Comments by "Regis Glass" (@regisglass5464) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. It's true. I mean, who's derrick going to protect anyway? The most i think he'll do is act like other incels and start blasting a public place.
    240
  2. It's honestly annoying incels see and treat women as inferiors, but still pretend the problem isn't them
    114
  3. He is intolerant, but if we're being fair, his views were fairly similar to the other MRAs since they also believe a women's "place" is in the home.
    100
  4. It's odd you arrived at that conclusion. The one time the MRAs gave an example about men being discriminated against, the feminists agreed with it.
    87
  5. I'm not sure that's true. Kursat didn't really seem to do anything except say feminism is wrong. His biggest contribution was his "gotcha" question which turned out to be mistaken (NOMAS is a feminist group that helps men).
    83
  6. Not really. The MRAs had about the same views as derrick. Well except kursat, but he didn't really do anything.
    41
  7. ​ @yannickclaes90  is that why 40% of households have women as the main breadwinner?
    36
  8. this entire video is a perfect example of why a smart person talking to a room of lunatics is like trying to make a turd shine
    36
  9. free thinker is now a person who knows nothing and thinks they're smart for it
    35
  10. He, sadly, is representative of the movement. As an example, note that zack had about the same views as Derek.
    27
  11. And "you look prettier when you smile" to random women on the bus.
    25
  12.  @the_onceler21  no, they seemed fairly sincere. Even their patience was inordinately high considering what Mr "women are like children" was saying.
    25
  13. He actually does seem the most sincere out of them which makes it all the more tragic that his views seem to reinforce the problems he decries. For example, he says there is discrimination in custody cases against men but also that women are inherently better than men in taking care of children.
    22
  14. He essentially has the same views as most MRAs. Even zack kept agreeing with him and he was the most "reasonable" MRA there.
    20
  15.  @mridulmalik4728  this is strange, why is asking what harassment she suffered being respectful? Also, why is it defensive to give him an answer?
    13
  16.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. As you state women are starting to make more money than men, is that why they're 40% of households breadwinners? Are you stating as such in an attempt to backtrack from your position on hypergamy?
    13
  17. To be blunt, this is like derrick saying he's going to protect women and when women say they don't need him to, he starts attacking their rights because he thinks women belong in the home.
    13
  18. I can kind of see that you're trying to be a moderate, but bear in mind that zack has about the same views as derrick.
    12
  19. That's odd, why is it normal to ask women details about their assaults?
    12
  20. ​ @sparkynate91  if that's what men are built for, then why was it forced by law for women to not do those things?
    12
  21. ​ @butthissureisfun5619  agreed, the MRAs accepting they were incorrect does take humility. It was a bit odd zach tried to ask how the women were assaulted though.
    11
  22. ​ @plumbus1758  no, the other MRAs did too. Zack and derrick both seem to believe women are biologically better parent than men despite saying the family courts are unfair.
    11
  23.  @views-kb6sv  when did kursat say anything that wasn't "feminism is wrong"? Honestly, he didn't really do anything.
    11
  24. are you talking about the one who was asked to give details about her being assaulted? seems kind of weird get answering is seen as wrong by you
    11
  25. What men are bullied over their clothes? Or are you talking about trans people before they transition?
    10
  26. Thank you for showing the feminists had a point
    10
  27. That's the idea i got too. I mean their views are literally telling women their strengths are in child rearing.
    10
  28. weirdly enough, men never really cared about that until the sexualization started being controlled by women. apparently women monetizing their sexuality is different from men monetizing women's sexuality.
    9
  29.  @jamorains  what's utopian about, for example, derrick not attacking women because they said they don't want his protection?
    9
  30. ​ @cassiusmarques  if so, who would the courts choose as a better parent: a parent who is nurturing and productive, or a parent who is not?
    9
  31. Wasn't what happened to her something that all women go through?
    9
  32.  @views-kb6sv  wasn't that when she had to explain about being sexually harrassed? It feels a little unfair to say she "flipped out".
    8
  33.  @views-kb6sv  didn't he specifically ask what harm had been caused to her? Like i said, it seems a bit unfair to say she "flipped out" when she answered his question.
    8
  34. @Searching for Ufos if you agree with MRAs that women are inherently better than men at child rearing, why are you surprised men lose custody cases? What do you expect to happen?
    8
  35. What point were you in the middle of?
    8
  36. ironically, all the people in the video are conservatives so i guess you just noted how normal conservatives act
    8
  37. I mean, only one of the MRAs agreed men and women are equal while all the feminists said men and women were equal.
    8
  38. So the women need Derek to protect them from Derek?
    8
  39.  @hajimehinata5854  but what is toxic fem? I've heard it a lot but never actually got an answer.
    8
  40.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. If only the law is what impedes women from doing what men do, then why shouldn't they do it?
    8
  41. Weirdly enough, your experience actually maps onto hers too. No one took her assaults seriously unless her boyfriend told the assaulters to stop, not even when they threw bottles at her
    7
  42.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question, do you believe women are hypergamous because they're the breadwinners in 40% of houses?
    7
  43.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "women are beginning to out-earn men [...], their list of male suitors get smaller and smaller" per your words: the more successfull women become, the less they date. You even write they divorce if they're already married.
    7
  44.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet as you kindly wrote, they don't date. They even divorce. So why is not dating mean women are hypergamous? Or are you complaining that women aren't dating multiple men at the same time, ie, arguing against monogamy?
    7
  45. Not necessarily easier. The problems women face in dating are clearly different from those of men, but there's a reason they're more scared of who they could date than the men are.
    7
  46. ​​ @tonyonaperky2128 correct, she dislikes that men went after her for saying no to sex
    7
  47. Didn't the MRAs say men were lesser parents while the feminists opposed that? It seems Mimi was correct as that position is supported by NOMAS
    6
  48.  @Dantheman-nf9xk  out of curiosity, do women win all custody cases or the majority? I ask because you state women are inherently better parents but also that abusive mothers win custody cases. If women win the majority of cases, does that mean abusive mothers are the minority that don't win?
    6
  49. Most of the comments prove your point about why incels can't be in a relationship. If you see your partner as lesser, then you won't be with them for long.
    6
  50.  @butthissureisfun5619  didn't the MRAs say men were lesser parents while the feminists opposed said view? It seems Mimi had a point.
    6
  51.  @DavidW-ng5zv  is that why they're the main breadwinner in 40% of houses?
    6
  52. Didn't the feminist give multiple examples of her being assaulted?
    6
  53. Why would asking details about how she'd been abused do that? That seems kind of extreme
    6
  54.  @tonyonaperky2128  correct, she stated men should not go after women who already said no.
    6
  55. I think the video actually did better than that. They specifically asked who believed men and women are equal (but different); which the 3 feminists and 1 MRA agreed with. So they actually showed what the ideologies generally believe which i think is more accurate then asking individuals for definitions.
    6
  56.  @ohlordohgoddadgotthebeltou2119  it's interesting you don't like the results of the court system despite believing that is what should happen. As you write of abusive women gaining custody, do you believe women win every single custody case in the USA or just most of them?
    5
  57. I mean, why would she need to be protected from guys like derrick? She just needs them to not cause mass shootings
    5
  58. It is a little bit funny a guy she didn't know asked for her number in a bookstore, and when she said no he felt hurt a complete stranger wouldn't give their phone number.
    5
  59.  @venerexate1841  no, he's quite clear he doesn't see men and women as equal regardless of being different. For example he sees women as superior in child rearing (despite MRAs believing there is discrimination in custody cases).
    5
  60.  @venerexate1841  you are entitled to believe body mass relates to how well one takes care of kids. This does make it baffling why MRAs like him even complain about discrimination in child custody cases though. What do you expect to happen if you believe women are inherently better than men at child care?
    5
  61. Wasn't that because she was asked to give details about how she was assaulted? Why would she be happy after she gave the details?
    5
  62.  @kauswekazilimani3736  then why are the MRAs saying women are better caregivers if they believe discrimination occurs in custody cases? That doesn't seem helpful.
    5
  63.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "It's just natural" that's an odd response. why defend men getting worse prison sentences by saying men being more violent is natural?
    5
  64. She has a point though, none of the MRAs said anything in regards to actually helping men. MRA positions even seemed to harm men like when they said discrimination exists in custody cases but that women are the inherently superior parent.
    5
  65.  @bethbates9826  since feminism legalized women entering military combat in 2016, does that count? Have MRA's done anything similar since, again, none of the MRA's said anything that help men?
    5
  66.  @feelingwell8069  no, i don't drive that type of car
    5
  67.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "women are beginning to out-earn men [...], their list of male suitors get smaller and smaller" Note your words, financially independent women essentially stop dating. Seems odd not dating is hypergamy or that suddenly finding one person you like is hypergamy. Or are you complaining that women aren't dating multiple men at the same time?
    5
  68. Not really. America only exists as it is because Isabella of Spain decided to finance Columbus's expedition. So technically, a woman built the world you live in.
    4
  69.  @jrdh8468  well that's interesting. You immediately backtracked from saying men built the world to now saying men and women built the world.
    4
  70. Not really. The MRAs didn't really give a lot of experiences. They didn't give a lot of valid positions either.
    4
  71.  @PapeySapote  kursat didn't really do anything. He basically just spent his time saying feminism was wrong. Which is odd because he ignored the MRA's saying women belonged at home and couldn't work as well as men.
    4
  72. Not necessarily true. It did show feminists help both sexes while MRAs seem to be more performative in their activism
    4
  73. No, he's definitely an MRA. Most of his views are actually reciprocated by other MRAs. For example, he thinks women are inherently better at child rearing despite stating discrimination in custody cases exists and that women aren't equal to men because of their biology.
    4
  74.  @hottboy6712  not really, even Zack who was the most comprehensive of them believes women aren't equal to men.
    4
  75.  @TheBritishGuy75  then we agree they essentially have the same views, ie, zack and derrick say women should be subservient to men? Where does derrick say he wants to force it though?
    4
  76. Out of curiosity, what's the logical process in MRAs saying women are inherently better at taking care of children but also complaining that discrimination in child custody cases exists?
    4
  77. Certainly there is. Why do you think female nurses make less than male ones when women are 90% of nurses?
    4
  78. Why would it be wrong for feminists to oppose the MRA view that women are superior to men in child rearing? Aren't both parents supposed to be equally valuable?
    4
  79. yeah i honestly thought it would be better but andrew was so behind destiny that he seemed incapable of understanding basic points, eg, he kept trying to pretend ultranationalism and centralization of power combined had not been mentioned
    4
  80.  @c2dajayy  by women setting the rules about what happens. Basically the opposite of what occured with Andrew Tate
    4
  81. I'm a little confused, why do you believe fathers spending money on their children means women have more rights? Surely you don't believe equality is when men don't support their children?
    4
  82. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRAs saying men are lesser parents is harmful to men. As you have not seen the video, kindly do so at 4:15. So doesn't that show only feminists help men per opposing MRAs saying men are lesser parents?
    4
  83.  @2crisp63  really? what did he say in regards to the other MRA's saying men are inherently worse parents?
    4
  84.  @bethbates9826  then as you seem to state more feminism is required to help men and women in war (as feminism legalized women being in combat), why is feminists helping the same as MRAs doing nothing? Or have MRAs done anything to help?
    4
  85.  @SuperJudeM  i assure you, women are becoming financially independent and are choosing who to be with. It's actually caused some unexpected issues for men because now they can't just say "I'm employed" and expect their part of the relationship to be done. Now they have to offer other things and, unfortunately, society has not prepared men for that.
    4
  86.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you kindly wrote, women don't date or date very little after becoming financially independent. Seems an odd way to describe hypergamy after you even write monogamy doesn't work while stating women are monogamous or simply not dating
    4
  87.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "women are beginning to out-earn men [...], their list of male suitors get smaller and smaller" Note your words, financially independent women basically stop dating. Seems odd not dating is hypergamy or that suddenly finding one person you like is hypergamy.
    4
  88.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd you also attempt to imply divorced women (some with children) are generally what men search for in a partner. Do you believe that's hypergamy?
    4
  89. Aysha was wearing concealing clothes. Didn't stop some guys from throwing bottles at her because she said no to them.
    4
  90.  @lilnotmaster6094  then do you believe men and women are equal as per the prompt given in the video?
    4
  91. What vague statement?
    4
  92.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you believe the MRAs stating men are lesser parents is gynocentric?
    4
  93.  @sparkynate91  that's weird, you didn't check your comment? To give you context, it only became legal for women to fight in the military in 2016
    4
  94. pretty much. i mean the entire conversation here was them complaining that women didn't know their place anymore
    4
  95. So derrick will defend her?
    4
  96. I think what annoys me the most is that while MRAs will say they are fighting for mens rights, their activism is basically non existent and they have a tendency to cause the problems they decry.
    4
  97. Don't most women have jobs, ie, do get their own stuff?
    4
  98. Is that why men lose nearly all custody cases? Because their role is to give money and that role stays after the divorce?
    3
  99. But it's a pretty big problem. If you do the same work, you should be paid the same.
    3
  100. As you believe women don't contribute to society or have helped it in a manner similar to men, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    3
  101.  @jdjdndjd5206  hence my question which has still not been answered. would you answer what men are bullied over their clothes? or are you trying to say men who are rich are assaulted because of how high quality their clothes are?
    3
  102. That's odd, you didn't timestamp the question. Would you write what the question was?
    3
  103. Because that would mean everyone they hate is correct about them
    3
  104. Marxism says people are equal regardless of class while feminism says people are equal regardless of sex. Apparently, anything that has to do with equality is seen as communism.
    3
  105.  @okay3499  aside from saying feminism is wrong, what did he do?
    3
  106. Has anyone noticed how no one has been able to define toxic feminity?
    3
  107. Before or after the sex trafficking trial?
    3
  108. @TECHNOBLADE NEVER DIES that's weird, isn't he still under house arrest?
    3
  109.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd answer, why would she be happy when giving details about her assault?
    3
  110.  @Nai_101  wait, isn't he saying there are no feminist groups that focus on men being discriminated against in child custody cases while the MRAs argue women are inherently better parents? Because the feminists did say the sexes are equal.
    3
  111. the irony of knowles saying he's confused why LGBTQ people think he wants to eliminate them after saying they're a social contagion
    3
  112.  @falconhoward4032  that's an odder response. Since you agree she answered only due to Zacks demand for details about her abuse, why is answering his question wrong?
    3
  113. @Searching for Ufos regardless of that, why are you surprised men lose custody cases if you actively state men are lesser caregivers? Why be outraged men pay alimony to the point you randomly state women trick men into taking care of kids that aren't there's?
    3
  114. Not really, kursat didn't really do much. Even when the other MRAs were talking about how women belonged in the home because they needed to be cared by men, kursat just said feminism was wrong.
    3
  115.  @inertiasquared6667  hence my statement, as you and the other state women have greater "proficiency" as care givers than men due to their biology, ie, MRAs believe men's body mass makes them more suitable for physical acts and not child rearing, what result do you expect in child custody case (note they are currently done on a case by case basis)?
    3
  116. No, she was correct (note NOMAS). Likewise most of the debate was MRAs saying men are lesser parents to women while the feminists said the sexes are equals
    3
  117.  @RandomDucc-sj8pd  then isn't that showing feminists are fighting for the rights of men?
    3
  118. i mean to be fair, most jobs aren't fulfilling and their wage is the price tag. Just ask anyone who works in the fast food industry. I think the better argument is: sex work is not the best job but they should have legal protections. They're still people after all.
    3
  119. That's weird, why do you think derrick was prepared when saying things that harm men?
    3
  120.  @butthissureisfun5619  that's strange, why do you believe women get pregnant asexually which is why men helping take care of the child is inequality?
    3
  121.  @kauswekazilimani3736  apologies, but if most individuals in the courts believe (as MRAs habitually push) that women are inherently superior care givers, what result do you expect? What result do you expect if instead they see men and women as equal? Surely you agree personal views influence conclusions?
    3
  122.  @kauswekazilimani3736  the father may love the child but it is up to the courts to decide who the best parent is and since you agree MRA beliefs, eg, women are biologically more suited to care for children, negatively influence court decisions, why are you surprised at the outcome? Doesn't this mean the courts need to be more feminist so men and women are seen as equal?
    3
  123.  @kauswekazilimani3736  and yes, people are petty. Look at the fact that MRAs get the result they want, ie, women are seen as better parents, but still complain about it, ie, men aren't seen as better parents.
    3
  124.  @kauswekazilimani3736  as for pettiness, again, why are you surprised at the inevitable conclusion of the courts if MRA's believe women are inherently superior parents? Why is not doing this pettiness on feminists part?
    3
  125.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, now you are justifying men getting worse prison sentences simply because "vvomen are physically weaker than men lol" and "men are more violent". aren't you therefore showing why only feminism helps people?
    3
  126.  @2crisp63  that's odd, you can't provide a single example? Not even about the one i directly asked about?
    3
  127.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, as you now backtrack to stating successful women simply stop or rarely date, why is that hypergamy?
    3
  128. I disagree, the MRAs had similar views to Derek. Two of the three don't even view men and women as equal.
    3
  129.  @anthk.4846  sadly, as shown by the video, that is not true
    3
  130. why is it a personal issue if all women have experience with it?
    3
  131.  @humankinglobetard3000  aren't all of those things done by men? Likewise, didn't feminists make it legal for women to enter military combat in 2015?
    3
  132. Well he is an MRA. As a general rule their positions are basically just opposing feminism. Note what they said about custody cases.
    3
  133. You are entitled to believe men gave birth to women
    3
  134. Why do you believe disliking certain jokes is inherent to women? That seems very strange.
    3
  135. It's interesting that their main complaint is in regards to something they uphold. Divorced or not, it's still women who care for children and men who provide money.
    3
  136. That already happened in WW2. Women just did everything instead.
    3
  137. Is that why all the feminists agreed men and women are equal while none of the MRAs seemed to?
    3
  138. That actually was his point. He doesn't think men and women are equals.
    3
  139.  @matteobasl3769  so that's a no then?
    3
  140. I don't know why people are scandalized she gave an intense answer. I mean, he specifically asked her what harm had been done to her. What did you expect?
    3
  141. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  why wouldn't I mention an issue the MRAs gave and simultaneously sabotaged?
    2
  142. what positions apply in regards to what you wrote?
    2
  143. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but if you believe seeing men as equal parents "demonizes" families, isn't that showing exactly why feminism is needed? Would you like to write the definition of NOMAS?
    2
  144. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, if you believe seeing men as equal parents "demonizes" families, isn't that showing exactly why feminism is needed? Would you like to write the acronym NOMAS stands for?
    2
  145.  @DavidW-ng5zv  so basically the entire basis of the Socratic philosophy was taught by a woman? It seems logic actually was invented by a woman.
    2
  146.  @lilgoober246  no they aren't. there's a reason everything is becoming more expensive
    2
  147. Why would women hate their husbands hugging their children?
    2
  148. Weren't the MRA views givne by the men essentially the same?
    2
  149.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, we just need Incel mass shootings to be at zero so they don't say they're protecting women
    2
  150. didn't the mra's specifically ask her how and where she'd been abused?
    2
  151.  @DavidW-ux2gc  over what?
    2
  152.  @DavidW-ng5zv  what experiences do you mean? Please be specific
    2
  153.  @DavidW-ng5zv  what abuses did the MRAs demand she describe?
    2
  154.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly it does. You stated she was abused and the MRAs demanded she give details about it. Kindly do so so we may see her answer. Or is it so awful YouTube will block you for writing it?
    2
  155.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd deflection. What were those tame things you previously described as abuse? Or did you avoid writing it because it is so awful youtube blocks you from writing it? Likewise, why do you believe her answering the MRA means she created the query?
    2
  156.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "She said that she had a bottle thrown at her head" apologies , but you deflected. Again, what else? Kindly provide the rest. And again, why do you believe her answering the MRA means she created his query? Is this because you noted her answer was fairly convincing?
    2
  157. "I do believe men and women should be equal." ironically, the MRA's disagree with you. you should probably interact with more feminists since you are already partial to their views.
    2
  158.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, where do the feminists state they hate men? The MRAs constantly say men are lesser parents, so does this mean they hate men?
    2
  159.  @humankinglobetard3000  as you note stating men are lesser parent's means the MRA's would hate men, doesn't that show why only feminists see the sexes as equals? or where in the video do they state they hate men?
    2
  160.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. if the MRA's don't hate men, why do they state men are lesser parents?
    2
  161.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for noting it is misandry for the MRA's to state men are lesser parents. Thus, isn't that us agreeing only feminists help people per stating men and women are equals?
    2
  162.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for accepting the MRA's stated women are biologically better parents, ie, you agree the MRA's are misandrists. Or would you like to quote them if not? Does having muscles make men worse parents or are the feminists correct that the sexes are equal?
    2
  163.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for thus showing why feminism exists. for example, why do the MRA's say men are inherently lesser parents?
    2
  164. That's strange, why would answering the MRAs question make you feel she was triggered? What answer did she give that made you feel as such?
    2
  165.  @DavidW-ng5zv  angry about what? What did she have to state that made her angry?
    2
  166. Not particularly. Women are 90% of nurses and they still get paid less than men who are nurses. It's quite unfair to do the same job yet still be paid less, especially when you're considered better than those getting paid more.
    2
  167. Didn't he say women aren't equal to men and then compare women to children?
    2
  168. Noticed there aren't a lot of comments congratulating the feminists, so I'd like to say thanks to them for absolutely nailing the talk.
    2
  169. Why do you think men showing emotions is about publicly crying when asking women on dates?
    2
  170.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noticing kursat was mistaken. Thus, how do the MRAs help men by saying men are lesser parents?
    2
  171.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noticing kursat was mistaken. Do you avoid writing of any MRA organization that helps people because they only state men are lesser parents?
    2
  172.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are entitled to pretend otherwise. But if the groups you named help anyone, why do they specifically say in their donation box that the money does not go to help men?
    2
  173.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for agreeing none of the groups you named donate to men in trouble. Thus, thank you for showing why only feminists help and noting the group that helps them.
    2
  174.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish. But again, thank you for agreeing none of the groups you named help men, ie, proving why only feminists help
    2
  175.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting kursat was mistaken and thank you for noticing none of your examples help men
    2
  176.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to backtrack, but thank you for noting kursat was mistaken and thank you for noticing none of your examples help men. You are entitled to pretend that organizations pocketing money helps men
    2
  177.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting kursat was mistaken and thank you for noticing none of your examples help men by noting they literally pocket the money sent to them. You are entitled to pretend NOMAS acts like MRA groups in order to pretend feminists don't help men
    2
  178.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for backtracking per noting kursat was mistaken and thank you for noticing none of your examples help since you admit they pocket the money sent to them. Would you like to wrote what NOMAS is an acronym for if it is an organization for women? But thank you for noting they are not like MRA's
    2
  179.  @The_Founder  "...on the basis of equality of the sexes" apologies, but why do you believe equality only affects women?
    2
  180. lying in regards to what?
    2
  181. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  before or after the sex trafficking trial?
    2
  182. yeah that was kind of weird. some men feeling unsafe to the point of crying because women say no AND then saying women are at fault are acting like children. some self reflection is clearly needed
    2
  183.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs said women are better parents. As the feminists oppose this and say both sexes are equal parents, doesn't Mimi have a point?
    2
  184.  @CristanioPeweyyy  then you believe men are inherently lesser parents? If so, why are you surprised men generally lose custody cases?
    2
  185. I don't get this point. So if an abortion is done before that then it's okay?
    2
  186. That's an odd response. Why is Zack correct for demanding Alysha give details about being assaulted?
    2
  187.  @falconhoward4032  if you believe so, then why not quote zacks question? it's actually fairly short. If answering questions is not wrong, then why state alysha answering zack means she went on "a whole rant"?
    2
  188.  @falconhoward4032  then we agree she was answering zacks demand for details about her being assaulted. It seems odd you see a description of assault as incorrectly done. was it so graphic it made you uncomfortable?
    2
  189.  @falconhoward4032  that's weird, then you haven't seen the video since you have such a bad phone? Because her answer isn't that long. Regardless, i reiterate my query. why do you think it is wrong to answer questions? Because it seems you condemn doing so as you see it as hateful to men
    2
  190.  @falconhoward4032  then why not assist me? Again, kindly quote what was wrong with the answer. It's honestly strange you deflect from this
    2
  191.  @promisewanogho  then why not explain? the MRA demands she give details about where and how she'd been assaulted and she answered him. seems quite strange you would assume she'd be happy to describe her being assaulted
    2
  192. ​ @promisewanogho  note you immediately backtrack by saying her tone is wrong for describing her assault. again, why are you criticizing that she wasn't happy when describing her assault? seems odd you believe it is correct for MRAs to demand details about women being assaulted
    2
  193.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per agreeing seeing men and women as equal in courts provides fairer results, ie, "they do", i thank you for agreeing with feminism. As we agreed equality helps, ie, you agree with feminism, do you wish to change to another subject?
    2
  194.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing men and women being seen as equals provides fairer results, ie, "they do". Thus, i thank you for agreeing with feminism. Do you wish to change to another subject?
    2
  195.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for agreeing that men and women being seen as equals provides better results. Thus, wouldn't equality between men and women, ie, feminism, help in regards to your new subject?
    2
  196.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting that seeing men and women as equals brings better results, ie, feminism. Thus, per your new subject, wouldn't equality also help? Or is it "a myth" as you previously wrote?
    2
  197.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for reiterating you believe equality is a myth despite stating it does bring fairer results, ie, you note feminism helps but oppose it regardless. Thus, why do you believe any issue exists with incels if equal treatment, ie, feminism, is not what you wish?
    2
  198.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as you stated "equality is a myth". Thus, why do you believe any issue exists when you agree feminism brings fairer results (thank you for noting this) yet still oppose this? It seems strange you imply incels wish to be treated as inferiors.
    2
  199.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, as you stated "equality is a myth", why do you believe any issue exists? Note you oppose feminism despite agreeing it brings fairer results (and agreeing no one likes being treated as inferior). Note how even incels who have money and work out complain about being incels.
    2
  200.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you stated "equality is a myth" and oppose feminism despite agreeing it brings fairer results. Thus, why do you believe an issue exists for incels? Note you imply incels wish to be treated as lesser. Or do no incels care for themselves or have a job?
    2
  201.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting incels do have money and work out yet stay as incels, ie, hypergamy is false. Thus, per noting feminism brings better results (which you oppose), why state any issue exists if you state equality is a myth? Again, it seems you believe incels wish to be treated as inferior.
    2
  202.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" again, thank you for showing that even while working out and having money that incels stay as such. Thus, per showing hypergamy is false and stating equality is a myth, why does any issue exist if you believe it correct incels are as such? It seems odd you view incels as inferior simply because you believe feminism striving for equality is wrong.
    2
  203.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" thank you for showing that even when working out and having money, incels continue as incels. Do incels believe hypergamy is false and agree feminism, ie, equal treatment, gives fairer results (as you do)?
    2
  204.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" again, thank you for showing that hypergamy is false as even when working out and having money, incels continue as incels. As you thus state incels don't believe in equality, isn't that incels fighting to be seen as inferior? Note you seem to believe they are.
    2
  205. ​ @netflix_and_chill20  men and women feel emotions and can think just as well. Or what do you mean by they're different mentally and emotionally? Because they're different biologically since one has parts the other doesn't, but it's pretty clear they both feel love and hate, as well as have an equal capacity to reason.
    2
  206.  @PriyanshuKumar-ez6qi  he kind of is, zack even defends derrick after he stated men and women aren't equal. Apparently, it's not that one is superior or inferior to the other, just that one has a biological preference towards child rearing. While derrick was the most blunt about what women's role in a patriarchal society would be, the ideals held by the other MRAs have the same conclusion.
    2
  207.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you agree with the MRAs saying men are inherently worse parents?
    2
  208. MRAs are weird
    2
  209. As feminism made it legal for women to fight in the military in 2016, does that mean you agree with it fighting for equality?
    2
  210. His views, with some minor differences, are actually the same as the other MRAs.
    2
  211.  @TheBritishGuy75  in regards to not seeing men and women as equal (but different). He even specifies women belong at home taking care of the kids because they're more "suited for that role".
    2
  212. ​ @TheBritishGuy75  then doesn't zack act like it too? He even says he's an advocate for where men (and thus women) should be in society. Honestly, they seem even more similar than i thought.
    2
  213.  @TheBritishGuy75  if the difference you want to focus on is that derrick is blunter about it, then yeah. That is obviously true.
    2
  214.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men are more violent on average" thank you for being an example. do you then disagree with feminism legalizing women fighting in the military or is that not equality? But thank you for agreeing women are incels too.
    2
  215.  @Speakertweaker-tp4em  that's odd, you think 90% of a hospital staff work part time in a place open 24/7?
    2
  216.  @sebastianb.2921  he probably does say that to women. It's why they keep rejecting him.
    2
  217. Out of curiosity, do you believe women are inherently better at child rearing but also that men are discriminated in custody cases?
    2
  218. Not particularly. He basically just said feminism is wrong and doesn't help men. Which is ironic because he kept ignoring the MRAs saying men are inherently worse parents while the feminists opposed this.
    2
  219.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would MRAs stating men are lesser parents create a healthy family unit?
    2
  220.  @Khan-kx9jw  it's not a complex issue. One of the main issues that can be solved by abortion is pregnancy complications. These are fairly common and can lead to women dying or obtaining permanent damage. Also, if we're talking about "controlling oneself" why is that men suffer zero issues when a woman gets pregnant to the point only about half of alimony payments are ever made? Kind of unfair women are forced to be mothers but men can choose whether they want to be fathers
    2
  221. Didn't they throw a bottle at her for saying no?
    2
  222.  @itsEpzen  then you agree it is harassment to throw things at people because they said no to you?
    2
  223.  @itsEpzen  then you don't think throwing bottles at people is harassment?
    2
  224.  @itsEpzen  apologies, you think me asking you questions is harrasment but throwing bottles isn't?
    2
  225.  @itsEpzen  then you do think its harassment to throw bottles at people?
    2
  226.  @alexl8445  i know it's assault. Why do you think 5 comments is harassment though?
    2
  227.  @itsEpzen  strange, then if it was all a joke, you mean throwing bottles is harassment?
    2
  228. That's pretty accurate
    2
  229. His views aren't actually that different from the other guys. He's just blunter about it. For example, Zack also believes women and men aren't equal, and all of them believe the harassment women suffer (clearly demonstrated by Alysha) isn't systemic.
    2
  230.  @kauswekazilimani3736  that's odd, why do you believe seeing men and women as equal, ie, feminism, is misandry? Do you not believe that's better for the courts? Please recall you do agree viewing women as the biologically superior parent, ie, the MRA view, causes discrimination.
    2
  231.  @kauswekazilimani3736  hence my questions. 1) why do you believe equality is misandry or would you write the definition of feminism? 2) thus, why would opposing MRA views that women are biologically superior parents be pettiness on feminists part? 3) are you then agreeing that MRA views of women being superior parents cause discrimination?
    2
  232.  @kauswekazilimani3736  wait, are you trying to change the subject to say feminists aren't perfect because you agreed MRA ideology actively harms men?
    2
  233.  @kauswekazilimani3736  because I'm still focusing on child custody cases.
    2
  234.  @kauswekazilimani3736  likewise, it seems quite odd you believe feminists pushing that men and women are equal doesn't help in child custody cases because you believe "Neither" help. Why would a judge and jury seeing both parents as equal not be what's necessary for a fair outcome?
    2
  235.  @kauswekazilimani3736  thank you for accepting judges need gender equality to arrive at a fair conclusion. Would you then write the definition of feminism to see if it is hubris that they fight for gender equality?
    2
  236.  @kauswekazilimani3736  its legitimately strange you avoid my queries, but thank you for at least agreeing feminism is about gender equality.
    2
  237.  @kauswekazilimani3736  i don't know why you try to change the subject, but as we agree feminism is about gender equality while MRAs are not (evidenced by their respective positions in child custody cases), why do you pretend neither do anything?
    2
  238.  @kauswekazilimani3736  why do you believe I am being condescending by asking you why MRA's misandry is the same as feminists focus on equality? Your response was to write "Neither" help, yet you agreed judges should consider all as equal, ie, feminism. Are you avoiding an answer because you believe it presents favoritism towards feminism?
    2
  239.  @kauswekazilimani3736  for example, were you aware feminism legalized women fighting in the military in 2015, yet most MRA's stated women were too weak to fight?
    2
  240.  @kauswekazilimani3736  thus you once more avoid my query. Again, you stated the definition and actions of feminism is for gender equality. Why do you then write this is the same as MRAs stating men are lesser parents because it's women that belong in the home? It seems fairly condescending to pretend this is your position.
    2
  241.  @kauswekazilimani3736  and yet we agree feminists legalized women fighting in the military while MRAs opposed this because they overwhelmingly saw women as belonging im the home while men were built for fighting. Thus, why is feminism's equality the same as MRAs inequality? Or do you believe changing the law was done by a minority of feminists while the majority opposed it?
    2
  242.  @kauswekazilimani3736  as you then agree the MRAs in the video don't see women as equal while the feminists do, do you then believe the videos creator specifically chose outliers that you state they don't represent most of the groups?
    2
  243.  @kauswekazilimani3736  likewise, do you believe feminists legalizing women fighting in the military 7 years ago was due to a belief in equality held by the majority of feminists or the minority? Likewise, why did MRAs oppose this?
    2
  244.  @kauswekazilimani3736  thank you for then agreeing the individuals here are representative of the groups due to being chosen at random. Thus, which ideology helps achieve equality, the MRA's stating men are lesser parents or the feminists stating the sexes are equal?
    2
  245.  @kauswekazilimani3736  per your words in believing the video chose outliers to represent the ideologies, "No its a few random people." again, thank you for accepting seeing men as lesser parents is a fixture of the MRA ideology while feminists legalized women fighting alongside men in the military due to believing in equality.
    2
  246.  @kauswekazilimani3736  again, thank you for your words noting MRA ideals are against equality while equality is a fixture of feminism. Thus, which ideology is helping people in, for example, custody cases? And thank you for accepting feminism legalized women fighting in the military while MRAs opposed this.
    2
  247.  @kauswekazilimani3736  it seems very strange you pretend to be impartial when stating neither group helps after agreeing MRAs actively oppose equality while feminists support equality.
    2
  248.  @kauswekazilimani3736  you are entitled to ignore what you wrote, but per your words if the groups were outliers: "No its a few random people." Thus, thank you for accepting the views shown in the video are representative of feminism (equality) and MRAs (misandry and misogyny). Kindly write which ideology then helps in custody cases.
    2
  249.  @kauswekazilimani3736  once again, thank you for you words demonstrating the views weren't outliers: "No its a few random people." Thus, which group makes the courts fairer due to pushing equality? Please note feminism legalizing women fighting in the military while MRAs opposed it.
    2
  250.  @kauswekazilimani3736  again, truly odd you pretend to be impartial after agreeing feminists push equality and MRAs push misandry and misogyny. As stated, thank you for accepting the views in the video aren't outliers.
    2
  251.  @kauswekazilimani3736  it truly is puzzling you consider me repeating your words trolling. Again, we already agreed only feminists focus on equality while MRA's do not. Why do you avoid answering honestly when i ask you which group helps in the courts? Again, please answer.
    2
  252. PS truly strange you attempt to backpedal that it's only a few MRAs that believe what those in the video state after accepting they were chosen at random, ie, aren't outliers, and attempt to extend this to feminists. Truly odd indeed.
    2
  253. Considering some conservative states made it illegal for women to have an abortion even when raped and/or dying due to pregnancy complications, that would be a no.
    2
  254. Refugees are in the country legally because their process is different from what migrants take. That's why they're not illegal migrants
    2
  255. The anti-feminists are always weird yet are still representative of their respective movements
    2
  256. True, the problem's men have are because they're seen as inherently strong and competent while the problems women have is that they're biologically seen as weak and incompetent.
    2
  257. this is basically a debate between people who are well informed and people who only know things through facebook memes
    2
  258. That's strange, then as the women's soccer teams wins far more than the men's team, why are they still paid less? Likewise, why do you believe athletes are paid through, for example, the souvenir shop? But thank you for accepting the wage gap is real
    2
  259.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would the MRAs saying men are lesser parents be helping?
    2
  260.  @topshelfdustin3060  so you think a court is going to choose the less nurturing parent as the main caregiver? Like i said, the MRAs complain courts favor women only to then say women are biologically better parents.
    2
  261. That's odd, you believe feminism is wrong because the titanic crashed?
    2
  262. There are more men in death row, and yes, part of it does have to do with the fact that men generally commit worse crimes, but also because no one thinks women are a threat (even if they commit the same crime). It's a patriarchal thing where women are seen as more submissive, docile and overall weaker than men. Basically the same logic that had women banned from fighting in the military.
    2
  263.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you repeatedly justified men getting worse treatment because "vvomen are physically weaker than men lol" and "men are more violent", aren't you showing why only feminism helps? Seems odd you believe not seeing men as worse than women is destroying society.
    2
  264.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly you justified it. Note your words when the subject has to do with men receiving more death sentences: "vvomen are physically weaker than men lol" and "men are more violent". so again, aren't you showing why only feminism helps?
    2
  265. Don't MRAs believe there's discrimination in custody cases but also thay women are inherently better at child rearing? Isn't that causing the problem they're decrying?
    2
  266.  @palle4859  it's interesting that your reply is to essentially say the guy recommending kursats video probably doesn't know or care what it contains.
    2
  267.  @palle4859  so why even recommend one watch it?
    2
  268.  @BigMeech935  precisely, i asked what example he could provide yet only received a deflection despite said individual having the internet at his fingertips. Truly odd he couldn't provide a single example wouldn't you agree?
    2
  269.  @BigMeech935  then would you kindly write what was different between this video and the other? Just one example? Assuming you saw his source of course. Again, seems odd one has all the knowledge and power of the internet but answering a single query is met with deflections. Truly odd indeed.
    2
  270.  @BigMeech935  it's odd how everyone deflects from providing just one example despite the internet at their fingertips. Why defend something you know nothing about over something you haven't seen?
    2
  271.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting MRAs stating men are inferior parents is not addressing men's issues. As you note feminists oppose this view, doesn't that show only feminists help men?
    2
  272. Women can protect themselves just as well as men can, ie, they both call police
    2
  273. Interestingly, zack actually had the same views as derrick but was politer about it. Kursat didn't really do anything.
    2
  274.  @SuperJudeM  that's interesting, you changed it. I never said anything about married, even the guy saying women are hypergamous was ranting about divorced and single women. So why did you say i was wrong by sneaking in the word "married"? Quite strange you're trying to lecture me about what women want by ignoring statistics
    2
  275.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, so if Viagra isn't free but is subsidized by the government, why shouldn't the same be done with tampons?
    2
  276.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, per pretending they didn't, thank you for noticing why MRAs don't help men
    2
  277. He is representative of the movement. Why do you think zack agreed with him on nearly everything?
    2
  278.  @The_ScaryCool  if so, what different views did the MRAs hold? For example, do they agree men and women are different but equal?
    2
  279. Do you want to fight derrick?
    2
  280.  @anthk.4846  as you saw the video, thank you for noting how MRA's systematically harm women. Also, thank you for noting that the MRA's stating women as belonging in the home is wrong.
    2
  281.  @fjoebidun5376  exactly, as most women are employed and thus take care of themselves, yet you state women aren't because you wish to open doors for them, isn't that showing why MRAs don't help?
    2
  282. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, then you believe the MRAs saying men are biologically worse parents is the same as the feminists stating both sexes are equal? Which of these do you believe helps custody cases have a fairer result?
    2
  283.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you believe MRAs telling people that men are biologically worse parents is more helpful in custody cases, thank you for showing why only feminists have solutions
    2
  284.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe MRAs stating men are biologically lesser parents to women is helpful in custody cases, thank you for showing only feminists help due to stating the sexes are equal
    2
  285. He asked what feminist entity helps challenge bias against men in the family court system and instigated any meaningful change in the law. The question required a hyper specific answer so it was pretty unfair. Ironically, no MRA movement has ever done anything to help fathers because the general MRA position is to say men are biologically lesser parents.
    2
  286. then why is it that nearly all women search for a job? seems odd they want men who work so the first thing women do is get a job
    2
  287. Isn't one of them being asked for details about how she was essentially assaulted? It seems kind of weird to expect her to be completely calm.
    2
  288. As feminists legalized women fighting in the military in 2016 and you demand more women do difficult jobs, does this mean you agree with feminism? Likewise, surely you disagree with the MRAs that men are inherently lesser parents?
    2
  289. why don't you guys just have literal fascists debate liberals (or anyone really)? this way people will actually know what fascism is
    2
  290. You are entitled to believe as you wish, but it seems odd you believe men and women being equals means men are hated. Or why would feminism legalizing women fighting in the military mean men become inferior?
    2
  291. What roles are men and women supposed to play?
    2
  292. Which views shared here do you side with?
    2
  293. Didn't roe v wade get repealed? Seems women have less privileges if their bodily autonomy is subject to the whims of the state
    2
  294.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if they're the same rights, why was it only the mra's saying women belong at home getting pregnant?
    2
  295.  @zoroverse8358  exactly, MRAs state women are biologically more nurturing parents. So who do you believe wins nearly all custody cases: the nurturing or the non nurturing one? As you surely note this harms men, why isn't this self sabotaging? Clearly that's not a reason for their group to exist
    2
  296.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange. if you believe (as the MRA's do) that men are biologically worse parents, then how does that help them win custody cases? isn't them losing the conclusion they should expect?
    2
  297.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why wouldn't it bother you that you view men as biologically lesser parents? But by doing so, thank you for showing why feminism exists and helps both sexes
    2
  298.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why would it not bother you that you see yourself as a lesser parent? Regardless, thank you for noting why feminism exists and showing how it helps both sexes
    2
  299. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, then why was it only an anti-feminist who stated women shouldn't be financially independent?
    2
  300. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, you deflected. Again, wouldn't that show the original commenter was correct in ignoring derrick as you state his point was that women didn't give him sex?
