Comments by "Zrips" (@Zripas) on "Wendover Productions" channel.

Where do you draw this magical line then? Can I own RPG? Would that be to much for you? What about actual tank? Can I have one? Land mines? C4?
7
@Wonder-wavez When your comment only include your personal opinion and not actual evidence, that's a conspiracy, at best. Are you like one of those who are scared that government will turn on them and they need to have entire army arsenal in their shed to fight back?... You are not living under dictatorship, you are safe...
5
People staged mass shootings to convince people that guns are bad?... Are you saying that all those mass shootings in US currently are all staged for same purpose?... How deep are you into conspiracies?
4
So you with your rifles will manage to defend against invading forces?... You do know that there are such things as... Armies... Right? Those things which have properly trained and properly equipped people who can properly counter attack enemy forces instead of having random red necks running around with guns?... Your argument is just silly, at best.
4
Did you just said that you will kill people because they would try to limit your free speech?... You are prime example why physiological test needs to be done before selling guns to the people... And repeating physiological test needs to happen too...
4
@koberamone1989 So when you said that Australians keep losing their freedoms, you made that shit up?
4
Give humans tool for easy homicides, what could go wrong? Och wait, we have prime example already: US.
3
Then don't complain when you get 1.5 mass shootings in average every day, just like US is getting now... Your points are silly at best, some are just stupid.
3
Like what freedom? Australians can still own guns, so that freedom never went away. So what exactly australians can't do now?
3
@koberamone1989 So as you just said, Australians can still own guns. So will ask again... What exactly Australians can't do now? What freedom did they lost? Ability to buy firearm in local home depot without background checks?
3
@frankwoods4179 What story is that? What are the numbers of gun violence before and after ban?
2
@7he.Polexican Papua New Guinea, which is about 93 miles away... From whose imaginary map did you got your 1,472 miles north, and 2,583 miles southeast distance?
2
Yet you still can if you want too, so same laws for US citizens would work out just fine, people could still get guns if they wanted or be allowed to own one after appropriate vetting.
2
@Ace-je7ri Now I wonder, do you people even understand difference between knife related crimes vs guns?
2
Will ask basic question everyone failed to answer here. Where do you draw a line? Just because i can make a bomb with house hold items, should I be allowed to stash C4 in my sched? Just because I can make rocket launcher, does that mean I should be able to own one? Just because I can make a tank, should I be able to own one? Just because I can make a nuke... Do you see issue with that thinking? You want more guns to protect against people with more guns... Who got more guns because they want to protect against people with more guns...
2
@HerzogVonMartian Is it tho? How many mass shootings you had before 96 and after?
1
@HerzogVonMartian I only have one account... Paranoid much? You claimed that mass shootings still occur on same level as those did before 96, so do you have any actual numbers to support that claim or was this just empty assertion because it sounds nice to support your own personal beliefs?
1
@theoneafterthelast Are you one of those who thinks that he needs his gns so that he can battle evil lizardmen controlled government or something?
1
@RightsAreNotTradition Youtube can auto remove comments which include links or something what gets marked as insulting or inappropriate. Aside of this... 8 of your comments are still visible, if there was someone removing your magical comments then you wont be visible here at all... Put away your tin foil hat, no one cares about your conspiracy theories, you just need to post them more properly...
1
@@ekl2947 Duno if there is a country which doesn't allow anyone to own a gun, even those with extremely strict laws still allows it if you pass all those requirements. Sadly people (especially in US) thinks that when you start to talk about gun laws it somehow automatically means that no one ever can own a gun...
1
Same exact reason why we have speed limits... It's those retarded people who is the issue, not the rest of us... But I can't see you complaining about there being speed limits or you being forced to wear seat belt and so on. We have to have laws which apply to everyone due to small portion of humans who will want to do stupid stuff.
1
@HerzogVonMartian You do realize that introducing gun laws will not magically remove guns from homes straight after it?...
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke Lying doesn't require even an average IQ, making your lie believable as truth might need more than that tho.
1
Did you failed to understand difference between violent assaults and gun deaths here?
1
@JM-os1oj Maybe he wants to play victim card, like enemy attacks, he shoots at them from his window, enemy vaporized his house and his family with real guns and then press can say "See, enemies killing civilians!!! It's a war crime!!! Reeeeeeee!!!"
1
You know what solves gun deaths? Moooore guns!!!!
1
@NatalieJ22 It is sarcasm from my end, sadly enough there are enough people who actually thinks that adding more guns will solve gun death issue...
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke If I would fail with IQ test then I should not own a gun. So we agree on that one. Cool beans.
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke If you would fail to answer (not even selecting one of the possible answers) to all question from IQ test, that's a failure... Right? How do you define failed test?
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke So your definition of failed test is "No"? Kind of short one... Do you have longer one?
1
thing is that most mass shootings are done by the people who got their gun for "self defense". More guns = higher chance in someone using it to cause harm. Its really simple and obvious correlation.
1
@Sahlooochi This entire issue is multi layered one, easy access to firearms is just one of many. I don't think there is a country in the world which doesn't allow you to own fire arms, yet country like US is suffering from mass shootings on daily basis which will only grow as its on snowball effect at the moment. More shootings more people will want to protect themselves which will introduce more guns into circulation which will increase chances in someone getting hands on a gun which will increase shootings... Rinse and repeat. You can get 1 000 000 valid honest gun owners, but you only need ONE to cause quite a bit of damage. Make it harder to get hands on a gun will filter out quite a bit of people who are now getting one without any training or any background checks, yes, this is a thing, you can buy legally a gun in US without ANY background checks. How to do it? Go to gun shows... Buy from second hand... Its not required legally for you to present any papers, so you can have one clean buyer which can then legally resell all those guns all over the place. Answering to your question. Yes, it went down. Mass shooting count went down. Violent crimes went down in general. Guns on their own causes more harm in shorter period of time with less effort put into it. Like that saying goes "don't bring a knife to a gunfight", because one will always win over the other. I would rather take criminal with a knife than the one with a gun, even if in first case I didn't had a gun and in second one I did. Gun is still more dangerous independent what you have for self defense. And more people you have with guns around you more on edge you will be yourself by knowing that anyone at any point could just lose their marbles and start shooting everyone. Solution? More guns?... Well, that doesn't work as of clear example with US.
1