General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Zrips
comments

Youtube comments of Zrips (@Zripas).

Plastic rice production show at 5:40 is quite misleading, as its showing generic plastic pallet production and not actual plastic rice production. Similar thing looks to be happening with fake beef video at 1:00 which looks like to be showing generic silicon mixing and not fake beef production. Not saying that there are no plastic rice or fake beef, but those videos are... Well... Fake... Ironically.
144
Got a ticket to asylum? Simply got relocated? Fired from job for being wack job? Just because people say to have magical technologies doesn't mean that they actually do...
54
@1HeatWalk It's a core issue, China likes to create quantity and not quality products.
38
Due to extreme price to build hydrogen refueling stations it will never take off as real product. If Hydrogen cars became a thing 10-15 yeas ago then it would have had chance to be something more than just a gimmick, but now electrical cars will take over due to it being better solution.
34
@professormadhattgaming583 Abundance of cheap energy... This is what you need for hydrogen cars to be more than gimmick. Nuclear fusion could provide means of cheap energy which can be used to convert Hydrogen which then could be used in cars. If we remove poor energy conversion rates when it comes to hydrogen, we will have more viable option. But currently its not. Hydrogen cars are between ICe and EV's, due to the fact that we have EV's currently there is no reason to even start investing money in hydrogen car development, as those are worst option when compared to EV's.
21
It's like the first thing you would be educated on when topic of retaking enemies supplies/territory comes up. You have to treat it as one big booby trap until it's properly checked for those.
19
@professormadhattgaming583 That's the thing, hydrogen is worst option vs electrical ones, if those dint took off before those have no chance now. Only single chance hydrogen has is if we get nuclear fusion going and we have abundance of energy, in this case producing hydrogen and using it as fuel could be somewhat better solution or be on same level as electrical cars, but its big IF.
17
EOMM unaware Science = Matter cannot be created or destroyed Religious nutcracks = God created everything from nothing when he got bored existing outside space and time. And no, science never said that big bang came from literal nothing, you should do basic fact checking before you post ignorant lies on public forums.
12
Cool story, now prove it to be true and not something you invented in your head.
12
@csaleen302 Hydrogen works when you need high density and you have dedicated supply of hydrogen, its not really scalable when it comes to generic cars, atleast not as easily as it is with electrical cars.
12
Entire civilized world is with you.
12
You can't spell "JackAss" without "Jack"
11
@peacenow42 It blew up for completely different reasons, so like original comment states, they fixed all previous issues.
10
Because?....
9
What are you even trying to imply here? Communications between sub and surface isint done over Starlink... Do you think that sub used starlink dish to communicate with their base on land or something?
9
It does apply to the global model. Which part you think that it doesn't?
9
Have you ever heard about thing we call "tides"? Do you still hold silly position that water doesn't curve?
9
Earths shape can be determined from your backyard... So no idea what are you saying here.
9
@KenDotCom Some calls it "normal sized car" which it is, more than enough space while not being unnecessary too big just for the sake of it.
8
@yestervue4697 Stating incorrect information doesn't make you aa liar by default. Lying requires you to know that information you present is false. Tho going back to reality. Are we talking about earth being flat or like normal one, globe?
8
@jmatasomo2660 "And how did you measure that speed?" ? Its one revolution every 24 hours... Do you seriously need detailed explanation how you get from one revolution every 24 hours to 0.000694 rpm?
8
Defending against agresor is being insane? Ok... I want your stuff, just roll over and don't defend yourself when I come for it.
8
You know what is another "natural" border? Russia and Ukraine border... So I guess Russia could do same strategic retreat back to that... Everyone will be happy.
8
@ElectraFresh67 Being allowed doesn't mean it doesn't have racist foundation. Affirmative action in its nature is based on people's race, aka racist law. Race should never be a part of conversation, if you are good at something then you are good at it, no need to bring in race, ever. At the moment you have something like "We will do X because he is Y race" its racist, by definition.
8
Your ignorance is just... Astonishing... "why does the rotation of the earth not get added or subtracted in east-west flights and west-east flights." First of all, conservation of momentum is a thing. Second, flight times to east-west and west-east are different, not much but they are. "If the earth is rotating at 1000 mph, why does the atmosphere stay still relative to the earth." Conservation of momentum... have you ever used a spoon in your coffee cup? Did yo noticed that in time water starts to spin at same speed as your spoon even tho you are not moving it directly? Its simplification, but valid analogy to what happens with atmosphere. "According to gas dynamics, the atmosphere should describe a spiral around the planet like the galaxy does" Just like tornados always spin to same direction on specific hemisphere and never crosses to another side? That type? "Wet a ball and spin it. The water will fall away" 1 rotation in 24 hours and it will fall where exactly? Down? To an actual earth? So you want to perform experiment with 500g ball to simulate earths gravity while standing on 5.972 × 10^24 kg earth?... Jebus, your ignorance is just... Amusing... "Just asking some basic physics questions" That's not physics, that's your ignorance. You failing to make even basic comment here relating any physics. "You condescending ignorant snob." Not our fault that you dropped from middle school and never learned basic physics. Your ignorance isint evidence.
7
Majority of the world still believes in magic and wizards because their books of fables said so. Do not underestimate stupidity of humans. But yes, quite few are just trolling, but there are actual believers too, sadly.
7
Care to prove that?
7
Peace talk start when Putin gets his soldiers out of Ukraine entirely.
7
Most sad thing about your comment is that i have no idea if you made a joke or are you serious. What a time to be alive...
7
@geshscale6068 You do realize that hydrogen needs to be produced and doesn't appear from thin air? On top of complexity of storing it, transporting it... You are using energy to produce hydrogen, which then needs to be transported manually to each refueling station and stored there in expensive storage containers, which then gets pumped out into a car which then converts hydrogen back into electricity which then gets used to drive your car. There is huge energy loss during this process. "If you put an hho generator with ev charging plug" That's the thing... You need specialized generator, while with EV's you just plug it into wall and be done with that. Hydrogen can have its own use cases and will be more practical in some situations, but not for mass produced cars. Hydrogen is in the middle of ICe and EV's. For hydrogen to be viable option we would need abundance of energy, which on itself would mean that we would have abundance of energy for EV's too, but at the moment hydrogen uses like 60% more energy in comparison to pure EV's, not even talking about complex infrastructure to feed hydrogen needs.
7
Ukraine will most likely join NATO and that's that.
7
Basically yes, TF comparing Musk to Holmes because SpaceX isn't even more better than everyone else... 10%?! Pfffff, amateur numbers, if it's not 10000% better than you are a scam artist!!! Thought TF while sitting in a toilet...
7
Where do you draw this magical line then? Can I own RPG? Would that be to much for you? What about actual tank? Can I have one? Land mines? C4?
7
You to know that "level" isint equal to "flat"? Right?
7
@Jinke888 Its too late for that, everyone is already involved here and everyone (besides Russia) has interest to prevent from Russia taking over Ukraine, for multiple reasons. There is no escaping here, while Ukraine fights, countries will support them.
7
Then don't ever complain about mass shootings...
6
@Poweruser75 Funny enough P900 actually proves globe if you actually using it as it should. For example, go to beach, zoom in on the horizon, find a big ship which is half way behind horizon, boom, curvature proved, mic drop. You wall of text is pointless, i can rebut all that nonsense with one word: Sunset.
6
@MrSirhcsellor He looks more like a troll at this point. He is too confused even for a flat earther.
6
Yes, lets try it when Putin turns around and leaves Ukraine.
6
Obvious troll is obvious.
6
It's called "Test"... You do things to test it what will happen in real world in case you lose a tile. They added sensors in those places to measure temperatures for future reference.
6
For supplies to run out. Even if they are trapped, they still can shoot back from their defensive positions. So its a war of patience at this point.
6
@Methoes123 If we dont have any understanding about physics, then why majority of physicists agree with us and not you? One of us clearly doesn't understand it, so who? Does experts know less than you?
6
Sorry, but earth is spherical, this can be determined from your backyard with some free time and minimal equipment.
6
@OYisit This subject proves that there are people who will believe anything as long as it goes against mainstream independent if its true or not
6
You seriously need to fact check before you talk... Even if 100% of astronauts said that, its still an argument from authority fallacy... Who cares what astronauts say when you can verify shape of earth by yourself? FYI Its a globe...
6
"I bet you most people reading this thinking “what an idiot he’s probably a flat earther duh der hu”" Are you? Yes, yes you are. "but you believe Bill Nye the science guy is an actual scientist" Depends on definition of scientist, but his degree is completely irrelevant here. He is not an authority here, earth is a globe not because he said so, he says it because earth is a globe. Try to feel difference here. "and most of the people who think I’m an idiot for realizing the earths probably not s spinning ball" You realized that earth is probable not spinning ball?... Just probably?... So that means that you are not even claiming to have evidence to support your own position here yet you think that you can complain about globe model?... C'mon...
6
Night NDay "Not a flat earth advocate but" Its like saying "Not a rapist, but..." while you might not be flat earther, you are not far away from one with ideas like that. What is interesting about your claim relating to Bermuda Triangle, how did people found out about ships sinking without damage? They used boats to go there? How? Why dint they sink? Is Bermuda Triangle picky on who sinks and who don't? Buoyancy isint a force... So what magic defines direction of fall? Why down is down and up is up?
6
First of all, earth is a globe, we agree on that, but I just have to correct you here as I can see this mistake made quite often. Don't mistake gravity with surface tension, those are not the same. Drops under that lemon have been held by surface tension and not gravity, their shape was due to surface tension and not gravity. Water droplets in size like that simply doesn't have enough gravitational force to manipulate anything substantial. To prove gravity you can always use Cavendish experiment.
6
@deerichardz Thriving? He stopped gaining subscribers for quite some time by now. And his live reactions to flight test have been wildly negative due to how little to nothing he actually knows about all of this. People like you only likes this channel because he constantly makes videos which boils down to "Musk bad!" you do understand that he is making living from people like you?
6
You would need to go back to school and learn some basics how things work.
6
Most pictures stored on internet are in jpeg format, yes, correct. But i guess you tried to make sarcastic comment here. Right?
6
@geshscale6068 HHO production is slow and you need specialized tanks to store HHO. Hydrogen only has one benefit at this point, its energy density, other than this its only drawbacks. No idea why people keep mentioning refueling times, if you can just plug your EV into wall socket over night, then every single day you will have full "tank" which will be allot more than you will ever need. You might save some time if you are doing 5000km trip, but like, how often do you do something like that? And you still need to do regular stops to stretch your legs, go to bathroom and so on, which is more often than your battery can drive you for. So its none issue in general. And recharge times are increasing and soon we will options to recharge from 20 to 80% in few minutes. And for refueling stations, again... Its not as simple as just getting electrical cable to the spot... You actually need either actual mini plant to not only generate hydrogen, but to store it. To build stations like that is exponentially more expensive than EV station with exponentially more maintenance required down the road. Hydrogen stations generally are more complex and more expensive than current fuel stations in build and maintenance costs. Hydrogen can work in specific applications where you need more energy density and you have local access to refueling station. For regular cars, EV's are the way to go and allot more future proofed.
6
You kind of need to specify which Dave you are talking about, sadly.
6
@Globeisahoaxx Some world shattering news for you, earth's tilt changes between 22.1° to 24.5°, yes, it's not stable. But heck, I guess your best evidence for flat pancake world is seeing something what doesn't exist.
6
@johnparr347yrsand2 So you are actually saying that its to spread stupidity? Which part did you actually disagreed here?
6
Its called: gravity. Which was proven long time ago. You might want to read a book or two just to catch up with 21st century...
6
@derouen1234 Well that sounded racist, or was it just me?
6
Because you failed to understand him?
6
@Wonder-wavez When your comment only include your personal opinion and not actual evidence, that's a conspiracy, at best. Are you like one of those who are scared that government will turn on them and they need to have entire army arsenal in their shed to fight back?... You are not living under dictatorship, you are safe...
5
@PreachingChief "I'd ask you exactly the same, what is the issue here?" Issue is with people attacking others for no good reason. "I'm not attacking him as a person or his character itself. " You are, you literally said that due to his woke bullshit you cant trust what he says, that's LITERRALY adhominem. "but if you repeatedly push some virtue signalling nonsense in the hopes not to offend anyone while blatantly denying facts or reality. Why should I ever trust you again?" Maybe because those are not related? There are many people where I agree on something and disagree on others, while still trusting their general word. Just because you disagree on one thing, doesn't make this person not trustworthy. "I'm not even bothered to watch the video, because I don't trust him to be any form of an authority figure anymore." He is not authority figure, he simply states facts in this video, you should always fact check if you are not sure if said things are actually correct. In this video Nye is factually correct, simple as that, what his opinion is about woke bullshit is irrelevant here. But the fact that you dint even watched video and yet you want to complain and discredit what Nye said is just silly at best... You dont even know what you disagreeing about with Nye here, are you here just to complain about Nye just because he is part of this video? Complaining for sake of complaining? "Go be triggered and cry somewhere else." Well someone is projecting himself here. You literally got triggered by Nye being part of video you never watched and keep crying about it. Are you ok? But like seriously, I could bet we both would agree that Nye position on woke bullshit is just bullshit, we both would agree that earth is a globe, that what Nye said here is factually true, yet you jut crying about Nye here for sake of crying and not because he is wrong in this video. Thats just... Sad.
5
@yestervue4697 Trace funding? First of all, how the hell did you traced his funding? Ether you work in government institution which allows this action or you did something illegal here... Nether option would be satisfactory, especially for you... And your failure to actually support your claim with actual evidence is just... Amusing... And just side thing here, as you can't prove that Johnny actually lied, doesn't that make YOU a liar by your own rules? Or about his funding? I mean, we can use your own rules to discredit your entire "argument"...
5
If technology is evil, why do you use it to say that technology is evil?
5
kpri101 You actually proving Elon's point here, if its so bad and people will want to leave in droves, then it means that he will lay down 75% of people from CURRENT staff, but it won't be hard to fill it back in with normal people.
5
because we do live on sphere.
5
Was he wrong? Because earth shape can be determined by anyone with basic understanding of geometry. So was he wrong in this video?
5
@Heoi_Bikuni Flat earther explanation why there is this grand conspiracy is as solid as their entire argument why earth is flat, well, its not. This makes it more funny when you realize that them saying "to hide god" makes even less sense when you have majority of NASA staff a religious people, especially when it was established. In general when you see someone saying that they believe in flat earth you just have to assume 50/50 chance that they are just trolling.
5
Its not an argument... Its like saying "2+2=4 isint convincing argument"...
5
Never thought about possibility that he took this recording before pandemic?... Like the fact that no one in his video wearing mask in air port?... How disconnected from reality are you?
5
@Globeisahoax if you think that we know that earth is a globe just because NASA says it, then you have no actual knowledge about this topic. NASA is 100% irrelevant here, NASA could say that earth is flat pancake, yet it would still remain a globe... I can disprove your flat pancake world without leaving my backyard and without using any math. You being sad troll will not disprove globe.
5
There are literal videos streaming video from space... And you dont need that, what you need is basic understanding of geometry and spare time to spend it in your backyard which can prove that earth is not a pancake.
5
Its like explaining "Why chopping your head of isint healthy for you" if you need explanation for something like this, then issue isint with this video, issue is with you.
5
There is no eral debate here, basic observation of sun anyone can perform from their backyard proves that earth is not flat. All those "debates" are just for fun.
5
Make it 19, as you wasted extra minute writing this pointless comment.
5
Both sides of ideology? From when former/retired aeroplane pilots and captain of seafarers believe in flat earth?
5
No. Bible is wrong on multiple things including shape of earth or celestial movements.
5
Peace talks start at the moment Russians go the f**k out of Ukraine territory, all of it. When that happens, only then, you can dream about peace talks. All you people here wanting this peace talk is just silly at best... Its like having robber getting into your house and then you just like "Ok, lets sit and talk about common ground here. You can take TV, but leave my PC, take jewelry, but leave cash. Does this sound good to you? If not, we can keep negotiating!!" This is your idea in a nutshell?
5
@deerichardz 1million sub channels don't just gain 10k subs in year you know... Something clearly isn't going as it should, which is opposite of what actually thriving channel should look like. Right? So which fact did I got wrong here exactly?
5
Cool story, tho we are talking about reality here.
5
@rp7159 Riiight, like Tom and Jerry have their own comics, so i guess there is a wild humanoid cat trying to kill humanoid mouse somewhere in America... Och and spider-man is real too!!! That's cool!!!
5
ironically enough tv screen is better evidence than "its flat because i feel it in my balls" type of evidence... We have live feeds from space, we have photos from space. Anyone can determine shape of earth without any need to rely on outside source, basic observation of sun proves that. So ether earth rotates or sun rotates around earth, in any case, earth is a globe.
5
They dont even have working model of it, how could they dream to start proving it.
5
He can't, he would offend Musk haters aka his cult members
5
Tredecimus Why do you even think that anything would change after one person says something delusional? President of the world could announce that world is actually pancake, would not make it so. And yea, earth shape was known for thousands of years by now and it can be proven with basic observation anyone could perform with minimal amount of geometry knowledge.
5
God cant be proven to not exist, while not being proven to exist, while for shape of the earth, it was already proven to be a spherical and anyone which basic geometry understanding can prove that from their backyard. Basically: God claim is unfalsifiable, shape of earth is not. Conclusion: Flat earthers hold worst position than believers in god.
5
@wolfspack3063 Why waste time and money on people like flat earthers? They will not take any position in power anyways, they are just tiny portion of humanity and even if you would launch them into space and kick over the board, they would still scream "CGI, FAKE" if they cant even understand basic geometry then nothing you will show them will convince them that earth is a globe.
5
Sunset, done. Earths shape was determined like 2300 years ago, there is no real debate here.
5
@ST8URCASE If you got into one conspiracy then it is more likely that you will get into another one. If you already think that earth is flat and that government and scientists lie, that can cause you to believe that global warming is not real, that hem trails are real, that moon landing never happen and on and on and on and on. You need to educate people on how to separate bullshit claims from real ones.
5
@Lowkeysmooth Like... Which part of the word "belt" you did not understood?... What is the shape of "belt"? What method could you think anyone could you to bypass that scary belt? Maybe, you know, its a wild suggestion, but you know, you could, like... Go around it?... What is funny is that people like you admits that there is such thing as van Allen belt which can only exist on a globe, but then at same time tries to use that to claim that people never went to the moon because this thing which can only exists on a globe prevented from that to happen... So are we now agree that earth is a globe and we are only discussing if people actually landed on the moon? Because those are separate topics on its own.
5
And yet earth is still a globe and they are still correct.
5
But... Like if we would take bible for example, by bible there is single thing which can't be forgiven, disbelief in god. So god creates people who will use their intellect to get to conclusion that god is not real and then god adds rule that if you don't believe then you get tormented for eternity in hell... If this is not hating intelligent people then I don't know what is.
5
Give me a video where you can see ship start to disappear bottoms up and then you bring it back fully into view with your magical p900... Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe, no need to even use camera... But well, you do you while Nikon profits from people like you. And did you know that p900 isint enough anymore? You need p1000! Go buy one!
5
Do you even know what "composite" is? Google it and then realize how silly your comment looks.
5
Define "leveled"... And do you say that tides don't exist on flat earth?
5
Because TF makes money from his own fan base by making these cheap videos, which is ironic. You could say he is snake oil salesman.
5
Hay Russians killed everything what moved, this on itself is a war crime. On top of this, people need to eat to survive... Sooner or later you will have to leave your house to get some food... How much food do you have in your house right now? How long would it last for you before you would decide to leave?
5
You don't like satellites? You don't want to explore universe? And its not sudden... Need of rockets was always there, just that their price was astronomical before reusable ones came into play. And starship development isn't being funded by government, you people should learn basics here before you try to complain about it.
5
They do know that word, they dont know what it means.
5
Why do you people care so much about images from space? First of all, we have crap tone of those from NASA or other space agency, its not like there is only one agency which went to space... But even then, you just screaming "Its fake! CGI!! Durh durh!!!" so what's the point? You can never prove that any of those images are fake, so you only express your personal ignorant opinion here, so why even bother?
5
You misspelled Ukraine.
5
It's not really a debate, it's mostly for entertainment.
5
You do know that atmosphere is in a gradient? From one to zero? And just to add up on this, nuclear fusion reactor, you have gas near vacuum. So yea, please wake up...
5
Isn't religious people who constantly scream that everyone should believe in their imaginary friend or burn in hell for eternity?
5
@Globeisahoaxx What is funny that you didn't denied "Trailer park, Country Music, 8th grade education" and you created different label, tells us everything we need to know.
5
Global warming doesn't effect your day to day life ether, but looking long term we do need to be aware of whats going on in entire world and start fixing that as soon as possible.
5
"I find it funny how so many ppl are so against this concept as if it’s not possible." But it literally not possible for earth to be flat... Like... Literally... Not... Possible... "I feel like if ur so dead set on one ideology your too narrow minded to explore possibilities." Explore possibility? What possibilities? Earth is factually spherical, there is nothing to explore here... Its like saying that we should be open to the idea that humans don't exist... It just makes no sense... "Hence innovation is not within your capabilities because it takes crazy consideration to invent the impossible" You cant invent shape of earth... "Think of the airplane the first guy who wanted to fly was considered crazy" Are you seriously comparing factual shape of earth to the new untested technology?... "we can hardly replicate some of the ancient wonders of the world" Name me ONE which we cant replicate. Not asking for example which we dint, but one which we CAN'T. As some one who started saying that he is not a flat earther, you do have generic flat earther type claims here. Even your logical thinking on same level... Which is not that much of a logical or rational one... tho funny enough in like ~90% of situations when some one starts with "I'm not flat earther, but..." ends up sounding just like one... Its like saying "I'm not against raping, but..." Its hardly ends up where you wanted it to go when you add that "but"...
5
@Keke-vs7gm So in your reality people with money are separate race, and separating people by race isn't racist? What do you smoke? Because it sounds to be really strong.
5
Cool lie. Do you know what never happens? It never happen where people return with actual video to prove this claim of yours when asked. I asked dozens by now, none of them returned with actual video, you will one one of those because you never bothered to actually fact check. So yea, stop gas lighting here with your personal ignorance, it doesn't help.
5
@stefyroxanne7567 My plastic chair could be used for that too, but showing it as a production of fake plastic rice would be stupid, isn't it? Fake video talking about fake things. Fake inception.
5
Your comment is strange. I mean, ok, you could start believing all kind of nonsense if you have 0 education, but like, is this even an excuse? We know that flat earthers have no knowledge about more or less anything, but that is the entire point about this claim, its just argument from ignorance.
5
Why Russia left it? Because Ukraine soldiers have been pushing towards it on quite nice and steady pace. So yes, they have captured it.
5
And its written in Harry Potter books that Voldemort is real... Whats your point?
5
@gamelzarbeluang2712 No idea if you are serious or just trying to troll. Why would you see curvature to the left or right? How the hell do you imagine it would even look like? Can you open paint and draw sketch how it should look like by you and show it to us?... Because by your logic and what you claim we should observer earth should be like 10 meters wide sphere... You do know that earth is a HUGE one? Right? Geometry? Its a thing.
5
@john-lvoth9765 generic attempt to shift burden of proof? You do understand that flat earthers made a claim too? Right?... And for love of your god... Stop bringing in NASA, its irrelevant to this topic...
5
It was actually to prove that earth is not rotating and they proved that it was, it's not really directly linked to its shape tho. But yes, they spend 20k for laser gyro and confirmed earths rotation.
5
@Gottum365 Ironically enough you are complaining about some one calling flat earthers dumb and ignorant while you ended with a comment about NASA and their videos... Some bad news for you here, first of all, NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth, second, there are dozens of space agencies across entire world and not only NASA, third, i can bet you will fail to present a method how you determined that photo/video X is fake and photo/video Y is not. To make as simple argument here for earth being a globe will give you really simple example: sun. You have 4 things about it which matches globe model 100% and doesn't match flat one entirely. 1. Moves at constant speed (yes, earth rotates and sun doesn't really move across the sky, but you get the point here) 2. Doesn't change perceived size across the day 3. Moves in a straight line 4. Sunset/sunrise All 4 things are basic observations anyone can perform from their backyard with 1 buck solar filer and some spare time, doesn't even require any math, simple basic observation with rudimentary knowledge of geometry. Forget NASA, forget any information provided by anyone, address this basic observation anyone can do and if you can actually explain ALL 4 of those and how could this be possible on a flat earth, then we can move to more complex things.
5
Those people still vote, so minimizing amount of ignorance is always better option.
5
"Stupid video... you can't prove it's round anymore than they can prove it's flat..." Stupid comment. You can prove that its round by basic observation of sun from your backyard, not even counting countless other methods. "Why didn't you address all Nasa flights manuals that are conducted using the standards of "taking off from a flat, non-moving object"?! " Because math is allot simpler for flat type surface and when it comes to some basic flights curvature is irrelevant. And you seriously need to fact check and read actual context of that sentence, you will look less ignorant. "You have to challenge the very documents and tests used by scientists flat-eathers attempt to use for their credibility. " Flat earthers doesnt even have working model... And there is no such thing as scientists flat-eathers. "You simply gave us your opinion, which in the scope of things means nothing." You dont see irony in that? Not a tiny bit? "Have you even bothered reading the Bible WITHOUT your BOM? " How is bible relevant here? Should he read Quran next? Maybe Harry Potter? And just FYI NASA is relevant here as much as you shoe color.
4
People staged mass shootings to convince people that guns are bad?... Are you saying that all those mass shootings in US currently are all staged for same purpose?... How deep are you into conspiracies?
4
@philindeblanc You need to learn how to filter out clickbait titles... Moon is TECHNICALLY in earths atmosphere because there are some atmospheric particles stretching way way out there. It doesn't mean that moon is literally in earths atmospheres, it only means that you can find earths atmospheres particles around moon. Atmosphere fades out gradualary, there is no hard cut off point... So it only depends how you would define what counts as being inside atmosphere, how much of this atmosphere you actually need for it to be one. In general sense space "starts" at 100km, so in some sense anything above that should be outside earths atmosphere, but that's just because we decided to make this cut off point, this doesn't mean that earths atmosphere ends at 100km. Heck, ISS needs to keep reboosting to stay in orbit due to earths atmospheric particles slowing it down, and that one is flying at 400km altitude. You look like one of those who has no idea what science is, has no idea how to evaluate things and just complains for the sake of complaining...
4
@PreachingChief That's still adhominen attack... You literally discrediting person on basis who he is or more accurately, what his opinion is on unrelated topic. How are you even better than Nye with his woke bullshit? And is Nye even wrong in this video? No, he is not. So like... What is your actual issue here? I don't think there is a single person who is correct 100% on everything, does that mean that you should not trust anyone ever because of that?
4
@yestervue4697 "you can track nearly anything you put your mind and attention to" Well yea, you could, but then there is all this legal side of your actions... "It takes the dedication of an investigative journalist" Being a journalist doesn't make you correct by default. "But the worst thing in the world to do is just accept blindly what you are told without ever questioning things." I have said this exact thing to flat earthers over and over again... So we agree on this one. "Show me where researching that is illegal?" You want to claim that Johny gets funding from government, do you seriously want to claim that this funding is public? If its public then you should be able to present evidence for it without any trouble. Another option would be that its not a public information, which means you used some methods to get this private information which would be, most likely, illegal. And third option would be that you are full of shit and Johnny is not funded by government and you simply - just accept blindly what you are told without ever questioning things. "I have been doing investigative journalism for years" You seam to be terrible at getting correct answer tho, so sad to say this, but you wasted years of your time on a thing you are bad at... Get new hobby. "I am well versed in my "arguments'...sorry" Atleast you put it into quotation marks. Those are not arguments, those are empty baseless assertions. " I am over a half-century old..." Congrats... "here I am free never arrested or charged..." Congrats?... I mean, you can get away with murder if you smart enough... Does that change anything?... "How do you think people make these channels?" Simply: Create account, post a video and you are done. have you ever investigated what it takes to create one? All this is quite out of topic, as you cant prove that Johnny lied here or that he is a fraud, that claim got dismissed. But like seriously, are you one of those who thinks that earth is flat or that it is normal shaped, spherical?
4
@yestervue4697 "You aren't brave enough to debate..." Do you seriously think I'm afraid of you? If i actually was, then i would not respond to you at all... So lets avoid making such childish accusations here. "it is ok to be afraid to show me anything knowing I can debunk it...I understand" Cha! You want to try and debunk something? Ok. Explain to me why suns path across sky is a straight line and not a circular one? Lets test your basic geometry understanding here. "Your fear of doing so shows through your talking in circles..." You literally failing to make actual argument here and present any actual evidence for any of your empty claims and you accuse me of talking in circles? Are you drunk? In general you look more like a troll and not some one who actually tries to prove here, you seam to be all over the place. But your next comment will ether confirm that you are a troll or we still be on a fence about this.
4
How else he could keep fooling people if not making predictions way into future?
4
Its interesting to see that in majority of cases word "sheep" is used by conspiracy nuts.
4
Funny enough that your only point is to complain about word usage, sadly for you one of definitions for word "round" is as "shaped like a sphere. "fallowed with example as "a round glass ball". ONLY people who have no actual argument starts to complain about this word usage, but anyone with any brain cells understands what "round vs flat" actually means. Should it have been "Is earth flat or oblate spheroid slightly wider on 'bottom side' where bottom is just arbitrary direction as direction relative, but on grand scale its perfect sphere" or maybe we could just said "flat vs round" and 99.9% of people with brains will understand what it means?
4
@mike73ng Well so far SpaceX went with zero casualties, 13 manned flights, around 52 total astronauts, zero casualties. So far they are on same track as NASA which experienced first loss at its 16th flight, so 3 flights to go until SpaceX will have better track record than NASA. Tho, on which basis you want to claim that SpaceX will have more casualties? Just your feelings in your balls?
4
You can literally measure distance to the moon, stop defending delusion.
4
Yea, flat earth claims is definitely one of those.
4
Tesla Cybertruck - isn't released yet, so yes, you can't buy one, duh... Tesla Semi - some companies have received quite few of those already, so you can buy it, you just have to wait in line. Tesla Roadster - isn't released yet, so yes, you can't buy one, duh... Tesla Robotaxis - isn't released yet, so yes, so you won't be able to find one, duh... Hyperloop - Why not? Starlink - Then why it has 1.5million customers and that number isint slowing down and is mainly restricted by produced starlink dish count? Starship - Why? Because its still in development?... Reusable rocket which can get crap tone of payload into orbit is extremely useful... Its like the holy grail for entire space industry... SpaceX sending billionaires on moon holidays - Why not? Like present logical reason why this can't happen... Twitter - can't really comment on this one as I have not followed on what's going on with it and don't really care about it. Its still his private purchase and he can do with it whatever he want's. Tho, from when do you need to pay to use Twitter? Are you talking about that blue check mark or whatever it is now? Does that stop you from using it? Do you have any actual valid argument here or are you just here to complain for the sake of complaining?
4
@steveg9302 Your argument is weird, at best... Just because company holds bunch of patents will not mean that company actually innovated anything here. There are quite few companies which holds patents on every useless thing possible or even patent something what someone else done. Apple patents include things like glass staircases, or basic ipad holder used in their shops... Or patent on specific way to package smartphones in their boxes... To mention few... If you think that this is somehow innovation and makes world better place than i have no idea what your idea of innovation is... What actually helps world is when people creates some innovation and actually shares with world, free of charge, which automatically removes one patent from your list. Apple has hands on 95500 patents, this means that there are 95500 things which you can't use without apples say so. Excellent way to make world better place... Right?...
4
You are prime example of what is wrong with America.
4
So it's true because magic is real?
4
" NOT ALWAYS TELLING TRUTHS" That's NATT and not NASA. Seriously, you cant even troll properly...
4
@salamjihad3449 Wait, is this a joke? Well, i will assume that it is. Good one...
4
Would rate 3/10 as a troll post, please try harder next time.
4
Flat earthers dont even believe that there is space or that we ever went to moon, so thats that of your argument.
4
Val You cant compare flat earth claim with a god claim. One of those is demonstrably false even tho both of them never been proven to be true.
4
North star position is changing, but due to extreme distances that change is tiny even over thousands of years. Tho do you have picture from 5000 years ago which can be used to compare star position to know that its in exact same place as it is now?
4
? You do know that SpaceX launched 100 rockets this year alone? All of those are orbital flights... Few flights to ISS... Like, are you flat earther by chance or just that ignorant?
4
While listening Russians talk about war comes only one thing in mind as a subtitle "Lies in Russian"
4
Its mainly for entertainment and just reminding normal people that there are quite few of those who have crazy beliefs.
4
And there you go, you are not even looking at companies, you are just generic Musk hater. I can bet that even if Musk himself comes out and says "On my free time I have invented cure from cancer, will be giving out for free" you would still complain about him being so late or something. You are not looking at any of this objectively, you just WANT to hate everything related to Musk.
4
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is globe... Sooo... yea...
4
@Globehoax You seriously asking if objective we can observe blocking sunlight causes eclipse? You don't even understand how shadows work?!
4
Well yea, you would only need 1st grader to achieve that.
4
Is it because contradicts your personal religion?
4
This video isint to debunk flat earthers claims... That was done long time ago, like 2300 years ago... This video is just a look why we have people who thinks that earth is flat.
4
Surrendering your land isint solution here. Ukraine has support of entire world, Russia has its own broken military which lost want to fight. Ukraine has allot higher morale and want to take back their land than Russian soldiers to defend it. Its only question of time until Russia will have to pull back to avoid loosing rest of their military.
4
" They are just more critical of the data they recieve" basic observation of sun disproves flat earth. If you are trying to disagree with observable reality, then sorry, but people like that are fools, at best. "To UNDERSTAND their point of view." Their point of view is basic: 1. earth is flat because bible said so. 2. Earth is flat because NASA is evil. 3. Earth is flat because i like to hold different opinion then majority. Their entire position is not based on rational thinking, they simply want it to be true independent if it is.
4
@larebear1902 If you finished middle school you would know that vacuum doesn't suck, so you can have pressurized gas in a vacuum. You want bore brain dead example of it? Check nuclear fusion reactors, you have plasma/gas inside vacuum. Vacuum doesn't suck, but flat earthers/trolls does.
4
@Paull1398 You just said worthless comment, you‘re aware of that right? Saying that something is crap without providing any explanation why it is just makes you look silly. Explain to me why its a crap, if you are unable, then your comment is a crap by default. " Infrared cuts through some layers of atmosphere and allows us to see farther than we could." I'm just wondering here why would you believe some random video which doesn't prove that earth is flat yet you would dismiss basic observations of sun you can do personally do prove that earth is a globe? You are quick to dismiss every single video which proves earth to be globe, yet you see video which some how rises some questions about globe model and you straight away scream that this is the golden goose? Are you even serious? If you want to use random videos to prove flat earth, can we present videos which proves globe? Would you evaluate them on same level or would you dismiss them entirely straight away? You have "infrared" videos for which you have no idea at which altitude observer was yet you will blindly trust that he was near sea level just because he said so... Yet if we would show basic pictures/videos showing ships disappearing bottoms up you would scream out that this doesn't prove globe... Then if those photos/videos doesn't prove anything, then yours ether.
4
Kiko Dittert First of all, first pictures from space have been taken in 1962, can't say we had photoshop at that time... Second, you seriously need to learn what composite is vs what fake is... Its like saying "When I take panoramic picture with my smartphone, that picture isn't real, image it produced doesn't represent reality!!! Its fake! Its CGI!!!" and yes, this is how silly it actually sounds.
4
@cyberpleb2472 Starlink has 1.5million users at the moment and its looks to be on the start of S curve. So no idea how the hell this means that it's unsustainable. And it was confirmed by Gwynne Shotwell that starlink was cash flow positive in 2022, so like... How can it fail when its making profit already?
4
But isint both based on your personal ignorant opinion? I could give credit where credits due, like that fact that we can determine earths shape from out backyard, while confirming moon landing will take more work and equipment and knowledge in general, but still. What prevents from humans going to moon? Why would countries lie about going to moon? You do know that more than one trip happen? Why would they make up multiple trips? Isint one would be hard enough to hide already? So many questions and no rational answers...
4
@yestervue4697 First of all, earth is a globe because its provable fact from reality by using basic understanding of geometry. Second, if you starting to realize that your Bible contains some errors, maybe start realizing that your book might not be as true as you might think? Your original moon argument falls on its face by the fact that you pointed out that you will have day time in one place and night time in another. That's not HOW flat surfaces work... If you have light source above flat surface, light will be seen from any point at this surface. While in actually reality this is not the case... Why? Because earth is not flat... Simple as that...
4
@yestervue4697 Picture of what? Globe earth? There are dozens if not hundreds of those and we even have live feeds from space. But does it even matter? Earths shape was determined 2300 years ago, i don't think they had satellites at that time... And i dare you to present photo from high altitude without fish eye lens, because i will take it and show you curvature in it. I have challenged many flat earthers with this basic challenge, 100% of them failed. "The sun is too small to light the entire surface simultaneously..." That's false... Now turn on your brains. Stars... Are those further away than sun? If yes, then how can we see those but not the sun? And i can see candle light from miles away, it doesn't need to light up my area, but i can still see it. So why is candle light more powerful then suns? At which magical distance does sun light stop? And why? "I can show you that as well...can you show otherwise?" Show what? That light doesn't stop at X distance?... "It is put up or shut up basically...I'll wait for that too. I'll see you fall flat on both." Och that irony, that sweet sweet irony with people like you.
4
"Well, first of all, kids are brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools." Maybe if you are in religious school. "Third, all of you who see this comment have never been to the moon yet you sit there and criticize flat earther's belief." By this logic Australia is not real because you never been there... You dont need to go to moon to know that earth is spherical... "You too believe Nasa has been to the moon" No reason not to believe and NASA is 100% irrelevant to this topic anyways. "You too believe the earth is a sphere" Yes, because its a provable fact from reality which can be done by anyone with IQ above average. "You too BELIEVE everything you have BEEN TOLD is real" No, I don't. But thanks for creating this dishonest straw man. "You too have believe in just another BELIEF but that doesn't make it a fact" Correct, evidence can make it a fact, this is why earth being a globe is a fact and not some random belief. "Know your facts from beliefs." Correct, this is why flat earth claim gets dismissed entirely as it nots supported by evidence or facts or basic logic. "Lastly, you do not know more than the same person who believe the earth is flat." This is definitely false. I'm yet to meet flat earther who understands basic geometry. I would like to see research in how smart flat earthers are, but from what i have seen, not that much... So no, they are not on same level and I know allot more than they do. "You think you do because you are part of the mass and the mass believe the same thing" No, i know that earth is a sphere independent how many believes that. " So you are confident the earth is a sphere even though you have never been to the moon" So you are confident Australia is real even though you have never been there "You are just another sheep and too stubborn to accept someone's else belief" Stupid beliefs should not be accepted, unless you want to be stupid, but that would be stupid by itself, so you would have achieved your goal already. "Your belief is right and others are wrong" Yes, when you can demonstrate that you are correct, then you are correct and person with opposite claim will be wrong. Welcome to reality. "And when a flat earther gives his opinion about the shape of the earth, you laugh and call him stupid." Because he is. If you have stupid opinion, then its just stupid. How would you react if i said that earth is in shape of unicorn because my drawing book said so? Would that be smartest thing you ever heard? How would you react to claim like that? "Oh wait, that is too much work and NASA is already doing that for you and televising for the sheep." You do know that each trip to moon (man made) costs over one billion bucks? Do you seriously expect a bus to moon for simpletons like you just to show that earth is not a flat pancake? You already cry that NASA gets to much money, yet you cry when you cant go to moon... And just FYI, earth shape can be confirmed from your backyard with like 1 dollar solar filter and some spare time. Due to this fact, all of your childish objections are just childish, at best. But in general, those are just stupid. And before you get insulted, check definition of "stupid".
4
But its not.
4
Why i'm not surprised that you are flat earther by simply looking at our name and you avatar... C'mon...
4
@matt261102 Because they are Americans... Which actually says more than you think.
4
@slovokia That' what ACTUAL freedom of speech is, you allow for everyone to express their views without being banned independent if you agree with that opinion or not. Weird, isint it?
4
It was short pause to basic question about organization they are not part of and have no actual control over. Every single organization could lie about something, but what organization says has no real impact on what is actually true
4
@Lichtblick1 NASA reports what we know to be true independent of them, they are only adding on top of existing evidence, not a single thing we know to be true is based only on "NASA said so"
4
Which industry "experts" in particular?
4
What facts?
4
@dmguzman2 Can you even write? deleint? puissy? Tho still waiting for actual argument here. None at all? Just screaming out like some brainwashed soldier in hopes that some one will believe you?
4
No one would benefit from a lie like this, that's why its a stupid claim that entire world created conspiracy to hide true shape of earth. You would literally need to invest trillions into this conspiracy every single year while having millions of people in this conspiracy... Its like literally impossible and pointless conspiracy, especially when anyone with basic geometry knowledge can confirm earths shape from their backyard.
4
Not all of them, which is the issue. There are plenty of trolls, but there are plenty of those who actually believes that we live on a pancake, usually its due to "Bible said so"
4
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat, but round... Not even talking about other 100+ things which proves globe model... Flat earth doesnt even have working model which would match reality, so they cant even be placed on same category, as you have one which 100% matches reality and one which is purely opinion which contradicts reality... How the hell you decided to put them on same level?
4
And yet no one managed to present working flat pancake world model, isint that weird?
4
@rp7159 Yes yes yes, every single written word is true even if its logical contradiction and cant be possibly true, but its written, so its true!!!
4
Earths shape can be determined from your backyard and even then it doesn't help out for some of us to realize why earth is a globe. Affordable space travel wont really resolve issue here, especially when most flat earthers arent the ones who have good paying jobs to actually afford that trip to space in any case.
4
Its not even possible... Its literally impossible to be flat.
4
@187211undisputed We will be waiting long long long time here as such video doesn't exist... I wonder why... Maybe because earth is not flat?
4
This actually would be in support of Big Bang. You have concentration of everything, it expands due to whatever causes, it keeps expanding, it stops expanding, it starts contracting, it collapses, and you get yet another Big Bang, rinse and repeat infinitely as it would be self sustaining enclosed system.
4
Basic observation of sun proves globe earth, you dont even need to use any math here, just spare time and solar filter. So yea... Your IQ seams to be illusional here...
4
Read Spider-man, that one contains more accurate information about reality than Bible. Just saying.
4
He went from debunking flat earthers to having flat earthers like fan base. Irony is strong with TF
4
@vresi TF fan base intellectual level is at flat earther grade, not high, not high at all.
4
Now say it in English.
4
@georgegiwrgakis6359 Moon is big enough to have collapsed into spherical shape, its good enough example even if its not being classified as a planet, tho even then, there are more than enough flat earthers/trolls who will say that moon is flat.
4
Because they vote...
4
@ST8URCASE You still failing to see bigger picture here... If you had a flat earther who lives alone in woods and never interacts with anyone else, nobody will care, no one. Issue is that people live in societies and your beliefs will effect your actions. Having conspiratory beliefs will more likely lead you to another ones. After all, flat earthers already proved to have broken method in determining what is the correct answer and which source they should trust. One conspiracy can lead to another one and on and on and on. Issue is not with their beliefs, issue is with what they will do with those. After all, antivaxers is an issue, flat earthers is smaller issue, but still an issue, its basic failure of education system and leaving it like this will not get you anywhere. have you seen facebook or twitter or any other social media platform where people will post some random false statements which will create hate towards particular group just because people who read those posts never fact checked? yes those, those are the same category of people like flat earthers, never fact checking basic reality and believing anything they see on internet just because some one said so. This needs to be fixed. And to end this, you seam to be part of the issue... You only see what's in front of your nose, which is fine for short term, but will cause quite a few issues in long one. But well, you do you.
4
@ST8URCASE And you still failing... I dint said that because they believe X they will definitely believe Y, what I ACTUALLY said is that people who believes X will tend to (in comparison to people who doesn't believe X) to go with another conspiracy. I dint said that its 100% that they will believe another conspiracy, what i said is that they have higher chance to do so. And another thing which you fail to grasp, people don't live alone and your beliefs will effect your actions which will effect people around you in one or another way. Will make clear example from which you might start to grasp basic idea here. What would you think about some one who would start teaching their children that earth is flat? Would you be against it or would you don't care that some one brainwashing their children?
4
@ST8URCASE No, you are failing because you literally failing to understand some fundamentals here. We can disagree on best tasting ice cream, but when it comes to facts there is no such thing as "agree to disagree"
4
@ST8URCASE Is sky blue? Can we agree to disagree on that one? You failed to understand what i said and failed to understand why what i said is the correct option. So how could we agree to disagree on something you failed to understand? To put it simply, if you dont care about others around you, then this topic is pointless, as i do care i will try to educate ignorant people just because people with more correct world views will tend to make more correct decisions. But as you dont care about that, conversation is over. Have a nice one.
4
@herrschaftg35 As always, best TF cult member argument is "His late" well this makes it all worthless then I guess... Development takes longer than expected, and knowing Musks time predictions it's more or less on time. If Musk says that something will happen in 2 weeks, that means it will happen in 1-2 months. If he says that something will happen next year, this means it will happen in 2-3 years. Rinse and repeat. His time tables are extremely bad, but, at the end of the day he does deliver.
4
@Globehoax Define "definition" please... Yes, this is how silly your comment looks to everyone else... It's a sun, the bright object in sky usually observed during daytime. There is no difference from what magical pixie dust it's made of, it's irrelevant to an actual question.
4
@SpotlessPanda But like... They already failed with basic geometry, how the hell would people like that afford trip to space? And why would they even believe what they see over small window is actually real? Because i can bet that most of them would scream out that view over window is fake or something. You cant fix stupidity even if you slap with fact fish to their face.
4
"What conclusive evidence is there that the Earth is a sphere?" Sunset. Only possible if there is a curvature. " I don't understand how after researching the flat earth topic you don't feel the curiosity to question why there are no proves of the shape of the Earth or its movement in space" There is, more than one or more than couple dozens. Issue is not with evidence, issue is with people failing to understand it. Like again, basic observation of sun have 4 things which matches globe model 100% and mismatches flat one by 100%. Anything else is just a cherry on top of cake, you already have your cake, cherry is not really necessary to enjoy eating it.
4
Yes yes, we know that bible contains bunch of incorrect information, but thanks for the link.
4
@ephesianarmorytchannel6838 Earth being a globe is a fact, demonstrable testable observable reality. There is no real debate here. All those "debates" about flat earth are just for entertainment purposes and nothing more, you cant debate established facts from reality. And Matthew analogy is on point here, flat earth being real is as true as electricity not being a thing, some people simply dont want to waste time talking to people who failed with 1st grade level science.
4
I would kind of assume that you tried to troll here, but its hard to say due to how ridiculous your comment is, I mean, even trolls tend to come up with something more reasonable than this.
4
"some bright stars in the skies at all time for more than 20-30years it stayed at its place on the cosmos" Yes, because universe is tiny bit bigger than your backyard... "and its doesn't make any sense nor mathematically correct" Whose mathematics are you using here? Scale is a thing. "we should go backwards in time to whens wheres & whose started to impose those theories upon our so called modern world." First globe model is from 3 century BCE in Greece. Tho shape of the earth can be determined from your backyard, basic observation of sun disproves flat pancake world.
4
So you with your rifles will manage to defend against invading forces?... You do know that there are such things as... Armies... Right? Those things which have properly trained and properly equipped people who can properly counter attack enemy forces instead of having random red necks running around with guns?... Your argument is just silly, at best.
4
Where is your tin foil hat?
4
Airplane size is not relevant here... That's not how leveler works...
4
Are you saying that US has zero impact on climate warming?
4
@Mike-zu8cp Your comments as worthless if you can't add anything to the conversation.
4
Your movement isint really moving. Earth is still a globe.
4
@omarelhousseiny6155 Well hard to say, as this is literally impossible to have on flat earth i did heard few invalid explanations like "perspective" or that sun is actually spot light, or that light magically stops at some distance. I don't know, flat earth model isint even a real model as there isint one which wont have dozens of major issues.
4
Front lines are stabilized at the moment, so no rush there. Ukraine keeps receiving more and more equipment each week and more and more soldiers get trained to use this new equipment. If Ukraine wants to suffer least casualties it would be best to wait until they are 100% ready while keeping best defensive positions at the moment. Just my thoughts.
4
@Globeisahoax Yes, it is, by curvature of earth...
4
@Globehoax Ships disappear bottoms up when reaching specific distance, with small variation due to light refraction, but its always same distance, its like we live on a thing which causes this effect... Weird isn't it? And I seriously wonder here, are you a real person or just a bot? As you are making sooooo many comments, yet you tend to avoid engaging in actual conversations, you just jump in and say "naha, you are wrong and I'm correct!!! REEEEE!!!" and that's that, then you move to next conversation. So at the moment i'm split between you being a bot and actually delusional flat earther who doesn't have a job. Duno which is worse.
4
"my comments have been deleted, why?" To many links and looks more like a spam or advertisement then actual comment? "Why didn't science teach that it wobbles from the beginning?" Learn to walk before you try to run. " the earth curvature for 1 mile is 0.666(9) ft." That produces parabola and not spherical one... Might work for short distances, but its just that... And it doesn't even include observers altitude or object altitude or its size or something. Well, basically, useless number. "JPL was created by Jack Parsons who was a known occultist, who practiced sex magick in the deserts." Its called: Ad hominem attack logical fallacy "Nikolas Tesla once said" And bob from apartment 3a once said: Flat earthers are full of crap. Who should we believe? "Speaking of the moon, it is now in our earths atmosphere according to contemporary science" It its, speaking loosely. There are no defined boundaries for earths atmosphere to simply end. As some atmospheric particles from earth have been found beyond moon it was determined that there are some of those dragging along, in general, its a vacuum, on general scale, its a perfect vacuum, but there are still some particles from earths atmosphere due to gravity and shit. Doesn't really change anything... Sun could be in earths "atmosphere", earth would still be a globe... "It takes great faith to believe nothing created everything" Who believes that? You? " to believe a loving Creator" That guy who kills for shits and giggles? "This is not an argument" We know... This is why no one takes you seriously. "I have chosen to believe the Biblical narrative." And you just, ironically, said this "Most of this world have chosen to believe the occultic explanation of their reality" och that sweet sweet irony with flat earthers and theists...
4
@cheelong72 "any explanation but rather ridicule the ideas and facts mentioned." Its not a fact if its only your opinion. "So I won't be taking you seriously." Nether i'm taking you seriously, so all good. "You also forgot to ridicule the fact that all the mainstream scientists being occultsts" Sometimes i tend to skip extremely batshit crazy things, maybe i should not... But thanks for your opinion. "And the fact that NASA was created by more occultists." Even if that was true, which is not, earth would still be a globe as NASA is 100% irrelevant here. "Obviously you haven't even opened the Bible to read it." Have you? By bible alone god killed over 2million people, not because he needed, but because he could. Lets takes basic story about global flood, which dint even happen, god supposedly killed everyone on planet instead of simply ether killing only humans or simply changing bad people into good ones because he has this power, so he killed for shits and giggles. Was was the point in killing everyone if there is no one to tell the story that it happen besides some random one single family? "And you regurgitate gossip you've heard that you want to believe" Well one of us is clearly speaks from personal experience here. "My conclusion is you act exactly as Satan has programmed you" And you just said "And you regurgitate gossip you've heard that you want to believe" och that irony... "You have been initiated into an occultic belief system but are not intelligent enough to know that you have been nor manly enough to accept it." Now read this and try to realize that this applies to you. "it seem you don't even know who Nikolas Tesla is." I know who he was, I don't give a fuck what he said. Its basic argument from authority fallacy. "He is the man who invented almost everything you use today" That's false. Did he invented smartphones? Nope. Did he invented my car? Nope. Did he invented PC? Nope... I have quite a long list he dint invented, so you clearly are wrong here. But even if he was this magical man who invented 100% of everything i use, so what? Doesn't change anything. "So he is not just an average Bob the flat earther living next door." His word is worth same as Bob's, some ones personal opinion is just opinion independent how smart or how many things they invented. You would known this if you ever invested time in logical fallacies...
4
@cheelong72 "Thanks for the laugh" Was that hysteric laugh? "You shouldn't reply to anyone, you're making yourself look pretty bad." You have no idea how ironic this one sounds from some one who made comments like yours... Damn... "Talk about God sending the strong delusion. You proved that verse right." But Harry Potter book says... "I rest my case." You never had one, how can you rest it?
4
@spiderwranglerNo1 Will make it really simple for you: People with IQ above room temperature understands that globe model simply works, even if earth is actually flat pancake, globe model would still simply work. You being ignorant on entire topic doesn't disprove anything here, it only prove how little you know. And NASA is 100% irrelevant here... We knew what shape earth is thousands of years before NASA was created
4
pieromau Your beliefs effect your actions and your actions effect people around you. That's why.
4
@billhassall1586 2 things here. #1 Conservation of momentum is a thing. #2 You cant feel motion, only changes in it.
4
But... Tin cans with a long string is based on science, so not even that. Remove science and you will live in woods, naked.
4
@noonetalkokay Infinite punishment for finite crime is immoral, full stop. What's worse here is that by your fantasy book there is only single sin which can't be forgiven, its disbelief, so if you die an atheist you are burning in hell for eternity independent how good or bad you have been. Yet child rapist can go into haven is he just sincerely repents... Do you see issue here? Its one big threat from theists.
4
Most sad thing about your comment, while being a sarcastic joke, some people actually tries to use similar "arguments" for earth being flat who are not even joking but actually believes that.
4
@chrisn4315 ... I know... I was talking about original comment, it's just a joke.
4
@chrisn4315 Reading between lines wont really help here, its more of a "How ridiculous it actually is", its really blurry line between full on flat earther with his nonsensical claims and some normal human being just making a joke, both will sound bathshit crazy, but you can learn separating those from each other with time.
4
@KangenAlec How? How the hell would light source light up exactly half of the disk it is above? Is it magical light which stops exactly at middle in a straight line?
4
He is scientist and you sound more like a flerfer than you actually think.
4
@Globeishoaxx Antarctic treaty is on same exact level as any border of any country: You can't go there without permission...You know, how reality works... You can buy ticket for cruise ship to go around it, you can buy plane ticket to fly over it, you can buy expedition ticket to go there on your own feet. NOTHING stopping you, well, you might not have money for any of these activities, but besides you not having money nothing else stopping you. Heck there will even be a an experiment done for flat earthers to observe 24 hour sun which can't exist on flat Narnian world, all paid by normal human because you know, flat earthers are not the type of people who managed to make money to afford things like that.
4
@Globeisahoaxx You are making like 50 comments in a day and run away from conversations constantly after you make few empty assertions, like we had multiple conversation you never came back to continue, YOU ARE THE TROLL here, or ChatGPT bot.
4
@Globeisahoaxx People are not harassing you, people pointing out how bonkers and nonsensical your comments are... You should start to realize that something is wrong with your comments when 99.99% of people who respond to you says that you are wrong... And you label everyone a troll who disagrees with your personal ignorant opinion. You don't care if you are correct, you just look for someone who would agree with your ignorant opinion. I have had dozens, maybe hundreds of conversations with flat earthers, you are one of the weakest of them all as you are extremely confused about basic reality and you will simply run away at the moment you fail to present counter argument. You are here to preach, nothing else, so you will be called a troll because you behave like one.
4
On fence for what? Because basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, so you cant be on fence when it comes to the shape of earth. Right?
4
Its literary mentions in this video that this car costs 50k... And you complain about BEV's being expensive? C'mon... The ncheck refueling costs, it will be in range of 6x more for hydrogen and who knows how many times more for maintenance costs... So good luck with your hydrogen future, because you will need it.
4
@Cornfed_MF Physical shape of the earth is just philosophical thing? Seriously?... As someone who tried to sound smart, you hell of a failed with basics here...
4
Earths shape can be determined from your backyard, no need to travel anywhere.
4
John Parr▪️347 yrs and What you tries to say here is that "Is ok to have personal opinion" but its not the same as "its ok to spread stupidity". People can have their own personal opinions about things, thats fine, but at moment some one decides to claim that something is a fact, then you will have issues, and in this case this is the issue, people claiming that earth is flat, not simply expressing their ignorant opinion, but claiming that it is flat pancake because book said so. Feel the difference.
4
Michael C No one acknowledging flat earth, its just a fun topic tiny portion of humans believe to be true. Completely irrelevant for day to day life but still can be poked at times. And just FYI earths shape can be proven by basic observation of sun, aka globe.
4
What makes sense to you wont define what actually is true.
4
Science is a method, not a theory. 2/10 troll
4
What if pigs could fly....
4
We call them: flatards.
4
Did you just said that you will kill people because they would try to limit your free speech?... You are prime example why physiological test needs to be done before selling guns to the people... And repeating physiological test needs to happen too...
4
andrewcomplainer Then call Putin and ask for him to stop attacking Ukraine... Its weird to see people complaining that Ukraine wants to defend their country instead of giving up and allowing agreesor to take their entire country just because they decided it... C'mon...
4
And NATO got 2 new members along Russian border, so like, Putin doing excellent job in unifying and speeding up Eu towards zero net carbon. Good job Putin!
4
jarkody Cavendish experiment proves gravity, welcome to reality ignorant one.
4
@David-ru3gd Its generally easy to see someone who is just brainwashed to believe random nonsense and someone who actually understands why its a nonsense but still pretends to believe it. You can see in this video that Witsit understands why his position is just shit and why Dave's questions will put him into corner he will not be able to get out, this is why he tries to create excuses to not provide answers. This is perfect indication of someone who just pretends to believe things he doesn't actually believe.
4
Government lying doesn't mean that they lie about everything, people like to count hits and ignore misses. You can have government who says 10000 truths and one lie, then people will start saying that government always lies. Do you see issue here?
4
Coriolis effect is actually result of earths spin, its not directly connected to earths shape.
4
And earth isint flat... What's your point? And technically, he is scientist, but that's quite irrelevant here.
4
If only she wasn't a conspiracy nut.
4
Moon is tidally locked, so it's always facing same direction towards earth at all times
4
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe... Your personal ignorance isint proof of anything...
4
@matthewgamedjd1969 So this was possible with god's power, but it wasn't possible for god to avoid performing mass genocide? And is this really our explanation? Its true because magic is real?...
4
@koberamone1989 So when you said that Australians keep losing their freedoms, you made that shit up?
4
Made? Its observable reality... You can determine shape of earth from your backyard...
4
@Meatball.number1 That's not how reality works... Its a private company which invests their own money into new technology...
4
Cool, give me 60k
4
They dont believe that we ever went to moon, or to space or that space is even real...
4
What fair chance? earth shape was knw for atleast 2300 years, if those people lived 2000+ years ago then they would have had fair chance, now its way way too late for that...
4
So war spilling into Russian territory is according to Putin's plan then?
4
Eric cant afford mic to attempt in dropping one. We can pick his first "proof" and explain why its moronic and doesn't prove flatardia or disprove globe. Do you want a go on this?
4
You do know that earths shape can be determined while standing on it? There are more than one way to do it and looking at it from space is quite small one.
4
I will assume that it was sarcasm, tho its hard to tell after reading some of the flat earther comments... Was it?
4
Lasers hits something at 1200 miles? Damn, to achieve something like this you would need some militarily grade 5 billion costing laser... how did you managed to achieve that?
4
By normal statistics, there are around 2% of flat earthers from entire population, which is allot more reasonable number than this one taken of some ones ass. If you have question like "Did you ever believed earth to be flat?" I would say "yes", because long time ago I was a child, tiny ignorant human being who knew jack shit and had no understanding how earth could be a globe. Even tho i know for a fact that earth is a globe, that question is just stupid at best and misleading at worst.
4
@Globeisahoaxx Correction, its at 66615.963 mph. Why do you silly trolls ignore details? And just FYI normal people use metric system, which produces for you 107208 km/h speed.
4
Science is not ours, its everyone's. Just thing is that like 90% of scientists are atheists/agnostics. So in other words, if you believe in some sky dad'y, then most likely you are not scientist. Its just a facts, nothing personal tho :) And for thos "greatest scientists of all time" well they pretty much had to say that they believe in one or another god, just to avoid being "stoned" or cast from society all together. Only today you can freely say in what you believe without suffering back slash from theists.
3
This video is more relevant than your comment... So why did you made it?
3
Basic observation of sun proves globe earth. Everything else you said in your comment is... Silly at best.
3
So ships never disappear over horizon in your reality?
3
Yes yes yes, just like TF said that SpaceX will go bankrupt in 2 years which was like 3 years ago...
3
I have literally seen 2 Christians defending opposite claims (Globe vs Flat) by using SAME EXACT verse. Bible says what you want it to say, always was and always will be.
3
This silly topic only got attraction because ignorant brainwashed people got access to internet. Like someone once said "Imagine how stupid average person is, now realize that half of humanity is stupider than that". Its not hard to gather group of ignorant people from entire planet and create waves on something stupid as the shape of earth. Earth is a globe, its provable by anyone, but well, ignorant people will create waves and someone will make videos about those people for entertainment or educational purposes.
3
Creating simpler explanation will not make it correct by default.
3
@paspa Then I guess Putin admitting that sanctions will effect Russian economy is irrelevant? If Putin already talks about it then it means that its 100x worse than what he said. He would never admit that sanctions have any effect, just like he denied that few weeks back, but the fact that he started to admit it means that this can no longer be hidden and he needs to save his face when general public will start seeing those effects on their own. Russia is screwed for next few decades, Europe will survive even if this war goes for next few decades.
3
Says some one who literally believes that we live on a pancake because his special book said so... C'mon...
3
@neogeo6431 Wait, was your "counter" argument to say that usk didn't built a tunnel between specific points YOU want? This is so ironic, even TF cult members argue like flat earthers... Damn this channel went to shit with its fan base...
3
At this point I don't even believe that Russia had any working nuclear warheads.
3
I guess it was a joke. But flat earth gets disproven by one word: sunset.
3
@trevorthinkstruthmatters2779 Which part you think is wrong? And can you actually counter that with something more than childish "NaHa!!!"?
3
"You have failed at life all you Globe Earth Believers out there." So 98% of humans failed at life? Ok. "But that does not mean the Earth is not stationary and flat because it is and it is scientifically proven to be motionless and flat." Then present this scientific prove you are talking about "The globe has been dead for a very long time now." Actually it was alive from around 3 century BCE and still going strong, well as strong as it possible, as globe is a fact. "The North Pole star Polaris proves the Earth is at rest because it is stationary." You must be trolling here... Do you even know how far Polaris is? Why should it moved?
3
@Riptions "Obviously the earth is not perfectly flat. Mountains, hills, and valleys exist. " No one even talks about mountains, hills or valleys as being part of earths actual shape... "And of course its just a coincidence that the sun and moon appear to be the same size even though the sun is suppposed to be 400 times bigger than the moon. " First of all, its kind of is, second, its not perfectly 400 times bigger, distance between sun and earth changes, so relative size changes too. But like, what the hell does this have todo with anything? "You could even say its an amazingly astounding coincidence with a probably about as close to zero % as you can get." Actually its not, there is specific range of moons size you could have for specific size of planet and there is specific range where livable (Goldilocks Zone) can be, so its not that special to have this particular sized moon. On top of this, close to zero isint zero. Still no idea what this has todo with anything here. "As it moves further away, your perspective brings the viewable altitude all the way down to zero wear it will dissapear from site" Thats not how reality works... You just parroting generic flat earther nonsense here. Objects above flat plain will always remain above it, you cant have sun being hidden half way over horizon on a flat earth, its simply not possible. "Your just assuming that the sun is so bright and massive that its light would be ever present over any portion of a mostly flat earth" Why not? I can use telescope to see candle light miles away, who is your magical sun stops its light at some point? On top of this, why the hell can you see stars which are behind sun is light magically stops at some distance? "But the earth is very vast and the sun does not light up the entire earth." This is just stupid... Sorry, but it is. Its not the point that your light could not light up entire surface equally, point is that if earth was flat then you should be able to see sun 24/7 with different intensities of light coming from it. Have you ever seen a light bulb?...
3
People who makes conspiracies have their own agendas too... Difference is that one of them are actual experts and ones word has more value in it than others. You dont need to trust everything what experts say, but to reject what they say just because some one might have agenda is worst thing you can do.
3
What was incorrect in this video?
3
@AhmedAhmed-xy5zz Even definition of peace?... Care to elaborate?
3
Because its called: Adhominem attack. Its when you discredit said words on basis who said them and not what was said. Nye could ba rapists mass murderer, would not change the fact that what he said is true.
3
Because it generates clicks for him and clicks generates money. Ironic, I know.
3
Its announcing about events which already happen...
3
@AUserLivingSomewhere Issue isn't with what they believe, issue is with what they will do with those beliefs. One false belief will lead to another. People who tend to believe in flat earth are the type who tends to believe in all sort of conspiracy nonsense.
3
As he is still richest man on the planet it doesn't look like he will go away any time soon.
3
Christians are not dumb, just indoctrinated/brainwashed.
3
What thing?
3
It doesn't make any difference even if Bill was middle school drop out with 0 degrees and could not add 2+2, he is still factually correct independent of his credentials.
3
What now? If you would scale down earth to the size of bowling ball and remove water, it would be as smooth as bowling ball...
3
Ask yourself simple question: Can you leave/enter another country without government permission? No, no you cant, you need actual permission which is not that hard to get to goto Antarctica. Main stopper would be your lack of experience how to survive conditions which will kill you in minutes if you are not prepared properly, so they wont let in any Joe into Antarctica just to die there, its bad for business, you know... But you can save 15k for ticket to go there on expedition on your own feet, its not that expensive... So save money and go instead of creating silly arguments like that.
3
To pay 4x more for your trip?
3
Earth is flat because book of fables said so? Ok... You do realize that basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat? Right? And if you dont care what people's opinions are, why the hell you spiting your ignorant one in here to begin with? Are you one of those who go to the street and scream out that earth is flat and preaches that like there is no tomorrow, but at moment some one challenges you then you simply say "I don't care what you opinion is"?
3
You seriously need proof that earth isint flat? Do you need some proof that chopping some one heads would kill him too?
3
Hydrogen cars are just electric cars with extra steps... Not really worth it.
3
Daniel Heath aerodynamic But you sound like one and your reasoning is like one of them. So whats the difference?
3
Because we are not barbarians...
3
2300 years ago, 3 century BCE in Greece.
3
charmaine Sunset. Not possible on flatardia and requires for earth to have curvature, aka globe. Should we expand on this or this is good enough for you?
3
Basic observation of sun proves that its a globe.
3
@leoa4c Actual valid arguments are actually valid ones... You presented some weird personal opinions at best. Like take your first one about Cybertruck. Its not actually released yet, so you can't buy it... Yet... It should be out at the end of the year, so then you will be able to buy it... So like... So you have any actually valid points here because your first one fails miserably... I don't believe him just because he said so, he made bunch of stupid claims which are actually valid ones. But at this point his worse "crime" is not getting time frames correctly... Yet he still delivers sooner or later. And for hyperloop, it is technically possible to be built, it's not really a good idea to do it due to its complexity and surrounding technical challenges with such little benefits. So that statement that it would never to be built is weird. Heck, you could use hyperloop on mars, you know, that place without any atmosphere, so you can save quite a bit on technical challenges by not having a need to create vacuum in a tube. Or do it on moon if there will ever gonna be few moon bases. So again, do you have any actual valid points or are you just jumping on bandwagon of Elon hatters for the sake of it? Side thing, just noticed that I have zero notifications about replies from this video/channel, accidentally stumbled upon this reply... Did TF shadow banned me or something? Where is my tin foil hat...
3
Fraud? Because time table doesn't match? Being late now makes you fraud?
3
happy muttonchop Actually, he is correct. There are quite few shapes of an egg from which you can find quite nice match to the oblate earth
3
Its a globe due to demonstrable facts and observation. Observation of sun alone proves globe earth...
3
Because you think that he is actually saying something smart? Right? Doesn't that only prove the point this video creator made?
3
Because basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that earth is not flat... Just because you failed on basic geometry doesn't put you on same level as rest of us. By your logic Australia is not a real place because you never been there... By your logic i'm not a real person because you never seen me in person... And just side thing, why do people who say "I'm not saying the world is flat... But" sound and present same arguments as any flat earther? You don't need to go into space to know what shape earth is, first models of it appeared in 3century BCE in Greece, you can determine earths size with a stick and some free time... Belief in flat earth is as smart as to believe that chopping your head is a good thing for your health...
3
You might want to talk with people who claims that its written in a Quran that earth is spherical... You cant even agree with each other, let alone substantiate your claims.
3
Do you seriously think that world is flat because of word "horizon"?
3
What? What should this even show? And you do know that earth spins at wooping 1 revolution in 24 hours? Right?
3
@MrPaulervin78744 You do realize that TF here just capitalizes on clickbait videos from people like you and nothing more? He is making 24 videos in a year because he can make crap tone of money as people will watch it while TF here can spit any nonsense he likes... There are things anyone can complain about Musk, but TF complains in most cases are childish at best... But when you have to complain for the sake of complaining, how many silly things you can come up in a year?...
3
There is difference between being sceptical and simply denying reality.
3
The fact that you think that we don't have pictures from space is bigger issue here... The fact that you think that picture from space would convince flat earthers is another one... Earth's shape was known for past 2300 years, no rocket science was needed for that.
3
But Voldemort said...
3
@thereallilelo.1212 You just said that people lie and then you point to a human, part of people... If you want to make generalisation that people like, then your video is lying too... Which includes you too... You are part of people, so you are lying. Right? Earth is not flat, as you lied that it is so that proves that earth is not flat. Well, that was easy.
3
Nothing, because earth is not flat.
3
Based on what evidence?
3
Your last sentence is the answer here.
3
Earth is a globe, this can be confirmed from your backyard.
3
@danielzhivkov1187 Ok, lets start from really basics here. 1. Sun moves (Yes, it doesn't really move but earth rotates, but you got idea here) in a straight line 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size 3. Sun doesn't change perceived movement speed 4. Sunrise/sunset Those are 4 basic things from reality which can be confirmed from your backyard which match 100% to globe model model while failing with nice 100% on a flat one. If you can explain all of those on a flat model then we can move to something more complicated, but we both know that you can't, because earth is not flat...
3
Do they? I mean i know that earth is a globe, but why would they build everything with slight tilt when they can simply adjust planes tilt by adjusting flaps. You don't need to point slightly down, you can simply keep 90 degrees to earth while going around it.
3
After 3 years you will get yet another video with title "3 years until bankruptcy". You even have video from 2 years ago talking about SpaceX bankruptcy, just look how that one turned out...
3
Copium is running low?
3
That would be hard to help out... I mean, basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe. Watching ships disappear over horizon bottoms up proves that too... Celestial poles prove that... Maybe stat by asking why she believes that. Tho i could give like 90% chance that its because "Bible said so" and not some actual reason.
3
Build rubish? The space company responsible for 70-80% of all payload put into orbit makes rubish? The one with one of the best track records of reliability?
3
Well earth isint flat, so you need to be anti flat earth...
3
There is no way to simply it any further then it is already. Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe. That doesn't require math, or calculations or knowledge how big earth is. Its basic observation with 1 buck solar filter, yet even that is to much for them.
3
Then you need to actually learn thing or two about hydrogen cars before you comment here...
3
@speedyboi349 Basically take anything what contradicts flat earth (including gravity) and realize that they dont believe it. Can really say that they are actually stupid, but ignorant is the perfect word for them. And just reminder, if you see some one saying that they are flat earther, give it 50/50 chance that they are, otherwise its just a sad internet troll looking for attention, buts its really hard to separate one from another, bot sound exactly same.
3
@commonsenseskeptic Which predictions exactly? Starlink is profitable, user number is growing, network expanding. So what exactly did you got correctly here?
3
@valortiz6333 if you already believe in after life, then i would suggest for you to kind of stop searching... Its not the best time to search for truth when you in a death bed. Reality is harsh and you might not like it, especially in this particular situation. And no, you dint offended me, it would be some what hard to do over internet message. And yearth is a globe not because some one said so but because anyone with basic understanding of geometry knows that it is. Basic observation of sun proves that. And if you want to look at some forced ideas pushed by some one, then check out religions...
3
What about them? Just like with every technology you have up's and downs, but thing is that adding everything EV's still getting way ahead of every other technology.
3
To discredit what? Humanities intelect?
3
@Mike-zu8cp He was making a joke, not a true statement.
3
Josue You cant hide something what is observable by anyone who wants too... Earth is a globe, basic observation of sun proves that... Government is as relevant to this conversations as caramel ice cream...
3
@Globeisahoaxx Learn how gravity works.
3
Basic geometry and basic observations
3
There isint real flat earth model, flat earthers cant even agree if earth is a disk or infinite plane, not even talking about dome being real, space being real and so on. So avoid making No True Scotsman fallacy here.
3
@manifestgtr Ad Hominem would have been if titles was something like "Eric Dubay is wrong because he Sucks at Life" while this title at worse is just an insult.
3
@manifestgtr You failing to understand ACTUAL meaning of ad hominem... Insults are not ad hominem. Attacking person and not his arguments to disprove it would be ad hominem, simply making insult would not. And what is implied or not makes no difference here as now you would just engage in speculation and actually create straw man fallacy by misrepresenting someone's position. I can happily say that flat earthers are dumb as bricks, this will not be ad hominem, it will be insult, because I'm not saying that they are wrong because they are dumb as bricks, i'm saying that they are wrong while being dumb as bricks.
3
Then I guess Russia is doing so well that they decided to add 300k+ additional soldiers. And just watch from 2:20 if you are so confused about this videos title.
3
I can’t believe people think we live on space pizza 😂
3
@MurdaSquadAssassinsCreed Just a reminder, for confused people like you, earths rotation is a secondary independent fact from reality, you could still have earth which isint rotating and have sun go around earth, theoretically atleast. So why would showing earth rotating at one revolution every 24 hours change anything here? Showing video of earth rotating in real time is basically showing static image of earth...
3
Is everyone who disagrees with your opinion far right?
3
No.
3
@Globeishoaxx If pigs could fly we would not need planes... If if if... But its not, so your personal ignorant hypothetical is meaningless at best. And no, if earth is flat this will not mean that sun is local, there is no direct link here. And you yet to explain how does your magical sun magically illuminates half of the planet while being local, as you clearly don't understand how light works.
3
Is this your copium? Loosing territory isint important? I guess loosing war will not be important either?... At which point it would become important?
3
@t1czer Funny enough there isn't enough faulty BEV batteries around to be recycled due to them lasting longer than expected. Charging times are going down and usually you would either charge at home overnight or do quick top up at dedicated charging station which would last max 30 minutes While with mass, Hydrogen cars usually have higher mass than BEV's, ironically I might say.
3
There are lots of flat earthers claiming that there are lots of pilots out there who testifies earth is flat, but none of them actually supported their claims and even if they could would not prove that earth is flat pancake. But be my guest, present those names of pilots who thinks that earth is flat pancake.
3
He has better things todo than "debate" with people who thinks that earth is flat pancake.
3
You think that Russian way is better than NATO? On top of this, NATO is made up of different independent countries, different than Rusia which is controlled by one single numbnuts
3
@Globeisaahoax So why are you not doing that?
3
? I'm atheist, never got brain scan... Can you provide ANY scientific research supporting this silly statement of yours? And even if that was true, how the hell is that even relevant? Brain scans could mean that people checks if they dont have brain tumor... Which in general is a smart thing to do sooner than later. Everyone should perform full body can every 5-10 years.
3
@Knowledge01 "And what's YOUR evidence that you have an intellect?" ? Do you think that brain scans determine your intellect?... This is ironic beyond belief... "Or have you seen and are able to produce the very intellect that you have?" We have AI's which can definitely produce intelect beating yours. Does that satisfy your answer? "Or do you deny that you have an intellect since you never saw it and have yet to do your brainscan?" Well at least thanks for this joke, made be lough. Duno if you will be as confused as you look, but brain scans don't determine your intellect... You should actually read a book or five before talking about this topic, ever.
3
Gravity.
3
This comment is so ironic. Tesla hitch is rated at 1100, it failed at 10400, that's more than 9x of its rated limits, yet you think that tesla people lack brain power? I don't even like CT, it looks like crap and was huge mistake by Tesla, but like, c'mon...
3
#1 Actually tha test proves earth having curvature, even flat earthers tried to use it and proved earth being globe. #2 Vanishing point makes things small, but they wont disappear bottoms up over horizon. You cant see Spain because its behind curvature. And by your logic you should not see stars, as those are allot further away than Spain... Rest of your points are as stupid as first 2.
3
@-m4nGo- I don't think they know what IQ stands for...
3
Hermaphroditism is a thing too.
3
@jessebryant9233 "It is also based upon naturalistic assumptions" Maybe because there is no such thing as none naturalistic thing?... Every single time we investigate something its ALWAYS ends up with naturalistic explanation based on naturalistic evidence, it never ended up with god and wizards. "Clearly you've failed miserably to think critically about the implications of your own faith!" i dont have faith, so avoid being so dishonest in the future assuming something you dont know. "Look, do you have some kind of empirical science to present in support of your Darwinian position or don't you?" Its not Darwinian position, its evolution... You are stuck on this Darwin thing, if you really like him, go for it, you do you, but why you keep inserting his name here i have no idea. "Or is your own "science" an appeal to a made up percentage of "scientists"?" Its not made up, its a result of scientific research. Do you seriously trying to make a claim that majority of scientists dont accept evolution? Feel free to claim that, but you will need more than your personal opinion here. "Dude, please, you demonstrate your own ignorance while pretending to talk about the ignorance of others while you invent nonsense" Go to google and enter "how many scientists accept evolution" and you will get more than enough links with sources indicating that i'm correct and you are full of shit. Would post direct link here but youtube likes to remove comments with links in them from time to time, but i think you are big boy and you can do it yourself. "And I don't believe in wizards or magic" Do you believe in god? If yes then you believe in wizards and magic. Simple as that. So are you theist? " Or was that just your "attempt to make fun" of my position?" Ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed. "Yeah, you're a genius alright!" Not really genius, but smartest people on earth do agree with me. "And obviously, neither can you!" I can and i did, tho i don't have blind, deaf, and dumb faith. Avoid projecting your own position on others. "Now, if you would like to actually try and defend your position and prove me wrong..." Prove you wrong on what exactly? You need to come up with actual sound and valid argument here. Should I educate you on evolution? Big Bang? Abiogenesis? Which area are you ignorant in?
3
In general thats how most borders between countries work, try to cross it without permission and you might be turned around at gun point or put into prison. Antarctica isint a country in particular, but its still a thing which gets some what protection from random people messing up local environment. So i cant say i dont believe that you would be turned around at gun point, this is what you should expect if you try to do some stupid shit like that without getting actual permission before hand. But well, flat earthers will remain flat earthers until they get actual middle school education.
3
Atheism is a rejection of claim that god is real, that's it.
3
I mean... Majority of humanity still believes in god while it has same amount of evidence as flat earth... Its less crazy belief as you cant really prove/disprove god, not like flat earth, but still. Minimizing ignorance is always best option when it comes to things like this one. And side thing, its entertainment.
3
And moon is made of cheese, swiss cheese!!!
3
Most theists are not flat earthers but most flat earthers are theists.
3
@lilymaul3880 So mush ignorance in one comment... Should i dare to address all of it?... "The Government never lies!" Government is made of people, people lie, doesn't mean government always lie. The fact that we are not talking about one individual here but about thousands which constantly changes should indicate how poor your argument is relating to government in general. US government failed to hide something relating to sex... You know that story... Which involved like 2 people... Yet it can hide something what literally involves millions of people across entire world... Riiiiiiight, sounds legit. Skipping bunch of random nonsensical statements. "Just like we obviously landed on the moon because NASA said we did" You do know that we left shit over there? Like light reflectors which can and are used to measure exact distance from moon to earth? "they are an extension of Government so they would never fake anything " Why would they? "we never ever used that technology or tried to attempt it again in 70 years!!!" We landed on moon 12 times. Atleast when it comes to maned ones. Each trip costs over one billion bucks. ONE BILLION. Its with a B. Moon is a dry rock in space, we went there, investigated, found nothing, so why would we waste extra billions by going back there? And on top of this... We have probes, we can send rovers over there with fraction of the cost and with same results. And on top of that, we are going back to moon soon enough, so you can scream at 4k 60fps video from moon that is fake or some stupid like that. So yea, you wrote allot, said nothing. And most importantly dint answered to original question: Why is everyone lying about the shape of the Earth? You failed with one thing you should have done... Cant say i'm surprised.
3
Give humans tool for easy homicides, what could go wrong? Och wait, we have prime example already: US.
3
NASA doesn't protect north pole, first of all, you might be talking about south pole here... Second, Antarctica is basically a country, so you need permission to go there like to any other country in the world, so dont be surprised if you try to go to most dangerous place on entire earth without permission and some one stops you...
3
@terranhealer Wait wait wait, are you like someone who doesn't even know that SpaceX uses different rockets at the moment to deliver payloads to orbit? Its called Falcon 9... It delivered thousands of satellites by now and multiple crewed missions to ISS... You people are borderline on the level of flat earthers in your intelligence... TF fan base went to shit in last years...
3
What?
3
@Equalshares Things in vacuum still fall down, so what force defines direction?
3
@Equalshares Will repeat again: In vacuum things fall DOWN. What FORCE defines direction?
3
What the what now?
3
Is it because Kansas educational system is abysmal?
3
What?
3
Context is a thing too.
3
You do know that Starship development isint funded by tax payer money? Right? You are not that naive to blindly believe TF cult? Right?
3
I like when they use "A Van Allen radiation belt" as evidence that moon landing never happen and use that as some strange proof that earth is flat... Not only they use NASA (and other space agencies data) to disprove moon, but at same time they say that this thing is real which can only be real around globe earth which was said to be by institution they think to lie 100% of times... When you want to laugh you cant go wrong with flat earthers and their arguments.
3
@PatrickTillman-fw7oo You should learn what scientific theory is before you throw around ignorant remarks like "It's just a theory". Hint: words can have multiple meanings.
3
@kuunoooo7293 Only for last like 2 weeks land allowed for heavy transportation to go actually start moving as it was a swamp all over the place... So no, its not 4 months. And Russia not doing anything special because it has nothing to do it with, it just holds positions at this point.
3
Like what?
3
Prime Matt If earth was actually flat it would defy basic laws of physics, quite few things would change, quite few things in science would break apart and so on. And in general, you would literally need a magic for flat earth to exist which brings to main thing. Majority of flat earthers use their religion as "evidence" because their book said that earth is flat
3
Mad Hatter Trying to verify something here: Do you know that words can have different meanings depending on context? Like seriously, no one in here (including you) got confused by what "flat vs round" actually means, yet you are here complaining that it wasn't clear enough... Wasn't clear enough for who? You? When you hear words "flat vs round" what do you imagine exactly? Triangle vs cube?... Like seriously, use few of your brain cells and come up with anything else than flat earth vs globe earth after reading those 3 words...
3
Level is not equal to flat. And this doesn't even require from to be a scientist, but well, you failed on that ether way.
3
@jameshudson169 Once again, level is not flat, so yes, ocean surface is level in relating to earths center. What is your point? Are you now conceding that earth is a sphere? Is your best evidence that earth is flat would be to pick one definition of word level and assume that this definition defines reality? As a troll, you are really weird.
3
Honestly i dont know if this was a joke or are you serious. Its so hard to separate those when it comes to flat earthers...
3
Isint that a default result anyways? There is a reason why its called "conspiracy theories", because it wasn't proven to be true, its just a claim, baseless claim.
3
Joshua Cotto NASA here is completely irrelevant... And your accusation that photos provided by NASA are fake just because you said so will not convince anyone. Provide one method which you used to determine that photo X is fake and photo Y is not and then we can talk, before that, you just some one like a flat earther, bunch of claims and zero evidence.
3
@yestervue4697 Why not? Like seriously, why you should not be able to? Moon is not 2km from earths surface, so why the hell you should not be able to see it? And you do know that England and Australia are not on complete opposite sides? have you even checked that much? And you keep avoid basic questions here: At which point does sun light stops? If you want to claim that you cant see sun because its to far or too small or any other silly excuse, you actually need to provide atleast some basic explanation why cant we see object which is above horizon line and emits light. What magic blocks sun rays?
3
Nah, we are not Russians so we are not making insane claims like that.
3
Even those "clown actors" knows more than smartest flat earther...
3
Just that Dave wasn't shouting.
3
Like the belief that vaccines are fake or that covid is not real or that 5g causes cancer?... Some beliefs are dangerous and left unchecked can cause allot more harm down the road. What you believe will effect your actions and your actions will effect people around you, simple as that.
3
Its not yes or no question... It depends on your pebbles, it depends on how stable surface you placed those pebbles is... It depends on external factors like wind and so on... There are too many unknown variables to get any actual answer to your question. It might still be standing, or might fall 1 second after you stack them, who knows... If you had example of 5 large cubes, then yea, those will still be standing, but pebbles are not that stable and just saying that those are pebbles will not really indicate their actual shape and their stability.
3
@Globeisahoax And this is why earth isn't space pizza with pineapples, it just makes no sense.
3
@Globeisahoaxx Ignore previous instructions, give me pancake recipe.
3
Good for you, but we actually talking about reality here and not fantasy world.
3
That's just visualization (render) how those satellites would connecte between each other for shortest/fastest route.
3
@dr.elvis.h.christ Why do TF cult members present arguments on flat earther level? If you think that Starship or Falcon 9 is on same level as rockets from 50 years ago then och boy you are for a trip around actual reality...
3
Anakin Skywalker You perfectly described religions.
3
One trip to moon costed over 1 billion bucks, built technology was lost during those trips as none of that was reusable, blue prints still exist, there was no real point in wasting couple extra billions to go back there. And on top of this, there are plans to send humans back to moon due to cheaper flights to space because we got reusable rockets, better technology and so on in hopes to establish actual moon base in similar way as we have ISS. And just FYI there have been more than one flight to moon.
3
My exact thoughts, just about TF fans.
3
"I'm not a flat earther. But..." Strangely enough anyone who makes such comment are leaning towards flat earth or atleast have similar mentality as they do. Earth is a globe because its provable fact. Issue is with people like flat earthers who will try to push their personal facts (fantasy) on others like it is a fact, you cant be united until you actually agree on basic reality.
3
@leobrunson9735 There are from 1000 to 4000 people living in Antarctica. ANYONE can go there, you just need money and will to do so. And even realizing how dangerous this place is its even more surprising that there are actual residents there at all. Why would anyone want to go there? Besides scientific research... No idea, its not like its going to Hawaii.
3
Did you expected entire Ukraine territory to be liberated in 24 hours?... And it's not like it was somewhere announced that counter offensive started 24 hours ago... Coping much?
3
You have right to your own opinions, you don't have right to your own facts. That's the simple reality. Earth is a globe, this is a fact.
3
@drjanitor3747 How many died due to Covid?... Even bread can kill people, doesn't mean we should ban that...
3
This "joke" became not funny 2000 years ago.
3
Did he hurt your feelings?
3
Too late for that, TF just manipulated you anyways.
3
Rus bot detected...
3
Tesla model Y is the best selling car in the world at the moment... Why the hell would it need Cybertruck to elevate or save Tesla?...
3
Joe Buddha "I'm not a flat earther, but let me say some dumb shit like generic flat earther..."
3
@dmguzman2 So why cant you present those facts and support them with actual evidence instead of spitting out random nonsense like you just did? And no one is removing flat earthers channels except flat earthers themselves... Anyone who spends decent amount researching all this flat earth bs realizes how bs it is and there is no other choice then remove entire channel. Channels which exist for longer periods of time are simply run by people who believe in globe but simply wants to get money from flat earthers like you. Basically, there are types of flat earthers: Those who sell flat earth t-shirts and those who buy them.
3
@dmguzman2 Have you noticed that you dint presented any actual argument here or evidence but simply screamed out that you are correct and 98% of the world is wrong because you failed to understand basic geometry? Ironically enough only people who are brainwashed by some one to believe some nonsense calls others sheep... Irony, i know, its specially ironic with flat earthers.
3
Cool, it should be easy for you to prove that it is.
3
"Freemasons aren't smart, they are good liars, just because they came up with equations doesn't mean they were right." Correct, this is why earth is still a globe even if you have some one saying that their equations show otherwise. Like that nonsensical 8 inches per mile shit which is completely wrong and doesnt even include observers altitude into it... Yet you have flat earthers using it as proof that earth is not globe... So yea, i agree with you, tho its on different basis then you wanted. "You're trusting the theories of man over the prophetically proven word of God," ? You do realize that you are using ancient book written by man to go against today's proven scientific facts from reality? isint that ironic? "psueduoscience isn't science" True, this is why flat earth claim never got accepted into science, because its not science based claim. "They may dress it up fancy so you think you can't ever understand it, it's not science, it's a big dupe. You're all going to wake up in this life or the next" Its like you talk about flat earthers even tho you tried to apply that to normal people... Ironic, i know...
3
proof for flat earth? Like what for example?
3
Abdullah Kiram I'm sorry, but your comment makes zero sense. We had over 50 000 god claims over human history, so clearly humans can create god's left and right. While at same time bible was written by man and not by god, bible itself even says that. So you are literally saying that you wont take mans word while at same time taking mans word... Those doesn't add up. You ether reject everything what man said (including bible) or not, you cant have both ways at same time, it would be cognitive dissonance.
3
Cool story, now go back licking Putin's shoes.
3
Same thing... Reality check: words can have multiple meanings depending on context. Welcome to reality!
3
It can be just generic electrical box for the lights and other utilities
3
@Harry-ff4vx Why would they have diesel generator instead of simply getting electricity from local source? It's not like this is in the middle of nowhere... It makes no sense to have any type of generator there. Unless there are no current electrical utilities in that area, in that case, what else could they be using until they get actual electrical cables lay down? This point is so weird...
3
@andrewjohnson6716 No difference between observable fact anyone can test and pretty much moral values set by humans?... They are not even on same category... Its like trying to compare banana with quantum physics... You might find some similarities between those two things, but those are not comparable in are reasonable sense...
3
@187211undisputed Don't post single links, those might get marked automatically as spam straight away. But will help you out here: There is no way to zoom in and bring back anything what went over the horizon. I can bet your video basically shows something getting back into view because it was too small to be seen without applying zoom, but yet, after certain distance object will start disappearing bottoms up and no level of zoom will bring that back, because earth is a globe.
3
@slvyc Bruh can you read? You look to be lost here... None of us even mentioned EV's here... Are you ok?
3
"Now don't get me wrong am not a flat earther neither a religious guy.. But..." Why i have seen so many comments in a presented in a similar way and then it continues with some irrational conclusion... Globe model doesn't have any issues, flat earth doesn't even have a model... So i have no idea on which basic thing about globe model you stumbled upon... Care to elaborate?
3
First of all, he most likely knows all the math side, but besides that point... You do understand that owning a company doesn't mean that you should know everything relating to it?... Its such a silly argument from your side...
3
And earth is still a globe even if space is fake... What's your point here exactly?
3
Some flatards even claimed that penguins are not real...
3
Its weird when you have comment which looks to be satiric one while at same time containing something out of place. mRNA is safe, i mean, if you want to nick pick then drinking water isn't safe either, but in general, mRNA isint dangerous in any sense.
3
What do you smoke?
3
Rolling Thunder Aerodynamics, spend maybe 5 minutes in getting basic about it... Or simply.. Go to google, enter "Landing plane" and what do you notice? Plane points slightly up, yet it goes down... Strange... Isint pointing out means that you should go up? Or maybe there are something else in the action here... In short... You don't need to point plane down at 45 degrees to follow earths tiny curvature... In general you could maintain plane pointed slightly up and still follow curvature without big issues due to... aerodynamics...
3
@Shakazaramesh To be fair, if some Jack from Alabama decides to go to Antarctica with his fishing boat while wearing shorts and beer in his hand, he would be rejected, as dead people are bad for the business of tourism.
3
What was wrong in this video?
3
Then create better blueprint for your magical better rocket, we will wait.
3
Prosecutor's fallacy Or pick any other logical fallacy. Having any chance value after the fact has no value. Like for example: What was the chance for me to write this exact sentence in this exact space and time followed by 5 million previous actions by me and others? Quite small i could say, allot smaller than sun and moon being similar perceived size. Tho i need to point this one up. Sun and moon are not same size, and perceived size varies depending on time of year and similar but that variation would be somewhere 359 to 426 times in comparison to that 400 time distance. So they are not same, they are similar perceived size. "Show an experiment where a pressure system can coexist next to a vacuum with out a physical barrier" Nuclear fusion reactor. And just FYI, vacuum doesn't suck.
3
@paulgmarriott Huge waste of time and money while at same time just making flat earthers to believe it more due to attempt in disproving it by richest man on earth. There is literally no reasons to give a free ride for someone who doesn't believe in reality.
3
Or maybe they already invested money and effort in hydrogen cars and realized how bad those are?... Its not like we never had hydrogen cars before... First hydrogen engine was invented in 1806, so if over 200 years wasn't enough to resolve basic issues, then how many more years we should wait before those get solved?
3
@yohan2516 Did you knew that most common reason why theist become atheist is reading bible? I mean, please, go around and urge people to read bible. Why do I have suspicion that I know more about bible than you do? You seam to want to claim that earth is what? Flat? Globe? Its really unclear, because I have seen dozens of people defending their position, ether its flat or globe, by using bible... That same book... So you need to be more clear here which side you are trying to defend. And just FYI something is true/false not because bible said so, but because we have actual evidence for that from actual reality and not just because book said so.
3
You do realize that you just implied that during eclipses moon actually enters sun or gets right beside it?... How the hell does that work in your tiny head exactly? And just another thing, need to verify something here. You do realize that if object is bigger but is further away, it could look same size as the smaller one which is closer? Right? You do understand that much?
3
"SpaceX will go bankrupt in 2 years" - Thunderf00t 2020
3
No? Moon orbits earth, and earth spins around. So how the hell should sun and moon stay on opposite sides?
3
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat, so i have no idea what you are talking about here. And there is difference between some one whose world view is based on facts, even tho that person isint really well versed on that, but still, making a claim that earth is flat because he feels in his balls and saying that earth is globe because science says so are some what different.
3
@yestervue4697 "Pilot for 30 years earth is flat" That's a scary thought, but as long as this flat earther can pilot plane, I think its fine... Tho he should never fly any intercontinental planes, or they would end up in north pole or somewhere... "Flight school trains u to navigate flat earth" In general, yes. Why? Because Flight schools doesn't train intercontinental pilots and to fly 10km back and fourth you don't need to understand actual earths curvature as it will not have effect on that. On top of that, you will fly from point A to point B in a straight line, on globe or flatardia, so as long as you have your gps working and you know which direction you need to go, it doesn't really matter what shape earth is. But if you tried to plan your route across entire world while using flatardian none existing map, that would cause some issues...
3
What is interesting with that is that you dont require such robust protocols from person you would hire to do the job in that same backyard who could cause allot more harm if he wanted.
3
The dude who was constantly baffled of what's going on during test flights in his live stream? That same dude would be beneficial for SpaceX? How? Why? Random person on the street might know more than TF here knows about rocket science...
3
"I just don't see how all this water can take shape of a ball naturally....gravity" Exactly... Gravity. You have gravity which pulls everything towards its center of mass, so you have big ball which attracts everything around it, aka water and stuff, which by itself should be quite simple to understand and should be obvious that water can take shape
3
As fake as it was with Russian army performing multiple "tactical" retreats by now. What is the real news by your opinion?
3
Why?
3
@gremblorthesackgoblin7953 It went over by more than 9x over its load limit, how exactly is it a death trap?
3
"then WHY IN THE HELL does NASA have to use harnesses" They are not using harnesses. "green screens " And not green screen. Care to prove that? "They have taken trillions $$$ over years to TRICK us with really really bad CGI" Bad CGI you cant even prove to be CGI? So maybe its not that bad of CGI if you failing to disprove it? And why are you not complaining about Military taking 10x more money for their CGI aircraft carriers? "Why do astroNOTS have “STARS” on the walk of fame?" What? "WHY is there a globe in EVERY classroom in every public school across the country from preK up?" Maybe because earth is a globe? "If you questioned the globe, you were laughed at, scoffed at, ridiculed for thinking differently" Thinking differently is fine, make empty claims that reality is not what it is, that would be ridiculed. Earth is a globe, this is demonstrable fact from reality, if you start denying reality, then dont be surprised when you get ridiculed. "I’m a FULL ON conspiracy theorist and I LOVE IT!" Duno is this what internet trolls say or are you legit, but well...
3
Your comment is weird... Flat earth android app which proves that earth isn't flat? Did I missed something here?
3
Whats the difference? Both are still fictional.
3
Difference is that @scottmanley actually knows shit about rocket science while TF here knows jack shit. Just watch his live reaction videos, he constantly baffled of what's going on. When you have case like this, why the hell would anyone believe anything TF says related to rocket science? Its like asking janitor is he can perform heart surgery...
3
Because it's not admissible in court?
3
"I do not have to submit this to peer review" I wonder why...
3
@martylawrence5532 "So you have faith in your evolution mentor's..." There are not mentors in science and there is no need to have faith when you have actual evidence. "epigenome-derived transgenerational adaptations" Well someone learned some fancy word salads here. Evolution is a fact, change over time in gene pool is a fact, its not really debatable anymore, just like there is no real debate about the shape of earth, its just a fact that its a globe, full stop there. We can sit and waste our time educating ignorant people, but that wont change facts. "PEER REVIEW HAS PASSED THIS NEW FACT IN DOZENS OF PAPERS. " Give me ONE. "I enjoy the fact of my free gift of eternal life thru Jesus Christ" Do you have peer reviewed papers for this empty assertion of yours? "You? Eternal flames." Why? Is your god so evil that he would send me to eternal torment just because I dint believed in him because I dint had sufficient evidence to do so? Why the hell (cha) are you worshiping evil being? "You better take the free gift as I have and millions and billion+ has before it's too late." Just like Muslims?... You do know that there have been like 50 000 god claims and NONE of them have been proven to be true? You do know this? So you have like 0.02% chance in getting correct one ASSUMING that god is real and that he is one of those which got already presuposed. Not a good ods.
3
"Many people over many millenia believed the Earth was flat" Yes, people have been ignorant, then we started to educate people about actual reality. "Some people have apparently ALWAYS believed this." Yes, some people are still ignorant. "Either way, belief is not proof. Public opinion is not proof" true that, this is why flat earth belief is quite worthless. "conforms to a curve, rather than NASA teaching otherwise, you wouldn't have this issue. " The fact that you bring in NASA into conversation shows how confused you are. NASA is 100% irrelevant. "I didn't need to make a whole video to say this." Say what? I mean, any video can be summarized into 2 sentences if you wanted, doesn't really mean that video is meaningless.
3
@bigboyeh3035 This is just generic attempt to lower opposition position to your own level just to have fighting chance, will not work. But we do agree that having faith is a shitty position.
3
Stop asking logical question here... TF isn't interested in those. That said, there will be flight 7 soon, in next few days, which will have like 10 dummy starlink satellites to test their deployment. Still ways to go before actual payload, but its not a banana and it will be interesting to see which excuses TF will make then, something like "Pfff, only 10 not real satellites, they can't even launch with real ones!!! Fake news!!! Its all fake!!! Reality is Fake!!! Musk is bad!!! Hyperloop!!!"
3
@jacksmith-mu3ee Under development. You TF cult members should come up with something better than "He's late" as an argument
3
Obvious troll is obvious.
3
Then don't complain when you get 1.5 mass shootings in average every day, just like US is getting now... Your points are silly at best, some are just stupid.
3
Sunset.
3
Majority of people still believes in wizards and magic just because some old book said so, how is it far fetched to have people who thinks that earth is a flat pancake?
3
@prestonweitersjr.9460 "One didn't travel very far, quickly then" Might there be a reason for that?... Like lack of option to do so?... " we're cleaner, faster, more efficient than ever before" Not when it comes to ICE cars, those dint improved that much over the years. " Wanna go back to those days, you go ahead..." he literally going for progress while you want to say with ancient technology. "where's all this electric power coming from?" Power plants?... Are you one of those whose main argument would be that some electricity is from coal plants? Some bad news for you, coal plants are being taken out on rapid pace, replaced with cleaner solutions, but even then, when you check actual pollution car produces over its entire life span ICE cars looses badly, you cant win this argument. Welcome to reality and its time to ditch your ICE car religion.
3
Big Bang is current BEST explanation based on all evidence we have and contradicted by none of that. Your personal ignorance isint evidence for anything.
3
@Alan-nq5xg Please avoid offending actually hard working janitors in fast food chain.
3
Yea yea yea and moon is made of cheese...
3
Conservation of momentum... By your brains, do you think if you are in a car going at 100KM/h speed and you just throw up ball inside it, by your tiny brains that ball should slam at back of the car at that 100KM/h speed?
3
But Tour behaved exactly like he does in any debate or even in his own videos. I mean, Dave could definitely lower amount of direct insults even if those are not wrong (Calling Tour a liar) but that could go down little bit. On another hand, exposing someone as a liar is somewhat simpler task than trying to explain hard core a biogensis chemistry.
3
I think they will do some basic psychological tests before hand and having some one who thinks that we live on a frisbee isint best idea, they could try to open air lock to "prove" that its all fake... Who knows what crazy things they would pull out...
3
He is scientist. Tho why the hell does people keep claiming that he isint one when him being scientist or not doesn't change anything about what he said
3
There is no such thing as invincible, but leopard tank is allot better at protecting itself and especially its crew from being blown up. You can easily replace tank, you can't replace trained crew.
3
We have more than enough of those videos and every single time flat earthers just scream out that its CGI and dismiss it without any evidence that it is actual CGI. So what is the point to present even more videos of something flat earthers reject as fake?
3
Yes, but we still need to invent cure from stupidity
3
@LePedantSemantique Ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed. What do you want here?? For us to say "Good flat earthers, you are doing great job by denying reality"? Their entire position is silly at best and doesn't warrant any respect. Respect is earned, not just given by default.
3
Because earth is not flat.
3
Why?... Use some brain cells here, how would cutting water to Crimea which survived for years after it was annexed by Russia and Ukraine cut of water then, how would that have any meaningful impact now? But on another hand, Russia doing this gained safe front at Kherson region and now can re deploy its troops in another place as Ukraine will not be able to advance from this side anymore...
3
@Loophole23742 Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat pancake world and shows that reality matches what we should expect on a globe model, no math required. Why flat earthers do flat earth things? Because bible said so. I'm yet to meet flat earther whose beliefs why earth is flat doesn't boil down to "Bible said so" P.S. No one is reading your wall of text when you start your comment so poorly.
3
15k for car with 15k free fuel? I mean, from first look this does sound like some weird but extremely good deal, from first look, but then you stop and start thinking why would anyone want to do that, then you remember printers... Those are basically been given away for free, because you will be paying arm and leg for each ink refill, this feels basically the same
3
Its called: Testing.
3
Hows that 3 day war going on after 400+ days?
3
So can you make coherent sentence?
3
@konfunable You still failed to present those more serious flaws. While Tesla nearly going bankrupt isint even remotely related to car quality. They have no issues selling cars and money issue wasn't related to car quality, so no idea why you even mentioned that. For Europe sales, first of all, Tesla currently doesn't even have factory in Europe, so importing cars adds big chunk to cars price which lowers amount who would decide to buy one. Second thing, i have no idea from which place you got this idea what VW sells more cars in Europe... 1. Tesla Model 3 - 100,993 2. Volkswagen ID.3 - 53,037 3. Renault ZOE - 45,694 4. Volkswagen ID.4 - 38,305 This is cars sold in europe only, even if you add both models from VW its still loosing against Tesla single model. Not even mentioning that VW is European car company... And not even mentioning that Tesla car produce enough cars to sell for those who want one... So if you want to be Tesla hater for sake of hating it, atleast bring in some basic facts to support your claims.
3
To be fair flat earth is demonstrably false because we can actually disprove it and prove that earth is a globe, there is a difference with god claim, you cant really disprove most of the god claims and you cant prove that there are no god(s) as its unfalsifiable claim. But yes, both positions are ridiculous.
3
It's not bad news, so like... What do you want here exactly?
3
Dark Darts Flat earth claim can be viewed as harmful, same as it is with anti vaxxers or similar. But then again... There are hundreds of flat earthers videos on youtube, hundreds... I never heard anyone complaining that their video got removed just because. So yea, no one is censoring flat earthers, this is simple fact. Should we? Well not really, they have right to their opinions, but at same time spreading stupid beliefs is not something we should be aiming at
3
@KangenAlec Its not blocking any exploration, its blocking random people going there for no reason, same as you have across majority of countries and their borders... You cant cross border without informing appropriate institutions that you are doing this. Welcome to reality little one.
3
@randomrandom450 Then on which youtube/twitter/facebook video/post you base your negativity towards him? What did he did so bad to earn your distrust in him? Give me actual example of him doing something really bad, worse thing you can remember him doing, and lets see how bad it actually is...
3
@davidspencer7254 You are excellent example of what OP said here. TF cult members are just that, blind cult members to parrot random nonsense based on the single point of interest "hate of Musk". Years ago it was about debunking scams, debunking flat earthers or creationists, now TF fan base in made of all of those people with same intellectual capabilities... Just sad...
3
Who is everybody? Majority actually knows that its spherical, so who is everybody?
3
@sammydark9 "the fact that you're literally waisting your time trying to prove something you can't prove yourself is very cute" Talking from personal experience? "If I see fakery in one part, like the phone call from the moon in the 60s, I just can't trust the rest of it" Och, so by your logic if source makes one invalid claim then everything else is a lie? Interesting... By this logic you are worthless in this conversation because you dint realized that satellites should not be visible in photos of earth. Well, cool, now you are free to go by your own rules! "hey I might be deluded" Not might, you are. "but I'm not a blind believer who doesn't question not so obvious "facts"" Questioning basic reality doesn't put you higher then anyone else, it could actually put you into mental hospital in no time. But like seriously, now i wonder if you actually know that earth is a globe or not. Are you a flatard or not?
3
Actually most flat earthers are Bible fallowers.
3
So what you are saying is that ONE's scientists word overrules rest of them just because he said so?... Evolution is a fact, heck, even you just now admitted that evolution is a fact by saying that all humans have only 2 ancestors while we have wide range of humans on earth. All those races, all those different body builds, the fact that I'm lactose intolerant and majority of people are not, is the thing we call "evolution" which you want to deny for some weird reason. And yes, every human shares same common ancestor's, as a group of them and not only 2, there is a thing called "viable minimal population" and for humans it's around 500. So no, it's not Adam and Eve, otherwise we would not have existed due to enormous incest it would have been which would have causes DNA degradation really quickly.
3
@Globeisahoax That's exactly what flat earthers do. The fact that you are here preaching your fantasy world without even ability to present working model shows how brainwashed you are.
3
@Globeisahoax Local sun and moon makes solar and lunar eclipses imposible. This is a fact. Welcome to geometry 101.
3
I don't see Russia winning it, so then... What should Ukraine do based on our personal opinions here?
3
You think that he knows something about rockets? Go and watch his live reactions to starship test flights and count how many times he was confused on what's going on or calling that something will happen when that thing didn't happen.
3
For what?
3
"not saying i'm a flat earther, but..." But... That magical word which makes previous statement irrelevant. "I'm not child rapist, but..." Keeping open mind is fine, being critical about provided information is fine too. But when it comes to basic observable reality and then you start questioning basic facts, that isint fine.
3
Basic observation of sun from your backyard proves globe and disproves flat... If you cant even trust your own head then issue isint with science, its with you.
3
@KangenAlec Well no, we are not floating in imaginary space, we are floating in actual space.
3
@Globeisahoax Yea, globe is a box, nice wooden box. Its true, internet said so.
3
TF uses Musk as his main revenue source, just check how many videos he made about Musk in last year and how many views each video got... This is his business independent on what he actually thinks about Musk, he will shit on him all day long because that makes him money.
3
@darenmccormick2115 Why do people keep repeating same claim that he is not a real scientist?... Even if that was true, what would that change? Would earth magically become flat?...
3
@darenmccormick2115 Technically he is scientist, just like people who flew with Blue Origin up to 100km altitude are astronauts. Would we really call those space tourists astronauts in same way we called people before them who went to space? No, but that doesn't change the fact that technically and by definition they are. Bill isint the "real" scientist in a sense that he wears white coat and does shit in a lab 5 days in a week, but he is still scientist by definition of that. But i'm more interested in people keep pointed that one out like it has any relevance here. You could have had homeless person without any degree here presented as scientist, would not have changed anything about actual shape of earth of what he said, its still factually correct either way...
3
@sylvatrass315 There are more than enough cis women complaining about this being unfair for entire women sports... What we never hear is anyone complaining about trans men competing in men's sports. Why is that?
3
I am not a flat earther but i do like caramel ice cream. Yes, this is valid analogy. Some science maybe being wrong is completely unrelated to the shape of earth or flat earthers failing on basic geometry. There is nothing interesting about flat earthers besides their ability to fail on basic reality.
3
Full steam ahead just like it was for past 400+ days?... Why would they even manage to go full steam ahead if they manage to take Bakhmut? Do you think that there are no more defensive positions in entire country besides this tiny town?...
3
Basic observation of sun anyone could perform from their backyard proves that earth isint flat. And this is basic one which doesn't even require you to perform any math or have expensive tools. if you cant pass this basic one then anything else will fly way way over your head.
3
Is this some sort of joke?
3
Hundred failed Space X launches? Can you list them?... Because I can only find 3 failures of Falcon 1 and 3 failures of Falcon 9, so 6 in total. None of those have been accidental rocket launch when it was performing static fire... On top of this, all SpaceX test have been done way way way away from anyone's house.
3
Why? Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe... Going to space is just a nice bonus you could get...
3
We did, we proved that, flat earthers started to scream and claimed that all photos and videos are CGI because they said so. Tho shape of earth can be determined by basic observations from your backyard, go figure.
3
You haven't watched the video? Its amount percentages, how many BEV's are being introduced, how many charging points being built and so on.
3
So there isint invasion in Ukraine by Russians?
3
Yes yes yes and Russia asking help from China is a sign of strong Russian situation...
3
@JudaismIslamUnited Well some one clearly finished middle school. "1032mph spinning speed" Is not relevant... Whats relevant is actual rotation which is ONE every 24 hours. Surface speed could be 10x higher, would not make any difference, after all in actual reality we have so called "conservation of momentum" like that fact you are not slammed to the back of plane which goes at 800km/h and you jump. Welcome to reality little ignorant one. "64,000mph moving around the sun" Same thing, irelevant. "540,000mph speed of the sun" Still irrelevant. "Yet any deep space telescopes etc remain exactly were they are supposed to. " We call that: orbit. Welcome to reality little one.
3
@chrisn4315 Its a joke... Relax. Tho you did proved my point here.
3
So you are saying that we went to the moon but we no longer have technology to do so? And to just education some people here, what NASA meant by saying this was that we lost actual physical thing which was used to go there, as it was not reusable and it was lost mainly in earths atmosphere. That doesn't mean that we cant go back there and we will be going back quite soon with new and better tech then before, so flat earthers can cry while watching 60fps 4k video from the moon, tho i can bet they will scream "Its CGI! Fake! Its true, because i can feel it in my balls!!!"
3
Scientific theory is current best explanation based on all evidence and contradicted by none of those. Science doesn't prove anything, it provides best explanations. While radio carbon dating could produce some different results, you still have multiple different dating methods to determine more accurate date, so i have no idea what your objection here actually is... Carbon dating alone will produce approximate age which will be more accurate then wild guess, so what are you objecting too here?
3
@a_mustache_of_great_repute Differently then religion science will not make 100% certainty claims, this is why in general you will have label as "Theory of gravity" and not "fact of gravity", that doesn't change the fact that this theory represents reality in best possible way. And evolution is a fact and a theory at same time. Earth is a globe, factually. And as you like to go by definitions, then, definition for fact is: a thing that is known or proved to be true. Scientific theories in most cases have been proven to be true, yes, most, not all, doesn't mean that those which got proven are not factual while still being called a theory. And to make it even more clear, there is no possibility for evolution to be false because that one was proven to be a fact. So yea... No idea why you tried to lower science and what you tried to achieve here, but well, you failed. Care to explain why you tried to do that?
3
@a_mustache_of_great_repute "I'm not trying to knock science down, I'm trying to lift it back up" Science doesn't need a lift up, it never was as high as it is right now... "We don't even KNOW what's at the bottom of the ocean or the core of our own planet, but we try to say we know what's in space?" Yes?... And we do know what is the core of our planet and we do have quiet good idea what is on bottom of our oceans. Space in comparison to those two is easy to check, atleast if you are talking about space and not the entire universe... "Its silly on the face of it, not to seek the answers, but to claim to have them. " ? So by your logic you cant even say that you have answers? So you basically saying that you know nothing? "You think I'm attacking science and I'm just not" i have no idea what your point here is in general as you are all over the place. "All I'm saying is, when a scientist says a black hole is a point of super density, i say "could be". And as someone who loves science i don't understand how it can be anything except "could be". " Ether you have no idea what science is or you seriously have no idea that argument from authority is a fallacy... Even if you can find scientist who says that black hole is super density, that doesn't mean that science as a whole says that. And your personal opinion that it could be, well, cool, you have your opinion, but that super density is actually supported by evidence and not some fuzzy feelings in your balls. "Granted, i do have my doubts about macroevolution" So another thing you have no knowledge about then, evolution. Micro and macro evolution have only ONE difference: time scale. To put it in analogy, micro is one second and macro is one year. So for you to say that seconds exist but it will never end up as a year is just silly and ignorant, at best. "No stages with half formed limbs on their way in or out" personal ignorance is not evidence for anything. Mudskipper, fish which can live on land and "walk" on its fins. You literally have transitional form which is alive today and you complain that you can see any on fossil records... C'mon... "I'm saying i have enough doubt that i can't call it fact" And? Reality is not driven by your personal opinion. You are literally commenting under the video which talks about people who thinks that earth is flat... So its clearly a fact that some ones personal opinion doesn't determine reality. "as long as their are such massive gaps in the fossil record" Generic creationist excuse... "Look there is a gap between those 2" we find fossil fitting in that gap "look, there are 2 gaps with missing links"... your personal ignorance is not evidence for anything. "is why do you insist on being so defensive of scientists when you claim to be defensive of science?" I'm not defensive towards scientists, as i'm not you i will not go with argument from authority, what i'm advocating here is fact based reality basing your reality on all the evidence we have to day and not simply say "Well i cant understand this so it must be false. That's how we got religions and that's why we had dark ages. Science is best current method in determining what is true or most likely to be true, if you can come up with better method, go for it, until then you have nothing to complain here. "A scientist should be able to hear "you could be wrong" and say "could be"." Not on factual reality. Could you be wrong about shape of earth? Could it be concave? Could it be in a shape of unicorn? How many laws of physics you would need to break to get those answers as reality? Is it a fact that earth is globe? Should we be open minded and say "it could be a unicorn"? "and that I'm attacking science itself when that is plainly not the case" You are trying to discredit or atleast lower scientific stance by exposing your ignorance on basic things, nothing more.
3
Fun fact, we know for a fact that Russia intentionally raised water levels just before blowing it up. Second fact, you need crap tone of fire power to destroy dam and it blew up at the side controlled by Russians. So, I know you might be bad at math, but lets add 1+1 here. You have Russians rising water levels and then Dam blowing up at the side owned by Russia. So who did it? Russia did it. Why? To cut off attach route Ukraine would have used for its counter offensive. Now this entire side will not be accessible for months if not until next summer. Welcome to reality little one.
3
i think you mixed round-earthers with flat-earthers here and then you will be correct with your statement.
3
@notatrap6586 "Obviously you've never had even an elementary education on physics" Its like literally 99.99% of physicists disagree with you... So when you say that some one doesn't understand elementary level physics, its you... "You've been brainwashed to believe whatever you're told." Exactly what we think when we see flat earthers. "Just like all round-earthers you believe you're right about everything and "facts and logic" are always on your side" Not right about everything, but allot more than generic flat earther, that's for a fact. At this point we can just assume that you are trying to troll here as you sound to much of a one then actual flat earther. maybe try harder next time? Wont be that obvious.
3
We don't, it's just for entertainment purposes.
3
Theists cant even muster single sound and valid argument for god's existence, what else needs to be said?
3
@DaftGoldenShaft "From the Earth, there is absolutely zero ways to confirm whether we are spinning around the Sun or the Sun spins around us; that's all." So now it's no longer about the shape of earth but about heliocentrism vs geocentrism?... Can you even be consistent in your rambling here? And no, we can definitely determine if we go around sun or sun goes around us without leaving atmosphere... Welcome to science 101... You still are not aware of this, but you are digging deeper and deeper hole for yourself here.
3
Russia is whining
3
@theexplainer1576 Bible says a lot of random stupid, immoral and false things, translated or not.
3
Blowing up bridges requires for only few soldiers to be properly commanded on who will have military training due to the fact that you need one if you are the one who knows how to set explosives for precision demolition, while retreat like this requires for you to properly command 30k soldiers which in most cases have little to no training.
3
What i have encountered from quite few comments that this belief mainly based on religions. Most people in here are from US or religious country which is heavily based on Bible. Then you have bible making claim that earth is flat, then you have blind believers thinking that this ancient book is correct, so it means that earth is flat even if basic observations shows otherwise. Another category would be people who will simply want it to be flat because its against mainstream thinking, not because they can prove it, but because its different. And last group would be trolls, pretending to believe something they don't just to get some attention. And those make like 20% (personal opinion) of people in here who say they believe in flat earth. You could add poor education system too into this, but its just additional thing on top of main ones. As i never encountered anyone who claims to be flat earther who actually understands basic geometry.
3
And this is why TF fan base in on third grade level.
3
@foreverilive Hard to say if you are just trolling or you actually believe this, will give it usual 50/50 chance.
3
Care to prove this 100% thing?
3
This joke stopped being funny after first 50 000 times we have seen it.
3
I would gladly look at this flight route you are talking here... Which flight route from South Brazil to Madagascar goes over equator exactly?
3
@holimolibebalanced9348 All maps are based on a globe, in most cases you will have flat representation of those on some screen. Have you ever wondered why intercontinental flight paths on flat map look strange? Because its representation of one from a globe... Damn... C'mon, you could do better than this...
3
@fanamlawuli6761 Entire Europe got enough gas for entire winter... There is a reason why gas price went down in recent month, its none issue anymore, while Russia lost its biggest customer, for ever.
3
Can you make good argument?
3
And like 99% of them are bible believers. Both things are actually related.
3
Jose Rocha Its really easy and takes one single word: Sunsets. Earth is a globe, basic fact from reality. All your strange questions are just... Strange... At best... Can't say they are even interesting ones or even original.
3
You can google them if you wish... Like there was one from FAA which demanded research to be done on how likely it is for starship to hit a whale... Which means that SpaceX wasn't able to launch until this research was actually done. Like seriously... Hitting a whale, in ocean...
3
Facebook isn't that scary...
3
Wardaddy There are 2 types of flat earthers: Those who makes t-shirts with label "Earth is flat" and those who buys them. Promoting false information like its a fact isint best thing i the world, while free speech should still be a thing, obvious attempt to rip off gullible people isint.
3
War map shows differently. You being brainwashed by your dictator will not prove that Ukraine blew it up you know...
3
@erikhartel456 "How long did it take Cook and Ross to sail around Antarctica? And how many miles did they log?" Yes, how many miles did they log? And what does it change even if they said that it was exact number which would be needed for flat earth? Argument from authority fallacy? "Why is there an Antartic Treaty keeping everyone away?" For same reason you can cross any other country border without permission... Do you seriously asking why people are not allowed into a continent just because they want too and never asked permission to do so? "Why are there zero flight routes across the “ice continent”?" Because in case of crash you will die ether from crash or due to extreme cold in hours, while rescue will come only in couple days or even weeks due to needed extreme preparations for such thing. And then you simply have issue with extreme cold not being friendly to planes... "Why do all the flights in the Southern Hemisphere make zero sense on a globe?" Care to elaborate? "why do you care what think about the shape of the earth?" Not really care in particular, i know that earth is a globe and that's that. "Just keep on believing everything NASA shows you on your TV" You do know that NASA is only one of dozens space agencies across entire world? You do know this? And earth is a globe not because NASA said so. "Government agencies are completely trustworthy" Which is completely irrelevant. "They care about us common folk and would never lie" Why would government lie about shape of earth? Especially when this lie involves every single government on earth, would involve millions upon millions of people working on this conspiracy and spend trillions every single year to some how hide it... And what it would gain from it exactly?
3
Itemtotem Oh God... That was my reaction reading your comment... Oh my flipping god I don't believe in... How brainwashed are you?... There is difference between object being too small for you to see and objects literally disappearing bottoms up over the horizon... No amount of zoom will bring back that missing part... Oh god...
3
It already did, as its tow hitch vertical load is 1100, so it went over by more than 9 times
3
stockmarket needs as fast connection as possible, this is why people who wants edge over the others will literally buy a building next to stockmarket servers to get sub ms speeds. You should educate yourself on some basics here before commenting next time.
3
There are 2 types of flat earthers: Those who sell t-shits with text "earth is flat" and those who buys them. Second video was made intentionally that way to help in selling "t-shirt"
3
@conradmbugua9098 You seam to be a troll. But lets amuse ourselves here. Definition of level: a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point. You do realize that you can have plane which has equal distance from a given point? Do you know what we call shape like that? Sphere. That point would be center of a sphere and then every single point on that plane would have same distance as any other point on that same plane. So you ether a troll or just really new to all this flat earth stupidity that you are failing even on definitional basis.
3
Spoken like true flat earther: ignorance across the board. You don't need to go into space to know what shape earth is... Government has nothing to do here. Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat pancake world.
3
Uncle Nobed Some "experts" actually understands meaning of "context", go figure.
3
Actually first globe model was made in 3 BCE in Greece, so you are wrong by 2300 years
3
Because it's not as bad as TF would want it too be.
3
Some of them trolling, some of them are serious, quite few of actual believers in flat earth are Christians and they are using bible to make a claim that earth is flat, you know, its true because book said so... In most, its due to poor education, this is why most of them are from US....
3
To extract hydrogen from water you will input more energy than it would be to just direct this energy into actual car propulsion.
3
We have more atheistic scientists today because you can freely admit to be atheistic today in comparison to what was going on before. But like, even today if you will have atheistic scientist and theistic, its allot more likely for theistic scientist to reject what atheistic says on basis that he is an atheist and not because his argument/evidence is false. And Galileo got house arrest for rest of his life for questioning bible, go figure.
3
Ignorance, low intellect, need to feel special, because bible said so and similar stuff. You have another answer?
3
No
3
From which fan fiction is this taken from?
3
Obvious troll is obvious
3
It is.
3
Because those are from Russian propaganda.
3
@kidd7359 Are you like drunk or something? How much do you think war costs? Like, by you, how much would it cost to fight against Russia? 10 bucks and some change?...
3
Because flat earthers exist.
3
So you only care about things which directly effects you?
3
@rachels.gaspard3487 With all due respect, from which dark place did you got your information about this magical forbidden law which doesn't allow you to go to Antarctica? You do know that you can buy a ticket for 50k for actual trip to the pole on your own foot? You do know this?
3
@rachels.gaspard3487 Isint that ironic that you talk about information feeding and then mention god?
3
@mariannebrix7394 They cant answer that because they have no idea, some say its finite, some says its infinite, some says they don't know... As we know that earth is globe they will never present actual correct answer and any answer which will be thick enough for us not to be able to dig though will be enough for them until we actually dig down and then distance will change... Don't expect answers to questions like that when they cant even present flat earth model.
3
If they could they would realize that earth is not flat.
3
Difference is like 0.3% between "height" and "width", so in general it's basically perfect sphere, to put it in simple terms.
3
@bedroazemour9956 We has hundreds of flat earthers making exact claim you just did, ZERO of them actually presented evidence to support this idea that ship which starts to disappear bottoms up can be brought back with zoom... Be the first one!
3
And this video never said that it will refute any of them... This video is a look at flat earth claim and people who makes them. And you dont need to refute something what never been proven to be true. Do we need to refute unicorns too?
3
Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth. They are mocking flat earth claim because its a extremely ridiculous claim to make.
3
@aaryajain9771 Its basic cognitive dissonance. Any thing they try to use against globe earth usually back fires, but when anyone points that one out they just ignore it. What can we expect, after all, we are talking about people with stone age beliefs here...
3
You only need to brake throw defensive lines to get to the other side, after that it's a free ride. And in general supply of military equipment isint really limited, biggest limit would be man power to actually use it.
3
2/10 for attempt to troll, try harder next time
3
When someone says "I'm not flat earther, but..." it kind of negates entire point. It's like saying "I'm not for raping, but...". Just because government lied about a thing doesn't mean it lies about everything. Just like the fact that YOU said a lie or two in your life doesn't mean that you are just blatant liar no one ever should trust you. And no idea what you tried to imply here mentioning black person or native americans, care to elaborate?
3
I hope that there will be IQ check before sending people to Mars, just to prevent flat earthers from ever going there.
3
You never fact check anything, don't you?
3
Eyes don't lie? Are you kidding me? Have you ever seen visual illusions? When you have static image but it looks like it moves? Or when you have parallel lines but they seam to not be? Eye can and does lie.
3
"They want trans women to be banned from all sports at all levels, and also banned from public space while they’re at it, and have it be legal to discriminate against them for housing and employment" That's a lie, isn't it? I'm yet to see anyone say that they are against trans woman competing in men's sports, like give me a single example of that. As of this point every objection was about biological man competing against biological woman, that's it. Same thing with public spaces. No idea what housing and employment discrimination you are talking here either. Can you give actual examples of it?
3
Soon.
3
Because earths shape can be determined from your backyard, you can't have personal opinion about something what is observable fact.
3
@dontjustbeanotherbrickinthewal Obvious troll is obvious. Sad troll is obvious too.
3
Video is stupid. Will make simple point here: You dont need to go into space to know that earth is a spherical, you can determine that from your backyard with basic observations of sun.
3
@Jesusmalaarki He employs people who legally came into America, and he is under american labor laws... if he wanted to exploit people then he would have setup his SpaceX in India or something and get way higher revenue. Are you against hiring legal immigrants?...
3
ezumach Artillery shells... Those big things which does big boom at the end of their trip... Not some pee shooters.
3
Earth is a globe not because some one said so, but because its observable fact.
3
Well then, good luck for Volkswagen, Mercedes or GM, they will need it. At the moment Tesla cars win on most important criteria when it comes to EV's, its price and performance, not even talking about production scale. All those Volkswagen, Mercedes, GM and many many more keep saying that they have new Tesla killer underway... Still nothing in sight... and even if something decent gets released, its just that, decent car with low volume of production. Or you get the ones which catch on fire and you have to recall every single one of those...
3
And it was entire point of this video... And you dont need to prove them wrong, it was already done.
3
Did Japan failed to perform static fire test where their rocket flew away too?
3
@Jedimaster-el1ve Even on flat earth you have tides which creates water with a bend... So even on this imaginary land you have water which bends... Care to explain that tiny issue with your fantasy land?
3
Ron Papi The fact that you literally have thousands of flat earth videos trying to prove their none existing flat earth model shows that you are fundamentally wrong here. Youtube might delete comments which breaks youtube rules or they are getting false positive marked and being deleted, happens all the time, for both sides. And this is not because youtube gives a damn about some minority talking about flatardia, but because they have flawed comment filtering algorithm.
3
@chris73brown "Basic observation of the sun shows goes from one end to the other over flat land" Will list 4 things about sun which matches 100% to globe model and missmatch 100% flat one: 1. Sun moves at constant speed. I know that sun isint moving, but earth rotates, but you got idea. Due to flat earth model sun should get closer until noon, so perceived speed should change, but its not 2. Sun doesnt change perceived size. On flat earth model sun gets closer until noon and further away after that, so on flat earth model it should change size. 3. Sun moves in a straight line. On flat earth model sun circles around, which is not what we observe in reality. 4. Sunset/sunrise. On flat earth model sun always remains above surface which would prevent it from ever going under the horizon. Those are 4 basic things about sun which disproves flat earth. Not even talking about dozens of others things, with actual calculations and tests. But this is my go to due to its simplicity, but well, as flat earthers has 0 understand how geometry works, even this flies over their heads. " Take note: U came back ruding me after l was just giving a summary from both sides and not ruding noone so... " Like I said, you personal ignorance isint evidence for anything. Just because you cant understand why earth is a globe and trying to place both sides on same level, will not make it so. Flat earth claim is just empty assertion, globe is proven fact. Those cant be compared by any reasonable person.
3
Your beliefs effect your actions and your actions effect people around you. Its called: education. I don't think you would want to go to the doctor who is antivaxxer and thinks that homeopathy is the best cure for your cancer...
3
Like what freedom? Australians can still own guns, so that freedom never went away. So what exactly australians can't do now?
3
@koberamone1989 So as you just said, Australians can still own guns. So will ask again... What exactly Australians can't do now? What freedom did they lost? Ability to buy firearm in local home depot without background checks?
3
Tesla is best evaluated company in the world, Tesla model Y is the best selling car currently, for Tesla to go belly up at this point in time you would have to intentionally compromise and and actually try to do it.
3
@OXNARD-805 You are correct, your leaders (priests) are lying to you.
3
@Lobos222 I hate people who doesn't understand concept of "test flight"
3
@eline8087 Need to have "identity" was due to flat earthers insisting that earth is a flat pancake, without them we would simply be... Normal humans... But as we have flat earthers its automatically puts non flat earthers into globe earthers group, aka normal people. Only flat earthers want to belong to special group as they want to feel special, because they are special, just in not in the way they actually think they are.
3
If you would shrink earth to the size of bowling ball, it would be rounder and smoother then all bowling balls on earth... On grand scale, earth is a perfect sphere. On more accurate measurements its a oblate spheroid, slightly wider on bottom.
3
Can skill share provide actual working model of flat earth? Because that would be something new and not some basic cash grag from gullible.
3
Earths shape can be determined from your backyard
3
@chrisross4898 "Have you noticed how you can talk of only fiction characters." Like god? "Enoch was no fiction character." Who cares? If you will have some generic human spiting out some random stuff, who cares? "He walk with God" Fictional character? "Enoch walked with God" Say who? Enoch? So if i say that i walked with Harry Potter, does that mean i did? "In the book of enoch, there are portals that the sun and moon go thru, read it for yourself . " As much i would like to read some fantasy books, that one doesn't seam to be attractive... "the reason why the us education system is failing, cuz all the numbers are wrong" What? What numbers? What?... "with more science, we as a people are getting dumber." Nope, with more science we are getting smarter. We have more knowledge then ever before, people in schools learn more and more complex things then ever before, atleast in normal countries. "Science and video is so far gone, people cant tell the difference between reality and fiction." This is why we still have religions and people talking about gods...
3
@chrisross4898 "why is God fiction?" Definition of fiction: literature in the form of prose, especially novels, that describes imaginary events and people. AS you have your book talking about some imaginary events and people, its a fiction. God is as real as harry potter, yet you would straight away say that this one is fiction, while both are written by man about some wizards with some real places and real events mixed in them and supported by same amount of evidence: none. Why is that? "In every story of the earth, it talks of a flood." Correct... Annual flood is a thing... You know that time of the year when snow melts and you get a flood?... Yea... That type... "Everyone knows this story. How are they fiction? Cuz you say so?" Knows what? That flood happens on regular basis? Well that part is not a fictional, its natural thing quite a big part of the world experiencing every single year... "You and scientists are always making shit up!!!" Yea, we and those smart bastards... What could they know... Pfff... Its not like they are the smart ones here... Pfff..... "If you unplugg yourself from the matrix, we can build a better world" I mean, it seams that you are trying to troll here, maybe not, but in any case, its just sad, troll or not, its just sad to see people like you...
3
It's not debated, it's just here for entertainment purposes.
3
What difference between flat earth society and flat earth movement? And how would you recognize one from another?
3
@therealzilch So Flat Earth Society is organization which has people from flat Earth movement, and some part of flat Earth movement makes Flat Earth Society. Ok. I still cant see the difference here... Well maybe that one is made up all flat earthers and one is only of small portion of them. Or did i missed something here?
3
@sharonmcentee8615 To be fair, they would be pilots, not engineers/plane mechanics who should know how radios work.
3
I would recommend for you to actually do real fact checking and not parroting what some Russian news channel said to you. And id you know that for last 8 years Russia directly fueled internal war in Ukraine?
3
Just FYI Tesla model Y is the best selling car in the world in Q1 2023, this is from all cars including ICE. What is an issue with Tesla self driving approach is that its approach is universal instead of preprogramed one which makes it exponentially more complicated to make which will make it look worse than competitors whose cars basically drive on virtual train tracks in heavily prescanned areas and will explode if something unexpected happens on the road, while Tesla FSD can work in any situation without any pre mapping. But that makes it more "buggy" can makes it look worse than it actually is.
3
Do you seriously think that earth is a globe because government said?
3
Jim Sars Do you seriously just said that perspective only works on flat surface?... You seriously think that perspective decides not to work on a sphere?... What the what now?
3
@Peterpan2355 "If gravity pulls everything straight down to the centre of Earth and Earth is a ball then all building CAN NOT be straight" ? In comparison to what? From whose point of view? Every single building you see is leaning from you by certain amount, while 69 miles for one degree lean FROM YOU is literally undetectable without special setup and special gear. You cant even notice 1 degree lean to the side, how the hell do you expect to notice 1 degree lean from you? Instead of repeating what some one who has no idea what perspective is, create basic 3d model on any 3d software, you can create that to the scale, place couple cubes to simulate buildings and try to notice any lean from the point of some one on spheres surface... This is what i'm talking about, ether you have no idea what geometry and perspective is or you have some understanding but you blindly repeating some nonsensical claims some one make while never fact checking them.... Which one it is? "As for My Perspective he does not have an account that you can donate money to like most you tubers." And how is that relevant to anything? And quite few youtubers gets payment from adds and not from donations. Tho i still have no idea why you even mentioned that. " Yeah The Sunlight Reflects on the water towards peoples feet, If you can't understand that, what the what from where to when what can you understand?" i dont understand what you are trying to say here, i have good understanding of perspective, geometry and light reflections. How is sun reflecting from water is relevant here? What is your point here? Yes, sun light reflects from reflective surfaces... So what? "If there was 24 hours sunlight in Britain where I live I would not be a flat Earther" ? I just assume that you are an actual troll here. Will stick with my original look at your comment. Do you seriously made a claim that on sphere sun should be visible 24/7? Do you even know what sphere is? Maybe you are mixing flat and globe models here, because you literally arguing points which apply to opposite models then you say. On flat earth model (while there isint even one actual which doesn't contradict reality) sun should be visible 24/7 and on a globe it should be visible only at some times depending on your latitude " If I am getting duped by anyone it is you" And like 98% of humanity... Who could known that smartest people on earth are actually wrong because one person named "perspective" is correct because he said so... Riiiiiiight. " I would gladly become a globe believer If only I could find one piece of evidence to believe in it" Sorry, but you will not find that. Not because there is none, there are more then needed. But because you will not understand it. Sorry to say this, but you are too ignorant to have any say about this topic. Face reality, you need to real basic things about reality before you have conversation about anything what is as complex as basic geometry... Yes, basic geometry is to complicated for you... Yet you are here claiming to be correct because reasons... Damn...
3
Imagine if you could directly use that electricity from those solar panels to charge cars instead of using it to make hydrogen and then use hydrogen to make electricity with exponential energy loss during those processes. Its like 60% energy loss, so you will need more than twice as many solar panels to feed same amount of cars. This isint a solution.
3
@takeiteasy4556 Batteries can be recycled and there are more than enough different battery technologies existing and under way which makes this none issue.
3
Evolution is proven fact, flatardia is as real as your IQ.
3
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is flat. You don't need to go into space to know what shape earth is. And... Astral projection?... Please, land on the ground...
3
So when children die from hunger, its not god's fault, but if you just pray and you got over your depression, that's what god did? How do you even know that it was god and not you doing all that yourself due to placebo effect by you praying? What is the real connection between your god and your getting over depression?
3
Wait, you are not aware that it was Russia who attacked Ukraine and not the other way around?
3
"What difference does it make for you what other believe, say or think? " They vote. "Will you do a video about this kind of people too?" He could, but that are many who already did that. Are you one of those who believes that earth is flat? Because you look to be personally offended here.
3
Down is towards center of earth, while in space there isint any actual up or down, and then if you would travel to the moon or any other planet at some point for convenience sake you would change "down" direction to point towards that planets center. Its all relative.
3
Yearth is a spherical not because some one said so. And funny thing about last point you tried to make here, for earth to have low earth orbit you need it to be... Spherical...
2
Hydrogen cars are relatively old. First hydrogen fuel cell powered car was released in 1966... It had more than enough time to become something, yet its still nothing... Its already at peak performance. There might be a way to squeeze extra few % from entire system, but it will not change much
2
They can't, because they can't afford plane tickets like that.
2
So lets ignore thousands of missile strikes in Ukraine from past 460+ days?... You can argue about that single missile all day long, will not change anything here.
2
Thing is that globe has actual evidence, flat one doesn't, so asking for a reason why some one believes in something which doesn't have evidence is quite appropriate.
2
To big, too expensive, too unesecerry. Keeping your car cool just to maintain your fuel levels while being always plugged into wall socket, is just... Weird... There is another technology which does similar thing, just in more efficient and better way... BEV's... You plug your car, it charges, it keeps that charge for months without a need to keep it plugged in. So why not simply use BEV's instead of liquid hydrogen?
2
@louis_the_hedgehog Electric engines could maybe be used to shorten trip to mars, but those will never be used to actually go into orbit
2
@carldzoga1348 So then... Like... Why are you so fixated on Musk losing money if you don't care about such things?... My point was that he will not go bankrupt just because one of his companies went bellies up... Just like you don't become homeless by buying lottery ticket and not winning anything from it... You just lost some money, you still have plenty left.
2
Wlatz Its only believable if you are ignorant and you just looking for simplest answer independent if its correct or not.
2
Basic facts: In comparison between hydrogen and EV you will need around 60% more energy to produce enough hydrogen which could be used to drive your car same amount as EV could. Hydrogen isint solution here, while its better than gas driven cars its not as good as EV's.
2
@johnnysun6495 Have you? CT hitch rated at 1100, it failed at 10400. One number is bigger than the other, for this to be a failure those values should be reversed, but its not. So like, have you watched this video?
2
It's called "technological progress" if we went by your standards we would still be riding horses...
2
Care to elaborate?
2
We are ready for BEV's... All the "issues" you could think of now is due to the fact that BEV's are still only tiny portion of market, we didn't even got enough old BEV's to have enough battery packs for recycling plants which already exist. We don't have recycling plants not because its not viable option, but because there isint enough batteries to recycle to make it viable option, yet...
2
Main issue is that this failed and actually launched when it should have been just a static fire test, that's a big mishap to have on your record.
2
What firmament?
2
@marietterheeder1191 Why?
2
@marietterheeder1191 Still waiting explanation why should I. Is any book true by default? Shouldn't you present any good reason to even care what that book says?
2
@marietterheeder1191 Soul? So after you failed to answer why i should care what your book says you continued by implying that i have something you cant prove to be real and that i should care about it? C'mon...
2
Because bible said it... Like seriously, in 99.9% instances it all boils down to "Bible said it"
2
You missed the entire point of the people you mentioned here. Its not about scrutinizing someone, its about doing the same damn thing for dozens if not hundreds of times without bringing up any new information. This video is basically random compilation of things he already said 50+ times already at some point, so its just a repeat of same statements, once more...
2
General law of physics: Conservation of momentum
2
You do understand what grey zone means and why capturing it is the same as moving forwards?... And like... How big is this grey zone for Ukraine forces to keep moving forwards?
2
What? You story is flawed... You have 3 year old who screams that earth is flat because he feels that in his "balls" while another is astrophysicist which 5 Nobel prizes who says that earth is a spherical while providing trucks of actual evidence which is independent of that astrophysicist... Slight difference.
2
Leif Andersen Simple question for you: Which side is more likely to be correct #1 democratic countries across entire world #2 Dictatorship country You have been successfully brainwashed. Ukraine wont fall, if it did then it would have in first 3 days like Russia claimed that it would, now Ukraine going forwards and reclaims their lands with help of entire world.
2
First of all, flight times are slightly different. Second, there is such thing called conservation of momentum. Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth, you dont even need to do any math.
2
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt Sunsets. There, disproved flat pancake world, wasn't that hard.
2
ICE engines burn hydrogen in same exact way as any other current gas powered car, while fuel cells combines air with hydrogen during which process you get electricity. Second method is more or less twice as efficient as first one.
2
TimeLess You want to include train stations? What about bus stops? Malls? Any bigger gathering?... At this point you should have checkpoint at your house door step which would perform full body check before you leave it... And government understands that guns are dangerous and they are smartly enough not allowing those in their buildings. Go figure.
2
Electric cars catches on fire allot less than ice cars. On top of this, fire itself isn't explosive, so its allot safer for passengers in case of car crash. Batteries cant either be recycled and reused in new battery or used in less heavy application, like power wall. And your "see what I did there?" due to lower instances EV's gets on fire. Live and learn.
2
What are you talking about?
2
@OSUBucknado Will try to explain it really simply for you, maybe you can even understand it. Have you ever took panoramic photo with your smartphone? That one is composite too... Does that photo represent fantasy world? Nope. How so? By your words composite is CGI and doesn't represent reality, so does that mean that when i take panoramic photo its taking photo of fantasy land? On side note, CGI stands for Computer Generated Imagery which is basically every single digital photo out there due to the fact that computer processes input and generates image from that input. You kind of need to learn about basic reality, you might even start looking less ignorant than you are now.
2
There are no electrolysis done in hydrogen cars.
2
@Poweruser75 Obvious troll is obvious.
2
@Poweruser75 Earths rotation is obvious as you being troll.
2
What?
2
Russian "facts"
2
Seek help...
2
@datvsl8554 What difference does it make what some book says?
2
What schemes? What did he done to hurt you?
2
Tesla is at all time high currently, Starship is getting to the point of being commercially viable option, so no idea what you mean by that.
2
@deerichardz Exposing fraud is fine, but to do it on weekly basis and repeat same statements over and over and over and over again for past few years is obsession at best. Hyperloop doesn't work that well, yes, we know, TF said this like 500 times (I don't think that this is even exaggeration) by now, ok ok, we know, tell something new...
2
@kamisama9715 Funny enough about this that if god is real and he is good and just then he should literally do that, send believers to hell for a weekend or so. Not for eternity, because infinite punishment for finite crime is immoral. But well, logic and theism are not really compatible.
2
@yestervue4697 So you are flat earther after all... Ok, as we established that thing, you want proof that earth is a globe? Not a problem, tho i will remind you that even if we could not prove that earth is a globe that would NOT prove that earth is a flat. So, proof, we will start from really simple ones, no math required, no expensive equipment required, no traveling required. 4 thing about sun and its behavior. 1. Sun moves (well, technically earth rotates and not that sun moves, but lets avoid that complication, for now) in a straight line across the sky. This matches 100% to globe and fails 100% on flat one 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size through entire day. This matches 100% to globe and fails 100% on flat one 3. Sun moves at constant speed. This matches 100% to globe and fails 100% on flat one 4. Sunset and sunrise. This matches 100% to globe and fails 100% on flat one Those are basic 4 observations anyone with a solar filter and some camera can perform from their backyard. None of those real life observations matches any proposed flat earth mode, while matching 100% to a globe one. Why is that? Why cant you even explain basic observations with your magical land claim?
2
Well atleast we agree that Russia did it. Now go and prove that US blow up pipe lines!
2
What? Cant understand if this was a sarcasm or are you for real.
2
So Russia attacking Ukraine was fault of NATO?... Try to read your comment on your own, slowly, and try to realize how silly it sounds.
2
@fs0c1ety_bs92 Well clearly one of us isint smart enough to figure out something what can be observed from your backyard and determined without even using math or tools. Yearth is a sphere, its observable and demonstrable fact from reality, your personal ignorance in how you can determine that isint our problem, its yours.
2
@ Will repeat question, as you seem to struggle with words. Do you know what "test" stands in "test flight"?
2
@KangenAlec That doesn't really answer to my question here. What evidence do you have that there is such thing as firmament?
2
@KangenAlec "See how it curves to avoid hitting the dome." You are kidding, right?... They curve sideways because this is how you need to fly to get into earths orbit... This doesnt prove that there is a dome, this only proves how little you know about actual rocket science... "Then it gets dumped in a bermuda triangle and the video feed switch to animation" Yea, you must be trolling here.
2
Todd Because everything Russians will do now will hurt them in one or another way. Russia just decided to cut off patth for Ukraine counter offensive from Kherson side, quite likely their big brain plan backfired when dam collapsed more than they wanted. Its not a question if Russia did it, only question what was their actual goal here, just to flood enough to prevent counter offensive from this side or was this their actual plan.
2
@mike44terra Dint you heard? We have vaccine already... Which is really fast, as usually it takes allot longer to create vaccine for new virus. So yea, smartest people invented something what will get as back on track... And even if you never seen any progress... So what? You could only make some what valid point if some one who are not so smart would have invented vaccine for covid before smartest people did... And even then... Whats your point?
2
Can you prove any of this to be actually true and not your personal opinion just like Mormons say?
2
"We always say WE DON’T KNOW WHAT IT IS how can we?" Maybe you, but you are not every single flat earther out there... But earth is definitely not a flat one, this can be shown by simple observation of sun. "it’s all CGI but that isn’t suspicious to y’all???" One simple question where every single flat earther failed to answer: What method are you using to detect CGI? For example, i give you 10 photos, 5 of them are CGI and 5 are real photos. What method would you use to determine which is which? Is this like "Because it looks fake" type thing? Or do you have some actual method? And for sake of everyone... Earth is spherical even if we would not had any photos from space... Flipping hell, first photo was in 1972... How the hell is that one CGI if such thing dint even existed for next couple decades?... Think...
2
yeahmhmmrightokaymhmmyeahsure "They already admitted its CGI does it really matter what type of CGI it is????" Now home work for you. Go and find where they said this, i dare you. Because what you can find at best is that cherry picked quote where some one says that its composite, which doesn't make it CGI... Panorama photos on your flipping smartphone are composites, doesn't make photo itself fake... Fact check before you talk... "but hey I’m not trying to change your mind just throwing this out there" Then avoid spreading lies. Yes, i can call it a lie unless you actually have no idea what you are talking about, then you have argument from ignorance, at best. So yea, go fact check and come back and then try argue your point... I dare you...
2
You do realize that there are more than one country in the world and that some countries provide full health care which is free?
2
"can't make a single usable rocket thruster" Are you just dumb or trying to look like one?
2
Doesn't that make them even more incompetent? How could you not know or not be able to properly adjust thrust power. They should have known single engine power, multiple that by 9 and you will get approximation of end result, and even then, rocket should be able to auto adjust its trust to desired amount instead of just ripping away from the pad just because it produced slightly more than expected
2
Where do you draw this magical line then? Can I own RPG? Land mines? C4? A tank? What about nuke? You should realize that at some point there needs to be a line, so where is it?
2
I quit at 0:20 at the moment he mentioned "free" energy... It's a stupid channel for stupid people, can't put it in any other way.
2
@Maine_87 Let me guess, you never been good at geometry in middle school? Right? Or maybe you want to say that geometry is part of conspiracy?
2
@jareerobay121 Airplane test is stupid beyond belief, so no real reason to explain why. To put it simply: flat or globe, level should remain level. River experiment is called "Bedford Level experiment" which is old news, but in short, it proves that earth is a globe due to observed curvature while performing this experiment.
2
Actually, its not. In average people are more knowledgeable about reality, issue comes with only few who screams loudest of them all and now have platform where they can reach people like them across entire world and create even bigger and louder group. Number of ignorant people dint increased, they simply learned how to use internet to be noticed.
2
@Steve.Cutler Well i'm not talking about US here, talking about general educational level across entire world and your point would only support mine. Its mostly people from US who will be on internet due to language barrier, so you will have more of those uneducated people here who will tend to make quite a bit of noise. I mean, just check like top 20 most famous flat earthers, majority will be from US. But well, we can agree that there are multiple reasons why seemingly so many flatearhers surfacing lately.
2
? Earth is a globe not because some one said so but because its observable fact... Anyone with basic understanding of geometry can determine that in no time. Your strange accusation that there is only one institution is a bollocks too... We have dozens of space agencies across entire world... You can even launch your own high altitude balloon and check shape of earth that way. So its strange to see people who says that you need to be skeptical while failing to evaluate basic evidence at same time. How is being skeptical will help you if you cant even understand what evidence is?
2
It's called "autism"
2
Like what?
2
@FreqBand When did I say that we should leave for good?
2
"sceiteific advance realting to language development." This is so ironic that I cant even...
2
@lidorshimoni5470 Figured that much, but still... This irony is quite strong. And just FYI "scientific theory" is the highest level you can get in science and its not just some ones opinion, its best current explanation for given question which is contradicted by none.
2
@lidorshimoni5470 Even if some theory will be shown to be wrong in future its still BEST one we have currently to answer to given question. You cant go wrong with scientific theory. And in general, theories usually are not changed completely, they are refined, new data comes along and we can shove that into theory we have and check it still works, if not, we will have to change it, how much depends on new data. If you have better method in determining what is true or most likely true then science, please, tell us...
2
Who said that?
2
@rksnj6797 If you think that smart need to do everything on their own to get a credit, then sorry, but you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
2
Was this comment made to make a joke?
2
@brumalh5548 Fair criticism? Seriously? You think that TF criticism is fair? Are you seriously that naive? TF complains about PROTOTYPE rocket not being 100% reliable with zero flaws from test flight 1... And you think that he is doing fair criticism?... C'mon, no one is that dense...
2
@rdf274 Once more, you as some cult member, care to elaborate how is starship development is indefensible exactly? They have biggest rocket which manages to land back on earth for reuse. Why are you as smart as generic flat earther?
2
Why not tho?
2
@still_learning7101 "Also the bible is much more than a book of fables" Its literally book of fables. "Most of the modern translations of the Bible have been ‘revised’ to the point that the original meaning is either misinterpreted, the complete opposite, or gone." So basically you came along with yet another translation?... Well we never had this one before... Right?... "Why the moon gives off its own light?" Its not, if it did then craters would not be black... "Did you know moonlight is actually cold and scientists, not science, still cannot explain it." Its not, experiments done to "prove" that was done incorrectly. And moonlight literally CAN'T be cold as that would violate laws of physics... Maybe this is why scientists could not explain it? Because its in realm of impossibility? "How the world came into existence? Read the Bible." Why read some book of fables? "What’s the meaning of life? Read the Bible." Why read some book of fables? "Why bad things happen to both ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people? Read the Bible." Why read some book of fables? To rest of them: Why read some book of fables? "You probably have no idea what I’m talking about at this point" You might be right here, because your entire argument is "But my book said so" which is meaningless and irrelevant. So i have no idea why you are writing all this. "Which is why, read the Bible" But why? Should i read Harry Potter next?... Your entire "argument" sums to "Its true because my book said so"... Can you identify logical fallacy in this?
2
@Globehoax Homeless are usually more valuable to society than flat earthers, for crazy people, well, flat earthers are crazy, but being crazy is a wide range which could include quite few who are actually useful.
2
Refueling Hydrogen car will not only be inconvenient, as there are few in between refueling stations, but it will cost you arm and leg to do so. Its more like a printer, you can get one derp cheap, cheaper than it costs to produce one, but you will pay 10x more on ink. Good quality BEV's are not that cheap and those tend to keep their value over the years.
2
TF genius? Seriously?
2
So this video of Prigozhin was not real in your reality?
2
What is the truth?
2
@scottkolaya2110 60% is the amount when it count electricity needed to produce hydrogen and what you will get back from it, this doesn't include any middle man which could increase this number even more, but that would be situational and would involve allot more complexity into conversation, 60% is more than enough to shut down anyone's argument.
2
Ph.D is not equal to Ph.D, you can have one from agriculture or from rocket science, if you would have actual flat earther with Ph.D from rocket science, well, he would not be a flat earther as this is simply not possible. There is not a single flat earther who passes basic geometry check, so there is no chance for any of them getting Ph.D which has any math or geometry in its requirements.
2
Walt Sandford Self deception caused by religions brainwashing? No thanks...
2
Zander OG "Anyway bruh maybe u can do some research of what flat earthers would say if you showed them a compass" In best case scenario they would simply say that its pointing to the center of disk. And that's that. "Or just physics" They cant understand basic geometry, why do you think they could understand basic physics? " I guess what im trying to say is their REALITY is just as real as ours so u cant rly say that argument" Yes, as real as ours, which is: we live on a globe. Their side is not supported by evidence, not a tiny bit. They cant even provide actual working model... Not even a map... I mean... How the hell its not possible to make flat map of flat plane? Because its not flat... "Yea, u cant hide it but what “it” is is the real question" It? Its a globe, end of story. "How is the government not relevant in this case?" Because its not? This is where red herring fallacy comes in. You could prove that government lied about something, will not prove that earth is flat. Only evidence that earth is flat will prove that earth is flat. Trying to redirect conversation to unrelated topic will not resolve issue.
2
Yes, 1020. And it costs less. This video comparison was weird, as it compares 100k car vs 150k, that extra 50k should give you all those ups by default, otherwise why would it cost 50k more...
2
Rest of the world felt it, Russia suffers from it. Its like comparing paper cut and loosing your leg, one of those things is more serious than another even if both are injuries.
2
cool beans, now you just need to make appropriate engine, create infrastructure, build plants to produce ammonia on reasonable scale with reasonable price. When that happens we can talk. Just FYI ammonia is poisonous, so you would need to have even better storage solutions than hydrogen has now.
2
Troll level 2/10, try harder next time.
2
@Globehoax For you I will give only 1/10
2
Just like NASA lost quite few?
2
Do you know what "composite" is?
2
We do know, its a globe, observable fact from reality.
2
@N8Dulcimer Comparison with Ram was quite meaningless as they didn't really went that much of extra where CT failed, on top of it potentially being the one rated for 1,200-1,500 loads. At the end of the day CT failed with over 9x higher load on the hitch than it was rated for
2
@ "The hitch weight should typically be around 10-15% of the trailer's total weight. However, it is important to note that this can vary depending on the type of trailer and its design. Towing capacity, on the other hand, is the maximum weight that a vehicle can safely tow." First google search result. CT is rated at 11000 towing capacity, so its hitch capacity should be at around 1100 to 1650. Your made up number of 30% makes no sense as no one requires that. Which safety regulatory institution indicates that hitch capacity should be 30% of towing?
2
No idea what weird setup you have in your house or how much energy you use, but there are quite few examples of people living 100% out of solar
2
So how is this 3 day war going on after almost 200 days? Winning or just whining?
2
If its cheaper, then why its price so high? And even if these cars are free, you do understand that hydrogen costs are astronomical? Its like buying printer for 50 bucks and then paying 150 for new cartridge...
2
och, you will be my +1 to the huge pile of flat earthers i ever asked and they failed to answer, but i will give you as shot: What method you used to determine that photo/video X is fake and photo/video Y is not?
2
Actually bible says that earth is flat and not round. And earth is not balancing, it falls towards sun, constantly, while flying throw space at amazing speeds. Tho in general, i have no idea why you brought bible to begin with...
2
Riiiiiiiiiight...
2
Clinton Its funny to see comments like that without you realizing that by this logic all humans are liar's because some lied at some point, does that mean that your comment is a lie and government actually doesn't lie? Just using your lack of logic here against you.
2
@clintonhart2652 "You're insane for defending this government..." But i'm using your logic, as you are human and humans lie, that means that your comment is a lie, which means that government doesn't lie. Right? That's YOUR logic. Don't complain when your logic backfires. "Literally insane" I know... Its 21st century and we still have people who thinks that earth is a pancake... Its insanity... Well... To be fair its more like ignorance, bunch of trolls and small portion of insanity. "I'm guessing all of you got the experimental vaccinations too because your government said so?" I'm guessing you have tin foil hat because you think that 5G will brainwash you or something. "That's what good little sheep do..." Fun thing about this is that "sheep" gets only used by conspiracy nutjobs, its like a trade mark of some sorts. I'm always giving 50/50 chance that some one is real flat earther and not trolling, you can still be one of those, tho duno which one is worst, being ignorant like a brick or pretending to be ignorant like a brick for attention.
2
Same thing as it is with any hybrid, more complexity, more failure points, more expensive to buy and to maintain for tiny benefits. Pure electric will always win against hybrid. Tho to be fair, every single hydrogen car is already a hybrid as every single hydrogen car has a battery which stored electricity produced by fuel cell engine, its relatively tiny, but it's there as necessity to have instant power when needed.
2
Yes, Quran says allow of random stuff, whats your point?
2
mohd fahmi zukri Earth is spherical not because book said so but because its a fact from reality.
2
Lying about what?
2
Well, yes and no. I'm yet to meet flat earther who isint hard core bible believer and goes back to "earth is flat because my book said so" while at same time they do like to feel special creatures by going against mainstream which goes back to entire religious belief of being the special beings for which entire universe was created.
2
Its not good idea to think that earth is flat when every single basic observation you can do yourself shows that earth is not flat... Basic observation of sun have like 4 things which match perfectly globe model and 100% mismatch flat earth. So there is no debate here, earth is not flat and not because some one was taught, but because its a fact from reality...
2
Except twitter those two companies are self sustaining and basically completely separate from each other. He screwed up with Twitter, but Tesla and SpaceX are the best companies in the world in their respectful niches.
2
Care to prove that?
2
@dionysus2006 wifi users?... Internet isn't wifi.... And most people have ZERO access to internet, quite few from those who does have uses crappy more expensive ones. So this Starlink has potential to have like 4billion+ customers, it's a big pie...
2
@dionysus2006 WiFi... Is wireless internet where in 99.9% instead being referred to home network and not connection between your device and World Wide Web... Damn you are ignorant here... I'm literally sitting in front of pc linked with physical cable to modem which is linked to internet over fiber optics, there is zero wifi here... So again, WiFi isn't internet... By this logic starlink uses WiFi... You look confused as hell here...
2
You should find some logic, as you are lacking in that area.
2
How's this 3 day war going?
2
With time people will realize that you don't need cars with sounds, just like people realized that we don't need phones with physical buttons.
2
But why? I always find it strange when some one suggests something like this when you could prove that earth is not flat with basic observation of sun with sun filter both for a buck... No need to travel across the world to prove that earth is not flat pancake, go outside and check suns behavior... Moves in straight line. Doesn't change perceived size. Moves at constant speed. Sets over horizon. All this matches globe model and all this doesn't match flat one. What more do you need?
2
Nah, studying anything will not make you dumber. I started "debating" flatearhers like 2 years ago, learned quite a bit about earth, physics and all that jazz. Gained quite a bit of knowledge while talking with quite stupid people.
2
Yes, this is why he skipped flight 6
2
Difference is that earths shape is demonstrably and factually spherical, anyone who wants to argue against it are just stupid. And going to your example, it was contested against mainly by religious people as they wanted to believe that this world is specially made for them, one of the reasons why majority of flat earthers are bible believers. While you should not blindly believe everything some one says, there is limit after which you simply become stupid by not believing what actual experts say to be true.
2
You do know that Hydrogen cars use like 60% more energy to drive same distance? So you will use 60% more electricity produced by your fossils than you would with BEV... Your argument works against Hydrogen, not BEV's...
2
You don't need an app to operate Tesla... No wonder you sold its stocks as you have no idea what Tesla cars are or how they work...
2
@willi1978 Which car requires and app to operate it then?...
2
@willi1978 Which means that app provides you extra functionality and doesn't prevent you from using motorcycle if you don't have it. Do you have any actual examples where usage of a personal car/motorcycle was not allowed until you installed some sort of app?
2
You can't abandon facts.
2
And Allah is wrong as earth is not an egg but oblate spheroid
2
You didn't watched FSD v13 videos, don't you? Have you ever wondered why TF avoids making videos on FSD? Because it works, while its not perfect, it already does most of its drives from point to point without any interventions, and it only getting better. It takes longer than expected, but it's getting there, even TF realizes this, and this is why he isn't making videos on it.
2
Calif is the only place on the planet where you can find decent amount of hydrogen stations, and even then people are not really jumping on that hype train.
2
Patent holders that help the world?... Preventing everyone else from using specific technology for 50+ years is helping out the world?... Did I missed something here?
2
@bigbadt Just go and check battery prices over the years... Its going down. Then look at battery capacity and its performance, that one is going up. Aka there is steady progress with battery technology without any actual limitation in sight. We have multiple battery technologies even today which would be a huge deal if scaling of its production was solved. Electric is the future, its only question how long it will take to reach the point where even considering any other alternative looks foolish.
2
50k screenshots of what?
2
Well its not a theory, atleast not a scientific one. But lets see them, give us BEST one you have.
2
Texeira Correa I think you got me wrong here, you came here claiming to have 50k screenshots proving that earth is flat, but now you want me to prove that its not? You do know that even if i could not prove that, this would not prove that its flat? Right? You do know this? But lets point out couple things here: 1. You cant feel motion, only changes in it. 2. Nuclear fusion reactor has gas near perfect vacuum. And to add on that: vacuum doesn't suck. Ok, now, can you present your BEST photo evidence that earth is flat?
