Which complicates things.
1
@anywallsocket That's why I said, people have a problem when entanglement is demystified. I explained entanglement well enough, there's really nothing more to it. If you know the values of one particle, you automatically know the ones of the other one - that makes them "entangled". That's all. No magic mumbo jumbo, no timetravel, no faster than light travel. But for popular youtube science this isn't enough. If there's nothing magical about it, then it won't hold viewers. So they invent some sci-fi or theologic bullsh_t.
1
Wow, you people are so uneducated.... Connecting physics to theology actually has a name: quantum mysticism. Go google it.
1
He didn't, it's still convoluted as fk. They making it sound like it's some mystical thing happening in physics that no mortal can understand. While in fact entanglement only means that if you know the properties of one particle, you can conclude the properties of the other. For example like this: spin(particle_a) = -spin(particle_b) Veeery simple. They're like mirrored, that's all. But that doesn't fill a 10 minute video. So he actually made it more complicated.
1
The "study" looks either invented or purposefully misinterpreted.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All