    2
  301. agreed, it seems MRA's are more likely to cause issues instead of solving them
    2
  302.  @venerexate1841  if you believe both favor equality, how many of the MRAs agreed men and women were equal? How many of the feminists did?
    2
  303.  @venerexate1841  if so, what was the query asked at 2:24? Thus, isn't that showing what the MRA movement is about?
    2
  304. Ironically, of that were true, their inequality would make them equal to each other. It's why men and women who were serfs were treated exactly the same, with them equally toiling the fields until death.
    2
  305.  @smolbean2803  what statistics did he give? Or did he just claim the wage gap is false which is why he believes feminism is wrong?
    2
  306.  @smolbean2803  I'm sorry but you accidentally didn't answer. You stated kursat gave statistics, so what numbers did he give? Because it seems he just said, for example, "the wage gap is false which is why feminism is wrong".
    2
  307. agreed
    2
  308.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why do the MRAs say men are lesser parents because they think women are biologically suited for it?
    2
  309.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you (like the MRA's) believe men are biologically lesser parents?
    2
  310.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting it is misandry for the MRA's to state men are biologically lesser parents. Kindly observe the first prompt given by jubilee to see as such. Or do you disagree with the feminists stating men and women are equals?
    2
  311.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "They said that vvomen generally are better at being caregivers." as the MRA's state this is due to biology and you try to deny them saying as such, is this because it shows toxic masculinity? Do you believe men are lesser parents?
    2
  312.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "I believe that men and vvomen are different" do you, like the MRA's, believe men are inherently lesser parents as one of the differences?
    2
  313.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "vvomen are more nurturing on average" and is that why the MRA's say men are biologically lesser parents? Seems odd to then say toxic masculinity does not exist if you defend men being seen as lesser parents
    2
  314.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "they said that vvomen are more nurturing on average." and thus my question. Again, is that why the MRA's then say men are biologically lesser parents? Or why not quote them?
    2
  315.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why not quote them? But thank you for noting it is toxic masculinity for them to say men are lesser parents
    2
  316.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "they said that vvomen are more nurturing on average." and thus my question. Again, is that why the MRA's then say men are biologically lesser parents? Do you avoid this query because it shows toxic masculinity?
    2
  317.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "they said that vvomen are more nurturing on average." and thus the question you avoid. Again, is that why the MRA's say men are biologically lesser parents? Is this toxic masculinity? Either way, thank you for showing only feminism helps people
    2
  318.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing that the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. So again, why isn't that MRA's pushing "the notion that m en are evil and that masculinity is toxic"? Seems odd you avoid the answer to your query
    2
  319.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing that the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. Still odd you avoid this question, so again, why isn't MRA's pushing "the notion that m en are evil and that masculinity is toxic"? Why is it toxic for feminists to oppose this?
    2
  320.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing that the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents and noticing this is toxic masculinity by now trying to blame the feminists for it. So why is it helpful for men to be seen as biologically lesser parents?
    2
  321. pretty much. they kept self sabotaging to the point the feminists turned out to help men more
    2
  322.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why did you state feminists are crying about roe v wade?
    2
  323.  @Rip_Bobby-t4l  that's odd, why is seeing men and women as equal toxic?
    2
  324. that's a strange response. in what way do men fear what type of clothes they wear?
    2
  325.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus my statement. Per your examples, you are entitled to believe every corner of the world is attacking men due to the influence of football clubs
    2
  326.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as i stated per your example (before backtracking), you are entitled to believe every corner of the world is attacking men due to the influence of football clubs
    2
  327. Out of curiosity, what main points do you mean? Child custody cases?
    2
  328. that's an odd response. if you agree derrick is a joke, doesn't this mean you believe MRA's are the same since they agreed with Derrick?
    2
  329.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you believe the MRAs saying men are lesser parents is not?
    2
  330.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting. As you deny MRAs state men are lesser parents, is this due to noticing that is gynocentric? Then you observing the video would mean you believe MRAs are gynocentric?
    2
  331. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then kindly observe their first statement upon them disagreeing with the first prompt. Again, as you noted this is gynocentric, is you accepting they state men are worse parents mean you believe the MRAs are gynocentric?
    2
  332.  @BRexxors  yeah, he kept lying and sidestepping the question. That's how I knew it wasn't a sincere conversation
    2
  333. I'm pretty sure women don't need to be "protected" from having the jobs they want.
    2
  334. Apologies, but what personal stories did the MRAs give?
    2
  335.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As you noted the commenter was incorrect in stating the MRAs were giving personal stories, it seems he didn't see the video, correct? Seems strange the MRAs couldn't give personal stories despite demanding women give personal stories.
    2
  336.  @Wellcee426  in other words, you haven't gotten any money
    2
  337. Not really, he didn't really do anything.
    2
  338. Honestly, they just seem to be fighting to oppose feminism, not to help anyone.
    2
  339. Everyone has to prove themselves
    2
  340. Based upon what was shown in the video, that doesn't seem to be the case for MRAs. At worst, they might actually be exacerbating the problems they condemn. At the very least i can say feminism made it legal for women to fight in the military.
    2
  341.  @apierrakeas9577  then why did the MRAs say men were lesser parents? That doesn't seem to be helping at all
    2
  342. Why is it wrong to call men and women who are trained as police? I can promise you that men do so as well.
    2
  343. Feminism is about equality for men and women. But if you noted, the MRAs don't seem to believe men and women are equal.
    2
  344. Not really. Selective service doesn't really do anything.
    2
  345. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  odd, what duty do you mean?
    2
  346.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, then you agree selective service does nothing as you switch away from it?
    2
  347.  @ComedyyJ  excellently described
    2
  348. @AV1611-KJV i am a bit confused by your question. are you asking me why i believe that men are NOT worse parents to women, ie, i agree with the feminists, or are you asking me why i view men as lesser parents, ie, agree with the MRA's?
    2
  349. @AV1611-KJV no, men and women can both be equally capable parents. not sure why people think parenthood is genetic.
    2
  350. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv again, as you agree with the MRAs that men are genetically lesser parents, aren't you showing exactly why feminism exists as the MRAs harm men in custody cases?
    2
  351. What was his answer when asked what the purpose of MRAs was?
    2
  352. Some Republican lawmakers from Idaho, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota have started telling the supreme court to reconsider their decision on same-sex marriage equality. In case anyone thinks conservatives are tolerant of gay marriage or that it's just an "opinion"
    2
  353.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why is feminism wrong for saying men and women are equal parents? do you believe men are biologically worse parents?
    2
  354. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc  that's odd, why is feminism pitting men men against women when stating both are equal parents? Again, do you believe men are biologically worse parents as the MRAs state?
    2
  355.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would opposing the MRAs saying men are lesser parents (because men and women are equal) be awful? Likewise, as you seem to agree incels treating women as a Madonna or wh**e doesn't help, thank you for noting treating women as equals is correct.
    2
  356.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you mean incels never interact with women at all? Wouldn't that be why they can't get dates? That's quite a change after stating women say no to them regardless of how much money they have, ie, why you state women are hypergamous. But thank you for noting MRA's demonize men. Thus, is it better to get advice from someone who sees you as lesser or as an equal?
    2
  357. If you are confused, please note that most incels complain that despite working out and making quite a bit of money, women don't pay attention to them. Seems odd that these top men are ignored by women if you state women are hypergamous by nature. Wouldn't interacting with women and treating women as equals be the solution? Again, note you agreed incels treating women as Madonnas or wh**es doesn't work.
    2
  358.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, are MRA's demonizing men better than feminists stating men and women are equal?
    2
  359.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for being an example as you believe MRAs harming men is more acceptable than feminists stating the sexes are equal.
    2
  360.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but thank you for noting what you call top men are those with money and who work out. As incels complain they don't get dates despite doing this, why are they incels?
    2
  361.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note you believe top men are in Hollywood (and nearly all are feminists) and incels complain they're ignored despite having money and working out, ie, what you described are top men (such as those in Hollywood). Thus, wouldn't treating women as equals helps?
    2
  362.  @DavidW-ng5zv  however, it is odd you try to blame women for not dating men who you now describe as broke, unhealthy and never interact with women.
    2
  363.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but thank you for noting "top men" (per your description) are those in Hollywood, ie, those who generally see women as equal.
    2
  364.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you're describing most men as never talking to women, then do you believe they should talk to women as equals? It does seem odd you blame women for incels being broke and unhealthy though.
    2
  365.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, you are attempting to take both positions in that you believe incels are broke and unhealthy, but also financially successful and work out. Thus, isn't treating women as equals what they should do?
    2
  366.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your odd comment, you seem to believe incels are both poor and rich, unhealthy and healthy (they work out), etc. Thus, again, wouldn't treating women as equals be what incels need to do?
    2
  367.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" I do at least thank you for accepting why hypergamy is false
    2
  368.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing hypergamy is false, and that incels are some how both broke and unhealthy, rich and healthy, yet still incels. "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, wouldn't treating women as equals be the differentiator?
    2
  369.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, do you believe acting as the MRAs do in demonizing men is helpful or is it better to be like feminists, ie, see people as equal? Again, note you accepted top men do treat women as equals, eg, Hollywood, while incels don't
    2
  370.  @DavidW-ng5zv  likewise, per writing MRAs demonizing men is more helpful than feminists treating all people as equal, thank you for being an example of why feminism is necessary.
    2
  371.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, per your words: "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, as you write incels are incels regardless of their situation, wouldn't treating women as equals be what changes things? Again, note you believe MRAs demonizing men is better than treating people as equals, ie, why you are an example.
    2
  372.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing that physical or financial concepts aren't what makes incels. "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, wouldn't treating women as equals be what changes things? Note your position that demonizing men is better than treating people as equals.
    2
  373.  @rogerking3026  feminism, as it seems (so far) to be the only one that helps men and women.
    2
  374.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing physical and financial aspects are irrelevant as incels continue being incels even when they have money and work out: "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, you note hypergamy is false. Again, as you are an example that believes demonizing men is better than treating treating people as equals, isn't treating women equally what would change things?
    2
  375.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it seems quite odd you backtrack your words in order to state i make logical leaps
    2
  376.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, as you wrote: "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, per accepting MRAs are demonizing men and women, and feminists state the sexes are equal, wouldn't equality be what's necessary? It does appear the answer is yes as you constantly try to backtrack your statements.
    2
  377.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet again, as you wrote: "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, per accepting incels (like the MRA in the video) are demonizing men and women, ie, stating one is inferior to the other, wouldn't equality be what changes thing? Or do you believe treating women as lesser will help incels? Again, it appears you agree with this as you try to backtrack from your words.
    2
  378.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, thank you for noting hypergamy is false by writing "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women".
    2
  379.  @DavidW-ng5zv  lastly, thank you for noting hypergamy is false as incels continue to be incels because "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women".
    2
  380.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and 75% of tinder users are men
    2
  381.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but we already reached an agreement. Again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". And yes, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. "I just said that it did" Likewise, thank you for accepting treating people as equals, ie, feminism, is what is necessary. MRAs are wrong for demonizing men and women, and thus creating incels.
    2
  382.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Through this, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. Likewise, thank you for accepting treating people as equals, ie, feminism, is what is necessary as MRAs are wrong for demonizing men and women, and thus creating incels.
    2
  383.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, per your words: "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. Again, thank you for accepting treating people as equals, ie, feminism, is what is necessary as MRAs are wrong for demonizing men and women (thus creating incels).
    2
  384.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", and thus showing hypergamy is false. As we agree MRAs create incels due to their views, eg, derrick, wouldn't treating people as equals, ie, feminism, be what helps? Or do you believe, for example, incels treating women as lesser people helps?
    2
  385.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it seems odd you ignore you backtracking constantly, even from your own words.
    2
  386.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking your odd statistic that implied only 25% of the populace are women. Likewise thank you for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" and thus showing hypergamy is false. Likewise, i will reiterate the query you seem to avoid: is treating someone as an equal generally reciprocated? Or is, for example, incels treating women as objects for personal gratification, ie, inferiors, a better option?
    2
  387.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting you are deflecting from my query. Thus i reiterate: is treating someone as an equal preferable to treating them as inferiors, eg, incels see women as only existing for their gratification? Regardless, thank you for noting your statistic that implied only 25% of the populace are women is false and for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    2
  388.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish but it does seem odd you constantly backtrack and deflect. It also seems strange you pretend how you treat people has no bearing on how they treat you.
    2
  389.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "wtf are you taking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior? Stop putting words into my mouth." Thank you for clarifying and accepting treating people as inferior is something no one likes. As incels see and treat women as existing only for sex, ie, inferior, wouldn't it be better if they treated women as equals, ie, feminism? Again, thank for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    2
  390.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but i still thank you for accepting no one likes being treated as inferior: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" As we agree incels see women as inferior, ie, only useful for sex (or what does incel stand for?), wouldn't it be better if they saw women as equals? Again, note Hollywood. Regardless, thank you for a writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    2
  391.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels per having written that looks/money/etc doesn't change them being incels (thereby showing hypergamy is false). Thus, isn't it better for everyone if incels saw women as equals, ie, not just for sex? "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    2
  392. She has a point though. A large amount of men don't even know how to cook for themselves because they think it's for women
    2
  393. It is true that derrick is a consequence of feminism. Feminists state women are equal to men, and derrick says women are not. Thus, derrick is an incel because most women don't like being seen as lesser.
    2
  394. pretty much, not to mention his view that men are biologically lesser parents
    2
  395.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then why did the MRA's say men are lesser parents to women?
    2
  396. that's odd. why are the MRA's correct in stating men are biologically worse parents?
    2
  397.  @averageguys_sa  i am confused by your answer. does this mean you agree with the feminists that the MRA's are wrong for saying men are biologically worse parents?
    2
  398. There is some truth to the position that men receive harsher sentence even if they commit the same crime as women. Why this happens is because women are generally seen as weaker and containing a more empathetic "nature" than men. Ironically, MRAs push this idea (that men are simply more powerful than women) so they're actually helping cause that which they decry.
    2
  399. They're focusing on the macro, not the micro. It's why the MRAs basically said feminism was wrong because women are happier in the home while the feminists said women in general are seen as lesser which is why feminism is needed.
    2
  400.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why isn't it toxic for MRA's to say masculinity means men are inherently lesser parents?
    2
  401. The MRAs were pretty bad, they basically spent the entire debate having things explained to them.
    2
  402.  @kritikabasu9503  i have watched the video. at one point the feminists were talking about the prevalence of SA and his response was to say feminism was wrong. if i missed something, would you write it?
    2
  403.  @kritikabasu9503  but that's why i am asking you, what points did he give? as far as i am aware, he never said anything except that feminism is wrong. for example, when all the feminists agreed that men and women were equals, he replied that feminism was wrong. when one of the feminists affirmed that feminism helps single fathers, he replied that feminism was wrong (which was ironic because the other MRA's kept saying men are biologically worse parents).
    2
  404.  @SwampthingDUK  hence my question, since the feminists in the video actually were sexually assaulted, ie, not a hypothetical situation like with your example, does that mean anything to you?
    2
  405. Isn't the question literally him asking for an example of how the women were harassed?
    2
  406. They don't think women should have rights. Two of the MRAs literally don't think men and women are equal (but different).
    2
  407. so you agree the wage gap is a problem when male nurses are paid more than female nurses? i mean they are doing the same thing since they are both nurses
    2
  408. Ironically, the MRAs disagree with this because they think men are biologically lesser parents. The feminists at least say both parents are equals
    2
  409.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then why do the MRA's disagree with you?
    2
  410. You know the weird thing is that not even the MRAs could answer that
    2
  411.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent question. what issues do the MRA's present?
    2
  412.  @michelledertinger  as you agree feminists have done as you demanded, ie, legalized women fighting in the military in 2015, yet it doesn't change your opinion of them, why are you actually against feminism fighting for equality?
    2
  413.  @buchholzstephen7562  so the differences mean that women are like children and men their parents, or why did he compare women to children?
    2
  414.  @ssamohtttelps1435  then why did the MRA's agree with derrick? seems weird you are aware derrick is wrong yet somehow see the MRA's agreeing with him as different
    2
  415. I am confused, you mean men wouldn't be angry about being attacked and not believed over it?
    2
  416. ironically the mra's actually foment this when they state women are inherently less capable than men. clearly the more dangerous people gets a stricker sentence than the ones who, per derricks words, are like children
    2
  417.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you state women are inherently weaker than men, isn't that you defending that men get worse criminal sentences?
    2
  418.  @don5241  glad i could help. I also apologize as it seemed strange you believed MRAs seeing men as lesser was helping men.
    2
  419.  @EppicGracie96  it's true, while there is discrimination against men in custody cases, men overwhelmingly (and i mean about 90% of the time) don't want custody.
    2
  420.  @lilnotmaster6094  excellent, thank you for accepting the majority of women are employed. You can be angry that the elderly are not if you wish. Thus, is that not accepting women do obtain their own things?
    2
  421.  @lilnotmaster6094  you are entitled to believe so when 40% of households have women as the main breadwinners. Again, you are entitled to be angry that most women have jobs and that men also get things in a divorce.
    2
  422.  @simpledanman  that's odd, then you didn't see any of the video since the MRAs present their views at the beginning? Why state derrick is the worst MRA if all believe the same as him?
    2
  423. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why is it only an anti-feminist who said women shouldn't be financially independent?
    2
  424. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but the wage gap is a verified reality. For example, note women are 90% of nurses but are still paid less than men.
    2
  425. It's odd nearly no one here has seen the video
    1
  426.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then why are only the feminists helping men?
    1
  427.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Only weak men can't control their emotional." thank you for showing why only feminists help men
    1
  428.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Only weak men can't control their emotional" again, thank you for showing why only feminists help men. Or are you backtracking from having agreed with the other stating one must control their emotions?
    1
  429.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, people should control their emotions as crying is better than committing acts of violence. thank you for thus agreeing with the feminists.
    1
  430.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, do you not consider fatherhood pertinent?
    1
  431. ​ @regisshiv3542  you can believe so if you wish, but the fact that all of you constantly change the subject or outright lie about what the MRAs say does show why only feminists help men.
    1
  432. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you deflected, again, do you don't consider custody cases an important issue for men? Do you believe men are lesser parents?
    1
  433. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you noted fatherhood is important, do you believe the MRAs when they say men are lesser parents?
    1
  434. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you noted fatherhood is important, do you state the MRAs did not say this because admitting they did would mean when they harm men?
    1
  435. i actually knew a woman who made less than men despite being a supervisor
    1
  436.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's a strange response. why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates?
    1
  437.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus my question: why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates? interestingly enough, female nurse supervisors (sometimes even nurse CEO's) also earn less than male subordinates
    1
  438.  @DavidW-ux2gc  apologies, but we already agreed the pay gap exists. you merely stated that it was justifiable. are you avoiding my question because you don't like agreeing with feminists?
    1
  439.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then again, why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates? after all, every male CEO works less than their subordinates. do you avoid my query because you agreed with the feminists?
    1
  440.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates." correct, yet you still attempt to justify women making less than their male subordinates. so aren't you agreeing with the feminists?
    1
  441.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates." and yet you still wrote this. are you trying to say you don't agree with feminists due to some weird emotional baggage? because you are agreeing the wage gap exists, you are just trying to justify it
    1
  442.  @DavidW-ux2gc  the emotional baggage brought by you writing "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and then justifying female supervisors earning less than their subordinates "because there are multiple factors at play". either way, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists.
    1
  443.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" yet you agree female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists.
    1
  444.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" note you agree female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap by seeing the proof yourself
    1
  445.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Hence the wage gap. Again, thank you gor agreeing female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap
    1
  446.  @DavidW-ux2gc   "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you notice this does happen, so you backtrack: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap.
    1
  447.  @DavidW-ux2gc   "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you try to defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  448.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you try to defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  449.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  450.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  451.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  452.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "I defend it" Why do you defend supervisors making less than their subordinates? But thank you for at least agreeing with the feminists that the wage gap is real
    1
  453.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "I defend it" thus the question you avoid, why do you defend supervisors making less than their subordinates? after all, you saw the evidence and backtracked to defend supervisors earning less.
    1
  454.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree this is wrong, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  455.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree this is wrong, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  456.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it upon seeing evidence: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree said wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  457.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" so as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  458.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" again, as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  459.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" again, as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  460.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as we agree the wage gap exists and you then write "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing exactly why feminism exists
    1
  461. @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as you then write "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing exactly why feminism exists.
    1
  462.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as we agree the wage gap exists but you defend it by writing that "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  463.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" Again, thank you for accepting the wage gap is real. So why is it correct supervisors earn less than their subordinates?
    1
  464.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Again, thank you for accepting the wage gap is real. So why is it correct supervisors earn less than their subordinates? why is it correct women earn less for doing the same thing men do?
    1
  465.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" again, thank you for showing the feminists are correct as per the evidence you just saw. So why is it correct women earn less for doing the same thing as men?
    1
  466. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" thank you for showing the feminists are correct as per the evidence you saw. Why pretend otherwise? And please don't lie
    1
  467. Why?
    1
  468. ​ @PinocchioDread no, that one has an even more depressing answer. Turns out most custody cases are solved outside of the courtroom by men just saying they don't want to care for the children. So the MRAs saying men are inherently worse parents clearly aren't helping
    1
  469.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for being an example
    1
  470.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, than you for being an example of the MRAs self sabotaging
    1
  471.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing exactly how the MRA's self sabotage
    1
  472.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus I thank you for showing MRAs either self sabotage or do nothing in helping men choose to be father's.
    1
  473. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv thank you for thus accepting the other is wrong in blaming feminism
    1
  474.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism
    1
  475.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism
    1
  476.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism while MRAs only self sabotage
    1
  477.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism while MRAs only self sabotage
    1
  478. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. If you believe seeing men as equal parents "demonizes" families, isn't that showing why feminism is needed? Would you like to write what NOMAS stands for?
    1
  479. I don't think women should be pushed to have sex with people like Derrick because you think it'll stop mass shootings.
    1
  480. At 5:00, why do you think derrick having said women are like children is an apology; and at 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where she was assaulted that you get angry she answered? Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? At 16:22, don't the feminists answer the question by opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents or why does that show MRA's should exist (14:28)?
    1
  481.  @Russell_Russ  thank you for accepting the other was asking about how and where she was assaulted. Thus, why are you angry that she then answered? Please note your answer shows as such, ie, you believe her answer is a "rant" even though you admit she is answering
    1
  482.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and doesn't your comment specifically show the feminists as correct since you feel offense at her describing her assault? But thank you for accepting the feminist did answer the MRA demanding to know where and how she was assaulted.
    1
  483. ​​​ @Russell_Russ "Women don't care about men's issues, period" As stated, per you being angry at women as a whole, isn't that showing why the feminists are correct? Recall you already agreed the MRA wanted details about how the feminist was assaulted so it seems odd you pretended otherwise. If you wish, why not present anything the MRAs do to help men?
    1
  484. PS please note you also deflected from my queries. I will repaste them here so you may answer them: At 5:00, why do you think derrick having said women are like children is an apology? At 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where she was assaulted that you get angry she answered? Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? At 16:22, don't the feminists answer the question by opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents or why does that show MRA's should exist (14:28)?
    1
  485.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's odd. The MRA requesting details about her assault is a guilt trip? Seems odd responding to his question is emotional manipulation. Again, isn't that showing the feminists were correct as you feel offense at the MRA having his questions answered?
    1
  486.  @DavidW-ux2gc  ​thus my question. Again, as you agree the MRA requested details about her assault, why is her answering a guilt trip? As you believe answering the MRA's question is emotional manipulation, doesn't that show the feminists were correct as you are angry the MRA was answered?
    1
  487. ​​ @DavidW-ux2gc per being angry to the point you now pretend the MRA demanding details is her fault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct?
    1
  488. PS and you avoided my query. Again, what have MRAs done to help men?
    1
  489.  @Russell_Russ  apologies, but you still avoid my queries. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but kindly answer them: 1) At 5:00, why do you think derrick saying women are like children is an apology? 2) At 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where the feminist was assaulted to the point you became angry she answered? 3) Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? 4) At 16:22 don't the feminists answer the question per opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents, or why is the MRAs seeing men as lesser helpful (14:28)?
    1
  490.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, per being so angry you pretend the MRA demanding details of her assault is the feminists fault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct? Seems odd the details the MRA demanded were so terrible that you consider answering the question a guilt trip. Likewise, what issue about men did the MRAs bring up that they didn't also sabotage?
    1
  491.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement (which you avoid). Per being so angry you pretend the MRA didn't demand details of her assault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct?
    1
  492.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRA demanded details about her being assaulted. Thus, why is answering his question emotional manipulation?
    1
  493.  @DavidW-ux2gc  precisely, why are you so angry that you are pretending they didn't ask about it?
    1
  494.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are. Otherwise why pretend the MRA demanding the feminist give him details about her being assaulted is the feminists manipulating him? That's a very emotional position, or why did you get upset about her answering his question?
    1
  495.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are, and i request you control yourself to answer my query. Thus, why pretend the MRA demanding details about the feminist being assaulted is the feminists fault? Why get upset over her answering his question?
    1
  496.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are, note how you pretend the MRA asking details over her being abused is the feminist doing so. Thus, why get upset that the MRA demanding details about abuse was answered? Seems odd answering this "simple" question brought such an emotional response from you. Please note, I am not insulting you. You actually are replying emotionally like the other was, eg, the other believes all women hate men and you believe answering the MRA is emotional manipulation. Again, doesn't your comment specifically show why the feminists were correct? Kindly control yourself like the feminist did in order to answer the query.
    1
  497.  @Russell_Russ  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish. However, you still avoid my queries. Kindly answer them.
    1
  498.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you continue being emotional by now stating the MRA being answered is irrelevant to the debate. Or are you upset that the feminists are shown correct by the MRA asking said question?
    1
  499.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, kindly control your emotions in order to cease pretending the MRA asking how she was abused is unrelated to him being answered. Or are you upset that the feminists are shown correct by the MRA asking said question and receiving an answer?
    1
  500.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for controlling your emotions in this debate and accepting the only reason the feminist brought up her abuse was because the MRA wanted details about it (though it seems odd you later state her answer was before the MRA asked it). Regardless, as you also accept she was correct in answering the MRA's question, isn't that you agreeing the feminists have a point?
    1
  501.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly they do. As you graciously wrote: "I never said that she shouldn't answer." Thus, as you agreed the MRA was answered when asking for details about her abuse and you became quite upset when she did so, isn't that you demonstrating the feminists had a point?
    1
  502.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus your statement: "I never said that she shouldn't answer." As you thus agree she answered the MRA's demand for details about her abuse and you became quite upset at her doing so, isn't that showing the feminists had a point? And note you are still upset as you still state answering the MRA is emotionally manipulative despite him asking for details about her assault. Again, kindly control yourself as the feminist did.
    1
  503.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for accepting the MRA is the one that demanded details about her being abused and that you are upset she answered the question. Thus, isn't that showing the feminists had a point?
    1
  504. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely my statement. Again, thank you for accepting the MRA is the one that demanded details about her being abused and that you are upset she answered the question. Thus, isn't that showing the feminists had a point?
    1
  505. ​​ @yournewfarther you are entitled to believe as you wish in regards to my person. However, bear in mind I did copy paste the others answers back to them so I would recommend you read the comments
    1
  506.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are upset. After all, you still believe the feminist answering the MRAs question is emotional manipulation. Thus, again, isn't that showing the feminist was correct? As for why the MRA demanded how and where women are abused, I am afraid I do not know why he decided to ask as such. Thus, my other question: do you believe it correct he did so? I actually just noted you had avoided this
    1
  507.  @yournewfarther  you are entitled to believe so, but it seems odd for you to say the other gives neutral comments yet me copy pasting them means i am gas lighting. Would this not be a double standard on your part?
    1
  508.  @yournewfarther  correct, I copy pasted their comments, ie, we said the same things. Why wouldn't I thank them for agreeing with me?
    1
  509.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?" excellent, thank you for accepting the MRA is the one that brought the subject to the fore. Thus, why is it correct the MRA asks said question when the answer is so terrible you think answering it is emotional manipulation?
    1
  510.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?" Again, thank you for accepting the MRA is the one that brought up the subject. Thus, why is it correct the MRA asks said question when you agree the answer is so terrible it immediately shows the feminist has a point, ie, you become upset and believe it is emotional manipulation?
    1
  511.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?" again, thank you for noting the MRA brought up the subject. After all, why would answering a question be what creates the subject? Thus, as you became quite upset when the feminist answered the MRA, ie, you agree the feminist has a point, why was the MRA correct in asking it? Kindly try to control your emotions in the same way the feminist did, ie, she was able to answer the question.
    1
  512.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Thus the question you avoid (per being upset): was it correct the MRA asked since you became so upset you stated the answer was emotionally manipulative, ie, noted the feminist had a point? Again, thank you for writing the MRA was the one to bring up the subject: "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?"
    1
  513.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you graciously demonstrated the MRA was the one to bring up the subject: "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?" Thus, as you became quite upset over the answer to the point you state it was emotionally manipulative, ie, you accepted the feminist had a point, why was it correct the MRA asked it? Again, kindly control your emotions in order to answer my query (as the feminist did).
    1
  514.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are entitled to leave, but per your words: "why shouldn't the MRA ask where and how she was abused?" Thus, thank you for accepting the MRA brought the subject to the fore. So again, why is it correct that the MRA demanded details of how she was abused? And you are demonstrating she had a point. That's why you feel emotionally manipulated per being so upset at her answer.
    1
  515.  @DavidW-ux2gc  seriously, the MRA brought up the subject. Go ahead and quote what they say.
    1
  516.  @DavidW-ux2gc  excellent, thank you for thus showing the MRA was the one that brought up the subject at 15:10. Or why not quote what you cut out? Thus, as you became quite upset over her answer to the point you state it is emotional manipulation and even misquote her, isn't that because you noted the feminist had a point? Again, kindly control your emotions like the feminist in order to answer the query honestly
    1
  517.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, per your timestamp, thank you for showing the MRA brought up the subject. Thus, why was the feminist wrong in answering that you became upset upon noting she had a point? Or again, why not quote the part you cut?
    1
  518. @DavidW-ng5zv  then kindly quote the part you cut out, and kindly control your emotional outbursts as there is no reason to throw insults. So again, why was the feminist wrong in answering that you became upset upon noting she had a point?
    1
  519.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe being descriptive is insulting. But again, as you noted the MRA did bring up the subject (as per your timestamp) and became upset because the feminists' answer showed she had a point (to the point you insulted me and said the feminist was emotionally manipulative), why was the feminist wrong? Or why not quote what you cut?
    1
  520. that's odd. wasn't a woman, Aspasia, a teacher of Socrates? Wouldn't that mean western thought was basically brought forth by a woman?
    1
  521.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "She may have helped" So logical thought was created by a woman and this is what influenced Socrates is what you are saying?
    1
  522.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your words: "She may have helped" So again, was logical thought created by a woman and this is what influenced Socrates?
    1
  523.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's interesting, so you do believe Aspasia invented logic per naming all the people she taught and the students of said people?
    1
  524.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your words: "she taught him rhetoric". So again, is this not you stating a woman's views is the basis of western thought?
    1
  525.  @DavidW-ux2gc  so you do think Aspasia teaching Socrates the basis of his ideas means women helped create western thought?
    1
  526. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "she taught him rhetoric" it seems you noted the basis of western thought started with a woman. Or why backtrack?
    1
  527.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "she taught him rhetoric" and "She may have helped" Again, it seems you noted the basis of western thought started with a woman. Or why backtrack?
    1
  528.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "she taught him rhetoric" and "She may have helped" Again, it seems you noted the basis of western thought started with a woman. Or why backtrack?
    1
  529.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "she taught him rhetoric" and "She may have helped" Again, it seems you noted the basis of western thought started with a woman. Or why backtrack to imply that teachers don't teach?
    1
  530.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "she taught him rhetoric" and "She may have helped" Again, it seems you believe the basis of western thought started with a woman. Strange you state she was "only" a teacher considering Socrates was "only" a teacher as well.
    1
  531.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "she taught him rhetoric" and "She may have helped" Again, it seems you believe the basis of western thought started with a woman. And thank you for noting the importance of her teaching it to Socrates upon backtracking on her "only" being a teacher.
    1
  532.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why are female nurses paid less than male nurses despite being 90% of nurses?
    1
  533.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, then you believe 90% of the staff doesn't do a full shift or isn't in inpatient hospitals? Again, please note 90% of nurses are women.
    1
  534.  @johnschultz6846  and yet male nurses still earn more than female nurses. Why is that if women are 90% of nurses?
    1
  535.  @johnschultz6846  also this is from nurse journal; furthermore, it seems odd you tried to compare the wages of different jobs in order to say women earn less.
    1
  536.  @johnschultz6846  that's an odd defense. So you believe 90% pf the staff doesn't include a specialist? Also, per wage negotiations, you mean women are offered a lower salary compared to men?
    1
  537.  @johnschultz6846  that's fine, that's why I wrote of nurses because women do dominate that area but are still paid less than men. We logically agree that 90% of said workforce doesn't generally do half time (otherwise how do hospitals run?) and that women make up most specialist nurses (there simply aren't enough men otherwise). However, you then stated bosses overwhelmingly offer women a lower salary compared to men. Isn't that showing feminism has a point, ie, there is a wage gap as men have a preference?
    1
  538.  @johnschultz6846  you can check other sources if you want, they all agree women are paid less compared to men
    1
  539.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Kindly answer my query
    1
  540. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. As stated, since women are 90% of nurses, do you believe there aren't more of them in inpatient hospitals, in urban areas, etc? Or are you attempting to compare new nurses with specialist ones?
    1
  541. ​ @johnschultz6846  if so, what did the source say about 90% of women being nurses yet still being paid less?
    1
  542. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, then you noted the female nurses vastly outnumber the male nurses in caring for inpatients because, again, they're 90% of nurses. Thus, why are they paid less for doing the same job? Or do you believe 90% of nurses only work a half shift?
    1
  543.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you essentially said that, for example, the 7 out of the 10 male nurses are inpatient so that means the 20 of the 190 female nurses that are inpatient are paid less. Even you noted female nurses are the majority in inpatient areas. Again, as female nurses are 90% of nurses, why are they paid less? Do you believe 90% of nurses work a half shift?
    1
  544.  @DavidW-ng5zv  in short, it seems you figuratively compare the salaries of janitors and CEOs in order to say a wage gap doesn't exist
    1
  545.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you state as such because you are aware women are still the majority of high ranking nurses, eg, inpatients? Thus, why are women still paid less for doing the same job?
    1
  546.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for accepting the vast majority of high paying nursing positions are held by women, ie, more women negotiate better salaries, do more work, are bosses, etc. So why are female nurses still paid less for doing the same work as men?
    1
  547.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd deflection. If you wish to compare different jobs then you can do so, but I'm baffled why you believe that's the wage gap. Do you do so because you noted the sources state the wage gap is real?
    1
  548.  @DavidW-ng5zv  regardless, we already agreed female nurses are overwhelmingly in the highest paid areas for nurses (because they're 90% of all nurses) yet are still paid less than male nurses who are in the same position. Thus, why are these women paid less for doing the same work?
    1
  549.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you entitled to believe an unnamed quote is a source if you so wish, but again, as we agreed female nurses in the highest paid positions are still paid less than male ones in the same position (on average), why are the women paid less for doing the same job? Recall women are 90% of nurses.
    1
  550.  @DavidW-ng5zv  ps still seems odd you tried to compare different jobs in an effort to justify the wage gap. Do you believe it valid one compares janitors and CEOs in order to say the wage gap doesn't exist?
    1
  551.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing your source and thus accepting the wage gap is real: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty."
    1
  552.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for providing your source and noting it states the wage gap is real. Per your sources own words: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty ."
    1
  553.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd you tried to state speciality is the reason for the wage gap when your source does take that into account and notes it still exists. Again, thank you for providing its name and its proof. So as age, education and speciality being taken into account shows the wage gap as real, why then are women still paid less?
    1
  554.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for providing your source and noting it states the wage gap is real. Per your sources own words: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus why are women paid less then men in nursing?
    1
  555.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting your source states the wage gap is real. Per it's words: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus why are women paid less than men in nursing?
    1
  556.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting your source states the wage gap is real: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." So why are women paid less than men in nursing for doing the same job? Seems odd you ignored what your source states.
    1
  557.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting your source states the wage gap is real: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Seems odd you believe the source giving advice to shrink the wage gap to an average of 5,100 means it doesn't exist. Kindly read your source and explain why women get paid less for the same work.
    1
  558.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i never said that the wage gap doesn't exist" thank you for accepting women are paid less for the same work. As per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  559.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i never said that the wage gap doesn't exist" thank you for accepting women are paid less for the same work. As per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  560.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing: "i never said that the wage gap doesn't exist". Likewise, thank you for sourcing that: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." In short, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  561.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing: "i never said that the wage gap doesn't exist" while noting your source state: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  562.  @Blind_And_Deaf  exactly, as 90% of nurses are women and are seen as more competent than men, why are the women still paid less than the men? Surely you don't believe the group that makes up 90% of the staff only does half time or isn't the majority of high ranking positions?
    1
  563.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing: "i never said that the wage gap doesn't exist" while noting your source states: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  564. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv certainly they have. Simply note how angry the MRAs are over it. They even demand women stay at home because they want them to stop doing that
    1
  565. Out of curiosity, do you believe there is discrimination against men in child custody cases?
    1
  566.  @DavidW-ng5zv  so the other did mean men are bullied for being rich? so the feminist was correct?
    1
  567. ​​ @butthissureisfun5619  apologies, but aside from saying feminism is wrong, did he say anything in regards to helping men?
    1
  568.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as your only example is about MRAs saying feminism is wrong, is that you accepting they don't help men?
    1
  569.  @DavidW-ng5zv  furthermore, didn't the MRAs say men are lesser parents due to their biology? Why is Mimi wrong when only the feminists in the panel opposed this?
    1
  570. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per believing this, thank you for showing feminism is needed to say men and wome are equals
    1
  571. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed to say men and wome are equals
    1
  572.  @GamedayStreams  why do you believe men hugging isn't showing emotion?
    1
  573. Then why is it that women still get paid less in nursing compared to men despite 90% of nurses being women?
    1
  574. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why are female nurses paid less than male ones when women are 90% of nurses? If you wish, you can state modeling is a more important and dangerous job than nursing.
    1
  575.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree women are paid less than men in nursing despite doing the same job, why do you defend it by stating the majority of inpatient and urban areas aren't covered by female nurses? Do you not believe 90% of nurses are women?
    1
  576.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as now you accept women earn less despite overwhelmingly being in higher paying locations and doing the same job as men, why are they earning less despite nearly all high paying fields, eg, nurse CEO, tending to be women? It seems feminism is needed if a male and female nurse doing the exact same job means the men earn more.
    1
  577.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet women are overrepresented as nurse CEOs to the point male nurse CEOs have decreased on a year per year basis. So why are women still paid less when we compare for the exact same job and the average of low-high paying positions?
    1
  578. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but we agreed that when comparing the same job that men are still paid more. Then you switched to comparing the average between the lowest and highest paying job, and we concluded men still make more even though women are more nurse CEOs. So why are women still paid less?
    1
  579.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you backtracked again. Why not provide your source as you had previously agreed women doing the same nurse position, eg, specialist, are paid less than men and that women are overrepresented in high paying positions, eg, nurse CEO, yet are still paid less than men? Seems odd you attempt to shift to state that 90% of the workforce doesn't do a full shift or is found in high paying locations. Again, as you backtrack to stating the wage gap isn't real despite trying to justify it, why not provide your source?
    1
  580.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my request for your source as you change quite a bit. Again, you previously agreed women doing the same nurse position, eg, specialists, are paid less than men. You then tried to switch to state men are overrepresented in specialists but you also noted women are also overrepresented in high paying positions, eg, nurse CEO. So again, as you backtrack from accepting the wage gap is real, why not provide your source?
    1
  581.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the wage gap is real per your source stating "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Seems strange you ignored your sources conclusions, but thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  582.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting your source states "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And thank you for accepting the wage gap is real per your new source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  583.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd you wish to go against what your own sourced state, but thank you for providing evidence to supports feminism
    1
  584.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your source "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And per your new source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  585.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your source "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  586.  @DavidW-ng5zv  And per your new source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Seems odd you disagree with your conclusions
    1
  587.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Seems odd you disagree with your conclusions
    1
  588.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your other source "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  589.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, per your source "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And per your other source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  590.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your source "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And per your other source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  591.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it's odd you consider your source a liar for stating "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And your other source for stating: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Again, thank you for (inadvertently) agreeing with feminism.
    1
  592.  @edwin1845  apologies, but i am merely concluding under what the other individual sourced. And per his source: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Do you agree with feminists that men should get paternity leave?
    1
  593.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, you believe me repeating what your source states is lying. Truly odd you consider your sources conclusions to be lying: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And the other: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism.
    1
  594.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to ignore your source stating "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, again, thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism.
    1
  595.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as your source states: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism.
    1
  596.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, and as your source states in regards to what you wrote: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." And: "For men, the average annual compensation is $376,000, whereas women take home $283,000. The survey only included physicians in full-time roles." Thus, thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism.
    1
  597.  @kingkohli4952  so why is it respectful to interrupt her by asking how she was assaulted?
    1
  598.  @casualkempt9933  if she refused to explain, why do you think her explaining her assaults was rude? Seems odd zack interrupting to have her explain her assaults is polite but her answering is rude.
    1
  599.  @casualkempt9933  hence why i asked: why was it polite of zack to interrupt her in order to get her to detail how she'd been assaulted? But thank you for noting she wasn't rude when answering.
    1
  600.  @casualkempt9933  then why is it neither polite nor impolite to interrupt people in order to get specifics about how they were assaulted? And thank you for noting she did explain. Seems odd to say she didn't.
    1
  601. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv then you agree with Mimi that she doesn't need protection as she only needs incels not to commit mass shootings?