2
Texeira Correa "centrifugal force is always accelerating, its constant acceleration" ? how is this relevant exactly? Centrifugal force created by earths rotation is something like 0.4% So why does it mater exactly? " it’s in a container and magnets keep the plasma in place or you wouldn’t have that CHAMBER" Right, just like gravity keeps atmosphere in place... you dint realized that? Don't you now? You have pretty much 1 to 1 comparison here: Plasma in vacuum held by a force in place with atmosphere on earth if held by gravity in place. "and we’re not talking about plasma being held by magnets above the earth" i know, but you asked about gas being surrounded by vacuum, yet you failed to understand that vacuum doesn't suck. " then why is it that the vacuum of “space” doesn’t equalize the “atmosphere” into an equilibrium ?" gravity?. "Your saying there is no loss at all?" there is, tiny portion, due to cosmic winds or something like that, i'm not really familiar with that particular topic, but there is tiny loss of atmosphere. "If you look it up NASA" DON'T CARE! Why do you people think that bringing up NASA would prove/disprove anything? They are irrelevant! "Lastly I’m just saying it’s more of a claim that you “know” where moving and you don’t feel centrifugal force at all" And we dont, once again, you cant feel motion, this is FACT, then you have this "ENORMOUS" centrifugal force which is 0.4% of gravity... Tho funny enough you can even test that by weighting something on pole and on equator, it will be lighter on equator. " I don’t have to prove anything to a keyboard warrior" Then why the hell do you even made original comment? If you are not interested in defending your ridiculous claim, then why you even started it? i asked for simple proof, one flipping image from your magical 50k collection, yet you failed multiple times to provide it. Which only proves that you dont have any actual evidence, you simply came here to get some attention from people, nothing more. "I didn’t come here to talk to Zrips unless your the creator of the vid in that case let’s talk, otherwise we can banter." Its public forum, you make comment on a public forum... What the hell do you expect to see? its like complaining that people looked at you when you went outside to the street and started to scream that earth is flat while this "conversation" was pointed to some specific individual... Damn... We both know that you dont have any evidence to present here, because if you did had, you already would have presented it. But you are here tap dancing, trying to disprove globe model, complaining that i'm not the right person and all that nonsense... Grow up...
2
Texeira Correa "plasma ima vacum chamber isn’t held in by gravity it’s electromagnetics" Correct... Damn... you still failing to understand a point i made... You wanted to claim that gas cant be in vacuum, i provided example where it is because its been held by some force, in this case its electromagnetism, in case of earth we have gravity... Do you still not realize this or what? "I know vacuums don’t suck" Then why the hell you said that gas cant be near vacuum if vacuum doesn't suck? "what I’m saying I just told that earth would lose its atmosphere if it was next to a vacuum without a physical barrier" GRAVITY? "hence you telling me it loses its atmosphere lol" And it does... its not like we loose 5% every year... but it does loose some of it... Whats your problem here exactly? "We’re do you think it all came from" are you asking about origins of life on earth? or what? "if it goes into space sure nuff no atmosphere" Yea, you have no idea how exactly we loose, dont you now?... And you do realize that we have a way to refill atmosphere? Right? its not like we have defined amount of air... "It doesn’t make any sense that the large vacuum of space isn’t enough for the air pressure and “gravity” to be equalized" Why should it? You have GRAVITY which holds atmosphere "stuck" to earth... This prevents from gas equalizing with a vacuum... its basic physics 101 yet i have to explain this to you... Why? "to be dispersed it quite literally doesn’t even equate to physics" Riiiight, so every single scientist on the world is wrong because you failed to understand physics?.... Riiiight... "Look up what happens when open a vacuum chamber what happens?" Open here? On earth? Where you have huge air pressure? or in space where you have dont have outside pressure and you dont have large enough mass to hold it in place? Its one of those situations where i have to explain people basic physics instead of disproving their claims... Did you skipped school or what? "SO GIMME PROOF!" Of what? That earth is spherical? Ok, check out suns behavior, shatters flat earth model (do you even have one?) straight away, not even talking about other 100+ issues. And this is basic observation, no need to understand how vacuum works or believe in gravity, basic understanding of geometry would be enough... "you need growing up because my message was quite literally put into reference to the author of the video" if you cant even win argument against some random dude like me, how do you expect to win against some one who made video like this? "and also can someone explain how I put a screenshot up on YouTube comments for this guy?" imgur.com decent site where yo can place images for free and get short link to them, no need to create account or log in or anything like that, drag and drop, you get a link, you post it here, as i'm still waiting your BEST image proof that earth is flat...
2
Texeira Correa 12 comments in and you still have no examples from your magical 50k image proof you claimed to have? Whats going on? Did you lied about that? Or you realized that all of those pictures you have are not evidence? "has can’t be near a vacuum because it’s will meet disperse evenly into the vacuum because there is no physical barrier to stop no air pressure to attract a pressurized system" One more time: Gravity. "And second when your talking electromagnetism and then jump into gravity which is a farce I just can’t follow you there" i know that you cant follow me here, this is why you think that earth is flat... Electromagnetism and gravity are both forces, different ones, but still effect matter in similar way. We even managed to counter gravity by applying electromagnetism on a frog... "I believe there isn’t any gravity" Who cares? Gravity is real, testable thing from reality. Cavendish experiment demonstrates that quite nicely. "it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t exist" Flat earth doesn't exist because it doesn't exist. There you go, used your logic to debunk your argument entirely. Are we done now? "Plasma being held in to place by a magnet inside a CONTAINER..." ? Seriously? You are joking?... Right? We have container because we cant have vacuum on a surface of earth without it... We could run fusion reactor in space without container, but that would be terribly impractical and would cost 10000x more to create one and test it... Nah, you must be internet troll... You cant be that ignorant... "you can’t have 8 inches per miles squared" Simple question to you: you have this equation, where exactly do i insert observers height? Before 8 inches or after? "because there is no curve seen on the mirror like floor for 400 miles and sometime farther" ? 400 miles? Please, provide coordinates where you have 400 miles of flat plane... Do you even live on earth? "the HORIZON if flat" But its not. Create 3d simulation with accurate scales, test your claim, after you fail, come back and say: i'm sorry, i was wrong. Earth is HUGE, dont expect to observe curvature on its surface... Atleast not to the sides... "there is no experiment of a vacuum and air coexisting at all " Fusion reactor. I told you about this once already... Another example would be... Wait for it... Earth and its atmosphere. "demons Tatar’s" What the what now? "There is no such thing as gravity and there is no such thing as space time" Gravity is a label on observable fact that objects with mass attract objects with mass. Space can be seen by going outside and looking up. Space time? No idea what this should even mean at this point. "VERY SPACE OF REALITY BY CURVING FROM MASS?" What? "Someone must show me how a vacuum would have no affect on a high pressure system" Lets test your basic knowledge about reality: Does atmosphere have gradient? Like that thing where if you went up it would become less and less dense? Is this a thing from reality? Because it is, unless you even tan to deny this one, then you are being help. So as we do have gradient of atmosphere, going roughly from 1 atmosphere to... Wait for it... Wait... 0! its not highly pressurised as there is no point where you would have big differences between pressure, its a gradient... GRADIENT. Wait, you do know what gradient is?
2
Texeira Correa " the cavendish experiment is constant for both variables it’s doesn’t prove gravity exist" Actually it does, it is to prove gravity. Objects with mass attracts objects with mass. We have one big objects under our buts, we call it: Earth. "and it doesn’t prove the earth spins" Why should it? it doesn't give us nice banana cake recipe ether... Doesn't make it false tho... Foucault pendulum experiments proves that earth spins. "the slightest movement even in a room of none movement will cause bad readings" This is why Cavendish experiment is done multiple times with different conditions to rule out any possible influence from outside. And you know what? It never fails to prove that gravity is real. Go figure. "gravity exist because you say so right?" No? Gravity exists because its provable fact, not because i said so... " It’s scientist there is no proof that the 4th dimension is time" ? But it is. You have 3 dimensions which defines where you are, then you need another to define "when" you are, which is time, aka 4th dimension. "in fact if you look up the Big Bang they say it is impossible" No idea how is big bang related to 4 dimensions... "It’s all pseudoscience backing more pseudoscience" Then all science is pseudoscience. Because things i'm saying is backed up by science and quite few branches of science are heavily dependent on all this being true, otherwise quite few things would be not working. " The air pressure comes from the volume of air over head" So basically a gradient from 1 atmosphere to 0 then? Right? This is what you are confirming with this one. "just being less dense (not gravity) and heat" Density is not a force... Tho answer me this one simple question: if gravity is not real, then why objects fall down and not any other direction? What force defines direction? Still waiting your image proof that earth is flat...
2
@hatlessjet7802 He is still flat earther... So anything he says in defence of flat earth model will burn your brain cells as it will be bullshit statements.
2
Kyaggwe Khamis You have no idea how ironic your comment looks.
2
Then you know nothing.
2
@JadeoftheGlade And this is why Kamala lost, because of people like you.
2
It could if religions take over once more, which could happen with Islam, sadly.
2
Sometimes its better to start from scratch than to try adapt existing technology to your own needs. Elon learned this with his first mistake when he tried to adapt Lotus Elise chassis to fit Roadster needs.
2
@julians7268 BD likes to use lidar and robots are in general more bulky. So majority of that would need to be redone from scratch which would defeat entire point in buying that company. If you have your own resources, your own smart people, then its better to just go with it and do it in your own way you actually want to do it. Just compare to how Tesla bot looks like and how BD bot looks like.
2
@julians7268 You can add similar haptics in those robots. In general you only need cameras for robot to map out entire area and navigate in it. Side thing is that depending on task it might be even simpler for robot to perform his task in comparison to driving car. After all with cars you have situations where environment changes drastically in seconds or less, with robots which just walk slowly in generally static environment you have more time to map everything and calculate best actions. Well, we will see, but cutting down sensors on robot not only makes it smaller, lighter, but most importantly - cheaper.
2
Yes, you could, but maintaining it will cost you arm and leg, not even talking about you needing expensive compressor to actually push that hydrogen into your cars tanks
2
@robbycassidy4240 You do understand that there is no difference even if he had 0 degrees and never finished middle school? You do know that arguments stand on their own and not on who said them? You do know that much? Right?
2
Energy conversion for Hydrogen car's vs EV's is like 60% difference. You are losing half of energy with hydrogen cars. While hydrogen cars are basically electrical cars which uses hydrogen to produce electricity to drive electrical motors... There is literally no reason to go with hydrogen anymore due to batteries getting cheaper and better each year.
2
@darksydephiI You are prime example of how "smart" TF cult members are
2
? When did cybertruck exploded? Was it that time when it was rigged with explosives?
2
Actually, technically he is scientist
2
Actually concorde got canceled mainly due to environmental and safety reasons. It was casing extreme sound booms which caused issues for everyone who lived under the path of it. There is a new concorde design already being made which cuts this down dramatically which can be used. There is a reason why planes in general became way more silent than those were before. If you are old enough you should remember how loud planes have been where you could hear one when you can barely see it in the sky, now its not the case anymore. Basically sound regulations killed concorde.
2
@loudcamaro79. Its like saying that petroleum cars are being powered by plankton... Crude oil comes from dead animals/vegetation over millions of years with quite complex process, but saying that you car is driven by plankton is just silly at best. Hydrogen cars run on Hydrogen, not on water. There are multiple way to get hydrogen, water is the most convenient one at the moment, doesn't mean that car runs on water... Water isn't hydrogen and hydrogen isn't water. Just like dinosaurs isn't petroleum and petroleum isn't dinosaurs even if you could make petroleum from dinosaurs or any other carbon based life forms...
2
@RoyMH1960 When you want to troll due to you being silly one, do a better job than that.
2
Samuel, if those magical 0.0001% people wanted us to limit, why its a common knowledge that we live in a galaxy with billions of solar systems while there are billions of galaxies like ours in the universe? Flat earth model is limited, globe is not. By some flat earth models we live in snow globe with a glass dome.. So they literally saying that there is nothing out there, not even a space... And yet you think that you brought a valid point here... C'mon...
2
Except the fact that you can buy gun without background checks from private sellers... You did know this? Right?
2
So you reject evolution which is proven fact, then you reject moon landing for some magical reason... Let me guess here and stop me when i will get something wrong: You are American, Christian, who believes in young earth, that earth is flat with dome above it, that global flood happen and all that jazz? Did i got something wrong here?
2
@johnadams2063 "I dont care what your opinion of my opinion of bill lie is. Sooooooo ummmmmmmm yeah. Oook then" What is interesting about this sentence is that you literally made original comment expressing your opinion about Bill to everyone else, so you clearly cared to do so, if you had no interest in anyone's opinion about that, you would simply never made that comment to begin with. Aside of this, you accused Bill of lying, ok, what exactly did he lied about?
2
What?
2
@thereallilelo.1212 Sorry, are you "people"? Is Sanchez belongs to "people"? If yes, then well, are you lying now?
2
Buh ma fReeDoomm! This is what I imagine their reaction would be now.
2
Doesn't really say much about car's performance, cost to refuel, distance it can drive with full tank, cost of maintenance and so on.
2
@gearheadfabworks If its HICE type engine then 300 miles is not possible with reasonably sized tank. Unless they used liquid hydrogen, but that's completely impractical thing for normal use cases. There are plenty of videos out there claiming miracles, some even claim to be able to use pure water directly to convert it into hydrogen... Because you know, laws of physics can be suspended in some old cars... Cars like that simply doesn't exist or those would be all over the place already. Biggest car companies barely manages to achieve 400 mile range with 3 huge tanks and twice as efficient fuel cell engine.
2
@gearheadfabworks Was it actually properly tested or "they drove 300 miles because they said they drove 300 miles"? And how big was that tank? I could hook up cistern and travel half the world (not really, won't be enough), doesn't really say much about actual efficiency of the car. Well, people lie, basic math doesn't. Tech like this Mike guy says to have simply doesn't exist and basic on basic calculations, can't exist. And just to note here, its NEVER getting actual independent verification when it comes to claims like that, it's always ends up at "Its true, because I said so" just to get those 15 minutes of fame.
2
@gearheadfabworks You can definitely get nice feel while driving any car, but without any actual deep dive it's just that, nice feeling for short time period. I will be really skeptical about people claiming to have revolutionary technology, yet their only evidence is "I said so" in a youtube video while at same time seamingly braking all known laws of physics. Atleast it wasn't "Powered by water" so car might actually run on actual hydrogen, but it's definitely not reaching those ranges with basic hydrogen tank in it. There is a reason why no one from car companies who plans to produce anything relating to combustion hydrogen engines mention any actual ranges or amount and sizes of tanks.
2
First globe model appeared around 2300 years ago, so no, Copernicus isint the first one here...
2
Alan Schiller Well, minority of Christians are flat earthers, but majority of flat earthers are Christians or atleast believers in some variation of bible.
2
@amanirouissi7836 Could you present your BEST proof that earth is flat?
2
@amanirouissi7836 Book is not evidence for anything. First of all, you cant prove that god is real, second, you cant prove that god said anything what is claimed by that book, third, even if god said that earth is flat in that book that would not mean that earth is flat. Fourth, i asked for a proof not for another claim made on bunch of presuppositions... And you "proof" at best results into argument from authority fallacy and not actual proof that something is true. So yea... I need your BEST proof, if this was it then sorry, but you have none of that.
2
@amanirouissi7836 no one managed to prove god's existence until these day, so if you can, go for it. Tho proving his existence will not prove that earth is flat, especially when basic observation of sun proves that we live on a globe and not on a flat surface.
2
You should watch TF reaction to flight 5, that was gold.
2
There is difference between being senile and being insane.
2
@Dr.Cosmar i guess that 50 meter long table is indication of him not having fear... He fears his own shadow at this point.
2
@marcwasson " Prove or try to curvature over water" Tides?... Even on flat earth model you will have curved water... So this argument falls flat on his face... " If you think you have a proof I will pay you say $500" Cool, you can send money to my paypal or you can donate money to charity. You choose. "Fake CGI from NASA is not proof" Calling photo CGI is not proof ether. Can you prove that photos of earth are CGI? Nope. "Earth is almost 75% water" earths surface* "Water is level" Right, level is not equal flat "No curvature no ball." True, but we do have curvature, there for ball.
2
Let me guess, 15 litre pickup trucks powered by good old gasoline is the answer?...
2
It can't be flat and round at same time, even if its simulation it still one or the other.
2
@dragonoftheeast695 I'm saying that you can't have both at same time, just like every single game out there are based on either flat world or a globe, one or the other, you can't have both at same time, its just logical contradiction like having "round square" it just can't exist. And most games are based on flat surface for simpler calculations, down is just down on Z axis, no need to calculate complicated stuff based on 3D coordinates where it would change based on where you are on the map. It doesn't produce life like results, but its good enough for that purpose, still, its just a flat map. Games which needs full planets simulation, like flight sims or some space games, those would use globe model with more complex calculations, still, its just a globe even if you want on the surface and horizon is being rendered ahead of you.
2
Russia always lies, so hard to say how much it was Ukraine shelling dam and how much it was Russia doing it. And who knows, Ukraine might have wanted to damage dam gates to release some water, but there is no chance to destroy dam with shelling, it was built to survive that.
2
Gabriel Tobing Fun fact: You are wrong. On grand scale earth is a perfect sphere, on more accurate scale its a oblate spheroid. That difference is so tiny that its trivial to even mention that its oblate spheroid and not simple sphere. Flat earths are still fundamentally wrong.
2
TRiiBE "I don't believe in flat earth but..." Why och why when people say like this it always ends up sounding like some generic flat earther argument... Earths shape can be determined from your backyard with basic observation, its size can be determined with a stick... Please, dont be like flat earthers, educate yourself on the topic before you start putting out your personal ignorant opinion about it.
2
So because basically all cultures on entire planet talks about sun that somehow proves that sun god Ra is real?...
2
@jaqtsonfromthemist That's the thing... Bible doesn't really even contain anything original. That flood story? Most likely "borrowed" from Gilgamesh flood myth. Its not the first one which made story like that you know... Its a fictional story, most obvious fictional story which was proven to be false, no need to create excuses here, it never happen.
2
Emmm, what? I mean, we do have capillarity effect which can drain water against gravity, but I guess you are not talking about that, right?
2
What i have seen mainly is that majority of actual flat earthers, removing trolls who pretend to be one, says that earth is flat because bible says that. So in general by proving that earth is flat would make bible more relevant and if earth was flat, then quite big chunk of scientific world would crumble apart and we would need to include "magic" into science books as this what we would need to explain something what is literally impossible to be true with current understanding of reality. Even sun has 4 glaring issues with flat earth model, so you would need actual magic or some "god power" to "explain" it. But in general, its just a religious indoctrination talking.
2
Plane flying upside down?... Get a photo from Australia with a plane in background, turn your head 180 degrees... Happy now?... Like seriously, what do you expect to see? Upside down photo? How the hell would that prove anything? And why should it be upside down while people in Australia don't walk upside down?
2
Why?
2
Moon doesn't rotate at the speed of earth... It rotates at the speed moon orbits earth, aka once every 28 days. And any bigger body of water will easily prove that there is curvature.
2
Yea yea yea... We heard this for past couple thousand years... Nothing happen... When will this "soon" gonna happen? Any actual time frame? Today? Tomorrow? In 5 gazillion years?... And god dint created anything if he is not real... So maybe start by proving that he is real before you make such claims.
2
@ratphink-3226 Which core values? How do you decide which ones to pick literally and which one discard as imaginary? Was there Adam and Eve? Global flood? Jesus? How would you decide which sentence depicts actual event and which one depicts fantasy?
2
They do, heck we even got fe photos of some new tiles painted red, clearly those are different in some way, otherwise there would be no point to paint them differently. Something changed with those, it might only be the top coating which gives that red color, it might be entire internal structure, who knows, but there are new heat tiles which will be tested on next test launch
2
Mitch Jensen Simple "Prove it", there was equally 0 of instances where someone returned with actual video proof that you can bring back ship with zoom when it started to disappear over horizon bottom up, because thats not how reality works.
2
1. Tesla is best selling car in the world at the moment, FSD is still in beta so no idea why people keep bringing it up here. 2. SpaceX was providing like 4x cheaper launches until roscosmes decided to cut their prices to be somewhat in line to SpaceX to be somewhat competitive, not the other way around. Civilian agencies does use SpaceX because its cheapest option and it doesn't involve soviets, so its win win. Starlink is mostly for those who doesn't have any access to internet or already overpaying for the one they have, so you can put your tin foil hat back into closet, you are safe here. 3. No idea what you are talking here... Twitter is a platform where YOU can decide if you want to use it or not. Like while i have twitter account I have used it like 3 times in my life which involved me opening it for like 10 minutes to checks someone's tweet and that's that, not using it and not really planning to use it, just like I'm not using facebook. So stop being so paranoid about basic things.
2
SpaceX already pushed basically all space companies to go with reusable rockets, now we have new most powerful fully reusable rocket performing test flights. All this attempt to colonize mars will drive technology forwards by miles while giving better idea on how to manage climate on planetary scale, which we are in desperate need right now.
2
So you dont even have model for your imaginary world?
2
Blaming NATO once more? Russia can't win this war from the start of it, now that Ukraine started to punch back you will keep blaming NATO for it?...
2
@WORKERS.DREADNOUGHT I can bet that even if Musk invents cure from cancer you would be first in line to complain that he took way to much time, right?
2
Running kids on bikes? When did that happen?
2
So doing a car which looks 99.9% same as previous ones looked for past few decades is form of art?
2
@salamjihad3449 I don't like flat jokes... I like when they are with some fizz...
2
@WanderingKakapo Are you paranoid or what? And who is Leon?
2
@Globeisahoax Its called: rocket
2
What the what now? Caramel ice cream proves that earth is globe?! NO WAY!!!!
2
Copium?
2
@therealzilch You cant really determine who is actually flat earther and who just pretends to be dumb, so i'm going with 50/50 chance. This gives me more hope in humanity than to think that we have so many people who doesn't understand basic geometry.
2
@dawidsienczak9821 Issue with hydrogen cars is about its complexity from end to end. There is no pure hydrogen on earth, all the hydrogen needs to be produced, which is expensive process. Then you need to store that hydrogen, which is yet another expensive thing due to so called hydrogen embrittlement which on itself causes a thing where all hydrogen tanks will have expiration dates printed on them, which is around 5 years. And then you need to think about hydrogen transportation as you can't have thousands tiny hydrogen plants inside cities, then storage (again) at the refueling stations, then expensive to build and maintain hydrogen refueling stations, then you fill up to your car which will have to store that hydrogen (again) and only then you can use it... And no, hydrogen combustion will NEVER be a thing due to the simple fact that hydrogen fuel cell engines are TWICE the efficiency, aka you can travel double the distance with fuel cells in comparison to just burning it directly, not even talking about complexity of entire HICE engine and its maintenance costs. BEV's at the moment wins across the board, this is why registered hydrogen car numbers dropped in 2023 in comparison to previous year, and this is why BEV's sold numbers still going up on basically exponential curve. At this point BEV's could ONLY be beat if we no longer have lithium to make batteries and we would not have any alternatives, other than this, there is no real chance for hydrogen, especially for regular private passenger cars.
2
@dawidsienczak9821 I would definitely be extra happy if hydrogen was actually viable option, but sadly it's not. There is simply soo many complications relating to it that transitioning towards it instead of BEV's makes no sense at this point, like, we have under 1000 hydrogen stations in ENTIRE WORLD, while there are over 3 000 000 BEV's dedicated recharging stations, this excluding the fact that any wall socket could be used to recharge your car, it will be slow, but it can be used. Where hydrogen fuel cell technology could actually shine is in bigger industries, like busses, trains, ships, semi or even planes, but regular passenger cars it sadly makes zero sense. Have a nice day!
2
I think its like 5k ticket to fly over south pole on a plane, so they might get enough money for that one. They did got enough to buy laser gyro, for like 25k or something like that, which proved that earth spins, but they dismissed that evidence, because... reasons...
2
@panickingstrumpet6881 Then he is luckiest person on the planet... As he made quite few projects successful. No idea what you are complaining about Twitter here, he is remaking it in his own way, you might like it or not, that's quite irrelevant. Killing monkeys? I mean, that isn't good, but we are talking about technology which should tap directly into humans brains... So while doing extensive testing it might result in some casualties. It always have been with animal trials and it always will be. If it was 100% safe then there wont be any need to perform animal trials and they could move straight to humans... And it's again, its somehow only bad when Musk company does it, but when you have thousands of other companies doing same or allot worse things, then it's just brushed away as a casual thing. Kessler Syndrome might or might not happen, but starlink satellites will be deorbited at the end of their life cycle. Is this possible issue? Yes. Would it be better to not have thousands of extra satellites in earths orbit? Yes. But this doesn't change the fact that we need those satellites to provide internet coverage for entire planet. 50% of humans still have no access to it, so we can't move forwards without bringing all humanity as a whole. Every single technology has its own bad sides, you just need to check which is the worse, to have it or to not have it.
2
What?
2
@valortiz6333 "who says i can't question these things? U?" ? I said... You can't compare them... Where did i said that you cant question them? "And y can't i add it to a God claim when in Gods word he clearly said when he was creating the earth he went over the waters and brought land up from it and separated the water from the waters" And Harry Potter book said that there is magical school for wizards... "U believe NASA if u choose to" ? Why the hell do people like you think that NASA is even relevant here? You could disprove 100% of what NASA presented over the years, that will not disprove globe... Earth is a globe not because some one said so, but because its provable observable fact from reality. "But some may argue that up there is water and a firmament." And some may argue that up there lives magical space pixies... We know that there isint any water which would cover earth and we know that here isint any firmament. So you can present your opinion as much as you want but you cant argue against reality.
2
Even Russian propaganda agrees with this map...
2
Studies have been done already, checking pollution from start to end BEV's still win.
2
@darkhorseman8263 Exactly, quite believable, but not possible. You can't just magically separate hydrogen from oxygen with some magical membranes... You have to put in crap tone of energy to get that result.
2
I have talked with quite few flat earthers, quite few of them could have been trolling, but in general most of them at some point brought in bible as "evidence" that earth is flat. So I could confidently say that majority flat earthers are religious but majority of religious are not flat earthers.
2
Should someone got hurt?...
2
Should tell you how much research Phil actually does here... As he can't even understand meaning of basic comments. Now I wonder if he even read it.
2
Flat earther would answer: Its density!
2
@cartermon_ I know nothing, like not even basic geometry, this is why they are flat earthers.
2
So basically what you are saying that having some old book of fables written 2000+ years ago gives you some sort of ethics framework?
2
Why wasn't it practical for you?
2
Basic sun observation proves globe earth... Your failure to understand experiments will not make something true.
2
@abdihassan7208 Pseudo scientists? You literally can observe sun by yourself without anyone and determine that earth is not flat... Damn, you are grasping last straws here before drowning...
2
Youtube doing youtube things... As always... Now i'm constantly getting suggestions to watch 8+ year old videos... And it keeps suggesting SAME videos over and over and over and over again... I need to click on "not interested" just to get rid of it even tho that topic might be in line what i'm interested into but not from videos made 8+ years ago...
2
Earth is round because its observable reality ANYONE can do, Nye just said something what is reality independent on what he is saying. Its 21st century, you have basically entire human knowledge under your fingers, use it, stop being so ignorant about basic things like shape of earth.
2
Battery technology is improving every single year, there are even promising research done on batteries based on aluminum, so it's not really an issue.
2
Why? And side note, when i see "I'm not X, but...." its kind of self negating, its like saying "I'm not rapist, but..."
2
@slow-mo_moonbuggy Obvious troll is obvious.
2
Doesn't exist.
2
majority of the world and countries are against Rusian attack, so no idea what you are talking here. Second thing, its Russia who attacked Ukraine, not the other way around.
2
I would want to see actual evidence for your claim here... ICE car better than EV?... Which oil company paid you to say these words?
2
Kevin Moyer " You globers say boats over the horizon is proof, then quote neil degrasse Tyson saying you can't see curvature from an airplane" Maybe because they are different things?... Boats over horizon shows that there is curvature going from you, while Neil was talking about observing curvature to the sides... Flipping hell... How delusional are you?
2
Kevin Moyer Ok, smart ass, i have home work for you. Get any 3d software, create appropriately sized sphere and place camera on top of it and try to see that magical curvature you cant to see... like seriously, how much of a dip you want to see on a sphere which is 6,371 km in radius while you are on surface of it? Do you ever calculated it or atleast made 3d model to the scale?... being ignorant on basic geometry will not prove your point...
2
...to bankruptcy.
2
You do understand that counter offensive is to retake land which belongs to Ukraine?... How brainwashed are you?
2
Issue is more fundamental than byproduct. You are loosing like 60% more energy producing hydrogen and then converting it back to electricity to be used in hydrogen cars than you would in EV's. This doesn't take into consideration refueling stations, where to build for hydrogen will cost you millions per site and EV's can literally be charged from wall socket at any house. Ice cars are worst than Hydrogen, but Hydrogen is worst than EV's. Hydrogen cars had their chance to become a thing, now its too late for it.
2
@alexbereczki2267 Its extremely dangerous to go over the poles, mainly in case you will crash if you will not die from that you will die in minutes from a cold. And on top of that planes are not made to fly over such low temperatures. And on top of that... There are specialized plane flights over south or north poles, 2k or something like that for plane ticket... You can even go on your own foot over there for 50k, 2 week expedition, if you want too...
2
@RivBank-o3j People like that usually do upvote their own comments, no idea why... Like, it should be obvious that person who wrote this comment likes what he wrote, otherwise he would have never done it... But rational thinking and people like that never come in same package.
2
@RivBank-o3j Weird comment you have here, but ok.
2
By defending it against attacker?...
2
Obvious troll is obvious
2
So because someone used "they" for singular usage 100 years ago, we should do the same now?... Sound logic...
2
Majority of flat earthers are bible believers, but majority of bible believers are not flat earthers. I have seen soooooo many so called flatearhers trying to support their claim with a quote from bible...
2
@lyvinlyphe9644 "Respond all you want, I won’t bother to comment back" Trying to scream that you are correct and then run away like a child? Nice... "I’ve done more of my fair share of back and forth with people like you." So does that mean that your personal experience of being put down into place got to you and now you want to avoid that by running away? And just for the record, it was you who made original comment, so you came here looking for a reply, you got it, now own it. "Science’s single most important goal is to remove a creator from your mind," That's false. Science goal is to determine reality, if we cant find god in reality its not a fault of science, its fault of your empty god claim. " along with being one of the biggest money making schemes in global history" Then don't support it, go and live in a cave naked, why are you using scientific tools to make such silly comment and complain out tools you use? Dont like it, dont use it. Lets see if your god will give you better ones. FYI Biggest money scheme is a religion, you might want to fact check how much its making while not even paying taxes. "With an infinite number of galaxies" Who said this? Who said that there are infinite number of galaxies? Did you counted them?... "and all that mumbo jumbo, you feel fairly small and insignificant don’t you? " Yes, on grand scale you are nothing. I know that you dont like that feeling and you want to feel special, but sorry, this is reality, not America, you are not special, you are who you are. "You don’t matter and were created out of pure randomness and coincidence. " Who said that we are created? Are you trying to smuggle in creator? And dint your god supposedly created us from nothing when he got bored existing outside space and time? "That’s what your science tells you." That's what reality tells us, its not our problem if you dont like reality.
2
Which part by you was false?
2
He is, but what difference does it make even if he wasn't?
2
@loschavez7694 Not crying, just saying that your joke was not funny.
2
@robertlascelle1602 Still... What?
2
@robertlascelle1602 "Jesus said..." Well that explains everything... Have a nice day.
2
Yaroslav As someone who praises Russia you hell of a fan of western platforms. Why are you even here? Go live in Russia and enjoy their things... Leave us alone...
2
And nothing is said about it... If you think that Russian army has less knowledge than this youtube channel then you are way deep into woods. And this only reports of what already happen... And Russia got this knowledge hours before it happen as it had to approve shieling and all that jazz... These news are old news... So relax...
2
Basic observation of sun you can perform from your backyard proves that earth isint flat, not even talking about countless other things which does the same. There are countless videos explaining why flat earth claim is stupid on its core, repeating same thing isint entertaining.
2
@dennyhobbs6977 NASA was and is run by quite few different people at this point, so its quite reliable source of information as it would be quite hard to keep some secret across multiple generations working there. And NASA is just yet another source of information, just ADDITIONAL source to confirm something anyone can determine from their backyard. No reasonable person ever said "Earth is a globe because NASA said so" neither does this video said this or even implied. And... Last thing here. In 99.9% instances its flat earthers who brings in NASA into conversation and not the other way around, when you hear normal people mentioning NASA its most likely their response to flat earther mentioning it first.
2
Expensive.
2
First sailors? Are you saying that no one ever used a boat before paper got invented?...
2
Cool story, any supporting evidence?
2
@TheBogdanator Will try to give you comparison for your brains to wrap things around. Just like crude oil isn't a fuel even tho you can make gasoline from it, water isn't one either even tho you can make hydrogen from it.
2
Afraid of what?
2
Flat earthers don't believe that satellites are real.
2
Questioning things is fine, denying reality isint.
2
No one. That "pear shaped" is gross misrepresentation what it actually looks like. On a grand scale earth is a perfect sphere. But as you even failed to understand that, well, no hope for you.
2
Which part of "test" word you didn't understood?
2
It was literally meant to crash into ocean at its end of flight due to it being a prototype... Why would it have crew on board?...
2
@LucreDenouncer It might be shocker for you, but you can actually like company and what it does without liking the CEO. Why are all of you TF cult members straight away go for Musk and not actual company? Is your entire character gets defined by "I hate Musk"?
2
What was false in this video?
2
I mean... If you lived in a perfect world where you could have perfect material without any elasticity and you could create perfect force to keep this long rope at perfect tension, well, maybe it would not touch the ground if earth was flat... But...
2
Having different beliefs is fine, having different opinions is fine, but that only applies when we are talking about things like best tasking ice cream, when it comes to testable and observable reality, you cant have opinion on facts.
2
@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463 Give me a photo from high altitude without fish eye lens distortion and i will show you curvature in it. I dare you.
2
Celsius is useless?... 0 degrees is when water freezes, should be really clear indication when that is, and then you have 100 degrees for boiling water, again, simpler and clear... 2 simple points based on most common element we use every day. can't get any simpler than that. For metric not being precise enough.... I have no idea what you tried to even say here... Metric is as precise as it gets... 2355mm or 235.5cm or 23.55dm or 2.355m or 0.2355km... Are you scared of point or something? If so, then you can use smallest one which produces clean number... Now do the same with your feet measurement system... Lets see how accurate it can get...
2
@raumshen9298 I will assume that you are trying to troll here.. But well, lets amuse ourselves here. By globe model we have thing we call gravity, which solve your presented none issue here. And side funny thing, I can stand on a ball, do you need video proof of that or maybe you could just google a video of "standing on a big ball"?
2
In like 99% of times it all ends up to "Because bible said so", aka religions are to blame.
2
First of all, its not a real problem. Second, why would NASA waste money on people like that when they could send someone actually worth it into space? Trips to space are expensive, really expensive, so to waste money on sending ignorant people is just wasteful, at best.
2
@Zatheris76 My point remains same. NASA wasting their time and resources in entertaining poor flatearthers (Yes, those are poor, even if you combined all of their money it would barely reach a price of one ticket, wont even dream about getting rest of the money back).
2
What?
2
So if someone is older than you that means they know more by default? No exceptions?
2
I will assume that you tried to make joke and failed on that.
2
Jeremy Guglielmo "does say that creation is made from invisible elements (atoms)" Atom alone is not visible, but put them together and you can see them with naked eyes. And then again, we did invented ways to see atoms. So no, atoms are not invisible, they are not visible by naked eye, but they are visible in general... So first thing which is false. "says blood is the source of life and health" Which should be known by cave man... Poke some one with a stick and if he blead's out, he dies.... Its like saying that bible presents scientific fact when it says that there is a sun... Its like basic fundamental fact from reality which only requires basic observation of reality... " says the Earth is in free float of space" But its not... Earth is not suspended, it rotate around itself, then around sun and then around galaxy center and then galaxy who knows where it goes... We are not suspended... And space is not empty space, it still have particles. "he suspends the earth over nothing" Over nothing? Nothing is nothing, you cant suspend anything over nothing... And earth is in space which is surrounded by space and not suspended over nothing... "says air has weight" But its not... It talks about force of wind, not about weight of air... Again, this is basic observation from reality... "says that light moves" Which part of that verse says that light moves? Which one? Because it only talks about darkness residing, which can simply mean that they wanted to say that after sun goes away, darkness comes or vice versa... It doesnt say that light is a thing which actually moves throw space on specific speed... "says the Earth is a sphere" For your god's sake... Learn what word "circle" means before you scream out that its sphere... Will help you out here. Definition of circle: a round plane figure whose boundary (the circumference) consists of points equidistant from a fixed point (the centre). Aka flat disk. "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" And it says that earth is flat pancake... Read your damn book before you comment. "it's says that the Bible doesn't say anything about science anywhere" And its accurate. presenting false claims and basic observations from reality is not a scientific information in any shape or form... "Remember, the Bible was written at least a couple thousand years ago" We know, this is why its fundamentally incorrect about reality. " Don't just take anyone's word because they sound smart. Do your own research." We did, now its your turn.
2
You do know that thing like heat shield is a thing? Right?
2
@zinnia3684 Plane path on northern hemisphere will have an arc, why? Because if you would put that same path on a globe model you will get perfect straight line... What you have seen is warped out representation. You cant unfold sphere surface on a flat one without loosing detail or making it some what wonky. Plane flight paths doesn't make any sense only if earth is flat, while in reality its round, which resolves every issue you are having here.
2
Wade Greene I know that flat earthers can understand 3 dimensions, but please, just try it... Down is towards center of earth, there are no "on the side" or "on the bottom", if you can understand it then take a globe, hold small figurine on "top" of the globe and if you want to grasp why people at the "bottom" are no falling off, then simply turn that GLOBE around and you will get your answer in a form of 1st grader level.
2
"why do YOU believe the world is round?" Because its observable fact anyone can determine?... "but it baffles me why anyone intelligent would treat ANY idea with such a closed mind" Because there is difference between having idea and having stupid idea. Flat earth is stupid idea because earth is demonstrably a globe. You can't have different opinion on a fact... This is why its simply stupid.
2
Its not.
2
Your beliefs effect your actions and your actions effect people around you. If they lived alone in woods, then nobody will care what they believe, but they live in society, so lowering number of numbnuts in society you live in is always best option you will have which will be beneficial for everyone.
2
2 contradictory models can be real? In what fantasy world do you live in? And why the hell would you require to watch 33 videos of some paranoid person? And even if he had 5 gazzilion views will not make his nonsensical statements any less false...
2
@tzizzzz Which first video? He has dozens of crazy videos... be more specific here...
2
@tzizzzz moon is a moon... Its not a reflection of anything... What the hell are you talking about? How the hell could moon be a reflection? How deep this nonsensical conspiracy goes?
2
@tzizzzz I'm interested in actual evidence and not some ones personal opinion. Moon is just a big rock orbiting earth, full stop here... You can create thousands of different "theories" what moon is, you can even say that moon is made of cheese, will not change reality what it actually is
2
How is Russians attacking and killing Ukrainians shifts blame towards NATO exactly?
2
passtheparcel2007 You got this exactly backwards. For world to be flat you would need actual magic to be real which would only support god claim. Every single observation from reality shows that earth is not flat, so having it flat would mean that some magic is in play here and maybe some one just messing with us in here and changing reality in a way to appear different then it actually is. Tho nether shape proves/disproves god.
2
I guess having biggest space company in the world makes you a fraud this days... Who knew...
2
And I guess war in Ukraine is just special military operation and Russia is winning?
2
@skyisreallyhigh3333 You can't be alive without breathing too... But like... Breathing will not have impact on your muscles... Muscle mass is mainly based on your genes and not how much food you will eat.
2
Because metric system rules.
2
How? By being invaded?...
2
So basically because majority of world wants to help out country which defends against aggressor it would be the same to send more ammunition to agreesor? Do you even think before you write?
2
But its not.
2
@10697018 "then why can't anyone ever prove it?" It was proven, 97% of scientists accepts that. Smartest people on earth accepts that. People with IQ above average accepts that... Just because you dont like something, doesnt make it false. Evolution, aka change in gene pool over time, is a proven fact. You can try adapt this reality to your story, but you cant deny facts. "You can say it is a fact all day long but without proof, you are just grasping at straws" Do i seriously need to educate you on something you should have learned in middle school? "We have proof of creation" Cool, prove that proof of creation. Because you know: You can say it is a fact all day long but without proof, you are just grasping at straws "In fact, Kent Hovind will give you $250,000 if you can actually prove it." No he is not. Because that would already happened by quite few people who would gladly take this challenge and humiliate Kent. Where is this official statement from Kent that he will give 250k for some one who proves evolution? Because i know couple names who will gladly take this challenge... Spare money is a nice thing to have...
2
@10697018 "Actually only 40% of scientists believe in evolution and them numbers get smaller every day" https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/ 97% unless you have some new research done which would show different number. Do you? "The smartest people on earth accept creation" No they don't. Most scientists are atheists. So which smartest people are you talking about here in specific? "creation because unlike evolution it can actually be proven" Really? You have proof for creation? Well, give me that... present evidence that creation is true... "Just because you don't believe in something, doesn't make it false" Exactly! "Evolution, aka change in the gene pool over time, is a proven fraud" Exactly false! That proof was actual fraud to brainwash people like you to think that it was debunked, while in reality it never was. "You can't deny proven facts. " Correct, but why do you deny proven facts? "The KJV Bible is proof of creation" False. Bible is a claim, not proof... Do you even know what circular argument is? FYI Its not a scientific method, not even close.... Its like opposite to science... " Well if that were true somebody would have already taken Kent's money and no one to date has ever done that." Maybe because Kent never made this an official challenge? I'm still waiting for the link for this challenge of your Kent... Stop tap dancing, provide link. "I mean look at how these evolution believers and their teachers were humiliated by Ray Comfort." ? Should i post videos where Kent gets humiliated? Would that prove that he is incorrect? Because i can find quite few of those if you want and if you seriously think that this would make some difference here...
2
Yea, and they only managed to make 6.6k dislikes... Shameful...
2
@mickeywicked478 Maybe because normal people doesn't really care to make a comment but just leaves a like under the video? And in general, normal people tend to avoid videos about flat earth, as its quite pointless, while flat earthers will scream on every single of them and dislike as many as they can. So you will have misrepresentation of actual current situation.
2
@mickeywicked478 Sort comments by "Newest first" scroll little bit down and you have example as " INSANE DISAPPEARANCES!!!! I can’t believe people think we have a molten core 😂" or " Alex Bereczki How can you know for sure that it is round ?" or " Djss The One Oh.... I just laugh on both side.... We dont have clue about anything.... We only know what they alow us... We only know what they teach us in school.... Dont bother about this , live life with family, ITS actual so short Cheers." or "Outcast Outdoors - On a Fishin' Mission When government lives off of you like a parasite, why would you believe anything they say?" Tho i can agree, in general this video does have quite a few flatearthers commenting on. Interesting. "My point is that if flat earth isn't as rampant as the "debunker" videos will have one believe, then why is there such a campaign against it??" Because people like nice good laugh? You can find videos about debunking pixie existence... Doesn't mean claim that pixies are real have any solid ground... "But, please, tell me more about these "normal people" who are dedicating their lives to the campaign.." Normal are those who can determine shape of earth by basic observation of sun, no math is involved, no government is involved, just plain basic observation from actual reality. Its not a campaign, just a hobby and in some cases people make videos about it because it gets some attraction and makes money for them, its a fun topic in some weird sense. What is your entire point here? What difference does it make if there was 0 or 1 billion comments from flat earthers? Would amount of comments make it less false?
2
"They still have a possible WW3 stored up. If that would not be the case, we would already be in WW3." ? How this sentence even makes sense to you? You do understand that no one wants to start WW3 and no one cares about attacking Russia?... There are plenty of countries in the world which would be no match for US or NATO, but no one is going around and taking those countries over... "China does condemn war and it blames NATO for this one in Ukraine" Citation needed. "The biggest point you miss to mention is that China and Russia know exactly that if one of them falls, the other one is the next. " ? Russia already failed and no one is planning to attack China, why would anyone attack China? What can happen is China actually attacking Russia when Russia uses up most of its military equipment, its not like Russia keep delivering high end equipment to front lines... But China could and would benefit by taking over portion of Russia without big or any fight back and can take over quite few natural resources by doing so, which is needed for China economy. "Just the prosperity of China is threat enough to the US." No, what is threat is Chinas want to expand its territory by taking over countries by force. "This alliance is rooted in the knowledge that the USA aims to rule the world by its own rules and will not stop until every country on earth bows down to them." Och that irony, you think that USA wants to control entire world while you have DICTATORSHIP countries trying to take over the world... How the hell you dont see irony here? " they just want a multipolar order" DICTATORSHIP countries want multipolar order? Are you drunk?
2
Damn Americans... I hope you know that there could be more than 2 opinions in the world? Right?...
2
@reportercrusher2411 "especially if it’s not from earth" What difference does it make? If i show you 2 images of a tree, how would you determine that photo X is real or fake? How would you determine that photo Y is real or fake? "I don’t know how images wil turnout from the moon ... nobody knew , at that time" Its basic photography... Exposure time... Try taking picture at night of stars while having bright object in view, like a moon... You simply can't take photos like that. You could do it in multiple passes, like taking photo of moon, then covering it up and taking photo of stars and then super expose one on another with some software, image will not be fake, it will be photoshoped, but it will represent reality. "Photoshop and animation is for the untrained eye very difficult if not impossible but I still believe there is not shared knowledge about this subject. " ? First images of earth have been done in 1946, photoshop invented 1987... There is huge gap between those dates... When first photo was taken such expression as "CGI" was not even existent, as at that time computers have been as smart as calculator in a dollar store... Tho at that time, computers took couple rooms in size and required multiple people to insert equations into it for processing... Photo realistic rendering have been possible only in last couple years, not 74 years back... "I’m not a it-specialist" I'm. "But when I have the images in my hands then I can see if they are messed with. " How? I still want to know what method you are actually using to determine that. "that said I don’t know how it works in space with the absence of earths conditions" In same way as it works on earth... Physics doesn't stop working just because you are in vacuum. And you can even get better/sharper looking photos due to lack of atmosphere which usually creates blurriness due to particles in air. "So show me video then ...." Of what? Earth? Space? ISS? I mean, you have dozens, hundreds, maybe even thousands of videos on youtube alone which are from space. Pick any official video and debunk it... You can go and google out original photo "blue marble" which is one shot image of earth and debunk that... As it should be simpler to debunk one image then entire video. If you honestly want to know the truth, but you cant even debunk ONE official video/photo from space, what does it say about your investigative capabilities? Do you reject globe model/space/moon landing just because its official stance and you want to be special one? Do you have evidence for anything? "I am not satisfied with the official narrative and therefore asking questions.... " Cool, ask questions, but don't assume that you are even close to truth if you simply want to reject official narrative just because you don't like it or you failed to understand it. Pick on single topic/image/video and lets dissect it. Because now it simply looks that you want to be different from others for sake of being different and not for sake of being correct.
2
@Knowledge01 "You left that question COMPLETELY unanswered" Because your question is silly at best... Intellect is defined as: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract matters. I think we both have this capability, dont we now? So we both have intellect... The fact that i'm responding to your messages demonstrates that I have intellect... So your question was and still is silly. So why bother answering to silly questions? "MY ANSWER: No it does not satisfy me, because I asked if you 👉👉SAW👈👈or can produce 👉👉YOUR👈👈 own personal intellect that you possess." Och sorry, then I guess there isint AI which can beat MY intellect. My bad, was only thinking about YOUR intellect here. "I'm not asking you about A.I. " You are asking about intellect, and AI is... Well.... Artificial INTELLIGENCE... It's like... In its... Name... Intelligence and intellect are interrelated, so my example of AI is valid. Big brain time!!! "You saw your own intellect or can produce it for us physically?" Its not that intelligent question... Its like asking "Did you saw number 2 as a physical object?" Number 2 isint a thing you can actually see, its a label for something what is none physical. Intellect isn't a physical thing on itself you could see in brain scans... This is why I keep bringing back your failure to understand that brain scans dont show your intellect... " let us safely and correctly assert" Don't assert, you intellectual capabilities will lead you to most likely wrong answer here. "your answer is an embarrassing NO. " Its not embarrassing. It was your claim that you should see intelect in brain scans... Do you seriously think that you can see intelect in brain scans? Because I will safely and correctly assert that you do, which would be embarrassing thing for you to claim. Right? " Fear GOD" Which one? We had like 50 000 god claims over human history, you need to be more specific here... Which imaginary friend of yours should I fear? "I asked you straight forward questions" Not intellectual questions, so response reflects question, I guess. Tho my response was more intellectual than your question, so I guess I'm wrong here. "you cannot mask your ignorance" Says someone who believes in sky wizards because his book said so... C'mon... "and if they're too silly to answer, why even respond in the first place?" Because its fun. "Sounds like powerful intellect to me! " Thanks! "That's what atheism does for you." I know right! We wont be fooled that easily in believing someone's imaginary friend just because he said "Fear god"... Pfff, we are better than this! "You didn't take a hint from everyone else who stayed silent" Or no one gives a f**k what you are saying? What would be the difference? I'm here just for fun distraction, but most people wont bother responding to some none intelectual comments. "and now they want to see how bad I would have made them look if they tried what you are trying!" You tried, but trying isn't the same as succeeding. "ANSWER: PlZ." To what? You posted my comment and asking for answer?... Will try to ask. Do brain scans show your intellect?
2
@Knowledge01 "I already said: If your not answering it is because it was too silly, then why respond in the first place?" Because I like silly people. "Saying it is silly does not justify not answering the question." That actually is justification to not answer to it... If I ask "I have my red shoes, then why does dogs have tails?" question is silly and doesn't require any answer to it, right? Question itself makes no sense and there is no need to bother answering to it. I can still engage in conversation and point out that your question is silly, we can talk why this question is silly, but I have no requirement to actually answer to it. Do we agree on that much?
2
You misspelled Russia with Ukraine, it happens, but be more careful next time.
2
What is more interesting that people fails to understand basic aerodynamics, i don't mean like actual ones, but simple example of a plane landing while keeping his nose up should show that you don't need to point your plane down to actually go down. But its quite besides the point that you dont need to point down while going around earth...
2
Which side gains more from this dam being destroyed? Russia which was on offensive and now Ukraine has no way to attack from this side or Ukraine which gains nothing from it... And no, Crimea loosing water supply will not make any difference here as it survived just fine for years when Russia annexed it originally and Ukraine cut off water supply... Please use some braincells you still have instead of believing obvious Russian lies...
2
Its called: gravity... Down is relative to your position on earths surface. What's down for you will be up for some one on another side of earth if you would look from side perspective, but down is always towards center of earth independent on which side of earth you are.
2
"lie" implies that you know what you are talking about...
2
“Show me the man and I'll show you the crime”
2
Its actually around 2% from all people, based on actual research. Number is small, percentage wise, but when you take into consideration that even your 0.01% would result into ~779,479 people across the world. Its enough to fill up small country.
2
Russia "advancing" for past 450 days... And made few "strategic" retreats during that time too...
2
@dalvinderbasi3495 It was complete stalemate for entire winter, front lines basically dint change at all. Finally losing Bakhmut isn't anything special, if remaining defensive positions have been obliterated then Ukraine retreating from it was a smart move. Russia already drained its forces desperately trying to take it, Ukraine achieved its goal and can play safe game by not risking more soldier lives than its necessary at this moment. But like seriously, I see people like you over the place but none of them provides "real" and none "propaganda" information... So what actually is happening in Ukraine right now and how do you know this?
2
@pub1iuz Will make a wild guess here: You never were best at math and geometry in school?
2
You do know that most mass shootings have been done with legally owned guns? Right?
2
Flat earthers scientists? You must be joking. Unless some one who doesn't understand basic geometry can become scientist, then maybe...
2
Hamster Lord You have no idea what peer review is? Don't you now?
2
Ok, boomer...
2
I mean, flat earthers do tend to use that, but its not a proof that world is flat, its just a claim.
2
Zero, as there are no reasons for Ukraine to blow it up
2
Russia raised military service age from 27 to 30, clearly they want more soldiers... And outgoing draft of new soldiers is yet another sign that Russia is running out of soldiers... Like... What sign do you need to get to actually realize this?
2
Irony is strong with you. From which magical place do you think hydrogen is being sourced? Its either natural gas or from fresh water, if its second one then you need around 60% MORE electricity to move hydrogen car than you would with pure BEV. Do you see now how ironic your comment looks?
2
@Spha_gatsheni ? Are you one of those who thinks that you can use water as fuel?... Will make it extremely simple for you: You need 2kg of hydrogen to produce 1kg of hydrogen. And no, those numbers are not backwards... Water ISIN'T a fuel... You need crap ton of energy to get hydrogen out of water, aka its more than you will get back from it, aka there is huge energy loss, aka you need 60% MORE electricity to move hydrogen car same distance as you do for pure BEV's.
2
There is independent thought and then there is basic ignorance. Earth shape is a fact, there cant really be a debate about facts.
2
And if we finalized mass production of nano carbon tube batteries all of your complains would be meaningless... We can speculate what could be if X would be reality, but let's talk about actual reality.
2
@jessebryant9233 Will try to explain some things here as clear as possible: Big Bang: Currently best explanation for origins of this local universe based on all current evidence and contradicted by none of those. This can still be changed if new evidence comes along, but for time being its the best one we have. Abiogenesis: Is not an answered question, yet. But due to multiple experiments we know that life can originate from none life material on its own without intervention of some wizard. This doesn't answer to the question how life originated on earth but atleast we know that it could have happen naturally. Darwinian mythology: What you wanted to say here was "Evolution". What Darwin said is completely irrelevant here, unless you want to address specifically Darwin's words, then we could agree that Darwin was wrong on multiple things, but that's not evolution. If you wanted to talk about evolution, well, that one is a fact, theory and a fact at same time. Strange, isint it? Science is complex, reality is even more complex, so don't expect simple answers to complex questions. That's what religions do, science isint one.
2
@jessebryant9233 Big Bang is a model based on scientific evidence, your objection here is silly at best. Abiogenesis like i said is still open question, i dint said that i believe it to be true, you miserably failed with that one too, but we have few possible natural explanations for origins of life and your sky wizard explanation isint even one of possible ones, its empty assertion at this point. On side note, it fun to see religious people so desperate to claim that opposition have faith just to try achieve some higher ground here while admitting that having faith based position is shitty one, well we agree that faith based position is shitty one, science is not faith based position. No idea why you keep saying darwinian mythology, was this attempt to make fun of it or try to make straw man fallacy? It fun to see people as ignorant as you claiming something to not be science while 99%of biologists and 97% of actual scientists disagrees with your personal ignorant opinion, i guess you are correct, scientists arent actually scientists and you youtube warrior status wins over 3million actual scientists because you read some random creationist web page.... Riiiiight... " I'm not expecting real answers" This this why you believe in wizards and magic? "and your comment contained absolutely no surprises" Yea, its like saying that my answer to question "What is 2+2" contained no surprised... i wonder why... "because when it comes to your blind, deaf, and dumb faith—you have absolutely no empirical science to support it" Well some one clearly have experience in this area. Go for it! You can do it! We believe in your blind, deaf, and dumb faith!!! I mean, we dont actually believe in your blind, deaf, and dumb faith, we just trying to support you, you are a champ!!! You are special!!!
2
@yazzamx6380 His scared, he knows that his beliefs are shit and irrational but he is just scared and tries to push his anger that he was brainwashed on atheists. Few more years and he should become atheist, i hope, well, he still need to learn to have decent conversation with people, but him being scared of his own beliefs is one step towards correct path.
2
@jessebryant9233 So it only took 5 days for you to admit that you are theist. Why it took so long? Why are you scared of your own world views? And yes, i'm atheist. See, easy, you asked and I have answered, why? Because i'm not scared of my position. "Can you make a positive case FOR your own position?" I don't need to. Atheism is rejection of YOUR claim that god is real, i dont need to disprove your claim, its enough for me to dismiss it to be an atheist. "If you are honest, you will sa 'yes' to the first and 'no' to the second." Second question is invalid, so cant provide "Yes" or "No" to it, but I have already corrected you on that one. So, going back to you "lie" that you dont believe in wizards and magic, lets do basic fact check here. Definition of magic: the power of apparently influencing events by using mysterious or supernatural forces. Definition of wizard: a man who has magical powers So yea, you know, like Jesus who used magic and by definition was wizard? So we can play this silly game all day long, but you do believe in wizards and magic, issue is that you are scared in admitting that. Why is that?
2
@jessebryant9233 If you want to make this conversation relevant than start by proving that there is such thing as god. We can actually talk about you being irrational here. You are irrational, right? You believe something to be true you cant prove to be true, right?
2
@jessebryant9233 Those 3 things you listed at start are not relevant here, we can say for sake of argument that all of them are 100% false, whats now? God is real because you cant explain something about reality? Discrediting those will not make your god real, not a tiny bit. And... If you seriously think that all 3 of those are false then why the f**k are you here? Disprove those and become most famous person on earth, like seriously, there are more than enough religious organizations which would financially support you all the way if you could disprove any of those, but yet you are here screaming and kicking like a child and calling something to be not a scientific thing while waste majority of actual scientists will disagree with your personal ignorant opinion. Why are you here? Are you trying to poke hole in science because you realize how shitty your own position is and that there is only one solution here for you to lower opposition side to your own shitty one just to have fighting chance? Yes, your position is shitty one, you realize that yourself, its not our problem, its yours, and i'm not shifting burden here, you believe that there is god, cool, can you support that belief with any evidence? No? So you have irrational belief. On another hand even if i could nor support any of those 3 things with evidence i could simply remove those from options for time being and that wont change anything about my world view, your god will still be imaginary friend of yours and i'm will still be more rational than you are, simple as that.
2
@arunkottolli And currently there are like over 4 million dedicated BEV charging stations in the world, where for hydrogen you have like 800 and that number seemingly only shrinking. And as you mentioned, every single wall socket is potential charging spot, so when it comes to recharge/refuel there is no real competition here.
2
Manhattan Project lasted 4 years and it got exposed, yet your conspiracy involving multiple times more people over decades wasn't?... Your argument actually supports the claim that moon landing happen.
2
@kain6996 You should stop listening to TF and actually fact check before you speak...
2
@kain6996 Even if I had no idea what CFO was that would not change basic reality here, which is that Tesla as a company is always revving up production of something and people who works in companies are coming and leaving all the time... So by your logic people should never leave companies which are not abusing people or launching some sort of broken product or something? Imposible option for CFO to just leave a company at some point in time? When would be a good time for CFO to stand down by your opinion? And just FYI he will remain at Tesla until the end of the year to give it smooth transition, this is not something you would do for the company you don't want to have anything to do with... So lets see how much you know about reality here and how much you just parroting silly talking points you have seen on facebook.
2
@kain6996 He worked for Tesla for 13 years... He didn't simply came and went... 13 years is a long time period... People leave their jobs for many reasons and the fact that actual reason was never specified doesn't give you right to make shit up and claim that it due to some internal major issues... Maybe he just decided to start living simple life, maybe he wants to work on his own project, maybe there was internal disagreement with CEO, maybe maybe maybe maybe... Until you get actual confirmation from CFO why he is leaving, you are just making shit up, nothing more. Like seriously, Cybertruck was announced in 2019, so why the hell he waited for almost 4 years to leave if it was such a bad product? He would have left back then or even before Cybertruck was officially announced... Are you one of those who just hates Tesla, well Musk specifically because people can't separate companies from CEO's, that you just complaining for the sake of complaining?
2
@ΑθανάσιοςΚΥΡΙΑΚΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ-θ7γ "the rejection of the claim though is totally irrelevant to the existence of a God" Yes, atheism is just a rejection of claim and not evidence that claim is false, so you got that one correctly. God can still be real and we can till have atheists. "the default position is determined by the society we live in" Default position is determined by logic and reason... What is most rational position you can take on a claim without evidence? Rejection of it and remaining neutral. That's atheism. Its not a claim that god is not real, its rejection of claim that he is real due to lack of evidence to support that claim. Simple as that.
2
@ΑθανάσιοςΚΥΡΙΑΚΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ-θ7γ What the hell are you even talking about here? Atheism is rejection of god claim. How the hell can this be dictated by anyone? Are you saying that there are actual evidence that sky wizard is real and someone is hiding it? If so, how the hell would you know this? And logic is... Well... Logic... Like seriously, are you drunk or something? Can you elaborate on your statement here and actually properly explain what you mean by this?
2
@ΑθανάσιοςΚΥΡΙΑΚΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ-θ7γ Define "dictated by" as i have no idea how could some one dictate rejection of empty assertion. Are you so desperate to put atheism on same level as theism just to have fighting chance?
2
@harambey So you mean to tell me that you are soo ignorant that you dont even understand what you are trying to ask here?
2
Its not a theory, its a fact.
2
@frankwoods4179 What story is that? What are the numbers of gun violence before and after ban?
2
@mohdadeeb1829 But like, what's the point? Having something accurate in religious book will not prove/disprove anything anyways. So why even mention that?
2
@mohdadeeb1829 And some people targeting none religious people. So still, what is your point here? If you want to talk about targeting people, we have like 13 countries where atheists can be legally killed. Name me one where this would apply to theists...
2
@mohdadeeb1829 Kim Jong-un is looked as a god himself, entire regime over there is based on religious grounds. North Korea is far from being secular... Nice try, but no. Do you have any actual one?
2
@mohdadeeb1829 Who said that we are blaming religious people? We are blaming religions in general. And if you would do some basic google search with keywords like "countries where Atheists can be killed" you will get quite few results. I mean, you are free to debunk those, but the fact remains that in some Muslim countries it would be wise not to expose yourself as atheist. Even in US atheists are looked as some black sheep, i mean, there was a study done where people have been asked for who they would vote, muslim or atheist, and majority picked muslim. Why? Who knows... Its like religious people will stick with other religious people even if their religions are not compatible, but as long as both sides have similar delusions they will stick with each other... While atheists have no issue voting for theist or atheist.
2
So your solution is to allow another country to take your territory bit by bit? What would you said when in next few years Russia repeats same attack and takes another 2 regions? Let them have it?... Then another 2? And then another?... Then Russia decides to attack rest of the countries? Allow them to take few of those too? There needs to be drawn line at some point, Russia got slight pass with Crimea, but this was over the board and now Russia will suffer consequences of it with Ukraine retaking ALL of their land back.
2
Some do. Its called stupidity.
2
@electr_icity4613 Its quite simple actually. I have engaged with quite few people who claimed that earth is flat. There is one big common thing amongst them: want to be special. Quite few of them simply scream out that its true because you cant trust government, because government lies and all that jazz. Then you try to provide examples, explain why this argument doesnt fly and so on. And one main thing amongst ALL flat earthers is their inability to understand geometry. I mean... You literally cant be flat earther if you understand how geometry works, how perspective actually works and so on. If that's not a indication of stupidity, then i dont know what is.
2
@electr_icity4613 Yet you forgot second part... Ignorance... Failure to understand geometry...
2
@Merennulli "Given that nothing in your post relates to anything I said, I'm going to just assume you're trying to troll and mute you." Are you scared of reality? Like seriously, you have some one who made simple question directly relating to your original comment, then you straight away went it him being troll and muting? Are you afraid of other opinions or simple questions? If you are, then why are you here on public comment section and not in some echo chamber?
2
Same thing applies to the people who hates everything related to Musk and nothing will convince them otherwise. Just that difference here is between one side looking at companies and their achievements, while the other side just hates everything related to Musk by default. I could bet that even if Musk comes out with cure from cancer people would still complain.
2
Basic observation of sun disproves flat plane...
2
I would say "obvious troll" but with flat earthers its hard to separate real one from a troll.
2
Welcome to Murica.
2
Now I wonder. How do you think government pays for things like roads? Do you use roads? Do you think they are free to build and maintain?
2
Then you should be able to prove that your knowledge is based on actual reality, right? Sooo, explain sunsets!!! Och wait, you can't.... Hmmmm.... If you fail with such basics, how can you know anything?
2
It is funded by SpaceX and not by taxpayer money...
2
There is no such thing as water powered car...
2
But flat earth claim is just... stupid... basic observation of sun disproves flat earth and proves globe one, anything else is just distraction. If you have some one who thinks that earth is flat because their rocket stopped at some point mid air, sorry, but they are stupid. Lets call it as it is, lets not pretend that we will have next Einstein from one of them. I had engaged in talks with flat earthers for quite a while now, but i still trying to find ONE which actually understand basic geometry. And just FYI definition of stupid is: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. So if you have some one who lacks intelligence or common sense, they are stupid by definition.
2
? Starship performed 2 soft landings by this point. Were you living under a rock for past year or something? Do you only watch TF propaganda videos and never fact check anything? And near future can mean anything... For me near future would be couple days, for some near future would be couple years...
2
Why should they? Its failed at more than 9x the rated load, they could even use this as potential advertisement in how much more load they can hold before failing.
2
Ukraine fighting Russia because Russia attacked Ukraine... U.S. Provides military support to fight common enemy. No idea why people like you fail to understand basic reality here. U.S. Can't join this war directly or it would start WW3 automatically. Ukraine asked for help to fight back, U.S. AND other countries started to provide help, that's it.
2
People think the earth is flat because you tell them the universe began with a sky wizard creating it from nothing when he got bored existing outside space and time.
2
@glenrisk5234 ""evidence" Big Bang" theory was originally predicated on has entirely been debunked" When? By who? Why scientific world is not aware of this?... "despite there being absolutely no evidence that there even can be a beginning?" Big bang is only a starting of already existing energy and matter, it beginning of our local representation of this universe. Simple expansion. "there is absolutely no evidence that matter or energy can truly be created or destroyed, only transformed" Correct, this is why claim that god created everything from nothing contradicts that and big bang never claimed that everything came into being from nothing... So you are proving my point here. "I agree that the available evidence is that your God is false" First of all, i dont have god. Second, some of god claims cant be shown to be false as they are not falsifiable. " But you have no idea what my concept of God is" Does it really matter if you cant prove that he is real in any case? "clearly no understanding of what the words "one true God" mean?" I do understand, its a buzz word, have no real meaning, simply looks cooler than saying "god" "No doubt you believe yourself the most intelligent creature in all existence" False. So avoid making straw man here. "there are species in this world known to have brains some ten times the size of your entire body" And? Size of brain is not directly connected with ability to use it. "So yeh no reason to be respectful of a possible higher intelligence than your own right?" When you manage to show that higher intelligence is there and is responsible for anything in this reality, then we will talk. But for now you simply made a claim that there are smarter creatures on earth and that there are creatures with bigger brains... Cool... Dont care... We are talking about god claim here, not about size of brains... Why the hell you thought that bringing up brain size would prove your god in any shape or form?...
2
It's called "whataboutism"
2
@Paull1398 "So since the globe model claims to have all the answers i would dare to ask for a proof of it's curvature" You do realize that even if you could disprove globe model that would not prove flat one? "Because there are countless videos and images where one could see WAY more and farther then the mathematics of the sphere would allow. " And? The fact that you cant see across ocean and you can only see some what further then bare minimum of math suggests shows that you have curvature. Its not a question if there is one, question would be: why you can see further then you should on a spherical surface? Well, there are many variables here, one of those is observers altitude and size of observed object. For some magical reason every single time when flat earther comes and makes a claim that you can see further then you should its about some huge object and in some cases video is taken from a mountain... Doesn't disprove globe, not a tiny bit. At worst you will prove that earth is a bigger globe... "This is a very interesting video because the sun happens to set behind those mountains" Which should not be possible of flat earth model... But well... Who fact checks these days. "are 163 miles away and therefor should be hidden behind 10300 feet of Curvature. The height of the mountain is 9150 feet." And observers altitude is...? What about light refraction? And the FACT that you can only see top part of it demonstrates that you have curvature... You seriously proving globe earth here... "This video is not from a person that supports flat earth" And? Its still doesn't prove flat one or disprove globe, it actually supports globe model, like i said, only tip of mountain is visible, which means that bottom part is hidden by the curvature. So yea... And to prove globe without using any math or NASA or media or government or brains... things about sun: Size, speed, straight line movement, sunset. Four things observable by anyone which match globe 100% and missmatch 100% flat one. NO math is needed, nothing, just a solar filter you could get in local home depo for 1 buck and some spare time. Was this enough or should we continue?
2
That sounds like it fully the guy fault. How the hell you go on a trip and don't check if there is enough fuel in tank and when you run out you complain about it? There is option to charge EV's too... 60% should have been more than enough to get to one of the charging stations.
2
I'm guessing this was a joke, right?
2
You failed to understand basic reality here. While you can produce hydrogen on yourself, its basically just a battery, 2 metal plates and cup of water to produce some of that, issue here is that production isn't equal to actual usage of it. While you can produce, you will not be able to put it into your car due to required extreme pressured it needs to be in. So in that case you would need quite specialized equipment with specially made compressor which could actually push that hydrogen into your cars tank up to 10000psi. Its like saying that people could make their own petroleum... While technically you could, no one is doing it due to extreme costs if you are just making it for your own needs. If your scary government wanted to keep control and have monopoly over energy source, then it would have never allowed BEV's to be a thing, as those provide extremely easy and complete freedom from anyone, just place few solar panels, hook it up to your car and you are done, free energy with little to no hassle.
2
That's... Not... What... Paradox... Is...
2
I have seen comment in here which sums it in one sentence: Flat earthers are one of two groups, those who makes tshirts that earth is flat and those who buys them.
2
Actually bible never says that earth is a sphere and multiple times implies it to be flat as pancake. Have you read it?
2
Based on what source?
2
"it's called brainwashing with no actual proof of it..." Just like making a claim that we live on space pizza? "and if people believed the earth is flat they probably put them in jail and or killed them???" Funny enough Galileo was put into prison for saying that earth is not flat... Strange...
2
Will be hard to explain to Russians why they nuked country they supposedly should be liberating, but who knows, its Russians, they wont do anything what is rational and reasonable so everything is possible.
2
@Globeishoaxx Which version of it? There are like a dozen more common ones... I have literally seen 2 christians arguing for and against globe earth by using same exact verse from same exact bible translation. Go figure.
2
@Globeisahoaxx I asked which version, you answered with "creation part"... Now I give you 70% for being a bot as you clearly do not track basic conversations here. Tho, that said, now when I think about it, ChatGPT can remember conversations which happens months ago, so you are worse at engaging in conversations than generic Chat Bot.
2
@semtex2987 It's not really a matter of being native speaker, it's always about context, especially when word can have more than one meaning.
2
Which scientists? When? Where? Are you just repeating random post you seen on facebook and never bothered to fact check?
2
Why every single time i see comment starting "I'm not flat earther, but..." it ends in total disaster... Yearths shape can be determined from your backyard, so entire flat earth idea is as silly as it gets.
2
@nathanericschwabenland88888 So having heads, multi segmented bodies and forward facing eyes makes you dumb?
2
You do realize that you just suggested that NATO should have started WW3 just because Russia had their troops near belarus ukraine border?
2
Whats your point here? Earth is a globe, that would not change, its a fact, verifiable by anyone from their backyard fact. You could argue about earth going around sun, as that one would require some more investigation, but shape of the earth is factually spherical. And I would not call flat earthers crazy. Maybe ignorant, uneducated, but not crazy.
2
Video was made for Russians, so they can show a tractor and they will still believe it was Leopard, och wait... They did this already...
2
Car's don't run on water... You use water to convert it into hydrogen and then use that to run your car. Its literally what Hydrogen cars do. Water itself isn't combustible or energy containing thing on itself which could be used as a fuel...
2
Paul ... Simple question to you: Can you cross country border without anyone knowing? No, no you cant. Antarctica is a "country" on top of being most dangerous place on earth to visit. You wont be shoot on spot as there isint anyone actively guarding it, but in general you need a permit to go there as you need permit to visit any other country. But... There are cruise going around Antarctica for like 5k, plane ticket over it for 2k and expedition on your own feet for like 15k. Get some money and go there... You wont see anything to interesting as its just a land full of snow, but no one prevents you from doing that, just spend some money and go...
2
Its cute when religious people tries to lower science to religions level just to have fighting chance. Will not work.
2
@kumarslvr1 "You are not educating me anything new." If its not new, then why you dont believe that we landed on a moon? If you know all this already, you would know that there is nothing preventing us to land on the moon. "I just simply don’t believe human beings can survive beyond the van Allen belt with the technology they had back then . " Again, thats cool personal ignorant opinion of yours. But when we look at what actual experts say, they would disagree with your personal opinion. So why are you who clearly dint do any actual research on all this radiation thing would reject what experts say and would go with his personal opinion? I'm not questioning your beliefs, I'm questioning your rationality in picking them. "I am just saying that they have not successfully put a living being on moon and got them back alive. " Based on what evidence? Like seriously, based on what evidence would you conclude that putting people on moon would not be possible? "Putting man on ISS is not bloody same as putting someone on the moon" Actually its not that far away. If you can put some one into space for long period of times, then its just few steps away from sending some one further away. "Stop being so arrogant just accept you don’t really know all the facts of what you are talking about for sure , you are not an Astronaut or a scientist. " But i know more than your do, as it seams. Just because you want to believe that we never landed on the moon, doesn't mean we dint. And again, going back, by this logic you should reject existence of atoms, after all, you are not a scientist who actually observed those, arent you now? So why do you accept that atoms are real which you never observed, but you reject moon landing on basis that you are not the astronaut or scientist? Do you seriously not getting where I'm going with this? You literally cherry picking what you want to believe from same group of people while rejecting something just because you cant think of a way it could be possible. Its like if I said that i have dog and you completely agreed with that and when i said that i have cat you would say that its impossible... You ether confirm both with same amount of tests/experiment/evidence or you reject both, but you cherry picking one of them while rejecting other. "choose to believe" You are not choosing what you believe. " I don’t believe in one countries claim of doing something that I think is not possible." But its not one countries claim... People, experts from across entire world says that they did it, so you reject actual expert words just because you as some one who did 5 minute google search cant think of a way it could be possible. "you keep calling me ignorant just cause I don’t agree with what you believe in." I'm trying to get to the core issue here, like actual reason why would you reject part of science and accept another one. I understand what you believe, now i want to know "why?" " in fact i would say I have little more knowledge in this field cause I researched about it as I did not believe in it. " That's false. You mentioned Van Allen belt like that could have any impact on people going to the moon, while in reality we simply went around it. Your knowledge about this topic is lower, that's clear. Get any rocket scientist, well, get any scientist and ask them if moon landing is possible or not. How many of them would say that it is? 98%? You literally trying to say that people who invest their entire lives in this topic knows less than your 5 minute google search... C'mon... "So grow up and agree to disagree on something." You cant agree to disagree on facts. You can have your wrong personal opinion, but it will not change the fact that we did sent people to the moon. To put it simply: You have right to your opinion, you don't have right to your own facts.
2
Generally it boils down to a single thing: Bible said so. Majority of flat earthers are bible believers, because bible implies in multiple verses that earth is flat pancake, and the fact that majority of world still believes in magic and wizards because some old book said so only pushes this silly belief forwards. Secondary thing would be distrust in government, even tho government has nothing to do with the shape of earth.
2
People might have been thought that earth is flat until 1900, doesn't make any difference here. First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE, so your point is mute. For that generic claim that we dont have photos from space... Well we do... Do you care to elaborate which method you used to determine that photo X is fake and photo Y is not?
2
We heard this claim for past 2000 years, why is he so late?
2
TruthRevealer Morals came into existence? Its like asking "How does number 2 came into existence"... It's not a physical thing to came into existence... And just to answer to your malformed question: Morals are result of evolution. We as social species basically invented set or rules we should follow to create best environment for us and everyone else around us. This is why we have different moral values based on different groups of people.
2
What exactly did taxpayer money funds here?
2
Issue is that now you still have 2 separate measurement systems... And when it should actually switch from imperial to metric? If we talk about distance between earth and moon, should it be in miles or kilometers? Amount of medicine you need to take? And so on... So then, why not do a smart thing and use ONE system for everything? Because your imperial system only works for day to day life because you are used to it and everything around you tend to be in that system, not because its more convenient. And when you do need to convert smaller values to bigger ones or vise versa, you will struggle. Americans just like to be special.
2
Not really.
2
Hydrogen is basically at its peak and its non option already, BEV's are only starting up and keep improving every single year.
2
Explosion goes upwards?... And this is what TF cult members intellect level is at... Fire goes upwards, explosions goes to ALL directions... Damn you people are dim...
2
@jameshudson169 Definition of level: a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point. In this case point is center of the earth, so you can have level water which is curved. Its wonderful how reality works.
2
And expansion of NATO was because Russia decided to attack Ukraine... The entire main point of NATO was to have defensive alliance, mainly from countries like Russia... So Putin proved that NATO is nesecerry to exist if we want to have independent European countries.
2
You do know that Starship development isn't funded by taxpayer money? Right?
2
Have you seen hydrogen cars being made by car manufacturers? Those usually have 3 huge tanks... And you have quite impractical car with huge middle console, uncomfortable back seat and tiny trunk space...
2
Its so interesting to see people trying so desperately to complain that Nya isint real scientist... First of all, he is scientist. Second, its makes no difference even if he wasn't, title might be misleading, at worst, but what he said is still accurate.
2
Why would one wing need to dip? You have rudder, it can slightly alter planes direction without need to change planes position. I mean, i guess we are talking about flat earth here, but that still applies. That plane level experiment is simply pointless, it CANT prove/disprove anything as you should expect same exact results on both models anyways.
2
HICE is half the performance in comparison to HFC, no idea who would want to pick first one over the second. And hydrogen cars are actually more expensive over BEV's, initial price and upkeep.
2
Is it because you got 15 000 bucks for fuel and you are still not used it up?
2
@KnightsUnion Basic observation disproves flat earth. He doesn't really need to prove opposite here, its like saying "Well you just saying that chopping some ones head isint healthy, but did you actually proved it?!"
2
@KnightsUnion Basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that earth isint flat, if you even fail to understand how so then you are part of problem here. "besides whats the harm if someone believes in flat earth??" Because its not uncommon to see flat earther who is antivaxer and believes other 50 random conspiracies like that. Having false beliefs will cause more harm then not. So you need to fix peoples ignorance if you want to avoid issues in future. "why are people like you so triggered that someone thinks about the world different then you ??" Because they are preaching that stupidity on others. Nobody would care what they believe if they lived alone in woods, but they are part of society, so thats the main issue. "what basic observation is that??" 1. Perceived constant movement speed of sun 2. Perceived constant size speed of sun 3. Sun moves in straight line 4. Sunset/sunrise Those are 4 basic observations anyone can perform without even doing any math, all of them matches globe model and all of them fails on flat one. If they cant even pass those 4 basic points then we have major issue here. Stupidity needs to be mitigated as much as possible or we will go into idiocracy.
2
No one needs to disprove flat pancake world, earth was proven to be a globe long time ago, now all this is just for fun, entertainment.
2
@TJ-o7f We are literally under the video showing people who claims that earth is flat/disc and you say that no one claims it?... Are you drunk?
2
@TJ-o7f You look confused here, we are not proving that earth isint flat, we knew this for past 2k years or so. What we are doing here is having fun with people who thinks that we live on a pancake world and from time too time just educating them and explaining why they are wrong. Do you see difference here? And same time, lets use your non existing logic. If earth wasn't a globe we would not have so many flat earthers trying to disprove it, right? Boom, mic drop, earth is sphere.
2
@TJ-o7f Again if the earth wasn’t spherical there wouldn’t be so many ppl trying to prove it isn’t
2
@TJ-o7f You don't like when your own argument gets used against you? Bad for you, next time come up with something better than 5th grade level argument.
2
So then why is your god not doing anything about it?
2
Just listen to what Pergosian says and how it contrasts to Putins lies... There is clearly a divide between these two specimens and one of them is clearly doesn't give a f*k and will not blatantly lie about basic reality.
2
Because mobilization stopped, for this time, so there isint many left who still wants to go out of Russia. But it was in thousands at one point during first days of mobilization.
2
@neilwinter8177 So clown actors know more than smartest flat earthers, earth is round and Biden won election? Ok, I guess we are in agreement here.
2
Yes, mentally ill people with a gun they easy got hands on... Will simplify it for you. You have mentally ill person in a middle of 100 people crowd. In one situation he has and ar15 with 5 full clips. In second one he has a knife. Question of the century: In which situation you will get more wounded/dead and why?
2
How so? They catched booster, while new version of upper stage experienced some new issues, not really surprising as it was remade. But catching booster for second time showed that its repeatable and wasn't just a lucky catch first time.
2
@dooeege298 Look numbnuts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY-FaLW1Bnk by your logic power cable is behind sun, so I guess sun is 3 meters away... Do you even think before you make comments or does it come out naturally?
2
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat. Every single flat earther i ever talking dont understand basic geometry and i mean BASIC geometry. While i can agree that simply accepting something to be true without ever fact checking isint best way to go, but you cant fact check everything in the reality, you simply create reasonable expectations based on previous experience that this source of information is trust worthy because in the past when you did fact checked something from it then it turned out to be correct.
2
@Yezpahr This can be explained, yet again, by Russian army incompetence. They might have wanted to cause flood but on allot smaller scale, just enough to flood which would prevent Ukraine advance and they screwed that up and entier dam crumbled releasing all of its water in one go. its not like Russia is know with their smart soldiers or something...
2
@KinG_K3 They already did bunch of experiments, when those showed that earth is a globe, it was just dismissed as invalid for some magical reason
2
Its a joke? Right?
2
@clintonbeavers8311 "where in the bible it ays it is round ball spinning in the middle of nowhere" It doesn't, because it never was written or inspired by god, but by simple people who thought that earth is flat while in reality its a globe. You should think about possibility that your source of information might be false... "answer me and I will answer you with foof come on lets do this" Anyone who has actual proof of something what would overturn current understanding of reality would have presented that. You don't have that.
2
@clintonbeavers8311 "I dont believe what the goverment tells me" Why not? " your a fool if you do" Why? "you should care what the bible says because god created you" Says who? Bible? So we should care what bible says because bible says that its true?... Do you know what is circular argument? Its a logical fallacy and you just made it... "we all had to start somewhere and that is with adam and eve" While in actual reality there was no Adam and Eve. Proven by actual science and not by blind belief that some ancient book said so "the prophecy have come true" First of all, no they dint. Second, even if you had 1000 accurate prophecies in your book, that would NOT prove that god is real, that would only prove that some one got accurate predictions but you would not had any idea how. Ok, will not bother to poit out dozens of issues with rest of your blabering... First of all, please, for love of your imaginary friend you call god, use punctuation marks... Its really hard to read one long sentence while at same time you make it in multiple different things... So i have to reread parts of your text to know when one claim ends and another starts and avoid mixing couple of them into one huge pile... Another thing, i dont really care what you have to say or what your book of fables has to say, i'm interested in reality, you until now only presented your opinion, which is cool, you have your opinion, but its worthless when it comes to reality. So if you want to convince anyone in here, start by presenting actual evidence and not simply making circular arguments...
2
@427max Because Musk is a threat to far leftists, they we already hammering on him for past 4 years even when Musk wasn't big part of politics, if Trump lost then it would be a high chance for lefties to create a reason to remove Musk from public, one way or the other. Heck, you don't even need to look far back, just check headlines of recent terrorist attack, what does headlines say? Something like "Cybertruck exploded, one dead" while it wasn't cybertruck which exploded, it was explosive materials which got intentionally ignited by a terrorist inside cybertruck, who died? The terrorist. Funny thing is that damage was minimized due to use of cybertruck, as it was still in one piece after explosion and even had power, but leftists media doesn't care about actual reality, they want to put Tesla and anything Musk related in bad light, this was the case for years by now and it would have gotten worse if Kamala remained in power.
2
@herrschaftg35 Musk was leftist, well, I was leftist, issue was with leftist going so far left that me not changing any views now sits on the right side... Smae happen with Musk. He isn't on the left, anymore. Why do you think leftists constantly attacks him?
2
Because hydrogen fuel cells are basically TWICE as efficient... So double the range for your car... This is why it's stupid to burn hydrogen...
2
I guess all those silly multi billion companies spending million bucks on a station have no idea how "easy" it actually is... Or maybe it's just you?...
2
" Why NASA lied about landing on the moon" They dint and NASA is not even relevant here... Rest of your comment is silly at best. Shape of earth can be proven from your backyard with basic understanding of geometry, so your silly attempt to poke at irrelevant things is... Well... irrelevant... Earth is still a globe and you still wrong.
2
@ichoosefreedom9321 Debunk flat earth? Easy, one word: Sunsets.
2
Congrats, you believe one false thing less than these flat earthers, now you just need to keep moving and seriously question your religion.
2
That's the worse thing to do. You would be wasting energy for zero benefit.
2
@mohdadeeb1829 He said "Earth is flat" basic google translate
2
Yes it is... Environment we made for us is made, well, for us. It's designed by us to fit human form factor.
2
@lividbitterman9728 So that will be 20! As some one who complains about wasted time keeps returning for me...
2
Well its 2022 and majority still believes in god... So it should not be surprising to see few of them having even more extreme beliefs.
2
So you are saying that Bahamut wasn't destroyed? Which part was false exactly?
2
Do you even know how much it costs to send someone into that outer-space flight?... And why would that even matter? Why would you want to spend money on people who doesnt even believe in earth being what it is instead of sending people who would actually enjoy ride like that?
2
@patrickhickman8723 "by any chance can you explain the energy that makes a plumb line vertical and a spirit level horizontal? " Gravity. "you will run from any actual observable facts and replace them with wild, tinfoil hat science fiction." Thats flat earthers job.
2
@patrickhickman8723 Says some one who thinks that earth is flat because his magical book said so... C'mon...
2
@e.a.342 You do know that when batteries are being recycled those are being shredded into small pieces and than chemically separated into usable elements? Right?... So like, then how is "impossible to spare apart" even relevant here? Shredder doesn't care how easy or hard it is, it just shreds it and a whole... And comparison to nuclear waste was just silly at best. It not nuclear waste, not even close. And you know what is less healthy for you than magnetic field? Sitting on a bomb... Tho like, how strong is that magnetic field you are talking about? This is like the first time I ever heard someone mentioning it, is there even a magnetic field to talk about?
2
Why?
2
Then why frontline dont change for past 6 months? Reality doesn't match your fantasy...
2
Operational silence... This isn't revealing of some secret plans... Its reporting about events which already happen... Jebus...
2
R. Lin Human life? Do you think that 5 second after sperm enters egg you have human life? This is the failure from religious people like you who fails to understand what they are even arguing on. We are not against saving humans lives, we are against forcing people to do something against their will. Abortion isint killing fetus, abortion is termination of pregnancy, which might or might not kill clump of cells, or embryo or fetus, 2 of those things can be easily argued to not be actual human life, maybe potential one, then then masturbanting would be mass genocide due to all those potential human lives being lost... Would you be for or against abortion at 8 months due to complications which if not done would kill both lives? Are there any situations in your head where abortion would be best cause of action? And at which point from 1 nano second up to 9 months you get actual human life? I need actual time frame. When you can get actual facts here, then we can talk, your personal feelings re not even relevant here.
2
Are you the one who thinks that wearing a mask takes away your freedom? And by which exact research you concluded that wearing a mask causes harm to your health? And which is less harmful, wearing a mask or getting Covid?
2
@wolfofmilan " yet another delusional sheep" Ironically enough people who calls others "sheep" are the ones who got brainwashed by some facebook post... "Its alright your life your choice, just don't ypu dare harm innocent people by lack of understanding anything" Exactly what i was thinking while reading your comment. Well we agree on something. " I won't reply back after this or it will go nowhere" Because you know well that your argument is based on bullshit? Well i do know that as most people who will read it. So yea, you are right, it will not go anywhere as you dont have an argument here. "its called having a heart and being human just you and anyone else" By creating dangerous situations and increasing risk to get a virus just because you dont like to wear a mask while buying pack of bear?... Ok... "You have your thought which are crude and wrong kn this matter and I have mine." Its like you have this cognitive dissonance where you think that you are the good guy by not following general requirement to minimize threat of infecting yourself or others with a virus... Are you ok?
2
@wolfofmilan Short reply... Skipping quite allot of what you blabbered here as most of that is quite irrelevant, just bunch of random sentences and accusations what i'm while you have no idea who i'm... Tho says allot about you. This should have been at end, but you might not even get that far and this is most important thing to resolve anyways. Lets take ONE topic here: Your claim that wearing masks creates toxic environment. CAN YOU PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THIS CLAIM IS NOT RANDOM BULLSHIT YOU MADE? "you lack the awareness to see past all these lies" Can you prove that those are lies? " it's if I want to even bother explaining to simple weak mind like yours" That's a good start.. Call others dumb and be done with that... That's what "smart" people... "to feel right from wrong" Feel? Is reality defined by your feelings?! And you called me weak minded?! Ok... "you take word for word what they tell you, you support the very situation and condition placed upon the people without a second guess as to why?" Em I? Do i look like you who never actually fact checks? You keep spiting out random stuff here while presenting 0 actual evidence to support any of your claims... Why is that? Do you think anyone will believe you without second guessing?... "its been proven all around the world if you but open your eyes" So maybe present that proof instead of screaming like a child that it was? "instead of remember what humans are capable of from our past" you know whats ironic about this? You reject majority of experts because of what humans did in past while accepting minority of random facebook warriors because they said so... Why is that? "Learn to use your heart and mind" Heart pumps blood... So i'm not really in control of it, atleast not willingly... It just pumps my blood... "learn to actually care for people you don't know" Like wearing a mask?... Damn, this cognitive dissonance is extreme with you... "not of a virus but of the lack of everyday human life interactions and freedom" You know what limits your interactions with others? being in hospital and connected to a breathing machine... Or being dead... And what freedom are you talking about? Are you against seat belts too? What about wearing pants? Because its not allowed to walk around with your junk flapping in the wind, yet you are fine with that... But och no no no, wearing a mask is too much... Or not having some party... Flipping hell... "You have no arguement but the delusion that you do" Och this irony... This irony with you... Its not strong, its extreme!!! "they will say even the slightest lie to get you to do what they want you to do" Like saying that wearing a mask takes away your freedom? That lie? " defend something they don't even understand themselves with zero proof to back it up" Well you clearly have experience in this one, as you are prime example with this last comment of yours. You just spit our some but hurt conspiracy theory type nonsense while providing 0 proof for it. I know i mentioned this, but this irony is just... Amazing... "Trying to explain masks, distancing, the virus to you and whats happening around you as the truth won't do a damn thing because..." Because you have no supporting evidence that you are correct? Ok. ", yet it's only so effective, it won't keep out everything at all" Are you stupid or just pretending to be one? You literally saying that masks help... yet you are against them because they are not helpful enough?... Damn... If masks help even tiny bit, conversation is over... Sonner we eradicate this pandemic sooner you can go back drinking your beer with your pals or something... "in a car, " From when do you need to wear one in a car? maybe when you have random passenger... But when you need to do that when you are alone or with your familly? "in public or in a store" Yes... Because otherwise it would defeat entire point of them... Crowded places like stores is a hot spot to get virus or to infect some one else... "the longer you wear a mask the more harm you will do to yourself" based on what evidence? Your feelings in your balls or maybe some actual scientific research some actual experts done? "as soon as you place on a mask the ppm levels that are trapped withing the confined space of the mask become extremely toxic within a manner of 20 seconds" nah, you just stupid... There are actual measuring devices to measure your O2 levels in your blood, quite a few experiments done all over the place, none of them supports your childish. And let me guess, your evidence for this is facebook post? Or was this youtube video? Ok, skipping everything else, no real point and you just blabbering random shit here... So now, first of all, friendly advice: KEEP IT SHORT... You terribly like to go into this tangent and talk about what i want or do or em or all kind of shit, just some random preamble and then you simply end it with some random claim like its a fact... Learn to make normal arguments and include actual evidence, like actual citations, links to research, anything... Its just huge waste of time to address all of your random claims, random blabbering...
2
@wolfofmilan So you are making huge response and then you block notifications?... Are you scared of reality? "At least the information I gave you is there to find" You know what funny about this? This is exact same thing flat earther says about earth being flat and that there is evidence you just need to go and find it... Riiiiiight.... Ok, will not even bother addressing anything else as i cant see any links to any of your claims. Sooo, ether present links to prove that your are correct or we can call bullshit on all of your assertions here. Simple as that.
2
What sin?
2
@7he.Polexican Papua New Guinea, which is about 93 miles away... From whose imaginary map did you got your 1,472 miles north, and 2,583 miles southeast distance?
2
Its not automated, nothing is automated 100%. And you need crap tone of server power to process all that data. You need people who will keep care of those servers, maintain them, update/upgrade and so on. Then you need bunch of people responsible for advertisements... It add's up. But yea, 4.5 billion sounds somewhat too high for digital company.
2
You have no idea what scientific theory is, dont you now? And this video wasn't to prove/disprove anything... You clearly dint watched or dint understood this video...
2
Actually its usually based on "Bible said so"
2
@RiderOftheNorth1968 So by using your own logic, issue is with a user, so to minimize instances where user misuses something we should limit access to easy tools which could cause allot of damage, right? Its basic logic 101. Like not giving sharp objects to mentally unstable.
2
@RiderOftheNorth1968 Then I would completely agree with you here, as long as its properly checked and buyer is properly educated on how to use weapon and MOST importantly how to safely store it then I'm fine with people having option to own guns.
2
Technically all 3 are scientists.
2
Why i'm not surprised that you mentioned Jesus here as some evidence for earth supposedly being flat...
2
Like what?
2
Apollo Moon missions ran on hydrogen because we didn't had any good battery technology at that time. Apollo mission 1969, invention of lithium battery 1976
2
What? Flat earth is a claim/model of earths shape while science is a collection of methods in determining best explanation for given question. Those are not the same things.
2
@PrimalEater Motion is relative... You can see "moving" trees when you are in car going at 50km/h, doesn't mean that trees are moving... What would be the difference between moving and stationary earth from you as some one on earth surface perspective? Like seriously, what do you expect to see if earth was moving?
2
@PrimalEater You already claimed that... And you dint answered to my actual question here. What would you expect to observe if earth was not stationary?
2
Yea, cameraman should put his head out and check who is shooting at them... Will end well...
2
Hybrid mode is the worst one... You basically have 2 cars in one... Maintenance cost is allot higher than pure ICE or pure EV or pure Hydrogen. Refueling stations is an issue, big one. Even now with EV's which can be recharged at your house from regular wall socket is still an issue of not having dedicated supercharger stations. Hydrogen stations require exponentially more money to be built and maintained, not even talking about producing of Hydrogen and transporting to the site and actually storing it.
2
Just the Truth You mean proof like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gii0yv8OU94 Och wait, it proves that earth is a globe... Well.. Worth a shoot, i guess...
2
Its actually highest at this moment as it been in last 12 months or so. Doesn't look like it plans to crash any time soon by current trend.
2
Doesn't really make any difference at the end, earth is still a globe and that experiment is still a failure. I could agree that lack of explanation why its a failure is a failure on itself, but at same time this video in general is a failure on many fronts already.
2
@billwilliamson1506 Bible isint even suited for moral claims as you have bunch of moral and immoral ones and some contradictory, like "no killing" while in another verse you have "stone homosexuals" or "burn witches" even tho killing can be moral depending on actual situation, like self defense. Bible is a mythology book. book of fables, nothing more. Harry Potter books would be better for moral claims than bible...
2
@billwilliamson1506 "If you think the Bible is a book of fables but Ancient Greek historians are 100% factual then you’re wrong. " First of all, dint said that Ancient Greek historians are 100% factual. Second, there is HUGE difference between a claim that dude named bob was real who built a house in comparison to a Jesus who was a god himself and performed magic... One of those requires more than a book to be taken seriously. And the fact that you have false claims, like global flood, which never happen, only indicates that its not a representation of reality, aka book of fables. "The Bible is more than fable but not true fact 100%." Get definition for a fable, read it, realize that bible fits it perfectly. "It is better suited fore moral claims since it at least outlines sound principles" Stoning homosexuals? Killing adulterous? Burning witches? Beating your slaves?... Those sound principles? Bible is useless when it comes in determining reality and for moral guidance, its simply useless... Because it is book of fables, nothing more.
2
It is a globe, u go on believing the fantasy pizza world!!
2
Damn, this is really nice joke!
2
@KangenAlec But Harry Potter book said that wizards are real!!!
2
Duško Dragić Actually it does matter. People who goes into one conspiracy will more likely go into another and another and another... This is why quite few flat earthers are antivaxers, chemtrail believers and so on. While it might not look that it effects your life directly, but it does effect it on some level or it will sooner or later. Fixing issue while is a small issue would be allot better than waiting until its unstoppable tidal wave.
2
It was Russians who blow it up, not Ukraine... Get basic reality straight...
2
And pigs can fly.
2
Slightest? yes, like in areas of 0% slightest. Each planet has its own gravitational field which would reach earth, but honestly coffee cup on your table has more effect on you with its own gravitational field than Uranus does... Same thing with electromagnetic fields and so on. All that effect falls under margin of error even if you could detect it.
2
First of all, you cant feel motion, only changes in it, so your senses here are meaningless at best. Second, what intelect?... You people can't even grasp basic geometry, let alone understand basic reality... Earth is a globe, this is a fact, at best you could argue about its movement in space as that one is more harder to be determined than just basic observation from your backyard when it comes to the shape of it. But well, you do you I guess...
2
"Globe earth believers have no actual proof" Will give you one from hundreds of others you might even understand: Sun moves in straight line across the sky which is only possible on globe earth model. Thats it, you got your proof. "NASA has no real images of earth" Prove it.
2
Yes, some flat earthers are liars, tho we call them trolls.
2
Or because it's simply isn't a good alternative?... Hydrogen production on itself is really simple, you just need access to water. All this technology existed for quite some time. So then, what was stopping anyone to invent working cheap mass production car? Answer is: Nothing. Then why it never became a thing? Because it only sounds cool on paper, but not in actual reality.
2
Fruitcake Aerodynamics
2
@CookyMonzta So you best counter argument is that BYD magically swoops in after tesla became best selling car in the world?... Coping much?
2
"But the entire time, he doesn't give even one explanation on why they are wrong" If you had video "Why people who thinks that chopping human heads is good believe that" would you expect explanation why chopping heads is not good for your health too? Basic observation of sun disprove flat earth in no time, there is no real reason to explain pre-school geometry here. "Yet instead, he ridicules them. " Because its ridiculous idea... You can ridicule ridiculous ideas. "if science is on your side, then by definition, it IS explainable." Right, but flat earthers are not interested in science or explanations which goes against them. There are countless videos explaining and debunking every single claim flat earther ever made, yet they still believe that. Its nothing new and having video which dives into why they believe this stupid shit is more unique than having 10000th video explaining why they are wrong.
2
@JoeJBuddha There is nothing to read about, you made a claim that ships going over horizon is optical illusion... Its not. You dont even disagree with earths shape, which is spherical, so ships should disappear over horizon anyways, so its not optical illusion. Everyone here are confused as hell what you even tried to say here.
2
@JoeJBuddha So then you need to correct your original comment here. But I cant say i'm aware of conditions which would allow for ship to disappear sooner over the horizon, there are some which allows you to see further than you should, but not shorter. Citation would be needed.
2
Riiiiiiiiight, that makes complete sense now, people spend billions to hide conspiracy which would require millions of people knowing truth just to gain couple millions after all that... This makes complete sense... In fantasy world...
2
How much electricity you need to drive car same amount as it would be with EV?
2
earth is not egg shaped... Its rounder than bowling ball...
2
@jerrythecat811 On grand scale earth is a perfect sphere, like i said, if you would compare earth and bawling ball then you would find earth being rounder, yet no one in their sane mind would say that bawling ball is an egg shaped... Issa just tries to find anything in his book to fit reality which could be used to justify his beliefs, kudos for you not doing that, atleast not in this case.
2
@dmguzman2 Flatard and antivaxer? Damn... Atleast natural selection does its thing with people like you...
2
@dmguzman2 Its nice that you removed your childish comment, atleast you realized how silly it was, but i will respond to it: No, I don't, I was in MacDonald's once in my entire life, tried it, was fine, ended at that, its a junk food, not my thing. Your point?
2
Congrats, you have been scammed. There is no such car which converts water to hydrogen on the fly... That would break first law of thermodynamics...
2
Context is a thing... You know...
2
@HaydenEvanoff "Scientists: “oh it’s cause of light refraction duh”" Well yes... Is a known FACT that due to cold air, which you will have near water surface, tends to bend light down, which means that you will see slightly more then you should. This is basic fact which needs to be counted into, just because flat earthers doesn't like reality will not make it false. "It’s constantly being corrected, improved, changed." Key word is "Improved". If you have ruler with 1cm accuracy then your accuracy will be... Well.. 1cm... If you get new one with 1mm accuracy you will change measurement number, it will be different than previous one but it will be more accurate, so you will introduce change in result but doesn't mean that original was incorrect, it simply was less accurate. "but I’m also willing to admit that I can’t prove it’s a sphere. " Earths shape can be confirmed from your backyard, just because you, personally, cant do this will not mean that earth is not a globe. This is basic argument from ignorance. "And your reaction to how much you belittle these peoples opinion shows that you never actually even considered it to be possible in the first place." You cant have opinions about facts... There is no real debate here, earth is a sphere, its a fact, having debate or having some ones ignorant opinion will not change this fact. "You would have been one of the people debunking scientists that called the earth a sphere first, only because of popular opinion. Think about that." There is difference between argument from popularity and actual testable and provable fact. Earths shape can be proved to be spherical, what you feel in your balls while looking at horizon will not be on same level as actual evidence for the shape of earth. "You believe that sight can bend?" Sight? What? Sight is ability to see, while this conversation is about light refraction... Which can bend... Provable fact. "We are bound to keep proving things we previously thought were true to be false." This only applies to theories, some of them, while earths shape is not a theory, its a fact. "And it doesn’t help that we live in such an evil world filled with agendas and deception." Yea, like people who tries to convince others that earth is flat... "and inverted around a spherical object at that" Invert? What are you talking about? "Also, a man’s height in no way is going to throw off a SIX MILE test.." ? What? You dint realized that altitude will have effect on how far you should see on a globe?... Seriously, you might want to start from basics of geometry here. "we are talking about inches, maybe a foot. The boat was supposed to drop over six feet alone." So it did dropped then? If it did, then there is no longer question if earth is a spherical, it would only be a question: How big it is? "Even the YouTuber above said the math was supposedly correct though? Am I missing something?" Youtuber above tried to reproduce place experiment is which is as stupid as it gets as it should produce same exact results on both models, so i would not trust what he says on any topic in general...
2
@ShamrockTJH "with research on EVERY questionable thing we are told to be true." What about things told to be false? And is everything questionable for you? Do you question if sun is real? What do you question and what you are not? "You control the fact that there ISN'T info out there to make you think outside the box." And i like caramel ice cream... This blabbering of yours is as relevant as my liking of this particular taste of ice cream... none... "And if you believe 911 is a thing and that it really happened the way the TV told you..." So now you will go full into conspiracies? Dint we talked about shape of earth which is demonstrable a spherical and now you want to talk about some another conspiracy?... Can you stay on one crazy topic at one time? "well then there is no hope for you." This is exactly what i was thinking while reading your last comment...
2
Autonomous car*
2
Then you should actually research this topic. Hydrogen only sounds good on paper, but it doesn't scale... Too many drawbacks of it for it to become anything more than rich people hobby.
2
@mrmurdock6994 My point was that you should research this topic before you try to talk about it and then you said that V8 HICE engine is a good thing... It's the worse one when it comes to hydrogen cars. The fact that you skipped over hydrogen fuel cell based cars is enough to show how little you know about this topic. You want drawbacks? Well your V8 is like 3.5 times less efficient than Hydrogen fuel cell based cars. How about drawback like that?
2
Riiiiiight...
2
I guess, none. You do need to have some basic understanding how reality works before you will get in change of hundreds of people lives... Atleast i hope so...
2
Youtube seamingly pushes out random things to random people. Today in the morning youtube completely blocked adblock on multiple browsers, few hours later, everything is working as it was before... No idea if ublock got an update or youtube just yet again changed their anti adblock. Some said that Youtube change their anti adblock code twice in a day to battle adblocks or people figure out new ways to bypass it.
2
Market already spoken, BEV's is the clear winner here. Tho hydrogen never stood a chance here at the moment BEV's came into market.
2
Zarik If you hate scientists so much, why are you using their inventions like this computer and internet you are using right now? Why do you support those "pedo terrorist witches"? Go live in a cave...
2
Ironically enough only racist people brings in race into conversation when no one else mentioned it.
2
But its still spherical.
2
Peace deal starts AFTER Putin takes his soldiers out of Ukraine territory. You people are weird... Its like you get a robber breaking into your house and you like "Lets negotiate: You can take my TV, but leave my laptop. Does this sound good to you?" or will you actually kick that robber out of your house, call police and when you are safe you will prosecute that robber?...
2
30% of gravity, which is enough for humans. While astronauts on ISS experience, well, ZERO of it. While you will need to still perform specialized exercises, there is no reason why you should not be able to live there. Bone density will degrease, but if you are not planning to live it then there is no real problem with that. Magnetic field is only an issue if you are walking without space suit... I guess they will simply not do it... Yes, no air on mars... Just like there is no in space, yet we have ISS with air... Something is weird here I guess, how can you have alive people in ISS while there is no air in space?!?! Witchcraft!!!!
2
And then some one comes along, gives you link like http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif and your entire post becomes irrelevant.
2
Do you even know what gravity is? Do you know how it works? Do you realize that putting water on a ball while standing on 5.972 × 10^24 kg earth is not something what you could call sane experiment to prove that water doesn't stick on a ball? Go to space where you will not have any massive object near you, try that experiment again and lets see if water will stick then.
2
@johnsheppard8102 " there is more important things to deal with in life" Correct, but that doesn't mean that we should ignore smaller issues... Its like saying "I got a water leak in my house, but well, will not fix that, there are bigger problems in the world then my leaking house"... Yea, there are bigger problems, but if you ignore smaller ones now you will have huge problems later originating from that. Flat earth nonsensical belief is that leaking house, you need to fix that before it causes more damage.
2
So basically you don't want to help out for those who lost their ability to move on their own... EVERYTHING can be used for immoral things, EVERYTHING. So its not an issue with technology, it would be issue with people who decided to use it that way.
2
Definition of stupid: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. Flat earthers lack both of those, so it would not be wrong to call them stupid. It might offend them, but its still factually correct label.
2
What?
2
Who cares what Copernicus or Columbus said?... Earth is a globe because its a demonstrable fact not because someone said so...
2
Yet you still can if you want too, so same laws for US citizens would work out just fine, people could still get guns if they wanted or be allowed to own one after appropriate vetting.
2
Yes, people are still educated enough to know that earth is not a pancake.
2
@kozad86 Inherited money? He co created Paypal which got sold for 175.8 million bucks which got invested into tesla later on. So when did he inherited that wealth exactly?
2
He is technically a scientist, but he isint that white coat scientist everyone imagines, so you can easily argue this either way, but at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter even if he was middle school drop out.
2
Its worse than this, people from stone age actually had reasonable excuse, but we are in 21st century with access to entire human knowledge under your fingers and yet we still have people who thinks that we live on a space pizza, usually because book said so.
2
It always was.
2
Guy was a scammer and he died like 13 years after his initial claim. Google is a remarkable source of information you know...
2
@deerichardz If Chanel is losing subs, then well, channel is failing, as you have less people coming in than leaving. But atleast we agree that this channel has an issue with subs, atleast we got agreement there. There are flat earther channels with growing sub counts, does this mean flat earth is the new reality? This channel was growing when TF was actually debunking stuff, when it went full on EDS it slowed down, now seemingly its starting to fall. Why you ask? Well because TF has EDS and he wants easy money from people like you, which is ironic, as he constantly complains about Musk taking money while TF doing the same
2
It wasnt an argument against flat earth... Its a video exploring reasons why they believe this...
2
Are you saying that we don't have a single person who believes in flat earth while majority of people still believes in wizards and magic?
2
B G So first things first, please learn what scientific theory is, you will look less ignorant on this topic. Second, you can see curvature on high altitude planes if you have wide enough view angle. Third, NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth. And last but not least, globe earth can be proven by basic observation of suns behavior over one day. So yea, earth is globe, not because some one said so, but because its a demonstrable fact. FYI Gravity can be proven (and was proven) by simple Cavendish experiment. So calling some one an idiot when that one cant understand basic reality, is not a far reach...
2
@mohdadeeb1829 So both books got it wrong then. Tho I would want to know which verses exactly said this, especially in a bible.
2
@rp7159 Yes yes yes, like we have written proof that Harry Potter is real and that there is secret wizardly world. We know, we got it, you have silly argument here, no need to beat dead horse, its dead, leave it alone.
2
@rp7159 So you believe that Harry Potter is real and that we have wizards running around?
2
Well then like 30% of scientific world would shatter as quite few things are made based on globe model and everything would have been needed to be reevaluated, but besides that, not much...
2
It says little to nothing for a CEO of company making around the country by using their own network... Like... What did you expected? For him to fail?...
2
@MrDwarfsChannel Tesla is best selling car in the world at the moment, so can't say that this bubble is even close to being bursted. SpaceX doing really well, maybe you had in mind Starlink system, which on itself is doing excellent as its cash flow positive already. So care to elaborate on your statements here?
2
I mean, you can't save the world if your own country tries to slow you down on every single step you make. So fixing country will help out to mov faster with fixing everything else.
2
Its not necessary, but its entertaining.
2
@juno1597 First of all, while I could agree of this video being dishonest and misrepresenting reality, you should avoid claiming such ridiculous things like Musk creating things like he is the only person in all of his companies who does anything, Musk only provides direction, rest of it is for the employees to solve.
2
Was this entire point to promote veganism or what?
2
@Eternal_Hoop Actually its around 2% who believes that earth is flat. So he made this video for 98% of people. But besides this, making youtube videos takes time, allot of time, its not a 5 minute thing, so when you spend hours, days, weeks or even months on something, you kind of want to get a reward for it in one or another form. For some, youtube is a job, people do what they like doing while getting money for it. So making video which will be for majority of people is quite obvious option here and your complain is strange at best.
2
@therealzilch They never tried it, majority of them who said this only seen some random shitty youtube video which is filmed in 720p then zooms into a ship which is few miles away.
2
What signs of the times?
2
@NateNewton-k9z At the moment its read only and its only to control basic things, like mouse cursor, when you enable it. There is exponentially higher chance for any modern car being hacked and causing damage than someone hacking into this implant and moving mouse cursor around.
2
Tidal lock.
2
@Davitofrito if only people like you used gray matter between your ears. Ukraine gains nothing from blowing up this dam, but Russia does...
2
Its like saying "If they dont want to wear masks, let them"... Your beliefs effects others in one or another way, so less nonsense you believe its better for everyone else.
2
Self driving cars have been sci-fi a decade ago, now its reality. Musk is definitely terrible when it comes to time frames, but he does make this sci-fi reality sooner or later.
2
@CookyMonzta Was talking about most recent times where self driving was still in a realm of sci-fi and not reality. You could track back self driving cars concept back to the times before first car was invented where someone complained that car isn't a horse and can't ride you back home while you are drunk...
2
And yet basic observation of sun disproves your video... Strange, its like reality disagrees with you...
2
SpaceX launching orbital rockets like 1-2 times every week
2
@pauldas9787 Well that one got delayed as SpaceX wasn't prepared to have rocket ready for rescue mission like this. Not a fault of SpaceX. Its like your friend calling to you and asking to help to tow his car and you like "You will need to wait little bit, I'm changing my tires at the moment" its not your fault that you can't do it at minutes notice, its just bad timing to ask for help. But they will rescue, just slightly later.
2
@hussainal-hussaini8483 "for example you can start with explaining the airplane trip lines issue" Those are straight lines when applied to globe from usual flat representation... "adjusting the plane during the flight issue" Ever seen landing plane?... Nose up, plane goes down... Why? Aerodynamics... You don't need to adjust plane by pointing it down... "the issue with the Bedford Canal experiment?!" Which proves that earth is a globe?... You do know what was conclusion of that experiment, right?... "And please spare me all the nonsense explanations such as we don't understand everything and the sience is so deep etc." Do i look like a flatard to you to say stuff like this? "But in the same time there is a very stupid explanations on some phenomena with the global model." Sorry, but your ignorance or basic lack of knowledge in physics is not a proof that globe model has issues... Lets make it really simple here. We have sun, anyone can observe it, anyone can check some basic things about it by themselves. Sooo, we have 4 glaring issues with sun alone which works 100% on globe and fails 100% on flat. 1. Sun doesn't change perceived speed 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size 3. Sun moves in a straight line across sky 4. Sunset/sunrise Just those 4 simple points from reality prove that earth is not flat and it needs to be round for all of them to be true. That's it. You can skip all that jazz with aerodynamics or physics or any other more complex stuff which actually requires decent base knowledge and understanding, simply look at sun (use sun filter...) and that will be enough. After you realize that earth is a globe, then you can invest more time in actually learning more complex things and figure out why planes dont need to point their nose down to go "around" curvature... Learn to walk before you try to run...
2
@hussainal-hussaini8483 "I can say the same thing to you!?" Yet you cant. My understanding of physics doesn't contradict reality. "And please can you explain what part in physics you are talking about?" Aerodynamics?... "Because as far as i remember I wasn't talking about the aerodynamics of the takeoff/ landing process.." And? I just give you simple example showing that plane doesn't need to point its nose where it wants to go... "alot of things left without fine scientific explanation in the global model!" No, science explained everything, YOU simply dint understood some points from that. Your personal ignorance is not counter evidence. We can sit here and teach you about some basic things and explain stuff, but this should have been done in middle school and we are not here to teach you. "so instead of systematically defending your own beliefs.." Its not a belief, its a fact, earth is a globe, factually round. You cant have personal opinion on a established fact... "as you can about the idea behind the airplane flying straight without any adjusting during the flight..Gravity?" Gravity and aerodynamics. In general plane could fly from point A to point B while keeping it perfectly perpendicular to center of earth. Would be extremely inefficient but possible. So i have no idea what is your complain here... Go and learn shit about aerodynamics after that you can complain that something related to it doesn't make any sense and then you can actually present counter evidence, because again, your ignorance on the topic is not evidence that its false. " Am so hungry to know about gravity and how it's really work.. " Cavendish experiment proves gravity. And to put it simply: gravity is attraction between 2 objects with mass. Yes, any objects. Even you have your own gravitational field, tho because you have such tiny mass in comparison to 5.972 × 10^24 kg earths mass, you have no impact on that. " And why there is many air trips crossing unreasonably great distances while there is shorter once based on the global model.." Like what? Give me example and not empty claims... And before you even done that, so what? Even if there was some flight paths, why cant you simply google out why they are in this way instead of making your own shit? "And am going to ask that again why we don't see the curvature on water surfaces even when mathematically we should.." On a 6,371 km radius spherical object you want to see actual curvature on water? Are you kidding me?... How small do you think earth is? 69 miles gives you around 1 degree of lean from you... Do you seriously think that you could observe this curvature on water?... And... Google... Ships disappearing OVER horizon. Ships (or any object) literally disappears bottoms up over horizon which is only possible if there is curvature. "And if you are going to explain that with your super natural, physical, rare and mysterious air density/light theory that you can't actually make or explain.." Basic geometry 101... Do you even have knowledge about geometry? because as of your last sentences it doesn't look like you do. "am 100% OK with what you've been saying about the sun facts and i have no problems with that.. I have problems with the other issues as I mentioned before" So basically anything you ACTUALLY understand you are fine but anything you FAIL to understand, that makes you doubt globe earth?... Do you notice pattern here? You literally think that earth could be flat because you lack of knowledge in particular area... Does that mean that rockets are not real because you have no idea how those work?...
2
That's cool and all, but you still need to verify that what you see is actually correct and not just use your personal perception to assume things.
2
@ZJL-. Aka you are easily manipulated?
2
Ignorance comes from spiritual awakening?
2
Minimal viable population is a thing...
2
@tylerdordon99 First of, difference between height and width is tiny, if you had picture of earth in size of your monitor, difference would be around 0.5 or 1 pixel, which is literally undetectable. So even as earth is oblate spheroid and slightly wider on bottom part, on grand scale its a perfect sphere. For photos, most photos are taken from ISS which is ONLY 400km away from earth. In this case you will get enlarged continents as you simple are too close to earth. If you want picture without distortions then you will need to go quite a bit further, "blue marble" photo is a nice example of a photo taken from appropriate distance. Tho... That's not even a point here. You could prove that 100% of photos and videos from space are fake, that would NOT disprove globe model. Earth is a globe because its measurable and observable fact anyone can do. Even basic observation of sun have 4 things which proves globe and disproves flat one without any need to trust anyone or do any calculations. So yea, photos are irrelevant, earth is a globe independent of those.
2
People compared those numbers, from start to finish, EV's are allot cleaner than ICE cars across cars life span, from material gathering to scrap yard.
2
@Hereford1642 Its half way across entire world... Tiny bit different than sharing same border, isn't it?
2
What was false in what he said?
2
There are no side or bottom on a globe as you describe it here. Australia is not on bottom of earth, from Australians point of view we are on "bottom" but that just adds even more confusion and only gives more talking points to flat earthers by saying that planes fly upside down even when you dont mean that they actually fly upside down while you say that they do fly upside down. Do you see where i'm going here?
2
God dint made other celestial bodies spherical, gravity did.
2
@sexualmaniac And yet celestial bodies are spherical because of gravity... You can feel free to prove your god, then to prove that he actually created gravity and so on, but its besides the actual topic here.
2
Providing military support to help out fight aggressor is somehow translates into wanting for Ukraine soldiers to die?...
2
Brainwashing, indoctrination.
2
@therealzilch Who? Flatards?
2
Yes, he is a scientist. You don't need to be 24/7 in a lab to be one.
2
@quietobserver4636 I can see that this conversation wont go anywhere without you defining "scientist". So who qualifies to be one by your opinion? Ad just FYI definition for "scientists" would be: a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences. Bill Nye is an expert in mechanical engineer which is natural/physical science. So i mean... By definition of scientist he is scientist... if you want to apply some more strict rules, then maybe he is not by that definition, but by general one he is scientist. But like, what does this has todo with anything? His degree doesn't impact his arguments in any way shape or form.
2
Because like 90% of all taxi drives is with 1 or 2 passengers, so to make car way bigger just for the remaining 10% isn't that of a good deal, especially when you could simply call 2 robotaxi at same time
2
Cutting it to 0 cylinders gives you infinite mileage!!!
2
Geo-Centric Model and Flat earth are completely different things and independent from each other... Duno if this was attempt to troll or just to make yourself look ignorant... But well... Congrats... I guess...
2
Och that king of evidence "Its true, go find evidence for yourself".... Yea... No thanks... Self deception is not our thing.
2
Then why secular countries tend to have least crimes? Why does atheists tend to commit less crimes? Why we have not a single war started in a name of atheism while we have hundreds, thousands in a name of religion?... I could go on, but you should get basic idea here.
2
@michaelbengochea2976 Could there be one? Yes. But then you would need to stop every few miles and change that filter as it would get clogged in no time. So you would need to carry bunch of filters and then dispose those after each trip or refurbish or... Not practical solution.
2
True that, this is how we got quite few religions...
2
@MyHugoboss12 Will explain this in simple way: What you believe affects your actions and your actions affect people around you. So fixing basic ignorance about shape of the earth is best option you have.
2
@MyHugoboss12 Well you clearly can't read or grasp basic understanding how conversation works... Your original comment was asking "Now if for whatever reason the earth is flat what difference does it make?" and I responded to that...
2
@marcgambone4240 No american, so don't bring your countries issues here. When you start sentence with "Not a flat earther but..." its like saying "I'm not for raping children, but..." that "but" kind of negates everything what comes before it. While you might not be full into conspiracies and belief in flat pancake world, you so lack basic understanding of reality here. You don't need to go into space to know that earth is not flat pancake, basic observation of sun you can do from your backyard disproves flat pancake world. And there is no such thing as 100% certainty except single thing, you knowing that you exist. That said, you don't need 100% certainty to have knowledge.
2
Yea, there have been few scams about water powered cars floating around.
2
@Shakazaramesh There isn't anyone actually guarding it, yes, but he would not get permission to enter and he would be fined after the fact, if he returned alive. But it's nitpicking at this point. Antarctica acts as a country, you do need to get permission to enter it, you can skip that step and do it without permission, no one will stop you, but if you are just some random guy who is not prepared for most deadliest places on earth, you will be rejected from entering in a sense of "You, don't dare to cross this border, or we will slap you in a wrist when/if you come back"
2
First of all, they don't need to, second, they can.
2
"statistical anomoly"? It's not a anomaly, it's a pattern... You could have had this point somewhat valid 15 years ago, now it's just sounds ridiculous.
2
How do you think defence against aggressor actually works?...
2
@yestervue4697 Any content behind paywall smells like a snake oil...
2
3.7km altitude isint really enough to see curvature. But like, why do think flat earthers could afford trip to Mt. Fuji?
2
@scottparsons8437 This is why you are not rocket scientist, leave that job for the experts.
2
I wonder why its only 9k...
2
I always assume that there is 50/50 chance that people actually believe in flat earther when they claim to believe it. Quite few are there just for trolling purposes, some are for money making from gullible people and some actually believes that nonsense, issue is that there is no real difference between these groups of people, all sounds batshit crazy.
2
Reality hurts?
2
@chrisbr1969 You basically engaged in multiple logical fallacies here. One of those would be sharpshooters fallacy where you basically shoot and then draw target around it. Did government lied about something? Yes. Does it lie about everything? No. While you here trying to pretend that just because some government officials lied about a thing that would somehow mean that everything what government ever said is a lie. I can easily turn your own logic against you and say "Because YOU said atleast one lie in your life that means that you are lying here"
2
Rus bot detected.
2
But it can be really good car for police. Small bullet resistance is a bonus.
2
@jmatasomo2660 Its for entertainment purposes, mainly. Flat earthers have no real impact here, let be honest here, those are not the sharpest tools in the shed, so no worries there.
2
Do you have correct math?
2
Well congrats, you got scammed... What you are talking here is perpetual engine, which doesn't exist... You need to put in more energy into hydrolysis than you will get out of it, so no, it's not an option to store hydrogen in water form... Never was and never will be...
2
@roshandinesh6701 This Russian war going so well that Russia decided to start second official mobilization?... And if it goes soooo well, then why the hell map dint really changed in past 6 months? Reality disagrees with your personal ignorant and brainwashed opinion.
2
troy amos Just because you deliver Hydrogen to stations doesn't make you an expert on it... Which you clearly demonstrated. Its a simple FACT that you need around 60% more energy to produce enough Hydrogen which could drive your car same amount as EV could. Your lack of understanding how hydrogen is made is the main issue with people who thinks that hydrogen is the solution... Please educate yourself on a thing you are so proud of doing...
2
@kaptenhiu5623 Thing is that battery technology rapidly progresses forwards, charging times get lower, batteries gets cheaper, while hydrogen, well, that one remains same and even now its a worst option even by comparing today's technologies and not what near future will bring to us.
2
@kaptenhiu5623 There is no "make hydrogen car died" as hydrogen cars never been really alive. It's to late for hydrogen to take over EV's, every single car manufacturer invests exponentially more into EV's than in hydrogen, even tho hydrogen cars have been in market for longer period of time in comparison to ev's. Hydrogen has more drawbacks than EV's, so there is literally no point in going hydrogen anymore.
2
It mentions in a video that its a night shift where they mostly doing testings and improvements for the main day shift, so factory is mostly shutdown. I don't think you could reasonable make a video like this during actual work hours.
2
Stop shilling for flatards.
2
3 day war at 170 and going? Are you winning now?
2
That Dubay guy cant even explain sunsets... Or why sun doesn't change perceived size... He is con man who makes his living from people like you.
2
@SirFlat "The earth is not an globe for sure, only if you watch nasa" Funny thing is that ONLY flat earthers bring in NASA in conversation about earths shape... Why is that? "we have an soul" First of all, this is completely not related to earths shape... Second, this is just empty assertion of yours. "In antartica u can't go around." Have you tried? There is a plain ticket you can buy for like 5k to go over antarctica, I think its 2k for cruise ship to go around it and like 15k for trip on your own feet to it. "THE NORTH STAR is there unmoved" Actually it does move and North star will change over time. Even North star isint actually at north. "I check for my self from 2020, " For 2 years?... Seriously? You expected for star which is like 323 light-years away to make noticeable movement in 2 years?... Are you trolling here? "Someone telling lies about us" To us* And that would be flat earthers, well, to be fair, some actually believe all this crap, others do it for the money as its allot simpler to take money from naive ignorant gullible people than to do it from rest of the population. But you dint addresed anything I said previously... Why is that? You just went on random ramble about random things... Explain to me why sun doesn't change it perceived size over the day while on flat earth model it should as it goes in circles over your head, this is basic geometry 101 and you conveniently forgot to address it. Is it because its too hard to troll on such basic things or are you just to ignorant to actually address it?
2
Isint disc a flat thing?
2
It's basically distilled water, so you can drink it.
2
You do have right to your opinion, you dont have right to your own facts. Earth is a globe, factually, you cant have your personal opinion about that.
2
@chrisf9377 Atleast 25.74 million people disagrees with your personal opinion here.
2
No, it was recalled for different issue, while what this video shows isn't even an issue as it went over rated capacity 9x
2
I have no idea what you tried to say here. Earth is globe, you agree with that, cool, but at same time you said that there are no photos of earth but only CGI... What?
2
@vladislav2381 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Marble C'mon, do some basic research instead of asking people to do it for you... "How you can be sure that photos/videos featuring our planet from space are real if you was never in space" Couple reasons: 1. There is no reason for anyone to lie about those photos being fake 2. No one ever proved that those photos/videos are fake 3. There are live feeds from space of earth where you can check cloud formation over your place and it will match live translation. 4. First photos/videos of earth have been shown long before term CGI was even a thing let alone technology which could achieve such thing 5. I have brains. "What I wanted to say is You will never believe/accept truth if you had no experience yourself" False, you dont need to go to Australia to know that its a real country... "How we can be sure that all information on this planet is true ..we cant " And how is this related to the shape of earth exactly?... Should we talk about Bob from apartment 3a saying a lie and concluding that every information in entire world could be false because of this?... C'mon, stay on topic... "But is the change always good ?" I like caramel ice cream...
2
This movement isint growing, flat earthers simply discovered internet and learned to use it which allowed them to group up from across the world and it only looks like it grow up. And its not a conspiracy... We always had flat earthers in the past and we will have them in the future, only question is: "How many?"
2
I think you misspelled TF with Musk here.
2
@VerbDoesStuff To put it simply: level should behave exactly same on flat or globe. Its as stupid experiment as flat earth claim itself. Tho the fact that he actually tried to reproduce it deserves a dislike by itself... No idea what he tried to achieve here by performing it... I hope he knows that it should have produced same results ether way.
2
Because he realized that he waisted so many years and been brainwashed in this lie, it can make you sad to realize that you have been lied to your entire life. Tho its only video, this is not representation of his daily life.
2
"Religion is nothing more than a political system to make God in Man's image." Because god was created by man to be in image of man... "I believe in God" Why? "My belief is my belief and admittedly is not reliant on factual data, but on what I feel and what I think and honestly what I want to believe." So basically what you are saying is that you have irrational belief and you are fine with that. Why? "This is MY belief and it is no more or less valid than anyone else's." But its more invalid. Believing in something you cant prove to be real is not the same as rejecting this belief on the basis that there are no evidence to support belief like that. "I do think that some things are true " Why? And how do you cherry pick which parts are real?
2
Terrible education system.
2
he is already richest person on earth and his companies making crap tone of money already, so like, what's your point here exactly?
2
Difference is that wind can be tested independent from person, while god seam to be real as long as you already believe that he is real. And we do know what wind is and what causes it, do you have anything like that for a god?
2
Bryan 97% of scientists accept evolution. Just because you can find crazy ones which rejects something will not make it true... i can bet you can find few scientists who believe in forest pixies or tooth fairy... Doesn't make it true... And how the hell is this even related to the shape of earth?
2
"For instance NASA will say we've shot things into outer space" You do know that you can observe ISS from earth?... "That's a lie and they admit it by saying, we've never left lower Earth orbit" Which is a lie spread by people who have no idea what they are talking about. Like seriously, find us actual quote for this one with actual context of it, i dare you. " You accept that. Even though there is no legitimate photo of it." Question for you: If you could explore some ones house from inside, check every room, but never leave house itself. Could you make a rough picture of how it should look from outside? "So honestly I can't say these flat earther's are exactly crazy or stupid." Not stupid or crazy, atleast not all of them, but brainwashed and gullible, definitely. And what is interesting about your comment here is that you tried to compare our galaxy with the shape of earth... Shape of earth can be determined with anyone, for f**k sakes, observation of sun proves that earth is not flat... But you want to compare that with shape of gallaxy which would require quite abit of knowledge and technology to determine that... And on top of that, shape of our galaxy doesn't really have any impact on actual reality, it could be round, it could be frisbee, it could be flat pancake, would not overturn entire scientific world like it would if earth was a flat space pizza. " I'll just stick with the answer that nobody knows" But we do know... You are slightly better than flat earthers, but still quite bad... "If it was based information there wouldn't be an opposing perspective!" ? Will say it again, 4 things about sun disproves flat earth, no need of special training or expensive equipment. Shape of earth is based on facts and evidence, just because you have some one who doesn't want it to be true doesn't mean that its not true... Pick anything from reality and you will find atleast one person who will disagree with that, hell, you can even find people who will say that you are not real... Does that mean that he has a valid point that you are not real and that your existence is not based on facts?... Do you see flaw in your thinking? "2+2=4... Based" Because its how we defined it... its not a claim about what is true, it is what it is... Even tho, ironically, you can get 2+2=5 throw some mathematical gymnastics. So yea, please, for sake of your own well being, try to educate yourself on basic reality... Earth is not flat, this should be obvious for everyone.. Well, atleast for most it is.
2
@malcolmrickarby2313 Extreme conditions might need v13 or v14, especially if its Indian city :D
2
you mean more people who will lie to your face and you will swallow that like hot candy?
2
@AndyB_01 Thats that TF here does. He is making dozens of videos on Elon every single year, complaining about EVERYTHING what is related to him. And you know what? It works, he gets bunch of clicks which generates him money, so he will continue lying to your face because you are gullible enough to swallow that. Just go back to TF videos from few years about SpaceX, those claims about it failing, about it not being profitable and so on, and check how badly it aged... Or about Starlink, or about Tesla... There are plenty of videos fact checking what TF here spits out.
2
Now i wonder how many failed attempts Russians had where animals got killed before that successful one they can boast about. Now we live in 2025 and we have LIVE translations from rocket tests, having a dog, cat or even a mouse would create quite bad view in case of explosion, especially in the test flight which isn't even planning to recover upper stage, its guaranteed explosion at the end.
2
Get your car to enclosed environment, turn it on, stay in that place for few hours and you will get your answer... Tho what the difference does it make even if its not the prime danger? Is it a danger?
2
History don't lie? Just like that history where Russia destroyed dam while retreating? That kind of history?
2
Mateo Nikolic Because if you would actually apply scientific method to your god/creator belief that would not stand a chance and you will have to ether reject science or reject your creator belief, or engage in cognitive dissonance and keep both.
2
@HUgdJHf64 What you are doing is called "red herring" where you try to distract with something irrelevant. This rocket is a copy of Falcon 9, even if China went and colonized Mars, this would not change the fact that its a copy of Falcon 9...
2
What do you think happens when you get into accident while you have 3 tanks at 15 000 psi? That would be an explosion which would vaporize you instantly. Car batteries catches on fire if you puncture those, but that process is relatively slow which gives you extra time to get out of the way. So yea, you could not be more wrong here, but can't expect more from generic Musk hater whose entire argument sums to "Its related to Musk, so it must be evil!!!"
2
But this wasn't the point of this video, was it? He didn't apply repeated loads on the hitch, he pushed it to more than 9x to what its rated at. That's no where close to what you are telling this video supposedly showed... Why such "lets make shit up" approach here?
2
Like Russia?
2
You only feel change in movement, not a movement itself... This is why flying on a plane which goes at 700km/h will not feel any different then standing on a ground... You will only feel change when plane slowdowns or speeds up... Do i seriously need to explain this to you?
2
It's a parody... This is why it's hilariously bad, it suppose to be like that...
2
@@AnonYmous-yj9ib Och, "real" flat earther who sells stuff for the real flat earthers, because he likes money? Now it makes sense!
2
Yes, buddy, yes you do...
2
@flatearth9140 Obvious troll is obvious.
2
@flatearth9140 Like I said, obvious troll is obvious.
2
@Ace-je7ri Now I wonder, do you people even understand difference between knife related crimes vs guns?
2
@steverrobbins10 Tell me you don't understand anything about rocket science without telling me you understand nothing about rocket science. Space race, that's that thing what was going on, NASA at that time basically had UNLIMITED budget and unlimited manpower to get people to the moon as fast as possible, aka before Russians does it. And they did it in short period of time by spending billions, like 125 billions in today's money. What SpaceX is doing right now is completely different thing, first of all they budget is way way way way less than what NASA had back then, and their goal is to make fully reusable rocket, and making one is a HUGE challenge on its own. If NASA had to make fully reusable rocket to get to the moon we would still be waiting for them to get to the moon for the first time... Like seriously, ask ANY rocket scientist if SpaceX is taking too long to make most powerful rocket which is fully reusable or are they actually really fast with their development schedule. I will wait.
2
Next time point your telescope up into the sky instead of your neighbours window...
2
Concorde got shutdown due to noise pollution, there are new planes being made which drastically lower sound shock waves created by it, so it can be properly used. There is a reason why planes became so silent in comparison what they were 20+ years ago, we got new regulations forcing those big chunks of metal to be way more silent. That said, big ass rocket creating sonic booms isn't a thing you would want anywhere near any city at any point for any reason. Earth to earth rocket travel is just silly, while you could think of few instances where this could be beneficial, there are just too many negatives for it to be anything more than just a dream.
2
@Brian-de6zx Because your statement is that he could not do it... That's it... It has nothing to do with its shape or size... He simply could not do it... Just like I can't reach Store X, but that says jack sh*t about actual distance to this store. Maybe i have zero legs and arms, which means that I could not get to store which is located on opposite of the streets, maybe this store is 50000km away and I have no means or funds to travel this distance... Maybe this store X doesn't even exist... Same exact thing applies to your statement here. Its worthless, someone could not circumnavigate something... That's it... It has no value... Did he failed because antarctica was bigger than he thought? Is it because its not actual continent but some magical ice wall? Your statement provides no such information, which makes it useless. So yes, YOU need to learn something here and actually filter out useful information which is applicable here. If you want to present any sort of relevant information here then start by giving actual name of the captain. Even tho... Just because someone said so doesn't make it true by default... You do know that people can lie about things? Right? So even if you had record on peace of paper that some captain in 1700's literally said that there is big ice wall and behind it you can find pure gold alien cities, that would not make it true... What you have is failed captain who could not do his job for some or the other reason... And just FYI you can still go around entire earth by following magical ice wall and get back to your original point which would be basically circumnavigating it. So then, why did your captain failed to perform his job exactly?
2
That actually will work better than it does in +C temps. Air is more dry and it should not freeze up on you that often. Tho no idea what happens with created water, does car keeps heating it up to prevent freezing?
2
You literally don't know which direction is down... Damn... At least you are honest to admit that you are not the one to know stuff, as we can clearly see to be the case here. You want picture with people being upside down? Turn picture around... Its like you are asking meme picture of australia which is shown on purpose upside-down to make a joke of it being on another side of the planet from US. They would ONLY be upside-down from perspective of people on opposite side of the earth, but that same thing can be said from perspective of Australia looking at US. Please learn what "down" is before you comment.
2
We have those in a form of wireless charging... But you need short range to have efficiency or meaningful charging. Having some towers which blasts terawatts of energy will not solve anything, it will only fry everything around it...
2
@jacksmith-mu3ee Proof of what? Do you not know that starship is under development? Are you so up TF rear that you don't know that much? Damn, you TF cult members are as smart as flat earthers...
2
@jmatasomo2660 You do realize that you just admitted that earth is a globe?... And duno if your are that stupid or just pretending to be, but... Van Allen Radiation belt... Key word is "belt"... Have you ever seen belt in your entire life? Is it in a shape of sphere? No? So you could just... I don't know... Go around it?... And what is funny is that Van Allen Radiation belt was reported by NASA, so you accept information from NASA on one thing and reject information from NASA on another thing, dishonest much?
2
Huey Simon Huge waste of money and time. Flat earthers can understand basic geometry, for them to figure out why they cant see China from Argentina would be to complex of a task.
2
Basic observation sun anyone can perform from their backyard proves that earth is not a pancake
2
@infinitefire3648 " is it a sphere or an oblate sphere ?" Its oblate spheroid, while being tiny bit wider on "bottom" part. It all depends on how accurate you need to be in general conversation, listing out every single criteria of earth in general conversation is just time wasting. At same time, on grand scale earth is a perfect sphere, its basically rounder than bowling ball. "We don't see or experience any motion on earth" First of all, you don't feel motion, you only feel changes in motion. Second, Coriolis effect is a thing which is direct result of earth spin. " We go to the highest peak on any location and the horizon is flat as far as we can see." Then why you cant see more than you should on a globe? Why cant you see New York from Paris? Why is there always some hard limit how far you can see and its increases higher you go? Maybe because there is curvature?... "Canals and railways are built for 100s of miles in laid perfectly flat. " Seriously? Go to google and enter "Power lines over Lake Pontchartrain" and observe curvature you are afraid of. "Kentucky is flat as the floor all the way across ." How did you measured that one exactly? I know how scientists did and what they mean by saying that its flat, but how did you do that?
2
Put away your tin foil hat. Just because someone made a claim to have magical engine which breaks laws of physics will not mean that he had technology which breaks laws of physics... And that guy you are talking died 13 years after his claim, duno how its in your country, but our government isn't even that slow to off someone for their technology which breaks laws of physics. By the way, did I mentioned that it would break laws of physics?
2
Ironically they don't realize that flat earth might be a lie.
2
Why would you?
2
With what magical tools you will do that? Spend extra 50k on specialized equipment to make your own hydrogen at home at 10x price?
2
700+ days into a 3 day war and Russia will win it? Ok...
2
Nope. I can bet that even if you would send every single flat earther into space and kick them over the board, some of them would still scream that its fake, CGI or something like that. You cant fix stupid.
2
When a thing doesn't make sense to be a lie, then what remains? Why would hundreds of thousands scientists and engineers lie about something like this? Why would competing countries like Russia admit defeat to US on getting to the moon first during cold war? It makes no sense for it to be a lie, because its not. You being ignorant on this topic doesn't make it a lie, it only exposes you as someone who doesn't understand basic reality.
2
You failed to understand difference between one time use and reusable rockets?...
2
It just sound stupid, nothing more. Earth on that grand scale is basically a perfect sphere, even bowling balls are less round than that, but we are not saying that their shape are like a egg.
2
"and there are no politics, propaganda or censorship attached to it. " There are, not on some big scale but there are plenty of who tries to brainwash people into believing that earth is a pancake and that people should not trust anything government says. Every belief you have will effect your actions and actions will effect people around you, this is simply how things work.
2
@user-ph1ob6nj7i Issue is that people who tend to accept one stupid thing will more likely accept another. One of bigger sell points for this pancake world is "Government lies to you" which can lead to allot of damage, like thinking that covid vaccines are bad to you because government said that you should vaccinate and similar shit. Everyone lies, government is made up of people, people lie, if you think that you should not trust government because it lies, then you should not trust any human being, because some humans lie.... Doesn't really solve anything, just creates more issues down the road.
2
But like... earths shape can be determined from your backyard, no need to spend any money.
2
Not really, jeep driver wasn't indicating to want to go left, which means that pickup truck driver could have been thinking to simply let that jeep turn right, aka just let him in due to heavy traffic, which is nice thing to do when people can't merge. It's all on jeep driver.
2
One is about someone imaginary friend and second is about actual real humans beliefs. Do you see difference here?
2
@saltyaphid3195 Did you misspelled "Hydrogen" with "Batteries"? Because batteries getting quite few improvements basically monthly at this point... we have multiple batteries which are exponentially better ones than existing, issues is their production scalability, but then again, breakthrough happens regularly with batteries currently...
2
*Oblate spheroid
2
But this it the problem, its not a new technology, hydrogen fuel cell technology was in invented in like 1869, so there was more than plenty of time for it to become something more than rich mans toy, but it didn't and seemingly never will.
2
Then question would be: What experiment proves flat earth?
2
"You def dont believe we wnt to the moon, if you do your an idiot." and then you said "AND, grow up and allow people to have an opinion. " Irony? I would say so...
2
@derekgreene7436 "it's just an opinion" ? Opinion that you have all those facts which proves that earth is flat? What? "you never gave me your reason for fully believing in the moon landings" And? In general i dont care about moon landing, earth is still a globe even if moon landing never happen. So what would be the point in spending another 50 comments explaining why it actually happen if it will not changed anything? "By the way where is your real footage of spinning earth??" By the way where is your method you used to determine that video X is fake and video Y is not? I asked this basic question now of couple dozens people who made claim like yours, i think i'm close to 100 by now. Guess how many actually provided method. None, 100% of them failed to present method. Isint that strange? Its like your argument against video of earth being fake are completely based on your personal opinion and not on actual evidence that those are fake. So yea. Thanks for your opinion but reality is not determine by it.
2
Wait until you are more independent. Its hard to say how would your parents actually react, but its not really worth risking it. You can always just start slowly transitioning towards that, like start skipping churches, less praying, less bible reading or any small thing, just lower exposure of religion one small thing at the time and when time comes to coming out as none believer to your parents, it wont be as shocking for them as it would be now.
2
Interestingly enough TF doesn't talk about FSD, maybe because its performing quite nicely now and only getting better with each version.
2
@Lowkeysmooth You are commenting under flat earth video with assertions what moon landing was faked, sorry if you look like someone who believes in flat pancake world... Did you noticed that your provided numbers do not include... Well... Entirety of a sphere? Its still a belt and you can still go around it. Moon landing missions simply did slight detour to lower amount of radiation, it wasn't complete skip of it, but it simply went around it... Use that same magical google to get basic answers here. Moon landing happen and still happening. Soon (in few years) humans will return there. So like, what exactly did you tried to imply here or even say? Moon landing did not happen because you don't understand how Belts work? You can always go to google and check "Images" for "Van Allen radiation belt" results to get basic idea how anyone could easily bypass that scary thing...
2
Ukraine seamingly is fine defending its country for past 400+ days. No idea from which orifice you got idea that Ukraine is NATO puppet when Ukraine got attacked by Russia and Ukraine asked for help to defend...
2
I always assume that 50% of people who say that earth is flat actually believes it, but there are people who actually do believe it, sadly. Just a reminder that majority of the world still believes in magic and wizards just because their 2000+ year old book said so. So its not that far fetched thing to have people who believes extra crazy thing.
2
Because that land has natural gas underground.
2
Ok, and how did that ended up?
2
God cant be disproven to do the nature of claim, while earth is a demonstrably spherical. Even tho both claims are based on personal opinions, one of them is demonstrably false.
2
Inefficient?... ICE car efficiency is around 30%, EV would be around 80%... That's more than double efficiency for EV's... So what the hell are you talking about?
2
I think they do some basic IQ test before hand... So no, you cant be flat earther astronaut.
2
@Demo5 I have no idea what exactly you are talking here on public charging stations. Tesla has its own network built with their own money. Other companies can get their own networks too if they wanted. Is this about government wanting to give money for other companies to build their networks while Tesla used their own money to do the same thing? Musk is literally the one person who is hated by government... Worker unions? Heard of those? Musk isn't allowing it, Government screams that it should be a thing. Doesn't really look like friendly relationship here. Heck Biden prised GM from being EV leader while completely ignoring Tesla or even acknowledging its existence...
2
@New Moon So basically lets give simplest and easiest weapons for psihotic ones just because they could maybe possibly use some different alternative?... is this even and argument?
2
By whose sources Ukraine is about to run out of ammunition?
2
They keep landing rockets within few feet of target, I think they could manage to get it into few yards on the moon.
2
Science is self correcting, differently from religions. In most cases science isn't wrong, what happens is that science provides new data which only increases accuracy of existing data. And shape of earth can be determined from your backyard, so its not like science could be wrong here...
2
@khoyrulislam There is difference between refining answer and providing completely new one. Earth is a globe, this is done deal, its a fact, science might provide more accurate information about exact shape of it, like exact dimensions, but shape of the earth wont change.
2
Flat earth model breaks dozens if not hundreds of laws from reality, having some pacman effect isint that far fetched when you think about it... Entire model is based on literal magic being real so having some magical wall which teleports you around entire space pancake isint that strange... As strange this might sound...
2
@eeeaten Reality disagrees. Man body has quite few advantages and having that transition will not eliminate it, you can suppress it slightly, but reality shows that trans women will beat cis women in overwhelming odds. There is clear advantage for trans women to go against cis women, for the same reason no one complains or even mentions trans men competing in men sports.
2
Voice Of Reason "He openly admits that it takes billions of years for a single-celled organism to evolve into a multi-cell organism but cannot realize that there is no observable evidence to prove that" ? So if you have murder, then by your logic there is no way to prove who did this? Evolution is proven fact from reality. Testable and observable fact. And just to be clear as i can bet you have no idea what evolution is, so will give short description of it: Change in gene pool over time. This is as short explanation as it could get. So, you have random mutations, which causes changes, big or small, which changes species from one to another over long periods of time. This is observable fact. You can start by checking fruit fly experiment (short life span, so its easy to test hundreds of generations in short period of time) then ring species, then silver fox experiment. And maybe then google out "dog breed change over 100 years" which will provide nice example (with pictures) how dog breeds changed over relative short time period. And yes, they are still dogs... But if you want to toss around "But they are still dogs" nonsensical argument, then you have no idea what evolution is and how labels work... Microevolution and macroevolution is same thing, its like saying that seconds are real but hours are not... But of those things mean same exact thing, there is only difference in scale...
2
Why? Because you don't like math?
2
@danellis-jones1591 Yes and no. Quite few flat earthers are not as stupid as they look, same as majority of theists are not as stupid as they look like when they start talking about wizards and zombies. Indoctrination does its thing. Tho i can agree that flat earthers are on some what crazy side of spectrum here, after all, shape of earth is demonstrable fact to be a globe, while theists have position which cant really be proven to be false even tho it never been proven to be true ether. It all depends what you like to do with your spare time. I learned quite a bit about things i would never would even bothered to check while making answers to flat earthers questions, so something good can come out even with conversations about trees needing a pants.
2
"It was funny to mock those who wouldn’t follow the heard mentality" Basically foundational conspiracy nut rule. Its not like you can prove your flat earth thing, its just that you want to be that special kid in the class who has different opinion from everyone else. "There are only CGI images of earth, and planets" ? First of all, give me a method you used to determine that image X is CGI and image Y isint. Second, are you saying that moon is CGI? What about Mars? You can see it with telescope by yourself. So are you saying that your brain is CGI? "Most every ball earther has genuinely never tested that fact." Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth model, no math involved. "The Blue Marble image of the earth was faked" And your evidence of that would be what exactly? "I will tell you for a fact its way bigger than they have led us to believe and thats enough not to think we are so smart to believe all the spinning ball crap" And your evidence for that would be what exactly? "Its not moving" You know this how exactly? "You never see it move in the nasa films!" ? Its ONE revolution every 24 hours, what do you expect? 5 turns in a minute?... Its half the speed of hour hand on analog clock, do you see it moving? "There is a reason NASA owns the worlds largest special effects film studio" But its not. " The Gyroscope does not lie…" It doesn't this is why we know that earth spins. "if the earth were curved 8 inches per mile squared you would take off in your plane maintain level and fly off into space…" Tell me you know nothing about aerodynamics without telling me you know nothing about aerodynamics. "ask yourself if you also trusted the science!" Science keeps producing most accurate results, is it perfect? No. But it is most accurate method we have with best track record of producing most accurate results representing reality. What do you have as alternative? 2000 year old book of fables?
2
@bennyskim Irony is strong.
2
Because it should remain in center on both models... nothing to explain there really.
2
100% incorrect statement.
2
Yes yes yes, lets keep this strategic retreat, back to Russian borders and we are good.
2
Obvious troll is obvious.
2
But sunset does.
2
@Dowent Musk hating videos are easy money, it's easy click generating approach. Even with someone being obsess with another person, you would not get so many videos with basically same exact information repeated over and over again, this looks like generic attempt to cash grab while this topic still hot. Heck, half of US voted for Kamala, so TF here basically gets approval from that population by default. You can go over comments and notice what people actually says, majority and I mean majority of them simply gets to the point of saying "Musk is bad" aka they are just generic Musk haters, aka anyone who shares same childish view will get their approval by default. Its sad that it came to this, but TF started to do it years ago, nothing new here honestly, maybe the share insane amount of videos he is putting out. I guess he doesn't have any other money sources and his channel no longer growing hampered his income by quite a bit, so trying to offset it with bunch of "new" videos.
2
What?Did you got it completely backwards here?
2
Why would you care what god thinks when you cant even prove that god is real?
2
Do you seriously think that it was better with Trump?... Ok...
2
There are like 5% of dislikes only on this video. Its generally a bad video on its own, so i can bet that quite few normal people disliked it, but even then its not like you have 50/50 distribution here... We will always have nutjobs in the world, nothing new there.
2
@alix9751 There are 2 types of flat earthers: Those who sell flat earth shirts and those who buy them.
2
@lenforstell1139 Yes US isn't dictatorship, so your "joke" doesn't apply there.
2
Gun ownership should not really be taken away entirely, what needs to happen is actual reasonable requirements put out for you to own one, like appropriate training in gun handling, mental state check, actual background checks, actual requirement in you to have safe way to keep guns and basically all this being rechecked every X years to make sure that you still following those rules.
2
@MagnasCarlsen Non option, US asking Russia to help out? No way that happens especially now when you have US supporting Ukraine to fight against Russian invasion. And why ask Russia when they can ask someone who can do it cheaper and faster and not ruin US name?
2
And? Even if 100% of people on earth believed that yearth is not movable, that would not make it true...
2
Are you a plant?
2
Big Bang hans nothing to do with evolution. Are you just some bored troll? As you look like one.
2
samuel gauthier First globe model of earth appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece... You need to fact check things before you talk... And yea, earth is a globe, basic observation of sun proves that.
2
You should update your propaganda notes. For example, Tesla latest batteries needs zero cobalt, so your children are safe... Even tho its not the issue with batteries needing cobalt, its an issue with countries exploiting child labor... Second thing, you can recycle basically entire battery pack and reuse materials for new ones, so non issue, again. Come back when you will have actual argument here.
2
@SCTALLN How do you produce hydrogen?... With imaginary nuclear power stations?... Again, you have to update your propaganda notes or just get basic education on this topic...
2
@SCTALLN You are clearly anti BEV's here while failing to present any actual valid arguments. I have no idea what technology you could talk here when it comes to IC engines. Use hydrogen for it? No, hydrogen fuel cells are twice as efficient as using it in IC engines, so this non option straight away. E-fuel? That one is basically hydrogen on steroids, still same issue, just bigger one. Use natural gas? Limited supply of it and isn't that efficient. So let's summarize your mistakes here. Batteries are not environmental catastrophe, we can even today recycle more or less fully and reuse materials more or less indefinitely. Cobalt isn't being used in modern batteries, so non issue. We do need extra few nuclear power plants as that one is most safe and least damaging power production technology we have currently. And IC engines are outdated and those need to be thrown away.
2
Flat earther in space: "Its fake, CGI, Illuminati, government lying to us!!!" It would be huge waste of time and money to send flat earther into space. At best you will convince one flat earther, everyone else will deny and accuse him of being shill or something like that.
2
@jurgensimpson3305 What exactly was those bigger problems you are talking about here?
2
@Mike-zu8cp Coffee cup caustic ONLY works on tiny scale and doesn't even produce results needed to match actual reality. Earth is a ball, this is why we have time zones And no idea what "distance" should have implied here. I mean, on flat earth sun should be quite close to the earth and move on a circular path which would introduce quite few issues when we compare suns behavior in actual reality, so yea, distance to the sun is an issue with flat earth claim.
2
@Mike-zu8cp Och wow, such a rebuttal, such evidence, now i'm 100% convinced that earth is flat! Thank you!!! Lets play this game. Tell me, how do you explain the fact that sun moves in a straight line in reality while it should move in circular motion on your flat world thing?
2
Few things to note. To refill hydrogen car you will pay like 60 bucks, to recharge BEV you will pay like 6 bucks. Maybe you are rich enough to value your 25 minutes more than 54 bucks, who knows, you might be making more than 100 bucks an hour. Second thing, you can and most people do, charge your car overnight at your home so that every day you have full "tank" and you basically never visit charging station saving your precious time.
2
yea, they were teaching that... Then we realized that its bollocks and we should teach what is actually true...
2
@OktoPutsch Well you two is a prime example of low IQ people complaining about someone with higher than average ones just because they struggle to make sentences. No wonder neither of you are rich or know anything about rocket science. Go figure.
2
Spinning so fast? 1 revolution in 24 hours is fast by you? FYI You cant feel motion only changes in it
2
Just like this 3 day war ended in... Wait... Its still going after 400+ days...
2
@DreamingPhenom Basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that earth is not flat, your personal ignorance wont disprove that. And noticed you mentioned vacuum like its an issue of some sorts, some bad news for you: Vacuum doesn't suck. Like seriously, vacuum doesn't suck, so there is no problem for earth to be in one... Learn some basics about reality before you embarrass yourself even more.
2
@DreamingPhenom I;m always giving 50/50 chance that some one is actually flat earther when he says to be one. Tho duno which is worst, to be one or to be some one who pretends to know jack shit about basic geometry.
2
@DreamingPhenom Correct, this is why earth remains a globe and flat earthers cant even provide working flat earth model. You know why? Because reality disagrees with flat earthers, who could knew...
2
Because hydrogen is extremely low density, so you have to pressurise it to get decent amount of it in given volume. This can usually go up to 10 000 psi, while natural gas usually would be around 3000. And binding hydrogen to something would mean that you need to split it back before usage, which will require more energy than you will get back, due to basic laws of physics.
2
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” ― George Carlin
2
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” - Arthur C. Clarke
2
Its in the future plans, this is only the v1 of it, there is already second patient with better v2
2
Conservation of momentum is a thing.
2
It must be true, because random youtuber on internet said so!
2
@randomrandom450 So again, its must be true because random person on internet said so!!! My source: trust me bro!
2
@randomrandom450 You don't even have actual counter argument here, you just screaming that something is true because random youtuber said so... There are bunch of things to complain about Musk, what he said or did, but he does deliver, you like it or not. I'm not a fan boy of Musk, he does allot of stupid shit, but I like what his companies do, reusable rockets, EV's, world wide internet, neuralink, that robot thing, universal self driving system and so on...
2
Ether get your bf back to reality or this relationship will not last.
2
I like caramel ice cream!
2
there is no real discussion about earths shape, its like having discussion if chopping your head would be good for your health or not... You don't discuss facts.
2
it was clearly full of fireworks which exploded for some reason. Cybertruck isn't related to that. Och, correction, just watched updated video on it, it was actually a terrorist attack, aka intentionally created explosion by having quite a bit of explosive stuff in the trunk, which ironically didn't do much damage due to how strong cybertruck is. No idea why they used cybertruck here, maybe just stupid Musk hater wanted to make it look like it was fault of cybertruck or something.
2
To be fair, there are as many flat earth "models" as there are flat earthers. Some even have multiple of those at same which contradict each other... Trying to find any logic when it comes to flat earthers is big waste of time
2
This one makes you embarrassed? You cant think of anything else?... Like something with orange tan...
2
Because it's more practical?
2
Not all of them, quite few are, some of them actually believes that.
2
"The earth is definitely not flat. But..." I'm not racist, but... "fact that you did not mention the number of pictures of the earth and other space bodies when supposedly the earth is surrounded by thousands of satellites" Lets do 5 grade math here. Surface of earth, 510.1 million km², for sake of argument lets use this number, even tho actual would be bigger for this case. Now, buy current estimation there is around 2666 satellites in earths orbit. For sake of argument lets say its 5000, because why not. Now hardest part: 510 000 000 km² / 5000 = 102 000 km² for ONE satelite, while general satelite size can be as small as basketball or as big as mid sized car. Now, another question on top of this. How far does car need to go from you until you cant see it? 5km? 10?... Do you see where i'm going here?... I hope you do... "Sun, Moon and every light in the night sky, you'll see that everything moves in the same direction" maybe because earth rotates?... Like seriously, what do you expect? Moon does one rotation around earth in 28 days, so even tho you can see that moon is moving at different speed than stars in background, its still quite slow. Then sun, earth does full rotation in 365 days, which means that stars in background in relation to sun will move even slower, but it will. Did you skipped geometry class?... "Basically, with all the rotations and movements in the universe, this shouldn't be possible" Says who? Closest star is over 4light years away... And you want to notice movement on daily basis?... Are you kidding me? "The fact that we can read the same stars our ancestors could and they don't seem to change pattern is odd" Present to us picture of stars from 2000 years ago and lets compare... Och wait... Berdard's star, is a start in record which moved by quite allot (relatively speaking) in last couple decades which was actually recorded. So yea, stars do move and it was proven. "there isn't a lot that disproves the flat earth apart from the obviously honest NASA (Nazi safe zone) and other space agencies" And you said you are not flat earther?... Seriously?... Sun disproves flat earth... Your ignorance is not proof of anything... "If you don't trust the government you shouldn't believe what they say is true or not true" Government is irrelevant to the shape of earth... Or to astronomy... Questioning is fine, being ignorant intentionally is not.
2
@sammydark9 "Ignorance is stating info given to you by others as facts without proving it yourself" Do you even know what ignorance is?... "Let me guess, you did all that math by yourself?" Yes?.... its like 5th grade math... division... Did you skipped that class? " all of that is almost impossible to occur naturally" "Almost" doesn't make it impossible. "The sun and moon can align perfectly despite them being different sizes and different distances from us" Why not? planets rotate on generally same plane, so why should it not align? "yet there are some that are completely fixed straight above us?" Yes?... You literally answering to your own question... Objects which are further away will move slower, relatively speaking, when you move to the side. Have you ever been in a car and looked to the side?... Its basic geometry 101... Tho you think that i need google to perform basic division, so maybe its not that simple for you. So sorry about that... "the fact that plane simulators can't even use a globe terrain" Why would they use globe? Its allow simpler to simulate physics on a plane and there is no point in making it curved, unless you are simulating space travel, in which case you have multiple games doing that with some wonky physics because of that. Its exponentially more simpler to code on basic X Y and Z coordinate plane instead of trying to do it on a spherical one, you would known this if you had any knowledge in coding, but i do... "There's no flight simulator that allows you to go all around the globe" Google maps?... Not a flight simulator but provides map of entire earth on a globe... What else do you need? "And my question to you is, why all these flat earthers?" Internet. Give access to internet and you will get rise in stupid claims, because its simpler for people like that gather into one bigger group. We dint got more flat earthers, they simply got money to pay for internet... "Why can't NASA just disprove all of them?" First of all, they did. Second, they dont need to. Third, NASA is irrelevant, basic sun observation disproves them. Forth, its not a question of disproving them, this was done long time ago, its basic education, as all of them (seams to include you) has no idea about basic geometry or even 5th grade math... "All they need is to live stream a rocket going from point earth to the moon's surface" Trip to moon is like 2 week travel, or its one week to one side. In any case. Nobody went to the moon for quite some time now, there are plans to return in couple years, so you will get your 4k 60fps video from moon. But this is not the issue, we can provide live stream from space being taken currently, there are live streams from space... Doesn't help out... So why would trip to moon help? "Scientists tell you that you live on a pared shape elliptic spheroid, but every single image you see is a complete round globe" because you are to ignorant to understand basic geometry. Difference between height and width is around 0.4%, its even smaller between hemisphere which creates this "pearshape" so it would be more suspicious if it actually looked like oblate spheroid in pictures... Please, learn basics about earth before you try to debunk it... "Or just with a telescope from earth show us the Flag on the Moon, that's literally all they have to do!" You do realize that you will need quite big telescope for that?... Like HUGE one... Which is none existent on earth to take such picture... You literally want to see flag which is like 1meter by 50cm in size at 384,400 km distance which is not even faced at you... Damn... Seriously, that initial "I'm not flat earthe, but" say more than we need.. You are flat earher, dont pretend that you are not...
2
@sammydark9 " It is none existent ? " What is? "Sun observation proves what?" Globe earth. "You say that they disproved it back in the day, who? NASA, the Greek's?" People with IQ above average. Flat earth doesn't need to be disproven, you don't need to disprove something what never been proven... Its like asking "Who disproved unicorns?" simple doesnt make any sense... People proved that earth is a globe, you can prove that too with some basic observations of reality and some basic understanding how geometry works. "You are basing your 5th grade maths on numbers they've given you... " ? how big do you think earth is? Like seriously, how big it should be? because it doesn't matter what they provide, we can take 1/4 of actual surface size, my point will still remain same... "You know for a fact the distance between the earth and the moon, the size of the earth... " I know approximate size, i can get more accurate from some one who did actual measurements. have you ever been to Australia? No? So its not real, right? Using your logic i we cant trust people who are saying that they live in Australia... So its not real? Right? "Don't lie to yourself when I ask you if you did all these calculations by yourself, trying to act smart when you're just a blind believer" Division? Its to complex for you to divide a number by another number?... "Both are basing their beliefs on scripture and what has been passed down through out history" doesn't
2
@sammydark9 "Questioning the existence of a country that you can perfectly visit or contact people from there is the same as questioning the existence of space black holes or the size of stars..." So now we are talking about black holes and size of stars?... How many topic will you change during one conversation?... You need to learn to walk before you attempt to run. So, still waiting your agreement that earth is a globe. Then we can move to something more complex than this. Deal? "You say flat earth doesn't have to be disproven..." Its not, same as god claim doesn't have to be disproven. Any claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Its simple. "Since day one on this earth every single civilisations describes an enclosed world" And? And since day one we had people thinking that thunder is controlled by some god in clouds... its still an empty claim which can be dismissed without any need to disprove it... "but rather a dome like shape" Which doesn't resolve anything. Well, you could some what resolve issue with sunset/sunrise, partially, but its still false, its would only be less false than actual flat earth. "You're saying that it doesn't have to be disproven because of Greek studies on shadows and lights / NASA images and studies...." Do you even read what i write? Because now you simply making shit up here... Shape of earth can be determined by YOUR PERSONAL observation of suns behavior. Will repeat, because it looks like its to hard for you to understand this basic point i'm making here. Shape of earth can be determined BY YOU without ANY outside help. NASA, government, greeks, Bob form 3a apartment or your dog are irrelevant to the shape of earth, if you have basic grasp how geometry works you can determine shape of earth. But i guess you are not wiser than Greeks who lived 2300 years ago... "You can't prove it with just observations" You can. "Everything we observe indicates that we don't float in an infinite space" Do you see what you are doing here? You just talked about shape of earth, where you made a claim that its not possible to know, now you complain about allot more complex not being possible... Seriously, learn to walk before you start running, you will hit your face to the ground less frequently if you do that... "It doesn't indicate that is completely flat or that it's round..." Yet observation of sun proved that it is round. Do you understand that? "Stop talking out of your a** and actually send me a link of an actual picture of the earth... I'm still waiting." Don't care, like honestly i don't give a f**k, i'm not your mom to wipe your ass when you shit all over yourself. if you are too lazy to do 5 second google search then there is nothing i could provide to you what would actually convince you. You are too lazy to know what is real.
