Comments by "Zrips" (@Zripas) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. Its called: Testing.
    3
  2. Well atleast we agree that Russia did it. Now go and prove that US blow up pipe lines!
    2
  3. It was literally meant to crash into ocean at its end of flight due to it being a prototype... Why would it have crew on board?...
    2
  4. How? By being invaded?...
    2
  5. Americans blow up dam by planting bunch of explosives in the middle of war zone on the side controlled by Russia?... This is overstretch ever for rus bots...
    2
  6. That's a weird comparison.
    2
  7. Brics? Its was a joke? Right?
    1
  8. Its a war... All this comes to actual supply lines and actual supplies each side can get hands on. Ukraine have allot better backing than Russia, so its allot worst for Russians than for Ukraine at the moment.
    1
  9. Mass firing would not happen even if this was a real flight with actual payload. This was a test flight which was expected to fail.
    1
  10. Which country (actually a private company) besides US launching reusable rockets into orbit? This was test flight, it was expected to fail, main goal was to clear launch pad, which it did. Besides this it collected quite a bit of data which can be used for next test. It would have been failure if it failed on launch pad, which would have damaged launch pad and provided little to no new data. Welcome to reality little one.
    1
  11. Like what?
    1
  12. True, Russians know how to brainwash their people.
    1
  13. Rus bot detected.
    1
  14. Nice joke.
    1
  15. Astrology?
    1
  16.  @bobdown1720  That's how cold works... Mr know nothing...
    1
  17. Question for the smart one in the room: How could WW3 start? Would direct US involvement in Ukraine war be enough to start that?
    1
  18. Losing war by continuously retaking land? How the hell is this losing exactly?
    1
  19. Ukraine does have bigger and better supply of appropriate equipment for winter time, so while it will be bad thing for both sides it will be allot worst for Russians.
    1
  20. Then no one should panic here. All according to the grand plan.
    1
  21. Clearly someone has no idea how war logistics works...
    1
  22. ​ @saviola5194  Any additional routes for Russia to have is a additional headache for Ukraine to keep monitoring. If this bridge goes down completely then Russian supply lines become exponentially more complicated and puts them into a bad situation. This is primary/secondary resupply route, taking it down means that everything needs to go over another one, which means that it becomes for Ukraine allot simpler to target it asit just basically single route which is allot closer to front lines... So yes, this is vital as its a route far far away from front lines which is hard to be reached due to all those air, sea and land defences.
    1
  23. I guess Russian rockets been reusable for decades now... Och wait...
    1
  24.  @bobdown1720  Sadly enough at this point it's not even stupid and quite believable.
    1
  25. Cost of new inventions...
    1
  26. For what?
    1
  27. Russia withdrew and got pushed back, how the hell did they won anything at this point?
    1
  28. Zelensky not like bunker boy, he is not running, he is charging.
    1
  29. So basically lay down and die? Surrendering would only mean that they would be ether shoot on spot or taken as prisoners which could be even worst punishment that being shot, or used as bargaining chip against Ukraine down the road. There isn't any good outcome with it comes to Russians and surrendering, unless its Russians who surrenders.
    1
  30. "Russia never throws anything away .." That explains WW2 weapons Russians are getting while going to front lines...
    1