    1
  602.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, we just need Incel mass shootings to be at zero so they don't say they're protecting women
    1
  603. ​ @AlexSmith-xk8tz wait so taxes pay for condoms but not for tampons? That pretty unfair
    1
  604. Should we also be critical of MRAs since they had about the same views as derrick?
    1
  605.  @Thatoneguy-ju6gq  mens rights activists, it's what the 3 guys in the video are
    1
  606.  @Thatoneguy-ju6gq  then what do they say about where women belong and who's naturally more suited for child rearing?
    1
  607. i don't understand. you mean non feminists don't call police because some women are police?
    1
  608.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why? But thank you for noting feminists made it so both men and women protect the nation
    1
  609.  @DavidW-ux2gc  excellent, thank you for accepting women and men protect people thanks to feminism while MRA's (such as you) state they should not. If they're a liability, however, then why do antifeminists keep calling the police for help?
    1
  610.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, i never said you would call the police even though you are an MRA. Regardless of your deflection however, if women are a liability in police and weaken it, then why do MRA's call the police for help? again, thank you for accepting it is due to feminism that people are protected by men and women
    1
  611.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus backtracking on stating women weaken the police force per noting MRAs still call the police for help. However, seems odd to state you are not an MRA yet you defend and explain how they think. why lie?
    1
  612. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  if you are not backtracking, then do you believe MRA's don't call the police to save them because they can do it themselves? again, thank you for noting they still demand men and women protect them If you are not an MRA, why are you defending and defining how they think?
    1
  613.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Some do, and some don't" then as we agree MRA's request female and male police save them per their inability to do so, thank you for backtracking on stating the police are weaker. Do you state you are not an MRA because you don't need the police to save you?
    1
  614.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and yet you stated MRAs demand the police save them because they cannot defend themselves. thus, thank you for backtracking on stating the police has become weaker. again, is this why you state you are not an MRA despite defining and defending their views? do you not expect the police to protect you as you claim mimi does?
    1
  615.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Some do, and some don't" again, are you pretending not to be an MRA because you noted they need police to save them despite you stating police are now weaker? Or do you expect the police to not protect you as you claim mimi does?
    1
  616. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "I also wouldn't call the police" Quite frankly, it's very odd you stated you don't need police to protect you and then condemned Mimi by claiming she lied about not needing police assistance (why not provide a timestamp of this?). Even odder you define and defend what MRAs believe and state while writing you are not a MRA.
    1
  617.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Thus far, it seems you are being a bit emotional as it seems you are an MRA lying about not calling the police to save you when you are in trouble. Which is ironic because this is what you accuse Mimi of.
    1
  618.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe i am shaming you as well as assume i am a feminist. But as for you being emotional, you again demonstrated it: "I don't even know wtf you're talking about. Where have I been emotional? I said I'm not an MRA and that I don't need the police to protect me. I stated facts. Where was I emotional?"
    1
  619.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Still quite ironic you seem to be doing the exact same thing you accuse Mimi of (though i still await your timestamp over this "fact"). Either way, thank you for backtracking on police being weak per noting MRA's demand male and female officers save them because they can't save themselves.
    1
  620.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe i am as you so wish. But kindly control your emotions, eg, "I don't even know wtf you're talking about. Where have I been emotional? I said I'm not an MRA and that I don't need the police to protect me. I stated facts. Where was I emotional?" Still ironic you are doing the exact same thing you pretend Mimi does, but thank you for backtracking on police being weak per noting MRA's demand male and female officers save.
    1
  621.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "She said that she had a bottle thrown at her head" and what else? Kindly provide the rest. And again, why do you believe her answering the MRA means she created his query?
    1
  622.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "She said that she had a bottle thrown at her head" apologies, but if her answer wasn't quite convincing, then why not write what else she said? Seems odd you avoid this. And again, why do you believe her answering the MRA means she created his query? Do you mean it was her plan to make all the MRAs backtrack?
    1
  623.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "She said that she had a bottle thrown at her head" apologies again, but if her answer wasn't quite convincing, then why not complete what she said? Seems odd you avoid this, but thank you for noting she gave quite a bit more examples. And again, why do you believe her answering the MRA means she created his query? Do you mean it was her plan to make all the MRAs backtrack by tricking them into asking her said question?
    1
  624. I mean, they didn't make the MRAs agree with him
    1
  625.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, jubillee wasn't wrong as derrick is representative of MRAs
    1
  626.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you don't think the other was correct in saying Derrick's views were sabotaging the MRAs? Have you seen the video?
    1
  627.  @DavidW-ux2gc  exactly, derricks views aren't sabotaging MRA's because his views are MRA views
    1
  628. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, the views derrick presented that were seen as so awful they sabotaged MRAs actually are MRA views. Would you then explain why said views are correct?
    1
  629.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus why all the MRAs sabotage their views, ie, why derrick is the norm. As you believe people hate the feminists for opposing derrick, you are entitled to believe they're hated.
    1
  630. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe the original commenter is thus a feminist for opposing derricks views
    1
  631.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. you are entitled to believe the original commenter stating derrick is sabotaging mra's makes him a feminist. Likewise, per writing derrick does not sabotage mra's, thank you for showing exactly why mra's are wrong.
    1
  632. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv you are entitled to write as such. However, per noticing Derrick's views are the same as what MRAs hold, thank you for noticing how only feminists help. You are entitled to believe the original commenter is a feminist for seeing Derrick's views as sabotaging men's rights.
    1
  633.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your words, Derrick's views are the same as what MRAs hold. Thus, thank you for noticing how only feminists help, and you are entitled to believe the original commenter is a feminist for seeing Derrick's views as sabotaging men's rights.
    1
  634.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as i stated, you are entitled to believe the original commenter is a feminist for opposing Derrick's views
    1
  635.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, you are entitled to believe the one above is a feminist for stating derricks views (whcih you state apply for all MRA's) don't help men
    1
  636. 1. If a person is brain dead, ie, will never wake up, but their heart is still beating, is that person still alive or is it okay to pull the plug? 2. Do you think cows and humans have the same SE? 3. So is it okay to pull the plug on a brain dead patient? 4. That's kind of like saying a soul is not necessary to be a person. So why is a soul necessary for person hood? SE is basically what people who aren't fundamentalists use to point out a soul existing. Since we can actually notice SE develops through neural pathways, we can then say a soul is being "created". And no, a soul isn't in the heart otherwise people with pacemakers would be seen as monsters.
    1
  637. ​ @brittaho2098 that's interesting. so if a woman eats food that can cause a miscarriage, is that acceptable since it is not intervening to stop a natural process? after all, miscarriages are a natural occurrence either way, it seems you noticed it is acceptable to "end" a brain damaged person per them not having sentience. so since a fetus has no sentience or has even developed the capacity for it, why is it wrong to terminate it? you can assume it is done through natural means instead of surgical ones if you wish
    1
  638.  @brittaho2098  I don't understand your point. Are you trying to say that naturally inducing an abortion is okay because it's not a surgery, ie, not natural?
    1
  639.  @brittaho2098   interestingly, that doesn't change my question since you seem to imply the intention to unplug a brain dead individual is the same as getting an abortion (body and fetus are both functionally braindead after all). So if the intent is the same and is done by "natural" means, does that make abortion acceptable?
    1
  640. ​​ @brittaho2098 I mean eating is about as natural as it gets so eating sushi or spices after having sex seems like a fairly "natural" way to get a spontaneous abortion. And you don't even know if you're pregnant at that point
    1
  641.  @brittaho2098  "I don't think a fetus having brain functioning or not has anything to do with my argument." yes it does. why else do you think its acceptable to terminate a brain dead individual? certainly not because its "natural" since its definitely "natural" for an abortion to happen because of your diet (something you clearly oppose even when the person can't confirm if they're pregnant). since you are aware there's a difference between a sentient person and a brain dead one, then reason states you are aware there's a difference between a fetus and a healthy child. after all, only one of them has a functioning brain.
    1
  642. the MRAs kept complaining that women weren't dating them or going against their "biology" of staying at home pregnant. apparently MRA's are about superiority instead of equality
    1
  643. ​​ @DavidCastle-fe3hi  then why did the MRAs state that men are superior because women are like children? For example, why were the MRAs saying women should be at home pregnant?
    1
  644. the feminists have their problems but they still help people. none of the MRA's in the video presented anything that would ever help men.
    1
  645. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's an odd statement. Why do you believe the conservatives that attempted to overthrow democracy at the US capitol are feminists?
    1
  646. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odder. You don't believe attempting to overthrow democracy would be harmful to the west?
    1
  647. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv hence my query. As you agree conservatives attempted a coup and you believe this would "collapse the west", why state they're feminists? Also, what replacement levels do you mean? I am uncertain what you mean by that
    1
  648.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "So what if conservatives tried a coup?" odd, why is an attempt to strip you and everyone of their rights irrelevant? Still odd you believe conservatives are feminists though. Also, why do you believe their views on the family unit influenced their attempted coup? Also, what do you believe conservatives wish to replace them with?
    1
  649. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv "So what if conservatives tried a coup?" Again, why is an attempt to strip you and everyone of their rights irrelevant? Again, why do you believe their views on the family unit influenced their attempted coup? As for replacement, you wrote as such. Kindly clarify it
    1
  650. But the MRAs did spend the entire talk trying to do just that
    1
  651. Yeah, it's all cultural. Used to be that for every 1 woman who was a mathematical savant there were like 20 men. Now it's like 1 in 3 and even that gap is shrinking.
    1
  652.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for agreeing there is no difference between men and women's neurological abilities
    1
  653.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why are the extreme cases being filled by women now?
    1
  654.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if the extreme cases are not being filled by women then why are you complaining that women doing better than men isn't seen as discrimination but as equality?
    1
  655.  @DavidW-ng5zv  or why did it radically shrink to 1 in 3 in regards to mathematical abilities?
    1
  656.  @DavidW-ng5zv  are they outnumbering them less than before, ie, that it's due to culture? Again, please note the 1 in 3 math difference when before it was 1 in 20.
    1
  657.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per writing "they outnumber them less than before" thank you for accepting the difference is cultural. Recall it was 1 in 20 until it became 1 in 3 in regards to mathematical abilities. And it's still shrinking.
    1
  658.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per writing "they outnumber them less than before" upon noting it shrunk from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3, thank you for noting it is cultural.
    1
  659.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you wrote, "they outnumber them less than before" when noting the difference shrunk from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3. Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural.
    1
  660.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet again, as you wrote, "they outnumber them less than before" per noting the difference shrunk from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and it's still shrinking). Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural.
    1
  661.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, as it's still shrinking, please explain why that is
    1
  662.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet again, "they outnumber them less than before" (and it's still shrinking) per noting the difference became 1 in 20 to 1 in 3. Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural.
    1
  663.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you wrote, "they outnumber them less than before" and "Males and females appear equally intelligent". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap shrunk to 1 in 3 from 1 in 20
    1
  664.  @DavidW-ng5zv  however, why do you believe noting men and women are equal means men are hated?
    1
  665.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per ypur words, "they outnumber them less than before" and "Males and females appear equally intelligent". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap shrunk to 1 in 3 from 1 in 20
    1
  666.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe so. However, i am just quoting what you state. Seems odd you believe the conclusions of your words don't count.
    1
  667.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you wrote: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap continues shrinking. It's quite odd you wish to disagree with your words.
    1
  668.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe your sources lied. But per your words: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap is still shrinking. It's quite odd you wish to disagree with your words.
    1
  669.  @DavidW-ng5zv  is the reason you attempt to change the subject to hypergamy because you accepted men and women are of equal intelligence?
    1
  670.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, you are entitled to believe your sources lied. But as you wrote: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking). Still odd you disagree with your words.
    1
  671.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for accepting you wrote both that: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking).
    1
  672.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you wrote that: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking).
    1
  673.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking).
    1
  674.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting it is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking). It seems odd you wish to disagree with your words though
    1
  675.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing: "Males and females appear equally intelligent" and "they outnumber them less than before". Thus, thank you for noting the variance is cultural as the gap went from 1 in 20 to 1 in 3 (and is still shrinking). Still seems odd you wish to disagree with your words and sources.
    1
  676. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv per now defending MRAs stating men are lesser parents, thank you for agreeing only feminists help people. Or why would muscle size determine parental capability?
    1
  677. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc it is not okay to be a misandrist and misogynistic
    1
  678.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you believe that menstruating and giving birth makes an inherently better parent? Thank you for showing why only feminists help people
    1
  679.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe menstruating and giving birth makes an inherently better parent, thank you for showing why only feminists help people.
    1
  680.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for agreeing it is not okay to be an MRA as per their misandry and misogyny
    1
  681.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you believe menstruating and giving birth makes an inherently better parent, ie, why you justify women winning custody cases. Thus, thank you for showing why only feminists help people.
    1
  682.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, as you believe menstruating and giving birth makes an inherently better parent, thank you for showing why only feminists help people by fighting for equality.
    1
  683.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe menstruating and giving birth makes an inherently better parent or, apparently, gives you better people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality.
    1
  684.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, since you demonstrate MRAs believe menstruating and giving birth makes a biologically better parent and, apparently, have better people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality.
    1
  685.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to believe so, but since you demonstrate MRAs believe menstruating and giving birth makes a biologically better parent and, apparently, grants better people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality.
    1
  686.  @DavidW-ux2gc  but thank you for showing it is not okay to be an MRA as per their misandry and misogyny (which you defend)
    1
  687.  @DavidW-ux2gc  not be an MRA, and therefore not be a misandrist and misogynist.
    1
  688.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. Since you demonstrate MRAs believe menstruating and giving birth makes a biologically better parent and, apparently, gives better people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality. Or does the MRA position help men in custody cases?
    1
  689.  @DavidW-ng5zv  hence my statement. Since you demonstrate MRAs believe menstruating and giving birth means men are biologically worse parents and, apparently, that this means they have lesser people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality.
    1
  690.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, per believing that menstruating and giving birth makes a biologically better parent and, apparently, gives better people skills, thank you for showing why only feminists fight for equality. Or does said MRA position help men in custody cases? seems odd you avoid this query.
    1
  691.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you now state that MRA's saying men are biologically worse parents helps men, thank you for showing exactly why only feminists help people
    1
  692.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you state it is helpful for MRA to say men are biologically worse parents per not menstruating, thank you for showing exactly why only feminists help people by opposing these views
    1
  693.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you state it is helpful for MRA to say men are biologically worse parents (because, apparently, menstruating grants people skills), thank you for showing exactly why only feminists help
    1
  694.  @D402S  why not quote what the MRAs state on the first prompt? It's odd you have not seen the video
    1
  695. If so, why is it the women's US soccer team winning more and generating more money means they still get paid less? Seems odd a #1 ranked team must subsidize a number 30 ranked team, agreed?
    1
  696.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. Again, why is it the US women's soccer team winning more and generating more money means they get paid less? For example, haven't the men's US team failed to qualify for the world cup? Seems odd the women's #1 ranked team must subsidize a #30 ranked team by being paid less.
    1
  697.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question, haven't the men's US soccer team failed to qualify for the world cup while the women always qualify? Again, seems odd the women's US soccer team has to subsidize the men's.
    1
  698. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query, haven't the men's US soccer team failed multiple times to qualify for the world cup while the women always succeed? Again, seems odd the women's US soccer team has to then subsidize the men's..
    1
  699.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team only now qualified for the world cup, ie, they have failed to qualify before. As you also noted the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money, why should they subsidize the men's team because they sometimes qualify for the world cup?
    1
  700.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team hasn't qualified for the world cup multiple times while the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money. If you wish to believe local games generate more revenue, you are entitled to do so. Regardless, why should the women subsidize the men's team
    1
  701.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, if you wish to believe local games generate more revenue, you are entitled to do so. Regardless, thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team failed to qualify for the world cup multiple times while the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money. So why should the women subsidize the men's team?
    1
  702. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then again, if you wish to believe local games generate more revenue, you are entitled to do so. But thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team failed to qualify for the world cup multiple times while the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money. I thus disagree the women should subsidize the men's team.
    1
  703.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as stated, if you wish to believe local games generate more revenue, you are entitled to do so. But per accepting the men's US soccer team has failed to qualify for the world cup (multiple times) while the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money, I thus disagree the women should subsidize the men's team.
    1
  704.  @abz.rehman  no, it's pretty clear the women's soccer team is far more successful than the men's team, ie, win and generate more money. Just note the fact that the men's soccer team fails to get into the world cup
    1
  705.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why do you seem to believe local games generate more revenue compared to the world cup simply because the men have failed to apply for it? Again, as the women always qualify and nearly always win, ie, they generate more money, I thus disagree the women should subsidize the men's team.
    1
  706.  @abz.rehman  certainly, first do you believe the world cup generates more revenue than local games? Because the men have failed to qualify while the woman always qualify for the world cup.
    1
  707.  @abz.rehman  after all, it would be fairly strange to say men generate more money through the world cup if they don't qualify for it
    1
  708.  @abz.rehman  then as you noted local games don't generate more than world cups and only the women always qualify for the world cup, thank you for accepting they generate more money
    1
  709.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, what money was generated with the men not qualifying for the world cup? Again, thank you for accepting the women always qualify while the men don't, ie, the women's team generates more money.
    1
  710.  @abz.rehman  apologies, are you backtracking? So you do believe local games generate more than the world cup?
    1
  711.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet as you graciously noted, the men's team have failed to qualify for the world cup. Per thus noticing the lack of money generated, thank you for accepting the women's team generates more money.
    1
  712.  @abz.rehman  and we know nobody went to the men's world cup because they didn't qualify. So as we know the women not only qualified but actually won (and do this consistently), thank you for noticing the women generate more money. Quite odd they're still paid less, is it not?
    1
  713.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you graciously agreed the men's team has failed to qualify for the world cup. Per thus noticing that generates no money, thank you for accepting the women's team generates more money.
    1
  714.  @abz.rehman  It is a bit odd you tried to correlate trying out for the world cup with the actual world cup. Regardless, as we agree the women do generate more money by qualifying and winning, it is quite odd they're paid less, agreed?
    1
  715.  @abz.rehman  agreed. For example, do you believe trying out for the world cup is the same as being in the world cup?
    1
  716.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you wish to pretend local games generate more than the world cup, than i thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  717.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, if you wish to pretend local games generate more than the world cup, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  718.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, as you wish to pretend local games generate more money than the world cup, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  719.  @jrdh8468  again, note you backtracking to stating men and women built the world. For example, wasn't Aspasia who basically created greek philosophy? Doesn't this mean two women built the world you live in?
    1
  720.  @jrdh8468  then women just invented that which allowed men to build stuff? Again, note women created America and created european thought. It seems odd you essentially credit musk's workers but not musk himself. Also, per ww2, if you noted men went to war while women did not, ie, were civilians, what does it mean when 2/3 of causalities were of civilians? Should it then have been legal for women to fight?
    1
  721.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's odd. have you not seen the video? kindly note their answers during the first prompt. But thank you for noting it is harmful to men that they act as such. why is it harmful for feminism to oppose said view?
    1
  722.  @DavidW-ux2gc  ​ that's interesting, now you are defending the idea that men are biologically worse parents by writing that "vvomen are the vast majority of those in care jobs". is this because you saw the video but don't want to admit it, ie, you noted only feminists help the sexes?
    1
  723.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "neither group helps men" thank you for noting MRA's seem to harm men. as for feminists helping men, again, did you not see the video or why state seeing men and women as equal parents harm men?
    1
  724.  @DavidW-ng5zv  we already agreed the MRAs harm men and that feminists help women. As for feminists helping men, again, why would seeing men and women as, for example, equal parents harm men?
    1
  725. What are his opinions?
    1
  726. Correct, trauma dumping on a date is extremely akward
    1
  727. Yeah, that's pretty triggering. I mean, describing how you were sexually assaulted is pretty unnerving but answering "why were you sexually assaulted" is fairly insulting.
    1
  728. ​ @SkaSka507 right now women actually do have less rights thanks to roe v Wade being repealed. things are pretty dangerous even for women who want to get pregnant since abortion is used as a life saving surgery if there's complications
    1
  729.  @DavidW-ng5zv  i assure you women do get abortions to save their lives if it is legal. unfortunately, since they have less rights, this is only applicable in some states
    1
  730.  @DavidW-ng5zv  " who said they didn't?" excellent, thank you for noting your mistake upon realizing it is illegal in some states for women to get an abortion
    1
  731.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, you agree women have less rights than men yet try to downplay it. so why is it correct women getting pregnant now carries a risk of death due to pregnancy complications?
    1
  732.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. as we agreed women have less rights, why is it correct women getting pregnant carries a risk of death due to abortion being illegal?
    1
  733.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it isn't illegal" per pretending so, thank you for agreeing abortion being illegal is a loss of individual rights. so again, why is it correct women getting pregnant now carries a risk of death thanks to abortion being made illegal?
    1
  734.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing abortion being illegal is a loss of individual rights. so why is it correct women getting pregnant carries a risk of death due to abortion being illegal? is that why you pretend otherwise?
    1
  735. The sexes are equal, but it seems only the feminists believe that.
    1
  736. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, then why was it the MRAs who stated men were biologically worse parents while the feminists opposed that?
    1
  737.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs stated men are biologically worse parents. As the feminists opposed this, do you state otherwise because accepting they did would mean they are fighting for equality?
    1
  738. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs view men as biologically worse parents. Do you state feminists opposing this isn't equality because you noted it is equality?
    1
  739. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs view men as biologically worse parents. Do you state feminists opposing this isn't equality because you noted it is equality?
    1
  740. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs view men as biologically worse parents. Do you state feminists opposing this isn't equality because you noted it is equality?
    1
  741. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs view men as biologically worse parents. Do you state feminists opposing this isn't equality because you noted it is equality?
    1
  742.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per now stating equality doesn't exist and for stating men are biologically worse parents, thank you for showing only feminists help both sexes
    1
  743. out of curiosity, what have mra's done to help men? because the mra's in the video said men are discriminated in family courts only to then immediately say men are inherently worse parents.
    1
  744.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query, what does she have to give details about that makes her angry, ie, what did the MRA ask? Seems odd you deflect from this.
    1
  745.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "where and how" in regards to what? Again, it seems odd you are so reticent in your answer. Why do so?
    1
  746.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies but you are still deflecting. Again, kindly write the details the MRA was given when he asked where and how the feminist was harmed?
    1
  747. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  why not? You just said she was triggered in her answer. I'd like to know what that answer was to see if it is true
    1
  748.  @cadet9576  do you have any examples of them disagreeing?
    1
  749.  @cadet9576  aren't you agreeing with me?
    1
  750.  @tyleryoast8299  what did he say?
    1
  751.  @brodyvaughn1260  not really. Mostly he just said feminism was wrong and said nothing whenever the other MRAs said something sexist. For example, when the MRAs said men were lesser parents and the feminists disagreed with them, he said nothing. Ironically, he later said no feminist organization helped fathers.
    1
  752. Kursat didn't really do anything to be honest. He mostly just said feminism was mistaken.
    1
  753. I agree with you. The MRA ideas were basically the same, ie, they all seemed to believe women were more suited for the home.
    1
  754.  @warriorspanthersblackhawks4651  Ok, i understand. In regards to sports, that one actually has it's own more interesting logic. To give you an example, the women's soccer team is consistently ranked #1 in the world while the men's team is #30. However, because society prefers to watch men lose rather than women win, this leads to people stating that the women's team has to do more than win (and break several records) in order to receive just pay. Meanwhile the men can consistently be seen as one of the worst teams on the planet yet receive greater compensation.
    1
  755.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if women are paid equally, then why are female nurse specialists earning less than male nurse specialists doing the same job and working for the same full shift?
    1
  756.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but as you write that in negotiations women are offered lower salaries while men are offered higher ones by default, isn't that showing exactly why the wage gap exists? Seems odd to justify it by confirming men are given higher wages for doing the same job.
    1
  757.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. As you now state negotiations involve offering men more money while women are seen as more agreeable so they're offered less money (unless you believe women actively state they want less), isn't that agreeing with feminism over the wage gap? Please note this means merit isn't being judged as they do the same work.
    1
  758.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, thank you for agreeing that women constantly winning is still seen as worse to men constantly losing
    1
  759. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, men are still offered more money while women are seen as more agreeable so they're offered less money when negotiating. So again, isn't that agreeing with feminism over the wage gap? Seems odd you believe that's fair
    1
  760. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  note you now agree both men and women negotiate yet women are still offered less for the same work. So why is it fair merit isn't rewarded?
    1
  761.  @DavidW-ng5zv  i apologize, but as you constantly change your answers, would you then provide your source?
    1
  762.  @DavidW-ng5zv  now you backtrack again. As you thus believe women are offered a lower wage in negotiations while men are not, isn't that accepting feminists are correct? Note you previously changed from stating only men negotiate to now stating women negotiate but not like men. Please note both show that men have a preference in wages.
    1
  763.  @DavidW-ng5zv  however, as you constantly change your position, kindly provide your source so we may see what it states. I'm confused why you state you provided your source when no name has been provided
    1
  764.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. As you constantly change your answers, please provide the name of your sources so i may read them. Notice how you backtrack from stating women don't negotiate. Thus, as we agree that when men and women negotiate, women are offered lower wages, isn't that agreeing with feminism?
    1
  765.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but your quote has no source. Please provide it as i am uncertain what you mean by past comments. Other people you disagree with are unrelated to me
    1
  766.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, you seem to state your source doesn't present as you claim. Is that why you don't wish to provide it? If your source doesn't support you, is this why you change from stating women don't negotiate to stating they do negotiate but given lesser wages? Note that you seem to state men get a preference regardless. Again, kindly provide your source
    1
  767.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you constantly backtrack to the point you imply your source states the wage gap is real, why not provide it so we may see what it states?
    1
  768.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. As you constantly change your position in writing female nurses negotiate their salaries and are offered less than men, why not provide your source so we may see what it presents? It seems odd you write you won't provide it because it seems to show the wage gap is real. Again, kindly provide your source so we may see its conclusions
    1
  769.  @DavidW-ng5zv  even your quote contains no source, so it seems odd you refuse to provide the source after i ask where you obtained said quote from. And you can believe of me as you wish
    1
  770.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd. Now you change to state women don't negotiate at all. As you then believe about 90% of of the staff don't negotiate and are thus only offered lower wages due to being seen as more agreeable, isn't that agreeing with feminism over the wage gap? Again, seems odd your source seems to state the wage gap is real which is why you refuse to provide it
    1
  771.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you provided quotes and even provided various examples justifying why women are paid less before backtracking, do you not provide your source because it states the wage gap is real and agrees with feminism?
    1
  772. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you constantly change your position, please provide your sources name. Thus far your justification is that 90% of the staff don't negotiate their salaries at all and get lower wages because they're seen as more agreeable.
    1
  773. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, i merely request a source for your quotes. it seems odd you refuse to provide it. Do you do so per noticing what it concludes?
    1
  774.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for providing your source and thus agreeing with feminism: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Is this why you refused to provide the source? Because it agrees with feminism after controlling all your justifications for the wage gap?
    1
  775.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd you wish to ignore your sources conclusions in order to state the wage gap isn't real.
    1
  776.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source, thank you for agreeing with feminism: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty."
    1
  777.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, seems odd you wish to ignore your sources conclusions. Is that why you refused to provide it?
    1
  778.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per the examples you gave: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Again, seems odd you ignore the conclusions of your source simply because it means you agree with feminism.
    1
  779.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Still odd you ignore the conclusions of your source simply because it means you agree with feminism.
    1
  780.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." If you wish to ignore your source, you are entitled to do so. But thank you for showing feminism is correct
    1
  781.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." If you wish to ignore your source, you are entitled to do so. But thank you for showing feminism is correct as you even try to argue it's conclusion is incorrect
    1
  782.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing exactly why feminism is needed
    1
  783.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing exactly why feminism is needed
    1
  784.  @DavidW-ng5zv  who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?
    1
  785.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for accepting only feminism helps both sexes.
    1
  786.  @DavidW-ux2gc  should there be equality between the sexes?
    1
  787.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus my previous question: "who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?"
    1
  788.  @DavidW-ux2gc  hence my previous question: "who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?" Seems odd you avoid this.
    1
  789.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus my query: "who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?" Do you avoid answering this query because it answers your doubts?
    1
  790.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus the query you avoid: "who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?"
    1
  791.  @DavidW-ux2gc  hence the query you avoid: "who is more likely to be fair: a jury that sees the sexes as equals or a jury that sees men as inherently worse at parenting than women?" Or is one something that can never exist? Do you avoid this query because you dislike that it shows feminism has a point?
    1
  792. I'm curious, what ambiguity do you mean?
    1
  793. generally speaking, MRA's are against feminism as a whole. that's why the MRA's kept pushing ideas that upheld patriarchal positions, eg, that men were biologically worse parents which is why women had to stay at home.
    1
  794.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRA's push ideas such as saying men are biologically worse parents in order to oppose feminism. however, why would the feminists saying the sexes are equals be harmful?
    1
  795. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv thank you for accepting MRA's push ideas such as saying men are biologically unsuited to be parents in order to oppose feminism. Do you agree with the MRAs?
    1
  796.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting said position implies men are worse parents. have you not seen the video that you are unaware of what they say in the first prompt?
    1
  797.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRA's state men are biologically worse parents to the point you now try to defend them doing so. Are you trying to justify men losing most custody cases by stating women belong at home raising children?
    1
  798.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you defend said position, thank you for showing the MRA's state as such. Odd you pretend otherwise. Regardless, as you believe men are genetically worse parents, is this why you justify them losing most custody cases? It appears feminism is quite necessary against misandry and misogyny if so.
    1
  799.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you now state the MRA position means they hate men, thank you for showing said view is extremely harmful to men. But again, as you believe men are genetically worse parents, is this why you justify them losing most custody cases? Odd you believe opposing said view is harmful though, or why do you avoid answering my query?
    1
  800.  @DavidW-ux2gc  excellent question. why do you think MRA's hate men so much that they say they're genetically lesser parents? Note you even agree with them by writing: "We have established (and you conceded) that genetics form the vast majority of our personalities". Likewise, why do you believe MRA's are gynocentric for stating men are lesser parents? Or do you not believe seeing men as lesser parents affects a courts decision?
    1
  801.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus the question you avoid. As you also believe that men are genetically lesser parents, why isn't that you and MRA's hating men? Is this the gynocentric position you state causes men to lose custody cases?
    1
  802. Out of curiosity, what points did kursat make?
    1
  803.  @dillonpercy1058  okay, what did he say about it? What were his solutions for it or what explanations did he give?
    1
  804.  @dillonpercy1058  I'm confused, that doesn't really show anything since he and 2 feminists just say it happens. Could you clarify? Also yes, you are supposed to provide solutions, that's part of the discussion. The feminists did so constantly and even derrick gave solutions (though they were pretty awful).
    1
  805.  @dillonpercy1058  but I'm not questioning kursats points, I'm asking what points he gave. If i only write "a lot of men crash planes while women seem to escape this" then I haven't really given any points, i merely stated something. That's why i ask what he discussed, his solutions, etc. I'm just asking if you could please clarify. Bea gave a lot of points so you'll have to be more specific.
    1
  806.  @dillonpercy1058  exactly, as you are confused about the plane thing because I didn't say anything else about it, that is why i am asking about kursat's point. Thus, would you clarify? Because if you're confused by it, it doesn't seem to be a point but a statement. I don't know what i should say about bea then.
    1
  807.  @dillonpercy1058  if that's the case, what explanations did kursat give in order to convert his statement into a point? Again, please clarify so we may see what his opinion was. Note, i observed the video and cannot find any of the explanations, ie, points, you mention exist. In essence, it is similar to the plane statement i gave due to a lack of context.
    1
  808.  @dillonpercy1058  then why is it sexist most women escape the death penalty? For example, if i write "a lot of men crash planes while women seem to escape this. this is sex based discrimination", that's me giving a statement because it doesn't really say anything. Do you and kursat know something i don't in regards to this?
    1
  809.  @dillonpercy1058  note how you now change from me saying i gave a point to now saying i gave an observation. I did give something based on gender, yet due to how vague it was (similar to kursat) you state it is incorrect. And as you are now attempting to explain for kursat what his observation was, doesn't that show you are the one making a point (and not kursat)? Or again, would you clarify?
    1
  810.  @dillonpercy1058  exactly, your attempt to explain kursat's statement is a point. Notice this is you doing the explanation, not kursat, so your interpretation of kursat's statement makes this your point. Also, I don't know how to explain it is based on gender anymore than you can explain why kursat's point is based on gender. This is also why i constantly ask you to explain kursats statement as he doesn't really seem to say anything. He just says it is.
    1
  811.  @dillonpercy1058  for example, i wrote: "a lot of men crash planes while women seem to escape this. this is sex based discrimination". Then you asked my why it is so, leading to me explaining which is what creates a point. Thus i ask the same in regards to what kursat stated. Would you explain because he doesn't seem to create a point. He just seems to give a statement.
    1
  812.  @dillonpercy1058  "his point is that this [...] should be stopped" Unfortunately, he never actually says that. This is why i asked you to clarify because even you assumed he had a point. But fine, i will stop writing.
    1
  813.  @dillonpercy1058  apologies, but if that were true, you wouldn't have needed to say what his point is after noting he didn't say it.
    1
  814.  @dillonpercy1058  you can take that position if you want. But it honestly seems like it wasn't a point if you had to state what it was (because kursat didn't say it).
    1
  815.  @dillonpercy1058  The point you state he gave is one he never provided, it's one you concluded. If you wish to believe it just needs to be more developed, you can write that, but if you (not kursat) have to say what his point is, then it is you who made the point (not kursat).
    1
  816. That's because, for example, they'll say women are preferred in custody cases but then say women belong at home taking care of kids. They complain about the results they want.
    1
  817. Apologies, you mean the individual who asked how feminists help men while the MRAs kept saying men are lesser parents? It seems she as correct as the feminists maintained their position that the sexes are equal
    1
  818. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  if it is solely for men, then why are only feminists stating the sexes are equal while the MRAs said men are lesser parents?
    1
  819. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting over 2/3 of men don't see feminism as going to far. As the MRAs kept saying men are lesser parents (i suggest you watch the video if you are unaware of this), why would MRAs help men? As such, it seems the feminists were correct and are the only ones to help men
    1
  820.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs don't help men due to stating men are lesser parents. As the feminists oppose this, isn't that showing only feminists help both sexes?
    1
  821.  @DavidW-ng5zv  please note your attempted subject change upon noticing the harm MRAs cause by saying men are lesser parents. Again, kindly see the video in order to note MRAs stating men are lesser parents. Thus, as only feminists seem to help men, isn't that showing they fight for equality?
    1
  822.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus returning to the subject. As you are aware the harm caused by stating men are lesser parents, thank you for thus noticing the harm MRAs cause. As feminism opposes said idea, and believes men and women are equal parents, isn't that you agreeing only feminism helps both sexes?
    1
  823.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you write the MRAs "spoke facts" when stating men are lesser parents, thank you for thus showing only feminism fights for equality
    1
  824.  @regisshiv3542  hence my question. Why is it helpful the MRAs state men are lesser parents? Seems odd that's an issue that affects men as it seems only feminists help men
    1
  825.  @regisshiv3542  that's interesting, so you do believe the MRAs saying men are lesser parents is helping men's issues? It seems the feminists had a point and only feminists help men
    1
  826.  @regisshiv3542  and i wrote as per what the feminists asked. So thank you for accepting you believe MRAs saying men are lesser parents is helping men. Again, it seems the feminists were correct as only they help foment rights
    1
  827. ​ @regisshiv3542  thank you for accepting you believe MRAs saying men are lesser parents is helping men per noticing what the feminists asked. As stated, it seems the feminists were correct as only they help men and women
    1
  828. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but as you wrote the MRAs "spoke facts" when stating men are lesser parents, thank you for thus showing only feminism fights for equality
    1
  829. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you wrote the MRAs "spoke facts" when stating men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists fight for equality
    1
  830. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you wrote the MRAs "spoke facts" when stating men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists fight for equality
    1
  831. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you wrote the MRAs "spoke facts" when stating men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists fight for equality
    1
  832. Agreed. It's also odd the MRAs complain of women winning custody cases while saying women are biologically superior parents.
    1
  833.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but do you believe men and women are equal parents, or is one superior to the other?
    1
  834.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you state men and women aren't equal, thank you for showing why feminism is needed
    1
  835.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, as you believe men and women aren't equal, thank you for showing feminism is needed.
    1
  836.  @DavidW-ng5zv  or again, do you believe men and women are equal parents, or is one superior to the other?
    1
  837.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you (like the MRAs) believe men are lesser parents because you assume men and women aren't equal, thank you for showing feminism is needed
    1
  838.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe men are lesser parents to women, thank you for showing feminism is needed as MRAs merely state women are inherently better parents.
    1
  839.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per writing you believe men are lesser parents to women (as the MRAs also did), thank you for showing feminism is needed
    1
  840. Didn't Zack hold the same views as Derek? What does it mean if the MRAs hold the same views?
    1
  841.  @BaronBoar  and the other MRAs weren't?
    1
  842.  @BaronBoar  in what way? Again, didn't they have about the same views as derrick, ie, women aren't equal to men?
    1
  843.  @BaronBoar  and in what did they say women are better than men? Is it the same "better" as derricks traditionalism states?
    1
  844.  @BaronBoar  thus my query, what areas are women better at? Did they say the same places derrick did as per his traditionalist views?
    1
  845. Yes, I also noted as such. The feminists did present multiple issues women and men face while the MRAs merely said feminists were wrong. It appears only feminists can help men as they even disagreed with the MRAs saying men are lesser parents.
    1
  846. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe the feminists were wrong about the issues they brought up, but thank you for accepting they did speak of multiple issues that affect men and women.
    1
  847. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  would you like to write what the MRAs presented that didn't have to do with saying feminism is wrong or saying that men are biologically worse?
    1
  848.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting feminists spoke of issues that affect men and women, though you are entitled to think they were mistaken about said issues. Thus, what men's issues did the MRAs bring up, or did they just say feminism is wrong and that, for example, men are worse parents due to biology (which the feminists opposed)?
    1
  849.  @GigaChadlovesandcares  that's an odd position to take. Why do you think the MRA's saying men are lesser parents is the same as feminists saying the sexes are equal?
    1
  850.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange, why would stating men are equal parents remove rights? Do you believe the MRAs saying men are lesser parents helps men?
    1
  851.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree with the MRAs that men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists fight for men and women
    1
  852.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you agree with MRAs that men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists fight for men and women
    1
  853.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you agree with MRAs that men are lesser parents and noted the harm this causes by now denying they said this, thank you for showing only feminists fight for both sexes
    1
  854.  @Blind_And_Deaf  what question?
    1
  855. Why is it needed that derrick protects her from himself?
    1
  856.  @stephanieryder8484  I'm confused. Did you not watch the video? Do you not know who derrick is?
    1
  857.  @stephanieryder8484  that's odd, then why don't you understand my query? It seems odd to state you did watch the video otherwise. Do you not know what the MRA said?
    1
  858.  @stephanieryder8484  it's interesting you're so descriptive of what the feminist said but fail to recall what was actually said. Are you just seeing complaints about the video and decided to join in?
    1
  859.  @Zain-iv9yv  I'm actually being quite clear. Did you also not see the video?
    1
  860.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then do you believe derrick can protect women?
    1
  861.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for noting derrick protects women from himself.
    1
  862.  @views-kb6sv  agreed, Zack was the only one of the guys to actually listen and empathize, more so after alysha stated this. Like all the girls here, he did try to understand where they were coming from.
    1
  863.  @fanaticjc9847  interestingly enough, the MRAs actually self sabotaged a lot of their points. For example, they'll say discrimination against fathers occurs in child custody cases, but then say women are inherently better than men at being parents.
    1
  864.  @mridulmalik4728  then as you agree Zack did ask her for examples of her being harassed, why is that respectful? Also, why is answering his question defensive?
    1
  865.  @mridulmalik4728  thus, as you agree he specifically asked her what harassment had been done to her (or what do you think they're talking about?), why is that being respectful? But thank you for changing to state her answering wasn't defensive.
    1
  866.  @mridulmalik4728  i am puzzled why you are confused. Again, as you agree he asked what harassment had been done to her, why is that respectful? Or are you already aware asking a woman this isn't respectful? Regardless, thank you for changing to state her answering wasn't defensive. You can believe of her "tone" as you wish.
    1
  867.  @mridulmalik4728  apologies, but this is why it is important for you to see the video as it seems you are unaware what being harassed is. Regardless, why is asking about when and how she was harassed/harmed/attacked/etc respectful? And, again, thank you for agreeing her answering isn't defensive. Believe of her tone when asked about being attacked as you wish.
    1
  868.  @advithbhaviya5712  hence my query. Note, Alysha said she was harmed by men but then zack interrupted and said "when and where". Why is it respectful to ask that and why is the tone wrong when Alysha describes how she was assaulted?
    1
  869.  @advithbhaviya5712  for example, would you write how Alysha was assaulted?
    1
  870. So it's correct of feminism that women fighting in the military became legal in 2016?
    1
  871. you can see NOMAS if you want. also, the MRA's kept saying men were lesser parents while the feminists disagreed
    1
  872. @Jael apparently, not only can no one define "toxic femininity", those that try to only manage to write sexist stereotypes.
    1
  873. what did the MRA's believe?
    1
  874. By sheer irony, all the MRAs agreed with his views. Even zack who appeared to reconsider his positions agreed with his views.
    1
  875.  @theweeklycritical5782  why would all the MRAs believing men and women aren't equal, women have too many rights and that men are simply lesser caregivers means the MRAs would confront each other? It seems strange you believe agreeing means they are confronting each other.
    1
  876.  @The_Founder  then why would you imply feminism is only about women yet write it's "on the basis of equality of the sexes", ie, equality for men and women?
    1
  877. No, she had a point. The MRAs kept talking about how men are biologically lesser parents while the feminists said people were equals. The entire conversation was the guys answer
    1
  878.  @nickyturnbull2172  "Men and women are not equal" This mentality is why feminism exists and why she was correct. Again, the entire conversation was the MRA being proven wrong. Also weird the MRA's complained about losing custody cases when they specifically said men are biologically worse at being parents.
    1
  879.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per you also stating men and women aren't equal, thank you for again demonstrating the feminist had a point. Or do you believe in the MRA misandry that is seeing men as biologically lesser parents?
