Comments by "" (@nightmareTomek) on "Memeable Data" channel.

  1. With how much a certain gender is protected from gender differences it seems to me that there is a significant difference.
    192
  2.  @TheReaverOfDarkness  No.
    111
  3. ​ @-WMD-Edutainment  One woman. Can you name another? The miserable ones that you think I'm referring to is from what I see the overwhelming majority. Probably you as well. And I could be useful, but then again I know too much and that isn't appreciated. So I also have quite the trouble giving a damn.
    56
  4.  @-WMD-Edutainment  xD because so many women helped build or invent power plants.
    48
  5.  @kaythebored8163  Great, but I don't care. You're arguing with the exception against the rule. And showing favoritism with your praise.
    8
  6.  @BeneathFullMoon  You girls have a masters degree in raising points that have nothing to do with the topic. I asked for another IN THE FIELD OF nuclear physics. She dug up some random weirdos from 500 BC.
    8
  7.  @BeneathFullMoon  If you want to argue solely based on feelings, how about you stick to talking with each other?
    6
  8. Blabber blabber blabbery blabber.....
    6
  9.  @BeneathFullMoon  did I really? Are you sure? Or are you putting words in my mouth?
    4
  10.  @sumyiiH  You're projecting that you're projecting.
    3
  11. Stop bothering me, because the AI here is partial.
    3
  12. Problem I have with something like at 14:00 is whether they actually face discrimination or whether they feel like being discriminated against. Because the latter is dominating our society quite a bit lately, and maybe not just lately.
    3
  13.  @pandafreak46  Not the reason. Women are naturally more sensitive, and we don't even know how many women were oppressed to how many were protected instead.
    2
  14.  @TheReaverOfDarkness  Enshittification is doing that to us all, and quite aggressively.
    1
  15.  @TheReaverOfDarkness  Enshittification is doing that to us all.
    1
  16.  @TheReaverOfDarkness  Enshittification is strong here, one can barely hold a conversation.
    1
  17.  @kaythebored8163  That's great but I don't care. You're arguing with exceptions against the rule. You reserve praise only for minorities. That's society in a nutshell.
    1
  18.  @BeneathFullMoon  You certainly aren't. Can't read like any other. I asked for another IN THE FIELD OF nuclear physics. She dug up some random weirdos from 500 BC. Is here anyone in this thread that can argue reasonably instead of with feelings?
    1
  19.  @BeneathFullMoon  You certainly aren't. Can't read like any other.
    1
  20.  @sumyiiH  Now you're projecting that you're projecting? Did you read that phrase somewhere and decided to use it yourself? No, my behavior isn't driven by feelings. Your behavior is driven by attacking the person instead of arguing the argument. There hasn't been a response to me yet with anything intelligent in it. It's either arguments that have nothing to do with the topic, or personal attacks.
    1
  21.  @sumyiiH  Now you're projecting that you're projecting? Did you read that phrase somewhere and decided to use it yourself? No, my behavior isn't driven by feelings, it's just something you wish because you have no other arguments.
    1
  22.  @sumyiiH  Women always project. So now what, are you projecting that you're projecting? Or did you read that expression somewhere and decided to weaponize it? And no, my behavior isn't driven by feelings. If that's what you assume, you probably simply can't distinguish it. You mean it as a personal attack anyway.
    1
  23.  @sumyiiH  Women always project. So now what, are you projecting that you're projecting? Or did you read that expression somewhere and decided to weaponize it?
    1
  24.  @sumyiiH  It's women who always project. Are you now projecting that you're projecting?
    1
  25.  @sumyiiH  I found that women are always projecting, no matter what.
    1
  26.  @sumyiiH  I found that a certain gender is always projecting, no matter what.
    1
  27.  @sumyiiH  women are always projecting
    1
  28.  @sumyiiH  maybe you read the expression somewhere and decided to weaponize it yourself.
    1
  29.  @sumyiiH  After all you didn't bring anything to the conversation but a personal attack. Like most others.
    1
  30.  @sumyiiH  And no, my behavior isn't driven by feelings. If that's what you assume, you probably simply can't distinguish it.
    1
  31. @Raimu_u You have 2 now. Well done! I guess it's my turn now, right? Here are a few male nuclear physicists that won nobel prizes. Henri Becquerel Pierre Curie Ernest Rutherford Frederick Soddy Francis Aston Charles Wilson Harold Urey Frederic Joliot James Chadwick Carl David Anderson Enrico Fermi Ernest Lawrence George De Hevesy Otto Hahn Patrick Blackett Hideki Yukawa Cecil Powell Edwin McMillan Glenn Seaborg John Cockcroft Ernest Walton Felix Bloch Edward Purcell Walther Bothe Willard Libby Robert Hofstadter Rudolf Mössbauer Eugene Wigner Hans Jensen Hans Bethe Aage Bohr Ben Mottelson James Rainwater William Fowler So. Are we done now? Can you do something for me and look up what I originally said? Besides, I noticed, 3 out of 4 women were working with men, often their husbands, on their projects and shared the nobel prize.
    1
  32. Please, girls, stop bothering me with your nonsense. Because it's impossible to debunk your delusions when the AI is only protecting one single gender.
    1
  33.  @Emptytopfloor  probably yes, they just failed at it. Because that's what they're doing today, too. Instead of just doing they prefer making a drama over it.
    1
  34. Didn't expect such an indepth analysis.
    1
  35. Balanced how? I gave it a dislike.
    1