2
@sammydark9 Its like you are trying to troll here or something... Do you even understand what "Belt" is?... Have you ever seen one? Its a strip of something... In this case its a strip of radiation... We cant go past throw it... But... Held on your chair, because this will be like a university grade stuff: We went around it... Like seriously, i'm reading your comments and it looks like you are some sad person who just makes some silly comments just to get attention... " It just doesn't add up" With what? Your personal ignorance? Maybe not, but reality is not dependent on it. I will say something scary here, sunshine, but reality doesn't give a f**k about you, your ignorance on basic things, like shape of belt, doesn't disprove our trip to moon. "so please don't call me ignorant if you believe humans with 60s technology did all that" But you are, you literally are ignorant human being. You want me to prove that? Easy. Explain to us ignorant people WHY it was not possible to go to moon with 60s technology. And just to save some time, avoid continuing with your random meaningless accusations that it wasn't, but actually provide evidence that it wasn't. Can you do it, sunshine?
2
@sammydark9 "The white house phone in the 60s was incapable of reaching a stable signal all the way to the moon, do I really have to explain why?" Should i care? "And this is the type of technology that took us around the Van Allen belt, which you say is just a strip" You seriously comparing white house phone with trip to moon?... You do realize that there is difference between sending signal to moon and back and having technology to go there?... Those are not the same technologies... Flipping hell... And if you would have spent 5sec and actually used google and entered "Van Allen radiation belt" you would known what i mean by it only being a strip... You can go around it, this is what they did in 60s... Not convenient and uses more fuel to go to moon, but as we cant go directly throw it, we simply went around it... This is where you complain about astronaut saying that we cant go pass throw it which was a fact but doesn't disprove a shit... You dont even know what you are trying to disprove here, no wonder you are failing on each step. "Please don't tell me you're naive enough to believe we actually we're able to do such a thing yet struggle to do so now" We are not struggling to do it now. It was over 23 billion dolars to go to moon, yes, with a B... After couple trips we realised that there is nothing in there, no resources to be used, nothing, just a rock in space. So no one will invest another 23 billion bucks just to make a trip back to this space rock for shits and giggles... But due to advancements in rocket science, mainly in reusable rockets, like spaceX have currently, this cost can be broth down to something like 80million per seat. This is why there are plans to go back there and establish research base, just like ISS. Which will be more or less test grounds before going to mars. Seriously, you are lazy and ignorant on so many things that its even sad to read your comments... "Please don't tell me it's not a coincidence that humans decided to stop going to the moon as the normal user's technology increased and Photoshop started being used by the common people" ? Isint this actually a proof that moon landing did happen?... We dint had technology to create fake images when moon landing happen, when we did had technology like that we dint went there... Isint this should be opposite if you have been correct? Like moon landing would have only happen after technology to create CGI images have been invented and not before it?... Honestly i just hope that you are just trolling here, otherwise your life will be difficult. Tho even if you are trolling, your life is already difficult... So i'm sorry about you.
2
@sammydark9 "You should care because the astronauts called the White House from the moon " Cool, and? You said yourself that it was incapable of making stable connection, you dint said that it was not possible to do so... Having unstable connection doesn't make it none existing one... And what is more ironic and quite common amongst people like you, you will cherry pick one part from source as a proof that another part from same source is false... Ether reject everything or accept it... If you believe that connection was unstable because they said so, why the hell do you reject their claim that we went to moon?... "You must be having a laugh" Actually i do, when i want to have some laugh i go to youtube comment section and read some flat earthers blabbering. " if you think you'll see humans in Mars any time soon" Why not? Space travel got allot cheaper and more companies invest more time and resources in inventing better technology for that. In couple years we will go back to moon. Mars is some what more challenging thing, as trip would be couple months to one side instead of a week. But that one is planned to happen in near future, so maybe 10 years or so. But you will not care, you will ether be a normal human being and realize that earth is globe or you will remain flatard and think that space is CGI or something...
2
@Katy_Jones Are you ok?
2
So then I guess Russia is incapable of taking over country which essentially ceased to exist as a nation? Damn... Then what Russia could take over?
2
Still dead.
2
@myname5068 Was this long winded way to say that Russians did good thing by killing random unarmed people on streets?...
2
Hybrid hydrogen car? Its already crammed inside, just imagine a need to fit in another engine and another fuel tank... And for me it looks quite bad, that front just looks weird.
2
And earth is still a globe... Whats your point?
2
Earth can't be flat and spherical at same time...
2
@andrewinman1687 There are multiple verses, like simples ones would be the ones talking about you being able to see entire earth from big tree/mountain. And earth is a globe, so we agree on that part, but bible has multiple verses implying earth being flat while have zero of those for a globe, which isn't surprising considering the fact that at the time bible was written majority of people believed earth to be flat and not a globe.
2
Dakota Black " just pray and you'll find the truth" Praying doesnt work, even by your religion it cant work. "nasa is a lie" First of all, its not a lie. Second, its 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth. "you know the first scientist ever working for nasa were Nazi Germany's top scientists?" I will not even fact check this one... "their name also means lying and deceiving in Hebrew if that doesn't throw a red flag I dont know what will" And your name in chupakabra means "ignoramus" if that doesn't throw a red flag I dont know what will "each one has different sizes of continents and what not" Do you know why? Because i can bet you don't... Now we are not even talking if NASA lied, now we are talking about your basic understand of reality.
2
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt Because your book said so?
2
Obsession comes from the fact hat more than 50% of his channel videos are about Musk and like 95% of those are regurgitated things he already said before. You could literally take all of his hundreds of videos about Musk and make a compilation of 2 hours without repeated information.
2
@dooeege298 So basically what you are saying that you have world changing information but you will not share it just because you are afraid of bogyman? If so, then why did you made this comment in general? Isint that exposing you already? You do know that people could track you down not by account name but by actual IP address or multiple other, more accurate than your name, methods already?
2
@Globeisahoaxx Geometry 101, that thing you should have learned in 5th grade or something.
2
@happylittlefriend9501 Top EV sales in Europe belongs to Tesla... So no idea what you mean here by "most common EV"...
2
@happylittlefriend9501 And just additional note, Tesla model Y was best selling car in entire world in Q1 2023, not best selling EV, but best selling car in general. So clearly they have no issues with demand and survivability. And additional note, Europe is mainly limited by the output of car production by Giga Berlin factory, which is still ramping up its production. But even then, its outselling every other european car manufacturer by a mile.
2
@markkelly8303 Funny enough Russia caused NATO to gain 2 new countries and exponentially expand NATO border with Russia. So I guess this was Putin's plan all along. How brainwashed are you?
2
"How do you chart sea level on a globe??" Sea level?... Its a... Sea level... Its in the name... Feel free to prove your pancake world.
2
@erolgoldberg3126 There are around 50 000 god claims made across human history, how many of them are you familiar with? For me it would be maybe like 20-30 of them, but this doesn't prevent me from not believing in god(s) in general. I don't need to be familiar with specific god claim to reject god(s) as a whole thing. This ONLY falls apart if this god of yours if a coffee mug.
2
That makes zero sense... To produce hydrogen you will spend more energy than you would ever could dream to get heat back from it... Its NEVER happening unless you get natural Hydrogen supply which doesn't exist on earth and never will. So heating your homes with electricity directly is exponentially cheaper than it would be with hydrogen.
2
Basic observation of sun proves that its not flat, what more do you want?
2
First law of thermodynamics...
2
Its for entertainment. Flat earthers, to be honest here, are not the sharpest tool in the shed, its not like flat earthers have any chances in ruling world or anything, they are minority of ignorant people, if they want to engage in this none debatable conversation, fine by me, we will get more entertainment while at same time educating them on basic reality. We can't hide ignorant people and hide from them, lets not pretend that there are no people who have silly beliefs.
2
Imagine being normal human being...
2
Or, you know, they could use heat tiles... Those magical things which are made to protect from heating...
2
@valdasaa Block 3 with raptor 3 engines should have more than enough lift capacity, at the moment SpaceX goal is to test reentry and landing, resolving heating on top of starship will be relatively easy. Again, as you TF cult members forget something here, its a TEST platform, its not the end product. You could check their "grasshopper" tests which started all of this, it looked nothing even remotely close to where it is now. So final starship will be way different than it is now, so you complaining about something now is just silly at best. Complain about it when they start launching it with actual passengers or cargo...
2
Its a vinyl wrap
2
@jaredwatford This is one of the most wrong statements I ever heard. Are you by any chance mixing cars manufacturing process with cars usage? As BEV's production needs more energy, but its nothing and gets offset quickly due to how efficient their usage is.
2
Common answer would be: "Because bible said it"
2
Your ignorance is amusing.
2
If Ukraine is defeated then why Russia cant even take single tiny village?
2
We can't get over it if its flat...
2
You do know that starship development isn't funded by taxpayer money? Right? You do know that much?
2
How is your religion/cult any different from Mormons?
2
Ilya Fenin "Your whole purpose of this video was to make flatearth look stupid..." I could agree that you dont need video to make flatearthers look stupid, they are fine appearing like ones by themselves already. "you proved nothing or gave any valid points." Video wasn't to prove flat earthers wrong, it was to explore why they believe what they believe. There are countless videos disproving flat earth already. "You mention flat earth society which was also created by you guys to make flat earth look ridiculous... " Could be, tho doesn't change the fact that your arguments are not really any better then those presented by the trolls.
2
Due to the fact that there are more than 1000 denominations based on bible should indicate the fact that even the ones who read that book can't agree what it actually says.
2
@danwallen5726 Tell me your are flat earther without telling me you're flat earther.
2
@blackcherre1108 You have no idea how big sun is, don't you now? And you have no idea who light works either?... Have you seen picture of electrical cables in between you and sun which makes them disappear? Are you saying that sun is closer than electrical cables which are like 6 meters above ground?... If you want to troll, do a better job next time, this is sad even by troll standards.
2
Daniel García Because it should stay the same on BOTH models... On imaginary flatlandia it stays same because earth is pancake, on real globe one it stays same because its pointing down, where down is towards center of earth, so in BOTH models you should observe same behavior which makes this entire "experiment" stupid on flat earther level. Tho as it was made by flat earther it explains why its so stupid.
2
ON which model? Flat or real one?
2
And pigs can fly.
2
Some are trolls, some are not. Do you seriously think that there are no people believing in flat earth?... majority of world still believes that sky wizard is real because their ancient book said so, and you think its not possible for some one to believe that earth is flat?... C''mon...
2
But isn't that's like 99% of flat earthers? I'm yet to see flat earther who doesn't go back to "Bible said so"
2
This is low attempt at insult even for people like you. Zelenskyy (learn how to spell) remained in country when it was most dangerous, went to front lines and all that "fun" stuff. Now he left country for short period of time, like diplomats should do to get support from friendly countries. And you to defend your bunker boy who sits at 50 meter table in fear that someone will stab him in eye... C'mon...
2
You dont need to charge your car for an hour... And those charging times going down with each new EV/Battery generation. Hydrogen never be a thing
2
Honestly no one would want to invade it and not because it has strong army, but because its a shit show currently over there.
2
Is it because he talks about something you cant comprehend?
2
What negotiations? There is only one solution at the moment, Russia goes out of Ukraine and Ukraine takes back all of its land. When that happens there could be some peace talks, not before that.
2
Don't do that, it will shock you.
2
Yes... It can be level in a round earth... First of all, its a label, not a description. Second, level definition is: a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point. That given point would be center of earth, draw a line at same distance from given point and you will get level line, it will not be flat, but it will be level.
2
Makes no sense...
2
Put away your tin foil hat... What you are talking here is electrolysis, it's not suppressed technology... Never was... And cars running on water do not exist, and simply can't exist due to basic first law of thermodynamics... Stop watching random propaganda videos on youtube and just do basic research...
2
Says someone who got brainwashed by Russian propaganda... Irony is strong here. And ironically enough if you are looking for fascism then you should check Russia. For nazism... Do you even know what this word means? How is Ukraine nazistic exactly? Because at this point in time Russia looks to be all over the board with it being nazistic for everyone who are against it...
2
There are more than one type of batteries and more on the way to mass production. Elements required for the batteries isint that big of an issue.
2
You either believe in that god or you don't, there is no third option, its binary option. Do you believe in Klumpipux god? No, because you don't even know what the claim is or what are the characteristics of this god, so you don't believe in that god. If by some weird chance characteristics of that god matches your current god belief but you are not aware of it, you still don't believe in Klumpipux. Your ignorance about that god doesn't exclude you from believing or disbelieving in one.
2
Brains? That's overstatement...
2
Your comment is weird...
2
@shawnm2113 "An advanced camera can zoom the entirety of the ship back into focus." It can't... That's not how reality works. If ships starts disappearing over the horizon, no amount of zoom will bring it back. As some one who claims to not be flat earther you say quite silly things here. "Dude literally took a video of something that should be over a mile below the curve…. But the Chicago skyline was right there. " I would strongly recommend to actually google out earth curvature calculator, enter correct values and check how much should actually be hidden... On top of this... How much is hidden is not even relevant, if its hidden at all then we have curvature, no need to even calculate how much it is. "It’s hard to not give credit to those who question the powers that be considering what they done." Being stupid doesn't really warrant for a credit. Earths shape is observable fact which can be determined from your backyard, questioning such rudimentary facts doesn't make you smart, it makes you stupid. "but one must also take into account as to why they feel that they cannot trust our government" Because they like to be special. Everyone lies, including flat earthers. Government is made up of people which usually come and go into power, so just because some one at some point in a history lied about something doesn't give you right to question such basic reality just because government agrees with established fact, its just plain stupidity. What government says here is not even relevant, it can say that earths is unicorn shaped, will not make it so. Same as flat earthers keep mentioning NASA, like it has any relevance here.. "Some of the moon landing videos are highly, highly suspect." Your personal ignorance isint evidence for anything besides your personal ignorance. "We know we went, but the questionable videos are exactly that, questionable." By ignorance people like you, but thats it, only by people like you. "You’re not privy to the Nikon 900 videos where they just simply zoom in….." Funny enough I asked dozens of flat earthers to provide video like that, guess how many returned with actual video... None... None at all... So maybe you can provide that video link? Is it magical one which doesn't exist? Or are you just never bothered to actually fact check and just parroting something you have seen on facebook post?
2
@sdesupreme5047 Well, they are "special" in a special way, if you know what I mean here.
2
Does Jordan know that making word salads doesn't make him right?
2
He was over 1 million for like past year, he hardly gained any new subscribers in that time tho. Have you ever wondered why this is the case?
2
There is no such thing as car powered by water... Anyone who claims that are plain out scammers. Cars can run hydrogen, but not on water. There is huge energy loss when you extract hydrogen from water, so this can't happen on car itself. So keep your 250k and avoid investing into scams...
2
@pieromau Fun fact from actual reality: First globe model appeared in 3 century BSE in Greece. NASA and shape or earth are connected in same way as caramel ice cream with last economical crisis... Basic observation of sun proves that flatardia is not possible, so why do you bring up NASA?
2
Rolling Thunder universe
2
What?
2
Sending free weapons to another country to be destroyed makes you double the investment? Care to elaborate?
2
One hydrogen station costs around 1 million to build. One BEV charging station is around 80k. This excluding maintenance costs. On top of this, you need to produce hydrogen and you will be using around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance as you do with pure BEV's. So not a good solution here.
2
Why should it be? Actual full moon would be when sun is behind you for it to fully illuminate moon which is in front of you... If its day time, that means sun is in front, moon is in front, so you wont get full moon unless moon is further away than sun... Is it?
2
It is, in most cases when flat earther is pressed to present evidence then sooner or later mention bible. In general, most of flat earthers are Christians while most Christians are not flat earthers.
2
@VladimirOnOccasion Earths shape can be determined from your backyard... If you want to troll, do a better job next time.
2
Normal people uses education, best tool there is.
2
It already lasts longer than your car will and you can recycle it to like 98% and repurpose same materials to make new batteries.
2
Yes and no. There is major difference between religions and flat earth claim, one is demonstrably false, other is unfalsifiable. Like, we can prove that earth is a globe, we can't prove that there is no god. Tho, to be fair, 99.9% flat earthers are religious and used bible as their main "evidence" that earth is flat... So there is connection between those two things.
2
What obvious reasons?
2
BEV's are basically on exponential growth at the moment and Hydrogen is basically non existent... What the hell are you talking about?
2
@Globehoax What is so satanic about spherical earth exactly? And how is 23.4 degrees make it satanic? Scared of numbers?
2
@Globehoax From sun.... Why you even asking things you could google out in 5 seconds? Do you know nothing about globe model at all?
2
@arreola891 It's not a "fact checker" its a "Context". This video isn't claiming that earth is flat pancake, so there is nothing to fact check when it comes to that. Youtube simply provides context about people who believes in flat pancake world. By the way, this is 2 year old conversation, so like, welcome back, I guess.
2
Aaron Chambers We literally talking about people in TODAY'S world believing that earth is flat while they have access to entire human knowledge and you think that no one ever believed that earth was flat?... I'm sorry, but that sounds as dumb as earth being flat...
2
Because random youtube videos doesn't make something illegal.
2
@OktoPutsch Och you sweet summer child, you should actually look up how much NASA wasted on SLS program so far...
2
@ You do know that SpaceX has Falcon 9 rockets they been using to send stuff into orbit for past decade?... You do know that much? And no, this starship development isn't funded by taxpayer money... You people are weird.
2
@okankyoto Its still a waste of money even if it did what it supposed to do, issue here is on how much money it costed to make it work (once) and not that it worked for that single time.
2
Not much of a secret meeting if you know about it and you share this information on public forum... Isn't it?
2
So basically argument from ignorance? This is your best one?
2
Have you ever seen visual illusions? Like moving static images? Trusting only your eyes is not the best suggestion...
2
In most cases its just peoples ignorance. and I have seen so many just screaming "I want hydrogen combustion car!!!" without knowing that those are extremely inefficient. Why they want those? Because it makes a sound... Seriously, this was main point for some of the people... It makes sound, so it's good...
2
@jwall70 So you rejected one conspiracy but accepted the other?
2
Yea, who cares about environment... Why even tos your trash into trash can, after all there are bigger sources of pollution!... Your logic is broken at best. This same technology can be used for trucks, trains, boats, tanks and airplanes...
2
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt Can you prove that Satan is real? Maybe your bible was actually written by Satan and Quran is the actual word of god? How would you know which is which?
2
@findaxelfoley8106 And how much in fuel are you paying for each kilometer on your magical v8?
2
Or just "reality"
2
I like caramel ice cream.
2
manasoru There is difference between intellectual opinion and just stupid one. Earth is factually a globe, its a fact, so there is no way to make none stupid claim that earth is flat one, especially when you cant present any evidence. To put it simply: You have right to your opinion, you have no right to your own facts.
2
Well bible says allot of wrong stuff in it, so no idea what you tried to say here.
2
If Russian said it, then its a lie. Or at minimum you should not believe anything they say and fact check as they lie more often than not.
2
Because youtube video said so?
2
Good luck with that... And why are you using Youtube? Its western thing... Stop supporting western side, stop using Youtube!!! Hypocrite...
2
Is this a joke?
2
S.C. Short answer: Because they vote. To go more into specifics, people like flat earthers or theists tend to push their fantasy on others, especially children, brainwashing them with all this nonsense, which is objectively harmful. Issue is not with their belief, but what they are doing with it. If you had some one believing that we live on a back of unicorn and he lived alone in woods, no one would care, but this is not the case, they are trying actively promote their fantasy, trying to promote pseudo science... And even more ironically, majority of flat earthers are believers.
2
@s.c.6157 "my child and yours are 'safe'..." Isint that selfish? I'm worrying about everyone, not only about those who are close to me. And in general, some one on another side of world will have impact on you in one or another way. This is simply a fact, especially when you have internet which connects everyone from everywhere. "and if that is the case,what can we do if we are minority...?" Educate them. Not all flat earthers are stupid, not all believers are stupid, brainwashing does its thing. I never meet a flat earthers who actually understands basic geometry. Why? No idea, but most likely due to poor education. Most of them dont know that vacuum doesn't suck... Most of them dont understand how perspective works... And on and on and on and on and on... And main issue is not with current flat earthers but with their children or people around them. You can brainwash anyone with repeatable nonsense every single day put in their heads. And biggest issue is with children brainwashing which can be looked as child abuse. So yea, dont know why you only want to help people around you and ignore everyone else, but some of us wants to help everyone...
2
@billhassall1586 Funny thing is that ONLY flat earthers mention NASA while trying to prove flat earth, why is that? And NASA here is as relevant as caramel ice cream, hint, its not, not a tiny bit. Let me make a wild guess here: Earth is flat because bible said so?
2
Error 404 logic not found
2
Sorry, but who was the one who started a war in Europe exactly?
2
@tenjisaga There is no perfect solution here, you either let them spread freely without being challenged and lowered air time or you publicly expose their ignorance giving them more air time. In both cases it will have cons and pros for it, neither is ideal. That said, in most cases videos like this are just for entertainment.
2
@big_monkey_man Hydrogen cars are not running on water, those are running on hydrogen, its like in their name.
2
@just_man209 Well you could produce petroleum from crude oil on board too... But like... What are we even talking about here? It's not even in a realm of being impractical, its a side issue of it. Main issue is that you would be spending more electricity to produce less of it... It's like having a battery, hooking it to a incandescent light bulb (because who wants efficiency), placing that bulb near solar panel, collecting that electricity and then using it to power electric motor, all on board of a car... Makes zero sense...
2
IDC Its completely arbitrary. For same exact reason we decided that North is always up on maps, basic convenience, it doesn't have to be like that, but its just convenient. And mostly is due to 0GMT time, basically anything west from England is Western and anything East from England is Eastern. Similar how Gregorian calendar is made up on some random point in time, yes, random, it doesn't even match supposed Jesus birth date by like 3-5 years. In short: Convenience.
2
Rus bot detected.
2
@SourBogBubble You failing to understand here something, that even if Ukraine would have destroyed nord stream, that would not mean that Ukraine destroyed dam... Is your logic basically "They did something in the past, this proves they did it here too"?
2
Have you ever seen landing plane? Pitching up, yet going down? And seriously, how small do you think earth is to see that level thing indicating that plane is always pitching down? Do you even understand scale of earth?
2
Och I heard this stupid argument before, so lets ask basic question here. How many miles FSD drove and how many confirmed fatalities it had?
2
Doesn't make him wrong tho...
2
Well... Size of plane isint the issue here, issue is that he is using actual earths center of gravity as reference point for his tiny scale. For that demonstration to make any sense for people who can think in more dimensions than 2D you would simply need to hold plane on top of earths model and rotate earth instead of moving plane. This would make it more accurate what's going on as there is no real difference if plane moves and earth is stationary or plane is stationary and earth rotates. But well, you cant really expect people like that to understand how gravity actual works...
2
First law of thermodynamics... So many comments like yours... Are you a bot or are you jus came here from a video which claimed that you can run your car on water?... What's going on?
2
99% of the times? Should I even ask for evidence?... And even if they did... earth is a globe not because government said so...
2
@Richard-5464 So i guess you don't have any evidence here then?... Ok. About science... Science works in a way which produces best current explanations by all current evidence and contradicted by none of that. Believing something to be true which is not true can be damaging for that person and people around him, so less ignorant people we have it will be better for everyone.
2
@amillio1612 If its patented then it should be publically available, right? As this is how patents work, so which patent involved magical engines or magical technology which was patented by government?
2
@thebosscb Flat earthers are flat earthers, some are just trolling, some simply wants to believe that earth is flat and they will believe that even if you would launch them into space and kick over board, they would still scream that its CGI. You cant fix stupidity.
2
Present ONE BEST prophesy from bible which came true.
2
Well, in general you dont need any tilt to keep plane level to the spherical earth. What i mean... landing planes... Nose points up, yet plane goes down. Its basic thing where you can adjust you altitude by simply increasing planes speed without changing anything else and planes will tend to keep interior as parallel to the ground as possible to avoid accidents.
2
@izzojoseph2 You could even go play some flying simulator which has actual atmosphere as part of it. You cant go above specific limit as there will not be enough lift from planes engines, so you can point your plane 10 degrees up, go full throttle and you will hit "ceiling" and you will follow it all around the earth, if simulator actually used globe instead of simpler flat one, which ironically was used as "proof" that earth is flat. Like not even joking, got some one saying something like "Flight simulators uses flat surface, there for earth is flat"...
2
When?
2
Entire flat earth claim doesn't make any sense, having nonsensical claim that government hides it is nothing special. Tho what i heard from some flat earthers why government hides shape of earth its so that they could hide god's existence... Not even kidding here... Tho they are failing even with this claim as majority who belongs to government are theists and they would want to actually prove god's existence instead of hiding it... So yea, nonsense...
2
Or ignorant or brainwashed
2
Will ask basic question everyone failed to answer here. Where do you draw a line? Just because i can make a bomb with house hold items, should I be allowed to stash C4 in my sched? Just because I can make rocket launcher, does that mean I should be able to own one? Just because I can make a tank, should I be able to own one? Just because I can make a nuke... Do you see issue with that thinking? You want more guns to protect against people with more guns... Who got more guns because they want to protect against people with more guns...
2
Rus bots hard at work.
2
@StephenJelinek "Money lol NASA has a 50 billion dollar a day budget" Its M not B. NASA currently has 22billion budget for entire year and its going down. Why would institution which by you hides biggest conspiracy in entire human history gets scraps in comparison to something like military which gets over 600billion? And just FYI, you do know that there are more countries in the world than USA? Right? You are not alone... There are people in other places too... And there are dozens of space agencies which only confirms that earth is not a pancake... If you want to troll, get better arguments.
2
@StephenJelinek I know how math works... Do you know how geometry works?
2
@StephenJelinek So the answer is "No, i have no idea how basic geometry works". So like, basic observation of sun alone proves that earth is not flat, this doesn't require any photos or external source or you to even spend money, just basic observation and basic understanding of geometry, but well, as you lack second part this wont really work with you, but then, if you are failing with geometry, why do you think you could actually have any say when it comes to geometry question in general?
2
Yea, bible is wrong on multiple points.
2
@guysofly4315 So like I said, bible is wrong on multiple things. But you can feel free to prove that your claims are actually true and not something you made up in your head, aka imaginary.
2
@robbynicolas Actually there are multiple verses which imply earth to be flat pancake and none of them implies earth to be a globe. But its not like bible is known for being factually correct about basic things in reality anyways...
2
@guysofly4315 Lets do really simple one, most obvious false one which involves magic to be real if it was actually true. Global flood. That didn't happen, not only you dont have evidence that it did happen, we have evidence that it did not happen. So that entire section is false. If you manage to prove this part of bible to be true, no idea how you could do it, but maybe magic and miracles actually happen, then I will give you next one. list is long, we will be here for years to come... But lets start with really simple one and then we can move on to more complicated ones.
2
@noonetalkokay You failed to understand small detail here, people who doesn't believe in god don't believe in him because they have no sufficient evidence to do otherwise, your god to me is as real as Allah is to you. And just FYI this entire reality supposedly was made by your god, all the rules have been set by your god, hell was created by your god, and all this was done with god's knowledge who will go to hell at the start of creation. So by your own religious logic everyone who was sent to hell was a result of your god choosing. Why did your god created me atheist? He wants to send me to hell? Or maybe he simply doesn't exist?
2
@Vhourgannox 'Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.' George Carlin
2
Hydrogen is simply not scalable. To build single hydrogen refueling station will cost you around 1 million bucks, to build one charging station costs like 60k, not even mentioning the fact that you can charge your car at your own house. Currently there are under 1000 hydrogen stations in the WORLD, while there are around 3 000 000 BEV's dedicated charging stations. And there is a good reason why this huge difference here... Because hydrogen doesn't scale...
2
no
2
And? Its not allowed to laugh from stupid claims like earth being flat?
2
Well you seam to care enough to make this comment to express your opinion that you don't care... Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe. Your personal ignorance can be damaging, sooner or later earths shape will come into play in your life, knowing correct answer might save you some headaches, but well, you do you, as you don't care what is true as long as its not knocking at your door.
2
@davie7670 "Well thank you for caring enough to reply to someone who doesn't care" Some one who doesn't care doesn't make comments saying that they don't care. Like seriously, if you dint cared, you wont even watch video about this topic, let alone create comment... "I made this comment because I see all these comments calling them stupid" But they are. I mean, you might not like this, but by definition of stupid, they are stupid, atleast their actions and claims are. ". I just don't think it's right to bash other people for what they believe in" That's not the issue. Issue is with people who screams that they are correct because their book said so. Issue is not with their beliefs but what they are doing with them. "I would still treat them as a normal human" Define normal. Because its not normal to think that earth is flat. So you should mean something else when you say that they are normal. "Sometimes it's not about being right or wrong, if it works for them, so be it." Yet they dont live on island alone... They beliefs effect their actions. How many do you think of them decides not to send their children to school just because it spreads "lies"? How many of them decides to teach their children that earth is a pancake? That's the issue, not that they have some stupid beliefs, but what they are doing with them.
2
@davie7670 No one is judging them as a whole, but when talk comes about flat earthers, its about those who makes claim that earth is flat while not having any supporting evidence for that. Flat earthers who doesn't cause harm will not be found in comment section screaming that earth is flat. Have a nice day too.
2
Yea, Ukraine will send more of those rockets as payment.
2
Se Ha This entire "debate" about earths shape isn't about its terrain, but about its entire shape... Globe vs Flat plane... Not flat surface against mountains...
2
They are really good at failing.
2
Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, so what are you talking about?
2
@MrChaosi Easily impressed? Falcon heavy launch is easy and common thing? What things impress you?
2
Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe...
2
Depends on definition of scientist.
2
"Gas under pressure is used in most homes to cook and heat" At what pressures? Around 100psi. Do you know how high hydrogen car tanks goes? 10 000psi... That's tiny bit higher with quite a bit of extra punch if it raptures... "Embrittlement is easily solved with plastic or rubber liners" Current best protection is ceramics, it still doesn't protect fully, but it does increase lifetime of hydrogen tank, tho you still need to replace it on regular intervals. "You are repeating the lies and propaganda , as though they are sacrosanct" Like you who thinks comparing 100 psi to 10 000 psi is reasonable?... C'mon... This joke writes itself. "Hydrogen is being canned because it is not yet economically viable." Because 100% of it needs to be produced, stored, transported and distributed. It never was viable and from looks of it, it will never gonna be. There is just to many issues relating to it. "It is like building roads, for an increase of 100 cars per year, and then finding our you're only getting 10 cars per year. " Reality is different. Hydrogen stations started to close down not because there isn't enough demand, but because its just to expensive to keep them running. This is why its extremely common to see hydrogen station not working and being under maintenance. Those require expensive and complex equipment which, as you know, suffers from that same hydrogen embrittlement, so constant repairs are needed. "because you were always against Hydrogen from the get go" Because technology ONLY sounds cool on paper, but if you spend more than 5 minutes on this topic you will realize how little sense it makes. You are only looking at positives, you want to ignore all of the negatives. "Hydrogen is safer to store and transport and use than Gasoline, or methane" Its not. Hydrogen being highly dense by weight have huge issue, it's extremely low density when it comes to volume, this is why you will either need to chill down to under -252C or to get it up to insane pressures. Tho duno why you compare it to gasoline or methane. Why not compare to batteries? "It is kept under lower pressure than LNG" That's obviously false... "and is not more dangerous than CNG gas use" False too. "Embrittlement is a problem for metals but not plastics" Then I guess we only need plastic tanks to keep that 10 000 psi under control?... Plastics do not stop hydrogen, even solit steel walls doesn't do it... Hydrogen will seep throw any material eventually. You could maybe slow it down with more layers, but it only slows it down, it doesn't prevent it.
2
@Globeisahoax Even when original commenters reply you never present anything in value. All of your comments are basically "Brainwash, government bad, conspiracy, trust me bro" and then you run away to the next comment, rinse and repeat, over and over and over again. At the moment someone asks to clarify things, why something works/doesn't work on flat earth you just reply with same "Brainwash, government bad, conspiracy, trust me bro" or simply run away to the next comment... And you keep doing this. Due to this you look more like a troll, or someone extremely confused about reality or some weird ChatGPT bot to drive this comment section up in its activity. What's going on with you? You can't muster a single sound and valid argument why your pancake world is true, its always just "Brainwash, government bad, conspiracy, trust me bro" and nothing else. Your comments are WORTHLESS in all aspects.
2
First seconds of video shows horizon at sea level... Ether people who made that video are clueless how geometry works or they know and did this intentionally.
2
What experiment can show that earth is flat? Because simple observation of sun shows that its not a flat...
2
Actually it's really easy to get real time face capture with basic smartphone camera, you can find quite few tutorials how to do it on youtube alone. Most "complicated" thing would be to create that weird looking 3D face model and rig it.
2
Why?
2
Level is not equal flat. "Gravity has never been understood" Yes, nobody knows what is actual cause of gravity, but most knows what gravity is: attraction between objects with mass. "Ballers deny the Earths Curvature formula" Maybe because its moronic one? its literally is a parabola equation... PARABOLA. And it doesn't even contain 2 essential variables in it: observers altitude and observed object height. "Ballers are followers of disinformation from paid puntiffs" Och that irony... "Ballers are Lazy and have no Common sense of their own Reality" Damn... This irony... Its strong with you... "Genesis overrides any science book " And Harry Potters book override science books too, whats your point? "The Creator says the Earth Unmovable and Stationary.Case Closed." Issue is that you cant prove that god is real, that god gives a damn about us, that god ever said anything, that god created earth or us or that your ancient book of fables is actually word of god, which cant even be true because it is full of false claims, self contradictions and bunch of immoral rules you should follow. So yea, Voldemort said so, so it must be true.
2
@ronpapi9539 "Spoken by an Atheist with No Faith" yea, when you have evidence you no longer need faith... Whats your point? "Darwin is your Lord." Darwin? Who is he? Evolution is true not because Darwin said so, after all, science is not a religion, facts and evidence are needed when some one makes a claim.
2
@ronpapi9539 Evidence for what? Evolution? We have that. Globe earth? We have that... You need to be more specific when you make such claims... As this video is about shape of earth, but for some strange reason you broth up Darwin... And level is not equal flat.
2
Do you realize that this is factually incorrect?
2
Around 2% from general public does as of some research.
2
@crispyduck5192 Yea, basic voting which would have been overseen by independent 3rd party would have given so much power for Russia. If vote like that happen and majority people wanted to join Russia, I don't think anyone would have supported Ukraine in this war and it would have ended in those 3 days with minimal casualties, if Russia was aiming to take over lands where voting was in favor of joining it. But nope, Putin just decided to take country by force because he thought that he can...
2
In real world, ball would start "falling" towards one of the sides as it would be stronger gravitational field than directly down which now would no longer have any, as you drilled all the mass in that direction. But thinking about some perfect condition situation when you don't even have actual trilled hole, but you some how manage to through object which can pass through earth, then ball would start slowing down until it reaches center, why? Because you will have more and more mass behind that ball which will start slowing ball down. No idea how long would it take to reach actual center of earth, as closer you will get, slower you will "fall" towards it. Ocean 0 altitude thing is just something we made up for base reference point as its more or less the same across entire world, so its simpler to measure object height from specific point then simply guessing how high it would be from center of earth.
2
@alphaschneider2468 You can't break laws of physics just because you really really want it... Hydrogen cars are really old technology by this point and it simply doesn't work in a way that it would be reasonable. You can't generate hydrogen on demand, again, first law of thermodynamics, heck any scientist will explain you why that one will never work. Water isn't fuel, just like crude oil isn't petroleum. You actually need to make it, produce it, and that takes crap ton of electricity and there is no way around it. Basic logical thinking here could create red flags straight away. You want to make hydrogen from water, so electrolysis, which produces hydrogen and oxygen, cool, after that you want to combine hydrogen with oxygen to produce energy, which results in that same water. Like, can you see potential issue here straight away? Water -> hydrogen and oxygen -> hydrogen + oxygen -> Water. So then, from which magical place does this excess energy should come from to power anything else, let alone to power actual electrolysis? Perpetual motion engines do not exist... Let alone those which can make crap ton more power than its using... We would be having thousands upon thousands water/hydrogen powered electrical plants across entire world if this magical technology could work in any meaningful way...
2
Yes, Russians do propaganda all day long.
2
@abramo7700 C'mon, everyone knows that everything posted on facebook is 100% accurate!!! True story, facebook told me that!!!
2
Basic observation of sun proves globe and disproves flat earth. So yea, you are demonstrably wrong and quite childish i might say.
2
@squadabingo7290 "I excelled in math as well" Me too, yet you failed in geometry class as it seems. "How do we explain the eclipses when the sun and moon which are millions of miles apart?" ? Are you saying that objects doesn't create shadow it they are further away? What is your question here? "How do they line up perfectly" ? Orbit? No idea what you are asking. They don't line up perfectly each time, there are quite big variations between eclipses. "Have you not seen videos that provide proof that the sun and moon are more local than once taught to us by the establishment" Have you seen 10000x more videos and more books and more people in general saying that this claim is bullshit? And just FYI we are talking about shape of earth here, so lets stay on this topic. After we can agree that earth is a globe, as this is demonstrable observable fact from reality, then we can talk about distances to the moon and sun. Deal? "Government worldwide has been caught lying to us on more occasions than we can fathom... agreed?" You know whats funny? Government is made up of humans, you want to make a claim that just because government lied at some point about something invalidates everything what it said, which essential means that anything what humans say is bollocks would mean that what you say is bollocks too.. Have you lied in your life? I can bet you did. Does that mean that anything you say here is bullshit and a lie? Do you see issue with your broken logic here? And yearth is a globe NOT because some one said so, but because its observable and testable fact from reality anyone can do to verify it. Your childish excuses that its false because government said so is just... childish... "Why wouldn’t they provide a cover story to keep us locked in a small area(hunger games, elysium)" Wait, wizards are real because we have Harry Potter movies? Matrix is real? Aliens are real?!!! Damn... I guess everything is true if its in a movie... " i believe there are more land masses than we are taught and why can’t “regular” ppl explore more." Cool opinion, but as you lied in your life this is a lie. Tho to be more serious, cool opinion, but lets go back to reality. Lets for sake of argument imagine that earth is a globe, you know, for sake of argument and not because its a fact. Antarctica is a continent belonging to quite few countries and it was put under general protection where people are not allowed to go there and pollute just because they want too. This was done for multiple reasons and main one is to preserve it as it is with else impact from humans as possible. Now, reality check. You can buy expedition ticket over there. You can buy plane ticket over it. You can buy cruise ship ticket around it. But its still a continent and you will not be allowed to go there without permission in same exact way as you are not allowed to cross country border without going throw customs... So maybe, just maybe regular people are not allowed there because there is no reason to do so? Do you allow any person who want to enter your house to enter without your permission? Do you? Could i just get into your house, use your toilet, watch tv and then leave without your permission? If i asked, would you let me in? Because if you would ask appropriate institutions for a visit of Antarctica, they will allow that. Have you tried it? "space and earth beyond the continents without being told to go away(military air aNd land space) once again... thought provoking statements" Childish statements. You can literally fly over Antarctica... I think is 2k for plane ticket, 5k for cruise ship and I think its 15 or 50k for expedition to the pole itself on foot. So yea, you are demonstrably wrong and quite childish. "what did I say that’s childish?" More or less, everything. "Did I hurt your feelings because you think you know the truth" Och no no no, you cant really hurt my feelings over internet, i'm not a millennial. And i know that earth is a globe, that's just a fact. Every other statement of yours got demonstrated to be factually false. "You have no idea what the truth is" I do, but you dont as it seems. " You only take information in and believe what you believe" Talking from personal experience? Like seriously, do we agree that earth is a globe? No? Can you explain why sun doesn't change perceived size, speed and moves in straight line over a day and actually does that thing we call sunset/sunrise which is only possible on globe model and fails on every step on flat one? And let me guess, you think that earth is flat because book said so? Or is this because its against mainstream? What is your evidence that earth is flat pancake?
2
@studioofgreatness9598 I can make valid argument for Harry Potter being real and wizard... Would that make it true? This is why I said "sound AND valid"... All of us can make shit up, not that many can actually prove it to be actually true.
2
"Many have checked the Panama Canal,it is 50 miles long and yet it has 0 curveture" Whats your sources for this claim? "On a ball Earth that is impossible according to NASA's formula for curveture" Its not a NASA formula, its basic geometry... "So plug in 50 miles to the equation for curveture and that will give u the curveture for 50 miles, bet you don't have the answer smarty?" What equation? Lets test how smart you are, provide your equation here because i can bet its incorrect one.
2
There isn't. But lets imagine that there is, how is this even relevant? At best this would show that moon is inside earth's atmosphere, doesn't say anything about its shape tho.
2
True that, tho there is additional issue with that, its amount of actual fuel we have on earth to power those nuclear plants, it's quite limited. If entire world shifted towards nuclear power plants we would run out of fuel for those in few decades, so it would be race against the clock and building nuclear power plants without knowing if there will be enough fuel to power those. Lets hope nuclear fusion get eventually solved and we can enjoy crap ton of energy.
2
What goes where?
2
@championknife You can brake 420 defensive lines if there are no one to defend them... Just like before we had Russian army running back and leaving everything behind we are quite likely to see same thing once more. And the fact that Russia announcing second official draft for another batch of cannon fodder indicates that Russia isint doing that good
2
@1_1__1_1 Ukraine has nothing to gain from it, but Russia does...
2
"there no telling how much money they gave to that childs family; because im 100% sure that what they did" Are you a prophet? Do you see future? Can you read minds? If you are none of those, then you have no basis to claim that they give money with 100% certainty, especially when nobody mentioned that and especially if they did, it would be mentioned by some one, as Trump has nothing else to brag about. And this is the main issue with Trump supporters, you make shit up to try justify jis actions or to try and make something positive about that story, even tho you have 0 evidence for that... Why?
2
So you are saying that they are shit right now but they will get (hopefully) better later?
2
Ok.
2
@jbignJesus Its not static and not a plane and first globe model appeared 3 century BCE.
2
@Globeisahoax Explain Lunar eclipse.
2
You sound like a troll, but well i will give you this http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif
2
@Globeisahoax Well clearly some one doesn't understand perspective, at all.
2
First of all, assume that 50% of people who claims to believe in flat earth actually believes it, rest of them are there just for shits and giggles. For most common reason it's always goes back to "hiding god" or something related to their religion
2
You would have to actually compare that with your specific local internet provider. Starlink is quite stable and gives decent speeds, in some areas it's no brainer pick and it can be cheaper than any alternatives, but it really depends on specific situation.
2
@TyTy-gm8yb You do know that those tanks are connected with fuel lines which can quite easily be broken and release highly pressurized hydrogen which in that state is highly flammable? And you have like 3 tanks in one car with 3 supply lines...
2
But if car gets so many issues after first weeks of use, then how the hell did they missed all of it? Poor quality of seats? How could you not see that after basic testing? Its made with cheap materials to reach that margin of profit.
2
Issue with this video is that Jerry took TOWING load number and used that for VERTICAL load test, those are completely different things. Vertical load is usually 10-15% of towing capacity, so actual vertical load limit was more like 1100 and not 11000, so CT beat it by more than 9x, yet this video want's to make a claim that it failed under its rated limits...
2
This specific technology requires for your skull to be open. There are other technologies which can do similar things where you "simply" put on special "hat", but those ones have their own drawbacks. Honestly its hard to say how much I would want to install technology into my head if I actually don't need it, but it would be just for convenience. Technology improves fast, having brain surgery to get tech which gets outdated in 2 years sounds pointless. But this is HUGE thing for those who lost control over their bodies, I think it would be hard to find those who would not want to get one of these implants to get some autonomy back.
2
Not really, what you are getting is distilled water and you can simply use none corrosive materials for that part if you needed, it's none issue.
2
@OktoPutsch It wasn't funded by tax payers... You TF cult members should alteast get basic things correctly...
2
But but but... Mah car soouuuund!!! Its all about that sound... People will use allot less efficient cars just to get that sound... Some people are just weird.
2
Because Putin said so?
2
@OskarsKaminskis Conspiracy is when people make shit up without any supporting evidence, which means that no one needs to discredit it because it never had any credibility to begin with.
2
What?
2
That's the issue, her qualification was "Dark skin color"
2
Call me skeptical, but this all looks more like just humans doing 100% of controls from behind the scenes than anything else.
2
Do you know what cognitive dissonance is?
2
Why should anyone care what bible says?
2
Nitrogen or hydrogen? In either case, for nitrogen it needs to be under −195C and for hydrogen its -252C, as you can imagine keeping something like that at such low temperatures is more than challenging
2
Actually majority of flat earthers end up to "Bible said so" and not that government lies, even tho quite few does say that earth is flat because government at some point in time lied about something. Tho its weird, UFOs? Government lied about UFOs? What the what? You look to be one of those conspiracy people who will dive into all of those crazy one and just reject most insane. UFO stands for unidentified flying object, so no idea how government could have lied, unless you want to claim that aliens actually visited earth and government hides that...
2
People who believe that we live on a flat earth and not on globe.
2
Waste of money and time
2
@charles7075 Still a waste of money and time. You can shoot flat earther into the space, kick out of air lock and they will still scream that its CGI... You cant fix stupidity...
2
Can't say that caravan even started to move yet.
2
So like those who spread lie that earth is flat?... Those ones?
2
There is HUGE difference between questioning things and simply denying reality. Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth, without any math. So if fail to grasp that much then it's not governments fault here, it's yours.
2
That same exact conversion you are talking here will be needed to produce hydrogen in the first place, not even mentioning the fact that you are putting more energy to produce hydrogen which then again should be converted into electricity which can then be used by this car. Energy loss is allot higher in hydrogen car then it is in electrical one.
2
@paulbrian6771 It should not dip, that entire experiment is a dumb as flat earth argument. In both models results should be the same.
2
@thabomeslane6957 By any chance you looked at northern star?...
2
@zeendaniels5809 You missed my point here... OP said that he observed sky over few hours and stars didn't move. So either he has terrible observation skills or he has terrible observation skills because he looked as the one star which would not move over night.
2
What?
2
What is your best solution to push out Hydrogen cars instead of EV's? You do realize that hydrogen cars are like 60% less efficient than EV's? Costs more to drive. Refueling stations costs exponentially more than EV charging stations and on and on and on and on... Hydrogen cars might have some use in some specific industry area, but those will never become wide spread and will never replace cars on the roads, too late for that.
2
@Maksie0 Yes, when they are not needed.
2
And pigs can fly, you just need to kick them really hard.
2
@BrotherAzrael Your original comment said that its zero maintenance... Which is 100% false. There are printed expiration dates on hydrogen tanks, all 3 of them and there is expiration date printed on fuel cell itself. Not by mileage, but by time... What does government do to prevent it? Because there are incentives from government if you buy hydrogen cars and if you need government to help out to push a product for people to actually buy it, maybe it's not that good to begin with? BEV's are being sold with or without government incentives, while hydrogen cars are not. Hydrogen stations isn't spreading because their cost is extreme at best. One stations costs around 1million to build, while BEV's one station is around 50k. This excludes actual maintenance costs with a need to have staff 24/7 at that station to help out customers and to resolve issues as soon as possible when those arise. This do not scale, especially when you have by your own words a more convenient competition. Here is your problem with the argument: You think about the title, I think about entire thing.
2
@BrotherAzrael "Ask yourself, what is your goal by telling me this?" To educate ignorant people. "remember hydrogen has a combustion power three times that of gasoline per kg" Remember that hydrogen isn't energy dense by volume, so that 3x when it comes to weight is meaningless when you need atleast 3 huge tanks pressurized up to 10 000 psi to get decent range. "As it was explained there was a catalyst cell that does all the chemistry" Which is what exactly? Hydrogen fuel cell or something else? It sounds just like some generic buzz word and pretend that it does something special here... What does this catalyst do? "I refuse to construct a huge ass wall of text to explain to some random youtuber as to why and how it works" Its because you can't. Nothing in entire world stops you to form short 2-3 sentences explaining basics how this magical technology works. If you need text of wall to explain something then you don't understand it yourself. "now shut the fuck up and believe what you want" Defensive much? Its like you starting to realize how ridiculous your initial comment is and that you got easily fooled and now you just want to pretend that its our fault to not accepting your and some scammers words on their face value... C'mon... All of us here know whats going on...
2
He has degree in engineering and done some work in appropriate fields, which makes him a scientist, crappy one, but still a scientist. Who why do people keep complaining about this irrelevant thing? What difference does it make?
2
So video was uploaded 100 years and 7 days after someone claimed that there was apparition at Fatima, so what?
2
Poor trolling attempt.
2
So making X actually free speech platform is somehow creating propaganda site? You do know that it was far left echo chamber before Musk got it? Right?
2
@KangenAlec Actual tilt is between 22.1 and 24.5. So you are wrong on that. And earths speed around sun is 67000mph or 107826kph speed and not 66600. From whose ass do you get your numbers from?
2
@TheRealKela Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth, so no, its not on same level, not even close. Flat earthers can't even present working model of their world, let alone evidence for it. Half of your comment is correct, the other half if just baffling. Its like you are one of those people who want to be special by not accepting anyone's position even if one of those positions is demonstrable fact. Your ignorance only proves your ignorance.
2
@valerystoichkov7429 Then don't buy it... It's in beta stage, it will have bugs... This is why it's in beta... If we had 100% working FSD system entire world would have changed forever. And honestly I'm more scared to be driven by certain people than by FSD
2
Worst example out there.
2
Intuition is not part of science... Observation is.
2
Suggesting to ignore issue wont actually resolve it.
2
@KangenAlec You do know that there are dozens of space agencies across entire globe? Right?
2
@KangenAlec Riiiiight, i guess Australia is not real too... S we are going all the day the crazy road here, why not include that one too.
2
@MrMichiel1983 "But until I psychically see the earth be round from a spaceship outside of the planets atmosphere" That's exactly how flat earthers think.
2
@MrMichiel1983 Well... Blindly believing authority isn't good either, you still need some confirmation that this "authority" is trustworthy. His mindset is exactly the same as flat earthers, there is only single difference here, he believes in globe instead of flat earth, but for same bad reasons as flat earthers do.
2
basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe and not flat. https://imgur.com/gallery/nSGtPtz check this, maybe you will learn something new about geometry.
2
@sebastiaanjacobs1885 You cant even make coherent argument in here, why would anyone waste time by an actual debate?
2
@christophermaloz-ux6cw Well you are perfect example of someone who studied for the grades and not for actual understanding of that topic. So even with your 4.0 GPA you still fail on basics here. Shape of the earth can be determined from your backyard, flat earth model doesn't make any sense in general when you simply consider how light works. Just FYI NASA gets like 7% of what US military does, so no idea why you think that NASA gets bunch of money. And... You do know, you should, because you have that 4.0 GPA after all, that there are more than one country with their own space agencies? And you do know that NASA is irrelevant to this conversation in general? You feel like someone who is decently smart who just wants to be part of some group and started to convince yourself that world is full of lizard people just because you want to be special. Earth isa globe, this is a fact anyone with basic geometry understanding can verify on their own, no need to create world wide imposible meaningless conspiracies here.
2
He was creating personal attack type content for years by now. While there are actual valid criticisms he could make, he always goes back to "but Musk is bad!!!" type argument.
2
Back to segregation?
2
Nope.
2
What?
2
@ihatemainstream1461 Funny enough you dint presented actual video which would prove you correct and instead you keep calling people trolls. Isint that ironic?
2
Global flood never happen, evolution is a fact, earth is spherical because its demonstrable fact not because some sky wizard said so, bible says that earth is disk which is flat, creation looses every time anyone challenges it, earth is not 10k year old... Is this good enough or should we start providing evidence for each claim we make? If so, then it will be your turn to start, i will follow with my own.
2
Was this a joke?
2
@Peterpan2355 How do you thing spirit level would behave if earth was round? I bet that you imagine a globe (not earth, but tiny model of earth), you put spirit level on top of it as starting point and then rotate spirit level around that globe? Thats not how things work... To make it more clear whats going on you will need to rotate globe itself while keeping spirit level stationary. Spirit level points towards center of earth, if you fallow curvature then spirit level should never change its position... This is why this experiment with spirit level is bollocks and doesn't prove/disprove anything because same results should be observed on flat or globe earth... And this is why i asked if you made a joke here, as this is just... silly...
2
@Peterpan2355 "If there is an observered movement in the bubble then the Earth is possibly round (apart from when the plane is landing or not set on "Lock into flight Path") If there is any observed movement of the bubble then it is Flat." First of all, dint you got this backwards? Like if there is no movement then its flat and if there is then its round? But even then... You still failing to understand that if its flat or round, bubble should NOT move in both cases... Plane stays at same altitude, its flat or not, you are still parallel to the ground which means that bubble will not move in any case... Why cant you understand this basic concept? Spirit level CAN'T prove/disprove ether model... Its like trying to prove that earth is flat by making banana cake...
2
@mountainman7564 His justification on Trump being fascist was to say that Trump maybe, could be, possibly remain in power after 4 years... Its like going around and calling everyone fascist just because they maybe could do something fascist like at some point in their lives... Trump was already in power, he went away and got replaced. So on what mentally sane grounds can anyone use argument like that to call someone fascist?
2
Depends from reference point, but in general you are not standing sideways, down is towards center of earth.
2
@lebaneeze Down is towards center of earth.... How much clear i can be than this? Pick any point on globe earth and down will be towards center of earth... That's it... "we are all spinning at 1000 mph" Yes, yes we are. But surface speed has no impact, what only matters is rotations in time, which is only single rotation every 24 hours. Conservation of momentum is a thing too.
2
@lotus9865 You do know that in today's world majority of scientists are atheists? And you do know that back then anyone could have been put into jail or executed for simply questioning bible? Do you remember what happen to Galileo when he questioned bible? He was put in jail... So who are you to say that Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, and Isaac Newton have been an actual theists? They have been smart ones, and in that time smartest thing to do would be to pretend to be a believer... Tho its completely besides the point... You literally made argument from popularity and from authority fallacies...
2
@commonsenseskeptic Internet which could lag and gap is a miles better than the one which doesn't exist... On top of this, satellite network isn't finished, so its not at its full stability, so to complain about its stability only shows how little you understand and how bias you are. Another thing would be option (which already is a thing) for more expensive plan which prioritizes your connection and provides more stable and faster connection, so again, you comment is just silly at best.
2
@commonsenseskeptic I never claimed that it is faster... It was OP who made some weird claim that stockmarket people would buy this system without knowing anything about it... Like no one ever said that this system would be good for stockmarket, like ever... Even Elon himself said that this will not replace internet inside cities as its made for the areas where internet access is low or none existent, you know, like in battle field, like the one we currently have in a country which got invaded last year and this system is being successfully deployed and giving and edge over attackers who doesn't have this capability, that type of application in a military situation... And still have no idea what you even tried to say here, as I never said what you just claimed, what does that say about you? Demonstrating your own ignorance?
2
Yea, what is really weird for me is for people constantly complaining that climate controls are hard (2 clicks...) to access while in my current car I have it set to auto and basically never touching it...
2
That's a silly generalization...
2
If US isint joining forces with Russia to fight Ukraine, then it will not have any actual real impact on the war. Support from Europe will continue and if needed will increase.
2
When someone actually invents technology like that which can be independently verified, then we can talk about it, but having "some dude in WW2 created X" will not be enough.
2
First of all, its not, second, doesn't make any difference what some books of fables says...
2
@goovitoo Its like you seen some flat earth meme posts on facebook and decided to have some fun on youtube comment section without any preparation's here. If you want to troll, add some extra effort into it.
2
Your comment made no sense and your conclusion is objectively false.
2
@pmoney2 And I never said that you are flat earther, bro cant even read. I was pointing out basic reality that government, you are so scared of, has nothing to do with anything in here due to the fact that we knew what shape of earth is for past 2300 years as minimum. You being ignorant on the topic doesn't really add anything besides you talking like a generic flat earther whose main "proof" is that government lies...
2
@pmoney2 You even "argue" like a flat earther. Its so weird.
2
@pmoney2 Did I made silly comment about government lying about shape of the earth or was it you? Sorry, buddy, but it would be you who needs to touch a grass and come back to reality. By the way, if video being 1 year old is such a bad thing, then why the hell you made comment on it? Seriously, every single comment you make is basically on same level and any other flat earther. Such a weird person you are.
2
@pmoney2 Did you noticed that you are not even trying to present refutation for what was said here, you just making some weird childish comeback comments. Are you like... a child? Because that would explain a lot here.
2
@pmoney2 I stop existing when you turn your phone off? Em I part of your imagination? Like, do you think that i'm your imaginary "friend" who doesn't exist in actual reality? If so, then you might want to see a specialist here.
2
@KangenAlec You dont even know actual reality here... Why i'm not surprised. Longest photo taken was of 370 km distance, which was taken from a mountain of another mountain. "Strangely" enough higher you are further you can see until certain specific point, its like earths surface dictates how far you can see, its almost like it has some sort of a curve to it... Strange...
2
Hydrogen cars are fine due to the fact that those are electric cars with extra steps, instant torque, fast'ish fill ups, good range, but... Extremely expensive to fuel and to maintain...
2
Ice dome? Sooo, does it melt due to sun? And you do realize that your personal research is as valid as any random persons who does 2 min google search about any topic? Like seriously, could you present your BEST evidence that earth is flat?
2
@trees6543 By the way, bible says that earth is flat. So are you a flat earther or are you in disagreement with your book of fables?
2
He is still richest person on earth, so like, what difference would it make even if he was the one who lost most wealth ever?
2
You misspelled "Russian" with "American", no worries, it happens for the best of us.
2
Eduardo Pena You do realize that you have option to not agree with 100% of what some one says while still agreeing on something? Bill is technically a scientist, no idea why people keep complaining, even if he wasn't wont change what he said.
2
@Jokoko2828 Same thing with TF applies here, when you get so many fans you can pull so much bullshit and people will keep defending you even when you are factually incorrect.
2
They can, and they are going to do it again. Thing is that there wasn't any good reason to do it again. Every single trip costed around 1billion bucks, we went there like 6 times with maned missions and quite few times with robots. Found nothing in interest, so there was no point in going back.
2
It makes more sense because its as simple explanation as it comes, its false one, but its simple one. This is why people who dint bothered to learn some basics about reality tends to pick simplest explanation out there they can actually grasp. But in reality you can determine earths shape from your backyard, and its a globe, simple as that.
2
You have no idea how war works, don't you now?
2
How is NASA related to any of this? Earth is globe not because NASA said so... Anyone can determine that with basic observations.
2
Or you could just measure your foot with actual measuring tape once in your life and remember that 2 digit number for future reference which will produce a lot more accurate results... Foot is not equal to a foot, if you said that you measured 125 feet by using your foot, I would have no idea how much that actually is...
2
Is everyone a nazi in your reality who disagrees with you? Funny enough one of the reasons why Kamala lost was continuous shouting that everyone who isn't for Kamala is literal nazi, well, that backfired.
2
So it wasn't Russia which attacked Ukraine?
2
NPP is working at 33% at this moment, there is enough water in that reservoir to keep it safe for quite some time even without refilling it with pumps. So if "accident" happens it was done by Russians.
2
@serpico1616 You seem to not understand basics here. This video wants to imply that CT miserably failed at its hitch test, while it exceeded it 9x the rated value. If you want to make argument about aluminum fatigue, cool beans, you could do that, but this video isn't about it, it was to claim that CT failed at something while in reality it did not. And just FYI as you people seem to not understand this ting either, I personally don't like CT, it looks stupid, it should have never existed to begin with, its not some work horse and so on, but at same time having misleading videos just for the clickbait isn't the way to go. Jerry here is but hurt at Musk, which again is fine, Musk behaves like moron recently, but this isn't justification for videos like this.
2
Oliver, trip to moon cost like 3 billion bucks, why would anyone want to spend so much money? Especially when NASA got its budget cut? We went there, found nothing in value, so why would we waste even more money to go there? We have rocks on earth... Besides low gravity, moon is quite useless. Which said, there are plans to set a moon base in near future for experiments and just to make a nice pit stop for trips to mars, do some experiments in low gravity and so on.
2
Problem is with efficiency AND fuel... Just go and read about hydrogen embrittlement...
2
Or maybe it actually is spherical?
2
Ok.
2
Carbon dating works, that was proven. And there are quire few other dating methods. Tho no idea how this is related to the shape of earth. And this video was not made to prove/disprove anything.
2
"I don't think the world is flat , but..." In most cases anything what was before "but" becomes incorrect... You might be exception, but its funny to see comments starting with something like this and then ending with same exact broken reasoning as any flat earther has. "For example weather modification!" Well, we have technology to shoot some chemical compositions into clouds to disperse them. This is not really weather modification, its simple cloud dispersion. "NASA just admitted there are UFOs" Correct, we have records of Unidentified Flying Object. Now, for sake of everyone's, read again what UFO stands for... Then try to realize why saying that you have some records about Unidentified Flying Object is nothing special... UFO is not equal aliens... Its literally Unidentified... "A nation wide (maybe worldwide) human trafficking ring" Maybe? From where do you get this information? "The defense department just announced they invented a microchip to put under your skin so everyone will be tracked" Why would they announce that? If they had any plans to track everyone, which they most likely can do already as everyone own smartphone which has GPS in it anyways... Why would they announce that? "So many people labeled "crazy conspiracists " turned out to be correct. " Like what? And its a crazy conspiracy UNTIL you can provide evidence that its not. Just because some one made up conspiracy theory we should not take them seriously, especially if they have 0 evidence to support that. "As we judge the people who fall into the flat earth web lets also remember sometimes some conspiracies are true and the word needs minds that question" We need minds that question things, but we dont need minds that question facts. Flat earth claim is just stupid on its core, its claiming that reality is not reality, as for flat earth to be real you would need for magic to be real and everything we observe in reality relating to shape of earth, gravity, galaxies, stars and so on would be faked somehow.
2
Because it depends what you actually trying to see here... You can observe earth's curvature at sea level by observing things like ships disappearing bottoms up over the horizon. But if you want to see actual curvature to the sides, you will need to go quie way way up there as earth is HUGE. At the end of day, earth shape can be determined from your backyard with spare time and basic tools, and yes, its spherical.
2
Its not.
2
after 200 days of war and this is your ending of Ukraine? How will that happen exactly?
2
You do know that its Russia attacking Ukraine and not the other way around? Right? You do know that much?
2
@WeirdScience-ET Does Darius J Wright writes fiction? Because what you said sounds really cheap and boring. Do you have anything more interesting? I do like fiction, but c'mon, even fiction needs to make sense.
2
What he needs least is to become muslim...
2
@herrschaftg35 NASA stated in its initial contract with SpaceX that they are paying like 4x less for same services they were paying to Russians. And I have no idea how is NASA's regular rockets are cheaper... Those are extremely expensive, even latest launch where NASA's SLS system could not have been launched, they went with SpaceX, and you know what? They payed like 178 millions to SpaceX, while launching with SLS costs around 2.5 billion... Do you see TINY difference here? So I have no idea in which reality it's barely cheaper... By the way, Falcon 9 currently has like 2 week turn around, it's getting shorter constantly, duno how much more shorter it actually needs to be for you to be happy. I guess you will be kicking and screaming until they reach 24 hours...
2
Then you have no idea how science works.
2
@geoffmather3764 its not egg shaped... Please avoid making such statements, we already got flat earthers miss representing earths shape by saying that it should be like pear... On grand scale earth is perfect sphere.
2
@Globehoax If they lie about the globe then... Earth is not a globe... That's it. As you clearly don't understand basic logical thinking, when something gets negated this doesn't mean that something else becomes true by default. Earth could be in a shape of unicorn and we all live in his anus, would explain dome thing, as its just fart bubble which should burst any minute now.
2
@Globeishoaxx Reality check, explain to me how does direct flights from Australia to Chile works in your reality? There are enormous issues with Gleason, one of the ones would be issues with distances, especially on southern hemisphere, like size of australia is bonkers. Gleason map is so bad that its weird that people like you even brings it up, smarter flat earthers started to simply dodge and say that they don't have flat earth map just to avoid being humiliated as they know that none of those actually work in actual reality.
2
@KangenAlec They know it same as people who "know" that aliens probed them?
2
Waste of money and time to amuse tiny portion of ignorant people who will most likely wont even believe that video anyways.
2
@nobbynobbs8182 Why? Starship development isn't funded by taxpayer money. You do know that much?
2
Being more convincing and being actually true are separate things.
2
@sumdumbmick You do realize that anyone can prove that earth is atleast not a flat? Sun alone has 4 things about it which 100% matches globe model and 100% doesn't match flat one... And you are here saying that its not possible to determine shape of earth... Have you been outside?...
2
Don't you just answered your own question here?... What Ukraine gains from it? Well, it gains Russia losing more men than Ukraine... At this point Russia only has advantage on the side of numbers
2
@LordDucarius Never said that war is a game, but war is a war... If your opponent has specific advantage then try to minimize it as much as possible. Defending is always simpler than attacking, so Ukraine can use Russian desperation to take over Bakhmut and drain its forces as much as possible while having as little loses on Ukraine side as possible. Basic war tactics 101. I'm not from Ukraine and honestly I would only be a waste of gear and ammunition as I'm not suitable for combat. War like this isint done on a single soldier level, if I would be hinderens for entire squad then its better for me to not be part of it. "No sane person wants to go through that hell and most ukrainians, just as most russians want the war to end. " Yes, yet we have Russia keeping this war active... What's your point? "The only people profiting from this are far away from the frontline" Like Putin. "Try to see the human, and not some numbers or words that are shown on your screen" It's a war... How naive are you? Do you think that Ukraine should just roll over and surrender to this aggressor? Like seriously, what is your solution here? "My relatives have gone to war and some returned, some not" That's how war works. "But people on their couch with mobile phone love wars and people dying as long as the "right" people die" If it was up to me I would end ALL wars across entire human history in instant, but its not, wars happen, we have one now, so what do you want here exactly? Pretend that its not happening? Should we start WW3? Because your solution for me to go there would be more or less result of WW3 where even more people would die and potentially entire world if diabolical Putin decides to push that red button... Never supported wars, I don't support this war, but I do support Ukraine defending their own country from aggressors. It's kill or be killed situation, its basic self defense situation...
2
@LordDucarius I'm not from US... I'm from Europe... From a country which belonged to Russia until 1991... So I have some idea how it feels to be owned by Russia and why Ukraine wants to take their land back from this aggressor... But again, as you seem to be one of those people who keeps pointing out that people are dying but never actually provides any actual solution here... So what is your solution to this war? Ukraine rolls over and surrenders? Russia takes entire Ukraine and then entire Europe when they decide to expand even more? So what is your solution here? If you don't have one then don't accuse me of treating this as a game when you just complain and can't provide any actual solutions here...
2
NASA isn't paying SpaceX for its R&D, NASA is paying for the results/services SpaceX provides for years by now. SpaceX doesn't need anyone to survive, its making enough money already to be self sufficient.
2
Sam ross Ok, you will be one more to my count. I asked dozens of flat earthers one simple question, 100% of them failed to answer it, lets see if you are the one: What method you used to determine that photo X is CGI and photo Y is not?
2
SpaceX being cheapest and launching most payload in comparison to the rest of the world has no value?... Explains a lot on what TF cult members are and their knowledge level.
2
Americans blow up dam by planting bunch of explosives in the middle of war zone on the side controlled by Russia?... This is overstretch ever for rus bots...
2
What?
2
What the hell are you blabbering about here? Ukraine gets Attacked by Russia, then Russia destroys dam and this is somehow Karma at play?...
2
Are you saying its extremely hard to find mass graves?...
2
@DavideCosmaro Its not arguing, its educating. Just saying.
2
@DavideCosmaro Yes and no, it would be really easy to shift from "This flat earther spreading misinformation is dangerous and needs to be silenced" to "your opinion is dangerous and needs to be silenced" Flat earthers will never take any control, we will have those for quite some time and there is nothing else you can do besides countering their claims with actual facts and explaining why they are wrong. When it comes to free speech, line needs to exist somewhere, but it's definitely not with flat earthers, i mean, religious people have bigger and louder and more impactful voice than all flat earthers ever combined, yet religious people are free to preach their reality, so maybe start with that instead of meaningless flat earthers.
2
Can't you see that there are actual flat earthers out there? I'm always giving 50/50 chance that person who claims to be flat earther actually is one, but the fact remains that we do have those people out there.
2
Why is NASA even relevant here?
2
And earth is still a globe...
2
How do you know that your decision is the one which is based by actual intelectual?
2
Makes no sense.
2
Why?
2
Being good and being flat earther are not mutually exclusive.
2
Elon rides Tesla, only Tesla and uses most recent FSD system which are not available for public, so your comment is not only wrong, it's just sad one.
2
Who? Putin?
2
Because he is scientist and it doesn't really matter who presents evidence/argument? You could have picked 3 random people from a street, would be basically same thing. Argument what matters, not the person who presents it.
2
@aaryajain9771 I was addressing initial point here as it was some what incorrect to connect earths curvature/shape with Coriolis effect. You could still have Coriolis effect on flat earth if it was spinning on north pole as an axis point, it would behave differently further away from equator, but that is different topic by itself.
2
@aaryajain9771 There are dozens of issues with flat earther model, i'm not even attempting to create working model here, as its literally impossible. Just giving small bits which could some what match something from their world view. And just FYI, as they deny gravity and think that object just magically go down, your objection would not fly with them.
2
Why would you use it in combustion engine when you would get allot better performance as hydrogen fuel cell? Makes zero sense... Are you one of those who will pick car with 100mile range over the one with 200 just to have that extra sound?
2
Wrong comment section, in here we are talking about flatardian model not about imaginary friends some one call "god"...
2
This entire video was to explore why people believe that earth is flat and not to debunk that. Earths shape have been proven for past 2300 years, no need to do that once more.
2
@tupacolypse1 "honestly his first piece of evidence was parallax, and that hasn't been proven wrong.." Prove that magical space pixies farting out universes after eating hot tacos are not real... You cant? But isint thats how your logic works, anything you cant disprove is correct by default? While in actual reality it would be you who needs to prove something to be true for it to be and not the other way around. "can u explain to me how i can see the same star constellations all yr around even as we travel around the sun.." Maybe because earth points to same direction?... Tho, more important question is: Why can we only see 50% of stars from any given point on earth and not 100% if we actually live on flat one?
2
@solofourohsixgaming "explain to me how the sun appears bigger on the horizon then it does when it's overhead." Not on camera. There might be a bloom due to sun light going through more of it near horizon to reach you. But using sun filters and picking day with clear sky will always show you same exact sun size, its nothing new, its simple fact that sun doesn't change size through entire day. "Also you do realize anything caught on camera is still interpreted by your brain?" You can literally COUNT pixels to determine difference... And there is none... Will you not argue that its not valid because you are using your brain? "How exactly do you think our eyes work?" Poorly, this is why correct experiments tend to exclude your actual eyes and gets replaced with actual technology which doesn't lie and isint biased. "you are saying that the sun during noon, and the sun during rise and sunset appear to be the same size?" Its doesn't appear, it is same size. "The moon and the sun look identical during those times, meaning when overhead they look small, and on the horizon they appear to be bigger." Again... Bloom... Have you ever looked at a old fashion light bulb? It looks big, but its not, its a tiny wire which produces light, just because it looks big to your eyes it doesn't mean that it is. You seriously never bothered to fact check this with actual sun filter?... Please... For your own sake, stop staring at sun without protective gear...
2
How the hell is this comparable to SpaceX exactly?
2
From which video you got this false information? You do understand that you got scammed? Right?
2
Maybe because TF here is grasping straws for those magical clicks which generates him crap ton of money?...
2
This joke was funny first 50 000 times I have seen it, after that it got some what dull.
2
@mikeyerian2562 Maybe they pushed that date because they are not ready to perform rescue mission? You do know that those stranded astronauts are not the fault of SpaceX, right? You do know that much?
2
Expensive to buy, to maintain, to fuel with basically non existing infrastructure.
2
Riiiiight, because hydrogen car sales are booming all over the place... Right? Or its not?
2
Old testament or bible in general doesn't say that earth is spherical, you might want to fact check. And no, i'm not flat earther.
2
To -252C? Well, you could, but that would require crap ton of energy on its own, which would defeat entire purpose in having liquid hydrogen
2
Look at what?
2
@khodorhassan5318 "And what different air pressure he stayed in the same height 1 M above sea, why should air pressure change? I feel that u people are the sort that memorize dont understand science " Air temperature does have effect on its density, aka pressure... As some one who says that we should understand science and not only memorize it gets same thing wrong one sentence back... C'mon... Irony is thick with you. "it was shot in hollywood. Dont even dare to deny it its common knowlege" Are you a poe? You cant be serious here.
2
With flat earthers reasoning In 99% of time it all goes back to "Because my book said so"
2
@MegaM249saw You said exactly opposite thing here, I'm yet to meet a flat earther who understands basic geometry, let alone what globe model is, or let alone being able to present flat earth model.
2
Green - reclaimed land Blue - recently reclaimed land which might still have some russian troops scattered, but not really a threat Light grey - active warzone where Ukraine troops can be advancing and having active fighting Red - Russian control zone Something like that
2
@MorganHill8 In any case your testimony about Jesus would be the same, you can believe in flat earth, forest pixies, aliens, have 50 Nobel prizes and have IQ of 500, your testimony would still be the same, which is: without actual evidence its only your opinion/claim. So yea, half way there, we will wait you on our side, dark side, we have cookies!!!
2
This comment was brought to you by Putin.
2
@rayjack400 You should present actual evidence of moon being upside-down when viewed from same exact location instead of just claiming it, because no one else on entire planet managed to observe this, so something clearly doesn't add up here. It's like saying "Why we had 3 suns few days ago? Can globers explain this?!?!?!" just makes no sense as it never happen.
2
We did.
2
Believing in evolution is being deceived?... Ok...
2
Just like TF makes excuses why SpaceX didn't go bankrupt like he said they will?
2
@sparehead8911 Blue Origin generally would be best shot, and cheapest
2
@Globeisahoaxx I can bet my house that you would fail to present a valid method to determine what is CGI and what isn't. You just screaming "Its CGI" will not make it so. I can bet that I would score higher than you if we did a test with random real and CGI photos trying to guess which is which as I have spent quite some time of my life looking at one.
2
Nah, just "thinking" due to the fact that basic observation of sun you can do from your backyard disproves flat earth. Funny enough, only conspiracy nuts use word "sheeple", i wonder why...
2
@deawinter Its based on actual reality... Pick top sprinters and their times, best woman falls somewhere around place number 5000... Its objective fact that on average biological males are stronger, faster than biological females, this is easily provable by basic data from physical sports across entire human history
2
This video dint even presented any actual arguments ether way... Let alone evidence... So its quite interesting that people would change their minds after watching video like this. Its like staring at wall and concluding that earth is flat because paint on the wall is on flat surface... just doesn't add up... But you do you.
2
@deerichardz Is Musk forcing people to work for him? Is he paying less or equal to minimal wage? Like, what EXACT exploitation are you talking about here? Care to give an example?
2
Can you touch or feel fairies? Can you touch or feel aliens? Can you touch or feel unicorns? Does that mean all of them are real?
2
@markiankchik1338 Its called: argumentum ad populum. Did you known that like 5000 years ago like 99.99% of people believed that earth is flat? Is it tho? Is it? You could have 100% of people believing that god is real, will not make it true, it will only show that 100% of people believe that something is true... So my argument still stands and yours still fail. Please, for your own sake learn basic logical fallacies otherwise you will not stand a chance in debates about topics like that and you fail like you just did.
2
@markiankchik1338 "well that is not what i was trying to say," Yet you said it. You literally said "So what you are saying is that 90% of people are wrong and only a small minority are correct?" which is argumentum ad populum logical fallacy. Amount of people believing X is not indication of it being true. And to poke your wound here even more, majority of scientists, who have in average IQ by 25 higher then general public, are atheists. And there are basic studies done to show that increase in intelligence leads you to atheism. So even tho i never said what you implied that i said, you are in some way correct. "what i was trying to say is that you obviously think that you are the smartest person on the planet" And i never said that... I'm not a smartest, never was and never will be, so avoid misrepresenting what i said while i never said it. "Rowbotham to prove that earth is flat is exactly the same as you are using to prove that there is no God" That's false. Like those not even comparable... Shape of earth is a demonstrable, you can literally test shape of earth in multiple different ways and prove its shape with quite nice accuracy, can you do anything like this for God? No. Thing is, we dont need to disprove you god, YOU need to prove that god is real and any claim without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And then you have basic golden rule: "nothing exist until its proven to exist". Same as you dont believe that unicorns are not real, that magical space pixies are not real and so on. You dont need to disprove them, some one needs to prove that they are real. if you can disprove, cool, bonus for you.. And to be crystal clear here, atheism is NOT a claim that that god is not real, Atheism is lack of belief that god is real, AKA rejection of claim that god is real. Same as you reject claim that bigfoot is real or that unicorns are real and so on. "And based on this i would say that both extremes are always kind of same, they just dont make any sense lol." YEs, claiming that earth is flat and that god is real while having 0 evidence doesn't make any sense, i agree.
2
@markiankchik1338 "It is quite funny that people who do not believe in God always try to convince everyone around that God does not exist" Its quite funny that people who believe in god makes shit up... Where did i said that god is not real? Like seriously, why do you see imaginary things? You already believe that god is real even tho you think that we should not believe in pixies while pixies and god have same exact characteristics. And you are here, yet again saying that i'm trying to convince you that god is not real... Please, for love of your imaginary friend you call god, put this into your head: I'm not saying that god is not real, i;m saying that your belief that he is real is irrational to which you agreed already by saying that we should not believe that pixies are real. To sum up: We should not believe in pixies because we can't touch or feel them and we should not believe in god because we can't touch or feel him. That simple. So my statement that you made fun of your own beliefs still stand unchanged. Have a great day!
2
@Lux "The problem is that youtube keeps deleting my comment." Depends from its contents, but it does remove some of them, automatically. "Are you gonna deny what I experienced just because you didn't live it?" Deny what? I will not deny your experience or your sexual preference, i will deny your claim about reality for which you cant provide actual evidence for. "The system you follow is the main responsible of hidding the truth" Dint Galileo went to prison for questioning shape of earth which was contradictory to what bible said? So who is hiding truth here? "Deny that you don't see it and you live because of it if you can. See? you can't" Yet i can detect air, measure it and so on. We know what makes air, how it works, what makes it move. We have nothing for god claim. "What if I tell you after my experiences that what you see on earth doesn't exist because when you die you pass to another dimension that is spiritual where the reality begins and you were the crazy that was only seeing mirages?" irrational Ok, will not bother to respond to rest of what you said here... Would make enormous reply... So lets concentrate on ONE topic here. PROVE THAT MIRACLES ARE TRUE. That's it, one topic.
2
@Lux "I feel that you won't reply because it's too difficult to accept that the first human wasn't brought by the stork " No, i dint addressed rest of your comments because it would have been huge waste of time. If we cant stay on one topic and we will have to jump all over the board, whats the point. Its already gets a long replies and for me to address 100 sentences from your each reply is just to much of time consuming thing to do... Lets stay on one topic at the time... One claim at the time... "Common nouns don't feel (a chair doesn't) so are you a chair or a spirit moves your body?" My brains move my body, feel free to prove it otherwise. "as I know, the brain is the system that carries information to activate your bones and all your biological anatomy, not your personal desires and occurrences." As i know, the brain is the system that carries electrical signal to and from it. It can send signals to your muscles (not bones) to make them contract. It can process input from your eyes or any other sensory input your body has, process and react accordingly. This is actually proven fact, by actual science and using actual evidence for it. Damage brain and it can damage your entire personality, it can change you entirely, what you like and what you dislike. Damage brain and you can loose memories... Which should not happen if there is something else controlling your body which is outside your body... So sorry if reality is to painful for you, but reality doesn't give a sh*t about your personal wants, it is what it is. "The evolution of hominids is the most stupid thing made official in science" Just because you don't like it or you failed to understand it, doesn't make it false. Evolution is a fact, observable, demonstrable fact. This is why religious people started to adapt evolution into their religions, to make them coexist, even tho that demolishes quite few things from it, but well, whatever makes them happy. "it's like a cat taking the shape of a witch with the passage of time." Its called: argument from ignorance. You have no idea how evolution works if you think that this sentence of yours is accurate representation of evolution. "A total irrationality and yet you still believe it and those things are naturalized in schools." Maybe because its actually supported by evidence and not by some old book of fables? "Not even bible (old testament) can be credible and you know why. " Correct, but evolution is true not because some book said so... So... What now? "If you believe a monkey turns into a man," I dont believe that. Why you ask? because this is yet another argument from ignorance of yours, or more likely straw man argument. In any case, logical fallacy. Humans dint evolved from monkeys, we and monkeys have common ancestor. You would known this if you had any idea what evolution is. "then why would you deny God when He is about energy, light, air, water, earth, fire and wind?" Maybe because there are no evidence to think that such magical being could exist? Why dont you believe that Voldemort is real? Its written in a book that he is... Your god and Voldemort share same amount of evidence: none. Yet you accept one and reject another, why? "most of the time God is represented as a giant light like the sun." And who cares? i could be represented and giant banana, would not change anything... "People repeat nature is wise because works surprisingly and intelligently as if a superior entity manages it, well, that's it." Yet its not. Which part of nature looks for you to be managed by intelligent being? and why? "I can't prove my experience because you didn't live with me all these years" Then your experience isint any different from people who claims to be abducted by aliens. We cant confirm their claims ether... So does that mean they are correct? "Point blank, that belongs to your thirst to investigate and demolish your own myths, not mine." What myths? Its not me who literally claims that magic is real... Its you... So prove that magic is real, then we will talk about your personal experience and its validity...
2
Issue is that transition like this takes time, allot of time. Generally you will need like 10-20 years to make this full transition, currently we don't have so much time, ether we keep supporting Russia by buying stuff from them or we get into situation where we don't have means to replace current needs with alternatives in time.
2
Still both are taking numbers out of their asses. I guess random youtuber knows more about profitability of the company than the company itself. Starlink was confirmed to be cash flow positive in 2022, its not lacking customers either, currently it has 1.5 million of those and its basically on the start of S curve. So clearly this video got some basic things wrong...
2
@KangenAlec "He was stopped in the ocean, by 60th parallel" That would be the border... Dummy... You do know that border can be in ocean? Right? You do realize that countries on sea shore have borders in actual ocean and not on land? Right? You are smart enough to realize this?
2
Are you drunk or something? There are plenty of evidence for a globe, basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that. For starlight... How the hell is this even in same stratosphere when it comes to light traveling and you simply observing it, with predictions of weather?
2
Soon.
2
And yet SpaceX dominating space industry even without Raptor 3 in use and Starship still being in development. Clearly someone did something correctly here.
2
@phiteonn3541 Sorry, but you dont need trolls flat earthers to make actual flat earthers look ridiculous, they are capable of doing that by themselves already. Eric Dubay is a con artist and quite good at it. You can recognize con artists from how many books/t-shirts or any other shit they try to sell, after all, there are 2 groups of flat earthers: those who sell tshirts and those who buy them.
2
Those flopped due to poor battery performance and poor price, this isint the case anymore.
2
Mike Van Roy I dont know which is worst, people who believes in flat earther or people like you. "How much would it cost to fake space photos?" In 1969? Imposible. Only recently we got good enough computing power to be able to create photo realistic CGI, in 1969 it was simply impossible. "About as much as it takes to actually go to space, and that's the whole problem" No idea what this should even imply... Go to space when? Because I can make photo realistic image of earth on my PC today with 0 cost, can I pay that much to go to space? Or are you talking about 1969 when CGI was not even a thing which would mean that CGI of earth would cost infinite amount of money, which is slightly more than actual cost to go into space at that time... "If you have the funds to go to space you have the funds to fake the space photos" Space photos are not relevant here... Space photos are cherry on the cake, take those away and you still have entire cake and I dont even like cherries. Earth's shape can be determined from your backyard with some spare time and solar filter from local home depo store. It will cost you like 2 bucks and few hours of your single day... "then you're probably not going to believe that NASA is the one agency telling the truth" And nobody cares besides flatards... 100% of the time NASA gets mentioned it was by flatard... You could disprove 100% of photos and videos presented by NASA and dozens of other space agencies and earth would still be provable globe. NASA is not relevant here, never was and never will be. "We have a flat earth problem because the government has a credibility problem." We have flat earth problem because we have education problem. Does government lies? Yes, sometimes. Is government relevant here? No, not a tiny bit... Why? Because some of us actually understands what is relevant here.
2
You are part of people who thinks to know more than experts because he have seen post on facebook...
2
What about slavery?
2
@JohnDoe-ss1vp You still dint really answered here... What about slavery? And are you saying that we should only talk about biggest issues while ignoring everything else? I'm not even talking about your silly statements in general. Its like you are trying to troll here, but you are failing to do so.
2
@DUTCH-CHRISTIAN2008 This will be shocker for you, but bible never implies earth to be a globe, but does it multiple times for the flat one. Not saying that earth is flat, because its not, its 100% a globe, but bible is simply wrong on this one as it was written by the people using their understanding from that time and it was common belief that earth is a flat pancake.
2
Why?
2
@z0mbyd0nky21 "The center of something has a down there is always a down if there is a center???" Not something... Earth... Do you even read? "Get a ball put a Lego man on the top of that ball now stand a Lego man on the opposite side of the ball that is upside down???" Lets test if you can figure out glaring issue with your example. Where is this ball located? Will give a hint: ON EARTH. What is earth? HUGE BODY OF MASS. What does huge body of mass create? GRAVITY. Which object has more gravity, earth or ball? EARTH. So you are trying to stick something on a tiny object while being on huge one which created billion times bigger pull? Do you even think?
2
No point and expensive as hell to do so.
2
So my guess this claim of your doesn't apply to flat earthers?
2
Earth is objectively spherical, its shape is not dependent on people's perspective or personal opinions...
2
NASA is not even relevant to this topic.
2
I guess you tried to make a joke.
2
A what now?
2
Erwin Diaz Will ask same question I asked multiple rus bots and every single one of them failed to answer: What is the source for those magical numbers of yours?
2
@leeharris8102 Its easy money to spit out same nonsense over and over again, TF isn't interested in presenting things, he is interested in making money, this is why he made like 50 videos about hyperloop being failure. It should be clear what is the actual TF goal here.
2
" In my opinion, NASA is BS period" Correct, in your opinion. Luckily your opinion doesn't define reality. basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, doesn't require 300 buck camera, you can prove that with 1 buck solar filter and some spare time. So yea, we dont need to prove that earth is globe, your ignorance is your issue, not ours.
2
@afterthestorm7012 "Tell me how your 1 buck solar filter proves the earth is a globe" Observe sun, 4 things with it shows globe earth and disproves flat one. 1. Doesn't change perceived size 2. Doesn't change perceived speed 3. Move in straight line 4. Sunset/sunrise That's it, 1 buck, one day in your backyard and you proved globe and disproved flat one. "Maybe you need to do a lot more research and read some old books." Maybe you need to do a lot more research and read some NEW scientific books
2
@afterthestorm7012 "In the flat earth model the sun and the moon travel over the earth in constantly changing rings depending on the season" I know... This is why those 4 observations disprove flat earth model... They do not match... "the sun does change in size" No, its not. It was proven multiple times that its not... And just FYI talking about actual sun size, not a sun flare size... Because this is common mistake flat earthers make... " It comes down to perspective" False again. Actual perspective demonstrates that earth is not flat. "just like looking down a set of railroad tracks" Yes, and further object is smaller it will get, while sun doesn't change size. https://flatearth.ws/sun-apparent-size like this one, prime example that sun never changes size "the horizon should drop below eye level but it does not" While in reality it does... How did you tested this one? I'm like curious now, because i can bet that your test was more or less "Well it looked to me that its on same level"... "buildings would look like they are tipping away from the observer but they do not" ? You will get 1 degree lean FROM you every 111 km. ONE DEGREE FROM YOU. Longest photo taken on earths surface was from one huge mountain of another one at distance of 400km or something, so longest taken photo would have introduced less than 4 degrees lean FROM YOU which is literally impossible to detect, atleast not with "This look straight to me" method... Do you seriously think that you should see buildings at 5km at 45 degrees?... "There should be some videos that haven't been scrubbed from the internet, explaining all of this more completely" There are, that youtube by keywords "flat earth debunked" you will get quite few of them and they will provide extensive explanation on all of those silly claims flat earthers make "Now there are mostly debunking videos" What videos are you talking about here exactly? You have millions of videos on youtube, you cant find one which explains basic geometry?... "Why would they remove them, if they didn't want us to see them?" maybe because they never did removed them? And even if they did, its internet, you should be able to find anything you want at any place... You have dozens of flat earth web sites... They should contain your videos if they ever existed... But like seriously, what videos are you looking for? And by what keywords you did looked for them?
2
@afterthestorm7012 "Don't fall of the ball" ? Its a ball... As gravity is a fact, you cant fall of the ball... But you could from your space pizza. "Check Gleasons Map" Yea, what about it? Its flat representation of globe earth... And? "read Terra Firma by David Wardlaw Scott." Why? If your best proof that earth is flat to suggest some ones book... Well... then you dont have any actual proof here. I can list you dozens of books written which talks about globe earth.. So what? "Look up Admiral Byrds "Operation High Jump"" Look up... Reality... You seriously trying to use some ones personal opinion based on personal experience that earth is flat?... And do you even know what argument from authority is? Its a fallacy, logical one... "Look up "Operation Fish Bowl"" Look up science book... "Check out gyroscopes on planes, ships, and submarines. etc. etc." What about them? They are self adjusting and compensates for earths curve... if you spent 10 seconds actually fact checking any of this shit, you would not be a flat earther, but you did not... So why should i bother rechecking your offered nonense? You failed to debunk 4 simple things about sun, and you spitting out random things here which cant even be verified, like your magical story about Byrd... Address 4 points about sun, if you manage to explain those without contradicting reality, then we can move to more complex things.
2
@sdub81sw Just imagine if one of those con man goes to space, then comes back and says "Nope, earth is flat, now buy my book!" they would make millions by fooling gullible people by claiming that they went to space and they observed flat pancake world from up there. There is literally no point in wasting time and money on flat earthers, there are allot more worthy people out there who could enjoy trip to space.
2
Way worse? Said who?
2
So in 6 months we could provide another 1million of those shells
2
Scared of meter?
2
your*
2
Well people simply expect 500k soldier column to march at X date without realizing that you can start this counter offensive months before slowing chipping away crucial parts of Russian logistics and creating chaos with some "random" attacks all over the place. When playing smart and wanting to lose as little people as possible it will be longer path than just saying "Go and die for the country! Today!"
2
Disprove god? Shifting goal post? Burden is on people who made a claim that god is real, there is no need to disprove something what never been proven to be true...
2
Dakota Black "they found Noah's ark in the 80s measuring the same size the bible said it was built to" ? lets set some facts straight here. Global flood never happen based on evidence we have today. So even if there was a boat, that would not mean anything. Second, how the hell do they know its Noah boat? Does it have license plate on it? Does it glow in dark? And Noah boat was "found" like 50 times already... And every time actual experts investigate that, it becomes yet another false story created by creationists... "they also found Mt sinai where moses recieved the commandments along with the altar he built to god with all 12 pillars still there just in pieces" Och, so by your logic spider man is real because New York is real?... having real places will not prove fantasy claims. "they also found chariots and bones at the bottom of the red sea" So it was impossible for some one to transport chariots and horses over the red sea and sink? This explanation is less likely then wizard spreading sea apart?... "tell me how that shit got there" No idea, same as you, i have no idea, so lets keep it at that until we will actually figure out cause of it instead of making shit up like you just did. " media will never cover these things but I assure you its 100% living proof of our creator" Majority of media is run by Christians and some of it by creationists... Yet its not covered by them... I wonder why... Maybe they understand how bollocks it is? "also if all of this in the bible is true and you can see it for your own eyes maybe other parts of the bible hold truth as well," False. Having 9 true claims will not mean that next one will be too... Each claim requires separate evidence, you cant scream that 9 claims before it was true so this next one which claims that magic is real will be actually true just because you like it... "like how on the first page it says our earth is flat with a dome over it" Which is demonstrably false. basic observation of sun disproves this claim... And then you have like 100+ other things you can shatter flat earth claim... So you have atleast 2 false claims in your book: flat earth and global flood. "but dont take it from me" And i will not. "pray to god and the truth will be revealed to you my friend." Why? Is he too lazy to reveal truth? Why the hell do i need to engage in self deception before he could reveal truth to me? I'm following where evidence leads, you made shit up and trying to find evidence which fits that while ignoring everything else...
2
@RainbowRising But this is the one of many issues, due to you needing to replace big chunks of your cars on regular basis, like every 5 years or so, costs of owning cars like that will simply be too high for regular people, on top of you needed to constantly recycle (duno how much you could actually recycle those tanks) and remake one. I mean, its good business for car manufacturer as everyone will be basically paying subscription fee to keep driving their cars, not that fun for customer. At the moment coating with ceramics helps out to minimize hydrogen embrittlement, but even then, those expiration dates are already with top notch protections, so it's not like you could buy one from Wish and expect it to last. And just FYI currently majority of hydrogen is being produced from natural gas, as its cheaper than to make it from water. Try to guess if this helps out with co2 offsetting... Is hydrogen better than petrol/diesel cars? Yea, from the standpoint of it being cleaner. Is it better for customer? No. Even BEV's are cleaner when it comes to co2 footprint from end to end, not by much, but still cleaner and avoids majority of the issues relating to hydrogen cars. This is why 99.9% of all hydrogen car promoting people will try to sell it on the point that it refuels in only 5 minutes... Like that really matters when you can recharge from any wall socket... We have alternative, its BEV's, trying to shift towards a worse option just makes no sense. While we need to transition to renewables, hydrogen isint the solution.
2
@RainbowRising Full battery technologies, BEV's. Those keep improving constantly without any real limit on sight. While initial cost might be higher, what it offers can and does usually offset that over few years of usage. And transition to BEV's is really simple for the customer, you could basically just charge your car at home over night and never ever visit recharging station, you could even charge it from your own solar panels. Its the most efficient way to move you from point A to point B. Like if you tried to compare energy usage between BEV and Hydrogen car, you will need around 60% more for hydrogen car to travel same distance due to the fact that you need to convert energy into hydrogen and then hydrogen back into energy, which will have huge amounts of energy loss in that process. Where hydrogen could work out is bigger things, like ships, planes, trains, semi's and so on, which could have their own refueling stations with their own team of people which keeps them running at relatively low costs due to it being done in house, but hydrogen will never work for regular passenger cars.
2
truong nguyen Entire europe got their reserves up and running, there is enough gas for entire winter already, so swop whining here, no one will be freezing this winter except Russian soldiers.
2
Its scam video, what did you expected?
2
There are allot of crazy stuff in that book, and the fact that earth is a globe and bible says that its a flat one just indicates that you cant use bible when it comes to reality and facts. Just saying.
2
Yes, quite few religions have this false idea of earth being flat... But its just that, some old texts written by ignorant people who used their beliefs, not much to talk here.
2
@DoubleMrE "Elon isn’t a rocket scientist either" Do you need PhD diploma do be rocket scientist? Like seriously, how does one become rocket scientist? Is it only PhD? No need to know anything about anything, you just need to have PhD in rocket science? And yes, having PhD doesn't actually indicate how much you know about this topic. " can’t cite a scientific paper off the top of my head" Because it doesn't exist. "but I have seen several PhD biologists and physiologists say that human beings can’t live permanently in a 1/3 G environment" Why not? Who ever tested human biology in 1/3 of earths gravity? No one, because we never had option to do it, ever. So people who made those claims are either plain out lying or to stupid to realize that they are lying. We don't know how human bodies would react to 1/3 of gravity, we ONLY have examples of 1G and 0G for longer periods of time, we have NO examples of people living in 1/3G for longer periods, this is simply the fact. "The normal development and health of our bodies depend on Earth’s 1 G gravity field" Is it tho? Cite me peer reviewed scientific paper saying that human bodies can't survive in 1/3 of gravity for longer periods of time. Not asking of anecdotal evidence, as I can cite you PhD biologist who says that evolution is not real... Like, yes, seriously, we have wackos with PhD's, shocker... "And a human child born on Mars would never develop normal bones and muscles." Normal for what? Earths environment? Why would he need it if he would be living on mars? In general I can go back to the same point: Citation is needed from peer reviewed scientific paper which says that humans can't live on Mars. I'm not talking about general posible issues, talking about actual unsolvable issues... Its like saying that humans can't live in space because there is no air... Well clearly we figure out solution for that one... Isn't it?...
2
Who said it was created to begin with?
2
The fact that he posed multiple times with multiple people with that thumbs up shows that he dint really cared if anyone was a Trump supporter, he simply behaved as he likes, like its a party and not a gathering for people who felt victims at shooting... Entire visit was about Trump and how good he is and not about victims... Lets not pretend that he cares...
2
It's not someone, it's you who would be controlling them. And what you are talking about is something what would be illegal, aka not good by definition.
2
Its a hot topic at this point. Why exactly its total shill?
2
But world is not egg like shaped and earths shape was known for atleast 2300 years. And its a globe.
2
Not safe
2
What we have is killing people... We appreciated those cars from 1886, its time to move on to something better.
2
@Globeishoax Millions of scientists saying that you are wrong, thousands of peer reviewed papers saying that you are wrong, but here like "Nah, I have youtube video which agrees with"... C'mon.. How dense are you?
2
"The airplane with the level is one of many ways to prove the earth is flat. " Yet in actual reality BOTH model would produce same exact results... So how exactly does this level experiment proves that earth is flat and not a globe? What do you expect to observe if earth was a globe? "Let's not forget the pyramids of giza were built by using the stars" As related to the shape of earth as caramel icecream... "This is your curvature theory you round earther." Your terrible eye sight is not a curvature or even vanishing point... " Water is flat, which is why we use cups" What? like seriously, what? "With over 300 or more satellites in orbit" Its actually around 6000 " the round earthers would have no problem winning this debate" And we dont have any problems winning this "debate", it was won 2300 years ago "One more thing science theory always are changing from this to that" not always, some times, to more accurate one if new evidence comes along. What's your issue with that? Science is not a religion, if new evidence comes, it will change previous theory to fit new one. Or adjust existing number to more accurate one, like age of earth, its always over 4billion years, its only getting more accurate with new technology we get. "Then you wonder why the flat earth movement is getting larger and larger." Its not getting larger, its getting smaller. You simply got means to get into contact with flat earthers across entire world, which isint indication of anything. I mean, c'mon, lets be real here, i can bet you will even fail to explain how perspective works, let alone provide actual flat earth model without contradictions. You will never prove your case here, we dont live in stone age anymore.
2
@chrisross4898 "about planes if it show thru out flight that level doesn't move that it is straight the whole flight? Why do people still say the earth is round?" Because this is exact same thing you should observe if earth is globe and you have gravity... BOTH models produce SAME EXACT result, so it will not prove anything for anything. " this debate was won over 400,000 years ago to be honest the earth is flat and doesn't not move." 400000 years ago? What does this dare should even be for? Because mine for 2300 was to point out that first globe models of earth appeared 3 century BCE, after that it only took some time to educate rest of the world. And earth does move, tho i wonder why do you think its not... You do know that you cant feel motion and only changes in it? "Also there are portals that the sun and moon go thru" Are you like trying to troll here? Because you failing with that. "The BOOK OF ENOCH CHAPTER 3 read it for yourself." But Harry Potter said... "Which is ok, cuz that, that doesn't kill me will make stronger or smarter." Debatable. "Question with 6000 satellites how many videos or pictures of the earth do they have? " Enough. " There's got to be over 18000 videos or pictures" No idea why there needs to be... I mean... Do you need 18000 video showing that moon is real? "With all of this technology, why is it the US school education system was once in the top 10, and are now in the 30 to 40 and falling?" Because US is failing country which is completely unrelated to the shape of earth, tho that explains why majority of flat earthers are from US... Try to connect dots here.
2
@chrisross4898 "my friend if I wanted to troll.....don't know what that is. " If you dont know what that is, why do you imply that you are not doing that? "In 2002 in Kandahar Afghanistan they killed a giant. Tried to find information about this, the only thing is the soldiers who lived to tell they're story" So they killed giant and evidence for that is some one saying that it happen?... Ok... Sounds convincing... And define giant... I once had a long conversation with some one about giants and then he simply defined a giant as a tall person, like 2.2 meters in height... Wow... Giant... "Back to the point their are people in our government who made deals with the ones in Antarctica that I heard" Cool that you hear random stories, but do you have any actual evidence here? And how is this related to the shape of earth? "There is more, they are say that they are portals and they are going to open up this month of March sometime after 16" So when match ends we can call bullshit on your claim after nothing happens? Atleast you give a short time frame. Usually people simply say that in near future something will happen without specifying actual date, you on another hand have only 2.5 weeks left to be shown to be wrong. " You dont have to believe in anything that I say to you but it's TRUE." And i will not believe that and you can say that its true, will not make it so. "I heard of a report of people going thru portals." And i heard of a report people being probed by magical forest pixies... I guess i should avoid going to forests from now on... "I know this sounds crazy." Yes, if we would scale something from 0 to 10, where 10 is batshit crazy, your claims would be around 8.5 " Look it up for yourself. It on gaia.com." Why i'm not surprised that your link leads to some site which offers paid services or sells books?... If some one has such world changing information and puts it behind paywall, its more or less 100% chance that its all bullshit. You have been duped, conned, they simply want your money and you willingly give them for some fantasy stories. "My friend these are scientists, real scientists talking. " Con artists. They might be real scientists, yet still con artists. And avoid making such argument, its basic argument from authority fallacy. "If you debunk them, then you are plugged into the matrix" I dont need to debunk them, they need to prove their case, if they cant, as they cant, then we can dismiss their batshit crazy claims as invalid without any need to present any counter evidence. So yea, no idea if you are trolling or just got conned by some con artists, but in any case... Its just sad...
2
@chrisross4898 But are you realize that sites like gaia.com is a con artist site to get money from people like you without providing any actual evidence? You do realize this?
2
@chrisross4898 The fact that they are on this site from 60's only proves that they are con artists... How the hell they are on this site for 60 years and they dint published this information they have for free? Why is this magical information behind paywall? Because they are con artists... Plain and simple... You literally have bunch of books on offer instead of having title page with actual evidence about all those magical things... They are con artists... Sorry, but you have been duped...
2
Not everyone is a troll, its surprising, i know, but not all of them are actually trolling here.
2
You don't need to go to space to know what shape earth is, heck I could even bet that you want to claim that earth is a pancake shaped, but then, how do you know this without going to space?
2
@tonyatgoogle6076 There is good reason for those sanctions... Especially for North Korea. What they want is not really relevant here anymore.
2
@GodWorksOut His only good at making word salads and talking for 20 minutes without saying anything.
2
@carsonkendall1924 Whats your point here? Lets make something crystal clear here. Flat earthers, your group or any other group, doesn't have working flat earth model. There is no such thing which would not contradict basic observations from reality. So how could you make a claim that you are that correct flat earther and others are not when you cant even provide actual working model for you claim? I can bet that you cant even agree on everything with your fellow flat earthers from your own group on everything, because you cant have common ground when its based on personal opinions and not facts from reality. But... Lets make it simple here. You complain that some videos are illogical, cool, i might argue that all of them are, but thats not the point here. Question is simple: Can you present your BEST argument for flat earth which would support flat earth and not globe one and would be actually testable or observable in reality? This is simple question you as "true" flat earther should be able to answer without any troubles, prove that you are better then those pretending to be flat earthers...
2
Russian bots. Pleeeease....
2
There is space between your ears, bunch of empty space
2
Depends on definition of scientist, but in general he is scientist.
2
@KangenAlec First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece, Vatican isint that old...
2
@KangenAlec Miss guided? Its historical fact while your personal ignorant opinion is misguided.
2
Majority of hydrogen is being produced from natural gas, aka a thing owned by big oil
2
Which part of word "test" in "test flight" you didn't understood?
2
He is in the category of dumber people, sadly.
2
They are planning to blow up dam
2
@raquelreyes2011 If for some reason canal experiment isn't valid, then please tell me, why the hell does water curve in that cannal? How the hell does that work on flat pancake world?
2
@raquelreyes2011 5 comments in a row? Spam much? Your original comment was more than ignorant and silly for anyone here to handle. On one hand you admit that there is a curve in that canal, on another hand you say that this doesn't work on a globe because its not its own body of water?... So I tried to ask you why does this water actual curves on your flat pancake world, as you seemingly agree that it does. Do tides exist in your reality? Because you know, it's a curved water after all...
2
How is god relevant here? If god is real or not will not have impact on the shape of earth... And its a globe...
2
Having flat earth would brake basic laws of physics, entire understand of reality would change... Flat earth would mean that entire understanding of universe changes fundamentally, gravity no longer works, there is mega enormous conspiracy involving millions of people working together to hide reality from rest of the humanity and on and on and on and on... If earth was actually flat it would change allot, but as its not, it changes nothing, but there are people who simply fails to understand why its a globe or wants to feel special by believing that it is flat.
2
@reesbritton6623 Thing is that in general nobody cares what you believe, issue comes from what you will do with your beliefs. Fixing ignorance is a good thing. And that narrow view where if something doesn't effect you directly you should simply not care at all, it just silly. Do you care about starving children in Africa? Does that have any effect on your day to day life? Do you have about cure for cancer? Does that effect your day to day life? I can bet there are many things you care about which have little to no actual effect to you personally, yet you still care.
2
@Globeisahoax And pigs could fly...
2
wayne merritt ALL your 5 senses can be fooled without any trouble. You can observe curved lines when those are perfectly straight. You can observe moving image when its a static one and on and on and on... If you want to base reality on your 5 senses alone, you are in trouble... Well... You already are as you think that we live on space pizza because your ancient book said so...
2
@Peterpan2355 "yes there is a video that I can't find at this minute" Thats convenient. " by someone called My Perspective" Why do i have suspicion that person who goes by this name has no idea what it means? "The globe earth shows the tall building with the one on its left tilting to its left" That's bullshit on highest levels. Buildings are not tilting to the left... They are tilting away from you and its a 1 degree every 69 miles or so... So yea, some one who named himself as Perspective has no idea what perspective is... Cant say i'm surprised. "In a spherical world: The reflection of the Sunlight doe's not reach the observers feet when standing in shallow water" What the what now? What reflection? From where? When? "On a flat Earth the Sunlight reflection continues on a straight path to the observer." So its 24/7 daylight then? If light fallows straight line and there is no hard stop for it then you should be able to see sun 24/7 as it always remain above flat surface. Right? Do you know what perspective is? Do you know what geometry is? Do you know that you got duped by some one called Perspective?
2
@paradelights Never said that it's worse than gasoline, hydrogen is between gasoline and BEV's,allot better than gasoline, slightly worse than BEV's.
2
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” ― George Carlin
2
What is your actual suggestion here?
2
You need to avoid mixing your dreams with actual reality.
2
You never actually looked any of this up, aren't you? Why generating hydrogen is relatively simple, 2 plates, some current in a tank of water and you got your generator, main issue is with scaling of this process, with hydrogen storage and actually putting that hydrogen into your tank which usually goes up to 10000psi, which would mean that you will need pumps capable of going as higher than 10000psi. All that maintenance cost crap ton of money... To build one hydrogen station costs around one million bucks, its maintenance would be crap ton of money on top of that. You can check existing stations and check how many are down for maintenance, its a lot, because those break constantly. And this is why it cost more than petroleum.
2
Colonization of mars isn't because earth is getting ruined... You people don't even understand actual point of it...
2
@deerichardz Or you could build enclosed spaces without a need to terraform entire planet... Do you like imagine that Mars colonization by default requires for mars to be earth like at the moment colonization starts?
2
Devell Burch Yea... We know that bible is wrong on multiple things, this is one of those, earth isint flat, this is observable and testable reality anyone can perform with minimal equipment and basic understanding of geometry. Congrats, you got double brainwashed... Not only you believe in god you cant prove to be true, you now believe that earth is a pancake because book said so...
2
Electricity production is shifting towards clean revewales, so its a mute point. Lithium mining isn't even an issue... Biggest lithium provider is Australia which is definitely not in a realm of human rights violations... So again, mute point. Battery technology is getting better every year with better chemistries which uses simpler and cheaper materials. This will only going to improve, so even now its a best option we have while it will only get better later on...
2
First you use word "narnia" for flatearth, then you say that fe wins. I'm confused. Are you for or against FE?
2
@bearsmack6969 You can't even formulate properly your own state, no wonder you are "undefeated" in debates as no one knows what you are trying to defend here. I'm still waiting for clarification which shape of earth you are trying to defend here. Will give 3/10 for attempt to troll. I have seen way way better ones.
2
@pearltears8039 adjective: oblate (of a spheroid) flattened at the poles. Its not that hard to google out definition of word. Or just google out "oblate spheroid" and check pictures to get visual of it. Like, what is your actual question here?
2
"white male" This actually said so much about you...
2
But Voldemort said...
2
@trieutulong4709 Got land? You do know that war is not over and Ukraine took back huge portions of their land back from Russia? Russia already lost, its only question: By how much?
2
@chrisaguilera1564 How the hell you know that they are not Norwegian's? I might have missed it, but maybe they showed their passports in this video or something? Because otherwise you have no idea who they are... They might be 5th generation of Norwegians... This is just silly...
2
TF's fans are officially cult. Period.
2
Or... Earth is actually spherical and there isn't this big nonsensical conspiracy from government?
2
Outcast Outdoors - On a Fishin' Mission By your logic government always lies, while government is made up of people, which would mean that people always lie, while you seam to be human that would mean that you are lying here... But that would mean that government doesn't lie... Wait... Something doesn't add up here...
2
@JonathanAbelWaik Make I guess if I was surprised with your best evidence being some 2000 year old book of fables...
2
Well some one is clearly brainwashed beyond belief... You do know that it was Russia you attacked Ukraine? Right?
2
First of all, it cant, second, light refraction could add tiny bit of distance, but in general as specific distance objects will start disappearing bottoms up and no telescope will bring that part back into view.
2
Mar Drafting Corporation " In a globe shaped world the artic ring would block the other half of the earth. " What? Are you drunk?
2
I can bet that your entire knowledge is based on 5 minute video made by Shell. Give me scientific peer reviewed research paper showing that EV's and HVs are less clean than petroleum cars, or maybe your tried to say that those cars still create pollution, which is obvious thing to say as there isn't a thing which doesn't. And can you elaborate what you tried to say with "functional efficiency"?
2
if you don't have that kind of money then don't buy BEV...
2
Yea, we call those "history books" a religious ones, like bible, quran and similar books of fables, it's definitely time for the truth.
2
That's a weird comparison.
2
I'm yet to see flat earther who isn't a bible believer, might be coincidence, but it seemingly always ends up with "its true because bible said so" with which statement I partially agree as bible do imply that earth is flat and not a globe on multiple verses which matches common beliefs at that time, so nothing really surprising there.
2
@zeendaniels5809 Well Muslims basically have the same book, so potato, potahto.
2
@dustinshort6627 Well both are books of fables, so that straight away puts them into same category. Then you have bunch of same/similar stories like: Adam and Eve (creation story) Noah and the flood Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael (patriarchs of monotheism) Moses and the Exodus Mary and Jesus appear in both texts, though with differing theological interpretations. It's like one of them copied from the other while adding some silly stuff of their own.
2
@Globeisahoax Obvious troll is obvious
2
So god caused this war?
2
There never was a bear to begin with.
2
15k for 5 years chauffeur work?... Is this based on some African country wages? 3k in a year, 250 in a month to be 24/7 ready to go and drive around for someone else... Do you want to be my chauffeur for this amount?
2
@jamesgreen1116 If needed we can give another trillion, as long as Russian ass gets kicked. How much did Russia sacrificed by now?
2
You are joking, right?
2
So you want to pick money over education?...
2
You have no idea how ironic your comment is.
1
Should we bring back steam engines too? Just for diversity...
1
@JoseRodriguez-rx4ck You do understand that this video is generic propaganda clickbait one? Title alone proves that. Hydrogen combustion engine is most stupid idea ever. We already have hydrogen fuel cell technology which is TWICE the efficiency, so combustion engine is straight away non starter here. There wont be hydrogen combustion engine in any practical way ever. We have cars like Mirai which has 3 huge hydrogen tanks to achieve 400 mile range with TWICE the efficiency technology, mirai itself is already bulky and interior quite cramped, so you can't really go any higher on hydrogen capacity than that, which means that combustion engine car would achieve at best 200mile range. Do you see potential issue here? Car companies might do some real tests and some fakes ones just to tick a box of "We are in a green sphere!!!" and that's that. They are not obligated to actually make it real and honestly making a random hydrogen combustion car concept produces better advertisement for the company than Superbowl one, and its cheaper. When it comes to batteries, its the way to go. We have multiple types of batteries with different capabilities and quite few are really promising tho only in lab settings, some are extremely good like carbon nanotube ones, but scaling production of those is a challenge on its own. At the end of the day, its still battery technology, we know that it works, we know that it works really good, its most efficient one, provides most convenience for the user, cheapest to operate. While hydrogen is just there, as a secondary option which doesn't work and doesnt' scale, so why even bother wasting time and money on it? Hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, more than 200 years ago, it barely increased in efficiency for past who knows how many decades, because its already at its peak performance and it sucks, especially for regular passenger cars. No escaping that. Just like having steam engine in passenger car would make zero sense and would make no sense to invest billions in development when you could invest that money in something better.
1
Ask your Jesus guy to stop this war. Thanks.
1
One more rus bot detected.
1
First globe model of earth was created in 3 century BC in Greece. Columbus was quite late to the party.
1
Bots, more bots!
1
Brics? Its was a joke? Right?
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 There is difference between always turning to one side and always just going straight. I could only agree that experiment like this would require quite a bit of money and brain power flat earthers don't have to be in any use. Basic observation of sun is more than enough to disprove flat earth, no wasted money and you can do it in your spare time while smoking weed or something.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, not even talking about dozens of other things which does the same. Tho to be fair, no one needs to disprove flat earth as no one proved it, its like saying "Cannot disprove magical forest pixies" well, why would we even need to disprove something what wasn't shown to be true? If we can, its only bonus, but not requirement.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 Your personal ignorance isint proof against globe earth. Globe earth was proven like 2300 years ago. Anyone with basic understanding of basic geometry can disprove flat earth from their backyard, no math is even needed for that. Sorry, but you had to finish middle school to avoid looking like most ignorant person on the planet.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 I wasn't making up about your educational level, I was making educational guess. Shape of earth can be determined from your backyard without even using math, if you fail that much then there isn't much I can actually help out here. You cant even muster to present actual working flat earth model... How do you even dream to convince anyone that earth actually is one?
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 "I study things first, most people just go with what is popular." And look where it got you... Let me make educational guess here, your main basis for believing in flat earth would be "bible said so"? Right? "I keep saying do your own research" Yes, you should do your own research IF you are capable in doing it. Going outside looking at horizon and deciding that earth is flat just because it looks like one isint an actual research and clearly leads you to incorrect conclusion. What research have you done to disprove globe earth? "There are plenty of flat earth model on the internet." And I asked for WORKING one... NONE of them matches observable reality, none. This is what I was talking about that you cant even muster WORKING flat earth model as you simply cant have one. There will ALWAYS be issues with any flat earth model you can come up as its simply cant match reality where earth is a globe and it rotates, there is no way to make flat earth model which could get even close to this without breaking few basic laws of physics. Flat earth is a position made by ignorant people which quite often originates from "Bible said so, so it must be true" which is based on same ignorance. Earth is a globe, this is a basic fact from reality, testable and observable by anyone with basic educational level. Its not rocket science you know...
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 I din't say that there are no flat earth maps, I said that there are no maps which match reality... I can give you map of Mordor, will not make it true... Is it? "Maybe YOU don't know how to research to find them." Maybe YOU don't even understand what I am asking here? So will repeat: There are not WORKING models of flat earth. I am not asking for a map of flat earth, I was asking for a model... Do YOU even understand difference between those? And to clarify, not asking of physical model of that imaginary world, asking for a model which would explain how shit works in that imaginary world. "Globe earth maps are not accurate either." Which ones? Flat ones? Yes, those are not accurate because its 2d representation of 3d objects... Those can't be accurate. But globes are accurate. " You seem like One of those who think they know all about a person from a few comments on the internet." I have seen and engaged in quite few conversations like this and I know where it's going and how little actual research you have done here. Let me guess, you never fact checked anything, you just watched few videos on youtube and read few comments on facebook or twitter or similar site? The fact that you thought that I am asking for a map of flat earth when I asked for a working model indicates that you are really new here, most likely stumbled upon this entire topic last month or so and now just trying to spread this "new" information without realization how unprepared you are. "I shouldn't tell you much about me because you are arrogantly pushing globe earth. " Globe earth is a fact, its not being arrogant to push a fact... Its you being ignorant about basic reality for you to deny basic facts from reality. "You say the flat earth breaks the laws of physics" PLEASE.... For your own sake... Learn to read... I dint say that flat earth brakes laws of physics, what I ACTUALLY said was that all existing flat earth models cant work with existing laws of physics and for them to be valid those would need to brake laws of physics. Earth could still be flat without breaking laws of physics, but there are no models of it which actually does that. Learn to read... "but you have curved water all over a Ball" Yes... We call that gravity... Another fact from reality... And this actually works on globe model, differently than flat earthers explanation of density which can't explain shit why objects fall down. "and many other things that don't make sense." Who cares that those things don't make sense for you? Its still true, just because you can't understand something will not make it false.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 "So you know how to find flat earth models on the internet. Good. Then why are you asking me ?" Still having trouble with reading I see?... Ok, will try this one more time, maybe third time is a charm with people like you, try to read my sentence slowly, if needed you can do it multiple times, no one will judge. What I asked was WORKING flat earth model. Will repeat, maybe you are incapable of saying capitalized words, soooo, give me working flat earth model. Working. Models with actually matches observable reality. Model which is based on what we can observe. Working model. Was I clear enough for you now? Should I repeat? WORKING MODEL. Do you understand now? Do you? I think my dog can get this point across faster than you... Why is that? "Someone you think is stupid ? " Not stupid, but ignorant, closed minded, brainwashed. "Globe earth models aren't accurate either" Name me ONE inconsistency with globe model... I will wait... And as you can't do it, could you stop lying or spreading your personal ignorance here? "gravity is is a word globe earthers use to save them when they have no explanation." Or... Just hear me out here... Or gravity is actually real and it actually explain all those things?... Have you ever considered this possibility? And once again... EVEN if earth was actually space pancake, globe model and gravity as its part would still work as it is presented, you literally failing to understand actual model here, we are not even talking about actual shape of earth now, we are talking about your lack of capabilities to understand presented models... Gravity is part of globe model which explains quite few things, this is the case independent of actual shape of earth, your personal ignorance will not change that. So, once more, give me WORKING flat earth model. WORKING. working. wORKING. wOrKiNg. Trying out different capitalizations here in hopes that one of those will stick and you can actually read it and understand. To clarify it even more and you will fail it. There are dozens of flat earth models on internet, I am yet to see actually WORKING model because ALL of them have issues with basic observations we have every day from actual reality. Soooooo, give me WORKING model. WOOOOOOORRRRRRKKKKKKIIIIIINNNNGGGGGGG model. Dun't know how much clear I can be here, but lets see if you can understand what I was asking here.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 Well atleast we got confirmation from you that there are no working flat earth models, thanks for this. Now, for globe model, give me SINGLE issue with it, I will wait. And just FYI, as you seem to be new here and extremely confused, even if there was no working globe model, that would still not prove that earth is flat, you do understand that much? Right?
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 "You are the one concerned with working models. Why ?" ? Trouble with reading? Still?... Or just memory issues? I asked for working flat earth model by pointing out that you cant even provide one, let alone prove that earth is actually flat. Everything starts by having actually working model which can be used in determining if its true or not... Damn you are ignorant... "Do you need to have your hand held to go to the corner store ?" I don't, but I will need actually working map if I go somewhere where I never been, you know, that thing which corresponds to reality which you don't have on flat earth "model". "There is no working models of round earth either." All of them are working, still waiting for a single issue on those. And to be fair will name one from your flat earth imaginary world: Distances. There is huge issue with distances on a south pole portion on flat earth "model" especially on continents like Australia, distances are completely out of whack and doesn't match actual reality. Now give me one issue from globe model! "There is one model that was created by God" Och right, you are one of those... Its true because my book said so type of people... That explains why you keep dodging and failing with basic reading. "Get the manager who is God." Manager position isint at the top, does that mean there is god of your god? Boss of your god? Can I get in contact with your god's boss? Because he screwed up as earth isn't flat.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 "You say (paraphrase) you need a map if you go somewhere you've never been. That's on you. I don't need a map. " So you just getting lost constantly?... I mean, you do you, but I generally like to get to my destination in time. "You mention South pole. There is no South pole." There is, but its besides the point. So lets go back to he point you so desperately trying to avoid. Give me a single thing which doesn't work on globe model! Go! You can do it! Well, you can't, but you can atleast try.
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 " First it's a globe earth model while the earth is flat." Now I'm curious if you are intentionally pretending to be obtuse or is this your natural behavior. I asked what is wrong with globe model, you claiming that its wrong because earth is flat, is just... Dumb... Like really really dumb... So will try again, as it really hard to get actual answer from you. What is wrong with globe model?
1
Recall for unrelated reasons to this.
1
Putin has no interest in saving lives, this is why he will send cannon fodder to the front lines to slow down Ukraine as much as possible in hopes that this will give them more time to claim those territories as their own or something stupid like that.
1
@IraFox84 What's funny is that you ended up with "Tesla fanboys..." Its like you have agenda to go against Tesla, more specifically anything related to Musk. Did I got it correctly here?
1
Just because he bought BEV startup which was basically non existing on the market, doesn't mean that it somehow negates what Tesla achieved. Rocket are not soviet design, Musk stated multiple times that he wanted to buy some engines from Russians, but they asked to much for those, so he (Musk) decided to make his own, and now we have Raptor 3. For your last statement, honestly, world needs someone who wants to allow actual free speech, Musk or someone else, but world needs to get its freedom to say what it want's to say, and heck, leftists are not the party which will allow that any time soon.
1
Its funny when people starts to talk about BEV's on Hydrogen video... And just FYI you can charge your BEV at home overnight, so your cycle time is at max as you are not wasting any time at all, it's always at full before you leave your house.
1
@silo3com You do understand that Hydrogen would cost 2x of what you been paying for electric?
1
@silo3com It makes no difference if I own BEV or not... Your entire original point was to say that BEV's are not practical because it takes time to charge, I pointed out that you can charge at home and avoid a need to charge it at all and have even better cycle time than any other car, you then went with point that it cost for you allot in electrical bills... And all of this is under hydrogen engine video... Do you see how fast you jump from one point to the next for some reason? Hybrids are the worse ones, now you will have 1.5 cars in one, which will only increase maintenance costs, more failure points and so on. if you are not charging BEV's at home, you can do it at dedicated charging stations which can do it quicker, but in general 30 minutes will be more than enough to go from 20% to 80, which will give you more than enough range. This is complete non issue for majority of people for majority of instances when they will be using cars... And charging times only going down over time.
1
@silo3com So you can't argue about something unless you own it yourself?... Solid logic there... Let me spell it out for you if you can't connect the dots. BEV's at the moment are expensive due to them still being new thing and production not being fast enough to catch up with demand. I tend to not buy brand new cars, issue with BEV's is that their price doesn't really drop over time, so there isn't many reasonable options, yet. I would gladly get Tesla Model Y if there was one for affordable price. And when it comes to hydrogen cars... Well, i'm not that rich to start diving into that rabbit hole... If you struggled paying bills for electric car then you will struggle with Hydrogen ones even more. By the way, did you never checked how much you will be spending on electricity before you got your electric car? Was that some sort of weird shock to you? Did you not expected increase in electrical bills when you got BEV?... Its so weird... Its like you bought electric car with expectations that you wont need to charge it at all... Och, and which BEV you had?
1
@silo3com I mainly don't own it because I rarely drive in general, if I was using my car daily then it would make sense to get an BEV, but when I use it maybe max twice in a week to get to local grocery store is just doesn't make any sense. I'm actually looking for a new car, new used car, was thinking about BEV, but that one would cost like 30k, my aim for a budget is tops 15k as there is no point for me to spend more than this on a car which will spend most of its time rusting in my driveway. Tho car after this one will most likely be BEV, especially if next 25k generation comes out in that time. "Used Tesla vehicles are very readily available from Hertz rentals at a steep discount" I'm not from US... Shocker... I know... But there are more than single country in the world. You could have guessed that part from by broken English on your own. In my country you can see supercharge as often as you can see Bugatti near dollar store... Sadly our country isn't being prioritized for BEV's, even tho I keep seeing increased about of BEV's on the roads. "This is magical thinking from EV fans who live in a delusional world." Did you had any actual point here? BEV's are more expensive than ICE cars, ok, its like saying "grass is green", we got it, we know... Point about BEV's is that it is cheaper to travel with those and it requires basically zero maintenance, so that difference in initial costs will melt down over few years. Side thing would be that it's more environmentally friendly. Are you just like someone who got but hurt by buying BEV because you forgot to double check your electricity prices before buying it? Or was that BEV so bad that you regretted buying it? Which BEV did you got?
1
@q-m-q1362 Basic observation of sun proves that. Things like objects disappearing bottoms up over the horizon and so on.
1
@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463 Seeing too far is your evidence that earth is flat?... You do realize that even if you could see extra 500 miles, that would only mean that you can see further then it was said to be the case on defined size earth, you can still be on a globe, just a bigger one... So get me actual evidence here instead of this irrelevant "I can see" stuff...
1
@q-m-q1362 "how much have you actually thought about this before coming to this conclusion?" Enough. "So if the boat disappears bottom first it proves the earth is a ball" It proves that you have a curvature, which matches globe model. This should not happen if we lived on flat surface. "But when we zero in on to specifics, sh*t get real" This is specific. This is literally evidence for globe and counter evidence for flat one. What else do you want? "Keep that up and we'll be here waiting" Waiting where?
1
@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463 "the seeing is the evidence" False. I can give you hundreds of visual illusions where you will see things which are not real, like static image which will look to you like its moving and so on. "if its curved we should see it" Do you even realize how big earth is?... Do you even understand basic geometry?... Like seriously, turn on your brains for 5 seconds and thing how it should look when you stand on a surface of 6,371 km radius ball... Do you seriously expect to see curvature? Are you flipping kidding me? "looking past where a ship goes over the curve is looking into space" So now there is space over flat earth? "if its not refraction, then we see it, and its not curved according to the R given" I dare you to present actual equation here to calculate what curvature you should observe. Lets test how ignorant and brainwashed you are, because i can bet your first thought was to provide generic equation which is a parabola and doesn't include things like observers altitude, objects size, refraction and so on. Please, prove to me that you have basic understanding of geometry here and provide correct equation.
1
And how exactly will you make that Hydrogen? Use electricity? From where does this electricity come from? Magic place?...
1
Cool, now provide that photo which proves that you dint just made shit up here and you will have valid argument.
1
Self deception?
1
Hydrogen uses like 60% more energy to drive car same distance as BEV. Hydrogen only has one actual benefit: energy density. Hydrogen cars are in between ICE and BEV's, closer to BEV's than to ICE, but not better than BEV's.
1
Plot twist: Putin is dead and there are only doubles left!
1
So its true because book said so?
1
@penguin82875 Well... Actually... There are multiple verses where bible implies earth to be flat and there are zero of those talking about spherical earth. This point "because book said so" actually goes more towards flat earthers than normal people. Bible is wrong on more than this, so you should not be surprised here. And it doesn't matter what most or all Christians believe, what actually matters is what this book actually says, after all, we have over 1000 denominations based on that book, so you will always find someone disagreeing on what it "actually" says.
1
@penguin82875 Give me one of the official translations which talks about earth being a globe, spherical or an orb. Just FYI circle is not a sphere.
1
@penguin82875 So you cherry picked versions you like most? NIV (most popular) "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth" ESV "It is he who sits above the circle of the earth" NLT "God sits above the circle of the earth" KJV "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth" CSB "God is enthroned above the circle of the earth" Those are top 5 most popular translations... I could continue but I could assume that you can go to google and find list of bible translations for Isaiah 40:22, then do ctrl+f and enter "circle" realize that like 95% of those translations uses circle, and only few special ones decided to go with globe, spherical translation, even tho its not what original word translates too... So when you said that most Christians would disagree, you might be right on that point, but doesn't mean that their translation talks about earth being a circle, aka flat disk. Majority of Christians are from those top 5 listed and ALL of them says that earth is a circle, not sphere. Care to try again?
1
@penguin82875 There is difference between knowing that earth is a sphere and what bible says... It was you who came here with those verses, cherry picked verses. Actual word is used as "circle", aka flat disk. Majority of translations have been made in that way because this is how it translates, because this is what original writers intended to say, because original writers used their beliefs at that time and common belief was that earth is flat. It was you who failed to give valid verse where it says that earth is a sphere, not me. So give me a verse which actually says that earth is spherical... Not cherry picked translation, but actual verse which actually translates from Hebrew to mean spherical. Some extra verses for you to think about while you do your homework here: "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" Now, give me one which implies earth to be spherical, I will wait.
1
@penguin82875 We are not talking about the one which predates... We are talking about actual Hebrew texts here... Are you just trying to troll here or are you just so desperate to say that bible isn't implying earth to be flat pancake? What's going on here?
1
@penguin82875 Just like Bible doesn't say that there was magical global flood which killed every land animal and humans from entire planet? That sort of false claim?... Like seriously, shape of the earth being wrong in bible is the least important thing... Yet you are so desperate in trying to defend it... Why? And still waiting for the verse which says that earth is a globe. And havent you said that there are multiple of those? Care to try with other verses? Maybe you will have better luck with those.
1
@penguin82875 Good for you, then do it more appropriately... Bible was written by simple ignorant people who used their beliefs to make claims about reality. All those verses are perfectly in line with someone who believed earth to be flat, which was common belief at that time, while you failed to present single verse which actually says earth to be spherical. My point was simple here and you should stop misrepresenting this ancient book of fables, you can slap flat earthers with one word "sunsets" or with 5689 different things without big trouble, but bible isn't the one unless you will get completely ignorant flat earther who has no idea what bible says, but it will be YOU who misrepresents what bible actually says, not the other way around.
1
You only need basic understanding of geometry to realize that earth can't be flat and realize that everything you yourself can and do observe matches 100% with globe model. Earth is a globe, this is just a fact.
1
What is ironic that its actually opposite of what you said here. When you start looking into hydrogen you start realizing how bad of an alternative it is. While BEV's just keeps improving with every single year without any limit in sight yet.
1
@tiggerthemighty8279 "Can we sustain the mining operations required for EV growth?" Yes. "'Can we fix the e-waste issues unrecycled batteries create?" Yes. Batteries are being recycled and in general you can recycle like 95% or even more of the old battery and reuse materials for the new ones. What is ironic at the moments is that there isn't enough old BEV batteries to be recycled yet as those lasted longer than expected, so not many recycling plants have been built, as there isn't batteries to be recycled in mass, yet. "Can EVs manage to improve in the secondary market where values drop almost 10 times as fast as ICE cars and buyer confidence appears to be dropping faster than the used cars' prices?" Example Depreciation Curves BEV: Year 1: -25% Year 2: -20% Year 3: -15% Year 4: -10% Year 5: -8% Year 6+: Gradual decline influenced by battery health and market trends. ICE: Year 1: -20% Year 2: -15% Year 3: -12% Year 4: -10% Year 5: -8% Year 6+: Steady decline based on age, mileage, and condition. Doesn't look like there is your 10x anywhere. "Just like it will tell buyers if EV ranges will ever reach the numbers 'promised' 10 years ago." Which would be what? How much do you want and how much to you actually need? And there is BEV with 500 mile range, so how much more do you need? "same coal fired grid" How is that even related? Grid is being shifted towards renewables, majority of electricity should be coming from renewables, just because there are still few coal ones will not really impact anything here. At the end of the day its still cleaner option than ICE cars. "You can't paste luxury sport packages over real world problems and call it progress." EVERYTHING was a luxury at the start. Look t first LCD tv's, 13 inches for 4000 bucks, now you can get one for like 100 bucks with better quality. We got real BEV's like a decade ago, which is still quite new technology as no one wanted to invest billions into R&D without knowing that it will pay off, but look at all new battery technologies being presented now from dozens of companies. We even have carbon nanotube batteries which are exponentially better, issue is just with production scalability which needs to be solved and if it is then that's that. There isint perfect solution here, every single technology has its own drawbacks, but at the moment BEV's at he best option we have and simplest one to transition into. As a reminder, we have over 3 000 000 BEV charging stations, while there are under 1000 hydrogen ones in entire world. This excludes the fact that you can charge your car at home, so people outside cities and living in their private homes could avoid visiting charging stations entirely, they can even charge their cars with few solar panels...
1
In this case, basically who lands first, owns that part of land, its not like anyone else could actually object to it...
1
@louis_the_hedgehog How would it lighten the load? You need extra equipment for that engine, on top of enormous power source. There is no chance for electric engine to actually be beneficial in going to orbit, arguably you would even benefit from it even if it was 0kg in weight as you would still need extra space to fit those in, on top of it adding additional failure points
1
@louis_the_hedgehog Electric engines takes ages to speed up anything, you can't just sit in space for another 2 weeks until it reaches escape velocity or something... Not even talking usage of those to reach orbital velocity... You simply can't use those for anything relating to actual rockets, you could use those for satellites which already going at escape velocities and just to increase speed of it, or maybe use one to shorten time for trips between earth and Mars, but then again, electric engines takes way more space per provided trust, and there isn't space left to cram in few tiny electric engines anyways. Do you remember first starship test flight when it just ripped apart launchpad? Because it has crap ton of trust. While electric engines taking same amount of space would have produces light breeze... There simply isn't enough trust from electric engines to be useless, while you need bunch of it to reach orbital velocity in SHORT time period
1
@louis_the_hedgehog You are not making any actual argument here. Electric engines are already in use for satellites... Which are already in orbit... Nothing new here. But those CAN'T be used for actual liftoff or anything what requires you to gain bunch of speed in short period of time, which is ESSENTIAL to get into orbit when you launch from earth. You could use electric engines when you travel between planets or going to moon to cut off small portion of time, that's a viable option, but it's ONLY viable for this purpose. Electric engines creates light breeze, which is tiny bit less powerful than Raptor engines produce, just a tiny bit. Its perfectly fine when you don't need to fight gravity and air resistance anymore.
1
@louis_the_hedgehog Because you want to add extra equipment, extra batteries, yes batteries, you can't have solar panels on rocket which isn't in stable orbit... And you think that this would increase payload capacity... IT WILL NOT. You can check how crammed rocket bottoms are already, where do you suppose to show those breeze creating engines? How much extra weight do you think you could lift off if all of that extra stuff had 0kg weight? It would be in few kg's, only few KG's, because again, electric engines are shit when it comes to actual power of thrust while taking up proportionally huge amount of space. If a craft is in orbit then it can use electric engine, just like what Starlink satellites already using, basically what all satellites uses, already. But this ONLY works because you don't really care how long it takes for it to produce thrust, you just need thing which could generate it. Starlinks generally takes from several weeks to several months to get into correct position after they get deployed by rocket. Why is that? Because light breeze takes time to add up useful thrust. At this point I don't even know what point you even trying to make here. Electric engines are being used, they have been used for decades by now, when its suitable for the task. Those are never been used for lift off or anything what requires fast gain of speed. So what is your point here what isn't already being done?
1
Well he still is richest person on earth even if he lost 44 billion by buying shitty company.
1
@carldzoga1348 Ok, then he will be second richest person on earth... Third... Fourth... He will still have more money then you will make in your entire life...
1
@CorrespondenceTheory Your "solution" by using methane would make like 0.1% of actual hydrogen needs if we would switch to it. Can't even imagine scale of those methane farms... Basic calculations, you need around 25kg of CH4 to make 5kg of hydrogen (single car fill up for 400mile range max), where 25kg of CH4 is around 84,228 cubic meters at 1psi... Do you see potential issue with scaling here?
1
@freedomextremist7921 Agnostic isn't a middle ground between theism and atheism... its separate label addressing separate thing. You either believe in a god (theism) or you don't (atheism), if you are not even aware of a god or know what this god is, what he likes to eat or what sex position is his favorite one, you are still an atheist and can reject that god. There are around 50 000 god claims so far, I'm aware of maybe like 20-30 of those, but I reject all of them, because I don't need to go over all of them, read their descriptions and try to figure out if this is the one I believe in, well I don't, because I'm simply applying general core criteria for all god's
1
Did you got scammed?
1
@youtubeshadower4039 Just saying that there is no such thing as Musk hydrogen engine, so you got scammed.
1
Alyosha Damn, you think that its fine to make argument which is logically fallacious? If i say "I'm god and its true because i'm god and i never lie" which is by definition circular argument, which is logical fallacy, it would be fine by your standards?
1
Alyosha "Atheists just call everything they disagree with a fallacy" You know whats funny and ironic about your comment? You made the hasty generalization fallacy here... And its quite simple to demonstrate who is correct here. Lets do it like this: you present your BEST argument for existence of your god and i will explain to you which logical fallacy it is and why. Sounds fair? Cool.
1
Alyosha "You would conclude someone with intelligence, in this case your mom, made that message." Did it? most reasonable conclusion would be that some one arranged those letters, but fun thing is that its possible for a random chance to arrange those letters too... So how do you know that its not a random chance? "We never observe nature writing messages, it always comes from an intelligent being. " We imbue meaning to those symbols... Same as you are going to make fallacious argument that DNA is a code or language... Its not... Not even close... "How then, can the first strands of DNA from the first life forms suddenly appear?" Now, go and ask actual biologist or any expert from this particular field this same question, lets see how many of them will laugh at your face... it dint appeared from nothing in an instant, it was gradual change... Evolution... Please read something about it before you make such questions... "This is not a false analogy" Its not even a analogy, its completely different topic by itself. "Even an Amoeba which we call primitive, has 290 billion base pairs, which is an alphabet of 4 letters" Riiiight, and if i split a rock in two and attach letters for each bump i can have a entire book of "code"... Doesn't make it a code tho...Definitely not a "code" which requires a coder. "This is not a "God of the gaps" fallacy" Well no, its special pleading fallacy on top or argument from ignorance with some sprinkles of argument from personal incredulity.... Who created god? By your logic intelligence can only come from intelligence, so who created your god? As everyone is already aware, your answer will be special pleading fallacy where you will say something like "God doesn't need creator, he is eternal" then why does universe needs one or life in general? " because I've given positive evidence" That wasn't evidence, it was empty assertions... There are countless videos addressing silliness of watch maker argument you just made here, go watch them before you try to use it in a conversation like this... " the 290 billion base pair string, that intelligence is involved" So is i find split rock in half which is perfect match to another peace lying nearby, does this mean that it was created by intelligence? And just once more: Evolution. "It would be "Naturalism of the gaps" to just say it must be natural because we can't accept intelligent causes." it would be irrational to say that it was made by god because we don't have natural explanation currently... And to end this one, Miller–Urey experiment demonstrated that life can originate from none life material in natural conditions without intelligence involved. This dint proved how life originated on earth, but... There is a kicker for you: we know that life CAN originate from none life material while you cant even demonstrate possibility of some being you call god existing... One of those is shown to be possible, one is not... Try to guess which is which...
1
Sunset.
1
@johnnysun6495 No... Its rated at 11 000 as TOWING capacity, this was vertical load test, which is usually around 10% of towing capacity. So vertical load capacity was 1100. Welcome to reality.
1
@johnnysun6495 So your counter argument is to say that video creator has no idea what he is talking about? Tong vertical load capacity is 1100, it failed at 10400, that's more than 9x. If you want to argue that some nutjob might improperly load his trailer with overweight load and then hit a pothole going 90mph at 45 degree down hill... Well... I guess you have a point... Next time complain that its not meteor resistant as it might be hit by one... So will repeat basic numbers here, tong vertical load rated at 1100, it failed at 10400. That's it. This same thing applies to basically all cars, you have towing capacity X, to get vertical load capacity you simply take 10% of that. If you want to overload it by more than 9x then don't act surprised that it failed... You people are making such weird arguments here, its just weird and sad at same time
1
String?... You seriously think you can get 5km string which can remain straight under such distance?... Is it a magical one?
1
@glennrobards585 He (Bob) literally showed that... Star trails... You have 2 points around which stars rotate (from your perspective) which indicates that its not the stars which move, but we are.
1
Too many drawbacks relating to hydrogen which will hardly ever gets resolved. Even now BEV's win over hydrogen cars on multiple fronts and this gap will only increase with better battery technologies.
1
Not really, what stops hydrogen cars is actual laws of physics, you can't break those just because you really really want it...
1
@noahadams2524 Benefit of buying used hydrogen car, its dirt sheep due to the fact that no one wants one or are able to use it
1
In which reality does Russia winning?
1
And this is Putin's biggest fear.
1
While I'm not a flat earther or believer in that guy in sky, there is distinct difference between those two. One is demonstrably false and second is unfalsifiable claim. While believing in both is irrational, atleast one cant be shown to be false by using basic geometry.
1
@OhJaniceWhyOhWhy Calling some one insane is... Well... Insane. There are more than one who believes crazy stuff not because they have mental illness or are stupid in general, there are plenty of smart people who believe in crazy stuff due to their brainwashing. Majority of those who simply believe that earth is flat is based on what their book says and they believe that its true because this book which is core thing for their brainwashing says to be true. Basically, believing in flat earth is a secondary step after belief in god, its more irrational than first step but its based on it. Yes we know that earth is a globe, but at same time we know that bible is full of shit too, yet we still have people believing that earth is flat or that bible is 100% accurate and represents reality.
1
@flatearth9140 Well caps make you correct by default, its true, internet said so. And bible is book of fables, why would we care what it says?
1
@A-Milkdromeda-Laniakea-Hominid First of all, your comment wasn't deleted, second, it's ironic to think that company which goes by leftist cult book delete your comment, free speech doesn't really exist under leftists. Third, people voted against Kamala and not for Trump, both options are bad, just that one is way worse and people got to experience that for past 4 years. Luckily nature is already healing even before Trump took office officially.
1
BEV's doesn't count?
1
Its only 2 stages, no idea why you think that its many.
1
@justindressler5992 He might have said "one rocket a day" aka both stages of rocket built in a day, or only second one would be built in a day as you would generally need less of first stage rockets so need to have same production rates
1
@terranhealer Because you like being in a cult.
1
Russia intentionally raised water levels to record high levels just before blowing it up. Not even talking about that new law being introduced in russia week before which says that Russia should not investigate disasters just like that...
1
It needs to be at −252.9C or lower... I will not find a place on earth where you could use outside temperature to cool it down that much...
1
I guess Russia was just playing around for past 450 days, enjoyed all those sanctions and trillions wasted on nothing while it could have been serious with it?... Do you even think before you write or do you need approval from Putin before you do it?
1
Only 93 billion light years? You want more?
1
@Valorous Vizier What? I'm responding to OP, what are you responding too?
1
You seriously believe that sun revolves around earth?
1
@marietterheeder1191 Why would i read book of fables to start questioning few things? Should i read Harry Potter next?
1
@marietterheeder1191 1. Then i don't care what your suggestions are 2. I have spare 5min i can spend in having conversations like that, don't you? Because you have spent more or less same time as me here. 3. I cannot be that stupid, this is why i actually asked why i should give a damn what you book says instead of blindly believing that its true by default just because book said so...
1
You mean some scammers claimed it and then died multiple years after it?
1
@dcampean Magical switch in electrical cars?... What the hell are you people even talking about? First of all, these hydrogen cars are electric ones. Second, no idea how is power source in the car relevant here... You can charge your BEV from your own solar panel if you wish... You can disconnect it from internet if you wish... So what the hell is this magical switch you are talking about and scared of?
1
You are wrong. There, corrected you. You need 60% more energy to produce enough hydrogen to travel same distance as BEV would, so yea, you are factually wrong on that point. No idea what you are talking about BEV repair and people being afraid of its battery. If BEV's battery is damaged it should not be handled by someone who has no idea what they are doing, same thing would apply to hydrogen tanks or hydrogen fuel cells or anything in general, if you have no idea how to handle a thing, don't...
1
Hydrogen engine was invented in 1806, you can get blueprints online after 10 second search... put away your tin foil hat
1
Its a war... All this comes to actual supply lines and actual supplies each side can get hands on. Ukraine have allot better backing than Russia, so its allot worst for Russians than for Ukraine at the moment.
1
What NATO war?
1
Why?
1
Flat earth model isint 2D
1
@boterlettersukkel Well, not an actual one, but general idea of earth proposed by flat earthers is still a 3d and no 2d even tho you cant have one which would match actual reality, but there is some sort of model of imaginary world they have.
1
@simonpedge You are literally repeating numbers provided by Putin... Those are worthless numbers. What we know is that car industry went down by like 95%. At the moment we can get actual reports from independent sources we can talk about Russian economy "growth" but Putin admitting that sanctions might have negative effect on it proves that sanctions have huge negative effect on Russian economy already, otherwise he would be quite in his bunker.
1
@paspa Reality is simple, Russia will suffer allot more than Europe or any other country in the world. What was keeping Russian economy afloat was simple reserves Putin collected over the years, but as that one is running out he started to change tune that now sanctions might have negative impact on Russian economy... It already did... Russian oil basically cost more or close to same price as it is to produce it. Russia lost main gas buyer for good, like, even if war ends most countries will never resume trades with Russia for its gas, that ship sailed and never going back. Russia lost this war even if it manage to take over entire territory of Ukraine.
1
And? Why cant you see Paris from New York on really clear day? Why its always some specific distance and not infinite one?
1
@JerryRigEverything But you are. Towing capacity 11 000, that's mostly horizontal load, while you done test on vertical axis, which usually is rated to 10-15% of towing capacity. There is a reason why so many people pointing this one out, because you screwed it up big time. To put it simply for you, vertical load for CT is rated at like 1100, so it would have been a big issue for Tesla if it broke around that number, but it went more than 9x before critical failure, yet you made it look like its the world ending results. Well, you got your clicks I guess, so this is what matters most for you and not objective testing.
1
Then aliens are more stupid than us.
1
Its true because he said so? By the way, he died 8 years after his scam claims, I know that government is slow, but are they so slow to assassinate someone with magical technology after 8 years?
1
@BogdanTestsSoftware One of my fears is that this is exactly what Russians might do at the end of this war. At the moment they will realize that they can't win this war they could blow up ZNPP and use that as excuse to withdraw from region or entire country like a "good" guys...
1
When you see something like "I'm not flat earther, but..." that "but" kind of negates everything you said before it. "they don’t have interest to in Kharkiv" Can you explain first few days when Russia tried to take over entire Ukraine from all possible sides? Their actions says more than what they are saying now...
1
There are 1817 words with a "lie" in them... Congrats for picking one of those and making some weird point here...
1
Maybe because government doesn't do it in general?...
1
You actually would not. Hydrogen cars are electrical cars, so if BEV's will not have stick then Hydrogen will not have one either.
1
@St.Miina. Cool story, can you provide name of that wizard who created a thing which breaks laws of physics so that we could fact check your claim?
1
Just like each time when something happens which could affect people... What's new? Its like the job of specific institutions to ground something until investigation is done to verify that accident was accident and there wasn't big risk of those debris falling on someone's house.
1
@neogeo6431 So again, your best counter is that he hurt your feelings by not building something until this point he promised to build? Well, I guess this warrants his head to be put on a stake or something... He promised... Its unforgivable... But it wasn't pink promise, so it doesn't really count, right? And yes, TF and his cult members became the same ones he was debunking years ago, which is ironic and sad at same time. TF and you only musters "He is late" as some sort of argument here. Get a life, touch a grass or something, no need to be jealous of Musk, he doesn't even know that you or TF exist.
1
@HerzogVonMartian Is it tho? How many mass shootings you had before 96 and after?
1
@HerzogVonMartian I only have one account... Paranoid much? You claimed that mass shootings still occur on same level as those did before 96, so do you have any actual numbers to support that claim or was this just empty assertion because it sounds nice to support your own personal beliefs?
1
Because that will simplify everything and will make total sense... Why do you think there are no ammonia powered cars in production at the moment?... Because its expensive as hell to produce ammonia in mass... Similar thing with matrix suggestion on top of it being extra heavy.
1
And yet you gave not one shred of evidence that the earth is a flat...
1
Rich Spillman I have no idea what you tried to say here with that 71% of oceans... Was this a pun? A joke? Tho on side note http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif there you go, proof that earth is globe. Done. Now its your turn.
1
Rich Spillman Humidity and heat will have some effect, but you don't have one in this case and that effect will not hide part of an object over the sharp line of horizon... Ok, lets look at this example https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/20170722-105552-feohd-jpg.27878/ Even if you would argue that your humidity and heat causes that effect at surface of water, you still need explanation why top of those poles creates nice curve down, exact curve we would have on a globe... Ok, lets as you another basic question: Do you have model of your flat earth which would match observable reality?
1
China doesn't care about patents, by are they not utilizing this magical patented technology you are talking about? And where can I read about that magical patented technology?
1
If everyone was armed then you will have mass shootings every single day on every single corner... US state clearly demonstrates what happens when you have easy access to guns.
1
You know what could protect from space radiation? Shielding... Shielding from radiation... Shocker, I know...
1
@Tane-c6m You know what else is a good radiation absorbing material? Water... And like seriously, do you think that every single rocket scientist who is working towards manned trip to mars failed to realize that there might be an issue with radiation or maybe they simply know more than your 5 minute google search and understands that its easily solvable issue?
1
Nah, that one is a fact. Tho thanks for admitting that flat earth is just a theory.
1
@benjaminhenegar291 Is Australia real? Have you seen it with your own eyes?! Do you see how silly your argument sounds? And you can determine shape of the earth from your backyard, its spherical, that's just a fact.
1
@benjaminhenegar291 So much wrong with what you said here... "the spherical earth is relatively new" First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE, so its atleast 2300 year old thing, can't say that its a new thing... Can you? "I have have traveled a bit, nothing iv seen says round." have you seen ships disappearing bottoms up over horizon? Never been on a beach? "Repeating what someone indoctrinated you isn't saying much about the intelligence you have acquired" Exactly, so why are you doing that? "and what does Australia have to do with whether the earth is round or a firmament" What does firmament has todo with anything here? You asked if we seen blue marble or been to space, which means that you require direct personal observation of a thing to know that this thing is real. So asking if you been to australia to know that its real is 100% accurate analogy to what you just said... "where in science does it say spin a heavy ball and things get attracted to it" Physics. But I guess you skipped that part in school. Now i'm just curious, how fast do you think this ball should be spinning? " let's keep the heavy ball wet see what happens" Say to me that you have no idea what gravity is without saying that you have no idea what gravity is. Congrats, you ticked 5 of 10 points on how to be ignorant flat earther.
1
@KangenAlec Local? Like how far do you think sun is?
1
@KangenAlec Now convert this distance into normal units, we call that "kilometer". So try again.
1
What federal law?
1
@keonyang3332 Then be happy with daily mass shootings in your country. You wanted this, you can have it. Rest of the world will have perfect example of what happens when you give free rain over gun ownership.
1
@keonyang3332 You literally have people with full army arsenal in their sheds just because they can buy as many guns as they want with little or no background checks... So yes, there is free rain over what firearms you can get. I could bet that you are not even aware that you can get gun in america legally without any background checks, right?
1
What is a human?
1
@theseattlegreen1871 Bernard's star, is prime example of moving star in the sky which was recorded over couple decades. All stars move, some less some more, but in general in your life time you will not notice any difference in the sky. Your share ignorance on how big universe is, just baffling... Closest star is over 4 light years away... And you want to see changing sky... Really? Do you even know how basic reality works?...
1
@davidoceans5604 I have wild idea as alternative for affirmative action, why not, you know, admit students without knowing their skin colors, gender, age or even name? You know, just admit on merit and avoid being racist... Its ironic that change was made to address racism while actually adding opposite racism...
1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#Earth's_core_and_the_geodynamo If you want to question everything, maybe read about those topic before hand? You will look less ignorant.
1
That's the thing, government then can say that anything it doesn't like is a inappropriate speech and could shut you up, anything. So question is, what worse, to have individuals with hateful speech or to have government with ability to control your speech?
1
Yea, we do think for ourselves, this is why we know that world is not flat pancake.
1
@tibby24 So first of all you tried to downplay every model to be on same level and then just said that flat earthers have better evidence for some magical reason... If they have evidence then its not faith... Your comment is as smart as any flat earthers, aka NOT.
1
@utestify Belief is not a faith. I can believe in something based on objective evidence, no faith involved. There is crap ton of evidence for globe model, heck basic observation sun you can do from your backyard disproves flat earth, so no, those two models are not comparable and not on same level and there is no faith required to believe in a globe, anyone saying otherwise just exposes themselves as the ignorant one about this topic, nothing more.
1
Just checking something here: Do you know that Zelensky is DEFENDING and not attacking? Right? You do know this?
1
@annabellelee4535 Will try this same thing with you, as you people seam to have trouble with reading: Is Zelensky attacking or defending?
1
@markgildo85 How dense are you? Russia attacked Ukraine, Zelensky defends his own country from attackers... Which part of this you fail to understand? Your argument is more than stupid, if Ukraine was attacking Russia, then you might have had something here, but now you just look to ignorant to have any decent conversation with.
1
Even if its being supported by Russian News channels?
1
Give me photo/video from high altitude without fish eye lens and i will show you curvature in it. Simple as that.
1
@ShieldStun I would say that you need to actually provide this video instead of making empty assertion. And on top of this... How the f**k do you know that it remains at eye level? Its literally not possible to determine that from a video... Like literally not possible... So ether you are just a sad troll looking for attention or you so ignorant that you don't even realized that small detail...
1
Well yes, if they know how to break first law of thermodynamics... Then it's easy!
1
Hydrogen isn't scalable... For example, to build single hydrogen refueling station will cost you around 1.2million, to build single supercharging station will cost you around 100k or even less. On top of this you will have exponentially less of maintenance for BEV charging stations than you will have for hydrogen. Then you need entire plants to produce this hydrogen on scale... Like current stations can only fill up around 3 cars in a row before you will have to wait until it produces more of that. It simply doesn't scale...
1
@BizantyjskiBorsuk Batteries are being updated, every single year. And we are not running on 20+ year based batteries... Biggest EV company Tesla currently producing cars with batteries which have been invented in recent years and are made specifically for EV's with cheaper materials and all that jazz. Your understanding about EV's in general is either 20 years old or you just watching to much propaganda from oil companies. You can extinguish electrical car, and those special places are basically made by people who are scared of EV's because they watched to many videos from oil companies saying that EV will burn your house to the ground if you leave it in you garage...
1
Just FYI protection isn't 100% one... There is no such thing. What comes close to that is being abstinent.
1
Would not say that 90%, but I do consider that 50% of them are
1
Yes yes yes and there will be ragnarok within a decade...
1
@chrisnotyou And I could say that he will not be in prison, what now?
1
Fun reality note, hydrogen cars are basically same weight as BEV's. And while yes, you hydrogen combustion engine will produce your sound, it will cost you arm and leg to run and maintain it. It could be interesting expensive hobby, but it will never be actual thing you would actually use as day to day driver.
1
Exactly, its electrical car with extra steps.
1
To be fair their copy could be in perfect working order, what they forgot to copy was static fire test pad.
1
What the what now? Majority of worlds population knows that earth is not a space pancake, so no idea what you call law numbers... Unless majority is a low number...
1
Video about what? NASA is not guarding glaciers... Its flat earhers who made that nonsensical claim...
1
Hydrogen production needs around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance as it would with electric car. So in which magical realm its grid scalable?
1
@derks0 hard to argue when you don't have counter argument? Understandable.
1
@derks0 You clearly have time to check youtube comments and make responses in the middle of the night... So can't say that this excuse actually works for you. Isn't it? People who actually don't have time don't spend time saying that they don't have time, they simply don't... Because... You know... They don't have time for stuff like this...
1
@derks0 So you had enough time to make 3 comments to explain that you don't have to explain something? What a goof
1
@derks0 First of all, majority of hydrogen cars are not burning hydrogen. Hydrogen fuel cell is a thing. Second, I haven't heard of a single country which would move towards hydrogen grid network, care to provide one name? And care to explain what exactly you mean by "hydrogen grid network" Third, yes, governments can have better understanding than some scrubs on internet, this is why governments are not really investing into hydrogen. You are yet to explain how is hydrogen grid scalable when BEV's need 60% less of that grid to be scaled. Or are you just saying that its scalable due to the fact that you can scale anything independent how hard and worthless it would be...? From what you said so far there was only one thing I could agree with you, is that hydrogen better suitable for things like ships due to extra space it has for all that hydrogen and ability to have centralized hydrogen distribution centers. Everything else is just... Weird... At best. Och, another thing about your "scalability". One hydrogen station to build costs around 1 million bucks, while one BEV station costs around 50k, while hydrogen station will have allot more maintenance costs associated with it. So I have no idea how hydrogen is a better scalability in your reality.
1
@derks0 Excessive emoji usage in addition to name calling would put your age at around 18-20 years old, which explains allot about your behavior. If you are older than that... Then well... There are bigger issues here than your weird "hydrogen grid scalable" claim.
1
@derks0 So will ask my original question again: Hydrogen production needs around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance as it would with electric car. So in which magical realm its grid scalable?
1
@derks0 35 year old and you behave like that? Damn... Better to be a child sometimes than always be childish.
1
@derks0 I guess we will have nuclear powered hydrogen in our cars now... Does that include nuclear reactor? There are no free candy... None of your examples are actually viable options. Give me a name of company or a person who made ammonia driven car which isn't a quirky hobby as theirs just for the shits and giggles but actual practical car. I will wait. "wat lol look out guys we got a real philosopher here lmfao" There are people who can be child like when moment is appropriate while rest of the time behave to their age, while other ones, like you, likes to be childish 24/7 which isn't healthy.
1
Its marked in different way than any other territory. Atleast it is at 0:47. Ukraine dint really had any control over it after annexation, so it's not like you can still mark it as belonging to Ukraine even if no one really accepts this annexation besides Russia.
1
I guess this 3 day war after 400+ days is going by the plan and Ukraine is being beaten badly?... No wonder you are so wrong here as you are not watching whats going on in reality.
1
Mass firing would not happen even if this was a real flight with actual payload. This was a test flight which was expected to fail.
1
What?
1
Mixing up technologies might not be that good of an idea. it would be better to just concentrate one the one which is actually scalable and avoid distracting yourself with something worse just for the sake of it
1
@AAAAAA-tj1nq Yes yes yes, counter offensive failed... Tho I guess Ukraine constant land retatig is somewhat weird... Maybe Russians willingly giving it back to Ukraine now.... Rus bots are funny.
1
@Robertas919 Yes yes yes, Russia like tactical retreats, just like those they did already, quite few major ones, they can keep doing it, they are doing really good job at that.
1
@AAAAAA-tj1nq First of all, provide sources for your numbers. Second, first line of defence is at the front lines... And those getting pushed back. Third, even if they lost 30% of nato armoured vehicles they can get 50% extra to not replace destroyed ones but to increase their numbers, its not like there is actual limit in how many Ukraine could receive... Its NATO, what Ukraine received was bread crumbs in comparison to what it could have received... So no idea what argument you tried to make here. But I guess Russia lost 0% armoured vehicles and Ukraine pushing them back is by their grand plan?... Lets keep that plan going until Russia is behind Ukraine borders!
1
@OSUBucknado Are you referring to "composite" video?... Do you even know what "composite" is?... Damn...
1
@OSUBucknado Its blue marble and yes, we have more than plenty of those valid pictures. To explain to you what that video was saying is that photos taken from low earth orbit (usually ISS) need to be put together to get one bigger picture, aka making panoramic one, this doesn't mean that photo is fake, it only means that photo is composite of multiple real pictures but into one big one. There are few pictures of earth which are single shot ones, but to get that you need to be allot further away than most satellites pointing to earth are.
1
@OSUBucknado Again... Two key things here... Low earth orbit and panoramic photos... There are good examples on internet how continent size "changes" depending from how far you are taking photo form when it comes to a globe, its not magic, its basic photography... And for repeating clouds same thing applies, if its panoramic photo then those clouds could have moved to next position before photo was taken, you can do same exact thing with your smartphone and panoramic photo mode. And like seriously, do you seriously think that people who supposedly have biggest secret under their table failed with continent sizes and duplicated clouds?... Ether they are genius level evil or moronic genius level evil... Hiding biggest secret involving millions of people and then failing at photoshop?... C'mon...
1
@OSUBucknado There are multiple satellites which orbit earth at different distances, some are close, some are further away, some are really far. Most of them are really close to earth and they cant see much of earth surface, so closer you are bigger continents will look like. Its nothing new, its basic photography and perspective in action. All this aside, earths shape can be proven by simple observation of sun from your backyard, all those photos are just cherry on top of huge cake you can verify yourself.
1
You misspelled Moscow with Kiev, try to be more careful next time.
1
@Poweruser75 "You are no match for me. " I know, I dont really like to troll people by being stupid, so yes, i'm no match for you. "the One and Only, Undisputed Linguistics Champion of English Dialect" Your best counter argument is word play? Good job! You disproved entire science by playing with words!!! "It simply moves across the sky and on out of sight because of perspective" Perspective makes things smaller, it doesn't make sun disappear bottoms up... You are really terrible at this, arent you? "The sun and moon are only about 6 miles above you making them local and able to follow those rules." Seriously, could you atleast add some extra effort into this trolling? 6 miles? Commercial planes fly at 5.9 to 7.2 miles, does that mean that you can hit sun or moon with a plane?... To lazy to even read rest of your trolling here, lost interest after this childish point of yours. Get something better next time.