    1
  880.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus i reiterate the query you avoid. Do you disagree with the MRA's misandry that men are lesser parents? Do you then agree with the feminists that the sexes are equals? And again, thank you for showing why feminism exists.
    1
  881.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for showing why feminism exists as you agree with the misogyny and misandry of MRA's. Or per the MRA's, are men biologically lesser parents compared to women?
    1
  882.  @DavidW-ng5zv  hence the query you avoid: are men biologically lesser parents compared to women or are they equals as the feminists noted?
    1
  883.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus the query you avoid: are men biologically lesser parents or are the sexes equals (as per the feminists)?
    1
  884.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and how are they different that men lose nearly all custody cases? Do you believe men are simply worse parents?
    1
  885.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you state all a father is is someone who gives money, does this mean you do believe men are inherently worse parents? Or how are women different that they win nearly all custody cases?
    1
  886. @@doncheadle8876 that's why i'm repeating the question. you probably noted he keeps trying to downplay or avoid saying he thinks men are lesser parents.
    1
  887. When the MRAs stood up to talk about women having more rights, wasn't half the talk about men having relationship troubles?
    1
  888. ​ @tonyonaperky2128 according to the one condemning her for answering, she did
    1
  889.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why do you believe zack is a she?
    1
  890. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  so you do believe like the MRA's do? It's baffling MRA's complain men lose custody cases when they constantly state men are worse parents.
    1
  891. What is toxic femininity? Every time i ask I'm just provided with a bunch of stereotypes about women so I'm curious what you believe it is.
    1
  892. Apologies, but an organization of what?
    1
  893. I'm pretty sure most women don't talk about grabbing people's genitals in a non consensual manner.
    1
  894.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" As you defend doing as such, thank you for showing why feminism exists.
    1
  895.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then why is it only the MRA's defending grabbing genitals non consensually?
    1
  896.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Again , as you defend doing as such, thank you for showing why feminism exists.
    1
  897.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly they did. Thus, why did only the feminists oppose it?
    1
  898.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. As for men and women non consensually groping individuals, why is it that only the feminists state this is wrong?
    1
  899.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Again, per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. Per men and women non consensually groping individuals, why is it that only the feminists state this is wrong? Why do you avoid this query?
    1
  900.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. So again, per individuals non consensually groping, why is it that only the feminists state this is wrong?
    1
  901.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Again, per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. So per individuals non consensually groping, why is it that only the feminists state this is wrong? Is this not showing why feminism exists?
    1
  902.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Again, per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. As you believe it impossible to stop individuals non consensually groping, thank you for showing why feminism helps people and why they're the only that do so.
    1
  903.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk" Again, per defending this, thank you for showing why feminism exists. As you believe it impossible to stop individuals non consensually groping, thank you for showing why feminism helps people and why they're the only that do so. As for what they'll do, probably the same thing they did when they stigmatized domestic abuse.
    1
  904.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Groping people is also stigmatised, yet it still happens." correct, thank you for agreeing feminism stigmatized domestic abuse and groping. Does this mean quite a lot was stopped? And per noting as well as defending it, thank you for showing why feminism persists. For example, "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk". Again, thank you for showing why feminism exists and that only feminism acts against it.
    1
  905.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "domestic violence still exists. Groping people is also stigmatised, yet it still happens." Thank you for accepting that domestic abuse and groping are stigmatized and criminalized due to feminism. Again, does this mean quite a lot was stopped? And thank you for showing why feminism persists as it is the only one to do anything about it. Again, why is it that only feminists oppose this? For example, "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk".
    1
  906.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "domestic violence still exists. Groping people is also stigmatized, yet it still happens." Again, thank you for accepting feminism criminalized and stigmatized these. Does this mean quite a lot of it was stopped? Or is there a reason you avoid the query? And thank you for showing why feminism persists as it is the only one to do anything about it. Again, why is it that only feminists oppose this? Note you even wrote "There's nothing wrong with locker room talk".
    1
  907. Except she has a point. All the feminists believed men and women are equal, but only one of the MRAs did. The other two MRAs believe women are better off at home because of their biology.
    1
  908. Fairly true, though it seems the only ones who want to change things are feminists. The MRAs seem to want to keep the current system because women being weak and men being strong is what they say is a biological reality.
    1
  909. weirdly enough, the MRA's actively discourage women showing interest in men because then they see the women as masculine
    1
  910. ​ @DavidCastle-fe3hi  then it seems it is just as hard for women as men. Otherwise, why would the MRAs complain women aren't married? after all, most men say they are told no by extremely attractive women
    1
  911.  @DavidCastle-fe3hi  if women control the dating market then why are the MRAs complaining that women aren't married and pregnant? Did you not see the video that you are unaware of their views of where they believe men and women belong?
    1
  912. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  Control in what way?
    1
  913. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv you mean men don't choose to have sex?
    1
  914.  @falconhoward4032  if so, why not quote her? like i said, it seems odd her answering zack's demand for details of her assault is something you see as wrong to the point you believe it means all men are evil
    1
  915.  @smayansrivastava12s32  that's strange, why is it a rant to answer the MRA's question? its honestly strange you guys really dislike people answering questions
    1
  916.  @smayansrivastava12s32  thus my question. why are you angry she described her assaults to the point you say it is a rant?
    1
  917. This is fair
    1
  918. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, do you mean women being able to say no to sex is inequality?
    1
  919. Then you agree taxes on tampons and allergy medication should be removed?
    1
  920.  @sorelooser6511  well that escalated
    1
  921. What would you call the MRAs saying men are lesser parents because they believe women are naturally suited to child rearing?
    1
  922.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why is it helpful for MRAs to state men are lesser parents?
    1
  923.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As you believe as MRAs do that men are lesser parents, how does that help men in custody cases? Isn't more helpful to state the sexes are equal, ie, feminism?
    1
  924.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, as women nearly always win custody cases on an individual basis, why is it helpful that MRAs reinforce the idea that men are lesser parents? Wouldn't more men win if they were seen as equal parents?
    1
  925.  @cs-mh2dh  then as you believe women are naturally better suited to be parents, why are you surprised women win nearly all custody cases? Isn't this exactly the result you wish?
    1
  926.  @cs-mh2dh  seems odd you state women share a bond with their children that men can never hope to obtain, yet assume this won't lead to women winning nearly all custody cases, ie, be seen as the better parent. Feminism is truly needed if you are unaware of how your views (shared by most of society) can "depress" men and women's rights
    1
  927.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree seeing men and women as equal in courts provides fairer results, ie, "they do", i thank you for agreeing with feminism.
    1
  928.  @cs-mh2dh  excellent, thank you for now stating men and women are equal parents as "men could bond with their children" just like women. As you now agree with the feminists, isn't that showing the positive change feminism does to your thought process?
    1
  929.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" thank you for showing hypergamy is false because even when incels work out and have money, they're still incels. Again, per opposing equality, ie, feminism, isn't that incels wanting to be seen as inferior? Note you seem to believe as such so it seems odd you complain about the result you demand.
    1
  930.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your new question, note your answers: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs", ie, you agree incels are incels regardless of their looks or money. You also state incels view equality as a myth and oppose feminism, so isn't that you writing incels want to be treated as inferiors?
    1
  931.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note your answers: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" yet they stay as incels regardless of their looks or money. You also write incels view equality as a myth and oppose feminism, so why state any issue exists for them (note you seem to imply they are inferior and are happy as such)?
    1
  932.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per your words: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" yet they stay as incels regardless of working out or having money. You then state incels view men and women being equal as a myth, so why state any issue exists (note you seem to believe they are inferior)?
    1
  933.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note your words: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" yet they stay as incels regardless of working out or having money. Thus, as you seem to view incels as inferiors, why complain about the results you wish? It seems odd you constantly try to backtrack your position.
    1
  934.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you weren't backtracking then you wouldn't be arguing against yourself. Again, note your words: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" yet they stay as incels regardless of working out or having money. Again, note that you seem to believe incels are inferior and wish to be treated as such due to opposing equality, ie, feminism.
    1
  935.  @DavidW-ng5zv  please note you backtracking to the point you are arguing with yourself: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs" yet they stay as incels regardless of working out or having money. You seem to believe incels wish to be treated as inferior as you state feminism must be opposed because equality is a myth.
    1
  936.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note you backtracking to argue with yourself: "loads of incels care for themselves and have jobs". So why do incels stay as incels regardless of working out or having money? Note you proving hypergamy is false through this. Again, you seem to believe incels wish to be treated as inferior as you state feminism must be opposed because equality is a myth. Is this not related to incels existing?
    1
  937. You don't think it's pretty alarming that all the women had a story (or several) about being sexually harassed?
    1
  938. That's odd. Why do you believe she needs to give a list of the amount of times she was sexually harassed?
    1
  939.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, the feminists were asked "when and where" they could give a list of feminist organizations that help men? Apologies, but have you seen the video?
    1
  940.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, you have not seen the video. Why state the feminist was wrong if you believe mimi was asked "when and where" to give the list?
    1
  941.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why not quote it? Kindly write where and when said list was supposed to be given. Please note NOMAS as an example.
    1
  942.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list? Either way, thank you for demonstrating you have not seen the video.
    1
  943.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. Why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list? But thank you for showing the other was mistakem.
    1
  944.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. Why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list? Again, thank you for showing the other was mistaken.
    1
  945.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as i asked as per the first comment, why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list?
    1
  946.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, as per the first comment, why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list? Thus, thank you for noting the others mistake
    1
  947.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Again, as per the first comment, why not quote where mimi was asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list? Or was the other mistaken? Recall the MRAs said men were lesser parents while the feminists disagreed.
    1
  948.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting mimi was not asked by "kersak" "when and where" to give the list, ie, the commenter was mistaken. As the MRAs said men were lesser parents (while the feminists disagreed), isn't that showing feminism helps men?
    1
  949.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting mimi was not asked by kursat "when and where" to give the list, ie, the commenter was mistaken, and for finally correcting your mistake in regards to his name. Regardless, as the MRAs said men were lesser parents and the feminists disagreed with this, isn't that showing feminism helps men? Or how do MRAs help by demonizing fathers?
    1
  950. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv and what different parts of the brain do men and women have that they process emotions differently? As for the variability hypothesis, do you then mention it due to noting women have the same capacity to reason as men?
    1
  951.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then kindly write what brain parts science daily gives. And again, per the variability hypothesis, do you mention it per noting women have the same capacity to reason as men? Seems odd you deflected.
    1
  952.  @netflix_and_chill20  if men or women as a whole don't act the same, why state men and women as a group react differently to each other depending on the situation?
    1
  953. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as for your other quotes, thank you for agreeing men and women have the same capacity to reason, though it seems there's a probability that women outperform men in memory tests. Is that why you avoid my query about the variability hypothesis because memory is fairly pertinent in regards to reasoning?
    1
  954.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Your claim was that men and women are exactly the same" You are entitled to pretend so
    1
  955. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "you literally claimed that women and men are the exact same." Then kindly quote me
    1
  956.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you seem to disagree with your other sources and quotes that women have the same capacity to reason as men (one even says women outperform men in memory tests). Is that why you avoid my query about the variability hypothesis? Is memory pertinent for a capacity to reason?
    1
  957.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are still entitled to pretend so
    1
  958.  @DavidW-ng5zv  still weird you ignore your sources
    1
  959.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as for the variability hypothesis, again, do you mention it because you believe men and women have the same capacity to reason? You seem to already agree they have the same brain parts after all.
    1
  960.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you agree with the feminists at 2:25? Or why avoid all the other queries and disagree with your sources after noticing men and women don't have separate brain parts?
    1
  961.  @netflix_and_chill20  "each individual is different" So basically this 2:25?
    1
  962.  @netflix_and_chill20  then i don't know what you were trying to explain if you agree with the feminists
    1
  963.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why did only the feminists show they help both sexes?
    1
  964. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "they only helped vvomen." thank you for accepting feminists at least help women. however, again, why did the video show them helping both sexes? or why not provide a timestamp of your claim?
    1
  965.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "they only helped vvomen" again, thank you for at least accepting feminists help women. interestingly, in your attempt to backtrack, you noted the MRA's don't help anyone, ie, "Neither group helped men". thus, as we agree feminists help women while MRA's do not help men, then why does the video show feminists also help men? or do you believe seeing men and women as equals only helps women?
    1
  966. Interestingly the MRAs actually agreed with derrick on most things so it seems there's an overlap between both groups
    1
  967.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  are you not mad that project 2025 demands men be drafted?
    1
  968.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  why wouldn't you be angry that project 2025 says you should be forced into the military? But you are correct about mainstream politics since they opposed the draft
    1
  969. ​ @HarryMcLeod-q8p  "No politician cares about you" Hence why project 2025 demands you be drafted. So why wouldn't you be angry about it stating you should be drafted? After all, the mainstream opposed the draft.
    1
  970.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  are you asking because being drafted would make you angry?
    1
  971.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  also JD vance says this (among other conservatives)
    1
  972.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  that's interesting, so why do you think asking you about a draft is an insult? Is mentioning it that bad that it actually angered you into saying I'm insulting you?
    1
  973.  @luisandrade2254  not really, though i understand why you think that because all the MRAs believed that too. I'll try to get you the timestamps for zack
    1
  974.  @luisandrade2254  4:16 and 14:50
    1
  975. Not really, i mean he didn't really do anything. Even when he was saying feminism was wrong, he did it while ignoring the two MRAs stating women belong in the home caring for kids.
    1
  976.  @misskingii  then what facts did he give and why did he ignore the MRAs saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  977.  @anthk.4846  apologies, you believe women are the ones that commit most crime in the USA? Also, why are you blaming the MRAs saying women are inherently better caretakers on the feminists?
    1
  978.  @anthk.4846  Technically, your implication was worldwide, but my question remains regardless. And again, why are you blaming the MRAs saying women are inherently superior parents on the feminists?
    1
  979.  @anthk.4846  apologies, have you not seen the video? They state this multiple times.
    1
  980.  @anthk.4846  i implore you, please watch the video. It is extremely informative.
    1
  981. @Searching for Ufos you quite clearly wrote it was a horrible situation, ie, outraged, men pay alimony because women nearly always win custody cases. This despite the fact that you believe women are inherently superior at child rearing. Again, why are you surprised by the inevitable result?
    1
  982.  @fochiqui  why would stating men and women are equal be misandry?
    1
  983. No, she kind of has a point. The MRAs, for example, said men are discriminated in custody cases but also said men are worse parents. Why is that needed?
    1
  984.  @DavidW-ng5zv  I am answering your question. Again, do you agree with the feminists that the sexes are equal or with the MRAs that men are inherently worse parents?
    1
  985.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then doesn't that mean men losing most custody cases is the outcome MRAs want?
    1
  986. Giving birth is one thing, but when women are the main breadwinner, they're also the one doing all the cooking, cleaning, etc. Apparently the division of roles is a unfairly balanced.
    1
  987. So you agree with feminism having legalizing women fighting in the military in 2016?
    1
  988.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus showing why feminism is needed
    1
  989.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing why feminism is needed
    1
  990.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing why feminism is needed
    1
  991.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe women fighting alongside men in the military makes women see them as the enemy
    1
  992. She has a point. For example, the MRA guys believe discrimination in child custody cases happen but that women are inherently superior caregivers. What do you expect to happen?
    1
  993. As a general rule, the MRAs are kind of a joke. I think their last activism was to state a defunct draft was sexist against men. Bear in mind, feminists actually managed to legalize women fighting in the military in 2016.
    1
  994.  @Eramor  that's kind of the problem. For example, if we take the 3 guys here as representative of MRAs then the only thing they really do is say feminism is wrong and that the sexes are not equal.
    1
  995.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, that's what the prompt says in the video and all the feminists agreed with it while the MRAs spent their time saying women belong at home raising kids. Ironically, they then said feminism is wrong because men lose custody cases more. Surely you agree feminism is more apt for helping men and women as they're the only one that whole heartedly agrees the sexes are equal but different?
    1
  996.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it's interesting you immediately backtracked from stating men should have their issues addressed to basically saying men don't have issues because they're not pathetic. But thank you for being honest.
    1
  997.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet feminists are the only ones to do so as shown by the video. Or do you believe MRAs stating men are lesser parents is helpful?
    1
  998.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement, aren't feminists the only ones addressing men's issues? As you state men are lesser parents, why do you believe that helps men in the court system?
    1
  999.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, then isn't that you agreeing feminists help due to seeing men and women as equal? Please note we agree MRAs seeing men as lesser parents does not help in the court system.
    1
  1000.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet as you agreed, seeing men and women as equals helps. Thus, isn't that agreeing feminists help as MRAs only state men are lesser parents?
    1
  1001. no offense or anything but women getting pregnant in their teens was definitely an issue
    1
  1002.  @nicolefroehlich1286  either way, your entire comment shows you should not have kids
    1
  1003.  @nicolefroehlich1286  not really. Anyone trying to say teen pregnancies aren't an issue because it was "normal" in the past and who says they want to be pregnant to feel better about themselves absolutely should not have kids. Seriously, there are so many red flags in your comment it's unreal.
    1
  1004.  @nicolefroehlich5284  "the only reason why its an issue now is because our society has made it that way" like i said, anyone that thinks teen pregnancies aren't an issue should absolutely should not have kids.
    1
  1005.  @nicolefroehlich5284  now that's interesting, you're backtracking (kind of, since you still state it's only an issue modern society made). Is this because you noted defending teen pregnancies shows you are wrong? Seems feminism had a point after all.
    1
  1006.  @Lulu2u  oh yeah, i forgot incels have a body count because of their mass shootings.
    1
  1007.  @lennertdevoldere7000  then as you agree zack and Derek see women as less capable of working as they assume they belong on the home, isn't that sharing the same views but with zack being more polite about it? Furthermore, as both of them state discrimination occurs in child custody cases, who would actually cause that to change: those stating the sexes are equal or those stating one is naturally better at child rearing?
    1
  1008.  @lennertdevoldere7000  why are you pretending you didn't write "zack thinks that women are better as caretakers"? Furthermore, you specifically said their arguments didn't convince you, so i am presenting said arguments again. Thus, as zack has the same views as derrick but is politer about it and since all the MRAs state there is discrimination in child custody cases, who can change said situation: those standing for equality or those stating women "have a predetermined skill set" (your words) in raising children?
    1
  1009.  @smogblazer4509  women don't actually dominate, but there are two problems in custody cases. 1) Most custody battles are settled outside of court, and a depressingly large amount end with the men saying they don't want the child or that the mother should have main custody. This means men are seen as the lesser parent. 2) Discrimination towards men in custody cases exists too (albeit in a smaller capacity). However, this occurs because people believe as the MRA's espouse, ie, that women are naturally better parents. In both of these cases, the results reinforce what feminism opposes (and what MRA's also complain about despite desiring said outcome), ie, gender stereotypes; one can't have equality between the sexes if one sex is seen as lesser or belonging to a certain role. This is what's wrong.
    1
  1010.  @smogblazer4509  and thus the problem. You now stated women are more suited for child rearing, ie, implied men are lesser at it. I assume you also believe men are "more suited for work", ie, women are lesser at it? Note this is what feminism opposes as it only impedes peoples ability to venture outside of it. I don't know why you state you never used the word equality, but please note that being pregnant is no metric for ones capabilities in caring for a child
    1
  1011. The incels dream is to be careful about what they wear so as to not worry about being sexually harassed?
    1
  1012. Why do they need it? Because the MRAs didn't really answer. They even sabotaged it at certain points
    1
  1013.  @CaptureTizz97  then what answer did they give for why mens rights are needed?
    1
  1014.  @StefanStuart1  PS also, most of your examples are ones the MRA's in the video disagree with. for example, the MRA's said men are inherently worse parents while also being less emotional than women
    1
  1015.  @StefanStuart1  it seems you deflected again. Is this because you can't find any examples of MRA activism that helps men?
    1
  1016. Then why do they all agree with him?
    1
  1017.  @miscerswetdream  feminists saying no to incels is about standards, not about ideals. Kind of weird you think saying not to sex makes them "wores" though. Either way, thank you for agreeing incels correlate with MRAs.
    1
  1018.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then would you like to define what in-cel stands for?
    1
  1019.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why not define what incel stands for?
    1
  1020.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for defining in-cel and showing this correlates with MRAs. Are there any points the MRAs give that don't have to do with being incels?
    1
  1021. That's an odd response. If feminism isn't about equality, why where the MRAs the ones to say men are more violent, worse parents, etc? But thank you for accepting women can be incels too. This is actually pretty rare for anti feminists to admit.
    1
  1022. i mean no one was drafted for the war in iraq so it seems no one has to sign up for a draft.
    1
  1023.  @Crustyshrimp99  then why is it a problem men and women get drafted in israel? isn't that what you guys want?
    1
  1024. ​ @michaelfry967  your comment confused me. are you trying to say there's currently a draft for the war in the middle east since the USA is currently at war? i promise you there is not
    1
  1025.  @riven4121  apologies, you mean both women and men cause wars?
    1
  1026. You are welcome to believe as you wish. But i do thank you for accepting the wage gap exists
    1
  1027.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why wouldn't i believe the wage gap exists when you also agreed it does? For example, why not provide the sources you gave in regards to nurses?
    1
  1028.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as for sports, you are still entitled to believe every athlete there is is paid in merchandizing.
    1
  1029. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then would you like to write the name of the sources? Surely it can only support you to provide them? For example, note nurse journal.
    1
  1030. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, per sports, you are entitled to believe all athletes are paid through, for example, souvenir shops, and believe sports clubs are the same as athletes (even though sports clubs have lost lawsuits over pay discrimination)
    1
  1031.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why not provide it so we note I didn't take a different one?
    1
  1032.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then if I am strawmanning you, why not provide the source so everyone can see what it says and prove i am doing so?
    1
  1033.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my request. If I am strawmanning you, why not show as such by providing your source? Otherwise it seems your source states the wage gap is real, or who wouldn't show that which strengthens their position?
    1
  1034.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it is real" excellent, thank you for agreeing with feminists. Thus, so we may see what your source states about it being real, kindly provide it. Note you already backtracked from stating there is no wage gap and you refuse to provide your source. Is this due to noticing what it concludes?
    1
  1035.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it is real" again, thank you for agreeing with feminists. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but would you kindly provide your source so we may see what it states? Seems odd you simply refuse to provide a source after stating the wage gap is real.
    1
  1036.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note you backtracked from stating there is no wage gap. Do you not provide your source due to noticing what it concludes?
    1
  1037.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you still refuse to provide your source. Do you act as such because of what your sources conclude? Note you backtrack to agreeing with feminists over the wage gap after reading the sources you refuse to provide.
    1
  1038.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then would you kindly provide the source? Again, it seems quite telling you refuse to provide it. Is this due to noticing what it concludes? Again, note you immediately backtracked from stating the wage gap isn't real upon reading it.
    1
  1039.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but it is quite telling you refuse to provide your source
    1
  1040.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then would you graciously write the sources name to show i cherrypicked? Again, it's quite telling you refuse to provide it when you even immediately backtracked from stating the wage gap isn't real. Do you simply not wish to reveal it's conclusions? But thank you for accepting the wage gap is real
    1
  1041.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but it is quite telling you refuse to provide your source. Is this due to noticing it would be my source?
    1
  1042.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism.
    1
  1043.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd you wish to ignore your sources conclusions in order to disagree with feminism
    1
  1044. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Again, thank you for agreeing with feminism.
    1
  1045.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism though it seems strange you didn't read your source.
    1
  1046. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism though it seems strange you didn't read your source.
    1
  1047. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per your source: "male RNs tend to earn about $10,000 more per year than their female RN counterparts, although that gap narrows to $5,100 when adjusted for factors like age, education, and specialty." Thus, thank you for inadvertently agreeing with feminism
    1
  1048. Weirdly enough, the MRAs shared his views so it actually was accurate
    1
  1049. but it is wrong to be a white supremacist, correct?
    1
  1050. Which point?
    1
  1051. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, then why are the MRAs saying men are lesser parents per biology while the feminists oppose this? Which helps foment fatherhood?
    1
  1052. The part that most annoys me is that the MRAs agree with derrick. The feminists had a point when they said they weren't sure why the MRAs existed.
    1
  1053. why so? after all, the legalized women fighting in the military?
    1
  1054.  @BrokenDiety1  that's weird, what men were conscripted for the war in the middle east? or are men and women treated about the same in the military?
    1
  1055.  @BrokenDiety1  what lie did i give? or do you state so in order to avoid answering what conscription men are under?
    1
  1056.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly they are. After all, it became legal for women to fight in 2016
    1
  1057.  @Khan-kx9jw  then do you believe as the MRA's state that men are inherently bad parents, ie, why they lose custody cases?
    1
  1058.  @BrokenDiety1  i assure you it is. after all, you made sure to give example of women AFTER they give birth and agreed only about half of men ever pay full alimony payments. quite unfair, is it not?
    1
  1059. ​ @BrokenDiety1  and most women can't afford a baby. Odd you justify men financially "aborting" when they can't afford a child but not women. Quite unfair men have more bodily autonomy, agreed? As for conscription, which one was active in the war in the middle east?
    1
  1060. As the feminists state men and women are equal while the MRAs state women are better at home raising children, who is helping more in child custody cases?
    1
  1061.  @aquilamxp6267  please note that the only way you can defend MRAs is by pretending they didn't state as i wrote. Thus, thank you for showing feminists are the only ones to help people. Or why is stating men are inherently better at child rearing helping fathers in custody cases?
    1
  1062. the fact that all the other MRA's agreed with him is the other reason.
    1
  1063.  @QueenMagenta-sv7fr  dude if you believe people should be treated equally then you automatically disagree with the MRAs.
    1
  1064. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc that's an odd statement. What law exists that state women can assault men?
    1
  1065.  @DavidW-ng5zv exactly my query. again, if you believe women are permitted to assault men, what law states so? Are the police impeded from taking women to jail for assault?
    1
  1066.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's an odd response. Why do you believe women being defended from assault means men are not? Seems odd you deflect from my query in writing what law legalized violence against men
    1
  1067.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odder response. As you accepted the law you wrote is about women being defended from assault, why do you then believe it's not women attacking other women? For example, is it not generally men who attack other men?
    1
  1068. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's interesting, you backtracked. As you now state laws against women being assaulted means women attack men, is that you accepting you made a mistake? Or again, why did you automatically assume violence against women includes men? Is it not women who generally attack women like it's men who generally attack men?
    1
  1069.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for backtracking from stating the law condones attacks. Thus i reiterate, why did you assume violence against women includes men that you state laws are being abused in that way?
    1
  1070.  @DavidW-ux2gc  likewise, per now changing to the UK, why not paste the law to see if what you write is true? But thank you for accepting men and women are equals as both can be raped.
    1
  1071.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for thus backtracking upon noting your mistake in stating rape laws don't include men, ie, noting men and women are equals. or why not quote it?
    1
  1072.  @DavidW-ux2gc  likewise, thank you for accepting no law condones violence against men. thus, again, why did you associate violence with men?
    1
  1073. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "why does the Violence Against Women Act only protect women" excellent question. Thus i reiterate, why did you assume violence against women includes men that you state laws are being abused in that way? Do women not attack other women?
    1
  1074.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies but you deflected. Again, per writing "why does the Violence Against Women Act only protect women", why did you immediately assume violence against women includes men? Bu thank you for accepting your mistake about the law.
    1
  1075.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent question. Allow me to answer that with a similar query to the one you avoid. As you immediately assumed the "violence against women act" involved men, is this similar to implying that violence against men overwhelmingly involves women? But again, thank you for accepting your mistake
    1
  1076.  @DavidW-ng5zv  i am answering your query. I am just doing it with the query you avoid. Thus i reiterate: As you immediately assumed the "violence against women act" involved men, does this mean you believe violence against men inherently involves women? Again, thank you for accepting your mistake
    1
  1077.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my query. I will reiterate as you avoid your answer: As you immediately assumed the "violence against women act" involves men, does this mean you believe violence against men inherently involves women? Seems odd you avoid an answer to your query
    1
  1078.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question which you avoid. Again, as you automatically assumed violence against women includes men, does this mean violence against men inherently includes women? Or if you wish to be even more direct, do you believe women are just as strong as men? Still odd you avoid an answer to your query.
    1
  1079.  @edaboodie6346  no, you just mentioned what he did
    1
  1080. agreed, the fact that the MRA's kept sabotaging men's issues while the feminists said the sexes were equal was fairly poignant. Just look at how the MRAs said there's discrimination in custody cases only to then immediately say men are biologically lesser parents
    1
  1081. Incels have literally caused mass shootings because women saying no to them makes them feel emasculated. That's pretty toxic.
    1
  1082.  @grey_apache  then i assume you agree men not commiting extreme acts of violence because they feel emasculated by women saying no is masculinity that is not toxic?
    1
  1083.  @grey_apache  we agree toxic masculinity is what incels do, ie, attack because they feel emasculated over women saying no. So is not doing that healthy masculinity?
    1
  1084.  @grey_apache  then as we agree toxic masculinity is a problem, there really isn't much else to say.
    1
  1085.  @grey_apache  what makes it so and what mass shootings has it caused?
    1
  1086.  @grey_apache  I don't know why you wrote another incel belief over women existing to be taken care of by men. Isn't that also the toxic masculinity that causes incels mass shootings?
    1
  1087.  @kauswekazilimani3736  exactly, then as you agree MRAs are petty for pushing what they decry, why are feminists petty for opposing discrimination?
    1
  1088.  @kauswekazilimani3736  then if we're still on the subject of custody cases, why is it the same that MRAs say men are inherently lesser parents while feminists says all are equal? Again, per the pettiness query, which position actually helps?
    1
  1089.  @kauswekazilimani3736  then why does only the MRA ideology say the sexes aren't equal, eg, men are lesser parents (thus affecting the conclusion of custody cases)?
    1
  1090.  @kauswekazilimani3736  perfect, thank you for agreeing feminism is about gender equality and is fighting for gender equality. Thus, why is this the same as nearly all MRA's stating men are lesser parents?
    1
  1091.  @kauswekazilimani3736  and yes, it is nearly all MRA's that believe men are lesser parents. Simply note what the MRA's in the video state.
    1
  1092.  @kauswekazilimani3736  Excellent, you agree the 3 MRAs in the video don't believe in gender equality while al the feminists do. Do you then believe the channel here specifically chose entities that don't represent MRAs? Likewise, as you write about the general trend of these ideologies, why did only feminists legalize women fighting in the military while nearly all MRAs stated women belonged in the home? Or do you believe feminism that changed the law for equality is the minority of feminist views?
    1
  1093.  @kauswekazilimani3736  again, thank you for writing that the views in the video aren't outliers as the individuals were chosen at random: "No its a few random people." It baffles me why you now disagree with yourself. Since this means feminists push equality while MRAs inequality, which helps people? Please cease deflecting and answer honestly.
    1
  1094.  @andreas2291  if you believe men are inherently better at making money and women are inherently better caretakers, doesn't that mean women will nearly always win custody cases and men will nearly always pay child support?
    1
  1095. Seems weird you think, for example, zack asking for specifics about how she's been harmed and that her answering about how she was essentially assaulted is her being unreasonable.
    1
  1096. No really, they agreed and then moved on.
    1
  1097.  @klugscheier1644  probably, but MRAs aren't really qualified to do so. For example, they don't really see women as equal, even saying they're like children. If the courts assume something similar, who do you think gets more prison time?
    1
  1098.  @butter3617  it's odd you try to deflect from the fact that she was asked examples about how and where she was assaulted.
    1
  1099.  @butter3617  apologies, have you not seen the video? Seems strange you don't know what she said, ie, "harm".
    1
  1100.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, would you like to quote the timestamp?
    1
  1101.  @butter3617  he seems to believe so
    1
  1102.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. If there was a logical leap, would you kindly quote the timestamp?
    1
  1103.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again (also i am uncertain what other comment you mean but kindly cease changing the subject). Again, if there was a logical leap, would you graciously quote the timestamp?
    1
  1104.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected (and kindly cease changing the subject). Again, if there was a logical leap, would you graciously quote the timestamp?
    1
  1105.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but kindly cease trying to change the subject. Again, if there was a logical leap, would you graciously quote the timestamp? Or do you avoid this due to noting there was no logical leap. I'm still uncertain as to what you mean in regards to the other subject.
    1
  1106.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but i graciously request you cease changing the subject. Per writing of a logical leap, would you kindly quote the timestamp? Or is the deflection due to noting what it contains? I'm still uncertain as to what you mean in regards to the other subject or what quotes you claim to have.
    1
  1107.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then once again, would you kindly quote the timestamp if there was a logical leap? Or did you notice the MRA did ask the feminist to specify how and where she'd been assaulted?
    1
  1108.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you gor accepting the MRA asked how and where the feminists had been harmed. Thus, do you wish to change the subject per noting there was no leap of logic?
    1
  1109. Not really, his ideas were about the same as the other MRAs but he was more blunt about them.
    1
  1110.  @avateraangshoe5025  as was zack. Simply note their position in regards to child rearing.
    1
  1111. So do you think derrick can protect women (per his words)?
    1
  1112.  @briankarczewski8588  so you agree with the people mocking him in that area?
    1
  1113. not really. the other mra's agreed with him on most stuff. even zach, the most "reasonable" mra, believed agreed with him
    1
  1114.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, the feminist wasn't wrong in asking why MRAs are needed of they constantly sabotage the issues they present.
    1
  1115.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's actually true, feminism saying both parents are equal is the reason MRAs then say men are inherently worse parents
    1
  1116. ​​ @DavidW-ux2gc and thus why MRAs sabotage men's rights by stating men are biologically bad at caring for their families
    1
  1117.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why do you believe men are simply worse parents?
    1
  1118.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and what roles do mothers and fathers have that you attempt to simultaneously state men are and are not worse parents? Is the role of men to only give money to the family, ie, not be a parent?
    1
  1119.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd. Why do you now essentially ask me why an issue presented by MRAs is pertinent? Shouldn't it bother you?
    1
  1120.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "why would it bother me?" exactly, thank you for thus showing why only feminists help people
    1
  1121.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "why would it bother me?" again, thank you for showing why only feminists help people
    1
  1122. @DavidW-ng5zv "why would it bother me?" again, thank you for showing why only feminists help people
    1
  1123. @DavidW-ng5zv "why would it bother me?" again, thank you for showing why only feminists help people
    1
  1124. Not really. Bea was correct pretty much the entire time while Zack was just polite. Actually, I'm not even sure what facts Zack was giving considering he basically repeated what derrick said
    1
  1125.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish
    1
  1126.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to choose whatever answer for me you wish
    1
  1127.  @DavidW-ng5zv  regardless of the answer I provide, you will make your own choice over it. Thus, you are entitled to believe and choose you wish
    1
  1128.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as i stated, you are fully entitled to believe I am whatever you so wish.
    1
  1129.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i don't believe either" again, thank you for providing your answer. You are entitled to believe in it
    1
  1130.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i don't believe either" and again, thank you for providing your own answer. You are entitled to believe it
    1
  1131.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i don't believe either" as stated, thank you for providing your own answer. You are entitled to believe in it
    1
  1132.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "i don't believe either" and again, thank you for providing your own answer and you are entitled to believe in it
    1
  1133.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet your own answer was "i don't believe either". Thus, thank you for providing your own answer and you are entitled to believe in it
    1
  1134.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per writing "i don't believe either", thank you for providing your own answer. You are entitled to believe in it
    1
  1135.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you can change the subject if you wish. Again, per writing "i don't believe either", thank you for providing your own answer. You are entitled to believe it
    1
  1136.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as i stated, you can change the subject if you wish. But per writing "i don't believe either", thank you for providing your own answer. You are entitled to believe it
    1
  1137.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noticing you can change the subject. Regardless, per writing "i don't believe either", thank you for providing your own answer over me. You are entitled to believe in your answer.
    1
  1138. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish. But thank you for thus providing your new answer
    1
  1139.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish. But thank you for thus revealing your answer
    1
  1140.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are welcome to believe as you wish. But thank you for revealing your answer per your subject change
    1
  1141.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe of me as you wish. But thank you for revealing your answer per your subject change
    1
  1142.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe of me as you wish. But thank you for revealing your answer
    1
  1143. ​ @notmyproblewm I actually forgot 70% of people in dating apps are men
    1
  1144.  @DavidW-ux2gc  odd, why is it not relevant 70% of individuals in dating apps are men? Does this mean you believe 70% of the global populace are all men?
    1
  1145. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you don't believe 70% of the global population are men, thank you for noticing it's relevancy, ie, women are just as selective as men. As per your new question, are you implying men can't choose to have sex, ie, rape? But yes, per it being illegal women to have abortions, women are forced to not have "flings".
    1
  1146. ​​ @DavidW-ux2gc ​​​​​​​​​ Thus my question. As you state men can't choose, does this mean they can't give consent, ie, are raped? Again, thank you for accepting women are just as selective as men, ie, roughly half the populace chooses to be with the other half. Or again, is 70% of the global population only men? As you now state only top men "get women", then why are incels who are rich and work out still incels? Thank you for accepting women are forced not to have "flings", ie, tinder, per abortion being illegal. Or why do you pretend roe v Wade wasn't repealed?
    1
  1147. That's kind of the problem. None of the MRA guys had any examples for them being abused whereas the feminists gave several examples of them being abused.
    1
  1148. In fairness, the MRAs actually agreed with him.
    1
  1149.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, derrick has the same views as the other MRA's. Hence why the MRA's look like him (as per the others comment)
    1
  1150.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's strange, I didn't say as such. The original commenter did. Or why do you believe they're wrong?
    1
  1151. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv then as you agree with the original commenter, thank you for accepting the MRAs had harmful views while the feminists did not
    1
  1152. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc then as you agree with the original commenter that MRA gave foolish ideas while stating they were correct, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1153.  @DavidW-ux2gc  yet the original commenter disagrees with you. Thus we can conclude they did give foolish ideas. Thank you for noting as such.
    1
  1154.  @DavidW-ux2gc  if you wish to believe the other is a feminist for stating the MRAs gave foolish ideas, then you are entitled to do so
    1
  1155.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, if you wish to believe the other is a feminist for stating the MRAs gave foolish ideas, then you are entitled to do so. Why not paste what he stated if you disagree?
    1
  1156. I mean, kursat didn't really say anything. He basically just ignored the MRAs saying men are lesser parents while saying feminism is wrong.
    1
  1157.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yes, him stating something similar to that is all kursat did.
    1
  1158.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why is it only the feminists stating parents are equals? Why was Mimi lying when kursat ignored the MRA's stating men are lesser parents?
    1
  1159.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree kursat ignored the MRAs stating men are lesser parents while the feminists stated parents are equals, isn't that you noticing Mimi was correct?
    1
  1160. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  yet we agree only the feminists stated men and women are equal while the MRAs self sabotaged by stating men are biologically worse parents. You even accept kursat ignored the MRAs doing thus. Thus, why is Mimi wrong if only the feminists defended men and women being competent parents?
    1
  1161. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  recall the MRAs presenting the toxic masculinity view that men are biologically worse parents than women
    1
  1162.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thank you for agreeing MRAs present the toxic masculinity view that men are inherently worse parents to women. If you wish, you can believe that men are biologically worse parents due to muscle mass (as the MRAs seem to believe)
    1
  1163.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing with Mimi that the feminists help men while noting the MRAs harm men. Isn't that you agreeing with feminism?
    1
  1164.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thank you for agreeing MRAs present the toxic masculinity view that men are inherently worse parents compared to women
    1
  1165.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed with Mimi that the feminists help men while noting the MRAs harm men. Why isn't that you agreeing with feminism? Or do you believe it normal that men are seen as lesser parents due biology?
    1
  1166.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thank you for agreeing MRAs present the toxic masculinity view that men are inherently worse parents due to biology
    1
  1167. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed with Mimi that the feminists help men while noting the MRAs harm men. Why isn't that you agreeing with feminism? Or do you believe it normal that men are seen as lesser parents due biology?
    1
  1168. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  and thank you for agreeing MRAs present the toxic masculinity view that men are inherently worse parents due to biology
    1
  1169. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed with Mimi that the feminists help men while noting the MRAs harm men. Why isn't that you agreeing with feminism? Or do you believe it normal that men are seen as lesser parents due biology, eg, toxic masculinity?
    1
  1170. I don't think they do. Which is weird because while they do complain about patriarchy, they also reinforce it. For example, they'll state discrimination in child custody cases happen, but follow up by saying women are inherently better care givers.
    1
  1171. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but what market states they don't need teachers?
    1
  1172. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, then you noted there is an enormous demand for teachers by the market?
    1
  1173. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, so there is an enormous demand for teachers per the market always demanding it? Or is the market not enough?
    1
  1174. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, is there an enormous demand for teachers as per the market? Is the market demanding teachers while also underpaying them?
    1
  1175.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, only the population ceasing to exist means the demand for teachers stops. So as we agree teachers have a higher demand than basketball players, is the market then underpaying them?
    1
  1176.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing there is a greater demand for teachers than basketball players. So why are they underpaid to the point you justify basketball players earning more? Note there actually is an answer to this
    1
  1177.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet the demand for teachers is still greater to the point every single parent in the country searches for one. So again, as you noted the demand for teachers supercedes that of basketball players, why are they still paid less?
    1
  1178.  @DavidW-ng5zv  still odd you noted the market puts greater demand on teachers yet still state sponsorships are why teachers get paid less. Were you unaware schools also get sponsorships?
    1
  1179.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the demand for teachers is higher while still being underpaid. Do you believe excellent teachers make more than basketball players that you seem to believe bad basketball players don't exist?
    1
  1180.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking in regards to sponsorships. Thus, thank you for accepting teachers are underpaid despite it.
    1
  1181.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement, as you accept the demand for teachers is higher while still being underpaid, isn't that accepting the market can't resolve this situation?
    1
  1182.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then do you believe excellent teachers make more than basketball players because their demand is greater?
    1
  1183.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then do excellent teachers earn more than basketball players? Note you agree there is a greater demand for teachers
    1
  1184.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet their demand is higher than basketball players. So why are they paid less? Again, note you implied it's because the demand is so high the market can't pay them what they're worth
    1
  1185.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the demand for teachers is higher than basketball players and that bad basketball players earn more than excellent teachers.
    1
  1186.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, is the reason teachers earn less because the demand is so high the market can't provide it?
    1
  1187.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then if being a teacher is easy, why is there still a greater demand than basketball players?
    1
  1188.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Where do you think the money will come from?" are you implying the market can't pay teachers what they're worth because the demand is too high?
    1
  1189.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "the extra money" thus my question, are you implying the market can't pay them because the demand for teachers is too high?
    1
  1190.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and if teachers are paid what they're worth, why is their demand higher?
    1
  1191.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Where will this money come from?" Thus my query, are you implying the market can't pay teachers what they're worth because the demand is too high?
    1
  1192.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as teachers demand is higher, why are they not paid their worth? Note the difference between intrinsic need and relative need.
    1
  1193.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, teaching is an inherent value as civilization itself cannot exist without it, ie, the market has an extreme and never ending demand for it, while basketball is relative, ie, the market does not have an extreme demand for it and thus the supply adjust to it. So as we clearly agree teachers have a higher demand than basketball players, is the reason they're not paid what they're worth because their demand is too high?
    1
  1194.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Where will this money come from?" Again, are you implying the market can't pay teachers what they're worth because the demand for teachers is too high?
    1
  1195.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yes, the population disappearing is the only thing that limits the demand for teachers. So as we agree teachers are of such high value, why are they paid less than basketball players? Again note the difference between intrinsic and relative value.
    1
  1196.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if they're paid what they're worth, then why imply the market can't pay them higher wages due to their demand being too high? You even ask where the money will come from.
    1
  1197.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "are you prepared to pay insane amounts of taxes?" So you are aware that without government intervention teachers would be inaccessible to nearly the entire populace, ie, the demand is so high almost no one could afford it? After all, anyone can afford basketball tickets without government interference.
    1
  1198.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, aren't you implying the market can't pay them higher wages due to the demand for teachers being so high? Or is it only possible to get teachers through taxes?
    1
  1199.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Then you are aware without the government the worth of teachers would be so high that almost no one could afford them? Again, aren't you implying the market can't provide said wages because the demand is too high?
    1
  1200.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, I assumed you understood what you meant when you wrote of taxes. Please note the difference between relative and intrinsic value, ie, you implied the market has too high a demand for teachers it can't pay them what they're worth.
    1
  1201.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, then as you are aware the worth of teachers would be so high that almost no one could afford them unless the government stepped in, aren't you implying the market can't provide the value of their wages because the demand is too high?
    1
  1202.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and yet you are aware that without government interference the value of a teacher would be so high that the market wouldn't be able to provide for it. So again, isn't that you stating the market can't provide them their value because their demand is too high?
    1
  1203.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed that without government interference the value of a teacher would be so high that the market wouldn't be able to provide it, ie, education would only be accessible to a few. So again, isn't that you stating the market can't provide them their value because their demand is too high? Note you even tried to deflect by demanding i answer if I want taxes to go up.
    1
  1204.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you graciously agreed that without government interference the value of a teacher would be so high that the market wouldn't be able to provide it. Again, note you stating the market can't provide their by demanding i answer if I want taxes to go up.
    1
  1205.  @Olivia-bl8ez  that's odd, you believe the stadium pays athletes? So stadiums are the owners of all teams?
    1
  1206.  @Olivia-bl8ez  correct, they generate and do more than the men's team. So why are they still paid less?
    1
  1207.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, you noted the women do more than the men as per what the other wrote. Thus, as the women's soccer team is better than the men's team in winning and generating revenue, why aren't they paid more than the men? For example, the men are paid when the lose while the women are not (even though the men lose far more).
    1
  1208.  @Olivia-bl8ez  note you accept the women are generating vastly more revenue due to winning, yet you defend them earning less because they have healthcare. Seems odd you believe men don't have healthcare
    1
  1209.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the wage gap is real as women winning and generating more revenue means they still get paid less. Why is it correct men losing money means they have better pay than women making money? Why is losing seen as better than winning?
    1
  1210.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you believe the other was lying, you are welcome to argue with them. But you did agree with them
    1
  1211.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet as the other graciously wrote, the women generate more money due to winning far more (which you agreed with). Thus, why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more than women winning money?
    1
  1212.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but thank you for finally noticing souvenir shops aren't how sports teams are paid
    1
  1213.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you believe the other was lying, you are fully entitled to believe so. But as she correctly stated women generate more money due to winning far more (which you agreed with), why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more than women winning money?
    1
  1214.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed with the other correctly stating women generate more money due to winning far more (which you agreed with). So why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more than women winning money?
    1
  1215.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, thank you for finally noticing teams aren't paid by souvenir shops
    1
  1216.  @Olivia-bl8ez  and yes, i graciously thank you for showing the other that the women's soccer teams wins and generates more revenue than the men's team
    1
  1217.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet again, you graciously agreed with the other correctly stating the women's soccer team generates more money due to winning more. You even tried to justify it. So why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more than women winning money?
    1
  1218.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you graciously agreed with the other correctly stating women generate more money due to winning more. So why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more while women winning money means they're paid less?
    1
  1219.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, thank you for noticing teams aren't paid by way of merchandizing or souvenir shops, but through wages. Still seems odd you tried to state women finally having healthcare like the men means that's why they're paid less
    1
  1220.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you still graciously agreed when the other correctly stated women generate more money and win more. So why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more while women winning money means they're paid less because both now have healthcare? Seems odd the women's soccer team subsidizes the men's
    1
  1221.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you graciously agreed when the other correctly stated women win more and thus generate more money. So why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more while women winning money means they're paid less? Seems odd the women's soccer team subsidizes the men's team, and that you justified this by stating both have healthcare now
    1
  1222.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per graciously agreeing with the other correctly stating women win more and generate more money, why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more while women winning money means they're paid less?
    1
  1223.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Seems odd the women's soccer team subsidizes the men's team, and that you justified this by stating both have healthcare. Apparently, not only did the women receive lesser pay, they also had no healthcare, and when they sued because they actually did better than the men, you justified women still earning less because they now had healthcare (like the men).
    1
  1224.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for graciously agreeing with the other correctly stating the women's soccer team win more and generate more money. Thus, why is it correct men losing money means they're paid more while women winning money means they're paid less?
    1
  1225.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" again, seems unfair you noted the women's soccer team subsidizes the men's team and are still paid less because you and the other believe they both now have healthcare.
    1
  1226.  @Olivia-bl8ez  and thank you for writing you believe the reason the women's soccer team generating more revenue leads to less pay is because they now have healthcare. Which the men already had.
    1
  1227.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for graciously agreeing with the other correctly stating the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money. Thus, why is it correct the men's team losing money means they're paid more while the women's team winning money means they're paid less?
    1
  1228.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" again, seems unfair you and the other noted the women's soccer team subsidizes the men's team yet are still paid less because women now have healthcare.
    1
  1229.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for graciously agreeing with the other correctly stating the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money. Thus, why is it correct the men's team losing money means they're paid more while the women's team winning money means they're paid less?
    1
  1230.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" again, per agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money yet is still paid less, why justify this continuing to occur because both of you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1231.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" again, per agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money yet is still paid less, why justify this because both of you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1232.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" per agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money (yet is still paid less), why justify the women's team subsidizing the men's because you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1233.  @divyanshsingh1078  interestingly enough, the women's US soccer team still generates more money. It helps they're ranked #1 in the world while the men's is seen as one of the worst. The women even successfully sued their employers for pay discrimination.
    1
  1234.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" Again, per graciously agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins won and generates more money (yet is still paid less), why justify the women's team subsidizing the men's because you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1235.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" Per graciously agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money (yet is still paid less), why justify the women's team subsidizing the men's team because you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1236.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it's strange you pretend you didn't agree with the other stating the women's soccer team generates more revenue. Is this due to noticing that healthcare wouldn't justify the women still earning less?
    1
  1237.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if that were true, you and the other wouldn't have tried to justify them being paid less while generating more on them now having healthcare. Thus, thank you for graciously agreeing with feminism
    1
  1238.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you still attempted to justify the women generating more money by stating they now have healthcare. Thus, thank you for graciously agreeing with feminism and stating the women subsidize the men's soccer team
    1
  1239.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" note you graciously agreeing with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money. So why justify the women's team subsidizing the men's team because you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1240.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "you hit the nail on the head" apologies, but you graciously agreed with the other that the women's soccer team wins more and generates more money. So why justify the women's team subsidizing the men's team because you believe the women now have healthcare?
    1
  1241.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you now try to backtrack. Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism that women winning more and generating more money leads to lower pay. Still strange you and the other tried to justify this by saying it's because they asked for healthcare.
    1
  1242. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  note you now try to backtrack again. Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism that women winning more and generating more money leads to lower pay. Still strange you and the other tried to justify this by saying it's because they asked for healthcare.
    1
  1243. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  note your backtracking. Thus, thank you for agreeing with feminism that women winning more and generating more money leads to lower pay. Still strange you and the other tried to justify this by saying it's because they asked for healthcare.
    1
  1244. agreed, and only feminists help men and women. thus far, mra's state men are inherently bad parents.
    1
  1245. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's strange. Why would saying men and women are equal parents mean men are hate?
    1
  1246. Agreed, the problems feminists confront are so serious that nearly every single woman has suffered them. Meanwhile the MRAs not only have no experience with the issues men face, they also sabotage the issues they speak about, eg, they complain men lose most custody cases while saying women are inherently better parents.
    1
  1247.  @andreraymond6860  not particularly. The MRAs said men are lesser parents while the feminists disagreed with that. Basically, Mimi was correct in what she said
    1
  1248.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent question. As you noted MRA beliefs foment the idea that men are biologically worse parents, do you believe the courts are incapable of believing the same as MRAs?
    1
  1249.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noticing the harm MRA views cause in stating men are biologically lesser parents. As the courts can and do concede custody to men or women, isn't that showing the courts are becoming more and more feminist as they award custody on an individual basis and not gender?
    1
  1250.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as for difference in crime rulings, have you not seen the video that you are unaware of what the feminist answers? If so kindly start on minute 12:30
    1
  1251.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting the courts becoming more feminist provides fairer rulings while MRA's attempt to impede this, ie, say men are biologically lesser parents. Thus, isn't that you accepting only feminists help both sexes?
    1
  1252.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again thank you for noting the courts becoming more feminist provides fairer rulings while MRA's only state that men are biologically lesser parents. Again, isn't that you accepting only feminists help both sexes?
    1
  1253.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, then are you backtracking from stating the courts award on an individual basis? As we agreed, MRAs state men are biologically lesser parents (which is not an individual basis) while the feminists state the sexes are equal, eg, equal parents. Thus, as you noted the courts have become relatively feminist (and therefore fairer), doesn't that show only feminists help both sexes? Seems odd you believe it's a men's issue to foment the idea that men are worse parents
    1
  1254. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents while the feminists state the sexes are equal, and noted the courts are more feminist due to working on an individual basis, doesn't that show only feminists help both sexes? Seems odd you believe it's a men's issue to foment the idea that men are biologically worse parents
    1
  1255.  @aliharis4266  then why is only the MRA stating men are worse parents than women due to biology? Is it not helping men when feminists say men and women are equal parents?
    1
  1256.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. As you agree a feminist court rules on a case by case basis while MRAs state men are biologically lesser parents, isn't that you agreeing feminists help men? Or what result occurs if the courts agree with MRAs that men are biologically worse parents?
    1
  1257.  @Jose_Doe  then what did he say in regards to the other two MRA's saying men are biologically worse parents?
    1
  1258.  @Jose_Doe  that's weird, did you not watch your link? It's why i asked you what kursat said
    1
  1259.  @Jose_Doe  okay, then would you write what he said? i don't know why you mention the link though, youtube doesn't let you paste them
    1
  1260. What an odd statement. If people can protect themselves, then why would they be happy that some random individuals assault them?
    1
  1261.  @shaunbuckley304  that's an odder answer. You mean derrick is going to protect them?
    1
  1262.  @shaunbuckley304  exactly, i also stated "uh huh sure whatever you say" to derrick protecting anyone. It's honestly strange he said so. At best, we just need to not harm anyone. Incels have committed enough mass shootings as is
    1
  1263.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting incels do commit mass shootings over their views. Clearly, we need them to not harm others, agreed?
    1
  1264.  @DavidW-ng5zv  would you like to write the views incels hold that influence their mass shootings? Or do you believe all men are like Elliott Rodgers?
    1
  1265. Doesn't that mean you think most men want to cause her harm? Why should the solution be that some of those men protect her?
    1
  1266. To be fair, incels have perpetrated multiple mass shootings because women say no to them.
    1
  1267. They don't do so because they don't actually advocate for men's rights. Even the issues MRAs brought up were immediately sabotaged by them. All they care about is opposing feminism.
    1
  1268.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange, why would the feminists stating men and women are equals be harmful? Do you not disagree with the MRA's saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  1269. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1270.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1271.  @DavidW-ng5zv  correct, you showed why feminism exists per your answer, not mine. thank you for doing so
    1
  1272. He actually believes about the same things. Except he seems to think men being unfaithful to their girlfriends makes women like them more.
    1
  1273. The MRAs showed that emphatically
    1
  1274. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  did the MRAs fight for men when they stated men are worse parents due to biology or the feminists when they stated the sexes are equals?
    1
  1275. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you believe MRAs stating men are inherently worse parents is helpful to men, thank you for showing only feminism helps both sexes by opposing this.
    1
  1276. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe MRAs stating men are inherently worse parents is helpful, thank you for showing only feminism helps both sexes by opposing this.
    1
  1277. It's smart he says women are inherently better than men at being caregivers and then complains about discrimination in child custody cases?
    1
  1278. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  from what?
    1
  1279.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then what dangerous situation caused the titanic to crash into the iceberg?
    1
  1280. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, what caused the situation which led the titanic to crash into the iceberg? Did the iceberg drive the titanic?
    1
  1281.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you repeatedly justify men getting worse prison sentences because "vvomen are physically weaker than men lol" and "men are more violent", aren't you showing why only feminism helps people? Seems odd opposing the idea that men are inherently more violent causes societal collapse.
    1
  1282. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv again, thank you for demonstrating why only feminists help men
    1
  1283. Didn't he say feminism is not needed while ignoring the two MRAs saying women belong at home raising children?
    1
  1284.  @Eseerrowez  then why are the MRAs saying women belong at home taking care of children? It seems feminism is clearly needed
    1
  1285.  @Eseerrowez  thank you for agreeing that's the MRA position. Thus, isn't that showing exactly why feminism is needed?
    1
  1286. Out of curiosity, as the MRAs say women are inherently better parents, do you think that helps men in custody cases? Or do the feminists saying men and women are equal help more?
    1
  1287. What is toxic femininity?
    1
  1288.  @ioan213  in what way?
    1
  1289.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you believe men expressing themselves means they can only do so by constantly crying? And you see that as toxic femininity?
    1
  1290.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you believe manhood means never expressing emotions otherwise it means men constantly cry, isn't that toxic masculinity?
    1
  1291.  @Supernimo735  the other was saying men shouldn't express their emotions because it means they constantly cry. Now he backtracks and says men do express their emotions but not like women do because, apparently, that's toxic femininity.
    1
  1292. ​ @mozzarellatherat9687 no the other guy has a point. If a person is afraid of having a child due to the responsibility it brings whereupon you immediately say "tough sh*t", then it's pretty clear you guys think being a parent is a punishment for "spreading your legs"
    1
  1293. Not really. MRAs seem to be a response to feminism instead of the issues men face. For example, they keep saying men are worse parents
    1
  1294.  @DavidW-ng5zv  odd, why would MRAs stating men are inferior parents be helping men? Please explain
    1
  1295.  @butthissureisfun5619  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish. But as MRAs state men are lesser parents than women (while feminists oppose this), why is that helping men?
    1
  1296.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting the MRAs believe men are inferior parents and that this does not help men. As you note feminists view men and women as equals, isn't that you agreeing only feminists help men?
    1
  1297.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs harm men by saying men are inferior parents. Per accepting feminists oppose this, isn't that you agreeing only feminists help men?
    1
  1298. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs harm men by saying men are inferior parents. Per accepting feminists oppose this, isn't that you agreeing only feminists help men?
    1
  1299.  @Tylerd838  so you agree police are the ones that protect men and women?
    1
  1300. Doesn't that mean you should respect people's opinion about how derrick doesn't deserve respect? Is that common ground?
    1
  1301. Out of curiosity, what do you mean by toxic feminist? And please don't write of something that can also be applied to men or is a stereotype about women.
    1
  1302. this is 100% true
    1
  1303.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then why not provide the definition of feminism? what does google say?
    1
  1304.  @DavidW-ng5zv  hence my question. If so many feminists hate men, why not provide the definition as per google? Google says incels "are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active", so does it say something similar for feminists?
    1
  1305. That's weird, you believe serfs were only men?
    1
  1306. Really? Why not?
    1
  1307. A team representing the nation should be one that wins, not one that loses. If the country prefers the team that constantly loses as opposed to the one that wins, eg, the women's soccer team, then something is deeply wrong.
    1
  1308.  @aoyenngoc502  that you believe winning and losing is relative in sports is exactly why i think there's something deeply wrong with society. And if "culture" is the reason the men's soccer team loses, then that makes it even more of a reason why the team that wins should have greater investments. I don't know why you think this doesn't apply to other sports, unless you're trying to argue there should be a baseline investment for all teams representing the nation.
    1
  1309.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, why would people prefer the team that constantly loses? Note you demonstrate the problem that people prefer to watch a team that constantly loses as opposed to one that constantly wins, eg, women's soccer team. Why should the team that constantly loses be the one that represents the nation?
    1
  1310.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why do you believe major trophies are the same as sunday league trophies? But thank you for noting those who win should be rewarded as opposed to those who lose.
    1
  1311.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you wish to believe sunday league trophies are the same as major league ones, then you are entitled to do so. Either way, thank you for noting those who win should be rewarded.
    1
  1312.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, if you wish to believe sunday league trophies are the same as major league trophies, you are entitled to do so. But thank you for noting victors should be rewarded, especially if they represent the nation.
    1
  1313.  @DavidW-ng5zv  please note the issue with society that you justify people investing on those who lose instead of those who win because those who win are women. It does appear feminism is needed.
    1
  1314. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you backtrack to stating major league trophies are more valuable than sunday league trophies, thank you for noting victors should be rewarded (especially if they represent the nation). Note the women's team has won major league trophies. Or who would you prefer to represent the nation, a team that wins or a team that loses?
    1
  1315.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, please note the issue with society that you prefer those who lose than those who win simply because those who win are women. Thus, thank you for showing feminism is needed.
    1
  1316.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you thus demonstrate that current society prefers to reward those who lose instead of win because it is women who win, thank you for showing feminism is needed so that the nation is represented by a team that wins.
    1
  1317.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you demonstrate that current society prefers to reward those who lose instead of win because it is women who win (even obtaining more major league trophies), thank you for showing feminism is needed so that the nation is represented by a team that wins.
    1
  1318.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, is the fact that you deny the women's soccer team has won more major league trophies mean you agree women should be paid more, ie, that one should reward victors?
    1
  1319.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Again, is you denying that the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies mean you agree women should be paid more if they did win, ie, that one should reward victors? Because as i stated, winners should represent the nation
    1
  1320.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies than the men's, and agree winners should represent the nation, isn't that you accepting winners should be paid more?
    1
  1321.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you can pretend soccer teams don't have championships if you wish, but by doing so thank you for showing the women win more. Seems feminism truly is needed if losing is something you wish rewarded simply because they're men.
    1
  1322.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies than the men's, and that winners should represent the nation. Thus, isn't that you accepting winners should be paid more? It does seem feminism is needed if you believe a winning team should earn less simply due to being women
    1
  1323.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe a world cup is like a Sunday league game if you so wish
    1
  1324.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies than the men's and that winners should represent the nation. Thus, isn't that you accepting winners should be paid more? It truly seems feminism is needed if you and society believe winners should earn less simply because the men losing is preferred viewing.
    1
  1325.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe a world cup is like a Sunday league game if you so wish, but thank you for accepting the women have won more championships than the men.
    1
  1326.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies than the men's and that winners should represent the nation. Thus, isn't that you accepting the women should be paid more as society should benefit reward those who win?
    1
  1327.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for admitting you believe a world cup is like a Sunday league game, and thank you for accepting the women have won more championships than the men.
    1
  1328.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the women's soccer team wins more major league trophies, championships, whatever other name you chose, than the men's, and that winners should represent the nation. Thus, isn't that you accepting the women should be paid more as society should reward those who win? Seems odd society prefers observing men lose than women win, is it not?
    1
  1329.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the women's soccer team wins more than the men, and that winners should represent the nation. Thus, isn't that you accepting the women should be paid more as society should reward those who win? You are still entitled to believe Sunday league trophies are the same as global championships.
    1
  1330.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, do you believe society should reward winners or losers? If losers are preferred due to the winners being women, then it seems feminism truly is needed
    1
  1331.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question, do you believe losing is a superior product?
    1
  1332.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you believe losing is better than winning because the team that wins are women, thank you for showing exactly why feminism is needed in order to change society for the better
    1
  1333.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe losing is better than winning because the team that wins are women, thank you for showing why feminism is needed to change society for the better
    1
  1334.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you believe losing merits great rewards, thank you for showing why feminism is needed
    1
  1335.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, if losing provides particularly great rewards, why shouldn't winning? Again thank you for showing feminism is needed
    1
  1336.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. As losing provides great rewards, why shouldn't winning? Again, thank you for showing feminism is needed to better society
    1
  1337.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as losing provides lucre, why shouldn't winning? Thank you for showing why feminism is needed to better society
    1
  1338. Don't the other MRAs in the video share his views?
    1
  1339.  @riven4121  if that's the case, what different views did they hold?
    1
  1340. Probably the same people who pay for the roads, police, etc.
    1
  1341.  @spookedspooks  why not? Some already pay for viagra, tampons don't seem that far fetched
    1
  1342.  @spookedspooks  actually i think viagra is more than that
    1
  1343.  @spookedspooks  yeah, i just checked. viagra is like a 2 billion dollar industry (per year) so that means in 10 years its $20,000,000,000
    1
  1344.  @spookedspooks  because tampons are cheaper than viagra, and viagra is something more expensive that you didn't even know you paid for. In other words, why are you complaining about cost if you didn't even know you spent money?
    1
  1345.  @spookedspooks  if it's absurd for us to pay that, why weren't you aware of the nearly double that you have to pay for Viagra? Doesn't seem you were paying too much if you didn't know it existed. So again, why are you complaining about cost if you didn't even know you spent money?
    1
  1346.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's an odd response. if men pay more than women and get products made exclusively for them at a far cheaper rate, eg, viagra is so cheap the other did not notice he pays for it, doesn't that mean tampons should be added so women have the same benefits? After all, if viagra is fairly cheap due to taxes, why shouldn't tampons be just as cheap? Not sure why you pretend the military exclusively needs viagra, but doesn't this mean women in the military should also have tampons subsidized?
    1
  1347. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for agreeing with the feminists that tampons should be government subsidized. Seems odd people think only Viagra should be paid for, agreed?
    1
  1348.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly you do. You already agreed women pay for men's Viagra and stated both should pay an equal amount of taxes. Thus, why shouldn't both get comparable benefits? Recall that while Viagra is far more costly, the amount is so small the original commenter didn't even realize he pays for it.
    1
  1349.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement, you graciously agreed women pay for men's Viagra and stated both should pay an equal amount of taxes. Thus, why shouldn't both get comparable benefits since women already pay for men's viagra? And thank you for agreeing that while Viagra is more expensive than tampons, the amount is so small the original commenter didn't even realize he pays for it.
    1
  1350.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men pay for their viagra" and women pay so men can have it too. As you even write that both should be treated equally, why shouldn't tampons be included so both can have the same benefits? Recall while Viagra is more expensive than tampons, the amount paid in taxes is so small the original commenter didn't even realize he paid for it.
    1
  1351.  @DavidW-ng5zv  correct, that is what subsidized means, that the government makes viagra cheaper. thus my statement, as you graciously agreed women pay for men's Viagra and stated both should pay an equal amount of taxes, why shouldn't both get comparable benefits, ie, subsidized tampons, since women already pay for men's viagra? And thank you for agreeing that while Viagra is more expensive than tampons, the amount is so small the original commenter didn't even realize he pays for it.
    1
  1352.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Vvomen are more likely to be on government assistance than men" and why do they get more government assistance? Again, thank you for noting women pay for mens viagra and that you state they should be treated equally. In short, thank you for showing why tampons should be added.
    1
  1353.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, what government assistance is that? Kindly write specific examples. Is it in regards to caring for children? Regardless, thank you for noting women pay for men's viagra and that you state they should be treated equally in regards to taxes. In short, thank you for showing why tampons should be added as it seems odd only men get benefits.
    1
  1354.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. What government assistance is that? Kindly write specific examples. Is it in regards to caring for children? But thank you for noting women pay for men's viagra and that you state they should be treated equally. Thus, thank you for showing tampons should be added as it seems odd only men get benefits.
    1
  1355.  @DavidW-ux2gc  apologies, but you deflected again. What government assistance is it that women use? Kindly write specific examples so we may see if what you state is true. But thank you for noting women pay for men's viagra and that you state they should be treated equally. Thus, thank you for showing tampons should be added as it seems strange only men get benefits.
    1
  1356.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you deflected again. Kindly write what government assistance is it that women receive if you are not lying (though you are entitled to believe of me as you wish). Regardless, thank you for noting women pay for men's viagra and that you state they should be treated equally. Thus, thank you for showing tampons should be added as it seems strange only men get benefits.
    1
  1357.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  why not? women pay for men's viagra. seems discriminatory otherwise
    1
  1358. Why would men's rights activists saying women are inherently better at child rearing be helping men in custody cases?
    1
  1359.  @longbow857  Apologies, but didn't you see the video?
    1
  1360.  @longbow857  then as you are aware this is something MRAs brought up and you write how they help men, how do they do so in custody cases by saying women are superior than men at child rearing?
    1
  1361.  @longbow857  thank you for noting them stating as such about women gives an inherent advantage to women in child custody cases. Thus, do you think this helps men? Note that feminists state men and women are equal, and have also stated there is discrimination in family courts due to what you stated.
    1
  1362.  @longbow857  as we agree MRAs fighting over fathers rights is something they actively self-sabotage when stating women are inherently superior parents, why do you state they help men? Or by simply opposing this position due to feminism being about gender equality (I don't know why you believe this position wasn't presented in the courts), have feminists already done more for men? You can pretend feminists don't help men, but it seems MRAs don't help anyone.
    1
  1363.  @longbow857  you can believe the term "child rearing" (as used in the video) is about nursing if you wish. Regardless, thank you for noting how they sabotage fathers rights despite claiming they fight for them. Seems strange to view this as being honest about who they help. Likewise, you can pretend feminists fighting for men and women to be equal parents doesn't help men, but i do thank you for noting this has been taken to court. Again, it seems MRAs don't help anyone while feminists help both sexes.
    1
  1364. PS if you write you never claimed MRAs help anyone when you originally stated they aim to do so, please note that this shows they aren't honest. More so when you agree they sabotage the very rights they claim to fight for.
    1
  1365. which one?
    1
  1366.  @DavidW-ux2gc  wasn't that after all the MRA's said men are lesser parents while the feminists disagreed?
    1
  1367.  @tonyonaperky2128  i mean if you want to believe 3 out of the 3 don't consider women as equal you can do that, but i decided to base this on the fact that only one of the MRAs sat down in agreement with all the feminists over men and women being equal.
    1
  1368.  @tonyonaperky2128  correct, 2 out of the 3 do believe women and men are unequal. I don't know why you repeat my original statement.
    1
  1369.  @tonyonaperky2128  excellent, thank you for writing the correct position is seeing men and women as equal. Would you thus write what the prompt at 2:24 states which both zack and Derek believe is false?
    1
  1370.  @anthk.4846  thank you for accepting both zack and derek see women as unequal and that their views are enough for you to disavow them as MRA's. Would you please quote what the description says at 2:11 and if they agree with said prompt? Or do you think the video specifically chose individuals with those views to represent MRA's?
    1
  1371.  @anthk.4846  It's a bit odd how you backtrack to the point you don't even wish to write about the MRA views shown by Derek and zach. Is this because the secret recording didn't change anything, not even kursat disagreeing with them?
    1
  1372.  @anthk.4846  thank you for accepting zach and Derek hold about the same views and are MRAs.
    1
  1373.  @anthk.4846  you can believe as you wish of kursat
    1
  1374.  @anthk.4846  if you don't understand why zach was bad despite him saying about the same as Derek, then why are you saying Derek was bad?
    1
  1375.  @anthk.4846  again, have you not watched the video?
    1
  1376.  @anthk.4846  If so, would you like to write what the prompt they disagree with says? 2:11
    1
  1377.  @anthk.4846  thank you for agreeing zach and Derek hold the same views and are MRAs. Again, it seems a bit odd you now backtrack from that as it appears the secret recording doesn't change anything.
    1
  1378.  @anthk.4846  again, thank you for accepting both zach and derek had about the same views and that both are MRA's. As you now backtrack from stating they were not, it appears you are aware the secret recording changes nothing. You can believe of kursat as you wish.
    1
  1379.  @anthk.4846  Again, please quote 2:11 to see what they are. Thus, thank you for noting they are MRA's. You can believe the video chose MRA individuals who aren't representative of the movement if you wish.
    1
  1380.  @anthk.4846  thank you for providing multiple individuals that think just like Derek and zach do. Especially paul elam. Thus, thank you for proving MRAs hold the same views derek and zach do.
    1
  1381. you wrote "probably not for the same reasons". what different reasons do women have to fear walking at night?
    1
  1382.  @DavidW-ng5zv  prevent what? What are women afraid of happening when they walk at night?
    1
  1383.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish. However, I cannot answer until you graciously specify what women fear will happen to them when they walk home at night. Is it something based upon the patriarchy that you suddenly said I'm a feminist?
    1
  1384. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you're backtracking. Again, you kindly agreed women fear something men generally don't. Upon me asking what it is, you immediately stated I'm a feminist. Would you write what said attacks are if simply mentioning it mean you're a feminist? Would doing so mean you agree a patriarchy exists?
    1
  1385.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and what is SA? Seems odd something that affects women so much is something you can't name. Again, you stated me simply mentioning makes it feminist, so doesn't that mean the patriarchy exists?
    1
  1386.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then kindly write what SA is. Seems odd you believe me merely asking what that is means you defensively state the patriarchy isn't real.
    1
  1387. Pretty much. Seeing women as inferior definitely causes them to steer clear of him
    1
  1388.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd response. Do you believe Derrick is highly successful with women simply because he is on this video?
    1
  1389.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then if women only care about money and looks, why is it that incels who work out and have a job are still incels? For example, Derrick clearly isn't poor.
    1
  1390. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's interesting, then you believe all incels are unemployed and overweight? Note you agree derrick being financially well off is unrelated to him being an incel. We can thus conclude being wealthy is irrelevant.
    1
  1391.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's even more interesting, then you believe derrick is poor? I therefore reiterate, are all incels unemployed and overweight that you state that's why all women are not interested in them?
    1
  1392.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then as you accept all incels are unemployed and obese, thank you for showing all women are unrelated to their situation.
    1
  1393.  @The_ScaryCool  correct, and as feminists explicitly state men and women are equal, who's the one helping men?
    1
  1394. Agreed. It's also telling the ones that recommend men never show emotions are incels like derrick though
    1
  1395. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  this my statement. As an Incel like derrick says women don't find emotions in men attractive, why is that trustworthy?
    1
  1396. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  hence my statement. As an Incel like derrick says women don't find emotions in men attractive, why is that trustworthy?
    1
  1397. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, as we are aware women don't like derrick, why would him deflecting by saying it's his emotions they don't like be trustworthy?
    1
  1398.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, you noted women don't find derrick attractive, ie, emotions aren't a factor. Thus, why trust him when he says women don't like emotions in men?
    1
  1399.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement. As derrick states women don't like men with emotions, and he clearly tried to act as such (or is he still with emotions?), yet he's still an Incel as women don't like him, why is he trustworthy?
    1
  1400.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per now backtracking from emotions, is that you agreeing derrick is untrustworthy?
    1
  1401.  @anthk.4846  apologies, have you not seen the video or do you believe women actually do belong in the home?
    1
  1402.  @thesupreme8062  then you agree with this 2:24?
    1
  1403.  @ligmaballs0911  if you believe women are better in the home, then i thank you for showing exactly why feminism is needed.
    1
  1404.  @marvin2678  sadly, as per the comments and the video, it doesn't appear MRAs believe in gender equality.
    1
  1405.  @passingthetime_  unfortunately, they are MRAs.
    1
  1406.  @slanphere  unfortunately, it is true. Simply note the video.
    1
  1407.  @slanphere  then i thank you for agreeing MRAs believe about the same. Please note about half of all households have women with a job
    1
  1408.  @snax7760  then do you believe jubilee specifically chose people who don't represent their respective movements?
    1
  1409.  @xtalfinn  yes to you too
    1
  1410.  @pleaseno4862  apologies, do you believe jubilee deliberately chose individuals who aren't representative of their respective movements?
    1
  1411.  @pleaseno4862  but thank you for accepting only the feminists overwhelmingly agreed that men and women are different but equal.
    1
  1412.  @pleaseno4862  thank you for noting all the feminists agreed the sexes are equal while the MRAs did not. If you believe it was vague, simply write it here to see otherwise. Again, do you believe jubilee deliberately chose people to misrepresent their respective groups? If not, thank you for accepting they are representative of MRA views.
    1
  1413.  @localerik  why do you believe him saying women are better suited for child rearing means a kitchen?
    1
  1414.  @pleaseno4862  then as you agree the MRAs weren't chosen with malicious intent, we can then assume they do represent the movement.
    1
  1415.  @localerik  then you believe zack, like derek, thinks women are better in the home? Why state this means only the kitchen?
    1
  1416.  @johnfisher8401  thank you for showing exactly why feminists exist.
    1
  1417.  @InsaneCollegeKid  not really. I just kept getting answers from different peoplem
    1
  1418.  @ems.master  2 of them. The third MRA didn't really speak except to, basically, say the feminists were wrong.
    1
  1419. Not really. Ask any MRA and you'll get the same answers these guys gave
    1
  1420.  @nocturnalrecluse1216  then why do their views keep influencing mass shootings?
    1
  1421.  @nocturnalrecluse1216  did you not see the video? I assumed you did because you noted the MRAs views were fairly inane
    1
  1422.  @nocturnalrecluse1216  so why do you believe the feminists saying men and women should treat each other as equals, ie, go their own way (which is what I assume you meant), is inane while the MRA position is to state men are biologically worse parents is not?
    1
  1423. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish, however, why not repeat how the mra's in the video see women in order to see how they influence mass shootings?
    1
  1424.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, once again, why not repeat what the MRAs say about women to see how they influence mass shootings?
    1
  1425.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my request. Why not write what they state about women so we may compare?
    1
  1426.  @DavidW-ux2gc  if you have to pretend the feminists stating men and women are different but equal is what the MRA's said, isn't that showing you are aware MRA's do influence mass shootings? Or why not write what the MRA's actually state?
    1
  1427.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing how they influence mass shootings per them opposing the feminist position that men and women are different but equal. Or why not quote what derrick says about women?
    1
  1428. Ironically, that's something Derek wishes his mother had done to him.
    1
  1429. Then as the women's soccer team generates far more money, why aren't they paid more? Surely you don't believe the women's team having healthcare means they should be paid less?
    1
  1430. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, how many times have the men's US soccer team qualifed for the world cup? Note the women's team always do.
    1
  1431. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team have failed at qualifying for the world cup. As the women constantly qualify and win world cups, why is it correct they are paid less for doing more?
    1
  1432. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the men's US soccer team has failed to qualify for the world cup. As the women not only qualify but constantly win world cups, why is it correct they are paid less for doing more?
    1
  1433.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, the men generate less money per failing to qualify for the world cup. Thus, why is it correct the women are paid less?
    1
  1434.  @DavidW-ng5zv  what money if the men failed to qualify for the world cup while the women won it? Do you believe local games generate more than the world cup?
    1
  1435.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you now pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1436.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, if you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1437.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, if you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1438.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1439.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, if you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1440.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, if you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  1441.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups. Thus, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  1442.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you wish to pretend local games generate more money than world cups. Thus, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  1443.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, thank you for showing internationally broadcasted events make more than local ones. Per pretending otherwise, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1444.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you wish to continue pretending international events generate less revenue than local ones, i thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap. After all, the men's US soccer team didn't qualify for any of those while the women qualified for the world cup
    1
  1445.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you wish to continue pretending international events generate less revenue than local ones, i thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap.
    1
  1446.  @DavidW-ng5zv  correct, you sent various events which the men's US soccer team did not participate in but the women's team did. Thus, as you wish to continue pretending local events are more lucrative then international ones, thank you for showing why feminism exists to oppose the wage gap
    1
  1447.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, per pretending internationally broadcast games aren't more lucrative than local games, thank you for showing feminism is needed to oppose the wage gap. After all, none of your written events included the men's US soccer team but they did include the women's soccer team.
    1
  1448.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, then i thank you for agreeing internationally broadcast games aren't more lucrative than local games. Thus, thank you for showing feminism is needed to oppose the wage gap as only the US women's team has participated in the world cup while none of earnings you gave apply to the men because they weren't there.
    1
  1449. Correct, the feminists were able to note actual issues and some solutions while the MRA's actually sabotaged themselves when they brought some up
    1
  1450. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish. Regardless, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1451. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you may believe of me as you wish. Regardless, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1452.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1453. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1454.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1455. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1456.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful to men to say they're biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people
    1
  1457.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you believe it is helpful for MRAs to say men are biologically lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help people by stating they're equals
    1
  1458. interestingly all the MRA's seemed to agree with derrick. so it seems that, on average, MRA's don't really help much
    1
  1459.  @opiniwise  did you not see the video? if not, just see the first prompt jubilee gives
    1
  1460. I disagree on both points
    1
  1461. I'm not sure. Whenever i ask about it i get some VERY sexist comments about women.
    1
  1462.  @eliza8491  you know the weird thing is that the MRA's also couldn't answer that. the closest was zack and he basically said they needed him as an influencer.
    1
  1463.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why do you think the feminists mentioning men's issues is not addressing them? Or what issues did the MRA's mention?
    1
  1464. ​ @tonyonaperky2128  precisely the MRAs said none of those things. They simply stated men are lesser parents while the feminists said men and women are equals
    1
  1465. ​ @tonyonaperky2128  see? You immediately backtracked. The MRAs literally say it's biology that makes men worse parents while the feminists disagree. So why blame the feminists for what the MRA's state?
    1
  1466. Is the mere fact that irresponsibility is endemic to it mean that it shouldn't exist?
    1
  1467. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why are MRAs helping men when they state men are lesser parents due to their biology?
    1
  1468. What did derrick say that you found relatable?
    1
  1469.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  but what did he say?
    1
  1470.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  it happens when YouTube thinks you're a bot, ie, copy pasting commentz
    1
  1471.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  he's relatable because he uses ink? that's an odd response
    1
  1472.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  that's a strange response. You consider ink to be a type of metrosexual male?
    1
  1473.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  if you think I'm wrong, just write the definition of metrosexual
    1
  1474.  @QWERTY-gp8fd  precisely, then why do you believe ink to be a metrosexual male? Please note you believe that "look very closely at my face" correlates with "what is essentially effeminate looksmaxxing".
    1
  1475.  @draco9513  wait, so you also believe that men are biologically worse parents?
    1
  1476.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why isn't equality a real thing that you, for example, believe men are biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1477.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Why isn't equality a real thing that you believe men are biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1478. ​@jan6742feminists definitely want equal opportunity. Look at how they legalized women fighting in the military in 2016. There clearly wasn't equality if it was illegal for all women to fight in the military until feminism changed that.
    1
  1479.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange, why shouldn't competent women replace incompetent men in the military?
    1
  1480.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking from stating no women should fight to now stating they deserve better training. As you state women are sent to war with worse training than men, doesn't that mean more feminism is needed so women receive the same survival skills men obtain?
    1
  1481. Then why did the MRAs have about the same views as him?
    1
  1482.  @deathbone  then doesn't that mean feminism is necesary as your position (as an equalist) is that men are lesser in caring for children and women are lesser in anything that doesn't have to do with child care?
    1
  1483.  @deathbone  then aren't you an example of why feminism is needed because you literally write "men traditionally are more capable" in non child rearing areas yet are unaware this leads to seeing women as lesser in non-child rearing areas?
    1
  1484.  @deathbone  if you believe i am misrepresenting you, do you then believe that someone who isn't capable is equal to someone who is capable? Thus, does this not show feminism is needed as you believe women are lesser than men in nearly everything outside of child rearing?
    1
  1485.  @deathbone  hence my question. Again, is someone who is less capable equal to someone who is more capable? I am honestly baffled why you deflected.
    1
  1486.  @deathbone  exactly as i presented it in this query: is someone who is less capable equal to someone who is more capable? I don't know why you have such trouble with this.
    1
  1487.  @happilysecular2323  that's weird, would you write what draft the USA has? Likewise, do you believe women are just as strong as men (per complaining about prison sentences)? Seems odd a few men going to prison is the same as all women being affected by roe v wade though
    1
  1488.  @happilysecular2323  apologies, but you deflected. Again, what draft do you mean? Was there a draft during the war with the middle east?
    1
  1489.  @happilysecular2323  then isn't that you taking the feminist position, ie, that men and women are equals, regardless of body strength? Do you then agree with feminism making it legal for women to fight in the military in 2016?
    1
  1490. That's weird, why would naming feminists law firms that specifically cater to men in child custody cases be about personal experiences?