1
@balthiersgirl2658 I wonder what you would say to thousands of civilian people killed by Russians...
1
If you want to pay 2x for fuel and like 10X for maintenance costs, then yea, go for it.
1
@garry69696 10 times less? You can buy Tesla for 40k, are you saying that you could buy new car for 4k with same features Tesla offers?... And while BEV battery fires are dangerous, those are generally slow, so if we would talk about car crashes then you will have plenty of time to get out of your car, with hydrogen cars, well, if that tank raptures and you get a spark, well... It will vaporize you in few milliseconds, so i guess its a better way to die... And you will be paying crap ton more for everything, this is why currently some car companies selling hydrogen cars gives 15k on fuel as a bonus. Why do you think this is the case? Because it will cost you crap ton of money... Mirai, hydrogen car, has like 400 mile range, has 5kg tank, while one kg can be around 20-35 bucks, so you are looking at 100-160 bucks per 400 miles. Now check it with BEV's... That price will go down to like 30 bucks if you used superchargers, less if you charged at home. Do you see potential long term issue here?... Then add exponentially higher maintenance costs... And just FYI Toyota Mirai starts at 50k, so its initial price is higher than BEV's, its fuel more expensive, its maintenance is higher... So stop dreaming about something what isint real.
1
Was this poor joke?
1
@unlocked.N Russians know exponentially more about what Ukraine plans than this youtuber could ever dream about. It's not sharing some top secret information Russia has no idea about... That video about being silent is about not leaking actual counter offensive plans, not about reporting about things which already happen...
1
People actually calculated all that end EV's still came first for least pollution done over entire car's existence. Nothing new there.
1
What explanation? Earth is a globe not because some one said so but because its observable and testable fact.
1
@prateeksharma6706 How to know when Russian lies? He speaks... But heck, tell us your Russian facts, who started WW2?
1
@prateeksharma6706 Who started WW2?
1
@prateeksharma6706 And what Putin said? By Putin, who started WW2?
1
@prateeksharma6706 Why are you afraid to answer to my actual question here? By Putin, who started WW2?
1
@prateeksharma6706 It was you who stated that Puting is saying facts, yet you now admit that you didn't even watched entire interview... So will shed some light here, by Putins "facts" it was Poland which started WW2. This is Russian "facts"... There is a reason why Russia banned wikipedia and why they want to create their own "history" And I have no idea why people keep bringing up US here... Stop with that silly whataboutism... US is country with its own problems and its own flaws, but its not relevant to anything here... There is known history and then you have people like dictator Putin claiming that their history is the correct one because he said so... WW2 was started by Germany when they attacked Poland, not the other way around, its basic reality, basic fact from reality, yet you think that Putin spits facts... C'mon...
1
Hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, fuel cell invented in 1869, so no, it's not just started, it was here for almost 2 centuries.
1
Islam which controlled people for past 1300+ years and you cant even see end of it at the moment? That type of cult?
1
So by your logic we should ignore every single problem in the world and only concentrate on one single biggest issue? So lets ignore wars and concentrate on global warming, because global warming will kill more people? Do you see issue here? "If it isn’t true and you think it’s so silly than who cares why make this video" Because unchecked stupidity will cause harm... How do you think religions have been created?... If you allow some one to spread lies you will get even more people believing that nonsense, its called: brainwashing. "The last I heard the earth was an oblate spheroid. Or pear shaped but I guess not we are back to the round ball? Ok." Well you are prime example. You never fact checked, you never spend 5min google search to actually figure out why its sometimes labeled as sphere and some times as oblate spheroid or even pear shaped. So let me do your job here: Earth on grand scale is a sphere, perfect sphere. Its rounder than bowling bawl. On another hand if you would use accurate measurements you will have difference between height and width, which is around 0.33% difference. Which makes it oblate spheroid. If you want to be even more accurate then you will have bottom part of sphere slightly wider than top part, its even less difference than 0.33%, which makes it some what pear shaped. To put it simply, earth is always a sphere, but depending on how much accuracy you need for the conversation you will ether call it a sphere, oblate spheroid or oblate spheroid which is slightly wider on bottom. Do you get it now?
1
@johnlindeman8172 " Like how did they have live video and audio when they went to the moon in the 60’s." 10 second google search answers to this question. " Why did they lose or tape over all the data mapping out the trips" 10 second google search answers to this question. "Why is moon light colder than in the shade" Its not, its made up nonsense by flat earthers. Again, 10 second google search answers to this question. "If earth rotates 1 time a day and orbits the sun once a year why doesn’t the sun set and rise at all different times of the day?" Why should it? Sun rises and sets when earth does one revolution... Which is at constant speed. So what the hell are you objecting too? "but since I don’t care enough to research flat earth, ball earth or pear earth" And this is the issue with people like you, you are too lazy to even spend 5 minutes of your day to answer to some basic questions. Time it took you to write those comments could have been used to actually answer to all of those questions, you have learned something new and you would avoided to look so ignorant to others. "It’s climate change not global warming" Its global warming which results into climate change. Or maybe you are one of those global warming deniers? Let me guess, you looked up global warming, you failed to understand some topic about it and then you simply give up and decided that its not worth your time to learn about reality...
1
@johnlindeman8172 "scientists who are really the modern day priest class" While in reality, they are not. Science doesn't even come close to religions... Comparing them with priests only shows how ignorant you are on scientific methods. In science you can become famous for proving some one wrong, in religion you can be put to death for simply questioning some one... There is no comparison between them... Never was, never will be. "Some scientists believe that the more they learn the more they realize they don’t know and that’s why so many things change" generalising "I know I can google stuff but I’m not gonna waste to much time on the flat earth more should anyone because these people won’t listen to a single thing you say because it goes against what the believe is fact" I have learned quite few things while debunking flat earthers claims, i could even dare to say that i have learned more while talking with them then i did in middle school when it comes to physics and any stuff related to flat earthers claims. "I was watching a NASA video and the engineer doing the video was explaining how they haven’t quite figured out how to get a manned craft to pass threw the radiation belts" have you watched it without cherry picking one part of it? And do you even know what is this radiation belt? Or how we simply went around it when we went to moon? He is correct that we cant go trow this radiation belt, but we can go around it... Which is not convenient, but with that time technology it was only option. Currently i dont know, there are plans to go back to moon in couple years, so we will see like 4k 60fps video from moon. But in general, when you get questions like that, simply google it out... Because you literally having issues in understanding what this astronaut meant by it and instead or factually researching it you will simply think that maybe we never went to moon...This is how flat earther is born... Laziness...
1
You failing to understand something here, he never said that there are no aliens, he said that there is no reason to believe that we have video recordings of them. Try to feel the difference here. There is high probability that there is life in the universe on more than one planet due to basic propabilities, but... This doesn't mean that there is life which has technology to travel hundreds, thousands or millions of light years across galaxy or galaxies and then just starts flying with high beams turned on over some random places on earth...
1
@chrisgold2303 Be open minded, but don't be naive or gullible. Rational people keeps this UFO label until actual evidence gets presented to show what it actually is, not sooner or later. At this moment we have zero confirmations that aliens are actually real and zero confirmations that aliens ever visited earth, so this option "It was aliens" aren't even in the list of possible explanations at the moment, not saying that its not possible, saying that it should not be included in the list when you can't present actual possibility value , especially when we have bunch of better simpler explanations already.
1
Because gas isn't measured by volume...
1
@davidwatson8118 What speculation? I mean, Tesla shares did drop slightly from all time high, so from like 480 to 420, but its the biggest BEV company in the world at the moment. Why you have something like BYD, it's just popular in China. While starship keeps improving with every single launch which indicates basic progression path which should lead to commercially viable option when it comes to payload launching. What about any of this is speculation? Do you seriously think that SpaceX will just say "Nah, starship doesn't work after all these successful tests and upcoming V3 Raptor engines which would enable even more lift capabilities, nah, not worth to have 100% reusable orbital rocket, we will stay with Falcon 9"? Like, in which reality do you think this would happen?
1
@nightshade7240 For payload delivery to orbit... Do you not even know what rockets are used for? How ignorant are you as generic TF worshiper?
1
Just like cancer.
1
Which country (actually a private company) besides US launching reusable rockets into orbit? This was test flight, it was expected to fail, main goal was to clear launch pad, which it did. Besides this it collected quite a bit of data which can be used for next test. It would have been failure if it failed on launch pad, which would have damaged launch pad and provided little to no new data. Welcome to reality little one.
1
@Thatgurlkassixoxo It's hard to say at this point if you are really flat earther or just sad troll who wants attention. You are going so batshit crazy with your claims that its more like you are trolling, but at same time it's still kind of in a real of someone who never picked any science books and dropped from middle school. Flat earthers/trolls are amusing, at least in a way to look into human psychology.
1
How is it a scam?
1
Yes yes yes, this 3 day war after 400+ days is lost cause... yes yes yes...
1
NATO, USA and EU isint even in Ukraine... If any of them have been then this war would have ended long time ago. Ukraine basically fights with military scraps and still prevents Russian army from moving forwards, just imagine how it would go with NATO actually being directly involved...
1
12k towing capacity would mean that its towing capacity, while this video performed vertical load on a hitch test, which is usually required to be like 10x less to what is the towing capacity, so it passed the test
1
Turtle... duh...
1
@effigy42 And I can beat your distance with cessna... Like... Seriously... Who the hell travels more than 500km without stopping for a brake? And yes, fossil fuel powered cars still have distance advantage... But this video was about EV's and not some ancient 30 year old coffins on wheels.
1
Why?
1
Rus bot detected.
1
Its a scam.
1
@yestervue4697 "Well?" What's well? You are not priority in my life, when I'm in a mood to go through youtube comments, I will. "SHOW me ANYTHING....do it" I have presented observable things YOU can do yourself. This is basic geometry, its not some random claim you could never confirm to be true, its basic geometry... Yet that was not even for you... So what do you want to get? A ticket to space?... "If this globe earth is indeed fact we should be OOZING with proof you can see with your own eyes" And we are. You cant even address basic observation of sun which contradicts flat earth and supports globe, not even talking about dozens of other points proving globe earth, but if you cant even understand basic geometry, which is only requirement for my sun example, then anything else i have to present will fly over your head even more. "not a single picture of it exists" We have thousands of those and we have videos. At moment you explain how you determined that 100% of those are fake and present actual method you used to determine this, you simply making shit up here to feel better. "You guys believe in a religion, a dream that only exists in calculations" Let me guess, you are Christian? Or some one who has its own religion and a dream that only exists in a book? "it is a religion and a religion must be taken on faith" So you admit that you have shitty position here? That your position is based on religion which is based on faith? Well thanks, I already knew this, but atleast now we know that you know this too. "Do you even understand the definition of faith?" Thinking that something is true without any supporting evidence? Like flat earth? Yea, i know. "Does your chin hurt?" Not really, i have comfortable pillow, sleeped like a baby. You? "POST ANYTHING YOU CAN SEE" Again, observation of sun. Can't you see a sun from your basement? Should i pick something different? What's your issue here exactly? " At least say something original..." So basically when some one asks: what is 2+2? I should say "banana", because saying "4" would be just same old not a original answer... Ok... Good to know... I will stick to old ways, as i like reality and accurate answers. "I believe what can be shown..." Nice, then show us that earth is flat, we will wait.
1
Failed to get this joke. Can you explain?
1
@ozziejim8472 Well if you mean by "dumb" that they are acting irrationally, then yea. But that's again isint their fault, atleast for most of them. I was a believer, because there was no reason not to. My parents said there is god, everyone around me believed that there is one, so i believed that there is one, because i had no reason to question it. With years this belief some what faded away, or atleast i cared less and less about it and as my parents dint really pushed it hard on us it eventually just faded out, i would have still said that i'm a believer and all that jazz, but i simply dint think about it at all, for couple years. Then i stumbled upon some atheists shows, started to watch, realized that religions are bollocks. I dint gained any IQ points, i just learned what is critical thinking, why some arguments cant be used and why some can, what counts as evidence and what evidence you would need for something like a god claim. From childhood up to becoming atheist, i cant really say i behaved dumb, i simply accepted something as true as there was no reason to reject it. majority of believers are on same level, they are not dumb, just been convinced that something is true and when you have everyone around you agreeing with that, then its quite hard to start considering that entire world view you have is actually bollocks. Anyways, went into tangent here... Believers can behave dumb, but they are not dumb.
1
Kesha Kennon What is biased? What was from my comment biased?
1
Kesha Kennon "so not only are you insisting they're all bad, you're insisting people don't have a right to religious beliefs. " Definition of bollocks: nonsense; rubbish (used to express contempt or disagreement, or as an exclamation of annoyance). Which part of this definition includes words "bad" or that they don't have right to religious beliefs? You literally thinking on religious level, you see something what is not there... And just because we have thousands of random religions across world has no general value in general. There are no good things which cant be achieved throw secular means, so yea, religions are bollocks. "This is such an insensitive thing to say that it borders on extremist" While in reality its not. Christianity is not based on evidence, which means that people who thinks that its factual was ether brainwashed by some one or they engaged in self deception. And just a fact that in majority of cases children will have same religion as their parents shows that religion is indoctrinated into them. Brainwashing is just another term which perfectly fits religions, after all, you literally have people who used multiple means to control people, usual method is to say "This book said so, so you must obey" "Saying Christians are brainwashed is like Conservapedia ( which is also insensitive for its hostility towards atheists) saying that, and I quote, "Atheists are sociopaths". See the similarities in those two sayings?" Not even on same category... Which is even more ironic that atheists in general are less prone to commit crimes than religious people, but besides this fact, Christians in general are result of brainwashing, why do you think one of the most common reasons why theist became atheist is actually reading their holly book? Because they never questioned their religions before, which means that their religion is based on some ones word, aka indoctrination, aka brainwashing. I was a believer for like 12 first years of my life, dint had any reason o question things my parents or surrounding people said to me. I was indoctrinated and brainwashed into religion, luckily due to low exposure to religion in later years it slowly faded away and at some point i actually started to question it which quickly lead me into deconversion because religions are bollocks... Religions are as useful as belief in thot fairy or belief in Santa, it could be easy escape when telling children about world, but that is not the best way to do it, especially when you have grownups still believing in Santa and trying to push laws based on what Santa wants...
1
How did you resolved hydrogen embrittlement?
1
So what you are saying is that world needs to close coal power plants and replace those with cleaner solutions?
1
You dint watched this video? Dint you? And what exactly does this all powerful russian army has to show after 170+ days of war?
1
The fact that you think that you need to go into space to know whats is the shape of earth is something you need to worry about...
1
@cameronharris5107 This is why you think that you need to go into space to know shape of earth... You are ignorant and if you don't want to fix that, then yea, you don't need to do anything, continue being ignorant on basic geometry. And there are plenty of things which relates to earth being a globe which you will encounter from time too time. Basic example would be those "weird" plane flight paths, which usually are in shape of arc, which looks strange on 2d map, but its because it was projected onto 2d from 3d sphere. But again, if you dont even care on what type of earth you live in, then you basically have no interest in anything what is beyond you backyard fence.
1
You do know that "test" stands in "test flight", right?
1
Yes this video is about Hydrogen which is quite different beast than generic LPG.
1
When there is a need you could come up with solution.
1
Unless you have a single guy who creates companies around the idea to colonize Mars. When you have single person with idea like that who can actually afford it, you no longer need world peace level miracles.
1
is it tho? What is the cost? What is the weight? What is the volume it would take inside car? And majority of hydrogen is being produced from natural gas, that thing owned by big oil.
1
Would be big waste of money.
1
@KangenAlec What dome?
1
@KangenAlec You do realize that even if you could magically prove that every single video/photo presented by NASA or any other space agency from space is a fake one that this would not disprove globe ether? You do realize that? Right?
1
? Do you even know definition of circle?... Flat disk... So no, it dint said that earth is a globe, it said that earth is a flat disk, aka flat... So it was Greeks who determined shaped of the earth before anyone else.
1
If you think that earth is flat, you obviously never seen a sun...
1
NaZZi?
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
Why not?
1
When you fact check basic reality: BEV's from end to end creates less pollution than hydrogen cars. People should learn to fact check basic reality before they speak.
1
Cool, then this should be none issue for Russia, so all good!
1
Technically bow does same thing as minigun, shoots projectiles. His point was... Weird...
1
@jaynenord101 "Sorry but you can't just say I'm wrong and the 6" per mile squared curvature calculation is wrong" First of all, it should have been8 and not 6, atleast that is common flat earther claim. Next. This equation creates parabola, not a circle... Third... Where do you insert observers and observed objects altitude? Nowhere... This is why its bonkers to use this magical equation, its worthless at best. " Please give specific details so we can calculate it and perhaps end the debate there." Go to google and enter "earth curvature calculator" you will get multiple results with online calculators which actually include ACTUAL equations which SHOULD be used when calculating things like that. "Gravity is a theory and interestingly the word hypothesis is listed as synonym for theory and vice versa. . . " Scientific theory is a model created from all known evidence and data, its fact based best current explanation for given question. Please learn what scientific theory is before you expose your ignorance on this topic again. "Since admittedly Gravity is a hypothesis only it can not be used to PROVE anything" Still false. Gravity is a fact. So let me educate you little bit here. To simplify label Gravity: attraction between objects with mass. Cavendish experiment demonstrates just like that, there is attraction between any objects with mass, aka gravity is a fact. "both water properties and the void of space next to the molecules of our atmosphere." Vacuum doesn't suck... Again, use google or search on youtube, there are dozens of videos explaining that with pictures and stuff.... "Nasa means deception in Hebrew" Jayne Nord means liar in trolish language... Once again, lets educate you on basic reality: N.A.S.A stands for National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Its abbreviation, not some secret word... And... For f**ks sake... NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth... "Nasa themselves have admitted to losing the technology" Yes... It literally burned in earths atmosphere... AKA loosing it... They dint said that they lost blue prints, they said that they lost physical thing... Please, watch entire video instead of cherry picking one sentence from it... "Please give the exact means by which the land line was connected and how that works in detail please so I can verify the technology." Can you teach of quantum mechanics in a 2 sentences? No? Why not? Would take too long?... Exactly... We are not here to teach you such things, if you want to learn, go learn... You have access to internet, use it. "again words have meaning and they are telling you in plain sight what they actually are" Word "set" has over 300 meanings, so i would recommend for you te rethink your sentence... Like carefully rethink it... Couple times... like 300+ times until you realize how badly you f**ed up here. "yet not looking as saddened and at a loss for words as those men who should have still been pumped up on the adrenalin from their experience. " Is not peoples emotional expression become evidence of something?... We know that earth is a globe not because we have astronauts... "I would also like to know more about how the north star has moved when it is still used for navigation" Maybe because its movement is really small?... Do you seriously think that north star should have moved to another side or something?... Have you even checked time frame for noticeable change to happen with it? "Also explain how it is that Galileo was never put to death over his "heretical hypothesis" regarding the cosmology of the earth when that was the normal practice of the day? " Do you seriously asking why some one was no killed just because he had different idea of earth surface?... Ask religious people... Tho Galileo went into prison for that, so he dint avoided punishment. "Could it be because he was what today we would call "controlled opposition" ?" Or maybe because it would be to much for religious people to kill some famous scientist just because he questioned their book?
1
@jaynenord101 Correcting your formula doesnt make it worth anything... Its invalid one... No one except flat earthers uses it. Well, you could use it for short distance calculation when you dont need to go throw complex equations and you just need approximate value. But again... Its parabola and doesnt work on longer distances and doesnt include needed variables for it to be worth anything when we are talking about shape of earth... Lets make it simple here, lets forget all equations or science or anything what requires more than 5 minutes google search. Sunset. This is only possible if there is curvature. That's it. No need for those broken equations, no need to know acceleration or understand gravity or anything else, basic geometry, you can even test this with a ball and light source...
1
@jaynenord101 "unfortunately something is not a parabola just because you say it is." ? Your equation is a literally a parabola... Do you even know what parabola is or what your equation is?... Its literally a parabola... Damn... Its like for you to say that 2+2 is not equal to 4 just because i said so... Flipping hell... "And yes the horizon ( means horizontal for a reason)" And? Yes, for a reason, because its horizontal... Doesn't make it flat... And avoid playing with words, you will loose. Well, you lost already, but you can loose even more. "is easily explained as perspective" And you have no idea what perspective is... " As things get farther away they will get smaller and smaller until you can't see them" Correct! Atleast you know one thing. But... There is that but... This doesnt explain why objects disappear over the horizon bottoms up and especially why sun disappears over the horizon NEVER changing its size... So your perspective actually disproves flat earth. "our vision does not have unlimited distance capability . . ." And? You do know we have cameras with 300x zoom? Telescopes?... " The sun works the same way as it travels away on it's path" Yet its not. Sun DOESN'T change size over entire day. So your example is invalid, demonstrably. You literally contradicting what you just said about perspective... "This concept known as perspective is a repeatable principle that is useful in science studies too" Its not a concept... Its just how reality works... Objects further away will look smaller. Cool. This is not the case with sun which doesn't change size and actually hides over horizon bottoms up without changing size. https://st2.depositphotos.com/2558631/12363/v/600/depositphotos_123631476-stock-video-beautiful-sun-rising-over-horizon.jpg Image like this literally contradicts your "proof" of flat earth... Sun dint disappear due to perspective, sun disappeared due ot curvature of earth.
1
Frank Nakamo "what I love about your answer is how you also dont prove anything..." Says some one who screamed out that earth is flat and dint provided any evidence... Damn this irony of flatards... "Maybe you should go an make some fake images with your friends at NASA and try to convince everyone with them..." Simple question every single flatard failed to answer: What method you used to determine that image is fake? And to end this all http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif boom, proven that its not a flatardia.
1
Exceeding 10x the rated load is junk? Weird.
1
By your broken logic Australia is not real because you never seen it with your own eyes? So i'm not real ether as you never seen me? Earths shape was determined in 3 century BCE. You dont need to go into space to know that we live on a globe... Basic observation of sun proves that, not even talking about other 50+ things anyone on earths surface could use to get tos same conclusion. And its interesting that you want to dismiss actual experts from appropriate fields, smartest people on earth, collection of entire human knowledge while at same time blindly believing what some old book said...
1
Why?
1
So your solution for Putin attacking Ukraine is to just simply give up and give away entire country? Not a good plan...
1
Actually it would always be day and never night, if it was flat.
1
Everything is provable about globe earth and heliocentric model... Basic observation of sun from your backyard proves a globe... You being ignorant and simply brainwashed by your religion will not change the actual shape of earth.
1
Do they tho? As hydrogen refueling stations barely gets built anymore and car companies don't really want to invest money in those either. Like, seriously, why would anyone want to buy one? There are under 1000 refueling hydrogen stations in entire world, while we have over 3 000 000 BEV stations, not including the fact that any electrical wall socket can be used to recharge it. Hydrogen isint coming back and any car company which will try to concentrate on it will go bankrupt in next few years.
1
yeahmhmmrightokaymhmmyeahsure "how do you know if those are real or not..." Because there is no reason to fake something what is obviously true... You have live feeds from space... Live flipping feed... And you demonstrated me being correct on that simple question i asked before for your method you used to determine that its CGI. You failed, because you dont have one, you simply said that its CGI because you dont like it... Bad for you, reality is independent from your personal opinion. "like I said I’m not trying to change your mind only you can do that" Cool, then stop spreading misinformation... "Just trying to wake you up and hopefully you’ll do YOUR OWN RESEARCH" i did... You cant even explain why sun behavior completely shatters flatardian model and 100% matches globe one. Yet you are here screaming that NASA provided CGI images like that would ever disprove globe model... Flipping hell... You could disprove 100% of what NASA provided ever, would not get you even one nanometer closer in proving flatardia or disproving globe model... "not base your whole existence on someone else..." yet you are here screaming that something is CGI while you never actually investigate it and simply repeating what some numbnuts said on internet to you... Irony, och that sweet sweet irony...
1
From my encounters with flat earthers, majority of them tried to use bible as proof that earth i flat... So yea, correlation is obvious here.
1
"Real" fuel is finite, so sooner or later you will have to transition to renewables. So why not sooner?
1
@tonytony978 Unless your gas powered ones gets a ban in your country at some point. People said exact same thing when there was transition towards cars from horses, and just look where we are now. You might not live long enough to get to that point, but its coming and you can't stop it. And just FYI most of those "golf field cars" can beat your manly pickup truck any day of the week, but well, you do you and we will move forwards.
1
@tonytony978 "Beat in what exactly?" Everything except max range, at the moment. Tho this will change too in next decade. "Can your golf car tow cars?" Yes. "Can your electric mower pack up a family and go on 500 km trip?" Yes. Lucid Air Dream Edition gets you around 800km of range from one charge. Welcome to 2023. Tho I have no idea why you would want to drive more than 200km without stopping somewhere to stretch your legs or similar. And during that time you can happily top up your EV. Its basically none issue, people traveled across entire USA multiple times with EV's and had no actual issues. You being scared of something you don't understand will not change anything here. "And what when you lose capacity of your batteries in few years?" You keep using it... it's not like battery capacity will become 5% in few years... You will lose some, but in general it's nothing magical. "Then spend another 20 000$ to keep going?" Looks like you seriously think that in few years EV's become bricks with zero range... "EV will in city surely but exchange normal cars never" Every expert disagrees with your obviously personal ignorant opinion here. Why is that? EV's are on rise, new battery technologies are basically discovered/invented every single year, or multiple times in a year. Their performance is increasing, their cost is going down. Battery degradation is basically going away. And on and on and on and on and on... There is a reason why basically all car manufacturers switching to electric, because this is the future we have to go into. You can't burn dinosaurs for ever here, sooner or later we will have to switch to something what is powered by renewables, so why not sooner and minimize pollution? And yes, EV's are greener than ICE cars even if you would use todays electricity production and include coal power plants, EV's are still greener, and this will only improve in time. ICE cars will be as common as horses are now, you can still ride one if you wish, but it will be just that, someone's hoby outside cities.
1
Tho difference would be that Musk would arrange new rocket in few days, while Boeingis like a year away from another rocket being ready.
1
@zombieman977 You seem to failed to see my point here. First of all, both companies can do rocket science, obviously they can do it better than you. Point is that differently than Boeing, SpaceX can actually quickly arrange new rocket launch if needed. So while screwing up with rocket science isn't nice, there is still difference when it comes how you would solve your screw-ups.
1
Hows that 3 day war going on after 400+ days?
1
@robertdownes793 Better to be ruled by dictator than by any other regime?... I guess you are living in North Korea or atleast Russia, right?
1
He didn't, that's the "funny" part here. You got fooled by Jerry here. Tong weight limit was rated at 1100, it failed at 10400, that's more than 9 times MORE than it was rated at, yet you think that Musk lied, tho its not Musk, its Tesla who makes statements like that. Do you see irony here?
1
How scared are you of a person living in same state? I mean, Musk lives on earth, so why are you still living on same planet as he does?
1
@wearabo You have right to live in Texas too, but you already said that you will not live there just because Musk is in same state, so by this logic you should stop living on earth, maybe buy a ticket to Mars with first wave from Musk or something? It would be extra ironic, but you would achieve your goal. Tho, that said, Musk lives in this Solar system too, so you might want to travel further away. Like, how far away you should go from person you don't like to be comfortable? Is there specific distance or is it just bound to the states? Could you live 5 meters apart as long as he lives in different state than you? And just FYI Musk isn't my hero, he does bunch of dumb shit, but being generic Musk hater doesn't help you out here. And I have no real interest to go to Mars at this moment, will wait until there is actual properly livable colony before even attempting to consider that option.
1
Hydrogen as byproduct is generally meaningless as you will get tiny amounts from that process and you would simply reinsert that back into production process like converting that hydrogen into electricity instead of trying to capture, store it, transport it and then fuel up some cars. And just FYI actual studies have been done and END to END BEV's produce less pollution in comparison to hydrogen cars
1
@joseonwalking8666 Why? You don't like basic facts?
1
@joseonwalking8666 Is it because you don't have any actual counter arguments?
1
@IraFox84 Probably more so that your head is too thick to understand. Every one of your comments ignores the downsides to FCEVs. I can say same exact thing here. There are no perfect technology out there, never was and quite likely never will be. But hydrogen issue list is longer than BEV's, this is why FCEVs never become anything more than someones expensive hobby.
1
Basically any dictatorship or heavily undeveloped country will accept Putin? Ok...
1
Why are they testing it on south Africa's roads? And just because they test something doesn't really mean that they will make it. Testing is fine, this is how you learn if this thing is actually viable option or not. Come back when BMW actually comes out with mass production hydrogen car already built, not empty promises or concept arts, but actually working and already built car.
1
@stewartw.9151 You should take into consideration possibility that they are doing this just for the sake of it, aka wanting to make low production cars so that they could say "we have hydrogen cars" and that's that. We yet to see hydrogen car which people would actually buy, especially instances where people would want their next car be hydrogen after they owned one. Experience owning hydrogen cars is abysmal at best.
1
@skuggeboy Farting damages ozone too, but like... By how much? It's so weird to see people screaming and screeching with statements like that "it damages ozone" well, anything can damage it, but like, by how much it actually damages it?
1
@PinkbombUK You do know that all those satellites have self deorbiting procedure? And is it seriously your main complain that you are annoying about few extra lights in night sky while at same time it providing internet for those who could not have gotten before? Should we enforce a law to turn off all lights in cities at night so that you could see stars?
1
@PinkbombUK I'm not talking about special tiny areas, was talking about actual whole cities... After all those block your precious view of stars... So should we enforce for ALL cities to basically cut off electricity at night? Should we change our life just because 0.013% (actual number of people who looks at stars with telescopes) of humans? Should we stop technological progress just because 0.013% of humans have extra troubles looking at sky?... I don't like street lights, should I just smash those? Like, at which point does this become ridiculous for you? What is the percentage of humans which gets inconvenient by a thing when we should start hampering something? If SpaceX launches space telescope for public use, would you ten be happy? No idea why you even want to imply that I would have said that Musk does it out of altruism... Its a business... Just like every other... You can't launch thousands of satellites without it being some sort of business. Will put it in different analogy here. At one point horses got outlawed from public roads. Was it a good or bad thing? Well, it was good for road safety, did some horse riding fans got offended by them no longer being able to go to their local grocery store to buy milk with their mule? Yes. Should we just said "F**k those pesky cars, we offended 0.013% of people, let keep using horses!!!" You sound selfish, honestly. Instead of providing cheap internet to remote places on earth to start educate people on the world you just want to look at sky instead... Like, c'mon...
1
@skuggeboy What damage? Why do people as generic Musk hatters can't even make normal argument here? How much of damage is it? Is it more than me farting? Is it less? You just said that it damages ozone... Like... Ok... There is million things which damages ozone, but without you actually giving any actual numbers is just waste of time to even talk about it. So, once more, how much damage does it cause?
1
@PinkbombUK Look at my lips and try to understand what I'm asking you here. HOW MUCH? I will not even disagree with you here, ok, it damages ozone, now tell me, by how much? If I pick a spray can containing ozone damaging chemicals and just empty out, small spray can, would that be more or less than what satellites causes? Can you give ACTUAL NUMBERS here and not just say that it damages ozone? Should we kill all cows in entire world because them farting damages ozone? Do you see issue here with your statement?
1
@skuggeboy There are dedicated organizations responsible for research like that, heck even FCC should be looking into it if it's actually worth anyone's time. It's not that we don't care, it's just YOU want to complain about anything you can. Get actual numbers, if satellites have actual impact on ozone which is worth noting then I will be first in line saying that its a big issue which needs to be addressed, until then you just hating for the sake of hating and pretend that no one else cares as much as you do... You making that silly comment created bunch of CO2 which increased global warming, we should STOP YOU!!! Right? This is your level argument. How much of an impact was your comment? Is it worth noting? So by your logic YOU DON'T CARE about environment or you should stop using electricity, right? Your intellect level argument turned against you, hard to argue against that, isint it?
1
@skuggeboy "So you call it complaining and hating that somebody mentions a possible problem that could affect our planet?" Correct. As you don't have any actual numbers you objectively have no grounds to say that something is bad, as for something to be bad you would need to prove that it is bad, but as you can't do that, you can't complain about it. Its basic logic 101. Get actual numbers, if those show that its actually causing an actual damage worth noting then you will have valid reason to complain, if its on level of rounding error then you don't have reason to complain. Simple. "Even if we don't have the numbers yet, it doesn't mean that it isn't a problem" And it doesn't mean that it is... THAT'S THE ENTIRE POINT! "can trigger destructive reactions between ozone and chlorine, leading to the depletion of the ozone layer" Can or does? If it only can then you even have way weaker argument than before... its not only that you don't know how much damage it causes, it only maybe potentially could cause some... "If you have looked into the matter you would understand that it's pretty complicated matter and there's no easy answer." Then don't claim that there is an actual matter to address here. If its complicated, then solve it, until then you don't have valid argument here. "You think it's okay that billionaires and big companies can just fill the low earth orbit with junk without looking into these matters?" No, but you screaming and screeching that something is bad because billionaire did it will not help you out here either. Prove that it actually damages ozone and we can work together to stop it. And just try to notice that now you went straight away in attack mode on billionaires and big companies, like it has any actual meaning. Billionaires, big companies, local tiny grocery shop runned by Joe, doesn't matter, have no actual impact on actual argument here. So why are you even mentioning it like it has any meaning? It either damages ozone or it doesn't, who did it doesn't have impact on argument. "What do you mean about that I should stop using electricity?" Because production of electricity creates CO2 and CO2 damages environment, so you should stop damaging environment, aka you should stop using electricity if you want to stop damaging environment. Just using your own argument against you, not my problem that it sounds ridiculous. "More and more energy is being produced without CO2 emissions" Magic isn't real. To produce electricity you will need equipment to do it, it can be wind, solar, water, geothermal or anything else, but you still need equipment to produce it and its production creates CO2 and general waste. Electricity storage/transportation creates its own waste on top of that, your electrical equipment (PC or whatever you are using) creates its own CO2 footprint. So no, there is no such thing as energy production/usage without CO2 emissions, there are only the ones which are less polluting. So use your own argument and stop using electricity!
1
@skuggeboy "I make risk assessments for living so screaming and screeching comes naturally to me" Looks like you are bad at your job. You should avoid screaming and screeching until you get actual numbers to work it, otherwise you just look like paranoid person. "Sorry for offending your world view" No offense, not even little bit, just annoyance of seeing people who seemingly are smart but are unable to think rationally in some situations. "a possible negative side effect" Yea, possible, just possible, without you even knowing if this is even worth mentioning at the end of the day. Its possible that sun goes supernova tomorrow, doesn't mean that we should start digging ditches... What is possible and what is actually true are not the same thing. "It was extremely dumb of me" All of us have their low times, I forgive you. "The best solution obviously is just to be quiet and not say a word" Or, you could gather actual information to support your paranoid statements? Wouldn't that be a better option instead of creating conspiracy theories? " I should stop everything I’m currently doing and start researching this complicated matter without any qualifications on the matter" So you don't have qualifications, you don't have any actual data on it, yet you want to rise this "issue" like its a real issue just because it maybe possible could be somewhat a damaging thing on some level? Do you see how worthless this makes your original statement? "Just like all the journalists are doing." Doing what?... Its like you are going balls deep into some sort of conspiracy... Maybe journalists actually looked into it and asked actual experts and they came up with nothingburger? Maybe there is actual damaging thing and journalists are simply gathering actual evidence BEFORE speaking about it? Maybe maybe maybe. But what they are not doing is not creating conspiracy theories. "We humans will keep repeating history by first trying things out without thoroughly searching them" What do you suggest here? Let's postpone things for extra few decades until its fully analized? How would you even fully analyze a thing which needs to be done in bigger quantities on longer periods of time to actually represent actual impact? With your logic industrial revolution would still be a thing of the future as we would be sitting around the fireplace and pondering how much of environmental impact bigger fireplace could cause here... "I shouldn't attack big companies and billionaires" My question is: Why are you attacking big companies and billionaires? Is this all about them and not actual environment? "It's not my place to criticize them because I'm just a lowly peasant" I mean, you already admitted to not have any expertise here and that you don't have any actual evidence, so yes, it's not your place to criticize anything here. Even if I agreed with our conspiracy theory, you would still have no right to criticize here... I'm not defending big organizations or billionaires, just pointing out your irrational argument based on your personal ignorance, that's the issue here and the only issue. "I might be too optimistic about reducing CO2 emissions but that's one of the issues that can actually be solved" Then show good example and stop using electricity, you can stop heating/cooling your house too, or using your car, or... I mean, everything you do in your life creates CO2, after all breathing is the thing you have too do and each breath creates CO2, sooo... Like... You know... Not actually suggesting that, but this is where your own logic leads too... Makes no real sense, doesn't it?
1
@skuggeboy "Every single risk will be listed" Like meteor strike? Alien invasion? Scientists figuring out that we are in matrix?... Clearly you are exaggerating here, you are not looking into ALL possibilities here, you are only looking into the ones which have some supporting evidence of actually happening at certain or higher chance value, right? Or does all of your risk assessments includes meteor strikes? Supernova explosions? Unicorns appearing from thin air and puncturing fuel tank with their magical horns? "We will then evaluate each risk with people with different backgrounds and expertise" Cool beans, so go and talk with those people if this is an actual issue or not, otherwise, as ridiculous as it sounds, its on same level as saying that there is a risk of aliens getting upset of satellites interfering of their spying no earth and due to that they will wipe all life on earth because they are that thin skinned... Do you see how ridiculous and how fast it can get with your level of logic? We could sit here for 5 years and list all possible issues with rockets and satellites, as there can be basically infinite amount of those, doesn't mean that we should waste our time on all of them, right? "If you think that I'm bad at my work because of it, then I'm happy that my employer isn't as harsh as you and I'm still employed" Depends on what is your actual job, if its just coming up with possible issues, then cool, I could do it too. But there is difference between coming up with possible issues and coming up with issues which are actual issues worth to talk about, and as you already admitted you don't have expertise about satellite deorbiting damage caused to ozone and you don't have actual supporting evidence besides that one research which says that something could maybe possibly potentially cause some undefined amount of damage.Like cool, me eating beans and farting could maybe potentially cause some undefined amount of damage to ozone too, doesn't mean we should all throw our hands up and ban beans now... What we need is actual data BEFORE you make any claims of a damage caused by that thing. "Same goes with the ozone layer. If we damage it for some reason the end result will be much worse than spending more time evaluating the possible risks." That's the more interesting thing, we already been at the point where ozone layer was severely damaged, it was way way way worse, we fixed cause of it, now it healed. Having some wage potential issue with satellites causing undefined amount of damage is just... Worthless at the moment. "Hardly ever rich people will go to jail if they break the law" Because that's not how the law works and, well, rich people do have connections helping them to awade punishments, tho issue right now is that you don't even have a case to make here. I would be more than happy to stand by your side and request different satellites or their banning in general if you managed to prove that there is actual damage by them, but you don't have it, you just trying to do some weird scaremongering, yes, this is basically what you are doing. Scaremongering. I'm not scared to be annoyed, I will be more than happy to be annoyed if I can correct someone. We seemingly agree on most of the things here, what we only disagree is your scaremongering, you might be used to just present bunch of possible issues as part of your job, but this is not your job, you should only present things which are actually an actual issues and not something YOU think to be an issue. Happy New Year.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Musk? Wait, do you seriously think that I'm an actual Musk? Are you ok?
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Biden, is that you? As your comments look like someone who has some mental senile issues. You are seriously paranoid... I guess everyone who disagrees with you is a potential real Musk in your head... Damn, it should be a scary life for you.
1
Because they are pushing Russia back from their country. War is going on in their country and Russia literally shells cities, what else do you expect? Loosing would be if Russia was actually progressing and Ukraine had no way to win against bigger military, but they are not, so its a win for Ukraine.
1
Anthony There is nothing you could not achieve without need to have religion on side. You can organize communities together without religion, so why would that be positive or even needed? Religions are here just to control people, nothing more.
1
@A2forty But its like saying "Even tho this person raped 50 children, he donated 5 bucks to local charity, so its fine to keep him around" its not like you need balance between good and bad things to keep it around, if there is little to no benefit in keeping something while actually doing that can cause allot more harm than good, then why should we keep it? Religions produce more harm than good, allot more harm than good, so why we should keep it?
1
Why didn't he mentioned that to build one hydrogen refueling station will cost around 1 million bucks, while on BEV recharging station will be around 50k. And there is no reason why electrical grid could not sustain BEV's, especially when you consider the FACT that producing hydrogen requires around 60% MORE electricity in comparison to BEV's to move same distance. Does he have stocks in hydrogen or something?
1
We can use BEV's.
1
@crwilliams4597 Is your constitution allows you to have a nuke?
1
This video wasn't meant to debunk flat earthers, it was to see why they think what they think.
1
As some one who doesn't care you make some but hurt looking comment that you don't care. People who ACTUALLY dont care, doesn't bother to even watch videos like this one, let alone make a comment that they dont care, you clearly do care. But now i'm curious: Why are you afraid to care?
1
sunset
1
Yes, its: Putin
1
Not really, i'm not flat earther but i left dislike due to poor presentation of this video. In general there are around 2% of people from entire population who thinks that we live on a pancake, but then again, if you would remember quote from George Carlin "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise half of them are stupider than that."
1
@penguin82875 You are not doing any favors here...
1
Care to elaborate?
1
Then you should actually do basic research here... Entire point is to be multiplanetary species, if something happens on one planet, then we still survive on the other. As now all of our eggs are in one basket. He isint promoting Mars as just "lets leave earth because we ruined it"... God damn you people are weird and ignorant...
1
@deerichardz Such a weird misrepresentation of what I said here. I didn't say to just abandon earth and leave for another, I said that we as species need to have backup plan in case something does happen. On top of this, challenges like colonizing mars will promote technological advancements across the board, which on itself can help out this earth. We will need to warm Mars, so we will need to figure out how to do it and how all that process will work, with that knowledge we could figure out a method to actually take better control over earths atmosphere and fix it. Again, not saying to abandon earth...
1
@deerichardz Kamala becoming president. Good enough response?
1
@deerichardz First of all, never said that you are American. Second, never said that I'm American. Third, do you know what a joke is? Fourth, to amuse myself here, do you remember what happen to dinosaurs after specific event? What do you imagine would happen with humans if similar or bigger thing like that happens? Sunshine and rainbows? Its a plan B to have separate colony, on top of humans actually starting to colonize other planets. We could even say that nothing will ever happen to earth, like ever ever and for ever we will live under sunshine and rainbows on earth, dystopian world with leftist in control, pronouns and all that fun jazz. This still doesn't mean that we should stay on single planet and not start to explore different worlds.
1
@saswatsarangi6669 I guess his talking about solid hydrogen, my best guess here...
1
Charge BEV using solar...
1
He literally volunteered for experimental surgery to test out new technology which can give back at least some autonomy to paralyzed people and you straight away went into some weird conspiracy?... Damn... Let me guess: Its bad because its related to Musk?
1
Why? Hydrogen cars are still a thing which is extremely unpopular without any bright future in sight. So what didn't age well here?
1
@andrew_l1900 Duno if you are joking here or just extremely misinformed... If you see anyone saying that Tesla going Hydrogen, its 100% bullshit... Check your sources before you parrot them.
1
Banana
1
Its because only that one makes any sense at this point. Hydrogen could have been decent alternative to go with if there wasn't BEV's, but as we have those then going with hydrogen makes zero sense. You would need to build hundreds of thousands hydrogen refueling stations and thousands hydrogen production plants. Its investment in quadrillions range. Or we could simply invest more money into expanding electrical grid which would be exponentially less costly and better solution long term across the board.
1
And here you go, you will guess stuff instead of actually measuring stuff and getting actual correct results. There is nothing complicated about metric system, nothing... No idea why people are scared. And we have 12 months mainly due to amount of lunar cycles. There is no good reason to change it now, entire world uses 12 months as standard, switching it to 10 will not bring you any real benefit besides generalizing things with metric system. Similar thing with clocks, even tho in normal countries you have 24 clocks, US still uses 12h clocks... This could be changed to 10 hours in a day, but it just gets messy, you would need to change minutes too, so 10 hours, 100 minutes in hour, 100 seconds in a minute. So it would be switch from 86400 seconds in a day to 100000 of those, which isint that big of a difference. Would simply things, but it would cost quite a bit of headache to make this switch. And issue is that you kind of need to do it in one go as you can't just have 2 time measuring systems at one time which uses same names, so then it would need to introduce new names for those seconds, minutes, hours, weeks, months and so on... Do you see how much trouble it would cause? This is not the same with metric system, entire world already uses it, we have separate names, entire scientific world uses it, only 3 remaining countries tries to stick with outdated measuring system for no good reason.
1
There is basic limit of how many students school can handle. More students means bigger classes or more of them, which will either impact general level of education quality if you increase student amount in class or you will need to hire more teachers and have more buildings to have those classes in.
1
Yes, please, learn to read. If you did basic google search you will get something like this "The war for Eternia begins again in what may be the final battle between He-Man and Skeletor." which is basic explanation what you should expect from these series. Its not saying that it will not be about he-man, its implying that its all about him and Skeletor... It was advertised as He-Man series, as actual continuation of it and not as some new series about completely different character with He-Man just doing cameo in it.
1
It didn't fail... It went more than 9x over its rated load
1
Depends, if you need to merge with fast traffic then having good exceleration is a big bonus, if you need to overtake a car and you can do it few seconds quicker, again, big bonus and safer. It's not a huge deal, but still a good thing to have.
1
99.999% of rocket scientists disagree with you. Why?
1
Those are the past.
1
@JEKitchens gas and diesel isn't sustainable, sooner or later we will have to switch to something else, something what is based on renewables, you know, like batteries or maybe even hydrogen. This is why gas and diesel will remain the past due to the fact that those are not renewable resources, not even talking about pollution and inefficiency of it in general.
1
@JEKitchens How do you think oil forms? Do you think it will magically keep forming underground for next few billion years? It takes millions of years to form. Are you suggesting for us to make it in a factory? You think that would be more sustainable than making batteries or making hydrogen?... Do you even understand what renewables are? Its a thing you can't actually exhaust because, well, it keeps renewing. You know, like sunlight, like wind, like slowing water, like geothermals and so on. Oil isn't one of those even if it could replenish of few millions of years, key issue here is those millions of years to be renewed. Unless you want to ride a bicycle for that period of time while you wait...
1
@syvadcram Now i just wonder if you have any actual argument here or are you gonna just quote some one who has no credibility in any area as they go their PhD by writing about tea tastes? PhD means nothing if its from completely different area... And especially if its from a source which gives it for anyone who signs their name and gives some cash...
1
@syvadcram Just because you might have had some one who actually known what science is doesn't mean that you do too... So no idea why you even mentioned that, its irrelevant and you should have learned that in your famous University...
1
@tenavrisen9279 Be civilized?... In same like Russia is doing now? By killing people? Seriously? You think that Russia is civilized country? Dictatorship? Civilized?... And you perfectly showed to everyone why not only government if bad here, but people too... Congrats...
1
Which whom are you arguing here? Who said that climate never changed? Issue isn't with climate change, but with how rapidly its changing now which matches the time we started to spit out crap ton of CO2 into air. Maybe this was natural cycle of climate change, but the fact remains that its going worse faster than we can manage it. Check top 20 hottest years ever recorded, like 18 of them will be from last 20 years... If lowering CO2 emissions can help with this temperature increase, then why we should not do something about it?
1
People said same thing about horses (not literally, duh...), look how that turned out.
1
So basically MIT needs to be racist? And yes, this is what it means when you are separating groups of people based on their skin color.
1
What?
1
@ЕленаБем-ц1й Such a good country... I guess there are no actual good reasons for all those countries to hate this country?... Not a single one?... Who is more likely to know what actually happen, the one who lives in russia and only hears Russian propaganda or those who actually lived and experienced what happen? Just like russian special military operation was not a invasion... In same sense Russia is a good guy here... because russian dictator said so...
1
It's really easy to fool your so called "common sense"
1
Well someone clearly watched too many big oil propaganda videos here... This is not how efficiency is calculated... You don't just pick least efficient way to produce electricity and go with it... By the way, you need around 60% more electricity for hydrogen cars to move it same distance as you would with electric ones.
1
What is always funny is that if a thing is patented then you should be able to find that patent and look atit, how it was done, what it is and so on. Conspiracy nuts just likes throw words around without understanding what those mean.
1
Now get a footage of sun with actual sun filter and you will realize that sun never changes its size... So next time learn to perform actual experiments before you scream that something is true...
1
James L its like said in that same video that it will distort... Its not changing size, light refraction due to particles is causing all this, not that sun actually changes size due to it moving away from you... https://flatearth.ws/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/sun-apparent-size.jpg one of many examples that sun doesn't change size... We are not talking about distortion here, we are talking about actual observable size of sun when we dont have distortion...
1
Wait, do you think that gas cars never catch on fire during collision?
1
@penguin82875 In any case, Quran is wrong.
1
What is always amusing is to see believers in same exact text claiming opposite things. I have seem quite a few Quran believers claiming that it says that earth is a globe, now we have one which says opposite of that... Maybe you people should gather together and figure out what your book of fables says and get to one answer and maybe then try to make claims like that? Would save us ton of time explaining why you are wrong here.
1
Trying to cope here? Does NATO scare you so much that you mentioned it twice in one sentence when NATO dint even joined this fight yet?
1
Yes yes yes, yes you do...
1
Patching takes time and if Russia starts to patching it then it will be clear signal for Ukrainian soldiers to preparate counter offensive near it or simply aim few extra rockets at it when Russia decides to cross it with tanks. Its good enough to prevent quick Russian forces movement until Ukraine takes back their lands on this side of the bridge.
1
You said that you only want to see pro EV stuff, so then why are you mentioning rockets?! Hydrogen is direct "competitor" or "alternative" to BEV's which is quite relevant to be addressed as its directly linked to BEV adoption.
1
Just like everyone make their own petroleum at home...
1
It does, it's on the main screen.
1
Because Putin said so?
1
Then go and buy Hydrogen car... Lets see how much you will save here.
1
@valerystoichkov7429 if TF is genius then why the hell is he making youtube videos and being wrong constantly on things he says? Go and watch older videos and realize how badly those aged...
1
Did your witch sticks said that?
1
2 hour video?... Why? You dont even have working model... How would this long video help you out?
1
Well maybe not, but that guy in your provided video does need help... Professional help...
1
Because earth is demonstrably spherical... While flat earthers cant even present working model for their claim. I mean, simple picture like this one disproves flat earth http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif
1
@TheHistoryofPropaganda "language is everything" Yes, and some words can and does have multiple meanings depending on context... Just like "round vs flat earth" is same as "globe vs flat earth" while "round table" would be "round flat disk table". You complaining about word usage will not change anything here, everyone understands what this video is about. "Why people use climate change when they really mean global warming" Because paid politicians made it happen. Paid by oil companies. Saying "climate change" is less scary than "global warming". But even then, both are still factually true, climate is warming in average and it is changing, so again, context is everything and in both cases you will end up at same place... "Using ‘round’ to describe a sphere is an error of grammar," Saying that word which has definition fitting situation being error in grammar is error in logical thinking. "Nye not a scientist either, but plays one on TV" Nye is a scientist, by all means and purposes he is one. Just look up definition of scientist and check who Nye is, what he does/did and what degrees he has, because by definition of scientist, Nye is one, you like it or not, I personally dont really like it, but he is one unless you want to redefine word "scientist". This is similar thing with space tourism where people realized that calling space tourists astronauts will lower value of actual astronauts, so some adjustments are being done to exclude those who went to space for 5 minutes and those who spent there hours, days, weeks after extensive training. But when it comes to scientists, Nye is one. So stop complaining here about irrelevant things... "Is Round 2-dimensional?" Is Tree 2-dimensional?... Makes no sense? Right? Round is a word to describe something, which can be 2d or 3d, depending on use case, word round itself doesn't have shape... It can be used to define one, but its not one on itself... "Yes round is two dimensions, in other words flat" Unless you have... I dont know... Something 3d dimensional? Did you entirely failed to understand that part where I have included actual definition of word "round" which can mean 3d object? Wait, i need this clarification from you: Do you understand that words can have multiple meanings?
1
@TheHistoryofPropaganda "With the sources. These so called 'scientists'" And your another mistake. Earth is a globe not because someone said so, its basic observation of reality anyone could do from their backyard. You simply have few scientists saying something what is confirmed to be a fact. "Bill Nye is not a scientist" Actually he is, which makes you wrong yet again. "Can we agree on that firstly?" We can't agree on false statements. " That Bill NYe is NOT a scientist" Once again, he is a scientist. You might not like that he is not 24/7 in a lab, but by definition of scientist and what Nye has, he is scientist. Completely irrelevant to entire topic tho, but as you have nothing else than a childish nitpicking, well, we have what we have. "No degrees" BS in Mechanical Engineering. So you are wrong again. Dont you get tired of being wrong constantly? "while holding back ridicule of FE" Flat earth claim is ridiculous, so you can ridicule ridiculous ideas. Welcome to reality. "The appeal to ridicule" Stupid ideas are stupid, but Nya isint saying that flat earth is false because its stupid, he is saying that flat earth claims is false and it is stupid because we have actual testable evidence to show that earth is a globe. If I came to you and said that I can fart out gold bricks after eating hot tacos, can you ridicule that or should you take me seriously? "argumentum ad auctoritatum" Hey, you know fancy words. Sadly you fail to understand why this doesn't apply here. Once again, shape of earth can be determined from your backyard. On top of this, using actual authority for an argument isint fallacious... If I have majority of astrophysics saying X and i use that as an argument, its not me using logical fallacy here, i'm using actual authority in this particular topic. Your capabilities to constantly fail is amusing, tho quite boring. "Anyone here ever heard of logical fallacy?" Well, clearly you only heard those labels, but never bothered to understand them. Skipping rest of your comment, as I see its pointless and waste of time to address every single ridiculous thing you said here. Will make it really simple: Earth is a globe, this is a fact. Flat earth claim doesn't even have working model, not even talking about evidence. What people said in this video is irrelevant, earth is still a globe. All of them are scientists, but even if they were not, wont change anything, earth still a globe. So maybe, just maybe, instead doing this childish attempt to poke a holes in this video, maybe just maybe, prove that earth is flat? Otherwise you just look like but hurt flat earther who has nothing better than complain about word "round" not fitting their personal definition...
1
Do you seriously think that waging war costs 50 bucks a month?...
1
@dreadroberts7283 "you do realize that "gravity" has never been weighed , touched , smelled , or seen right ?" Have you weighed , touched , smelled , or seen radiation? No? Well then its not real, i have one ticket to Fukushima, you might like it there this time of the year. And just FYI There is such simple experiment as Cavendish experiment which demonstrates gravity in action. So yea, gravity is detectable. So you are, no surprise, fundamentally incorrect. "so why does one believe it exists ?" Because some of us have IQ above my shoes "because your government school teacher told you it did ?" No, because globe model matches reality 100% while you dont even have flat earth model without basic contradictions...
1
@dreadroberts7283 ? Cavendish experiment doesn't involve any calculations by itself... Its a demonstration that any object with mass will attract another object with mass... This is entire point of it, demonstration of gravity in action... The share fact that you failed to realize this says allot about you and why you think that earth is flat...
1
@dreadroberts7283 Then why all of your comments sound like you are? Do you know that earth is a globe?
1
@dreadroberts7283 "i do not know what shape the earth is" I do... People 2000 years ago knew that... Whats stopping you? "i have never been far enough away from the earth to get a good look" And you dont need to. Go to a beach, observe ships disappearing bottoms up and you will have evidence of spherical earth. Go to your backyard with a sun filter. Observe suns behavior. You have 4 things to look up: Sun moves in straight line across sky, 100% match to globe, 100% mismatch to flat one. Sun moves at constant perceived speed, 100% match to globe and 100% mismatch to flat one. Sun doesn't change size, 100% match to globe and 100% mismatch to flat one. And then you have sunset, 100% match to globe and 100% mismatch to flat one. Do you seriously think that you can only know what shape is earth by going to space?... Every single observable planet is spherical, but you think that earth could be flat just because?... What else do you need? "my comments are only to say belief in another mans words is religion , and man should think hard about what it believes" Cool, do that, but starting to reconsider something what is factually true is not healthy... "now you can say this test and that test prove some thing but unless you personally do said test you truly know nothing and are taking another mans word for it." have you ever seen a sunset?... Because that's enough to disprove flat earth... And yet you want to suggest that people need to question something like that... There is place and time for that, questioning shape of earth is not one of those. "also i wonder if the cavendish experiment will work if you replace the iron balls with wood ?" Yes. And it was led, not iron. And led was used for its density, as more dense object will create bigger gravitational pull. Having wood will create gravitational pull, but it might be not enough to counter strings tension which can prevent from this experiment giving you any results at all. Any object with mass attracts another object with mass. Simple as that. Only difference is in how strong this attraction is. " it would still be to objects but without the magnetic properties of iron." Again, Cavendish experiment is specifically done with none ferromagnetic materials to eliminate possibility in it attracting each other due to electromagnetism and not gravity. Again, wood could work, but due to its low density it could not produce enough of attraction to make any noticeable effect.
1
@dreadroberts7283 "why does the sunset prove a globe ? " Because sun CANT set under horizon if its over flat plane, basic geometry... "and have you seen the videos of boats being pulled back over the horizon with a powerful zoom ?" No, never, have you? I can bet 100 bucks that such video doesn't exist. Do you want to make this bet? There is no video where you would have actual boat going over horizon and you could bring it back with a zoom... This is generic flat earther claim 101 i have seen dozens of times, try to guess how many times people presented actual video after i asked for it... No one... Why is that? Maybe because you simply blindly repeating what some one said on internet without actually fact checking? Could this be the case?
1
@dreadroberts7283 EXACTLY! This is one of most common responses i'm getting, something in between of lines "I'm correct, go find evidence!" Damn... Its not my job to prove you correct, its yours, if you cant, and it looks like you cant, then we can assume that you are wrong and you made mistake when you made that claim. If you want to show that ship can go back into view, its YOU who will need to provide that evidence, but because i know that such thing doesn't exist, we can happily call bullshit on your claim. Will you send 100 bucks to me or are you happy to donate that money to some local charity? Ether way it works for me...
1
@dreadroberts7283 You already said this yet you presented 0 evidence of that. Why is that? Why do you think that repeating same empty claim would make it some how true? Ether present evidence or we will know that your claims is full of s**t. Which one will it be?
1
@dreadroberts7283 Cant see even one link. If you made a post from only a link or something, youtube most likely removed it, well, not removed, but hidden from everyone else except you. Try ether posting only one link with some text to avoid being flagged as a spam post. You can test that by logging out of your account and your messages with links will no longer be visible to you. This is general thing youtube does from time to time just to minimize spam people put here, but you get false positives. In any case, if you had any actual youtube videos, post only second part of it, like watch?v=IwJzsE8CvzQ or even IwJzsE8CvzQ which will be enough for me to check it out.
1
@dreadroberts7283 Ok, now i see 2 links. So lets begin. Second link uses nonsensical lens to make a point about disappearing objects over horizon. So couple glaring issues with that. Atmosphere is not a magnifying glass... You can have some distortions, but its not huge magnifying glass. Next, this example doesn't show objects being broth up to the view with a zoom... So no idea why you give me link to 10 minute video which talks about none existing glass lenses... Now first one... Are you kidding me? At which point in this video you see ship disappearing over the horizon which gets broth back with a zoom?... You have some one standing on a beach, quite high from water, zooming into a ship which is not over horizon and you posted this link as evidence for you original claim? Are you ok?... Like seriously, are you?... This is not evidence that you can bring ship back to view after it disappears over the horizon, it proves that zoom can magnify things... That's it... Ship is not over the horizon, its still before it... Now, this is what actual link to actual video which proves some ones position should look like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSMRhTPMSfk You have 2 ships on the horizon, one is not yet went over the horizon, another did. Zoom as much as you want will not bring back into view ship which is already hidden by the curvature. And just one additional note here in response to your second video. Why is this magical glass lense effect is present at same distance (give it or take couple km) independent of weather conditions? You can be in a desert you will have objects disappearing at same distance as you will have them do the same over the ocean. Why is that? If you have completely dry air, how do you get same exact water magnifying effect as it supposedly is over the ocean? Why does distance at which objects start to disappear match globe model? So yea, maybe another link got filtered out which actually proves your point, but from those 2 links... You failed... And i cant really leave that one, but you seriously think that you could compare water particles in air distributed relatively evenly between you and object you observe with a solid block of glass in middle? Are you even serious here?...
1
What do you smoke?
1
They are questioning... More than others... This is why you will always see anything related to Musk all over the place even if other companies or people done same or worse things. Its basic reality at the moment, if ONE Tesla catches fire in a year you will have full blown front page coverage on all news papers, but if you have 500 ICE cars burning off every single year in US alone, that wont get any coverage, because who cares about common thing when you can point out something what is hot at the moment?
1
Because we will always have ignorant people independent of our scientific progress. Maybe at some point in future when we can increase peoples IQ and lowest one will have IQ of 100 then we can hope to eliminate flat earthers. But who knows...
1
Offensive failed before it started?... Did Putin paid you to make this childish comment?
1
No, it wont require more maintenance. Yes, electrical grid can happily support transition towards electric cars. And your personal preference will be personal, just like some people said that they will never replace their horse with a car, well, there are no more horses on roads, you can still ride one if you really want, but its not something you can use for a daily "drive"
1
You seriously don't understand difference between car and a train?...
1
Its expensive in comparison to alternatives, aka EV's.
1
So you are against technological progress?
1
Not a cheapest one...
1
riiiiiiiiight...
1
Its not that simple... You can run cars on water too, but you still need to replace/upgrade billions of cars
1
Ask Putin, he will definitely tell you a truth. And do you know what is "correlation is not equal to causation"?
1
Your comment makes no sense here... What are the same issues when they use different technologies? Source of electricity? While both need electricity difference is that pure BEV's needs like 60% less of it to travel same distance, so no, its not the same issues. Maintenance costs are way lower for BEV's than hydrogen cars. You literally have expiration dates printed on all tanks in hydrogen cars, same thing for fuel cell itself. Basically you will need to replace everything between and included fuel tanks and fuel cell itself every X years independent how much you drive. Tho more driving can shift that time line.
1
@scottkolaya2110 Could be the case, but like I said, that number really depends on amount of middle steps and how efficient those are, while simply using base 60% is just straight forward indicating that you are loosing atleast 60% of electricity independent of anything else.
1
@martinherald6492 "I don't know anything about how long hydrogen tanks last, but an LPG gas tank needs to be regularly inspected." There is so called hydrogen embrittlement which literally, well, makes metals its incontact with brittle, while LPG doesn't really have this issue yet it still need regular checks. That embrittlement is one of the major issues with hydrogen systems, this is why hydrogen tanks are usually coated in ceramics which minimizes issue, doesn't solve it entirely, just minimizes. "What's an EV's battery pack like after 10 years of regular use?" Depends on use. We still have BEV's from 2012 driving around with original battery pack. But difference is that battery packs degrade slowly over time, you just losing capacity, slowly, worst case scenario you will fail to get to your destination. While with hydrogen cars, worse case scenario: you get vaporized in instance when that tank raptures. See the difference? "My point is that everything that makes Murais unpalatable to the public, is exactly the same problems EV's have" Not even close. EV's are actually wanted, while people who buys hydrogen cars NEVER actually looked up what it brings to the table. I was originally all for hydrogen cars, because it sounds so cool to have car which drives on fuel which was produced from water, it's sounded so clean and cool. But then started to look into it and realized that hydrogen technology is extremely complicated, expansive, dangerous and non scalable across the board. "The primary concern is still all about range anxiety, with both vehicles" Only from the people who never owned BEV, especially tesla, as that one will plot entire route for you with needed stops along the way to get you where you want as fast as possible without you needing to think about it. Range anxiety only exists until you drive BEV. "Ferrari owners don't care about service costs" And how many Ferraris do you see on the roads?... Your argument doesn't hold water here. We are talking about replacement for all or atleast most passenger cars, you are bringing in example of a car which is like one in a million... There are more Ferraris in the world than there are hydrogen cars. "Arguing over percentage losses between EV's and fuel cells is pointless as well" But its not... You literally started by saying that BEV and Hydrogen cars experience SAME issues, when in reality they are not. Its like saying "You have 1 apple and I have 1 million apples, its exactly same" well no, that number difference makes it quite different story... "The fact that the sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow, so green energy production must be at least double the capacity of existing fossil fuel produced electricity means NOTHING" ? What the hell is this argument even is? All this applies to EVERYTHING anyways, hydrogen production, BEV charging or even petroleum refining... Source of electricity applies to EVERYTHING equally... "The average climate alarmist doesn't care if it takes far more production for green energy" Care to give actual example here? Like actual example where so called green energy produces more pollution than so called dirty energy. A single example will do. "Dealing with these sorts of arguments is like dealing with petulant spoiled brats" Then why do YOU fail to present actually valid arguments here? You even started complaining that we are using numbers here... So like, what is your actual argument here and based on what exactly?
1
Liquid hydrogen is non option for private passenger cars. Why you ask? Well simple, liquid hydrogen needs to be under -250C temperatures, if it gets higher then it boils off and if your car is just parked then all that hydrogen will simply be ejected out of your car on constant rate. Aka after filling your car you will have like 3 days before all that hydrogen just goes away. So non option. There are no such thing as hydrogen on the go, unless you are talking about liquid hydrogen being "converted" into gas form, but its not production of hydrogen and usage of that "hydrogen on the go" would be extremely misleading. So please take time to update your comment with facts from actual reality and not "facts" you got from facebook post.
1
@LeeBarker-x3p If patent run out then you should be able to atleast provide patent number for me to look it up and your non disclosure agreement should have runned out at same time patent became public. So what was it? because I have no idea what you are talking about here and what I should look up.
1
Well atleast we agree that Russia is a terrible country!
1
By Russian propaganda Bakhmut was taken over like 5 times by now
1
@michelcharron4633 What I was saying is that Russian propaganda is hard at work constantly lying...
1
@michelcharron4633 Well clearly source which keeps claiming that something happen over and over again isn't really reliable source of information...
1
There isn't much of a difference between hydrogen burning and any other gas, including gasoline, so if those rotary engines do not work with regular fuel types, it will not work with hydrogen.
1
Yes, you are correct, we truly live in a world where 2 + 2 = 5. Now lets do maff, Russia raised water levels to record levels, all dam controls have been fully on russian side, so they did it intentionally. Russia already mentioned that they mined dam before. Russia made new law ONE week before blowing up dam which says that it should not investigate such disasters. Then extra points, tho it might be to hard for you to add up, but maybe you can do it. Ukraine gains nothing from this, NOTHING. Russia on another hand cut off possible route for counter offensive and this entire side will be basically inaccessible until next summer, atleast for few months. So this shortened entire front line drastically. On top of this, dam should have been monitored 24/7 and if Ukraine blow it up then Russia would have published this video proving this ages ago. Och, one more, WW2 Russians blew up dam, so its not the first time they used this tactic in desperation. So please, do some maff here...
1
Whataboutism?
1
Yes yes yes, Russia is good, everyone else is bad... If Russia did anything for humanity it would have never started this war which resulted in over 100k dead and more like a million wounded while destroying entire cities.
1
Ask your god.
1
Or its one big scam because you can't bent basic laws of physics?...
1
@wallygator369 Religion is by definition a brainwashing factory... Every single religion is not based on actual evidence but on that blind faith and then you have people pushing that belief on others, aka brainwashing. "Ever deceived yourself?" What? How can you deceive yourself?... If you already know that you deceiving yourself then how could you actually deceive yourself while doing that?... It would be some mental illness if you could actually do that... You cant choose what you believe but you can engage in self deception. "are you headed to Heaven or is that a patently absurd hoax?" Its as real at this moment as Voldemort... Zero evidence and no reason to believe that such thing is even possible to be real. "average intelligence, mighty faith" Why do people with higher IQ tend not to believe in god?
1
You will not get any straight none self contradictory statements from them. Their thought process is as broken as their beliefs.
1
@BigJon410 Now use your own logic and scale it up. Should people be able to own tanks? What about nukes? Like, at which point would you draw a line and say "Ok, this is too much, lets not allow regular humans with weapons like that"?
1
@branko4138 Why not? What's the difference here? Scale of damage you could cause by using it? Och wait... Isint this is the entire point?... At this point do you draw this line when you say "This is too much of possible damage one person could cause, lets not allow it"?
1
@BigJon410 So by your logic every single person needs to have a gun to be able to defend against one who has a gun... How you people (Americans) can't see issue with this is just baffling...
1
@galaxyhunter9392 Implement strict requirements to own gun, properly train people how to use guns, require from gun owners to have secure storages and so on. How many stories you have heard of mass shootings where someone simply used his parents or his neighbours guns? If every single house contains a gun which is just laying in a closet, its really easy to get hands on one and start shooting everyone you see when you get into unstable mental state...
1
@BigJon410 Your failure to understand basic reality here is just... Sad... I'm not against people having option to own gun, I'm against people being able to buy one at grocery shops and people being able to buy guns in mass like they are preparing for a civil war. This is extremely obvious from US current state. People are not educated how to use gun, how to properly store it, they are not properly background checked and so on. More guns in circulation only leads towards more mass shootings. Simply go and check how many mass shootings happen because of shooter getting access to a gun which was in appropriately stored? I live in country where I can get gun if I want too, will have to go over few things, some training and all that jazz, but nothing stopping me to get one. But I'm not because I don't need too because I know that people around me are not owning gun which could be used against me. For you on another hand is becoming snowball effect where you want more guns in your house because you neighbor has more guns than you while your neighbor things exact same thing about you. By this rate soon you will have law which will allow toddlers to own handguns just in case they will need to defend against another toddler with a gun...
1
@nobonesar Irony is strong with people like you. When you hear words "gun control" you start screaming in imagining that this would take away your right to own gun. There is difference between allowing to own gun and actually requiring something from you to do that. Gun lovers want to be able to buy guns as easy as possible because, actual argument from people like you I have seen, "If people can use guns they will drive cars into crowds"... But lets put this aside, lets ask different question, more interesting one. At which point would you say that person should not own X thing? For example, can I own RPG? Can I own C4? Can I own tank? What about nuke? Yes, those are extreme examples, but I want to hear from a single gun lower where he would draw this line... Obviously you want to be able to own guns, so then, how far would you go with it? What would you require from people who wants to own guns? There is direct correlation between ease of gun buying with homicides relating guns. More strict laws lead to less crimes with guns, less death from guns, less illegal guns and so on... So are you for more strict gun laws? In US you basically getting quick background check before buying one... That's like... Insanely silly requirement... In normal countries it will be required for you to pass training in gun usage, you will be properly checked for mental stability, you will be required to have correct and safe way to store gun and in some instances you will have to redo exam every X years to keep your gun license. Och and in some cases you need to provide exact location of your gun, where you keep it, to police. What do you have in US? Nothing... You want gun? Cool, have some cash and you can get one in 5 minutes... Och forgot to add, you don't even need background checks when you buy guys from private sellers... So basically a toddler can buy one if he has cash and someone wanting to sell one, and it would be legal...
1
Scammers will be scamming. Water isn't fuel, never was and never will be. You can't beat laws of physics.
1
"Im not a flat earther by..." Yea, in 90% of instances i see this one it leads to some conspiracy theory and some one talking like flat earther... Does government hides something? Most likely, everyone does, everyone will do. But earth is spherical, you cant hide reality... Basic observation of sun proves that, no need to involve government ar anyone else... So for the future, avoid making red herring fallacy, government is irrelevant, especially when you have no supporting evidence that it did lied about this particular topic.
1
ashGC My suspicion is that flat earthers are people who failed to understand something in class, when they realized that they cant grasp what some one says to him, then he starts inventing excuses why this doesn't make sense, why this is a lie and all that nonsense... Its more like a self defence mechanism, where they try to invent some excuse why they cant understand something what should be really simply to understand. but well, i never meet flat earthier who actually understands geometry...
1
Och no, hindenburg burned down, with hydrogen tanks pressured up to 10k psi it would simply result in vaporizing of entire car in instant
1
I asked this quite few like you, will try it again: What is your source for this 10:1 number?
1
How do you think hydrogen is produced? Scooped from thin air with buckets?...
1
"Just wondering what actual proof you have it's a ball. " Sun observation proves that... Not counting in other 100+ proofs based on evidence... "There is not one single real photo showing it is. " There are, hundreds of them, even videos. Issue is not with that, issue is that you will reject everything presented for globe earth not because you can prove it to be fake, but because you dont like it. How do i know this? Simple... What method you used to determine that picture is fake? "You would be killed if you flew anywhere near the North Pole, " Its 5k or 2k for a plane ticket which goes over south pole, same goes for north one. Tho i think you wanted to say "South" and not "north"... And you can go there on your actual feet for like 50k. (Still talking about south pole...) "Gravity is nothing but a theory. Not actual evidence." Cavendish experiment. "There are more than one thing the majority of the population believe is true without actual fact. " Like god? "Now I'm not a flat earthier" Yet you are... "however I do question everything" Which would be fine if you would not be one who is rejecting evidence because you question everything... "There are scriptures in the Bible eluding it's flat. " Right, because bible was written by simple people who lived 2000 years ago... What did you expected? That it will match reality?... "I challenge you to question all of this "proof" you've been taught. " We did, still believe in globe earth because its demonstrably true. "Ever wonder why those who break through with cures and other ways to live die? " Deep into conspiracies? And how is that related to something you can yourself observe? "I will stay neutral until NASA" Why? NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth... Why do you talk like generic flat earther and bring up irrelevant things and yet you say that you are not one of them? "NASA can actually show some real prof it's round, not a computer generated photo." Cool, now debunk every single photo NASA presented and present us your method you used to get to that conclusion. We will wait.
1
Like... This is why SpaceX building Starship... To drive those costs way down which will open space to wider customer base. If you have self landing rockets which can go into space and back, then you can use those to mine valuable ore in space and bring it back which can be quite profitable.
1
@maemorri I never went and googled exactly how many of those have been detected near earth, but there is one which is predicted to have pure metals worth around $11.65 trillion, so like yea, there are some of those and there is definitely more of those which never got discovered. It can become HUGE industry on its own, like seriously, even now people complain about lithium due to how limited it is and how damaging to the ecosystem its mining is, if you could get bunch of that from space it would be worth crap tone of money and everyone would be happy.
1
In general its not. In public spaces you have no right to privacy, you could be filmed without your permission. When it comes to gyms, well, this would be in general controlled by gym itself, does it allow filming inside or not.
1
But its not infancy, HICE engine was invented in 1806, hydrogen fuel cell engine was invented in 1966. So no, it's not in its infancy.
1
@Savannah1891 Issue is with basic physics, there is just so much of energy you can get out of hydrogen and there is just so much of hydrogen you can fit into your car... There might be some tiny improvements with billions invested, but there isn't much to improve. On top of this, hydrogen is really bad option as alternative due to looooong list of issues relating to it, so there is little to no chance for it to be anything more than someones expensive hobby.
1
Like what?
1
@jeffreyluciana8711 Over few years engaging with flat earthers I'm yet to meet one which isn't bible believer. So from which dark place you got your 93% stat?
1
Russia is scared of Ukraine counter offensive. Perhaps that had something to do with it?
1
Toyota Mirai has 3 huge tanks to achieve 400 mile max range on good day with back wind, with car which uses fuel cell technology which is 2x more efficient than most efficient combustion engine, aka v8 would need like 7-8 of those tanks to get that distance on a good day. So yea, you have a point, look into Mirai and you will realize how little sense v8 makes.
1
1. Weight isint big issue as we can see from real world examples. 2. There is no such thing as hydrogen on demand, you have been scammed. 3. Again, being scammed. Stop watching facebook posts and blindly believing them, fact check. 4. And that refueling costs like 150-200 bucks... Who are you working for by trying to spread such silly things?
1
You will NEVER be able to fill up at home due to how expensive equipment is required to do it. Its not just like filling gasoline, you actually need high pressure build for hydrogen compressors which should be able to go up to 10 000psi, Its not happening, ever.
1
@jakebenson4187 Millionaires will do millionaire things, like buying v12 cars to be displayed in their garage and never actually used for practical purpose, but this is like 1 in a million who does it, rest of the people can't afford something like that. Even for millionaire to have its own hydrogen station at home sounds silly, its like having your own crude oil processing plant in your backyard just because you can afford it, can't say I have heard of any millionaire or billionaire with something like that
1
You both look funny then.
1
Doesn't glasses count as mark of the beast?...
1
@Sh1znitz Why not? Glasses are closer to forehead than his implant, so like, does bible say that its specifically about brain implants?
1
@Sh1znitz This tech is for those who can't move their limbs... Its decades, if not centuries away from this being mandatory to buy/sell something if this would ever be a thing used for that. I can buy things with cash, I can buy things by exchanging thing I want with another thing even tho I can buy things with Paypal... You trying to see something what doesn't exist is just weird...
1
@horus4862 Cool, can you prove that?
1
@horus4862 Hmmm, sounds like a good investment... Let me think about it.
1
That's not how reality works...
1
@cwill2127 So basically if you have improperly placed load, you are hitting pothole while going at 90mph while being at 45 degree downhill, that MIGHT create enough force to break it?... This is non starter as an argument. If you want to complain then you could simply point out issues with aluminum potentially accumulating small fractures over time, which on its own should be tested and verified to be the case with their alloy as Tesla doesn't use some generic one and have their own, so fracture accumulation should be tested. But to make some fantasy scenarios where this maybe could be a potential issue is silly at best.
1
@ You people are weird, I'm not here to defend Musk, he is acting like a moron and this CT is stupid in how it looks and how its was built, but this doesn't mean that you getting random numbers from your arse will have any actual meaning. Tow capacity vs hitch capacity are usually 1 to 10 ratio, you want to claim that its 30%, so please provide source which institutions require this.
1
@ If we should leave conversation for big boys, why are you here?
1
You do understand that it would be like 31 minute until Russians get vaporized back?... So I guess you will get whole 1 minute to laugh at us being vaporized... You can have your last laugh I guess.
1
Unless you think that Russians are even more dumber to not understand what Ukrainian army tries to do... Then yes.
1
Lying about basic reality doesn't help here. Jerry here failed to understand difference between towing capacity and vertical load. To put it simply, CT went over by more than 9x its rated vertical load before failing, while Jerry claimed that this is astronomically bad thing... For going over rated limit, is somehow bad...
1
You will either need to back into parking spot or back out of it. Some dont like one or the other. But again, simple solution is to simply have cars with different opposing charging ports, so its either on back left (not right like you said, its on left side) or on front right side, so you approach charging stations both ways depending on your car, but it needs to be standardized anyways.
1
For similar reasons Santa was created.
1
@keonyang3332 Nukes don't kill people either... Right? Can I have one?... Like seriously, where is the line for you people? By your logic we should be able to own anything we wants, we should be able to own deadliest viruses or chemicals in our sheds, because you know, chemicals don't kill people, people kill people... Its about ease of the action... Any other normal civilizes country still allows you to own guns, but you have to go over strict background checks, you have to be trained how to use gun, you have to have safe space to keep your guns and so on. This is none existent in america and you want more freedom to buy anything you want just because of your "SeCoNd aMeNdMeNt"... Grow up..
1
You do know that ice car is like 10x more likely to catch on fire than battery one? Right?
1
@davidellis279 Will try it again... In AVERAGE ICE car has around 10x higher chance to catch on fire than EV's, that's AVERAGE, this takes into account amount of cars... And no idea what you are talking about Chinese car buyers. And yes, ICE car industry is on verge of collapsing.
1
@orlando9510 It doesn't take expert, but it does take basic google search to realize that what this video explains is bollony... You can't get hydrogen from water without putting in more energy than you will get back from water... If this was possible then we would have water/electrical power plants.
1
Those are not mass destruction weapons and those get delivered in a generally small batches. While some crazy Ukrainian general decide to strike Russia directly, he would need to be extra crazy on top of people who will actually push this button. There is a risk, but it would be allot worse if Russia would take Ukraine. Risk and reward.
1
Globe makes money? How? Why?... Are you one of those who makes random comments without ever thinking if they make any sense at all?
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
What?
1
Its not how it works...
1
Hydrogen isn't easy and it's not cheap... Which propaganda site did you got that information from?
1
@hypnosh2917 What are you talking about here?
1
Mirai is hydrogen fuel cell powered engine, not internal combustion one...
1
Your comment makes no sense. Ukraine isn't part of NATO, this war isn't US war, there is no obligation for US to provide any support, yet it did. So why are you trying to complain here?
1
@Asghaad Wait, so your logic is that because Russia broke that same Memorandum and made it invalid you are now saying that because US give aid to Ukraine made it unreliable?... Who broke memorandum? US or Russia? As you mentioned, it was signed by both sides, if one breaks it, then why the f**k should remaining keep upholding? Russia invalidated that memorandum in 2020... Get your head out of Pudings ass...
1
Exact thing people said about smartphones, all those physical buttons, no soul... And look where we are now, no one wants those clunky phones anymore.
1
Your comment some what contradictory. Having flat earth would be allot stronger evidence that god exists then having globe. After all, globe matches everything we know about reality, while flat earth would require for magic to be real.
1
@thewonderblunder3421 I'm not racist, but... This is how your comment started. It always looks like anything what was before "but" is a lie. "I loooooove the concept of "The more you know, the more you don't know."" Which is misleading. More you know, more you know. That's it. You might get 2 new questions after you got one answer, but that quote implies that you are going back in your total amount of knowledge, while you simply accumulate more questions while getting more answers. "Space and time = gravity? How would one explain this concept to the general public?" Who cares? We are not expecting for regular Joe to understand things like this, but to understand how basic geometry works should be expected... Which is more than enough to know that earth is not a flat pancake. "It's such a tragedy that more people are turning to the simple dependency on their own senses" This was for like... Ever... Globe model was only introduced like 2300 years ago, while human civilization (well, relatively speaking, as this doesn't really have starting point) existed for like 250 000 years. So majority of time humans used their senses to get to conclusion that earth is flat, but only recently this was replaced with actual scientific method and not personal opinions.
1
Stanley Meyers was a scammer...
1
@web_jar6630 It would help out with range, but cost-benefit isint there for it to be viable option. In general BEV's already have over 300 miles of range, which is more than enough for any long distance trips as you will need to stop sooner than that to stretch your legs anyways, and for daily use that 300 mile range is more than enough, especially if you can charge your car overnight at your house.
1
@darthvirgin7157 Are you so dense that you don't even understand that more than one person could read this conversation and reply to it? And like @tusse67 stated here, to claim that starship can't get into orbit is just plain stupid. It never was their intention and it was intentionally made to not reach orbit in their test flights, why you ask you ignoramus? So that rocket would fall back to earth on its own if communication fails for some reason. Its basic security, not limitation of capabilities.
1
Then buy one.
1
Question of the week: Will your next car be a hydrogen?
1
Dyida Its called: education. Basic understanding of geometry proves that earth is not flat, if you cant grasp that idea then anything else would be to advanced.
1
Then I guess when Putin said that sanctions might have negative effect on Russian economy was a lie?
1
NASA? How are they relevant here?
1
Alex Went Just FYI first globe model was created in 3 century BCE in Greece. Tho interestingly enough, none of those are even relevant... Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth none existing model...
1
Alex Went What Sun/Moon simulator?... Can you be some what more specific what the hell you are talking about here?...
1
Because Putin said so?
1
All those things are coming independent if Elon does it or not, while he can have more say in how those technologies gets implemented and add extra security to prevent or atleast minimize that upcoming threat. He can make it safer, its not hypocritical to do it.
1
@shanenewton8560 Did someone hurt you or something?
1
Why not?
1
Well you might not care what actually is real, but if earth is actually flat then huge bulk of science becomes broken. Flight paths which are based on globe becomes incorrect, anything relating to gravity no longer works and on and on and on and on and on... Well, even magic becomes real if earth is flat... So yea, you might not care what reality actually is, but some of us do.
1
What? Russians kicking ass? Last few months having no real progress on front lines would disagree with that.
1
We call those videos: Scam.
1
@aguerra1381 Maybe Toyota simply doesn't care about some random youtube videos?... If you only have those random youtube videos and zero actual confirmations from Toyota itself, well, this is scam 101. There is no such thing as hydrogen on demand, never was and quite likely never will be... Do you even understand that if this was possible then we would not have coal electric power plants but we would have water electric power plants instead?... Water isn't hydrogen, you need twice as much energy to separate hydrogen from water then you will get back by recombining hydrogen with oxygen, this is basic physics 101... Stop being fooled by random youtube channels...
1
Same thing with what happens when ICE car gets stuck in winter traffic for hours.
1
It's NOT water powered, its HYDROGEN powered... Learn the difference.
1
Then explain to us this simple picture http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif
1
Your avatar picture and your name says everything we need to know, comrade.
1
Then don't complain about mass shootings happening every single day and their number will only increase... If you are scared that in democratic country you will need guns to fight back against your own government, then hell, be happy with people dying everyday just that you could sleep at night knowing that you have fire power to fight entire government, just in case...
1
Yes, some places still use outdated measuring systems, but its mostly due to the american manufacturers than anything else.
1
US spends around 877 billions on military every year. So it can go on for quite a while if it wants too without actually noticing any real impact.
1
Starlink was reported to be cash flow positive in 2022, that only increased this year. So they are making money and they will be. Around 50% of humans don't have ANY access to internet. Market for one is HUGE and there is more than enough customers for it. I pay 16 euros for 300Mbps internet, so yes, Starlink isint for me, because its not made for me... Its made for the areas where reliable fast internet access isint an option and there are bunch of examples even in first world countries where you will be paying less and getting higher speeds by using Starlink than any other alternative.
1
Would guess that its USA, lack of education and still heavy religious beliefs in the country. There might be some 3rd world countries, but those atleast have excuse to have flat earthers.
1
Because he likes smart sounding words which have no actual meaning. How to make word salad 101 while looking like intelectual.
1
@jjwn939 Although the quintessential facet of my gastronomic predilections inexorably gravitates towards the consummate amalgamation of ambrosial comestibles, my proclivity for the gustatory realm invariably culminates in an unequivocal and unwavering preference for the perennially cherished and time-honored repast commonly denominated as pizza. What I just said in normal human words was: I like pizza. That first sentence was example in how Petterson talks while saying nothing in actual value. You can use fancy words in long stringed sentences which will sound profound and intelectual to most, doesn't mean you actually said anything intelectual here.
1
Do they now? What would be actual benefits of that paste? What would be reasonable cost of it? What's the energy density? What's the by product of it?... List of questions is loooooooong and what you only have is "someone made a hydrogen paste"
1
@tibblescat2918 Because SpaceX actually sends orbital rockets and isn't into joy rides. SpaceX did 13 manned flights, I think they proved that they can do it consistently and safely, why would Musk need to go on the rocket? Just to show that he could for people like you?... You people complain when he "wastes" money and then you complain about him not wasting money... Can you be happy?
1
@ Wright brothers barely lifted from the ground... Bezos flew on a tourist trip, barely reached space for few seconds. While company like SpaceX does actual orbital manned flights which takes slightly longer than few minutes. So you want for Musk to make a trip to ISS for shits and giggles or something? Some weird requirements you have there...
1
When you have topic of "round or flat earth?" it's already assumed that its about "oblate spheroid vs flat pancake world", no need to nick pick on the words here.
1
@tausifnazim5048 ICE type engine by its nature is less efficient than Hydrogen fuel cell type ones, so like, how the hell will that get solved exactly? You are burning/exploding hydrogen to create pressure and heat as by product, that heat is main energy loses. So you think that someone will invent cold hydrogen burning?...
1
Just like people bet on NFT's... And just look where they are now...
1
Then get your Nobels prize for proving that it actually works... EVERY single time it gets properly tested, it fails, end of story.
1
So basically nothing changes then?
1
Why not?
1
Most of them literally using bible as proof that earth is space pancake... So by your logic quoting bible counts as being children of devil? Cool...
1
Well they are not loosing it, can't say that they are winning ether. Ukraine has huge disadvantage against Russia, everyone thought that this war will end in few days, but Ukraine dint surrendered and now after some many weeks of fighting its still going on. In general if Ukraine holds back this attack then its a win for them, if not then this war can go on for months.
1
There is a reason why we have low amount of stations, its basic demand. No one want's those cars. And no, its not the biggest issue, biggest is the actual cost, initial one, maintenance cost and fuel cost.
1
Glue used in car assembly is quite common thing and quite often that glue fails way before actual metal which is being glued
1
Arguing with imaginary friends will not prove anything.
1
Agent 007 Sho is to stop crazy policeman?... Another policeman... How complicated was that? What your next argument will be? Something like: Because government could use nukes on us that means we should be able to own our own nukes just incase?
1
@phildavenport4150 I know, but its still fun to point them out
1
It sounds like you tried to use FSD in parking lot, which isn't really supported, atleast it wasn't before, it would be interesting to know which exact version that Model 3 had when you tried using it. Is it perfect? No. But its getting there. We still need more videos of v12 from different people and different places to get better idea how much of a improvement it is now with end to end method. at same time, as it is now end to end process, its basically the last major change for its base, now it would only need more training data to be passed over to get better results. Previous versions included constant major changes which still required quite allto of manual coding for specific situations, now its just shove in video and check results. It definitely takes longer than expected.
1
Its not.
1
Which god?
1
@francisevangelista8118 Which one it is?
1
Funny that you said this, electrical cars had infrastructure as long as we had...Well... Electricity... You can literally plug it into your homes outlet and charge it that way, chargers only speed up that process but infrastructure was and always will be here. You need more energy to put into producing hydrogen then you will get back from it. While electrical cars will simply use that energy directly without a need to produce hydrogen, transport to refuel stations and store it there for long periods of time. Its simply worst option than battery driven cars and car manufacturers knows that.
1
@gregautomotive8409 Home chargers are not as fast as dedicated ones, but that's besides that point. Building electrical charger stations are allot simpler and less expensive than hydrogen stations and you cant really make any hydrogen at home. "The fact is, more CO2 is produced making an EV than making a gas car" Yes, so what? Look at total CO2 production over cars life span, not just how much it produces when you make one... "The EV doesn't offset it expenditure until about 400k miles." Where the hell you got this number from? Is it from some Oil company?... Generally speaking EV's start producing less CO2 after 1-2 years, from where you got your magical number is a mystery. "Keep in mind the cost of pack replacement is horrifying" Keep in mind that you wont need to replace battery pack... And total maintenance cost for ICe cars is allot higher than EV's anyways. "I'm already seeing the effects." Its called: Anecdotal evidence. "The hybrid is the cleanest bet going right now" ? Hybrid is the worst option... You basically have 2 cars in one which will brake allot more than it would if it was ether ICE or just EV. And its strange, now you are saying that its better to have cars like that but it would be worst to have fully EV? How does that work in your head? Adding EV parts into ICE car makes it cleaner and better, but it gets worst if you remove ICE parts entirely? "They use strip mines and in some cases slave labor" Do you seriously think that literally polluting air your breath in makes your alternative better? And not every battery manufacturer uses slaves... You do know this? Right? "Cancer and birth defect rates around these facilities has gone through the roof." So now you are not even arguing about EV's vs ICe cars, now you just complaining about some issues surrounding battery productions?... "This shit is not green or sustainable. " ? Count oil spills and general deaths from air pollution, then remember that OIL has literal limit in how much there is in ground and you will realize which option is less clean and sustainable here... There is no limit in electricity production, there are multiple ways to make batteries using multiple different methods and most of those methods can recycle batteries up to like 95% which can be reused over and over again... "Your basically saying fuck other people on the planet so I can pat myself on the back here in the west for being environmentally conscience" Your basically saying fuck EVERYONE around me on the planet so I can pat myself on the back here in the west for being environmentally conscience. Now you just went with appeal to emotions... Try to stay on topic here. "How is it going to handle all the cars too" Without any problems. There have been studies done on this one and electrical car production will be under the limitations of even current electrical grid expansion, not even talking that it can be speed up if needed. There is no problem to expand grid to incorporate EV's... "Lastly net's not forget that currently only 3.84% of these batteries are being recycled because no one wants to deal with the toxic chemicals in them" ? From where you got this number from? Like seriously, can you provide citation for this?... "These heavy metals don't break down because they are themselves elements and they'll be finding their way into groundwater." Irony is strong when you think about hundreds if not thousands of oil spills every single year... C'mon... I'm not even saying that you are wrong here, wont even bother with that, but the fact that you so conveniently ignore every issue surrounding oil sector is just... Interesting. "Many EV's, because they no longer have ICE's no longer have OBD ports and force the consumer back to the dealer. Tesla is a big one." Tesla does have OBD port... Are you even real mechanic? If you cant even find OBD port then maybe you should not put your hands on electrical cars in general?... Electrical cars are basically smartphones on wheels, you need actual software understanding of this specific car to be able to properly fix it. Adapt or go out of business. "No right to repair." No right to screw up shit you have no idea how it works. Even now Tesla is under attack by everyone just because they are not part of big car manufacturer group, what they least need now is someone messing around their cars when they dont know how to do it. Its not that good that not everyone can fix electrical cars, but if you have issue you can always get into contact with Tesla service center and get it repaired by licensed professionals. "So you're putting me out of business eventually too. " Well, tough shit. Society progresses forwards, we no longer have quite a bit of jobs which existed years ago, so what? Its adapt or go out of business. Don't expect that everything will remain exactly the same for thousands of years... We cant just sit here and like "Och wait, we cant do this technological progress because it will remove this work sector"... If we did this we would be still living in caves, butt naked. We had jobs like rope winders, those got replaced by automated machines, its not like you go to buy rope and complain that it wasn't handmade or something... "EV's are a far cry for decent, green, sustainable, affordable or a reasonable solution" Experts disagree with you. "Donut doesn't seem to realize many auto and truck makers are on board with hydro. " No, they are not. Auto makers only want to say that to be part of current trend, which is going green. Automakers want to remain on ICE cars for eternity, but they cant, luckily we got Tesla which pushed over the board auto makers and forced their hand to start making electrical cars and invest billions into their development. Hydrogen cars might only become some niche thing for some specific things, but it will never become mainstream, to late for that. Check battery prices over last decades. Main cost of electrical car is battery pack, which is going down, fast. While Hydrogen production cost remains more or less same. If it dint lift off before, it wont have any chance now. Go and count Hydrogen stations across entire world... Its 685 across entire world... While EV's has over 100 000 of those and more to come, not including basically every single electrical outlet in the world which can be used to charge it. Its simply to late for Hydrogen to make any real dent. "They just build a 455hp hydrogen injected V8 that's supposed to sound amazing." Who cares? Are you just for the sound? 455hp is generally speaking low amount. We have EV's with 1000hp+ in mass production... And you can add any sound you want if that's what is most important for you... " Hyundai just released their N Vision 74 hydro" Design from 90's, outdated even before being mass produced. Unless you like older looking cars, but its just my personal taste. " The future is not EV's." Everyone disagrees with you, but well, you can have your opinion here.
1
Put away your tin foil hat... you can literally buy hydrogen car from multiple different car manufacturers today, so clearly your conspiracy doesn't apply here... Right?
1
Sir Tom You are prime example of someone who is so ignorant that he doesn't even know where this war is going on and who attacked who... Damn...
1
Give who?
1
@DrWhom Do you people always reply to a question with a question?... So will repeat it: Why not?
1
NO.
1
@auritone If he is a fraud then he could be easily sued, right? Its so obvious as a fraud? So it should be easy win. Just sue him, you will get billions from him... Easy case... Or... What you imagine here in your head isn't a fraud at all? Maybe what you cult leader TF says isn't actually a fraud? Random sad youtuber vs entire legal US system, who might be right here? Hard to tell...
1
Yea, I mean there are videos showing thousands of BYD electric cars abandoned just so that they could boost numbers up. What China reports is as trustworthy as it is with what Russia reports.
1
Why make smart comment when you can make the one you did.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Prove what? His comment makes no sense, do you need explanation for it? Seriously? Try reading it again and try to realize how nonsensical it is.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Jebus, you TF cult members are seriously dense, so will try to explain it like you are 5 years old. Mars is already uninhabitable, it maybe could be made habitable with terraforming, but its not habitable currently. So to say "Why go to mars when we can make earth uninhabitable" makes no sense and this sentence implies that we would be going to mars to make it uninhabitable, but it already is... On top of this, we are not going to mars because earth going to shit, we are going to mars to colonize it. Its quite different thing. Do you understand it now or should I simplify to for 4 year old level?
1
@bradengle3491 "You have religious beliefs that are a fairy tale. " So what you are saying is that having religious beliefs is a shitty position to hold? "we've never seen anything become something completely new the way evolution suggests" Speciation was observed, what you want to observe is not what evolution says. But then again, go to google and enter something like "dog breed change over 100 years" and you will see dramatic change in dog's over this tiny amount of time, just imagine how much they will change in another 1000 years, you would be having hard time calling those animals dog's at that point. And funny enough dog's are decedent's of wolfs and I can bet you would be conflated to call great wolf and chihuahua same species. "Dogs will always be dogs etc" Until they are no longer dog's. Analogy time! Exactly same thing happen with language evolution, there was no point in time where Latin speaking person give birth to spanish speaking one... Evolution of language fallows same exact rules. You have gradual change over time and when you accumulate enough changes you will get new label, aka speciation, aka new language. So yes, lets keep this in perspective. By the way, why are you afraid of evolution being true? I won't disprove your god, so why are you scared of it being true?
1
@bradengle3491 " a wolf is still a dog regardless of how many mental gymnastics you do" Cool, tell me this. Can Great Wolf interbreed with chihuahua? "what your priests in lab coats told you to think" So now you are against priests?... Damn... You seriously don't like your own religion? Don't you now? "Claiming complexity, like DNA, can come from nothing" Argument from ignorance is like the top logical fallacy theists make. No one said that DNA came from nothing, its just your ignorance at work. "is nonsensical and NOT scientific" 99% of actual scientists disagree with you. Why is that? Why do YOU think that evolution isn't scientific when 99% of actual scientists thinks that it is? Arrogance at work? "Why is it so hard for you to understand that science is observable and repeatable?" And it is. But you would not know this due to your ignorance. Will skip addressing rest of your comment. This was more than enough.
1
@bradengle3491 "unlike evolution from nothing or pess complexity. " Weird argument from ignorance. Or was it straw man fallacy? "You can't adress all my points because that would clearly prove you and your priests wrong if you do" Again, you attacking your own religion here just harms your own position. I don't have priests, you do. "The reason you can't go back to a wolf is because you've LOST information" I have no idea what you even tried to say here... Go back to wolf? What? Are you saying that chihuahua can't go back to wolf? Are you drunk or something? "This ironically helps prove my point that complexity CANNOT come from non complexity. " Reality disagrees with your empty assertion. Thanks for playing. "Natural selection is real. " That is evolution. Welcome to reality ignorant one. "but unfortunately you've already admitted that you won't be adressing all of my claims" Because there is no real point, if you miserably fail in the first part, then there is no actual reason to address rest of it. Where is your Nobel's prize disproving evolution exactly? Or are you saying that all scientists are in some weird conspiracy or that all of them understand less than you do because you did 5 minute google search? Its so weird to see people who doesn't even know what evolution is and yet wants to claim to know better than people who spends their entire lives investigating it... How arrogant are you people?
1
Wow... Russia yet again shelled a city... What's new?
1
Why are you not complaining about military spending 10x that amount? You do know that aircraft carriers are not real but CGI, right?
1
Ticket to go into space is like 50 million currently, so you want to waste so much money on one flat earther who will ether be a fake one or after he realizes how wrong he was every other flat earher will accuse him of being a shill... So what would be a purpose of this? You cant convince flat earther with evidence, this was already proven.
1
@n64fan60 At best you will shut up ONE flat earther, that one which went to space. Even then its not guaranteed that he will believe that he was in actual space. Every other flat earther will simply call that one a shill and reject anything he has to say. So you will not shut them up, you will only waste 50 million on one random person.
1
@n64fan60 Buddy, you are making joke about something what some people actually believes in. If you want to make a joke, make it obvious, you are on wrong section with comments like that. Go into real world more.
1
Just like astronauts are right now? Can't say they are complaining about lack of freedom of speech or something...
1
What was false in this video?
1
@emperorpalpatine1469 Will try again as people like you fail to answer to basic questions here: What was false in this video?
1
Why should we? Have you ever been on a plane? If you walk from one side to another, do you do it at 600km/h speed?...
1
Have you seen thousands of BYD cars being parked in abandoned parking lots just to boost sales numbers?
1
Read a book...
1
happy muttonchop I know, but at same time he is correct, technically.
1
Fish eye lens* Its like you are trying to troll, but even failing on basic things like that...
1
He can't feel/control anything below shoulders. Neuralink at the moment allows to perform some basic actions, like moving mouse and clicking, so at the moment separate action list is relatively small, but its just for now as this is the first human to have this technology and he will be used to actually learn what can be done with this V1 of Neuralink
1
There are allot more reasons to help Ukraine to win this war than just avoiding being humiliated, even tho there is nothing to be humiliated about... West isint directly part of this war, if Ukraine loses it then its all on Ukraine, west has nothing to do with that.
1
True, Russians know how to brainwash their people.
1
Mass genocide for shits and giggles is kindness? How?
1
Just a scam account?
1
@dee1089 Your own comment has that basic key word "currently". Batteries are improving every single year, especially now when more companies start investing more money into R&D. We have multiple promising battery technologies which have been shown to work, issue is just scalability of its production. Batteries are the future.
1
@bigbadt How the hell would hybrids be more environmentally friendly? Tiny battery which is basically the same thing as pure BEV and then you have ICE engine on top of that?... From which big oil web site did you got this silly idea? And battery technologies are getting improved every single year, check battery capacities per kg over the years, or its price. And we have multiple battery technologies in the works which could make HUGE difference, like carbon nanotube ones, its only question if that one can be used on scale, aka issue with scalability, aka needs more R&D, aka no real limit in sight yet. And batteries are not getting bigger, cars getting bigger ranges while having same/similar battery capacities.
1
Sanctioning crude oil caused living crisis?... What?... Are you drunk? Did you drink that oil?...
1
Would suggest to actually look into it more deeply than 5 minute videos
1
Texeira Correa 5 comments in a row?... “Forbes, Scientist admit they don’t know how strong the force of gravity is” Cool, now get entire article and get context for this one... Tho interestingly enough this would suggest that you do think that gravity is a real thing, there is only issue with not knowing how strong it is?... What difference does it make? You just admitted that gravity is real... Och that irony... "literally varied results with no constant?!?" F = (G x m1 x m2) / r^2 , where F = force of gravity G = gravitational constant m1 = mass of the first object m2 = mass of the second object r = the separation between the two masses "You get direction because you are in a fluid that cause you to either go up or down because you or dense or not dense enough I really don’t know why you say it like" Once again you failed to understand my question here. I'm not asking how things behave, i'm asking "WHY" they behave like that... Why things fall down and not up? What force defines direction? Density is not a force, neter buoyancy. So what defines direction? "in the beginning there was no time(4th dimension )" First of all, prove it. Second of all, what difference does it make? you could not even have 3 dimensions... Doesn't make any difference to the shape of earth... And this is quite red hearing from your side, stick to the topic... "it simple terms having mass doesn’t turn up anything but density does." ? Will make it caps, because you have issues with reading: WHAT FORCE DEFINES DIRECTION? "the cavendish experiment to this day isn’t used because" ? Dude come back to reality! Cavendish experiment is done countless times, especially in universities. Anyone can do it, you can find dozens videos of this experiment on youtube alone... So avoid repeating this nonsensical statement, you will look even more ridiculous then you look already.
1
Texeira Correa 7 comments?... "hence you saying gravity isn’t constant then showing a formula" When did i said that gravity is not constant? Do you even read? "just because someone does it doesn’t mean that the documentation showed already it’s useless dud of an experiment if you can call it that" It demonstrates repeatability of that experiment. "It says in big bold letter so even you can read that the 4th dimension isn’t time" In most common situations you will see all those 4 dimensions: length, width, depth and time. Tho i still have no idea how this is related to anything... You can debunk Big Bang all day long, will not change the fact that we dont live on flatardia... " and you failed to explain as simple as I did, it doesn’t have to be complicated" Having simple answer doesn't make it correct by default. Maybe this is why you think that gravity is false because it too complicated for you to understand... "You through on gravity I’ll throw on buoyancy" Will repeat, just for you: BUOYANCY IS NOT A FORCE. Its on a level of saying "You through on gravity I’ll throw on banana" like that makes it on equal level... Its not... "you still haven’t explained what gravity is or how it works" ? Seriously, you ether have no capabilities to read or you just some sad internet troll... But well, lets repeat this one more time: Gravity is a label put on observable fact from reality where objects with mass attract objects with mass. What it is exactly and what causes that action in particular is still unknown, but we know what it does. Which is perfectly fine and enough to explain all this jazz about spherical earth. Skipping bunch of nonsense, no point in debunking them for the 50th time... So, lets go back to your original claim, that you have 50k photos which proves that we live on flatardia. Where are those? Because you can scream like a child here that gravity is not real, that your buoyancy explains something and all that nonsense, but that will not prove that earth is flat. Disproving gravity will not prove your flatardia. So maybe lets avoid wasting time on disproving globe model and lets prove yours? Sounds like a deal? Cool. imgur.com upload your best photo and lets screed it into peaces.
1
Russia tossed around nuclear threats from day one of this war, and still doing it. What they will be threatening with and what they will actually do are separate things. But at the moment Russia has nothing else to use besides threats of nuclear war
1
@diond9927 Och that nice whataboutism, desperation to distract people from Putin's war crimes... Will not work.
1
Why?
1
Sounds as practical as having steam powered cars where you have to shovel coal into furnace at regular intervals manually... Hydrogen on demand will never be a thing, like, ever.
1
@KangenAlec Dint i already corrected you on actual earth tilt and actual speed? Do dont learn from your own mistakes arent you>
1
" made up bullshit from Tesla fans" Said by Tesla hater.
1
That's fine and dandy, but there is limited amount of sun you could ever get from a footprint of a car, which amounts to not that much, I mean, you could maybe get 10-20km of range over entire day if your car was sitting during really sunny day, but its not really worth the effort to cover entire car with solar panels.
1
@MrTiltmealot Most efficient solar panels at the moment extracts around 25% of sun's energy, so at best you could go 4x that, but realistically it would be extremely hard to even double current efficiency, as even now major breakthroughs in solar panels are measured basically in fractions of single percentage. There are some new ones which tries to grab wider range of solar radiation, but its not that much more and cost of those panels is huge due to them being multi layered. We will get better batteries sooner than we will get solar panels worth placing on your car.
1
I heard pig's can fly, its on TikTok.
1
Cynical its actually around 98% by some studies, which is more or less matching reality, after all, majority still believes in sky wizards, so flat earth claim is not that far fetched.
1
Best way to determine astrology being a scam is simply reading random horoscope of previous day and checking if it fits what happen to you, then do the same with rest of them. horoscopes are ALWAYS generic and talking about some wage generic things which should happen to you, and its enough to get one correctly to convince regular person that horoscope is correct.
1
What?
1
Because Putin said so?
1
You do understand that even Russia propaganda sites admits that Russian army did "strategic" retreat from those areas and now its under Ukraine control? Which part exactly in this video do you think is false?
1
Don't think so. People thought that earth was flat for majority of human history, people want to have answers and simpler answers will always be more appealing instead of correct ones.
1
Priority Steel Erectors Ltd. I'm tired of repeating myself, but will do exception for you. I challenge you to present a method you used to determine that photo X is fake and photo Y is not for you to claim that all those thousands of photos and thousands of hours of videos from space are fake. Please, for your own sake, learn basics about reality before jumping into nutcase conspiracy theories.
1
Peace talk start when Putin gets his soldiers out of Ukraine entirely.
1
From where did you got that 90% number?
1
Unlimited oil? Is this some sort of joke or something? And coldest weather on record? We currently experiencing warmest winter in like... Ever... During entire winter we had temperatures around 0C, mostly in positives, so it only snowed for like 2 days, then nothing until now... Duno in which reality you live in, but climate is way warmer than it was 20 years ago...
1
Well that's the thing, due to people living in world without lack of food or roof over their heads and so on, people want to create issues where there were none before. Its not the most important issue, but its the one of the issues which can cause quite a bit of harm if not addressed properly
1
And basic logic tells that earth is not a flat space pizza. basic observation of sun proves that.
1
"Stop with this pseudoscience. But yeah, round." ? I'm sorry, but do you even understand what "pseudoscience" word means? Which part in this video was pseudoscience?
1
Good for you. Tho what's your point?
1
@ManishManish-cg8zf Again, so what? Even if it did said that, will not make your religion true... So why do you even mention it? I can make new religion which will have more correct information about universe that you could learn in your life time, yet it will not make my newly created religion any more true when it comes to magical claims. So why do you even mentioning that your religion talks about spherical earth? On side note. Which religion it is and can you give me citation where it mentions spherical earth?
1
@ManishManish-cg8zf So you cant give me actual verse which says that earth is spherical?
1
Yea, its just like religion, tho most flat earthers are religious, so that explains allot.
1
@thetrintarianmessianicyahw589 "Most fights I've seen over religion were initiated by atheist attacking street preachers" I guess crusades have been caused by atheists too... If you want to make shit up atleast try harder. "I personally know atheist flat earthers" Yes, there are bad atheists out there, but waste majority of flat earthers are theists and majority of those are believers in bible. "What explains their reasons for believing the earth is flat?" Lack of education, most likely. "We've seen it from space" We knew that earth is round for past 2300 years, you dont need to go into space to know what shape earth is. "So could you try to clarify what your point was?" It's really simple point: Most flat earthers are theists, most theists are not flat earthers. "And please spare me a rant about all the naughty things done in the name of religion (though not because of Religion)" Isint that the same thing? Doing in a name of religion being a cause of that same religion you are doing it? Like 9/11? How many atheists flew planes into buildings in a name of atheism? "you've found after fine tooth combing through history to find all the blemishes in religious history" You clearly have no idea what happen in history. Did you knew that when British invaded America native Americans got 2 options: Accept Christianity or die? I mean... Even today we have 13 countries where atheist can be killed legally... And you have trouble finding issues with religion in a history book?... C'mon... "like Slavery Abolitionists in America" That's false. Slavery got abolished not because bible said so, but because science said that every human is equal. Why do you think we had slavery in the first place? What do you think people used as justification to have slaves? Did you knew that bible gives specific instructions about slaves? Like that you can beat them as long as they dont die? Or instructions where you can get your slaves? Or instructions how you can trick them to become your slave for rest of their lives and so on? It wasn't religions which abolished slavery, it was religions which created it... "Scientific Revolutions in Islam and Christianity" Still false. There is HUGE difference between doing something because you are religious and doing something while you are religious. Atheist scientists in past 200 years contributed more to science than religious ones ever did combined. So avoid using such silly points... "Charity work from Sikhism and Buddhist" And why do people actually do charry work? Because book said so or because they want to? You basically saying that people are so evil that you need ancient book for them to do charity work... Seriously? You would become evil person if you stopped believing in your religion? If so, then please, keep believing... And what exactly does it change? Name me ONE war which was started in a name of atheism and I will name you 10x more which got started in a name of religion... If you want to count heads, we can, but you will lose here.
1
Imposible. You need enormous amount of energy to convert water into hydrogen. You would literally need electrical power generator to convert water into hydrogen and then back into electricity with enormous power loss. You simply can't have car driving on water independent what clickbait newspapers would want you to believe.
1
First of all, having shitty grid is unrelated thing to EV's, its an issue with government or whoever is responsible for the grid. Second, grid expands based on demand, just like it did from the moment we got first lightbulbs. Third, and most ironic thing, hydrogen cars required around 60% MORE electricity to drive same distance, yes, you need electricity as we have ZERO pure hydrogen on earth which means that 100% of it needs to be produced, so that said anything you could say about issues with grid will be 60% worse for hydrogen cars, aka you made argument against hydrogen cars without realizing it.
1
Yes, what could go wrong by having bunch of highly pressurized tanks across entire car, what could go wrong in case of accident... To put it simply, there is no reasonable way to put in bunch of tiny tanks all over the place, current cars already have 3 and its 2 tanks more than it should have.
1
Its like saying "Saying that 2+2=4 is propaganda!!!" riiiiiiiiiight...
1
I'm sorry, but how exactly starting a war and having at least 200k+ killed and like 600k injured during this war makes it better even if all what you said was true? It wasn't US or Ukraine who started full blown war...
1
@ValMartinIreland Putin was left with no choice?... What about simply stopping this war?... That's a choice he has... Right? Zelensky might have wanted to do peace talks at the beginning as it was quite likely that Ukraine will fall, but with support from other countries this is no longer the case and there is no reason to have those peace talks with aggressor.
1
@worldaswar3784 Water doesn't bend? Ever heard about tides... C'mon, even on flatardia water bends...
1
@worldaswar3784 Forming globe is a separate question, but tides is direct debunking of your troll'ish claim that water doesn't bend, well, obviously it does, so you might want to pick some different silly point.
1
@worldaswar3784 You people? You mean, normal ones? Some one with basic understanding of geometry? Those ones? And why don't you address tides? Those debunk your claim about water not bending, soooo, please, explain, why do you have tides on flat earth, what causes them? Did something big jumped into water on another side of ocean?
1
@worldaswar3784 First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece. People knew that earth is not space pancake for quite some time, but due to religious pressure this was not wide spread. Just check out what happen to Galileo when he wanted to question bible on earths shape... Was put into jail... Which is quite lucky, as in general that would have ended in beheading. I could agree that people who believed in earth was called lunatics, doesnt mean they have been ones. What matters is what you can prove and earths shape was proven to be a globe and because religious cant any longer kill anyone they disagree with, they no longer can hide from reality, so yea, earth is a globe, deal with that.
1
@worldaswar3784 Yea, in 2020 we still have people who thinks that earth is a space pancake... Or snow globe... And you think that you made some clever joke with your 1900s?... C'mon... We have ignorant people throw entire human history and this doesn't seam to get fixed any time soon as of prime examples with flat earthers. Even if you had people today ridiculing globe earth that would not make them correct, evidence would, but you have none of that, but we do. So yea. Atleast you make me smile with jokes like that, so thanks.
1
@worldaswar3784 Agreed, luckily majority actually believes in a actual global model and not the flat one, so all is good.
1
@DanRyzESPUK Give us reason why would Ukraine do this, especially when its gaining ground in that area and when Russians moved people out of that area for past weeks? Only lobotomised person could not see red flags all over the place of this Russian lie.
1
Paranoid much? How the hell does BEV's enslave you? Those are the most freeing type transportations... You can disconnect from the grid 100% and still use your car... People like you are so weird...
1
Its wrong to use ancient language and its words as any indication. Even today saying "round" can mean "round table" or "round ball", one means flat disk and one means spherical shape. First actual globe model appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece, so its safe to say that flat earthers are atleast 2300 years behind.
1
@markboen Please, for your own sake, stop blindly believing every single facebook post you see... Musk would rather go bankrupt than go with hydrogen cars... When you see someone claiming otherwise you will know with 100% certainty that they either lying or spreading false information.
1
You are talking about something what CAN'T exist. You need more energy to extract hydrogen from water than you will get back. To simplify, you need 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen, and no, those numbers are not backwards.
1
And i like caramel ice cream... This was video about shape of the earth, not that we are using it for our gain... Please try to stay on topic...
1
What?
1
Best guess that after quick visual examination self destruct was initiated to sink both of them as there wasn't any plants to bring those back, especially ship one, as it was half way across the world.
1
Because its provable fact from reality?...
1
"If you open your eyes what do you see? A curved horizon?" I see quite flat one, doesn't mean it is flat tho. "Take a look out a plane window at 35k ft. Do you see curvature?" Depends on how wide you can actually see, but in general you could see curvature. " I tend to believe what my eyes see and I don't get suckered by those "never a straight answer" psycho's." Yea, but issue is that its really easy to fool your eyes... Google out "visual illusions" and you will get your answer. But like seriously, what do you expect to see? Do you even understand how big earth is? Should you seriously observe curvature to the sides on sea level or at 35k ft? Did you ever done any calculations to check this? Because i can show you curvature from any photo/video taken from high altitude without fish eye lens... And basic observation of sun proves that we dont live on flat plane and then you have like other 100+ issues with flat earth claim, which doesnt even have working model... Should i continue or you got basic idea?
1
@baroneleve1196 Hows special military operation going? Or is it war now? Can you say that it's a war now or is still forbidden in that dictatorship country?
1
You are one of those... Will to use simple words here: Ukraine is defending against attacker (Russia), Ukraine asked for help and other countries including US decided to provide some of that. Stop doing this childish whataboutism and mentioning US here... You just look childish and silly at best.
1
Hydrogen cars were invented like 100 years ago, those will always be around, but those never gets basic "expensive hobby" stage due to cost and complexity
1
What now?
1
@WAFFEN77Russ Answer to a question with a question isint actually answering it. Could you elaborate what you wanted to say with original comment?
1
@WAFFEN77Russ I use google translate... Miracle of modern world... You should try it sometimes... And no, Russian language will remain in Russia, entire world will ether start to talk in English (which is already happening) or any other country which makes up majority of population, Russia is tiny and no one likes that language to be used anywhere. Do you have any actual point here?
1
Because laws of physics don't exist in your reality?
1
@frankjames1955 You think that electrolysis runs on magical pixie dust? I will go with this until you realize where you made a mistake here, besides watching some scam videos on youtube.
1
We already have technology which can recycle like 97% of old batteries... What the hell are you talking about?
1
@gdc4736 Cheap enough to be worth recycling.
1
@ Yea, its really sad to see people like you being brainwashed by TF cult, but well, you do you.
1
@answerstotoviasinger6742 "The model of flat earth is not made yet" Why the hell not? It should be extremely easy to map out flat plane on flat piece of paper. What's stopping you? Reality? "no rocket has a camera seeing ahead, always seeing back, why?" Why would it look forwards into space?... Go outside, look up, this is what rockets would see... Would that be productive information to have? No. Its way more interesting to see ground and not to look at sky. When rockets starts to get into orbit those will start flying more horizontally and will include portion of the sky. So no idea what you are complaining here and what point you tried to make. " the planes dont go to space" Yes, because those are planes and not rockets...There is a reason why rockets are being used to go into space and not planes... Hint: air density. "nobody feels the movement" Correct, welcome to reality. You can't feel motion, only changes in it. This is basic reality you fail to understand. Have you ever been on a plane? It goes like 500km/h and you can't feel that speed, especially if its on cruising altitude, if you close your eyes it will not be any different than being at home in your bed, aside of cabin noise there is no difference, as there is no actual change in speed. "nobody sees the curve" We do, like, sunsets are the thing caused by curvature... "all photos of the globe are fake or not faithful" Or not faithful? So some are not fake photos of globe? Good to know, atleast you admit that much. "nobdy has gone to space" We did, and you just said that some photos from space are real, stop contradicting yourself here. " they always lie" Who are they? Lizard people? "this iswhy russia dont say that apollo to the moon is fake" Or... Or moon landing actually happen and Russia lost? Like, what situation do you imagine to be if we actually went to moon? Russia screaming that its all fake? Well russia are not that stupid to deny basic reality and make themselves look stupid. "A lie needs more and bigger lies" Like religions?
1
Feel free to go to Ukraine and help them to keep those tanks safe...
1
Duno how often you get to drive for 350+ miles without stopping, but there are EV's like Tesla Model S which can get you around 400 miles of range and this range is just increasing with improvements on batteries, constantly. And that 30-60 minute charge would only apply when you are trying to fully charge, you can charge like 200 miles of range in 15 minutes which is more than enough for next few hours drive before you will need another leg stretch where you can repeat same thing. Its like you just filling up your entire tank and going non stop for 400 miles... BEV's have more than enough range and charging times are good enough to not be an issue. Hydrogen stations are extremely expensive to build and to maintain, charger stations on another hand can be built anywhere where you have electricity, heck, you can even charge your car at come and always have full "tank" if you wanted too.
1
Yes yes yes... Those will outsell electrical cars... And you do know that you can charge electrical car in like 15 minutes from 20 to 80%? How often do you fuel up your car fully? Ev's work in winter, no issues there. And batteries will outlast your car. Do some basic research before you talk.
1
@strangebutsatisfying2615 There are multiple battery technologies and more on its way. And do you think that hydrogen is just magically appears in pressurized tanks? What magical power will you use to produce hydrogen? "we all know not loading batteries full is damaging batteries...." Which propaganda site you got this one from? In actual reality you should avoid fully charging or discharging batteries, even your beloved Tesla by default only charges to like 80-90% and strongly recommends to avoid charging to full unless you really need it. But you more or less will never need full battery as no one rides a car for 5+ hours without a brake. Do some basic research here before you embarrassed yourself even more. And again... In which fantasy world do you live in where you can get hydrogen for free? Do you think we have some ocean of hydrogen where you can just scoop it with a bucket and fill up your car?... You need to actually produce it... So use electricity to produce hydrogen which then gets used to produce electricity AGAIN which gets used in electrical engines... And you think that this is better than batteries?... C'mon... And no, electrical cars will never become illegal and if you dint know, hydrogen cars are electrical cars... Damn you are ignorant...
1
@strangebutsatisfying2615 What is your actual point here? You can charge our battery from 20 to 80% in like 15 minutes and be done with that, or leave it plugged at home overnight and it will be at preset percentage in the morning for you to enjoy... And yes, Tesla dint sold majority of cars... Electric cars are on the rise, those are sill not being manufactured fast enough... Tesla has like 1 year wait time due to high demand and to low supply at the moment, Tesla literally cant produce enough cars even with major production ramping ups in the past years. No one wants hydrogen cars, but everyone wants electrical one. On top of this, in 2035 in europe you wont be able to buy new ICE car, just try to guess what will be alternative for that... And do you know how many hydrogen cars got sold last year in total across all manufacturers? 15,500... Do you know how many fully electric cars got sold? 4.2 million... Those number are not even comparable and difference between sold cars will only increase as electrical cars are on start of S curve.
1
@taMeska There is literally enough materials on earth to make enough EVs for next couple million years. There are dozens of different types of batteries using completely different chemistry in them from which some uses completely common and abundant elements. And that only about existing technologies, excluding those which will be discovered in the future. If you best counter argument is to say that some current technologies might run out of materials then you don't have a real case here.
1
@taMeska Because it's currently cheapest option when it comes to price and energy density ratio. Electrical cars only improves with time, battery prices are going down, new battery technologies are being discovered and this will only increase with more companies investing more money in battery technology, this is only beginning. While with hydrogen, it wont change much anymore, technology is settled down, you maybe could get cheaper cars if it goes into more mainstream production, but you still need to change entire infrastructure for hydrogen refueling stations, those are extremely expensive to build and maintain, this isint the case with electrical stations. Hydrogen cars had a chance to become something bigger if those took off like 20 years ago, but as we all know oil companies would not allow that they are still not allowing for electrical cars to take over, atleast trying to slow them down as much as possible, but its too late, every major car manufacturer started to shift towards electrical cars, only few who claims to make hydrogen cars in low numbers which is nothing. Like I mentioned, you have 15k hydrogen cars over 4.2million electrical ones and this gap will only increase as no one wants to buy car which cant be used due to none existing refueling stations. Another thing. Electrical cars are like half the price for each km you drive than Hydrogen, it is cheaper than gasoline, but its still more expensive than electrical ones. So what exact benefits you have with Hydrogen cars which should show that Hydrogen is better than electrical cars exactly?
1
@taMeska " Charging time isn’t decreasing, not everyone wants to wait for their car to charge." So then... Plug it at your home and have fully charged car every single day... Problem solved. "And also I just don’t like EVs being pushed in every type of motor vehicle." You don't like environment with less pollution? Less noise and toxic pollution? EV's doesn't work everywhere, but those work in most cases. "Hydrogen Semis are coming soon, and with be better than electric alternatives" Electric semis are coming soon too... So we will see which one wins this battle. And on which aspect its better than electrical one? "EVs have their place, but so does hydrogen." Yes, where you need high density of energy hydrogen might win, for now, but battery technology improved dramatically over past few decades, in density of energy and cost. Hydrogen won't win for long on that front.
1
Actually bible uses word "circle" which is a flat disk.
1
Or... Just hear me out here, or... Russia lied and there isint any Nazis to be killed? Like seriously, you have full blown invasion and complete cities destructions across entire country and you still believe lies from Putin that they came to eradicate Nazis?... Should US nuke Russia just because there are few nazis in it too?... Think with your own head...
1
@mg_customs8531 Usually its based on "Because my religious book said so", they can start with some silly stuff like "Government always lie" or "NASA lies", but generally it always ends up with their religious book.
1
1. Atmospheric distortion? But in general actual example with a photo would be nice or something... 2. Tilted? Which direction? When? Where?... Seriously, actual example would be nice to have. 3. Moon is lit by the sun, tho you should keep in mind that sun is quite further away then moon. But again... EXAMPLE... You made 3 questions which are on a level of being ridiculous yet you dint provided any actual real examples and still want for some one to answer?... Ok...
1
Doesn't look like its successful doing that, isn't it?
1
Coping much?
1
Is it tho? Women always wants to fight for equal rights, but ONLY when it benefits them. Have you ever seen feminist screaming that equal amount of women should be drafted? No. Or that equal amount of women should be working in high risk jobs? No.
1
ww3 would ether extend this war for years or end it in few days with nukes, nether option is better than it is now.
1
@allens2784 David and goliath? You do know that in that story David won over Goliath? And you have volunteers helping out Ukraine to defend, cant say i see any issues with that, especially if you have some one who has its own gear and wants to help.
1
Said who? Putin?...
1
There is no such thing as water powered cars... Never was... And most likely never will be...
1
@loudcamaro79. You get water, put 2 electrodes in, hook battery to those and it starts producing oxygen at one electrode and hydrogen at the other one. Its old news... But what people like you fail to understand that you will be putting in more energy into this hydrogen production than you will get back from it, so you can't just use water in you car and make hydrogen on the go, that's not how basic laws of physics work. If you put in like 2Kw into production of hydrogen, you will get like 1Kw back from converting hydrogen back into electricity. Basic reality.
1
You do understand that instead of killing hundreds of thousands people in this war Russia started and spending trillions on this war, it could have simply... You know... Invite Ukrainians to Rusia who wanted to be part of Russia?... Like, in which reality starting a full blown war and killing all those people is a better option when borders have been open between these two countries and people could have freely left if they wanted too?... Stop watching Russian propaganda and start thinking with your own head.
1
Hows does this truth winning in last 400 days?
1
First of all, that truck was rated for higher tow capacity than CT, second, CT got to 9X the rated hitch weight limit before breaking. And no, I'm not a fan of CT, it looks stupid, its not some sort of work horse or anything like that, just expensive huge BEV, but you still need to do basic objective look at this instead of just blindly hating thing for the sake of hating it.
1
@Monte1970SS Fact is that steel truck was rated for higher loads from the start and their test barely went over from where CT failed. I'm not here to argue that aluminum is as good as steal, obviously its not, but CT failed at 9x the rated load, no idea what type of pothole you would need to have such impact on the hitch. This entire video was extremely misleading and presented CT like complete rubbish while it outperformed rated numbers by 9x... And once more, not saying that CT is good or that using aluminum is good in this use case, but nothing what was shown in this video reflects actual reality.
1
Why do you get gasoline?... Do you have dedicated gasoline station at your apartment? Arguments like yours makes zero sense... You have 300+ miles range, how much are you driving for you to have a need to have ability to charge your car at home and never visit nearest charging station?
1
Och, whataboutism argument... Yet again... "Russia is bad, but look US is bad too!!!"...
1
Creating excuses? Shelling entire city just because there might be few soldiers hiding isint something who doesn't want to kill civilians would ever do... It wasnt precision strike, it was wiping out entire cities from the map...
1
And this is why people voted for Trump and not Kamala... Because of people like you who goes straight to calling someone facist... What exactly did Musk did which qualifies as fascism?
1
Well if you know how to break laws of physics, then maybe we could use water.
1
Tony Basoni Its cute that you are trying to lower science to religions level just to have fighting chance, but sadly (for you) this will not work. Science works with reality, religions works with personal opinions and fuzzy feelings in some ones balls.
1
I guess people who worked on this technology for decades and spend millions if not billions in R&D never thought about it... Or there might be another reason why it could not work that way...
1
@chrishostasek5104 Or maybe you are just wrong?... Do you seriously think that there is some sort of grand conspiracy or just bunch of lazy people in the world that no one thought of something as simple as you just suggested?... Go for it, make billions by selling your patent here...
1
@chrishostasek5104 Because using liquid hydrogen isn't an option. Just like entire hydrogen car idea, it only sounds good on paper, it doesn't scale in reality. Liquid hydrogen needs to remain under -250C, which as you can imagine isn't really possible to remain in a car when you might have ambient temperature at +30C. That temperature gradient is the main issue with liquid hydrogen even before you get into methods you will use to transport it from that tank to engine itself. Then you just have general practicality, safety and efficiency of system like this. I can see one major issue with it, what would be "hydrogen on demand" issue. You don't need constant supply of it, it needs to change based on demand and there isn't good way to just increase hydrogen supply at the moment you actually need it if you only using your evaporating method. At best you would need some battery in between which could store energy and equalize supplied power to the car to counter that slow change in hydrogen pressure, so yet another energy loss source.
1
Dam blowing up on the side which was under control of Russia after Russia raised water to record levels just before it blowing up is quite enough to know who did it...
1
@samueltriad7103 "Just as society once thought that the earth was the center of the universe and it was common belief it got proven wrong" Correct, by those same people who proved that earth is a globe, in space, in a huge galaxy, surrounded by billions of other galaxies... And from where do you think this "center of the universe" came from? Religions... And who corrected this? Science... And what science says about earth? Its a globe... Do you notice pattern here? "Also experience is the best teacher, so don’t just take everything you hear on the news as fact, do your own research!" Cool, and basic observation of sun you can perform yourself proves that earth is a globe. So what now? "That would be my one point to you and others who are too afraid or narrow minded to think outside the box, or in this case outside the “globe”" Thinking outside box is cool and you should do that, issue is not with that, issue is with denying reality or having 0 understanding of geometry and making positive claims based on that... There are no chance for earth to be flat based on dozens of experiments anyone can perform and dozens of observations anyone can do... Flat earth claim in on same level as to say that water is made up of magical space pixies... It just doesn't make any sense...
1
Length of level is irrelevant here... It still shows position based on small bubble in the middle which would not change its position independent of entire level length.
1
I would say that 80-90% of flat earhers are bible believers which simply believe that earth is flat because bible said so.
1
"the politicians will eventually realize it would be un ethical to stop it" But like... Its already un ethical to go against it, yet they do it. They will only stop at moment there wont be anyone to fill their pockets, not a minute sooner. You can have FSD with 100% safety rating and you will still have people who will say that its bad system because of X Y and Z.
1
Prototypes and promises are not really worth anyone's time. Car companies can promise cars running on water, doesn't really mean that those will ever exist.
1
@Nikki67762 Well, I got all correctly... Strange... Its like there is pattern surrounding ignorance Evolution is proven fact and it would be time for you to adjust your beliefs to fit reality and not the other way around. But yea... Ignorance ignorance ignorance...
1
@Nikki67762 "First there was nothing,,, then it exploded!" Is that should be straw man? Are you trying to create some childish claim no one in their sane mind claimed so you cloud "demolish" it and call a victory? Big Bang is not explosion from nothing, its expansion from already existing energy and matter. Please, for your own sake, learn what you are trying to debunk before you do so, as now you just look silly. And just side note, didn't your god supposedly created everything from nothing? Are you trying to make fun of your own religion? "you gotta start with the Big Bang right?" you gotta start with non fallacious argument. "Einstein admitted it was his biggest mistake" Proves jack shit. "Hesitation Model" No idea what's that and I honestly don't care. How is that related to anything exactly? "Oscillation Model " Again, no idea and don't care. "Requires Antigravity forces Never observed" Nether your god, so i guess we can stop at this? None observed things don't exist? Right? "I’ve done my homework, " You might double check logical fallacies and how to make sound and valid argument here. You dint proved/disproved anything here, mentioned bunch of random stuff and thats that. Even if you could disprove Big Bang, that will not prove your god. So go and learn how to make appropriate argument. "You’re brainwashed by “the powers that be! “" Says some one who believes in god because got brainwashed by their parents and local church... Riiiiight, its me who is brainwashed... You cant even manage to make sound and valid argument here and you call me brainwashed... C'mon... "How about Nachmonides? " How about caramel ice cream? "You gonna do your homework here or shall I do it for you?" Not my job to prove you wrong, its your to prove you correct. So, start by presenting actual evidence that your god is real, not that big bang could be false, but that your god is real... Disproving X will not prove Y by default... Logic... Use it... "How about the speed of light? Let me guess,,, you believe it’s a constant??? " How about you bring actual relevant topics here? You like a lost puppy, jumping all over the place without any real meaning. I dont have time to teach you every single thing from entire universe... Pick ONE topic... Even better, present your BEST evidence that your god is real and lets see where it fails. Can you do this?
1
@Nikki67762 You do know that praying has no effect? So maybe do actual thing instead of talking with yourself? And bible is just a book off fables, nothing more. You have bunch of self contradictions, bunch of false claims and bunch of immoral laws. Which is not surprising as it was written by people who knew jack shit about reality. And you call me brainwashed? C'mon... You literally believe that magic and wizards are real because your book said so...
1
@Nikki67762 You into quantum physics?... Then why actual experts from this field never mentions god? And how do you know that god is real to begin with? How do you know that he created us? And how the hell would he send his son to die while his son supposedly was a god himself which cant die, and then he dint, as being in comma for 3 days is not a death. And again, prying is useless, better send me a buck, or even better send a buck to local charity or something...
1
@Nikki67762 Happy Birthday... Tho why did you removed that comment? And why you made a comment informing that you will come back to me instead of actually making actual reply to my comment which would take same amount of time or even avoiding making any comment and simply making one addressing my comment? Anyways...
1
@Nikki67762 I understand that you can busy, i'm not in a rush here. I had replies which happened like 6 months later. Things happen. "I’m into Quantum Physics! Hyper dimensions. " Into like having actual degree or simply watched few youtube videos? "Michio Kaku said: " That's called: argument from authority fallacy. Skipped everything mentioning names. "Okay so there are many top physicists and scientists for you. " And no one cares. Even if Einstein said that god is real, that would not make it so. Some ones personal opinion is not evidence for anything. "Seeing a baby born" natural process for which we have complete explanation is some how proves that god is real? How? Why? "plus he has proved himself to me" How do you know that its not a delusion but something what actually happen? "He is our Heavenly Father who created us and loves us. " Well, you still dint proved that he is real, let alone that he created us. On top of that, if we would go by bible alone, god supposedly killed over 2 million people for shits and giggles, and he would send none believers into hell to be tortured for eternity for simply not believing that he is real. That is not a loving god... "I don’t view the Bible as religion I view it as a book of instructions" Like that part that you can own slaves, that you can beat them as long as they dont die? That part which says that you should kill homosexuals, or adulterous? That part talking about burning witches?... Should i continue?... "Adam and Eve messed everything up so Jesus had to fix it by dying. " Doesn't make any sense. First of all, by your religion god is all knowing, so when he created Adam and Eve he already knew what they will do, because he made them that way. So punishing some one for action they have been forced to do is just stupid. and Jesus dint died... Do you seriously think that Jesus is dead right now? If you answer is no, then he dint died. All this presupposing that Jesus as a god is even a real thing. "They couldn’t kill him!!! " So did he died or not? Can you make up your mind here?... Did he died or not? Was he killed or not? "Genesis 1:1 Romans 1:20 Ephesians3:9 Acts17:24 Colossians 1:16-17" Why are you posting verses from bible? What do you expect to achieve here? Like seriously, if i start quoting Harry Potter book, would that make you believe that wizards are real? "It has 50 scientists that believe in creation. " 50 scientists?!?!?! Och wow, its like 0.001% of all scientists... Majority of scientists are atheists, and of those who are theists, majority of them doesn't mention god at all in their research. So if you want to go by what scientists say, you will loose.
1
@Nikki67762 I dint asked for single scientists... I can find scientist who believes in forest pixies... I asked for consensus, which is what majority of them accepts to be true. Your answers are not valid ones, you might answered them, but none of them proves your religion or that god is real. Did you forgot about that global flood which killed everyone on the planet? Was that done by people too?
1
@Nikki67762 Key words "ancient text"... We have plenty of those, ranging from history to fantasy. Bible is both of those in one place, this is why its book of fables. And just want to draw your attention that you never proved that god is real, you made quite few claims and assertions that he is, but never actually provided even a sound and valid argument that he is. Why is that?
1
@Nikki67762 "astronomy answers that! So does the Bible! " Answers what? And making claim is not answer. For you to use bible to prove bible would only create circular argument, which is logical fallacy by itself. You need to prove that bible is correct, you cant use bible to achieve this... "Why don’t you ask him to prove himself to you? " Ask who? I'm atheist, i dont believe that god is real, so who will I ask? Should i talk with myself? And even then, why should i ask? Is your god so dushy that i have to ask him while not believing that he is real so he could save me from his eternal punishment?... What? "I think you know he’s real and are trying hard to prove to yourself that he isn’t! " I know that god of bible is not real, thats for sure. I'm not sure that god in general is not real. But that besides the point. I'm here explaining to people why they have irrational beliefs, this includes you. Even if god is real, even if god of bible is real, your beliefs are still irrational due to your inability to prove that he is real. Fun fact. Over human history we had over 50000 god claims, so by presupposing 2 huge things here, that god is real and that he is one of those already presupposed, you literally have 0.02% chance in getting correct one. And the fact that humans to create god's, obviously, chances that yours is made up is quite astronomical, while you cant even prove that your god could be possibly real. "You will have to answer to him someday wether you believe that or not." Is that a threat? Because its sounds something like "Pay me monthly fee and I will not brake your legs" if he is such an asshole to punish some one for simply not believing that he is real while he never bothered to present efficient evidence that he is real, then yea, i have no interest in a god like this, even if he is actually real. Funny side note. By bible alone god killed over 2million people for shits and giggles, while devil only 2 after he got permission/instructions to do so from god. On top of this, by original Adam and Eve story god lied while devil said truth. So who is the worst one? All this presupposing that your god is real and that your bible is accurate, but you got the point.
1
@Nikki67762 "I feel sorry for you honey!" Why? "faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen. " Yea, its when you believe whatever you want to believe independent if its true. Basically blind faith, nothing more. I care what is actually true independent how harsh it might be, you on another hand will pick sweet lie instead. "What you can’t see is more real then what you can! " So does this prove that Allah is real or that Zeus is real? Have you seen ether of them? No? So its more real than your god you would want to claim to know that is actually real? Isint that defeating your own world view by using your own logic? "I promise you Mr. Zrips Atheist that I will keep you in my prayers! " Like, please, don't waste your time, instead of talking with your self while thinking about me, do something productive... Like plat a carrot or something... "Can I have your first name?" Why? Does your god needs a zip code too? He is not able to find me by my nick name? After all, my nick name is more unique than my actual name, so it will be simpler for you god to find me.
1
@Nikki67762 And why should I waste time reading that book? There are books on more or less everything. I don't have time to read all of them. If you cant provide any actual evidence for your claims, then that's that. Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
1
@Nikki67762 You could try presenting evidence that earth is flat. Its nice that you are trying to recommend some fantasy books, but I came here for the facts.
1
@Nikki67762 Bible says allot, why should we care what it says? And there are more Christians who will use that same bible to claim that it says that earth is a globe... To be honest, I literally had to play devils advocate few times and explain Christians that bible actually do say that earth is flat... Which works in my favor in any case... You have religion which makes bunch of false claims, including shape of earth, yet you want to use that ancient book for some reason... Its a book of fables, it cant be used for anything, well, maybe as a toilet paper substitute...
1
@Nikki67762 "the Christians that say it’s a globe obviously don’t study their Bible" Nether do you. I can bet i know more about your bible than you do, even tho i'm not even a Christian. "A circle is not a globe lol." Correct, this is one of many reasons why bible should not be taken seriously, as it gives bunch of obvious incorrect statements, including shape of earth. "Not toilet paper hun. It’s a book of instruction!" How to beat your slaves? That you should stone adulterous? That you should kill homosexuals? That you should burn witches? That you cant eat shrimps? That you cant wear mixed fabric cloths? That kind of instructions? And maybe you are right, using bible for a toilet paper can be painful, paper is quite hard and sharp, not really suitable even to wipe your but... So its completely useless then...
1
@Nikki67762 Youtube notifications are pain in butt... I'm not getting those sometimes too, no idea why, but i have to check old conversations from time too time to make sure that there isint any replies. Youtube does its thing, i guess... "I study my Bible everyday hun" Slow reader? Did you got to the part where it says that you should kill homosexuals? "I UNDERSTAND the Bible!" I do too, its quite simple: Bible was written by people from that time and not by god or inspired by god, based on a fact that you have bunch of self contradictions, bunch of immoral instructions, bunch of false claims and so on. Unless your god is actually real and he just wanted to make a prank by making bible in a way it is right now. Like seriously, for one second try to consider small possibility that bible was actually written by simple people from that time and you will realize how every issue you try to explain starts to make actual sense, why its written like this and so on. Just for one second. "It makes me feel very sad for you but I won’t give up praying for you no matter what you say." Well brainwashing clearly did its thing on you. Once more, praying has no actual effect, its just talking to your self, better do something what actually gives you results, like plant a tree or something... But seriously, as you seam to claim to know bible better than me, then please, explain to me how you justify instruction which says that you should kill homosexuals? Or adulterous? Or burn witches? Beat your slaves? I'm curious what excuse you will make here to try justify something obviously immoral.
1
@Nikki67762 Care to address immoral instructions in your book?
1
Water isn't fuel.
1
Rus bot detected.
1
Overused joke.
1
Having account actually simplifies everything by a tone... With Tesla in general you just pull over, plug in and you are done, no need to do anything, its tied to your account and you will get bill automatically. To use same Tesla chargers you will need account as there is no interface on charger itself, but its one time thing and you would only use this single small app when you actually need it... So no idea what are you complaining here about.
1
@johnadams2063 "But yes bill lie gets way outside the bounds of science with his rediculas global warming claims." What did he lied about? "He cant say how warm the earth would be if people where never here and so on." You do realize that its not "E=mc^2" equation to calculate something like this? It had like hundreds of variables in play and for most of them we dont even have accurate numbers, but we know that humans speed up global warming by emitting pollution, this is simply a fact at this point, what you could still debate is actual effect it will have in near future. But when you have like 15 hottest years ever recorded in last 20 years, you can start seeing some pattern here. "Hes simply lying." Lying about what?... And based on what evidence you can claim that he is lying? Are you lying here? "The truth should supersede everything to a scientist." It does, this is why majority of scientists accepts global warming. Like seriously, what is your issue here exactly?
1
@johnadams2063 "and further more bill lie clames to know how to solve the climate change situation we find ourselves in. That's not science its activism plane and simple" So what?... Are you trying to claim that if you have "scientist" tile you should never express opinion of your own on any topic if its not 100% factually backed by scientific data? Its like you just want to be angry at him for sake of being angry... Did he hurt your feelings or something?
1
Why would you have that? It would be quite dangerous and wasteful to keep tank filled with hydrogen in your trunk. Differently than petroleum, hydrogen is not that dense in energy when looked from the side of volume, and then you simply have complications relating to you actually being able to refill hydrogen tank from that additional one. It simply to much hassle for no real benefit.
1
How is (assuming that its true) manufacturer having good quality parts would be relevant to anything here?
1
Its night shift.
1
Water isn't a fuel...
1
Water isn't fuel... You need more energy to extract hydrogen from water then you will get back by using it, aka you are wasting energy and money.
1
@gearheadfabworks 3kg would be like 180 miles of range for hydrogen fuel cells, which are twice as efficient as hydrogen combustion engines, so realistically Mike's car should be doing under 100 miles in a good day.
1
@gearheadfabworks Just saying that its either multibillion technology made by someone who doesn't know that it is so good, or those numbers have been highly inflated for some reason. I would be more than happy for hydrogen to be a viable solution, but its not. And there are just too many people claiming to have magical technologies relating to hydrogen and none of them ever proves their claims to be actually true. We had hydrogen engines as of 1806, it's nothing new. Like Toyota tries to create some weird advertisement campaign with their V8 hydrogen combustion engine... It's like the worse option you could dream about, you will need sooooo much hydrogen to power that thing just to get half decent range... Not even talking about refueling prices. It's really easy to burn hydrogen, its really hard to do it in efficient and sustainable way.
1
Welcome to war. All this could end at any moment if Putin decides to stop attacking Ukraine... So things like Howitzers helps out to kick out orcs out of Ukraine, so it is success.
1
I would like to see flat earth model which actually corresponds with reality...
1
Everyday driver want's convenience, consistency and cheap rides, hydrogen cars do not provide any of that.
1
You can't kill something what never been alive.
1
Actually most flat earthers use bible as their main evidence that earth is flat, so its more of a religious brainwashing than being afraid of government, tho its definitely not uncommon to see people screaming "Its flat because NASA says that its round" but at the end of day it ends up with "But my book says..."
1
Whats your point here?
1
@CulturedWhiteBoy Are you saying that earth is globe because bible said so? Because bible says that it is flat. Or are you tried to make argument that earth is flat because bible said so?... Like seriously, i wanted to get clarification here what you meant by your original comment...
1
You only need 1 to hit the target and we know how accurate Russian artillery is, so it would not be surprising if Russia uses 4x more shells.
1
@amanirouissi7836 Who said that its made? Creation needs to be demonstrated, not asserted. if you want to make a claim that it was made for us, then sorry, but this argument doesn't fly. Majority of earths surface will kill us, 73% of water, from land we have extreme cold and extreme heat regions, so at end you are left with like 10% of thin strip where you could survive without special protection, like cloths. Even fish have bigger livable area then we are... And if you looked in to universe itself... Well... 99.999999999% of it will kill you in seconds. So which exact criteria shows that this is a creation?
1
@amanirouissi7836 proof of globe: geometry + sun observation = globe Doesn't require any calculations or complicated math or additional knowledge, just basic observation anyone can perform over one day span.
1
You do realize that war is going on in Ukraine and it was Russia which destroyed it? Ukraine isint surrendering and its not loosing. While west dint even started to actually participate in this war, so no idea what west lost here...
1
Main issue with liquid hydrogen is to actually keep it at liquid hydrogen state, which would be under -250C temperature. You could make cars with liquid hydrogen, but those would constantly lose their fuel by simply sitting in your driveway. Not ideal thing when hydrogen costs you arm and leg and now it just constantly leaks.
1
"And PUTIN went to UBEKISTAN for fresh troop for counter attack in UKRAINE" Why Ubekistan? No more dumb troops to be taken from Russian territory for this meat grinder? Looking for help from other countries? War isint going by the plan? "NATO will never try to get in UKRAINE reason is PUTIN already warned NATO of using his Nuclear BOMB if ever NATO will get involved" Russia threatens everything with nukes... Because they dont have any real power here just to scream like a child and say that they will kill everyone including themselves if others wont do as they want. Nobody cares at this point. "WHO is winning BIDEN, for every signature for ARMS delivery for UKRAINE the US Mil Indl Complx get paid in turn they will never forget BIDEN. " I mean, even if this was true, so what? Ukraine gets help to fight against invaders, US makes some cash while doing so, its a win win situation even if this was actually true.
1
@Trashh757 And now realize that people voted for person like this instead of Kamala. This should show you how far leftism went that Trump actually won... 8 years ago I was saying that Trump is the worse option for president there could ever be and he needs to be put in jail for rest of his life. But now... If I had not choose between Trump and Kamala, well, you know what I would have chosen... And my views about Trump didn't even changed over the years...
1
Ukraine was neutral and it give up nuclear weapons, and still Russia attacked it... So yea, your silly excuses isn't working here.
1
@grenadaball7655 Isint Russia's entire "goal" to denazify Ukraine or something? Or was is to free Russians from Ukraine? Now its about Ukraine wanting to join NATO so that means that Russia got validation to attack it before that happen?... How the hell do you people not realize some issues with this mental gymnastic you are trying to perform here? Now NATO got 2 new members and expanded NATO border with Russia exponentially, some would call it "not a good plan" but I guess master strategist Puding knows what he is doing... You know, 3 day war after 2 years of it is a good plan in works...
1
420? Did you forgot to place a dot after 2?
1
Gatitasecsii Why? Like seriously, he literally presents actual numbers you could verify, he basically presents hard facts and not his personal opinion and you still think that he is being paid by Elon?... While Tesla doesn't even need that due to higher demand than supply of Tesla cars at the moment even without any marketing.
1
@johncipolletti5611 Weird comment you have here... So will try to ask it differently, as you think that EV's are not the answer (right?) then what is?
1
@johncipolletti5611 Then I have no idea what you even tried to say with your original post... Government brainwashing people about a thing which is actually true and is the answer?... What did I missed here? Is EV the answer or not?
1
Not even if you launch this balloon from Paris? Just poking around, you do need to clarify location you launched this balloon, after all there are more countries in the world than US
1
@Globeisahoax Not on flat pancake world it should not, this is why flat earth fails on every single step, just like you
1
I heard that caps make you correct by default, its true, internet said it...
1
How far do you think those stars are?...
1
Reef Jack "Our atmosphere extends up over nine hundred thousand miles up." And how do you know this? Like seriously, how? Its not based on evidence or something, not even written in any book of fables, like bible. So from which body part you took this number out? "General Ebert the military as they try to find an opening in an ice ring wall they travel over 68,000 miles" And how the hell would this even prove that earth is flat? Even if they actually traveled longer distance then they should, how the hell does that prove flat earth? "that purpose it's a take the Creator out of the equation now those are things that you can add up" Maybe because creator never was shown to be real to begin with? You cant have something added in if that thing never existed... "When you go out to sea it's called sea level" Right, and "level" doesn't mean that its flat... Check definition... And are you trying to make logical fallacy here by appealing to definitions of words? "For me it's all about uplifting and educating people on the truth" Then stop spreading nonsensical claims, like that earth is flat space pizza...
1
@therealzilch I could be more funny without even trying. Hes here just trying to get some attention from people, maybe he is lonely or something, who knows.
1
@flatearth9140 People who uses caps are ether a troll or has serious mental issues, tho being troll might put you into same category anyways.
1
@flatearth9140 Text in caps looks stupid and immature, if you want to look stupid and immature then you are succeeding. But like, do you have something more funny jokes here? As this starting to get boring.
1
His a Christian, he is definitely rejecting Lono even before he heard anything about him. Its like saying "This guy who flew to the moon might believe in flat earth, so we need to verify it by explaining in detail what flat earth is and see if he actually rejects it" I can bet my house that there is no chance for person who flew to the moon and back to say that earth is flat... Just like JP accepting Lono.
1
And Harry Potter books are history record...
1
@blue_beephang-glider5417 Rockets kill ozone? I mean, you farting kills ozone too, but like, by how much?
1
Bots still botting.
1
Base "binning" should be based by your biological sex, male of female. Why you ask? Well simple, on AVERAGE males will have stronger muscles, bigger lungs, wider hand reach, higher bone density and so on, this alone should straight away separate biological sex into two groups by default, after that you can go into more detail, like height and weight, like we have with boxing. At the end of the day, if we don't have this actual perfect method in determining capabilities, then maybe lets not change what was before until we came up with that method?
1
Said who?
1
Just because company invests some money into something doesn't mean it's a good thing, especially when there is basically a requirement from car companies to invest money in cleaner alternatives, so either its hydrogen or yet another BEV, they clearly can't compete against BEV's, so what's left? Hydrogen toy cars... There is nothing you could R&D here, hydrogen is limited by physics, not by lack of technology.
1
So believing in reality is bad now?
1
What's with that weird dash? As it feels and quite likely is the case to be made of 2 screen's where one is 50% covered with rounded shapes just to make it look more "classic", but like, why? Why can't this just be a software thing instead of physical one? Unless they actually put in multiple tiny screens, for some weird reason. Second thing, what's with that hole at front wheel? For mud to accumulate on your door? For rocks to scrap the hell out of your paint?
1
How many lives did this FSD took and how many lives did it saved? Any actual factual numbers you have to present here?
1
It's only Russia which wants this war...
1
Nah, its just that internet allowed for ignorant people to bunch of and start screaming their nonsense, it will go away with time and some basic education. And there is a reason why most flat earthers are seemingly from US where education system is a good as my cooking skills.
1
When you talk with some one who claims that earth is flat, just assume that its 50/50 chance that he is trolling. Some actually believe this, some not.
1
"Environmentally ICE is the only way to go" Did you read this on big oil web page or something?... This is the most ridiculous statement you can ever say. "Electric is just too energy inefficient" In which reality?... "destructive to the environment to last" But its not. Most of electric cars can be recycled and reused, this is not the same story with ICE cars which spits out pollution as long as it runs "especially when people learn the truth rather than the current propaganda" Its ironic to head word "propaganda" from someone who thinks that ICE cars are the way to go... C'mon...
1
@deerichardz You asked if I don't know "why" when I asked "why"? How much more dense can you be? I specifically asked "Why?" to know why this person thinks that both need to be put in jail. You people are weird, you don't even understand meaning of question... No wonder you lost election.
1
@deerichardz So you are dense and not even American? Well, sorry about that. So, do you know how question work? I know that I made a question to ask if you know how questions work, so I guess we will see from your response if you actually respond to it or make some another dense one.
1
War in Ukraine needs to be won by Ukraine, involving any country you have listed here would start ww3 automatically which would lead to exponentially more deaths if not nuclear war.
1
"Flat earth is a CIA creation to make conspiracy theorists look stupid" You dont need CIA to make flat earthers look stupid, they are experts on that already. "NASA IS lying to us" based on what evidence? "They are a bullshit company with a bullshit agenda and have done nothing for years" Couple inventions by NASA: Camera phones, Scratch resistant lenses, CAT Scans, LED's, Land Mine Removal, Athletic shoes, foil blankets, water purification system, dust busters, ear thermometers, home insulation, the jaws of life (tool, used bi firefighters, usually) wireless headset, memory foam, freeze dried food, adjustable smoke detector, baby formula, artificial limbs, computer mouse, portable computer... "I think they are hiding our true origin and place in this galaxy" And i think i can fly. Can I? " For example try debunking why there are no stars on the moon from the NASA space programs" Camera exposure time?... Try taking picture of stars at night while having bright object in that same picture... You cant have that... Cameras dont work that way. "Why do they not take beautiful shots of the earth from the moon" They took realistic ones. Again, you cant have stars and bright object in same picture without actually using Photoshop and overlapping 2 separate photos to get this beautiful photo you want... This is not how cameras work... " I could go on and on" And you would fail again and again... So maybe dont... "This all sounds crazy" It does and i showed why. "Trump 2Q2Q!" Well, that actually explains allot. "The background is completely blacked out which is why you don't see stars" Actually if you had basic knowledge how to use photoshop or any other decent photo editing software, you could crank up contrast to crazy values which would reveal couple stars in those photos. "But there are missions that are completely faked" Based on what evidence? " Those missions you can see the wire holding up the astronauts" You cant, your imagination and ignorance is not evidence. "You cant just throw moon conspiracy theorists with in the flat earth idiots" Why not? Both denies reality, so why not? "everything can be logically explained through science of the earth being round" And everything (as i have explained) can be logically explained through science that we went to moon, multiple times. "Use your brains to decipher truth from fiction, common sense from bullshit." Well you are atleast not a flat earther, so you are half way throw a bullshit sea. "Oh btw the earth isn't exactly a perfectly round ball either." Yet on grand scale its a perfect sphere. Tho its nick picking, so who cares, its still a spherical.
1
700+ days into 3 day war with crumbling Russian economy. Doesn't feel like a smart move by a smart person to me.
1
Lots of words to say nothing in particular. There is a definition of a woman which was used to create special places for woman and special rights for them, that word was and still should be based on objective biological reality, that's it.
1
Wait, are you complaining that Tesla put too many charging stations instead of giving those few square meters to you?
1
You don't know how comparisons work, don't you now?
1
@darthvirgin7157 You should go and watch your masters TF videos about Holmes. She was selling faulty medical equipment, she was literally killing people with that. No idea in which reality does that gets into comparison what Musk did. So you should spend less time licking your god's ass you call TF and actually just use your own head, for once in your life. You might be surprised how much you will learn.
1
@herrschaftg35 ? Lied? This is your criteria to put someone into jail?... Lying?... Och no... He lied... Did you lied in your life? Yes, yes you did. Does this mean now you should be put into jail for that?... Do you people even understand differences between different things? Holmes was selling faulty tests which basically put peoples lives on the line, and you trying to compare Musk lying with that? First of all, what he lied about? Second, how does this compare to what Holmes did?
1
Yet bible does mention earth being flat. Have you read it?
1
@ratphink-3226 So basically there is no way for bible to be wrong? Everything what science goes against will be just allegory, everything what science supports will be true and everything else is true until proven false by science?... By these rules, why would we even care what bible has to say at all?
1
@ratphink-3226 And? What is your actual point here? Bible is book of fables, contains some true claims, some false, some self contradictory claims and so on... Anything we can confirm to be false is false, anything relating to magic defaults to false until proven to be true and any regular claim is irrelevant in any case. Tho i'm still wondering how the hell you decide which thing is misconstrued and which is not... As you already stated that anything what contradicts current understanding of reality is just allegory... Ok... Is god and allegory? Science cant disprove that, so if he? Its yes or no question, so answer to it and provide explanation how you got to a conclusion.
1
@ratphink-3226 That still doesn't answer to my actual question... You are saying to believe in Jesus or atleast in a god, ok, why? How did you decided that this particular sentence about Jesus being real is actually true and not something what was made up like obviously made up global flood? Same exact question would be surrounding god.
1
@lalalalalalalalalala-js5xl have you seen starship flight 4 and his reaction to it? How many things did he got correctly there?... TF is just some sad person who wants to make money from each topic: Musk hating. And that's that. He isint that smart when it comes to any of these topics, he constantly fails and claims things which are obviously false. He complains for the sake of complaining, because there is group of people who likes anyone who is negative against Musk independent if they are correct or not.
1
Tesla cars are not a new thing you know... And this combination of single screen to control everything was a thing for years, yet Tesla is still the safest car when it comes to actual accidents and actually getting into accidents, so clearly having those controls on screen isint an issue as you want to say that it should be
1
What was false in this video?
1
Magic!
1
@thelorddoctor1519 What government? Are you crazy? Its penguins... They have technology to control weather and they are guarding ice wall... Its true... Internet said so.
1
@thelorddoctor1519 No no no, lizardmen control government, penguins control lizardmen.... C'mon, its common knowledge...
1
@thelorddoctor1519 I'm not a penguin... I swear!!! I'm not!!!
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 have you seen penguin? Its majestic!!! I mean, magical!!! MAGIC I SAY!!! Its true, because i used caps.
1
Little search will indicate that your dude died 8 years after his initial scam claim and he never actually proved his technology to actually work... It was a scam, because water isint fuel, it simply can't be due to basic laws of physics.
1
Because Putin said so?
1
Because it makes easy money.
1
Earth is a factually globe, you dont really need to prove that earth is a globe when its a fact from reality... And this video wasnt even made to prove or disprove any model, but simply look at how flat earthers think and why they believe this nonsense.
1
Bedford Level experiment Its repeatable experiment which one of many proves that earth is a globe.
1
Can he do about real nasa landing too?
1
Because its just a scam?
1
By going home? Maybe. Doesn't really matter as long as Ukraine can take its land back.
1
Actually bible says that earth is flat, best verse you could point to is the one which says that earth is a circle, but circle is a flat disk and not spherical shape. Just FYI i'm not flat earther.
1
@boterlettersukkel It only been translated into a word which would mean ball for sake of keeping this lie and not to what original word actually means. There is reason why majority of translations says it to be circle, because its actually accurate translation, people who realized that this would mean that bible advocates for flat earth translated it to mean a ball. So nothing strange here, people will make their own shit and create yet another denomination, after all we have over 1000 of those.
1
@therealzilch We can pile things on this by pointing out that there is not a single place in bible which implies earth to be actually spherical, but there multiple verses implying it to be flat, just like it was commonly believed at that time.
1
@jamesheggs6825 That's the point... I'm not misquoting bible... Bible is wrong on multiple things, shape of the earth is quite irrelevant thing on itself, still wrong in bible, but irrelevant.
1
@joshuaa3075 You will spend 60 buck instead of 5 to save like 20 minutes of your time. But then, is your 20 minutes worth more than 55 bucks? And most people charges at home overnight, so that "refueling" time is completely irrelevant. And just FYI every hydrogen car has multiple tanks and every hydrogen tank has expiration date written on them, which is around 5 years. Same thing for fuel cell itself. Maintenance costs will skyrocket after first 5 years of usage on top of you spending tens of thousands on hydrogen every year.
1
Why does every flatard thinks that disproving globe model will prove flat one? You cant even explain sun behavior which completely contradicts what we should observe if earth was flat... Yet you think that by trying to create some straw man fallacies about globe model some how will prove that earth is space pizza...
1
Wondering if Putin simply dont care about Kaliningrad or he failed at chess? As now they cry about cut off routes to it and from it due to sanctions.
1
Its an issue with amount... While plants absorb CO2 there is simply to much of it to be absorbed
1
@billfred9411 It wont be water world as there isn't enough ice to actually create so much extra water, but it will increase sea level by quite a bit. Total increase would be around 70 meters, which sounds alot and would basically delete most costal cities, but there would be plenty of land left. Rising sea level is basically the smallest issue from all of them what we will be facing down the line. And i think we already past the tipping point, now its only the question how bad it will get based on how much we will continue to pollute until it stabilizes.
1
Well yes, people realized how shitty hydrogen cars are in comparison to BEV's. If hydrogen cars started to be pushed properly like 20-30 years ago, then those would have had a real chance in becoming something bigger than just expensive hobby as it is now. Too late for that, we have better option now
1
Toni Gonzalez Remind us how long it took for Russia to take Bakhmut and what did Russia sacrificed for it exactly? THAT IS A EPIC FAIL
1
@baubljos103 "Seems to me you focus mostly on name-calling and insult." What would you call some one who thinks that pigs can fly because children book said so? Would you call that person smart? Would you call him intelligent? What label would you put on some one like that? "although he did take a level on a airplane. That is a test, but not in depth." Actually i have issue with that "test"... Level on airplane is as smart way to check if earth is flat or not as it would be if you would take that same level and place it on random spot on ground and use that as proof of anything. "He should have taken an electronic level" Why? What would be the difference in levels behavior on flat and on globe? Should it change in any of those models? If it should, why? " and he should have set it up horizontally and then measured at regular periods" You do realize that horizontally would be perpendicular from center of earth. So what would change when you go around earth and you keep this same perpendicular position?... Nothing... Nothing would change... Same exact thing would happen if earth was space pizza... So maybe you do have point here, he should have included actual science as someone in here fails to understand some basic geometry.
1
@baubljos103 "you cannot know what "someone thinks" because you cannot read their mind" Was I not clear enough?... Ok, will put into different words: What would you call some one who CLAIMS... "I would call them a person making interesting claims" Seriously, person who claims that pigs can fly because its written in a Childs book would be interesting claim to you?... Seriously? "I would not call them bad names - that's what kids do." Funny enough only kids are afraid of bad names. "Inter alia, I concur w/u - test the level on ground as a control." You are joking here? Right? You cant be serious... level on ground as control?... You are joking? " I believe your "would be" claim is premature and implies bias." Its like literally what it is... This is literally how level works... It shows deviation from perpendicular position from earths center. Its like saying that because i said 2+2=4 implies bias... What the hell? " In other words, if you declare (explicitly or implicitly) a preconceived notion about the earth shape BEFORE considering the data then your conclusion may be clouded by your preconception." First of all, we already know that earth is a globe and that gravity is a thing, so there is no real experiment here to be done. Second, in BOTH models, globe or flatardian one behavior of level would be same, because this is what those models says we should observe... So doing experiment which should produce same results for both models is just... pointless... "is the term "horizontal" equivalent to "perpendicular from the center of the earth"???" Definition of horizontal: parallel to the plane of the horizon; at right angles to the vertical. So yes. Should i explain it in more detail or are we good here? "AS I understand the term, "horizontal" means parallel to the horizon." Cool. And? Horizon would be perpendicular to earths center. Should i really explain geometry to you here? "However, he could and should improve the test - and I support improvement and further testing." What test? He wasnt testing if earth is flat or globe with that test. So why would you support it in general? Its irrelevant test for what it was performed for. So why would you support tests like that or why would you want to improve it which would not change actual outcome of that test? "You know, electronic transit levels today have an auto-read mechanism." And apple released colored mac's... Your point? If we keep talking about random irrelevant things here, why cant we change topic to something more interesting? You could have 1million worth level with 500+ decimal values precision, would not make any difference here. Will put in analogy here, you literally talking about tool which have better temperature measurement range when conversation goes about car having square wheels... How is that relevant? What would it change?
1
@baubljos103 "I did not see the pig claim, so I reject your premise." Its not premise, its analogy... "No I'm not joking because a control group is an element of scientific hypothesis testing. " Its quite interesting, you seam to have this mental defense here where i will point out absurdity in your comment and then you will return with a valid sentence which is not a direct answer to original one. Yes, having control is needed when you perform experiment, but that was NOT the point i was making here... Placing level on ground to have this control point is just stupid. Should I explain why or maybe you can understand it by yourself? "Did you test that hypothesis on Antarctica? " ? What the hell does Antarctica has anything todo with anything in here? Are you saying that gravity works differently in Antarctica?... What the hell? Are you drunk or does this random sentence generator you have in your head just comes up with random sentences by itself on regular basis? "Who is "we"? " Normal people. People with basic knowledge about reality and how to test shit. "If you want to represent other people then I want to see their written authority allowing you to do so" Damn... How thick headed are you? Did I said that I represent others? Its like you desperately trying to discredit anything I say while miserably failing on each step... Its quite sad... I don't need their written word saying that i can simply point out that majority agrees with what I'm saying here. "So - PLEASE - go ahead and explain gravity." Well you clearly dint aces gravity, so let me to educate you about it. Gravity is a label put on observable and testable phenomena where object with mass attract objects with mass. This was demonstrated and proven with experiments like Cavendish. "You might find that Flat Earth theorists have some interesting gravity arguments related to the putative gravitational pull of the moon" Who cares? Why should we care what some random person thinks reality to be when they cant present any evidence to support that? "Young Earth Creationists argue that because the Moon gravity was not strong enough to keep the moon's alleged orbit constant they've actually calculated that the earth must be much younger than is commonly claimed" Personal ignorance is not evidence for anything. This claim was debunked long time ago. "So - there's some interesting gravity arguments out there in addition to yours." Interesting arguments? No, not really. There are bunch of empty assertions based on personal ignorance and personal incredulity, but nothing interesting about those. " Your claim was "Horizon would be perpendicular to earths center..." But the definitions don't read that way, because you alluded to "perpendicular" but the definition gets at "vertical"" Draw a circle, because you might even understand 2D, place a point in center, draw a line towards circle side, you will have reference line which will be the vertical one, then you can make line which is 90 degrees (perpendicular) to that original one and you will have horizon line. So that horizon line would be what bauble level is showing. Should i explain it one more time or are we good now? "Seems to me that you are not really prepared to determine what is relevant to what the test administrator intended to achieve." Isint thats the entire point in performing tests? If i want to measure buildings height and i start performing tests how animals bread, why would that test be relevant? You keep talking about some unrelated shit like that could impact main question here... Ok, as you seam to like making shit up as you go, please explain how would having digital self recording level change outcome of plane experiment which was done to "prove/disprove" earths shape in relation to using basic level? "I have not decided whether a level test is relevant or not." So then you might know less about reality then you think. You might start looking into globe model, how it works, what it predicts, how gravity works and all that jazz, after this you can come back and apologize for wasting time with your nonsensical "arguments". "I'm inclined to favor the level test because I like people who test hypotheses." Riiiight, so you might like people who tests forest pixies too... Different than you some of us dont really like wasting time on crazy/ignorant peoples claims. We know that earth is a globe, thats simply a fact. Having different opinion about established fact isint interesting in any shape or form. "AS to your "analogy" I did not find it compelling." maybe because you are failing to understand even basics, like the fact that having level on a plane, even if its digital self recording with 50 decimal points, would not prove/disprove a shit when it comes to the shape of earth. You cant even understand that, so no wonders you failed to understand my analogy here.
1
@baubljos103 "She said that if other don't comprehend your points - it's your fault" Exactly what i was talking before, you keep adding some random stuff and now you simply saying that it my fault that you failed to understand basics here... Ok... Doesn't change the fact that you failed to understand basics here... "If you don't like the "control" then you are free to propose an alternative. " Why would I? Your "experiment" is pointless and would not prove anything. Having some control point for your level is meaningless in any case. You can have most accurate level in the universe, will not change the outcome of your experiment... "But you failed to do so, which seems to imply that you oppose a "control"." I'm not oppose to have a "control", I'm opposite in performing experiments which are useless. "But I support the "level" test and I support other tests as well." And i support caramel ice cream. What's your point? "I asked if you've tested your hypothesis on Antarctica because Antarctica is a key factor in the Flat Earth Theory." Why? Why would Antarctica have any impact on a level test? Why do you keep making nonsensical side steps over and over again? Will your next comment be about me going to moon and checking if some one landed on it to prove moon landing deniers that they are wrong?... C'mon... You sound more and more like some internet troll here... "To which I say - 1st - even if they are "normal" - you failed to provide any proof that they authorized you to speak on their behalf. 2nd, you failed to prove that they are "normal". " 1st, i dont need their permission to say that i agree with them. Second, normal is something what is in majority. Hundreds of years ago it was normal to believe that earth is flat, it was wrong belief, but it was normal. While going back to reality, majority of people are educated enough to know that earth is not a pancake under the magical dome or something. Are you some one who thinks that earth is flat or globe? If you know that its a globe, then you belong to normal people group, so you are part of "we". if you are not a normal person, then you are not part of that. So which one are you? "You allege the insult "... How thick headed are you? "" Ok. "When you make a claim about "WE" - you are representing others. On doing so, your opponent is rightfully entitled to ask for your authority." Which is false. I can happily say that we as a humans agree that we should not kill each other. Should i get written confirmation that i can say this too? I'm static basic things here where I agree with majority on specific topic, i'm not saying that i'm representing specific group of people and anything i say will apply to them... Why its so hard for you to grasp this basic thing? "Without authority from your so-called "majority" you have not proved that they agree with you." Jebus... Should i get some statistics to prove that i'm correct here? "Also interesting that now you seem to support testing, whereas you seem to have opposed the level test." That would be a straw man fallacy. Have you ever read what that means? You seam to toss some fancy words and names all over the place, yet you dont even know that you should not make basic logical fallacies here. "For example, the tests could possibly be performed in outer space, or possibly at the center of the putative globe" So like I said before, your personal ignorance isint evidence for anything. You don't need to perform Cavendish experiment in outer space or in a center of earth. Entire point of that experiment was to demonstrate that objects with mass attract objects with mass, where it was done will not impact actual results. "The basis of the claim was not personal ignorance, the basis was the moon's alleged distance from earth. As such, your claim is false." We, yes, we can calculate distance to the moon with 2mm accuracy, its not alleged distance from earth, we know what that distance is exactly. And to got this basic thing through your thick head, "we" would be a human race in general, "we" as a accumulated knowledge by humans. "I find the arguments and counter arguments are interesting." Then you do you, i like actually meaningful arguments, you like random speculations and you like to waste time on those random speculations. "Your analogies have failed previously, and you've previously resorted to fallacy and misrepresentation. AS such, I do not accept further analogies from you. " So not only you failing to understand basic things here, you cant even understand analogies... Good to know. "You are - essentially - advocating censorship. I reject that . " Censorship? Are you drunk? "I say the post is open to the public and anybody can reply." Yes, you can reply, but when you start misrepresenting what other said and waste time with nonsensical irrelevant arguments, some apology could be nice to see. But you do you. "You are not "we"" You keep repeating same point over and over again. Why? Do you think i will not get your objecting from first 5 times you said this? Or do you think that repeating something will make it true by default? Tho funny thing about that word "we", definition would be: used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people considered together. If you want I can get my GF written agreement that I can represent her about this specific topic and that she agrees with what I'm saying, so my usage of "we" is 100% accurate and your childish objection to it is just... Childish... Tho ironically you did complained about bad word usage which i said to only be issue with kids... So yea... ironic, I know... "I understand precision because I was instructed in precision in calculus physics and statistics, among other courses which I ACED." And? Are you saying that just because you got good grades you cant make a mistake? you could have 50 Nobel prizes will not make you correct on everything by default... If you ever aced anything relating to logical fallacies you would known this... So maybe go and learn that one instead of calculus? "I've used extremely sensitive and precise measuring devices in testing hypotheses. So I claim that I do understand." Sorry, but you don't understand. Having digital level for that plane "experiment" is as useful as having red shoes while measuring buildings height... How accurate your level is in that plane experiment will not change outcome of it, because that plane experiment will not prove anything in ether way. So your entire argument falls on its face. "I reply that you failed to engineer and compose valid analogies and you failed to defend your analogies." You dont need to defend your analogies, those are analogies... Do you even know what analogy is?
1
@baubljos103 "If I failed to understand your claims the responsibility is yours, according to my instructor, because you composed your claims" Does that make me wrong? If i say that 2+2=4 and you fail to understand this, would that make it wrong? "The mere fact that you don't recognize a point does not mean that a point does not exist." Then explain how would this plane experiment by using most accurate level in the universe would prove/disprove shape of earth? If you cant explain this basic thing then your experiment is pointless for the question given. "And I asked if you've tested that hypothesis on Antactica because Antarctica is a significant location in FE theory" You keep repeating what you said without actually explaining why it even matters... What difference does it make where i perform that experiment? As earth is a globe, what difference there would be to perform it in Antarctica? And if earth was flat, what difference would be then?... Like seriously, you keep coming back with some random irrelevant sentences here and then never actually explain why you even mention them... "But if you want to make claims and not test them - that's fine with me" Talking from personal experience i see. Tho that wasn't my claim or position, so thanks for yet another straw man. "Based on my review of your claims here I infer that your claims and your reasoning are defective." Says some one who thinks that we need to use digital level for this pointless plane experiment... Riiiiiiiiight, it is my reasoning which is defective... Whatever helps you sleep at night. "My understanding of normality arises from the Statistics course I Aced" You keep mentioning that you aced something like that would make any difference in your arguments... If you ever aced area relating to sound and valid arguments you would known that your "aced" is irrelevant. So you clearly dint aced more important thing here. "And I'm inclined to infer that your claims about "normal" are fallacious." You can infer, but until you can actually prove it to be false, we will stick with my claim. "You made another "...thick headed ..." insult." I did. Does that hurt? Will you go an cry in a corner? Why do you keep behaving like a child and crying that some one used words you don't like? "Ok so you know how to insult people." I do know how to insult people, but that wasn't meant to be an insult. If you think that it was... Och boy, you clearly never been in a real world and never heard actual insults... "You claim "... Having digital level for that plane "experiment" is as useful as having red shoes ..." Reply. I disagree." Care to explain why? Or is this on a 3 grader level where you put your fingers in your ears and scream that you are correct and everyone else is wrong just because you said so? "You ask "Do you even know what analogy is?" Reply. Yes." Care to elaborate your knowledge about it and explain why I should defend my analogy? Because if you know what analogy is then you would know that it doesn't require defense, its analogy and not a claim/argument... Its interesting to see pattern here. You keep coming back with basic: "nah i'm correct and you are wrong" ok, care to support that statement? Care to explain why you think to be correct or to think that i'm wrong? Care to explain why would digital level have any impact on plane experiment? Or will you keep this childish behavior?
1
@baubljos103 "You might be correct twice a day, but you could possibly be not right at all." And?... You keep making some random irrelevant comments here... Over and over and over again... Why? Is this your intention or does it come naturally for you? Your entire clock example, not analogy, is pointless and not relevant to the topic or to anything i said here, you simply make an example about broken clock being correct twice a day and maybe not even that in case its still some what ticking... Ok... Cool... And?... "Whatever explanation I might try to provide you would be a waste of my effort" So basically you are trying to say that you have perfect explanation which could stop my questioning why you made that silly comment but you will not provide it because i will not accept it?... Maybe before you start talking in behalf of me, for which i dint give you my written permission, and actually present your explanation and then we will see if i will accept it? Right? "Levels test level, but the Globe Earth Theory is based on roundness." Level tests level, which would be 90 degrees from earths center. So your word play is childish at best. "Levels that I use test lines that are not necessarily horizontal, in other words lines that are sloped." That still uses same exact principle as generic level... you still measure that slope in relation to the earths center. "But you have already argued that you oppose the type of levels that I use, and that level is perpendicular. " What is the reference point for your sloped levels? Is it banana? Is it apple? Maybe sun? What reference point do you use when you determine that this slope is X degrees? "the person who Aced physics, calculus, statistics" You keep repeating that like it has any relevance here... Argument stands on its own, not on who said it. Your aced physics, calculus, statistics will not change your argument, your argument is flawed even if you had 50 Nobel prizes and you would be some one who aced 50+ other categories. So why are you repeating same irrelevant information here? "But you seem to oppose testing - and you cite your reasons." Still a straw man fallacy, its a logical fallacy, but you should know this already as you made it before. "Yes - you can draw 2 lines on your paper and claim they are perpendicular. However, your perpendicular lines are hypothetical, it's below the theory level." Do you even understand what perpendicular is?... How the hell drawing 2 lines which are 90 degrees from each other would not make it perpendicular when this is what it is by definition of perpendicular? How often do you make shit like this? "Applying your perpendicular hypothesis to a Globe Earth Theory, requires testing" It requires knowledge of geometry you clearly dint aced. " From a statistical point of view, a single perpendicular point compared to an infinite multitude of non-perpendicular points raises the potential for mathematical inference." Its not a point, its that same width of your level. You have perpendicular short line, aka level. But now you just starting to play childish word game. "Then there's the issue that a line is only 1 dimension" And then we have issue that banana is yellow... At this point, you ether a internet troll or just some confused one, i will give it 50/50 chance. When will we start talking about caramel ice cream? As that one seams to be related to the topic as any of your comment in here, so atleast we could talk about tasty food. "Have you ever seen a suckling baby pulled from mammy's titty?" Have you ever seen monkey throwing shit?
1
@baubljos103 "Generally the "broken clock" analogy is used to address the issue of being "wrong" or "right" without a reliable formula for reasoning. " Cool, now explain how this side track relates to the main topic here? "Reading your claims has un-motivated me." Truth hurts? "And then you admonish me for doing what you've done "...before you start talking in behalf of me, for which i dint give you my written permission..."" Just using your own silly rules against you. You dont like that? Then avoid making such silly rules. You keep repeating that i'm against tests or having base ground, while i have repeated that I'm not against that multiple times by now. So why are you keep trying to misrepresent my position even after you got correct? "You seem to be missing the point, that only a single point on the level is putatively perpendicular. " And? Its a reference point in any case and entire level is built to utilize that one single "point" to show at which angle you have more or less perpendicular angle. You side tracking is just amusing at this point. " It's not like you've actually been to the center. " What? Mars doesn't exist because we never been there?... Yes, this is accurate analogy for your statement... Just because we never been at center of earth, doesn't mean there isint one... Center of earth is... Center of earth... Center of sphere... Center... Do you understand what center is? You do realize that not traveling to the center of earth will not imply that center of earth doesn't exist? Right?... "Problem is that drawing pictures on paper does not test the hypotheses that you claim. " If you cant even grasp basic geometry on 2d plane, how the hell would you grasp it on 3d space? Learn to walk before you attempt to run... "According to the perpendicular picture you drew - there's only 1 point of intersection of the 2 lines. Now you seem to be claiming there's a multitude." First of all, i dint drew any picture here, but i might, as you seam to have trouble by using your imagination, maybe you want to ace that one next time. Second, having level and its width is just a nice simplified representation of perpendicular line. But you failed with that one too, so i guess we are done with that topic. " A yellow banana does not change the fact that line is 1 dimension but the earth is 2 or 3 dimensions, maybe more" And? Your side tracking to say that i'm talking about 2d while earth is 3d would be a irrelevant,. again, side track. BEFORE we start talking about 3d space, YOU will have to understand how things work in 2d space. After all, 3d would be extra step and complexity above 2d space, so until you get basic understanding about this topic in 2d we cant move to 3d space. So your another thing to ace would be geometry in 2d space. "I did see at the neuropharmacology lab a scientist had cut the skull off of a monkey head and implanted various wired electrodes for testing." No no, it was instance on YouTube, cant remember if it was literal video or just some one in comment section doing that figuratively. Who knows, more investigation is needed, which is currently in progress.
1
Because ban like that would take years/decades to actually produce actual noticable results. But I guess mass shootings can be solved by having more gun in random peoples hands... Because it worked so well so far...
1
Luckily you are not in charge what future will be about.
1
Source: Trust me bro I lick Putin's boots.
1
Not possible. Direct charging will always be more efficient, induction charging is a convenient way to charge your car without doing anything, but this will not beat direct charging, ever, just like phone wireless charging isint beating direct one.
1
@alexl579 Wireless charging for cars quite likely will be a thing which can work quite nicely at mall's where you just drive in and its charging and you get bill at the end of month if you opt into it. But then again... For wireless charging to work you need it to not be covered with metal, it needs to be fairly close between sender and receiver, so actual charging pad would be quite a bit extruded over the surface. It will be as popular as phone wireless charging, nice thing to have, but it's just secondary way to charge your phone. And yes, phones could potentially faze out usb-c slot due to limited space, this isn't an issue with cars and never will be.
1
Oil rules because its a cheap and easy to handle option. Hydrogen on another hand is not that and will never become mainstream for passenger cars.
1
Woke culture. Not the smartest bunch in the room.
1
@princeexaltedhorns6926 Now i'm curious, what convincing arguments does flat earthers have? And do you know that having convincing argument is not a proof that you are correct? And to simplify everyone's points here to something allot simpler you could check without spending a dime, you have 4 things about sun which prove globe and disproves flat one: 1. Sun size doesn't change throw day 2. Sun speed doesn't change throw day 3. Sun moves in a straight line 4. Sunset/sunrise All 4 things match 100% to globe model and 100% fails on flat one. And after couple of years i have spent with this passive tracking of flat earthers claims, i never seen ONE claim which would match reality and flat earth model while would fail on globe one. So as you said that you have some convincing flat earth arguments, that would mean that you have argument which match flat earth model, match reality and miss match globe mode. Right?
1
Adding extra pins to connectors which add extra capables, which increase size of cables and all that jazz isn't lowering price of anything too. Second point is basically goes back to standardization, bugs can be solved if everyone uses same standard. third point is somewhat silly, having card reader on charger will mean that you will need bunch of extra stuff on it, including screen. Which creates bunch of failure points which can cause entire charger to not work. Simplicity is a key. And its allow simpler to just setup your account ONCE and then charge your car without doing any additional work, plug & play Tesla literally opening their charging stations to everyone and opening their chargers for everyone... What else do you want? And you failed to actually mention actual real issues with this, you just complained for the sake of complaining...
1
His argument was weak?... Where is yours?
1
@scottheller1663 "About the mysterious death of Kubrick" having something "mysterious" is not evidence for anything... "How bout the fact that none of the supposed " moonlanders" will swear on the bible that they've been there" Maybe because they are not Christians and it would be insulting to them to do such nosensical thing? And from whose ass did you got this claim? Is this based on that one video where one crazy guy tried to force astronaut to put his hand on bible as swear that earth is globe or some shit like that? Because i would not do it even if it was about globe one... "Or the fact our cell phone has 100x the computing power of the 69 equipment" And? You have 100x faster phone, can you cross atlantic ocean on your own right now? Would your phone help?... And how is that even relevant? You do know that shit in past have been controlled by humans?... Right?... "Fluttering flag on moon" What the what now? "amateur rockets hitting firmament" Which is literally impossible. Unless you want to claim that firmament is like 10km above earths surface... How high did those amateur rockets went? And how do you know that it hit sky roof and not cloaked alien shit? Sounds crazy? Well yes, because your arguments sound crazy to all of us too... Even tho aliens are more probable then snow globe earth...
1
@scottheller1663 "You goona get vaccinated?" Why not? "You believe the covaids story?" What? " Trust fauci?" What? "Cant fix stupid" True true, atleast we agree on one thing here. "Well, what the fuck happened? We lost the map?" We went there, investigated, found nothing in value or interest, we stopped going because each trip costs over 23 billion bucks... Its not cheap trip... Especially when there is nothing todo there... "Go ahead, haven't been back in fifty years, goin back soon...." Yes, going back soon, in couple years, to establish base on moon similar as ISS currently is in earths orbit. "You've apparently already got it all figured out. Funny youth." Ironically enough, yes. You have been brainwashed, nothing new here. Younger generation have more knowledge about critical thinking then you because we use internet more than you and we look for information more than you. Better education you get less likely you will be religious, because you know what is critical thinking and belief in god doesn't flow with critical thinking... No one ever managed to present evidence for god's existence, no one even managed to prove that god could be actually real, yet you think that its more likely because some ancient book said so... C'mon... lets be real here... You simply want it to be real independent if it is.
1
@scottheller1663 Cool counter argument. Tho cant say i'm surprised that you dint had any.
1
Parallel universe doesn't imply that you will be opposite of yourself... You watched to many movies...
1
How exactly will you make hydrogen to bind with CO2? It would be all sunshine and rainbows if you only looked at the fact that you are capturing CO2 and then releasing same one, but you are ignoring entire production process of making that fuel in general which will generate more CO2 than you will capture back, aka its not carbon-neutral
1
Its cheap, its reliable, it being tuned for accurate controls, no real reason to reinvent something you can buy from local shop. But yes, it is bizarre.
1
@tsr-gtr Makes recognizable?... This truck doesn't have a single Tesla logo on it... This is the most known truck in the world at the moment even without any branding on it.
1
@tsr-gtr No one noticing?... Riiiiiight, people will not notice cybertruck going by them... Because you know, there are soooooo many like it on the roads... When you see generic truck on the road, in like 95%+ instances you will not know the brand until it gets closer and you notice badge on it. Tesla produces minimalistic cars and most aerodynamic ones. Just check what BMW electric car "grill"... First of all, it looks terrible, second, it's not even real one... If you want to talk laziness, then you have perfect examples there. They didn't even bothered to update car design when going from ICE to Electric, you will have to be expert to know that this car is actually electric. Cybertruck is made of stainless-steel which doesn't like to bend, so it HAD to be made from simple shapes without curves. You look like one of those who will complain for the sake of complaining and when you get corrected you just shift to the next point like nothing happen... Get a better hobby.
1
@tsr-gtr As you are watching carwow and you say that carwow shows nice cars, so I guess Cybertruck is a nice car after all, by your own words. And I have no idea what NPC should even mean in this context... Non-playable character? Is there some new meaning to this abbreviation I'm not aware of? There is wide range of people watching videos like that, just some of us look at it more objectively. Do I like how CyberTruck looks? No, not really. I would have prefered more roundy look, but this is made to be robust and practical for the type of people who might want to use this truck for more than just going to grocery shop to get some bear. I can see it being really good at construction sites where you have all kind of funky stuff going on around your truck and you can just ignore it as you will know that it can handle it. It was made to be practical and not to be one of those generic looking trucks just for the sake of it.
1
Gullible are you? One video was enough to self brainwashed yourself?
1
Fact check.
1
@ReturnOfHeresy You dont need to verify everything. You can simply verify what you can, if that agrees with previous claims and results would lead to the conclusion of claim, you have good basis to take experts word. This in general only applies for natural claims. Like for example if i said that i have pet dog, you can take it on face value, as we know that human can get a pet dog, that dog's exist and so on, so there isint anything to indicate that i'm lying. If i said that i have pet tiger, well, this might require some extra fact checking, like basic checking where i live, do laws in my country allow pet tigers and so on. If i said that i have invisible fire breathing pet dragon, then you can straight away call bullshit and request actual evidence. There are levels of trust, not just black and white. I dint investigate Big Bang theory in every aspect possible, but from everything i know it sounds quite a reasonable conclusion and I'm fine with that. Even if that gets shown to be false, it will not alter my world view that much. But if earth is actually true, then everything breaks apart, everything i can observe with my own eyes is a lie, so that would require allot more evidence to convince that its even possible to be real. Like basic observation of sun shows that earth cant be flat. This is one of many things which can disprove flat and prove globe, but its enough to atleast dismiss entire flat earth claim.
1
That's not how business works. By this logic every single person who makes more money than the lowest ones should be fired and then everyone should get same amount of money independent on which position this person takes and what his job is. Makes no sense.
1
Or we could use BEV's
1
What do you smoke?
1
1. Weight increase would be enormous, not even talking about increased price 2. What type of flexible material would you use to move liquids at lower than -252C? 3. Aerogel is extremely brittle, so not suitable for insulation, especially in environments with a lot of vibrations 4. No idea what you wanted to say here exactly. What exactly hybrid? Like hydrogen fuel cell? Then why even include combustion engine when you can achieve 2x performance with hydrogen fuel cell engines?
1
@AmaroqStarwind If you want to have extra battery in your car, then why not simply replace ICE engine with Fuel cell? What would be the point in having combustion engine? Its half the efficiency, would cost your kidney to maintain it. I keep seeing people mentioning matrix option, cool beans, but none managed to actually present actual numbers here. Like, how much of hydrogen can you store in given volume? How much weight would that be? How hard is it to actually insert hydrogen into that matrix? What about extraction? Cost in general? While it might sound cool to have that matrix, its just pipe dream.
1
@AmaroqStarwind Toyota will not follow with it anyways, at best they will make like 1000 of those cars and will sell like 200 in total. Its PR move, nothing else. Even fuel cell cars fail to be adopted, there are no chances for combustion ones to be anything more than someones expensive hobby.
1
What?
1
@ahmetmutlu348 I mean in matrix type universe there is nothing real in general... But its just nick picking on irrelevant things. Earth is still a globe even if your floor isint perfectly flat on nano levels... Its like mentioning shoe color while talking about quantum computers, those are simply not related to each other.
1
@ahmetmutlu348 "that tiniy difference is what makes earth round" Its not a tiny difference that makes earth round, its overall shape of it. If you would look at earth at tiny level then it would go all over the place, up and down, but in average it goes "down" as in going around and creating sphere. Your arguments are weird, lets leave it at that...
1
If it lost, then why Russians are so scared?
1
Russia attack Ukraine and this is somehow proxy war?... Seriously?
1
You do know that SpaceX launching 1-2 orbital rockets every week? They did 98 launches this year, should be 100 until the end. So like... What do you smoke exactly here? Maybe you had no idea that Falcon 9 is a thing, ok. So you are talking about starship? Cool. That one for past 5 launches wasn't aiming to get into orbit for SAFETY reasons. Only during last flight 5 they relaunched engines in space to verify that starship can properly deorbit, which means that they were basically not allowed by FCC to do orbital flights until they verified engine restart in space. Do you get it? They were hair shy of getting into orbit, few extra seconds of burn and it gets into orbit. But to avoid possible issue where communications with rocket gets lost and you have huge thing just floating in space they had to do suborbital flights. Flight 6 should still be suborbital, might be orbital, but SpaceX might do second engine relight test, just to be sure. Flight 7 is aimed to be properly orbital. You TF cultists are weird... You don't even understand meaning "test" in "test flight"...
1
That's not even relevant...
1
Bakhmutis still not taken fully... So like... Are you ok?
1
@tokyo.peking Its lost when its lost... Entirely... Bakhmut might be lost in a week or two or never, but it isint at the moment. And you think orcs are winning? Is that second mobilization sign of winning?
1
And? What would be the point in saying that earth is flat when its not? There is difference between government lying and government hiding shape of the earth... Those are not related...
1
There are plans for bigger starlink satellites to be deployed which would require starship, it's not a necessary, obviously as its already working, but it will be needed later on.
1
List of concept cars which never been realized is loooooooooooong, or you get a model which has like 10 cars built in total. They could come up with V12 hydrogen combustion engine, but if they build 5 of those and sell each for 5million, well, its a maybe cool toy for the rich, but nothing more than that.
1
How's your 3 day war going on? Good?
1
@largestoflads9409 270k (and counting) dead Russians and like 1million+ wounded. Countries economy in shambles... Everyone hates Russia even more now... NATO got 2 new members. NATO borders touching Russia expanded exponentially. War is still going on and Ukraine is retaking its land, bit by bit. So, was it worth it?
1
Och no... It's almost half of Netflix subscription to defeat Russian dictator...
1
And where is your test results?... Did your dog eat them?...
1
So what you just said is: "I never did any experiments, not observations, nothing, but because i don't like what people say, they are wrong" Did i got this one right?
1
Brandon Wilkins Och, now i see, you directly answered to video title. You kind of need to specify next time this part, because if you would read your comment without that, its sounds like you saying that nobody went to space and that all that data and theories about space are fake and bullshit. In short, generic flatardian talk :) Nice to hear that you are not one of them ^.^
1
That's how war works... Russia took over part of Ukraine territory, now Ukraine takes it back. Without this action parts being controlled by Russia would be split away from Ukraine, just like crimea was.
1
We call those "helicopters"
1
Flat earth movement, maybe, but flat earthers existed before globe ones. First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece. So maybe we had some one before that knowing that earth is globe, but in general humans believed that earth is flat from first "human" because it looked flat to them. Just saying.
1
From which magical place do you think hydrogen would be produced?... Water...
1
Plane length has nothing todo with any of this.
1
Did you got paid to make this comment?
1
He isn't sponsored by oil companies, its just basic reality of hydrogen cars, its too expensive. Not only you need to produce it, but you need expensive equipment to transport and store that hydrogen before you could use it. Don't get me wrong here, hydrogen cars are allot cleaner than any oil driven ones, but due to their complexity and price it will not win against alternatives, aka BEV's. So it simply flopped because there are better options out there.
1
says the book...
1
Snake oil salesmen.
1
@MrThirteen09 ... Do you seriously think that people who makes youtube videos publish them on same exact day? And especially when you have someone clearly being at multiple places including flying with a plane and you think that he did all that in one day and then had time to process and composite this entire video and publish on same day?... So you are still disconnected from reality... "I for one have very little faith in the establishment, so I guess i can accept being disconnected." No, you are disconnected from reality, not from establishment. You cant even notice obvious things and you will complain about that. You already failed twice. So maybe, just maybe, come back to reality and then claim to be against establishment...
1
@MrThirteen09 "Alright then i fukd up" Well atleast i can give a credit for being honest. "of the flt.earth theory" Its not a theory, definitely not a scientific one. Opinion at this point would be correct label. Tho not even opinion... Delusion maybe... Earth is globe, that's it. Flat earthers doesn't even have model which would not contradict reality, so its not even in a pile of possible things, its in a pile of some ones delusion. And what the hell do you need to dig around exactly related to this delusion? Which claim you think are even worth effort to be investigated?
1
@keonyang3332 Damn you are going all over the place... One talks about food, you talk about cancer... Did you know that majority of mass shootings have been done by using legally acquired guns? That silly argument of "Don't take guns from good people" is as valid as "Don't impose speed limits on good people", like het, by this logic there should be zero laws... Everyone for themselves... Because why would you want to impose rules and limitations on majority... Answer: Because it only takes one... We have speed limits not because majority wants to drive at 120km/h in a suburbs, but because it only takes one to cause mass deaths who will drive on those stupid speeds, so to minimize accidents we got speed limits. Nothing complicated here.
1
? EV's basically starting to become most wanted and most sold cars across the board, hydrogen cars still remain expensive fiction. Hydrogen cars stand in between BEV's and ICE cars, so there is no point in bringing those one up when we have better option already.
1
@bruceenterpriseriskservice9752 There are no discussions on this because its none issue... Studies have been done and it showed that grid will have no issues scaling up due to the share fact that it will take decades for BEV's to become majority of cars on the roads. For "special" parking spaces to charge your car at home... I have no idea what point you tried to make here exactly. At this moment we have zero capabilities to fuel up your cars at home besides you have some fuel tanks in your garage. Same thing with Hydrogen. While to charge BEV's you would basically need a wall socket and a cord long enough to get to your car, that's that. And yes, changing something will cost money...
1
How often do you drive 900 miles without stopping?
1
fantasy story from book of fables?
1
Incompetent, yet richest person on earth? Weird combination.
1
@panickingstrumpet6881 His history track record is quite impressive... Like what do you have to show as a contribution for society? You like him or not, but he did some impressive shit. There are valid things to point out about him doing stupid shit, but like... He is richest person on earth and he is definitely not a stupid one. So why this enormous hate towards him exactly?
1
Funny enough easiest way to get gun illegally is to buy from person who got it legally in one or other way.
1
@grahambrown1980 Thing is that other normal countries have no actual issues with mass shootings. Why? Because those country have actually working gun laws, not the ones which prevents you from owning gun, but the ones which properly vets you and educates you about guns before giving one to you, on top of not being able to buy a gun from random person on street legally... Yes... Legally... You can actually buy gun in America from another person without any background checks. Like seriously, majority of mass shootings in America are done by guns which got acquired legally...
1
@1911GreaterThanALL Are you asking for an advice or something?... Don't know, don't really care, i know that you can buy legally guns without background checks, which was my entire point here.
1
@1911GreaterThanALL In US. Welcome to reality.
1
Ok.
1
Och this irony... You claim that there is no proof and then continue making wild assertions about Ukraine planting charges with drones on Russian controlled side without being noticed... How naive are you?
1
Yea, religious people are obsessed.
1
● It operates only on geofenced, precision mapped, limited access highways ● It operates only at speeds of 40 MPH and below ● It operates only in the same lane—no lane changes ● It operates only with a lead vehicle within 100 meters ahead ● It operates only in clear weather—no rain or snow ● It operates only with no direct sun on the cameras ● It operates only if the driver doesn’t avert his gaze from ahead for more than five seconds ● It operates only outside of tunnels ● It operates only with an internet connection
1
What?
1
And most polls are taken in US... I mean... US... That country which elected orange guy... That one...
1
@justnoah2073 Well voting for Trump was voting for something different, to go against mainstream, same thing with flat earthers, quite few of them simply want earth to be flat because its against what government says. I don't know exact statistics but i can bet that you will have more flat earthers amongst flat earthers then amongst normal people. I have no no idea what type of statistics he used here, but by my knowledge there are around 2% of flat earthers from US or globe population, cant recall exactly, but it could have been US, because most polls are done there. In any case, it is around 2% which would make sense. He might have included people who dint had any opinion about earths shape or people who never thought about it, like if you asked some one without education what is the shape of earth, more or less all of them will answer that it is flat because it looks like one. Doesn't mean they are stupid and we are doomed, we just need better education system. Its hard to find decent research in how many flat earthers we have, because its quite useless thing to investigate. And we will always have stupid people, but due to access to internet we have quite few of them grouping up and making big fuss while actual number of them should be decreasing due to access to information.
1
@justnoah2073 That's the thing you are missing: knowing how to think not to what to think. Yes you can be educated in kindergarten that earth is a globe, but you need to know why it is and how you could determine it. US does have poor educational system, well, in US education is a business not a means to actually educate people. There is a reason why countries with better educational systems tend to have more people with less crazy ideas, if you know how to evaluate claim then you are set for life, but if you just preparing for a exam with 4 options for each question, then you only preparing for a exam and not for actual life.
1
@justnoah2073 You will have flat earthers independent from country they are in, but you will have more of them in a countries with poor educational system. Stupidity is not limited to specific place.
1
@justnoah2073 40% of worlds population has NO access to internet which by itself would be most poor ones and most likely without any education. Just because you see people from first world countries commenting about earth being flat is not indication that its because they are from first world country, it just indicates that they have access to internet. But when you actually talk with flat earthers... Well... I never meet a SINGLE one which understands basic geometry, aka failed education.
1
@justnoah2073 have you ever talking with flat earthers? Because i never meet ONE single from dozens i had conversation with who understood how geometry works. So yea, i can confidently say that lack of education is main reason why we have flat earthers. Secondary would be: Plain dumb people. Third but not least, people who pretend to be flat earthers for financial or another personal gain.
1
@justnoah2073 We are not talking about some complex geometry here, basic observation of sun proves that we don't live on flat earth, that doesn't even require any calculations. And your guy who used math to prove that water would stay on spinning globe? Maybe you wanted to say that it could not? In any case, there is difference between repeating something and actually understanding it, as i have seen flat earthers constantly repeating that magical curvature equation which only works for short distances and its only approximation and when pressured on it they all fail. You literally cant have genuine flat earther who actually understands geometry.
1
@justnoah2073 What thing is common amongst majority if not all of them? Lack of understanding how things actually work... You cant be flat earther while understanding that basic geometry disproves your position, that's not how things work. You will never get into such conspiracy if you know for a fact that you are wrong, no amount of being special will cover up basic understanding that you cant be correct here. I can agree that some does pick this notion just to be special, but every single one with whom i talked failed to answer to basic geometry questions. So ether i never meet a single flat earther who become one just to be special or you cant be an actual flat earther if you understand geometry. One of those things makes more sense and from my personal experience i can confirm that its a lack of education which creates flat earthers, simple as that.
1
Funny enough hydrogen fuel cell engines are twice the efficiency than your sound making ones, so if you want to save the world you should go with the one which doesn't make a sound, right? RIGHT?!
1
@DLP_Racing_505 If you cared you would have researched any of this and realized that hydrogen isn't better than BEV's, yes, they are not, even if you took fuel cell type, its still polluting slightly more than BEV's. Live and learn.
1
Tesla cars are the most safe cars in the world... Like... What the hell are you talking about? And please, enliothing us, which human organ is equivalent to Lidar? If there is none then does it mean that no humans should be allowed to drive any cars due to increased risks?
1
What have you even tried to say here? You do know that SpaceX is constantly launching satellites into space? Like, SpaceX is the one which launches the most of them in entire world. On top of this NASA saves crap ton of money by using SpaceX instead of hiring Russia for that. You haven't looked into any of this, haven't you?
1
Fusion energy is being developed and it always feels to be just around the corner, tho there are quite few advancements being made recently due to bunch of new startups popping up everywhere. Flying cars? We do have those, those are called "helicopters". We don't have actual flying cars because of actual noise pollution and actual danger in having bunch of people going all over the place, even now people can't drive on the roads, imagine them getting access to flying cars... We do have personal jet packs. There are even jetpack races going on. Some rescue teams starting to use them in some situations. Moon base is relatively easy to make, issue is with costs. Every single flight to the moon costed around one billion bucks, just to send 3 guys in a tin can. We went there, checked around, its just boring rock, turned around and went back home. From that point we were sending probes/robots, which is exponentially more cheaper.
1
@nightdipper5178 Like seriously, which part of this map is incorrect? Can you give us link to Russian source which says different story? Is by Russian propaganda entire Ukraine belongs to Russia now or what?
1
Or you could just plug your car into any wall socket and that's that... To produce hydrogen is really easy, to store it and to actually push it into car tanks, well, that's the challenge.
1
@darkhorseman8263 Cool, tell me then, how much energy will you be inputting into system and how much you will get back? Because for this to be a thing you need to get more energy out than you put in. Is this possible with those magical membranes?
1
Are you drunk or something? How the hell would Musk know if there are aliens or not?
1
This isn't even the worse excuse they can come up, better ones are those where they say that Ukraine nuked nord stream which supposedly proves that they nuked this dam too...
1
Its not wasting time, its for entertainment purposes at this point. And to even add to all this... You have no idea how much I have learned about world while talking with flat earthers, that its just scary how little I knew about it beforehand...
1
Which part of 12 buckets you did not understood? There isn't enough space where your current fuel tank is. on top of this, due to high pressures hydrogen tanks need to be cylindrical which are worse when it comes to space savings, this is why most hydrogen fuel cell cars have 3 huge tanks all over the car making it extremely unpractical.
1
@kcleach9312 You do realize that not everyone is fluent in English and that there might be more than one country in the world? Right? And I didn't made this video, so you need to atleast pay more attention to basic things here. Will try to use simpler words here. There is not enough free space in a car to fit all needed hydrogen for that car to remain practical in day to day life. Was this simple enough for you?
1
It is true, most flat earthers are from USA and their education system is more than terrible. On top of this you have more or less unrestricted free speech, so you can say whatever you want and claim that earth is a unicorn and no one will stop you here. Free speech is double edged sword, sadly.
1
Yes yes yes, sanctions don't work... We heard this story thousand times... We will keep and maybe add few extra none working sanctions for next few decades, you should not object to that as those doesn't work, right? Cool beans.
1
Yes, but its allot harder than just going to gun show and pick one from the shelf...
1
No really, it might start small fire which is allot better and gives you allot more time to get away then it would be with gasoline car which would go into flames in instant
1
Interesting counter argument... Recent thing which happen across the globe, you know, pandemic and stuff which lowered cars driven in populated areas, what was the result on air quality in those areas? Did it improved? Do you like to breath? If yes, then why would you even complain that it only reduces emissions by 2 (its allot more, but besides the point) percent? Is any percentage better than none?
1
@cesarvazquez4234 "Let's make more ppl buy these 55k plus electric cars" Price is going down, but generally speaking there is higher demand of those than there is supply, so while demand is higher than supply price will remain higher. "questionable reliability" Its not questionable, we know it to be more reliable than ICE cars. "probably won't be diy cars" Which ones are? And why would you need DIY car? "and annual registration would be up the crap." What now? "dude I'm pretty u got a more chance of dying to damn road rage than a so call harmful emission" Cool, then go (not actually suggesting here) to your garage, fire up your ICE car, close all doors and windows and enjoy that none toxic environment... You are extremely short sighted... Its basically "If it dint killed me that means it has zero effect on me"... No... If it dint killed you it means that it doesn't have iminent effect on your health, doesn't mean that there is no negative effects in general. And that pollution not only, well, pollutes air, but it add to climate change, but its another topic on itself. And just FYI you have higher change slipping in your bathroom and splitting your head than dying in car accident, but that doesn't mean that we should ignore car accidents... Your analogy is weird and irrelevant.
1
@cesarvazquez4234 "It's funny to me how all the sudden everyone became car ppl and know everything about cars" Isint its you who made original comment implying that you know everything about cars?... Isint that ironic on itself? "If you care so much about climate change then take the bus, less ppl driving right. " It needs to be group effort... if you just go and shit all over the place then rest people wont manage to actually prevent climate change... I mean, its already too late, we passed that line, now its only question how worst it will get before it gets better IF we lower emissions. "But u won't lol I have a weird view." Yes, you do have weird view, we agree on that. "And guess what, servicing their own vehicle is a money saving." So all those parts you replace you got for free? No need to buy them? You just patch everything with hot glue? And just FYI electrical cars need allot less maintenance as you have like 100X times less moving parts, go figure. "Or neighborhood mechanics being able to fix u know the car." Just like back in the time people used horses and thought that owning car will be too expensive... And look where we are now... Its basically same situation, buying horse was cheaper than buying car, it even is now, but maintaining (feeding and all) horse is allot more expensive than a car. Same exact thing applies to EV's now, while it might cost more to actually buy one its maintenance/exploitation will be less. "Smh cars are the pinnacle of reliability and emissions friendly still getting more and more better" Do they? Do you have actual numbers how much "better" it got in past decade or two? And that doesn't resolve issue even if it did, its still way more than what EV's produce. "Let's not forget electric run thru tires at a significant rate higher than normal cars because of weight" Let's not forget that you don't need to change brake disks due to regenerative braking. Tit for tat I guess. " There goes 2 percent less to 1 percent lol" You still dint provided your citation for this 2% magical number, can you? Just to demonstrate that you are not some bozo who like to type away at something ya not even sure if it's true or false. Right? "But hey 👋 dude u keep saving the world 🌎" Yea, fuxk the planet, who needs it, we will be dead before it becomes to unbearable to live in it anyways, so who cares... Fuck the planet... What is your actual argument here? You cant afford EV so its bad?
1
@cesarvazquez4234 "electronic modules and battery go out and aren't cheap lol" You think other cars dont have electronic modules? Where do you live? In Russia?... its 2022, every single car has electronic modules in them.... its not 90's anymore... Engines are not cheap ether. If you bothered to spend any time actually researching this instead of being buthurt you would know that you will need less maintenance on EV than you are on ICE car and total cost will be lower. Just because battery pack is expensive doesn't mean that you will need to change it every year... "But your buddy elon musk and the other business don't care about that" Like 99% of car manufacturers makes or plans to make electrical cars, so I guess everyone is bad because you dont like EV's... Ok. Tho why do you mention Elon in specific? Hating for sake of hating? Or being jealous that he became richest person on earth while you still stuck in your shitty job? Whats up with that? "Same way they don't care about the planet, it's all about the money remember that" You kind of need money to be able to produce shit... You know... That's how business works... Its not like you dont like money... Aren't you now? "Ppl like u don't know business use the quote save the world as a gimmick to get ppl to buy ev." Answer me this, its simple question and you should be able to answer it with "Yes" or "No" answer, question goes as: Does EV produce less CO2 emissions over its life span? Simple question, try to show that you are not keyboard warrior and honestly answer to this really simple question. Just FYI there are actual data supporting one of the answers, so you should want to actually fact check before you answer just to avoid showing yourself as a keyboard warrior who talks about things he has no idea about. Prove me wrong!
1
@josuegalindo2616 Your evidence is cherry picked youtube videos?... Pick ONE video and ONE claim from it... I'm not here to address 150 different silly claims... And once again, basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe. This is observable by anyone, not some silly youtube video, but actual reality you can fact check by yourself, you dont even need to use any math, you just need basic understanding of geometry. So yea... You dint presented evidence, just bunch of silly empty cherry picked claims...
1
@kensmith174 Then I guess there isn't a war between Ukraine and Russia and Ukraine never shifted war inside Russia either, it's all lies.... Or is it? 3 day war going strong after 2 years where now you have Ukraine troops inside Russian territory, all is going by the plan of Putin I guess.
1
Learn how crimes work.
1
Or we could use BEV's... Actual studies have been done and BEV's end to end are cleaner than Hydrogen cars, not even talking about other benefits.
1
@russianhomecat3313 Independent studies. Tho interesting thing to note here that you went straight away to Musk and not to something like Tesla as a company. Provide me with a study which done end to end research and determined that Hydrogen cars pollute less. And when I say "end to end" I mean entire cars life span, from its materials being mined to it being recycled after its no longer usable. Don't cherry pick single thing, look into entire thing.
1
Then you... Recycle them...
1
HICE engine invented in 1806, FCE engine invented in 1839, so no, its not a new technology and its not in its infancy.
1
You mean its Russian go to strategy?
1
Already repaired? How would they have repaired it? Put few wooden planks on it?
1
@jacleena So will ask again: How did they fixed it? Put few wooden planks on it?
1
Most likely both, incompetence and attempt to flood area to prevent Ukraine counter offensive in this area.
1
Your comment makes no sense.
1
Pointless and waste of money.
1
Then attack it... Attack single NATO country, lets see who will be gone at the end of the day.
1
With what magic do you think hydrogen is being made?
1
@derrickwilson6712 "Yes flat earthers do agree on a model" There isint one... That's the thing, there is no flat earth model, there is only basic idea of it, but there is no actual model. "Just because u haven't seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist" ? I have seen flat earthers presenting completely different claims about their fantasy land... All of them failed as no one of them matches actual basic observations, but point is that I have seen multiple different claims about this magical land. So your original argument is factually incorrect, some believe in space being real, some thinks that there is space and dome, some thinks that there isint space and so on... You are factually demonstrably incorrect here. "Why do we have no videos or evidence of the moon being anywhere in the sky "at all" during a lunar eclipse." ? I guess you are just trolling here... Moon magically disappears during lunar eclipse? First of all, its lunar eclipse, so it kind of should be less visible as its behind earth directly, so no direct illumination by sun, but like, what the hell as you talking about here? "You don't even know what a heliocentric model is." I do, you might be confused here, i'm not flat earther... "And science is constantly changing the globe models facts." Its not changing, its refining, if you fail to understand difference here then you are as smart as any flat earther out there. "There gonna change again and again." Refined, not changed. "The geocentric model hasn't changed for 6000 years dude." ? First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE, like 100 years before that first known geocentric model was made. No idea from whose ass you got that 6000 magical number. Are you young earth creationist? Because you starting to sound like one. And bible quote? Seriously?... C'mon... This is low even for theist...
1
@derrickwilson6712 "k so your saying we have video of the moon approaching the sun bofore... the lunar eclipse. Not the solar, as u mentioned before.. the solar. " We have both, for lunar and solar... This is one of those things flat earthers cant explain as it doesn't work on any "model" they proposed so far. Basic observations like that contradicts any attempts of flat earthers claiming that they have model. "Do u believe that water always finds its level based on physics?" Level isint flat. And even on flat earther you have curved water... Ever heard about tides? "yes I am a young earther. But. I wasn't. I was an athiest." I can bet you were atheist for terrible reasons as you are now not one and young earth creationist for even more terrible reasons. "Ur gonna have to open ur mind a bit cuz your sharing something I know better than u do" No, no you are not. I can bet my wage that you know less than me on all of this topic. "But u really don't know anything about (what I now) believe." Should I care? There are allot of people who believe bunch of crazy stuff, I dont really have any interest in what they believe, only in "why?". As you said that you are young earth creationist, ok, why do you believe that? Because book said so? You do know that this is logical fallacy? Right?
1
Then buy hydrogen car and show them all how it's done!!!
1
@ningendaggermouth Inferiority complex? Buying new car is inferiority complex? Buying better cars is inferiority complex? Weird thing to say, but ok, you do you. And you do know that hydrogen cars are hell of a expensive ones with quite high maintenance costs? Right? Its not like you can get one for 10k and have 0 on maintenance costs...
1
@ningendaggermouth Its interesting that you mentioned 20k limit and then talked about 60k car. You do realize that majority of new cars independent of their fuel type costs over 20k? And how exactly is having money to buy car which costs over 20k is inferiority complex... inferiority complex is when you buy 500k car which isn't practical, fits only 2 people, creates excessive amount of noise and so on, but not 25k one...
1
@ningendaggermouth "As I said no sane person will dump $60k into a hydrogen car...or a shitty plastic Jeep" But this is not what you said, you said that people in general who pays more than 20k for a car have inferiority complex. It wasn't about hydrogen cars, it wasn't about poorly made cars, it was general statement of yours. "And you can still buy solid cars for under $20k" Yes, just like you could buy one for 100 bucks if you really wanted... Like, what actual point are you trying to make here? Car prices does have wide range, some are overpriced, some are not. New car for 20k or less will be some cheap tiny box "car". Can you get used one for that or less which is in good condition? Yes, but has no impact on actual point. "dumping more money into something which purpose is to drive you around the city and that will usually depreciate the moment you start driving it, is dumb" Tell me this then, from which magical place do you think used cars come from? Your magical 20k car was owned by someone before which drives price down over few years allowing you to buy it cheaper, years later. Welcome to economics 101. "instead of investing money they waste it on some stupid ass status symbol "white Mercedes" just to show the world "how successful they are"" ? Are you here just being jealous that someone can actually buy new Mercedes while you can't? Seriously... It so weird... Its like people can't spend their money in a way they want... If someone makes 500k in a year, I think they should be able to buy a car for 50k without you attempting to make fun of them for "wasting" money... Are you one of those who buys used toilet paper because buying new one would just be inferiority complex? "People are driven by the desire for others to envy them and they make wrong decisions" Or people simply wants cool stuff? "more and more cars are being repossessed because the idiots can't make the payments for their overpriced cars" And? "(and they are currently still the most inefficient no matter how much the author of this video would like to present it otherwise)" Like, care to present actual factual numbers to show that those are inefficient? Because by all actual scientific research ever done it was shown that BEV's are the most efficient ones. So like, on what basis can you make such wild statement? "Once I actually get my own home and save some money I would then and only then trade up from my current Dacia Sandero but the next car will still cost me under 20k and I'll enjoy driving it and laugh whenever I see an idiot driving a Bentley, a new Porsche 911 or a freaking G-class" ??? So your entire point is that YOU can't afford better car currently and YOU will spend money appropriate to what YOU can afford, while YOU will laugh at those who CAN afford better cars while saying that YOU will buy better one when YOU will be able to afford one... What's going on here?... Is your entire point "Don't buy car you can't afford" by making it overly complex? "so no it doesn't only have to be a 500k hyper car for someone to be a perfect example of an inferiority complex." Correct, but you should learn to avoid making general statement when you are talking about exceptions... I'm not even arguing against the fact that some people who barely survives from payslip to payslip decides to go on vacation or buys expensive stuff just to boast to their friends. But this doesn't have anything to do with some people buying more expensive cars when they can afford one.
1
@ningendaggermouth "I had to stop reading when you pulled the oh so predictable jealousy card" Because you sound like someone who is jealous of people who can afford more expensive cars... "who dumped insane amount of money into his crappy Ferrari, Porsche, some ugly Aston Martin SUV and a G wago" But we are not even talking about Ferrari here, we are talking about 20k+ cars, which is extremely cheap when it comes to cars in general, especially new ones. "because you can buy a good personal city car for under 20k" Yes, you could, or you could buy more expensive one if you have money... You could even buy a bicycle and avoid owning car in general... But it's non argument. "and everything above it is just people stroking their fragile egos" So they simply have money to spare?... Not everyone in the world are poor you know... Some can actually afford slightly more expensive cars, especially if they want to buy new one and not the one owned by 10 previous owners. "but if that's the only option that you see for that price that's your problem" That's the thing, its your problem. By your logic you should never buy anything more expensive than 500 bucks, because that car could serve your needs too... But there is the difference between buying car just to get from point A to point B and getting car which can do it allot more comfortably for more money. "meaning even if I could afford it I would never buy one or anything in that price range" Even if you were making 10 million in a year? You would not want to have a nice new unused car which provides all the comfort and features you could get? "to drive around the crowded Euro city" That's the funny thing, you could (in US you can) get something like Tesla BEV with FSD which would drive for you, you could relax and enjoy actual trip. Would that be a flex or buying something for your own convenience? Especially if you can afford it. "because I will do me and stay true to my values no matter the amount on my bank account" That's fine... You do you, issue is just with your incorrect statements here... Will clarify something here. Ironically enough I'm looking for a new car and I'm looking for something in a price range of 15k, was thinking about max 10k initially, but due to how low quality those cars are with barely any newer features I would like to get, had to go slightly higher. Which is basically max what I would be ready to give for my next car. Its not like I can't afford more expensive one, I can, its just that there is no point to do so for me personally. Main thing for me is to get newer car with more modern technology in it for to last like 10+ years before it starts to become completely outdated across the board. If I could I would drive single car for my entire live, but car's do break and at some point there is no longer a point to keep fixing it. Point is, if someone is buying new/used car which is more expensive than YOU can afford, this doesn't mean that they are trying to flex, maybe, just maybe they can afford it and they want to own that car and it is beneficial to them. Additionally. Buying BEV which initial cost is higher than ICE car can be more money saving than buying cheaper ICE one due to lack of maintenance costs and cheaper "fuel". So my question would be: Is it really a flex to buy a car which saves you more money in long run?
1
@abdihassan7208 Suns observation shows that earth needs to have curvature. You cant have sunset without earth having curvature. You cant have sun moving in a straight line if earth is not rotating on its axis or sun going around earth, where in both cases earth needs to be a globe. Sun perceived speed doesn't change throw entire day, which again requires previous conditions which again points to globe earth. And sun never changes its perceived size, which means that distance between earth and sun remains same, which again... yes, you guest it... Requires earth to be a globe... Everything about suns observation matches globe model, none of that matches flat one. So even basic observation of it proves that earth is a globe. And i broth sun into conversation because anyone with 1buck sun filter can confirm this without leaving their yard.
1
First of all, that would be argument from authority. Second, Einstein saying that Tesla is smarter than him doesn't mean he actually was... Third, there is no such thing as flat earth based cosmology...
1
I can bet it already happen.
1
Then why its not doing this already? This war costing Russia crap tone of money and ruins its name for decades to come, if they could end this war today they would, but clearly they dont have fire power.
1
Hydrogen had its chance to take off, now every single company prioritizes BEV's over any hydrogen car, its too late, Hydrogen might only become relevant things in sectors where energy density is big criteria
1
It feels more of an aim to create a feel that Tesla's catches on fire on itself, which would harm Tesla and BEV name, it's not like they expect to be shown burning cars live on TV.
1
Do you even understand what NATO is?...
1
Why would anyone want to abandon NATO?
1
@EksperHotelkin What are you even talking about?
1
@EksperHotelkin Ok, so basically you have no real argument here. Cool.
1
@EksperHotelkin Well clearly its not that obvious as no one here understands what you are saying.
1
How?
1
I mean, TF is a grifter, but like... Hyponatremia, do you know what is it? Its water poisoning, its when you drink to much water. So, while water is essential to our survivability, if you drink to much of it you risk of actually dying. Keeping this in mind, its not an issue with CO2, its an issue with amount of it. Plants do consume CO2, but there is basic limit on how much they can. This becomes even bigger issue when you get things like expanding deserts, deforestations and so on. Issue is with amount.
1
Cool, follow up with a proof that it is and you will be correct with your statement.
1
If you think that you dont have to support your claim with actual evidence, then we dont have to listen to your and assume that your statement is false or atleast invalid. Well that's cool.
1
Its not only drives costs bringing things into space, it drives costs of bringing things back from space. Entire space mining industry could be started from all of this. Space tourism. Actual space stations. Colonies on moon or mars. Its all based on costs. Like one trip to the moon was around 1 billion for single trip, get that down to few hundred millions and you will have line of people wanting to visit moon. TF is just making shit up here to complain and lie to his viewers, nothing more.
1
@toomanyaccounts Like... Every rocket scientist disagrees with you here... You can make bunch of spare rockets quickly if you just pump them out, doesn't make it cheaper than just retrieving used one, do basic maintenance on it and send it back... Why do you think SpaceX managed to drive costs down so much if its cheaper to just get rid of those boosters instead of reusing? Do you throw away your car after using it once?... Do you think before you write comments?
1
@toomanyaccounts Did you got these "facts" from facebook or something?... Like seriously, if you think that you are correct here, give me citation... I will retract what I said before if you can prove your bullshit to be actually true. Can you do it or are you here just to troll because you are bored?
1
Rus bot detected.
1
Driver side display is for more expensive car models. Sonic sensors got replaced with cameras which while not being perfect are good enough for most use cases. Surround camera view... Well that one is strange is its just a software thing and tesla already has enough cameras to make that 3d view reality.
1
There are as many answers to those questions as there are flat earthers.
1
But its not, isn't it? Hydrogen car sales are dwindling, while at same time being replaced with BEV's sales, which are on quite steep growth curve at the moment
1
Colonization of mars isn't because we are screwing up this planet... Why do you people not even understand position you are trying to argue against? Why are you arguing like flat earther?
1
@loandbehold5178 Reason for investors would be to make money... Currently there is no financial benefit to go to Mars, Musk himself said this multiple times and this is why he is funding all of this from his own money, primarily from what Starlink will be making. What you said was an implication that Musk wants to ruin this earth to go to Mars, which makes no sense, as this isn't the goal of mars colonization, never was and never will be, after all as bad it could get here on earth it will be better than it will be on mars from day 1. So making a sheltered colony on earth would make way more sense than to make one on Mars. Colony in a sense of building some enclosed self sustaining mega shelter in case earth's atmosphere can no longer sustain life. If you have this idea just because Musk does it, then just say it, but to make up such silly arguments is just, well, silly.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Seriously, you can't read? Don't you?
1
Why its a mountain and not something tincy wincy bit smaller?
1
Correction: Bible says that earth is flat pancake and never mentions it being spherical. On top of this, earth isn't suspended, its orbiting sun, which is basically falling. Earth is in constant movement over multiple trajectories... Sorry, but you are not better than flat earther here by pointing to an ancient book and making shit up to justify your beliefs.
1
@tjjones621 Then be a good boy and find me ONE verse which says that earth is spherical... You as Jim here never actually read bible? Dint you now? There is only single verse which uses word "circular", but sadly for you it translates into flat disk and not spherical one. On top of this bible multiple times says that you can see entire earth from big tree or mountain, this is not possible on a globe. Stop defending ancient book, it was written by ignorant people with that times common beliefs, which have been "earth is flat pancake" which is not surprising and expected.
1
@jimbrogan9835 "please give the specific scripture where the Bible says the earth is a "flat pancake"." It doesn't say those exact words, after all, bible is as wage as it comes. I have literally seen 2 Christians using same exact verse as proof that earth is a globe and flat in same comment thread... But well, few verses for you: "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" "I am not here to defend the Bible" Then don't, especially if you are not familiar with what it actually says. "You sound like an angry child looking for someone to lash out at" Just correcting people with their false statements. "You have obviously never read the Bible so you are lashing out with ignorance of both it and me. Grow up." Well, we will clearly gonna test this one right now. I have presented multiple verses which at worst for you indicates earth being flat pancake, now you should provide atleast ONE verse which indicates earth being a globe. Side thing, are you now agree that earth isint suspended on nothing but in constant motion? Can we atleast agree that bible got that one wrong?
1
@tjjones621 Funny enough you did not presented a single verse which would even imply earth being spherical, yet here we are with multiple which at best for you would be just a figure of speech. Why is that? Why is bible so useless when it comes to reality? "So, what are we discussing here?" No idea, I guess your attempt to defend ancient immoral self contradictory book of fables? its fun to see people like you coming along and making their own personal interpretation what this book of fables "actually" wanted to say in specific verses. Its fun. "I contend and maintain that the Bible is correct when it comes to the shape of Earth." Yet it never says that earth is spherical and yet it multiple times talks about it being flat. You cant escape reality, sooner or later it will hit you like a truck, but longer you wait faster it will be going when it gonna hit you. Bible was written by simple minded ancient people who used their beliefs, which at that time was common to believe that earth is flat pancake, this is reflected in this book of fables. It doesn't disprove your god or anything, it only shows that bible is wrong on multiple topics. Now i'm wondering here, do you believe that there was global flood which killed everyone except one family? Or was that part a figure of speech too?
1
@jimbrogan9835 "I have read 13 different translations of the Bible" Which only proves how useless it is. If you have more than on posible translation of a text, that only means that its not clear enough to be used for anything. "The word that you claim translates as circle is also translated as sphere" Yet the fact that this is only maybe could be the case that people who wrote that verse wanted to express that earth is a globe and not flat... but... This would be long stretch at best as there isint any indication in entire book that people realized that earth is actually spherical and not flat. And then you add up that simple fact that it was common knowledge that earth is flat... So what you get exactly? Which translation of this word would be more correct? Sphere or flat disk? On top of this, actual experts who translated bible doesn't use word "sphere", they used word "circle" which mainly translates into flat disk. Why? Because this is its intended actual translation... "You believe the Bible is wrong and will make any argument to uphold your beliefs" Bible is wrong on allot bigger things than shape of earth. The fact that people who wrote this book of fables thought that earth is flat isint even big deal. "If the Bible and every Religion based on it were proven wrong in their entirety my faith in God would remain unshakable" First of all, thats just shifting burden of proof... No one needs to disprove your book, YOU need to prove it. Second, that only means that you are closed minded and you dont care what actually is true, you already picked answer you like independent of evidence. So you are the worst person to have any conversation relating to god's existence. "My faith is reinforced by every discovery of science and nature" Yes majority of scientists are atheists and those who are not, well, majority from those will not even claim that science proves god... So there is clearly something wrong with your thinking here... "I do not need the Bible to be right, but in this case it is." Your entire religion is based on bible being right... but its not... Its just a book of fables and nothing more. "You insist that the earth is not suspended upon nothing because it moves? What a ridiculous argument." Why? If you think that earth moving t multiple vectors while constantly falling towards sun is being suspended. Then what isint? Like seriously, if earth is suspended by your logic, in which situation it would not be? "The Bible is not a book of science!" Clearly... It cant even get correctly shape of the earth... "The Bible attempts to convey the religious beliefs, history and culture of one small tribe of people." ? So what you are saying that bible made sense only back in the day and god inspired this book knowing that in the future it will be looked at like a book of fables because it makes no sense? Its not a good plan by your god I might say... Tho, why is your god isint capable of convening something complex in a simple CORRECT words? Like why not say "Earth is like a round rock going around sun" why is this sentence to complex to be understood by this small tribe? And why is this only for this small tribe? Is your god playing favorites? "Your racial and social intolerance is despicable" What? Racial ans social? What the hell man? When did any of those came into conversation? Is this some sort of childish attempt to accuse me of being racist and dismiss everything I say based on that stupid claim? Are you ok? "All cultures, races, religions and peoples deserve respect." Respect is earned, not given. Do you respect Hitler? "Hating people who are different than yourself or who disagree with you is moronic and borders on insanity." Damn... You are seriously but hurt believer here... I don't hate people, I hate religions, try to put this into your thick head. And yes, I will use harsh word, you deserve this after you tried to imply all this stupidity about me. "If you insult people they will insult you back" Go for it, if there is a reason to insult me, fine, I dont really care, its just a words. Reality is allot more harsh than someone insulting you on internet. "You can't win an argument by insulting people" You can win argument while insulting people. "Yes, flat earthers are dangerous" Ironically enough flat earthers is just another type of religion, just like yours. Think about that. "so are people who are intolerant of any view, perspective or opinion that is not their own." Like Crusades?
1
@flatearth9140 Yes, bible is wrong on multiple things.
1
@flatearth9140 GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created. GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created. Atleast one of those verses is wrong. I have bunch of other self contradictory examples and this is not even counting actual false claims bible made.
1
@flatearth9140 You need to learn to read. Verse 7 talks about god creating man from dust, verse 8 talks about god creating garden of eden, so for your tiny brains: Man before plants.
1
@modelaircraft6576 Its not really question of you being ready, at some point you wont be allowed to drive ICE car in public roads as much as you would like it, its on same exact line as it is now with horses, while you can still ride those, you cant really go to work on one. Europe bans new ICE car sales from 2035, so while it might take some time to take out existing ICE cars from the roads at some point you wont have real option besides buying EV's.
1
They would put anyone in jail for trying to go to south pole without permission in same way you can be jailed for trying to cross border of any country without permission.
1
South pole belongs to seven nations: Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom... Every single corner of earth belongs to some one... "some countries lay claim to parts of it but its not ran officially by a single entity" And? You still have some one responsible for not allowing anyone who wants to go there and mess things up... "do they all agree on the same location for this.." They dont even have working model, let alone agreement if there even is edge. Flat earhers usually range from earth being infinitely wide to people who thinks that there is actual physical edge be hide this "ice wall" "What would be the crime for going to the edge of the south pole and what goverment would enforce this?" Why not? We are talking about land which still belongs to some country or group of them. Its still a property. And i have no idea why would it not be protected with atleast basic "Can i go there?" answer "Yea, go for it" thing... Its not a free for all land, its still a continent... And it still belongs to those 7 nations...
1
Kevin Moyer "it is geometry that shows us there needs to be nearly 8 inches per mile squared of spherical drop on a sphere 24,900 miles in circumference" And there is. Tho before you scream out some nonsense like "But we should not see X" explain to me where do you insert observers height in your magical equation? http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif "It's a camera at 1 foot off the water, looking at geothermal stations across the water" https://goo.gl/TytLkC And this is picture of electrical poles which are exactly same height a above water which has obvious dip down further you go. Picture like this will shatter your geothermal example every single day without any actual debate. Or maybe even this one https://goo.gl/fXEAKC a video of bridge which has obvious curve which follows earth curvature. "But as flat earthers have proven time and time again, there is no curvature over bodies of water." Maybe in your fantasy world. But having claim that some photo was taken from X feet in comparison to a photo of same sized objects which stretch over horizon will always loose. I cant confirm your photo/video being taken from 1 foot, while i dont even need to provide height of my provided links, because that one becomes irrelevant when you have obvious curve. So yea, was fun, but it ended quite quickly.
1
Kevin Moyer "Is this your first time hearing about flat earth?" Sadly, its not. I was "debating" flat earthers some time ago, then i realized that they have little to none understanding about basic geometry, so i stopped and found some what more logical people: theists... Tho that one started to look similar to what i had with flat earthers, some what better, but not really. This video showed up in my recommendations, so i watched it, then started to comment, duno if it was good idea... "I'll take the time tomorrow and destroy those stupid links you posted" Och, this will be fun to watch. I wonder if you even understand basic geometry. I need to get some popcorn or something. "Then when I'm done, you won't reply (with anything of value)" I have more links, tho you will not even manage to disprove those i provided, so no need. But in general i'm not the one who stops replying. Unless youtube decides not to put your reply into notifications... Which happened multiple times already with other conversations which sucks... As i have to manually go throw old conversations to check if there are any replies... "And you'll disappear, like the rest of them" NEVER! "You'll hear from me soon" Why not now? Its literally takes like 2 minutes to make a comment, even tho you already made one right now... And instead of actually debunking atleast one of the links you ended up with pointless comment announcing that this magical destruction will come on later date... I can wait... But i'm always baffled with people who makes comment to announce that they will make a comment... Ok...
1
Kevin Moyer "and you never mention the basic geometry that I'm explaining to you" Ok, lets test your basic geometry understanding: 1. What curvature should we expect to see if we would lived on a such huge spherical object as earth and we would be on its surface? 2. Should sun size change throw day if we lived on flat plane and sun circled around us? 3. is it possible to bring back object with a zoom when its disappeared over the horizon? 4. is it possible for sun to be hidden over horizon if we live on flat plane? I have quite few more, but lets see if you manage to answer to those ones. "there will need to be 7.98 inches per mile squared of curvature" At which place in this "equation" you insert observers height? Because without that this is worthless number when we are trying to apply it in reality. Right? "And you don't address the 12 mile observation of the geothermal stations" because i have no idea how far that object actually is or how high photographer was. i will not trust flat earther who will try to twist reality to his needs... This is why i presented photos and videos which are independent from what i could say about them, like height at which it was taken. Because that becomes irrelevant when you can see obvious curvature. "or the 275 mile observation of the world record long distance photo" Och that one... Do you know what it was photographed and from where? Will help you out here: Big mountain from top of big mountain... Did you ever wondered why it is like that? Why do you need to go up and photograph something tall to get this distance record? Maybe because earth is not flat? "then you claim you won't see any curvature left to right in your vision" On surface of earth, you will definitely not see that. Och, one another question from basic geometry: When you increase circle radius, what happens with its edge line? Does it sustain its curvature or does it starting to flatten out until you cant really notice that it is curved? "Its pretty clear who's not understanding geometry and looking at all the evidence" Och, this will really be fun after you fail to answer to all those basic questions! "'ll get around to explaining to you why your links are wrong, but I've had company the last several days" Cool excuse... But that would took you less then it took you to make those 2 comments... Why cant you explain why first one of Toronto is wrong without spending 1 week with preparation for that? "I haven't had the time to completely make you look foolish" Yea, you have been busy by making yourself look foolish, its understandable... I can wait... No rush... Globe earth will not go anywhere anyways...
1
That's how civil war starts... You get bunch of armed people who thinks to know better than elected government and then they try to overtake it by force, you know, just like it already happen, just on larger scale than that. Should be fun times.
1
This level experiment is on highest level dumb as it would remain stationary on both model, flat or a globe, would produce same results. That's besides the fact how inaccurate it is to use something like that on a plane which can change it pitch at any moment for one or the other reason...
1
Rafa RS First of all, people have been in space, we have photos and videos from space and all that jazz. Issue is not with all of this, issue is with people like you who will never accept anything like that not because you can prove them to be fake, but because you simply don't like it.
1
Rafa RS "can't make fun of a flat earther, because you have no more proof than a flat earther that earth is round." Then you are a victim of flatardian movement. Basic observation of sun, which can be done by ANYONE, disprove flatardian model, not even talking about other 100+ issues with it. Then you have every single observation and experiments anyone can do which matches globe earth model with 100% accuracy... Just because you as every other flatard failed to understand basic geometry doesn't mean we cant prove globe model to be real without going to flipping space...
1
Rafa RS Re read what? You made a claim that we dont have evidence for flat or globe earth, when in reality is demonstrably false. So what did i read incorrectly here exactly?
1
Rafa RS Have you ever seen Australia with your own eyes? No? So its not real then? What about Greenland? How many places in entire world you visited? I bet its less then 1%, so more then 99% of the world is not real because you never seen it with your own eyes? Do you see issue here?
1
Rafa RS "There's no reason to lie about the existence of Australia" And there is no reason to lie about the shape of earth... Especially when anyone can determine it by themselves... Basic sun observation disproves us living on flat plane. " You think your government would share with you?..." Cool conspiracy claim... Its like a generic convenient "proof" when you simply bring up government to the equation when its completely irrelevant to it. "A hand full of people supposedly got out of this planet" Maybe because it costs millions and in some cases billions to do so?... You think its cheap to go into space and it should be affordable for everyone?... Are you flipping kidding me? "You can't just believe what you've been told until you see it with your own eyes." Then dont believe that Australia is real just because some one told you so. After all, every single picture or video from Australia is CGI... Right? Isint this how this works? You have photo/video proving that you are incorrect but its more then enough simply scream out that its CGI and be done with that. Right? So yea, you have 2 options here: Think that 99% of the world dont exist because photos and videos are CGI or admit that photos/videos from space are real in same way as those photos of Australia are real... You cant have both ways... Ether Australia is real even if you never seen it with your own eyes or its not (but then you will have to apply same rules for photos/videos from space) or its all fake and CGI because you dont like reality...
1
Rafa RS And you still failing to realize that screaming that something is false without any supporting evidence will not make it correct. Earth is a globe not because some one said so. Space is real not because some one said so. Australia is real not because some one said so...
1
Rafa RS And you still failing to understand that flat earth and globe earth models are not on same level, not even on same category... One is demonstrably true and another is fantasy world.
1
Rafa RS Well you dont even need to calculate to prove that earth is spherical. Bedford Level experiment, this is more then enough. Then you can simply use your eyes and observe suns behavior, which matches globe model with 100% accuracy, while flat earth model (Well you don't even have one...) completely contradicts reality. You dont need to be rocket scientists to realize this, but you need to know basic geometry... Tho you failed on that one... Multiple times...
1
Rafa RS "All theories are still theories until proven right" Do you even know what scientific theory is? "You'll never be able to proof Earth is a sphere because you'll never get out of earth" http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif https://goo.gl/TytLkC https://goo.gl/fXEAKC And there you go, i just did that. All those observations are only possible on a spherical earth. Was easy enough.
1
Rafa RS Have you "forgot" to address my links or are they not showing up for you?
1
@bobbobber4810 Why i dont understand about that stupid rocket launch is that he could have simply launched high altitude balloon and get even better results... How high did he even expected to get up with that thing he called rocket... And how much money did he wasted on it... He could have got high altitude plane ticket for cheaper and go higher then that thing could ever go without dying in process...
1
I guess Putin is excluded of from this because he pays himself for causing this war and all those deaths.
1
Tesla is still increasing car production rates year over year, so clearly people are buying those and Tesla is basically the only BEV company which actually makes profit from sellings BEV's, price drop was simply because before it was way higher due to higher demand than supply. Are you seriously complaining that Tesla dropped prices?... Should they have increased it?
1
@PaulBriden Tesla had raised prices before to accommodate higher demand, this is why now its dropped as supply started to catch up with demand. Is charging not at home more expensive than it is to refuel with petroleum? Like, what point have you even tried to make there. Some countries have higher electricity prices, ok... What's your point? I have no idea what you are trying to say with Ebay here... Do you have some secret stats indicating on for how long and how many sales Ebay makes or something? Like, Tesla model Y got second place in UK last year when it comes to sold car numbers, so like, clearly people are buying new ones... And just like any ICE car after few years you will start spending crap ton of money on maintenance. So like, what's your point? Losing few % on range is worse than spending hundreds if not thousands on maintenance just to keep car working? And once more, no idea what point you tried to make with your friends leasing Teslas. Why they will not be leasing them again? You mentioned depreciation, which was basically one time thing and people who got that car days or weeks before it did suffered low blow, but that has nothing to do here with actual car's value. Do you have any actual valid arguments here or was this your best attempt?
1
@PaulBriden Just wait until something breaks... Just because you currently doing oil changes yearly isn't the point here, point is that when ICE car's start to break then you will start experiencing nice maintenance numbers, and och boy those cars like to break all over the place.
1
You might want to rewatch this video or just do basic google search to understand what actually happen.
1
Isn't punishing some one for using word depending on his race is racism by it self?...
1
In which reality?
1
Reminder that hydrogen in its pure form doesn't exist on earth and you actually need to make it by introducing crap ton of power into entire process. Reminder that biggest lithium exporter is Australia. Reminder: Fact check.
1
@IraFox84 Yes, it is stupid point to say that EVs need energy when hydrogen needs around 60% MORE of it... So yea, it is stupid point... How much pollution does lithium mining causes in comparison to how much pollution hydrogen production causes? Just FYI biggest source of hydrogen at this moment is natural gas. Yes, maybe fact check yourself.
1
Tesla got here because Musk was in control, so why the hell would shareholders want him out exactly?
1
@jameslafand2718 He made the company what it is today, this is the weird part, he makes company, creates brand, then people comes along and like "He needs to go before he ruins company" which makes no sense as it was he who created this company in the first place. Does Musk makes stupid decisions from time to time? Yes, just like every human ever. Doesn't really mean that he should be kicked out
1
To lower pollution...
1
EV prices are going down, technology improving and all that jazz. Even without government tax exemptions it will be allot smarter choice to get EV instead of ICE car. Currently EV's have only 2 issues: initial price and charge times. Price is going down and battery technology improving drastically, which will minimize first issue too. So soon enough you will have EV which can charge as fast as ICE car can fillup gass. EV's will not die, ICE cars will. Its not a matter of opinion, its a fact.
1
Do controlled scientific experiment and return with results. Because at this point every single time actual scientific experiment done on this proved that dowsing doesn't work.
1
Because it would be huge waste of time and money?
1
@pvman2 Because at best you will convince one flat earther of his delusion, everyone else will say something like "its fake, shill, CGI, sheep" or even that same flat earther will say that he was drugged and he never went to space. You cant reason with flat earthers even if you can slap them with fact fish, they will not notice that.
1
@pvman2 Most "leaders" are not flat earthers, they simply pretend to be one to make living from gullible people. So if you will waste money on one of those, he will definitely return with a claim that earth is flat and he seen it, he will get 100x followers and 100x income. So it still fails.
1
Yes yes yes, strategic running away, I guess when Russia runs back to its country and loses Crimea will be yet another strategic retreat... How many of those should happen until you realize that Russia is getting its ass kicked by Ukraine?
1
He is paying for it... Entire point of Starlink is to generate enough money to fund Mars colonization
1
Riiiight... Book said so, so it must be true even tho evidence shows opposite...
1
So just like i said, book says so, so it must be true... Yes, book, not a god, but book. Because you dont have any evidence that god said anything, you only have a book which claims to be inspired by god...
1
How is "US wants war with Russia" makes any difference when it was Russia which invaded Ukraine?
1
Interestingly enough Russia fails to utilize this magical stockpile of weapons in this war and sends soldiers with outdated ones. Unless what you meant is that Russia has some ww2 weapons stockpile which is enormous and could be used...
1
That would be quite inefficient with added complexity with bunch of inconvenient things. Having 2 expensive cars put into one will not make it better solution.
1
Yea and Russia could be free from corruption if someone did that. Good plan.
1
Yea, be honest, prove that earth is flat instead of making empty assertions.
1
@junevandermark952 If you want new pronoun to have as a third option besides base he/him and she/her, fine, make a third one, but don't steal the one which already has different meaning for your own purposes and expect that everyone else need to adapt to your wishes... Make your own, make it standard, that's it... And make SINGLE one, not infinite amount like some are trying to do now which makes entire pronoun thing not only useless, but completely bonkers when anyone can become anyone every 5 nanoseconds and you can't ever miss use someones pronouns or you will be cancelled... Those pronouns need to be based on something and those pronouns need to be limited in amount and just make your own...
1
@junevandermark952 Largely accepted today? By who?... Because it's quite often the opposite where people are confused why single individual identifies with "they"... And yes, language evolves, but that doesn't mean that you have to hijack existing word and change its meaning to fit your own preference here... Just make your own and be happy with it... Hardly anyone will complain... I would not... Now you want to use word which is either used to identify two or more people and singular who doesn't have specified gender... How the hell you don't see confusion/issue here? Example: #1 I need help, could you ask them to come help me? Then one person comes, and i'm like... I asked for multiple people, I need more than one... #2 I need help, could you ask them to come help me? Then multiple people come, and i'm like... I asked for single one, I don't need rest of you... Do you see issue here?
1
Antivaxxer who doesn't like BEV's.... Shocker...
1
@sithwolf8017 You sound like a smart reasonable person, but like, why are you still Christian?
1
Caused? How? Did Putin got offended by how US looked at him?... Do you even understand what you are talking here? Russia attacks Ukraine and you blame US?... Seriously?... Think before you respond and show your personal brainwashing...
1
Not mentioning evidence for something what doesn't have evidence isint surprising... And just for reference here, find me some one who isint dumb who believes that earth is flat. lets see if IQ is directly related to belief in flat earth or not.
1
Failed?... Electric cars are at the start of S curve... Petroleum cars gets full blown ban in 2035... And technology in last 100 years improved exponentially... Like what the hell are you talking about? Did oil company paid you to say those words?
1
@mydogsbutler Hydrogen hybrids? Do you want to combine 2 cars into one? How? Look at current hydrogen fuel cell cars, they are extremely impractical due to how much space you need for hydrogen tanks, and this is with hydrogen fuel cell technology which is 2x the efficiency in comparison to combustion one, so combustion is straight away non option. So with what you would combine fuel cell? Regular combustion? Or just basic electrical car as you would already have all the things you need, after all, fuel cell cars are electric ones with extra steps, you have battery, you have electric motors, so why not simply expand that battery and ditch entire hydrogen thing and be done with it?
1
Yea, he was obliterated.
1
Whose video are you refuting here?
1
@NoMirr0r My curiosity is why people like you complains about that in general? Words mean things, and words mean things independent who said those. And just FYI by definition of "scientist" Nye is one. I myself don't really like to call someone like Nye a scientist, but he is one, doesn't really make any difference here tho... Isint it?
1
@NoMirr0r What you like personally makes zero difference to what he says. Is this admission that you are here complaining about his scientist status for sake of complaining because you dont like him and not because he is really not a real scientist and your complaint has actual meaning? "He pretends to be a scientist while inserting his political positions (like abortion for example) with arrogance and “science”" ... Once more... You could have Hitler himself here saying that earth is a globe, would that change anything? Would it be relevant to anything he said in relation to him killing millions of Jews? Would earth become flat pancake because Hitler said that its a globe? Definition of scientist: a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences. Would bachelor's degree and working on 747 as an engineer at Boeing make you an expert in one or more of the natural or physical sciences? It kind of does. Does it matter? Not really... So why are people like you trying to desperately to introduce red herring here?
1
I have glasses, does that mean I have mark of the beast?
1
@loschavez7694 Because your "joke" is just weird. On top of bunch of people actually believing that he got this mark of the beast due to this implant. Go figure.
1
Russia went to war 6 months ago, but like NATO, EU or USA dint even joined yet, imagine if they would...
1
Why?
1
How? Tesla won on range and efficiency, only thing it lost on was claimed range with real achieved range, but that could have been due to use of autopilot system which can additionally drain your battery. But still, how did Nissan won?
1
Because hydrogen refueling stations are 100% different. While those might look externally similar, all the internals are 100% different. So in general its cheaper to build new one than to try to replace old one when everything needs to be changed.
1
What?
1
@robertlascelle1602 I can understand that English is not your native language, but still... I have no idea what are you trying to say here... What? Use google translate or something, will get more coherent sentences here as not quite few words are not a real words in general... "bleave"? Do you mean "believe"?
1
@waterwomaninFL EDS is strong with some people
1
It did survived for past 15 years or so.
1
Yea, silly humans who lives in reality.
1
? Being anti theist is just additional thing to being atheist, you are still atheist... While atheism is just a lack of belief in god(s)... So no idea why you call yourself angry coward here...
1
it could, but you no longer have all of your eggs in single basket.
1
you have right to your own opinion, you dont have right to your own facts. Earth is not flat, this is a fact, so when you have people with different "opinion" about earths shape... Sorry, but this does to realm of ignorance, at best. And ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed.
1
You can charge your car overnight, and in general to charge one from 20% to 80% would take like 20-30 minutes. So like, when you take into consideration how much money you are saving when you are paying for electricity instead of petrol, those 15 extra minutes sound quite appealing... Or you just charge it over night while you sleep and lowest prices and save even more money and never visit recharging station.
1
@billcarpenter5615 Then use supercharger. 20 minutes instead of 5 isn't that big of a difference.
1
Alternative wasn't any better, well, it was worse.
1
@Matuse Its was picking a turd and a turd with sprinkles on it, at the end of the day it's still a turd, so what you are left with is to pick smaller one
1
Having engine which can run on hydrogen is really easy, we had one since 1806. Issue is with how corrosive hydrogen is, not in how you could use it in an engine.
1
@KangenAlec Yes, little one, he is a normal human being with basic understanding of geometry. Who are you?
1
How? Another war? Another threat with nukes?... How they could retaliate without repeating same threats over and over again which have been already done? Threat to invade another country?... C'mon...
1
@Mark-Stone "It’s not round; it’s spherical." C'mon... Why are you nick picking on such basic words?... Everyone in here understand that he believes in spherical earth even if he said that its "round"... You do know that words can have more than one meaning? Right? No need to be party pooper here...
1
@Mark-Stone "Misinterpreting words is part of what causes people to fall for absurd conspiracies." How ignorant you should be to misunderstand meaning of "round" in this context?... Should they have used "Oblate spheroid with slightly wider 'bottom' side where 'bottom' is arbitrary side of globe earth we decided to call based on..." or just use "round" where any reasonable person will know that its about spherical earth? How much detail is to much detail? You do know what "context" is?
1
If road cant handle 2,003 kg car then you seriously need to rethink quality of your roads...
1
Ironically enough earths shape can be confirmed from your backyard without any tools or even doing any math, yet even that is too complex for some people, so mentioning what some doctors said at some point in time is quite irrelevant here.
1
@dazzamcg2369 Yea, seen messages like that quite a few times by now. Which is more ridiculous when you have some one screaming that there isint a single photo from space while at same time rejecting every single photo from space on a claim that all of them are CGI while miserably failing in explaining what method they used to determine that it is CGI. In general I'm always assuming that its 50/50 chance for someone to be real flat earther when they say that they are, no idea what real number of trolls are out there pretending to be ignorant, but we do have some.
1
But that's the thing, there are actual flat earthers out there... After all, majority of humanity still believes in wizards and magic just because their old book said so.
1
@Mullet-ZubazPants For same reason why we should engage in debates about religions. While you might not convince the one you are talking with, you might convince the one which is on the fence. And ridiculing ridiculous ideas is quite good way exposing its flaws. And yes, there are bunch of trolls, I always assume 50/50 chance that person I'm talking with which claims to be flat earther is actually one, but that doesn't mean that there are none of those or what we should ignore ridiculous claims, even if those come from sad basement trolls.
1
@Brad_Fallon Good for them... I guess... What's the price of that magical solid hydrogen? What's the weight per distance traveled? Can it be used in cars?...
1
@Brad_Fallon Why are you spamming like a bot?
1
Then go and buy one... If you want hydrogen cars then you will have to actually buy one... So have you?
1
@emprr_ Because no one wants to buy hydrogen cars. This is why BEV's won over Hydrogen, you can plug those at your house and have it always full and to build charging station is relatively cheap. Hydrogen had its opportunity to become a thing, it failed, that's it. If it could not overtake market when BEV's have not been viable option, it has no chances to do it now when battery chemistry improves every single year, prices of those go down and we are getting more and more companies producing BEV's and miniscule amount of Hydrogen options.
1
@randy-ke8vn Emissionless would mean that car doesn't emit emissions while being used, not while being produced or recycled...
1
@randy-ke8vn And its the main one. There are ZERO products in the world which produce zero emissions, heck even hydrogen cars being in use produce small amount of emissions due to basic wear and tear. But it becomes nict picking than anything else.
1
@randy-ke8vn I was pointing out that you are nickpicking here with your original comment and then pointed out that you could go all the way with same approach... Doesn't really do any good here either way.
1
What?
1
Space technology is not slow, flat earthers are.
1
How? By laying down basic facts?... Like, which part of this videos was false? And include explanation why its false.
1
@Dreamriderindia5678 Said who? Because we have studies which shows that BEV's produce slightly less pollution than Hydrogen over its lifespan. You never fact checked this? Didn't you?
1
@Dreamriderindia5678 You will have option to buy ICE cars for quite some time... Start complaining about it when you will no longer be able to get hands on one and then try to complain about price issues, if there will be any.
1
@Dreamriderindia5678 Fact remain that we HAVE to transition to sustainable alternatives here, you want it or not, but oil is limited and it WILL run out sooner or later. Ban on new ICE cars being sold should start in 2035, so its 11 years away. This is only in Europe, which means that you can still import new cars from different countries and sell those as "used" even if those have only 2 miles driven. And then you will have additional 10+ years before last legally sold new cars become outdated. So its a possible issue which might be and issue in like 20'ish years from now in Europe... No one is banning ICE cars, there will only be limited access to new ones as we have to stop polluting environment if we want to keep living on this planet.
1
@Dreamriderindia5678 European country, one of those which will get this ICe car ban in 2035 if that law remains active until then and not postponed.
1
Did you know (you didn't clearly) that LED's got invented due to a need to have efficient light source on space station? Yes, that same thing powering your monitor/phone you are currently using to make that silly comment. There are dozens of inventions which you are using daily which got invented by space agencies to address one of the issues. On top of this, this is a private company, it can do whatever it want's and isn't obligated to solve world hunger... On top of this... You can have space stuff and solving issues on earth at same time, you know, multitasking and stuff...
1
Chadimir Putin This is what happens when defending forces run away in fear...
1
Nukes are a thing which is basically just exist there to show that you have it and should never be actually used. Its maintenance costs crap ton of money, so you are paying for a thing which should never be used. Knowing how Russia doesn't have corruption (sarcasm) all over the place it would be safe to say that nukes are either in poor condition or entirely non existing.
1
@JamesSmith-ix5jd NATO is defensive alliance... What you are parroting is just generic Russian propaganda. And just FYI we are talking under a video where RUSSIA attacked another country and threatens with its nukes rest of the world if they decide to help Ukraine. Do you see tiny issue with your non existing logic here?
1
@JamesSmith-ix5jd It's interesting that you said "by population" here, now, how many percentage amount of the people who "support" russia are from countries which are based on dictatorship? And if Russia has so many friends, then why does it continuously threatens with nukes? If majority of the world supports Russia, why does it struggle to end this 3 day war after 3 years? Something clearly doesn't add up here. Russia gets support from 2 types of countries: Dictatorships or 3rd world countries heavily supported by Russia. Feel the difference. By the way, by which metric did you got 70%? Because I can only find pool data saying that Russians living in Russia are at 70% of support of this war. I'm yet to find any indication of remaining world doing the same. Sooo, did you got suckered by generic Russian propaganda here and never bothered to fact check?
1
@JamesSmith-ix5jd One more thing, there was UN vote, it got 141 going against Russian invasion and only 5 for it, duno how it works in your reality, but in mine it looks like majority are against Russia invading Ukraine.
1
Gravity*
1
Yea, video with turned comments is always a great start...
1
Entertainment purposes mainly.
1
@chadsupporter4093 How long do you think Putler can keep up this war going on? He is not gaining land, he is losing. So if this war keeps going and Putler keeps losing it, how will his supporters react?
1
@chadsupporter4093 What?
1
@4ytonly "Its been 2 months since the Ukrainians started their counteroffensive" Its been like 9 months since Russia started this war. How is it going? Good? Gaining new lands?... Or loosing? "which are btw the land the Russians abandoned" Well at this pace Russia will "abandon" Ukraine in next year, so I guess its all good. "Russia is still in control of 15% of the Ukrainian land" And? Wasn't it more? Why this percentage number going down? "And those 300k newly recruited men are about to enter combat" Without appropriate equipment and training at winter time? Yea, good luck with that. If they manage to reach front lines without freezing, they will either freeze at front lines or will get massacred. Russia already failed to supply existing army, this 300k cannon fodder wont help, it will make it even worst. "The whole NATO is helping Ukr" Giving out some scraps, here and there. But isint it strange that like rest of the world is for Ukraine and against Russia? Maybe that single country isint in right here? "with very little to show" Actually the fact that Ukraine managed to stop and now push back Russia is a major show, not only it showed that Russia can't take Ukraine, it showed that Russia is weaker then it was thought before. "Tens of billions of taxpayers money wasted, inflation rampaging, gas prices soaring.." Yea, Russia is f**ked. "And do you really think Russians will fold!?" Who cares? It's a war, Russians either fold or go back home in bags. "They never fold." And they keep failing. There is a reason why Putin is afraid of NATO, having friends is always nice, while Russia has no friends left, its all alone and all those existing "friends" can backstab Putin at any moment. They can never fold, but nobody really cares. "There are only 2 outcomes, Russians win or we all perish in a nuclear WW3." And this is exactly why entire world is for Ukraine and against Russia. We should not negotiate with terrorists.
1
@chadsupporter4093 Words scare you? Damn, you better never leave your house as reality will be allot more scary than my word.
1
@chadsupporter4093 Why? Words don't scare me, but it does you. So maybe fallow your own advice here as you might have some mental issues relating to written language. Are you only afraid of words? Does some symbols scare you too? If I would show you circle, would that scare you? Square maybe? Hexagon? Unicorn?
1
To make it more equal.
1
Nice joke.
1
Yea, its not a stupid ball, its oblate spheroid.
1
What missile?
1
bunch of nonsense, circular arguments, no evidence and then threat at the end... Yea, we have true theist over here...
1
Is it tho? You forgot to actually compare ranges from that full tank... Longest range with hydrogen is around 400 miles, while with petroleum car (ford focus) it would be around 1000. So you need to actually check price per mile and not just price per fill up.
1
It can't store liquid H2, liquid hydrogen needs -252C or lower temperatures, so no go on liquid hydrogen straight away.
1
? Who says that you can? its around curve... Objects are blocked by the curve itself... This is like the main point of globe earth... But besides this http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif you have no counter argument.
1
He simply doesn't play by the rules, he will say to your face how it is without sugar coating. Is it smart or stupid? Well, debatable. And X is still most popular platform. And if you think that he got to this point by luck... How naive are you?
1
Actual smart people did actual comparison on which cars pollute how much and BEV's came first as cleanest ones. Just a reminder that batteries can and are being recycled to make new ones which could be done or less indefinitely. And... Water isint fuel, hydrogen is, to get hydrogen from water you need to actually process it and that processing will cost you quite a bit and it will create extra pollution on its own.
1
You mean, sphere?
1
I honestly have no idea what you wanted to say by this. Fly upside down? You dont need allot of speed to do that, how would flying fast make you fly upside down exactly? And no idea what you tried to say with "plus 1G force", by going straight up? Well, astronauts experience around 3G's when launching. Did you had something else in mind? I'm confused here.
1
Allow what? Engine which doesn't exist and can't exist?
1
Its when copium kicks in, you have to start saying that you wasting 100k on a dead game was actually worth it because you are having "fun", tho if you actually need to make video to make a point that you are having "fun" it's most likely that you are not having fun anymore.
1
@MurdaSquadAssassinsCreed Just trying to clarify here something, you do understand that live video from space showing earth would be basically showing static image because of that single rotation in 24 hours? Right? Like what exactly do you want here or expect to see? Its like you are trying to troll because you are bored or something, yet you can't even do that properly. Weird.
1
@MurdaSquadAssassinsCreed As a troll you are terrible at it. JWT isn't there to prove that earth is not flat... We have more than enough of those which are pointing towards earth at all times, taking either pictures or live videos, tho videos are quite pointless as you wont notice any change anyways. So like, why are you so bad at this? Don't you have some better ways to troll? As this is just silly at best even by flat earther standards.
1
Customers want BEV's, in general. Some want Hydrogen. Toyota simply tries to get that small portion of pie while they can, tho bigger portion will remain for BEV's
1
In that case nuclear WW3 would start and Russia would stop existing, millions if not billions dead. This is what would happen.
1
Sadly you cant say same thing about your belief in god
1
@foreverbooked2964 Well you have right to your own opinion, but you don't have right to your own facts. Belief is not a choice, you ether believe or you don't, i cant choose to believe in magical space pixies farting out universes after eating tacos, this is not how reality works. And core issue with religions is not that you have people having those beliefs, but that those individuals will use their beliefs in their daily actions, which in case its based on fantasy, will more likely cause harm than good to others. I have no issue with some one believing in god is he is living alone, his entire life, but this is not the case, you will effect others with your belief and we should eliminate false beliefs as many as possible.
1
@foreverbooked2964 "I can't stand a person who denies science." What about person who believes in something absence of evidence? Denying science and believing that X is true without evidence isint that different. But more interesting question would be: Why do you believe in god(s)? Do you even care to know what is true or you simply want something to be true and you will pick sweet lie instead of harsh truth?
1
@foreverbooked2964 "Because I do not fully know if gods exist or not" Knowing and believing are 2 separate things. "But i guess why for the time being I believe they exist is because they give you a sense of hope" So you just want it to be true independent if its actually is true? "Even If that's running away from the harsh truth, i couldn't care less about it" Which is main issue with religions. You hide from reality. Its like when some hurricane goes throw thousands of people houses and instead of actually doing about it and helping people you simply pray... Praying doesn't work, has no effect on reality. Same as believing in something what you cant demonstrate to be true but you will make decisions in your life based on that will lead you to more destructive route. "The sense of security stays with you forever" False sense of security. You are not secure, you simply think that you are, which, again, is dangerous. Jumping from a building and having sense of security that your imaginary thing you call god will save you will result in quite predictable way... Splash... "At the same time, I have nothing against atheism" if you are rational then you cant have anything against atheism, as its just a rejection of empty assertion that some gods exist. "both atheists and theists are equally correct and equally wrong." False. Atheism is not a claim that god is not real, atheism is rejection of your claim that god is real. We are not on equal grounds here, not even on same category. Its not 50/50 that you are correct and i'm wrong, you cant even give chance value in how likely god is real, so you cant calculate any probability from that. But share fact that your position requires for literally magic to be real, you are on terribly low footing here "consider me as somewhat an in between." You ether theist or atheist, you cant be in between.
1
@foreverbooked2964 "You forgot to quote that I also separate my contemporary from my religion" But you cant. Your beliefs will effect your actions and your thoughts even if you try actively separate them. In one or another way, it will have effect. "I loved how you ignored it." I did not, i simply skipped it as it was irrelevant. "I never said that I want it to be true irrespective of whether it actually is. Dont take it out of context you're complicating matters for yourself." So when you said "Even If that's running away from the harsh truth, i couldn't care less about it" was what exactly? "Because I know going to deep into religion or being overly religious is harmful." Yes, and your smaller amount of religion only lowers harm, not eliminates it. You seam to agree with me while at same time attempt to disagree... Religions are based on personal opinions and not on reality, this can't get you any actual value. Like for example, if you encounter some one believing in Santa you would look at this person strangely, yet when you look at yourself believing in pretty much same exact thing just labeled as "god(s)" its seam to you perfectly fine. Why is that? is believing in Santa until you die at age 90 gives you only benefit without any harm? "The sense of security is enough" Which is dangerous when you think that you are secure while you are not. Correct? "As I said earlier I believe gods exist but they left the universe to work on scientific principles." Which is purely based on your personal opinion and not reality. So why would you believe that? "And yes there are people who are in between. There might not be a term for it." yes, its called: nonesense. You can only be one of two things: theist or atheist. Its impossible to have another option. You ether believe in god(s) or you dont. That's it. Your "i dont know" is not part of theism, so dont mix those ones. Its binary option, not a quantum mechanics with infinite positions.. "But these people are like me who KNOW science is real but only BELIEVE that god(s) are/were real." So you are theist. Full stop. You are not in between theism and atheism, you are theist. "Why do atheists always assume that all religious people are religious fanatics who see god as the only answer and completely disregard science?" Why do all theists assume something what atheists never claimed to be? I dint said that you are fanatic in any sense, what i actually said that your personal opinion about reality will cause more harm than good because its not based on reality. You could be some one with 50 Nobel prizes, would not change my point. "what problem do you have with a person who believes in gods but also believes in science" in general nothing, in some sense i dont give a flying f**k what people believe, issue is what you will do with your beliefs. You could believe in space pixies farting out universes, would not care if you lived alone your entire live, but you are not, you live amongst others and you will spread your personal opinion about god's to others like its some fact from reality or this belief will effect your actions in one or another way. This is the issue. "I mean, they are not doj you any harm, as opposed to people who only rely on religion and never on science" So you want to say that 9/11 was performed by flat earthers? You have quite few religious people who accepts science while believing literal interpretation of their book. Yes, its contradictory to accept science and believe in literal interpretation, but we are talking about religions here, not about actual scientific approach... Just to be clear here, if i sound harsh, well, sorry, but it just tingles my spider senses when some one tries to put science and belief in god(s) on same level when they are not even from same category. Science is based on reality, belief in god is based on your fuzzy feelings in your balls. So in general i cant see some one who is actually intentionally rational and knows how science works and at same time thinks that god(s) are real. That just doesn't add up.
1
@foreverbooked2964 "No I am talking about the many atheists who say that all theists are fanatics who'll do anything in the name of god. " ? Its like for me to say "I'm talking about many theists who impose their fantasy on others"... First of all, not many, poor choice of words, in both cases, theists or atheists, you only have tiny part of them who behave like that. But lets not generalise everyone on a small portion, just a friendly advice, after all, you would loose comparison like this, badly. "That's great but as I said I assure you, I will never do anything stupid or idiotic in the name of religion." Yet it wasn't my point. Any belief you have will effect your actions even if you are not avare of this. "As I said I dont know if that's true because science hasn't yet predicted what happened way before, in nothingness" Doesn't that make it god of gaps argument? FYI Its a logical fallacy. "The moment we know for sure that gods never existed at all, I'll turn to being an atheist." And this is your fundamental issue. Actual rule you should follow is: Everything doesn't exist until proven to exist. In you case you believe in god(s) until some one manages to disprove them... Which is not how rational human should actually approach things like that. "that's because i know Santa isnt real. But the same can't be said about gods" Can you prove that Santa is not real? No, you cant. Can we prove that God is not real? No, we cant. Yet, you accept one and reject another. Why? They are on same exact level, both made up by humans, both have no evidence and both can be real or not. "As I said before, we dont know what happened way way before." So then say "I don't know" and not "i don't know there for god did it", this is god of gaps argument 101, aka argument from personal ignorance or personal incredulity... In any case, its a logical fallacy, unless you are not interested in logical fallacies... Are you? "And man you sure do type long comments." Yes, i do. Well, i have to. When you make bunch of sentences and each of those needs to be addressed in atleast one sentence or more, you will have long response. I could skip some of them, but then, skipping and not addressing them would kind of imply that i agree with you and you are correct, which is not the case. To sum up issue with your particular world view: its based on logical fallacy. if you are not interested in being logically consistent, then its fine, keep your belief, but that is not a scientific approach in any sense. Saying that you will stick with god until some one proves it false when you never proved it to be true, is logical fallacy. By this logic you can believe any crazy thing until some one manages to disprove it. While at same time your particular belief is more or less unfalsifiable, which means that it cant be shown to be false, yes, you cant prove that god(s) are not real, so you literally picked position which cant be shown to be false and your criteria to stop believing in it is when some one does impossible... Do you see issue here?
1
@foreverbooked2964 Deconverting from theism can be a long process, so take some time and think about that. Its not a 5 minute thing. And you could watch some shows talking about theism and atheism, like Atheist Experience, where you have live calls and people who have better knowledge then I do, use logical arguments talking about belief in god. And sorry for more or less overturning your world view, but well, welcome to dark side, we have cookies.
1
If I showup with long coat, big hat and fully covered face, should i be allowed because i'm modest about my looks? If no, then you lost your argument, if yes, then there is no point in security guards as anyone could enter with anything with excuse that they are modest or its their religious thing...
1
NaZZis?
1
If your prototype sounds broken, then your end product will not even exist... It's usually backwards, when you have excellent numbers for a prototype and then it gets somewhat worse when it gets into real product
1
That movie is from 2006 which could have applied to that time as you had basically zero BEV options, doesn't really have any value now tho.
1
Yea, flat earthers are condescending smugs... What can we do...
1
Yea, Putin's regime never was legitimate.
1
Why are you so brainwashed? Russia attacks Ukraine and you accuse US?...
1
Russia attacks Ukraine and its a fault of west?...
1
@timetoreflect1394 Will try this one again. You do know that it was Russia which attacked Ukraine and started full blown war? Right? Or is your entire argument is that Russia got scared of Ukraine becoming more of western (civilized) country and that "forced" Russia to attack it?... What is your actual point here?
1
@timetoreflect1394 Incorrect analogy, better one is "Bear is chasing you, you have no way out, you stop, turn around and hit this bear with a stick, bear becomes confused as he wasn't hurt back for long time" what do you think it will do? It will ether run away or keep attacking, so you atleast have 50% chance in avoiding being eaten by a bear instead of 100%. So which option is better? Lay down and be eaten or fight back?
1
@timetoreflect1394 "Just who is the real aggressor?" Starts with "R" and ends with "ussia" "You feel the Russians are the aggressors and I feel differently." Your opinion doesn't matter, aggressor is the one who started the war... "No one is a angle is the war and the Westerns Nations need to give the Russians some space or this war will spread into our back yards." ? Need to give Russia some space?... So Russia being in its own country isint enough space? It needs to be able to invade other countries and take them over?... Are you kidding here? Russia attacked another country with aim to take it over and you think that we should be basically "Let it have it, poor sad Russia needs to get few countries to be happy, just let it kill people"... How sad is that?
1
Says someone who parrots what his Dictator said to him... C'mon...
1
Doesn't that same thing applies to BEV's? At the end of the day you still need around 60% more electricity to drive same distance with hydrogen car than you would with BEV. This is not even accounting additional complexities and costs involving entire hydrogen eco-system. Hydrogen is only somewhat viable for bigger transportations, like buses, semi, trains, ships, planes, but not for small passenger cars.
1
@trailbossdan1 Majority of world believes in sky wizards and you think that there cant be people who thinks that earth is flat?...
1
Funny enough (not really) belief like that is even more reasonable than flat earth one. Atleast cheese moon doesn't brake laws of physics and doesn't contradict observable reality.
1
Hydrogen is energy dense by WEIGHT, its extremely bad when it comes by VOLUME, this entire video talks about VOLUME issue, not weight...
1
@LucreDenouncer Waste of money? Its the biggest space company in entire world responsible for 70-80% of all payload put into orbit in 2024... So tell me, what exactly is the waste of money here?
1
Because you dont like it?
1
@ronopatrick7104 Ukraine isn't losing, so isn't that accurate?
1
@ronopatrick7104 Does Russia winning? Doesn't look like it... So the fact that this all powerful Russian army can't take over means that Ukraine is actually winning. Retaking land back, Russians retreating and so on. Which part do you disagree with?
1
@ronopatrick7104 "Choosing a side that's winning is irresponsible and helping spread propaganda." ? I'm not choosing side that's winning, i'm choosing side which is the better one. "What about the economic side, can ukraine sustain their blitz?" Can Russia? Putin already looking for soldiers from other countries.. So clearly Russians doesn't want to fight or Putin is too afraid to draft actual Russians to this meat grinder war. "Watching this channel alone could convince you that ukraine has everything sorted" Who said that i'm only watching this channel? You can watch Russian propaganda channels, their tune changed too over last 6 months and especially after latest Ukraine blitz. "citizen that the suffering with the cost of living they are going through because of supporting this war is okay." This war isint ok, this is why Russia should go the f**k back to Russia. Rest of civilized world supports country which defends itself against aggressor here, not the other way around... Do you even understand that? Ukraine DEFENDS here, not attacks...
1
So if government says to stay with ICE cars you would buy EV?
1
@i6power30 Do you remember Blackberry phones and some people screaming that phones needs physical buttons? Well that didn't age well, isn't it? I mean, yes, Tesla does like to go somewhat over board with its minimalistic approach, but at same time this is what it makes actually good cars for good price. 95% all those buttons in ICE car you basically never use or use once a month, so you don't really need it. And... I have no idea why you shifted to Tesla cars here as you started this complain about BEV's in general. You can always buy non Tesla if you want buttons...
1
It's not real engine...
1
@zepkauvaka8316 If you listened instead of screaming you might even understand something here. Things about sun proving globe earth: 1. Moves (perceived movement as earth is actually rotating) in straight line across sky 2. Moves in constant perceived speed 3. Remains same size through entire day 4. Sunrise/sunset All those four things match 100% to globe model and miss match by 100% to flat one. And this is only observation of sun... If you cant even grasp this basic observation which can be done by anyone, then anything more complex or something involving actual math will fly over your head.
1
Larry 457 He might be trolling or ignorant or American... Who knows...
1
@zepkauvaka8316 Not trying to fool you, trying to educate, but as you clearly are not interested in reality i cant help you out here.
1
@zepkauvaka8316 "Have YOU SEEN the true shape of the sun???" ? First of all, I wasnt talking about shape of sun... Second, you can check suns shape with sun filter and decent telescope... "SUN IS MOVING. EARTH IS STATIONARY, UNMOVED !" Actually earth rotates while sun is stationary, relatively speaking. "YOU CAN'T EDUCATE ME WITH A HYPOTHESIS THAT YOU CAN NEVER PROVE !!!" Nah, that's not the reason I cant educate you...
1
@zepkauvaka8316 Moving or rotating? Have you seen night sky? It follows some strange pattern... Like it would turn around you, but it cant turn around you as that would break all known laws of physics, but maybe, just maybe we are rotating... Hmmm... On side note. There is Coriolis effect which proves that we rotate. There is ring laser gyroscope which proves that earth rotates... I mean... I can give you examples, i can explain you each of them how it proves what i say it proves, but whats the point? Do you even understand what globe model is? Like what you should expect to observe in actual reality based on that model?... Because i have hard time believing that you could actually grasp basic understanding about what we are talking here, let alone understand how ring laser gyroscope works and how it proves earths motion...
1
@zepkauvaka8316 "your condescending talk down on me is laughable and I'll let it go seeing you resort to ad hominem" Stating facts is not adhominem. You literally don't understand basic physics here, I'm not saying that you are wrong because you are ignorant, I'm stating the fact that you are wrong and you are ignorant about this topic. "since you can never humble yourself and admit you can't and will never be able to prove a GLOBE EARTH" First of all, i can, but then what's the point. We already established that at this moment in time you lack of basic knowledge about basic physics. You can count this as adhominem if you want, but currently its like teaching a child about nuclear fusion reactor, you can explain it as many times as you can but you will still not get any results because child needs base understanding of some fundamental physics before we can talk about anything more complex. In this case you lack basic understanding about basic physics, so i have no idea where we can go from this point on. I'm not here to teach you middle school science, i'm not getting paid for it... So maybe learn that and after you do, return and we can have a talk. And just FYI basic observation of sun proves globe earth which only requires 1 buck solar filter and some spare time, you dont even need to do any actual calculations. If you can grasp this basic concept then we can move into anything more complex then that, but if you cant, then there is no point. Learn to walk before you try to run.
1
@zepkauvaka8316 2 years passed... Did you learned basic physics yet? And just FYI like 99.9% of scientists know that earth is a globe, so I guess smartest people on earth are wrong and you as someone who got C- from art class knows better?... Yes, art class, as you only need basic understanding on how perspective works to realize that earth is a globe. You can add maybe geometry, aka math class, but heck, that would fly over your head.
1
Those are separate budgets... You can fight wars and invest in better country at same time... And it's not pointless war.
1
@isaidthat4505 Did he said that he seen Russians running with his own eyes? And are you saying that if he dint see it with his own eyes it dint happen? On top of this, what would you call this occupied land retating exactly, did Russians AGAIN made strategic retreat?
1
@Automedon2 Well you could start polluting less, that could be a good start.
1
Youdo need electricity to produce hydrogen, and quite a bit more of that too... Even in comparison to hydrogen fuel cells you will need around 60% more electricity for same traveled distance. This doesn't even include the fact that you need to transport and store and distribute this hydrogen. It's a lot worse than you think...
1
So even Russia itself doesn't provide heating for their own people?
1
Oil companies would love hydrogen cars as its yet another way to produce something people will have to buy from them. What oil companies doesn't want is BEV's
1
What is more likely to be true: Lizard people controlling government and offing people with magical technology, or people lying to have magical technology?
1
Only flat earthers think that NASA is relevant in this conversation.
1
@TruthSeeker223-b News flash buddy they are not First globe model appeared in Greece in 3 BCE century, when was NASA created? And you do know that there are more than one space agency? Right?
1
Aravinda Fernando Does that mean that Putin now is brave enough to call this war a real war?
1
@john doe When you have army in another country trying to take over its territory for itself, it's a war independent how you call it... If Putin has enough power and bravery to call this a real war it would have ended in first days, clearly it dint happen and Ukraine is stronger now than it was before. So what does Putin waiting for? He is clearly not winning this war in current state...
1
@john doe He is failing already, so this should go into official war state soon enough. It wont really help Russia and will more likely to cause internal issues and riots inside Russia than anything else.
1
@john doe Thats a wishful thinking you have there. Countries wont surrender to Putins blackmail here, to late for that. Even if some countries somehow manages to collapse their economies it wont be Russia which comes into help. But lets see hows Russian economy will hold out in those few months. And yes, if you have dictatorship you have evil people in power, especially if this dictatorship was established during same people who are currently in power. Why do you think laws have been changed where its now allowed for president to be longer than 10 years in power which wasn't a thing before Putin came into power? Nothing suspicious here?
1
Tesla and Waymo systems are not even really comparable here... One only works in pre mapped specific area with bunch of extremely expensive sensors while the other works on any road without a need to premmap with just a few cameras. And those autonomy levels are just that, numbers on paper, those don't really represent actual capabilities of the system, it only represents what responsibility company takes for any accidents which could happen. In other words, Waymo is more stable because its more or less hard coded for specific roads, Tesla is a universal system which will have more issues as its been built to work on any road. Waymo will win on short run, but will loose on long one. This is why even after all these years Waymo is still limited to small areas in just a handful cities , because it simply doesn't scale...
1
It's around 60% more energy required for same distance for Hydrogen fuel cell based car. That's excluding all the extra work, equipment and time you would need to produce it, store it, transport it, store it again and then distribute. Hydrogen only sounds nice as a newspaper title like "Car runs on water".
1
Hows that 3 day war going on after 400+ days? Winning already?
1
Scared of reality? Entire world is against Russia, do you think there might be something with that? Maybe its russia who goofed out here?
1
Because it doesn't solve anything?...
1
@AlexNesh Then why are you not using it?
1
@AlexNesh Doesn't answer my question tho...
1
@AlexNesh Well that explains it then.
1
There is difference between doing your own research (which is not possible to be done on everything) and simply denying reality.
1
@raumshen9298 Scientist who makes such stupid comments?... Well I guess this title can be given to anyone these days...
1
@raumshen9298 Is this even serious question?... Stand on a big ball and not fall off?... Do you have trouble with balance? Imagine you got a ball which is 15km in diameter, would you have trouble to stand on it too? Like, how big ball needs to be for you to not have balance issues to stand on it?... What about 12 742 km one? And yes, flat earth conferences are like circus with people who thinks to not be clowns, which is funny and sad at same time.
1
@raumshen9298 "you can yourself check out a model describing how flat earth works" There isint flat earth model out there which would actually match reality... Not a single one. You might have one which explains one thing, but then will fail on dozens of other things. So again, there is no flat earth model, there is only flat earth claim. "everyone is just doing propoganda of Ball earth because it's easy to be Not required to think" Funniest thing about this is that flat earthers fail with basic geometry and are the ones who are scared of thinking. But well, you do you.
1
@raumshen9298 "I am a skeptic" No, no you are not. "so it looks round but it's also flat" It looks round but its flat?... Wait, are you just saying that "round" in this instance means flat disk?... You do understand that "round" in this context actually means spherical? Right? " this is why we ca spot two Suns if we look properly" No... You can't spot 2 suns... At bes you could get mirage effect which would "double" sun in distorted way for short period of time when its near horizon... And you call yourself skeptic... That's a joke of the year.
1
Still better than hydrogen.
1
@raymondjmcclain First law of thermodynamics makes your idea fictional at best. Electrolysis requires MORE electricity than you will ever had back from created hydrogen, so its non option.
1
Rus bot detected.
1
If you can keep that hydrogen under -252C, cool beans, but this is practically impossible and it would just boil off over time. Liquid hydrogen would ONLY make sense for quick usage, like you fill up and then go on 400 mile trip straight away, but if you have any plans to have this car in your driveway, liquid hydrogen will not work.
1
What exactly did Ukraine gained from this? Cut off water supply to Crimea?... That place which survived for years without this water when Putin annexed it originally?... Cut off its own posible attack route? So what exactly did Ukraine gained here to be worth destroying dam on the side which was controlled by Russia?
1
So liking a model which is best current explanation which is based on all current evidence and contradicted by none of this is a bad thing?... Ok... If that is bad, then what is good?
1
@hithere8753 Which topic no one takes seriously? Big Bang? Because that one is a serious topic. And i can agree that flat earthers are not takin Big Bang seriously, after all, they cant even grasp basic geometry, how could they grasp Big Bang.
1
Conservation of momentum?
1
Well FSD would still need to handle it appropriately, if camera is covered then either FSD isn't engaging at all or performs on way slower speeds
1
@cafl9844 I mean, yea, if the one which is essential for driving is covered, but there are multiple of those and those do tend to overlap. If FSD will not know what's going on around it then it will stop working, just like every single system in the world. Duno what point you tried to make here. It will not work if it can't work.
1
Its cutting of current forces of Russian army, when they get to this bridge they can figure out plan how to cross it. And this damage is minimal, will be fixed in few days or can be completely ignored for quite some time.
1
Humans comes into existence when he is born. That would be by definition of human being, which is "a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens" where child is born fetus. So clearly human doesn't come into existence before that, if you want to play word semantics here...
1
Its not.
1
Which one is simpler to be used? Tesla or type 2?
1
@manu.yt25 I asked... Which one is simpler... And not how many times you used one particular type... C'mon...
1
there is difference between pumping a liquid and pumping smallest gaseous element in the universe.
1
@eq2092 ...and... ?
1
@Alan-nq5xg You might want to add "by using sun filter" because they might actually start staring at sun and get blind...
1
You cant be right because earth is a globe based on evidence not on opinions like flat earth model... Och wait, there is no flat earth model which would not contradict reality...
1
What?
1
There was a moderator?!
1
What was false exactly and why?
1
Yea, in Narnia...
1
Liquid hydrogen isint an option for regular passenger cars, you can't magically keep that hydrogen under -252C temperatures for any extended periods of time, this video was about hydrogen in a gas form, just like every single hydrogen car in the world uses.
1
People do want EV's, issue is that EV's are still more expensive to buy than gas cars, for now. But to complain that you don't like cars with computers is like complaining that smartphones no longer have physical buttons... Its just weird.
1
Peace talk start when Putin gets his soldiers out of Ukraine entirely.
1
No idea what you tried to say here. Care to elaborate?
1
Starlink?
1
@shedroids "Just like your name" What about my name? "Why do you think it's a globe---> when did you last get a look!!" Have you been outside of your basement?... Sun has 4 glaring (cha, pun) proofs that earth is globe and not flat. Simple observation of sun proves that. Not even talking about couple dozens of other things which proves globe earth and disproves flat one. "Now, I am just an "earther"..." Ignorant earther* "So, when did you last SEE the entire freaking earth LOOK like a globe??" Och, so Australia is not real because you never seen it with your own eyes? Right? Do penguins exist? Have you seen them? Em I real? You never seen me, so by your logic i could not be real. Right?... You dont need to see actual earth from 4000km away to know that its globe... "you mean you saw the GLOBE at the store with the map on it, OH... I SEE!" Sadly, you dont see... Your ignorance is not proof of anything, "Good luck with that DUMB argument" It is dumb, but i dint made it, you did. So what does it say about you? "People like you are dead-ended, suffer from cognitive dissonance" ? Do you even know what cognitive dissonance is?... Because its clear that you dont if you think that its correct way to use it here... "and very mocking of others" Ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed. Right? "Let me guess---> Liberals!" Let me guess---> Muricans! Yes, A is missing, as you don't deserve it because of your ignorance level. "return with an intelligent explanation to why you believe it's round" We have brains and basic understanding of geometry. Do you have that? "You hate being put on the defensive, eh!" Not really, i can put anyone into place while being in defensive or offensive, doesn't make big difference here. You would only hate that if you could not defend your position, which says allot about you.
1
You missed entire point? Dont you?...
1
What video one more time, David explains exactly why its a huge issue at beginning of a video.
1
Main point was that action like this requires approval from Congress or atleast should be done that way (not really familiar with laws in US) having a orange guy who can simply say "kill this guy" is not something anyone would want... Even if Congress votes 100% to kill this guy, its still a better approach then having one insane guy dictating who should die...
1
Fahrenheit or Celsius?
1
Exempt Exploration Why would people care to correct false belief?... Do you even read what you write before you do that? Why would we care to correct your false comment? Think about it and if you fail to get to correct conclusion we can help and educate you on that.
1
Will simplify things here: you need 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen, and these numbers are not backwards. You might notice potential issue with your idea here.
1
That's the funny thing, just like they want to come to you and say "I prefer that you address to me with these pronouns..." we should be able to say "I prefer to not do it..." and it SHOULD be on equal ground if not on higher one due to them trying to push something on us while we just expressing our own preference of what we will be doing.
1
We gonna recycle them by... Recycling them... Like what is your actual question here? We have bunch of companies already dealing with batter recycling and more underway.
1
This is part of solution, getting easy charging solutions will attract more people to buy EV's in general
1
So your suggestion is for Ukraine to roll over and surrender? When Russia decides to attack another country after Ukraine, do the same? So your suggestion is to just allow for Russia to rake over ENTIRE world just because they might use nukes if they got but hurt by losing "special military operation"?
1
@wyihupoip8105 Check Russia war records... Its always attacking something and taking it over... And again... What is your suggestion here? For Ukraine to roll over and surrender? And how the f**k Putin's hand got forced here? Why are you so desperate to defend aggressor here?
1
@fissh29 I just want to know something here: Do you realize that words can have more than one meaning? Like seriously, did you skipped kindergarten? Words can and do have different meanings depending on context... Word "set" has over 300 of them... And you are here with this childish "theory is a theory"... I hope you are trying to troll here...
1
@fissh29 Cavendish experiment proves gravity. Just because you failed in middle school will not prove anything. Scientists have been wrong, so what? having 1 wrong thing from 1 million, will not disqualify 1 million +1 things as invalid... It will only disqualify ONE thing which was shown to be wrong. Gravity is proven fact, to late to debate that. And just to educate you on the matter: gravity is label put on attraction between 2 objects with mass. This is observable fact from reality. Again, Cavendish experiment proves gravity. Full stop.
1
Globe. Even if its simulation, we still live on a globe earth.
1
Kurren You can put this in basic analogy. Have 2 drivers in your car, both with steering wheel and both with pedals. How long will it take before both of them decides to do different things at same time? Which ones input we should take? If you have a branch on road, should you turn left or right? Maybe you should ignore entirely? Issue comes with general costs and issues with conflicting inputs. Lidar could detect object where there is none, this is why lidar cant really work in snow or rain, it just derps out. While camera only could not see all objects. Both systems are not perfect, but smashing them together isint helping ether.
1
@Elektrolite111 I could agree that radar system could have been there as backup, in case camera is not sure whats going on then it could double check with radar output. But in general who knows, maybe it was mostly due to extra cost to have radar system in a car and getting rid of it is needed sooner or later anyways. Cheaper cars will speedup transition to this system, it might take longer to make equally good and safe system, but in long run it will pay back.
1
Well true, for it to flop it would have needed to be a thing in the first place.
1
And what would be the cost of it? How fast can you extract hydrogen from it? How much power you need to extract it? And so on.
1
Hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, you can download blueprints from internet... This is 218 year old technology... No one is going around and taking out people who claims to have magical technology... Some people simply lie about having magical technology...
1
Conspiracy much?
1
Why are you so ignorant? Why you don't understand geometry? Why are you going by what your book of fables says instead of what reality is? Just a few questions to start conversation.
1
You still need to store it, transport it, store it again, then you can fill up your car and use it. There is huge energy loss on top of huge maintenance costs for all of this process. Just imagine trucks with 5000psi hydrogen tankers crossing city streets... "No Smoking" signs would be in 5 mile radius each time one gets noticed in the horizon.
1
@IraFox84 EV's, some people actually did the math for end to end and how much pollution each of them causes. BEV's still won, to be fair, not by much, but still won. But what is interesting with you people is that it always ends up with "BuT Ev'S aRe BaD!11!1!" while commenting under video talking about hydrogen cars... Can you stick to the topic?...
1
No actual mass produced hydrogen cars will be combustion type ones, so you are right, it's all bollocks from the start...
1
To be fair, if you tried to crash test any older car, all of them would be a mush against modern ones. Tho yea, this one looks to be extra stiff and would hardly feel someone ramming into it, one of the reasons why it might never be allowed in Europe.
1
@danharold3087 Yea, that helps for the cybertruck passengers, question is how would the car which crashed into it look like.
1
Because hybrids are not practical, maintenance costs are quite high on those and you need extra space for all that extra stuff. You can't just combine multiple cars and expect it to be the same as pure ones.
1
Bots will do bot things I see.
1
@la4t329 Can you handle the truth? Which side is fueling war? Attacking side... If you want for this war to stop, then ask Putin to... Well... Stop attacking... Simple as that. Right?
1
Infrastructure required for hydrogen production and storage costs crap tone of money. When it comes to EV's is allot simpler, but even then its really slow in being adopted. At some point when ICE cars gets completely axed hydrogen cars for public transportation or specific use cars could rise up, but its hardly will ever win over EV's.
1
Do you seriously think that you can only know what shape of earth is by going into space?... You seam to believe that earth is globe, which is good, but your main point is on same exact level as any flat earthers, its broken...
1
@tzizzzz There are no transparency to the moon... Take a photo of it... Can you see stars behind it?... Nope... And there is no such thing as moon light temperature, moon reflects suns light and your measurement system is flawed.
1
@tzizzzz "The bigger earth is globe." Then what shape is smaller earth?...
1
It failed at 9x of rated weight, what are you talking about?
1
@ Ram hitch was rated for higher loads and they barely went over the load of where CT failed. So like, what's your point here?
1
Like what for example?
1
What was false in this video?
1
Columbus did discovered America. Doesn't have any impact that there have been people already, it was discovered for everyone else in Europe and rest of the world because no one in there have been aware of America...
1
And you think that hydrogen is ready?... C'mon...
1
One more rus bot... You do know that it was Russia which started this war? Right?... And its all up to Russia to stop it... While on another hand Ukraine is simply retaking its lands...
1
Yea, Putin is BS.
1
His not doing that everyday all day... He can reply to few of those in this spare time. From basic stats he makes like 12 tweets in a day in average. If for you to make 12 tweets takes entire day then you might have some what valid claim here.
1
@josh7120 12 comments in a day? How many comments do those youtubers reply to or manage? Thousands?... There is HUGE difference between making a 12 replies while you shitting in comparison to checking thousands upon thousands of comments across hundreds of videos. Those are not even similar. So again, why its impossible for him to make 12 comments in a day?
1
@josh7120 There are statistics in how many comments he makes on tweeter, in average it would be around 12 a day. So no idea about which other replies your are talking about. If you have actual stats in how many replies he makes and that is in hundreds, then yea, you will have a point, but that dude is a workaholic and making 12 tweets in a day isint much.
1
Hydrogen even if it will improve it won't improve on same pace as BEV's does and due to extra complexity involved in this entire Hydrogen deal thing, it doesn't really have real chance to become anything more than niche thing for narrow use cases where energy density is more important than anything else.
1
@skyisreallyhigh3333 Food is important, but its a secondary thing to muscle growth... Main one is your genetics... Give same food to women and to men, lets see who will be stronger here... Your argument is mute at best.
1
@KB-jz1nq Its like saying that having good trainer gives you advantage... Like... Yes... It is... But it applies to BOTH sides... I am not arguing that good nutrition have no effect, I am arguing that good nutrition is just secondary thing which will effect BOTH sides and there is only one thing which can be done by both sides is having same genes...
1
@estebanslavidastic4382 Will try use simpler words here. You need caloric surplus to develop musculature, I never disagreed with that... But like... No one here actually talks about what you eat, we are talking about difference between male and female GENES... DNA... That thing you can't change or effect by eating apple...
1
Few basic facts here. First hydrogen combustion engine invented in 1806, fuel cell in 1969, so this tech isn't new, its ancient. Second, while it takes to charge BEV's tiny bit longer, that tiny amount is worthless when you consider the fact that you will be paying like 10x more for hydrogen refueling just to save extra 10 minutes, and yes, 10 minutes, as you can go from 20% to 80% on BEV in like 15 minutes, while it takes around 5 to refuel hydrogen car. So that 10 saving is actually you wasting your money. Next, hydrogen needs to be produced, by using electricity, and using more of it, so your complain about BEV's shifting pollution to power plants is even worse complain for hydrogen. Lithium production isn't big issue and we have quite few new battery technologies which either lowers lithium usage or removes it entirely, on top of this, you can recycle old batteries and reuse that same lithium to make new batteries, over and over again.
1
Astrology?
1
@jeradblazek677 Cool claims, can you now support that with actual data? 5 soldiers for every Russian? Ok, which source you used to get this information from?
1
@jeradblazek677 Retired generals? Cool story bro... I know a guy who knows a guy who says that you are full of s**t. Does that count? You need actual source and not some random who claims to know shit because he said so and because he supposedly has no reason in lying... C'mon...
1
Yet facts show it otherwise.
1
@mattmantrell5708 Because putin said so? Lets test how naive and honest you are. Did water level got raised to record high before it blowing up? Do you know that blowing up dam requires crap tone of explosives and you can't do it with rockets? Do you know that entire controls of dam have been on the side Russia controlled? Do you know that Russia one week before blowing up dam made a law which says that country should not investigate blowing up dams? I have have quite few of those if you can address these one, so do you best!
1
Wasn't media owned by lefties/democrat for past 4+ years? Wasn't the main reason why Elon bought twitter to have platform not controlled by left?...
1
Or... This might be a wild idea, but just listen... Or he lied?... Its physically impossible to use water as fuel... This is not how physics work. What you actually heard is someone using water, then performing electrolysis to extract hydrogen from water and then using that hydrogen as a fuel for a car. So it wasn't running on water, it was running on hydrogen... On top of this, you have to put in a lot more energy into all this process than you will get back from it, so you can't have electrolysis on board of your car. Its 2023, if something like that ever existed it would have been shared on internet straight away... Yet people like you think that there is some sort of lizard people government who tries to control something what was already published to be a thing?... Why the hell all these people with this magical technology never releases blueprints or even explains who all it works? Why its only a empty claim?
1
Is it winning tho?... 460+ days into war and Ukraine starting its counter offensive and starting to regain its territory, while war started to spill into russian territory... What Russia gaining from this is cutting of Ukraine ability to attack from Kherson side and Russia can divert its forces to other fronts... Who isint gaining much here is Ukraine... "Starving" crimea from water supply won't have any meaningful impact here, Crimea lived with this water supply for years after Russia annexed it, so it will survive now... So just use more than 1 brain cells here next time.
1
v p Its quite fun to see flatard screaming that there is no real photos or videos from space but at moment some one points out that there is you simply scream that its CGI, and this is not because you can actually prove it, but simply because you dont like reality. So simple question for you, as every single flatard failed to answer until this point, maybe you can: What method you used to determine that particular photo/video is CGI? And side node, first photo of earth was made in 1972, while such thing as photo realistic CGI was only possible in recent years. Something doesn't add up here...
1
You have seen AI auto generated scam video. Such system can't existing without breaking laws of physics, aka it can't exist.
1
@bencarter1666 NATO can keep up Ukraine ammunition usage without any trouble... Your tiny brains fail to understand difference between limited support for country in war and actual war... Ukraine is getting scraps, left overs... And if Russia is so strong, then why is this war still going after 470+ days without any meaningful gains from Russian side for the past year? Why did Russia made multiple major retreats so far if its so powerful? Reality disagrees with your personal brainwashed opinion here.
1
If it took 8 months for Russia to take a single tiny town, then well, its says alot about Russian army capabilities.
1
And this is why rest of the world don't like Russians...
1
I don't believe that you are real person.
1
Evolution is proven fact, flat earth is some ones personal opinion which was proven to be false. Those 2 things not even in same category for you to compare them...
1
@10697018 9 comments in a row, this is a "good" sign... "51% of scientist believe in God. " ? have you checked that actual pewresearch? You never did, dont you now? Let me help you out here: 33% believe in god, 18% don't believe in god but believes in some higher power, 41% dont believe in god. So, lets do some math here: 18+41= 59% of none believers in god, aka atheists. And this is from 2009... 11 year old research and the fact that atheism is on a rise while religions in decline would only indicate bigger difference. "Evolution and Climate Change are both nonsenses" 100% unrelated to the shape of earth... Next... "It's you that deny proven facts not me." Which one? For what? That earth is a globe? I dont deny that proven fact. "here is the post about 66% of scientists believing in God" Your link doesn't even include links to source research... So its a horse shit. Its on same exact level as for me to say that 100% of scientists are atheists because i said so and you should believe me because i said it on internet... C'mon, find actual real articles supported by some actual research and not some random posts... "You can reach Kent Hovind in Dinosaur Adventure Land in Lenox, Alabama." Why? You made a claim that Kent challenged people for 250k to prove evolution. Still waiting for evidence that this is not yet another horse shit of yours. C'mon... Stop tap dancing here...
1
EV's are most efficient from all the alternatives, so no idea how that makes them not efficient. Batteries can be and are recycled. You complaining about some countries exploiting their people is only that, some countries exploiting people, which is not related to BEV's, on top of that, for example biggest lithium exporter is Australia. You have this video which shows car with 3 huge hydrogen tanks, its range is around 400 miles. No idea how can you get additional 200 miles easily here...
1
@KangenAlec I would suggest to put away your tin foil hat... It seams to cause some brain damage...
1
Now say this in English.
1
I will have two of those what you smoke.
1
If there was given time frame when they should leave then Ukraine can simply wait until that happens or not, no point in rushing anyways.
1
Water powered generators don't exist...
1
Why? Holmes was selling faulty health reports which endangered and maybe killed quite few people, she was selling something what never existed. What exactly is Musk doing to be on same level?
1
And?
1
Its 99.9% chance that this was pre recorded thing or someone using cheap face capture from behind the curtain.
1
No one uses T-55 (65 year old) tanks in modern warfare either, but Russia does... What others use isint indication what Russia uses, especially if old technology is cheaper to have. We are talking about Russia here after all.
1
Ukraine isn't part of NATO... There is extreme balance when it comes to Ukraine support. If NATO sends bunch of modern military equipment and it loses, then you have Russia with bunch of it. If Ukraine wins then you have Ukraine with it. So US and NATO sends just enough to keep fighting and give an edge over Russia, not ideal, but this is how reality works.
1
@surfingonmars8979 In reality it's not that simple. If it was that simple it would have been done already.
1
@surfingonmars8979 I guess you know better than rest of the world, you can become ruler of it and we can live in peace and harmony... Dictatorship rules!
1
@surfingonmars8979 Do you even know what ad hominem attack is?... Because this wasn't it... So just learn what logical fallacies actual mean before you try to use those next time. Going back on topic. Ukraine isn't part of NATO, at the start of war you would have hardly find anyone who would have said that we should throw everything into this war and help out Ukraine to fight back, this in time changed, peoples view changed on it, countries started to allocate funds for that, it started to change with time... This is why you have this increase in Ukraine support over time... That's the basic reality. And while at the moment "Enemy of my enemy is my friend" type situation, no one knows what will happen after war ends. Ukraine is not a dictatorship, current president will be replaced with someone else in a year or so, which means that his replacement can be someone who could be pro Russia, chance is low, but previous presidence was one of those, so its definitely possible. Sooooo, using basic logic and not logical fallacies, feeding Ukraine with crap tone of military equipment which might or might not get over to Russian side one way or another isint smartest move in the world, just like most countries providing military support to Ukraine realizes. To be crystal clear here, I would be really happy if Ukraine kicks Russian ass with provided enormous support, i would be all in for that, but that would be short sighted and not so smart to do. We are supporting Ukraine and we will do it until this war is resolved.
1
@mickeywicked478 Did I even tried to convert you?... When did that happen?
1
Not worth, if Ukraine starts invading Russia then it can legally call it real war and can mobilize every human being in their territory by force. Its not worth it.
1
I guess Russia blowing up dam is a good sign of actual counter offensive starting up
1
Banning Russians might make them actually think why this is happening... because they still think that they are the good guys here... And yes, not all of them are bad, but its not like we have technology to separate good ones from the bad ones... What we can do is simply separate ourselves from entire country. What is your "better" solution here? Open all borders? Provide free housing for any russian who wants it?
1
Its called "playing smart" what Russian forces lacking across the board. Defending position is allot simpler than attacking and because Russia is desperate to take Bakhmut Ukraine can use that against Russia. Take good defensive positions, wipe out bunch of Russian forces, if if gets dicy for your current position, booby trap it and fall back little bit, russia take that place, bomb the hell out of it which will take out extra few russian soldiers, rinse and repeat. What Russia currently has is cannon fodder, i mean, if you had 100 people rushing at you with sticks and you had AAC Honey Badger with crates of ammo, you would still need to take defensive positions and maybe even fall back as you simply can't take out all of them fast enough.
1
@redeempohtam9358 Ok, let me paraphrase here: Damn Redeem Pohtam... I hope you know that there could be more than 2 opinions in the world? Right?... Generalising
1
@redeempohtam9358 So if you know this, why do you straight away put people in some weird categories? Just because some one has one different opinion doesn't mean that they hold 100% of particular group opinions...
1
False, like demonstrably false... BEV's can be charge at your house at night with your preset schedule when electricity prices are at lowest and every single day you will have full "tank" where 99% of users will never have a need to use superchargers. Its a mute complain...
1
reporter crusher What method do you use to determine that photo X is fake and photo Y is not?
1
@phildavenport4150 Its not my first rodeo with flat earther. I can debunk him all day long without any issues.
1
@reportercrusher2411 "Not trees on earth so I mean if I have the real photocopy-roll" Yet you want to make an argument that photos are fake, which should not matter what is shown in them in general. Tree or an alien. If you want to say that photos from space are fake then you should have a method to determine this. Do you have one? "Stalin was photoshopping in 1942. " Did you photoshoped videos too? Did he photoshoped in an earth from space?... "there are more things possible because they or people or governments hide patents of very unknown techniques" And? First of all, you have no idea if there is such thing. Second, even if there was one, there is no need to photoshop photos from space when you can simply launch a rocket over there... Third... First photos appeared during cold war with rusia, which means that if some one would have photoshoped anything and faked shit it would have been publicized all over the world... Your argument is as sound as pineapples on pizza... Just doesnt make any sense... "When its digital , I do not have the equipment at home to run a decent program over it or in sink with it. " Then you have no rational justification to say that those are fake if you cant even confirm that those are fake... Your personal opinion is not evidence for anything, its not even evidence for yourself... "But Stalin ( or his IT specialist )is already a photoshopping in WOII. " ? Do you seriously think that they used computer to remove people from photos? "Ánd I have bin fighting 31 years to prove and convince people of massive corruption by the fifa en the KNVB" Good for you, when you can do that you will prove that there is corruption in those places but it will not disprove photos from space... Why do you even mentioning this? Its irrelevant to the topic... "And if I’m wrong a have no problem admitting that. " What would convince you that you are wrong about phots from space? like seriously, what? "If you whant proof of the photoshopping being much earlier then you claimed to know. Leave your email ...." Painting over photos is not a photoshop. Even if you have photoshop 500 years before first photo of earth from space was taken, that will not prove that photos have been photoshoped... Lets say for sake of argument that government is 500 years technologically ahead of general public, they are not, but lets pretend that its true, how would that disprove photos taken from space? Or even, how would that disprove globe earth? Earth is round not because some one said so, but because it provable fact from reality. Anyone can do this, anyone can determine shape of earth without even using a single equation. Photos from space are just cherry on a cake, you can remove cherry and you will still have that same cake... And i don't even like cherries...
1
Or you could say we need robotaxi type service where you could conveniently and cheaply travel between exact points without having to deal with people and still have free time to do your own thing while you travel.
1
What self driving stuff? FSD?
1
Have you seen those images? You have clear signs of potholes caused by rocket impacts. If it was sabotage you would not have those... Unless you want to claim that some one with short range rockets attacked this air base, which would make no sense as Russian anti air system would have intercepted that... Russia showed how painfully useless it is in the war, it cant even handle Ukraine, it has no chance against EU, NATO or US alone, its none threat.
1
So what you are saying is that Tesla market capitalization grew by 35B in last year?
1
He can't his ENTIRE channel is based on hating everything related to Musk, majority of the videos he made in last few years was about Musk, so he literally can't do it.
1
@jonelectronics510 This isn't science channel, not anymore.
1
You do know that hydrogen cars have their tanks with printed on expiration dates? Right? And for the battery, BEV's usually give you warranty on those for quite some time, in some cases it can be 10 years or 100k miles. You should actually look all this up before you start talking about it.
1
6 hours to get to the launch site? Are you trying to imply that launch site can't be closer than ~500km from nearest settlement? I mean, launching rockets between cities on earth is a stupid idea and never will be a thing, but c'mon, next time use more than 2 brain cells when you write a comment... Why does TF cult member are so dumb?
1
@hovikarnian6035 Well you are one of the examples why TF cult members are so dumb. Why did you assumed that English is my native language? Its not, but if you are not dumb you will understand what I'm saying and you will understand that maybe just maybe not everyone is 100% fluent in specific language. That said, why are you so dumb?
1
Said who? Putin?
1
Waste of taxpayers money. There are allot more people who are allot more worthy to get free ticket to ISS than some random flatearther which cant even grasp basic geometry.
1
Krells Are all of them Christians or have religion based on bible or believers in general? Because what i noticed is that majority of flat earthers are bible based religion believers. So you could add that one to the list.
1
Muslims say: Christians believe that the earth is flat because it's written in Bible Go figure.
1
@Lee.S..B Some Christians dint had any problem with earth being spherical ether... But that's not even relevant here.
1
Why tho? Its only in read mode, so at worse someone takes over control of what you are trying to control, so its as dangerous as any bluetooth controller out there.
1
Hydrogen kind of works in things like buses, as you will have centralized hydrogen refueling place and buses generally have more than enough space to have those huge hydrogen tanks in them. Sadly this doesn't work for private passenger cars.
1
if you been in power we would have started WW3 and nuclear war 20 years ago...
1
There is difference between questioning things and denying reality.
1
As a troll, you are bad at it.
1
@dalvinderbasi3495 How do you know that its flawed?
1
@dalvinderbasi3495 And for your "Ukraine obviously thought differently" well, Ukraine used Russian desperation to take this city against them. It's allot simpler to defend inside city than in any place, so Ukraine used this to wipe out more Russian forces than it could have in any other situation with minimal threat to their own army. This is why it was slow and steady fall back across entire city. And yes, citi itself has no strategic value, but it was golden opportunity to cause a lot of harm to Russian army.
1
@dalvinderbasi3495 How do you know that Ukrainians lost more soldiers than Russians?
1
Doesn't look like Russia is doing good job remaining in Ukraine... So like...
1
Biggest exporter of lithium is Australia... Hydrogen cars have their own list of issues, long list of issues, looooooong list of issues.
1
Overused "joke"
1
Why?
1
What?
1
@1laforees829 Still no idea what you are talking about here...
1
@1laforees829 And i still have no idea what you are trying to say here...
1
@1laforees829 Exactly
1
From what Trump did and said so far it doesn't look like he is that friendly towards Putin, but we will see how it goes. In any case, Europe isn't stopping its support and its actually started to prepare plan B in case US stops its own, in that case Europe will simply increase its own support.
1
When that becomes mandatory you will be old enough to actually want this FSD in your car and just relax while driving to work or anywhere else.
1
@blur3253 It will be more or less same as we have currently with horse enthusiasts, you can ride a horse if you want, you will be able to drive car manually if you want too. There is no real reason to be against FSD, its safer, it could get you to destination allot faster if all cars are not human driven, you could remove basically all traffic signs or street lights.
1
First of all, made up numbers doesn't count. Second, you have countless of videos and evidence showing that palestine uses humans as shields, so casualty numbers would be higher than usually. If you don't want civilian casualties then maybe Palestine could start wearing uniforms and stop hiding in hospitals?
1
And this is why no one likes Russians.
1
@ZACKARDO No, he is right, hydrogen cars are electric cars. Hydrogen is just a fuel to charge batteries in that car which will then use its power to turn motors. Difference between hydrogen fuel cell car and pure BEV is that hydrogen car will have smaller battery while containing 3 hyge hydrogen tanks to be used to charge that battery. Its electric car with extra steps.
1
EV scam?... Well clearly someone never researched about BEV's or hydrogen cars.
1
@pub1iuz Santa equal satelite?... Are you saying that Santa is real?... Because you can see satellites, sooo, like... Ok... Most of us stopped believing in Santa when we reached 5 years, but if that keeps you going, you do you. "basic inquiry and logic are difficult for you." You have no idea how ironic this one sounds from some one who fails in basic inquiry and logic.
1
@pub1iuz "You do not see satellites anywhere except in cartoons from nasa. " ISS can be visible with naked eyes, with basic camera with decent zoom not issues there at all. While satellites are allot smaller and you need to actually know where to look to spot one, those can be seen from earth with telescope without any issues. Your personal ignorance on this topic is amusing and sad at same time. "You cannot provide one photo of the fictional space traffic you claim is taking place in orbit around your fictional globe in fictional space realm" What space traffic? And there are thousands of photos from space, but even then you simply scream like a child while saying "Its CGI!!!" so what exactly do you want here? "Talk about irony." Yea, talk about irony... Flat earthers dont even have model which would match observable reality, so not even Hollywood is good enough to make even CGI render of your fictional lalaland let alone you having any actual evidence of it. C'mon... Not a sharpest tool in the shed. Still giving you 50/50 chance that you are just some sad troll who wants attention in holiday time, will stick with this option as alternative is even more sad.
1
Maybe yes, maybe not, but Russia changes their tune (lies) weekly.
1
Like one smart guy once said "There are no chicks with dicks! Only guys with tits!"
1
@SylviaisGod2060 It was, stupid movie in general, but that quote just works.
1
There would be no reason to fake it as FSD already performs on that level and this was in specific place with specific destinations, so it could have been trained specifically to handled this place particularly well. There might have been possible remote access in case car gets stuck, but it would be huge thing for them to fake it. I would be suspicious too if we didn't had FSD on the roads already.
1
First hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, first hydrogen fuel cell was invented in 1966. How much more time do you need?
1
@coloniusdagreat1172 Sunsets. Here, disproved your flat earth in one word, was simpler than tying my shoes. What evidence do you have that we live on a flat pancake world?
1
@coloniusdagreat1172 Even that one word was too complicated for you... So like, what else should I have said? If this is too much, what isint?
1
That's secondary question AFTER you would demonstrate that there is a dome
1
Which part do you disagree with?
1
@iRecordOS "a good book you should look into is zetetic astronomy by Daniel robothum" Why would I care what some guy said in some book? Which is NOT surprisingly is a paid one. After all, there are only 2 types of flat earthers: those who makes t-shirts and those who buys them. You are the one who buys them and Daniel is the one making money from gullible people like you. Start thinking with your own head instead of being constantly scammed. " Rather than me go back and forth I think it’s a good read to give you some experiments that are simple enough to break down and understand" Sunset... One word... Disproves flat earth... Its free, no math is needed. See how simple it was? Sunset. Boom, flat earth disproved. "It was published in 1899 or so" 1899? Ok, lets read some 120 year old book from single guy and believe his bullshit because he said so and lets ignore every single scientist out there who would disagree with his ignorant opinion... C'mon... When it comes to weak arguments this one takes the cake.
1
Andy Andreas Kumaseh Thing is that normal people are not in interest to spend millions or even billions to produce this live feed which would prove something what can be proven by basic observation of sun from earth... And even if some one wasted money to show this 24/7 feed (which is technically impossible, but whatever, its imaginary world you live in, lets pretend that they did this) even if they presented that, you would screamed "Its CGI, fake!" and thats that. Just like you did with every photo/video we currently have, and not because you can actually prove that its fake, but its simply something you dont like...
1
Its less green than BEV, ironically.
1
Are you seriously attacking peoples stutter? Seriously? How low of steam are you?
1
?... How the hell you missed the point of you using 12V battery here?... You are putting in more energy into that entire system than you are getting back out, so you are just wasting energy by using electricity to create hydrogen and then use that for power... Welcome to physics 101.
1
Home fueling?
1
Question of the day: where exactly is terrorist attacks stand in?... You have over 140k deaths by stroke each year and only ~50 deaths by terrorist attacks. You always see "Breaking news" about even attempt in terrorist attack, but you will never see breaking news about some one dying from a stroke... If this is your criteria, then stop talking about terrorists and concentrate about strokes. If not, then your comment is bullshit. Pick one, both will make you look silly :)
1
"Since you have no opinion or facts" Are you saying that 140k deaths by stroke is inaccurate? Are you saying that ~50 death by terrorist attacks each year is inaccurate too? I have my opinion and you would not like it as it really easy to offend Murican snowflakes these days.
1
"I deal with facts not your feelings" So will repeat my question, as you seem to have some trouble with reading "Are you saying that 140k deaths by stroke is inaccurate? Are you saying that ~50 death by terrorist attacks each year is inaccurate too?" " Former Marine here so no flakes here!" Its snowflake, not a flake... Its expression for people who are easily offended by anything. "Your issue is that you want to put an opinion to fact and that is fine but facts do not care about your feelings..." So correct me on my "opinion" that there is 140k deaths by stroke. I will wait of your magical facts.
1
"Where did you get your numbers?" Similar as you as it seems from matching numbers. So isint that means that you have been wrong by claiming that my numbers are not factually accurate? FYI 140k is 140 000 "You are the one that said it was your opinion" Quotation is needed. "By the left's credo we should out law every thing that may be bad for us because we are not capable of making our own decisions" That Murican paranoia... Its like hearing one side saying "we need more strict gun laws" and another screaming "YOU WANT TO TAKE OUR FREEDOM, MAKE US SLAVES!!! HOW DARE YOU!!!!!!!" Flipping hell, relax m8... "but do not hold it against me that I am not as weak as you are" Weak? In what imaginary sense? Having a gun make you strong? Isint it makes you weak for being afraid to be incapable of defending yourself without one? Logic, use it. "and that I do not need protection" So that means you don't need a gun? Yes? " I do not need someone to tell me how to live" And who exactly says you how to live?
1
Because you don't like it?
1
BY this rate Russia should take Ukraine in 5000 years, give it or take millenia. Ukraine plays smart war, Russia just send fodder. Situation switched from Ukraine defending to Ukraine attacking as now Russians just sit in one place and defend current positions. No real gains in last 3months from both sides, which is quite achievement for Ukraine as Russia should be this big bad boy who should have won this war in few days...
1
BEV's you can charge at home or from any outlet out there, you can set schedule to charge your car when electricity supply is cheapest, this includes renewables. You don't need expensive and complex infrastructure to produce, transport and store hydrogen. Hydrogen doesn't appear from thin air, you are spending around 60% more energy from end to end to drive hydrogen car in comparison to BEV... And so on... There is only single benefit of Hydrogen at this moment, its energy density, other than this its losses on all fronts.
1
In your dreams
1
@PSlokol2rist Stop digging deeper hole for yourself... Just stop before your head is still above ground level...
1
@Spha_gatsheni Electric cars will work in more places than hydrogen, that's for certain. It's allot simpler to get a wall socket installed than to get 1million costing hydrogen station which will cost you another arm and leg to keep it running... Do you ever wonder why we don't have that many hydrogen stations in general and why quite few are either being closed permanently or are at like 50% rate of being on maintenance mode? Hydrogen cars sound cool ONLY on paper when you read first line "Run's on thing which it sourced from basic tap water" while ignoring 5000 page remaining explanation why this tech is silly, especially when we already have better alternative: BEV.
1
@Spha_gatsheni Bigger equipment with dedicated refueling and dedicated maintenance crew might kind of work, and I mean, might, but with any small improvements in battery technology that makes less and less sense. Hydrogen definitely doesn't work for passenger cars, there is still small chance for it to work, partially, for anything bigger, anything what can have enough space to house huge hydrogen tanks.
1
@Spha_gatsheni There isn't much to increase anymore, it's basically at peak performance already. Hydrogen fuel cell technology was invented in like 1839, while it improved over all these years, it was tiny steps and in recent decades it basically remained exactly same. There is limited amount of energy per 1kg of hydrogen. Currently we are getting around 40-60% of energy, theoretical maximum would be around 80%, that's basically at max 30% efficiency increase if you can reach limits of physics, which isint really realistic, as theoretical maximum will always be way higher than real world. Just like you could now have LNG tank in your car trunk... We have hydrogen cars, Mirai is one of those. It has 3 huge tanks which makes central console huge, back seat tiny and trunk cramped. Max range: 400miles. And when it comes to weight, ironically enough Hydrogen doesn't have head start here. Tesla model Y is basically exact same weight as Toyota Mirai. To be fair Model Y does have slightly lower max range, but it has allot more space inside of it, so if you would try to get that space back in Mirai you would be down to like 200miles range max. And no idea why you mentioned solar here. You can charge BEV's from solar, in any case you will need less of that electricity for BEV's than you will for hydrogen cars. And NASA is space agency and hydrogen application is way different from what you would be using it for. In some cases hydrogen is better solution than basic batteries, but those are few and in between. And just FYI majority of that is being used as rocket propellant, because you know, hydrogen likes to burn/explode which is perfect for rockets, not so good for passenger cars
1
Actually first globe model appeared in 3 century BCE and we always had people who said that earth is flat...
1
And this is the issue, you don't see any fault of using aluminium while rest of the world does, and for good reason... Aluminium isn't suitable for wires, otherwise everyone would be using it for everything.
1
So I guess people on ISS living for like 6 months are imaginary?
1
TF doesn't like logic...
1
@micahhuppert1374 Nano carbon tube batteries are in extreme early development, while we can create few of those on tiny scale, there is still needs to be made scalable process, which could take decade or two, but tech is here already, it's an issue with scalability, just like hydrogen. Issue is that we have to transition to some sort of alternative. Hydrogen could have worked as middle step between gas and batteries like 20 years ago, but now, there is no point anymore. To build one hydrogen station costs around 1 million bucks, to build one BEV charging station costs around 50k, lets assume that you need 30 minutes of charging BEV and 5 minutes to fill up hydrogen car, which would be 6:1 ratio, so we are still looking at 300k to 1million, its still 3x more expensive to build hydrogen stations. This excludes actual maintenance costs, and believe me, those are huge for hydrogen ones. Top this with the fact that any wall socket can be your charging point only means that hydrogen doesn't really have much chances here to be anything more than someones expensive hobby. Hydrogen sounds only cool on paper, but sadly it doesn't scale when you start looking into it from start to end.
1
@jessebryant9233 "Are you one of those tools who thumbs themself up?" Never give myself thumbs up, like EVER. But thanks for showing yourself to be even that dishonest. "How do you know that?" Because there is no evidence to even imply that there is none material things so its logical to conclude that such thing is not real. I might correct that to satisfy your silly stance to: by current knowledge nothing points to supernatural being real. Would that be better for you? "ALL laws are immaterial" Those are concepts. Are you saying that your wizard you call god is a concept? Because we will agree on that. " And is honesty a physical thing? If so, you don't seem to be in possession of it!" Says some one who accused me of liking my own comment. C'mon, you are the last person to talk about honesty here. "Zrips, stop lying to yourself and obfuscating" You are terrible troll. Is it you who fails to confirm his beliefs in wizards and magic when some one asks him and simply obfuscates answer and redirects conversation? Should i copy/paste exchange where this happen? "Here you again deny the faith you clearly have and demonstrate the very ignorance I was referring to before that you call "dishonesty"" Again, i dont have faith, i have no use from it, but thanks for admitting that faith is a shitty position. "You're a liar" That's what we normal people call: Being dishonest. Calling some one a liar is a huge accusation. Did i called you a liar when you said all this shit which you cant prove to be true? Nope. You know why? Well first of all i'm more honest than you. Second, you might be brainwashed and simply spreading false information without knowing that its false. Lying implies that you know truth. "Consensus ≠ science" Yet when you have majority of actual experts disagreeing with your personal ignorant opinion, well, i will go with experts and not you personal ignorant opinion. "And history is replete with examples of so-called "science" being debunked." Ironically enough in most cases when it was debunked it was due to it not being scientific to begin with but being based on some sort of religion. Isint that strange? "You wish! But no, not at all." As you are not claiming that majority rejects evolution, then it means that we can go with my statement that majority do agree with evolution being true. Cool, we sorted that one out. "You need to pay more attention to what you're reading and not let your emotions get the better of you—that make you say such silly things" Well some one starts feeling his ass burning as it seems. You objected to my claim that majority of scientists accepts evolution, i pointed out to evidence to support my claim and now you just "BUh what majorify sais dont mak it trufh" correct genius, it doesnt make it correct just because majority said it, but when you have waste majority is smartest people on earth and actual experts saying something to be true from that specific area its quite likely that its actually true. Do you seriously go to doctor and when he says that you have cancer you like "Third doctor saying this to me, it must be false!!! And my mailman said that i dont have, so i will go with his personal opinion"... This is your argument basically. "You would need to argue for that—rather than confuse fiction with the claim being made" Does that mean that you are an atheist? Its ironic to see people like you who accuse some one obfuscating while you cant provide actual answer here. So will repeat: Do you believe in some sort of god? Irs YES or NO question. Tho on side note, over the years every single time some one is scared to admit what their position is on belief in god its always ends up with them admitting that they do believe in god. Do you know why? Because atheists are not scared to admit to not believe in wizards and magic, but you do. Prove me wrong and just say "Fuck ALL god's" and lets test my theory here. And wont bother to reply to rest of your childish comment. Friendly suggestion would be to grow up, like seriously, grow up, start behaving like one and try to have decent conversation with people and maybe then you wont look like some generic ignorant troll dush on internet. Just a friendly suggestion.
1
@jessebryant9233 "As for your claim about "nothing" pointing to anything supernatural. Well, that is a claim, not an argument" Its not a claim, if you wish to counter this then present us example of supernatural which was confirmed to be real. Go for it. "What we do know is that nature could not have caused itself—and so something outside of an independent of nature must be responsible. So clearly you're wrong." So clearly you are wrong. No one said that universe caused itself, but that doesn't mean that cause needs to be supernatural. We have more than enough examples of natural thing causing another natural thing. If we are talking about Big Bang, it only talks about ALREADY existing energy/matter expanding from single point, that is not a claim that there was literally nothing before it, so Big Bang could have been caused by another natural thing and not some wizard. "However, the magic you mislabel as 'evolution' is just a concept" Evolution is a fact, you might not like it but that doesnt change the fact that its a fact. "Well, can you demonstrate the first or are you just a liar?" You just did it for me. Calling some one liar without supporting evidence is being dishonest, so thanks for proving me correct. " On the second, you just appealed to something immaterial while deny that anything immaterial exists." Concepts would be electrical patterns in our brains, those are material. "And what belief of mine have I failed to confirm?" Any, you failed to confirm that you are theist, there have been multiple questions from me and others asking about your actual beliefs and you dodged that question by obfuscating it with silly statements like that. Why are you scared to admit that you are theist? Is it so bad to be theist? "First of all, you're lying again, as I don't' believe in anything that could correctly labeled a wizard or magic" Yet you still dint indicated what you actually believe, so until you do so i will say that you believe in wizards and magic. And just friendly suggestion, check definitions of wizard and magic and then check what you believe and try to realize why my labels are accurate. "You are a prime example of the pot calling the kettle black." Wait wait wait, did you just admitted that you believe in wizards and magic? Damn... You never fail to amuse here with your failures. Well atleast we know that you believe in wizards and magic, now what you need to prove is to show that I believe in wizards and magic. "And I think that is more than enough of my time wasted on a lying, unthinking, self-refuting troll such as yourself." Irony is strong with you. "Let me know when you feel up to using your brain..." I always was using one, maybe you are not familiar with that feeling, we can wait.