    1
  1491. Didn't he say feminism is wrong while the others MRAs kept saying women belong in the home?
    1
  1492. i recommend you watch the video considering the MRAs main position was that women are not equal to men
    1
  1493.  @blake-m2r  unfortunately you can actually watch them doing so on the first prompt. the main difference between them is that derrick is extremely blunt about his views
    1
  1494.  @blake-m2r  then why did the MRA's agree with derrick? seems odd you think they're not representative of MRA's
    1
  1495.  @blake-m2r  did you actually see the video that you are confused by my comments?
    1
  1496.  @blake-m2r  if you saw the video it would make sense. after all, they are representative of MRAs and they all believe about the same things.
    1
  1497. Why would she know off hand any feminist organizations specifically dedicated to giving legal help to men in divorces?
    1
  1498.  @aconthebeat1  not really, that seems ridiculously specific and defeats the purpose of debating over ideology. As an example, you'll notice none of the MRA's were able to answer what they were fighting for in regards to helping men.
    1
  1499.  @aconthebeat1  if that's the case, why did they say otherwise at 2:24? As stated, none of the MRA's seem to have any answer as to what they actually do to help men.
    1
  1500.  @aconthebeat1  as you agree 2 of the 3 MRAs don't believe "men and women are different but equal", and none of the MRAs have any answers as to how they help men, isn't that showing only the feminists are helping? Or do you believe jubilee specifically chose the worst form of MRAs to present?
    1
  1501.  @aconthebeat1  as per your doubt, do you wish to quote the prompt at 2:24?
    1
  1502. ​ @echochamber1234  no, she was definitely correct (though her presentation was lacking). Just look at NOMAS as an example.
    1
  1503.  @ace2311  i mean, it does seem kind of important
    1
  1504.  @ace2311  if that's the case, would you quote what the prompt says? But thank you for accepting all the feminists believed men and women are equal while the MRAs don't.
    1
  1505.  @ace2311  again, would you quote what it states in 2:24 so we may see the views of MRAs? This is to see if their views are different from what derrick has.
    1
  1506.  @michelledertinger  wasn't roe v wade just repealed?
    1
  1507. Weirdly enough, yes. There's a substantial overlap between them, incels and PUA (the last two focus exclusively on sex).
    1
  1508. Didn't all the MRAs agree with the guy in yellow? Also, what issues did the MRAs present?
    1
  1509. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc that's strange, why would the feminists saying men and women are equals mean men are demonized? Didn't the MRAs say women aren't equal to men, and even compare them to children?
    1
  1510.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my previous query: why would feminists stating men and women are equals be demonizing men? Since you agree MRAs stated men and women aren't equal, eg, they believe men are inherently lesser parents, why is that helping men?
    1
  1511.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing with the feminists per noting MRA views harm men. Thus, isn't that you noting feminism helps men and women, or what issue for men did the MRA's bring up?
    1
  1512.  @Psych9589  you mean there are real issues men face and that there should be a group to confront said issues? Yes, though bear in mind feminists are the group that does this per being the one that sees the sexes as equals. The MRA's don't really do anything. Even in the video they either self sabotaged men's issues or just spent their time saying feminism was wrong.
    1
  1513.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, would you like to quote where in the video they say so? Or do you believe feminists saying the sexes are equal means men are demonized?
    1
  1514.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. Again, per agreeing MRA views harm men, isn't that you noting feminism helps the sexes, or what issue for men did the MRA's bring up?
    1
  1515.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent question. In said patriarchy, are men seen as lesser parents to women, or are they seen as equals?
    1
  1516.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per now backtracking on your query, thank you for thus agreeing feminists are helping men by stating the sexes are equals. Or are men lesser parents to women?
    1
  1517.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely my query. Again, are men seen as lesser parents in said patriarchy or are they equals as per feminist ideals? But thank you for accepting MRA's actively harm men due to sabotaging men's issues while feminists help both sexes.
    1
  1518.  @DavidW-ng5zv  You are entitled to pretend the feminists stated what the MRA's did, but thank you for thus indirectly agreeing with gender equality, ie, feminism, and for agreeing MRA's harm men per fomenting inequality. Or are men and women equals? When was it when the patriarchy existed?
    1
  1519.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are entitled to pretend the feminists stated what the MRA's did, but thank you for indirectly agreeing with feminism and for agreeing MRA's harm men. Or are men and women equals? When was it when the patriarchy existed?
    1
  1520.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are entitled to pretend the feminists stated as the MRA's did, but thank you for indirectly agreeing with feminism and agreeing MRA's harm men. As you agree with the MRAs that men are inherently worse parents because the sexes aren't equals, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1521. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to pretend the feminists stated as the MRA's did, but thank you for indirectly agreeing with feminism and agreeing MRA's harm men. As you agree with the MRAs that men are inherently worse parents, thank you for showing why feminism exists and what toxic masculinity is
    1
  1522.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you now reiterate what the MRAs state, thank you for showing why feminism exists. You are entitled to pretend your and the MRAs views are what the feminists state, but thank you for agreeing MRA's harm men. Or why isn't it toxic masculinity for the MRAs to state men are biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1523. No, women did that too. Even feminism legalized women being in the military
    1
  1524.  @camerononeel7054  in regards to?
    1
  1525. ​ @divyanshsingh1078  no, they are. It's more likely competent women replace incompetent men if only because it's not illegal for women to be there
    1
  1526. It's true, feminists support fathers more than the MRAs do.
    1
  1527. Correct, the feminists believe men and women are equal while the MRAs stated they are not. As it stands, it seems only feminism helps both men and women. As for Mimi, her statement was awkward but she was correct. NOMAS is an example and it bears reminding that the MRAs spent most of the talk saying men are lesser parents while the feminists disagreed.
    1
  1528. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noticing Mimi was correct. As the MRAs seek to divide people by saying men are lesser parents, doesn't that show only the feminists help?
    1
  1529.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to backtrack, but thank you for having noticed Mimi was correct. Again, as the MRAs divide people by saying men are lesser parents and women lesser breadwinners, doesn't that show only the feminists help due to saying the sexes are equal?
    1
  1530.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, do you not believe MRAs fomenting the idea that men are biologically lesser parents affects custody cases?
    1
  1531.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing you believe the MRAs stating men are lesser parents due to biology isn't harmful. As feminists oppose this view, thank you for showing only they help men and women
    1
  1532.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking and accepting MRA's seeing men as lesser parent's is anti-male. As feminists oppose this, thank you for demonstrating only they help men and women.
    1
  1533.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRA's seeing men as lesser parent's is anti-male harm. As feminists oppose this, thank you for demonstrating only they fight for equality among men and women.
    1
  1534.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRA's are anti-male due to seeing men as lesser parents. As feminists oppose this, thank you for demonstrating only they fight for men and women. Seems odd you believe feminists acting as such is a bigger issue
    1
  1535.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for accepting MRA's see men as lesser parents, ie, anti-male as per your words. As feminists oppose this, thank you for demonstrating only they fight for men and women. Seems odd you believe feminists acting as such is a bigger issue
    1
  1536.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, you stated feminists were a bigger issue, ie, you agree MRAs are anti male but believe feminism is more problematic. Thus, thank you for accepting MRAs are anti-male due to seeing father's as lesser parents. As feminism opposes this, thank you for demonstrating only they help both sexes
    1
  1537. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing MRAs are anti-male due to seeing father's as lesser parents. As feminism opposes this, thank you for demonstrating only they help both sexes
    1
  1538. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing MRAs are anti-male due to seeing father's as lesser parents. As feminism opposes this, thank you for demonstrating only they help both sexes
    1
  1539. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish
    1
  1540. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe so
    1
  1541. It's true, i mean how is it mens right's to say men are inherently lesser parents and then complain about discrimination in custody cases? What do you even expect?
    1
  1542.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you agree the MRA's are wrong for telling women they belong at home getting pregnant?
    1
  1543.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. If they're the same rights, why is it only the mra's saying women belong at home to get pregnant?
    1
  1544. ​ @tonyonaperky2128 no, it was the MRAs as a whole. After all, one is currently defending that position here
    1
  1545. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant, thank you for showing why men have more rights
    1
  1546.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly men do. After all, you agreed with the MRAs that women must stay at home to get pregnant. Thus, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1547.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant, thank you for showing why men have more rights
    1
  1548.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant, thank you for showing why men have more rights.
    1
  1549.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant and now even state no one forces women to have kids, thank you for showing exactly why men have more rights
    1
  1550.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant and then obliviously state no one forces women to have kids, thank you for showing exactly why men have more rights
    1
  1551.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree with the MRAs that women belong at home getting pregnant and then obliviously state no one forces women to have kids, thank you for showing exactly why men have more rights. Does no one force men to pay alimony since only about half ever pay the total amount?
    1
  1552. You know the MRAs didn't actually give a reason why their group exists. Even when they saif father's are discriminated in custody cases, they immediately backtracked by saying women are biologically better parents.
    1
  1553.  @KKomalShashank  didn't the MRAs have about the same views? Honestly, the guy in yellow just seemed blunter. Also, did the feminists self sabotage like the MRAs did? For example, the MRAs said men are inherently worse parents while the feminists disagreed so I'm not sure it's true they're just as bad.
    1
  1554.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why do you believe MRAs saying men are lesser parents is helpful? Don't you agree with feminists stating men and women are equal parents, or do you believe doing so isn't for men?
    1
  1555.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Why do you believe the MRAs saying men are lesser parents is helpful to men? Do you believe feminists opposing said position means it isn't for men?
    1
  1556.  @zoroverse8358  i asked who you believed wins nearly all custody cases: the nurturing or non nurturing parent (as per your words), and you assumed i meant better parent. So it seems you agree MRAs harm men and self sabotage.
    1
  1557.  @zoroverse8358  note you continue deflecting. Again, i thank you for noting MRA's self sabotage and harm men. Or again, who wins nearly all custody cases: the nurturing or non nurturing parent? Note you inadvertently showed you are aware one of them is a better parent
    1
  1558. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, i thank you for noting MRA's self sabotage and harm men to the point you believe women you are biologically better parents
    1
  1559. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, i thank you for noting MRA's self sabotage and harm men to the point you believe women are biologically superior parents. Thankfully feminists oppose this
    1
  1560. The wage gap in sports shows women can win more and even generate more money, eg, US women's soccer team, yet are still paid less. And society will still state the men deserve more because people enjoy seeing men lose more than women winning. This is fairly odd considering that the US men's team can't consistently qualify for the world cup while the women do.
    1
  1561.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you believe men and women are equals? If not, then why should women get the same sentences as men?
    1
  1562.  @DavidW-ux2gc  above men in what way? For example, if women and men are not equal, then why should they get the same prison sentences or why is there a bias in child custody cases?
    1
  1563.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Again, above men in what way? If women and men are not equal, then why should they get the same prison sentences or child custody?
    1
  1564.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's odd. as you try to blame the feminists for what the MRA's stated, eg, that men are inherently more violent and biologically lesser at raising kids, does this mean you are indirectly agreeing with feminism? Or why not quote where the feminists state as you claim?
    1
  1565.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "If men aren't biologically more violent, why are they far more likely to be involved in violent crime?" thank you for now demonstrating you agree with the MRA's (recall they even state men are lesser parents). as you previously tried to blame feminists for stating this and even stated this was evil, thank you for showing feminists opposing MRA's is conducive to a better society.
    1
  1566. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "If men aren't biologically more violent, why are they far more likely to be involved in violent crime?" Again, thank you for demonstrating you agree with the MRA's and for noticing this view is harmful as you previously tried to blame feminists for stating this. Thus, aren't you indirectly agreeing feminists help people?
    1
  1567.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Why aren't men naturally more violent?" Again, thank you for demonstrating MRA's simply harm men. Or why then should men and women receive the same prison sentences if men are biologically more violent? Thus, aren't you indirectly showing feminists help people?
    1
  1568.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "but men are" Then again, why should men and women receive the same prison sentences since you state men are biologically more dangerous? Again, are you not showing why feminism exists since only feminism state the sexes should be treated equally?
    1
  1569. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, would you then provide a timestamp where that is said?
    1
  1570. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, why not provide a timestamp of feminists stating men and women are essentially clones of each other? But thank you for accepting only anti-feminists believe women shouldn't be financially independent
    1
  1571.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for admitting you have not seen the video. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish. Thus, why state feminists are the problem when only an anti-feminist stated women shouldn't be financially independent?
    1
  1572.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd. Do you attempt to change the subject because you disagree with the anti-feminists? If so, isn't that agreeing with feminism?
    1
  1573. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then you are changing the subject because you disagree with the anti-feminists? If so, thank you for agreeing with feminism
    1
  1574.  @alexl8445  as you agreed men made it illegal for women to fight alongside men in the military, why is that taking anything for granted when feminists legalized women fighting too?
    1
  1575. Thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  1576. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why do the MRAs say men are lesser parents while feminists state they're equal?
    1
  1577. ​ @regisshiv3542  then you agree with feminists stating men and women are equal parents and noted they are correct in opposing MRAs saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  1578. ​ @beganitdidnt6535  what point did he give?
    1
  1579. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  when did he state so?
    1
  1580. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then you believe the point derrick gave was that women didn't give him sex? Wouldn't that show the original commenter has a point in ignoring him?
    1
  1581. Don't all the feminists believed men and women are equal while most MRAs (like in the video) don't?
    1
  1582.  @butthissureisfun5619  if that's the case, why did the opposite happen in the video? Why did all the feminists say men and women are equal while the MRAs did not?
    1
  1583.  @happilysecular1833  why wouldn't they find it amusing that the MRAs say women are inherently better at child rearing and then say discrimination occurs in child custody cases? Isn't that MRAs causing what they decry?
    1
  1584. What different views from the MRAs did he hold?
    1
  1585. That's odd, why is it the feminists fault the MRAs state men are lesser parents? All the feminists did was state men and women are equal
    1
  1586.  @venerexate1841  yes
    1
  1587.  @venerexate1841  precisely, the MRAs disagreed with feminists that "men and women are different but equal". Thus, isn't that showing what MRAs stand for?
    1
  1588. Wasn't his question answered by the other MRAs saying women are better parents than men?
    1
  1589.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then isn't that you agreeing the feminists were doing as he requested by opposing the MRAs?
    1
  1590. ​ @riven4121  what else was said? For example, derrick and Zack thought men were lesser parents. Did he oppose that?
    1
  1591.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but why wouldn't i mention the MRAs sabotaging the issues they bring up?
    1
  1592.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but why wouldn't it be a problem that MRAs sabotage the issues they bring up? Does it not matter that they foment the idea that men are worse parents due to biology?
    1
  1593. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why do the MRAs say men are lesser parents while the feminists opposed this?
    1
  1594. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you accept the MRAs view men as lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help both sexes
    1
  1595.  @smolbean2803  thus why i am asking for said statistics. It seems odd you state he provided them but don't write them. Again, would you kindly do so?
    1
  1596.  @smolbean2803  "I don't want to" thank you for clarifying that you failing to provide kursat's statistics was deliberate. I assumed you were being sincere but it appears i was wrong. Is this because you are aware kursat essentially just said "feminism is wrong" because he thinks, for example, the wage gap is false?
    1
  1597.  @smolbean2803  "i don't want to" again, thank you for clarifying you are purposely avoiding writing any statistics. Did kursat say that as well or did he simply state "feminism is wrong" because he thinks concepts like the wage gap are false?
    1
  1598.  @smolbean2803  don't you think you should answer my question instead of deflecting? Is this what MRAs normally do?
    1
  1599.  @smolbean2803  because you agreed the feminists noted men are given harsher prison times since opposing said discrimination is what feminism is about
    1
  1600.  @smolbean2803  PS note that the feminists, as we agreed, do defend men and women who are discriminated against. Thus, why not state what numbers kursat gave if he didn't simply spend his time saying "feminism is wrong"?
    1
  1601.  @smolbean2803  and yes, as stated, thank you for showing you were deflecting by writing "I don't want to" when i merely asked for the numbers kursat gave. It is honestly disappointing you pretend otherwise.
    1
  1602.  @smolbean2803  thank you for accepting kursat essentially spent his time stating "feminism is wrong" because he believes concepts such as the wage gap are false. Do you, like kursat, also believe rape culture is false? I am honestly disappointed you now pretend the wage gap relates to death row, but thank you for writing feminists act to end discrimination in prison ("the feminists agreed").
    1
  1603. That's an odd response. Why would it be appropriate to ask someone how and why they were sexually assaulted?
    1
  1604.  @mikegoldman402  I'm confused, why do you believe that's not related to what i wrote? If you like, would you quote what the feminist replied?
    1
  1605.  @mikegoldman402  apologies, you accidentally avoided my question. Would you write what the feminist answered when asked by the MRA over being sexually harassed as per 15:19? I'm not sure why you changed the timestamp, but how is that also not related to what i wrote? For example, didn't the MRAs say men are inherently worse parents? 4:06
    1
  1606.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if you believe I avoided the query, why not answer my queries to receive the answers?
    1
  1607. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies but again, if you believe I avoided the query, why not answer my queries to receive the answers?
    1
  1608. Yes, but MRAs generally believe men and women aren't equal so their perspective on rights is inherently different.
    1
  1609.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and why isn't it toxic masculinity for MRA's to say men are lesser parents due to their biology? Why wouldn't opposing this view help in custody cases?
    1
  1610.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing that the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. thus, why isn't that MRA's pushing "the notion that m en are evil and that masculinity is toxic"? Or is normal to see men as biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1611.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. Again, why isn't that MRA's pushing "the notion that m en are evil and that masculinity is toxic"? Or is normal to see men as biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1612.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, thank you for agreeing the MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. Thus, why isn't that MRA's pushing "the notion that m en are evil and that masculinity is toxic"?
    1
  1613. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's strange, why is it harmful to men for the feminists to disagree with MRAs that men are lesser parents?
    1
  1614.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting it is misandry to say men are lesser parents to women. please watch the video to note the MRA's stating men are lesser parents in the first prompt
    1
  1615.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking upon watching the video. thus, why is it helpful for MRA's to state men are lesser parents per biology? again, thank you for noting the MRA's are misandrists and misogynists.
    1
  1616.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for backtracking upon noting that the MRA's do state men are worse parents by pretending i held said misandrist view. Thus, as we agree MRA's are harmful to men, why is harming men helpful?
    1
  1617.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for accepting the MRA's state men are lesser parents. again, why is it helpful that MRA's seem to hate men and women? Thus far, it seems only feminism helps both sexes.
    1
  1618.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRA's state men are lesser parents. so again, why is it helpful that MRA's seem to hate men and women? Thus far, it seems only feminism helps both sexes.
    1
  1619. "an unborn child is a member of the human species that is not born yet" this is so flawed it actually makes my head hurt. is she implying children exist before babies? are unborn babies different from unborn children? is a zygote synonymous with unborn child?
    1
  1620. Wasn't roe v Wade repealed?
    1
  1621.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why?
    1
  1622.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why?
    1
  1623.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if it has failed, why are you stating men and women have equal rights regardless of roe v wade being repealed?
    1
  1624.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, then first world nations are feminist and third world nations are not? why would conservatives attempting a coup at the capitol be due to feminism? why is that normal?
    1
  1625. If that is the case, what is toxic feminity?
    1
  1626.  @riven4121  that's odd, as women are 90% of nurses, do you think nearly all work part-time even though hospitals are open 24/7? That doesn't seem feasible, so why do the male nurses earn more?
    1
  1627.  @riven4121  thus my question. Again, as women are 90% of nurses in a place open 24/7, ie, they do practically everything, why are men still paid more? And yes, if you write women work 30% less in a place open 24/7, that is you writing they don't do full time.
    1
  1628.  @riven4121  unfortunately, 30% is too large a number to not be about part time. However, recall we are in a pandemic so it seems strange constant overtime didn't occur to you. Thus, why is there a wage gap?
    1
  1629. Again, recall women are 90% of nurses in a place open 24/7 during a pandemic. And yet they still earn less than men who are 10% of nurses. Why isn't that a wage gap?
    1
  1630. Why would they? Kursat didn't do anything and Zach had about the same views as derrick.
    1
  1631.  @SphumZAR  he kind of did, he was just more diplomatic about it. For example, derrick flat out says he doesn't think women are equal to men. Zack says it's not that they're inferior or superior, it's just that women are more productive at home.
    1
  1632.  @SphumZAR  if you want to say Zack agrees with derrick but doesn't strongly agree with him then sure.
    1
  1633.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, didn't he say he's an incel that views women as children?
    1
  1634.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting Derrick's views (as an Incel) are that women are children. Why is it normal to say women are like children when you're an incel?
    1
  1635. What does selective service do?
    1
  1636. I can promise you that none of them say that if only because abortion occurs to a fetus and not a baby.
    1
  1637.  @DavidW-ux2gc  what colors are those?
    1
  1638.  @DavidW-ux2gc  so you have to go to another country or state in order for said fear to materialize? what an odd fear to have.
    1
  1639.  @DavidW-ux2gc  you are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but i asked what clothes cause men to be afraid and you mentioned sports teams from london. again, seems strange you have to go to different nations and/or cities in order to be afraid. Are women only afraid in certain neighborhoods or is the danger anywhere on the planet?
    1
  1640.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's interesting, you changed the subject to being attacked for money. Is this because you stated you live in London yet have to go to Bermondsey in order to be attacked for what you wear? truly an odd fear to have. If men are more likely to be attacked, then why did you imply through your deflection that only women are attacked over their clothes?
    1
  1641.  @DavidW-ux2gc  so it is in Bermondsey. Thank you for clarifying that. So again, as you changed the subject to being attacked for "other things", is this because you have to go to a football club in Bermondsey to be attacked for what you wear? Again, if men are more likely to be attacked, why did you imply through your subject change that only women are attacked over their clothes? Seems women are more likely to be attacked if so.
    1
  1642.  @DavidW-ux2gc  note you backtrack so much you now state women aren't worried over being attacked due to their clothing choices. Again, is this because you noticed that saying men are afraid of being attacked at a football club in bermondsey means men aren't afraid their clothing choices will instigate crimes too?
    1
  1643. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc precisely, you wrote of a football club in bermondsey. Thus, again, as you backtrack from writing about being attacked per clothing choices, is this per believing women are more likely to be attacked?
    1
  1644.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus my statement. Again, note your backtracking from stating men are attacked over their clothes to stating men suffer more violent crime in general. So is your backtracking per believing more women are attacked as you have to compare all crime with women being attacked over their clothes? Are women only afraid in certain neighborhoods (as you wrote men are per your example) or is the danger anywhere on the planet?
    1
  1645.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, seems odd you wrote men must go to another state or country in order to be in danger over clothes, don't you agree? Or is the danger for women over clothes found anywhere on the planet?
    1
  1646. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc  do you then believe men fear the actions of sports clubs in every part of the world? or what other example is there that means men "have to watch what they wear and can wear whatever they like at all times"? if no other example exists, then it seems odd you state men must go to other parts of the world in order to fear what clothes they wear.
    1
  1647.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Yes, it can be anywhere in the world." then you are entitled to pretend every corner of the world is attacking men due to the influence of football clubs. But per doing so, thank you for showing men don't fear the type of clothes they wear.
    1
  1648. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for now backtracking again. Still seems odd you believe men have to go to specific states or cities in order to feel said fear.
    1
  1649.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to pretend every corner of the world is attacking men due to the influence of football clubs and gangs. but i thank you for noting why only women fear drawing attention as per their clothes
    1
  1650.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "victims of violent crime" again, thank you for backtracking, or do you now write of violent crime in general because men don't have to be worried about what they wear?
    1
  1651.  @DavidW-ux2gc  and again, you are entitled to pretend every corner of the world is attacking men due to the influence of football clubs and gangs. still odd you believe men have to go to other nations or cities in order to have said fear.
    1
  1652. Not really. They don't really seem to do much. Even in the video they mostly just said feminism is wrong and that women should know their traditional roles.
    1
  1653. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would MRAs stating custody cases favor women only to then say men are lesser parents help men? As the feminists state men and women are equal, isn't that doing more for men?
    1
  1654.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but have you not seen the video? If not, kindly observe the MRAs stating men are lesser parents in their first response. Thus, why would MRAs stating men are lesser parent help men? As feminists state the sexes are equal, isn't that showing only feminism helps men?
    1
  1655.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting MRAs stating men are worse parents is harmful to men. As you now backtrack from saying the MRAs never said anything like it to now saying I misinterpreted them, why not quote what they state to see them saying men are biologically worse parents after stating custody cases unfairly favor women? Thus, isn't that you noting feminism helps both sexes as only they fight for equality?
    1
  1656.  @DavidW-ng5zv  correct, the MRAs said women are better parents due to their biology. As they thus believe men are worse parents due to how they're "built", why is that fighting for men's rights? Again, it seem only feminism helps men as only they see the sexes as equal
    1
  1657. Doesn't derrick have about the same views as the other MRAs? Also, why is it fair to specifically ask for the name of any feminist entity focused on supporting men through the law when they suffer discrimination in custody cases? I doubt anyone would have that on hand
    1
  1658. Then you agree men and women are equal (without being clones of each other)?
    1
  1659.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you agree with the feminists that derrick and the MRAs are wrong? Or were the MRAs correct for agreeing with derrick?
    1
  1660. That's odd, don't all the MRAs believe the same as derrick? For example, don't they all believe women belong in the home?
    1
  1661.  @IForgor._.952  then which of the MRAs agreed when the prompt said "men and women are different but equal"?
    1
  1662.  @IForgor._.952  I am confused by your answer. if you agree derrick is not the best person, why is it a fight we agree the other two repeat his views?
    1
  1663.  @IForgor._.952  then which of the MRAs agreed women and men sre equal?
    1
  1664.  @IForgor._.952  exactly, as you then noted 2 of the 3 MRAs share the same views, why do you think it's only derrick that's a problem? I can at least say all the feminist see men and women as equals.
    1
  1665.  @IForgor._.952  precisely, he believes the same as derrick but is polite about it. Isn't that also a problem, or if a thief is polite about his actions does that make him less of a problem? As for the other point, do you then mean the individuals here aren't representative of their respective ideologies? Do you mean the video specifically looked for outliers?
    1
  1666.  @IForgor._.952  precisely, he believes women and men aren't equal as he says women and men belong in different places. Just like derrick. If you want to make the argument that Zack realized he was wrong, you can do so as it appears he did realize that. But like i said, it seems feminists generally do believe all are equal.
    1
  1667.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you noted none of the MRAs had personal stories to give, why would the other state they did as a criticism of the feminists? Seems he didn't see the video, agreed?
    1
  1668.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As you noted the commenter was incorrect in stating the MRAs were giving personal stories, ie, demonstrate men's issues, it seems he didn't see the video, correct? Why couldn't the MRAs give personal stories despite demanding the feminists give personal stories, ie, demonstrate women's issues?
    1
  1669. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus noting the commenter was mistaken. Per noting none of the MRAs have any experience with issues men face while all the feminists do, which side can actually help people?
    1
  1670.  @montymython754  precisely, all the MRAs avoided the query as per your timestamp. Seems odd you believe that's interrupting them, or is that an indirect way of showing you noted your mistake?
    1
  1671.  @montymython754  as an example, why not quote what derrick says?
    1
  1672.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies , butbyou deflected. Per noting none of the MRAs have any experience with issues men face while all the feminists do, which side can actually help people?
    1
  1673. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. Per noting none of the MRAs have any experience with issues men face while all the feminists do, eg, the MRA's say men are lesser parents, which side can actually help people?
    1
  1674. Pretty much. The feminists even defended men's rights more than the MRAs, which was kind of weird. I mean only the feminists as a whole thought men and women were equals.
    1
  1675.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing exactly why only feminists help
    1
  1676. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv then why are only feminists defending men and women?
    1
  1677.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why did only feminists defend rights for both sexes? for example, who did MRAs state are worse parents?
    1
  1678. The wage gap is unfortunately real. Note women being 90% of nurses yet still earning less than men.
    1
  1679.  @billusher2265  then why do female nurses earn less than male nurses when women are 90% of nurses? Seems strange men choosing to be nurses earn more.
    1
  1680.  @billusher2265  then, basically, you believe 90% of nurses works part time even though hospitals are open 24/7?
    1
  1681.  @billusher2265  1) apologies, then you mean 90% work a full shift yet still get paid less than 10% of nurses? 2) why wouldn't it matter that women are 90% of the staff in a place open 24/7? Seem strange to say nearly the entire workforce does less work than 10% of it.
    1
  1682.  @billusher2265  1) excellent, so in a place open 24/7 women are working full time, ie, aren't taking more vacation time, aren't leaving early, etc? 2) precisely, since 90% of the workforce does nearly everything, why are 90% paid less when they literally do nearly everything?
    1
  1683.  @billusher2265  I'm a little confused why you assumed 90% of the workforce does less work than 10% of it on an individual level.
    1
  1684.  @billusher2265  1) correct, a hospital is open 24/7 so it always needs people there. So do female nurses work a full shift or half of one, or do you believe 10% does the remaining average time of 90% of the workforce? 2) then as we agree women do nearly everything in a place open 24/7, why are they paid less or do you believe 10% of the workforce does the leftover work of 90%?
    1
  1685.  @kauswekazilimani3736  you don't really twist stats when 90% of nurses are women and hospitals are open 24/7. To say 90% of the staff on average work part time, especially in a place open 24/7, is fairly ridiculous because then how does a hospital even function?
    1
  1686. Isn't the problem with toxic masculinity that men keep ending themselves due to loneliness because they think having friends is girly?
    1
  1687. Why is it only "she got touched" when they threw a bottle at her?
    1
  1688. It is, that's why all the feminists agreed men and women are equal while only one MRA agreed and even then he had a caveat over it.
    1
  1689. It's true there are issues in the family courts. Do you believe feminists help by stating both parents are equal or the MRAs when they state men are lesser parents?
    1
  1690.  @daustin439  thus my question. As the MRAs say women are biologically better at raising kids than men and that men are inherently better at making money through work (due to biology, somehow), does that affect the court system outcomes? Or is it fairer if the courts act as feminists do and view the sexes as equal?
    1
  1691.  @DavidW-ng5zv  i assure you they do
    1
  1692.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, have you not seen the video?
    1
  1693.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why does it bother you if feminist help men?
    1
  1694.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, you don't believe men have issues that must he addressed?
    1
  1695.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query, why is it an issue that feminists help men?
    1
  1696.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as MRAs demonize men by saying they're lesser parents, doesn't that show only feminists fight for men's issues?
    1
  1697.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As we agree MRAs demonize men, why is opposing this view not helping? Why is it an issue this helps men?
    1
  1698.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet we agreed MRAs state men are lesser parents. So again, why is it wrong feminists help when opposing this? Why is it an issue that this helps men?
    1
  1699.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting feminists do help men through the court systems by noting men and women are equal. Thus, why is it an issue that feminism helps men?
    1
  1700.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you present men as lesser parents to women, do you then believe it's wrong that men lose nearly all custody cases? Why wouldn't men wish for help in this?
    1
  1701.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you state men are lesser parents, do you then agree it is correct that men lose most custody cases? Thus, why wouldn't men wish for help in this?
    1
  1702.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, you believe men are lesser parents. Thus, why is it an issue feminism helps men to be seen as equal parents?
    1
  1703.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you already stated you view men as lesser parents. As feminists state both parents are equal, why is it an issue they help men?
    1
  1704.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you (like the MRAs) state men are lesser parents as you view women as better suited for child rearing. Thus, why is it an issue feminists state men are equal parents? For example, terry crews has stated fathers are equal to mothers.
    1
  1705.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "they're equal yes" then as you agree with feminists, eg, terry crews, while noting MRAs state men are lesser parents, why is it an issue feminists are helping men? Note they've even change your mind.
    1
  1706.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it seems strange you constantly backtrack from stating men have issues that need to be solved to stating they have no issues to solve. As the courts believe women are better parents, then who will nearly always win custody cases and who will nearly always pay child support?
    1
  1707.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, have you not seen the video? Again, as MRAs state men are lesser parents, why is it an issue feminists help men by opposing this?
    1
  1708.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but thank you for agreeing with feminists that men and women are equal parents
    1
  1709.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, thank you for agreeing with feminists that the parents are equal. Thus, as MRAs only state men are lesser parents, why is it wrong feminists like terry crews oppose this?
    1
  1710.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but again, have you not seen the video? You seem to quote them but i cannot tell if you do so deliberately.
    1
  1711.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my previous query, have you not seen the video? Or who is seen as a better parent when MRAs state men are naturally suited for employment while women are naturally suited for child rearing?
    1
  1712.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, as you continue quoting the feminists that men and women are equal, thank you for agreeing with them? Thus, why is it an issue feminists, like terry crews, help men?
    1
  1713.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but why do you believe MRAs demonizing men is a group that helps men? Again, as you constantly quote feminists that men and women are equal, why is it an issue they oppose MRAs?
    1
  1714.  @DavidW-ng5zv  surely you agree with feminist Terry Crews or Joseph Gordon-Levitt that men and women are equal?
    1
  1715.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you already are a feminist. You even noted men and women are equal. If you are uncertain what this means, kindly observe the video.
    1
  1716.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, why do you believe MRAs demonizing men means they help men? Why is it that feminists opposing this demonization an issue?
    1
  1717.  @DavidW-ng5zv  likewise, per your constant quoting of feminists, it seems you are a feminist. You merely seem to dislike the word.
    1
  1718.  @daustin439  exactly, thank you for agreeing with feminists on equality to the point you disagree with MRAs that men are lesser parents and women are lesser employees.
    1
  1719.  @daustin439  correct, it is illegal for a woman to abort eve when raped. Clearly women have less rights
    1
  1720.  @daustin439  apologies, you don't believe men have issues in the family courts?
    1
  1721.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then do you believe feminists help by stating both parents are equal or the MRAs when they state men are lesser parents?
    1
  1722.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, why is it only feminists who state men are equal parents while the MRAs state men are lesser parents? Is it helpful for MRAs to demonize men?
    1
  1723.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, have you not seen the video?
    1
  1724.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you noted the feminists stated men are equal parents to women while the MRAs stated men are lesser parents, why do you believe MRAs demonizing men helps men? Is it better if a child custody court sees men and women as equal parents, or women as inherently better parents?
    1
  1725.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thus thank you for demonstrating why, on average, men nearly always lose custody cases due to MRA views and why feminism is correct for stating men and women are equal.
    1
  1726.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting the MRAs were demonizing men while the feminists opposed this. Thus, why is it more helpful for MRAs to demonize men than feminists stating men and women are equal?
    1
  1727.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs were demonizing men while the feminists stated the sexes are equal. Thus, why is it helpful for MRAs to demonize men but not for feminists to state men and women are equal? Which brings a more equal result in child custody cases: stating men are lesser caregivers, or stating men and women are equals?
    1
  1728.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, thank you for accepting MRAs were demonizing men while the feminists opposed this, and that you agree with MRAs demonizing men, ie, why only feminists defend men
    1
  1729. No, she has a point. Most of the problems the MRAs brought up they immediately sabotaged. For example, they'll say men are discriminated against in family courts and then add that men are biologically worse parents. How does that help anyone?
    1
  1730.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why would men be worse caregivers?
    1
  1731.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thank you for showing exactly why the feminists were correct.
    1
  1732.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to pretend so
    1
  1733.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to pretend so
    1
  1734.  @DavidW-ng5zv  what does my first comment say?
    1
  1735.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting. You now write that the MRA's stating men are biologically bad parents is misandry (though you also seem to believe me writing they state as such is the same). Thank you for thus agreeing that men and women are equals, ie, feminism.
    1
  1736.  @DavidW-ux2gc  yet you noted MRA's stating men are seen as biologically lesser parents is misandry. thus, thank you for showing exactly why feminism is needed as per their misandry and misogyny.
    1
  1737.  @DavidW-ux2gc  Now you are backtracking. Thank you for accepting i did not state men are inferior to women to the point you know write that men being seen as inferior to women "isn't misandry, though"
    1
  1738.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, thank you for accepting i did not state men are inferior to women to the point you know write that men being seen as inferior to women "isn't misandry, though". Or are men lesser parents?
    1
  1739.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to pretend so, but thank you for accepting the MRA are misogynistic and misandrists for stating men are lesser parents.
    1
  1740.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to pretend so, but thank you for accepting the MRA are misogynistic and misandrists for stating men are lesser parents per attempting to pretend me quoting them made me as such
    1
  1741.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting i did not state men are inferior to women to the point you know write that men being seen as inferior to women "isn't misandry, though". Or are men lesser parents as per the MRAs?
    1
  1742. how much money?
    1
  1743.  @melliem7481  i get the feeling they're the type of people that would repeatedly fall for the nigerian prince email scam
    1
  1744. -Do you then believe women are just as strong as men that they should be seen as equally dangerous as men? -Do you then agree with feminism legalizing women fighting in the military in 2016? -Do you disagree with MRAs that women are inherently superior parents?
    1
  1745.  @DavidW-ng5zv  -then why are you surprised women get lesser sentences if you see men as inherently more dangerous? -and should it be illegal for women to fight? Or are they all too weak to do so? -as you note men being seen as lesser parents harms them, isn't that showing MRAs harm men as only feminists support equal parenthood (as they demonstrated in the video)?
    1
  1746.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, did you not see the video?
    1
  1747. Out of curiosity, what was Alysha asked that you think she was hypocritical?
    1
  1748.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and what was the question that you state made her be emotional? Or are you simply assuming she became emotional?
    1
  1749.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and what did she say about how and where men abuse women that made you assume she was emotional? Or again, why are you assuming she became emotional?
    1
  1750. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  If she did, then again, kindly quote what she said about where and how men abuse women. Did she answer the query? Seems odd you avoid this
    1
  1751.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and what experiences did she give that you state they are unrelated to the subject? Or why do you imply it was wrong she answered the MRA's question, ie, "which were irrelevant"?
    1
  1752.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. again, if the subject of men abusing women is unrelated to what she said, what does she say that you avoid writing it? Seems odd answering the MRA's question is something you state was wrong.
    1
  1753.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my request, which you avoid. What was her answer in regards to the subject of how and where men are abusing women? Still odd you imply answering the MRA's question is wrong.
    1
  1754.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and why is it wrong to provide personal experiences of being abused by men when the MRA specifically asks for example of how and where men abuse women? Again, why is it wrong the MRA was answered?
    1
  1755.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my query. As we agree the MRA specifically asks for examples of how and where men abuse women, ie, he asked her a simple question, why is it wrong she answered to the point you state she became emotional? Again, was it wrong the MRA was answered when he brought up the subject?
    1
  1756.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. As you stated the MRA asked her to give details about how and where men harm women, why was it incorrect he was answered? Or again, what did she state? It is odd you avoid this query. Was the answer truly so terrible?
    1
  1757.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why did you lie about what she said? I understand her examples were very upsetting, but please control your emotions. Regardless, per your actions, thank you for showing why feminism has a point.
    1
  1758.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly you did, and as you clarified her examples don't upset you, kindly write them. But per lying, thank you for showing feminism has a point.
    1
  1759.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "where did I lie or get emotional?" Thus my request. Kindly quote the feminist examples since you became emotional and lied about it. Note you even state her answer did not affect you, yet you continue avoiding the request, ie, were emotionally affect by her answer. Either way, thank you for showing the feminists had a point.
    1
  1760.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "where did I lie about it? Where did i get emotional?" Hence my request. Kindly quote the examples given by the feminist since you became emotional and lied. Either way, thank you for showing why the feminists had a point.
    1
  1761.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, kindly control your emotions (as shown by you lying) and graciously quote the feminist. Either way, thank you for accepting the feminist had a point.
    1
  1762.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for now showing the feminist wasn't lying. Seems odd you pretended all men are the "system". Please try not to be so emotional again. Now, again, would you kindly paste her examples?
    1
  1763.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing you were lying. Please try not to be so emotional again. Thus, would you kindly paste her examples so you may answer your new query?
    1
  1764.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my request. kindly quote her examples so you may find the answer to your query. And again, thank you for showing you were lying. Please cease being so emotional.
    1
  1765.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing you were lying but I at least thank you for admitting the MRA was asking details about where and how she was abused. Seems odd your emotions make you dislike him being answered, or is that why you avoid having your query answered by quoting the feminists' examples? It seems the feminist had a point if so
    1
  1766.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, thank you for showing you were lying, though I do thank you for admitting the MRA was asking details about where and how she was abused. Thud, kindly quote her examples to receive the answer to your query. Seems odd her answer made you so emotional you can't write the answer to your query. Either way, thank you for showing the feminist had a point
    1
  1767. 1:53:54 this woman is a godsend for pointing that out. republicans point blank don't want abortion, they just obfuscate on the late term abortions because they know that's an incredibly unpopular position
    1
  1768.  @justarandomguy157  since she basically says the same as the MRAs here in the video, do you know of any MRA activism that has actually helped?
    1
  1769. Strange, didn't feminism legalize women fighting in the military back in 2015?
    1
  1770.  @kianbautista1016  then the facts are that some men and some women do the necesary work in those fields, correct? And that it was illegal for women to do so in the military until 7 years ago, agreed?
    1
  1771.  @apierrakeas9577  if that's the case, why were only the MRAs saying women are inherently superior at child rearing?
    1
  1772.  @views-kb6sv  then you think the creators of the video specifically chose said individuals as representatives of the MRA movement? Would you like to explain why when you agree the feminists in the video are representative of feminism?
    1
  1773.  @views-kb6sv  apologies, but it seems you note the MRA's were chosen randomly. Thus, isn't that accepting they are representative of MRA's? Or as you write toxic feminists are an extreme minority, wouldn't randomly choosing feminists correctly lead to those found in the video? But thank you for accepting the MRA's in the video are toxic while the feminists are not.
    1
  1774.  @views-kb6sv  interestingly, kursat doesn't do anything except say feminism is mistaken. Ironically, this is also representative of MRA's. As you write "coincidences happen", ie, you agree none were chosen with ill intent, but note the MRA's in the video were toxic and the feminists were not, ie, "a toxic feminist you see online doesn't represent the entire movement", isn't that you agreeing those in the video are representative of their respective movements?