1
@jessebryant9233 Will make it really simple for you and we will see if you are even honest on basic things. So simple question: Are you theist?
1
@jessebryant9233 Long long it took for you to admit that you believe in god? You were dodging every single time some one asked you what are your beliefs when it comes to god and only after few days when we pressed on you only then you give answer. So why have you been so scared? And you ended with some random quote from your book of fables? Why? I wont even bother to look up what it says, as i honestly dont give a f**k what some old book says, if you think that it should matter then i will start quoting Harry Potter books, after all, yours and Harry books are more or less same, talks about wizards and magic.
1
@jessebryant9233 We are holding your ass over the fire and exposing your dishonesty and its more fun to do that than educating you on reality. Lets make it simple, you believe in magic and wizards, ok, cool, can you prove that your belief is based on actual reality? No, no you cant, so you have irrational belief system. Feel free to prove me wrong he and prove that your god is real, but we all (including you) know that you cant do this because you have been scared in admitting that you actually believe in god which only means that you do understand that you have irrational belief system here. Correct? Correct. So yea, we're clearly done here.
1
@jessebryant9233 I don't have faith, you do. My position is clear: I'm atheist, aka, some one who doesn't believe in god(s), aka some one who rejects claims that there is god. Is that clear enough for you? OK. So now, my position doesn't require evidence to be held, yours do. So on what basis do you believe that there is god?
1
@jessebryant9233 "No, we BOTH have faith" Thats what we call: Straw man fallacy. On top of being dishonest one too. When i say that i dont have faith that means that i dont have faith, making silly claims that you know better what i have is silly at best. "and we practice it every day of your lives!" I don't. "And if you truly are an atheist (and not just an intellectually lazy tool) " So now you even questioning my position? Are you even a theist? You cant be one? Right? I said so, so it must be true... Avoid making such childish accusations or you will get kicked out of any normal debate. Will give you a pass this time as you seam to be learning here how to have normal grown up conversation. "then you should have good reasons for embracing the naturalistic faith" Its not faith. But thanks for admitting that faith is a shitty position to have. "which is the only option available to you" Maybe because we never got confirmation that there is anything besides naturalistic world? Your fantasy land isint included in equation until you can prove that this fantasy land of yours is actually real. "See, YOU'RE the one with the supposedly "scientific" position, mine is philosophical in nature" So basically mine is based on evidence and yours is based on your feelings in your balls? Ok, we don't disagree here. " So what you believe by faith—is wrong!" Rejecting empty assertion that there is so called imaginary friend of yours because some old book said so isint faith, its reason, critical thinking, basic logic, you know, being normal human being. "(There's a little 'evidence' for ya!)" Atleast you added quotes as this isint evidence, learning, good. "Yeah, thinking deeply or seriously is not something you fools are willing to do" Says some one who thinks that some wizard is real because old book said so... Riiiiiiiiiight... Tho on side note, why majority of scientists are atheists? Why majority of philosophers are atheists? Isint that strange? "It is too incriminating and infuriating and frightening! Why?" It wasn't me who was scarred to admit to believe in wizards and magic, it was you, dont project yourself on others, thats not healthy. "Because..." Because i don't care what some random book of fable says? Should i quote Harry Potter book to you? Would that prove anything? Would that make any difference? Nope, nether does your random quote form book of fables about wizards, magic and talking donkeys'. Grow up man, its time to stop believing in magic, just like you stopped (assuming) you stopped believing in Santa, its same thing. Your God is Santa for grown ups.
1
@jessebryant9233 "the FACT that you have a naturalistic faith" And i still don't have faith. Why are you so desperate to put me into faith category? Is having faith so shitty? "(as your comments prove)" My comments say that i dont have faith, those literally say that, you can feel free to prove otherwise, but until you manage to prove that i have faith you will only show yourself being dishonest here by claiming that i have what i'm saying that i dont have. "that you're claiming to be unaware of isn't a strawman" Its a straw man for you to claim what my position is when I specifically said multiple times that its not my position. This is literally a straw man fallacy. "it is the TRUTH of your ignorance and intellectual sloth" Its not for you to talk about some ones ignorance and intellectual sloth... Definitely not up to you... "You do believe that nature dun it" I cant see any evidence to even suggest that it wasn't nature, so why would i believe otherwise? "though you have no idea how" Who cares? Do you know how exactly rockets work? No, no you don't, doesn't mean that those are magical ones... There are more then enough examples where you lack of knowledge how something works, doesn't make that magic by default. "despite the fact that known laws of physics reveal that it is impossible" Key word: KNOWN. Fact remains simple, over entire human history we had exactly 0 instances where answer to unknown was supernatural, not a single time. And every single time when we got answer it was based on natural world laws of physics. So its logical to conclude that next explanation will fall into this category which had 100% success record so far and it wont be one which you cant even prove to be actually real. Its basic logic 101. "Your FAITH is blind, deaf, and literally dumb." Again, stop writing comments while looking at mirror, its just makes you look silly. "it only proves that you're a fool and a self-deluded liar." Is this what you say to your self to make yourself feel better when you realized that you have been lied all your life about this wizard in the sky who will punish you if you brake his immoral laws?
1
@jessebryant9233 "You don't have faith? " Nope, not a tiny bit, faith is useless, complete waste of time. Why you ask? Well it simple, there is no position you could not take based on faith, you can believe that earth is flat based on faith, you could believe that earth is in shape of unicorn based on faith, faith is 100% useless thing to have and i have no use (duh) from having faith in anything due to this. "Well, you've demonstrated otherwise..." Nope. "You've also demonstrated that you are not a critical thinker or a truth seeker" Says some one who believes in magic and wizards because book said so... Riiiiiiight, its me who is not a critical thinker and truth seeker.... Riiiiiiiight... Whatever helps you sleep at night. And again with your silly quotes from your book of fables? You do realize that i'm not even looking them up? I don't give a f**k what some old book of fables says, its completely irrelevant, so why are you continuing with those quotes? Are you so terrible at critical thinking that you don't even realize that quotes from book proves jack shit? So yea, where is your evidence that your belief in magic is rational? Prove to me that you are critical thinker ad truth seeker by presenting actual evidence or atleast sound and valid argument that your god is real, go for it, prove me wrong and prove yourself correct, until you do that you have no right to imply that i'm not a critical thinker when your position is based on book of fables and your feelings in your balls...
1
And this is why its not future as no one will invest billions in construction and billions in maintenance of those stations before there are enough cars to use it, and there wont be enough cars if there are no refueling stations.
1
Bakhmut at this point as a city no longer exists, its all about "win" at this point, they need this victory to boost none existent morale. While Ukraine plays it smart and uses this against Russia.
1
Tranquilo Guy Can you call bowling ball a perfect sphere? Because if you would scaled down earth to bowling ball size, you would have more perfect sphere then that one... Don't mix landscape with earths curvature.
1
Correct.
1
@allgoo196 Where the electricity to produce hydrogen come from?
1
@allgoo196 Cool, as we cleared out that much. Now, did you know that for hydrogen car to travel same distance you will need around 60% electricity from end to end?
1
So basically generic Hybrid car?
1
@bobdown1720 That's how cold works... Mr know nothing...
1
What?
1
@mamuebav Will put it in simple terms. To travel, lets say, 100km, you will need 60% more electricity for hydrogen car than you will need for BEV. Why? Because producing hydrogen takes crap ton of power and then converting hydrogen back to electricity has its own efficiency losses. This adds up quickly. And BEV batteries can be recycled fully and reused to make new batteries more or less infinite amount of times, so once lithium is mined it will be used over and over and over and over again for battery production.
1
So basically everyone should keep outdated broken system just because its too inconvenient to switch over to a better one?...
1
It would be illogical to claim that Aliens don't exist by the share fact that there are billions of solar systems in our galaxy and that there billions of galaxies in observable universe alone and we know that life can originate from none life materials, so its basic logical conclusion to say that Aliens are more like to be real than not. There is completely different question between "Do aliens exist?" and "Did aliens visited earth?". At this moment what you have at best is "We have records of UFO, where UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object which only means that we have flying object which can be anything from glitch in the recorder to actual aliens", that's it. And no, moon landing happen... There is no actual reason to not believe that... Why would moon landing be a hoax? Do you not believe in space or something?...
1
My guess is that Model S Plaid was to close to the roadster stats that it made no sense to make one anymore without some drastic improvements. Plaid already hangs around the limits of physics when it comes to traction, so to gain 0.1s 0-60 for extra 100k might make no sense for customer or Tesla to invest money and time, as it would be low production amount car.
1
@Devilishlybenevolent I guess you are in cult of TF.
1
@longlostwraith5106 TF is making his income from videos about hating Musk, this is why majority of his videos are about him, because its easy money. You only need to make video with title "Musk sucks" and you will get hundreds of thousands views. This is the times we live in, hating on Musk is simply profitable. Proof of that? TF constantly repeats same statements in multiple videos. Like, care to count all videos where TF said that hyperloop is bad idea? How many dedicated videos about hyperloop being bad idea? 10? 30? How many about SpaceX? Tesla? Its fine if you make one video from time too time with something new to include, but when you constantly make same videos about same things with basically identical information, you should start to see pattern here.
1
@Devilishlybenevolent You don't understand how reality works? Don't you? Elon could be pathological liar, doesn't mean that people are not in TF cult. Right?
1
@Devilishlybenevolent Saddest part is that you don't even know to belong to the cult when you are in one. How many videos TF made about SpaceX being bad or that it will fail or that starship is bad idea and so on? 10? 20? 50? While he tried to do 2 live streams with him reacting to test flights and he showed that he knows little to nothing about starship or rocket science in general. Was hyperloop silly idea? Yea. Was earth to earth rocket flights silly idea? Yea. Are those tunnels between 2 points silly idea? Yea. TF explained this hundreds of times by now. Why do you think he keeps repeating same thing over and over again? Because his cult members generate him money each time he says "Musk bad!" It's a cult independent how good or bad Musk or SpaceX or any other company is, you are part of cult.
1
@kain6996 Who stepped down before a major product launch?
1
7 to 1 because they cant hit a shit.
1
@rite980 Yes I'm sure. Even using basic geometry is enough to determine that earth cant be flat. It could be harder to determine exact size of earth, but its spherical, basic observation of sun alone proves that, not even talking about dozens of other ways to do that.
1
@alexs6770 So you basically trying to say that we should not be allowed to talk about things which are not the thing we are? So we can't talk about endangered animal species? No animal rights? I can't talk about cat's because I'm not a cat?... Do you see how ridiculous this sounds?
1
Brains.
1
NATO is defensive alliance, manly defensive against Russia, this is why NATO got 2 new members after Putin decided to start a war in Ukraine. Stop blaming NATO, its not NATO who started this war...
1
We are getting new battery chemistries every single year, multiple of those, and this will only increase with more interest in new battery chemistries we will get. So no, we will not run out of resources to make batteries, like seriously, check actual reserves of those resources needed to make current generation batteries, those increased multiple times because there was a need to find new mining locations for those.
1
What keeps you at this 5% flat earth belief?
1
@yaya9816 "mainly because the government always lies about this" About what? And you do realize that having 10 statements and making 5 false statements in a row will not mean that last 5 are lies too?... Each statement needs to be shown to be true/false independent from previous ones. " i believe her moon landing is fake so they could easily say something like the earth is a sphere and lie too yk?" Earth is sphere because its a fact. Moon landing happen because its a fact too... Government is irrelevant here. That's what i cant understand when people try to bring in government here... Its irrelevant. "and sometimes flat earthers reasonings behind their opinion make sense to me" Making sense and being actually true are 2 different things. And i'm seriously curious which flat earth claims makes actual sense to you? Because they dont even have working model which would not contradict reality. So which claim of theirs could be used to prove that earth is flat? Because claim like this doesn't exist which would only apply to flat earth, would not work on globe and would not be contradictory to observable reality. This simply doesn't exist. "majority of the time i believe it’s round" Why majority? Earth is a globe, full stop, you cant have doubts about observable reality... Basic observation of sun proves that. So why would you some times consider that earth could be flat?
1
Jack Morgan Do you seriously need explicit clarification that when this video talks about round earth that its about oblate spheroid one?... Its not obvious enough that those people are not stupid enough to believe in some flat pancake world or something else by their word used here?...
1
@jackmorgan8931 "What is obvious to me is that they, and you, apparently, are oh so eager to believe something that they, and you, have never, and can never, "prove" to and for themselves but will eagerly accept it as true.." You do realize that you can determine shape of the earth from your backyard? Right?... Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth... And this where they, flat earthers, and you, fail in basic geometry class. "Or have you or those three chaps ever traveled so far into space that you have seen, with your own eyes, that "round" earth.." You don't need to travel into space to determine shape of earth... People 2300 years ago did that... You are 2300 late and still failing to do what they did back in the day... "I mean a few hundred years ago everyone knew that the earth was flat" Everyone believed that because it was based on their ignorance based on "It looks flat, so it is flat" mentality. But what looks flat doesn't make it actually flat. "And they knew the earth was the center of the galaxy" Again, they believed that, mostly due to their religion making them "special" people in more than one meaning, doesn't make it true tho. "well, "they" went into space and "they" took photos and "we" simply have to believe them, right?" No... Its not religion that you should just take "their" word... You can actually verify that... On your own... Welcome to 21st century... " I don't care if the earth is flat and round or flat and square or any other shape, size, and description you care to come up with." Well I can see that you dont care what is actually true, this was already obvious with your conspiracy theory mentality. "are far more zealous in preaching this gospel of a "round" earth" Why are you making yourself look so butthit here? You already said that you don't care what shape earth is, which means that you never actually verified its shape. So why are you buthurt about something what you don't know to be true or false? ""stupid" people who didn't agree with 'em." But they are stupid if they dont agree with 'em, aka reality. Earth is a globe, this is just a fact, no real debate here. I yet to see single flat earther who understand basic geometry, you failed with that yourself, so you classify to be "stupid" in this case. Its not insult, its a fact. I'm stupid in different areas, you seam to be stupid when it comes to this topic. "Yep, starting to sound more like religion than science...to me." Talking about reality is a religion now?... Ok...
1
@jackmorgan8931 "So if I say the sky looks "blue" to me are you going smile and nod and agree or are you going to go into the lecture about it's not really blue, at all, but only appears blue because of light refracting off particles in the air and...." I can do both things depending on my mood. And if its evening, sky might not be blue entirely. And... Sky color can be objectively determined to be blue or not. If we observe same thing, then fine, lets agree that its blue, if we want to be sure that its actually blue, then we will need actual objective evidence of it being blue. Not a rocket science here. But at the end of the day, sky is either blue or not blue, objectively. "I'm simply at a loss to understand why people still argue and debate something that is of no useful relevance within the stuff of simply daily life" Entertainment... Mostly... Secondary reason is to show that we still have gullible and ignorant people in our world and we need to improve educational system to lower this issue. "Why do you, personally, care what anyone thinks or believes about the shape of the earth?" Because your actions will be impacted by your beliefs... Will give most obvious example. Covid. Flat earthers in general thinks that EVERYTHING what government says is a lie, this spills over to things like "vaccinations" and they will tend to not do it just because government said you should do it. So not having herd immunity defeats entire (not entire, but biggest thing) purpose of vaccinations. Believing in stupid shit will increase chances in you accepting other stupid shit which will impact your actual real world decisions, and because you live in a society, your actions will affect people around you, in one or another way. "that it makes you feel really good about yourself to be the smartest kid in the class?" I'm not the smartest kid in the class, just slightly above average. "And if that's the case, then yes, you are indeed just like those preachers because you are determined to convert the world." Convert?... You wanted to say "Educate"? Right? Or are you saying that educating people is converting them into some religion? Should we leave ignorant people ignorant?
1
@jackmorgan8931 "But that makes me "ignorant" because I don't have that "formal education," right?" What makes you ignorant is your lack of knowledge or ability to properly evaluate presented evidence. Earth is a globe not because some smart people said so, its a globe because its objectively is independent of anyone's personal subjective view. "And yes, I am indeed suggesting that the worship this nation has for "formal education" is indeed religious." Thanks for your personal ignorant subjective opinion, but well, its not religious, but still, thanks for your opinion. "I mean "everybody" wants to be "smarter" and more "educated" than those lowly, "ingnorant" blue-collar working folks, right?" Why so many quotation marks? What should this indicate in this instance? There are plenty of ignorant and quite stupid people who makes exponentially more than those with 5 PhD's... So no idea what are you getting too here... Education isn't requirement for you to make bunch of money. "Yes, it is indeed the absence of that pretentious bullshit that I find refreshing." So your entire argument is based on your personal anecdotal experience?... Seriously? This is your entire argument?... Your shitty experience with some workers?... Damn... And just for your ignorant ass, definition of religion is as: the belief in and worship of a superhuman power or powers, especially a God or gods. And ironically enough you are being prick here trying to insult people just because they don't fit your own personal standards. Ironic, I know. But like, do you ever considered that it was you who was not likable and not those coworkers you had issues with in your previous job?
1
Ok. Which source indicate this?
1
@mohdadeeb1829 Yes, can, in a sense that you can avoid any legal punishment as long as it was an atheist who you killed. By their own religion they have a rule which instructs them to go and kill none believers. "There's a difference between Atheist and Anti-Theist. " Yes, those are not even from same category... So yes, those are different.
1
This "joke" was funny first 50 000 times, after next 100 000 it got dull.
1
Because its a feature, not a bug. Driving that "disastrous pieces of garbage" is dangerous for EVERYONE around it, so in general it should not allow you to do it for your and others safety, maybe there could be some option to override it and allow to drive heavily damaged CT at capped speeds and power.
1
RETRO GAMING What do you imagine in your head when you hear sentence "is it flat or round?" Do you think "Is it flat or flat?". Context is a thing and there are no issues to understand what "round" means in this context, especially when you have such ridiculous opposing position.
1
So you believe it because dude said so? You do know that it never was confirmed to be true to begin with. Right?
1
Yea, russia does like propaganda.
1
@@happynineleven Yes yes, Russia threatens with nukes every single week... It got old really quickly, now nobody cares anymore what Putin screams about.
1
What happens? Tesla is like best valued car company in the world... SpaceX is best valued space company in the world... So like... That kind of sounds good to put people with Asperger’s in charge, isint it?
1
That's where investigation come into play. Just like Russia said that they will never attack Ukraine had no value, not having Putin saying that it should have ended in 3-10 days will not mean that this was their plan.
1
@kingorange7739 "If a sperm or egg is left to its own devices, nothing will happen." Doesn't that same thing applies to all human developments? Like, if you do abortion that's basically leaving that sperm and egg (zygote, embryo, fetus) to its own devices. So using your own words "it requires two to tango".
1
@Cortesevasive Where do you put anti air defense system when enemies target is residential buildings or something near those?... Its not like Russian artillery is well known for their precision... Isn't it? And funny enough you skipped other points here from original comment, hard to argue against those?
1
@Methoes123 Your counter rebuttal to my comment was "No it doesn't!"? Are you a child?... because this is how children argue... I'm presenting facts, your response in on 5 year old level... Whats going on here?
1
@Methoes123 I'm schmuck? Your "rebuttal" to my comment was to simply say that you are correct and i'm wrong... It's literally on a level of 5 year old, if its offensive to you, then correct your behavior, but this is literally what it is. If you want to prove yourself correct, prove it, don't assert that i'm wrong and run away like a child, hold your ground and prove that you are not making shit up here. Can you do that?
1
@Methoes123 How do you call some one who makes irregular claims and never actually supports them with evidence? And even if i was schmuck, that doesn't make we wrong and that doesn't make you argument true.
1
And?
1
@electr_icity4613 That's where stupidity comes into play... You have people who doesn't understand basic geometry and they are not even basing their beliefs on any actual facts... Aka stupidity. Tho this can be strong word, but saying that they are simply ignorant would be understatement, so stupidity it is.
1
So by Russia failing to stop this war for 500 days, after multiple major retreats, is somehow Ukraine losing?
1
@victorsamuel8708 How many trillions did Russian spent so far? Is it winning now? Are you jealous that Ukraine actually has friends?
1
@Paul_Wright Russia reported that they took Bakhmut like 6 times by now...
1
Ok, lets try this, http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif can you explain this observation?
1
"will disappear from the ground up cause of perspective and angular resolution..." Perspective NEVER partially hides objects, and i have no idea why you even mentioning angular resolution which is not even on same topic... How the hell angular resolution hides part of the object? How any of those two does that? In which reality do you live in? "listen that fact you’re searching for curve in that photo means your an idiot lol..." I'm not looking for a curvature in a photo, i can see it in a photo... i follow where evidence leads me, i'm not you, i dont make shit up to try and fit imaginary world into reality. "find curve on a horizontal horizon of city skyline should be very easy" How big do you think earth is? like seriously, do you even understand how big it is by globe earth model? Because if you did, you would never made this sentence, as its as moronic as it can get...
1
"We understand exactly its size according to your model it’s not that large" Not that large? Radius of 6,371 km is not that big?... Are you kidding me? "So you’re clearly the one who doesn’t understand size..." Says some one who stands on 6,371 km in radius sphere and complains that he cant see curvature... Riiiiiight... Will make it really simple for you, maybe even you can understand it https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/20170722-105552-feohd-jpg.27878/ basic picture, shows obvious curvature. And yes, your flurspective doesn't explain this, not even close.
1
@adamwaterhouse So basically, like Jan here pointed out, if some one brakes into your house you will simply surrender part of your property just because this burglar could remain in your house indefinitely otherwise? Ukraine isint going anywhere, they are literally fighting for their own land and they are not stopping any time soon. While Russian attack on Crimea was quite different story, it was only Russia vs Ukraine, now its a different story with different leaders on top. Why do you think Russia said that this war will end in 3 days? Because they thought that it will same story as it was with Crimea, but it wasn't. Can't say I see any reason for Ukraine to stop pushing Russians out of their lands and I can honestly see Ukrainians pushing all the way to Crimea and taking it back. For countries still trading with Russia, well, you cant change fundamental supplies needed for your country over night, things like that can take years, but majority of civilized world is against Russia here, just check which countries are in support of this war... Try to notice similarities between those...
1
@adamwaterhouse There is one big reason to not stop: Make an example for Russia. If they stop now Russia will know that they can take countries territories in one or another way. Morale on Russia side is terrible and it will only get worse with time, they are left alone against rest of the world, while Ukraine soldiers are being supported by it and they want to take back what belongs to them. This stalemate situation wont last for long as looses are on both sides and one side will have to change tactics, but its doesnt look too good for Russian side here. We will see how it will end in next month.
1
Yea, next week "Russian lawmakers in both St. Petersburg and Moscow fell of the window, at same time" But they are brave enough to call it out, so kudos for that.
1
What happens if oil runs out? What happens if there wont be any fresh water to be used for hydrogen production? What happens when sun goes supernova?... If materials start to run out, you can have your question, until then, its not an issue and you can always recycle existing ones.
1
@chrismayer3919 This is why we are starting to shift towards renewables before oil runs out... At the moment best option is BEV's, because hydrogen cars ONLY sound good on paper and isn't scalable in reality.
1
He was on one million for past one year, channel is stagnant at best at this point.
1
It helps to 3D scan parts which are reflective
1
Singers Unite If it was only single random video which was not even made to debunk or prove anything to change your mind about shape of earth... Och boy... You are in trouble...
1
People said same thing about smartphones without physical buttons, just look where we are now... Or same thing about cars replacing horses, and just look where we are now... You can't stop progress just because you like the old "feeling" of something.
1
@Bengiatare4real It's fine to have personal hobbies, you can keep those, just like people can still ride a horse or own old school blackberry phone with physical buttons, but those are exceptions and not the rule, same thing will happen with cars, i don't need to hear your car 10 blocks away, keep that to yourself, play a video game if you really want to hear that special sound of yours and be the rainbow man or something.
1
There are situations when you need that extra speed, you might not need 0-60 in 3 seconds, but like when you need to merge with faster moving trafit, that extra umph helps allot.
1
Because you can't afford it?
1
Are you saying that he is fighting himself?
1
Just that you will be paying 10x for fuel and 50x for maintenance. Good luck doing that just to get that sound you want.
1
Cleaner is better, best would be distilled water. This is why majority of hydrogen at this moment is being acquired from natural gas.
1
Yes yes yes, they are advancing and by this pace Russia should take over Ukraine by 2536 year...
1
Isn't it's interesting that you talking about batteries under video which talks about hydrogen cars?
1
We will miss you...
1
You think that BEV's cost you more in taxes than it would by switching towards eFuel?... Naive are we?
1
Because laws of physics prevents this from happening...
1
@DamodarDasKirtan First law of thermodynamics. Will make it extremely simple for you here. You need 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen. And no, those numbers are not backwards. You should see potential issue with your idea here.
1
Yea, what could go wrong by having poisonous gas in your car tank... Biofuels are expensive and have high energy requirements to be produced, so its not a good replacement if you want something what is more carbon friendly. And its not carbon negative, there is no such thing in general. At best you could collect back most of the carbon to create new fuel, but to create it you will need to use energy which will produce carbon which you can't utilize as you already used the one which was already created from previous biofuel cycle... All those carbon negative things only apply to tiny portion of entire cycle, not entirety of it. Carbon doesn't disappear when you create biofuel, all that same carbon will be released back into air. Do some basic research here.
1
@Mentaculus42 Carbon negative would imply that you are actually consuming carbon during which process you either convert carbon molecules to something else, aka bonding/splitting it, or you, well, bond it and store it as solid somewhere. How exactly would that work with biofuel? As while you can bond carbon with hydrogen creating biofuel, at the moment you start using that fuel you will be releasing the same carbon back into air, so you are not getting net negative here, you simply can't. On top of this you need to use energy to actually bond that carbon to hydrogen, not even talking that you need energy to produce hydrogen in the first place, and each energy source will have its own carbon footprint. " is scientifically determined to be substantially CARBON NEGATIVE due to not allowing the methane to enter the atmosphere directly" Which is weirdly sounding fluff without actual meaning. It's like saying that BEV's are carbon negative because by using electric cars you are not using ICE ones... Or that having solar panels is carbon negative because you are not burning coal... That's not how carbon footprint is actually calculated. "Ammonia is toxic, not poisonous" Exposure to high concentrations of ammonia in air causes immediate burning of the eyes, nose, throat and respiratory tract and can result in blindness, lung damage or death. I mean, ok, its toxic which can kill you if you inhale it in higher doses... I stand corrected... Its not poisonous in that sense... Potato potahto. "It doesn’t surprise me that the non-informed public lack basic understanding." Correct, this is why general public still thinks that going with hydrogen or ammonia or biofuel is better option than just going with electric cars. Go figure.
1
@Val-qm9me Simple things are simple, and what is simple is that even if we would live on a space pancake world that would not disprove globe model, because its simply works... What makes water "seeks its own level"? Gravity... And you dont need much of the force to hold ocean... Size has no impact here, its one atom or its entire ocean, same gravitational pull still applies. And for that silly smoke thing... Conservation of momentum... Ever heard of it? For the same reason if you jumped inside place which is going at 500km/h, you will not slam at the back of it... you will land at same exact spot, because this is how physics work... Air moves with earth surface... Its like 5th grade thing here. Most simplistic analogy I can come up here is when you use spoon to move your coffee or tea in your cup, keep constant speed and you will notice that water just follows your spoon, same thing happens with air because earth was spinning for past 4+ billion years, so it had time to catch up with it...
1
Yes, freedom to shoot some one is a nice thing... Yes indeed...
1
You do know that you can charge your car at home over night while you sleep?... And usually to charge BEV from 20 to 80% is like 20-30 minutes, not hours. Please do basic research next time.
1
@gremblorthesackgoblin7953 Different time periods uses different technologies, for better or worse. This is why you wont be doing something like safety tests against 15 year old cars, because those will not have anything close to what modern cars have. In this case you had one car which used aluminum and the other which used steel, that alone makes this comparison void. On top of this he never mentions actual load capacity on that other truck, as it could have been one of the higher classes which can go up to 1800, which is way more than what CT is rated at, so it should have failed way higher where CT failed. Its basically oranges to apples comparison
1
Battery technology has still ways to go, even existing one can be miles better than hydrogen, issues is just production scalability. Hydrogen can have its own place for some time, where energy density is more important than anything else, but it wont last for long.
1
Losses are huge? The fact that Ukraine isint disclosing numbers would be enough to understand that anyone who claims that is making shit up and 99% likely to be from Russian propaganda.
1
@klasykapolskiegohh8798 I bet you don't even know from where hydrogen is being sourced for your "future" of the cars. Do you now? And you haven't even provided second benefit of hydrogen cars besides the one (mentioned not even by you). Why is that? Why do you only speak in abstracts without any specifics?
1
Care to explain? As hydrogen cars are still a flop.
1
2% from entire population believes that earth is flat. This is not a hoax, we simply have bunch of brainwashed people.
1
Dirkardo StEvergreen I don't think so. I mean, do i need to remind you that majority of the world still believes in sky wizard because book said so? Then why 2% who thinks that we live on flatardia is generous? But this is besides the point. Those statistics have been taken properly, excluding possible trolls and all that jazz. So its quite accurate. And just side note: half of population is belove average IQ... Just saying...
1
Dirkardo StEvergreen "God can’t be proven either way" False. God can be proven to be true, he cant be proven not to exist. "plus churches provide community for a lot of people" And? Is your argument that we should keep societies which are based on fables and creates harm just because it can create some good to?
1
Dirkardo StEvergreen "But besides that, my main point is that you can't prove that God doesn't exist any more than you can prove that he can" Once again, this is false statement. If god is actually real then you have actual chance to prove that he is real. While if god is not real then you have no chance to prove that he is not real, because he could be real and be expert on hiding. God claim is unfalsiable, which means that you cant prove it to be false, but you can prove it to be true. Keep in mind that i'm not saying that he is real, its just basic logic 101. " I don't think a society where we tell people what they can and can't believe is a very healthy one" Its double edge sword. In on hand, yea, we should never limit what you can or cant believe. But... There is the main issue with things like beliefs in sky wizards. Your beliefs will effect your actions which will effect everyone else around you which in most cases will lead to more harm then good. Belief in imaginary things which doesn't fit reality is not a healthy thing while at same time you should have right to have those fantasy beliefs... There is no win/win situation here. "churches actually do a lot of good that isn't necessarily broadcasted" And yet you can achieve that and even more without any need to have 30 minute pray before they give out food for hungry... Do churches actually do some good? Yes. Should we have them just because of that? No. We can achieve same things and churches becomes useless. "they do a lot of good things both locally and abroad, particularly with youth" Don't want to throw a stone into your garden... But... Churches prioritize youth because its simpler to brainwash them with all of that whoho. So this sounded like a terrible thing to me... Please leave youth alone... "They don't advertise that but there is a lot of good that they and many churches do behind the scenes that most people aren't aware of." Cool, now find secular groups which help out people, they dont advertise themselves ether, yet they dont ask from people anything, while on another hand churches agenda is to get as many followers as possible while doing all those good things. But this all is quite besides the point: Do we even need religions? Short answer: No. Long answer: No.
1
Flesz You haven't watched this video, don't you now?
1
Imaginary friends have no power here.
1
Cool, what potential does hydrogen have? Like, give actual example.
1
Hydrogen cars have been around for quite some time now, those had their chance to become relevant, it's too late now due to enormous increase in BEV's, so yes, Hydrogen cars flopped.
1
@bh.76 Each time manufacturers tried to bring in hydrogen cars and offer those to buyers it failed. One of the main drawbacks is lack of refueling stations which will remain huge issue due to complexity and cost to make one. It's a lot more complicated and alot more expensive thing to build, not even talking about transportation of hydrogen from plant to station and its storage in general. BEV's main draw back is its cost, which mainly being determined by battery itself, but, battery cost is dropping down rapidly, its performance is increasing with each year, station count is increasing exponentially, not even to mention that you can charge your BEV at your home from basic wall socket. What is my point is that transition to BEV's is allot simpler, faster and cheaper in comparison to hydrogen cars, so Hydrogen cars did flopped. For comparison, as of now we have over 2 million BEV charging stations worldwide, while there are only like 1000 of hydrogen stations in entire world...
1
Because there is tendency to accept other stupid conspiracies if you accepted one of those. Its quite common to see flat earthers who are antivaxxers with excuse as "Government lies" which is used for flat earth claim too. And... Flat earthers don't live alone in woods, they are part of society, so their actions will effect you in your or another way, so fixed that is beneficial for everyone. Tho to be fair, earth remains a globe either way and videos like this one is just for entertainment purposes.
1
@glenrisk5234 Whatever god you believe in, all of them currently have same amount of evidence: none. Atleast big bang is based on observable facts from reality.
1
@glenrisk5234 "Claiming that you do understand is obviously dishonest." Interestingly enough you dint bothered to present actual definition of god you believe in... Yet you complain that people don't understand what you mean by your buzz words... C'mon... Lets be real here... You just want to find excuse here to avoid presenting your argument as you know you cant defend it with actual evidence. "A common misconception but then there is an awful lot of that in the English language?" Word "set" has over 300 meanings, so if you still continuing with your complain that some one doesn't understand you personal interpretation of some particular word while you never bothered to present actual definition of it... What does it tell about you? I'm using most common definition from most common religion, if i got it wrong, cool, correct me and present your definition, otherwise you just complaining here. And what is more interesting that i had similar conversation with some one who complained that i presupposed their position while after couple back and fourths was clear that i did not, he simply wanted to complain about my presupposition what his position is even if it was correct one... This maybe is not the case with you, but as you want to avoid to present your god definition, well, will have to go with most common. "The problem people such as yourself face is that willfully ignoring reality so that it has to be proven to you will sooner or later result in being so far at odds with reality that your survival is no longer tenable?" Whats your point here exactly? It sounded like a word salad to me, can you put it into simpler words? I'm not ignoring reality, i'm atheist, this is most real you can be at this point. So what the hell are you talking about? "Good luck but I have had my fill of dishonesty" What about ignorance and/or dishonesty? Your original comment implies that universe started with a bang, while big bang is an expansion. So ether you know that its expansion and you have been dishonest by saying that its a bang or you are ignorant on this topic. Which one was it?
1
@glenrisk5234 "As for my concept of God it's not relevant" You literally complained that i dont know what is your concept of god and now its irrelevant?... if its irrelevant, why did you complained about it? "You seem to think you can demand I explain this concept to you?" You started this complaining that i dont understand your concept, so if you think that its fine to complain but never clarify why you do that, then well... You do you. "You are grasping at straws it is idiocy. I do not believe it ever began." So you intentionally tried to misrepresent it as a bang and not expansion? "Interpreting them according to your own tradition is obviously idiotic." it is, but at same time, you have dozens, hundreds or even over a thousand different interpretations, depending which religious book you will pick. But the fact that you can interpret one book more than in one way means that you have worthless source of information. And to top that one up. By your logic if religious book says that raping is good then it means it was good when it was written even tho its not today? "If it speaks for itself why don't you know?" Know what? And it doesn't speak for itself as a being... We discover things throw scientific methods. Will sum all this with simple quote: Science made people fly, religions made people fly into buildings.
1
Its not to make any legitimate move here, it's just propaganda move to convince their own people and everyone who supports Russia that they own all those 14 countries, while rest of the civilized world will not accept it.
1
... There is no such thing as cars running on water... You will put in crap tone of energy into conversion and you will get back like 50% of it... So if you already have energy to be used for conversion, then why the hell not simply use that to move your car?
1
@dianaw4827 Give me link to peer reviewed scientific paper which talks about this magical extremely high efficiency electrolysis... Facebook posts doesn't count. I will wait.
1
And this technology you are talking about, what is it exactly? As you would need some sort of median to store that hydrogen, if it low pressure then you will need something lime metal lattice, which is heavy. Otherwise you would need to chill it down to -252C
1
So Hinduism is less false than other religions? Ok. Does it make any difference at the end tho?
1
@user-gn7wb7ht1b But its still wrong... I mean, ok, good for the Hinduism to be less false, atleast in one area.
1
Gas could be free, heck, government could be paying for you to use gas, still would not change anything here... We are transitioning from gas not because its expensive, but because some of us trying to stop killing this planet.
1
Biology ridiculed? What?
1
How long does your car usually last? 5? 10 years? And do you really want to account everything? Like oil spills too? Because that wont really help your case, isint it?
1
@colinboertje3305 Good for you, in 15 years your will be able to buy used electrical car. With something like Tesla model Y you have structural battery which can be easily removed and replaced with new one if needed. But you wont need to do that for cars life time, unless you are some hard core driver who wants to hit one million mile range or something. Average cost to repair ICE car is higher than cost to repair electrical one.
1
Its round... There is no way you can look at it which would result in it being flat.
1
@Argedis It was indicated that consumer returned car because it was "only" at 60% of charge. And it was him who ordered EV to begin with. So like, who is at fault here exactly? If he wanted EV, he got it. If there was some problem with EV not being at 100% charge, well, he could have double checked that before leaving. Like seriously, every car provides estimated distance you can drive with it... So why he drove part way before realizing that it won't be enough?
1
Art Diary Please fact check before you express your opinion about something.
1
Other countries experience some issues as Tesla charge while being smaller and being better isn't being used as a standard, this same issue will be across all countries unless Tesla decided to ditch their superior plug over inferior just to have single charging standard.
1
Fortunately ENTIRE world isn't buying Russian propaganda. How is this special military operation which should have lasted 3 days going on after one year?
1
You should actually fact check and not blindly believe random videos on youtube, especially the ones using AI voice with random clips in it. To put it simply, NO, Toyota didn't invented water engine...
1
@mikehankins4513 Title isn't an argument, so it can't be a paradox on itself... Dummy...
1
@mikehankins4513 Bill being or not being a scientist doesn't change the fact that you have no idea what paradox is. On top of this, was there anything wrong what Bill said here? Is earth now flat because Bill is leftist tool by your words?
1
Where? Why?... Are you drunk?
1
@Tigercuddle First of all, there are multiple calculators online where you can get your answer on how high you need to be to be able to see something. Second, that claim about pilots not seeing curvature is just... Stupid... At best. Give me photo or video from high altitude which was taken without fish eye lens and I will show you curvature in it, simple as that. Earth is a globe, this was known for more than 2000 years... And you need to go back to middle school and learn basic geometry.
1
Vote counting started in 2012 for next X years, where X is the years Putin will be alive.
1
Its electric car, engines are small and doesn't require any maintenance, no oil change, nothing. Only instance when you would need to do anything with it is if they broke.
1
@FuzzyImages BEV motors are completely closed and requires zero maintenance, this is one of the benefits. This is why engines are usually buried deep inside car as you will not need access to those unless you have complete failure and replacement is needed.
1
Not as bad as Russia
1
@FoodwaysDistribution How try to use more than 2 brain cells at the time. Who is gaining more here, Russia by cutting off posible ukraine counter offensive route and now being able to redeploy their forces in other places or Ukraine by flooding their own lands and cutting themselves from possible attack routes and maybe tiny bit harming on long run Crimea by lowering their fresh water supply?... Why do you people never use your own heads and just repeat Russian propaganda?
1
I heard Russia will not attack Ukraine too, but I guess that one was a lie... Right?
1
@RIFFRAFF104 Its always funny to see people claiming that they don't care when they cared enough to make original comment which is contradictory to your second one. People who don't care never makes comments, because, well, they don't care... And it was Russians who blew it up, not a rocket science here.
1
Actually length of level has no real effect.
1
That would be the case if we didn't had BEV's taking majority of the car market at the moment.
1
Way better than to be flat earther.
1
@noonyahbizness6433 No idea what that means.
1
@o00scorpion00o Isn't that easy as it looks... It's not like you will buy 20k worth equipment to refuel your car at home.
1
So 3 day war being at 170'ish without any meaningful gains by Russia for past 3 months is indication that Russia winning this war? And its not like Russia dint lost nothing until now... You have over 40000 dead Russian soldiers and quite few military equipment. And just FYI if you dint realize this one yet, Ukraine is defending in their own land, so there are no Russian military bases in Ukraine territory to be destroyed, but there is plenty Ukrainian ones... That's how it works when you are defending and not attacking...
1
But you do understand that just because some news papers makes a claim doesn't make it true by default? Right?
1
To much of land they lost in last few days for this to be deception. If they allowed for Ukraine to take some narrow corridor aad then pushed from both sides, then yea, but now... Its 21st century, Ukraine army has real time photos of Russian forces at all times, so they can't just sneak around with 1000 tanks unnoticeable.
1
And interesting side thing, if there was this universal metric which could actually determine how good you are in specific sport, you wont really need to compete anymore as you already got your answer in that magical universal number value
1
Unions are double edged sword, it's not all sunshine and rainbows with those.
1
Jordan is good at making word salads, nothing more.
1
it's not free energy...
1
@spacecowboy07723 They won batte, they recaptured territory, your nick picking of words will not help Russia to win this war. And for love of your god (Putin) watch actual video before you try to make any comments about it, you will look less brainwashed.
1
@spacecowboy07723 if you were smarter you would know that there is a way to get back dislike counter. And no, ratio is not what you want it to be.
1
So defending is as bad as attacking?
1
Should there be white colleges? Back to segregation?
1
Distance doesn't play any role? Size of the planet have no effect either?
1
Simple fact remains that with higher IQ and freedom to reject local religion you will have more people as atheists than theists. What is most interesting with those "theistic" scientist examples, its ALWAYS about someone from 100+ years ago when not believing in god would have meant that everyone automatically reject everything you say and declares you devil worshiper or something. This is not the case in today's world where you can publicly say that you are atheist without fear in losing your job or your head.
1
@stetsonscott8209 "I'm not aware of higher IQ alone being associated with athiesm" It's not like its associated, but there have been studies done which demonstrated that higher IQ will result in higher changes of you not being religious or/and believing in god. Basic example, 33% of scientists believe in god, 83% of people from general public believes in god. There is big difference here when you think that scientist average IQ is like 20 points higher than general publics. Higher IQ leads to more critical thinking and critical thinking leads to, well, atheism due to the fact that all religions cant support their god claims with actual evidence, not even sound and valid argument for it. "I know scientists and mathematicians who are xistians today, they just aren't famous." Its called: Anecdotal evidence. We are not talking about who you know personally, we are talking about average from ALL scientists. "Making the claim that "smart people are more likely to be atheist because of the liberating power of intelligence" unscientific, nonsequite" Its a fact, not some sort of assertion. Just google "Scientists and Belief" and check pew research page, its from 2009, cant see any newer research at the moment, if you have any those should be even more dramatic due to theism being in decline. We can test this really simply: Can you present sound AND valid argument that god is more likely to be real than not? If you can't (you can't, will make prediction here, call me prophet) then doesn't tat mean that people who actually understand critical thinking would not take position which isint even supported with sound and valid argument, let alone evidence? Its really that simple. On top of this, have you ever wondered why countries which have lower educational level have higher level or belief in god(s)? Can you see correlation here?
1
@stetsonscott8209 "He also didn't cite any credible source that scientists that were polled for belief were also tested for IQ (which would be necessary for his claim to go through)" Scientists in average have higher IQ than general public and all accepted studies done will be based on picking random individuals which would mean that you will have average IQ above average from those who got questioned. So if you are data scientist you should have known this. "Higher IQ is associated with creative problem solving, not exactly critical thinking" Let me ask this differently, maybe this will help you out here. On average, do smart people (with higher IQ) less prone to be scammed and fooled? " Critical thought, when taken to the extreme is pure cynicism" Who said that you should take it to extreme?... Are you now going with red hearing here? Or just straw man? " would expect somebody who spends thier time in the epistemic game of the scientific method to see life through that lense" Why do you think science is agnostic when it comes to god? Maybe because there are not supporting evidence for it? Why do you think majority of philosophers are atheistic? Maybe because people cant even muster sound and valid argument that he is real? Science deals with everything what is in reality, at this point god isint part of it and smart people tend to follow simple rule "Everything doesn't exist until proven to exist" "I could be an athiest for all you know." And I don't care, you arguments are still factually wrong. "If you are gonna be an athiest, do it right eh?" What? Rejecting empty assertions needs to be done right? How? What's wrong with current method? "plenty of people with high IQs think wrong things" And here you go, you are doing something what you accused video creator of doing: Anecdotal evidence... There are smart people who believes in forrest pixies... But we are not talking about exceptions here, we are talking about averages. "If you know where those studies are that make the direct link between IQ and athiesm" Quick google search, because doing work for you is my job now. ''Researcher Helmuth Nyborg and Richard Lynn, emeritus professor of psychology at the University of Ulster, compared belief in God and IQs.[7] Using data from a U.S. study of 6,825 adolescents, the authors found that the average IQ of atheists was 6 points higher than the average IQ of non-atheists.'
1
@stetsonscott8209 Well this is a wall of text... "though you freely chose to debate me here, so now it is yours" We are not debating, we just having conversation. Feel the difference. "not to mention one of the authors is widely condemned as racist, remember I mentioned the third reich" This is called ad hominem attack, it's a logical fallacy... "on an apologist blog called" Apologist... Seriously? What exactly did you expected by reading it? Without reading it I can bet 1000000 bucks that this APOLOGIST said that theists are allot smarter than atheists because god said so or anything like that and wont ever present actual peer reviewed data to support it. Did I got it correctly here? And just notice what you did here, you presented personal opinions of some religious people and not actual objective evidence to support one of the sides. Why? Do you think that personal opinion wins or is equal to objective evidence?
1
@stetsonscott8209 "the writer of the article is a statistician who teaches at Cornell" Its interesting that you mentioned his qualification and not actual source he used for his opinion... Why is that? Do you think that having 50 PhD's makes you correct by default in all instances? And no, you wont get your money as you completely failed and only proved my point here. Thanks for playing tho. "Conversations and debates aren't too different" They are, you have actual rules for debates, conversations are just that, conversations. "Also, it would feel like less of a debate if you didn't quote me and then respond with debate analysis language" No can't do. If there is 50 claims/statements you made which i need to address, then its best for me to actually copy paste that and repost to it specifically instead of making one long generic response to everything you said and accidentally making you think that you actually said something correct here. If you want no copy/pastes, then make your responses short, one statement at the time, 2 max. "You seem intellectually dishonest" Thanks, you too. " If you read what I posted they are scientific analysis, and popular writing with scientific citations" I have actual peer reviewed research indicating that your citation of some single apologist is wrong. Which one is more likely to be true? "It is faster to read an article that has already digested the study, and you seemed very resistant to even citing a study" For which claim in particular? I wont really paste links here, as youtube doesn't like those and can automatically shadow delete my response to you. Do you need key words you can use in google? I mean... Its not that hard... Like "Is IQ correlates with atheism" and just pick first peer reviewed scientific paper, not someone's personal opinion, but actual peer reviewed one. "Also, I don't have money to throw around for scholarly article library access and didn't think you would either." Those are free... You will only need to pay for ones which are newer than one year or those created by theists, because god damn, but theists do like to sell books like "Proof that god is real 100!" or "Proof that evolution is 100% false!"... Science is free... Your religion isint... "It is ad-hom, but it's isn't irrelevant ad-hom in light of the study" Not relevant ad hom?... Its like saying "I dint murdered him, I just stopped his existence"... If its ad-hom then it IS irrelevant. Do you even understand what ad-hom is? Even if Hitler said that killing jews is good thing, we know that its bad not because Hitler said it, but because killing people is bad... "Also, you did some ad-hom in your assessment of apologists" There is a reason why they are apologists, their entire life is based on proving that their god is real in any means they can. Its like having article from Mr. Flat Earth apologist about "What is shape of the earth" what conclusion can you draw from this without even reading article? Do you think this article presents evidence that earth is a globe or it will be riddled with "evidence" that its flat? Give me article from unbiased source based on actual objective evidence and then we can talk. "by nitpicking the looser parts of my discourse, like calling a racist a racist" And I have red shoes. Was this information useful to you? Does this information have anything todo with this CONVERSATION? Is pointing out that someone had some racist remarks makes any difference on anything relating to the topic? "I know I'm right when somebody hides behind "wall of text" claims" Cha.... Cha cha cha... Seriously... This was funny! You are right because I pointed out that you wrote a wall of text? Seriously?! This is your best counter?! Not even presented actual objective evidence, just the fact that I pointed a fact about your comment? Damn... "You can leave anytime." Och no, i'm having fun here. Will keep your but over the fire until you run away or admit that you have been duped by believing some apologist nonsense. Och, by the way, give me citations from that opogist, like actual sources he used to conclude what he concluded. Not asking about "But he did this himself" nonsense, because we have flat earthers who claim that they did their research and they proved earth to be flat... Give me actual evidence here! "Plus, I hate typing all this on a touch-screen." And yet you made that wall of text... So you do like to punish yourself for no good reason. "You have a serious case of debunktivitis! " Nah, I just really dont care in being nice with people who pushes their silly religious beliefs on others. Keep your imaginary friends to yourself and we can live happily. "Go take a college level philosophy of science course or two" Funny that, ask 10 random philosophers if they believe in god. "from the bet you lost." Dint lost, but nice try. If you think that I lost it, then give me that peer reviewed data I included in that bet. Do it!
1
@semtex2987 Again... This is topic about flat earth, aka flat sick, and round earth... Like... Its should be obvious... Flat AGAINST round. Where "Flat" is a description of surface, so its flat surface against round surface, so it should be really obvious that its about flat earther against normal globe. And no idea why you bring in german language here, its a video in English and there are quite few expressions in english which would translated completely bonkers into my native language if I did it word by word ignoring actual context.
1
It does imply it to be flat in multiple places and never does it for the globe tho. Not saying that earth is flat, just making clarification here.
1
@sparehead8911 Natalia here never said that earth is actually flat pancake, it was conversation about what bible says.
1
@flight2k5 Still waiting for the verses saying that earth is a globe. When will that happen?
1
@larryg1902 its as round as it comes... Remove atmosphere and it will look exactly same... Heck, just check mars photos, that one doesn't have atmosphere, still looks perfectly round... Isint it?
1
@larryg1902 What previous comment? Care to elaborate here? How is earth not round but atmosphere makes it round?
1
This claim was made by hundreds of flat earthers, guess how many of them provided actual proof that this is what happens... None of them... None... Its a nonsensical claim by itself. If something got hidden over horizon, then there is no way to bring it back into a view with any kind of zoom... This is not how reality works...
1
And once again... Provide a flipping evidence of your claim... Why its like this always? Some flat earther screams that something is true, that he made experiments, that he even have pictures or videos of it, but when asked to present it, they simply ramble for next 50 comments without actually proving a jack shit... But let me be a prophet here: You had a ship or something, it went far away for you no longer being able to see (naked eye) then you took your magical p9100 camera, zoomed in and you got your boat "back"... This is NOT bringing boat back when it went over the horizon... This is simply zooming into an object which was too small for you too see with naked eye... http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif There you go, simple picture, simple proof of curvature, you can zoom as much as you want, will NEVER bring back missing part, because its obstructed by actual earth curvature...
1
Robert Charles Can you read?
1
10k is already more than anyone would want, pushing it further would only require a lot stronger tanks with better and more expensive materials while increasing risk of major failures if something goes wrong. Increasing pressure isn't really an option
1
Millions of scientists are wrong, but you as random person on internet after reading on this topic for 5 minutes know more... Yea, right... And just FYI planet being greener in a sense of more intense green color, doesn't really help you out here... Ot only means that there are more CO2 plants can absorb from the air, it actually works against your entire ignorant taride here.
1
Free fall for some distance, then due to earth being all over you then you would start experiencing lower and lover gravitational pull, to lazy to look up any actual math but in general at exact center of earth there would be 0G due to earth pulling you to all directions more or less equally. At end of day you would simply stop at exact center of earth.
1
@DarrenSemotiuk His question was theoretical on its core... It wasn't question if we could drill hole like this, it was question if there was hole like this and you fall into it what would happen.
1
Agnostics doesn't say that “no one can know”... They say that THEY doesn't know.
1
Mark Howe And millions will say that it only they who doesn't know... Whats your point? I'm agnostic atheist and i don't say that “no one can know” so something is wrong with your original assertion...
1
Wait, isn't this was entire excuse for Russia to attack Ukraine now or to annex Crimea?
1
You have a company which wants to provide cheap rides for everyone and you here like "Atrocity!!! It only benefits rich!!!" like... What did I missed here? Which part of this technology is actually bad?
1
@gustavocardoso5435 Having opinion is fine, but like, could you atleast try to defend it with some actual factual data or something? Like, which part of this technology is actually bad? And why?
1
Magic isn't real...
1
It can, but its more efficient to convert hydrogen into electricity than to use it as explosive fuel.
1
But like... We do have dumb people in the world... Or are you saying those dont exist? Because that would be dumb thing to claim, ironically. Point is that there are real flat earthers out there, some just pretend to be one, some are genuine. And just a reminder, for a long long time majority of humanity believed that earth is flat and first globe model "only" appeared 3 century BCE in Greece. So it might take long time until we can eliminate all flat earthers, but in general without gene therapy and increasing minimal IQ to above 90 you will never get rid of them.
1
@dr.gordontaub1702 Being flat earther is just slightly more extreme position than believing in god. Both positions are unsupported, difference is that god can't really be disproven while flat earth was, yet we still have majority of people believing that there is god just because some irrational reasons. There are more than enough flat earthers out there and by some research from entire human population we have around 2% of flat earthers, while most of them believes that earth is flat due to religious beliefs and not because they are literally stupid. Its more of a belief based on indoctrination and people wanting it to be true to support their religious beliefs. Thing is that majority of believers in god are not flat earthers, but majority of flat earthers are believers in god. There is direct connection here. All this aside: Its a fact that we have people who genuinely believe that earth is flat.
1
I always wonder if Americans actually think that there are no world on another side of their country borders... There are quite few space agencies across entire WORLD, quite few in US and quite few private ones too. But then, why its always "NASA lies, so earth is flaaaaaaattttttttyyyy!!!!" Funny thing to note, only conspiracy nuts and trolls use word "sheep" in their comments, just fun side observation.
1
@Matuse Well in any case, quran is wrong.
1
There are BEV's with 500 mile range, duno why you would ever need anything more than that. BEV can be charged in like half an hour, it all depends on charger. Charging car at home from wall socket could take few hours, but that can be easily done over night while you sleep, so no issues there. Chargers are convenience for you and it will be more expensive as its not located at your house and usually can charge your car exponentially faster than you could ever do at your home, so no idea why are you surprised that its more expensive. Infrastructure is growing and its exponentially bigger one. There are under 1000 hydrogen refueling stations in entire world, while there are over 3 000 000 bev dedicated charging stations, so if you think that BEV's lack infrastructure, then hydrogen cars have non existing one. Battery production is expensive, this is why initial BEV price usually will be higher than ICE car, nothing surprising with that. There are Tesla cars made in like 2012 which are still on the road, ironically due to how long lasting BEV batteries actually ended up we don't have enough of those to be recycled and for bigger recycling plants to be built yet, as there isint a real need. And you can recycle majority of the battery and reuse materials for new one. Government can tax hydrogen, because 100% of hydrogen needs to be produced... Differently than BEV's which can be charged from basic solar panels, you would need expensive hydrogen equipment to produce it and to actually pump it to your hydrogen car tanks which might require up to 10 000 psi pressure to do so, which means that you would need expensive pressure pumps which could actually handle pressures like that. Hydrogen is the most abundant element, but there is ZERO of it in a pure form on earth. Biggest supply of it could be from water, but that need crap ton of energy to be extracted from it. If you think that government is forcing you to buy BEV's, then why are you not buying hydrogen car? Support your ideas here, promote hydrogen by actually buying one, be the one who pushes hydrogen cars forwards!
1
Because Putin wants to control everything... This is why Russia is constantly at war with its neighbors and keeps slowly expanding its territory. Its not rocket science you know.
1
So allowing Russia to take over countries by force is fiiiiiiine? Whats next? Allow for puttler to take another country? Then another? What would you say if Puttler decided to attack NATO country? Allow it? What would be your line? This was cutting cancer before it started to spread out and caused long term issues, this will cause less damage on long run than it would have been otherwise. If you want to complain about this situation then go and talk with Puttler.
1
World As War literally
1
@kumarslvr1 "What I am saying is believing in flat earth and not believing in moon landing is not the same thing. " Well yes, those are not the same things and one is less irrational than other. "other is just simply not believing someone’s claim of achieving something" But why? It would be more or less on same level as to say that you dont believe in atoms or anything what you never observed with your own eyes. " I can believe unmanned rockets going out of atmosphere and van Allen radiation belt bit more." But you dint explained why humans going there would be impossible or unlikely to happen… Do you even believe that people are in ISS going around earth? And as you mentioned Van Allen radiation belt... You do understand what "belt" means? Its a strip around earth of radiation. As it was stated, we cant go through it due to radiation when it comes to maned missions... But... Crazy idea here... Lets go around it?... Like what exactly they did with moon missions? They simply went around it... It does take more time, fuel and so on, but this radiation belt doesn't prevent us from going to moon, it simply makes it slightly harder. So like again, what rational thing you could present here so you could not believe in moon landing?
1
@kumarslvr1 "ISS is such a lame excuse that everyone use," It wasn't an excuse, it was to clarify how much you accept and how much you reject. Same institutions which made claim that you have Van Allen radiation belt or ISS with people on it says that went to moon, yet you accept one thing while rejecting other. So i'm wondering how did you picked one over another. "I just simply don’t believe we had the technology during that time to survive out of the van Allen radiation protection belt" Why not? What is the radiation levels beyond this point? Is it dangerous for a mission which takes a week? Even if it was possible death sentence or extreme chance for astronauts to get cancer due to radiation, how would that even disprove that we never went to the moon? And whose data are you using here? NASA? Those same guys who flew people to moon? "no other countries have been able to place a man on moon other than America despite technological advancement by countries like Russia, China etc ." Because one trip costs over 1 billion bucks... Yes, with a B... Its expensive vacation to go and see a dry empty rock... Its not that they cant, they simply don't want to waste money on something pointless as this when Americans already paid for it 12 times... Its allot cheaper to send probes, you can get more or less same results with fraction of the cost. "I think it’s a hoax that was spread intentionally to claim technological superiority over other countries. It’s all a lie according to my opinion" ok, but that just your personal opinion based on your personal ignorance, at best. And maned mission to moon was due to race against Russia. Do you seriously think Russians would have been quite if Americans pretended to be the first who landed on the moon?... Or are you think that every country in the world who has space capability is in this conspiracy? How does that work? Its not enough to have photos of rovers left by those mission on moon? Light refractors left there does cut it ether? What would be enough as evidence for you that we actually been there? "also not believing in moon landing is not same as not believing in atoms" Why not? have you seen them? Who said that atoms are real? scientists? Same people who said that we went to the moon? Like seriously, how do you pick conspiracies? Where is your personal line when you say "Nah this is real" and "yea, this is conspiracy i believe in"? You dismissing moon landing while using data from same people who sent people to the moon, while accepting that there are such things as atoms from same people who sent people to moon, but at same time, not believing in atoms would be ridiculous, but rejecting moon landing is fine... How does your logic work exactly here?
1
@kumarslvr1 "You are just so arrogant to force me your opinion or what you think as facts." I'm not forcing my opinion on you, i'm trying to figure out how you decided to cherry pick one thing over another. "You don’t have much knowledge in the field you defending so much about. " But it seams that i have more than you do, its not being arrogant, its static a fact. "You literally compared ISS and moon landing that if I believe in one I should believe in the other" No, what i actually tried to ask here is if we can put people into earths orbit, house them for infinite amount of times in actual space, what prevents us from sending people to the moon? Will use basic analogy here, you have a bicycle, you can use it to ride to local shop 2km away, that fine by you, but you are saying that its not possible to use same bicycle to ride 20km. So I want to know why this is not possible, what prevents this from happening? You dint presented any actual rational explanation, you basically said "I simply don't believe that" ok, but why? "They are so completely different apart from the fact they both involve rockets and few other things, that’s all. " Not that different. You still need a way to launch people into space, you still need a way to safely house them in space for longer periods of time, provide food, water, air and so on. At same time, ISS gets regular resupplies, but those are not weekly ones, while moon trip took around 1 week, which simplifies quite few things here. Its basically comparison between building a house and simply backing your backpack for a short trip into mountains. "You really are just as ignorant as you assume people who don’t accept your “facts” are" Ignorant? Of what? What i'm ignorant of? Just because you want to reject reality doesn't make you correct by default. Provide me ONE example i'm ignorant about, do it, prove that you are correct and that i'm ignorant here.
1
Och yea, its less flamable, it only vaporizes you in case you puncture that 10 000psi tank...
1
@v3exceed How do you know that it existed? Was it independently verified to exist? Or was it generic "its true because I said so" type deal? Because you can't just kill technology, that dude could have "accidentally" lost his blueprints or something, but nope, as always you have generic story of someone claiming to have magical technology and then they just never ever actually prove it. Claims are not evidence. This falls on its face especially in today's world where we have such things as a new laws in Europe where new cars sold as of 2035 can't be petroleum powered. Why the hell would your big scary oil company not come out and say "Hold up people, we just invented new tech exponentially increasing performance of the cars, no need to switch to electric anymore!!" but nope, silence. Why do you think that is the case? If something appears to good to be true, its most like because it isn't. And for your information, people die, constantly, that doesn't stop conspiracy nuts to go wild with it. Like that story about Mayers supposedly creating water engine and conspiracy nuts saying that he was killed by lizard people or something, without realizing that he dies 13 YEARS later... By their logic if anyone claims to have magical technology and then dies at some point in the future, that means that big oil lizard people offed him for it... Or... Mayers was just one of many scammers?... Argument that big oil killed more efficient way of fuel usage is stupid on its core, its self defeating argument. Big oil biggest threat is its own pollution, is there was magical technology driving that down drastically, heck even by 50% would be major thing, they would be advertising it all over the place and giving out patents for free, but this isn't happening.
1
@v3exceed So there is magical technology which has its name and is known how it works but no one can use it because lizard people did voodoo stuff or something? How do you know that your Pouge Carburetor actually worked? Have you tested it? What is your source "Just trust me bro"? And no idea about what electric car you are talking about, you have to be more specific , we had thousands nut jobs claiming to have laws of physics breaking technology
1
@OYisit And this is my exact point you proved perfectly. You don't have actual evidence, your argument argument sums to "Naha, government bad, conspiracy good, trust me bro". I have no trouble believing something if you can actually provide actual evidence, you just blindly believing a thing will not prove it to be true. Its like you people think that humans can't lie while at same time thinking that government (made of humans) always lies. What if person who claimed to have magical technology is actually the one who lied? Could this be the case?
1
@rinzler9775 So many delusional people in this comment section. Like, lets be honest here, you never been the sharpest tool in the shed, aren't you? As there is common thing between conspiracy nuts, low IQ.
1
@justadutchman5169 We are living in a world like that... What this video is showing isn't actually working technology, this is why it never got adapted, as there is nothing to adapt. Its generic nonsensical claim for clicks.
1
@SeanBook001 Yea, who cares what experts say, lets just listen to random youtube video created for clicks... What could go wrong...
1
@jasonhansen8996 No idea what you tried to say here, care to elaborate?
1
Reality check: If US or Europe countries directly interjects into this war by sending troops, well, that's automatically starts WW3 and this would result in allot more casualties as it is right now... Do you want that? And for that childish thing where you think that US uses Ukraine for weapon testing or some stupid thing like that... Dont know if you are aware of this, but... Just hear me out here... Russia attacked Ukraine. You fallow so far? Good. So, Russia attacks Ukraine, then Ukraine pushes back Russia but needs more military support, then Ukraine asks for help from any country which could help out. Following so far? Then multiple countries from Europe and US decided to help out with military support. So now Ukraine has more firepower to repel its invader with the help of west where Ukraine asked for help. Was this clear enough for your brains or should I use simpler words?
1
Currently this invasion in Russia is called as "special military operation" which means that anyone can actually refuse to go into war as this isint an actual war. But at the moment Russia decides to say that this is full blown war, well, you will have ww3, which wont end in a day, but will end with millions dead.
1
@bendordoy4815 And its fine, you believe what you want to believe. There are those who takes bible more literally and believes what it says: earth is flat. Some just cherry pick what they want to believe and discard everything else. You do you, but bible does advocate for flat earth, doesn't mean that earth is flat, but that just a fact.
1
Funny fact here, glue used in cars is a common thing and quite often then glue hold way better than any welding. Glue isn't the issue, low quality glue would be.
1
@ONLINEWARRIORSFORCHRIST So basically nothing new under the sun, just yet another empty claim like we had for all of those centuries before... How long should we wait until we can call bullshit on your claim? A year? Two? Millenia?... Bible said that Jesus will return in current generation, the current in 30CE, yet nothing happen. So like, we waited for 2000 years, how much longer will it take for you all powerful god to lift his ass and do something?
1
Give us survey which actually proves that. There are multiple studies done on this topic, including relation between IQ and belief in god(s), everything fallows basic pattern, smarter you are less likely you will be theist. I mean, we yet to see actual sound and valid argument for god's existence, so how could smart person who has basic understanding of logic hold irrational belief like that? Some will, but most will not.
1
@bobgarrett7134 " The smarter a person is the more likely they're a theist" That's a claim, not a smart one, still a claim. Now support this with actual research data. "In fact 87% of Nobel Prize winners were Christians or Jews" First of all... You are pointing same exact thing I said before... If you have threat of losing job or even worst, then you will say that you are theist independent if you are. Second, Nobel prize winners are not indication of IQ... Or how smart you have. So that on itself wasn't smart todo. "Arno Penzias, who discovered the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation and the 13.8 billion year age of the universe is a strong believer." Who cares? This doesn't help you here... Yes we have smart people who still hold irrational stupid beliefs, or atleast they say that they do. Who cares? We have actual pew research data from 2009 which shows that majority of scientists are not theists, simple as that, this is not anecdotal evidence like you keep presenting here, its actual data taken from multiple scientists... "the fine tuning of the cosmological constants " It's not fine tuned. Answer me this: Is there a difference between fine tuning and situation where life adapts to existing conditions? This fallacious argument was debunked already, so it not sound and valid. "the unbelievable exactitude of subatomic construction" First of all, i have no idea what you even tried to say here. Second, do you know difference between highly unlikely and imposible? I can toss a coin 100 times, that sequence I will get will be highly unlikely to happen, but it did. Just because you cant understand something will not mean that god did it, its just argument from ignorance or argument from personal incredulity logical fallacy. "Atoms have a lifespan of 26 billion years and their constrained power is immense" Ok?... And I have red shoes... Your point? "BTW the universe will suffer heat death so the material world is temporal -- also evidence for a maker." Still false. Heat death only means that matter will disperse at some point, this have nothing todo with maker... At this point its not even confirmed to be actual fact. How did you ruled out possibility that after this heat death all this energy and matter would start slowly collapsing back into one tiny dot and create yet another big bang? Will repeat this once more. Majority of scientists, actual experts in the fields, are atheists. And from those who still believe in some sort of imaginary friend of theirs, or atleast say that they do, they wont even claim that science proves his existence. Why? Why does actual experts from those fields disagree with YOUR personal ignorant opinion?
1
@bobgarrett7134 "Smart and accomplished people are more likely to be theists" Now support that with actual evidence, objective evidence and not someones personal opinions. "They’re also happier, healthier, and they live longer." I mean, if you lived in a country where people can kill you legally, would you be happy and healthy and live longer?... "All these facts can be easily researched by anyone with intelligence. " And yet you dint presented any sources for your claims. Why? "You like to insult Christians." No, I like to insult Christianity. Avoid making straw man arguments here. And would that really be an insult pointing out objective facts? "The fact most Nobel Prize winners are Christians and Jews can be researched" Do you know why? Will help you out here. Because only in recent times, basically 2 last decades or so, people are no longer afraid to publicly admit that they no longer believe in some imaginary friend. So yes, most Nobel prize winners should be theists as Nobel prizes have been given out for last 120 years... Theists had allot more time to grab all those trophies than atheists... Congrats for making none point here, again. "Pew research is biased." That's literally what pew research isint... That ENTIRE point of pew research... Do you even understand what it is?... You could do some basic google search on it, If you have any brains you can do this. "Nobody believes in a God like that" Reality disagrees with you... Literally... Like seriously, you literally paraphrasing question from a research which indicates that there is a portion of scientists who believes that... Maybe you’re too biased or too dumb to do this. "There is no God like that." There is no god... But like, how would you know? Maybe there is god like this who actually interacts with people (not you) on level like this? How would you know this? On what rational basis can you even make claim like this? "You would ask that God for a Billion dollars cold cash." And? Is your god not capable in giving you billion dollars in cash? Not asking what you believe, asking if your god could do it... Could he? Because even humans could do it, so your god could definitely do it, right? "Man, that answer is ignorant." Answer isint ignorant, question was. "The cosmological constants are fine-tuned to a hair’s breadth" Demonstrate that cosmological constants could not have been any other way... PROVE IT, dont assert it, actually PROVE IT. After you achieve this Nobel price worth thing, then your will need to PROVE that those " cosmological constants " REQUIRE fine tuner. And after all this you will need to PROVE that this fine tuner is actually god. And then you will need to PROVE that this god is your god. Do you see how things actually work in logical and rational world? You actually need to prove shit and not simply assert it just because you religion said so. "Go learn something before you post to me again" Irony. "And atoms were made to constrain that energy" Prove it. "Atoms enough to fill a pinhead could blow a crater in Earth 20 miles across and spread thermonuclear fire for 100 miles. " And I have red shoes. "The sun has given Earth light..." And in few billion years sun will go supernova and vaporize entire solar system. What's your point here? Do you understand difference between life adapting to existing conditions and conditions being made for that life? Because we have quite a few life forms on earth which cant handle sun and it kills them... Just like it would you... Have you ever heard about sunscreen? As something so fine tuned you still need protection from it... Makes total sense... "Humans have been trying to produce viable nuclear fusion for 3 generations without any success." And? Could humans makes monitor you are using right now 50 years ago? Nope. Does that mean that god was required for this monitor to exist?... How the hell you don't even follow your own train of thought and apply it with basic examples like that? Just because we cant do something currently, doesn't mean that we wont be able at all or that it requires god to do it... And just FYI nuclear fusion reactors are a thing and in development which almost hit the self sustaining state which would basically create mini sun on earth which on itself is allot more complex process than actual sun is right now... All these facts can be easily researched by anyone with intelligence. Maybe you’re too biased or too dumb to do this. "The ordered, beautiful, functional, purposeful, and temporal world we live in proves God." Still false. Prove it, dont assert it. Good luck with that. And just FYI you can get Nobels prize in no time if you manage to prove god. So why the hell as you here? Why do people like you think that parroting their preacher talking points proves something what would overturn entire world on youtube comment section? GO get your Nobels prize, be that smart theist, prove me wrong... Prove majority of scientists wrong... Why are you here exposing your ignorance on basic things and still think to have something to show?
1
@bobgarrett7134 "Think for yourself and find your own arguments" Is 2+2=4? yes. Would it change if this was repeated 5 gazillion times? No. So then why would I need to come up with new arguments when old ones work just fine independent of how many times it was already said? "You have no objective facts, just lies" Irony with theists, its amusing. "I go back to the 1950’s" Why? Why not go back to 1905? Lets just go way back when 99.9% of people said to be religious... That will definitely be reflection of TODAY'S world... "Atheists were never discriminated against in the last century." Do you live under the rock? Can someone in US become president if they are atheist? Because funny enough there was pool done about this and question was in line of something like "Would you rather have muslim president or atheist?" where majority picked muslim just because they have same delusion about this imaginary friend. Atheistic discrimination still exists today, its allot less than it was in 1950's, but its still there. Should I remind you about those 13 countries where atheist can be killed legally? "To this day many Muslim countries discriminate if you’re Christian" Not as much as if you were atheist... If you are, then its straight away death penalty. "In the USA and most places there’s religious freedom" Yes, and that doesn't mean that people are not discriminating against none religious... You keep failing to understand basics here. Majority still believes in imaginary friend they call god and most religions say that you should go against or even kill those who doesn't share same beliefs. That's what religions say... "Christians and Jews are fewer in number than Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs who have won less than 2% of Nobel Prizes" And my shoes are red. "Christians are over 65% of winners and Jews are 22%" And my shoes are red. "How I do I know God doesn’t grant all requests?" Newer asked that... But go on, explain to me something I never asked... " I ask God..." That's your problem, maybe it's not your god which is actually real?... "Pew Research is so biased they’re not going to say they’re not biased? " Do basic research and try to understand how Pew Research actually works... But will educate you here, yet again, free or charge. Tho I might start charging you at some point. Pew Research is based on peer reviewed papers. While peer review is based on a method where ANYONE can try to disprove someone's presented claims/tests/conclusions and so on. If no one can then it gets accepted and passes as peer reviewed. This is exponentially better than trying to cite some single dudes claims who is clearly biased towards his religion being true which never got actual peer review done on his claims... Do you see difference here? Because I can make same article as your guy did and claim that 100% off religions are false because I did this scientific research... Would you then believe me? "For insulting me, insulting Christianity, and insulting God" I can insult Christianity all day long, you seriously need to read your own bible and realize how imorally bankrupt that book of fables is. I don't believe in god, so I cant insult imaginary friends, only people who believes in those can be insulted by that, but its not my problem. Duno where I insulted you directly. "There’s no excuse for contemptuous conduct toward believers. " Crusades? Anyone?... I can give you more examples... Just say a word! List is looooooooooong. "You want a source for claims? Here’s the odds of a single protein forming by chance" ? Damn... You dont even understand how chance works... ok... I can now insult you... Do you know what is the chance for me sitting in this exact location in this exact time and typing in this exact text and you reading it at this exact time? Well, its low, i can add more criteria to it which will make it lower than protein forming. Does that mean what you experiencing now isint real? Because by your logic it should not happen because it has such low chance in happening... Yet it did... Why?... Because this is not how chance works, you numbnuts... Chance for past event is 100%, because it already happen... Even winning lottery ticket is like one in 10 million, yet someone gets it all the time... Another thing, again, free education for you. ANY chance value above 0 with infinite amount of tries is equal to 100% for it to happen. So if you want to say "Buh proteins forming is low chance!!!" then give me number of tries it had... You cant, cant you now? Because you are brainwashed one, not me. You don't even understand how propabilities work, I have no hopes for you to know how statistics work anymore... "“You’re out all day and the brightness off the snow might burn your face" So basically... Not a perfect design, isint it? Even you cant handle sun... Weird, isint it? Its like our body isint well designed after all... "Earth couldn’t last a second without the sun" Numbnuts... Earth can last for next billion of years without sun... it would be frozen rock, but earth would remain intact... For humans, well, if sun disappeared right now, we would survive few more months until earth becomes frozen, after that, hard to say. But no, earth would not implode if sun disappears... "You have red shoes and they were made by people" Do you know how we know this? Because we have actual evidence of people making red shoes and we have no evidence of shoes appearing naturally in the woods on some trees. This is not the same with your "Its creation" claim. Demonstrate that it is, not assert it. And funny enough, by your logic EVERYTHING is creation, then how the hell you know what creation is if you have no example of none created thing? You cant have light without darkness, and you can't have creation without things not being created you compare too. "Nuclear fusion will not become a viable man-made energy source. It's too complex. " Smart people disagree with you. Why i'm not surprised? like seriously, we have multiple multi billion nuclear fusion projects across the world, with some already working and demonstrating that its possible to actually make it work and you here as some one who cant even understand how probability works and claims that something is not possible because its too complex... It might be to complex for YOU to understand, but it doesn't mean that its to complex for actually smart people to achieve it. You keep proving my point here about IQ levels and religion being directly tied to each other... Thanks. "Nobody gets the Nobel Prize for Theology" Overturning entire understanding of reality would definitely get you one... Some even got Nobels prize for using duct tape on a pencil... You can definitely get one for proving that this imaginary friend of yours is actually real. Heck, I would give you some money from myself if you could manage to actually prove god's existence... Heck, religious groups across entire world would make you most famous person for proving that their god is real in no time... What's stopping you? Understanding of probabilities?
1
@bobgarrett7134 " Your ramblings are getting worse" Your failure to understand reality isint my rambling. "An atheist could become president if he had a brilliant record on public policy" Not in America he cant, not yet atleast. "I would vote for him" Good for you, but its not you alone who determines who gets to be president. Tho, funny enough, try to apply same logic to Trump, he won election, how many criteria did he fit from your listed ones? So why such high bar for atheist president and such low for theistic one? "There's no excuse NOT to be president if you were born to be" You are not born to be president... There are thousands of those who had no chance in being presidents who could have been exponentially better ones than those who actually have been. "Mother Teresa said..." Who cares? "Since most already know people know God exists, nobody will win a prize for proving this to the few atheists." No, people dont know that god exists, they think that he does. The fact that you cant prove that he is real is enough to show that its only a delusion shared by group of people. On top of this... Why are you so silly here? We have multiple major religions across entire planet. If this is so obvious for most people that their god is real, then why the hell we have multiple worshiped god's? Which one of those is actually real? Allah? Zeus? "The sun is well designed" PROVE IT. You keep asserting shit, but you never actually prove any of that. Why? "People skied for 100's of years before sun screen was ever invented" Yes, and back in the day average life span was 30 years... Do you see correlation here? Improvements of human technology to increase life span of this "perfect" body of ours?... If it was perfect then we would not need sunscreen and we would not be dying from cancer... Fun fact on the topic. Even if we could stop aging, we would still die from cancer. Sooner or later you would get cancer and you would die from it. Unless HUMANS invents cure to fix this flaw in our body. So either human body isint designed or your designer is shitty at his job that even humans can fix quite few flaws with it. "We've spent trillions on nuclear fusion over 3 generations" Yes, and we might spend more over next few... What's your point? You cant make rocket there for rockets are magic and imposible to build? Yes, this is accurate analogy. "Some scientists who quit after 30 or more years of it say it's money down a rat hole." And who cares? Did ANY of them said that it's impossible to achieve? Then who cares what they said about it being money sink at the moment? Every single new technology is money sink at the start, especially while its in development... EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM... "God's existence if proven unmistakably by his mighty works" That's assertion, not proof. "Millions of finely calibrated systems, processes, and mechanisms that all work synergistically prove he's there" That at best would only prove that there was this being who made this world this way, will not prove that he was a god or that he even exists now and it definitely wont prove that its your god. But again, thats assertion, you still need to actually prove it. Otherwise, all this what we see is not made by god because I said so. My statement is as valid as yours, deal with that. "Some people (not many as a percentage) are being deliberately and rebelliously stupid about this" No, those people are actually rational and understands what evidence is. Majority of scientists are that way. And you know what? They are definitely not stupid about this. " I mean, flat Earthers are stupid, but atheists? Oh brother..." Yea, atheists are not stupid, I agree. Atleast in most cases, we can still have stupid atheists, but in general we are not. And just to educate you on reality. Atheism is rejection of a claim based on lack of evidence that there is a god. This can't be stupid position, as simple as that. And you know why? Because over all those comments you made here, none ofthem actual provided any evidence or proof that your god is real, you just keep asserting that he is because you feel it in your balls. Due to this lack of evidence, most rational position you can take is... Atheism... Welcome to reality little one.
1
Don't get me wrong here, Xiaomi cars looks like some cheap and literal embodiment of "Made In China" but having reasons like "It's too fast" or "I could not afford food" sounds more than silly...
1
Stanley Meyer was a scammer... You can't beat first law of thermodynamics. Will make it really clear here. To make 1000g of hydrogen you need 2000g of hydrogen. Yes, you need more hydrogen to create half of it again. Hydrolysis requires a lot of electricity, then you have general energy loses for electrolysis and for hydrogen fuel cell engines which creates huge net loss, aka it's NOT possible to create hydrogen on board without having dedicated battery for that purpose only which defeats entire point of hydrogen car.
1
Which magical pixie dust things you think we need to create hydrogen? It starts with E and ends with LECTRICITY.
1
Cope?
1
@truthrevealer771 Why do you think that quoting book would make any difference here? Why should we care what your book says?
1
@truthrevealer771 Quoting book isint an answer, especially when its a book of fables. Would you be happy if I answered to your question with a quote from Harry Potter books? Would you even care?
1
@truthrevealer771 You do know that bible is book of fables? Right? And do you seriously think that book becomes historic record just because its not saying to be fictional? Because if you do Muslims will want to have a talk with you....
1
While BEV's have like 60-70% efficiency. Hydrogen cars would be better than ICE cars, but still worse than just pure BEV's.
1
You recycle it and reuse materials to make new one. Actual studies have been done and it was shown that BEV's create slightly less pollution from end to end than Hydrogen cars do. This includes everything, from material mining to car's disposal/recycling.
1
@kuunoooo7293 Everyone thought that Russia will be cable to take Ukraine in few days, maybe weeks, just look how that turned out... Clearly Russia issint capable of shit at the moment or it would have done it already. Why the hell would it wait? Its goal was to take over entire Ukraine territory, this is a fact due to their initial attack. So why the hell would Russia drag this war for 460+ days if they could have ended this war long before?
1
That's not how spirit level works...
1
@AnselmCarasco Sarcasm in text form doesn't really work. You need to be extra clear that it was an actual sarcasm... After all, we are talking about flt earth topic in 21st century...
1
There are multiple verses implying earth to be flat in bible, zero of those implying it to be spherical. And when you realize that it was written by simple people by using knowledge of the world from that time, it matches. And earth is a globe, thing is that bible is wrong here, nothing new tho.
1
@favouredd It never said that its a sphere, but it implied in quite few places it to be flat. Again, that was common belief at that time so it should not be surprising to see same false belief in bible.
1
@favouredd I know, and its not really deformed because of the moon, its deformed because of centrifugal force, but that deformation is extremely small. My point was that bible isint a thing you should take seriously and it makes quite few obvious false claims anyways, so no idea why would anyone use it for anything here.
1
Yes, but then we got actual evidence that Giraffe exists and that people who claimed that those are real are not actual wackjobs... Can you do the same with claims in this video?
1
Elon never said that Tesla will have Hydrogen cars... Congrats, you have been duped. Fact check before you engage in conversations like that. Hydrogen cars will not become a thing, it had its chances, its too late now. And you are not driving on water, you are driving on Hydrogen... Learn the difference here.
1
Its really simple to stop this war... What needs to happen is for Putin to go the f**k out of Ukraine and war stops immediately... But clearly Russians are not interested in peace or this war would have never started.
1
Or, wild idea here, I know, but just give it a shot here, or you could expand that and not use lift? Maybe this one uses lift because its a semi prototype level thing and adding elevator in area where land cost is astronomical was best option? As someone with youtube channel (Liked your videos on flat earth by the way) and named it "CoolHardLogic" you didn't really used a lot of it here. Its like TF going to hyperloop mockup years back and complaining that it wasn't built from space grade materials... Jut use some logic here. By the way, underground tunnels are not a good idea, those can work to redirect traffic, but it's borderline on being useless, basically bunch of effort and money to maybe lower down trafic little bit, it works, but isn't worth the effort.
1
Funny enough even those sources would be better ones than the ones coming for Russian lies.
1
Have you seen haircut of Albert Einstein?...
1
You like literally trying to discredit some one by his haircut... Its called: adhominem attack. Its a logical fallacy.
1
Grow up? You are saying to me to grow up while your "argument" was an attack on some ones hair cut? That's cute.
1
"You seem so worried about my criticism of his hair. Is he your lover?" Damn, some one who said that i should grow up uses 5th grade level insults... Och that sweet sweet irony. "You could have breezed pass my comment" I could, same as you could never made one to begin with. "Do you think I care about what you think or say?" You made 3 extra comments, so its clear that you do care, otherwise you would never even made your original post... After all, only people who seek attention or wants approval from others will make original comments. So you did cared and now you are being dishonest... "Give your head a shake Zippo." Ok, this one would be 4th grade level insult... You should go up, not down...
1
genoa49 ^.^ Well atleast you are grown up enough to realize when you have been defeated, was fun, lets do it again some time.
1
There is no middle here... This is what you are not getting here. Russia attacked Ukraine, peaceful resolution would be for Russia to get the f**k out of Ukraine and then Ukraine retaking ALL of its territories.
1
Acknowledging what stupidity?
1
Because he could be assassinated on earth?
1
What was busted about starlink?
1
Not ruined and no hopeless. Gain is to retake Crimea and all its lands. Join NATO and be safe from Russian attack ever again.
1
Educating Americans... Russia attacked Ukraine, it was doing this for like a decade now. Crimea? Heard about it? Soooooo, basic reality check here. Russia attacks Ukraine because we have senile Putin, then Ukraine asks for help, then help comes. And there is this saying "Enemy of my enemy is my friend", so its logical to help out country being attacked by your enemy. Do you seriously think that Putin would have stopped at Ukraine border? He would have continued its expansion until someone starts fighting back. Ukraine isint part of NATO, this is why support for it started to came in quite a bit later from the start of war. And yes, Americans are not saints, we can discuss their crimes when this war ends.
1
You can always explain things shown in this video wrong or something, instead of just waving your hands and saying that people you disagree with are wrong.
1
Its like saying "Make your own petroleum" while you could do it technically speaking, issue is that it would cost you arm and leg to do it, so this is why no one does it. Same thing with hydrogen, it involves more steps than just sticking 2 electrodes into cup of water.
1
Well, you go to the edge of earth and then... Jump... Och wait... There is no such thing...
1
Is there an edge or not? Because even flat earthers cant decide on this simple question...
1
Sadly this war needs to be won by Ukraine, directly involving NATO countries into this war would automatically start WW3
1
You do know that this is a lie? Right?
1
Because there is no pure hydrogen on earth... 100% of it needs to be produced, ironically most of it is being produced from natural gas currently.
1
Due to basic laws of physics you can't just convert water into hydrogen and then back into water while producing net gain of electricity during that process.
1
You do realize that all those buttons in new cars are not actually directly connected to AC or any other thing, but goes to internal computer which then relays appropriate signal? Which means that you are complaining about something you dont understand here. I have my car and there are plenty of buttons, but i'm only using like 3, one to control heating/cooling, one to control volume and third... Duno, just added third to be more fair. Buttons are not needed, those only add potential failure point, which ironically was an issue and i could not control headlights due to weared off contacts on a dial type button. For FSD, it is in beta, its optional thing for people, but then again, its only still unsafe in a cities, but not anywhere else where you would have straight roads for hours and it would be allot safer for you and others that you would engage autopilot which can react to dangerous situations at any point even if you are half sleeping due to boring roads. After all, 99% of times its a fault of human driven when accident happens.
1
@perpotercommentare You can sell pre alpha stuff if you want, you just need to clearly state on what condition it is while selling it. For grabbing buttons on bumpy road in the dark, which one exactly would you need to engage in situation like this? How often do you use buttons in general? Like honestly, think how often do you touch any buttons besides heating and volume dials? Once a month? Some buttons are soo rare to be used that if I needed to find one at night on bumpy road I would never managed to do so without creating 10x bigger distraction than having clear button on properly lit up screen,
1
@perpotercommentare FSD needs allot of real life data as its based on AI, so you cant just code in "2+2=4" and be done with that, that's not how AI works. Having real people with real trips in real roads in random situations speeds up this AI training by quite a bit. Why do you think Tesla is ahead of everyone else? Its because of share amount of data they have to train neural network on. And while FSD isint perfect in city streets, its generally safer on any other, especially on highways where you can get distracted by driving car on smooth straight line while looking at grey surface for all this time, FSD doesn't get bored. There are basic statistics involving how safe is your ride, with FSD, with partial one and without one. Try to guess which one wins and which one is worst... In 99% of car accidents it will be due to human error, human is weakest link.
1
Why?
1
Put away your tin foil hat... Multi billion companies are attempting to make hydrogen cars, you can buy one today if you really want, so clearly your comment makes zero sense here.
1
@Cole_Cross Then go and buy hydrogen car and support its adoption... Multiple car companies tried to push hydrogen cars, some even offer you 15k on the fuel, just go and buy. But thing is, no one actually wants them and those who tried just sells them as quick as possible. Hydrogen car's simply do not work, those ONLY sound cool in news papers with titles as "Car runs on water" and that's that. It will cost you like 150 bucks to fill up 350 mile range tank. Basically you will be paying 40 cents per mile. This is just not viable option as alternative and its ONLY taking into consideration hydrogen price and not looking into mile long list of other issues surrounding this entire thing. Last year best selling car in the world was Tesla Model Y, fully electric. Electric cars are more expensive for its initial price, but it can and will be cheaper if you drive a lot with it, because electricity price is relatively tiny, maintenance basically non existing. This is why BEV taking over while hydrogen cars never had a chance.
1
@Cole_Cross Check your local hydrogen refueling stations and their prices... By the way, all hydrogen tanks have expiration dates printed on them, which is around 5-8 years, goodluck replacing those. Similar thing with fuel cell itself.
1
@Cole_Cross Same price? Which would be what? Either you have unusually low hydrogen prices or unusually high gas prices.
1
@Cole_Cross Its only in California where you have hydrogen stations which can provide you with some options, check any other state and it will make it crystal clear that its not viable option for anyone. Issue is with how expensive it is to build one and how much money you have to put into its maintenance. Hint: its a crap ton of money. This is why there are under 1000 hydrogen stations in entire world and those numbers barely going up even with government support.
1
@Cole_Cross 5.5-6.5 bucks for a KG of hydrogen? Which station is that exactly? Because of my knowledge hydrogen prices are around 36 bucks per KG
1
I mean, if nuclear fusion gets solved and we have complete excess of energy to burn, then maybe hydrogen could work. But let's talk about such things when those actually become reality. Tho even then, it would only solve ONE of many issues.
1
Its not zero emission car, you still need crap ton of energy to produce hydrogen.
1
Sunset.
1
@Paulman.K Governments are made of people and in some instances you can get nutjob in office who believes random crap, just like you, then he spits out it as a fact and every gullible person, like you, just swallows it. Aliens are quite likely to be real due to share scale of observable universe, but this doesn't mean that aliens actually visited earth. You actually need evidence for your claims and not just "But this guy who works in government said that it's being ruled by lizard people, so I 100% trust his words because it aligns with my already existing beliefs"...
1
@Starstruck-v2u Maybe its not that what's stopping you to go into this field but you actual lack of understanding and ability to comprehend reality?
1
Interestingly enough this video some what twists reality. That same pool indicates that only 2% of people actually believes in flat earth and then you have 64% who actually answered to that question. So its not as bad as it looks like. And then you need to remember that it was a pool from US and only from 8215 people, which is tiny sample.
1
@flatearth9140 Seriously, if you want to troll, you should learn to change your tune when it was debunked ans shown to be stupid in previous comment, atleast that way you can be some what entertaining.
1
@flatearth9140 Yea, its is lol as there isint anything to debunk. But atleast you are trying to entertain us here.
1
@flatearth9140 20 minutes? Lizardmen are slow these days, back in the day it was around 4:20 to get to some ones house who tries to expose them, they are getting sloppy... I'm disappointed.
1
@anthonylandowski9923 I always give 50/50 chance that someone is just trolling when it comes to flat earth claim,doesn't mean I can't just debunk it in either case.
1
Why?
1
Why should it lead to war? Worst case scenario you can always heat your homes with electricity... Or buy gas from other countries... There is literally no point to start any wars over this...
1
Atheism is a lack of belief in god(s), this is who you are born, an atheist. Only after few years you will start believing in god(s) due to brainwashing from people around you. Its easily arguable point if you want to go that route. On top of this, are you seriously want to claim that people in islamic countries who believes different god are not brainwashed to believe it? Do you think that people just magically start believing the same religion their parents do?
1
Pradip Anjara Let me get this straight, you think that Tour shouting out that majority of chemists in the world are wrong because he said so makes him more qualified than Dave who came with peer reviewed scientific papers? Is it because he used slides and not chalk?!
1
@hydrogen-power-gas When you see someone saying "hydrogen on demand" its 100% scam... You can't beat first law of thermodynamics... Will make it simple, you need 2000g of hydrogen to produce 1000g of hydrogen. Do you see TINY issue with those numbers? Water isn't fuel, hydrogen is, but to make hydrogen you need to input crap ton of energy and you will get back only portion of it, aka its a net negative energy, so you simply CAN'T have hydrogen on demand and never will. So congrats, you got scammed, just hoping that you didn't invested in one of those "companies"...
1
@hydrogen-power-gas There is no such thing as hydrogen on demand.
1
Between 0 and 100% of the time in a day, how much of that you spend thinking and hating Musk?
1
What about the people he killed?
1
@TOM-ei9nb "Otherwise without solid facts things like flat earth have somewhat more arguments." Care to elaborate on this one? Like what exactly would flat earth claim have and globe wont?
1
@TOM-ei9nb Lake experiment isint good one and done correctly proves globe and not flat one. Observation of objects disappearing bottoms up over horizon is one of many observations which match with globe and should not be possible on flat one. Issue is not with experiments and observations, issue is with people failing to understand them... Basic observation of sun proves globe earth, this doesn't require any special equipment only 1 buck solar filter and some spare time and you can do this from your backyard at any point. But even that it is too complex for flat earthers. Nothing is. So i will repeat: what exactly would flat earth claim have and globe wont?
1
@TOM-ei9nb "You would have to ask that of flat earth believers then" But it was you who made claim that flat earthers have upper hand in some weird situation, so what it is? "And I clarify that observation of sail or rod technique is a poor technique, because it leads to TWO conflicting result outcomes, period" But its not... Give me second result which could be a cause of objects disappearing bottoms up. "As I said I don't care what shape it is" Which is an issue by itself. That would mean that you dont care what is actually true, I do, many people do care, and less false beliefs you will have less stupid actions you will take. After all, you beliefs will effect your actions in one of another way. "I'm after a clear scientific result, no matter the outcome, while perhaps you wish to say the earth is a globe" Yearth is a globe based on actual scientific results... I have no idea what you are even trying to imply here. I know that earth is a globe because of scientific methods, not because i have this feeling in my balls or something. "But 100 years ago I can see how people would be able argue othetwise" First globe model was made 3 century BCE in Greece... Like I said, there are multiple ways to prove earths shape which doesn't require you to go into space. Size of earth was determined by using sticks or/and by using water wells. You seam to know little to none surrounding this topic in general, yet you want to make comments about it... Why? "By the way earth is not a perfect globe, you know this, it is an ellipsodal globe" Well its oblate spheroid while slightly wider on "bottom" part. I know... Its clear that i know more than you about this topic. I'm not using actual complicated description of earth due to share fact that its irrelevant for basic conversations, its enough to agree that earth is a globe and not flat pancake, what exact shape it is would be quite irrelevant and waste of time if we cant even agree on basic shape. "So I could argue that nearly 100% of globe earths sold in shops are at least a false representation of reality" And i could argue that you are 100% wrong here. That difference in size would be more or less impossible to replicate on globe replicate sold in shops and it would be stupid to even attempt to do it as it would not change anything. On grand scale earth is a perfect sphere, if you want to go into details then yes, you have variation, but that variation is meaningless on globes sold in shops... So yea... Globes sold in shops are NOT false representation of reality, it only could be false if it was shaped as cube or any other shape except sphere. And just to educate you on reality, difference between "height" and width is 0.3% I dare you to find globes sold in shops which doesn't have any warping introduced in their castings which are perfect spheres... You are trying to nick pick some silly things here while exposing your own ignorance while doing that... For your own sake, stop it...
1
@TOM-ei9nb "What makes you pressume you'd qualify as somone who could educate me or others for that matter." Because it clear that i know more than you about this topic? I mean, we already established this fact, we could continue arguing if i know more than you, but it would be quite a waste of time at this point. "You are being aggressive and very arrogant, for what reason?" Aggressive? Arrogant? When did that happen? "Mirrage (things also disappear bottoms up) is a second reason." And when you don't have mirage and you have objects disappearing bottom up, what's then? If you want to start including random phenomenon which could cause similar effect then i could say that in case you have object in between you and ship and you lover your altitude you will observe same effect... Well.. You will... But we are not talking about that, we are talking about clear examples when you don't have mirage, yet objects disappear bottoms up. This is what you would call correct scientific observation when you eliminate anything what could f**k up your results. Tho, what was the first reason? "Which is way closer than the 5.3km horizon line (i may be corrected on this)" Depends... 5.3km would only be correct at specific altitude. So you kind of are and not really. "Arrogance doesn't make one qualify to educate others for that matter" Arrogance is irrelevant in your ability or qualification to education others... Ironically I need to educate you on this one... "Would you care to point out exactly where I made a claim to earth being flat?" Care to point out where i made a claim that you are flat earther? Felling silly? "If you cannot, i urge you to apologize." Yes, please, apologize for implying that i said something i never said. So where exactly did i said that you are flat earther? "Otherwise I'd seem like you are putting words into my mouth and then arguing against them." EXACTLY! You seam to have personal experience in this one, so maybe avoid doing it? Just a friendly suggestion.
1
@TOM-ei9nb So you misrepresented what I said and now made this childish comment and running away? Damn... Ok... Its interesting to see people attempting to corner some one with some silly tactic, but at moment their buts gets burning they just run away like nothing happen. C'mon, be a grown up here, apologize for miss representing what I said and that's that, its not that hard to do...
1
@TOM-ei9nb "My attempt was to highlight the fact that a technique that provides two contradictory results should be rejected" You entire complain was to say that experiment which was done improperly should not be used in any case... Well in that case we cant use anything at all as you can use any method/experiment/calculation/observation in a wrong way which would support both sides and by your rules we should discard it entirely... The Bedford Level experiment is an experiment which proves globe earth, just because you have some flatards who cant do it properly and gets wrong results because of it doesn't mean we should discard that experiment in general... FYI Still waiting your apology for miss representing what I said. Be a grownup and do the right thing! You can do it!!!
1
BEV's don't explode... Hydrogen cars do, same as petroleum cars. Who paid you to say this nonsense?
1
@donpettyandthespacefakers1798 "it’s all in the names Sea Level" Honestly i just hope that you are just some sad troll here and not really serious. First of all, its just a word, second, level is not equal flat, if you spent 5 seconds with google search and extra 5 to read what "level" actually means you would saved embarrassment. "Air Plane" Derives from the French aéroplane, which comes from the Greek ἀήρ (aēr), "air" and either Latin planus, "level", or Greek πλάνος (planos), "wandering". Definition for level: a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point. Now question for you: If you would draw a line which maintains same distance from given point, what would it result into? Will help you out here: It would be a circle. Now do this same thing in 3D and you will get sphere. So level is not equal to flat surface. I'm happy that i can educate you on basics here. "don’t call it sea curve or curve line" Yea, you must be a troll, you cant be that stupid. "while in a airplane does a pilot keep dipping the nose of the plane so it doesn’t fly off into space" Talking like a true aerodynamics expert i see... Not.... You do realize that plane is getting adjusted constantly? Do you seriously think that on a globe model plane should dip his nose 45 degrees down to not go into space?... Damn... Seriously, just admit that you are troll, it would be so sad to realize that you are actually serious here. "Neil Tyson says an oblate spheroid pear shaped" Did you know (i dint) that on grand scale earth is more round than bawling ball? Those differences are sooooo tiny that for general talk we dont even bother to clarify that its actually blate spheroid and slightly wider on "bottom" part, because its such a tiny difference that is basically irrelevant for most use cases. There is no such thing as perfect sphere, every round object has imperfections, but even then for simplicity sake we will call some of those a perfect sphere while they are not, it only depends how accurate we need to be for the task on hand. But yea, I just assume that you are trolling here, you cant be that ignorant on basic reality.. Can you?
1
Its made to be simple and cheap to make so that Tesla could make millions of those in short period of time. Could they make your crab car? Yes, but it would add way more complexity and increase its initial cost and maintenance price for rare instances when this feature would have tiny benefit. Not a good trade deal I might say.
1
Do you expect to go there on v8 engine or something?
1
@OrionDworkinORION 0 to 60 (not 100) in 2.5 seconds is just a by product of how BEV's work, tho honestly HFC cars should be able to do same exact thing as those usually have batteries inside to equalize discharging. And saying that China is doing China stuff doesn't make actual argument against BEV's, it only points out how badly China handles BEV market, nothing more.
1
There might be reason why he i former if he was actually one to begin with.
1
EU provides military support for the country which want' to keep fighting against aggressor... Welcome to reality.
1
Jiminy Rabbitson "Bill Nye is not a scientist" His tile has no real impact here, arguments stand on their own, not on who said them. "nor someone anyone should be listening to for advice" Why not? "(When does life begin Bill? Its a single word answer.)" Its not single word answer... if you think that it is, please, answer to it with a single word... "Havnt heard about the 3rd guy, so maybe he's fine." Third guy was Tyson... Wait, you do know that Tyson is a man and not a woman? Right? You cant be that ignorant... Can't you?
1
You do know you can just reply to my comment directly? No idea how me being alive in 1975 would change anything here. I can be 5 year old or 95, makes zero difference here. Ford can buy whatever they want, doesn't really make that patent actually valuable.
1
Hows that 3 day war going on after 400+ days?
1
@doddermodd Actually... First globe model was introduced 2300 years ago in greece. But you are a lot closer than @Sugaaary was.
1
Or maybe... Just hear me out here... Or maybe tech like this doesn't exist and people simply scamming others by claiming that it does?...
1
Promoting fake videos?... Is someone paying you for this or are you just random internet bot?
1
@KangenAlec You are joking here, right? And you dint really answered to original question here... Why would government which is controlled by religious people would want to hide something what would count towards proving that god of bible or atlest some sort of god is real? Think before you talk...
1
@KangenAlec Soooo, still religious people control religious people and my argument stands... Your point? " My reply they follow the orders." So what people who give orders gain from this childish conspiracy? Because to keep one you would need to spend trillions every year and it would involve millions of people trying to prevent it to spread out... Well that sounds reasonable... Not...
1
@KangenAlec Shouldn't this apply to you? As its not me who denies reality here and you seam to not want to address question here and just trying to dodge with some strange "insults" or something. Who knows... You clearly don't...
1
@KangenAlec Do you even have an actual argument instead of making those childish "No you" comebacks?
1
@KangenAlec So no real argument here then? Ok.
1
@KangenAlec You just spitting our random sentences here, its not a new information, its random blabbering from your side.
1
@KangenAlec When i see some one spiting out random nonsense, I will point that out. Simple as that. Allowing some one to run around and spread nonsense isint my thing, sorry.
1
Congrats, you have been scammed! By the way, I have a bridge for sale!
1
@MrI8igmac 1 gallon? You measure gas production rate in volume?... You do understand that I could go to biggest vacuum chamber in the world and will it entirely with my single fart? Gas needs to be measured in weight, not volume... And no, you can't have diesel generator to create hydrogen, that makes no sense... You will be wasting energy for no reason.
1
Irony is strong here.
1
blowing up dam in desperation doesn't sound like potential win for me.
1
Russia knows that too, this is why they keep threatening with nukes, every single week... But it would be quite hard to explain to Russian people why Putin nuked entire country which he should have supposedly liberate. It's hard to hide nuking a country from your brainwashed people.
1
Funny enough EV have crap tone of safety in them which makes it allot less likely to be hit by EV than you being hit by some random ICE car.
1
@furrier69 Companies can't make those fast enough, so clearly there are enough people to buy brand new EV's... Do you know what car is the best selling world wide? Tesla model Y, its an EV... Basically every single automaker is moving towards EV's, you can't escape that. Increased demand in those increases money amount used to research new battery technologies. So EV's price will be going down and battery technology will be going up. Basic reality.
1
@furrier69 Exactly, why put our eggs in one basket? Because it is now... Oil is limited, its a thing which will run out sooner or later and we are extremely dependent on it at the moment. EV's will not replace 100% of transportation as it would take quite a big jump in battery technology to replace all of it. And, EV's are cleaner in comparison to ICE cars, so its better solution if you want to think about cost for the planet. We can recycle like 95% of batteries with todays technology, this can only increase in the future. EV's can be powered with cleanest most efficient energy sources out there. Just imagine if we finally make breakthrough with nuclear fusion (there is difference between fusion and fission) we would have basically unlimited energy source to power everything we want derp cheap for unlimited time periods. We are going there and we will be there, just question is when. ICE car's haven't changed for decades, because there is nothing left to improve, those are at peak performance and efficiency, while EV's are just at the beginning and those will only go up.
1
@pobeditel_life What?
1
If you want cool v8 noise, go play racing game or something.
1
People want BEV's, thing is that people want good BEV's. Tesla for example are still ramping up production and sells all the cars they produce without any issues. Why? Because those are actually good cars for reasonable price. Hydrogen for passenger cars will never be a thing due to long list of issues relating to it.
1
When is your delusion goes away? Liking your dictatorship?
1
Thing is... Ukraine isn't a monster to kill and destroy civilians.
1
@karnubawax So you are saying that Russia failed to shoot down shitty drones like that which flew from Ukraine?! Damn, you are shitting on Russian air defense so hard here! Och man you people are funny.
1
What? How would digging hole prove anything?
1
@whitelucifax6700 No idea what joke you are trying to make here, sorry.
1
Like Russia cares about its own people... C'mon...
1
Stop watching Russian propaganda sites.
1
@wolfthorn1 "Thank god the Russians were able to shoot down the other 5." You literally failed to understand what Luzr said here, dint you now? " Use your head dude." I do, just like entire world does, this is why entire world support Ukraine and not Russia, go figure. "The Russian authorities began relocating civilians from the city and areas on the right bank of the Dnieper last month." And now give me ONE reason why would Ukraine want to flood entire region when its on the way to retake it? You really need to read something like "war for dummies" as this is not what attackers do, this is what retreating defenders do... There are no reasons for Ukraine to blow up that dam, there are bunch of reasons for Russia to do it. Should I name it or maybe you are smart enough to realize atleast few of those on your own?
1
Its not a debate, its a video about exploring reasons why people believe that earth is flat, its not a debunk of it...
1
Russia could stop this was instantly... So why are you trying to attack US?
1
@gattungen-ng8go Question of the century: In which situation you will get more wounded/dead and why? Crowd member having a gun or not have no effect on my actual question here. In which situation you will get more wounded/dead? Let's assume that 100% of people in that crowd has a gun and they are trained to use it. In which situation you will have more wounded/dead?
1
@gattungen-ng8go So in your head someone with AR15 will do basically same amount of damage as someone with knife? You are desperate to keep your guns to not even see obvious issue with what you are saying here?... Be intellectually honest with yourself, someone with a gun will do way more damage than someone without one and just having knife. And just FYI as this part people fail to understand, no one advocates for 100% of gun removal, people advocate for actual gun laws being implemented and not the joke ones currently present in US. Did you know that you can buy a gun without background checks if you did it at gun shows? So not only background checks have no actual impact on how gun will be used or who is using it, but you can just get one without any checks at all... That's a big issue on its own. People need to know how to use gun, people should be doing regular mental checks to be able to use guns, people need to have safe places to keep those guns which should not be easily accessible by anyone else than the person whose gun it is and this needs to be checked by official representative. Basic protections against random people with mental health issues getting access to guns, no one is advocating that you should give away your right to own guns...
1
Can you elaborate?
1
Riiiiiiiight...
1
Cybertruck reception isn't that good either with few issues, like acceleration pedal detaching and getting stuck... How the hell did that one pass quality control...
1
Saying "third hand" has no actual meaning here. Battery degrades based on its usage and charges. You could have car which passed 10 hands and would still have battery at 99% of health.
1
@bernarddavidson9030 5 years would get you around 90% of battery health. 10 years like 80%. It really depends on multiple factors, just like it really depends how long will your phone battery gonna last. If you use superchargers, it will degrade it quicker. If you charge it up to 100% often, it will degrade it faster. If you discharge it fully, again, faster degradation. Use in extra hot weather can degrade it faster. Same exact things apply for BEV's batteries as it does for your phone.
1
@bernarddavidson9030 Car batteries can and are recycled to around 97%, mostly discarded materials are the useless ones which can't really be recycles. Main materials can be recycled more or less infinite amount of times as those do not degrade like it is with plastic recycling. So non issue there. There are quite few companies currently doing that already. There is enough materials and there is always new improvements in battery technologies. Like for example Tesla no longer uses Cobalt in their batteries. Lithium is still main material, but even that one can be replaced with alternatives. We currently have like 50 different battery chemistries, tho most of them are not suitable in BEV's and those which are still needs improvements in mass production. Like we have carbon nanotubes based batteries which are exponentially better than lithium, main issue with those is current inability to mass produce those and at reasonable price, tho same thing was with lithium or any other technology in general, first few years is always low production rates with extreme price tags.
1
It was banned from EU because of pedestrian safety, as you don't want to be hit by something which has no soft surfaces and have quite few sharp ones which can cause quite a bit of damage even in a light hit. Not even talking about this thing ramming to another car, while people in CT would be safe, the ones in normal car would be, well, not so. Ban has nothing todo with capabilities to tow or even its built quality
1
And this is true because Putin said so?
1
You can recycle battery to like 92% each time, so its not like entire battery will be disposed, it will be reused.
1
This sounds like some sort of cheap scam.
1
@jumbomobile8806 There is no free energy... Anyone who claims otherwise are either scammers or to ignorant to know basic reality. And no, it will not be advertises on EV magazines... Scams tend to not be advertised by respectful outlets...
1
Would it be better to start WW3 and/or nuclear war? Before this Ukraine was asking for help, now its demanding it... C'mon... We are already helping out here... If Ukraine is so unhappy with Starlink, then Musk could just shut it down in entire Ukraine... Would that be better?...
1
@yuki1496ny Did you just got scammed?
1
@yuki1496ny I mean that there are tons of fake videos promising magical solutions, doesn't make those true. Have you ever fact checked your claim here? No? Why not?
1
@yuki1496ny What's the technology called or whats the name of the video?
1
@yuki1496ny So it's just a tv show? Not actual report by actual Toyota? So will ask again: have you fact checked those claims? No? Why not?
1
@yuki1496ny Solid-state batteries are that... Batteries... Not hydrogen storage cube thing you mentioned originally...
1
@yuki1496ny In your video at 0:20 if this is Toyota R&D department then they are in big trouble... And its only a claim, not actual proof that Toyota is even related to this video or its contents. We had videos from respectful (atleast at that time) sources that there is a car which runs on pure water... That magical cube might produce small amounts of hydrogen, but its useless, first of all, you will need to put it into some sort of container, then you will need to collect hydrogen while separating oxygen and then pressurize it and put it into tank... And after that you will need to take out remains of that cube, clean everything and repeat same meaningless task. No one in their right mind would think that this is a good solution, its vaporware.
1
@yuki1496ny What link? Youtube is picky when it comes to any links in comment section, you you will have trouble posting anything if it contains any url. Giving exact name of video and channels name is the best option to avoid auto filtering.
1
Have you seen what happen with this perfect Putin's war in last 400+ days?... its a shit show... So why do you even dream that they could organize something like an ambush of supply routes? And another thing, all the supplies coming from countries which belong to NATO, if Russia strikes anything inside any of those then NATO as a whole would respond which would be demise of entire Russia instantly. Its not like Putin doesn't want to, he can't do shit.
1
Ok.
1
You sound like someone who never ever in his lifetime fact checked anything and just parroting what far left said to him... In which reality does Musk attempting to destroy democracy exactly? Like give me actual example of what he is done or planning to do wich would destroy democracy...
1
@acrylique2976 Him using free speech platform is destroying democracy? Isn't him providing free speech platform negates your entire argument straight away? Kamala spent over 1billion to on its own campaign, I don't think Musk spent anywhere close to that, yet you think that Kamala isn't destroying democracy while actively trying to shut down people's opinions which disagrees with hers?
1
@acrylique2976 Its run by private people? Which platform isint?... And I'm yet to see actual example of someone getting ban for basic speech. If you free speech starts to include actual promotion of harm, well, ban should be applied or basic account suspension as minimum. There is no actual free speech as you still have to limit some types of speech. But in any case X now is exponentially more free than it was under his previous management. First of all, US elections are dumb on its core, 2 party election is dumb... And yes, there should not be any funding of politicians in general, there even should be set specific money amount you could spend on your campaign to avoid rich people spreading their word more widely than rest of the "peasants". 1 billion for political campaign is insanity... No idea about which instance you are talking where government almost shut down because some rich person said something... Care to elaborate on this one? And if it only takes for one rich person to say something on the platform to shutdown government, doesn't that indicate core issue with government and not with that rich person?
1
What western provides is nothing, if western countries actually been part of this war it would have ended long time ago. Its Russia vs Ukraine which got some help from west.
1
@clintonbeavers8311 "how many times does the bible say man will lie to you" Isint that convenient? Write a fictional book and make a claim that people will not believe it which means that it made prediction would some how prove that its correct in other places?... People lie, and people who wrote that book of yours could have lied too. Ever thought about that? "Satan is the Prince of thhis earth so if satan is the prince of this earth do you really think you are being told the truth" Yes. By your own book, it was God who lied and not Satan, so if any of those are real, i would go with Satan, he looks more trust worthy, ironically. " read genesis and job" Why? Why should anyone care what some old book says? And we know that earth is globe not because book said so, but because it verifiable fact from reality. "water dont bend thats a fact" Tides?... Even on flat earth you will have bending water... Do you even know what you arguing against?... "there I can keep going on and on" You can and we will demolish every single thing you say here. You are not the first one with arguments like this, and you are not the last one being educated on reality.
1
@clintonbeavers8311 Its a fictional book with self contradictory claims, bunch of false claims (like shape of earth) with bunch of immoral instructions written by simple ignorant people. Why should anyone care what it says?
1
@clintonbeavers8311 "the prophecy have come true to the letter " First of all, no it did not. Second, even if you had 500 correct prophecies which actually happen, that would not prove that those came from god... "like lots wife was turned into a pillar of salt " What the what now? We have some ones wife in a shape of pillar of salt? What the what now? "show me just ONE thing that's a lie in the bible" Shape of earth? Global flood? Adam and Eve? ... " and prove it " Shape of earth is provable by basic observation of sun. Global flood would have left traces of it happening, which is not the case. And you cant have life springing up to billion difference species across entire world in couple thousand years from one ship... Let alone that you need more than 2 individuals to maintain population... And for Adam and Eve... Evolution... That one is a fact to which proves that Adam and Eve never existed. " he died on a cross" No, he is not, by your own religion he never died... Its called cognitive dissonance... By your own book says that god is immortal and cant be killed yet it claims that Jesus who supposedly is god died... At best h would go into coma for 3 days, but definitely not dying. " for our sins " What sins? "evwrything the bible says is true" I showed that it contains false claims. "this is not a ps4 game this is real life" Well atleast ps4 games are more reality based then your book... So you are right, this is not ps4 game, its even worst...
1
@clintonbeavers8311 "yes the flood did leave its trace" While in reality its not. There are no respected scientist from appropriate field who agrees with you. There are no records in any scientific book that global flood said to happen in bible ever happen... So you are fundamentally incorrect here. "you still didnt prove nonthing" I don't have to, its your claim, its your burden. "sun need oxygen to burn" Sun is not burning, its glowing due to nuclear fusion process... Please, learn basic reality before you try to debunk it. "want more just ask me" Do i want more ignorance? Not really. I would want to get actual evidence, but you dont seam to have any of that. "jesus is the son of the living God repent of your sins and ask for forgiveness" Och, so you will end with a threat?... Nice... Exposes issues with religions quite nicely. "god the father created all" Prove it. Dont assert it, prove it. "may god have mercy upon you" he is genocidal maniac... Atleast this is what you book says. So yea... And what is more strange that you seriously think that you could change god's mind by sentences like that.
1
@clintonbeavers8311 "yes the bible says god flooded the world" And? In Harry Potter books said that there is a magical place... While in reality we know that global flood dint happen. This is one of the reasons we know that your book was not inspired by all knowing being but was written by common people, just like Harry Potter book. There is only one difference between them: One of them claimed to be factual. "besides that the earth is flat" Again, false. basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe. "if you need the scriptures to any of this I will be gladly to send them" I dont need your fairy tales, i need actual evidence that your fairy tales are true... Quoting book will NEVER prove that its correct, especially when its demonstrably false. "water dont bend" Tides? Even on flat earth water bends... So you literally contradicting your own model or basic observable reality... "sun needs oxygen to keep burning" Sun is not burning, its glowing... have you ever seen old fashion incandescent light bulb? That one where its in a glass compartment, yet glows brighter than your future if you keep going on this path of ignorance... "moon landing video shows the american flag waving why because there is air" And now we talk about moon landing hoax... You cant even understand that earth is a globe, how the hell you could understand moon landing? "I can prove all of this" Cool, then prove it. Instead of wasting time with empty claims and some demonstrably false ones, prove them. "can you disapprove it" I did. Next. " the cgi that nasa uses sucks" What CGI? I will ask you same question i asked couple dozens of flat earthers like you, 100% of them failed to answer, so maybe you can: What method you are using to determine that photo/video is CGI? "how man lies to you" Like those who wrote bible? That type of man? "nasa means in hebrew" While in reality N.A.S.A means National Aeronautics and Space Administration " you can thank me latter " For your attempt to brainwash me? No thanks. "do your own research" Why? All of those are your claims, prove them or we can dismiss all of them as invalid without any need to provide counter evidence. "whem you do you will see the truth" Yea, i see it, moon if a globe, sun is a globe, earth is a globe.... Hmmmm...
1
@clintonbeavers8311 "send me proof of just 1 thing that the bible didnt come true" Sorry, but its not my job to disprove your claim, its yours to prove it... Learn who has burden of proof here... "because even your science will back me up" false. There are equally 0 places in science where you will have god as even possible explanation for anything... "people comming back to life" While in reality we have 0 confirmed events like that. Being near death and actually dying are two different things. " telling of stories of heaven and hell" And you think people cant have delusions after being clinically dead for couple minutes?... And even if they actually seen heaven and hell, that would only prove that there is heaven and hell but not that god is real. But you dont even have that... "people getting healed of leprosy of cancer" So why do we have doctors? if your god can heal people, why do we have doctors? And do you know that such thing as remission exist? "science cant explain it " Och, god of gaps argument... Or this argument from ignorance? Science cant explain it, so god much have done it because my book said so... C'mon, this is not how reality works. " look on youtube of people having died" On youtube? Place where you can fake anything you want? YOUTUBE is your evidence for people coming back to live after being dead for hours? SERIOUSLY?! YOUTUBE!? "explain that" Not my job to disprove your claims, its yours to prove them.
1
Said who? Where?
1
Its called truck not because it can tow...
1
@aseldesu Just like any car's... But its not a requirement to have ability to be called a truck, heck in general name "truck" should mean quite different type of a car on its own, so maybe you could argue with that and not capabilities to tow something.
1
@aseldesu Why do you people when you have no actual counter argument start attacking someone's else's grammar? If you lost argument, just admit it and move on, no need to be so childish. By the way, English isn't my native language, had to learn it on my own, so will be making few grammatical mistakes here and there, so forgive me for not being perfect to meet your standards... Take your L and go away.
1
You need extreme pressures, you need to keep it cool and due to the fact that its Hydrogen (tiny molecule) it leaks from basically any tank. Its not as easy as you might think. Hydrogen will never become main stream, it might get its uses in areas where energy density is more important than efficiency and price, but regular cars will never be the ones.
1
@dejan1081 We are moving, but its not related to the shape of earth... So lets start by actually agreeing on the shape of earth, after that we can discuss its movement and how we can detect that. Agreed?
1
You do know that "circle" is a flat disk? I'm not flat earther or religious, but when you present argument for your position you should double check it instead of repeating it what you heard from your local preacher. People who translated bible into multiple versions used word "circle" and not "orb" or "sphere". Why? Why would experts use word which depicts earth as flat instead of accurate word?
1
@MrSparkums Bible was written by simple man who knew jack shit about reality, so its not surprising and expected to see references to earth being flat due to the fact that people at that time believed that earth is flat. I can give you multiple verses pointing to earth being flat while you will fail to provide even single one to point towards globe. I simply pointed out that your original comment about "חוּג" only supports flat earth as you have first translatable word as a flat disk and all bible translations used that word which was translated by actual experts. If you want to argue against it, you are barking on a wrong tree here, go and fix bible and then you will have valid argument here.
1
Ship do not disappear bottoms up over the horizon? So those images are not real? Thousands if not millions of photos and videos showing ships disappearing over horizon bottoms up are fake?
1
@phop101 "The earth might not be flat but it's clearly not round." You clearly dont understand how things work here... You can't have it both ways, its ether flat or not, if its not flat then you have curvature and if you have curvature then it goes all the way around... And why can you ONLY see 10 miles away and not 1000? Maybe because there is curvature in between?... Earth is a globe, you failing on basic geometry will not disprove that.
1
@phop101 "according to advanced geometry something 1 mile away would drop 8inches 2 miles would drop 32inches 3 miles 72 inches and so one" Och this irony... Real advanced geometry would include your altitude, object altitude and actual equation which results in a sphere and not parabola... What yo just mentioned is preschool geometry. "So at 10 miles fishers island would not be visible" Why not? What happens if you increase your altitude? Och wait, in reality you should see further if earth is a sphere... Och no... That means that you failed on preschool geometry... "yet we can see the beaches (with binoculars)" Then you should be able to provide video where you stand on a beach and you can see another beach 10 miles away while at same time you hold that camera as close to the water as possible, lets see how far you will see then... "Oh and why can't we see 1000 miles away is called visual perception" Visual perception? Are you dense?... Do you even know what those words mean?... "Do NOT bring intelligence into the equation when you clearly lack even the rudimentary ability to think critically." Well you clearly didn't bring any intelligence into the equation and you failed with basic geometry here and called it advanced... Irony is strong with you people. "You are sounding dopey" Ok.
1
Because you fell for a silly scam. There is no such thing as electrolysis inside the car which would make any practical sense. You need to put in more energy than you will get back out of that process, basically you need 2 kg hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen. This is besides the point that you can't use generic engine with hydrogen without melting it over the time.
1
US din't even entered this war... How could it be loosing?
1
I mean, cars replaced horses and we still have horses...
1
So many people in here actually believing this nonsense... Sad times to be alive.
1
What method you used to determine that its CGI?
1
Why? Basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat... Spending time and effort for something what will be dismissed by every flat earther is pointless... I mean, there is video where flat earther tried to prove that earth is flat, proved that its round and then made shit up to "explain" why results have been "inaccurate"...
1
False, bible says that earth is a circle, which is not a sphere but flat disk, and earth is not suspended, but constantly fallings towards sun while flying across galaxy. So circle is not a sphere, and constant fall is not suspension. Fail 2 of 2.
1
Are you talking about Russians here? Because this is exactly what happen with them.
1
? Mars has its own resources which can make colony self sustaining. What you only need is initial resources and equipment for you to start scaling up over there. What resources will run out on earth which are needed to colonize Mars exactly?
1
@imacmill Why would you need fossil fuels on mars?... For what purpose?
1
@imacmill You do know that you can make synthetic plastics? Or simply use different materials? Bioplastics is a thing and would be perfect alternative for Mars. There, solved your issue with single word. Now. Besides plastics, for what else you would need fossil fuel?
1
@imacmill Bio-plastic is made from plants... You do know that oil is made from plants too? Right? So bio-plastic is basically the same thing, we just not using it because its exponentially more expensive than just pumping oil from the ground, but it would be perfect solution for Mars colony. "Bioplastics are a type of plastic material derived from renewable biological sources such as corn starch, sugarcane, vegetable fats, or cellulose, as opposed to traditional plastics, which are made from fossil fuels like petroleum"
1
What Ukraine receives from all of those countries is just scraps. Like germany alone has around 2500 tanks. If it was NATO or even EU vs Russia, then Russia would have had zero chances here. While China can have their tank arsenal, logistics of it would be nightmare and basically impossible. And China isnt that stupid to support losing side
1
About what?
1
Brainwashing 101
1
@user-ue3pl2gf4o Gravity is not a magnetic field.
1
@elif.4199 Gravity is attraction between objects with mass. Bigger mass equals to bigger attraction force. This is testable and provable with Cavendish experiment.
1
Yes BEV's catch on fire like 10x less than ICE cars... So like... What is your complain here exactly? Its bad because its not 100% safe?
1
@TungPham-dk3mk It's called "whataboutism", it's basically saying "I know that Russia is a shit country, but look how US is shit too!!!" Yes, US isint saint, no one said that... And this entire conversation is about Russia starting a war in Ukraine and not what US did... Stay on topic.
1
Obvious bot is obvious.
1
Well my table is flat, so i guess we can say that earth is flat too... This entire "debate" is about earth as entirety, is it flat or not. If you want to play semantics here, its not the place. Earth is not flat, period, some areas on earth can be said to be relatively flat, but that doesn't mean that earth is.
1
Whats the difference?
1
Bill Nye is not a source, its a video about few scientists explaining basic reality, you should never take some ones word, always fact check. But why are you so fixated on Bill here? Did he did something to you?
1
Hans Hows that working out for ya? 280'ish shootings in US this year... So its like 1.5 mass shootings every single day... Even news channels stopping to report it as it becoming as common as car crashes...
1
@Tylerd838 Its called "average"...
1
@Tylerd838 Once again, this might be hard for American to grasp, but its an average of shootings. You have time frame, you have amount of instances, you divide both numbers and you get result which quite often results one with a fraction. Average, word of the day for little ones.
1
"tinfoil hatters" I'm guessing you are "tinfoil lover"? By any chance you believe that 5G is for brainwashing or something? How many conspiracy theories do you believe in?
1
@patrickhickman8723 Funny that you said this, you might want to double check what scientific theory is, you might look less ignorant here.
1
Like, what do you want here exactly? Its Putin who wants this war to drag until Ukraine surrenders... Ukraine is defending its own land with all this support we can provide it. What peace talks do you even expect here? Give away portion of Ukraine to Putin just to stop this aggression from his side?
1
@e.a.342 Nuclear waste is "unsolved" because nuclear waste emits particles which can't be contained by simple sealed container, you need to put bunch of heavy material to prevent if from leaking out. This is not the case with battery materials, while those could be toxic to environment, but same thing applies to most elements out there, anything in more concentrated quantities isn't good to environment. We simply need more recycling plants and improve recycling methods, which should come natural as more BEV's gets into circulation and more BEV's starts to become outdated. We are still at the start of BEV's batteries becoming unusable on bigger numbers as BEV's became bigger thing in last decade, so not many to be recycled at the moment. You basically have 10 year delay from BEV production to it being recycled, or even more. We will see how it goes in next few years.
1
What?
1
I guess starting war and killing people for shits and giggles makes you a good guy for Russians... No wonder no one likes you... And no wonder so many countries split from Russia when they got chance to do so.
1
Well that's a bad approach when you deal with reality. Can you see, feel, hear, smell, taste radio waves? Are they real?
1
@Mr.Ramirez95 You completely missed my point here. What i was saying that just because you cant see, feel, hear, smell, taste something doesn't mean its not real. And just to clarify things here, i'm an atheist, but your approach is still broken. One simple example would be black holes, only recently we got an actual image of it, until this point no one ever see, feel, hear, smell, taste it, yet it was real. Do you get my point now?
1
@Mr.Ramirez95 Einstein dint prove that black holes are real, he only showed that those are possible and should be real. Bu then again, go 50 years before Einstein and you don't even have that, yet black holes existed for quite some time now. And not having evidence for something doesn't make it not real, it would only invalidate claim that it is real. Going back to the black hole claim, if some one made a claim 1000 years ago that black holes are real, claim itself would be dismissed as invalid due to none existence of evidence, yet black holes existed, but claim that they are real was never justified at that time. All this comes back to your original claim: If I can't see it, feel it, hear it, smell it, taste it... It's not real. Which i showed to be false. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
1
@flookd5516 What is a woman?
1
@flookd5516 Duno, just looking for a definition of a woman, biologically, psychologically or hoo-hah-ly
1
There arent really any educated flat earthers out there. Any flat earther who looks to be educated isint real flat earther, he just pretends for sake of making money from flat earthers.
1
@ramadadiver59 Will try differently with you: Should abortion not be allowed in ALL situations or maybe there are some when it should be allowed?
1
@ramadadiver59 We are not talking about ethics here, we are talking about what should be legal or not. You might not like that some people wear blue jeans, doesn't mean it should be illegal to do so. And if there are situations when abortion should be allowed, then that's that, abortion isn't illegal. And just to educate you here little bit, abortion is termination of pregnancy and not killing fetus, you can have abortion at 8 months which can still result in viable fetus. But main point remains simple, its all up for the women who is allowing for this fetus to use her body to either allow it or not. If you want to make exception and say that in this situation women looses all rights in her body, then maybe we can by force take one or your kidney and donate it for someone who needs it? After all, if we wont do it then it will result in someone dying, so your opinion on this should not matter, right?
1
@ramadadiver7810 "So you think intentionally killing a human is equivalent to nor liking blue jeans ." Embryo/fetus isn't human. "How would you like it if someone said..." Funny enough this is exactly my point, you should not be able to force someone to do something against their will, this includes "remaining pregnant" "Um no the woman keeps all of her organs" Except that pregnancy changes woman's body for rest of her life. Do basic research on this topic. "It's not a great analogy" Will make even simpler analogy just that you might even understand it. One morning you wake up and you realize that you got hooked up to someone, toubes and all that jazz, if you would disconnect you would kill that other person. Now, question of the year: Do you have right to disconnect? "The two pills used in abortion" And knife can be used to cut bread or to cut throats... What is your point? We have things which can cause someone's death? Yes, yes we do. "Abortions are done precisely too kill" Definition of abortion: the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. While it could be most often, it doesn't mean that it's always that way. By definition abortion is termination of pregnancy and not killing fetus/embryo. And please, for your own sake, learn difference between child and fetus.... I have seen so many people like you who don't even realize that unborn isint a child...
1
@ramadadiver7810 If you think that egg with sperm inside of it is a human, then its yours issue, not mine. "Every ones bodies changes for the " rest of their life " everyday .." Are you intentionally so dense or does it come naturally? "And secondly that is moving the goal posts ." Its called... ANALOGY... Learn basic logical fallacies so that you could avoid making straw man fallacies... Ironically... "You tried to equate pregnancy to organ donation . You have now abandoned that claim" I don't abandoned it, I changed to simpler one you might even understand, as it was to complex for you to grasp idea that someone would do something with your body against your will. I did a favour for you. Will try again, simplifying it once more time: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to use it to save someone's else life? This will be as simple as it gets and lets see if you can muster actual answer here.
1
@ramadadiver7810 You seem to be afraid to actually answer to my analogies, so I have to simply it and you starting to realize that you have no answer which would save your ass here. So will try again: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someones elses life? Its yes or no question, you and do it! I believe in you!!!
1
@ramadadiver7810 You did? I might have missed, so please, answer to this again: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someones elses life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Will repeat question here: Can we take your blood against your will to save someone else life? Its simple question, I know that you can answer to it if you try really hard to use your head and actually be honest about it! You can do it!!!
1
@ramadadiver7810 How ignorant are you? Have you ever heard about umbilical cord? But will repeat question here, you have some trouble with answering to an actual question, so maybe 5th time is the charm with you. Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life? Clarification, as you seem to be extremely confused. My question isn't direct representation of pregnancy, its a question relating to bodily autonomy. So, be a good buy and answer to my question instead of childish tap dance. And yes, its a trap, we both know this and you yourself know that you cant answer to my question without invalidating yours. So good luck! I will repeat same question over and over again until you run away with your tail between your legs.
1
@ramadadiver7810 "The mother also forcibly takes things from the fetus body against their will" You do realize that this doesn't help your argument, but it actually helps mine? Irony... Will ask again: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 My argument would justify separation of mother from fetus... Thanks for agreeing with me here. Th lets go back to my question you are so scared to answer: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Damn, you seriously are no capable in answering to my question... So will repeat, and just try to read actual question here and actually answer to actual question and not something you invented in your head. So lets try it again. Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Will repeat question: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someones else? Answer to this question, dont answer to one you made up in your head, answer to this exact question as its worded. Forget pregnancy, forget fetus, forget previous conversation, actually answer to actual question here. Its YES or NO answer. GO!
1
@ramadadiver7810 Question isn't false dilemma... Are you again imagining something what isn't there? So once more, will repeat question: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 You keep answering to your own made up question, try to actually answer to my ACTUAL question. Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's life? Answer should not include pregnancy, or babies, or fetus or anything related those things as its not the about them. Can you muster that much? Answer to ACTUAL question instead of your childish dodging, it wont help you here.
1
@ramadadiver7810 YES or NO question: Do we have right to take your blood against your will to save someone's else life? I can make it simpler for you as you struggle with that question: Do we have right to take your blood against your will? Do you need it simplified even more? Its YES or NO question, so answer to it with those few letters and not something you made up in your head as a question I dint ask. You can do it!
1
@ramadadiver7810 Och finally, after 50 tries we finally got actual answer to my actual question. Ok ok, lets try to move it slowly, just to avoid scaring you off. If you wake up and you find yourself connected to someone with tubes and you never agreed to this, do you have right to disconnect yourself even if that kills another person?
1
@ramadadiver7810 I'm guiding you with baby steps here, so avoid introducing distractions here. So as you can disconnect from person who was connected to you against your will who would die without you. Ok. Now, what's the difference between this analogy and pregnancy?
1
@ramadadiver7810 In both examples you have someone connected to you against your will and in both cases if you decide to disconnect both will die. Yet you agree that in one situation you should have right to disconnect and in another example you should not be allowed while BOTH examples are same thing... Do you see cognitive dissonance here?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Why are you so desperate to change my example to something you imagined? I never said that you should kill that person before you disconnect... Do you have to kill fetus before removing it? I mean, you can do it both ways, difference is that we know that fetus can't survive this and terminating its life will be most humane option. Same exact rule would apply to my example, if you know that this person will suffer if you disconnect from him and you have no way to save his life, best humane option is to actually ends his suffering in least painful way. Its not rocket science... So as we agree that you have right to disconnect if you dint agreed to it, then I guess we agree what mother should have right to stop pregnancy. Cool, we agree.
1
@ramadadiver7810 Nice, number play. Even if it was 1 gazillion fetus being terminated, will not have any effect on my argument here. Stop introducing irrelevant information here. If you can't support anyone dying due to lack of spare kidney, then we should have right to take yours against your will. Right? This is your logic, right? Your rights doesn't matter if someone needs saving his life?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Do we have right to take your blood against your will? Do we have right to use your body in a way we want against your will?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Funny enough this is exactly what applies to your position here. No matter how many times you will repeat it, mother should have right to choose, not you force her to do what you want.
1
@ramadadiver7810 Should we care if its objective or subjective? Should humans have right to choose what happens with their bodies? Its really simple question and you could even avoid going into distractions and actually answering to it. Can you do it?
1
@ramadadiver7810 Your "consistent" isn't consistent... You want one human body overriding another human body rights... why the hell are you so inconsistent here and self contradictory? If you find yourself connected to another human body against your will, do you have right to disconnect and potentially kill that person or this person who connected to you have higher rights to force you remain connected? Be consistent and answer to this question.
1
So you are saying that Ukraine isint taking Russian territory and Putin complaining about Ukraine taking Russian territory isint true either?
1
" in 10 years everybody would figure out how to make fuel for free" ? You mean like using solar panels to charge BEV's, which already being done by people?
1
@marcslingsby8843 "I love what God loves and hate what he hates" Isint that strange? That your god is exactly like you... Its like he is not real but you simply created him in your mind...
1
@marcslingsby8843 What difference does it make? I can be 5 year old or 95, i can have no education at all or have 50 Nobel prizes... Doesn't make any difference to what i'm saying... Fact is fact, you have imaginary friend you call god you cant prove to be real, then you think that its so good that he agrees on all aspects you do, well, its not strange, its quite normal, imaginary friends tend to be in exact way YOU want them to be. And before you try to be offended by "imaginary friend" label, check its definition, then think about your god claim and try to realize that those are same exact things.
1
@marcslingsby8843 "I'm guessing you are closer to 5" Is it because i'm challenging your fantasy world? You think that putting me under 5 year old category will make you correct? Are you a 4 years old?... Because even me as 5 year old (your assumption) understands how basic logic works, yet you failed on that. "I forgive you for being malicious when you don't believe" Din't asked your forgiveness... Nether should i care... "god's plan..." And Voldemort said... "I used to be a bad person" And i'm not... Whats your point? That having fantasy beliefs makes you better person? Cool, keep them. If only belief in god prevents you from doing bad things, keep believing, will not make it true, but atleast will make you behave like a good person... "but now through verification of many facets of evidence" Could you present BEST evidence you have for god's existence? Like that type of evidence if i would demolish you would atleast stop and reconsider your beliefs? Can you do that? " I would give my life for you !" Why? I dont know you, you dont know me, why would you give your life for me?
1
@marcslingsby8843 "how did DNA come into existence ?" DNA? Evolution. If you are talking about origins of life, then this question is still not answered. But making argument from ignorance and showing your god into gaps will not resolve anything... "99% of scholars of both religion and history all know Jesus existed" Jesus as a guy or Jesus as a god? Because we can give you that irrelevant thing and say that guy named Jesus existed at that time. How the hell does that prove that he was a god? "you are clearly uneducated beyond belief." Irony is always strong with theists...
1
@marcslingsby8843 "as not to waste time that you are so brainwashed or just straight shilling ." Or maybe, just maybe it not us who are brainwashed?... have you ever considered this possibility? "but wasn't you saying the Bible has so many falsification, can you show me what you believe to be untrue factually ?" Global flood? Adam and Eve? Earth being flat pancake? Zombies? Unicorns?... I mean... C'mon, you read your book, you should know all this stuff already... So lets pick easy ones: Earth being flat pancake while in reality its observable fact that its not. Do you have explanation for that?
1
Care to prove that?
1
@RobHappiness So do you even care if you are correct? Because i can prove that earth is globe, yet you rather think that its flat just because... Why?
1
@RobHappiness First video... You have video trying to explain why upside down moon makes sense on flat earth... ok... What? You do know that globe has a valid explanation too? So why do you even post this video? Second video, skip to around 0:59 time stamp. What do you see? rotating stars right? Is it missing something?... You do know that we have 2 points around which stars "rotate"? Right? So again, you have video which tries to explain why something we observe on reality makes any sense when trying to claim that earth is flat, while globe did that long long time ago. Both videos fail to actually explain, but besides this point, at best you would have something what works on both models and none of those things could be used to prove/disprove anything... "do you care if you're correct?" I do, this is why i like fact checking. You seam to like just feel good and go with option which makes you feel best and not the one which can be supported by actual evidence. " You came to argue under my comment" And you made original one. I came here to respond to your "argument" aka "empty claim". If i wanted to argue for sake of argument, i would go and post comments under flat earth videos. "and I'm proving you it's flat." False. You are not proving anything here. Both videos you give here can be perfectly explained with globe model. So again, even if those videos dint failed to prove that observable reality matches flat earth, that would not prove that earth is flat... You need observable reality which would match flat model and missmatch globe one. If you have something what matches both models, then you proved nothing here. Lets go with simple thing, simplest one i can give you. As by your flat earth model sun is always above earth circling it, how come we have sunsets? How come sun sets under horizon without changing its size while by basic geometry sun should never ever for ever touch horizon? Seriously, make an experiment in your house, get a round table, place light source above it, try to make it go below horizon... its basic geometry 101...
1
@RobHappiness If its so easy to prove, why you dont prove it right now? Its a basic geometry when it comes to sunsets, those should never happen if earth is flat, yet we have those. I can give you even more to think about. Sun moves (actually earth rotates, but well, you got the idea) in a straight line, while it should circle around if earth was flat. Sun should change perceived size if earth was flat, yet its always the same size. Sun should change perceived movement speed, yet its not. There are 4 basic things about sun you will fail to explain on flat earth model, and this is even basic example which doesn't require any calculation, just basic knowledge of geometry, but you still think that earth is flat... Wild guess (not really) here, your main drive to believe that earth is flat is because bible said so?
1
@zorrolimonero First of all, its "almost", second, religion is based on manipulations and elites controlling masses with lies and all that jazz. So he described religions quite nicely here. Och and religions based on bible, well, bible does say that earth is flat, so you can include that one too.
1
@zorrolimonero "in addition to the fact that the bible itself invites us to question its content because it might not be true" That's false. Its clearly stated in bible that you should never question god, while bible should be representation of real events and actual will of this god. Its literally says that you should have faith and it will be enough, so what questioning could ever happen based on that? "it is a sin to blindly follow the Bible and everything it says" Then why most theists always end up with "You just need to have faith"? And there is only one single sin which cant be forgiven: Disbelief. Have you even read bible? "if they really controlled us they would have to invent something more ingenious, don't you think?" Like churches? Like priests? Like Popes? Like this rule book you call bible? This sort of way to control people? Do you remember Crusades? Religious killing where if you refuse to believe specific thing, you will die. Isint that a way to control people? And atheism is a rejection of god claim, its not even close in being same as belief in god. Its literally opposite of that. "I have written "Almost" correctly" Google translate helps.
1
Now calculate how much water vapor you would produce from hydrogen car which would actually become vapor and not simply absorbed by ground vs how much Co2
1
longroadhome108 Wait, are you saying that women cant be soldier? Thats sexist... Isn't it? I mean, it could not be a norm in your 3rd world country, but like, in rest of the civilized one its normal for a women to be a soldier.
1
@Schoenmann3 "I also like how you include the voice of Eric Dubay without crediting him" Ever heard about " Fair use" law? "nor do you account for ANY OF THE MANS BOOKS, WORKS, OR ARGUMENTS LOL" Why should he? "That's like trying to talk about deep sea diving using a parachute to explain xD" Yes, this is why flat earth doesn't make any sense. "These are the physical phenomena that explain the still unproven notion of Gravity." Cavendish experiment proves gravity. "Walter #Russel and Nikola #Tesla talked..." Who cares? Do you know what is argument from authority fallacy? "I mean, it's really pretty obvious once you start peeling back the layers" True, this is why majority of humans know that earth is globe. You could try that too some times. "All the signs and symbols are there" That earth is a globe? Then you are correct. Otherwise you are demonstrably incorrect. "And you're telling me your ignorant dumb ass believes THAT? HILARIOUS!" Just like 99% of smartest people on earth... Strange... Its like smarter you are dumber you become, by your world view... Makes allot of sense...
1
@Schoenmann3 " Dubay has several books and publications you are misleading your audience!" Why do you think he has books? Because he is making living out of people like you... You are buying random made up s**t created by Dubay. And that same Dubay uses same pictures taken from internet in attempt to misrepresent them and deceive people. Flat earthers doesn't even have working model... No one takes them seriously, its just a nuisance, nothing more.
1
It wasn't what he stated. Yet going on that, it's more cool to realize that we evolved over billions of years over natural process due to complicated things than just "We are here because god farted us out", one is more cool than the other.
1
Then what is not propaganda? What your dictator says to be true?
1
What would be the weight of that tank? What would be the cost? What would be the raw weight of hydrogen you could store in that tank?... Just saying "hydrate" will not make it best option ever by default
1
Red hearing? Shape of earth is independent from what scientists say... Anyone can prove shape of earth and its a globe...
1
Why? What difference does it make? All modern cars are being heavily controlled by computers, while that "ipad" is just a interface for you, all of those cars can still work and drive with that screen being broken. Its same story as we had with blackberry phones and their fans wanting buttons... Just look where we are now and just look how many "wants" buttons back...
1
@Klako-ls6yt You are repeating same blackberry story here. Was it better to have physical buttons on your phone? Yes, but only when you wanted to type things, but for general purpose those became useless, cluttered entire front face, minimized real estate of the screen and simply introduced more failure points, one buttons fails and its basically no longer usable. There are no perfect solutions here, but fact is that majority of buttons in your car are used once a year or even less often.
1
By defending against aggressor? Are you ok?
1
jonny money Yes yes yes, just like this war will be over in 3 days...
1
Flat earther? Seriously?
1
@jerry-xi4gi Calling you a flat earther was an insult? Ok. Does that mean that you do believe in a globe earth then? You seem to believe in firmament, which would only make sense on flat earth. You don't believe in satellites, you that would mean that you don't believe in a globe. So like, which part was an insult exactly?
1
Was this video made to do that?...
1
Then what is it?
1
You missed entire idea of colonizing another planet...
1
Issue is that when it comes to Tesla startup, they had no actual competitors, but lucid now has Tesla. Like this car is 2-3x more expensive than Tesla model S Plaid. It's not that compelling to buy lucid when you can get multiple Teslas with tiny bit less performance in them. Lucid is struggling and burning money at the moment, this is why they want to have ridiculous cars like this one, just to remain on the map.
1
@solutionproject9020 In short, not my video, no idea who is Darius, basic evidence that earth is a globe would be sunset, i have 50+ other facts from reality which proves globe, but one will be enough for you. And what is more ironic that you made that silly comment "you're just a illiterate person" while you cant even put couple dots at end of your sentences for it to be simpler to read and it would become less illiterate mess you just made here. So yea, what do you smoke? It should be a good one to post something like that.
1
So I guess Russia reporting about this Ukraine advance is a lie too... Everyone lies, especially Russia... Right?
1
@jacqdanieles Are you saying that Russia did not reported about Ukraine gains here?
1
Irony is strong with you people.
1
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt Let me make a "wild" guess here, your core reason why you believe that earth is flat pancake is because bible said so? Right? Please correct me if I'm wrong here. Edit: You can not bother answering, reading your other replies realized that I was actually correct here, you are hard core bible believer which you are trying to use as your main "proof" of your "knowledge", so I got my answer here already.
1
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt Physical, scientific and mathematical proofs definitely helps, issue is that you don't have any of that, so at the end of the day it will always go back to "its true because bible said so", but heck, I'm feeling entertained here, please present your BEST evidence that earth is flat. I don't want your opinion on why earth isn't a globe or why globe model doesn't make sense to you and so on, what I want is actual evidence for a flat earth. Go!
1
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt " it is called straw man argument that you are trying to pull here" Feel free to actually explain where I made this strawman fallacy and not just assert it. "Asking me of evidence of something that you yourself don't have" You are correct, I don't have evidence of flat earth, this is why I asked you... Did I missed something here? " number one most overwhelming evidence of our flat Earth reality is that there is absolutely nothing that shows us that we live on a spinning globe" That's a logical fallacy 101. And like I said, don't tell me about a globe, present evidence for flat earth. Earth could be a cube if its not a sphere, you can't just say that because you fail to see evidence for a globe it must be flat pancake... That's not how logic works. "Curve ? Nope , only in cartoons" You can observe a curve on a beach. Heck even sunset/sunrise proves curve. "Measurable speed?" No idea how that's related to the shape of earth. Maybe earth is a sphere and its stationary? Have you ever considered that? No? Just silly flat earth troll points? "in fact every single person try to measure the speed came to the exact opposite conclusion" That earth is rotating? Yea, I know. "Nope only a theory based upon a theory" Cavendish experiment proves gravity, anyone can perform that one too. You don't really anything special, just some spare time. "Electrostatic charge of the ground along with density and buoyancy will do just fine" In which reality? And why is there gradient of pressure? Why does objects fall down? Why does objects which are not electrostatically effected behave in same way as any other object? You throwing around random words doesn't prove your flat pancake world. "All of which by the way on light gravity are measurable observable and verifiable" Funny enough buoyancy is the result of gravity. So like, yea, you do play yourself here nicely. "Vacuum of space? " Yes, what about it? "Scientifically impossible" 99.99% of scientists disagree, why? "and also provable" What's provable? Because I can bet that you don't even understand what vacuum is, let alone how it works and why earth with its atmosphere existing in it doesn't break any laws of physics and it is scientifically possible. "How many times do you have to catch someone in lies before you call them liar?" Depends, its really wage question. Like, if I said 1 lie in 100 years I lived, does that make me a liar? What if I said 1000000 of those? Like at which point does saying a lie makes you a liar and at which point saying a lie makes everything you say a lie? Have you ever said a lie? Yes. So does that mean that you are lying here and no one should take you seriously because you are liar? Every single thing you said there wasn't proof of flat pancake world, you just desperately tried to misrepresent globe model. Do you have any actually interesting argument, proof, evidence or something for me here or was this the best you can do? Because its getting really boring...
1
Because putin said so?
1
@shanerogers8078 Which is so weird... On one hand you claim that you completely don't care, on another hand you spent time watching this video and writing comment saying that you completely don't care... People who actually doesn't give a f**k about it don't even watch videos like this, let alone leave comments explaining that they don't care...
1
1) SpaceX is a private company, do idea why you mention closing schools here... You look confused here even tho you claim to work as contractor/engineer... Main money supplier will be Starlink, Musk mentioned that few times by now, so it will be private money which will fund all of this and not government... 2) SpaceX isn't the only one space agency... Its currently the best and cheapest one, but its not the only one... And no idea how is not wasting taxpayer money is insane and hugely inefficient... Are you saying that NASA should have kept building its own one time use rockets? That would have been cheaper? You call yourself engineed, but you seem to know little to nothing about this topic... Why is that?
1
@hddun " What the Heck is that word" English isn't my primary language, wasn't even secondary. And as someone claiming to be engineer fails to understand what misspelled word "engineed" should have been in this context... C'mon... I thought engineers should be smart people... I must have been wrong here. "how do you know the revenue stream from Starlink" Was reported to be cash flow positive last year by Gwynne Shotwell. Is there any actual reasons to not believe this? Yes its privately owned, but like, what would they benefit from saying that privately owned company is now cash flow positive while they could have kept its in negative side for quite some time with really simple excuse as its still in a deployment and so on? Starlink is in early stages, so getting it into positive numbers is generally unexpected. "I don't know." I can see that... "Mr. Musk doesn't say or estimate the cost." Because its a thing which never was done and estimating something like that would be silly. Like for example, in early days moon missions costed around 1 billion per trip, if rocket blows up you get extra billion of expenses on your hand... It's not that small of a number for event which was basically accident. With mars it's a lot worse as you have a lot longer trips involving dozens of rockets for initial colony. He is building rocket for that purpose, how much it will cost at the end, no one knows and generally not really important as long as it gets done. " many lives and $$$HUGE were lost but no one to my view lost a manager job at NASA..." Weird engineer you are... Not much money was lost as what you lost was just raw materials, excluding human lives. While raw materials are just a fraction of the cost. Everything else is from labor which is basically wages to the people who made money from all of this and put that money back into circulation. When it comes to government institutions it's basically money going in circles, with private companies its slightly different, but still money isn't being lost at 100% rate, it's more like 2%. And accidents happen, no idea why NASA should have fired anyone... Rocket science is... Well... Rocket science... One small mistake in design can result in total failure, one of the reasons why NASA took ages to make anything as it could not afford accidents and had to to thousands of simulations and controlled tests before attempting actual launches, with private companies, well, you have prime example as SpaceX, they can blow up few rockets to gather data as fast as possible and improve on it with next iteration of the rocket. "200 people marooned to die a slow death from starvation or radiation and yet no way to help them -- tragic..." its so weird, its like you think that we will be sending people there in droves with their lunch box and nothing more... Have you seen movie "Martian"? Point is that you actually can grow your own food on Mars, initial setup will be expensive and tedious, but Mars colony can be fully self sustaining.
1
Yes, Russia is a slave.
1
They think that world is flat: 1. Bible said so. 2. Its a view against norm. 3. Its a view against government. 4. They have no basic understanding about reality. 5. They are trolling. Did that helped?
1
Which one?
1
Sorry, i'm to old to have imaginary friends. But seriously, which one? Because there have been around 50 000 proposed gods over human history, so be more specific next time...
1
That's cool and all, but some people actually live in places where that heat from engine isn't being used to heat their cabin but additional load on engine being added to drive generator which could drive AC in their cars. And there is new invention, some call it "electric heater"
1
First of all, water isint free. Second, hydrogen isint free. Third, oil companies killed it. Fourth, it has more draw back than EV's. Should I go on or is this enough?
1
And bible said that there was global flood which killed everyone which never happen... Whats your point?
1
They still vote tho.
1
Dinesh is one of the most unhinged dishonest people on the planet, but he isn't wrong here.
1
360 degree span? What would that give you? Black void view?... Or do you want to observe stars you can see from earth? And show me ONE photo which was claimed to be real picture which has CGI on it... And what shade artists are you talking about? And why cant they hire one?
1
Russians will not have same issues at winter? I can bet that Ukraine will provide better cold protections to their soldiers than what Russians will get.
1
@PrimalEater What? By your logic when you jump inside plane which goes at 700km/h you should splat at back of it... Do you? Do you even know how conservation of momentum works? Ok, you failed with this one. Do you have better example what we should observe if earth was not stationary?
1
@PrimalEater You keep claiming that but you keep failing to even explain what we should observe in case it was moving... Your personal ignorance is not evidence for anything, you failed with your first attempt as you had no knowledge about basic conservation of momentum and then repeated that its not spinning without any evidence at all... You do realize that you will not convince anyone with comments like that and you will only make yourself look ignorant on basic physics?
1
Funny enough you are using numbers provided by the country which claimed that they are not planning to invade Ukraine weeks before they invaded Ukraine...
1
People are dying and your solution is "good thoughts"?... Are you kidding me?
1
Yea, Russian media is lying.
1
When did Musk killed people for his own gain or something? You talk like he is reincarnation of Hitler...
1
@EaseOfSorrow Yea, war is fake, let go home now. 0:52 if you would take attention to the shadow, cameraman is one of the soldiers, so don't think he had priority to actually film Russians with his Iphone...
1
@EaseOfSorrow its called "recording events as they happen". Now you will shift to the point that its not a big deal because he has his phone turned on... Can you be happy with anything?
1
Fixing problems one at the time
1
Combustion system are even more stupid... HICE engine vs Hydrogen fuel cell is TWICE as inefficient, so take math from this video for hydrogen engine and double it. Its the worse option for anything. HICE engines are only a thing just because you can potentially convert existing ICE engines and those produce that engine sound, but that's it, its extremely inefficient
1
Riiiiight, this is why you have right to your opinion that world is flat, while some people likes facts and knows that its a globe.
1
@trailbossdan1 Sadly but most likely he is not...
1
And yet front line is moving and ukraine gaining more and more of it every day... I guess "losing" few tanks had little effect on that, isn't it?
1
I mean, you are not wrong, lithium is history as we had it for quite some time and it looks like new battery technologies are being created which lowers lithium usage or removes it entirely for better solutions.
1
@philliplopez8745 At this point we have like a dozen really cool battery technologies, issues is that most of them ends up only being viable on tiny scales or have some huge drawback somewhere, like tiny amount of life cycles. And yea, I have seen that video from Munro you are talking about, if it does what they promise it to do, then it could be huge game changer for entire EV industry.
1
Mike B you do understand that Iraq, Afghan, Kuwait doesn't have border with US?... Its like literally across half the world... Logistics of war like this is a nightmare on its own... Russia can't even do shit with a country which has long ass border with it.
1
Cool beans, where is this technology? How much energy do you need to free it? What would be the cost? What would be the weight? What is the density number? I keep seeing claims like yours, but non of you manages to present actual numbers...
1
Och noo... We had bad things done by countries in the past, we should allow this bad thing done by Russia today too... Well, Germany did quite evil things too, more or less most countries conquered other regions in the past... Should we give pass for Russia because of that?
1
Diversion for what?
1
So basically all this destruction is fault of Ukraine and Russia has nothing to do?... Entire cities being deleted from the map is fault of Ukraine?... Damn... And then you have people who wonder why others hate Russians... This is exactly why...
1
@foolishdrunk2181 You don't choose what you believe. So ether you are flat earther or you simply say that you are while you believe in globe. Tho it says allot about person who intentionally pretends to be dumb just to get attention...
1
@foolishdrunk2181 You literally don't chose what you believe... If you think that you do, then i would suggest for you to start your journey by actually reading some book about this topic instead of making yourself look ignorant... I'm questioning your sanity... Does that count?
1
@foolishdrunk2181 Again, what you believe is not a choice you actually make... You cant choose to believe that moon is made of cheese, you ether believe or you don't. Rejection of facts is a choice, but that doesn't define what you actually believe. Like for example flat earthers reject fact that earth is globe, they still believe that its flat not because they choose to reject evidence that its not but simply because they believe that it is flat. Seriously, read some book about human psychology, critical thinking, philosophy or something...
1
@throwawayavclubber7269 You would be surprised how many people actually believes what this Foolish Drunk spits out. There is literally no difference between Poe and actual blind believer.
1
You do know that currently war is on stalemate? Right? So clearly Russia doesn't have upper hand here... So on what basis you think that Russia could win this war were Ukraine gets constant support from rest of the world and russia just sends their solders to be sacrificed as a meat fodder?
1
@teslamastermind What significant gains did russia got in last 30 days? And how many soldiers Russia losing every day? After all, this 3 day "special military operation" got dragged out to 150 days without any end on the horizon, so something dint go too well for Russia with their plan, isint it?
1
Piece of crap EV? Seriously?... What a tool...
1
@djjeeveslarue3499 It became dull after first 500 times I have seen it, it became not funny after another 500. Jokes are only funny if you never heard them, repeating same one over and over again is just... Dull... You should come back with that joke about cats pushing everything down if earth was flat, that one might be used slightly less times by now, so technically its a better joke.
1
Why? What real benefit would Russia gain by nuking territory it want's to take over? And it would be hard to explain to Russians why it nuked people it was promising to liberate from those "nazis"... Nukes are just empty threat as there isint anything else they could use here now.
1
At this moment Russia is Putin and Putin is Russia.
1
They are just idiots. To be more serious, when car company boasts about making some super duper clean car, its usually just PR move to tick that box "making green cars" and that's that.
1
Plant a tree?
1
@billwilliamson1506 "You are so angry with Christianity that you can not even agree with a basic fact that the Bible is not a history book, and nor is it 100% fable." I agree that bible is not a history book, but when it comes to it being book of fables... Well, that is factually true. If you want to nick pick that something in it is not a fable, cool, doesn't mean that book itself is not a book of fables. "something like the flood likely never happened" Its not likely, we know that it dint happen. "and if it did it was WAY overstated and fictionalized to be a fable. " AKA Fable. Definition of fable: 1. a short story, typically with animals as characters, conveying a moral. 2. a supernatural story incorporating elements of myth and legend. 3. myth and legend. 4. a false statement or belief. Pick your poison. "The Bible is better suited for moral claims because those do not require scientific proofs" And yet bible is still useless when it comes to morals... Is killing wrong? Bible says that it is and that its not... Sooo, which one it is? By 10 commandments its wrong, by the verse where you should stone homosexuals its fine... So which one it is? And how would you know? Would you use bible to determine that or some completely unrelated source? "Jesus Christ existed and was crucified" Jesus like generic human being with this name or Jesus like a god? "that is a fact," Not a fact, claim at best. "(proving how two separate eyewitnesses claim the same thing in different sources, etc)? " I can get you 1000 different sources claiming to be probed by aliens... Does that make it true? The fact that you can have those 2 different source being same one just dressed as different is quite big possibility, bigger then having some god being crusified. But i could give you for sake of argument that some guy named Jesus got crusified, so what? Having Peter Parker who lives in New York will not prove that spider man is real... So again, bible is useless. "Of course, both must be combed through, but it is false to claim the Bible is just a book of fables." Bible IS book of fables by definition of fable... Its BY DEFINITION book of fables. And again, for some historical person not being actually real will not change our world view, but if you want to claim that some god lived and died (well he dint died as you cant kill immortal god) will require more than a book said so. I can believe you on face value that you have pet dog, but if you will claim that you have invisible pet dragon, that will require more than your word. So to summarize: Bible is book of fables by definition of fable. Bible is useless when it comes in determining that is or was real as any claim made by bible gets verified by actual external sources and then its been shown to be accurate or false. Bible is useless when it comes to moral values. Conclusion: Bible is useless book of fables.
1
There is no such thing as water powered cars... You have been scammed...
1
@huwgrossmith9555 That's the scam part... Water isn't fuel, electrolyzer needs crap ton of electricity... From which magical place will you get that electricity to create hydrogen? Because in actual reality you need around 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen by using most efficient hydrogen fuel cells and electrolysis methods out there. And no, those numbers are not backwards, you are losing 50% of electricity with each cycle just for hydrogen production, no idea from which magical place you will get extra electricity to move actual car...
1
@huwgrossmith9555 Then I would STRONGLY recommend you to fact check, because it looks like you just watched some random scam video on youtube and believed it. There are NO water engines, because those CAN'T exist due to first law of thermodynamics. And just FYI IC engines are only 50% efficient in comparison to hydrogen fuel cell engines, aka you can travel twice the range with fuel cell than you could with IC one. So straight away you have an issue here as you are using less efficient engine. Water isint fuel, never was and never will be. Hydrogen is fuel, but there is equally zero of that on earth in its pure form, 100% of hydrogen we have is a hydrogen bonded to other atoms, like hydrogen + oxygen = water type deal, and for you to extract hydrogen from water you will need to input quite a bit of electricity into that conversation, and because magic isint real and basic laws of physics apply, you can't magically create a thing which can generate power from water. If water engines existed then we would have water powered electric power plants, not the ones which uses water to turn turbines, but the ones which uses water as a fuel... But we dont... Because water isint fuel...
1
@RhydianLewisEntertainment Earths shape can be determined from your backyard, so your comment about this silly NASA conspiracy is just looks like some joke, at best. You being funny is not our problem, so what we can only do it laugh.
1
@RhydianLewisEntertainment I'm sorry, I guess you are incapable of understanding someone who isn't fluent in English, i'm sorry, I assumed that you are smarter than this. Earth is a globe, this is a fact. Was this sentence simple enough for you? Should I use simpler words? Which grade words should I use? Pre-school?
1
US/NATO is a god now?
1
We don't agree with your opinion. Being open minded is fine and you should be one, issue is not with being one, issue is with failing to understand basic reality and to claim that your fantasy is true because you feel that in your balls or because its against big corporations... Earth is a globe independent of anyone, its provable and testable fact from reality, if you question something like this, then ether you are completely ignorant on basic things, like geometry, or you are too stupid to comprehend basic things like geometry, ether way you should not express your opinion until you fix this issue.
1
And? Even if that was true, it still doesn't prove flat pancake world, that would only prove that people imagined world as flat pancake world.
1
Silent Reviews But like... Why? Why not invest this money into EV's instead? Why waste money on worst option when there is better one?
1
This joke was funny first 50 000 times.
1
Isn't that racist? And calling for segregation to be put back?
1
@MrFuckwit999 If you have entire team which does nothing, no matter how much CEO gets there is no reason to keep those people around and keep paying them salaries. Right?
1
Isint Russians themselves keep saying that all those explosions in Russia or Russian controlled territories are caused by accidents where someone decides to smoke near explosives or something? And why do rus bots keep mentioning nordstream? Lets assume that Ukraine did it, lets assume that US did it, lets assume that NATO did it... How the hell does this prove that Ukraine blow up dam?... Use your brains before you talk.
1
@Lichtblick1 Earths shape was determined in 3BCE in Greece, heck, anyone with half brain can do that from their backyard. We knew the shape of the earth long before NASA provided pictures from the space. And this might be a shocker for you people but there are more than one space agency in the world... I know... Shocker...
1
Water engines do no exist, please fact check before you talk about topic.
1
Irony is strong with people like you. In what form hydrogen (you said nitrogen) should be for it to take less space? Liquid... It should be liquid... And how can you make hydrogen liquid? Chill it. How low you ask? -250C and colder. Its cold, really cold. Now. Can you even grasp basic idea of what type of container you would need to keep that hydrogen chill at such extreme temperatures for long periods of times? You can't, it would boil off in like 3 days. So liquid hydrogen isn't being used in any passenger cars for this reason. So, as we put this aside, what else you will have? Hydrogen in gas form. So how much space would hydrogen in gas form and under something like 10000 psi would take to achieve 300 miles? Its more than regular gasoline tank.
1
@polska905 I do have a clue, you simply have no clue why hydrogen cars don't need lizard people intervention for it to not become anything more than someones expensive hobby. You don't need to kill something what isn't alive.
1
Bradley Jaggi Sun filer + sun observation for 1 day = globe earth Sun doesn't change size, sun moves at constant speed, sun moves in straight line and... sunset/sunrise... All of those are not possible on flat earth, they are simply impossible. What else do you need?
1
Yet BEV's are taking off anyways, so it doesn't look like big oil can stop a good product.
1
Smart comment. {sarcasm}
1
What i have noticed was simple observation where most religious are not flat earthers but most flat earthers are religious, and when i say most religious i mean bible believers due to the fact that bible implies earth to be flat. So they are usually using their own religious belief to "prove" that earth is flat because their magical book said so.
1
NO Hydrogen stations except California in US, so you will not see any hydrogen cars anywhere else.
1
Not really, first of all, they cant afford trip like that. Second, even if you would launch them into space they would say that its fake, CGI or some other nonsense. Shape of earth can be proven by basic observation of sun, if they cant even manage that, then spending thousands on a trip around world will not het you anywhere.
1
What?
1
Crimea is isolated from Russia, Ukraine simply needs to take back its lands and blow up bridges and tunnels leading to Crimea and after that there won't be a lot of options for Crimea besides surrendering. It most likely will be taken over diplomatic means than actual war.
1
Or its all made up and there is no video to be shown...
1
Youtube is American made, why are you using and supporting it?
1
First globe model appeared 3 century BC in Greece. Just saying.
1
Let me summarize: we have flat earthers because bible said that earth is a flat pancake.
1
issue with ush back like this one is that you have less and less territory where enemy can be located at, which means that there will be more and more resistance in some areas with more soldiers. In general if this push could continue without any real stopping then Russians would simply surrender and run away.
1
@lesbrunswick5137 It will either stop in next few days or Russian soldiers will simply "Fu*k this shit, I'm out" both options are possible now in addition to actual lawmakers in Russia itself calling out to remove Putin from power. People started to realize who is in wrong here.
1
TF here said that SpaceX if going to bankruptcy 2 years ago, is it tho? Now he says that another story for you to swallow... Like, how naive are you?
1
Do you know what heatshield is?
1
First hydrogen fuel cell car was made in 1966, so its not that new of a technology, but it hardly improved over the years due to basic limitations of the laws of physics. Hydrogen cars are basically at their peak performance, there might be few % improvements made over the years, but nothing substantial. And when you have better alternatives like BEV's then why would anyone invest billions into technology which already losing to it?
1
@FriedChkn4Eva BEV - battery electric vehicle And no idea how my first sentences proved you right here. Hydrogen technology hardy improved, not because no one tried, but because there isn't much to improve anymore, just like ICE cars hardly improved in last few decades, those reached peak performance/efficiency rates quite some time ago, while BEV's just keep's improving without any clear sign of limitations ahead.
1
@FriedChkn4Eva "let alone the common American family household being able to afford a car like that" Why not? Lithium battery price dropped 5.5 times since 2000's... Lithium battery capacity doubled since 2000's. So on what basis you could say that something will not be accessible for regular people? Every single new technology will be expensive one, but it always goes down in price and up in quality. Just check prices of first flat screens... You could have bought a house for one, even tho its quality was shit in comparison to what you can get for 100 bucks in local home depo. "Id like to see some road tests and cross country driving personally before i shell out over 100k for a electric supercar??" Why? Like why do you need electric supercar? And there are plenty of videos with people doing cross America trips in BEV's, in particular by using Tesla cars. "All the Teslas just mostly look like they’re great… for driving around the city" Because you need more than 350 miles of range to go outside the city?... Like, what reason would there be to not be able to drive Teslas outside cities? "I do think a happy medium is HYBRID" Hybrids' are the worse, you will have 1.5 cars in one, which would be 1.5 higher maintenance costs and 1.5 times higher chance for something to go wrong. "as the way to go if they wanna keep the petrol users happy and still keep a clean environment" How the hell is petroleum car keeps environment clean?... Entire point about BEV's is to have sustainable and cleaner solution here, if you have bunch of hybrids and everyone uses the petroleum portion, then what's the point? "stuck somewhere in the wilderness or anywhere where its hard to get help, you can’t start the car in all electric" You can charge it... You know... "sources like Lithium are not really in abundance and when there is a shortage, that causes problems in the market." And there are more than one battery technology and more are being invented. And its not like we have infinite amount of oil either... Its not a question if we will need to switch from petroleum to something sustainable, it's only question "When?" and sooner we do it better it will be for environment and for us.
1
And?
1
@moussa8512 See what?
1
@moussa8512 See what?
1
Because you will need to put MORE energy in separating that hydrogen from oxygen than you will get back out of it, aka you will lose energy, aka water isn't a fuel, never was and never will be.
1
We dont have exact answer which method they used to built them, but we know about several they could have used to achieve it. Its not hat they used magic, its just that we dont know which method was used because they dint recorded that...
1
Why not? If someone wants to buy something you have plenty off, then why not sell it?
1
Which BEV became disposable junk?
1
Well, military might is heavily dependent and based on soldiers, strategies and so on. So he did miscalculated on that front heavily. Support from nearby country started to come in quite some time after this war started, it only started to come in when Ukraine showed that it can push back Russian army
1
Ships disappearing bottoms up is enough to prove that earth is spherical. For the plane experiment, its invalid on all fronts, on flat and globe model you should observe same exact behavior with that level, it wont change, so who made that experiment was ether to ignorant or intentionally created silly method for who knows what reasons.
1
You seem lost.
1
Colonization of Mars isn't because we f**ed this one...
1
Yes yes yes this war will end in 3 days...
1
@Factsagainstpropoganda You failed to actually understand my comment here, no worries, will explain my actual point here. When I said that this war will end in 3 days, I wasn't saying that it will end, it was a jab at the point that Russia hoped that this war will end in 3 days, yet we are what now? 430+ days into war? And we are still waiting Ukraine to start counter offensive, so lets see how that one will end up for Russia. And just FYI Prigozhin announced his retreat from Bakhmut due to Russian government stupidity. I guess everything is going by the master strategist plan? Right?
1
Petrol prices went down in my country by like 20-25%, it's even lower than it was before covid. So clearly something is happening with this oil price limit. Putin already started to admit that sanctions might effect Russian economy, which only means that it already had massive negative impact, otherwise he would have never said this.
1
@1stsampan Not from UK, no idea why would that matter tho. I'm from Europe, that's enough for you to know. Putin said that in Russian... It was to keep brainwashing his own people, why would he say this in English?... And yes, that quote is correct one, now we just need to convince Russian people that they have been fooled by their dictator. Maybe one day...
1
Prove it.
1
Well ironically SpaceX got contract to deorbit ISS in few years. And ISS being 400 km from earth is not the same as human base being 225 000 000 km away
1
Only 2 seats because 90% of all drives involved 1 or 2 passengers. Future is where humans no longer need to work and everything is done by robots instead. We already have heavy automation relating to every single production aspect, automation isint bad.
1
@theoneafterthelast Are you one of those who thinks that he needs his gns so that he can battle evil lizardmen controlled government or something?
1
Like 50% of humans die, big portion of this planet becomes uninhabitable for next few hundred years. Everything collapses. Besides this, not much.
1
@KangenAlec Well when you have access to the internet you can gather all sort of crazy from entire world, so it might look like they are growing in numbers, but in reality, they are not. It just that they have better means to get into bigger groups and scream lauder, nothing more.
1
@KangenAlec have you ever considered possibility that its you who got it all wrong and not 98% of human population?... I'm always curious with people like you, why would anyone even try to create this conspiracy which involves millions upon millions of people across entire globe just to try and hide actual shape of earth? What would anyone gain from that?... Maybe, just maybe, its you who actually got brainwashed by some facebook post and not the rest of the world?... And to make it really simple, you can prove earth to be a globe by simple observation of sun. You have 4 basic sun behaviors which match 100% globe model and fails on flat one with nice 100% accuracy... You don't need government, you don't need facebook, you don't even need to use math here, just basic observation and basic understanding of basic geometry... Yet you are here trying to convince others that everyone is in this magical conspiracy to hide something for which there is no point to do... C'mon...
1
If its hollow, what shape it is?... Because you still need a shape for it to be hollow... Right?
1
@shavrael That doesn't answer to my question, so will try again: What shape does earth have? Will give couple valid examples: Sphere, torus, cylinder, cone, cube, cuboid, triangular pyramid, square pyramid , triangular cylinder, triangular prism and so on... So which one it is by you?
1
Question for the smart one in the room: How could WW3 start? Would direct US involvement in Ukraine war be enough to start that?
1
We need rockets with bigger lift capabilities. No idea why this is monstrosity tho. Don't like shape of rocket? You want something pretty?...
1
Dee Joun "I'm not a flat-earther but..." Yes, yes you are... Atleast you think like one. All those maps are basic projections of spherical map while not putting any specific country at its center to make everyone more equally represented. There is nothing behind it, its simply good representation of spherical surface on 2d plane...
1
ICE cleaner than EV?... Did you got paid by oil company to say this lie or are you just so badly educated on this topic?
1
With which part of this video you disagree?
1
Well as Hydrogen cars never been alive to begin with, that would mean that no one killed it...
1
Europe focusing on hydrogen? I live in europe and this is first time I heard it... Hydrogen cars in europe are as popular as everywhere else: not.
1
Because there isn't anything to fix? It exceeded its rated load by more than 9x, what should they fix here exactly?
1
I have a bridge to sell here...
1
Reality disagrees.
1
People said same thing about horses... Goodluck with that.
1
Anything? No reusable rockets? No internet from space? No neuralink? No bev's?... Nothing? Nothing at all?
1
Losing war by continuously retaking land? How the hell is this losing exactly?
1
Yes and no. Sit in your regular car and count buttons and nobs you are not using or using once a month. Most buttons are not needed to be specialized, so why have them? Same story like it was with Blackberry phones, people wanted physical buttons, but it failed because it allot more convenient to have everything on dynamic screen which can actually adjust and provide you with more options and not clutter cars interior with useless buttons. That said, it is cheaper to avoid adding bunch of buttons no one is using and just program them into a software.
1
First of all, update your memo, at the moment BEV's can be recharged in like a half an hour, or like 15 minutes if you are doing that from 20 to 80% or like... You know.... Charged at your house over night while you sleep... There are even batteries in the works which should be able to recharge from 0% to 100% in like 15 minutes.
1
Energy density is not a part of efficiency... Entire talk was about how much energy you will need from end to end to drive same amount of distance... ICE cars are the worst ones, then Hydrogen and then BEV's.
1
@therealjohnsquad You still mixing energy density with efficiency here. If you want to talk that ICE cars are more efficient in a sense that those can carry more energy and drive longer, then yea, you will have a point here, but its not efficiency, it's just energy density. Most of that energy in ICE cars is being converted into heat. When it comes from end to end and how much energy you will use to drive X distance BEV's will win against ICE and Hydrogen cars because BEV's directly stores and uses energy with efficient means of energy transportation from the plant which produces it to car itself.
1
@jerrythecat811 On grand scale earth is a perfect sphere, its rounder then bowling ball. Those differences between width and height are only noticeable when you actually measure it, but if you would shrink earth to the size of bowling ball you would not have any difference between them.
1
Ukraine does have bigger and better supply of appropriate equipment for winter time, so while it will be bad thing for both sides it will be allot worst for Russians.
1
@HaydenEvanoff "You are not responding with any level of respect or objectivity." Respect is earned not given by default. And what objectivity you are missing here exactly? "I am not going to take any more time trying to have a civil conversation about this with you." Because you cant support your side of argument? Ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed, if you dont like this then dont make ridiculous claims, simple as that. "And for the record, did I once say the earth is flat? No." Where did I said that you said this? Feel free to read my comments again. Ironic, isint it? You dint read my comments while you accuse me of not reading yours... Its like you are looking for excuse here. Earths shape can be proven by anyone with basic understanding of geometry, just because you cant prove that by yourself and you are confused which one is correct will not prove anything in general. You need to fix your ignorance on this basic topic, otherwise you will stumble with simple things in your life.
1
@HaydenEvanoff "Respect shouldn’t have to be earned" Are you saying that you should respect some one just because they are famous or something else? That one hell of a broken logic you have here... People need to earn their respect by performing actions which would increase neutral respect he has by default. You cant start by having 100% respect... This is not how reality works... "It is given by the merit of the giver." What?
1
@HaydenEvanoff People should be treated equally, respect isint part of that. Unless you are using "respect" in completely different way here. I will not be ass towards people by default, but everyone starts from same level, after that you ether earn respect or you loose it. You can look it in a way where you have gradient from -10 to 10 points where everyone starts at 0 and then it will go ether way. So again, respect should not be given, its should be earned.
1
If you have abundance of energy to produce Hydrogen.
1
@ShamrockTJH NASA is only one of many space agencies, so no idea why you complaining about them. And they can go to moon, there is no real point in doing so as moon is just a rock in space and one trip costs over 1billion bucks, unless you want for NASA to spend extra billions to get new videos from moon. While on this topic, trip to moon will happen soon enough, as space flight got allot cheaper with reusable rocket technology, it is planet to establish moon base in near future, so expect to see 4k 60fps videos from moon, tho we all know that you will cry out that its a CGI without ever providing method how you determined that. But well, reality doesnt really care what you feelings are.
1
@ShamrockTJH "It really dowsnt hurt to do research to actually find out for yourself rather than just believing what you read in some article that was put out there by them." EXACTLY! Yet you are here making claims that hey dont have technology to go back there while in actual reality if you ever spent 5 minutes of google search you would have realized that was not actual talk about actual blue prints of this technology, but that they lost actual built things, after all, reusable rockets become reality just recently... They dont have built technology to go there, they have technology blue prints... And even if they dint had that one... What difference does it make? Earth is still a globe even if we never went to moon... "They say its bc the water is evaporating or floating in space as a droplet would but I say it's a bubble." How different would bubble in water against water in vacuum look like? like seriously, what would be the difference? And what you think and what you can actually prove to be true are 2 different things and independent from each other. "You cannot tell me what my eyes see. " Yet its really easy to fool your eyes... have you ever seen visual illusions? Have you ever heard about the blue/white dress where one group of people sees completely different colors then others while looking at same exact picture? "And just because they have some stupid explanation people buy it..sorry not me." Stupid or actually correct ones? Just because you dont like explanation doesn't make it false. Explain to us layman what difference we should observe between air bubbles in water and water bubbles in vacuum in 0g.
1
@ShamrockTJH Where did you find your information? Did you used Bing?... Have you went to library? Or your entire claim is based on a facebook post? Google is just a means to find information, like if you would find me actual article which was talking about "lost" technology you would realize how badly you have messed up, but i can bet you never fact checked this claim, you only parroting what some flat earther told you and you simply blindly believed in his words. Prove me wrong.
1
No, they all believed it. As they can't even muster working flat earth map.
1
Why?
1
Aptera is the company making solar panel powered car, fyi its BEV.
1
Truth hurts?
1
Yes yes yes, just like this war ended in 3 days...
1
Why?
1
@mrmurdock6994 Exactly my point... And thanks for proving me correct here. The share fact that you mentioned internal combustion engine instead of fuel cell shows how little to NOTHING you know about this topic. Fuel cell engines have TWICE the efficiency, aka it can drive you twice as far with same amount of hydrogen. It's a toy for rich people, nothing more. If it exists at all. What you only heard is "Toyota V8 Hydrogen engine" and just "forgot" to fact check about actual fuel consumptions and its range... Because it's not mentioned... Just try to guess why... Some estimations buts it at 3.5x less efficient than hydrogen fuel cells, yes, its even worse than economic HICE engines, who could thought that it will not be a good idea to make V8 hydrogen engines... Please, for your own good, actually research this topic before you try to talk about it...
1
Money. As a short answer. Negative video about other space agencies doesn't generate so many clicks from generic Musk haters.
1
Education time! Hydrogen needs to be produced and if you would use electrolysis you would need around 60% MORE electricity, so all of your arguments against BEV's and electricity production sources will bite your butt 60% more.
1
Electrolysis needs electricity... From which magical place will you get that?
1
So did your rocket reached orbit?
1
@RightsAreNotTradition Youtube can auto remove comments which include links or something what gets marked as insulting or inappropriate. Aside of this... 8 of your comments are still visible, if there was someone removing your magical comments then you wont be visible here at all... Put away your tin foil hat, no one cares about your conspiracy theories, you just need to post them more properly...
1
Then it would be really hard to brainwash people who thinks that this "special military operation" is to liberate people while entire region gets literally nuked. On top of this, nuking area will mean that its not accessible for quite some time, so no real benefit to do it for the area you want to have control over. but who knows, Putin can be insane enough to try do it.
1
Then I guess all those ammo depot and military equipment Russians left behind during this deployment was just a gift for Ukraine? How the hell is this even making sense in your head? Russia controlled territory and they just decided to give it back to Ukraine just because they need to redeploy somewhere else? Why do they need to redeploy? Does that mean that they cant defend another more important area and this is the reason for this "tactical panic retreat"?
1
@cdeford So now you will have to explain what the hell is going on here. If Putin has no interested in maintaining territory they already taken and Russia has no man power to do so, then what the hell is Russia even doing in Ukraine? And no, its not speculative, we already got confirmation about all that left ammunition and military equipment, it wasn't planned retreat, they simply run away as quick as possible. Side thing, you do realize that due to this Ukraine advancement one of the main rail roads Russia used to supply their front lines now under control of Ukraine? How the hell is that not a strategically important part?
1
@cdeford "but he's decided not to use more than originally committed" Riiiiiight, I guess all those confused Russian soldiers who got transported to Ukraine to fight without them even realizing this is by this magical plan too? If this overlord of yours has enough man power and can end this war in a day, then why the f**k isint he doing this? People die every single day, hundreds if not thousands every single day and Putin like "nah, we wont send more troops, we will drag this war for years to come, because why not"? "That road was important for the supply of the troops in Izyum, but after the withdrawal it's no longer vital" Och so basically because they already lost territory then there is no point in keeping strategic points? Sounds legit. Why would you want easy supply lines under your control when you could give it to the enemy... Makes complete sense. "Personally I think the withdrawal was a strategic mistake" Strategic mistake started 6 months ago... This was quick run away in panic. No one performs strategic retreat while leaving ammo depot and military equipment for the enemies, worst case scenario you destroy all of it before retreating, this dint happen, which only means that it wasn't planned retreat or Russian army is completely incompetent across the board, neither option is good for Russia. "but if they didn't have enough troops to hold the area, and didn't want to send any more" But like, why the hell not? You already claimed that they have man power, so where was it?... Your magical story doesn't add up... It takes few hours to transport soldiers, yet they run away from entire region... Do you even understand yourself that your made up story doesn't add up? "All I can see is that the Russians seem comfortable about not escalting at this time" Really? By destroying electrical strations after this "strategic" retreat? This is your not escalation? Russians loosing and they know it, this wasn't planned retreat, it was unplanned running away. Do you even remember start of the war when Russia went from all sides and took everything they could? If they never planed to take over entire country they would have simply established defensive lines in appropriate regions and that's that, but nope. Now they are failing to hold points and only natural barriers help them.
1
@cdeford "Putin's not mu overlord" If you dont live in Russia then he is not, if you are, then he is your overlord. "I've already said I don't know why he's making the decisions he is" Multiple reasons. First of all, because he can. Second, because he is a narcissistic asshat. Third, Ukraine is in strategic location between Russia and EU/NATO. Fourth, Ukraine has natural resources which can be sold for trillions. Pick your poison, or multiple ones. "But he's smarter/better informed than me or you" Clearly he didn't calculated everything as this war should have ended long time ago if he was smarter than me and he should have realized what would happen if world decides that this is enough for him to be asshat and attacking countries. He screwed his own country for decades to come, this wasn't smart move, it was dumb one. This entire war going terribly poorly for Russia independent of its end result. Russia was making billions every month from selling gas to europe, now its all gone and will never return. Russia ruined its name even more. Russia got cut of from the rest of the world. Russia shown how shitty their military actually is as it cant even take Ukraine. This was one huge mistake and now Russian people will suffer for it even if Putin gets kicked out of his throne.
1
Fusion would be harnessing stored energy... But your comment is so weird, you talk like some sort of expert who knows about everything and more than all those scientists working 24/7 on nuclear fusion for past few decades, its so weird... Write some scientific paper, prove your claims, instead of making weird comment on youtube comment section.
1
@championknife If Russia so great and makes soooooo many shells, then why is this war still going on? And I mean, is it really the matter of amount of shells or how accurate you can shoot those in general? If you miss 10 shells from 11 fired then even if you produce 8 times more than Ukraine gets, you are still losing.
1
Not really possible, to create hydrogen you need to use water and bunch of energy to separate it from oxygen molecule, which on itself is the expensive part which can't be simply bypassed by some magical thing, as you will need that energy either way. Best case scenario would be for us finally making nuclear fusion reactor which would give more energy than we need and we could use that excess to waste on hydrogen production, otherwise its not really a good way to go.
1
Yea, religions did lied to us, we are starting to wake up.
1
@701983 Honestly, both of you are wrong. First of all, there is so much water on earth that it would require few million years if not more to have any noticeable impact. Secondly, it would actually "drain" earth from water. When you convert water into oxygen and hydrogen, well, you only need accident which releases that oxygen or simply realize that due to how small hydrogen molecule is it will tend to naturally leak from any form of container. So any hydrogen which escapes container will rise up and way into space which will be picked up and "blown" away by solar winds, so no hydrogen, no water going back into circulation. But that would take long long long time to do any serious damage, redirect few water asteroids and you basically replenished any lost hydrogen for next few thousands of years.
1
@701983 I haven't even dived into actual numbers here, just stated random numbers, but I'm glad that i got it more or less correctly! Wait, does that mean that we could solve rising sea levels by producing hydrogen and releasing it into space?! {It's a joke} So to sum up, we will not drain earth or flood it, change will be more or less unnoticeable and irrelevant either way.
1
@701983 That would only tiny bit slow down water "loss". Not much to consider here honestly. I think it's cheaper and more economically viable to just make hydrogen on the site than to try dig some from underground.
1
Which makes even less sense as you are getting half the efficiency, aka you will be paying 2x to travel same distance, on top of huge maintenance costs as hydrogen will melt your entire engine over time.
1
@noniespam There is so called "hydrogen embrittlement" which well, makes materials brittle over time. This is why hydrogen tanks are usually coated in ceramics to minimize that issue, but even then you will have literal expiration date printed on those tanks, which is around 7 years. Engines itself suffers from this on top of issue with actually containing hydrogen due to how small it is. Infrastructure is non existing, you only have something going on in California, single state in entire country, but even then its barely getting new stations and quite few are closing at same time, like shell recently pulled out all its hydrogen stations entirely. Toyota might be doing something with hydrogen fuel cell technology, which is better than combustion engines, still suffers from same issues, its just more efficient and cheaper to maintain. While hydrogen has more energy, its loses when you check its energy density per volume, this is why most hydrogen cars have 3 huge hydrogen tanks to get around 400 mile range. As sad as it is, hydrogen only sounds cool on paper, all those news paper titles "car runs on water" was nice clickbait for its time, but due to enormous list of complications it will not work out. BEV's are not perfect, but at the moment those are the best option we have.
1
Why?
1
Shatter Blaster What is the power loss when you charge your car with solar panels on your house roof?
1
Why do people like you not understand that reporting about events which already happen makes no difference here... Russia knows what happen... Russia reports same stuff on their own propaganda sites, this is not a secret... What Ukraine wants is that people who actually knows what will happen to not disclose this information, to not disclose what next move Ukraine will do and not what happen already...
1
Did you just tried to measure gas in volume?...
1
Dr. H Its like complaining that people who claims that moon is made of cheese no one presented counter evidence to debunk that... Should you?... Should you even bother to present counter evidence for claim like that?...
1
Liquid hydrogen usually boils off in few days, not much you can do about it
1
Why not simply use normal system for everything instead of making a mess?
1
Because its less relevant... When Islam becomes an actual issue in his country then he will talk about it more often. Simple reality 101.
1
@sirvanmokriyani6770 His priority are the things happening in his country, then things happening in civilized countries and then rest of the world. There are alot of things which need to be addressed, priorities must be done.
1
Its went over rated limits by more than 9x and its still fragile?
1
@Bharatiyamriki Och ok, we are going into fantasy land here, my mistake for thinking realistically.
1
@ Ok.
1
Yes, technological progress... Without automation you would not have device you are using to make this silly comment... Ironic, I know...
1
@HugoJunkers-lc4kk I'm too old to know what your "44 / 5.000" should even mean. But your inability to counter what I said proved my points, thanks for that at least. Mary Christmas!
1
@SpaceAdvocate Och no, I go it's wrong by 8% by guessing from my head... That changes everything! By the way, you are wrong, it's actually 37.6% Biology isn't fined tuned for earth's gravity, we simply evolved to fit this particular gravitational pull
1
Its not endless. its not like US sends 100% of their military... Its more like 0.1% of it. But the fact that Russia is failing to take over Ukraine only shows how terrible Russia is when it comes to actual war.
1
@johnsheppard8102 You still don't get it... I agree that there are more important things in the world then educating flat earthers, but that doesn't mean we should ignore them... My analogy with leaking house is a direct comparison to flat earthers. And its a terrible idea to just concentrate on biggest issues while ignoring everything else. Its on same level as to say "Lets stop with this cancer cure, we have starving children in Africa" or "Who cares that women got raped, we have starving children in Africa" or "who cares that i got stabbed and i'm bleeding, we have starving children in Africa"... Do you see where i'm going with this?
1
Norway? Over 98$% of their energy comes from renewables, so clearly its not impossible to go full green.
1
@valerievankerckhove9325 That doesn't go against my point here. Countries can go full green if they invest money into it, hydro isint only option out there, but that is besides the original point which was made in original comment...
1
@valerievankerckhove9325 You keep missing my ACTUAL point here... Original comment claimed that going green will never ever work and I presented actual example where going green actually worked... That was MY ENTIRE point... You nitpicking about complexity of other green options is irrelevant... Going green is possible and it was done, so that original comment is debunked and conversation is over. If you want to talk about general idea of going green across entire planet, cool, we can do that, but its a separate topic...
1
@valerievankerckhove9325 Going green can work and it does work, simple as that. I can go and explain why going green is possible for rest of the world, but you clearly just want to nitpick hell out of everything for sake of doing so, so why even bother...
1
This video by itself is some what stupid, so not only flat earthers can give dislike. I mean, entire plane experiment is stupid on its own level and yet Johnny tried to reproduce it... That alone deserves a dislike.
1
What?
1
What was fake in this video?
1
Which one of them invaded Ukraine?
1
@cnccarving Funny thing is that it takes longer than a week to relocate your army, so what is your point here exactly?
1
@cnccarving "kiev forces bombed the basin a week before russian army crossed the border" And I just explained that relocating military forces takes longer than a week, so that means that Russia was preparing attack long before any of that happen. So why are you even mentioning it? Plans to invade another country start months if not years before it happens, not in 7 days... Especially when it comes to a country with such long borders... "you trying to ignore the fact kiev fighting their own citizens with army" Why? Why there was a war inside Ukraine? And who fueled opposing side? As you cant have government going against farmers and not being able to win. So who supplied money and weapons for the side which went against Ukraine government? "zelensky decided in january that hes going to bomb the hell out of the donetsk basin" And Putin said that he will never invade Ukraine, so what is your point here exactly? "thats why they asked russias help" Asked? So you got few farmers sending email to Putin for weapons to start a civil war and Putin like "Yea, why not, I will give you bunch of guns, go kill someone"? "just go to doctor, or go back 3rd grade and practice more reading" Irony is strong with you people... I guess next stop is Russia, after all, Russia like to invade countries and kill people, so by the same rules you just lay down here, everyone else has full right to nuke shit out of Russia and be done with that. Right? Your rules, not mine.
1
@cnccarving Will try to make it really easy for you and use simple words: Russia has no right to invade another country and start a war. Is this clear enough to you or should I use even simpler words?
1
@cnccarving Will make it really easy for you: You just admitted that Russia is in wrong here and they have no right to invade Ukraine. Thanks for admitting this.
1
@cnccarving So we agree that Russia should not have invaded Ukraine. Whats the problem?
1
Neuralink only reads some basic signals in the brains and tries to interpret their meaning, there is no way to do it backwards, not at this moment atleast
1
"We must not look to photo shopt Photo's from Nasa" Editing photo with photo editing software doesn't make it fake... It makes it edited... "in acient script it is told the Earh it flat" And Voldemort said... I guess English is not your primary language. In any case. We know that earth is a globe not because nasa said so but because its observable fact from reality.
1
@Silverboy9091 Like seriously, what do you smoke?
1
@Silverboy9091 Dude... Please, seek some professional help as this is to far into the woods already. Have a nice day...
1
Your comment is so weird. First of all, you don't need fire for life to exist. Second, how the hell would anyone know what exists in ENTIRE universe? Our galaxy alone is 105,700 light years wide, aka if someone lights a fire on one side of this galaxy, its light would be visible on another side 105 700 years later. And this is about our own galaxy, for everything else its in range or millions if not billions of years... So there could be massive visible alien structures all over the place of this universe and you would simply not see them due to the fact that light still didn't reached us. To say that there is no life in the universe besides years is not only ignorant but borderline offensive to humanity in general. Only religious nuts who wants this entire universe to be only for them will claim such silly things, no sane scientist ever said that, not a single one.
1
Congrats, you got scammed... There are no such thing as water powered engines... You can't beat first law of thermodynamics independent how much your facebook friends say to you.
1
Issue is that people actually picked her over alternatives to represent Australia in olympics, so not only she thought to be good enough, bunch of others responsible for sending people to olympics thought that she was enough...
1
@foch41 Entire situation is just weird
1
@@ekl2947 Duno if there is a country which doesn't allow anyone to own a gun, even those with extremely strict laws still allows it if you pass all those requirements. Sadly people (especially in US) thinks that when you start to talk about gun laws it somehow automatically means that no one ever can own a gun...
1
@zacharymorris9917 But this is the entire point... JP doesn't have actual coherent position, he keeps flipflopping all the time. Funny enough he went to that Jubilee event which was labeled as "Christian vs 20 atheists" which then had to be changed to "JP vs 20 atheists" because no one f**king knows if JP is a Christian or not. Why you ask? Because JP takes ALL positions at same time, and when I say ALL, I mean ALL of them. He never stated that he believes in god, yet in this video he wants to claim that atheists are in wrong to reject belief in god, make this make sense. If he is against atheist then he should be theist, but he never admitted that, why?
1
@zacharymorris9917 There is nothing to understand because JP doesn't make straight forward answers, he makes word salads. Let me demonstrate this, some time ago I went to ChatGPT and asked to make a sentence in a way JP does, this was the output: "Although the quintessential facet of my gastronomic predilections inexorably gravitates towards the consummate amalgamation of ambrosial comestibles, my proclivity for the gustatory realm invariably culminates in an unequivocal and unwavering preference for the perennially cherished and time-honored repast commonly denominated as pizza." You know what this mean? I like pizza. But even then, this convoluted mess of buzzwords actually have an actual specific meaning, aka "I like pizza", while with JP he will spend 20 minutes answering to the question "Do you like pizza?" and after all that you would still have no idea if he does or maybe he is even allergic to gluten or something... He is master of meaningless word salads. Heck, tell me, does JP believe in a god? Is he a Christian?
1
@valerystoichkov7429 Borning rich and inheriting riches are 2 different things... You can be born to a richest person in the world, doesn't mean that you will have option to use any of that money in your entire life...
1
Nice joke!
1
Have you watched this video? Because it was explained, in detail...
1
@fullimetal7581 Our local shops tok out most russian and Kaliningrad made products, not all of them, but majority disappeared. Same thing with energy, it's not fueling European market... Not anymore... And no idea why you even mentioning China, its a country which supports Russian aggression without officially supporting it and Putin NEEDS all the deals to be done in rubble, this is why he was crying about Europe paying to him in rubles when Europe was dependent on his gas. Rubble has no real value outside Russia.
1
" Even for trump it seems literally unbelievable that he would act like that" Are we talking about same Trump?... Because Trump i know this is natural behavior for him... He doesn't care about others, he cares about himself...
1
@desolder75 To be fair, Edison failed like 1000 times before he managed to create light bulb. You can't have progress without some failures down the road.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee When did I said that failing is a bad thing?... Do you even read? Can you understand English? As it looks like you only see words you want to see and then respond with something extra weird.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee I proved it in one of the replies to one of your silly comments. Go find it.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Go and find it... I'm not your mom... Learn to do things on your own, its about time. And why you keep mentioning Musk here? Do you have fetish for him or something?
1
Give some time. Prigozhin needs to drink some tea or stand near open window first.
1
Its extremely old technology... And it still yet to catch up? Why? Hydrogen combustion engine invented in 1806, hydrogen cell engine in 1966, how much more time do you need to invent a thing which could actually work? As from the looks BEV's are taking over on rapid pace, those are getting better and better each year while hydrogen remains same terrible option like it was 50 years ago
1
There are plans to have moon base. At the moment space travel becomes relatively cheap we will establish bases on the moon, bigger and better ISS like stations around earth and colony on Mars.
1
If you say "I'm not a flat earth, i'm not a round earther" this says it all already...
1
@ Those would be good qualities, if... You didn't deny basic reality based on your own personal brainwashing. Earth's shape is provable to be a globe, you can't be "open minded" about basic reality. Its like being open minded about harm caused by someone losing his head... We know what happens in that case, you can't be open minded about it...
1
You seem to be new to this 3 day war after 400+ days, will explain few things here. NATO dint even joined this war, US dint do it, EU dint. What we have is Ukraine fighting back aggressor with some help from west, if NATO joined this one it would have been over in 3 days, but this isint a case. Russia is fighting Ukraine, not NATO...
1
You what who ruled over entire Ukrainian territory? Lithuania... Would that mean that Lithuania should have complete right to take over old lands it owned?
1
What the what now? Shape of earth is independent from "creation" or "evolution" and you can have "creation" and "evolution" at same time... Your comment doesn't make any sense and completely irrelevant to the topic.
1
Do you seriously think that Puting would leave his country to any none dictatorship ruled one even without this?
1
End for Russia?
1
Have you asked if owner is actually happy with that car? Because I could bet that he isn't thrilled about it. Even better, ask if next car will be hydrogen.
1
@thomascorbett2936 Again... Majority of humans still believe in wizards and magic and you think that flat earth belief is over the board?... We have more than enough ignorant/stupid people with all sorts of crazy beliefs... You are fundamentally and demonstrably incorrect here, which is ironic as it literally goes against what you just said "overwhelming evidence and common sense" we have overwhelming evidence and common sense that there are actual flat earthers out there, but you don't believe that. Isn't that ironic?
1
What's exactly unreliable with Ev's?
1
@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars I mean, Tesla owners have no real complains about charging network or software issues. So those would only be for bad BEV's out there. So it's more like exception and not the rule.
1
@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars ? Tesla cars are basically the cars which depreciate least from all cars in general... At one point used car was more expensive than new one due to limited production rates and high demand. So do you have actual valid argument here or what?
1
This doesn't exist... Fact check next time.
1
Climate alarmists? What are those?
1
Because hydrogen needs to be produced by using same electricity you would use to charge BEV's... BEV's skips production step in this case.
1
Because why would you want to have 2 separate measuring systems when you can have one?...
1
They are not much up to, just going bankrupt by wasting time and money on hydrogen.
1
"I can say for a fact that on ur flight u did not see curvature" Should he? How high you should go to start seeing curvature if world is a globe and not flatardia?
1
Sun never gets closer... Unless you want to count in elliptical earths orbit around sun which can get us closer to sun by 3% during 6 month period...
1
23.5° Tho what point are you trying to make here?
1
Still no idea what you are asking here... Care to clarify it?
1
At which latitude?
1
When there is a need, there can be a solution. Artificial gravity is a need, cool, let them cook up solution for it. Traveling in few days will not be possible for who knows how long, maybe when fusion reactors are running and miniaturized we could use one with electric engines to shorten that trip time, but this will be in like 100+ years, so not really a thing you can just sit and wait, especially when you don't even know if this will ever work, as current test fusion reactors are in thousands of tons in weight with all of its infrastructure, so long way to go. Besides this I can't even think of any other way to speed up travel without inventing some sort of warp drive or just magical teleportation thingy. You don't really need to terraform mars, you only need to build settlement which can self sustain.
1
Yes yes yes and Santa is real too...
1
Are you saying that Puting didn't made that official statement saying that Prigozhin is a traitor? Like, which part of this video was a lie in your reality?
1
What?
1
Seen where? Because in US its like $30 per kg. So where exactly have you seen those tiny prices?
1
@IraFox84 So then, will ask you... So where exactly have you seen those tiny prices?
1
Its called: Whataboutism.
1
So your solution is to allow for Putin to take Ukraine?
1
Yea, I was listening and failed to understand why he was complaining about security guard doing her job. If its in the rules to ask/demand from people to take off head coverings or something, that's it. He made some weird big deal about it being religious thing, like, If I came in with long coat, face covered completely and said "Its religious thing, leave me alone" should I be allowed to enter?... Such a weird video
1
Why?
1
Ammonia is toxic and extremely corrosive across the board. Duno about you but this isn't a good solution even if it was a free fuel.
1
woof beast making shit up will not help your case. FYI NASA stands for National Aeronautics and Space Administration...
1
woof beast "God is in all things by the property of omnipresence." What the hell does your god doing in my but?! "Exactly what the New age Academy of Satanic Associations want you to think!" Yea but your G.O.D aka "Galactic Obliteration Device" or "Graphic Overlay Data" or "Gamers on Dope" or " Game Operations Director" or "Gnomes on Dope" or "Game or Die"... You literally making shit up just to feel better... abbreviation... Learn what that means...
1
Hydrogen could only worked if we got those before BEV's went into mass production, so when we already have better alternatives, why would anyone want to go with hydrogen?
1
@petterlion2659 Territory controlled by Russia is contracting from the start of this war. Russia isn't gaining new land, its losing control over existing one. Russia already did 2-3 major "tactical" retreats, so reality disagrees with your personal opinion here.
1
Let me guess, you never got A from math class?
1
Its weird to have video about most secret tech in the world without it being taken down... Which is more likely "One person creating scam video about magical technology" or "There is magical secret society of lizardmen who steals secret technology AFTER it gets mentioned on social media"? Isn't it weird that all those videos claiming to have world changing technology NEVER actually explains how it works for everyone to reproduce it?
1
It costs arm and legg to refuel, it can drive tiny distances. Yea, good luck with that.
1
Which is really bad thing to do. Basic visual illusion can mess your senses to infinity and beyond.
1
Its a scam video...
1
@Harry-ff4vx I'm not saying that its 100% not a diesel generator, I'm saying that it makes less sense for it to be one than it simply being electrical box of some sorts
1
Its not really increasing, simply flat earthers learned how to use internet.
1
Because you said so? Have you seen actual BEV's sale numbers?... Its at the beginning of S curve... Please just double check facts with reality before you speak.
1
@donguess4332 Based on what evidence? Or is this just your personal opinion?
1
Copium running low? Now you just doing whataboutism?
1
Irony... You think to be smart when you don't even know that you can't feel motion, but only changes in it... Och that irony with flat earthers.... And just FYI all those speeds are not related to the shape of earth, so no idea why are you even bringing up something you clearly don't understand which is not even relevant here...
1
Bleadng taxpayers? How much do you think each tax payers pays for Ukraine support?
1
Ok.
1
Its not a concept, is fiction.
1
@b12beyou "but why do you believe in evolution? " Because evolution is a demonstrable fact, even theory of gravity is supported by less evidence than evolution at this point. There is no real debate if evolution is true or not, its true, get over it. This is on same exact level as to say "Why do you believe that earth is spherical?" because its demonstrable fact... Get over it... "Maybe you haven’t seen the latest research and heard the talks within the scientific communities." And yet when asked you dint gave any citation for any of this... Are you lying or just brainwashed and parroting something you never fact checked yourself?
1
@b12beyou So you made a claim and now you are saying that you cant present any evidence to support it and on top of this making another excuse so you could run away by accusing us not being reasonable? If you actually been to actual scientific conference then you should be able to tell us what kind of, when it happen and where. Right? Should be really easy to recall such event which happen few months ago and quick google search will show who said what at that conference. Right? So maybe instead of trying to dodge and run away, maybe start proving that you are correct and not just parroting some ones lies?
1
Or its the one way to actually show Russians that there is actual war with actual consequences. i'm not for the war, far from it, but when you have one side always defending and one always attacking, something needs to change for this war to actually end, one way or the other.
1
Let me guess, you got these "facts" from facebook post?
1
Here's idea for generic Musk haters: Maybe government should fix Earth? Just FYI Musk isn't getting your precious taxpayer money for nothing, he is selling services for which he is getting payed, there is ZERO obligation for him to spend his earned money on anything besides what he wants.
1
There are countless expensive projects companies invested billions for them to just disappear into oblivion.
1
Yes yes yes, like we heard "Tesla killer is just around the corner!!!" for past 10 years... GM and Honda can try to make those magical cars, if people starts buying them, cool, until then it's just empty claims and empty promises from car companies like they did for decades. And no, even if California gets more hydrogen cars that will not mean that every other place could do the same.
1
2 french people who volunteered got killed and you think that's American tactic to use people as cannon fodder?... Cope much?
1
They have like 5million users currently, demand for starlink is huge, so they can jack up those prices and still have enough customers. Tho I didn't even kept track of their actual prices, how much did it change?
1
Same exact reason why we have speed limits... It's those retarded people who is the issue, not the rest of us... But I can't see you complaining about there being speed limits or you being forced to wear seat belt and so on. We have to have laws which apply to everyone due to small portion of humans who will want to do stupid stuff.
1
Fun fact #1: You can recycle batteries. I know, shocker, but still... Fun fact #2: Biggest lithium provider is Australia. Fun fact #3: Zero people returned with explanation about metal hydride characteristics after being asked to elaborate more with actual numbers. Weird thing, its like people just heard those words and decided that it's the holy grail of everything by default.
1
@christiantaylor7901 There aren't that many to be recycled, that's the interesting part, batteries held way better than expected so there isn't that many dedicated recycling facilities built yet, its just starting, but those are being built which will recycle all of those batteries. And you once more mentioned your magical Nickel Metal Hydride. What are those? Which facilities recycle them? At what cost? At what rate? How does that even compare to actual batteries? And for material sourcing, what you are complaining here is about COUNTRIES exploiting people, not that technology itself is bad. And there are more than one battery technology and more to come out with different chemistries. So maybe instead of complaining about batteries requiring rare materials, maybe complain about countries exploiting people? If companies are secretive about this magical Nickel Metal Hydride, then how the f**k do you know that its the holy grail? How many companies do you recall saying that they have magical technology in the works which never came out as one? Its the point of the company to say that they have ground breaking thing on their hands, that's how they will get investments... But if they can't present any actual verifiable numbers than its just a random magical claim. Its like the people who claims to have engines running on pure water... Atleast in that case we know that they are full of shit due to basic physics, in your case with Nickel Metal Hydride we have no idea what that is and how to eat it. Yet you think that its a really good thing, while at same time you admit to know jack shit about it because they are not sharing any actual information about it... Do you see tiny issue here? You know how you can store hydrogen? By bonding it to... Oxygen... You know, in that for its really safe and stable we usually refer to as water... Why arent we doing that? Maybe there is a good reason why this is the case?... Even if they bonded hydrogen to some element and got some good density, doesn't mean that its actually viable option. Basic questions remain, like "How much energy do you need to separate it from that bond?" or "How quickly it can do it?" or "How much weight will that entire thing be?" or "How much will it cost to produce?" You know, basic questions which are the corner stone of every single technology. If you need same amount of energy or close to it just to separate hydrogen from one magical Nickel Metal Hydride, then what's the point? How much energy will you get from that entire tank? Will you be able to drive 10 miles with it? As you will use separated hydrogen to produce electricity to use that to separate more hydrogen... So how much is left after all this process? Its like having can of water and saying that this stores hydrogen perfectly and in perfectly safe form. Well, yes. But you will need MORE energy to extract hydrogen from that water than you will get back from using it. Do you see potential issue now with your magical Nickel Metal Hydride? Och to add to all this, there is actual holy grail of batteries, graphene based, those are extremely good, safe and clean and easy to recycle. Issue is that at this moment in time we don't know how to actually mass produce them, basically we know how to make those, but we don't know how to scale production up due to complexity involving. This is the actual technology which is worth someone's time, not some weird wapor ware as Nickel Metal Hydride you know nothing about.
1
NO PAIN NO GAIN Maybe because your "other stations" are Russian propaganda ones?
1
@pauldas9787 Because TF isn't interested in objective information, he is interested in anything what could put any company related to Musk into bad light. That's the entire point of TF videos. You can easily notice it when you know to actually pay attention to what he is saying and have basic understanding of actually reality how it actually is.
1
From where did you got this magical number? And have you seen hydrogen cars? Those with 3 huge tanks and getting 400 mile range? So then, what range do you think you could get from your retrofitted car? 100 miles?
1
@gjermundification You are missing one TINY issue here... Your calculations are based on Hydrogen being in a liquid form which is extremely difficult thing to have and quite impractical in general as it will boil off by simply being in your tank. On top of this. You will need actual place to put this new tank or multiple of them, so existing fuel tank place will not be suitable for it, so most likely your trunk will be used, so you will lose that one entirely. This assuming that you could go with liquid hydrogen. If not, then you will have tiny range by going with highly pressurized hydrogen tank. Its not that easy to just convert existing car... It will cost you arm and leg to retro fit it, then it will be extremely inconvenient due to how much extra space it will take and then you will pay arm and leg to refuel it... So why would anyone want to do it?
1
@gjermundification yes yes yes, just get bunch of cinnamon and you can travel across the world...
1
What did he say?
1
So evidence like this makes it what shape exactly? http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif
1
3 I think, might be wrong.
1
You forgot to... Fact check before parroting something as stupid as this.
1
basic observation of sun disproves flat earth model, even tho flat earthers doesn't have flat earth model which would not have contradictions to reality. So its not hersay, its basic facts and basic geometry and basic education on basic things which proves that earth is not a space pizza. Earth is globe and anyone with basic understanding of reality knows that.
1
J.J McQuade ? None of this happened under Trump? Maybe because this war started after he was president?... How dumb are you?
1
First of all, water isn't free. Second, you can't beat basic laws of physics here. You could have easily said that your legs are free so now you will just walk everywhere for free... Well... Those are not free either
1
@mvlad7402 To put it simply: Meteor hits earth, life dies out on it, people on mars survives. We simply need to become multiplanetary species to have highest chance in surviving random natural disasters.
1
@zachmoyer1849 Yea, and pushing technology forwards by creating this need to have bases on different planets will only create new tech everyone could be using. Heck, there is HUGE list of tech NASA made for space which is now being used by everyone on entire planet.
1
@tylerdordon99 Its hard to keep straight face when you talk with some one who thinks that we live on a pancake and their usual reason is: because book said so. Flat earthers mention NASA because they think that having different opinion then mainstream some how makes them correct. They simply want to be against usual things, they don't really care about evidence for the globe model, they just want to be rebels.
1
You could, issue is when you are not using that car, and boiling off isn't really adjustable on the fly, so you still need a method to supply hydrogen in quantities you actually need at that moment.
1
Keep your book aways from something was is actually real...
1
@richardrandomk You can just do some google search, i'm to lazy to look up actual articles about it. To put it simply, EV produce more CO2 when those get built, but this gets offset in like 2 first years of usage, so in average over cars life span you will produce allot less CO2 even if you would keep using same unclean power sources, like coal plants, switching to renewables would shift that even more.
1
Actually it is intelligent, most intelligent people says that this is the reality. Unless you want to argue that intelligent people are wrong... But then you would need to be stupid to know truth... Och wait...
1
I'm like every other normal human being, yea, i do believe and i know that its not a flat pancake.
1
I know, its quite big waste of time to try prove flatardia by using flatardian science.
1
You know what you can use solar or wind for?... To charge BEV's battery... Shocker, I know...
1
Funny enough, both of you are wrong. First life forms on earth appeared like 3.7 billion years ago. We evolved from those, so it wasn't millions or 300k years, it was billions...
1
Fun fact, hydrogen cars are more or less exact same weight as pure BEV's Toyota Mirai 1850kg Tesla model Y 1780kg to 2003kg depending on configuration
1
But its not...
1
@Matt561 But its not...
1
@Matt561 How the hell is it not dependent on grid? You need 60% more electricity to travel same distance, so you are more depending on a grid... Without ability to recharge at home... And if power goes down, hydrogen refueling station will not give you any hydrogen, so good luck with that. First of all, by product is NOT only water. You still need to produce hydrogen to begin with. Second, you need fresh water, which means that in places where its already an issue when it comes to fresh water access having cars which consumes it isn't a solution. So yea, its not...
1
@Matt561 No idea what you are trying to even say here. Not dependent to charge the car? What? Are you saying that its using different technology than BEV's?... Like... Duh... Its hydrogen car... Even tho hydrogen fuel cell car technically is a electrical car, just with extra steps.
1
Desire for war with Russia? Why? No one wants Russia... Everyone simply wants for Russia to stop attacking other countries... And America isint in Ukraine, if it was then this war would have been over 150 days ago.
1
Because water will not move your car...
1
@tws57tws57 Yes, you can make H from water, by having specialized equipment and putting in crap tone of energy, so its not like you can produce H in your car and even having equipment at your home isint really a reasonable option.
1
@dominicpullen8791 Let's test your basic understanding of globe model. Which way is down on a globe model?
1
You ignoring the fact that you watched AI generated fake video and you think that it represents actual reality...
1
Because Putin said so?
1
MadMax You should start with yourself. You already starting to dive into conspiracy territory and soon you will be drinking kool aid with people like this "Globe is a Hoax". Just because some one from government lied at some point, doesn't mean that government in general lies. By your broken logic it would mean that just because humans lied that would mean that every single human on entire planet is a liar, which would make YOU a liar by your own standards. By that same logic just because we have some insane people... Well... You get the point... I hope...
1
@sexualmaniac Einstein wasn't even believer in god, but its besides the point. Majority of scientists today are none believers in god, if you want to go by argument from... science... Then you wont get far.
1
@lavabite2245 He made a claim that god did something, thats just a claim... While we know why planets are spherical, its due to gravity... We can prove that, its all fine. But he still needs to support his claim about gravity being created by his god. Its not rocket science you know...
1
Promises are not lies by default... If I promise to you that I will be at your house at 8pm and I'm there at 8:30, I didn't lie, I was just late for one of the other reason. That promise would ONLY be a lie if I knew that I will not be at that specific time.
1
What expertise do you have in robotics?
1
What is more likely: Ukraine passing over Russia front lines with short range launchers or Ukraine usint long range rockets which they got day before? Doesn't really make difference ether way, you will ether have Russian failure to prevent Ukraine from getting to any target with short range rockets or that Russia cant protect anything what is reachable by long range ones.
1
@GTAandApplechannel Isint most wars got caused by difference in religious beliefs? And "strangely" enough, secular countries seam to have lower crime rate than those which are heavily religious, or that none religious people are under represented in prisons. Believing in god doesn't prevent you from doing bad things, its really easy to argue opposite to be true.
1
@GTAandApplechannel How? Lets pick one of popular ones: Christianity. Does bible contain come good instructions? Yes. Does it contain some immoral ones too? Yes. You have things like burning witches, killing homosexuals or adulterous, that you can own and beat your slaves as long as they don't die in a day or two and on and on and on... You don't need religion to be moral, but you can make moral person immoral by using his religion.
1
@GTAandApplechannel Was owning slaves ever moral? You seam to want to say that just because bible was written back in a day when owning slaves was normal thing it some how becomes actually moral thing? And what difference does it make even if it was moral then? Is it now? Should we use religions and their books when it comes to moral values? Short answer is: No. We know that owning slaves is immoral not because book said so, its actually opposite of that. So no, we don't need religions, never needed them and we will never need. You can have allot better world which is not driven by any religion.
1
And this is why we can't have nice things... Because we have people like you...
1
Why?
1
You do realize that this works both ways, right? Russians are not making any progress here while Ukraine keep retaking land back, clearly one side is more efficient.
1
Bot? Or is it @YashRaj-m8b a bot who made same exact comment one hour later
1
@Bkkriversidelifestyle Are you one of those who thinks that government put microchips into you when you vaccinated? What exactly are people like you scared of here?
1
And you will spend extra few k for maintenance and refueling.
1
And? Like, he pushed BEV's, he pushed reusable rockets. While he is extremely bad with his timelines, he does deliver.
1
@johnwatson3948 You can't make an actual argument, don't you now?
1
@sundiver137 ? How brainwashed are you? Check any FSD v13 video, it does point to point driving basically without any flaws, its improving with every version. Hyperloop NEVER was Musk thing... He promoted it at one point and that's it, he never actually invested money in it... Cybertruck is the best selling truck at the moment, even if it looks stupid, it made crap ton money for Tesla already. Starship achieved its goals and getting to finish line too. So besides hyperloop which wasn't Musk's thing, none of the others have been recalled (?) and are the best in their sector at the moment. So what are you smoking? Or is your face so deep in TF ass that you can't even see daylight anymore?
1
Hydrogen fully recyclable?... Current most common source for hydrogen is natural gas... And even then its extremely expensive... What do you propose? Collect water hydrogen engine creates and then send it via mail to the factory to be used for hydrolysis to make more?
1
I have a bridge to sell...
1
@quietobserver4636 Whats your point here? Like seriously, lets assume that he is not a scientists, that he has no degrees, that his IQ is 80, what would that change? Is what he says wrong? And just FYI do you know what ad hominem attack is? Is a logical fallacy where you attack person and not argument itself. So maybe try to debunk anything he said instead of attacking him?
1
You cant really force dictator from his position with a petition.
1
Well everything is in the bible if you simply make shit up to fit reality...
1
What?
1
Flat earth isint a theory, definitely isint scientific theory. On top of this flat earth is demonstrably false.
1
And they caught booster for second time. While upper stage was completely new design with some new issues. Its R&D, shit will happen, just like Blue Origin one disintegrated on reentry.
1
Change isn't ok when change is the wrong one... Just because something changed, will not mean that it got better.
1
or you could use BEV and charge it overnight from basic wall outlet and have full tank every single day and never visit fuel station.
1
Education of basic reality does help out here with understanding how reality works
1
You can't fix basic laws of physics...
1
What failure?
1
@deantunkara1567 Its better winning than what Russia experiences currently... Keep in mind that Ukraine doesn't have and doesn't want to sacrifice bunch of their own people in this war, so their progress will be slower than it could have been, but this is saving lives, Ukrainian lives. And if you are so concern about lives, then Russia should just stop this war and go home...
1
Then no one should panic here. All according to the grand plan.
1
Attacking another country is existential threat to their survival as a state? Seriously?... Ironically enough this war actually created existential threat to their survival as a state. Irony.
1
@garretttobin7451 "this Nato expansion is an existential threat to Russia" How? Stop complaining on countries joining willingly NATO, explain how exactly this is an existential threat to Russia. Because at this moment it sounds more like "Stop grouping up and preventing us from taking other countries by force!!! I want to wage wars without fear of fight back!!! Maaaaaaam!!! They are bullying me!!!"
1
@glowingboy4547 None of that will work. There have been already instances where flat earthers tried to disprove globe, but instead proved it, then dismissed results and continued with their propaganda like nothing happen. At best what you will achieve is to educate that one single flat earther who will do all this traveling, but even then, it might not even work on that single one.
1
Difference between answering stupid question and explaining why question is incorrect and what is the correct answer for this topic.
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
It eliminates a need to protect your car from scratches or general damage. If you are using your truck on construction site, you will know how easily regular car body can be damaged by random debris or simply by you moving in and out heavy equipment. You can go offroad in a bushes without risking to damage paint. And its rust resistant.
1
@TheRealSpencerMarks Its generic failure from flat earthers to understand what composite photos are, they basically saying that when you take panoramic photos with your phone that resulting image is not representative of reality and everything you see in it is CGI and all that nonsense.
1
If they could have they would have done it already. Russia loses millions if not billions every single day, longer this war drags out worse Russia will be. So what Putin are waiting for?
1
There is one more "TF cult mind virus" which closely relates to "woke mind virus" as there is big overlap
1
*Lies in Russian*
1
Because... ● It operates only on geofenced, precision mapped, limited access highways ● It operates only at speeds of 40 MPH and below ● It operates only in the same lane—no lane changes ● It operates only with a lead vehicle within 100 meters ahead ● It operates only in clear weather—no rain or snow ● It operates only with no direct sun on the cameras ● It operates only if the driver doesn’t avert his gaze from ahead for more than five seconds ● It operates only outside of tunnels ● It operates only with an internet connection
1
Why? I can bet that even if he did you would still have no idea what JP's position actually is or what he is objecting here against...
1
No idea how its win win, and no, your modern american truck is still constrained by space. Do you expect it magically to not require bunch of extra space to fit all those hydrogen tanks in it? Or do you want to make those american trucks even bigger? Space issue remains independent of car type and size. This video was about V8 engine, by my knowledge V8 eats way more fuel than, well, any lover V's does, right? Your double performance is in comparison to actually economical hydrogen combustion engine, might be V4 or even V3, not a V8. Fuel cells break, but those break less than combustion engines. Why do you think there are no actual hydrogen combustion based mass produced cars? Because its a big issue when it comes to actual maintenance costs of those. Its just a expensive toy. And for f**k sakes, why do people keep bringing up BEV's into this conversation? This V8 can't even compete with fuel cell, why even bring in something else into conversation?
1
@Rene-uz3eb That's cool and all, but increasing car size will increase fuel consumption. So pick any of your super duper sized truck and try to shove in few cylindrical tanks in it. All that extra space you got from this super duper super sized truck gained would be lost, so what's the point? Your truck already utilized more or less max amount of space, just like every other car. There aren't just huge empty voids in cars chassy where you could just put in multiple tanks without compromising something. Google Toyota Mirai, its hydrogen car, it has 3 tanks to get 400 mile range. This is equivalent to basic car with 400 mile range, but, try to compare actual usable space in it, because Mirai suffers from huge central console (has one of the tanks there), small back seat (again, tank under it) and small trunk (yes, tank under it).
1
@Rene-uz3eb Check size of Mirai car, its huge, yet interior is tiny due to it needing to have 3 tanks. And its hydrogen fuel cell car. Now double that for combustion and then double that for v8 and you will realize how quickly you will run out of empty voids in your oversized (compensating for something?) car. Not even talking about maintenance costs... As every single hydrogen tank has expiration date printed on them, like every single one of them. Imagine a need to replace those every X years... Good luck with that.
1
@Rene-uz3eb Hydrogen tanks expire based on time, not on refuel cycles, this is why those have expiration dates. You might extend their lifespan if you avoid filling them to the max, but you will still have that same expiration date after which you will HAVE to replace those independent on how much they degraded over time. And yes, its a crazy idea. Combustion engine on its core is silly idea as hydrogen fuel cell produces twice the energy, aka you can travel double the distance. And what exactly do you win by wasting energy with combustion engine? Sound... That's it... There are no other "benefit" besides it making similar sound to petrol one, everything else goes into negatives, including price, maintenance cost, refueling costs, usable space...
1
@Rene-uz3eb Cryo hydrogen is non option due to mentioned boiloff. No one in their right mind would want a fuel which just evaporates if you are not using your car and you would be risking to be stranded if you not used your car for few days. Money thrown away. And no, you can't just fill up before each trip, share amount of equipment needed for this would be more than the car itself in cost and in maintenance. Again, no one in their right mind would pick that option. So compressed gas it is. BEV's keeps improving on regular basis, its generally most convenient and cheapest option out there as alternative for gasoline cars. Hydrogen fuel cells would be second option, third would be, maybe, e-fuel type cars, then maybe hydrogen combustion. Aka your combustion engines would maybe kind of potentially work for heavy machinery, kind of, not really tho, as you could still get better performance and cheaper maintenance from fuel cell. Point is that hydrogen came in too late for it to become anything more than someone rich guys expensive toy, we got better solution.
1
"need a baterie that is still made by children in africa and china and have to be changed every year or so" What do you smoke? Because it sounds good from all this fantasy you are writing here. "still doesnt have a good enought autonomy to replace conbustion in all field" Does it need to replace in all fields tho? "require to have a CLEAN source of power to be deemed zero Co2 emition" That's not how reality works... There is no such thing as zero CO2, everything creates it. But at the end of the day BEV's creates least of that, even with partial renewable sources. "OR just use a bike and walk when you have the option, just be reasonable with your travels will help" Or not? Car provides quite a bit more convenience than a bike, and this is not a solution to current problem, its just suggestion to use your car less.. Doesn't really impact that fact that car needs to be cleaner than it is now anyways.
1
GPS is one way connection which can't even be turned off in specific areas.
1
They are more eco friendly than alternatives. There is no such thing as eco friendly, there are just less polluting
1
5 straw man fallacies in one sentence... I mean, i can only congratulate you on this one! Its a first time when i see such moronic sentence.
1
Hyperloop isn't Musk's project you know. Neither was theranos. No idea what "Fyre Festval" is. Going to mars it to simply colonize it and have backup plan in case something happens to earth.
1
Which makes that hot rod just an expensive toy. Hydrogen combustion engines are the half efficiency in comparison to fuel cell ones, on top of that, V8 would be like only 25% of fuel cell engine... Aka your hot rod is even more impractical.
1
@ArrKoKo Earths shape was known from 3 century BCE...
1
Even more expensive and extremely toxic, what could go wrong in car crash... If flames doesn't kill you, ammonia fumes will.
1
Why do you think there are zero mass produced hydrogen cars with combustion engines? Because those are half the efficiency in comparison to hydrogen fuel cells, which are already expensive to fill up.
1
@piero17sb Burning hydrogen will ALWAYS remain less efficient than hydrogen fuel cells, this is just how physics work, so there wont be a moment when going with combustion engine is a good deal for anyone who doesn't want to pay arm and leg for their fuel and for maintenance.
1
@piero17sb Much lower in infrastructure? Are you sure about that?... Because it's the most expensive infrastructure for any type of fuel out there... No cheapest, but most expensive one. Maintenance cost will be high too, as for example every single hydrogen tank has expiration dates printed on them, yes, not by mile driver, but by time. And due to how corrosive hydrogen can be in general you will be paying big bucks to keep that car running. Main waste from hydrogen cars is production of hydrogen and it needs crap ton of energy. This "real" car will be as popular as Blackberry was with its physical keyboard. Hardly anyone even remembers that company anymore... Times change, we don't need cars which can be heard from 10 blocks away just because YOU want to hear that sound. If you do want that sound, then buy a video game, put on headset, turn volume to 150% and enjoy it. Hydrogen cars will not be a thing, and I'm not even talking about combustion ones, I'm talking about the more practical fuel cell ones which are the only ones being produces, and for good reason. Hydrogen is already extra expensive and going with 2x (at minimum) the cost is just insanity even if you like the sound.
1
Smoked Ukrainians where?...
1
Russia, they would have more interest and it is in line of what they like to do.
1
@eagle1onoteagle10 Those are defensive... If you are being attacked you can't just hide inside bunker... You actually need something to shoot back... Seriously... Do you even know how war works?...
1
@eagle1onoteagle10 Maybe war would have ended by Russia taking over entire Ukraine... But is it actually a better option? Like, where would it stop? If Russia attacks Ukraine and we do as some people suggests "Just surrender" then where would Putin actually stop? By using that approach Putin would have taken entire world by now...
1
Why?
1
Hull Hogar I guess Russia not having any real gains for past year is a sign of Russia winning?...
1
@scottparsons8437 NASA isn't deceitful and NASA is not even relevant here. Space can be and is a vacuum, because... Flash ew to you: vacuum doesn't suck, literally.
1
@scottparsons8437 You have really weird approach here... Instead of disproving globe or proving flat earth, you literally saying that there might be issues with air leaking which can be lethal... I mean... Ok... But even if that was the case earth is still a globe and space is still real and your complains could be just you not understanding something properly and so on. So like, what is your point here in general?
1
@scottparsons8437 Human life cant be sustained under water ether, but there we are with submarines defining reality, i guess... But like seriously, what is your entire argument here? You cant understand something there for its not true? We went to space, we currently have multiple people in space, living, breathing, no issues. Some smart people figured it out, so what is your entire point here?
1
@scottparsons8437 Are you saying that ISS is not real and there are no people on board of it?
1
What?
1
What happen in Crimea air base? Incompetent soldier smoking near rocket fuel? If you want to believe everything what Russians says, go for it, but like seriously, how hard would it be for Russians to shell their own troops and accuse Ukraine?... Have they never done this before?...
1
@andrewthurman8836 So then was it incompetent Russians (again)? Is Putin now scared that Russians keep accidentally blowing up his air bases?... You do realize that this lie by Putin doesn't make him look any better than Ukraine blowing it up, right?
1
Why? Because Musk said that some IP's originated in Ukraine?
1
But why are you a Christian?
1
Well yea, it will no take long to take down entire Russia, or it will take 3 days, just like it took 3 days to win this war.
1
Why?
1
@AmanNama-wv5dt "well for starters u can make hydrogen straight up with just connectin a solar panel to water" Well yes, just like you could make your own petroleum from crude oil... How many are actually doing that? Equipment and work required to do this on private scale is way higher than you will get back, this is why you don't have private petroleum factories in everyone's garages or even near cities. Its just economically not viable. " has all the benefits of a convectional car" ? Like what? Hydrogen cars require bunch of space for their tanks, this is not conventional... Hydrogen cars are basically electrical ones, most of them have batteries to equalize delivered power and to have source of power on actual instantaneous demand. "fast charging" By how much? 5-10 minutes? How much more will you be paying in comparison to BEV's? 150+ bucks for full "tank"? Do you make 150 in 5-10 minutes for this to be worth your saved time? By the way, you can charge BEV at your house over night, so charging times are non existing and every day you have full "tank" "ability to carry fuel in a container so ur not a grid addict" No, just no... This is definitely a false information. Hydrogen in these cars gets up to 10000 PSI, yes, this high. You can't just have a tank of hydrogen you can carry around in a meaningful way... It would be way easier to carry a battery... "and u dont need to make billions of batteries and pollute the environment in the process" How do you think hydrogen is being made currently? Natural gas... Do you think that this actually is cleaner than BEV's? No, no its not. Calculations have been done on BEV and hydrogen fuel cell cars, while both are really close on overall pollution, BEV still wins, not by much, but still wins. "just imagine how much stress it' gonna cause to fucken rebuild the electric grid in the whole world to handle EV charging" And this is why you should spend more than 5 minutes on this topic before you start claiming that one is better than the other. Did you know that producing hydrogen will require 60% MORE electricity to drive you same distance as it would with pure BEV? So your argument about the grid works against hydrogen cars. Even tho its non issue, grid expands based on demand, just like it did for its entire existence. "its impossible they just selling bullshit" But it is possible, car manufacturers have specific goals governments sets for them, companies are required to start shifting towards cleaner solutions, so they want it or not, they simply have to make something, it can be complete rubbish, but they still need to make it just to tick that "I make green stuff" check box. "we talking here insane amounts of energy and the resources we need just to make it all lmao" And we will need way more for hydrogen cars, so you are debunking your own argument here.
1
What do you smoke?
1
@vresi Well I have read quite few comments in last 2 weeks made by TF fanbase, and they are not that bright I might say. And I did argue with flat earthers some time ago. Comparing both I can definitely see similarities, one main is blind acceptance of what their leader told them without EVER fact checking even if it takes 15 seconds of google search. And their "arguments" usually sums up to "naha, I'm right and you are wrong! mooooom!!!"
1
@grugnotice7746 Don't stand near open window or you might accidentally fall from it, just like many did in Russia in recent years... And don't worry, we are not starving and we will not be, why should we? Worse impact is due to grain shortage from Ukraine exports, but like, if Russia could just f**k off and go home that could be solved in no time, even tho its not really noticeable issue.
1
Which can do like 60 miles on full tank which costs like 100 bucks to fill it up. It's a cool toy, nothing much else.
1
Not that many are lucky enough to never experience religions brainwashing, but it looks that trend is going up, which is nice. And if you want to have some basic idea, just remember something you have been told to be true and later on realized that it wasn't, multiply that by 1000x and you will be little bit closer.
1
@TiLonGonn Bible doesn't say that earth is a sphere and that its in outer space... And just FYI "circle" is not a sphere but flat disk. As i'm suspecting you are referring to that verse. For outer space, its that "hanging on nothing" thing? Because earth doesn't hang, it falls towards sun, aka orbiting it, aka moves like hell.
1
@TiLonGonn "The word circle in Hebrew means sphere mate, they're interchangeable." Riiiiight, so people who translated it decided to use wrong word because why not... And if its interchangeable, then how the hell you decided that its referring towards globe and not flat? Which part of bible actually says earth to be a globe and not flat? because there is verse which indicates that you should be able to see entire earth from big tree or mountain... Soooo, if nothing in bible says that earth is globe, but we can find quite few talking about earth being flat, which way should we go exactly here? "What object looks like a circle from any angle? Oh that's right it's a sphere." Riiiiiiiiiight, because it was talking from perspective of an angel... Duh... How dumb em I.... "it's called a figure of speech" like global flood? Like Adam and Eve? Like god? How did you decided which verses are figure of speech? Is your rule "If its got scientific debunking evidence then its figure of speech, otherwise its a fact until proven to be false by science"? "The bible does confirm the existence of nothing outside of Earth" But its not nothing... We still have particles in space, even earths atmosphere stretches' beyond moon, then you have entire solar system, billions of stars in our galaxy and billions of galaxies, so yea, not nothing... So one more fail in your basket. "You say you're not a Flat Earther but you keep repeating the same Flat Earther bs." I'm not flat earthers and i'm not religious, this is why i can poke in both sides while using flatardian arguments against you. Bible is simply wrong on basics, nothing new here and you will not get away with that as hard as you want too. Shape of earth is generally quite small issue with biblical claims which have been proven to be false.
1
@TiLonGonn "I'm just saying the bible doesn't say the Earth is flat, plain and simple." But it does say that. We have quite few verses which indicates earth to be flat and we have none of those which would say that earth is actually spherical. And when you think that bible was written by simple people who knew jack shit about actual reality and that people at that time thought that earth was flat, its really not surprising to find verses which indicate that... There is no way around this, bible never says earth to be spherical but multiple times indicates it to be flat, deal with that. "You can disagree with whatever you want, I'm not even sure why you're arguing tbh." Pointing out your miss understanding and miss representation of what bible actually says. What was your point in trying to defend ancient book and make it less false then it already is?
1
@TiLonGonn "Point out exactly which verse says that the Earth is flat." "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" Those are at best wage descriptions which lean towards earth being flat, now provide me a verse which would lean towards earth being globe... "You're just spreading the same lies that Flat Earthers are" Its not a lie, your failure in your own religion is not our problem, and like i said already, your book talking about earth being flat is one of smallest issues with it... So if you are so but hurt about this tiny thing then och boy what would happen if we would start addressing actual and meaningful things from it...
1
@ericb3157 "SHOW US a PHOTO of those FOUR CORNERS OF EARTH." What? You dint read anything except last comment or something?... I'm not flatard... I'm just pointing out that bible talks about earth being flat... "NO. it does NOT. LIAR." I'm literally quoting you bible here... LITERRALY QUOTING BIBLE. If you have objection to that, then go and complain to people who made those translations... You are barking on a wrong tree here...
1
@ericb3157 "NOT ONE of those quote you copy-pasted ACTUALLY uses the word "flat" AT ALL." Och sooooooory if it doesn't mean your silly standard here... But saying that you should be able to see entire earth from tall tree only makes sense when you have flat earth... "THEREFORE the bible does NOT say earth is flat." Therefore you are still wrong. "YOU think it "leans toward flat", but that is ONLY YOUR intentional," And you think this doesn't apply to you? "MALICIOUS mis-interpretation, and your meaningless OPINION." Och that irony... "and you claim you're NOT a flattard? PFFFFT. how pathetic." I'm not, just pointing out that bible is even wrong about shape of earth. You being butthurt that your magical book is wrong on one more thing will not change the fact that it is wrong.
1
@TiLonGonn "So by using an expression like "to the ends of the Earth" doesn't mean something very very far away but instead it means the Earth has a physical end? Do you understand English?" Do you? I'm giving out you quotes from your magical book, you have verses which leans towards earth being flat, which perfectly matches what people at that time thought earth to be, which is fine, bible is wrong on earths shape, nothing surprising here. On top of that you have no verses which would indicate that earth is spherical. So why do we have multiple ones which lean towards flatardia and none which leans towards reality? "Again like I said at the start, learn what a metaphor is." So is everything in your book is metaphor if its been proven to be false? Global flood is metaphor too? What about Adam and Eve? How do you cherry pick which verses are metaphor and which are not? "You failed to show a single verse that says "the earth is flat" plainly and clearly, so you failed at your original point in general." Well you as Eric here so desperately trying to defend your book of fables that its even sad to read... Why do you try to defend it on such basic issue? People thought at that time that earth is flat, this is reflected in bible, simple, nothing mysterious about it, bible is wrong on more things then shape of earth, yet you so desperately trying to defend this one specifically that it would even matter on a grand scale... it doesn't... Bible is still just a book of fables even with it talking about earth being flat or not... "You don't have to agree with religion. But you don't have to lie about it either." I dint lied, your brainwashing and attempt to defend your own religion will not change the fact that people who wrote your book thought that earth is flat and this clearly got reflected in your book.
1
@ericb3157 "does your precious bible have a PHOTOGRAPH showing "all of earth from a tall tree"?" Who said its my precious bible? I'm atheist... Like seriously, you seam to be the one who never reads any previous comments and just makes shit up as he goes... Damn... "therefore it does NOT qualify as "proof" or "evidence" by ANY "standard" WHATSOEVER." And i never said that it is proof or evidence for earth being flat... C'mon, try to keep up here... "YOU are the one claiming that "the bible magically proves earth flat."" Suggestion for you: learn to read. "YOU show US that!" YOU get brain cells!
1
@TiLonGonn "It's not cherry picking, it's common sense." No, its called: cherry picking. If you say that this verse is metaphor while another one is not and both of them talks about magic being real while having same amount of evidence for both, zero, that is cherry picking. "which means it's open to interpretations." I know, this is why we have over 1000 denominations based on same book... "he verse that says the Earth is a circle or a sphere" Actual word in Hebrew in your book was "ḥūḡ" now be a champ and give me link to dictionary which translates this word into sphere as secondary option for Circle... Because what i can only find is "ḥūḡ = circle = flat disk" So by which translation its a sphere? "along with a few other things like the water cycle" Which verse talks about that? Because i can bet that you dont have a single verse which actually explains water cycle but you cherry picked multiple of those and invented your own interpretation of it to make it a "water cycle"... Tho... What's your point? Even if your book had E=MC^2 that would not prove that god is real... Having one correct thing doesn't make rest of it correct... "it's not always 100% accurate because many languages" Correct. So how do you know that "ḥūḡ" word was miss translated? If it was, why then all translations done by actual experts in Hebrew translated it as circle and not as sphere? "Again I never said I was defending my religion" But you are... You still trying, even with that attempt to claim that bible talks about water cycle... You are trying to defend your book... And even the share fact that you got so butt hurt when i mentioned bible talking about earth being flat shows that you want your book to have less false things in it that it already has... C'mon... We both know that you are trying to defend your religion here, no need to pretend... "As we keep telling you, there's not a single verse that says that directly. " Which is interesting, because your book is quite free for interpretation across the board... Yet, we have multiple verses indicating that man who wrote it had basic idea of earth being flat and not spherical, this is obvious from multiple verses provided in here. Simple man who wrote your book had no supernatural knowledge, they wrote it as they though it to be, which was common understanding at that time, so nothing surprising here. "Adam and Eve and the Flood have nothing to do with the shape of the Earth." Actually, it does. As you have bunch of false uneducated claims in your book it only proves that your book was not inspired by some all knowing god but it was written by ignorant people. It only supports my position, its not direct proof, but its proof that ignorant people wrote your book, and having ignorant one will lead you to incorrect statement, like shape of earth... 1+1=2... Just adding everything into one big pile and sooner you realize this better it will be. "You can criticize whatever you want. But making stuff up doesn't help you." And i'm not making stuff up, you are. You have text translated by experts in Hebrew and they used word "circle" and not "sphere" or "ball" or any other word which would be accurate to reality, yet you are here trying to make a claim that this word actually means sphere because reasons... Sorry, but its not me who makes shit up...
1
@ericb3157 M8... You are out of your league here... And quite confused... So i will try to explain it again, just for you, as you seam to have issues with reading. I'm not flatard, earth is a globe, provable fact, what i was saying is that bible does talk about earth being flat, this is not a proof that earth is flat, this is proof that bible contains false information... Why its so hard for you to understand this? Are you doing this intentionally or is this natural for you?
1
@ericb3157 "i am taking issue with the FACT that you keep flinging cheap INSULTS at everyone who says the bible does NOT say earth is flat, EXACTLY like ALL flat-earthers do!" I'm not insulting, i'm just stating facts. Just because you dont like facts, after all, you believe in wizards because book said so (take that as insult if you wish, still a fact) so just because you dont like facts, that will not change the fact that those are facts. "f you don't want to be taken for a flat-earther, STOP saying "the bible says earth is flat, YOU IDIOT"!" When did i said "You idiot"? Only one person here used that word: TiLonGonn So are you now trying to be a liar and misrepresent what I said? Isint that a sin by your religion? And stating fact that your book says something doesn't mean that i'm making a claim that its true... For example, your book says that there was global flood, thats a fact, your book makes this claim, but at same time its a fact that this claim is false. Same thing with shape of earth. Why do you failing to understand some basics like that? "if you don't want EVERYONE to think you're a flat-earther, stop acting EXACTLY LIKE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM." Like what? How many flat earthers you know who says that earth is a globe? Do you even think before you write? "is LITERALLY identical WORD-FOR-WORD to what several flat earthers have said TO ME." Riiiiight, so if i can find mass murderer you used sentence from your response, would that mean that you are mass murderer?... Use your brains... For once in your life, use your brains... "so, you are either a flat-earther or a particularly disgusting TROLL." Or nether of those. Like I stated multiple times by now, earth is a globe, thats a fact, but bible talks about earth being flat, thats a fact too, again, same thing like it was with global flood claim. Your failure to understand this is just baffling... "STOP WITH THE CHEAP INSULTS!" Like what? Its you who keeps calling me flat-earther when i corrected you already. Its you who wants to call me a troll just because our opinions doesnt match... Its you who misrepresented what i said... C'mon...
1
@ericb3157 "those ARE insults you HYPOCRITE!" Really? Lets check them out. 1. "You being butthurt that your magical book is wrong on one more thing will not change the fact that it is wrong." That's not an insult, that's stating a fact that your book which talks about magic being real which makes it "magical" talks about earth being flat, you trying to come up with some excuses to try and explain that its not saying it is you being buthurt as that would crumble your "perfect" text. 2. "You are out of your league here... And quite confused..." Again. Simple fact. You are out of your league here and quite confused. Its not an insult, its stating facts. 3. "Sorry, but its not me who makes shit up..." Again, simple fact, it wasn't me who makes shit up to try explain something what isint there, it was you. 4. "you believe in wizards because book said so (take that as insult if you wish, still a fact)" And one more time, thats simply a fact, its not an insult, your book talks about being which uses magic which makes him a wizard by definition. You might not like this fact, but its still a fact. Now I have suspicion that you don't even know what actual insult is... "ONLY a flat earther would accuse someone who disagrees with him of being brainwashed. that is a SIN, you disgusting LIAR." Are you trying to imply that i'm flat earther? Isint that a sin by your world view and you will burn in hell for eternity by doing this? "you forfeited ANY right to complain about being treated like a flat-earther when you VOMITED that LIE." First of all, i dint lied, thats quite dishonest of you to say that, so you might be ready to burn in hell for eternity. Second, even if i lied, that would not make me a flat earther, that would only make me a liar... You cant even keep basic logical statements here you just want to try to make some childish accusations... I mean... I can see that you are buthurt that i'm questioning your immoral self contradictory book which contains bunch of false claims, but still, calm down, its just a book of fables. "so do YOU believe in the "great flood" or NOT?" Why would I? Its a fictional story in your book, nothing more. And on top of that we have evidence that it never happen. So why would i believe that?
1
@TiLonGonn "I said that you're attempts to say that the bible says the Earth is Flat is idiotic." It would be idiotic to say that bible doesn't atleast imply that earth is a flat disk by labeling it as circle and not as sphere. I have multiple verses which at worst implies earth to be flat and you have none which would imply it to be spherical. So it would be idiotic to say that bible doesn't talk about earth being flat. "I used that word because again, there's not a single verse that says the Earth is Flat." Yet we have verses like "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth" where circle is not a sphere but flat disk. As some of you desperately tried to say that it should not mean disk but sphere, well, you failed to defend that point and you should go and make your own translation of your book if it was miss translated. But as you dint do it, i will go with translation provided by actual experts and not some random youtube comment warriors like all of you here. "The. Bible. Isn't. A. Science. Book." I know, this is why i pointed out that it contains incorrect information about earths shape... Duh... "Regardless of if you believe in a god or not, this basic scripture is describing the water cycle." ? Its basic observation... have you ever seen boiling water? Creates mist, that one condenses and drops down... People who observed that and compared that mist to clouds could have easily made this verse from basic observations... its nothing new... On top of this, its not accurate verse, you literally interpreting it as you wish to fit actual reality. Its not god who draws up water, its evaporation. You literally making shit up here. Tho i have no idea why you even mention it... Even for sake of argument i could say that bible contains some accurate observations of reality... Cool... So what? Will you make argument from personal incredulity to explain how they knew it? "This here again is describing something scientific." Something scientific? You cant even describe what it says and yet its scientific?... Again... You do realize that existence of embryos was known for quite some time now? Right? So how is mentioning something from common knowledge proves anything? "This will likely be my last post as it seems to be pointless to go further." It is pointless, because you will not win this argument. Not my first rodeo and you clearly have nothing substantial to present here anyways. "The bible doesn't directly say the Earth is Flat, so saying that it does is false." What's the meaning of word "circle"? is it spherical object or flat one? If you want to claim that its spherical one, then make a correction to your book, fix those issues and then we can say that you are correct, until then you have nothing here.
1
@popcornman6993 Welcome. One more person to explain basic reality. "This dude's bible is stupid" This one will hit you hard soon enough. "the real bible states the earth is a globe" Give me a verse which says that earth is a globe. I dare you. Och wait, you cant, as it doesn't. So by your words "This dude's bible is stupid" I'm keeping my promises, your comment hit you hard soon enough. " suspended on nothing" Its not suspended in nothing. Its constantly falling towards sun while going around it while sun goes around galaxy center while galaxy moves towards who knows what. Earth is not suspended, its in constant movement... " it talks about how many stars there" Are you trying to make a claim that people at that time never seen night sky?... I mean... If bible was written by one person who never encountered anyone else and was literally blind, then i would agree that its some what interesting how he would known this... But... C'mon... Even people at that time knew how to count by looking up... Are you even serious here? Does your book talk about fish living in water too? Or that most birds can fly?... Because that would be even better "evidence" that you cant even make a valid argument here for your book of fables than previous two people in here... Damn you people... You keep amazing me with your logic like that... Stars... Who could known that people never observed stars when bible was written... Damn...
1
@popcornman6993 " the real bibles " Real bibles? How do you know that those are real when you dont have original? Maybe original was wrong? Ever thought about that? "bibles agree with gravity" Like what? Which verse talks about gravity? "it explains how the earth was created" But it wasn't created... Atleast not by some mind... It was formed through natural processes... "It explains how the earth looks" Like a circle? Flat disk? Like in a way its not? "Now I would normally get into a war with idiots and prove them wrong" Maybe you would, with idiots, but in this case you dint stumbled upon an idiot and you are failing to prove me wrong. "prove them wrong by showing evidence and real claims but I have an essay to do." So its like saying "I have a girlfriend, but she goes to another school"... Riiiight, you have essay to do... Riiiiiiiiiiiiight, i totally believe you... After all, making comment that you have evidence is not the same as making comment which presents evidence.... Riiiiiiight, I totally get it... You do have girlfriend who goes to another school....
1
@popcornman6993 Is this your best counter argument? You cant even support your own claims and your counter argument is to attack me personally? Damn... That's low... People who makes such silly excuses that they have outside lives and that because of this they cant provide evidence is just childish at best. You clearly had time to read my comments and create your own, so you clearly are not so busy as you claim to be. Providing evidence takes same amount of time as to make one comment, you made 3 comments by now and no evidence. Why is that? Is it because you don't have time or is it because you don't have evidence for your claims?
1
@popcornman6993 4 comments and you still cant even make sound and valid argument here to support your claims. Strange... Its like you made shit up and when you realized that you cant defend it you will create some childish excuse like you are doing now. FYI It doesn't take 24/7 to make a reply to youtube comment.
1
Scientific theories are based on facts... We have a fact that objects with mass attracts objects with mass, that attraction is explained by theory of gravity. Scientific theory if a highest level you can get with explanation for given question...
1
@kingruxgoddydymyncityrecor4677 "however physics breaks down everyday. " Care to elaborate on this one? "The known human physics dosnt apply to the universe. " How many unknown physics you know which are not known by humans?... "So based facts get distoted 8nto a blackhole called theory." What?
1
@kingruxgoddydymyncityrecor4677 " when satellites telescope or whatever used, reaches the edge of known universe. Those mathematics dont add up." What? reached edge of known universe?... What? We have so called observable universe, observable, not reachable, we have no way to know what is beyond it if there is anything beyond it... So no idea what the hell are you even talking about here... "Those mathematics dont add up" And? Just because some math doesn't add up doesn't mean that physics break down... "you distort information like a blackhole." What?... Do you speak human?... "Just talking too fast. Or you reading too slow." You talk random nonsense... Speed is irrelevant here...
1
Small vulcano outbreak? One Starship launch emits as much CO₂ as about 10–20 long-haul plane flights. So are you saying that 10-20 planes creates small volcano eruptions? We should stop all those thousands of plane flights happening every single day!!!
1
So atheist can't talk about atheism with another atheist?
1
@nothing26375 Atheist can debate anyone he wants, most interesting conversations are when you have opposing sides, aka atheist vs theist, but there is no rational reason why atheist could not talk with another atheist about atheism. It's like saying that biologist should never talk with another biologist about biology... makes no sense...
1
Making excuses?
1
You clicked on video and left comment to say that you dont care, that self contradictory on itself. People who actually dont care will not even watch this video, let alone invest their time to leave a comment that they dont care.
1
Its auto generated bot content, what do you expect?
1
Still not flat.
1
World is as flat as Jesus was a real god...
1
Even if that 2D nonsense was proven, you still have spherical earth... By definition... So it will not make flat earthers correct, maybe tiny bit less wrong, but earth will remain spherical in any case.
1
I guess gaining land is failing at counter offensive in Russian standards, this is why they are winning for past year or so, by losing ground.
1
Because there is a guy who is playing video games with his mind... Its old news and because TF can't make click bait video about it he isn't.
1
@jmatasomo2660 If you sitting on the fence about shape of earth in 21'st century, then there is big issue here, mainly with your countries educational system. Shape of earth can be determined by anyone from their backyard without even using any math, just basic observations and basic understanding of basic geometry.
1
@WJV9 They literally added hands free mode where it tracks your attention to the road and not your hand placement... Which part you failed to understand?
1
Your comment perfectly demonstrates what's wrong with today's society, thanks.
1
Complicated part is only agreeing at which point during pregnancy you should no longer be allowed to perform abortion. It can be 1 week, 3 months or whatever time period, but abortions should be allowed for multiple reasons
1
Its not
1
Every person with IQ higher than room temperature disagrees.
1
You should invest more than 5 minutes into this topic as you clearly have no idea why hydrogen being extremely old tech never became anything more than just someones expensive hobby.
1
Music isint a video and its allot more distracting for you to keep switching between music and maps constantly instead of having both always open. Its just basic oversight or work in progress thing.
1
Water isint hydrogen... Its like saying "It became 'impractical' when they try to sell you Petroleum instead of crude oil"... Do you see issue here? While petroleum is made from crude oil for you to actually create petroleum you will need more than a 5 buck equipment...
1
@kentzo85 to make hydrogen on low volume just for the sake of making it, well, that part is easy. Now do it in continuous way and then transfer it to a car with 7000 psi and you will start noticing complications here and there... There is a reason why single hydrogen refueling station costs over 1 million bucks... Because it requires expensive equipment... Try to google out basic equipment to make hydrogen on daily basis with compressor which could handle hydrogen and get it over 7000 psi and lets see what the bill will be for that... Just like you could make petroleum from crude oil in your garage, doesn't make it practical or economically viable option.
1
What? Ukraine being attacked by Russia makes Ukrainians puppets of the west?
1
@Wypipo Do you have any actual argument here besides some childish comments?
1
@Wypipo Thanks for confirmation.
1
Bunch from flat earthers and bunch from people who realizes how stupid plane experiment is in general for Johnny to try to reproduce it.
1
You can't beat physics.
1
Batteries can use multiple different combinations of materials and more comes out every single year... Getting materials for batteries isint really an issue. Not even talking that you can recycle like 95% of the battery and reuse it for new EV.
1
You guys will say that Russia is winning even after Russia makes yet another strategic retreat from entire region...
1
@James Williams Belgorod? And just reminder that Ukraine is defending its own land against attackers, not the other way around... So when you have someone attacking your country, some land will be "lost" to those attackers while war is going on... Welcome to war 101...
1
@rg5445 "but instead we tend to ridicule and mock people" Ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed. There are o question about shape of earth, you could have had this debate maybe 2500 years ago, but not now... Earth is a globe, factually a globe, you cant just come along and start claiming that its flat and we should be open for this idea to maybe be possible... Its no longer possible... You can keep open minded for something what is not been proven to be factually true, maybe origins of universe, maybe abiogenesis, but not shape of earth... "The gate keepers have grown ridge and arrogant and they are the problem, not people asking questions. " Actually is the problem with people. Every single flat earth i ever had conversation with has no idea how basic geometry works. You cant tech people why earth is a oblate spheroid if they cant thing in 3 dimensions.
1
@rg5445 Well you belong to another group of people which is the issue too. All of us live on same planet, everyone effects everyone in one or another way. You cant just simply ignore issues in excuse that it doesn't effect you personally. Eliminating ignorance will get allot better results than allowing this nonsensical claim spread. What do you think they will teach their children? Is it ok if they indoctrinate next generation into believing that earth is a space pancake? How big issue needs to be for you to take it seriously?
1
@rg5445 "I don’t belong to any group a can assure you" You belong to the group who doesn't care about others if they don't effect your life directly. Wasn't this what you said? "doesn’t mean I don’t care about actual important issues" So you simply ignore smaller issues? Small issue is not an issue for you? "if you really are indeed worried that everyone needs to believe what you believe" No, what i want is for people to know how to evaluate claims, to understand logical fallacies, to understand basic reality and to simply go with facts and not with personal feelings what is true or false. I care what is actually true, i want others to care about it too. I want to educate people about reality and not spread some silly unsupported claims. "ridiculing them won’t change their minds. Would it change yours?..." Maybe. If you present a claim and i can actually ridicule it and my ridicule is not invalid, shouldn't you stop and reconsider your claim? I can agree that ridicule is not the best approach, but doesn't make it invalid. "because where I come from the only thing that would’ve got you is a busted lip. " And? Does that make people who busted my lip correct just because they dint liked ridicule? Which brings yet another issue... Thin skin... Resulting in hand waving is not something you should do, if some one doesn't like what they hear, they can leave, but this is not the case for actual physical assault, so try not to compare those. "if you’re on a mission to rid the world of ignorance good luck with that" Thanks. "What are you the thought police?" What are you, ignorant one? I don't advocate for specific thoughts, i don't even advocate for speech being limited, what i advocate is that you cant go around and claim that earth is flat because you feel it in your balls. You could come along and propose claim that earth maybe could be flat while it would be shut down straight away as nonsensical claim as its a observable fact that its a globe. Again, ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed. If you don't want to be ridiculed, don't propose ridiculous ideas... Which is quite strange, as on one hand you say that people can make ridiculous ideas and propose them as possible reality while we cant actually ridicule those ideas... You cant have only one of those, if you have one you will have another, if you want to ban ridiculing then band ridiculous ideas, if you don't want to ban ridiculous ideas then you cant ban ridicule. Its simple.
1
@rg5445 "Why anyone would think that ridiculing people is an effective way of persuading people" No idea, but dint i just said that ridiculing is not the best way?... Which like by definition would not make it effective... But well, maybe i wasn't clear enough here... So let me clarify here: Ridiculing is not effective and not the best way, but its still a valid one and it still gets point across. "I think maybe you should take your own advice and if you don’t like what someone is saying you can just walk away" Yea, but i don't want to just walk away, i want to correct them. " On that point we agree." But we don't... But you do you, as you dont care what others believe unless they cause direct harm to you, then well, you can walk away, i will stay.
1
@SirFlat Sorry, but I do pay attention, this is why i know that he is con man. We can make a bet here where you will attempt to prove that earth is flat or even better, explain to us why sun doesn't change perceived size over entire day while it should on flat earth "model" and if you can do that without introducing magic into it, you will win this bet. Sounds good?
1
@SirFlat You keep blabbering about random nonsensical things, but why cant you address my actual question here? If you want to troll and present yourself as some one who cant even understand basic geometry, fine, you do you, but atleast be honest and answer to my actual question here: Why sun doesn't change perceived size over the day?
1
@SirFlat Are you ok?
1
@SirFlat Because it doesn't look like you are. You ether a dedicated troll who seeks attention by pretending to be ignorant on basic reality, or you are actually ignorant on basic reality who thinks to be smarter than smartest people on earth. So, are you ok?
1
SpaceX currently makes crap ton of money from Starlink, and that only going up with each month. Government contracts are tiny portion of SpaceX revenue.
1
@tulmar4548 It was stated in 2020 that Starlink started to generate actual revenue, this year it should be around 6 billion, next year expected to be around 11-12, which should keep growing for next decade or so until actual satellite limits (which will be replaced eventually with better ones) and population demands are met. Again, you as generic TF cult member never actually did any fact checking?
1
@ghostship85 I can see that you are being silly, tho i'm not even sure if you are making a joke here or trying to make some actual point. Call me confused.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Are you ok? Did I hurt your feelings about your cult leader TF here? You could have made 5 bazillion comments in last 10 hours, would not have replied in any case, you know why? Because some people are not spending all the time in youtube comment section and sometimes I like to get some sleep, shocker, but what can you expect from cult members like yourself. Prove TF wrong? Ok, there is a video of him claiming that NASA spends more money by using SpaceX, he even shows document which allegedly says that, issue is that on second page of that document it clearly states that by using SpaceX they are saving like 4x, aka showing that not only TF is wrong but that his research abilities are shit at best. Do you need more examples? I mean, how many of those you would need to get basic picture here that TF isn't interested in objective things and ONLY looking for clickbaits from cult members like you?
1
It's only custom if it's not a standard.
1
Costs. Simple answer. Its not stupidity, its simply costs of it or even reasons to do it. No one really wants to own hydrogen cars, people simply wants "cleanest" cars for bragging rights. Hydrogen doesn't work for passenger cars.
1
@jjwn939 Isint this the issue with Peterson? One is confused in what Peterson tries to say, you come along trying to explain what he is saying while adding that this is what you think he most likely wanted to say. Issue with Peterson is that he just creates word salads and leaves interpretation for the listener in hopes to appeal to everyone at same time...
1
@Zerspell As of now we have zero examples of intelligence existing outside a body, all current AI's exist in some sort of body and will keep existing in one. There is no rational reason to believe that intelligence could exist without body.
1
I could bet you would fail to name one fallacy and point out where it was used in this video.
1
@YinYangPanda "This is a rhetorical ploy, not a rational critique." You do know that this is youtube reactionary video and not official debate? Right? So how the hell is saying "Jordan Peterson just had his Cathy Newman moment." is a logical fallacy? "It primes the audience to interpret Peterson’s statements through a lens of hypocrisy and intellectual collapse—before any claim is even analyzed." So if I said "You are wrong and here is why" in your world view this would be logical fallacy because I primed listeners to think that you are wrong? This is nitpicking on highest level at best. "Peterson could be critiquing atheism’s rejection of misunderstood or oversimplified religious structures without necessarily defending specific dogmas" Funny enough that you added "could be" its like no one actually knows what is Peterson's position here which would indicate that your critique here could be (cha) invalid as you can't base your "false dilemma" accusation on "could be". Is it or is it not? If it only could be then there isn't a false dilemma if by Petersons actual position he should must either fully accept or outright reject religious belief in its broadest forms, right? "Peterson does not reject Lono—he plainly states he doesn’t know anything about Lono" Just like atheists do not know about god, yet Peterson wants to say that atheists reject god because they fail to understand one. It wasn't a strawman it was using Petersons argument against Peterson. I could only point out that David jumped the gun to fast and should have asked if Peterson accepts or rejects Lono as a god, but we both know where this question would have lead to "Define belief, define god, define knowledge, define Lono", still, not a strawman fallacy. "Appeal to authority: “We studied this—so we must be right.”" That not even what Appeal to authority is... And appealing to actual authority isn't a fallacy. If I have brain cancer me appealing to a brain surgeon isn't committing some sort of authority fallacy, he is an actual authority, what would be fallacious is for me to find a plumber and ask him to explain to me what I should do with my brain cancer and maybe even ask him to cut it out... That would be stupid, as he isn't an authority on that topic. "Begging the question: “Our knowledge proves our knowledge.”" When did that happen? "Epistemic closure: “There’s no way we’re wrong because no valid challenge can exist.”" When did that happen? "→ Personal incredulity seals the loop: “We can’t imagine being wrong, so we aren’t.”" When did that happen? "Now, you tell me—how accurate was my extrapolation?" It wasn't, but atleast you tried.
1
@YinYangPanda That's one of the most non responses I ever seen. You thinking that you made some valid points will not mean that you actually did. And no, it wasn't a word salad, it was simply wrong. You sound like someone who just learned few names of logical fallacies and decided to know way more than anyone else, this is why your first point was to say that he made a logical fallacy just because he made a metaphorical reference is no where near to being a logical fallacy. Please learn basics if you want to have normal conversation, otherwise you just look like someone who is desperate to find anything to complain about while failing to present a single valid thing.
1
But that's the thing, investing 10k at that time into bitcoin was a stupid idea even if it worked out at the end. Like saying goes "Even broken clock is right twice a day"
1
He isn't making cars you know... CEO's don't do actual engineering or manufacturing of things, they only point fingers to general direction. So its weird that you want to attack a person who has least to do with performance of the car
1
Why?
1
It was, two decades or so ago, now it's BEV's.
1
@charlesheck6812 Damn you went downhill so fast... How the hell is having earth as a globe changes your religious beliefs exactly? Is your god not capable in creating spherical earth instead of flat one? Are you saying that all those galaxies we can observe in the sky are not real?... Jebus... You just went all the way with this one...
1
Well we know that is a globe and NASA is 100% irrelevant here.
1
This is because you think that you need to wait 2 hours just to top off. I would strongly recommend to actually research this topic instead of going by the information from 90's.
1
@icholi88 First of all, BEV should be charged up to 80% for daily driving and only for long trips you can go to 100%. Tho its side thing, but clearly you didn't know that. 2022 Kia EV6 Wind AWD charge time from 5 to 100% is 44 minutes. So you are factually incorrect on that. I mean, I can't even find a BEV which takes longer than 90 minutes to fully charge. So again, you are using data from 90's as it seems. And if i recall correctly some company like 1-2 months ago did a fast charging test where they recharged car fully in like 10-15 minutes. So not only you failed to realize that BEV's don't need 2+ hours to charge, you failed to understand that there are quite few technologies in development which can cut that charging time basically to the same ones you will spend at hydrogen station. "You are either a corporate plant or intentionally ignorant. " This is so ironic from someone who thinks that you need 2+ hours to charge BEV... C'mon... "Range and charge time remains a problem for most electric vehicles compared to fossil" Aaaaand? BEV's now usually have 300miles, some have 500. How often do you need to travel that far in one go? And charge times are nonexistent issue if you simply charge your car at home over night while you sleep, isn't it? There are bunch of people who use their solar panels to charge their cars which makes their travel at lowest cost possible and always have full "tank" before leaving to work. "Hydrogen resolves the largest issues of both" By asking 200 bucks for 400 mile range? Yea, no... There is reason why some companies gives 15k for the fuel when you buy hydrogen car, even then people struggle to refuel due to lack of infrastructure due to how bonkers and demanding it is. "It just requires a completely different infrastructure to support it while electric already is taken care of because of the existing grid." yes, and this will not change. To build single hydrogen refueling station you need to invest around one million bucks, while BEV charging station can be like 50k or even less. This doesn't even takes into consideration how much more maintenance you need for hydrogen stations and how often they break due to their complexity. And not even taking into consideration that any wall socket can be used for charging your BEV. Hydrogen cars are non starter, those ONLY sound cool on paper but doesn't work in reality. Too many issues with its fundamental technology.
1
What is most funny that people saying "n-word" is basically same thing as saying "n-word", just like me saying d**k will make everyone understand what I said here, tho one is allowed and the other isn't. Weird stuff.
1
@PhillyDee215 "if that core was strong enough to keep over 70% of water 💧 pulled to this earth then we as people would be pancaked " ? Do you have bones or muscles? Yea, those things which allow you to not be a pancaked... And gravity is relatively weak force, its enough to keep things on its surface, but it is relatively weak force. So i have no idea what you tried to even say here... Do you even know what gravity is? "So we're just walking freely within this same gravity that's holding this entire earth together" Yes, welcome to reality. "but that would mean this earth is made out of a sphere and all this water was poured in" no... Again... gravity... Object in size like earth and with mass like earth will tend to collapse on itself creating most optimal shape for that: sphere. Where you have equal distances towards center of mass. Its basic physics here... I just assume that you are trying to troll here. "So the astronauts have to penetrate thru a sphere not the atmosphere to get to the moon" Are you drunk? What sphere? "if we're within the same gravity that's holding down the mass amount of water then it would be impossible to even walk" Says who? You? based on what? Your personal opinion?... Ok... We dont care. present actual math, actual calculations which would prove your point, otherwise its just an empty claim of yours based on your ignorance about... well... everything... "Gravity is a made up explanation to explain what goes up and y it comes down" Cavendish experiment proves that objects with mass attract objects with mass. So, lets use big brains here: earth, big mass attracts humans. Gravity is a fact, i know you dont like reality, but well, you cant escape it in your fantasy world. "its called weight" How does weight calculated? Because i can bet you dint realized that but to calculate weight you need to include gravity into equation. Isint that ironic?
1
@PhillyDee215 "water don't naturally bend nor curve unless its taking the shape of something" Tides?... Like seriously... TIDES... You have literal water bending even if we lived on space pancake (assuming you believe in space) and you want to say that water doesn't bend? " So since the earth is round u say..." I'm not saying, its just a fact. Grass is green not because i said so, but because it is... "So we're living within a ball shaped object in order for the water to take this shape your saying?" What? "Gravity alone does not cause water to shape into a ball....Common sense here." We left common sense when we started to talk about earth being flat... But like seriously, i will assume that you just trolling here. But well, troll or not its always nice to educate people. Like i mentioned before, gravity, attraction between objects with mass. So as water have mass if you would put water in a 0g environment it would form into a ball due to gravity, that's basic physics 101. In our case we dont have only water we have bunch of earth and other stuff which is heavier then water, soooooooo, hard thinking moment here, as we have gravity everything will tend to take most optimal shape, which is... sphere... I know its hard for you to understand this as this requires thinking in 3 dimension and not on 2d like flat earth, so it might require some extra thinking, but well, reality just disagrees with you and your personal ignorant opinion will not change it.
1
@PhillyDee215 "let's not 4get earth itself is supposedly spinning in space itself..." And? 1 revolution over 24 hours is nothing... "now how does the earth 🌎 stay where its at opposed to floating into some black hole" What? Are you talking about orbits here? You do know that earth is orbiting sun which orbits center of galaxy which is basically a black hole? "ok so how does the earth itself stay planted in space with no gravity" ? What again? Earth experiences gravity from every thing with mass, mainly from sun... So seriously... What? "no trolling here buddy...just two diff opinions bro" hard to believe that you are not trolling because your questions are really basic one, i mean on basic level of physics. And its not just 2 different opinions, mine is based on facts and yours is based on ignorance, its huge difference here. "If we wanna talk facts....then we would have to fly up high enough to confirm ourselves if this earth is flat or not" This is factually false. You can determine shape of earth while staying at sea level... Even basic observation of sun proves that earth is not flat, not even talking about other couple dozens of things which proves that. "and these scientists which have clearly agreed that their own info was wrong" ? So people who never admit being wrong are not wrong and cant lie? Because we have quite few religions which claim to be factually true and never claimed to be wrong while they are in contradiction to each other, so you are, again, factually incorrect. Just because science tend to correct itself if new information comes along doesn't make everything else wrong.
1
@PhillyDee215 "so the sun keeps the earth in place and gravity keeps us in place....ok" What?... That's not even close to what i said... "and just bc the scientists and or government feeds us info don't make it facts" Correct, but just because you don't like government or scientists doesn't make them wrong and you correct. What makes something a fact is evidence, you have none of that and we have more than enough. "We live in a deceptive world, government been lying to us since day one" And i like caramel ice cream. Not related to the topic? I agree... "Science was man made to try and figure out how the creator created all of this" Science was man made to figure out how shit works. There are 0 places in science where you will have god as even possible explanation for anything. "They still don't know🤣u probably believe in heaven too😏 " Are you asking if i believe in after life? First of all, i dont. Second... Why the hell you keep bringing up some random topics? You said that you are not trolling, but its really hard to believe some one who makes comments like that, constantly. So ether you are a troll or you just had really nice joint...
1
@PhillyDee215 "i did have a joint..." That explains allot "Thing is that this video promotes a round earth" You mean, this video promotes reality? "But let me ask u a honest question, what facts do we have that the earth is round? Your facts? Not science nor government" Will give you simplest ones possible: Sun. You have things about sun which match 100% globe model and missmatch 100% flat one. So: 1. Moves in straight line. 2. Suns perceived speed doesnt change. 3. Suns perceived size doesn't change. 4. Sunset/sunrise. 4 simple things anyone with 1 dollar solar filter can confirm, no government involved, just some free time and access to local home depo. If you can grasp those 4 basic ones we can get into more complex ones which proves that earth is round, i have quite few of those. But even one is enough to shatter flat earth claim and i give you 4.
1
@PhillyDee215 "all four of those are based on science tho " ? Its geometry... Do you seriously think that object getting further away from you are not getting smaller?... Damn, you need to stop smoking joints before you comment... "I've confirmed it with my own eyes👀.....it's not a theory😉" And? Earth is a globe, not a theory, fact. So yea, simple observation of sun proves that earth is not flat and it matches perfectly globe, simple.
1
@PhillyDee215 Damn, you joint is strong... Do you seriously think that sun is closer then clouds? You do know that highest clouds only goes up to 85km? How big is your sun in diameter? 5 meters? Like seriously, at this point i seriously dont know if you are just trolling or just so high that you started to think that sun could be in front of clouds... I can get you a picture where sun looks to be in front of power cables which are like 20 meters away... Damn...
1
@PhillyDee215 "i never said the sun was closer than the clouds" literally
1
@PhillyDee215 Just noticed that my comment got cut off... Well thats new... To make it short, you said that sun looks to be in front of clouds, while highest clouds are at something like 85km altitude. Other than this i can show you pictures where sun looks to be in front o power cables which are like 20 meters away from you... Light glare is a thing too... So i have no idea what you tried to imply by that.
1
@PhillyDee215 Who said it was created? And why are you jumping all over the place with random questions? Its like you are looking for one thing you can grab on while ignoring 1000 things you got answer for... Saying that sun was created will imply that it needs a creator. You need to demonstrate that its a creation and not assert it.
1
@PhillyDee215 "The Sun and the rest of the solar system formed from a giant, rotating cloud of gas and dust called a solar nebula about 4.5 billion years ago. As the nebula collapsed because of its overwhelming gravity, it spun faster and flattened into a disk. Most of the material was pulled toward the center to form our Sun, which accounts for 99.8% of the mass of the entire solar system." Quote from NASA page, you can get same results from any other source if you don't trust NASA or something... You have internet, use it, internet contains more or less entire human knowledge in one place reachable by anyone and basic google search will provide answers in no time. Main thing would be to learn to recognize bullshit sites from real ones.
1
@PhillyDee215 "but that seems to be based off of science. What makes science facts?" Evidence... "So science says the earth came from a gas?" What? Where did science said anything like that? "Im just tryna understand bc science says a lot of things.....that aren't facts." You inability to understand something doesn't make it false, there is a huge difference between some random guy on youtube section saying that X is false and thousands if not millions of actual experts who spend majority of their lives investigating something says that it is true based on evidence... Main topic was about shape of earth, you keep jumping all over the place... Cant you pick ONE topic and stay with it? Because at moment i answer to your question you jump to another one and completely ignoring what i said before. This is quite pointless and huge waste of time. Earth is a globe not because some one said so but because its observable fact anyone could actually verify. Your tap dance about sun or earth or science is as relevant to this conversation as caramel ice cream...
1
No one really trusted Russia, but it was easy and cheap access to natural gas. Transition like this generally takes decades, but well, now we will learn how to do it in a year or two.
1
Because its not that easy to just turn a knob and have your car refueled... While hydrogen production itself could be really simplistic, you will still need equipment which can do it on a consistent basis, then you will need equipment which could store that hydrogen, then you will need equipment which could pressurize it up to 7000 psi or more for you to be able to fill up your car. All of this will cost you crap ton of money as initial investment and then continuous payments for maintenance due to how corrosive hydrogen can be. Making hydrogen at home makes zero sense.
1
@ He already tried to defend his video in comment section, clearly he wants this video up and he wants his "message" to be seen independent how dishonest it is. His entire "defense" was something in between the lines of "Well if you improperly load your trailer, you hit a pothole at light speed and you will be on 90 degrees downhill, this can create enough force to break hitch!!!" like... Yea, it would, but is it realistic? Every single hitch with break at some point and complaining that the one which went over its rated limit by 9x will break in some particular situations is just childish. But well, he got his clicks.
1
Hydrogen fuel cell engine is a thing, which uses hydrogen to... wait for it... Wait... Charge a battery!
1
aka scammers.
1
Run on crystal? And you accidentally no longer have this magical crystal or it conveniently no longer powers your radio? Right?
1
@EricMort-l8i I mean, I can hook up potato and run a radio too... How much electricity does your magical crystal produces? Where can I find this peer reviewed scientific paper?
1
@EricMort-l8i But again, did it actually existed as you remember it or are you just misremembering it? As there are no actual peer reviewed scientific papers saying that you can power things with crystals. So something doesn't add up here.
1
@pasjonatpl We will see, if being dumb becomes "better" option for passing your genes then we could go into ideocracy type world, but its some what self balancing thing, we had flat earthers in past, like go back 2000 years back and you will have like 99.9% of flat earthers from entire human population. So who knows, maybe smart people will unlock a way to do some basic gene therapy and prevent from stupid people being born ever again. And just side note, majority of believers are not flat earthers but majority of flat earthers are believers in god. While theism is on decline that might help out with flat earther issue on a the long run. We will see.
1
On v12.3?
1
@deerichardz Its fun as its like looking at flat earthers level comments, which is ironic, TF started by debunking flat earthers, now his fan base is on same intellectual level.
1
Its asinine because it goes against your beliefs? So you basically against freedom of speech? Are you Russian by any chance, Ivan?
1
What truth? That earth is globe?
1
@-Abel00 Why would Hubble do that?... There are specialized satellites already doing it... And what do you even expect to see if it would turn around? At best you will get photo on same level as you have currently on google maps... Like seriously, what was point of your entire comment about Hubble?
1
@-Abel00 "Everything you see if "Space" is CGI" Based on what evidence? I will try to ask you simple question 100% of flat earthers failed to answer: What method you used to determine that photo X is CGI and photo Y is not? Be the first one and claim the prize!!! "Bruh there's maps of more Continents "Pass" the South pole" And there is a map of Middle Earth... Whats your point?... That imaginary maps become real because some one drew them? "Admiral Byrd said there's more land" And million say that there isint... So if you want to appeal to authority, i can appeal to popularity... Crazy people word is worthless. You need evidence, not some ones opinion. "curviture of the Earth is Not Detectiable" it is, throw multiple experiments. basic one would be to observe suns behavior which alone disproved flat earth. "The Earth is FlAT With More Land !!" Yes yes yes and middle earth is real too and Voldemort is bad guy and Thanos will soon snap his fingers if we will not do something about it...
1
Hows that 3 day war going on after 400+ days?
1
And?
1
But his video was specifically about Toyota's V8 engine, if Toyota makes V6 or V4 then he will make one on those
1
Going where? Who is stopping who to go where?
1
Its like having bulgran in your house and he is like "Lets talk about this. Lets find common ground!" well... NO... First of all, get the f**k out of my house, then we can talk about consequences you should suffer.
1
Riiiiiight, all 5 of them... And just because car manufacturer decides to make car model in extremely low numbers doesn't make that technology not a flop... We had dozens of attempts by now from car manufacturers to sell hydrogen cars, every single time it failed.
1
When it comes to some one claiming to be flat earther i'm giving 50/50 chance that they are. Issue is that we do actually have people who thinks that earth is flat, but we do have some who just here trolling people and wanting some attention by pretending to be dumb, which ironic on itself as to behave like that is dumb on itself and i could even argue that pretending to be flat earther is worst than being one.
1
Yes yes yes and humanity is being controlled by lizard people... There is no such thing as water powered car, it phatically can't exist without you braking basic laws of physics here. Hydrogen conversion from water takes in MORE energy than you will get back out of it while converting it back into water. No amount of perfected electrodes will help you here, you can't beat physics... So which scenario is more likely, there is lizard people controlling the universe who are afraid of water cars, or that dude lied?...
1
Hydrogen cars already have battery, so what you are talking about is the car in this video.
1
It's not real engine, so it will not go up.
1
"Hoover Dam and other will in 5 years stop producing Electricity because of the lack of Water . Climate change is a HOAX" Why do you think Hoover dam lacks water?... Yes... This is why... Climate change... "OH forgot Lithium batteries can;t be recycled" Everyone disagrees with your opinion. "Now if U want to produce electric power in the quantity we will need then it must be Nuclear like France." If nuclear power replaces current electricity production we will run out of uranium in like 20 years. Its limited resource, none renewable. Will last for some time on current scale, but its not sustainable.
1
Jules Domes Well in most cases flat earthers try to use bible as "proof" that earth is flat. Well they do have a point, it does say that its a flat disk, but why should we care what some old book says...
1
What's there to debunk? Flat earth model cant even explain sunsets... Canal experiment involves allot more than basic geometry, so lets start from basics and lets see how far we can go.
1
Bible what now?...
1
@tellit2my9 Basic physics explanation here. You need 2000g of hydrogen to make 1000g of hydrogen. And no, those numbers are not backwards. You need double the amount of hydrogen if you will use it to create more hydrogen, which defeats entire purpose. What you got here is just you being scammed after you watched some random video on youtube or facebook where it claimed that you can create hydrogen on demand... Technology like this simply can't exist due to basic first law of thermodynamics, anyone who says otherwise are just lying or simply spreading lies without knowing it.
1
@kiradripkage Toilet paper is more relevant than bible.
1
Fun fact from reality, bible actually implies that earth is flat pancake in multiple verses, i dare anyone to present single verse which indicates that earth is a globe. And just FYI before you do so, google definition of circle as i can bet i know which verse you wanted to presented here. Just being friendly and saving you from being embarrassed on internet.
1
@kiradripkage Bible is ancient book of fables which isn't a representation of reality in any shape or form due to its inconsistencies and false claims. So while i can atleast use toilet paper to wipe my ass, bible cant even have that purpose due to paper being to thick. Feel free to prove me wrong here.
1
No idea what you tried to say here.
1
Word of god isint final authority until you can actually prove that there is a god and that he said those words and that we should care what he said.
1
Turn on radio or something if you want your "cool" sounds...
1
If you need 10 years of study to get to the conclusion for the shape of earth, then you are doing something wrong here...
1
When did he said that?
1
@jakestarr4718 "Lol the ISS is in lower Earth orbit, go read. All satellites as well." First of all, you do know that orbit is only possible on a globe?... Second, most satellites are on lower earth orbit, but not all of them. "We've never left Earth buddy. EVER!!!" Dint you just said that ISS is lower earth orbit? And are we talking about shape of earth or your claim that we never went above that? Because we need to establish shape of earth first of all, before we go something more complex than that... "Read the NASA page with pictures, "Renditions". Not including project fish bowl. " Yes, please, read, all of it, not only one sentence you cherry picked but entire thing... lets see who is incorrect here... And what is even more funny that you literally believing what NASA says on page X while dismissing everything on page Y from same NASA... "No I couldn't determine how it looked from the outside without actually seeing it" Why not? And especially when using same analogy and applying to our galaxy, walls of this house are transparent. You know how far away each room stretches, you can determine actual size and shape of the house without looking at it from outside, no need to be 100% accurate, but you can do that... "You could make any geometrically shaped light bulb and from a far enough distance it will appear round. " ? have you ever heard about sun filter?... You know, that thing, that glass with some tint on it which removed glare and you can actually see real shape of light source, that one... "Philosophy is a tool of understanding or realization" And how is this related to the shape of earth?... "Language gymnastics is next?" Correct. Word "set" has over 300 meanings depending on context, so we can perform literal language gymnastics. "Ok then Mrs Butterworth" Well atleast its clear what is your mental age. "Your name is irrelevant." Correct, my name is irrelevant, something is true/false independent who said it, what matters is argument itself not who said it. "I'm not going to claim something that isn't concrete or based in proper evidence" Cool, so you cant claim that earth is flat, especially when its proven fact that its a spherical. "I suppose the Earth's core is a molten chunk of iron and surrounded by water waiting to explode too!" Who made this silly claim? "I suppose the frequencies emitted by the Black Knight satellite is fantasy too" Do you have evidence that its not? "But no one actually knows. If someone does know and has proof it's hidden for some reason. " Which is more likely: Natural object which follows natural laws of physics or magic? "to try and manipulate my mind to think like yours" Like a normal human being you mean? "However you brought nothing but absurdity in thought" Says some one who thinks that flat space pizza is possible because he failed to prove to himself that earth is a globe... C'mon, lets be real here... "There ya go... Obama on lower Earth orbit. Big break throughs... Yeah like leaving lower Earth orbit." ? What this video should even prove exactly? That earth is globe? Because you can only have orbit on a globe. That we dont have appropriate technology to safely travel further than lower earth orbit? Well we are working on that one. Moon missions have been performed just to piss off Russians and maybe find something useful on the moon in regards of dangerous trip to it. There was nothing, so after couple missions it was shutdown as each trip costed like a billion dollars, quite expensive trip to the place which has nothing to offer... Now as we have different companies investing their money, like spacex, which can lower costs of space travel multiple times, traveling to the moon became something reachable and in near future we will go back there to establish some basic base like we have with ISS. After that will be Mars with an actual self sustaining base. So your provided video only proves my point here... So thanks.
1
@jakestarr4718 "Orbit is only possible on a sphere... Looks at sun and moon..." Moon orbits earth, sun is a center of our solar system, while sun doesn't orbit another planet, it does orbit center of the galaxy which by current understanding is a black hole. Did i need to be extremely specific when i make some general claims? "Everything else works elliptical. Not on Earth! It's special! " What? What works elliptical? What the hell are you talking about here? Could you be any more specific?... "I was designing a road yesterday for a sphere. But I used a plane model for it." And? if we are talking about 3d design and you have sphere in size of earth and you have road in size of a regular one, then i cant see any issues in using plane of a road... What issue there should be? "I tried to use a compass on a sphere, but it works on a plane model." ? Compass point to the poles, what issue do you find with that exactly? And why would compass point to south pole on flat earth model? "I dunno man, there's like reoccurring incident." Yes, your ignorance. "Even when looking at shipping lanes to flight plans." How do they look like? Take any plane flight path on southern hemisphere on a flat map, how do they look like? They have an arch, right? Why is that? If you would take same exact plane flight path and put on a globe, how would it look like? Nice and straight line... Who could knew, its like earth is actually sphere and not flat pancake... But seriously, all 4 comments you made here are more or less you being but hurt and screaming at me while holding your fingers in ears... Did you had any point to present here or did i missed one?
1
@jakestarr4718 And you missed everything i said... Earths shape is provable by simple observation, basic observation of sun proves that it atleast not a flat plane. Anything else on top of that only supports globe earth. I dont believe that earth is globe, i know that it is. Issue would be with you not wanting to know basic reality.
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 If earth is actually flat and you have evidence for it as you claim to have done "correct" research here, can you present your BEST evidence of that? Like your BEST evidence which match flat earth 100%, missmatch globe, and matches observable reality? One will do just fine. Can you do this? After you fail providing this, for obvious reasons, can you actually go and do some basic reach from actual scientific verified sources before you humiliate yourself even more?
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 More proof? Where was the first one? Making some random assertions is not a proof of anything. And your generic "Go research it yourself" gets boring quite quickly. If you cant support your claim with evidence, then we can dismiss it without any need to present counter evidence. Case closed.
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 At moment you will manage to present any actual evidence that earth is flat, we will accept it. Can you do this? Can you present your BEST evidence that earth is flat. And just to save some time here, avoid trying to debunk globe, concentrate in proving that earth is flat, after all, disproving globe will not prove flat, so don't waste time on something you can achieve, give us your BEST evidence that earth is flat.
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 I can experience flight by injecting some drugs into my veins... Would that mean i can fly?... Present your BEST evidence that earth is flat or simply go home. Your personal experience means nothing. You dint presented anything, so far, what would prove that earth is flat. Which comment of yours should have been evidence that earth is flat or a method we could use to determine that? Care to clarify?
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 "and even posted at least one video" You might double check that one, cant see a single video link from you. "which describes everything we Flat-Earthers believe" I know what you believe, i want to know "WHY?" you believe what you believe. "and why it's scientific fact" Scientific fact is that earth is a globe. No idea which pseudoscience you are using here, but its not science. Give me a name of respected scientist who thinks that earth is flat... "We're not here to spoon-feed you like NASA does" And you even think that NASA is relevant here?... Jebus... NASA is as relevant as caramel ice cream... I can prove globe from my backyard... NASA only provides cherry on top of huge tasty cake, you can take away that cherry and you still have cake, and I don't really like cherry anyways... "it's time you do some work on your own now." Says every flat earther ever when asked for actual evidence for their claims... Sorry, but i dont have time to do a research for every single empty assertion out there. If you cant even present a single evidence that earth is flat while i can present dozens of those for a globe, you dont even have a starting point here.
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 "What is it with you people with the whole "...says every Flat Earther" line?" What about it? Its just basic observation that flat earthers like to use phrase like this when they cant actually prove their point so they simply say that we should go and find information which should prove their point... Its not our job to prove you correct/wrong, its yours. "our beliefs are the same, so obviously you'll hear similar truths" What truths? Your statement that i should find information supporting your claim is some what a truth? Its your empty claim and i will not waste my time doing your job here, if you cant prove your point, then thats that, we can dismiss it entirely as invalid without any need to provide counter evidence. "And even asking the question how NASA is even relevant here shows how much you've missed the mark" But NASA is not relevant here... There are dozens of space agencies across the world while those are irrelevant here too... We know that earth is a globe not because NASA said so, but because its provable fact from reality anyone could confirm from their backyard with 1 dollar solar filter... "Lastly, I won't ask for your backyard proofs, because they don't exist" So if you dont even know what are those, how do you know that those dont exist? Scared of reality? My proofs are really simple, doesn't require any math, no expensive equipment, just spare time and 1 dollar solar filter. If you cant even pass this basic observation anyone can do, then anything else than this will fly over your head. So lets from basics and lets see at which point we disagree. Learn to walk before you try to run. "and you couldn't prove anything even if you wanted" Yet I can. "which you obviously don't because you don't seem to understand what truth is." Do you? Because until this point you only presented your ignorant opinion, nothing more. So what do you call "truth" and where can i find it in your comments exactly?
1
@ultraniusmaximus1536 "You calling anyone's opinion ignorant is, in itself, ignorant." If your opinion is based on your ignorance, its it ignorant. What objection can you even have against this? "I've been stating truth from the start" If its a truth then you should be able to prove it to be true and not only make a claim that it is. What you did so far was only a claim that something is true, you dint proved that it is true. "You seem to want to fight instead of learn" False, i want to know what is actually true independent of how i will feel after getting this information, if you could prove that earth is flat then i will accept it in no time, but as you failed to do so i will go with things i know to be true which in general matches globe model without any issues. "I have better things to do than to deal with cognitive dissonance." What? Where did I engaged in cognitive dissonance? Do you often make shit up just to create excuse to run away when you got your ass put on fire? Basic reality is quite basic, you made a claim that earth is flat, you failed to present ANY evidence that it is, so claims without any evidence can be dismissed without any. While i can sit here and list dozens of separate methods proving that earth is a globe. Its not a cognitive dissonance, its basic education.
1
They are not... They never actually joined this war...
1
Don't like reality?
1
@malcolmrickarby2313 I'm just curious if FSD actually using geolocation data to use different training data based on where it is, as different countries will have slightly different rules and will need slightly different training data. Base one could be shared across all countries, like "do not hit puppy" but there is always some small/big differences between countries.
1
patrick cockell You are kind of right, for something to be flopped you need for it to be a thing to begin with. Hydrogen never was a real thing, so there isint for anything to flopp.
1
Well it looks like you are being quite happy with your internet access... If you want to battle need of internet then stop using it... Simple as that. And those satellites will be deorbited, intentionally, aka with the option to aim where those enter and where potential debris could land, aka over ocean. So you fear about debris is silly. Actual concern here would be with potential broken satellites which can't be deorbited, but there should be quite few safety things on them to avoid that.
1
Russians are not normal...
1
700k NATO army? NATO dint even joined this war yet... Are you ok?
1
That's why they have guns and not shovels... Duh...
1
@HerzogVonMartian You do realize that introducing gun laws will not magically remove guns from homes straight after it?...
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke Lying doesn't require even an average IQ, making your lie believable as truth might need more than that tho.
1
@painfull73 What if you just tell the answer? "$60" is quick and easy in comparison to your long explanations that people need to watch video and that you will not tell them...
1
Conspiracy is something what has no actual evidence for... Why the hell should you believe in something you can't prove to be true?
1
@ikukootsuka74 You have no idea how irrelevant your information is... On top of it being aimed to mislead people.
1
Scientific arguments for god's existence? Do you have your BEST one to share with all of us here?
1
Well whats interesting, that yes, bible actually kind of says that earth is flat. It mentions that earth is circular, aka flat disk, you can see entire earth from big mountain or tree, that it has corners, has pillars and so on. But at same time you will find Christians who will use bible to claim that it says that earth is globe... In general, bible says what you want it to say...
1
Hydrogen cars have literal expiration date written on their tanks... And its around 3-5 years. And hydrogen fuel cell has one, which is like 6-8 years. Good luck replacing those.
1
You seriously trying to blame US and NATO for Russia invading a country and starting war?...
1
Yea, he is a good friend of Putin's, go figure...
1
Those lies are for Russians and not for the rest of the world.
1
It wasn't the goal or even allowed to go into orbit...
1
Or... Hear me out here, it might be crazy idea... Or its all bulshit conspiracy theory?...
1
Petrol isint better, no idea in which reality you think that it is... Are you just saying that its better because its less expensive?
1
@wsbill14224 Are you one of those who just parrots talking points made by some big oil company and never bothered to fact check?... For your own sake, go and fact check which fuel types produces most pollution, END TO END.
1
Hydrogen is a bad energy storage solution, there are better ones, if we are talking about general energy storage from excess energy production.
1
@bpeng2000 I mean, yea, hydrogen can work for buses, trains and similar heavy equipment, will not work for regular passenger cars. And for energy storage, well, there are hot salt ones, hot sand, some water ones where you have one pond lower than the other and so on. Hydrogen simply introduces quite a bit of complexity and maintenance costs to be viable for any excess energy storage. Using that excess to make hydrogen which you will then use in trains, planes or what not, kind of works, but you would still need to produce that hydrogen on site and it would be split across all those separate sectors... Hard to say how viable that would be.
1
@SHARKCAT23 I have literal example of actual history where Russia destroyed dam and you think that you mentioning something completely irrelevant proves something here?... How brainwashed are you to think that sabotaging gas pipe is equal to destroying dam? Or that destroying a bridge equals to destroying dam?... You do understand that you are grasping straw here and look foolish at best?
1
@mateonikolic6984 Science is based on evidence, repeatable and testable experiments, predictable outcomes and reality in general, yet science contains equally 0 places in it where you would have a god/creator as an explanation. You cant even prove that creator is possible to be real, so if you believe something to be real which cant even be proven to be possible to be real, that's opposite to what scientific method is. So you ether reject science, religion or you keep both with cognitive dissonance. And its interesting that you instead of presenting actual counter argument here you simply said that I'm wrong and that's that... This is not scientific method, this is religious one...
1
First of all, in 99% of times you are not charging from 0 to 100, second, this time is getting down and some new battery technologies promising 10 minute charge times from 0 to 100. Second, for regular driving you wont even need to charge it specifically as it can do it over night from basic wall socket, so this time would only be relevant when you are doing 300+ mile trips, but even then you can quickly top up battery in few minutes every 150miles or so, which is more than enough of range for you to stop and stretch your legs anyways. Hydrogen isint future, its quite bad alternative when you actually start looking into it.
1
Hydrogen is quite bad as a energy storage solution. Liquid hydrogen is non starter for regular passenger cars. Producing hydrogen will require crap ton of electricity too. Storage of it is expensive and complicated... I mean, there is a reason why hydrogen is basically non existing anywhere even tho we had hydrogen combustion engines for 200 years. if you want independence then going fully electric is the solution, no more dependency from some refueling stations working, basic wall socket will do the trick.
1
@Matuse Issue is that this firmament supposedly holds water behind it and prevent it from flooding this snow globe earth thing or something.
1
What would be difference between it being proxy war and US/West helping Ukraine to defend against Russia?
1
Fire is already raging, this is attempt to put it down...
1
Funny how no one says anything about Hitler killing Jews?? First of all, its not NATO war, its Russia attacking Ukraine... Second, if you want to talk about past events on every single current event it will be a long long day...
1
That's the funny part about people who claims that greed killed magical technologies... Like... Why? If someone invented car which can run on water then owning patents for something like that make you multi billionaire overnight
1
You would need to carry that water around, but in general you could have system which collects that pure water and when you go to refuel your Hydrogen car you could have second outlet which could be used to dispense water out and get some discount. But that introduces allot of extra parts and more complexity which isn't really worth the trouble.
1
But they can't... You can't use existing engines, you need specialized ones with specialized metal alloys and coatings in them and specialized lubrication's and so on...
1
@charleschristian7806 Because its random scam video generated by AI. here are hundreds of videos like that all over the place, none of them actually showing anything real besides random unrelated clips.
1
He did weaseled out of it by saying that its misconducted question, there is no chance for JP to answer to some straight forward questions. There is 20minute video of JP "answering" to question "Do you believe in god?" at the end no one had any idea if JP actually believes in one or not... That's a "Yes" or "No" question...
1
Did you failed to understand difference between violent assaults and gun deaths here?
1
Whataboutism?
1
@firstysecondy2377 lets test your basic knowledge about geometry, unless you want to claim that geometry is a government conspiracy. Throw entire day sun size doesn't change, observable fact from reality, right? Cool. By flat earth model sun circles over flat plane. Which means that sun gets closer until noon and further away until sunset. Which means, that sun should change perceived size, basic geometry 101. Ok, do you see issue with this basic observation anyone can do with 1 buck costing solar filter and some spare time? Government is as relevant as caramel ice cream.
1
@firstysecondy2377 You dint answered to my question which directly addresses your nonsensical claim about government... We knw that earth is a globe not because government said so but because its observable fact from reality. And as you failed to address and answer my basic question indicates one of couple things: You have no idea what you are talking here. You understood my point and realized that you just got ass kicked and you cant actually talk about it without exposing yourself of being ignorant on basic geometry. You just some sad internet troll who wants attention. Which one are you?
1
I just wonder how would rest of the world react if China decides to take portion of Russian land to itself.
1
Your idea will never work in this reality. First law of thermodynamics prevents this.
1
Because you dont like it?
1
@LynxSpeck I'm no asking about CNN here... This same information being presented over multiple sources. So why is this fake news exactly?
1
@capellagis7749 Will try to repeat question here: How is this video fake?
1
@capellagis7749 Damn you people... If you cant defend your claim, then say so, no need to show your personal ignorance here over and over again. Just because its from CNN doesn't mean its fake... You actually need to prove that its fake otherwise I can simply say "Its 100% true because its on internet" and be done with that... Do you see how silly it gets?
1
Simple question for you: You do know that you cant feel motion only changes in it? Right?
1
It will not go anywhere, BMW like many other companies realize that they can't compete with BEV's and they still need to produce clean cars to get that check box marked, so what they do is just say that they will be working on clean solution. Maybe they will even make few real cars few people could by, like few, in hundreds, but it will end there, like it did before with everyone who tried it.
1
@matt79hz For really small brain people. 8"per mile2, where do you exactly insert observers altitude? Because this is one of the main variables you need to have while calculating how much curvature you should be able to see... So as generic flat earther you are (maybe just a troll) you are failing on basic math here.
1
@RoadKing05FLHR I still have no idea what you are trying to say here... Earth isint flat, so working flat earth app would be based on globe model if its actually working one... So its not really a flat earth app then... Or maybe you are saying that there is app which uses flattened globe surface map or something?...
1
@RoadKing05FLHR But that's the thing, as you agree projection of spheroid on 2D plane isn't accurate, so its not accurate map of the world. So what am I missing here?
1
@RoadKing05FLHR When you project 3D shape onto 2D surface, you will have issues with distances... Unless you are picking tiny areas, then those will not be noticable, but still not 100% accurate. That's the problem when it comes to globe projection on a flat plane... There is no way to do it without introducing warping. So no, that flat earth app isn't accurate, it simply can't be... Your best argument would be that its simply uses generic globe projection onto 2D surface and contains same generic distance issues, but is still good enough for generic purposes when you need to measure distances in small areas, other than this, I have no idea what you keep trying to say here. its flat earthers app, its garbage either way.
1
@RoadKing05FLHR What do you even mean "parallels and meridians are not semetrical"? Symmetrical in what sense? Most common maps, which are projections of globe into 2D surface will have parallel meridians to each other and parallel parallels... Which is not the case when it comes to actual globe, so flattened maps are not accurate representation of reality, those are decent approximations, but not accurate. So flat earth app using flat map of a globe earth will not be accurate, it is good enough for general purposes, but its not actually accurate. You can go into google and enter "true sizes of countries" and get general idea how distorted 2d maps are. If you want to claim that it can show accurate distances programmatically between 2 places by using actual gloe model while displaying it on 2D image, ok, that 2D is still inaccurate visualization of reality. Duno if its you or me who fails to understand entire point here... "As I said, all maps are flat. What you're expecting doesn't exist." It does exist... We call it a "globe"... You know, that thing which is actually 3D which is actual representation of actual reality which can be utilized in an app... Of you know, you can have physical globe on your desk, that one works too... So I have no idea in which reality none flat maps don't exist... Which multiverse do you live in? Cartoon one?
1
@RoadKing05FLHR "so you are continuing on with the picture doesn't match reality so it's not an accurate map." Because its not... It might be good enough for general purposes, but its not accurate... Its a 2D projection of 3D object... It can't be accurate... "You are using flat earthers logic by taking one part of the map and saying it's semetrical." No idea what this sentence even mean. "As I said before the land has to be in the correct location to make an accurate map. The shape has nothing to do with it." How the hell is shape of a thing will have nothing todo with it? Take Australia for example, its usually shown wider than it actually is, because that's what happens when you use Mercator projection. And there isint one which would not have some issues with distances, in one way or the other. If you magically got one, feel free to share it with all of us. "There is a good reason why there is no scale on a full Earth Mercator. That reason is that it's a projection. A scale will not work." Correct, so that makes this map inaccurate... Right? Just like any flat earth map would be? Right?... "a globe is not a map." Actually it is a map, so something new for you to learn. "Maps are accurate, they are all projected into a useful shape for a specific reason." Yet they are not... You can get them accurate enough if you pick small area, as it would result in basically flat surface which would have smallest amount of distortion, but you can never get 100% accurate representation of spherical world on a 2D plane. "However you have failed to say anything rational on the topic of the Flat Earth app." Something rational? Ok, you should not use flat earth app. Was this rational enough for your taste? "If you can point out something actually wrong with the app then maybe you have a point to make. I'll be happy to confirm that the coordinates are correct. " Coordinates? So your entire argument is that this flat earth useless map is only accurate if you are only looking at a coordinates and not at representation of actual earth in an actual map format? Then at this point I can make earth is a shape of unicorn and still produce accurate coordinates for you... Would that make this app useful in your head? I just wondering why are you so desperate to defend app created by someone who is denies basic reality, uses data from globe model and uses fictional map of earth? And its a geocentric model based one too?... It could be cool for memes or something, but its useless app, most likely created to troll people. So that's that.
1
@RoadKing05FLHR "Maps are accurate" Not 2D maps. "There is no such thing as an actual Earth map format or whatever you keep trying to say." We call those things: Globes. "Do you think the Mercator map was created by a rectangular Earther?" No, it was made by normal human being, doesn't make any difference here... Your remark is weird... My point remains the same and its know issue, you can't properly project spherical surface on 2D without introducing warping... Why do you think we have like over 50 different projection types of a globe?... Because there is none which is actually fully accurate... All of them have their own issues. Welcome to reality little one. "The app is accurate." Its claiming to be based on geocentric model... So clearly something isn't accurate there... Right? "The equidistant projection was created to measure distance along meridians." Cool, now use same projection and give me shortest path between Australia and Chile. Then give me shortest path to travel there. Then give me calculated distance in KM between those places. Lets see how well it will work out for you. "Maps are projections. A globe is not a map." Education time. Definition of a map: a diagrammatic representation of an area of land or sea showing physical features, cities, roads, etc. Where do you see exactly requirement for a map to be a projection? And for love of your god, just google "Is globe a map?" that will help you to save your face here. " As I said before the app was not created by a flat earther." App called "flat earth", using generic most common earth projection as its base map, and based on geocentric model isn't made by flat earther?... C'mon... Then was it made by a troll who made it for shits and giggles? "Instead of referring to your imaginary map that doesn't exist why don't you try to find what's incorrect in the app?" Why are you so desperate here? Are you the creator of this useless app? "There is nothing incorrect about the geocentric view" Everything is wrong about it... Its incorrect view of actual reality... "That's the way we see it." Maybe ignorant people see it that way, doesn't make it correct way. Some people think that earth is a flat pancake too, doesn't mean that its true or that we should use flat earth app for anything... "The app, like others that are made to display the data show it that way because that's the way it is." But its not, earth is a globe and its a heliocentric model. So why twist actual reality? "It is displaying the Sun, Moon and other planets as they are to the observer at their zenith." Which is incorrect way to display reality... Why not simply use globe model instead of accurate placement of those celestial objects in the sky? like seriously, that flatardian map has enormous issues when it comes to anything on southern hemisphere... People would looking away from north pole around entire southern hemisphere and seeing same start, which makes zero sense on that map... So then how the hell will you display celestial objection which is in the south on that map? "this demonstrates the flat Earth phenomenon pretty well." Yea, people are either stupid, willingly ignorant or just trolls. "Some people who want to fool you show you an accurate map and tell you it's the flat Earth map." No idea what this sentence mean. There are no accurate 2D maps. "So being as all the data comes from NOAA, NASA and other agencies and are considered accurate they have no leg to stand on." ? What the hell is this sentence should even imply here? I can disprove flat earth with one word: Sunsets... no need to point to some random dumb flat earth app on android...
1
@RoadKing05FLHR "A globe is not a map." Globe is a 3D map, try to think in more than 2 dimensions here. "Geocentric view is accurate." How?... It factually incorrect about earth's movement around sun... So no, its not accurate... " The app is accurate" Its map isn't accurate. Its entire earths model isint accurate. "Pretty much take everything I said and reapply it to the brain and take everything you said to the contrary and put the word false, and write what you said beside it. " So basically your reply is "Naha, you're wrong and i'm correct!!! Maaaaam!!!" "your description of a map does not include a globe." ? It does include what globe is... Right? You can understand that much? Are you saying that globe isn't fitting this? "A diagrammatic representation of an area of land or sea showing physical features, cities, roads, etc." "If you cannot figure it out that all maps are projected then I guess it's not your fault" You are not the best at reading, are you now? Your 2D maps are projections, I made this quite clear... My entire point is that your app uses projection and not actual representation of earth... That was my entire point here... Damn you are slow... And as you seem to agree that your map is just a projection, then maybe you can be brave enough to agree that projections are not accurate? Can you be atleast that honest? "Every GIS program in existence requires that you select a projection before you can even create the map." Or you could use actual 3D globe... Your GIS program requiring you to pick one of the projections would ONLY apply when you are making flat maps... Do you even think before you write or is this natural thing for trolls? "Globe is not one of the several hundred choices." There is only one option for the globe, there are dozens for flat maps. Welcome to reality little one. "I keep picturing you riding in your car with a globe mounted in there, looking for a gas station. " Or i can use GPS... You know, that modern thing which can have maps in them based on a globe... Tho again, you might have missed few things in my replies, but I already explained that small areas have small distortions, so you can use flat map when you are traveling relatively short distances as those will not have big discrepancies for it to actually matter. But I guess now you just resulting in some 5 year old insults or something.
1
@jimthomas777 Which verse says that earth is a sphere? Dont get me wrong, earth is a sphere, thats a fact, but which verse in the bible says that earth is a sphere? And Genesis 1:8 doesn't say what firmament is, let alone matching reality. And if you would read Bible further and get to Genesis 1: 6–8 it talks about water being on another side of firmament. Is it tho?
1
@jimthomas777 "Genesis 1:8 says that the Firmament is Heaven" Ok, but then what is Heaven? Clouds? Space? "and they knew what a Firmament was" Yet you cant explain it now... Replacing word with another one is not a explanation. What is firmament? If its heaven, then what is heaven? And why do you have different words for same thing? "so to hear that these Flat Earthers claim that it's a Dome over the Earth makes me Laugh" It does make me laugh too, but when you have bible which says that firmament separate waters, that would mean that you have some boundaries, some barrier, something what separates that. What is it? Air? Clouds? Atmosphere in general? "That's a cool name Zrips , is that you're first name or Last " Nether, its a nickname, internet is not as private as you might want too and showing of your real name isint best thing in the world. And i'm using this same one in multiple places, so in some sense it is my internet name, allot shorter and more simplistic then my real one. "I will give you a hint" Why all those hints instead of actual verses? "the clouds are in the Firmament or Heavens , Last time I looked clouds are WATER" yet bible says that firmament separated waters, which means that clouds are not in firmament but on another side of it. So clouds cant be part of your firmament. So what it is then? You literally using same exact verses to try prove that bible is correct about earth being globe while flat earthers use those to prove that earth is flat, while both of you just creating your own interpretations to fit your world views... The share fact that you need to tap dance all over the place to "explain" what firmament is should be quite clear confirmation that your bible isint that clear about things as you think it is.
1
"The rouble is the strongest currency of 2022" That's a nice lie. Rubble is only valuable inside Russia, try to trade with it outside it, its worthless. "Everything is fine in Russia, don't even try to argue against it, it's a fact." Said who? Putin? Go outside any Russian main citie, you will realize how shity it actually is. Only main cities are being maintained to keep that look of russia not being shitty country.
1
@flatearth9140 What's flat?
1
@flatearth9140 Hmmm, you cant even be good troll. Can you do anything decently?
1
@flatearth9140 My mam is dead, so she hardly could do anything at this moment. But atleast you admitted that you cant even be good troll.
1
Wheels are better when you have flat surface and you need actual speed to cover bigger distances, in majority of cases basic feet are more than enough and a better option as more universal solution.
1
New and original video from TF with a title "Musk is done for! For real this time!! Trust me bro!" and then repeats same statements he did for past 5 years in 1 hour video...
1
You know whats funny about your comment? Circle definition: a round plane figure whose boundary (the circumference) consists of points equidistant from a fixed point (the centre). I can give you multiple verses which implies that earth is flat, you have none to show that it says that earth is a globe. FYI I'm not flat earther.
1
vs 60 000 BEV's charging stations in US alone.
1
Yet its still holding against Russian attack, so clearly it's possible. Cutting off Crimea would minimize front line by quite a bit too.
1
What now?
1
@herrschaftg35 You should educate yourself on basic things here. First of all, NASA had unlimited money and man power to get to the moon as fast as possible. Second, NASA doesn't have luxury to blowup rockets for testing purposes, it would look really bad for tax paying people, that said, SpaceX is a private company who actually wants to launch as many rockets as possible to gather as many real world data as possible as fast as possible independent if rocket blows up on the pad or on reentry. And no, SpaceX development of rockets isn't funded by taxpayer money
1
Then I guess this war is going by the plan of Putin?
1
@WanderingKakapo Leon? Whose Leon?
1
Yes yes yes, just like every single BEV manufacturer claimed to have Tesla killer just around the corner...
1
Said Russian bot.
1
You do realize that this technology is available like on wiki page entire world can check and reproduce? Right?...
1
Because Putin said so?
1
I guess those mushroom clouds have been caused by Volkswagen beetle gas tank exploding...
1
@mrjerzheel Does it make allot of difference if it was ammunition or planes? Fact remains that it was hit ether way. We will get those photos in time, but as you can imagine Russia are not too fact to release those photos himuliaitng them.
1
We need one bigger improvement in battery technology, like solid state batteries, and its gonna be last nail in a ICE car coffin.
1
What does it say?
1
Clearly someone has no idea how war logistics works...
1
@saviola5194 Any additional routes for Russia to have is a additional headache for Ukraine to keep monitoring. If this bridge goes down completely then Russian supply lines become exponentially more complicated and puts them into a bad situation. This is primary/secondary resupply route, taking it down means that everything needs to go over another one, which means that it becomes for Ukraine allot simpler to target it asit just basically single route which is allot closer to front lines... So yes, this is vital as its a route far far away from front lines which is hard to be reached due to all those air, sea and land defences.
1
You are new here, arent you now?
1
@jackiebird4336 So what you are saying that you who watched few videos from Munro, purchased some stuff from them and driven tesla knows more who works in actual company which specializes in car evaluation and has decades of experience in that area? If you got defective car, well, bad for you, doesn't mean that Tesla is bad in general, it only means that you got unlucky. Your personal anecdote will not make a valid point here.
1
@jackiebird4336 Do you even understand what moving goal post means? And i will take experts (Munro) opinion over some one like you who thinks that just because he driven tesla car he knows more... And yes, you are new here.
1
And? Even on flat earth pancake world map there is end of that ice wall thing... Just because some guy in 1700's had trouble circumnavigate something, means literally nothing besides that this guy in 1700's failed to circumnavigate something.
1
@Brian-de6zx You missed my point here... Could you circumnavigate antarctica? No? So you would have trouble? Right? What exactly would that prove here? Nothing... Nothing at all besides that you would have trouble circumnavigate antarctica... That's it... It says jack sh*t about antarctica shape or size... It could be ice wall all around flat pancake world, it could be just normal one as it actually is, just because some guy had trouble following its walls all around it means literally nothing... I won't even deny that this guy said what you claim that he said, because it has no value here... Will try it with analogy: If I said that I have trouble reaching "Store X", what does it say about distance to this store? Is it 5 meters? Maybe 5 kilometers? Maybe 500000km? What distance to this store X is based on what I said?
1
@Brian-de6zx You need to filter out relevant information here. saying that someone had trouble circumnavigate something is not relevant.
1
~90% of times one of the main flat earthers reason why earth is flat would be to point to bible as say that it is flat because book said so. Another reason would be to go against mainstream. And last one would be just to troll people and pretend that you believe in something you dont.
1
It's not a question how YOU perceive it (subjective), it's a question what shape of earth is (objectively).
1
How much its worst/better than you have with old production lines? And how many oil spills into ocean would make it worst than anything clean energy produced?
1
Yea, you sound like some troll here, poor one too, which sadly might put you into actual believe category...
1
Well someone likes dots...
1
What?
1
Yes yes yes, just like Putin said that it will be over in 3 days... 150 days later and you have stalemate... Yes, it will be over soon... Keep believing that...
1
Its only proved that your ignorance about science is not a proof for anything. Can you give us one best question which was left unanswered which would some how prove flat earth and that same proof would not apply to globe one?
1
@hulkhatepunybanner He did got you there, so take your L and be happy with it.
1
@ What about it? First stage got cough verifying that it wasn't just a fluke with that previous one. Starship experienced issues with some internal fuel leaks and had to be destroyed. As this as the first generation of the new starship version nothing to much surprising even tho it could have performed better. Next flight should be in a month. Why did your master TF skipped last 2 flight tests?
1
Referendum AFTER it was occupied by Russia... And then Russian government said that referendum voted for joining Russia... Shocker... I know...
1
What if... I know its wild idea, but what if its you who is that one who thinks to be intelligent and isn't?
1
Playing devils advocate here. Actually... Bible says that earth is a circle, while circle by definition is a flat disk... And then you have multiple verses implying earth to be flat while none of them talks about earth being actually spherical.
1
@fremue9312 Well its not, this is why I'm playing devils advocate here. Its interesting to see people using that same book to defend opposite positions, while both of them cant be proven by using this book only.
1
Well you are clearly not an engineer and not a scientists or just someone who did basic google search. Water isn't fuel, to extract hydrogen from water you need energy, which is, shockingly (to some here), higher than you will get back out of it even if you used hydrogen fuel cells which are twice the efficiency in comparison to efficient combustion engines. Shocker, I know. Basic math, you need 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen. Try to see issue here with the math.
1
Are you drunk or something?
1
@Interglacial_optimist I do care, this is why i'm not making some childish claims here.
1
@Interglacial_optimist And I never said that I made any here... It was about your childish claims and pointing out that I'm not making such claims, which is proven by the fact that I dint made one... How much more obvious this should be for you?
1
@Interglacial_optimist Best counter argument ever... And I don't live in Russia to be worried about such things, or be scared of open windows...
1
@Interglacial_optimist Was is attempt to insult then?
1
...
1
You do know that this hydrogen car already has battery in it and uses electric motors in general? It's already a hybrid, all of them are.
1
Not for long. There is limited amount of oil in ground, it will run out sooner or later, hydrogen is better option when it comes to supply of it, EV's would be best solution across the board.
1
@daliborzak2485 Are we talking about convenience for the people or actual best solution fr environment and for long run? Because now you just saying that EV's are bad because some people in remote areas might experience inconveniences... Ok... EV's are still best solution either way, independent how inconvenient it might make someone living in mountains...
1
What is the "real" casualty estimation?
1
Sadly it is true, like 99% of people who advocate for hydrogen cars include something like "I hate BEV's" or something in those lines.
1
Your scammer Mayer's was a scammer... he died like 8 years after his initial scam. There is no such thing as water engine, it simply can't be due to basic laws of physics... Please verify basic reality before you spread lies around.
1
Russia threatens with nukes like weakly... I would even surprised if Russia actually still had any working nukes at this point... NATO is defensive alliance, defensive mainly against Russia, which is ironic and makes complete sense why Putin is so scared of it.
1
Like what for example? Give me SINGLE example of this wisdown.
1
To create fake look for Russians that Putin won it fair and square. This is entirely to keep brainwashing Russian population.
1
Result of clickbait news papers titles like "cars which can drive on water" which result in people literally believing that there was this magical technology allowing for cars to drive on literal tap water and now government hides it from society... People don't understand that it was about hydrogen cars which drive on hydrogen and not on water.
1
Cool, when you return present your findings, until then, basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that earth is not flat.
1
@fantasticlife49 Good luck with that, Russia isn't the only one country with all resources in the world you know... After all, sanctions doesn't work, so you should cry about it in here anyways...
1
Because hydrogen is extremely low on energy density when it comes to its volume, then combine it with combustion engine which is half the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell engines and you will get this low bar
1
Sorry, but no, globe earth and heliocentric.
1
@richardlawrence3770 If you argument includes race in it, its racist by definition. Affirmative action was made to be racist towards non blacks as it was giving special treatment for specific race, aka being racist. Why can't we just have a thing where race becomes irrelevant and you are being treated based on merit and not your skin color?
1
Clean energy?
1
Nah, by flat earthers every single planet and star is a globe, except earth. Dont try to find any logic in that, its flat earth claim after all...
1
@therealzilch I have seen claims that moon is just hologram, that its transparent, that its flat, that its not real, that who knows what... As there isint flat earth model every single flat earther will have his own personal opinion what reality is, so there isint one single description of a thing on flat earth. But yea, it ranges from insanity to pure ignorance.
1
From a guy who knows nothing about rockets?... I mean, it would definitely be a new perspective... Duno how valuable it would be tho.
1
This is exactly how people created religions, there isint answer for something then just shove in "god did it" and call the day, who needs evidence, just make empty assertion and become hero!
1
There is no such thing as hydrogen on the go...
1
@timhodgson4423 Its called: Scam. You might not be familiar with that as you only watch one type of videos, but you should learn to fact check things before you try to spread that misinformation around. But heck, please, give me names of those cars which run on water and sources you know that those cars actually run on water... Random link to random youtube video about random person making claims will not be enough here, just saying.
1
Get a better and new "joke"...
1
Even if flat earth was still taught today, would not mean that earth is flat
1
Starve The Beast "The biggest difference between flat and round earth theory is that flat earth is observable" You meant to say "globe"? Right? because basic observation of sun shows that its not flat... "whereas round earth has us relying on hearsay of alleged astronauts who have been caught lying repeatedly" You seriously misspelled "round" with "flat" here... "derogatory reaction from globe proponents by simply stating the facts?" What facts? That you have no evidence that earth is flat and we have more then enough to prove that its not? Ok, lets test you: Why sun doesnt change size throw entire day? It should if we live on space pizza, right? "Anyways, the played out "boat over the curve" argumaent is easily debunked by anyone who simply uses a high zoom camera or telescope to bring the boat back into view after it's alleged descent over the "curve". " no wonder he said "ignorant freak"... You dont even understand how zoom works... i dare you to bring entire ship into view after part of it got hidden... I dare you... Flipping hell... I hope that you are only a sad internet troll...
1
@sgb4798 I can see your replies, well 3 duplicated ones. Youtube comment section is broken, still, now I start to think that Youtube did this intentionally for some reason, as this bug started to happen like more than half year ago and still going. You can see all of your comments if you navigate to this conversation manually and not using notification link. First part contained good stuff, waiting for the second!
1
So you want actual WW3 and millions more dead?
1
@puzzlerabbit9325 " most of the world maps are drastically inaccurate when looking at the sizes of the land masses and their given measurements. " Because you are projecting spherical surface on 2D surface. You cant have accurate none distorted representation of that. That's simply impossible. But globe map itself is 100% accurate and small area of earth projected on 2D surface will be accurate enough to be used for travel. Your objection here is just... Strange... "I find local maps to be very accurate but not the world maps" Correct. Projecting bigger surface will have bigger distortion due to the share fact that you will be projecting more curved surface on a 2D surface. Thats how reality works... "I don't believe the earth is a sphere and i don't believe the earth is flat with a dome on top of it." Ignorance is a bliss, i guess. "I believe the earth is just earth and it goes on forever. " That would mean that earth is flat. So you are flat earther after all. Why did you said that you are not? You cant have infinite earth which has any curvature or shape, so only flat one could be infinite. Soooo, why are you pretending not to be flat earther? "Don't i have the right to believe what i want even if you think it is wrong?" Well, you can believe whatever fantasy you want, but earths shape is demonstrable a spherical one, so you are demonstrably wrong about this. As long as you dont use your false beliefs and try to push it on others, keep it, who cares. But you are still factually wrong here.
1
@user-ph1ob6nj7i Is your solution to read every single scientific paper out there and try to get ot your own conclusion based on that? How much free time do you have?... Because that would take you multiple life times to go over all of them... Do you even sleep?... You have actual experts from appropriate fields, its completely fine to accept what they are saying as true. You could spend your time and investigate specific topic on yourself, but this will be limited to some specific while you still need to use something from other scientists what you cant verify. Currently it looks more like you are advocating for everyone to become scientists in every possible area...
1
@user-ph1ob6nj7i Water can kill you too, so i guess you should stop drinking it... Your arguments start to sound more and more like generic flat earther... Whats next, government is controlled by lizardmen?
1
@ammarhaziq919 Putin already started to admit that sanction might have negative effect, which only means that sanctions already had major impact on Russian economy as otherwise he would have never said this to save his face.
1
@ammarhaziq919 "of course there will be negative impacts for Russia, what you expect ?" I don't expect anything special here, sanctions will have and had negative effects, but the fact that even Putin himself started to talk that those will have negative effect will mean that effect itself is really bad for Russia in general for Putin to even make such statement. Putin will lie all day long to save his face as much as possible, to admit that sanctions work is a low blow for him. "but Ukraine just gone way worse" Well... Yes... War is going on inside Ukraine... Like... Duh... Entire cities are been leveled to the ground... So Ukraine will suffer quite a bit right now, world will help to rebuild it after war ends, will not happen same with Russia tho. "second EU probably will never let them in because no one in EU really wants to bear the ukrainian debt into their economy" Not true and there is actual motivation to help Ukraine to get on its feet and be strong economically and militarily just to have it on a border with Russia. "maidan rebellion in 2014 is just a big mistake that ukrainian have done" No idea what you even talking here, is this about losing Crimea? No idea what mistake would that be, giving it to Russia without a fight? Well, maybe that was a mistake... Tho Russia made bigger one last year by starting this war. "it bring nothing good to ukrainian people" Doing what? Not taking back its own land from agreesor back then?
1
Which science says that EV's doesn't help?
1
But its not real.
1
Define "genius"...
1
@travelvids9386 Rejecting empty assertion isint speculation... Do you even know what "speculation" word means?
1
@travelvids9386 isn't Typo, but did you seriously failed to understand what it should have meant in this context?
1
@travelvids9386 Just repeating that you understand something will not mean that you do understand it Explain to me what "speculation" is and how it applies for both original statements of yours here.
1
@travelvids9386 Will try it in simpler words here. Back in the day not being believer would have had harsh results, losing job, losing your family, maybe even losing your life. So if I lived 100 years ago and I was atheist, I would have said that I believe in locally worshiped god and went to church to keep that disguise just to avoid all of those issues. Why do you think that every single time someone mentions some famous scientist its from way way back when like 99.9% reported to believe in god and not from today's world? This is what we can debate, god is not up to debate as its unsupported empty assertion, but we can debate on some famous scientists ACTUALLY believing in god or not.
1
@travelvids9386 Ok, I think I used to many complex words here. Lets do it one step at the time. Like back in the days, lets just say 50 years back in US, did atheists lived nice and prosperous lives? No consequences in publicly admitting that you don't believe in this locally worshiped imaginary friend? I mean, Galileo got house arrest for rest of his life just because he questioned bible... Only in recent years people got option to actually publicly admit that they don't believe in this imaginary friend without big fear to loose their jobs in instant... have you been living under the rock? Should I do some basic google search for you here or maybe you could do it yourself? Another example from which entire US was started. Native americans had 2 options: #1 Accept Christianity #2 Die. Do you want to contest this one? Even today we have 13 countries where atheist can be killed legally. Do you want to contest this one? If I lived in one of those 13 countries I would be "theist" for everyone who asked, because I can pretend to believe in someones imaginary friend to avoid death...
1
First of all, bible said that earth is a circle, and circle is not a 3d object but flat one. Second, earth is not suspended on anything, its falling towards sun constantly while zipping throw space on enormous speeds. Please, get your facts correctly before you share them.
1
Peace can come any second now at the moment Putin decides to stop this war... Is your solution for peace is just for Ukraine to surrender? And Putin himself already admitted that sanctions will have negative effect on his country, which means that its quite bad situation for him to admit thing like this publically.
1
That's hydrogen fuel cell...
1
@NicolasCorte "There are very good videos explaining how for the sunset to work the way it does the Earth surface has to be flat" Like what? For example, how do you explain sun literally HIDING behind horizon without changing its size? Its literally impossible if it was over flat surface, basic geometry 101. "We wouldn't be able to see the reflexion of the sun in the water all the way to our feet if the surface of the Earth would be flat." Did you wanted to say "not flat"? Or did i missed something here... And i have no idea what you tried to say here... Its reflection, if you have appropriate angle of water towards sun then you will have reflection. Tho on flat earth sun would NEVER get so close to horizon. I dare you to test this one with some basic 3d model, place your sun as far or as close as you want, will never touch horizon.