    1
  1775. ​ @views-kb6sv  precisely, you agree he did nothing but say feminism is wrong, eg, asking for the name of a feminist organization focused on advising men on the bias of child custody cases in order to say feminism is wrong (while ignoring the MRA's saying men are lesser parents and the feminists saying both sexes are equal). Again, you agree the individuals here are representative of their movements as your only rebuttal over the MRA's being toxic (and the feminists not being toxic) is that it is a coincidence.
    1
  1776.  @views-kb6sv  hence my statement that you agree the only thing kursat did was say feminism is incorrect, ie, did not fight for gender equality, even though it was the MRA's that said men are lesser parents while the feminists said the sexes are equal. Again, you agree those in the video are representative of their movements as you note they were randomly selected, ie, you write "coincidences happen" that the MRA individuals were toxic. I actually just noticed you did this.
    1
  1777.  @views-kb6sv  it's odd you ignore your words that kursat only spent his time saying feminism is incorrect, eg, asking for a specific feminist organization that looks for men who suffered from bias in child custody, while the MRAs said men are lesser parents and the feminists said both sexes are equal. Regardless, per agreeing the individuals were chosen randomly, i do thank you for agreeing they are representative the movement. You even note kursat ignored the MRAs saying men are lesser parents while the feminist said men and women are equal.
    1
  1778.  @views-kb6sv  apologies, but do you not think it odd we agree kursat only said feminism is incorrect even while the feminists disagreed with the MRAs that men are lesser parents? Likewise, as you write these individuals were randomly selected, thank you for accepting they are representative of their groups. Again, why do you ignore your words when you even agree kursat ignored the MRAs attacking fatherhood?
    1
  1779.  @views-kb6sv  thus, again, we agree kursat only said feminism is incorrect while the feminists disagreed with the MRAs that men are lesser parents. Thus, per agreeing the individuals were randomly selected because the MRAs being toxic means "coincidences happen", thank you for agreeing they are representative of their groups. But as you agree kursat ignored the MRAs attacking fatherhood, ie, "he ignored everyone", why is that acceptable? Or were the feminists not presenting facts when they stated men and women are equal?
    1
  1780. Yeah, the MRAs were pretty weird
    1
  1781. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's weird, why do you believe the conservatives that attempted a coup at the Capitol were feminists?
    1
  1782.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odder response, why would conservatives attempting to overthrow democracy not be related to your belief over western collapse? Again, why do you believe they're feminists?
    1
  1783.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent, thank you for agreeing that conservatives tried to destroy democracy and are not feminists. However, please explain why you believe conservative views on the family led to them attempting a coup.
    1
  1784.  @DavidW-ux2gc  yet you already agreed conservatives attempted a coup and state that's a symptom of their views on the family. Again, please explain this
    1
  1785. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc that's interesting, now you backtrack from stating the family unit is the result of the west collapsing and that it was an influence on conservatives attempting to destroy democracy. Why is that? But I thank you for agreeing conservatives attempting a coup is what you see as the collapse of the west.
    1
  1786.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but as you (again) agreed conservatives attempted a coup and that their views on the family unit was an influence in it, why then state they're feminists? Remember your words: "the attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society" and you state it was influenced by their views on the family unit. Why do you believe this makes them feminists?
    1
  1787.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you did. Per your words: "the attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society". If you wish to backtrack on stating the family unit is the main reason for the collapse of the west, then i thank you for doing so.
    1
  1788. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to backtrack. However, per your words: "the attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society". Seems strange you believe that conservatives attempted a coup due to their views on the family unit yet also state it is not one of the main "symptoms of a collapsing society".
    1
  1789.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, you stated the conservatives attempting a coup was a symptom of a bigger issue, ie, their views on the family unit. Thus, why try to backtrack from this?
    1
  1790.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting they instigated a coup and that this was influenced over their views on the family unit. Did they hold your same fear over the family unit changing?
    1
  1791.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd. If you are writing about societal collapse, why try to backtrack after writing: "the attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society"? Again, why not write what view conservatives have on the family unit that you state it influenced said symptom of a collapsing society?
    1
  1792.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "the conservatives like the family unit", "destroy the family unit and is one of the main reasons for societal collapse" and "the attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society", Note you state conservatives hold strong views on the family unit and that views on the family unit is the motive for a collapsing society (and you state their attempted coup is a symptom of a collapsing society). Thus, why blame feminists for conservatives attempting to destroy western society due to being influenced on their views on the family unit?
    1
  1793. No, she has a point. Derrick can't protect her and he's more likely to harm her in trying. Incels do have a tendency to commit mass shootings after all.
    1
  1794. it means she is a woman who is not white. it brings attention to racism (this is because of the USA's unique history with slavery) but also sexism (this is because women are seen as lesser to men).
    1
  1795. Incel logic says that one "high value guy" is with 500 women. It's the justification they use for the fact that no one wants to be with them.
    1
  1796. ​ @QWERTY-gp8fd thank you for being an example
    1
  1797. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv then why are incels who are attractive still complaining that they're alone?
    1
  1798.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly there are. simply note those that go to the gym. or are you stating all incels are morbidly obese and disfigured?
    1
  1799.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why do incels who go to the gym, ie, are physically attractive, complain about being incels? Or are all incels morbidly obese?
    1
  1800. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "going to the gym doesn't make you attractive on its own" thank you for indirectly agreeing incels are physically attractive per going to the gym. or are you stating only metrosexual men date women? So again, as incels are physically attractive, why are they still incels?
    1
  1801. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc  "going to the gym doesn't make you attractive on its own" again, thank you for providing examples of incels still being alone despite being attractive. so if looks aren't the issue, why are they still incels? Odd you think all those at the gym are short though
    1
  1802.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "going to the gym doesn't make you attractive on its own" once again, thank you for providing examples of incels still being alone despite being attractive. So if looks aren't the issue, why are they still incels? or are incels all obese and disfigured?
    1
  1803. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "going to the gym doesn't make you attractive on its own" again, thank you for noting incels are alone despite being attractive. So if looks and money aren't the issue, why are they still incels? Seems odd you believe all people at the gym are short though
    1
  1804. Because the MRAs don't think it's a real problem and incels actually say they want it.
    1
  1805. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, then why are most women employed?
    1
  1806. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. Why then are most women employed and the main breadwinner of 40% of houses? Furthermore, why do incels believe it's a privilege to be sexually harassed?
    1
  1807. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you believe being employed and the breadwinner carries no responsibility (only privileges), it seems odd you believe both men and women have no responsibilities and are only privileged.
    1
  1808. but he didn't say men and women "are both fundamentally equal". he specifically said they're not equal. So doesn't that show why people are mad at derrick?
    1
  1809.  @astroadhds9407  like which ones? I mean, we already agreed he went against your main point so i'm curious what causes you to let that slide
    1
  1810.  @astroadhds9407  but in regards to what other views? as far as i am aware, he only said women aren't equal to men.
    1
  1811.  @astroadhds9407  yes. that's why i am asking you what other point he gave, or are you trying to say he only appears like that because jubilee purposely made him look like that? Because if that's the case, then you agree everything he says is based on saying women are inferior but are now trying to say the video is a hit piece. which is weird.
    1
  1812.  @astroadhds9407  then why not present any of the views you say are acceptable? i mean if you are defending him and everything he says is about women being lesser, what do you think you're defending?
    1
  1813.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you believe men and women are equals (as per the original commenter), or do you believe men are biologically worse parents?
    1
  1814. That's interesting, you stated the men aren't shown respect but then immediately note derek was treating them horribly. Why do you then condemn the women?
    1
  1815.  @freddylong2292  apologies, then you don't agree derek was an awful human being?
    1
  1816.  @kingkohli4952  then if you agree derek was an awful person, why are the girls to blame for disliking him?
    1
  1817. I mean she had a point since the MRAs kept saying men are biologically worse parents. Only feminists help men in that regard
    1
  1818.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would feminists disagreeing with MRAs that men are biologically worse parents mean men are hated?
    1
  1819. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange. Then you believe the feminists opposing the MRAs saying men are biologically worse parents means men are hated?
    1
  1820. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  it seems you agree with the feminists that the MRAs are wrong for saying men are worse parents. As such, isn't that showing feminism helps both sexes?
    1
  1821.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you agree with the feminists that MRAs are wrong for saying men are worse parents and backtrack from saying this causes hatred of men, isn't that showing feminism helps both sexes?
    1
  1822. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you agree with the feminists that MRAs are wrong for saying men are worse parents and backtrack from saying this causes hatred of men, isn't that showing feminism helps both sexes?
    1
  1823.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you agree with the feminists that MRAs are wrong for saying men are worse parents and backtrack from saying this causes hatred of men, isn't that showing feminism helps both sexes?
    1
  1824.  @DavidW-ng5zv  recall you agree with the feminists that MRAs are wrong for saying men are worse parents. Thus, isn't that showing feminism helps both sexes as you agree with feminists?
    1
  1825.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, do you backtrack from having accepted the MRAs said men are biologically worse parents because doing so means you agree withe feminists?
    1
  1826. Out of curiosity, why do you assume one would offhandedly know a feminist legal group that helps men who face discrimination in child custody cases?
    1
  1827. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why was it only an anti-feminist who said women shouldn't be financially independent?
    1
  1828.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why is feminism hating men for wanting women to be financially independent? Note you even agree with this
    1
  1829. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my original question. Then why was it only an anti-feminist who said women shouldn't be financially independent?
    1
  1830.  @DavidW-ng5zv  hence my query. How does feminism hate men if only an anti-feminist said women shouldn't be financially independent?
    1
  1831. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. How does feminism hate men if only an anti-feminist said women shouldn't be financially independent?
    1
  1832. That's weird, don't people with diabetes constantly complain about the cost of insulin? So is it correct people are forced to pay a few hundreds dollars for something they have no control over?
    1
  1833.  @5aitama638  then doesn't that mean the feminists had a point?
    1
  1834.  @5aitama638  and why is it too little? It seems odd the complaints of insulin users is acceptable but not feminists over something like the price. If both pads and insulin were a dollar (or less), would that be better for everyone? Or is it better if they're free, ie, paid by taxes?
    1
  1835.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why would them disagreeing when the MRAs said men are lesser parent be emotional? Do you believe men are lesser parent to women?
    1
  1836.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noticing that viewing men as lesser parents is harmful to men. As you are unaware the MRAs said men aren't as capable parents as women due to biology, kindly see the video. Isn't that showing feminism needed?
    1
  1837.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, kindly quote 4:14
    1
  1838.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRAs do say men are lesser parents and noting this is harmful to men. Thus, isn't that showing how feminism helps?
    1
  1839.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs harm men by saying they are lesser parents due to their biology. As feminism opposed this, isn't that showing how feminism helps?
    1
  1840.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe men being equal parents to women means the sexes are clones of each other
    1
  1841.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs harm men when saying they are lesser parents due to biology. Do you believe large muscles makes one a bad parent?
    1
  1842.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe so, but thank you for backtracking your position that the MRAs didn't say men were lesser parents. Thus, thank you for showing feminism helps both sexes.
    1
  1843.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to state so, but thank you for accepting the MRAs harm men by saying they're lesser parents. Thus, thank you for showing feminism helps both sexes by opposing the MRA view.
    1
  1844.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs harm men by saying they're lesser parents. As you noted feminism opposes this, thank you for agreeing feminism helps both sexes. You can believe saying men and women are equal in things such as parenthood is collapsing civilization if you so wish.
    1
  1845.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe men and women being equal in things such as parenting is collapsing civilization. But thank you for accepting MRAs harm men by saying they're lesser parents while noting feminism helps both sexes due to opposing said conservative views
    1
  1846.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the issues MRAs present are ones they foment, eg, they harm men by saying they're biologically worse parents. Per noticing feminists oppose their views, thank you for accepting feminists help both sexes.
    1
  1847. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the issues MRAs present are ones they foment, eg, they harm men by saying they're biologically worse parents. Per noticing feminists oppose their views, thank you for accepting feminists help both sexes.
    1
  1848. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the issues MRAs present are the ones they sabotage. Per noticing feminists oppose their views, thank you for accepting feminists help both sexes.
    1
  1849.  @riven4121  really? what did he tell the other MRA's when they were saying men are biologically worse parents than women?
    1
  1850.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange, you don't believe the MRAs saying men are lesser is misandry?
    1
  1851. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv that's strange. Did you not see the video that you are unaware of what it contains? Kindly do so, but thank you for accepting that the MRAs seeing men as lesser parents is misandry.
    1
  1852.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd response. You mean seeing men and women as equal parents is inherently feminist to the point it forces people to agree with feminism?
    1
  1853.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Again, you mean seeing men and women as equals parents forces people to be feminists? Do you state as such because the MRAs see men as lesser parents?
    1
  1854.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, have you not seen the video? Kindly do so, but thank you for accepting said position is sexist.
    1
  1855.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you believe men and women are equal parents?
    1
  1856.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and as the MRAs say men are lesser parents, is that the different you mean? Again, kindly watch the video (or at least the first question), but thank you for accepting said position is sexist
    1
  1857.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and per now stating men are lesser parents, thank you for showing how the MRA's are sexist against men and women.
    1
  1858.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly you (and the MRAs) did. And again, thank you for accepting that is a sexist position. Or who is more likely to win custody, the parent that's the better caregiver or the parent that is not?
    1
  1859.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, and as you (and the MRAs) stated men are inherently worse parents due to their biology, who is more likely to win child custody on an individual basis? Again, thank you for admitting said view is sexist.
    1
  1860.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly you did. Again, as you (and the MRAs) view men as biologically worse parents, who is more likely to win child custody when judged on an individual basis? And yes, thank you for admitting said view is sexist.
    1
  1861.  @DavidW-ux2gc  and thus my query. as you (and MRAs) state men are biologically worse parents, who is more likely to win child custody? Note you already accepted it is done on an individual basis.
    1
  1862. I promise you, most women are employed.
    1
  1863. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's strange, why would getting jobs and some earning more than most men be hypergamy?
    1
  1864.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and were they drafted during the middle east? Or what does selective service do?
    1
  1865.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question, what does selective service do? Was it used during the war in the middle east?
    1
  1866.  @DavidW-ng5zv  likewise, is it still illegal for women to fight in the military that you write of only strong men defending the nation?
    1
  1867. That's odd, why would both men and women being employed mean civilization is collapsing?
    1
  1868.  @SI-cd7xs  then as you state it is nearly impossible to focus on children and employment, why is it impossible for men to care for children?
    1
  1869.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus showing the other is incorrect per showing women are both employed and caretakers. Seems odd he then says civilization is collapsing due to women, agreed?
    1
  1870. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing the other is incorrect per showing women are both employed and caretakers. Seems odd he then says civilization is collapsing due to women, agreed?
    1
  1871.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing the other is incorrect per showing women are both employed, employers and caretakers. Seems odd he then says civilization is collapsing due to women, agreed?
    1
  1872.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and yet we agreed women are both employed, employers and caretakers. Seems odd he then says civilization is collapsing due to women, agreed?
    1
  1873.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly, recall we agreed women are both employed, employers and caretakers. Seems odd the other then says civilization is collapsing due to women, agreed?
    1
  1874. if it was easier for LGBTQ people to adopt or for sex education to not be attacked, i think a larger group of people would agree with you. but they aren't, so abortion and birth control should get public funding. And this is especially true if people aren't mentally capable of raising a child because why should they raise a child if they don't even understand how they got pregnant?
    1
  1875. Not really, i think his coma affected him a bit because he's gotten kind of weird. A while back he was complaining that a plus sized model was "authoritarian tolerance".
    1
  1876.  @pineo3064  correct, content such as writing that plus sized models are a sign of "authoritarian tolerance". Again, he's gotten kind of weird.
    1
  1877. In fairness, derricks views are shared by the other MRAs. The main difference is that derrick represents the group that keeps causing mass shootings.
    1
  1878.  @temporarilyjeffrey7826  what different views did the MRAs in the video show?
    1
  1879.  @lilnotmaster6094  what different views from him do they hold?
    1
  1880. Honestly it seems the MRAs don't understand men.
    1
  1881. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why did the MRAs constantly sabotage their own points? Seems odd they complain of custody case results when they state men are lesser parents per biology.
    1
  1882. ​​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus I thank you for showing how the MRAs don't understand men. Or why are they fighting against something they want to happen?
    1
  1883. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then why do they sabotage the issues they claim affect men? Again, thank you for showing only feminists help both sexes as you believe (like the MRAs) that men are worse parents due to biology.
    1
  1884. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you believe MRAs sabotaging men's issues means they help men, isn't that showing they don't understand men?
    1
  1885. But wasn't kursat mistaken, ie, there are feminist organizations that help? It seems odd to criticize mimi for being correct.
    1
  1886.  @ryanmcguire9951  while what you stated is false (there are more such as NOMAS), isn't that you still accepting the feminist was correct? Seems odd to state that's belittling people instead of accepting the facts.
    1
  1887.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then would you like to write what the acronym stands for?
    1
  1888.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing it is a feminist organization that helps men. However, why do you believe men don't suffer from sexism?
    1
  1889.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for having written it is a feminist organization that helps both men and women.
    1
  1890.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for having written NOMAS is a feminist organization that helps men and women.
    1
  1891.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for having written NOMAS is a feminist organization that helps men and women. Seems odd you believe helping men and women means the group is only for women.
    1
  1892.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting NOMAS is a feminist organization that helps men and women. Again, per your question, would you like to write what NOMAS stands for?
    1
  1893.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, i thank you for accepting NOMAS is a feminist organization that helps both men and women.
    1
  1894.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting NOMAS is a feminist organization that helps both men and women.
    1
  1895. Then why are female nurses paid less than male nurses?
    1
  1896.  @Coyote_Skull  they unfortunately are
    1
  1897.  @ElinWinblad  I'm confused, aren't women 90% of nurses?
    1
  1898.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting a wage gap exists. Thus, why is it correct female nurses make less than male ones for doing the same job? Why is it correct male models earn less than female ones for the same job? Aren't women about 90% of the workforce in both cases?
    1
  1899.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus as you state it is the market that dictates, why aren't women paid more as nurses when they generate nearly all revenue, ie, are 90% of nurses, and there is currently a pandemic, ie, high demand? But thank you for accepting there is a wage gap.
    1
  1900.  @Coyote_Skull  that's odd, you believe about 90% of nurses do only half time? Seems odd to state 90% of nurses don't do their job properly as they do everything too.
    1
  1901.  @Coyote_Skull  then as we agree it's odd to assume an average of 10% of workers complete a full shift while an average of 90% of workers don't, why state male nurses work more than female nurses in order to justify the wage gap? Clearly the group that's 90% of the workforce does nearly everything, ie, works harder and does better.
    1
  1902.  @Coyote_Skull  thus we agree 90% of the workforce isn't working less than 10% of it. Because it would be odd to assume only 10% of nurses (on average) does a full work shift. So why are female nurses paid less than male nurses when they work the same (on average)?
    1
  1903.  @Coyote_Skull  so basically you do believe 90% of the workforce (on average) does half time, correct? "the small number of men who complete a full shift are mostly men" and don't believe as such for women. Seems odd you believe as such considering there was a global pandemic.
    1
  1904.  @Coyote_Skull  then as we agree 90% of the workforce does full time (on average), why are female nurses paid less than 10% of the workforce, ie, male nurses?
    1
  1905.  @Coyote_Skull  if you believe 90% of nurses aren't women, you are free to provide the correct percentage.
    1
  1906.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe so as well as assume that a wage isn't based upon a specific amount of time worked, ie, a full shift or half shift.
    1
  1907. I'm curious what middle position you took. Could you write it?
    1
  1908. No, the feminists actually had a point. None of the MRAs said anything about helping men. Even when they presented actual issues like custody cases, they just said women are better parents.
    1
  1909.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, why did the MRA's state women are better parents while the feminists disagreed?
    1
  1910.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you now write that men are lesser parents (as the MRAs state) while feminists oppose this, isn't that showing only feminists help men? Seems odd you believe stating women are inherently better parents doesn't apply to an individual basis though
    1
  1911.  @DavidW-ng5zv  why is it so to defend men and women?
    1
  1912.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, you deflect. As you wrote men are lesser parents (as the MRAs state) while feminists oppose this, isn't that showing only feminists help men?
    1
  1913.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, like the MRAs you believe men are lesser parents (something feminists oppose) though try to defend this by saying they're worse parents on average. Again, isn't that showing only feminists help men?
    1
  1914.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting you do see men as lesser parents than women. If you disagree, do you believe women are better parents due to their biology? Regardless, per noting this is only opposed by feminists, isn't that you accepting only feminists help men?
    1
  1915.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you believe men are worse parents. Again, do you believe this is due to biology? You seem to imply you do. As you accept only feminists oppose this view, isn't that you accepting only feminists help men?
    1
  1916.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for confirming you, like MRAs, see men as inherently lesser parents due to their biology. As only feminists oppose this, thank you for showing only feminism helps men.
    1
  1917.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per writing MRAs see men as inherently lesser parents due to their biology, and as only feminists oppose this, thank you for showing only feminism helps men.
    1
  1918.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing only feminism helps men as MRA's believe men are inherently lesser parents. Seems strange you believe most women aren't employed.
    1
  1919. compliment each other in what way? I ask because the MRA's kept saying men were lesser parents and that women were better off staying at home
    1
  1920.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Both have different strengths and weaknesses." such as? Again, i ask because the MRA's state that men were lesser parents (and inherently violent) and women belong in the house (raising kids).
    1
  1921.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you agree with the MRA's that biology states men are inherently worse parents and that women should stay at home raising children, aren't you showing exactly why feminism exists? furthermore, recall feminism made it legal for women to be in the police and that people still call the police to be saved
    1
  1922. @AV1611-KJV sure, it's what the MRA's respond to in the first prompt.
    1
  1923.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my question. as you believe men are inherently worse parents, aren't you showing exactly why the feminists help in fighting for equality? Or does it help men to be seen as genetically lesser parents in custody cases? Note that Ukraine legalized women fighting in the military and are currently winning,
    1
  1924. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv and thus the question you avoid (which actually answers your question too). Since you admit MRAs harm men, aren't you showing feminists help men by stating they're equal parents?
    1
  1925.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. Aren't feminists helping people by seeing parents as equals, or why isn't it you hating men when you state they're biologically lesser parents?
    1
  1926.  @DavidW-ux2gc  thus the question you avoid (which ironically also answer my question). As you believe it is harmful for feminists to say both sexes are equals, why isn't that you hating men per seeing men as biologically lesser parents? Please note this is a fairly simple question.
    1
  1927. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  and why isn't that you hating men? Still odd you refuse to provide the answer to your own question while implying you see yourself as a lesser parent. Or why should "fatherhood" correlate to "competent parent" when you state men are biologically lesser parents? If you get divorced, why should you have custody of your child if you're a genetically lesser parent?
    1
  1928.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then kindly explain why it isn't you hating men when you say they're genetically lesser. Seems odd you avoid providing an argument and only vaguely imply men nearly always losing custody cases is simply a matter of "truth" due to their genetics (and not discrimination). But thank you for accepting you see yourself as a genetically lesser parent.
    1
  1929.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then again, kindly explain why it isn't hateful for you to say men are genetically lesser parents. Seems fairly odd you keep avoiding the argument while vaguely implying men nearly always lose custody cases due to their genetics, ie, not discrimination. Or are custody cases not part of your statistics?
    1
  1930.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "VVomen are better" Kindly note your words. Thus, again, please explain why you don't hate men when you present that men lose custody cases due to their genetics, ie, you state men are lesser parents to women. Seems odd you don't wish to discuss your data
    1
  1931.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "VVomen are better" Again, note your words seeing men as lesser. Or do you agree with the feminists that the sexes are equal parents? "I state that vvomen are better at caregiving because the evidence says that they are" Truly odd you don't wish to discuss your answer as why it is not hateful when you even justify men constantly losing custody cases. Are you avoiding my query because you noted you made a mistake?
    1
  1932.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus the questions you avoid. Note your words: "VVomen are better" Quite odd you don't wish to discuss your data when you imply women are genetically better parents per winning most custody cases, ie, "do the vast majority of childcare in the world". Again, why isn't it hateful for you to state men lose custody cases due to being genetically lesser parents? Are you refusing to answer because you noted your mistake?
    1
  1933.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Rather than you spouting your hatred for men" since you noted it is hateful to state men are lesser parents to women due to losing most custody cases by trying to imply I stated as such, isn't that you noticing you do seem to spout hatred towards men?
    1
  1934.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly it is. That's why you tried to state I was hateful for repeating your views. Odd double standard on your part. Regardless, as you don't wish to discuss your data, ie, "[women] do the vast majority of childcare in the world", isn't that due to you noticing your mistake? In other words, doesn't this mean you believe one of the main points the MRAs gave over male discrimination is fallacious, ie, you believe most men lose custody cases over being genetically lesser parents and not due to discrimination?
    1
  1935. Do any of them have to do with the traditional views that women are biologically better parents?
    1
  1936.  @charlesmaxey89  what about the depressing reality of how an inordinately large amount of men (over half) just don't want custody?
    1
  1937.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, do you believe women are inherently better parents than men?
    1
  1938.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. Again, as the MRAs state, do you believe women are inherently better parents due to biology?
    1
  1939.  @charlesmaxey89  why wouldn't it? If men simply choose not to have custody because they believe women are biologically better parents, then it doesn't seem the problem is with the courts. Note the MRAs state men are worse parents while complaining men don't obtain custody.
    1
  1940. It depends on what you mean by toxic. Incels, for example, have already caused multiple mass shootings. I am unaware of any done over feminism.
    1
  1941. Then why did all the MRAs agree with him?
    1
  1942. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  is that why the MRAs kept sabotaging their position on custody cases by saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  1943. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but why wouldn't I note the MRAs sabotage the men's issues they brought up? Seems an odd thing to ignore
    1
  1944. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, how is it not self sabotage for MRAs to complain custody cases favor women only to then say women are biologically better parents? Seems odd you try to deflect from this
    1
  1945.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, as you thus noted MRAs believe men are biologically worse parents compared to women and thus sabotaged their complaints that the courts favor women, thank you for showing feminists help both sexes by opposing this.
    1
  1946. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why do you believe men opting out of fatherhood due to seeing themselves as worse parents means society will crumble?
    1
  1947. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you thus noted MRAs believe influence men to opt out of fatherhood by stating they're biologically worse parents, and believe this destroys society, thank you for showing feminism helps society by saying both parents are equals
    1
  1948.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you thus noted MRAs influence men to opt out of fatherhood by stating they're biologically worse parents (and believe this at least harms society), thank you for showing feminism helps by noticing parents are equals
    1
  1949. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you thus noted MRAs influence men to opt out of fatherhood by stating they're biologically worse parents (and believe this at least harms society), thank you for showing feminism helps by noticing parents are equals
    1
  1950. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you thus noted MRAs influence men to opt out of fatherhood by stating they're biologically worse parents (and believe this at least harms society), thank you for showing feminism helps by noticing parents are equals
    1
  1951. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you thus noted MRAs influence men to opt out of fatherhood by stating they're biologically worse parents (and believe this harms society), thank you for showing feminism helps by noticing parents are equals
    1
  1952.  @animesamurai3081  it is very strange you believe disliking certain jokes is inherent to most women because you think most women aren't funny.
    1
  1953.  @Nyabennah  hence my statement, it appears you also believe women inherently dislike certain jokes as you believe women aren't funny.
    1
  1954. so you think women can also be incels or is that destructive advice only for men?
    1
  1955.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "What destructive advice?" exactly, if women cannot be incels then what destructive advice indeed
    1
  1956.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you agree the other is wrong? After all, what destructive advice indeed that impedes women from being incels
    1
  1957.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then once again, do you agree the other is wrong? After all, it must truly be destructive advice that which impedes all women from being incels
    1
  1958.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then you agree the other is wrong? After all, what destructive advice indeed that impedes women from being incels, ie, group thinkers
    1
  1959.  @DavidW-ng5zv  so you agree the other is wrong? After all, quite silly advice from feminists that impedes women from being incels, ie, group thinkers
    1
  1960.  @DavidW-ng5zv  so again, you agree the other is wrong? After all, must be some advice that impedes women from being incels, ie, group thinkers. or are women incels that "realise that it's too late due to biology"?
    1
  1961. To be honest, all their views were about the same. The main reason derrick is seen like that is because zack at least seemed to be able to change his mind and kursat didn't really do much.
    1
  1962. Oddly enough, I've never actually heard of an MRA group that helps men.
    1
  1963. Correct, that is why feminists legalized women fighting in the military.
    1
  1964. the MRA's are generally like that. you can even see this in the video when they say, for example, that men are inherently more violent and biologically worse parents.
    1
  1965.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you seem to have deflected. again, why is feminism pitting men men against women when stating both are equal parents? Do you believe men are biologically worse parents (as per the MRAs)?
    1
  1966.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men and vvomen have different strengths. This is true" thank you for noting it is harmful to men for MRA's to state that they're biologically lesser parents per you downplaying what they state. or why not quote their answer on the first prompt? But thank you for showing why feminism opposes said patriarchal view.
    1
  1967.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "different strengths" Again, thank you for agreeing MRAs harm men by saying they're biologically lesser parents because they uphold the patriarchal view that women belong at home raising children. Or why not quote them? So again, aren't you showing why feminism is necessary?
    1
  1968.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "they said that vvomen are more nurturing" Thank you for accepting the MRAs state men are lesser parents. As per the query you avoid, wow would opposing the above, ie, seeing people as equals, harm men?
    1
  1969.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "If it's not genetics, then what is it?" Thank you for accepting the MRAs state men are naturally lesser parents. Do you believe said genetics are the reason men generally lose custody cases and receive greater prison time? How would opposing the above, ie, seeing people as equals, harm men?
    1
  1970.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Genetics make up 80% of a person, including personality?" And why do you believe men are inherently lesser parents due to their genetics? Again, are said genetics the reason men generally lose custody cases and receive greater prison time? How would opposing the above, ie, seeing people as equals, harm men?
    1
  1971. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv "It told you it wasn't due to genetics" Then why isn't it gynocentric for you to say men are biologically worse parents and then state women win custody cases due to genetics? Does this include you stating men are more dangerous and thus receive worse prison sentence? How does it harm men for feminists to say men and women are equal parents?
    1
  1972.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "What I said isn't gynocentric" Why isn't it gynocentric for you to state men are inherently worse parents due to genetics? Are men not equal parents or is it discriminatory for women to constantly win custody cases?
    1
  1973.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note my question: "Why isn't it gynocentric for you to state men are inherently worse parents due to genetics?" and your response: "but men are physically stronger than vvomen. Men and vvomen are entirely different. Men are also better at chess." so again, kindly answer my query as to why your position is not gynocentric. Otherwise, it seems you noted it is. After all, why state it is discriminatory most men lose custody cases if you believe most men are genetically lesser parents?
    1
  1974.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's not gynocentric. It's a fact." "It is discrimination. It's the result of people like you pushing an anti-male agenda." Thank you for noting your position is gynocentric (while trying to pretend it is not). After all, you do believe most men are genetically lesser parents and even accepted this is why most men lose nearly all custody cases, eg, "Why do vvomen do the vast majority of childcare in the world if they're not more nurturing?". Strange you accuse the feminists of what you are doing however.
    1
  1975.  @DavidW-ng5zv  is that why gender roles remain even after the divorce?
    1
  1976.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for being an example of my comment.
    1
  1977.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for being an example
    1
  1978.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, are you stating some men desire feminism's help in regards to not being incels? If so, I would suggest incels treat women as equals and thus cease their mass shootings.
    1
  1979.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, then you believe treating women as superior or inferior will help? Again, thank you for being an example.
    1
  1980.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why is it disparaging to men to oppose MRAs demonizing men? Why are feminists treating all as equals worse than MRAs saying men are lesser parents? Likewise, you are correct that incels treating women as Madonnas or wh**es means women show no interest in them regardless of how much money said incels make. However, why do you now backtrack to state all women want incels who have money?
    1
  1981.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. If you believe treating women as equals doesn't work, why is it that incels who work out and have money are incels? Didn't you note most men who treat women as Madonnas or wh**es become incels? Or do incels not interact with women at all?
    1
  1982.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, why is it that incels who work out and have quite a bit of money are incels (as you state misogynistic men with money get women)? Isn't equality necessary as nearly all of Hollywood is feminist, ie, where nearly all top quality men are located?
    1
  1983.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, as you noted top men are feminists, eg, Hollywood, while incels are not, isn't that you agreeing incels should treat women as equals in order to stop being incels?
    1
  1984.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note we agree the top men are in Hollywood and nearly all are feminists, and that incels complain they're ignored despite having money and working out, ie, what you described as top men. Thus, doesn't this show treating women as equals is correct?
    1
  1985.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you backtrack to now write most men don't interact with women, are broke and physically unwell. It seems odd you blame women for men not talking to women, being broke and being unhealthy.
    1
  1986.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you noted incels are financially successful and do work out, and interact with women, wouldn't they be successful if they treated women as equals? Again, if incels work out and have money, why are the still incels if women are hypergamous? Note that Hollywood, ie, where top men reside, is quite feminist.
    1
  1987.  @DavidW-ng5zv  once again, thank you for admitting hypergamy is false by writing that incels are both broke and unhealthy, rich and healthy, yet always incels. "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Thus, wouldn't treating women as equals be correct as we agree Hollywood is full of top men and nearly all are feminists?
    1
  1988.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your words, it doesn't matter if an incel is rich or poor, healthy or unhealthy. They'll still be incels. And yes, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. "I never said incels have money" followed by "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". Again, as you believe MRAs demonizing both sexes is better than equality among them, isn't equal treatment what would change things? Again, note Hollywood being predominantly feminist.
    1
  1989.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet per your words, it doesn't matter of an incel is rich, attractive or has status because "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". And yes, this shows hypergamy is fallacious. Note you accepted MRAs (which include incels) are demonizing men and women, so wouldn't equality be what's necessary? Again, note Hollywood being fairly feminist.
    1
  1990.  @DavidW-ng5zv  it's odd you try to backtrack from your position. Again, you wrote an incel will always be as such because "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". You even accept MRAs (which include incels) demonize men and women, so wouldn't equal treatment be what's necessary, ie, not demonize men and women? But thank you for accepting hypergamy is false and that Hollywood is fairly feminist.
    1
  1991.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women". "I just said that it did" thank you for also agreeing MRAs are wrong for demonizing men and women (thus creating incels) because treating people as equals, ie, feminism, is necessary.
    1
  1992.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe only 25% of the people on the planet are women
    1
  1993.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, 75% of tinder users are men. You are entitled to believe only 25% of the people on the planet are women
    1
  1994.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per your example (which you attempted to support through tinder statistics), you are entitled to believe only 25% of all people on the planet are women.
    1
  1995.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe only 25% of people on the planet are women per you claiming your tinder statistic was based on real life. But thank you for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", and thus showing hypergamy is false. MRAs are wrong for demonizing men and women, and thus creating incels (as that is how they think people should act), so i thank you for accepting equal treatment is correct. Or is treating women as inferior (as the incel in the video does) help anyone?
    1
  1996.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are still entitled to believe only 25% of the human population are women as per you stating your tinder statistics apply to real life.
    1
  1997.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, it seems odd you would believe only 25% of the human populace are women that you assume said tinder statistic represents real life. However, thank you for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", and thus inadvertently showing hypergamy is false. Likewise, thank you for agreeing MRAs create incels due to their views, eg, derrick. Thus, wouldn't treating people as equals, ie, feminism, be what helps, or is treating people as lesser helpful? Again, per backtracking all your points, it appears you agree.
    1
  1998.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note your constant backtracking and that you pretend 25% of the populace are women in order to state tinder statistic represent real life. Regardless, thank you for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"; thus inadvertently showing hypergamy is false. Again, it appears you agree incels treating women as inferior is an issue as per you attempting to state that how you treat people is unrelated to how they treat you, ie, "treating women as inferior, equals or superior won't help incels". Thus, wouldn't equal treatment be what is needed?
    1
  1999.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for your constant backtracking, eg, your statistic that implied only 25% of the populace are women and you noting incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" (thus showing hypergamy is false). Likewise, i will reiterate the query you seem to avoid: is treating someone as an equal preferable to, for example, incels treating women as inferiors?
    1
  2000.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, thank you for backtracking on your tinder statistic that implied only 25% of the populace are women as well as writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" (thereby showing hypergamy is false). But again: is treating someone as an equal preferable to treating them as an inferior, eg, seeing women only as objects to gratify incels needs?
    1
  2001.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you again deflect from my query. I reiterate: is treating people as you wish to be treated, ie, as equals, better than treating them as inferiors, eg, incels see women as existing only for their personal gratification? Again, thank for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    1
  2002.  @DavidW-ng5zv  this is odd. Per writing how others treat people is irrelevant because "Some people are inferior", do you then believe incels enjoy being treated as such? Why state they need help otherwise?
    1
  2003.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting no one likes to be treated as an inferior: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" As incels treat women as existing only for sex, ie, inferior, wouldn't it be better if they treated women as equals, ie, feminism? Again, thank for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    1
  2004.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but thank you for backtracking to now accept treating people as inferior leads to bad outcomes for incels.
    1
  2005.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the no one likes being treated as inferior: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" As incels see women as inferior, ie, only useful for sex, wouldn't it be better if they saw women as equals, ie, not as only for sex? Or what does incel stand for? Thank for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    1
  2006.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting no one likes being treated as inferior. Thus, as incels see women as inferior, ie, only useful for sex, wouldn't it be better if they saw women as equals? Or what does incel stand for? But, thank for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false.
    1
  2007.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting no one likes being treated as inferior. As incels treat women as only useful for sex, ie, inferior, wouldn't it be better if they saw women as equals? Or what does incel stand for? Thanks for writing incels "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false. Thus, note Hollywood being quite feminist.
    1
  2008.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS and thank you for your constant backtracking to now state treating people as equals does help. Seems odd you originally believed only 25% of the human population were women
    1
  2009.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Again, note your words (and backtracking) is evidence: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" Thus, thank you for accepting no one likes being treated as lesser. "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" thank you for accepting incels stay as such regardless of their circumstances and that hypergamy is false. As we thus agree not treating people as inferior is more pertinent than money and looks, wouldn't it be better for everyone if they saw women as equals, ie, not just for sex?
    1
  2010.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet we agreed and you even backtracked several of your views. Again, thank you for accepting no one likes being treated as lesser and that incels are as such regardless of their status (and thus noting hypergamy is false. Per agreeing equal treatment is the differentiator, isn't it better if incels saw women as equals, ie, not just for sex? "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2011.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to ignore your words. But again, we agreed and you even backtracked several of your views, eg, you accept incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels per writing their looks/money/etc doesn't help them (and thus noting hypergamy is false. Again, isn't it better if incels saw women as equals, ie, not just for sex? "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2012.  @DavidW-ng5zv  but you are still entitled to believe only 25% of the human population are women as per your tinder statistics
    1
  2013.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for accepting incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels per admitting having looks/money/etc doesn't change them being incels (thereby noting hypergamy is false). Thus, isn't it better if incels saw women as equals, ie, not just for sex? "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2014.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are still entitled to believe only 25% of the human population are women as per your tinder statistic.
    1
  2015.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels per having written that looks/money/etc doesn't change them being incels (inadvertently showing hypergamy is false). Thus, isn't it better for if incels treat women as equals, ie, not just for sex? Again, note Hollywood being quite feminist. "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2016.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing incels treating women as lesser is why they're as such as even when they have money/looks/status they stay incels (thereby showing hypergamy is false). Thus, isn't it better if incels treat women as equals, ie, not just for sex? "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women" Again, note you attempting to backtrack from your evidence.
    1
  2017.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and again, note nearly all of Hollywood is feminist. Seems odd you believe an area that is essentially all top men is irrelevant.
    1
  2018.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for writing incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels after writing that money and looks doesn't change them being incels (which shows hypergamy is false). Thus, shouldn't incels treat women as equals, ie, not just for sex? Again, note Hollywood being extremely feminist as well as your words: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2019.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels by noting that money and looks don't change them being incels (showing hypergamy is false). Thus, shouldn't incels treat women as equals, ie, not just for sex? Again, note Hollywood being extremely feminist as well as your words: "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2020.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, thank you for accepting incels treating women as lesser is why they're incels, and writing that status doesn't change them being incels (showing hypergamy is false). Thus, shouldn't incels treat women as equals? Again, note Hollywood being quite feminist. "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2021.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing that incels having money and looks doesn't change them being incels (which shows hypergamy is false) due to them treating women as lesser. Thus, shouldn't incels treat women as equals? Again, note Hollywood being quite feminist. "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2022.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing incels having money and looks doesn't change them being incels (thus showing hypergamy as false), and that they're incels due to treating women as lesser. Thus, shouldn't incels treat women as equals? Note Hollywood being quite feminist and mainly holding what you describe as top men. "wtf are you talking about? Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2023.  @DavidW-ng5zv  ps you are also entitled to believe of me as you wish. Still seems odd you backtrack constantly in an effort to say your conclusions don't lead to better outcomes if incels treat women as equals.
    1
  2024.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting most men in feminist Hollywood are top men. Per noting incels having money and looks doesn't change them being incels, and that women don't like being treated as lesser, shouldn't incels treat women as equals, ie, as Hollywood men do? And yes, thank you for thus showing hypergamy is false. "Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2025.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting most men in feminist Hollywood are top men. Per graciously writing incels having money and looks doesn't change them being incels, and that women don't like being treated as lesser, shouldn't incels treat women as equals like Hollywood men do? And yes, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. "Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2026.  @DavidW-ng5zv  ps it seems odd you backtrack to the point you ask me for evidence in regards to your claims. Why disagree with your words?
    1
  2027.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing most men in feminist Hollywood are top men. Per writing incels having money and looks doesn't change them being incels, and that women don't like being treated as lesser, shouldn't incels treat women as equals, ie, as Hollywood men do? Likewise, thank you for showing hypergamy is false. "Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?" "having money and working out doesn't make you attractive to women"
    1
  2028.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS you are entitled to ignore your words and pretend you never wrote them
    1
  2029.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" and that women don't like being treated as inferior ("Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?"). As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and you state these are top men), shouldn't incels treat women as equals?
    1
  2030.  @DavidW-ng5zv  ps you are still entitled to pretend you never wrote your words and backtrack on your tinder statistics implying women are only 25% of the populace
    1
  2031.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" and noting women don't like being treated as inferior ("Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?"). As most men in Hollywood are feminists and you state these are top men, shouldn't incels treat women as equals?
    1
  2032.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for noting your tinder statistic implied only 25% of the populace were women. Truly baffling you provided this source. Regardless, i still thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" and that women don't like being treated as inferior ("Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?"). As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone?
    1
  2033.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting your tinder statistic implied only 25% of the populace were women, and i thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" as women don't like being treated as inferior ("Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?"). As most men in Hollywood are feminists, wouldn't incels treating women as equals help?
    1
  2034.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS but yes, thank you for backtracking your position
    1
  2035.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Again, you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" (thus showing hypergamy is false) and that women don't like being treated as inferior ("Why would they enjoy being treated as inferior?"). As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone? But thank you for accepting your statistic implying only 25% of the populace are women is incorrect.
    1
  2036.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus you are entitled to believe only 25% of the populace are women due to online statistics. Regardless, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone?
    1
  2037.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note your constant backtracking due to noting what the conclusions of your views are
    1
  2038.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe your evidence stating 25% of the populace are women. Regardless, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone?
    1
  2039.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are still entitled to believe only 25% of the populace are women due to online statistics. Regardless, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone?
    1
  2040.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS please note these are your claims that you try to backtrack from
    1
  2041.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe only 25% of the populace are women due per your statistics. But thank you for writing you believe "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists, wouldn't it help if incels treat women as equals?
    1
  2042.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone? You can continue believing that only 25% of the populace are women.
    1
  2043.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus you are entitled to believe only 25% of the populace are women per your online statistics. Regardless, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". As most men in Hollywood are feminists (and top men as per your words), wouldn't incels treating women as equals help everyone?
    1
  2044.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior", and thus accepting incels should treat women as equals. You are entitled to leave and believe only 25% of the populace are women
    1
  2045.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior", and thus accepted that incels treating women as equals helps everyone.
    1
  2046.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting you did write that "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" (hypergamy is false) as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In other words, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. What puzzles me is why you don't just accept the conclusions of what you wrote. They're your words, not mine.
    1
  2047.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting you wrote "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" (hypergamy is false) as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels must stop treating women as inferior. Again, truly odd you disagree with your words
    1
  2048.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting you did write that "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" (hypergamy is false) as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In other words, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to ignore your words.
    1
  2049.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS and you are entitled to believe women are only 25% of the populace as per your statistics.
    1
  2050.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you did write that "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women" (hypergamy is false) as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In other words, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to ignore your words.
    1
  2051.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you did write that "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In other words, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to ignore your words being.
    1
  2052.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for accepting you wrote "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In other words, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to ignore your words and believe your evidence stating women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2053.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting you wrote "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, you agree incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to backtrack your positions and believe your evidence stating women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2054.  @DavidW-ng5zv  ps you are entitled to believe of me as you wish
    1
  2055.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, because "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". In short, incels are as such due to how they treat women. You are entitled to ignore your words, assume of me as you wish and believe your evidence implying women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2056.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, though you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals. You are entitled to ignore your words and believe women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2057.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, though you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals. You are entitled to ignore your words and believe women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2058.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, though you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals. You are entitled to ignore your words and believe women are only 25% of the populace.
    1
  2059.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals, but thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2060.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, though you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals. You are entitled to believe only 25% of the populace are women.
    1
  2061.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, though you can believe incels like being treated as inferior by attractive individuals.
    1
  2062.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2063.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2064.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, and that "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2065.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, and "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2066.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser.
    1
  2067.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish.
    1
  2068.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are still entitled to believe of me as you wish.
    1
  2069.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish.
    1
  2070.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS you are entitled to believe incels like being treated as lesser just as you believe women like being treated as lesser
    1
  2071.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, and assume incels like being treated as inferior.
    1
  2072.  @DavidW-ng5zv  for example, note Elliott rodgers being abusive towards women being why he is an incel.
    1
  2073.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, and assume incels like being treated as inferior.
    1
  2074.  @DavidW-ng5zv  PS thank you for writing that Elliot Rodgers was abusive towards women, ie, why he was an incel. You are welcome to write this abuser of women was unattractive.
    1
  2075.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior", eg, you noted Elliot rodgers was abusive and an incel. Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, and assume incels like being treated as an inferior.
    1
  2076.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, eg, Elliot rodgers being an incel due to his abuse. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish.
    1
  2077.  @teyabartley  he really didn't like that he accidentally sided with the feminists
    1
  2078.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for writing "having money and working out doesn't make [incels] attractive to women", ie, hypergamy is false, as "Women might not necessarily like being treated as inferior". Thus, thank you for agreeing incels need to stop treating women as lesser, eg, Elliot rodgers being an incel due to his abuse. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish.
    1
  2079.  @ElinWinblad  if that were the case, women would win all custody cases instead of most. So do women win all custody cases or nearly all custody cases?
    1
  2080. Why aren't women allies when they make up most feminists? That seems an odd complaint.
    1
  2081.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing the MRA's holding said position makes no sense since it harms men. However, as you state the MRA's do not say that, have you not seen the video?
    1
  2082.  @DavidW-ng5zv  now it seems you accept MRA's harm men when stating men are biologically lesser parents. if you have seen the video, then why not quote what the MRA's state on the first prompt?
    1
  2083. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv thank you for accepting MRA's harm men when stating men are biologically lesser and now defend this view because you stopped pretending feminists say this. Do you believe men are biologically worse parents and that this is why they generally lose custody cases?
    1
  2084.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRA's state men are genetically lesser parents. Is this the gynocentric view you claim makes men lose most custody cases?
    1
  2085.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRA's state that men are genetically lesser parents and that you defend said position. as you also state this is why men generally lose custody cases, have you not shown why feminism is needed in order to oppose said patriarchal view? or is said MRA view gynocentric?
    1
  2086.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing MRA's state that men are genetically lesser parents and that you defend said position. as you write their biology is why men generally lose custody cases, have you not shown why feminism is needed?
    1
  2087.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for agreeing MRA's state that men are genetically lesser parents and that you defend said position. Is this the gynocentric position as to why men lose custody cases? as you write their biology is why men generally lose custody cases, have you not shown why feminism is needed?
    1
  2088.  @Femmeaesthetic  and was he answered when he asked for details about how she'd been abused?
    1
  2089.  @smilingturtle8693  if so, what different views from the other MRAs did derrick have? Again, note them stating women are happier at home taking care of the kids. Also, do you disagree that men are generally seen as more powerful than women?
    1
  2090.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, that perspective is what MRAs use to justify seeing men as lesser parents and women as lesser workers. It's why it only became legal for women to fight in the military in 2016 because men are still seen as more powerful.
    1
  2091. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but wasn't most of the conversation about the MRAs saying men are lesser parents while the feminists disagreed? Doesn't that show Mimi was correct?
    1
  2092.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As the MRAs say men are lesser parents while the feminists disagree, isn't that demonstrating Mimi is correct? For example, do you believe women are better parents due to their biology?
    1
  2093.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's an odd deflection. Do you believe, like the MRAs do, that women are inherently better parents due to their biology? If so, doesn't that show Mimi was correct?
    1
  2094.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. Regardless, thank you for noting how harmful said view is to men. So doesn't that show Mimi is correct? Though it seems odd you ask for a timestamp when the video starts with the MRAs stating men and women aren't equal. Have you not seen the video?
    1
  2095.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men and women are equal, but different" thank you for inadvertently agreeing with the feminists, demonstrating Mimi was correct and showing you did not see the video as the MRAs disagreed with this.
    1
  2096.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men and women are equal, but different" again, thank you for agreeing with the feminists by inadvertently quoting what they all believe. Per backtracking to now accept the MRAs stated men are lesser parents, isn't that showing Mimi was correct?
    1
  2097. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  "men and women are equal, but different" again, thank you for inadvertently quoting what the feminists believe. Per now accepting the MRAs stated men are lesser parents, isn't that showing Mimi was correct? Likewise, as you didn't see the video, please do so.
    1
  2098.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected from my query. Kindly answer per inadvertently agreeing with the feminists and see the video
    1
  2099.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men and women are equal, but different" thank you for inadvertently quoting what the feminists believe. Per accepting MRAs view men as lesser parents, isn't that showing Mimi was correct?
    1
  2100.  @DavidW-ng5zv  per now backtracking from your words that "men and women are equal, but different" because you believe "equality isn't realistic", thank you for showing Mimi was correct as only feminists seem to view men as equal parents
    1
  2101.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per backtracking from your words that "men and women are equal, but different" because you believe "equality isn't realistic", thank you for showing Mimi was correct as only feminists seem to view men as equal parents
    1
  2102.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you backtracked from writing that "men and women are equal, but different" because you believe "equality isn't realistic". Thus, thank you for showing Mimi was correct as only feminists seem to view men as equal parents to women. I again request you watch the video
    1
  2103.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you backtrack from your words that "men and women are equal, but different" because (as MRAs state) you believe "equality isn't realistic". Thus, thank you for showing Mimi was correct as only feminists help men and women.
    1
  2104.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per backtracking from your words that "men and women are equal, but different" because MRAs state "equality isn't realistic", thank you for showing Mimi was correct as only feminists help men and women
    1
  2105. Pretty much. Weirdly enough MRAs seem to hate other men too considering how they sabotage custody cases by saying men are lesser parents
    1
  2106. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRA's state men are biologically lesser parents. why is it not toxic masculinity to denigrate child rearing in men as inherently feminine?
    1
  2107.  @anthk.4846  apologies, kursat said feminists tried to hide that women can be just as violent as men? So aside from having things explained to them, they also spent the debate saying feminism is bad? Is that what MRA's are for?
    1
  2108.  @kritikabasu9503  what did kursat say?
    1
  2109. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why doesn't feminism help the sexes by saying they're equals? Do you believe MRA's help by saying men are worse parents because women belong at home pregnant?
    1
  2110.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus my query. Why are the MRAs correct for stating men are lesser father's because they think women should be at home getting pregnant?
    1
  2111. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, does that mean you agree with the MRA's that women should stay at home to get pregnant? or do you think it correct men nearly always lose custody cases?
    1
  2112.  @DavidW-ng5zv  If it is the feminists fault that men lose custody cases, do you then agree it is wrong for the MRA's to state women should stay at home to get pregnant? Or do you believe men are inherently lesser parents (as per the MRA's)? Or are you simply stating that only women should have parental leave from work per being the only ones who can get pregnant?
    1
  2113. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you state that only women should have parental leave, is this because you consider men as lesser parents, ie, why MRA's state women should stay at home to get pregnant? Or do you agree with the feminists that the sexes are equals, ie, both can have a job?
    1
  2114.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Men can have a few weeks of paternal leave" precisely, so why do the MRA's state women should stay at home to get pregnant when not getting pregnant still provides parental leave? shouldn't women and men both be able to get a job since you state parents have equal value? After all, society judges women and men on being dependents.
    1
  2115.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question: why should women stay at home to get pregnant when not getting pregnant still provides parental leave? after all, do we not agree both parents have equal value?
    1
  2116.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question: why should women stay at home to get pregnant when not getting pregnant still provides parental leave for men? after all, do we not agree both parents have equal value?
    1
  2117. Apologies, but as all the feminists stated men and women are equal while the MRAs stated men are biologically worse parents, why would the former cause hatred compared to the latter?
    1
  2118.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as you thus noted the harm in saying men are biologically worse parents, i thank you for noticing the feminists help men's issues by opposing that. As you also seem to have not seen the video, kindly do so in order to see the MRAs stating men are biologically worse parents.
    1
  2119. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs cause harm by saying men are biologically worse parents while feminists oppose this
    1
  2120.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, thank you for agreeing the MRAs cause harm by saying men are biologically worse parents while feminists opposing this helps men and women
    1
  2121.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe MRAs are correct in stating men are worse parents. As this causes great harm to men, thank you for showing feminism helps men and women by stating the sexes are equal
    1
  2122. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per now even stating equality cannot exist, thank you for showing why feminism exists. As MRAs don't believe in equality to the point they'll say men are lesser parents, thank you for showing only feminists help both sexes
    1
  2123. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  per your words, MRAs state "women are generally more nurturing". Seems odd MRAs complain women win nearly all custody cases, or why do you expect the nurturing parent to not win custody cases?
    1
  2124. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing feminism is needed as you do believe men are worse parents, and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes
    1
  2125.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you do believe men are worse parents, and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes
    1
  2126. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you (like the MRAs) do believe men are worse parents, and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes
    1
  2127.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes.
    1
  2128.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes.
    1
  2129.  @DavidW-ng5zv  as stated, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe as MRAs do that men are biologically worse parents (which the feminists opposed), and don't believe in equality and fairness between the sexes
    1
  2130.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe that men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality between the sexes.
    1
  2131. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe that men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality between the sexes.
    1
  2132. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe that men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality between the sexes.
    1
  2133. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing feminism is needed as you believe that men are biologically worse parents, and don't believe in equality between the sexes.
    1
  2134.  @slivovitz1683  i assure you, despite not showing emotions, no one respects derrick.
    1
  2135. Strangely enough, they revealed they foment some of the few issues they brought to light. For example, they say custody cases favor women, but then say men are more productive at work while women at raising children. If you're angry women generally end up with the kids while men pay child support, why do you say that's their roles per biology?
    1
  2136. Yes, but the MRA movement itself seems more opposed to feminism than anything else.
    1
  2137. Since all the feminists were sexually assaulted, does that mean anything to you?
    1
  2138.  @SwampthingDUK  apologies, but which of the men in the video suffered as you wrote? In regards to the harm the women went through, ie, not a hypothetical scenario, i thank you for thus agreeing with the feminists.
    1
  2139.  @riven4121  no, they definitely have the same hours. after all, women are 90% of nurses. or do you think 90% of the workforce only does half shifts?
    1
  2140.  @riven4121  then again, do you think 90% of the workforce in every hospital on the planet only does half shifts? seems odd hospitals function at all if only 10% of nurses are working a full shift. and please note you did separate overtime from regular working hours here: "Male nurses work up to 31% more hours than their female counterparts and take the majority of overtime." so again, seems odd hospitals run at all if 90% of the workforce only does incomplete shifts.
    1
  2141.  @riven4121  excellent, so we agree the majority of the workforce does full shifts otherwise the hospital wouldn't be able to run. Odd we had to reach an agreement that a hospital needs the majority of it's staff doing full shifts. If you are confused about this, please note it is not relevant if 10 out of 100 (10%) female nurses and 3 out of 10 (30%) male nurses work more. We already agreed the amount of workers is not relevant since we are discussing full shifts done at the same job, ie, the wage gap. So again, why are the female nurses still paid less for doing the same thing as the male nurses?
    1
  2142.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then why does it still exist when women in specialized areas who are also in inpatient wards are doing full shifts? after all, women are 90% of nurses so they are clearly the majority number in all of that.
    1
  2143.  @Kootenay613  i assure you i do. i have read the statistics demonstrating the wage gap is real
    1
  2144.  @Kootenay613  that is, unfortunately, false. simply note the wage gap in nursing (despite 90% of nurses being women)
    1
  2145.  @Kootenay613  yet all statistics point to it being real. Again, simply note nurses
    1
  2146. Sadly, the MRAs actually do agree with derrick. Note what they stated about women and men not being equal.
    1
  2147.  @justphantomic7002  thank you for accepting zach is an MRA. As he actually repeats what derek says, ie, men and women aren't equal as women belong in the home, why isn't that showing what MRAs believe? Or what have MRAs done to help anyone?
    1
  2148.  Mew2Win  isn't that still more than the 0% of men that MRAs help?
    1
  2149.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  why is it not helpful for feminists to see men as equal parents to women? or do you agree with the MRA's that men are lesser parents to women?
    1
  2150.  Mew2Win  why is it helpful that men are now forced to be fathers? after all, they didn't pay alimony if an abortion was taken
    1
  2151.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  why is it not helpful for feminists to see men as equal parents to women? or do you agree with the MRA's that men are lesser parents to women? please see the video
    1
  2152.  @HarryMcLeod-q8p  that's odd, why do you believe the MRAs saying men are biologically inferior parents makes them feminists? But thank you for noticing that means MRAs hate men. Kindly watch the video on normal speed (or at least the first 15 minutes). So why is it hateful for the feminists to say men and women are equals?
    1
  2153.  @DavidW-ux2gc  interestingly enough, they actually do support mom's in that they don't want men to pay alimony. so again, why do the MRA's disagree with you?
    1
  2154.  @AUGHHHHHBBG  this is kind of true, though it may be that only those type of men decide to raise their children considering how little single dads there. it's basically like trying to see how talented men are at chess and only testing champions
    1
  2155.  @DavidW-ng5zv  interestingly enough, nearly every woman that has tried out for chess professionally has become a champion. so how do you account the fact that 90% of men that try fail at becoming chess champions while nearly 90% of women that try do become chess champions?
    1
  2156.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing that whenever women decide to enter chess championships, they win. thus, as 90% of women that enter win while 90% of men that enter lose, what does that say about the original example?
    1
  2157. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc  again, as you graciously noted 90% of women that enter chess championships win while 90% of men that enter lose, and you now try to backtrack by pretending otherwise, is this because you noted you made a mistake?
    1
  2158.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per backtracking, thank you for noting 90% of women that attempt to win in chess tournaments actually win while 90% of men that try lose. would you like to write why that is or did you finally note your mistake?
    1
  2159.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per backtracking, thank you for noting that most women that attempt chess become champions while most men do not. so again, did you backtrack because otherwise you would not be able to say men dominate chess?
    1
  2160.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting that women that attempt chess become champions while men who attempt it generally do not as per your constant backtracking. Again, why not answer why this occurs?
    1
  2161.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet per your backtracking, you did note women who enter chess tournaments habitually beat men while most men lose. Thus, what does it mean when 90% of women that enter a tournament win while 90% of men that enter a chess tournament lose? Did you backtrack because your perspective forced you into a conclusion you dislike?
    1
  2162.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, per backtracking, thank you for having noticed that women that enter chess tournaments win while most men who enter chess tournaments do not. as you reveal this shows intellectual superiority, is this why you now pretend women don't play chess?
    1
  2163.  @DavidW-ng5zv  exactly, 90% of men try to be chess masters and fail whereas 90% of women try to be chess masters and succeed. you were even gracious enough to write that about 90% of chess players are men. So again, per you noting the percentages show women generally succeed at chess despite most chess players being men, what does that demonstrate?
    1
  2164.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for noting 90% of men try to be chess masters and fail whereas 90% of women try to be chess masters and succeed. You were even gracious enough to write that about 90% of chess players are men, ie, the majority that lose are men. So again, per you noting the percentages show women generally succeed at chess as most chess players being men, what does that demonstrate?
    1
  2165.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, thank you for noting 90% of men try to be chess masters and fail whereas 90% of women try to be chess masters and succeed. What does that state about the variability hypothesis when 10% of the group is in the top 100 yet most of the 90% are not?
    1
  2166.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "They need separate categories for vvomen" not they don't. again, note how you constantly backtrack. So again, what does it state about the variability hypothesis when 10% of the group are champions (and even makes it to the top 100) yet most of the 90% are not?
    1
  2167.  @DavidW-ng5zv   depends on who practices more of course. Also a genuine question, since the variability hypothesis says that there's a greater level of geniuses in the minority, why doesn't this apply when women do it in chess? After all, they definitely bring prodigy level players out of nowhere (considering how small the group is) while the men seem to stay at only highly competent levels (something Kasparov found out the hard way).
    1
  2168.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "men have a higher percentage of geniuses" you mean like how there's a higher percentage of women who succeed at chess especially due to their low number? In other words, the variability hypothesis? This is why i asked about your double standard.
    1
  2169.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, this is an honest question, why do you state it only applies to men? Your answer shows you noticed that chess shows it applies to women too.
    1
  2170.  @DavidW-ux2gc  did you conclude as such because that is what the variability hypothesis concludes? if so, thank you for noting the variability hypothesis is insane by pretending that was my conclusion.
    1
  2171.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "If vvomen are better at chess, then it is down to genetics" and thus the question you avoid. as you provide a double standard for women when invoking the variability hypothesis, is that because you conclude women outstrip men in chess per being the minority in said sport? again, simply note Kasparov.
    1
  2172.  @DavidW-ux2gc  again, note your backtracking upon noting the conclusion you see in variability hypothesis when noting women succeed in chess. You can pretend you're leaving because this is boring if you wish, but i do thank you for showing the variability hypothesis is inane as per your double standard to the point of denying reality. Or why not write how Kasparov (chess grandmaster) changed upon losing?
    1
  2173.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "They need separate categories for vvomen" you are entitled to pretend i am lying after you erroneously stated this. As you also presented a double standard when it is women succeeding in the variability hypothesis (to the point you deny reality, eg, Kasparov), thank you for backtracking as you dislike the conclusion it shows. Recall women are a small minority in chess yet still constantly win, ie, you believe the variability hypothesis in chess shows women are genetically superior which is why you now pretend women never win at chess.
    1
  2174.  @theredstar6493  to be clear, i ask this because it seems we are in agreement the MRA's in the video said nothing
    1
  2175.  @theredstar6493  why would they not be? are you not an MRA if you aren't an activist? that's why i asked what activism MRA activists have done to help men. for example, feminists legalizing women fighting in the military in 2016
    1
  2176. You are welcome to believe of me as you wish
    1
  2177.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe as you wish. Do you believe feminism is correct in stating men and women are equal parents, or the MRAs in stating men are lesser parents? Kindly answer to obtain your own answer
    1
  2178.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. Again, do you believe MRAs are correct in stating men are lesser parents or feminists in stating the sexes are equal parents? Please note your answer also applies to your question
    1
  2179.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "women are more nurturing" thank you for writing you believe women are inherently better parents, or do you believe courts decide for the less nurturing parent to care for children? Thus, thank you for accepting MRAs harm men while feminists help them
    1
  2180.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe seeing men as lesser parents isn't toxic masculinity, but thank you for accepting only feminists help men
    1
  2181.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, you are entitled to believe the MRAs seeing men as lesser parents isn't toxic masculinity. Thus, thank you for showing why only feminists help men and women
    1
  2182.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe so as well as believe MRAs seeing men as inferior parents to women isn't toxic masculinity. Again, thank you for showing why only feminists help men and women
    1
  2183.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are welcome to explain why a non nurturing parent is a better parent. But as you note MRAs see men as inferior parents as they believe it is a woman's job, why isn't that toxic masculinity? Again, thank you for showing only feminists help men and women as they see them as equals
    1
  2184.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for thus showing you view men as lesser parents per believing women are biologically better at caring for children while men are not, ie, toxic masculinity. It seems strange you complain the divorce courts have women care for the child while men provide money when that is exactly what you wish to happen. As feminism states the sexes are equal, thank you for showing only they help men and women.
    1
  2185. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing you divide men and women by stating men are lesser parents per viewing it as a job for women, ie, toxic masculinity. As feminism states the sexes are equal, eg, men and women are equal parents, thank you for showing only they help men and women.
    1
  2186. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  ​​thank you for showing you divide men and women by stating men are lesser parents per viewing it as a job for women, ie, toxic masculinity. As feminism states the sexes are equal, eg, men and women are equal parents, thank you for showing only they help men and women.
    1
  2187. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing you divide men and women by stating men are lesser parents per viewing it as a job for women, ie, toxic masculinity. As feminism states the sexes are equal, thank you for showing only they help men and women.
    1
  2188. "A" since women can be incels though male incels mock them by saying they're ugly (because the people incels hate most are other incels)
    1
  2189.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly women hate incels the most. after all, not only do incels say "vvomen cannot be incels", but they state so because they're jealous of women. after all, incels want the attention they believe all women have.
    1
  2190.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "There are no attractive inkwells" and incels say women are ugly. thus, thank you for agreeing women can be incels too
    1
  2191. aren't all those traits about telling women they aren't equal to men?
    1
  2192.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for showing why it's called toxic masculinity
    1
  2193.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then are women equal to men if toxic masculinity isn't real?
    1
  2194.  @DavidW-ux2gc  then as you state women aren't equal to men, thank you for showing toxic masculinity is real.
    1
  2195. Out of curiosity, if feminists legalized women fighting in the military, would that change your view of them?
    1
  2196. Don't the MRAs all have the same views, eg, that women belong in the home?
    1
  2197.  @lilnotmaster6094  what different views did those in the video have?
    1
  2198.  @riven4121  so when the MRAs were saying that men were inherently lesser parents while the feminists disagreed, that's not evidence against his claim?
    1
  2199.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if MRAs care about men, why is it they say men are lesser parents? Do you disagree with feminism saying men and women are equal parents?
    1
  2200.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose this. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2201.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose this. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2202.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose this. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2203.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose this. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2204.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you can believe of me as you wish. But thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose that. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2205.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you can believe i am whatsoever you wish, but thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose that. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2206.  @DavidW-ng5zv  you are entitled to believe i am as you wish, but thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose that. So isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2207.  @DavidW-ng5zv again, thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose that. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2208.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting MRAs believe men are lesser parents while feminists oppose that. Isn't that you accepting only feminists help women and men?
    1
  2209.  @ssamohtttelps1435  not really, no. i mean the MRA's don't really seem to help men. mostly they complain that women aren't serving them as traditional wives
    1
  2210.  @ssamohtttelps1435  unfortunately, derrick is most MRA's. that's why they agree with him in the video
    1
  2211.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for agreeing with the feminists asking why MRAs existed. Why don't feminists help both sexes by stating they're equals?
    1
  2212.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, why do you imply a hatred of men per agreeing with the feminists that MRA's do not help men? likewise, why is it harmful to state both sexes are equals?
    1
  2213.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet you agreed with the feminists that MRA's don't help. so does that mean you hate men? as for bringing up issues, do you agree with the MRAs that men are biologically lesser parents, ie, why they lose custody cases? if so, why doesn't that mean you hate men?
    1
  2214.  @tonyonaperky2128  which ones?
    1
  2215.  @tonyonaperky2128  ironically the MRAs disagree with you as they state men are biologically worse parents. Does it make you a feminist to agree with the feminists?
    1
  2216. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but wasn't that after all the feminists disagreed with the MRAs saying men are lesser parents to women?
    1
  2217. ​​ @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, have you not seen the video that you are unaware of what the MRAs stated? Kindly start from minute 4 to see their views. Regardless, per noting said view harm men, doesn't that show Mimi was correct as only the feminists said men and women are equal?
    1
  2218. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for seeing the video and thus accepting the MRAs stated men are lesser parents to women. As only feminism states men and women are equal, why would MRAs causing divisions be helpful?
    1
  2219. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for accepting the MRAs stated men are lesser parents to women. As only feminism states men and women are equal, why would MRAs causing divisions be helpful?
    1
  2220. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, thank you for accepting MRAs are causing divisions by saying men are lesser parents. Thus, doesn't that show feminism is helpful by opposing this?
    1
  2221. ​ @riven4121  did he disagree with the other MRAs stating women belong at home because men are biologically worse parents? Or what other things did he say?
    1
  2222. ​ NerdinessD  no, Ukraine made it legal for women to fight in the military in 2016. So since feminism is doing what you requested, does that mean you agree with it?
    1
  2223.  NerdinessD  no, that also became legal in 2021. so does that mean you agree with feminism?
    1
  2224.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then i thank you for agreeing with the feminists that the sexes are equal. Fairly strange the MRAs say women are biologically built to be caregivers that stay at home, don't you agree?
    1
  2225.  @DavidW-ng5zv  excellent question. Do you believe men are biologically worse parents (like the MRAs state)? Does that help in custody cases?
    1
  2226.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and is that due to biology? If so, how does that help in custody cases to say men are biologically lesser parents?
    1
  2227.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it is due to biology" Thank you for thus admitting you believe men are lesser parents due to biology and therefore showing why only feminists help people. Or how does saying men are worse parents per biology help in custody cases?
    1
  2228.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "it is due to biology" Thank you for admitting you believe men are lesser parents due to biology and therefore showing why only feminists help people. Or (again), how does saying men are worse parents help in custody cases?
    1
  2229.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "it is due to biology" Odd how you ignore the answer to your query. Again, does saying men are worse parents help in custody cases? But thank you for admitting you believe men are lesser parents due to biology, ie, why only feminism helps.
    1
  2230. Then you agree with feminism legalizing women fighting in the military in 2016?
    1
  2231.  @vareseources  that's odd, why do you think an ideology is a woman? Regardless, as you wrote more women are needed, do you support feminism legalizing women fighting in the military, ie, having more women there?
    1
  2232.  @vareseources  exactly, as you agree with feminism legalizing women fighting in the military and thus doing what you wrote, why do you believe it was illegal in the first place?
    1
  2233.  @temporarilyjeffrey7826  in regards to custody cases they state discrimination exists against men but that women are inherently superior parents to men.
    1
  2234.  @don5241  why do you think MRAs are fighting for men's rights by saying women are inherently superior parent's?
    1
  2235.  @don5241  then as you agree MRAs aren't fighting for men in custody cases when they say women are inherently superior parents, why are you confused at what the other guy is saying? It seems you agree with him.
    1
  2236.  @lilnotmaster6094  would you like to write the percentage of employed women?
    1
  2237.  @lilnotmaster6094  excellent, thank you for thus agreeing the other was mistaken as most women are employed. You can be angry some men get things through divorce too.
    1
  2238.  @lilnotmaster6094  thank you for accepting about half of households have the women as the main earner. You are entitled to be angry that women are employed and that men also get things in divorces.
    1
  2239.  @lilnotmaster6094  as stated, you are entitled to be angry that about half of households have women as the main earner and that men also get things in a divorce.
    1
  2240.  @lilnotmaster6094  as stated, you are entitled to be angry that women are the breadwinners in about half of households and that men get things in a divorce.
    1
  2241.  @lilnotmaster6094  you are entitled to be angry enough to pretend about half of households don't have women as the main earners and that men don't get things in a divorce.
    1
  2242. That's odd, didn't the other MRAs share his views?
    1
  2243.  @simpledanman  then you don't even know what views the MRAs hold?
    1
  2244.  @captainkenzie6873  didn't zack support and defend derrick when he said men and women aren't equal? kursat didn't really do anything except say feminism is wrong.
    1
  2245.  @captainkenzie6873  then i thank you for noting all 3 MRA's believed about the same thing. It seems there was no agenda after all.
    1
  2246.  @captainkenzie6873  and what did they disagree on?
    1
  2247.  @butter3617  then why were the MRAs focused on saying women are lesser than men?
    1
  2248.  @wingknight7132  correct, the MRAs were wrong for stating women are lesser. Thus, why is that what they present as men's rights? Note feminism legalizing women fighting in Ukraine's military in 2016. Isn't that more helpful towards gender equality?
    1
  2249. Agreed
    1
  2250.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, thank you for agreeing anti-feminists say silly things. Thus, isn't that you agreeing with feminism? Seems odd you would then hate men.
    1
  2251.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but we both agreed with the feminists that the anti-feminist said silly things. As you now state you don't hate men while agreeing with feminism, wouldn't that show feminism is correct?
    1
  2252. Correct, which is why it's strange the MRAs constantly say women are inherently better than men at being caregivers. What do you expect to happen otherwise?
    1
  2253. Why would the feminists stop fighting for equality between men and women?
    1
  2254.  @jacksonholt4594  you didn't watch the video, did you?
    1
  2255.  @jacksonholt4594  what was the first question asked to the group? Or did you not see the video?
    1
  2256.  @jacksonholt4594  sure, the idea that people are equal. And per the statement the video gave (which you just wrote), who did agree with it: the 3 feminists or the 3 MRAs?
    1
  2257. ​ @jacksonholt4594  then as you noted feminism is an egalitarian ideology that says people are equal (as per you quoting the video and noting who agreed with it) while the MRAs state the opposite, isn't that agreeing feminism should continue fighting?
    1
  2258.  @DavidW-ng5zv  certainly, do you believe opposing MRAs saying men are lesser parents helps men? Or do you believe women are inherently better parents than men?
    1
  2259.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then as you believe the MRAs seeing men as lesser parents is irrelevant, thank you for showing why feminism is needed
    1
  2260.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you don't see MRAs stating men are lesser parents as pertinent, thank you for proving why feminism is needed.
    1
  2261.  @gewnurb  that's odd, why does equality mean more rights? Do you believe the feminists opposing the MRAs saying men are lesser parents is as such?
    1
  2262.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you don't believe MRAs stating men are biologically lesser parents is harmful, thank you for proving why feminism is needed.
    1
  2263.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you see MRAs stating men are biologically lesser parents isn't harmful, thank you for proving why feminism is needed due to them stating men and women are equal parents
    1
  2264.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you stated MRAs viewing men as biologically lesser parents isn't harmful, thank you for proving why feminism is needed as you now even try to backtrack from it
    1
  2265.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, as you stated MRAs viewing men as biologically lesser parents isn't a problem, thank you for proving why feminism is needed
    1
  2266. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you stated MRAs viewing men as biologically lesser parents isn't a problem, thank you for proving why feminism is needed
    1
  2267.  @OrdieBoomBoom87  so did he say anything in regards to the MRAs saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  2268.  @OrdieBoomBoom87  wait, so he also believes men are lesser parents like the other MRAs do, but defends it by saying women get abortions? And that's not hiding his crazy stuff?
    1
  2269.  @OrdieBoomBoom87  I'm not sure how the video will help since you were just describing what he says. Also the link doesn't appear, it seems YouTube might have blocked it because it sees it as spam. So please try to explain it
    1
  2270.  @OrdieBoomBoom87  this is why i asked as i did, though i thank you for noting there is no link. 1) the MRAs constantly said men are lesser parents to which the feminists disagreed, ie, they note fatherhood is important. You then state kursat said women commit more infanticide. This is odd. 2) per the first question about infanticide, what statistics did he give? 3) would you then explain what you wrote as i can't find it?
    1
  2271.  @anotherrandomguy8871  that's an odd response. then why did only the feminists say men and women are equals while the MRA's disagreed?
    1
  2272.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if so, then did the MRAs and feminists both say men and women are equals, or did only one do so?
    1
  2273.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question, did the MRAs and feminists say the sexes are equals? Strange you avoid my query.
    1
  2274.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's interesting, it appears you have not watched the video. Kindly do so. If you have seen the video, thank you for noticing the feminists were correct about patriarchal views by pretending otherwise
    1
  2275. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for backtracking. Thus, if a patriarchy doesn't exist, then why did only the feminists say the sexes are equals while you said they're not?
    1
  2276. She kind of has a point. Derek and zack basically had the same views, and kursat just spent the entire video saying feminism was wrong.
    1
  2277.  @humankinglobetard3000  that's odd, why would seeing men and women as equal be misandry? Or do you not agree Derek was sexist?
    1
  2278. What numbers do you mean?
    1
  2279.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if women on average do nearly everything as nurses and work the same as men, why are women still paid less for doing the same job? However, it seems you backtrack on stating the wage gap isn't real to now attempting to justify it. Is this due to finding a source confirming it? Why not provide it?
    1
  2280.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet nurse are 90% women so we know they're in the highest paying areas, eg, nurse specialist and nurse CEO. So why are, for example, female nurse specialists earning less than male nurse specialists despite doing the same job and working the same hours? Again, it seems you backtrack over the wage gap being false. Is this due to your source confirming it? Would you provide it?
    1
  2281.  @DavidW-ng5zv  male nurse are also in the lowest paying fields yet are also paid more than female nurses in lower paying fields. Again, why are the men paid more for doing the same thing for the same time frame? But again, you did backtrack on stating the wage gap is false. Why not provide your source to see why you did?
    1
  2282.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query. As we seem to agree that male nurses earn more than female nurses in the same position for the same time, why is that correct? Again, why not provide your source as you seem to have backtracked from stating the wage gap is false?
    1
  2283.  @DavidW-ng5zv  seems odd i constantly asked for sources yet now you attempt to take me out of context.
    1
  2284.  @DavidW-ng5zv  yet male nurses earn more than female nurses even when they're in the same position, place and working the same hours. So why is that correct? Why not provide your source as you backtracked from stating it doesn't exist to now justifying it?
    1
  2285.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note we agree the wage gap is real, but you attempt to justify it by stating 90% of the staff don't work full shifts or found in the areas they're needed. Thus why i ask for a source, though it puzzles me why you believe me asking you this is strawmanning you
    1
  2286.  @DavidW-ng5zv  Now you change to accepting the average earnings are lower for women after noticing women working in the same are for the same time leads to a wage gap. Thus why i request your source as you constantly backtrack
    1
  2287.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, please provide your source as you not only backtracked form stating the wage is isn't real, you now accept the average earnings for female nurses working in the same position and for the same time as men means they earn less.
    1
  2288.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you backtracking again from stating the average earnings are less for female nurses in the same position and working the same time as male nurses, ie, you had agreed with feminists on the way age gap. Please provide your source as you constantly backtrack in order to justify the wage gap. Do you avoid this because upon noticing what you write it shows the wage gap is real?
    1
  2289.  @DavidW-ng5zv  otherwise it would seem odd you believe the study is comparing nurse CEOs with nurse interns, and assuming 90% of the staff only works a half shift on average, in order to justify the wage gap.
    1
  2290.  @DavidW-ng5zv  precisely, note you backtracking as the reason I ask for your source. You now agree the wage gap is real, and that it exists when male and female nurses work the same time and position. Thus, again, kindly provide your source due to your constant backtracking as your conclusions state the wage gap is real yet you still try to justify it
    1
  2291.  @DavidW-ng5zv  or do you believe your source is comparing nurse CEOs with nurse interns, and assume 90% of the staff only works a half shift on average? Quite odd if so
    1
  2292.  @DavidW-ng5zv  then if your source states a such, kindly provide it. I would greatly appreciate being able to read it as your constant changes are puzzling
    1
  2293.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. If your source states as such, kindly provide it as your constant changes are puzzling.
    1
  2294.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you now backtrack to stating your source is comparing the same time and workplace position instead of different workplace and work time Again, please provide your source as i wish to read what your source states
    1
  2295.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected. As you wrote "my source shows", kindly provide it so we may see what it shows. You constantly change your position so it is quite necessary to do this.
    1
  2296.  @DavidW-ng5zv  For example, note you backtracking from stating the wage gap is false to stating there is a wage gap between male and female nurses when we compare the same working hours and position.
    1
  2297.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you wrote "my source shows". Thus, kindly provide it so we may see what it shows as you constantly change your position
    1
  2298.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note you backtracking from stating the wage gap is false to stating there is a wage gap between male and female nurses when we compare the same working hours and position to then stating they're comparing different jobs and working hours.
    1
  2299.  @DavidW-ng5zv  do you refuse to provide your source because it agrees with feminism?
    1
  2300.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if your source proved feminism is wrong then kindly provide it. Again, do you avoid doing so because your constant backtracking meant it agreed with feminism?
    1
  2301.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, note you backtracking from stating the wage gap is false to stating there is a wage gap between male and female nurses when comparing the same working hours and position to later stating they're comparing different jobs and working hours as, apparently, 90% of the staff doesn't work a full shift on average
    1
  2302.  @DavidW-ng5zv  i am uncertain what you mean as I see no article here. Kindly provide it so we may see how it proved feminism is wrong. It's quite odd you avoid doing this
    1
  2303.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, it's truly baffling you refuse to provide your source despite assuring that it proves the wage gap as false.
    1
  2304.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but why not provide your source? If it proves feminism is wrong, surely it can only support you?
    1
  2305.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. As you mistakingly stated you had already provided the source, i kindly ask you you provide it as no source is found here.
    1
  2306.  @DavidW-ng5zv  truly odd you refuse to provide your source when you assure it proves feminism is mistaken
    1
  2307.  @DavidW-ng5zv  if your source proved feminism wrong, then kindly provide it. Seems strange not providing a source means there is one that says feminism wrong. Or do you not provide it because it agrees with feminism?
    1
  2308.  @DavidW-ng5zv  odd, why would I have a source proving you have a source? Again, kindly provide yours if you believe it disproves feminism
    1
  2309. That's probably true. Modern feminists aren't racist for one
    1
  2310.  @DavidW-ng5zv  that's odd, you believe the feminists in the panel are racist?
    1
  2311.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my query, do you believe the women representing feminism in the video are racist? Or are you backtracking per trying to change the subject? Seems odd seeing men as equal parents is hating men though. Or do you agree with the MRAs that men are inferior parents to women?
    1
  2312.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my question. As the video provided 3 feminists as representative of feminism, what did they say that was racist? And as the MRAs state men are lesser parents, why would opposing this mean feminists hate men? It seems odd you believe the MRAs didn't say this. Did you not watch the video?
    1
  2313.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for now backtracking on stating feminism is racist per noting none of the feminists representing feminism is as such. As you also noted the MRAs do see men as lesser parents, thank you for also accepting feminism helps men by opposing this
    1
  2314.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for backtracking on stating feminism is racist (as per the video) and that the MRAs do see men as lesser parents (while feminists oppose this). Thus, why would MRAs saying men are lesser parents help men?
    1
  2315. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting feminism is not racist ("I don't know if they're racist") while the MRAs do see men as lesser parents. Thus, why would MRAs saying men are lesser parents help men? Do you believe women are superior caregivers due to biology? You can backtrack your previous comment if you wish.
    1
  2316.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and thus i thank you for accepting MRAs saying men are lesser parents is harmful to men. Per them doing this in the video while the feminists oppose this, doesn't this show feminism helps men? But thank you for backtracking on saying feminism is racist.
    1
  2317.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but have you not seen the video? It seems odd you are unaware of some of the first things they say. Regardless, once you watch the video, thank you for accepting feminism is not racist while the MRAs do see men as lesser parents. Thus, why would MRAs saying men are lesser parents help men?
    1
  2318.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies again, but why do you defend the MRAs saying men are lesser parents?
    1
  2319.  @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies again, but why do you defend the MRAs saying men are lesser parents? Thank you for agreeing with the feminists that doing so is wrong however.
    1
  2320. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  as you defend the MRAs saying men are lesser parents, thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1