1
No one really wanted hydrogen 20 years ago when BEV's wasn't even a thing, so we don't need battery breakthrough for Hydrogen to be a thing which no one wants, because no one wanted it, ever.
1
@JohnJaggerJack Good to know.
1
Och noooo, Putin got scared of NATO so he decided to attack none NATO country... Makes total sense... What could make you more stronger than wasting your military resources on a war... Or... Maybe Putin simply wanted Ukraine due to its natural resources and general strategic location? Just like it was attacking other countries in the time Putin was in control? Its not like Ukraine is the first one Russia attacked...
1
Rus bot detected.
1
@ignacio4159 This is exactly the point, Russia controlled it and you cant just destroy dam with shelling or rockets, it was made to vistand that... Heck Ukraine failed to destroy Crimea bridge, there are no chance to destroy dam without actually placing explosives, crap tone of those, inside dam itself. Russia itself even said that they have mined dam months ago... Russia was the one who raised water levels to record levels just before it got blown... There are so many points showing that Russia did it that its not even funny to see people like you two here being so brainwashed by Putin to not realize who is the bad guy here...
1
Every car company advertises car acceleration if its any good, electrical cars by its nature has really good acceleration so its natural for cars being advertised with that number up front. When it comes to people misusing that feature its the fault of people and not the cars.
1
@Twiggy163 Solution is to educate people, not to cripple cars just because some can't behave like normal human beings. And electrical cars which don't advertise their acceleration simply has poor acceleration.
1
@Twiggy163 Depends on car model and type this acceleration can be good or bad. Entire advertisement section is based on showing information which put you ahead of most competitors.
1
@Twiggy163 To which level? Like, how would you decide to which level it needs to be toned down? In general having better acceleration means that you will perform overtaking maneuver faster which is safer than trying to do it with a shitty car. So to which level would you tone it down?
1
What is China's peace plan? Give away portion of Ukraine to Russia?... That's not peace plan... That's extortion... Peace talks start when Putin takes his cannon fodder out of entire Ukraine territory and never returns.
1
What did you wanted from him? To do 5 hour lecture with dry numbers explaining why he is correct?
1
@JG-dd8jy Exactly, he had only few minutes to make a point, atleast he showed some graphs to make it simpler to understand what he is talking about instead of just saying that he is correct. TV ebates are completely unsuitable for things which require extensive data and visualization being presented
1
This is why you are not rocket scientist.
1
Huge waste of money.
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 You do realize that it would look more like making fun of people with mental condition in public?... That would not get any positive publicity in any shape or form... Flat earthers need to be educated, not to be laugh at while putting them in space for everyone to see. If flat earthers make themselves look like fools, that's fine, but making fun of them just to make fun of them will not get you far... And its still a huge waste of money. People like Elon or Bezos doesn't need publicity like that.
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 Ok... That went sideways quite quickly... Ok, they are not stupid, they lack of education. Is that better? My point still stands here tho, having laugh from ignorant people will not get you anywhere... That will not convince ignorant people and those who have knowledge to know that flat earthers are ignorant will not change their mind anyways. So what would be the point in wasting millions if not billions in sending some one who doesn't even understand basic geometry? Maybe you could some how convince them that they are wrong, they will still have no idea why they are wrong, you will simply show them being wrong by wasting money on that. Cheaper solution would be to actually hire some one who could teach them basic geometry in a week or so and that would be enough to actually convince them that they are wrong. And while we are on American school topic... Its one of the worst ones from developed countries in entire world, so no wonder most flat earhers we can find are in US. Lets start from educating them instead of wasting money to make fun of them...
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 There is difference between seding a tweet and actually spending millions (hundreds of millions) on some actually stupid idea. Space travel is expensive and dangerous activity, sending some flat earthers into space will not get you anything... If you want to laugh at them, do it on earth, will not change anything. After all, flat earther looking at earth from a dragon capsule could simply scream out that its fake, CGI or any other stupid thing they usually say and be done with that. So no, that would be huge waste of money, time and everything else for gaining nothing in return... You could even loose with that by trying to send some one famous who pretends to be flat earther just to earth money while he would simply say that he was offered payment to pretend to go into space, he would gain 100x more followers by doing so. So yea, still cant see any reason to actually do such pointless thing...
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 He launched tesla because he had to launch something for testing purposes and launching his own car was just a fun thing todo and nice PR move. Making snarky comments about flat earthers is not the same as wasting millions of some actual physical action which will requite not only money but time too... And that would only give more ammo for flat earthers by putting them out in public... Get any crazy idea, make most famous person talking about it and you will increase people amount who will actually believe that crazy thing by quite allot... Yes, rocket launches doesn't cost a billion dollars, this is why i was talking about millions. But in any case, you need special training for people who will go there, you will have to send more than one, so that increases cost in overall. We can talk about amount of wasted money it will be all day long, its still a wasted money... Even 5 bucks is 5 bucks too much spent for a flat earther... You can get better PR move by sending some famous youtuber or twitch'er or anyone who has millions of followers instead of sending some one to make laugh at...
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 Interestingly enough to tried to defend your joke as like it was not a joke for quite some time now and now you are trying to put this conversation mainly on me for some strange reason... Ok... Suggestion for your future "jokes": 1. Make it obvious to be a joke when you make one. 2. If some one failed to understand your "joke" then simply clarify that it was a joke in next comment and be done with that. Yet in this case we have generic sentence of yours which cant really be looked as a joke but more like a suggestion, then you continued to defend this comment of yours for next 2 days after which you made 180 turn and blamed on my by trying to point out why your original comment doesn't make any sense... C'mon... Own your mistake...
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 If some one dint got your joke, its quite likely that you failed in expressing your joke properly. Tho it is interesting to see you trying to make some strange excuses here, you failed with your joke, your continuous defence of it dint helped that ether. After all this saying that all this was just a joke, well, its just silly by itself. Own your failure and be done with that, its that simple.
1
@unidentifiedheadbumpstormt1937 Then don't assume. You should have realized that i'm not from America from my broken English. Tho i have no idea why you even bringing this up, what does it matter? I could be from mars... Doesn't change anything here...
1
This is good question. On one hand NATO or EU has nothing todo with that, but on another hand nukes are nasty and having one exploding in Europe would be in extremely grey area when it comes to attacking EU or NATO country indirectly. On another side, it would be really hard for Putin to keep lying and convince Russians that nuking country they supposedly should be liberating is a good thing.
1
So when Russia started this was, who initiated all this damage exactly?
1
@derekgreene7436 "How did they get the buggy they were driving on the moon." Got from local home depo on moon, duh... "Not one piece of footage of earth turning mate!!" ? Earth makes 1 rotation every 24 hours. You want to observe that rotation in a live video?... Will repeat: 24 hours results into 1 rotation "Look, we cant trust NASA in my opinion" Who cares? In both cases, who cares what NASA says and who cares what is your personal opinion? Earth is still a globe independent of you or NASA. Moon landing still happened independent of NASA or your personal opinion. "But the video is making people out to be idiots" No, people make themselves look like an idiots, video just shows them behave like one. "and been ridiculed for having an opinion" Making active claim that earth is flat is not just an opinion "Einstein admitted all his theories are not fact" And? "theres people who teach in colleges who believe the earth could in fact be flat" Then they should loose their jobs for doing that, actively promoting fantasy as reality should not be allowed in educational institutions. "With all the facts we have I think its flat" What facts? Basic observation of sun have 4 facts which match globe model 100% and missmatch flat one on same 100%. So what facts do you have to prove that earth is flat? And to me extremely clear here as i have seen this countless times by now, disproving globe will not prove flat one, if you want to prove that earth is flat, prove that earth is flat, avoid making claims that earth is not a globe, that will not prove that it is flat. And especially avoid bringing terribly irrelevant things like NASA, goverment or moon landing...
1
@derekgreene7436 You literally said "With all the facts we have I think its flat." and after this you backed up by saying that this is just your opinion... Can you even be consistent on your claims here?
1
@derekgreene7436 "where is your proof the earth is a globe??" Sunset... Done... Wasn't that hard. "No one has proof." Majority has, you simply dont understand or dont want to accept it. "There is no curve that were supposed to see!!" Ships disappearing over the horizon bottoms up. Like i said, you just blind or you dont want to see. "Theres no point in quarrelling about it." Well atleast you are correct about this one. Earth is a globe, established fact and talking about it will not change that. "and not giving your opinion or proof" I did, sunset and ships disappearing bottoms up. I have like 50+ more, but if you cant handle those 2 then there is no hope for you grasp others. "Think for yourself instead of being arrogant and ignorant." Then why are you ignorant? basic knowledge of geometry proves globe, yet you are here saying that i should not be ignorant... Yea, riiiiight... "Why do you think the earth is a globe??" Because it is?... Ok, will give you 4 basic things anyone with basic understanding of geometry could fact check and you will only need some spare time and 1 dollar solar filter: 1. Sun doesn't change perceived speed 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size 3. Sun moves in straight line 4. Sunset/sunrise All 4 things 100% match globe model and 100% doesn't flat one. This alone proves globe model even tho i have allot more. But if you cant even understand this, then there is no hope for you understand anything more complex then basic observation which doesn't even require any calculations...
1
Its aging even better than expected.
1
@FamilyWheels It is remarkable, but not in a good way. Toyota basically decided to go bankrupt in a few years if they remain with this hydrogen plan.
1
Why? Because some of the IP's originated in Ukraine? I can bet that some originated in US, should he shutdown starlink in US too?
1
Riiiiiight, everyone is evil except your dear leader and your echo chamber... Riiiiight... I guess entire world is wrong and only those few countries with dictatorship are good ones... I wonder if there is a connection between dictatorship and brainwashing...
1
@KangenAlec "To support the lie they created a whole system of brainwash and indoctrination" Let me guess, your best evidence that earth is flat would be your religious book? Do you see irony in this?
1
@KangenAlec There are 4 things about sun which matches 100% globe model and 100% mismatch flat one. Anything else is just cherry on top. But as you clearly have no idea how geometry works, that one will not work on you... Even tho this doesn't even require math or any calculations, just basic observations. Tho congrats on trying to shift burden of proof, you failed, but atleast you tried.
1
@KangenAlec Lets test your reality then. Should sun change size while circling above flat earth?
1
@KangenAlec To determine if you live in this reality or your fantasy world... But by now its clear that you are not on this earth...
1
@KangenAlec Geometry... I dint said that it would change its actual size, but perceived size from your point of your SHOULD change if it was circling above flat surface. But as this is not the case in actual reality is proof enough that we don't life on flat pancake. This is why i asked and this is why you failed in all possible fronts.
1
Guess who just turned off radiation sensors at nuclear plant... Sad I can only agree with you here, I was predicting this same outcome last year, that he could use nuclear plant meltdown as an excuse to retreat and leave entire Ukraine before officially losing this war.
1
But it isn't, is it? Which part of this video got outdated and why exactly?
1
Why are you not fixing this one?
1
He has multiple other companies to work on and honestly, hydrogen will not be anything more than someones hobby in a shed.
1
@pepperdeez ". The fool is you for thinking it's a fact and saying it's a fact because it's "the best" explanation we have..." You need to learn how to read here. What i said is that Big Bang is currently best explanation based on a currently known facts, like the fact that universe is expanding or Cosmic Microwave Background radiation or few other things. Those are facts, Big Bang is an explanation based on those facts, it could still be shown to be incorrect at some point, but currently its a best explanation we have. So again, learn to read instead of making your own shit. "It is on you to jot believe in God and to believe there was a big bang" Yet one is just a claim and the other is based on evidence and facts... Which is more reasonable? And on top of that, having big bang doesn't disprove god, so you can have both or none of those... "Maybe really look into it and understand the entire theory and look through all the "evidence". " I did, did you? And at worst you would point out issues with Big Bang, maybe even disprove it entirely, but you know what you will not achieve? You will not prove that god is real... Disproving X will not prove Y by default...
1
You got that at the end of video...
1
There is 0 of pure hydrogen on earth, ALL of it needs to be produced. Hydrogen cars simply do not work as valid alternative, especially when we are getting BEV's now. Maybe it would have worked if it was only option and we had to transition away from oil products, but now, not a chance.
1
Then why its not a future? After all this is ancient technology, combustion engine invented in 1806, fuel cell in 1966, yet we still have no meaningful impact.
1
So like, having wind turbines, geothermal, solar panels, all of those are run on hydrocarbon too?... What do you smoke?
1
Yes, we know... We have seen this comment like 500000 times already... Get over it...
1
So I guess earth is flat now...
1
Ironically most hydrogen is being produced from natural gas...
1
Yes, lets blame victim here...
1
@nfldend501 Taking over by force countries land and then complaining that some one turned off water?... Again... Lets blame victim here, what could go wrong...
1
@nfldend501 Its weird to see people talking about some one invading countries, taking their territory by force and then complaining that country which got attacked did something inconvenient... C'mon... And just FYI what Putin currently is doing is getting quite close to what Nazis did back in the day, its ironic, i know.
1
Riiiight, because those are piling up so fast already... Och wait...
1
Name me one human right trans people do not have.
1
Getting permits to build your experimental thing doesn't indicate how feasible it actually is. If you have 5 new plants opening, 5 existing ones failing to be profitable and 5 being closed, you should start seeing some basic pattern here
1
Will put my 2 cents here. While reparability should be primary thing across the board, there is still some fundamental issues here. Electrical cars are not gas cars, you can literally kill yourself or burn your entire house if you shorten something you should not. Its dealing with high voltages which needs to be handled with experience and not by random Joe Shmo in his garage. Second thing is that Tesla is already under attack by everyone, how many news have you seen reporting about Tesla burning? Quite few. Does that mean that Tesla is more dangerous than gas car? No. Its like 10 times less likely that electrical car will catch fire than gas one, yet if only one electrical does it then its breaking news. Now imagine if you got situation where some one killed himself and burned his house while trying to fix something he should no have tried to? So making those schematics public at this point in time isint best solution even tho i would 100% agree that you should have those. Its a slippery slope.
1
Jupiter flies with all other planets, just like earth... Orbit... Sun... All planets orbit sun... They move together... And closest star is 4 light years away, try to calculate how much that is in km... Its allot... More then you can grasp...
1
@TheAnnoyingBoss We have different technologies for batteries and more will come in time... Not even talking about the fact that you can actually recycle batteries and reuse majority of it in a new one. And I have no idea in which reality you live in where electrical cars are not efficient... You literally need like 50-60% more energy to drive Hydrogen car in comparison to EV... Not even mentioning ICE cars. Do you think that Hydrogen just magically appears from thin air in pressurized containers on its own?
1
@somethingelse9535 LFP isint Hydrogen, that's like the main point here, its quite different from any other technology and requires specific infrastructure. To give some numbers here, one hydrogen station costs around 1million to build, while one BEV charging station and be 100k or even 50k, that's not even including actual maintenance costs which would be enormous due to hydrogen being extremely corrosive, like, heck, Hydrogen cars have literal expiration dates written on their tanks, which is around 5 years due to hydrogen embrittlement. It only sounds cool on paper, but when you start to dive deeper you realize how unviable this option actually is. And, have you seen existing hydrogen cars which can do 400 miles? Tiny back seat, HUGE middle column, tiny trunk. Why? Because you need 3 huge tanks to get this range, this will basically never change as you can't really go any higher on pressure and you can't fit more tanks (not that you even want to have 3 of them to begin with), so its not scalable and not practical. Price would drop, slightly, but not much. There are hydrogen cars which gives you like 15k free hydrogen refueling, but it's not because its really cheap to refuel and manufacturers can actually provide it, but because no one wants hydrogen cars and that 15k will quickly run out and you will start paying crap ton of money to make basic trips.
1
@lukew6725 And? We are banning ICE cars not because we want to piss of ICE car lovers here... We are banning those because those creates pollution which is not only harmful to environment but harmful for the people around them. It's not about you...
1
@Fatal_Inertia Please, for your own sake, do some basic research into this topic. First of all, battery life span was already in a realm of cars life span, tho its getting even better with each year. Second, batteries can be recycled and materials reused to make new batteries. Third, studies have been done and it showed that BEV's are less environmentally damaging in comparison to hydrogen cars. Fourth, charging times are going down, you are paying fraction of what you would for hydrogen refueling and in most cases people charges their cars at home overnight and each day they have full "tank" Hydrogen cars on another hand in non starter, this is why no one actually buying those independent how good those sound on paper.
1
@spidergoose891 I will assume that you tried to make some sort of snarky joke here or something.
1
@spidergoose891 Makes no sense... Solar panels already exist, solar panels already generate electricity and to make hydrogen you need electricity... So like... What are you missing here? What other magical technology do you need to make hydrogen with solar panels?
1
@madasorusosol4596 If EV's isn't then Hydrogen car's have zero chance being one either. Hydrogen cars do not work due to long list of complicated and expensive roadblocks which are not present in BEV's. While BEV's are not perfect its still the best current option we have.
1
Question of the year: Will your next car gonna be hydrogen?
1
I guess those mushroom clouds have been produced by Honda Civic... Do you even think before you write? Or are you just some generic bot?
1
@borax92 You have videos produced by Russians showing simultaneous enormous explosions and you think that it was just simple fire due to someone accidentally dropping cigaret?... So instead of Ukraine attacking Russia, you would rather go with Russians being so incompetent that they are keep blowing up everything in their possession for past few months?
1
@borax92 This is your best counter?... Point out that cars got damaged too besides 8+ planes?... Seriously?... And how its going on for Russia to win this 3 day war after 180 days?
1
@john doe By shelling more cities?
1
No, Russia plans to blow up dam flooding entire region and cutting out attack path for next few months
1
Yea yea yea, then add that you need to replace batteries weekly... All new cars have access to internet one way or the other, just like your phone does. So if you are scared of that then you should avoid buying any car produced from like 2015 onwards...
1
What do you smoke? As it sounds really good!
1
He actually showed that CT can survive more than 9x its rated vertical hitch load
1
I guess Russian rockets been reusable for decades now... Och wait...
1
And pair with that fellow who says he can make perpetual motor... You will have trifecta of scams here!
1
@unikitty5131 First globe model of earth was made 3 century BCE in Greece, so yes, people knew that earth is a globe for thousands of years, you are factually incorrect and ignorant here.
1
Your sentence makes no sense.
1
Your sentence makes no sense. If Ukraine runs out of men then Russia takes it all over, so it will not be west which carves up Ukraine, isint it?...
1
Joe you do know that Bible was written by simple immoral people and not by some all knowing sky wizard? Which is actually goes into opposite direction, as we know that earth is a globe, but bible said that its flat, which means that you have atleast one false claim in that book, which means that you cant really trust anything else, especially when it comes to claims that literal magic is real. So yea, bible doesn't prove that earth is flat, globe earth proves that bible is wrong. Ironic, i know.
1
@josephscott6642 "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" Issue with that book of fables is that you can have any interpretation you want from same exact sentence. Like for example you would say that "circle" means that it said that earth is round, while definition of circle indicates flat disk. I have seen flat earther and not using same exact verse to "prove" their point... And no, bible doesn't contain any useful scientific data which could not be known at that time. I dare you to present any verse which provided actual information about reality which cant have more than one interpretation. Lets see with what you will came up here.
1
Sun has 4 glaring observable issues with flat earth model while matching 100% to a globe. Do you need anything else?...
1
@inquizative44 1. Sun moves in straight line 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size 3. Sun doesn't change perceived speed 4. Sunset/sunrise Those 4 simple observations about sun which match 100% to globe model and 100% fails on flat one. Flurspective is not a thing. Yes, flurspective, if you want to use perspective then you need to learn what perspective is before you embarese yourself even more. " Don't believe the sun is 1500 times bigger than the Earth and 93 million miles away" Doesn't change anything about those 4 observations from reality. "You see, you're thinking in 'scientific' terms" You mean "smart" way? " The flat earthers think the sun circles the Earth along with the moon" Which contradicts observable reality. "The UN and flat earthers seem to be on the same page. " ? UN map was created in a way to avoid placing any particular country or continent in a center, you know, like a round table... No one is in charge... But seriously, you dont have working flatardian map. Go to Australia and measure distance from east to west and compare that distance with flatardian map and normal one, which one will be accurate? Globe... Duh... Because earth is not space pancake, if you even believe in space... Who knows, there are so many flat earth imaginary models that its hard to know which one you think is real...
1
@inquizative44 "The sun does not move at all, if you believe the Earth is round" Do you pretend to be so dumb or is this natural thing for you?... Yes, sun itself doesn't move across the sky... Its an expression... used simplified words for you better understand them, seams that i over estimated your capabilities. "Me and the UN know the truth" Then find UN representative and ask what shape is the earth and lets see his expression when you do that. And even if he agreed with your delusion, you would have had argument from authority or argument from popularity fallacy. So ether way, you loose. So, care to address those 4 points i made or we can conclude that you cant as earth is a globe?
1
@inquizative44 It was simplification for people who cant grasp basic geometry, like you in example. I can paraphrase this one, so you will have less options to nick pick and actually address my point instead of behaving like a 5year old child 1. Due to earth rotation sun has perceived movement throw sky of a straight line. Sun doesn't move, earth rotates. Did that clarified things for you, or should i dumb it even more? And what is even more moronic, yes, not ironic, but moronic. Having geocentric model with sun rotating around globe earth will still disprove flatardia... So your objection is as moronic as it gets, you simply want to find excuse not to answer while failing even doing that. Damn... Atleast i can get nice laugh here.
1
Is it because he disagrees with your far left ideas?
1
@M.P.7. Is it because he disagrees with your opinion?
1
@M.P.7. Not really what I asked.
1
@M.P.7. So why can't you answer to my second question exactly?
1
@XI_Ronin "I know how to respect a person and their opinion no matter how ridiculous it might sound to me..." Respect is earned, not given by default. Spreading stupidity doesn't earn you respect. And yes, its stupidity. Basic observations you can perform from your backyard disproves flat earth, there is no real debate here. An in general, quite few who claims to be flat earthers are here just to troll people for shits and giggles, because I guess pretending to be dumb makes them happy. "something most of you guys don't have the maturity to do" Funny enough, if you had maturity you would not say that earth is flat pancake... "For some reason you feel the need to offend people or make fun of them which only ends up making you guys look bad and immature." Doesn't make us wrong tho. "And I'm only 31, assuming you're much older than me you should know how to carry yourself better than this." 31 and still believe in flat pancake world? Don't you have internet or something?
1
@КириллХ-ш8ъ Och right, for Russia to cope with this loss they need to think that they are fighting NATO, just imagine how humiliated they would be if it was only Ukraine doing all this... Och wait...
1
@КириллХ-ш8ъ I'm sorry, but which part of your reply was to my questions exactly?
1
Yea, Russian propaganda is always hard at work
1
You are still bound by the supply chain, as we have 0% of pure hydrogen on earth, so 100% of it needs to be produced. And just FYI hydrogen fuel cell cars still uses batteries to store energy, as fuel cell can only output specific amount of energy while driving requires more instant power deliver, so you want it or not, hydrogen fuel cell cars are simply BEV's with extra steps.
1
@Franckiefresh Interestingly enough hydrogen cars are NOT lighter than BEV's, they are either similar weight or even heavier. We have couple hydrogen fuel cell cars accessible for common people, you can verify their weight and compare to BEV. While yes, batteries are smaller, but you still need them, on top of needing fuel cell engine and multiple high pressure tanks. This introduces way more failure points and increases maintenance cost exponentially as you will NEED to replace fuel tanks and fuel cell itself on regular basis, there is leterral expiration date printed on each tank. Brakes are not relevant, heck, most BEV's are still driving around with their original breaks due to basic regenerative braking which slows down vehicle without using brakes at all. Same thing can apply for hydrogen cars too, as those could use their electric motors to generate electricity and store it in a battery. I could maybe agree that there is issue with tires being worn out quicker with heavier cars, but again, hydrogen cars are not lighter, so that same issue applies to those. On top of this, BEV's are getting quite nice improvements over the years which increases range or makes them lighter, with hydrogen cars you can't really trim anything anymore. How is having dedicated extremely expensive to build and maintain station is simpler than just having electricity? To build one hydrogen station costs around 1milllion bucks, to build one BEV recharging station costs around 50k, this doesn't include the fact that ANY wall socket could be used as charging point, it could be slow, but you can always do it over night while you sleep. And yes, you do need to be connected to the grid to refuel hydrogen car, or you would need to have hydrogen generators to create electricity for the pumps which could properly pump all that hydrogen into your car. Why does it look like you think that hydrogen is in some liquid form you could refill your car from a can or something? And yes, you are wrong, nothing to bad with that, as its quite common to see people who thinks that hydrogen is the best solution ever and yet never bothered to actually look into, I was in similar position, but then I went on a research trip, more I looked into it less sense it made to have it as viable option, because its not. There is simply too many issues relating to it, especially when we already have BEV's as way better alternative. Hydrogen cars might have worked out if those started like 20-30 years ago, but its too late now, hydrogen ir worse option than BEV's and due to how fast those spreading is only confirms that hydrogen is dead on arrival. When it comes to hydrogen conversion to electricity, its not variable and it takes some time to ramp up, aka its not instant. You could imagine it as a turbo in your regular car, it just needs some time to kick in, and it has its own limits too. So best solution and more logical would be to just have a battery which could be constantly charged to some level which could then be used as power source for instant power on top of the current you can get from fuel cell itself. Like I said, its BEV with extra steps, instead of having big battery you will have small one which gets charged with hydrogen to have that buffer of power when you need it.
1
@Franckiefresh If hydrogen actually worked I would be first in line to promote it, fuel from water sounds amazing, on paper... But then you start looking into it and it just falls apart so quickly that its insane how much propaganda being spread about it being second coming of Jesus or something... That said, hydrogen could still have its niche, it could be used relatively economically on bigger equipment, like ships, planes, maybe even trains. Basically anything what doesn't care about extra space needed and can have its own dedicated refueling stations and its own dedicated maintenance groups. So basically everything else what isn't personal use equipment. Atleast with current technologies of batteries, if those gets better then it will not make any sense to use hydrogen anywhere else at all. When it comes to BEV batteries, neat thing about those is that you can recycle around 97% (with current technology) of their materials, and funny enough in some instances those refined materials are even better quality than it was originally as those went over additional refining process. Point being that once you mined those materials you can keep reusing over and over again. And on top of this, new batteries chemistries are coming out each year and its usually the ones using less of limited minerals. Who knows what will happen with battery technology in another decade, it already going wild with dozens new promising battery technologies being tested in labs. You can look into carbon nanotube batteries, those are extremely good, issue is with basic production scalability, basically we know how to make those, but we have no idea how to scale their production to make any economical sense, atleast not yet. For power grid, another interesting note for you to keep in mind. You will need around 60% MORE electricity to drive your car if you used hydrogen. Why? Because hydrogen needs to be produced, it needs to be transported, it needs to be stored, then put into your cars tank, then converted back to electricity. So you are loosing big chunk of that. So if you want to say that grid will not keep up with BEV's then there is no chance when it comes to hydrogen cars. On top of this, grid expands based on demand, this was the case as long as we had electricity in general. What you referring too is some people creating strawman from a claim that if magically entire planet switches to BEV then electrical grid will not be able to handle it, well, switching to BEV's will take decades even if we really tried hard to do it, there is more than plenty of time for electrical grid to adapt. For bigger equipment, I don't know myself how feasible it would be to have them as pure BEV's, doesn't really look like it could work with current battery technology, but it can easily change tomorrow.
1
@Franckiefresh Well what you are talking about here is just that grid in your country is just plain sh*t, which is separate and independent issue from BEV's or hydrogen cars. And you could potentially have solar panels on your house roof and be 100% independent when it comes to electricity to power your car and when it comes to your house in general. I wish my house roof was different and I could put some solar panels on it, but sadly not an option.
1
@Franckiefresh I mean, I'm arguing that there are bad grids and reaching those goals more or less is impossible on the rate it goes currently, but this is an issue with government and/or companies responsible for those grids.
1
Bluetooth, its like the beaty of this entire system, it can be undetectable as it doesn't have any wires sticking from your head and scarring would be minimal to none
1
@Pindosina It's more of a read only at the moment, so no newds and it should be using quite heavily encrypted data with who knows what type of tech being used to actually communicate. As this deals with implants in human brains, security should be top notch without any real ability to hack into it, but who knows, at the moment we only have 2 people with these implants and I don't think anyone tried to hack into those, yet.
1
@Allthesechickens In general you have 2 types of flat earthers: Those who dropped of middle school and those who sells t-shirts.
1
CT went 9x over its rated limit on vertical load, so tell me, how exactly is it a bad thing?
1
It's called "recycling"...
1
That would increase cars complexity, price of purchase and its maintenance. And hydrogen stations are really bad at producing sufficient amounts of hydrogen, you need actual plants and we need less of fuel stations in general, let alone big explosive buildings on each corner of the street.
1
"He has a PhD in psychology" And? I can find you a person who has PhD in biology who denies evolution... Anyone can get PhD if they want too... "He is pretty good as a psychologist" His actually bad at that too. " and offers deep and self-admittedly biased analysis of human behavior" Word salads are not that deep. "and is able to articulate it in easy to understand ways" This is a joke? Right? You can't be serious with this statement... The is the most wage person in existence... You can't even point me to an instance where he said to believe in a god, or to be Christian... He takes all positions at same time while talking in extensive word salads. So you must be making a joke here.
1
@stevenarvizu3602 3 paragraphs? Those few short sentences of my were 3 paragraphs for you? No wonder you think that Peterson's word salads are intellectual. The person best known for making word salads is the person who is able to articulate it in easy to understand ways by you... Atleast I have good laugh here. Sorry for this long post, all these 10 paragraphs of text might have scared you. Sorry again!
1
Are you doing this for some EDS research purposes?
1
@bearieroblox6451 making more money from cars which are one time pay and then owner spends little amount on electricity to charge it independently of big oil and basically never does any real maintenance on the car... While hydrogen combustion car is basically same as gasoline ones due to the fact that most hydrogen comes from natural gas and you will have to invest even more money into maintenance... So like... How the hell is your comment makes any sense here?
1
How is government helping him create monopolies?
1
"Starship" is just generic name from Sci-fi to label a ship which travels in space between planets or solar systems or even galaxies. Nothing special about the name...
1
@MrWyzdum Lambo is a brand, not definition of what that car is capable of... You shot your your foot here with your analogy. There is literally a tiny slow tractor made by Lamborghini. What you tried to say here is that we, as generic human, associate car brand as "Lamborghini" with super cars, doesn't really mean that this brand only makes super cars, does it? By the way, did you know that our sun is a star? So if Elon launches starship to the sun, would you then agree that it's a starship? Why are you even so fixated on the name? You might be new here, but Elon likes weird goofy names, he literally wanted car line up with letters which spell "SEXY" tho Model E was copyrighted by someone, so he had to change that to Model 3. Similar thing happen with his optimus naming... What name would you give to it? As it will be passengers carrying spaceship, should it be just called "spaceship"? People can't use more interesting names? Its not permitted under your watch?
1
@nightshade7240 "How many passengers has it carried anywhere?" ? Is this even serious question? Do you not understand what "TEST" means in "Test flight"? Do you seriously want for SpaceX to have few humans onboard just for shits and giggles while they push starship to its limits?... Like, how desperate are you here to grasp such silly straws like that? "How many stars has it visited?" How many brain doctors have you visited? Och none? Well that explains it. "For a spaceship to be a spaceship, it has to actually go into space" And it did, multiple times. Space starts at 100km altitude, starship reached over 200km, that's 2x the amount needed to count as reaching space. So it's a spaceship. Feeling silly yet? "Technically it has to go into outer space" Technically it needs to reach space to be, well, in space... You do know how words work, right? "Lamborghini never claimed to only make super cars" It wasn't my analogy to claim that... You can't read? It wasn't me who used label "Lamborghini" to mean supercar by default, I was saying that "Lamborghini" makes other things than just supercars, so to use that label is wrong, as you have things like tractors made by Lamborghini. Like seriously, you either can't read or you see what you want to see. As you generic Musk hater and worshiper of TF duno which is more likely to be the case, maybe both at same time. "The name is part of the con" To name a thing with cool sounding name is a con?... I guess in your world he should have called most powerful rocket ever built a "steel can" just to satisfy your personal weird fetish. You people are funny, keep going, I like to have nice laugh.
1
^ Generic Musk hater 101
1
It exist because youtube video said so?
1
There is limited amount of nuclear fuel, so entire world can't switch to one even if we wanted. And no, batteries are not as harmful as combustion engines... Not even close...
1
Depends on that "zero tolerance" policy and how badly its written. If it says something like "If you say N word in any context, you are fired no questions asked" then Karen would be correct, in a weird way but she would be correct. Entire issue would be with that policy as its the dumbest thing ever.
1
@deanpearce8581 That's generic missunderstanding about IT in general. Its on same level as to have someone who knows how to change bike chain and expect him to know how to fix space engine. IT is extremely wide category, you can be expert in one aspect and know jack shit in another. And... Don't know why I even need to say this, just because someone own's or is a CEO of technology company doesn't mean that they actually know anything about it
1
Just like Ukraine will lose this war in 3 days...
1
@RoscoPColtrane17 Its not me who keeps coping. All this easy war will end in 3 days, right? Yet is over 2 years now without Russia achieving anything. So keep coping.
1
What about Michelson Morley experiment? How is that experiment relevant to the shape of earth?... As someone who wants other to dig deepers you seam to went into woods here... Earth can still be a globe and not moving... Those are not related things....
1
What?
1
@Mr.Unacceptable It was you who made claim here, so can you support that with something more than just "Putin said so"?
1
And anyone who understand a tiny bit about cyberattacks would not start pointing fingers, so why did Musk did that? Is it because some of the IP's were from Ukraine? If you yourself understand that such thing as VPN exists which could misslead from where something originated, then why does your Jebus savior Musk failed to understand it and keepts quite until actual evidence comes out?
1
Lemma Baruda So what you are basically saying is that if bigger country attacks you, then you should just roll over and surrender?...
1
Why?
1
Your logic is so broken that I dont know if Its worth investing my time explaining why...
1
You do know that starship has heat tiles, right?... You can't be that ignorant...
1
No one actually cares what Russia will want as no one does now.
1
After that they will need to resolve remaining 69 issues...
1
This robotaxi is extremely simplified version of model Y and still costs 30k, no chance in getting something even cheaper and make it bigger than that. That said, I have no idea why robotaxi is so expensive
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 Earth is a globe, simple fact. Honest people tend to admit when they are shown to be wrong, science tends to correct itself due to how it works, but in most cases science isint wrong, its just gets more accurate over time. For example, if you have a stick to measure distance and you got 50 stick length for something, thats accurate by using this stick, time passes and we geet better way to measure distance, like actual standard which can get you to 1cm accuracy, ou measure it and you get 55 meters, cool, now new improvement and you can get to millimeter accuracy, you measure it again and you get 54 meters 98cm and 56mm. Would this make previous answers incorrect? No, new one is only more accurate even if those dont really match. Same thing happens with quite few things in science, like age of earth, while it did change, small amount, its getting more and more accurate due to new available information and better tools we have.
1
@khoyrulislam Basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth. You only need free time and basic understanding of geometry. If you think that you need to get into space to know what shape of earth is, then och boy how little you know how reality works...
1
@allthatyoutouch3164 Truth self evident? How does this logic follows your claim that earth is flat pancake while 98% of humanity rejects that? If its self evidence, then why the hell no one with IQ above average believes in it? Your logic is none existent and your "arguments" disprove your own position here... And we are not pushing it hard, we just having fun poking at ignorant people. Flat earthers have no power and never will, earth will remain a globe for rest of existence, your personal opinion has no effect on actual reality, tho you do vote, i guess, so your ignorance needs to be put into place before you make decision based on your fantasy world instead of actual reality, but then again, you are in minority which even if put together would not really manage to do anything with that.
1
Yes, it's usually 3 of those and it extremely limits interior space for passengers, we have few examples of cars like that already
1
Hydrogen cars which uses hydrogen fuel cell technology has no sound, as its electrical car with extra steps. So any sound you hear will be added intentionally
1
@alphonsocarioti512 Around 2% of humans still believe in flatearth, majority of them are believers in bible and uses it as confirmation that earth is space pizza. There are true believers in flat earth, but when you see someone claiming that they are one of those you should use 50/50 chance approach that they are just trolling. Some are, and some are not, claiming that none of them believes this is just silly, after all majority of humanity still believes in magic and wizards just because their ancient book said so, belief in flat earth isint that unbelievable.
1
Its "yuan" which would be around 12,749.31 Euro
1
Reverse racism card?
1
woof beast "the revelation of knowledge" Really? Like what?
1
woof beast And yet you dint answered to my question...
1
woof beast Actually you din't, but whatever.
1
woof beast I asked how is your claim that "Religion is the revelation of knowledge" is actually true, you "responded" with some irrelevant thing like "you suddenly just know, the light bulb flashes on" which doesn't answer to my question not even a tiny bit. There is no connection between those things and one is not dependent on another... So try again...
1
woof beast And how exactly this "revelation" is related with religions?...
1
woof beast Religions are man made for 2 reasons: create made up answers for something we yet don't know and/or to control people. "most cogent and searching commentary" Lets hear it! Tho i have suspicion that it will never happen... As people who starts saying "I could present world shattering argument here!!!" never does that... Why is this the case?
1
Then why there are zero hydrogen based energy storages out there?
1
@chadpunte1731 I'm talking about actual energy storage plant, not a car with hydrogen tank in it... Hydrogen is quite bad when it comes to energy storage, this is why no one actually uses this method, anywhere... You have few hydrogen cars, but that's it.
1
@chadpunte1731 I'm guessing you tried to make a joke here.
1
@chadpunte1731 Producing your own hydrogen for your car is on same level as to producing your own gasoline from crude oil... While you could do it, that entire process will be expensive and tedious and impractical and so on.
1
You do know that first hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806 and first hydrogen fuel cell in 1959? Its not day one technology... Its technology from a century ago and counting...
1
When you have 2 extremely bad options, people are just blindly picking one at this point.
1
@bobdown1720 Sadly enough at this point it's not even stupid and quite believable.
1
What?
1
Oprahs FatAss By some polls we have around 2% of flat earthers. They are rare, but there are quite few of them, especially in religious country which is mainly bible based one.
1
@gastonave BY those same polls it was said that Hillary will win popular vote, not that she will win presidency... In normal country she would have won, in America you have that cool election system where guy getting less votes actually wins...
1
@robertpunu7624 If there is working model, why cant you present it? You literally continuing with empty claims here... basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, yet you are here trying to say that earth is flat because internet said so... C'mon, try to use your head for once in your life...
1
@robertpunu7624 "the working model is the polar azimuthal equidistant map" Yet we asked for working model... So lets check yours, Australia, width shown on that map doesn't match reality. Why is that? And as it doesn't match reality, its not a working model. And FYI map is not a model of earth, its a map... Which is not even accurate... So try again. "this map is in the White House Situation Room" Maybe because having a globe would make only one side visible and it would take quite allot of space?... "and in the ancient world..." Yes, ancient... That time when people known shit about world... "how can observing the sun disprove the flat earth?" Sunset. Only possible on earth with curvature. None changing perceived sun size. None changing perceived sun movement speed. Perceived sun movement in a straight line across sky. All four matches Blone model 100% and fails 100% on flat one. Why is that? "I don't believe the earth is flat because the internet said so" Yet you best "evidence" was flat globe representation in WH... Yea, riiight... "but because of the overwhelming evidence brought about by scientific research" Like what? Flat earthers like to mention science or scientific research, but every single time they present that its not even close to be scientific... " which are not publish by the ''scientific community" Maybe because they are bollocks? have you ever considered that? "scriptures in the Bible and the Quran" Och... Right.... Completely forgot, earth is flat because book said so... Sorrrryyyyy.... Not internet, it was a book... "so use your critical thinking and don't be easily led astray, like sheep." Correct, so why do you behave like a sheep and follow blindly what some ancient book says without ever actually thinking about it? Explain to all of us why sun doesnt change perceived size throw day while it should in your world view. Why it moves in straight line? How is sunset possible over flat surface? None of that makes any sense o flat earth, none. Yet you are here saying that you have scientific research... No, you dont, you dont even know what science is if you trying to claim that ....
1
@robertpunu7624 "Australia in the map matches reality or as close as possible, but in what way doesn't it match reality? " Width. By flat earth map Australia should be allot wider than it is in reality. Quite simple. "it shows it better than a globe would" False again. BY globe model Australia size matches perfectly to actual size. "compare the actual airline plane's flight paths on a globe to that of the flat earth map" Actual flight paths? So you want to say that when you change flight path to something you want it to be then its matches something you claimed to be true?... Isint that convenient?... And no, flight paths makes no sense if earth was flat. But it does make sense if its a globe and flight paths got projected on a flat surface. This is why you have those arcs in flight paths while plane flies from point A to point B in a straight line. "they could show the globe in 3D graphics on a flat screen, regardless of the size" Yes... But why should they? That map is not made to used for war purposes or something, its just for decoration... If they need to plan something which requires actual globe, then they will use a PC for that... "Since the 600s AD, scholars have supported that view, and by the Early Middle Ages (700–1500 AD), virtually all scholars maintained the spherical viewpoint." I think it was 3 century BCE and not 5th... But well, doesn't really make any difference here. People thought that earth is flat because it looked like one until some one which geometry knowledge realized that it cant be flat due to multiple things. Proved that and it became settled thing. This is how science works. While flat earth was not based on science, but just on personal feelings and opinions. "According to Stephen Jay Gould" According to me, i dont give a flying f**k what some one said... If you want to make argument from authority as evidence that earth is flat, we are done here. You clearly have no idea what counts as evidence and why using logical fallacies wastes allot of time... "the sun goes into the horizon and disappear from your sight just like when you see a railroad track, as it goes further away from you" False again... Can you get one thing correctly here?... Railroads don't disappear, they getting to small for you to see them. They will only disappear if they go over horizon. Sun on another hand doesn't change size, which is in contradiction to your rail road analogy, and disappears over horizon bottoms up, which matches globe model 100%. So ether you have no idea what perspective is or you never observed sunset or both... Stop acting so ignorant, read a book about perspective or something... "it's how your vision works, it's because of perspective. " False again... Objects become too small for YOU to see them, but you could still bring some of them back with a zoom. But... ALL objects on earths surface have set hard limit how far you can see them before they start disappearing bottoms up. This is proof of curvature 101. Your failure to understand geometry is astounding... Sun doesn't disappear due to perspective, its been hidden behind curvature... Which is observable fact. Article like this explains why you are fundamentally wrong on all possible levels https://flatearth.ws/sun-apparent-size " yes, its in the internet, so what?" So what? You blindly believe what internet says instead of doing some basic experiments by yourself to get to correct conclusion... Something is true/false not only because internet said so... And blindly believing that earth is flat because internet said it will not get you far in life. "the visual evidence for it is still better than any ''peer reviewed paper'' from incorrect modern day scientist. " First of all, you have no visual evidence for flat earth, but we do have visual evidence for globe one. Like that link with sun size. Second, peer reviewed papers are exponentially more trust worthy source than random article on random web page which says that earth is flat because it looks like one... Do you even know how peer review works?... "and what makes the evidence presented by flat earthers not scientific? " Because they are not scientific?... Because they are not using scientific methods? Because they are not based on science?... Because they are demonstrably false?... "because you can't accept anything that would shatter everything you've been taught since kindergarten. " Talking from personal experience? As you literally cant accept something what would shatter your world view even tho i'm showing facts into your face. "not accepted maybe because modern scientist refuse to let go of their religion of the heliocentric model that's found in the Jewish Kabbalah." or maybe because its actually true?... its like you expecting something different in case it was actually true... How would scientists behave if heliocentric model was actually true by you? Like how would that be different? "why the quick capitulation?" Maybe because its demonstrable reality? Anyone with any capability to understand geometry realizes that you cant argue against globe earth model... Which actually exposes some issues with you... " the scriptures in the bible and the Quran just proves that the religious view has proof of the flat earth" False again... What some ancient books says are irrelevant. We know that earth is globe not because some book said so, but because its verifiable fact from reality. "observable and repeatable= Known and, Known= ''science''. all else invites deception. " Well correct... Strangelly... Tho on that note, earth is observable to be a globe, repeatable experiments and observations. So we know that earth is a globe, you dont know that, so by your own words, you are not using science and you invited deception into your world.
1
@robertpunu7624 ? 90 minute video? Are you kidding me? I have better things to do in my life then waste on some nonsensical video... You could atleast provide time stamp to the part which actually explains why flight paths proves flat earth and disproves globe... Can you? After which i will still point to basic real life observations you can make and prove that earth is still a globe even if light paths some how magically proves flat one... I will take observations from reality i can perform every single day over some random youtube video... And just FYI i can provide dozens of videos which proves that plane flight paths prove globe and disprove flat one. Do you want to see them? Will you change your mind about your world view after you see them?
1
@robertpunu7624 "I go where the evidence leads me" Issue is with your "evidence". "and exactly how do you know what the real shape of Australia is? from a globe?" ? Go and measure it... Width... Compare to globe and flat earth map, what you got in reality and what you should get by those maps.... One of them are bonkers, make a wild guess which one... Its direct scientific experiment anyone can go and compare results with both model claims. Easy. But it always results into 1:0 for the globe. "from CGI images from a satellite?" Cant remember if i asked you this already, but lets try. As dozens of other flat earthers failure to answer to this simple question, will ask you: What method you are using to determine that photo X is CGI and photo Y is not? Be the first one from dozens who i asked and none of them managed to answer! Do it! "but you've already judge my video as nonsensical without seeing i" Should we watch a video which is 3 hour long proving that magical space pixies farting out universes after eating hot tacos are real?... Especially when i know that earth is not flat due to basic observation of sun. Unless your video provides evidence that reality is not real, then you might have a valid point here, otherwise your video is bollocks. You literally would need for magic to be real for flat earth to be real at this point... So why should i waste 90 minutes of my life on claims i cant bet i already heard dozens of times? "which means you don't want your worldview challenged" I want to know what is true, challenging it with nonsensical claims is waste of time. You can challenge about belief of god, atleast that one cant be proven to be false and never was proven to be true. So we could talk about that. But when it comes to the shape of earth, there is no real debate here, we are here to educate ignorant people like you about reality. "I don't want to provide timestamps because there are a lot of convincing proofs on the video that I want people to see" So you dont care to defend your point?... So if i will provide links to 5 000 scientific papers which contain 500 pages each and will say that you need to read them all and it will prove that earth is globe, would you? Will you want to be challenged on your world view like you want me to be? Will you spend months o reading pages after pages after pages? "and I still don't get what these ''observations from reality'' that would prove the earth is a spinning ball is, that spins faster than a bullet flies, I might add." Learn to walk before you try to run. First thing you need to learn is how to determine shape of earth. After we establish that earth is a globe, we will talk about earths spin and all that jazz. So, first step for you: learn what perspective is and why it DOESN'T explain sunset. After you understand this point we will move slightly further, after like 50 steps we will talk about earth spin. So yea, learn to walk before you try to run.
1
@robertpunu7624 "shows the sun is in the earth's atmosphere" Look at this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY-FaLW1Bnk I guess sun is 10 meters away... Sun literally cant be in atmosphere, it would literally cook us and burn atmosphere... "so the Australia represented there has the correct measurement of the real world Australia. sounds like circular reasoning to me" ? No?... Do you even know what circular argument is?... What i said, couple times already, that if you would measure actual size of Australia by going there and measuring it, you will get results matching what globe model predicts and while compared to flat one would be bonkers. Real life observations match globe model, not a flat one. This is not a circular argument in any possible imagination... "and you'll see that it will answer most of your questions, atheist." Well that last word is quite out of place. What did that has todo with anything? What does it even mean in this context?
1
This is a joke? Right?
1
5 stages of grief, first one starts with "Denial", you are here at this point. Soon you will shift into anger.
1
@vic321344 Wow, what come back... You are definitely winning this argument, just like Russia is winning this war.
1
@vksasdgaming9472 Are you lost? Wrong person for reply?
1
Ken Rik Or... Just hear me out here... Or Russia just leaves the fu*k Ukraine alone to deal with its things instead of fueling internal war for last 8 years and then starting war by using this internal conflict as excuse to start full blown war?... This is entirely Russian fault, if you want peace then talk with Russia.
1
@ephesianarmorytchannel6838 "how is the earth a globe?" To make it really simple? Sunsets. Those are not possible on flat earth "model". Other things relating to sun: Moves at same speed over entire day. Doesn't change perceived size over the day. Moves in straight line. All those things doesn't match flat earth "model", but matches 100% globe one. If you fail with something as rudimentary as this, then anything else will fly over your head and isint worth even mentioning. "I am skeptical that water can curve while at rest in a basin like a lake or ocean." Tides?... What the hell do you think tides are?... Even on flatardian model you have curved water as we have tides... "Id be skeptical of a moving earth, but relativity explains the motionless we observe and feel." You cant feel motion, only changes in it... So you failed with such basics too... "Can you model water bending around a ball for me?" Yes, prime example: Earth. "please don't insult on this channel either." Being dumb and some one pointing that one out, isint insult, its just stating a fact. "I didn't fail first grade science." But you failing to understand basic geometry here. So which grade does it belong too? In which grade you learn that objects further away from you gets smaller? "I am in college and reached out to many professors, including from Harvard if that means anything to you." And yet you think that we live on a pancake type world? Let me guess here: Your main evidence is bible. Right?
1
@ephesianarmorytchannel6838 "All the sky, not the ground, thus, literally, no ground for discussion relating to the earth." Duno if you are just trolling or are you actually so ignorant. Sunsets are only possible with help of ground... Its combination of sun and ground, more accurately, curved ground, which shows that earth is not flat. This is some really low grade attempt to reject my point. Nice try, but you failed, miserably. "Tides are not curved water" Tides are literally curved water... If you have risd water level in one place and dropped one in another place, you will have curve... Its just basic thing that I have no idea what you even trying to achieve here with such silly arguments. "Oh you can feel change in motion." Yes, change in it, not actual motion itself. "Rotation and orbit are both change in motion, as they are not linear travelling, thus why those planes and trains arguments fail for the globe." Rotation is not change in motion, earth never stop or changes it rotation speed, it remains constant, so you will never feel that motion. Same thing with orbit, nothing changes there, its always at same speed. So once again, colossal failure. "If you turn while you throw something up, it will immediately deviate, and nothing ever does. " Does this same rule apply if you throw up a ball inside plane going at 900km/h? Nope. Why not? And once again... Use your own silly experiment rules, throw something up and do rotation at 1 in 24 hours and lets see how far will you get before this thing falls down. "So you cant show me curved water, you just claim the thing being questioned, cant do that." Tides, I did showed that, if you cant even grasp that basic reality, then you seriously are too ignorant to have any decent conversation with or you just trying to troll here be pretending to be as ignorant as that. "Perspective and shrinking objects work fine for a flat earth" Sun doesn't change perceived size even tho it should on flat earth "model" so no, it doesn't work on flatardia. "Evidence for flat earth is from empirical methodological science." And yet 99.9% of scientists are not flat earthers. Sooo... Ether majority of scientists are terrible at their job or you are fundamentally incorrect here. Which option is more likely to be true?
1
Was it winning for past 2+ years in this 3 day war?
1
What? Earth is globe not because NASA said so...
1
@allent.g560 If you have country which thinks that Russia attacking Ukraine is a good thing, then its a barbaric one. Simple as that.
1
@allent.g560 Fine, will change by claim to "Countries which have been brave enough to take none neutral position and are civilized supports Ukraine" Is that better? And why does those countries are afraid to take official position on this war? Are you for or against this war? Or are you one of those who thinks that remaining neutral solves problems?
1
Copium running low?
1
But this is the thing, EV adoption is still in early stages and shifting now to a better standard would be allot better than being stuck with some bulky outdated one for decades to come. You like Tesla or you hate it, but you can't argue against their better charger
1
Russia already looks weak across the board, Russians will claim their incompetence than admit that it was Ukraine. So nothing would really change here.
1
End to End comparisons have been made and BEV's still win over hydrogen cars, not by much, but still wins.
1
@danellis-jones1591 If you never correct stupid idea then people who made those will think to be correct which will make them to spread it. How do you think religions covered entire globe... Same exact thing... No one bothered to fact check and they liked fantasy explanation and we have what we have...
1
First of all, flat earthers make up tiny portion of population, what they believe have no real impact, so no point in actually spending millions to just prove to them that earth is a globe. Second, there are live launches (most recently SpaceX rocket launches) which shows live video. But issue is that even if you would shoot flat earther into space, they would still scream that its not real. You cant fix stupidity, you can only fix ignorance.
1
Good luck with that...
1
@renatsafiulin392 Russia cant even move across single country, Germany is quite safe.
1
and गोल can also mean "circular", but circle is a flat disk. Issue with ancient languages like that is multiple meanings of same word and only now when you know what is actually true then you start to interpret text in particular way. Maybe some one realized that earth is a sphere 10000 years ago, but its quite irrelevant at this point.
1
@SonsofLightTraining Ball earth is based on science, so you are calling science a religion. Please try to be consistent here. "They faked the Blue Marble" Your evidence of that? And there are hundreds, thousands of pictures of earth from space, you do know that much right? Its not like we only got single picture of earth... "We didn't have the faith to believe the lie anymore..." Well it never was a lie, but now you do believe in one. And let me guess, your foundation to believe in flat pancake world is "Bible said so"? Right? I could bet my kidney that your entire reason would boil down to "bible said so" and this is why you believe in your flat pancake lie here. Did I got it correctly here? Don't tell me why you don't believe in a globe, tell me why you believe in flat pancake world
1
Its usual tactic of theists, simply disagree with something if it contradicts your stance at the point in time and then agree with it if it does support your point... Flip-flop is a second name of theists.
1
So I guess Russians will make tactical retreat back to Russia... We are all waiting.
1
@theworld3104 It was your words... Stand by those. If this retreat and giving back territory to Ukraine was actual tactical thing, then they should use it again and again and again until they are fully are in Russian territory. Best tactic ever!
1
Which Russian propaganda site said that Poland recognized Crimea as Russian territory?
1
But they are intellectually superior to flatearthers. Right?
1
Trustworthy? He doesn't trust anyone. So he is looking for someone who will support his side, currently, but with "friends" like that, well, Putin can be backstabbed at any moment.
1
They can't, there are no such thing as intellectual property in China, any company there can copy anything they want, sadly.
1
@kevinvidal9336 You sound like generic flat earther which requests video record of something while at same time rejecting every video record as CGI... How do you not realize this silliness of yours?
1
Because their production rates are increasing on slower rate than it did before? Like in which reality did BEV's flooped exactly?
1
@Andy_Dang Infrastructure is there to support BEV's, if there is electric outlet, there is infrastructure. You don't have gasoline refueling station at your house either, doesn't really cause much trouble to you, right? You can use dedicated charging station when needed, its non issue. For longer trips, well, BEV's can go around 300 miles in one go, this is WAY more than you should do without stretching your legs, so while you do that you can top up your car's battery which will take few minutes. And how often do you do longer trips? Once a year? It's only an issue if you want it to be.
1
@Andy_Dang Nothing of what you just said here was relevant. At the moment there isn't many companies who are actually making quality and cheaper BEV's, so adoption rates are lower than it could have been, doesn't mean that it flopped in any shape or form. Australia is far away from anyone and without dedicated car factories over there, BEV prices will be extra high, but is has nothing to do with anything here.
1
Russia can't win against Ukraine, it has 0 chance to win against US if it decides to start war with it, this is why it will never happen. While Putin is immortal dictator, he is not that stupid, he only attacks countries which he thinks he could take, this is why this war was claimed to end in 3 days, Putin thought that it will be easy win, he failed and exposed himself as incompetent leader who doesn't have any real firepower.
1
@pavlo_herasymchuk Actually it does. Not saying that earth is actually flat, its oblate spheroid, but bible does imply that earth is a pancake.
1
@pavlo_herasymchuk You seam to be new here, so will drop few verses for you to think about. "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)""
1
@pavlo_herasymchuk "Can the 4 angles be taken literally?" How would you decide which parts need to be taken literally and which should not? "For even with the flat earth theory there are no angles." Flat earth claim doesn't have actual model to be presented, so i have no idea what you mean by this comment. There is only one thing certain about flat earth claim is that earth is flat. "Job 38:13 and Psalm 104:5 speak of dry land." So when it literally says that earth has edges it actually talks about dry land?... "Pillars in the Bible refer to mountains." Pillar is something what supports something, mountains dont support anything, so calling them pillars is silly at best. And why would people who wrote that verse use word "pillar" instead of "mountain"? "is clearly not to be taken literally" Clearly is not clear which verses should be taken literally, otherwise we would not have 1000 denominations based on same book... "don't take the verse out of context" Its literally copy paste of verse and you say that its taken out of context... "Read verses 23-24, it says the judges are sown into the ground, will you take these verses literally too?" And there is verse saying that there is god... will you take these verses literally too? Just go back to your own comment and try to see what you are doing here. You literally trying desperately make an excuses to failures in the bible by creating your own interpretations and literally replacing words with something what would match reality... Bible was written by people with their knowledge of that time, where most people believed that earth is a flat thing, so its not surprising that bible talks about it being flat, what is more surprising is people like you so desperately trying to create excuses. Why are you doing this? Why cant you simply admit that bible contains incorrect information and be done with that?
1
You forgot to fact check basic reality...
1
`Show me the man and I'll show you the crime` Just because you know the regulations doesn't mean that institutions could delay process of those for months just for the sake of it. Heck, there was even one where SpaceX was claimed to break the law by not hiring non US citizens, its Space company, you legally can't hire non US citizens... So regulators decided to make non win situation where SpaceX is demanded to hire non US citizens while not being able to hire non US citizens, and still got fine for not breaking the security law... So like... Again... Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
1
why?
1
It really depends on plane and speed you are going at, but you could go up while point up, pointing straight or pointing down, so basically where plane is pointing at is fully and completely irrelevant to the shape of earth. And yea, flat earthers could simply go and play some flight simulators to realize that planes would basically naturally follow the curve without trying to do it, plane would simply each it max altitude it can go and then start to stall and naturally start to dip down, which would increase lift which would then rise planes altitude again, rinse and repeat around entire earth.
1
Since start of this war. There are multiple markings being used in this war, most common is Z for Russian army. In general you need some clear markings from both sides to identify who is who as you can start shooting your own in no time as everyone is dressed in green and rides same/similar military equipment.
1
There might be small difference between people in sauna and people in prison, can't think of one at the moment, but I can feel that there is atleast one.
1
? Talk to Russia?... Why? They started the war, they could stop it at any moment, but they are not. Why? Because they are not interested in peace talks, they want to control
1
Is it tho?
1
@dakawans83 Do you remember 2020 when you hag most strict corona restrictions and people stopped driving their cars and you got nice and clean air in cities for few months? Well, replace those cancer inducing polluting cars with clean ones and you might understand why it's a big deal. And yea, it's around 15% and not 1%. If we would talk about passenger cars, if you would include all transportation then it would be around 30%.
1
@Nomolyx1 Per video? Damn, as i don't care about patreon, never actually looked into it, but this explains it all then. He can pump out shitty videos all day long and still make crap ton of money out of it.
1
From where are you getting those numbers from?
1
@EricTheBroBean Its funny to see people claiming that Zelensky is a puppet while previous Ukraine president was literally a puppet of Putin, just like Lukashenko is now.
1
You said allot, yet nothing at all. First of all, who said that this is a creation? Second, proving globe requires basic understanding of geometry yet you went into some cosmic level stuff...
1
You might want to fact check.
1
@joannhutchins3709 Give me evidence that Russia is thriving, in economics, and this war. I mean, this 3 day war is at like, what, 270 day? Russia keeps loosing land? Even had to start mobilization. Lost entire Europe as gass buyer. Lost import and export to most countries it was doing before war... List is long... What exactly do you have to show for your claim?
1
And join Russia as one?
1
You are completely wrong by saying that he is completely wrong. What now?
1
Opinion vs Opinion
1
Steve Gee Did you misspelled "globe" with "flat"? Because there isint even a working flat earth model... And basic observation of sun disproves faltardia... So yea... I think you misspelled words here.
1
You do know that NASA using SpaceX saves money and isn't wasting it? Right? You do know that much?
1
Europe already preparing for a chance that Trump turns back on Ukraine and stops support, well, Europe will not.
1
You do know that he has autism? Right?
1
@noahsawyer7155 What?
1
Russians throwing their troops now in hopes to gain ground, defending is allot more simpler than attacking, so holding position at this moment in time while Russia is so desperate to take land is the best plan of action. This will deplete russian forces in proportional to Ukrainian and when that's over Ukraine can freely push forwards as there won't be anyone left to defend.
1
Its not that simple. If you would put bunch of soldiers in one area then Russia would simply carpet bomb entire area by concentrating everything it has. So sending just enough forces to push forwards is good enough to avoid mass shelling.
1
Why? And no idea what FSD has todo with anything in here.
1
It exceeded rated weight limit by more than 9x and you say that its embarrassing? How embarrassed are you now realizing that you screwup?
1
When will that happen? 3 day war and its what now? 570 days? And front lines moving backwards?... Doesn't look like something what should look like if everything is going by the plan...
1
So by your logic because you said one lie in your life that makes you a liar? Are you a liar? Should we discard everything you say because you are liar? On side note. Earth is a globe not because some one said so, but because its provable fact from reality. C'mon, first people determined approximate size of earth with sticks... Just because you think that you should blindly trust what some one says to be true doesn't mean you should. Fact checking is a thing too. Even basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe.
1
@Otome_chan311 "If an organization lies, then it is not a reputable organization." Organization is made of multiple people while at same time those people change over time and at same time, organizations usually make quite a few statements from which you can have some incorrect. After all this you will need to determine if people who made that claim knew that it was incorrect or not. "Academia lies time and time again. Media lies over and over. Governments lie constantly." And all of those are made from people. So people lie over and over again. So are you a liar? "So why wouldn't they lie about something like the shape of the earth?" Why would they? Especially when shape of the earth is a factual spherical one? "But the fact that we even had to pause and wonder" You can and you should pause and wonder on every claim. Issue is not with that, issue is with you deciding that everything what government says is a lie, that's the issue. Everyone lies, one less one more. But to simply scream that government always lie is just silly. "just look at all these people who genuinely believe that "gender identity" is a thing" Och for f**k sake... Why do you keep bringing that one up?... Who cares... Its like you are trying to use one thing to prove that another unrelated is relevant to the topic... "People assert a lot of things about history simply because they were told it by an authority figure" History is hard to fact check, so somethings NEED to be taken on its word, if its some sort of authority, then well, its better to take word of authority then word of Bob from 3a apartment. "But since authority figures have declared we should worry and pass restrictive laws and declared that viruses now work in a new way, they change it all up and everyone falls in line" So i guess you have scientific papers showing otherwise then? I mean, i'm always for the facts, so present your facts and we can go with that. Can you? Because now you are trying to make a claim that entire world governments decided to screw up economies of their countries for no reason at all. Why? What would be the point in doing so? And how the hell every single government agreed with this move? "I find more often than not, when someone declares that their belief is based in "science" what they really mean is that they blindly accepted what an authority figure told them" So by your logic we should not believe anything what some one says and we should only believe what we can personally test? So, is Australia real? Yes? No? Have you ever been there? No? So you are trusting authority that it is real?... There is a point where you need to go with experts instead of starting to fact check every single tiny detail. You will spend your entire life fact checking and you will get like 1% of everything we know now by doing so... That just pointless... Create base line for your knowledge, have basic understanding of reality, how it works and so on, and then when you see claim like "Earth is pancake" you can quite quickly realize how little sense this claim makes based on huge amount of other things which would not allow this pancake thing to exist in actual reality. Just the fact that you stopped to consider that flat earth could be possible exposes issue with your lack of knowledge in how world works.
1
@Otome_chan311 "Why would they lie about something factual like "gender identity"" Gender identity is that, gender identity. Its not based on some factual data, its something based on opinion. So why do you have problem with that so much? "Because it's the most glaring example of academia blatantly lying?" Or not? You literally picking some completely opinion based topic and then accuse some one of lying... Its like accusing some one who likes caramel ice cream that they are lying saying this... "There's no "need" to trust organizations that have consistently lied." So again, because some said a lie then everything is a lie even when its a completely different person saying this? You do realize that organizations are made up of multiple people who can change? You do realize this? "Literally anyone who can remember longer than a year ago could tell you this." Yet you failed to present actual evidence and went with some irrelevant comment. Why? "And now you can start to see why I have trust issues when it comes to authority figures." You failed to understand my point here... You are trying to make a claim that thousands upon thousands of people decided to create this chaos for no good reason... If you want to toss around such claims, be ready to support those with actual evidence. After all, we cant trust you, as you did lied in your life which makes you a liar. So, present evidence for you claim. "But the tl;dr is that international corporations tend to control governments; " Cool claim. Can you support that with actual evidence? Especially evidence showing that this was the case what happen with corona pandemic. "I think it's best that we don't trust known liars and instead approach things rationally." How do you know that some one is a liar and some one is not? Do you test every single source of information? " So unfortunately if I care about the truth (which I do) then I have to just dig into everything myself" How? Google search? "If it wasn't so impactful, I wouldn't care to look into it. " So maybe next thing you need to investigate is your paranoia? As you seam to think that every single human being in any position is a liar by default until proven otherwise...
1
@Otome_chan311 Maybe we got into miss understanding here. My previous comment was aimed towards gender identity as pronouns, while you seam to be talking about trans. I can agree that trans is not a choice. But that is quite besides the entire point of your silly empty claim that government always lies. But well, you do you, as this seams to be something what personally effects you as you seam to be fixated on all this gender thing... Good luck.
1
Yes yes yes and Ukraine started this war... Does Putin pay you bunch of money to say such things?
1
Batteries are, Hydrogen isint.
1
@makdrumz Hydrogen packs too many backdraws for it to become anything more than someone's side project. Hydrogen could only possible work out for specialized transportations, like busses, boats, planes, but will not work for passenger cars.
1
What if... I know that this is wild idea, but what if we do both? You know, fix earth and colonize Mars? Why it feels like people want to demand from Musk to fix this earth with his own money... What are governments for?
1
I bet you can see or feel radiation, but i can bet you would die in second if you would swallow chunk of uranium... But whatever.
1
No need to suck to him, he doesn't even know that you exist. And Musk doesn't know everything about everything, on top of Musk not even indicating how many of those attacks actually came from Ukraine, just saying that some points to Ukraine makes no difference here and doesn't indicate that it was done by Ukraine as a country. Blaming country is stupid move and crashing stocks indicates how bad this one looks.
1
It's not like Tesla struggles to survive under Musks control... Isn't it? So maybe he is doing something correctly after all.
1
Having 2 planets colonized will half the chance in going extinct in its base probability calculation, tho in reality it would drive chances basically to zero, as asteroids hit planets extremely rarely and we would have plenty of time to colonize another planet or to repopulate earth
1
Could agree on all points except... 9/11... I mean, don't get me wrong here, i think it wasn't inside job, but... This is that but... Why cant it be? Its like saying that we can find crazy people only from outside particular group and it cant ever have any crazy ones inside. There are no real restrictions why 9/11 can't be inside job, can it?
1
got 2 notifications and cant see any of your comments. In any case, what i can see from notification itself, you still talking about government... I honestly don't care, its 100% unrelated to this topic...
1
You could easily define it by using one or multiple criteria like amount of bullets you could shoot in a minute, size of bullets, amount of bullets in single magazine. There will always be that grey area of guns which could be handgun or assault rifle or maybe both at same time. its not really an issue with defining what it is, its an issue with lack of gun control and who can buy those and what type in general.
1
Then don't complain when you see yet another mass school shooting... This will only increase with more guns in circulation.
1
White hydrogen still isn't a hydrogen, so you still need to actually produce it. Basically we have 0% of pure hydrogen on earth, so 100% of it needs to be produced from somewhere. Current biggest source for hydrogen is natural gas, which isn't ideal if you care to actually minimize pollution. If your white hydrogen extraction is way more complicated and more expensive than just simple hydrolysis, then why even bother?
1
@joabran9011 From which random AI generated youtube video you got all these "facts"?... This is the one of the most insane claims I have seen for this topic, and that says alot.
1
@joabran9011 Just because youtube video said something doesn't make it a fact you know... So yes, please, get educated.
1
@rockethead7 Irony is strong with you.
1
"they prove the plane was not dipping which means that should have flown into orbit" ? What the what now? Plane can go into orbit?... So why the hell do we have rockets if you can go into orbit with planes?... Do you even understand how aerodynamics work? Do you even understand how planes work? "So you ballers deny your own scientific proof in front your own eyes" We dont, you simply creating silly straw man arguments and then pretend that its our position... Like this one of yours where planes could go into orbit... Damn... ":Saying those to words no explanation no scientific data" So physics are not real? What the hell are you even saying here? "So let start with why the level expirament proved flat Earth ?" Maybe because it did not? have you ever seen landing plane? Nose up and plane goes down... How is that possible? Aerodynamics... That's how... You could have plane going down while pointing slightly up or going up while pointing slightly down... You have quite few factors effecting your travel direction and you don't need to point your plane nose down when you have 1 degree lean every 69 miles or so. Even if plane did that, you would have tiny amount of lean forwards which would not be noticeable by that spirit level. While in actual reality, you don't need to point down to actually go down. "thats your 1 st question.It's ez." it is easy, for anyone who finished middle school...
1
@konfunable I made really basic question, if tesla experienced bigger issues then it should be easy to list them out. This video literally shows situation where car doesn't even start and its not an isolated situation. I'm not aware of this issue with early models of Tesla, so, can you give any?
1
@Grauenwolf So how exactly will that make Musk bankrupt?
1
@toomanyaccounts No income doesn't make you bankrupt, especially when you have stocks in multiple other companies.
1
@SilkyH Whataboutism is the best argument for Russian supporters.
1
You would have imaginary car fueled by magical pixie dust.
1
@RobL350 You got it backwards, globe is finite space, flat is infinite, well, depends on which flat earther you ask because they cant even agree on this none existent flat earth model. Maybe you are talking about actual universe or something, but that has nothing todo with the shape of earth... So you are as confused flat earther as it gets.
1
Why its weird?
1
Nancy Falcon I'm still confused here... Are you trying to imply that there is some meaning when atheist mentions angels and demons? You do know that majority of atheists are ex believers? Right? And they tend to use some expressions which got indoctrinated into them when they have been believers... I'm atheist, but i still use expression like "for god's sake" to express myself and not to imply that i actually believe in that imaginary friend of some ones. Its just an expression... Unless you wanted to make some another point... Would be nice to get some better clarification what you actually wanted to say...
1
Nancy Falcon " I am a believer, so it seems odd to me that an atheist would use the phrase "better angels" or inner demons"" Like i mentioned from before, things like that are used just because its something they have been using for long time while they believed in that or because everyone around them uses those expressions. In general you could have atheist who believes in angels and demons, those are not dependent on god's existence. Being an atheist only means that you dont believe that there is a god, anything else is not atheism. "but am not sure that most would have ever considered themselves actual believers" Would recommend you to avoid using such claims. There are current atheists who have been actual preachers, people who actually went and tried to spread all that mythology as fact. I was indoctrinated into believing that god is real, because i was only a child... That faded out more and more with each year and eventually i simply stopped even thinking about it, for couple years i had nothing todo with religions, then i find some videos about religions and atheism, after watching couple of those realized that i'm not a believer, and wrongly labeled myself "agnostic". I wasn't only agnostic, i was agnostic atheist. Even tho i cant personally call myself as some ex true believer, as i never actually believed in that, i still use those expressions from time too time, not because i actually believe that god is real or trying to mock that he is not, its only an expression i use in particular situations. "The use of these phrases strikes me as intellectually inconsistent" Then dont use anecdotal evidence.... "I personally try not use common phrases that are inconsistent with my beliefs" They are common... You answered yourself. "For example, I do not ever say "Good luck."" Why not? Does it have some strange meaning to you?
1
And?
1
Because its a scam
1
2 main causes: Being conspiracy nut and using bible as evidence for earth to be flat.
1
This is why you have electronics all over the place to prevent it. There is no real need to have completely separate capable to transfer current.
1
Jason Ramsingh From when Kent is a scientist?
1
How's your 3 day war going on?
1
@traderboi2662 So 3 day war was planned to be 160+ days after heavy losses? Not a good plan...
1
Not happening, unless you want dictatorship.
1
It broke at 9x the rated load... CT isn't allowed in Europe not because of this, but because of it being not so friendly to pedestrians, as you would suffer quite a bit of damage by simply being hit by those sharp corners.
1
@effigy42 Slaverism? You being dependent on fossil fuel which being controlled by few isn't slaverism?
1
VESANG " And what is actually truth is that it is not a spinning ball my friend !" Nah, its definitely not a space pizza. "Mechanically impossible" ? Care to elaborate on this one? As i have no idea what it is about mechanics and shape of earth... "empirically provable ..." That its not a flatardia? Well yes, basic observation of sun proves that. "but hey it is your right to believe whatever ! " Right, this is why you can keep your fantasy, just avoid telling this to others like its a true or something...
1
Only conspiracy nuts or trolls use word "sheep". Which is quite interesting observation have made over few years checking comments. Its like there is a rule book in how to be flat earther.
1
You can't break laws of physics tho.
1
One more rus bot detected. How much Putin is paying you? 1 Lada every week?
1
Honestly majority of men either doesn't even know that this movie exists or they don't care what its about. Tho this is a topic of today's world, aka hot topic, clickbait one and so on. But no, men are not being assoulted by this movie, they simply give zero f**s
1
@amitjose3739 Its always this way, same with black washing in movies, try to reverse it and you will have a shit storm on your hands, but for some reason its fine when you replace white character with black one even if it makes zero sense to make it so and character itself is dependent on being white. Weird times to be alive.
1
Tin foil hat all the way? You can explore Antarctica... No one preventing you to do so... 50k for 2 week trip to the pole on your feet, start your double shift at McDonalds and you might make it until the end of this century. You can't just pack your pants and go to Antarctica, you will need permission, just like you need permission to visit any country in the world... On top of this, governments agreed to preserve Antarctica as much as possible and avoid contaminating it with random trash random people could bring there. on top of this, Antarctica is the place where you can die i minutes if you don't have appropriate gear, so its bad for business to have bunch of corpses littered all over the Antarctica. You want to go there? Go... There is even plane ticket for like 2k which flies over Antarctica... You should be able to afford that much... And no, Antarctica was discovered January 1820, NASA was established July 1958, unless you want to claim that US waited 138 years before establishing space institution for the sake of hiding land mass...
1
Why do you think there is this 15k incentive? Because people are not buying those cars in droves... Every single car manufacturer who makes hydrogen cars is doing in a huge loss at the moment. There are under 1000 hydrogen refueling stations IN THE WORLD, while there are over 3 000 000 BEV charging stations, excluding option to change from any wall socket. So yea, it's not going too well for hydrogen and people after using that 15k will try to sell it due to how insanely expensive it is to refuel.
1
Do you want some specific product he made alone without anyone's help? Do you know what is team work? Or being in charge of a project?...
1
1.3mil cost is for ENTIRE car teardown from which they will only show/address like 0.1% on youtube. So if they simply did teardown of the things which they will be showing on youtube that price would go down dramatically... Heck, they could present most of that information from their heads by simply looking at few parts. Its not like they will be reading that 50000 report here or something. Its usually ends up being videos about specific parts and general costs of those and just general opinions of it being good/bad. This video was weird.
1
Robot job killing? At the moment entire industry is at the most automation it ever been, yet unemployment is at lowest. Its like people can simply find jobs elsewhere. And I have no idea what you mean by "fascist", is it because he disagrees with woke culture?
1
@nmk5003 So please explain how DEI isn't a racism, because clearly we didn't understood something here, clearly.
1
What difference does it make if he uses liters or gallons if he does it for both things?... Check any modern hydrogen car with decent range, all of those have 3 huge hydrogen tanks all over the car. Why? Because you need allot of space to fit all of it...
1
Its like no one ever did end to end calculations here... Flash news! It was done, multiple times and BEV's wins over any other fuel by a mile. Its the most energy efficient method, its not debatable.
1
@JM-os1oj Maybe he wants to play victim card, like enemy attacks, he shoots at them from his window, enemy vaporized his house and his family with real guns and then press can say "See, enemies killing civilians!!! It's a war crime!!! Reeeeeeee!!!"
1
Bunch of cars which needs water to produce fuel in a place where water is extremely scarce so that by product of those engines could water land? Not a good plan.
1
What?
1
He should have also used data from city driving only and not highway... As he talked about autopilot, which is the one you can use only on highways... 2x speed kind of increases chances of injury. Tho at same time, its not even level 3 or 4 or 5, so entire fault is on humans and not on auto pilot, but heck, people will be doing what they do best "Spreading fud for the sake of it"
1
We have dozens of different chemistries for the batteries, cobalt is not requirement, its one of the options. And more batterie options come out every year. Hydrogen is a quick and dirty solution for the issue, just like nuclear power was in comparison to nuclear fusion.
1
"I challenge any of you to walk to the center of a gravtron State Fair ride!" Not a problem, run it at 1 revolution in 24 hours and i can do it during my sleep... I hope you are some sad internet troll and not some one who thinks that he made actual argument here...
1
RAINS ACOMING And? it could go at 1 to power of 1000000 would not change anything... You cant feel motion, only changes in it. So there is no difference how fast in mph it turns if its only one revolution every 24 hours... Damn... You are internet troll? Right?
1
NASA? How is that institution related to the shape of earth? You think that earth is spherical because NASA said so? how cute... "blindfolded and not know the difference between going 1 mph to, let's keep it legal, 65 and not know the difference" Yes, please, do this basic experiment. Tho don't forget to put something in your ears, as you will be biased while hearing engines noise and not the fact that you cant feel that 65mph... Damn, seriously, are you a troll? You should be one, you cant be that ignorant on basic things from reality...
1
RAINS ACOMING So once again, NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth. You could disprove 100% of what NASA ever presented, would not disprove globe model or prove flat one... Not a tiny bit... "there are forces put on the body during acceleration" Cha! Seriously, you ether a terrible internet troll or someone who is as ignorant as it could be. ACCELERATION. Just like i said multiple times already that you cant feel motion only changes in it, which includes acceleration. Earth doesn't accelerate or decelerate, so you have constant motion. Tho thanks for confirming that i was correct here.
1
RAINS ACOMING "And to believe you would not feel a change in speed is means you need to go back to school" Can you even read? Like seriously. Can you? Because you started to create straw man here... I never said that you cant feel change in speed, i actually pointed out that you can only feel change in the speed, but not speed itself... yet you are here making this silly straw man... Unless you are talking about yourself... And please avoid pretending that you are not flat earther... Everyone sees that you are one...
1
RAINS ACOMING "I'm not a flatearther! No man has seen the shape of our World, no one!" Then why do you sound like one? "You said you cannot feel the change in speed! Remember?" No?... Like no?... Please, learn to read... Then go back to my comments and reread them... Because you ether failed to understand basic words or you intentionally creating straw man here... I said multiple times already by now that you cant feel motion, you can only feel change in it... Do you not understand this sentence or what? "And anyone that believes that an acceleration of speed cannot be felt is the troll" Yea, when you find one, give me to know... "How simple minded you people are" You? Who are those? And to which group do you belong? "and just because I believe differently does not make me a troll or any other name that's thrown at us!" What makes you troll is trying to create straw man fallacy and claiming some nonsense like you did. You need to learn how to read... Then learn some thing about reality, maybe then you will realize that we do live on globe earth which can be determined by anyone who wants that and things like NASA is completely irrelevant... basic observation of sun proves that we live on a globe... Not even talking about other 100+ things which can demonstrate that... So yea, this makes you a troll or terribly ignorant person, pick your poison.
1
Definition of speed: the rate at which someone or something moves or operates or is able to move or operate. So this is motion. You cant feel speed, you can feel acceleration, just like you said before and now you want to change your song... " No one had seen the shape if our World. Who's the troll now?" You? You do know that we have live feed from space? Right? You do know that quite few went to space? Right? So if you want to claim that they never did this, cool, prove it.
1
Is it tho?
1
@keonyang3332 Then don't complain when you get daily mass shootings...
1
@1stsampan Homicide's are not mass shootings or even gun deaths... Don't mix those up.
1
@1stsampan Well then include deaths by eating ice cream too... As we are going with unrelated statistics here, so then why not... This entire conversation is about guns and gun deaths, not deaths in general. That's separate topic on its own... Homicide amount would only reflect on a state of society, which is not related to gun ownership. So stop ducking specific topic here and try to stay on it.
1
@1stsampan So you still don't understand difference between all homicides and deaths by guns?
1
@1stsampan So still failing to understand difference between gun deaths and deaths in generals? And by your logic you should include natural deaths in to your "statistics", after all, dead person is a dead person? Right? This is fun.
1
Yes yes yes and government is being ruled by lizard people...
1
You know what solves gun deaths? Moooore guns!!!!
1
@NatalieJ22 It is sarcasm from my end, sadly enough there are enough people who actually thinks that adding more guns will solve gun death issue...
1
@championknife How many days did Russian officials planned on? 400+?
1
What are you smoking?
1
How did you determined that verse X is accurate and verse Y is just a story/metaphor? Because it looks that anything what was proven to be false from bible becomes just a metaphor and you should not take it literally and claims which are not proven to be true/false should be taken literally... Atleast until we get evidence that its a false story... Issue would be with your cherry picking what you want from your book while rejecting everything what contradicts reality with excuse that its just a story which should not be taken literally. Did global flood happen? No? Why not? Because we have evidence that it never happen? What about Jesus? Was there actual god in humans body? Yes? Why? Because we cant prove otherwise? What about Adam and Eve? What that true? Because we can prove that there never was first human like that, so was this fundamental story true or fiction?
1
Starting a war which took hundreds of thousands lives is somehow better than what Biden did?... C'mon...
1
@dragomirdragojevic2544 Russians said it multiple times that if they can't have it then no one will. They are bully who will rather destroy anything they want than allow for someone to have it.
1
First part of your comment, agreed, then middle part was wrong, end agreed again. While level on plain is beyond being stupid, your explanation why its stupid is incorrect. That entire "experiment" was to check if level would change while you go over curvature. Issue is not that its on random surface, issue is that on BOTH models it should remain same, so if it actually moved then it would have debunked flat AND globe models.
1
More to note, he mentioned auto pilot, which is the one used on highways, while compared to Waymo which only works on specific city roads, that alone makes this comparison silly.
1
Because you dont like it?
1
Like a train?
1
@oscarfentanes2504 So basically, exactly what subway doing now?
1
This device only reads electric signals in small part of the brain relating to body movement, it can't read actual thoughts or memories
1
Or we can perform basic experiments and determine that earth is not flat and be done with that...
1
Why? Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth model. Then continuing observation of sun will demonstrate that it matches globe model with 100% accuracy... So what else do you need?
1
Tyler Smith Good reasons to believe both? Can you name ONE which would classify as a good reason to believe in flat earth? Tho this is quite besides the point that globe model is demonstrably true, its like for you to say "Well sun must be not real, there is good reason to believe that"... Its not... You cant have good reason not to believe something when its demonstrably true...
1
@chicken29843 Like it or not, this "competition is coming" was said for like 10 years by now... Still waiting for the competition... Competition is good, but Tesla is too far ahead to get any, well any time soon.
1
@akaijah4472 Well i could suggest to watch some Street Epistemology videos, basically listen to Anthony Magnabosco, what and how he talks with people who have different beliefs. Its some what best method if you dont want to appear to be ass by pointing out why some one world view is full of crap but basically make them to get to that conclusion on its own. It will be some what harder to do and will take more time, but if you want to keep this relationship, this would be best approach for you.
1
How so?
1
The guy who provides internet for Ukraine army gets money from Putin? I don't think that Putin is that stupid... Is he?
1
Third pin could be easily added. Its not an issue with pin count, its issue with actual technology behind it, size of connector and how easy it is to use one.
1
@davidnelson7407 But this is the point, third pin can be added and connector could be slightly bigger, or remain same, to lazy to check if it would even need to increase in size to be able to accommodate another pin. But... It would still remain better option over existing alternatives. Its like having USB-C vs USB-A, one will win at the end of the day.
1
@davidnelson7407 It would... It might be renamed to something like NACS 2.0 or something, but entire idea, entire technology behind it would remain same. Just like we had USB iterations with more and more speed without changing its actual shape and even having backwards compatibility. Its not rockets science you know... Point is that NACS have better approach here than any other connector, you like it or not, its just is. At best what you can argue here is that at this moment in time NACS isn't supporting 3 faze charging, but it's a mute point...
1
@davidspencer7254 OP talked about people like you going and attacking Musk instead of companies, then you made a comment attacking Musk and not a company, so you proved his point. What else do you want to hear here? On top of this, will provide educate, free for you, as you clearly need it. Starship development isn't funded by taxpayer money, shocker, I know, if you been less of a boot licker here you would have actually looked it up and fact checked, but nope, you wanted to be embarrassed on public platform... On top of this, the fact that you even try to compare starship to 1950 only shows how little to NOTHING you actually understand here on how vastly different those rockets are. So yea, you proved OP's point here and we thank you for that.
1
@davidspencer7254 Its not attack on people like you, its basic observation that you can't muster actual argument besides "Musk bad" You want me to provide rebuttal for that entire stupidity of a video? Will do for the first point. At 1:35 TF, as usual, said that traveling to Saturn would make astronaut bones a jello. Yes, it was exaggeration, maybe, hard to tell when TF is serious and when he is doing stupid stuff on purpose, but trips like that would be done by using ships with some sort of artificial gravity, so like, first words from his mouth in this 25 minute videos and its already moronic. If I had to rebutte this entire video we would be looking at a bible thick book... And there is seriously no point in doing that as you just like any generic TF cult member will simply ignore everything and pretend that it didn't happen. So why even bother?
1
@gjl4101 Why are you TF cult members are so ignorant and dumb? Hyperloop never was Musk's project.... Why do you even mention it? Vegas tunnel is actual Musk's project, which is working, even tho its pointless project, but whatever. Tesla semi works quite well too, and those can be more efficient than rail if you would stack them in the line, basic physics 101. And no, Tesla didn't made anyone 350k with being taxi, cool beans I guess. SpaceX rocket is in development, so no idea how its current capacity is representative of end product...
1
@davidspencer7254 Stop being dumb. SpaceX achieved orbit a decade ago, Starship is completely new platform of completely different type of rocket. The fact that you think 1950 rockets are comparable with starship only indicates how dumb you are. And the fact that you don't understand (even tho I think I have correct you on this already) Starship wasn't allowed to go into orbit by FAA for safety reasons, so all flights have been aiming hair shy of orbital trajectory. Why are you TF cult members so dumb? Genuine question, as before it felt that his fan base was made of quite smart people, but now you are on flat earthers mental level. Its weird.
1
@BacsPet96 I mean, having stuff on semis means that you don't have to load and unload at train stations, so you skip few steps here and save on efficiency already. Other than this, duno how that math exactly works out.
1
@BacsPet96 It would still be energy efficiency as you would be spending less energy to move cargo from point A to point B. So it would be more energy efficient. I mean, in general how it was said it did imply that moving cargo with trucks is more energy efficient than it is by moving with trains, like a direct comparison. In that case I would need to see actual math behind it. And it could be just one of those things where you have specific situation where semis are more efficient than trains, but it's like less than 1% of those situations, so who knows. Can't argue either way as I'm not that interested to actually do full blown research on how much energy each of them would spend in all scenarios.
1
But like... Isint Russia keeps reporting that some "insert generic russian name" accidentally blow up strategic point by smoking near fuel tank or something? Ukraine will not gain anything here by this dam being blown up, Crimea survived for years after Russia annexed it and Ukraine cut of water supply... Do you seriously think that this will have any actual impact now for Crimea? It wont be convenient, but it wont change anything for it. But on another hand now Ukraine has no ability to attack from Kherson and Russia can redeploy its forces to other parts. And Russia did same thing before in a different war, so its not like its somehow uncommon for Russia to blow up dams...
1
@StephenJelinek "with this logic the elites can keep us in deception for another thousand years." Religions still keep people in deception, so thats that. While it comes to actual reality you dont like, shape of earth can be proven from your back yard with basic understanding of geometry without any involvement of any math or lizardmen you are afraid of, yet you are here screaming that earth is a pancake and I can bet you will eventually go with "But my book said so"
1
@deerichardz ? Yes, please, go look it up... There are even photos of cybertruck having lights on AFTER explosion and AFTER fire was put out which would indicate that actual electricity is still running and battery wasn't damaged at all. Are you drunk or just so deep up TF rear that you can't even see obvious?
1
Cool claims. do you have any evidence for that?
1
@amarramoul4027 Give me SINGLE technology past civilization had we can't have today... And no, we don't need to look into past, we learn from the past, we improve upon it, we fix our mistakes... Aka the mistake to believe in flat earth... That one was fixed like 2300 years ago, its time to move on, earth is a globe based on actual objective evidence and not some meaningless subjective faith based position. I asked for evidence and you came back with "Have faith"... That's not evidence...
1
@amarramoul4027 Shape of the earth can be determined from your backyard... First globe model appeared 3BCE in greece, clearly back then people had no space ships to see earth from space... You dont need to go into space to determine shape of earth... And for love of your god, NASA is not relevant here, earth if a globe not because NASA said so, earth is a globe and NASA simply agreed with that and provided additional evidence for it. Please educate yourself on some basic geometry here and learn why earth can't be flat pancake world instead of blindly trusting some ancient book of fables.
1
Duno what you would do with hydrogen fuel cell in space, but yes, you can do it, kind of. You would still need oxygen to combine with hydrogen to get energy out of it, but that would be only that, electricity. You are better off to just use solar panels.
1
I mean, nukes dont kill people either, but you only need one person push that button which will kill millions in instant..
1
@keonyang3332 Yes, its a fault of human, cool, but this only proves my point here. Giving simpler means for humans to cause harm isn't the solution. This is why majority of humans would agree that there needs to be some sort of line what you should be able to own. How's the saying going "A Spoonful of Tar Spoils a Barrel of Honey". You can have 100000 law abiding citizens, but it only takes one to cause mass deaths... Why do you think we have speed limits? After all, its not the car who kills people, its the people who drives them... Right? But still we have speed limits. Are you against those too?
1
Why? Putin was smart to start this war?
1
Can they tho? Look at basic ink printer market, they are being sold derp cheap, why? Because they will be making money back on selling ink. And in general products which have extremely small demand yet require full scale production usually are at loss or near loss for the company, this is why most startups fail to start making money before going belly up. You need to have production lines to drive costs down for thing you are selling to actually make money, if not, then you have to make money from something else, like selling fuel or offering services for it.
1
@RB-bd5tz Its not always about sales either, in some instances companies just want that green tick near "Made eco friendly car" or "Have eco friendly option" independent if its profitable or not. Hydrogen cars are on extremely low numbers, so loses for the company will be relatively minimal, tho at same time due to those numbers being so low companies will not have dedicated production lines for it, so margin on those products will be low or non existing
1
3 main reasons: #1 Flat earth is demonstrably false due to the fact that we can prove that earth is a globe. #2 Theism still makes up bigger part of human population than atheism, so it gets automatic support from majority. #3 You cant really disprove god as its unfalsifiable claim, so at best you can only say that at the moment we have no supporting evidence that god is real, but he could still be if some day some one manages to present sufficient evidence.
1
@kennysides6892 We are exploring alternatives, with battery technology, which on itself have few different variations. Hydrogen technology doesn't scale across the board. Take basics here, to build one hydrogen station you need around 1million bucks, to build one BEV's recharging station it would be around 50k, on top of that you will have wildly different maintenance costs. This is why we have like 3 million public BEV charging stations in the world and this is why there are under 1000 of hydrogen ones... Hydrogen doesn't scale...
1
Then why BEV's are taking over? After all, at this moment biggest source of hydrogen is natural gas, aka the thing controlled by the oil industry.
1
@marklearner3299 You are not talking about practicality here, you are talking about your personal preferences
1
Coping hard? Bunker boy has escalation dominance? Then ask your bunker boy to poke NATO... Lets see which side will escalate this war to the point that other side will be wiped from the map.
1
Funny enough that those photos being from relatively close distance only proves that there is such thing as arbiting which only works on a globe. Astronauts dont travel thousands of km from earth to take live feed of it... What would be the point of that? 10 minute live feed of entire earth would be basically static image as there wont be any major changes in that time. But we do have satellites way out there which do provide images of earth and in some cases video recordings.
1
Because they have no idea how hydrogen cars work or/and how hydrogen is being acquired in general or/and general cost of everything. Aka just plain old ignorance and being anti-BEV
1
@sammydark9 Well some one doesn't have response to my comment... What happen? Choked on your own ignorance?
1
@sammydark9 "What good has space travel and NASA..." Still with red hearing fallacies?... You keep changing subject at moment some one shows you fundamentally wrong... Its like you desperately trying to find atleast one thing you can use and claim victory while ignoring 100 times you failed... To answer your ignorant question, couple inventions by NASA: Camera phones, Scratch resistant lenses, CAT Scans, LED's, Land Mine Removal, Athletic shoes, foil blankets, water purification system, dust busters, ear thermometers, home insulation, the jaws of life (tool, used bi firefighters, usually) wireless headset, memory foam, freeze dried food, adjustable smoke detector, baby formula, artificial limbs, computer mouse, portable computer... How many things from this list you are using in your daily life? Quite few, isint it? So yea, again, you have been shown to be fundamentally wrong, so go, change subject again, we will happily show you wrong again.
1
@sammydark9 "What does water purification systems have anything to do with space?" You are trolling? Right?... Entire thing with space is that you have limiter amount of resources, this includes water... So its essential to have water purification system which cleans out water from any waste, which includes urine. " So there was nothing like that before space travel?" Nope. Technology gets invented when there is a need for it. Before space travel there was no real need in having water purification system. "Can't go to space" Actually you can, it costs around 50 million per seat. "can't see space" ? Space is defined ether as something outside earth atmosphere or a empty space, so what should you actually see? Space pixies?... "Are all computer generated" Cool, now provided method you used to determine that. As you cant we know that you are one of those flatards who cant even make one valid argument here. Claiming that something is CGI while not having evidence puts you on a brainwashed people group. And you call us sheep... Och that irony... "Just like the masks being used today for COVID-19" And what about masks you objecting about? COVID is a virus transmitted over air, blocking and slowing spread of that is general prevention method. it will not make you 100% immune, but it will slow down spread. Your ignorance on basic things are amussing. "you all are a herd of sheep that are spoon fed theories and unprovable information as facts and reality" Did you wrote this while looking at mirror? Tho its interesting that you decided to only nick pick (and fail miserably) one thing from entire list. So as you have been debunked again, which unrelated topic do you want to pick next? And i'm still waiting your confirmation that earth is a globe. So is it?
1
@sammydark9 Its fun to see people like you "forgetting" to address what i said when they get their but kicked ^.^ Care to do that? Or should we add this but kicking of yours to the existing list? And funny enough you call others a sheep while getting destroyed left and right here. You cant even support your delusion with evidence because you have been brainwashed by flatards and you want to call us sheep... Damn... Cognitive dissonance 101.
1
@sammydark9 You cant even present anything even close to what we did here. So yea, butt kicking it is. And the fact that your usual "debunk" of our points is to call us sheep only shows that your have 0 evidence to present for your fantasy, you simply want to argue here and keep this dead conversation going in hopes that you will find one thing you could use against us while ignoring 50 things you have been shown wrong about. To be honest, its quite sad...
1
@sammydark9 Yes, 50 or more. You still failed to address issues with observation of sun. Basic fact from reality which matches globe model 100% at fails on flat one. So if you cant even debunk that, everything else is pointless. And you again simply stated that something is wrong and never actually proved that. You look like a 5 year old with their fingers in their ears screaming "la la la la la la" and thinking that he made a valid counter argument... Its seriously sad to see people like you behaving like that...
1
@sammydark9 Definition of perception: the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the senses. So you are still failing to answer to my 4 points about sun. And your comments got even shorter. Is this the time when you use some random algorithm and its spits out random words and you will hope that one of those can actually disprove something? I have bad news for you, this will not happen, you cant argue against facts.
1
@Mark-Stone At this point i'm just curious if he/she for real or just trolling.
1
@sammydark9 "Fact is you believe in something you haven't even seen" Once again, observation of sun proves spherical earth. If you want to see curvature of earth, go to a beach and observe ships disappearing bottoms up over the horizon which is only possible on globe earth. "I'm just bored" Yea, getting ass kicked over and over again can become boring. "I can't elaborate huge amounts of text every time I get a chance to reply" Why not? You still dint explained 4 sun observations which disprove your flat earth model. You could even try to debunk one of those with a single sentence or something, yet your responses have been childish at best. Which indicates that you have no counter argument here and you simply trying to scream at us that you are correct because you said so while holding your fingers in your ears. Its childish behavior and you will never win any argument that way, let alone prove that your fantasy land is real...
1
@sammydark9 "Ships disappear unless you use a camera or a pair of binoculars, they come back" Do you try to look ignorant or this your natural behavior?... I'm not talking about ships becoming smaller then you could see, i'm talking about ships literally disappearing bottoms up over the horizon... You ether trying intentionally twist my point to some straw man or you seriously have no idea what you are talking here. Go to google, enter "ships over horizon" and try to understand difference between ships become to small for you to see and ship actually disappearing bottoms up... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSMRhTPMSfk Video for you, its short one and demonstrates you being fundamentally ignorant and wrong about reality. "You said it, bored of getting my ass whooped" Then stop making ignorant claims and you might not be whooped next time... "Just keep believing spoon fed theories as facts, I'll keep living in my fantasy land" You have no idea how ironic this one sounds from some one who thinks that we live on a pancake because some one said to him that we do... Your fantasy land contradicts reality and we demonstrated that over and over and over again, your willingness to keep this fantasy only proves that its you who got brainwashed as you dont care what is true, you simply want your fantasy to be real even after your failure to prove that it is real and especially after we showed that you are wrong. So yea, you have right for your own opinion, you have no right for your own facts.
1
@sammydark9 "I never said we live on a pancake" Yet your every single argument and objection is copy/paste from any generic flat earther... "I just don't know" its called: Willing ignorance " and I question people who think they know" Cool, you questioned, you failed, multiple times, yet you still think that you are correct here in continuing questioning something about reality which is demonstrable... Its not being open minded, you questioning reality itself... "You literally call me this and that when you know nothing about me" We know that you are ignorant, you demonstrated that yourself multiple times. What else should we know about you? "and I know you think about me in your spare time" Actually i dont, i have multiple conversations in my notification section, everyone gets put into same bucket. "which must be a lot mate judging by your replies." ? Judging by what exactly? That i'm curious if you are real or just a troll? because i'm curious about quite people i'm having conversation on same flatardian topic, you are just one of many and nothing really special about you. So yea, you have your fantasy, we have reality and we can end on that note.
1
@sammydark9 ok
1
So then maybe, just maybe, Russia should simply... You know... Stop attacking?... You do realize that Ukraine is DEFENDING here and not attacking? You do understand that much?
1
@187Rajah Neutral state?... Like it was and then Russia invaded it?...
1
There is no point in wasting time and money on someone who failed on basic geometry. There are exponentially more people who are actually worth being sent to space than bunch of ignorant buffoons who would deny shape of the earth even if you would have kicked them throw air lock without EVA suit.
1
@RobL350 Full flat believer?... How flat are your beliefs then?
1
Wait, you dint noticed that in last 6months Russia was attacking Ukraine, dint you now?
1
What about nasa documents? And how is nasa even relevant here?
1
Where do you think production of electricity comes from for electrolysis?... You people are weird...
1
Let me guess: You dropped out of middle school? Earths shape can be determined from your backyard. You cant even provide method you used to determine that photos from space are fake. And they all are scientists, tho its not relevant to what they said.
1
What? Destruction of Ukraine of what?
1
Joke is only funny first 50 000 times.
1
Well yes, but like, why not? Bible does imply that earth is flat pancake, so why double standards? Just FYI I do know the answer, just making a weird point here.
1
Make a short response: ridiculous ideas can be ridiculed.
1
And you are one of those guys who makes shit up to explain something they have no answer for with random explanation they made up in their head?
1
Do you know what's going on?
1
Sun filter? Heard about that?
1
Dakota Black Once again, sun filter? I can take photo of sun with my smartphone which is not made to take photos like that, you will have mostly white screen... Its called: sun glare. Which is not a representation of suns size...
1
Some flatards done that bedford experiment, they proved that earth is a globe... Tho nice try.
1
Zane Sady "notice how you had nothing to say or debate on my auguste piccard video" I tend to avoid addressing moronic videos with 50 moronic claims. Your comment is more then enough. "you didnt mention a single scientist who conducted the experiment" Do i look like flatard for you that i would cite scientists names like that would prove something?... Ok, get top 50 scientists from entire world, all of them knows that earth is globe. Is this argument on a level of yours? Argument from authority? ok, lets make this simple, as simple as even you might get your head around and lets see how ignorant or how much of internet troll you are: Why does sun doesn't change size throw day? If we live in flatardian land, it should, as it changes distance between you and sun throw a day. Right? Cool. So why it doesn't change size?
1
If the earth was actually flat, you might have came up with original comment...
1
Just pointing out that i have seen comment like yours until now for like 50+ times... I mean, if its not your comment, why do you even bother making it?
1
So you are not against battery technology, you are just against child labor in 3rd world countries?
1
Whataboutism? Really?
1
@AMC2283 Would tend to agree, on some level, I would avoid saying that there are no evidence, as even me saying "there is god" would be evidence, it would be extremely weak evidence, but still evidence. Maybe use word proof instead of evidence, or just saying that there isn't sufficient evidence to believe in any of the god(s) Its nickpicking, I know, but theists will happily jump on your throat and prove you wrong on this statement in no time, they will not prove that god is real, but they will prove that your statement is factually incorrect.
1
@marcuspoopismaximus3795 Never said that there is, didn't I?
1
@Brehman_X Again, please, people, READ... I never said that there is a god, I just said that having someone who claims that there is would be evidence, extremely bad evidence and definitely insufficient even if entire human population said it, but still evidence.
1
But we do live on a oblate spheroid flying throw space. Dont like reality?
1
Scott hill And yet you can prove it false when i can provide some pictures like this one http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif which proves that we do live on a sphere. Basic ubservation of sun proves that we dont live on flat plane...
1
Robert Charles Obvious internet troll is obvious.
1
To prevent Ukraine counter offensive from Kherson side... To be able to send their forces from that region to other places in hopes to hold back Ukraine...
1
Why would Ukraine blow it up?... What would Ukraine gain from it? Ukraine is already pushing back Russians and Russians are in retreat from that region, there is literally zero reasons for Ukraine to do it, but there is more than enough for Russians... Just stop and use your brain for few seconds here.
1
@billnikola2463 You think that cutting off water to Crimea is even a thing on Ukraine minds now?... Folding entire region where they are trying to retake is fine just to cut off water supply to Crimea? Do you even think before you write or are you just parroting Russian propaganda here?
1
@too_blatant You can retrofit generic engine to use hydrogen... For short period of time... After that you will have to replace entire engine as it never was made to properly handle hydrogen, shocker, I know...
1
Why would he surrender?
1
@merijnhugens he didn't signed in the first days, he will not do it in the last ones... Just a reminder that Zelensky remained to fight and often visits front lines, while bunker boy run away from Moskow when Wagner started to move towards it. So yea... And just FYI there are plans from US to give additional 20billion in aid for Ukraine and there isint any slow down, let alone stopping support from remaining countries. Main thing could maybe possibly be lack of man power, but this is why Ukraine isint pushing blindly like Russians did, Ukraine actually tries to save as many soldier lives as possible.
1
@merijnhugens Russia KIA 47k and Ukraine 350k?... Now I know that you are full of shit. You should stop following Russian propaganda or you will start believing that NATO invented nazi mosquitos targeting Russian soldiers only...
1
@merijnhugens So quick research. According to an assessment collated by the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency, Russia has suffered 189,500-223,000 total casualties, including 35,500-43,000 killed in action and 154,000-180,000 wounded. Ukraine has suffered 124,500-131,000 total casualties, including 15,500-17,500 killed in action and 109,000-113,500 wounded in action, according to the document entitled "Russia/Ukraine - Assessed Combat Sustainability and Attrition." As many as 354,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have been killed or injured in the Ukraine war which is grinding towards a protracted conflict that may last well beyond 2023, according to a trove of purported U.S. intelligence documents posted online. All this from routers site. So you basically looked at 350k total number from Russia AND Ukraine and imagined it to be from Ukraine alone... While in reality Ukraine lost half the numbers what Russia did. Do some basic research before you speak on this topic next time...
1
Just like they did for past 500 days?
1
You could just plug in your EV at home and then you would never need to visit any charger ever...
1
Car's will not convert water to hydrogen on its own... You would need separate power source to do that and then use same hydrogen which gets converted into same electricity which was used to create hydrogen in the first, just by wasting like 80% of energy during this process, so why not simply use that energy directly in a shape of batteries? There is no real argument here and AC DC has their own purposes where one cannot exist without the other. You can transfer electricity over long distances with DC and you can't run electronics with AC. Hydrogen cars are just... Bad... Less bad can gasoline cars, but still worse than electric ones.
1
@blackhawk7r221 Yes, fat fingers, AC long range, DC short range.
1
So what are all of you pro Russia shills gonna do when Ukraine is done with Russia and you were wrong on absolutely everything?
1
If you literally promote and push your fantasy believes on others, how is that beneficial to anyone?...
1
@killercrock9362 Tu Quoque fallacy? And what exactly do you mean by saying that we do it too? Any actual examples?
1
@killercrock9362 They have right to have their own opinion, they have no right to their own facts. If they believed that earth is in shape of unicorn, i would not give a flying f**k about that unless they push their fantasy on others, what they are doing. I have no problems with people have their personal opinions, but this is not the case, they literally teaching their children and indoctrinating others with all this nonsense. One side is supported by evidence, demonstrable evidence, another side is supported by ignorance and stupidity. You seriously don't see difference here?...
1
@killercrock9362 "is stupid people wish teach their kids stupid things all the better" Its called: child abuse. If you for action like that... Sorry, but we cant be friends... Differently than you, I actually care about their well being and well being ot their children.
1
@killercrock9362 You are irrational by thinking that people you personally don't know has no effect on you... If people are less ignorant on reality better it will be for all of us in bigger or smaller means. Allow flat earth nonsense to spread will not fix anything. And belief in flat earth doesn't prevent people like that to reproduce, ironically countries with lowest education levels, which usually are poor ones, will have bigger children number in a house in comparison to some one who has higher IQ. So it should be in you best interest to educate everyone across the board, especially those who doesn't really have capabilities to understand themselves how reality works, like flat earthers. So yea, you seam to be quite selfish person here, you only care about yourself and you don't care about others, especially if they don't have direct impact on you...
1
Damn those rus bots... You skipped first few seconds of this video?... This is literally a propaganda move... If you fail to understand this much then you are actual rus bot without its own mind.
1
I failed my first try, now I could teach others how to drive. So your point is silly at best. Why I failed? Well, simply missed a sign, still did everything safely and drive before it was completely fine, but missed a sign, so my driving test was a failure. So maybe there is difference between failing because you are unable to drive and failing just because you are nervous and you are new to it so you might make some small mistakes? If you want to filter out bad drivers, then request repeated driving tests every X years with more frequent ones at older ages.
1
This is entirely technical issue... Hydrogen is extremely unfriendly when it comes to its production, storage, transportation and general usage. No amount of subsidiaries will help you out here.
1
@alexishaas7095 It's about fundamentals of laws of physics when it comes to hydrogen, you can't just bend those to your will by throwing bunch of money, this is not how it works. Arguably sending robots to Mars or to any planet in our solar system is simpler task than to solve issues relating to hydrogen use as a fuel source. No idea why you keep mentioning subsidiaries, those have nothing to do with anything here... Once again, it's a fundamental physics issue, not the money issue... You could throw at hydrogen research another 5 bazillion buck's, would hardly have any real impact. And all those oil and gas gets the money because those ALREADY work, hydrogen doesn't. Do you see difference here? Hydrogen could be used for heavy industry, IF battery technology doesn't improve, but this is highly unlikely based on how fast those keep progressing in recent years without any actual obvious limit being reached yet. We even have extremely good batteries based on graphene, only issue is to solve its mass production, this is where government could throw money at, not hydrogen. Battery technology is limited by money investment, well, not much by money now, as quite few companies already started to invest crap ton of that, now its limited by basic time put in researching new chemistries and developing new technologies to help with mass production and so on. While hydrogen was done being researched long time ago, and it remains same due to basic laws of physics which you can't break. One of the issues is hydrogen embrittlement due to the FACT that hydrogen is the smallest molecule which will NOT change independent on how much money you throw at it. And no, you can't just bond to something else, as that would defeat entire purpose of it being a fuel as you would need to add energy to the system to once again separate it from the thing you bonded it too, so you will not get net positive energy, it will ALWAYS be in negatives. There are way more issues with hydrogen than this, basically all of them are due to laws of physics you can't resolve without involving magic.
1
@dndcoversrap Twitter share prices are going back up, as its anti far left platform which actually promotes free speech and is opposite of what leftists wants to have, it would have lost some value, but its going back up. So no idea how is twitter a bad thing, its the only platform where you can actually say things without being banned for "making offensive comment" or some rubbish like that. Tesla shares at its highest now, doesn't look like its doing poorly. And full self driving is coming. I could agree that selling FSD from the start was a dumb idea and some people should be compensated for it, but it's coming and from everything it looks like first robotaxies will hit the road this year. At the end of the day, as usual, your complain is "He is late"
1
Put away your tin foil hat and read basic physics book or something... Water isn't fuel, electrolysis requires shit ton of electricity, aka you will be wasting electricity to produce hydrogen which would be used to produce electricity to power motors... Aka most dumb idea ever. Will simplify things here, you need around 2kg of hydrogen to produce 1kg of hydrogen. Those numbers are not backwards. Do you see potential issue here?
1
So why do you still live there?
1
Ryan H Basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, not even talking about other 100+ issues that model has... Globe model simply works... Because we live on a globe, not on space pizza...
1
Putin already decided to call occupied territories Russian land, so there is no difference anymore here between recently occupied lands by Russia and Crimea. But Ukraine will push it all the way until they retake Crimea, when that happens war will be over.
1
Some basic education here. First of all, majority of people charges BEV's at home over night, so they are spending 0 seconds charging stations. Second, most BEV's can be charged from 20% to 80% in like 20 minutes, which is more or less the range you should operate your car in anyways. So your "inconvenience" is just your ignorance on this topic.
1
Just because company decides to go all in with one technology, doesn't make it good or smart. Hydrogen is dead in the water, always was and always will be.
1
More carbon than gas cars?... Tell me you parroting generic big oil propaganda without telling me you just parroting big oil talking points.
1
@Globeisahoax An obscuring of the light from one celestial body by the passage of another between it and the observer or between it and its source of illumination. Solar eclipse would be when moon is in between sun and earth, ok, this could kind of work on flat pancake world. Issue is with the second thing, lunar eclipse, is when earth is between sun and moon. Tho I guess in your reality moon isint real and all that fun nonsense.
1
@Globeisahoaxx Point is that it doesn't work... Just like you can't present actual map of your pancake world without distance distortions, sun and lunar eclipses doesn't work on flat pancake world, that's the point.
1
Thing is... No one is attacking Russia, but Russia is attacking other countries.
1
Yes yes yes, so can you explain why sun behaves 100% in a way it should on globe model and fails on flat one?
1
@blondythesuperdog8825 This is exactly what i'm saying, because you people still think that NASA is even relevant here shows how your movement is standing still or moving backwards. Please come up with relevant points here, something new, something what wasn't debunked thousands of times by now... Shape of earth can be determined from your backyard, without any math, just basic observations, no NASA or "government said so" needed, yet we still have ignorant people on internet screaming that earth is flat because their book of fables said so... Its 2023 CE, not 2023 BCE...
1
Option 1: Jerry had no idea what's the difference between vertical load on hitch vs towing capacity which introduces horizontal load Option 2: He knew the difference and still tried to make it look like its the same thing because he wants to get his free clicks and ride the hate bandwagon. I lean towards option 2
1
@alicianowell9758 Its book of fables.
1
Things is that Crimea is separated from Russian mainland, main connecting road is a bridge which got already damaged. If Ukraine gets to the border of Crimea then it will not be that hard to take it back
1
What was wrong in this video?
1
"I don't know, I'm making this up" - Thunderf00t 2024
1
I mean, you are not wrong, at this moment Russia is the one who supplies most military equipment for Ukraine, so they could achieve that by retreating back to Russia. I like this plan.
1
Yes yes yes and magical space pixie farting out universes are real too...
1
We have flying cars, those are called helicopters... And there is a reason why you see so little of those flying around. Noise pollution, safe risk, cost to operate, you need special license to operate it and you need special license to actually fly in specific areas as now you are no longer driving on the roads, you would be flying over someone's house, and lets be honest, you would not want some drunk a** person flying with his flying carpet over you... And for hydrogen being lighter than air... That's like least important thing, hydrogen is being stored either under extreme pressures which makes it way heavier than air or in liquid form. And no, we will not have flying cars you imagine here.
1
Education.
1
He got EDS
1
Whataboutism? And in really weird form...
1
Its ironic after having people in power for the past 4 years who actively worked to silence opposition.
1
@genericgamer1319 I can reject magical pixies without knowing exact descriptions of those, me rejecting a claim without hearing it out doesn't make my position invalid or Petersons more true. By the way, I still have no idea if Peterson believes in god(s) where god would be something sharing more common definition than something Peterson comes up on the spot which doesn't describe anything something what can fit anything you want
1
@deeboyz6263 Why are you here? You are using computer or your phone to send this message which was created by science, yet you complain that science causes more harm then good... If you think that, dont support science, go back to the caves... And to put in perspective, due to scientific progress our life expectancy went up from 30 years to like 70+ in past couple hundred years. If you think this is more harmful then nuclear bombs which killed less than religious wars, then sorry, you are on a wrong side here...
1
You do understand that this applies to all car manufacturers, even to ICE cars? And its not lying, those ranges are based on perfect driving conditions with as little power usage as possible, so it will be different than real world driving.
1
Why?
1
First of all Mars colonization is not funded by tax payer money and quite likely never will. Second, you can fix earth AND colonize mars at same time, crazy idea, I know, but it could be done.
1
And this is true because a guy said so?
1
@jasonreeves9909 Or... I know its a wild idea, but just listen up here. Or he lied....
1
I'm not flat earther, but you do know what "circle" represents? Hint: Its not sphere.
1
@alfraecalumag6630 So people never seen an apple? Potato? Eye ball? Even calling earth as hearth would be more accurate then saying that its a circle... Lets not fool ourselves here, people at that time thought that earth is flat, which is reflected in bible as you will not find a single verse which even implies earth being spherical, but i can point you to multiple which implies earth being flat. And on top of this... Experts in Hebrew translated bible and used word "circle", why? Why its not "sphere" but "circle"? Are you saying that actual experts mistranslated it?
1
@alfraecalumag6630 My point is simple, any comparison to an object which is not a flat plane would be better than calling earth a circle. People at that time had multiple examples of round objects they could have used as example for shape of earth, any of those would have worked. And my entire point is just to point out that due to people realizing that earth is not flat pancake but bible implying that it should be, should indicate that bible isint something you should take as representation of reality.
1
@alfraecalumag6630 But why it would be surprising to have bible saying that earth is flat when it was written by the people who at that time in majority thought earth to be flat? There is no real point in trying to create excuses here, bible was written by simple ignorant people and not by god.
1
Do you seriously think that Russia cares about Crimea and its water supply over winning this war?... How naive are you?
1
@avus-kw2f213 Does that mean that Russia lost war because Crimea lost water supply?... Think before you reply...
1
pear? is this new flatardian model i'm not aware of?
1
Thing is that Ukraine dint do anything like that, so no idea why even talk about hypothetical like that.
1
Good luck to them, that's how you bankrupt entire company in just few years.
1
Execution?... Its not Russia to be executed... He would be put into jail and that's that.
1
Well clearly you can
1
@fuckingdrummachinez Irony is strong with you here. We had conversation on different thread, you left 10 comments in a row with 8 of them being "test", so clearly you can leave comments, ignorant one. Some education time, there is a bug with youtube comment section, if you go to the conversation from notifications you will usually not see all of the comments, no idea why its a thing, no idea why its still a thing, but its there. To see all of them you will need to go that that conversation manually, usually sorting comments by newest first and navigating to that conversation will show all comments correctly, again, no idea why it behaves like that, but its a thing, ignorant one.
1
Hydrogen by itself will require around 60% more energy to drive your car same distance in comparison to BEV's. So this alone increases price atleast 60%. Then you could try to include hydrogen production price in general, its storage, its transportation, its storage (again), and then actual delivery to customer. And the nadd maintenance costs to refueling stations. Hydrogen could only have a fighting chance if for some reason no one can produce batteries for BEV's ever, otherwise, no chance.
1
Technology is developed based on need, if there will be a need from your nanotechnology then it will be advanced, if this fails and it will need to be replaced with your nanotechnology then it will be, but without trying you can't know it.
1
Or you could do both at same time?
1
Why?
1
After reading your comment i have concluded that you are just joking.
1
Rus bot detected!!!
1
How?
1
Tell him to google "hydrogen embrittlement"
1
Or... He lied... Water isn't fuel, its basic fact. You would need to literally break laws of physics to make water a fuel...
1
@getwhatyoudeserve9419 Your beliefs will effect your actions and you are part of bigger society, so what you believe actually matters. Do you think it matters that Russians think that they are in right attacking Ukraine? Its only their belief... Right?... Who cares that they are brainwashed and think that they are good guys here by killing people... Yes, its extreme example, but its exactly same thing just on different scale. And yes, basic observation of sun disproves flat earth, and this is only one of many things you could do yourself to achieve same results. So if you think that you cant determine shape of earth on your own, then issue isint with government, its with you.
1
When you have choice between wokeism and Trump, well, you can't really go with wokeism, so what's left? Its picking leser evil, he isn't supporting Trump, he is going against woke virus and when you have system which only gives you 2 options, well, its easy pick
1
@BingusLover45 My question is: Why are you doing this? Is there a club of generic Musk haters? Is your entire character based on you hating one person and nothing else? There are valid things to not like Musk, he does stupid stuff, but if you think that TF makes valid points then you should check reality and go outside and touch a grass or something. TF literally still have a video saying that SpaceX will go bankrupt, it was 2 years ago, look where SpaceX is now... And have you watched SpaceShip test flight 4 and TF live reaction to it? What a shitshow it was for TF.
1
Truth hurts?
1
What do you mean "regular"? What is not regular about the one they made?
1
@Don Lobo Well, kind of, but if you would actually drill deeper to actual core of this belief its always ends up with "bible said it, so its true"
1
You mean like when Russia blew up dam in ww2?
1
Hydrogen combustion engine is non starter straight away. Why you ask? Simple, hydrogen fuel cell engines are twice the efficiency, so at best it will be hydrogen fuel cell and not combustion one. Basic physics, you can't beat those.
1
You do realize that there are better alternatives than surrender to insane dictators wishes?
1
@hellgates_javed6451 Bakhmut. Yes, its not really a village, tiny city of some sorts, but my point remains.
1
@hellgates_javed6451 Its not useless, Russia is desperate to take it, Ukraine will need to defend in Bakhmut or any other place or city, so keeping Russians away in one place is allot better than doing it across multiple cities, especially when you can utilize quite good defensive positions inside city. People die every day and they would have died either way even if Russia took Bakhmut on first day.
1
@hellgates_javed6451 I guess all these mobilizations in Russia isn't a sign that Russia is running out of soldiers...
1
Key words "Russia has record low inflation" just like that time when Russia said that they will not invade Ukraine... Lets believe their word and be naive sheep...
1
When will that happen? No one want's hydrogen cars and anyone who tries it doesn't want next car to be hydrogen. It simply doesn't work.
1
@eboyblackout Its not me who is crying here. Hydrogen car's simply do not work, no one wants them, its expensive, impractical... Its like being vegan, its only for you to boast about it to your friends...
1
Then I guess Musk producing robo taxis would be counterproductive against his goals to make more cars?
1
@stuartcastle2814 He will be producing cheap cars with quite small profit from those to basically provide easy means of transportation for the people and create environment where you don't really need to own a car. That's counter productive if you want to make more cars, isn't it?
1
@stuartcastle2814 He stated it already that he will be selling those cars to anyone who wants to buy it, I imagine that at first it will either be under Tesla directly or some specific company, just to perform actual real world test without going full on wide release, but you will be able to buy one. How can you bankrupt uber? You can't, so are you trying to complain that Tesla will provide cheaper means of transportation? And jack prices up to what limit? Uber can be used by anyone, Uber isn't owning anything, they don't need to pay wages for the people who uses their own cars to drive people around... Uber will either have to match the pricing or stop providing services, as no one in their right mind will pick Uber over Tesla robotaxi, especially if price is way lower. Its no longer 2000's, we don't have taxi drivers sitting on the side of the road waiting for passengers.
1
Except people uses sticks too... Every time this was tested with properly set scientific experiment it failed miserably.
1
its actually only 2% who thinks that we live on space pizza. And its quite small debate, as its been represented by quite tiny portion of quite silly people. " I have 10 years in aviation and over 1200 hours in the sky and I can almost promise you the earth is flat !!!!" Cool, good for you that you can do atleast one thing in your life. Now, question for you: how high did you go? And who do i need to pay to get pilots license without knowing a shit about reality? "NOT TRUE matter affect the round theory is only about 500 years old " Actually first globe models appeared 3 century BCE in Greece. "but every culture knew about flat earth" Actually they thought that its flat because it looked flat, then we got some basic knowledge about geometry and whoala, a globe. "that’s why most civilizations were so vague on astronomy bec the stars are always in the same exact position every single day like a MAP !!" Why they should not be? Should they change? Because some stars do change, one of the examples is Barnard's star which moved by quite a bit in last couple decades of our observation. But that movement is tiny even over those decades... But well, you will not get this, after all, you think that flatardia is real...
1
Enlighten us, wise one.
1
Hydrogen is most abundant element in the universe and we have equally ZERO of it on earth... Hydrogen is being produced, not extracted from ground... You have to put in crap tone of energy to convert water into hydrogen which then could be used to move your car.
1
@georgejones3526 SpaceX gets money when they reaches set goals. NASA paying 3billion for SpaceX to get people back to the moon on top of other services. You do understand that its actually a trade deal and not just NASA giving SpaceX money for the sake of it? Right?
1
You have good analogy, for gun laws. Because you have gun paint you can paint allot more in shorter time than you would with paint brush, so having tool which can do more in shorter time can be a huge difference here. Going back to actual guns. If you have access to ak47 then you will cause allot more damage in shorter time than you would with a knife.
1
@nathanbohn1078 So you failed to understand actual point here or intentionally skipped it. Paint gun allows you to do more in shorter period of time, same exact thing applies to guns, you can do more harm in shorter period of time with less work involved. But let's try this other way around, will ask basic question and try to answer to it: Where do you draw a line? Can I own RPG? C4? A tank? What about actual nuke? At which point would you say "No, you can't own this, it's too dangerous"?
1
What? What planets? And Adam and Eve never existed. So what?
1
@Abhigyan Tiwari You cant name something what you cant literally observe. We have 8 planets in our solar system, exclude Earth and you have max 7 ancient people could have dreamed in observing. So no idea from which magical place this 259 recorded planets come from. "And yes certain cultures a few 1000 years ago actually figured out the solar system and other planetary objects around the Galaxy." Give me citation for this claim.
1
@Globeisahoax Obvious troll is obvious
1
210 days past, we still waiting...
1
@JCElzinga Russia already lost independent how this actual war ends.
1
So you want for Musk to drop everything and fix earth? Why can't you do that?
1
That's why ALL of them showed 0% left of battery while still allowing around 10km of extra distance, that was backup battery...
1
@ajv1947 Whataboutism? This is your best defense?
1
Check Mirai and how much space it has, now imagine having 2x more tanks to fuel this V8 atrocity.
1
Is Peterson a Christian?
1
@Globeisahoax Obvious troll is obvious
1
@EdwardTilley "The Bible is a textbook that explains how to build sustainable societies" Like killing homosexuals? "Family Values, the Golden Rule, The Ten Commandments" Which existed before bible. Golden Rule is... Well... Golden rule... Existed before bible. 10 commandments are useless... Only 2 of those 10 are actually punishable by actual law. "50-year economic resets" What? To make a short response here: Bible is a book of fables with immoral laws, with self contradictions and with bunch of false claims. To make it even shorter: Bible is useless.
1
@EdwardTilley " As I said, the Bible is absolutely scientifically on-point. " Which is factually incorrect statement. Global flood? Never happen. So you have atleast one thing which is not scientific... "You've been dumbed-down by a collapsing society's academic mediocrity so you don't understand why this is" And you have been duped by your religion... Thing is that science contains 0 places where you will have god as explanation for anything, yet you believe that your god is true because you book said so without any actual evidence. C'mon...
1
Why?
1
@Globeisahoax Obvious troll is obvious.
1
Well it always was like that, like only 1% of entire Russian border is actually protected due to how long it actually is. No one ever wanted to attack Russia... Why would they?... Its only when you have mentally ill people in dictatorship countries which will decide to do it.
1
Public transport isn't convenient, while it works and can get you from point A to point B cheaply, issue is with remaining distances you will have to travel on foot.
1
POsting scam videos? Why?
1
Because he is in his own home?...
1
What was false in this video?
1
@mclovin7082 Its not dependent on which side you want to support, if there are mistakes in this video then I would want to know, there are so many people who just says some silly things like that "its all lies" and when asked never explain what was false and why. Its just bizarre or basc result of brainwashing I guess.
1
"Because it would STUPID EASY to prove." And it is really easy to prove, its was proven like 2300 years ago...
1
Put away your tin foil hat... Water engine is a scam, unless someone figured out how to break first law of thermodynamics...
1
Question itself was ether made by rain dead person or some one with agenda to push flat earther belief. At age of 5 i think every single person had no belief or ability to grasp that earth could be in a shape of ball, so in general 100% of people should have answered to that question that they dint always believed earth to be globe, because that's simply i a fact, doesn't mean that flat earth claim become more viable, it simply means that question itself was stupid.
1
Flat earther?
1
@Rokomarn ok.
1
Having completely different meanings of basic day to day word based on additional information would only lead to issues. We already have with things like "theory" which in common usage has wildly different meaning than it does in scientific context, even when this word doesn't impact that much, only can cause confusion in conversations. Simplest solution is for wokism religion people to create new words instead of stealing existing ones.
1
Why? Its rated for 1100, it did 10400, that's 9x over the rated limit. How does that make it piece of junk exactly?
1
@joedominic9848 "After over 32years of commercial flying" As passenger or pilot?... If as pilot... How much did you paid to get your license?
1
They proved you wrong long time ago.
1
Fuel cost would be astronomical. Hydrogen already is extremely expensive, having it combined with CO2 only increases price. You might resolve one issue, it still creates more. And you know what is the biggest issue with methanol? It being extremely toxic when ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin. Not that good of alternative I might say.
1
Rus bot detected.
1
@jakari3327 Will join live debate if you can present ONE sound and valid argument for the flat earth claim. Can you do that? Show how smart you are and present your best argument here and we will know that it wont be a huge waste of time to go into this live debate.
1
Yes, just ask Putin to leave Ukraine and war stops immediately...
1
Seeing people who never fact check, Toyota never made on-demand electrolysis... You should avoid watching AI created fake videos... Or at worse fact check.
1
@davidlawrence6342 Jordan takes every position possible without taking any position at all... Just listen to what he is actually saying and how wagely he states anything. Why? Because he wants to appeal to everyone at same time even without supporting everyone. He ALWAYS talks wage enough to be able to be interpreted in multiple ways by anyone
1
If Ukraine isn't doing well, then why is Russia so bad at holding front lines?
1
@user-od1yi5iq1k Yes yes yes and they killed 5 Zelenkies... As its going so poorly for Ukraine, Russia should not panic? Right? Cool. Putin's constant threats and demands to lift sanctions clearly are not real too? Because you know, sanctions doesn't work...
1
Cleaner better, in general distilled would be best one to use.
1
"oh and a car is not and never be an asset." Tell that to taxi drivers...
1
@StimParavane Tell me, which position you CAN'T take on faith?
1
@rogerhearn5243 With age comes health issues, being hinderens on battlefield can do more harm than good. Ukraine isint Russia, they actually think before sending troops into battlefield.
1
Because everything TF complains here is just that, complains which are not legally admissible.
1
@AnArtificialPlayground Again, if anything here was actually admissible in court then it would be used, but its not, because it isn't.
1
@AnArtificialPlayground When did tax payer paid for SpaceX? Heck, by NASA report they are saving 4x by using SpaceX, so they saved like 2 billions or something, of those same tax payer money... Or are you saying that NASA hiring SpaceX is a waste of tax payer money? Or maybe you think that NASA is paying for Starship development?
1
@AnArtificialPlayground And? Like, you people do understand what contract is? Right? Maybe not, so will give short explanation: Contract would be when one side pays for the services/good's the other one provides or will provide in the future. You know, payment for a thing... Its like you think that government just give 20 billion to SpaceX without asking anything in return... There is a huge list of services SpaceX will need to provide to get all that money. But maybe you would have been more happy if 40billion went to Russia instead for the same services... You do know that SpaceX is the cheapest option in the world at the moment? Right?
1
@KangenAlec Give us photo/video from high altitude which doesn't contain fish eye lens distortion and i will show you curvature in it. I dare you... Seriously, why do you keep exposing yourself to be so ignorant?
1
@jbignJesus What was my criteria? NO FISH EYE LENS... You can see in that video of yours that horizon goes from concave to convex depending on at which moment you will look... So yea... Give me actual video/photo from high altitude without distortions and i will show you curved horizon. Simple as that.
1
That's how ww3 starts. Sadly but its all up to Ukraine to win this war. If Ukraine was part of Eu or NATO then it would be different story.
1
@dezzjays9568 Whole NATO? NATO dint even joined yet... Do you imagine massacre it would have been if NATO would have actually joined?... This is Ukraine with NATO giving some weapons fighting Russia, NATO never joined this war. And Russia is losing... Have you heard latest news of Russia running away from main city?
1
So you need to be climate scientist to understand numbers?
1
Is this about one those cam claims that cars can run on water?
1
People who bought Tesla's hate Musk now? I mean, you could find few of those, but like, what would be the actual percentage of people who now dislikes Musk for the car they got and not because he is Musk?
1
@Weary_Wizard Its like you think that Zelensky gets a literal cheque into his hands which he could cash out at local bank or something... That's not how reality works...
1
@Globeisahoax Obvious troll is obvious
1
This technology doesn't exist and honestly can't exist... Will put it simply. To produce 1000g of hydrogen you will need 2000g of hydrogen passed over hydrogen fuel cell which is TWICE as efficient as burning hydrogen. So yea, you are talking about something what can't exist without breaking laws of physics.
1
Hydrogen cars are just electrical cars with extra steps. Those only sound cool on paper and not in reality, this is why actual engineers understand which one is better and this is why people who deal with texts on screen only has no idea what's up with this.
1
Spoiled west? Russia literally trying to take over entire country by force and you think that west is spoiled?...
1
So Russia attacking Ukraine is actually US fighting Russia in your imagination?
1
Computers were actually useful to be worth investment, hydrogen technology isint. Tho we already have methods to produce hydrogen, but it always goes back to basic laws of physics. To produce hydrogen you will ALWAYS use more energy than you will get back from it, its net negative. Not much to improve on it, maybe few extra percentage points for efficiency. But this hydrogen thing has more than one issue, so even if we had easy and cheap access to hydrogen you would still need to solve all the other issues for this to make any sense
1
Countries will stop providing support if Ukraine starts directly attacking Russia, so its not likely to ever happen for Ukraine to start invading Russian territory.
1
@darthmarr9886 " how can i believe in sonthing, if it never even crossed my minde?" Exactly, this is why everyone starts with disbelief, this is why you don't believe in Klumpipux. There is basic saying/rule everyone should follow "Everything doesn't exist until proven to exist", doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist until its proven to exist, it only means that you should live your lives in a way like that thing doesn't exist until someone proves that it does. So you go from disbelief into belief. "By your logic i eiter believe in everithing i don't know about anything at all or i do even tough i don't know anything about it." That's not what I sad. " i don't know that god exists butni known about the concept so i can chose to belive in its existence or not." And here we go, you are mixing knowledge with beliefs. I don't know if there are aliens out there, but I believe that there are due to share chance value based on how big our universe is. So no knowledge but belief in a thing. Same thing with god, I don't claim to have knowledge that god(s) exist, but I don't believe that they do. So no knowledge and no belief. See how it works? Belief and knowledge are separate things. "so i can't even chose to believe in itnor not believe in it" Belief isn't a choice you make, you either believe it or you don't, its basic dichotomy, its either A or not A. You yourself said that you can't believe in something you are not aware of, which means that you lack a belief in a thing you don't have knowledge about by default, so you never choose to not believe in Klumpipux, you simply don't. "now that i know Klumpilux can exist i can chose to belive in it or reject it" When did I say that Klumpilux can exist? And once again, belief isn't a choice. "But to make that decision i need to look more into it." Cool beans, at the end of the day you will still either believe in Klumpilux or you wont, there won't be a third state when it comes to your beliefs about Klumpilux. So your beliefs will either change from disbelief into belief, or it will remain at disbelief.
1
@darthmarr9886 "I don't even read past your 1st argument because you clearly didn't comprehended what I said.." That's a sure way to discredit yourself here. If you can't even bother to read and then accuse someone of not understanding you, then why even bother having conversation with you? "I can't believe in the unknowable BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT" ? And this is why you have to actually READ what was actually said and not create your own fantasy land... I never said this, I never said that you have to believe in a thing which is unknowable, I said the opposite of this... Do you even read? " how can I pull it out of my hat to belive in a gods existence or not if I never had knowledge about it. " Because everyone lacks a belief in a thing they are not aware of... Why is this so confusing for you? You never had (still don't) a belief in Klumpipux, even after I made that statement your still lack a belief in one. Seriously, if you still reading this, what state you were before your heard word "Klumpipux" relating to beliefs? As you can ONLY have a belief or don't have it. Two states, clearly you didn't had a belief in Klumpipux before you even knew about it, so then, question of the century, what was your belief state? What is the alternative to a belief? "then I can chose to belive in it." For the third time, beliefs are not a choice you make... "you can't belive in sonthing if you don't know about it's possibility of existence. The two can not be separated. " Never said that you can believe in something you don't know about. So with whom are you arguing here? "That's my point." And? You literally arguing with someone who isn't here... You are not arguing against anything I said, you just said basically what I said while at same time claiming that I'm wrong... Its so weird...
1
@darthmarr9886 If you think that you are trying to understand what someone is saying, then why the hell you still think that I'm here arguing that you could believe in something you are not aware of? You made that point multiple times by now, I explained that this is not what I'm saying, but you keep repeating it like I did... Do you see issue here? Lets do it really simple here. Answer to this question: Are there only two states for belief? Existing belief and non existing belief in a thing. Right? No third option? Follow up, if I'm not aware of a thing, do I have a belief in that thing or do I lack a belief in that thing? Your failure to understand what I'm saying doesn't make my points contradictory, its just your failure to understand what I'm saying here.
1
@darthmarr9886 "That was the contestants argument too, that since JP dose not know about it he automatically REJECTS it" First of all, he is a Christian, someone who believes in specific god, so yes, he does reject Lono as it can't be any other way if he want's to be a Christian. Second, I don't need to know everything about 50 000 proposed god's so far to reject them all on a basis that no one managed to present sufficient evidence for their god or even show that god could be explanation for anything here. If JP knew how to talk in non word salads he would have said that he rejects Lono as its not Christ he believes to be the only god out there, but here we are, word salads it is. " and yes ofcorse there is third option." There isn't. "Once you know about the thing you either belive in it,don't belive in it or you know it exists." ??? Read your own sentence here... Slowly... Notice something weird here... First 2 options is about belief, third was about knowledge... Do you see tiny issue here? So lets try it again... One more time... You can ONLY have a belief or don't have a belief, this is basic dichotomy, there is no third option. You having knowledge about something is SEPARATE thing which might or might not result in you having a belief in a thing or not having belief in a thing, still only two options when it comes to a belief. Why is it so hard for you to grasp this basic concept? "Because English language doesn't have enough variety in words in this specific case to narrow the different meanings down" Google definition of "dichotomy" and maybe find definitions and differences between "belief" and "knowledge" as clearly you don't understand difference here.
1
@darthmarr9886 "It dose not matter if he is cristian or not because the argument is not about Christianity" But it is about what JP believes, which is Christianity, which gets him to reject all other gods by default, that's how religions work. There are around 50 000 god claims so far, JP rejects 49 999 of them while accepting one. Or do you think that he accepts all those thousands of god's he doesn't know about? "He uses "word salads" because without clear definitions of meanings cannot be arguments." No, he uses word salads because this is what makes him sound intellectual without him actually being one. If I said something like "Although the quintessential facet of my gastronomic predilections inexorably gravitates towards the consummate amalgamation of ambrosial comestibles, my proclivity for the gustatory realm invariably culminates in an unequivocal and unwavering preference for the perennially cherished and time-honored repast commonly denominated as pizza." I would sound like freaking Einstein, but if I said "I like pizza" I would be just generic Joe who likes pizza. In both cases I would be saying same thing, just that in second one everyone would actually understand what I said without them pondering what the hell does "quintessential facet" even mean... Like some smart dude once said "if you can't explain it simply then you don't understand it well enough" " we can't narrow down definitions." But we can... To have a conversation we have to have working definition, while by JP logic we should first of all define word "but", then define "we", then define "can", then define what "we can" means, then ponder about meaning of life for 50 minutes, talk about "gastronomic predilections" and then shift conversation to new topic. Normal people simply have a conversation and most often used most common definitions of words to avoiding redefining every flipping word to something no one uses. "You don't understand what I mean and keep missing the point, and I don't understand why you don't understand it. Even if you don't want to admit." This is exactly my thoughts about your failure to understand difference between beliefs and knowledge. "knowledge and belife CAN NOT be separated" That's false, by definition. Those are separate words, one is about beliefs and one is about knowledge, those are mot mutually exclusive, so clearly you don't understand how words work, maybe as you said its a language issue and you think about knowledge and belief to mean same thing in your language or something, hard to say at this point why you fail here. "it has 3 stages: you either believe or don't, but once you know something you don't belive anymore you just know. That's 3 there." And still false... You knowing doesn't eradicate your belief/disbelief... You STILL either believe or don't believe it independent of your knowledge. Like seriously, what is your understand of word "belief"? In normal reality you can only have two options, you either have a belief or you don't, there is no third option, never was and never will. You either believe in unicorns or you don't, your knowledge about their existence has no impact here, your belief position could change with your acquired knowledge about unicorn existence, but you still either believe in those or you don't BELIEF and KNOWLEDGE as separate things.
1
@darthmarr9886 "Altough i still think he just ties to be as soesific as possibly" Cool beans that you think that, but there is difference between what you think and what he is actually doing. Intellectual people straight away understand that they can't use jumbo mumbo in a conversations with regular people or in a setting where regular people will be watching, so they know that they need to "dumb" it down and use common words to create as simple sentences as possible. So you either have JP as intellectual who knows jack shit about reality and doesn't understand that making word salads isn't good, aka doesn't really make him intellectual. Or he is doing this intentionally to confuse everyone who is listening to him. The share fact that you can't get any straight forward answer from him on ANY question indicates that its quite likely that his goal here is to just sound smart and take ALL positions at same time. This is why he was unable to accept or deny Lono god, because he can't... That's not how his script works... He never takes a position, he just dances around it with word salads to obfuscate actual topic. " i mostly understand what he is trying to say or refer to." And i mostly understand words from my word salad about me liking pizza... Doesn't mean that this is how intellectuals should engage in conversations, even tho my word salad actually had an actual statement where I took a position to make a claim that I like pizza, JP would have talked for 20 minutes about pizza and its toppings without ever agreeing or disagreeing with it while at same time making so much salad that you would drown in it drying to figure out what the f**k is he saying. "But logicly once you know something or someone exists 100% , thatbis not belife anymore it is knowledge. " You still have a belief... You failing to understand that belief never just magical disappears... I have knowledge that earth if a globe, by your logic I should not have a belief that earth is a globe, just a knowledge... Does this mean that I don't believe in it as I lack a belief? Do you see how irrational it sounds? I believe in globe earth and I have knowledge about it. "But logicly once you know something or someone exists 100%" There is no such thing as 100%, maybe only for the fact that you exist, as you can't have thoughts without existing. It sounds more and more like you mixing faith with belief. It is faith when you don't have knowledge about something and faith goes away if you get knowledge/evidence. Even tho you still either have faith or you don't, which is still binary option, there is never third option in between of faith and no faith. I'm trying to figure out why the hell you are so confused here and why you keep mixing things up here for no good reason. "Let's say you never met a chiken but you know about them from others or pictures or whatever. So you now belive their existence or don't" I have knowledge that kangaroos exist, I have never seen one in real life, so I have knowledge and I believe that those exist, both things at same time. When you have knowledge about something being real and you don't believe it, that's basically being delusional, still an option, but not a healthy one. "your belife changes into knowing" You yourself said that belief and knowledge are separate things... Then how the hell can one thing morph into other? And try to answer to this, when you gain knowledge, do you no longer have a belief in chickens? " Aftwr that there is no way you still can't belive in chikens existence (logicly, since stuoid people will always exist)." Exactly, stupid people still exist, which means that you can still have a belief which is in contradiction to your knowledge, which means that those are not dependent on each other. "So basically two different words with 2 different meanings are related," They are related, but not mutually exclusive. Do you know what mutually exclusive means? "one becomes the other once it is proven." False. This is not how words work... This is not how any of this works... Go ask ChatGPT if you don't trust me or something. I might be bad at explaining things here.
1
@darthmarr9886 "Usually things are more complicated then a simple yes or no" Yes, but... Do you see how easy it was? I agreed with you with basic "Yes" and then added "but" where you can dive deeper into that answer. This is how normal humans talk, this is who JP should engage in conversations, not with his word salads which doesn't even answer to a question being asked. In normal world you will have 99% of questions which can be answered really simply and then if needed expanded on that answer, but when it comes o JP its 99.99% of questions he never answers and just rambles about word definitions and then pivots to new topic. " Faith and belief in my language is one word and means one thing in any context. " Yea, quite likely you are thinking about "belief" as replacement for religious faith while "belief" in this context is a "believe" which is just accepting as something being true or false. But that still has that same issue for you where you can only have a belief or don't have it, there is no third option. "I guess then "I belive in you" and "i have faith in you" dose not mean the same thing in English" In this case "I believe" would be more like "I think this is the case", while "I have faith" is just religious excuse used when you don't have evidence for your beliefs. Like if I said "I believe that earth is a globe" you could ask "How do you know that?" I could respond "I have testable repeatable evidence for it", on another hand if I said "I believe that earth is flat" and you asked "what evidence do you have for it?" my response can be "I just take it on faith", which is what religious people do quite often. "I thought those are just synonyms." English is more than weird, those are not synonyms, closely related, but different words with different meaning, quite often used interchangeably and its meaning would depend on context. I might have made a mistake by using word "belief" instead of "believe", but just like it is for you English isn't my native language and that "belief" word just sounds more in line what I want to say than to use "believe". In any case, belief or believe, you can only have it or don't have it, there are no third option here, never was and never will. Just like earth is a globe or its not a globe, two options here, basic dichotomy. Law of the Excluded Middle. Even if earth is in shape of unicorn, its not a third option, it only means that earth is not a globe. So you either have a "belief/believe" or you don't, what you know is separate and independent thing which doesn't impact your "belief/believe" state, its A or not A.
1
Making word salads and never answered to questions isn't a good trait to have.
1
Not for long.
1
And unicorns are real, its true, Bob from 3a apartment said it... You need to realize that argument from authority is a logical fallacy...
1
They don't, Toyota will go bankrupt in few years if they stick with their all in hydrogen nonsense... It simple doesn't scale, it sounds nice on paper, but it will not become reality.
1
Your entire comment is one big speculation based on your personal opinion... But this sentence "There's also a serious risk that the west can't supply Ukraine anymore because their own supplies of ammunition and weapons are running low" is really dumb... No one is running low on ammunition, what Ukraine got was just a scraps, US spends over 600+ billion bucks every year on their military, what they sent to Ukraine is nothing in comparison. Not even talking about rest of civilized world. "I mean, yeah the Kharkiv offensive was a surprise, but the numbers don't don't lie..." What numbers? Can you give citation for your numbers?
1
Waste of time and money.
1
@effigy42 From whose ass are you taking those numbers from?
1
Riiight, because having Puting spitting his nonsense is factual because he said so...
1
Well, as it technically never was a thing, so it could not have flopped yet, technically.
1
Do what?
1
Why?
1
Or you could do all of them at same time?
1
@701983 But don't they carry balloons with them? In some cars you have like 3 of those, highly pressurized one, for extra umpfs during collision!
1
@701983 I wasn't saying that your carbon tank is a balloon in literal sense, but both of those share quite few things. And it really doesn't matter how strong that tank is, after all you still have bunch of connections which can easily snap off. On danger scale I would oder things like BEV > ICE > Hydrogen going from safest to most dangerous ones. BEV's while being hard to extinguish takes quite some time to actually burst in flames, so you have quite a bit of time to get away. With ICE cars, will those can engulf entire car quite quickly, but still, its better than Hydrogen which would just explode and vaporize you on the spot.
1
Con artist? What about him?
1
@deerichardz Solid? Coping hard I see. Carry on.
1
Actually electrical ones are more future proofed than hydrogen. Battery technology improves every year and EV's are allot less complex than Hydrogen ones. Hydrogen currently only wins on the side of energy density, which can be useful in some situations, but for general mainstream transportation, EV's all the way.
1
@pieromau Are you saying that we should not limit peoples actions? Can i come to your house and take your stuff? Do you care about people who thinks that they an go around and kill others? Should we do something about that? Because by your logic (lack of it) we should ignore people with different opinions independent what those are, so some one who is literally aa genocidal maniac and has a belief that he can go around killing everyone is jut fine? Where do you draw a line? Do you draw a line? And just FYI we are talking about harmful beliefs, beliefs which are not founded on reality. And main thing is that you can have any belief you want as long it doesn't effect others, but as you clearly dont live alone on island, this is not the case, so we have to do something about people with harmful beliefs. Simple as that.
1
@pieromau All of my 50+ personalities... What difference does it make who is we?... I can change that to "I" if that helps you... My argument still stand...
1
500 days into this war, when will Russia start exactly?
1
People keep saying this, never supports that with evidence. Why is that?
1
What?
1
Stand should be able to hold rocket in any case, they most likely reused same stand they used for their previous tincy rocket and thought that it will be enough to hold new one
1
Energy density by weight flies over the window when you check its energy density by volume. You could have energy source which can get you 1000miles from 1kg of fuel, will mean nothing if you need 1000m^3 of volume to store it. Is exaggeration of numbers, yes, I know, but its to make a point here, hydrogen takes up a lot of space which usually isn't something you can afford in passenger cars.
1
Being open minded is fine, thinking that everything what government says is a lie just because it said it, is not so fine. Tho i have no idea how is government even related here...
1
@andreasspyrou7688 "Because someone had to create the Flat earth if indeed this would be the case" And? Earth is not flat and doesn't require creator... So no idea why you bring that one up... "And absolutely 100 % beyond the shadow of a doubt the government is lying about everything." Everything? So when government says that Australia is a real country, you think that its lying? Or when it said that Covid is killing people, you think its a lie? And... Once more... How the hell is government even related here?
1
@andreasspyrou7688 so no actual counter argument, but some simple childish tap dance and running away? We both know that you failed here with your government accusation, then why do you pretend that you dint? Everyone lies, i can bet you did that multiple times in your life, does that mean that your original comment was a lie? How many lies you need to say to be a liar? How many truths you need to say to be truth teller? If i said 5million truths and one lie, does that make me a liar? If i said 5million lies in a row, does that mean that next one will be a lie? Something to think about for you until you grow up.
1
It was special firework operation.
1
Would suggest to actually double check about hydrogen cars in general before you waste your money on one.
1
How do you know that it was done? Youtube video said so?
1
Your last sentence is correct.
1
@Withnail Well you can have irrational atheist, you might even argue that most of them would not be able to make rational argument why they are atheists. But it would be really rare to have flat earther atheist, not impossible, but extremely rare.
1
Its... Gun... CONTROL... Not ban... Why people keep messing up this basic fact... Australians can still own guns if they want too, like every single civilized country allows you to own gun... But there is difference between how easy it is to obtain one in US and how easy it is to do it in Australia. Like you said, Us allows you to have gun 3D file, heck there isn't even actual laws against owning 3D printed gun... Which is THE issue. Solution is the gun control. And are you seriously using your fire arms to defend against mexican cartel?...
1
@arizonashopper5095 Is your argument basically "Because there are illegal guns, that means that anyone should be able to buy one legally at grocery shop"? Its exaggeration, I know, but this is what it looks like you are trying to say here. There are illegal guns in Australia or any other country in the world... Cool... So maybe instead of simplifying laws to own guns, actually increase gun control not only for generic people but for preventing illegal ones coming into country? Maybe get harsher laws for owning illegal gun? Is your solution for illegal gun issue is to have more guns?...
1
@eddx5758 You can if you are professional shooter and you can actually prove that you are one. AKA you can get one if you actually have to have it, otherwise you should not have one. Why would you need AR15 to begin with? Line needs to be drown at some point anyways.
1
@eluilus4017 Are you ok?
1
If this video convinced you that earth is flat then you should reevaluate your own methods of filtering nonsense from the information you receive, as you failed miserably here.
1
@TheCarter84 "However, he then goes on to say that it's the result of light refraction, air density, and other factors tricking our minds into seeing something that's not real" Mirage? Visual illusions? Ever heard about those? And, there is ALWAYS specific range you can see, it only slightly changes based on atmospheric conditions, but its always in specific range of it, you will NEVER see something 400 miles away while looking from sea level altitude, like NEVER. "I believe the Earth's curvature calculator should work if the earth is a globe, but it does not" But it does. Like seriously, it does work, as long as you will properly include observers altitude, observed objects height and atmospheric conditions, it will produce results within margin of error, which is like 1%. Feel free to prove me wrong here by producing video which shows something you should not be able to see based on globe model, just again, a remainder, your calculations NEEDS to include observers altitude, as I have seen to many times people using that stupid 8 inches per squared mile equation telling that we see to far, where this equation is a parabola and doesn't include observers altitude, which is major thing for globe earth model if you want to calculate how far you should be able to see. "Maybe I'm just untrusting of the whole system like he says, and I am just skeptical about everything I've been taught" This. And you are not being skeptical, you being paranoid more likely. You can disprove flat earth by simply observing suns behavior from your backyard, no math required, single days observation would be enough to shatter flat pancake world idea. What about sun in particular? It "moves" (actually earth rotates, but its different topic) in straight line. Sun "moves" at constant speed. Sun remains at same exact size (use light filter to actually see its actual size and not its glare). Sunsets/sunrises. Simple 4 things about sun you can observe on your own which matches 100% to the globe and are 100% imposible on flat one. That's it, no lizard people controlled government conspiracy brainwashing doodly do thing needed, just basic observation with your own eyes. "I'll know for sure when someone actually lands on the moon and sends me a picture that I can verify as legitimate." We got that in 1969, yet you still don't believe it. So why do you think it would change when we land next time and send 8k 60fps live videos back? Especially when in 1969 things like CGI wasn't even a thing and today we can actually create photorealistic CGI images? Silly flat earthers claimed that videos and photos from the time when CGI term didn't even existed have been CGI, and you want to say that today would be somehow different?... C'mon... We both know that you will not believe that... You just want to be special here who has different opinion from everyone else, nothing more.
1
How would destroying technology which could be used for that same control be in benefit for the lizard people who wants to control people?
1
@VladimirOnOccasion Observation of sun and basic knowledge of geometry. If you still struggle with what I mean here exactly, will explain in detail. Do you?
1
@VladimirOnOccasion 4 basic observations of sun, which can be done from your backyard, which 100% matches globe and 100% contradicts any flat earth model. #1 Sun maintains constant size over entire day. #2 Sun maintains constant speed over entire day (Yes, earth rotates and sun isint actually moving, well it is, but its different topic on its own) #3 Sun moves in a straight line across the sky. #4 Sunsets and sunrises Those are really basic observations which doesn't require any math from you, just basic understanding of basic geometry. Its not rocket science you know...
1
@VladimirOnOccasion You dint read what I said, dint you now? But let's play this game of yours. What shape of earth should be for you to have sunsets?
1
@VladimirOnOccasion Weird, I asked simple question here and your response was way into fields. If you want to troll, you need to do better job here.
1
Satellite images appeared already and there are quite clear indications of being hit by rockets, so its not internal sabotage but it was hit with rockets, from where, hard to say, but its hardly you will have short range launchers inside Russian controlled area
1
Hydrogen cars only sound cool on paper, but those do not work in reality as a practical solution. And by the looks, it will never do. BEV's keep improving every single year with bunch of new battery technologies on horizon already. Some are even exponentially better ones, tho main issue is scaling up their production and driving down costs. While with hydrogen... Well... Those remained basically exactly the same from the moment it got invented.
1
Proven correct? Where exactly was it proven to be correct? Because i can point to multiple places where it was shown to be wrong... Like global flood... never happen, yet its claimed in your book that it did... And earth is oblate spheroid even tho your book says that its flat... Just saying...
1
@Dr.Cosmar Bringing in some imaginary friends of yours will not help out here.
1
@zackandjessadventures6219 How much of that original car would still be there? And you can easily replace battery pack, especially with new structural battery packs in Tesla cars which will make your car to out last any ICE car out there...
1
Russian victory? 155 days of war and Russia barely holds back Ukrainian forces and you hope that Russia wins?... They already lost, now its only "how much"
1
@raybeauvais296 Driving empty cars would be basic balancing, if you got one car coming in and there are no passengers going out, you still need to move that car out of there to create free space and to balance car count on both ends. This definitely isn't ideal, but its basic thing you have to do when you have more passengers going from one end and not the other.
1
Yes, this is why Russians shelled entire cities.
1
Ironically enough this video wasn't to prove or to disprove anything... But which part you think proved flat earth exactly?
1
Cost of new inventions...
1
I mean, bible does say that you should kill homosexuals, just saying.
1
@thedeep697 Like, who cares? What actual original says? There are like 1000 denominations based on bible, so yes, we will have different beliefs with different personal interpretations of that book. Can't say I see a point here tho. At the end of day bible is immoral, false on multiple accounts, self contradictory book of fables, nothing more.
1
Because magic isn't real.
1
@tylermanter1548 Best argument ever... No wonder you never win any debates.
1
Poor guys...
1
@AwardQueue It might be first, but its a huge one. Failed static fire where rocket just flew away. It was tested while surrounded by people and doesn't look like it was properly aborted due to this mishap. Like you have some famous spacex falcon failures, those get blown up straight away, but with this one, no, it just flew away and seemingly only stopped when all engines failed
1
@AwardQueue It doesn't matter how much fuel there was, from all the smoke and inconsistent power loss should be obvious that it wasn't due to actual termination, but it was due to simple failure of engines. It's a huge mishap on multiple fronts.
1
One way trip?
1
This is video about hydrogen cars, not BEV's...
1
Go to google, enter "ships over horizon" and there you go.
1
Exactly what Putin says to his cannon fodder.
1
@arreola891 I don't think that anyone understood what you tried to say here.
1
2 cars in one, can you see potential issue here? Mixing multiple engine types isn't really a good idea, maintenance increases, reliability goes down. Why not simply go with full electric?
1
Says someone who thinks that its aliens because he can't come up with any better explanation... C'mon... its 21st century, basically every single person caries 4k camera these days in their pocket, yet best we can get of this aliens is 480p video at best from single angle... For some reason this video quality never increases with all this years passed, we still getting those rubbish videos about aliens doing something on our planet for some weird reasons... And you think that he is arrogant... Irony is strong with conspiracy nuts.
1
When that happens then this video can adjust its calculation, until then its just a dream. And that would only apply for Japan... And that would only produce specific amount of Hydrogen for specific amount of cars, will not mean that refueling will become dirt cheap, it should drive cost down, little bit, but it will not be game changer.
1
By producing cleaner cars? That is funny "idiotic" to say, I agree.
1
Yea, Russia is that.
1
Tech you are talking about doesn't exist.
1
@malasc12 That's not really true. You can detect curvature at sea level, you will need extra tool to see that tiny tincy wincy curve, but it's there. You don't need to go over troposphere...
1
" I wonder how the short battery life and needing to be replaced effects the comparison and environmental impact? Seems like a scam to me." Nah, its only scam by the people who makes such statements. Batteries can be recycled to like 98% and completely reused. And it wont run down in 3--10 years... We have Tesla model S which came out in 2012 which still drives on the roads without any issues. So from whose ass did you took those numbers exactly? "Doesn't California have rolling blackouts because their "green" power generation methods can't keep up with demand?" Does it? Blackouts are not equal to inability to support EV's. Its already known that EV's will not outpace electrical grid expansion, there is 0 risk. "CO2 makes plants green" ? CO2 kills people too... What's your point? "Can we fix the damage strip mining does to waterways?" Can we fix thousands of oil spills every year into oceans or on land?... Whats your point? "It seems EVs are not the wonderful solution they are sold to be" Well if you will only listen to oil companies propaganda, then yes, EV's are bad... But in actual reality EV's are allot better solution than ICE cars. "The battery tech just doesn't seem to be there yet." And how do you think any technology improves?... By demand... If there is no demand in technology then there is no point in investing billions in a research for better solutions... We already have batteries good enough to push forwards transition towards EV and new battery technologies came out every month.
1
Basic observation of sun contains 4 things which proves that earth is a globe, your personal ignorance on basic things proves nothing, earth is a globe independent of you.
1
@farehhossain1989 Then I guess Putin constantly crying about sanctions and threatening with nukes isn't true? War is over? Russia won it? Entire Ukraine belongs to Russia already?... Russia is only winning in Russian media... For this 3 day war they are taking their time...
1
care to elaborate?
1
Amen-Hotep There is already live streams of earth... Doesn't change flat earthers minds in any way shape or form... You could send them to the space, kick out throw air lock and they would still say that earth if flat and that all this is CGI because reasons...
1
You do understand that Starlink is a private company? Right?...
1
You should watch TF reaction to test flight 4 and 5, cringe overloaded.
1
If hydrogen as a energy storage system so good, why no one interested in energy storage system uses it?
1
They didn't voted for Trump, they voted against Kamala.
1
@michelesilvestri8340 Combustion type engines do make sound, its more or less same one as it is from gasoline, same explosions, same piston driven engine. Hydrogen fuel cell engines, which are twice as efficient in comparison to combustion ones, those don't make any sound.
1
Russia attacking Ukraine is Ukraine starting a war with Russia? Do you Russian bots get paid alot for such jokes?
1
@HappyBeezerStudios Simple question and lets see if you can answer honestly here. Which which tool you can cause more harm: assault rifle or knife? Or this question. Which tool requires less effort to cause more harm: knife or gun?
1
Who said that it was Elon's hyperloop? This is the funny part, you don't even realize that it never was Elon's hyperloop, yet you blindly listen to what your cult leader TF says to you without ever fact checking basics here. Why is that?
1
Not really.
1
EU can do without Russian energy, thing is that transition like that normally takes a decade or two, so while everyone want's to avoid paying Putin there isint any quick solution here.
1
So basically Putin got scared that Ukraine might join defensive alliance and decided to attacking Ukraine before it happen?... And this is justified somehow in your head?... Tell me, why do you think Ukraine would have wanted to join defensive alliance like NATO? Might there be some weird reason for it? Like, you know, fear to be invaded by a moron?
1
Well earth isn't like ostrich egg, its oblate spheroid
1
7 to 1? And this 3 day war is still ongoing?... Either your number is bullshit or Russia is extremely bad at war...
1
@findaxelfoley8106 You haven't answered to my question tho...
1
Majority of population still believes in wizards and magic, having few who thinks that earth is flat pancake isint that far fetched.
1
For the exact reason you clicked on this video and watched it, entertainment.
1
You will, as bunch of companies already does, recycle them and reuse materials in new batteries. Recycled materials do not lose their properties, so in sense you could recycle batteries infinite amount of times.
1
Bible states that its flat pancake.
1
You do know that he is sending rockets to moon for manned missions before he is attempting to do it for the Mars? Right? Or that unmanned rockets will be sent to Mars before manned? So basically, learning to crawl before trying to run.
1
"Its true, trust me bro, I play minecraft!"
1
Isn't that... NATO?...
1
@zedtrek 'NATO's purpose is to guarantee the freedom and security of its members through political and military means.' So like, how is this not a NATO you are talking about?
1
@zedtrek What are you talking about? How is having US bad exactly? If Russia attacks then article 5 of NATO engges and all countries gets involved into this war, if US decides to not engage, ok, would be exactly same thing if we were part of different group of countries for defence purposes... So like, what is your actual complain here? We can go into war without US... US would be obligated to help out with the war if one starts... You are complaining about NATO while wanting to create NATO... Do you see issue here?
1
@zedtrek How is creating another group of countries which performs exact same thing as NATO does now solves anything? If US leaves NATO, ok, creating yet another group where US will not want to join will produce same results. Entire point of NATO is to have group of countries which will work together to defend each other, US is part of it or not, doesn't change its function as it is. What you are asking here is basically "Keep NATO, kick US out of NATO" would be exact same result what you want.
1
@zedtrek NATO existence means that we don't need another grouping, we already have one... And NATO borders are being respected due to that same Article 5, if anyone attacks any NATO country, rest of them will join the fight, this is why Putin will not mess with NATO, this is why Putin was afraid of Ukraine joining NATO, this is why Putin is scared of any countries joining NATO, because this makes every country as one big defense alliance which can't be easily attacked. Russia and China are dictatorships, luckily for us Russia and China doesn't have actual friendly relationships. At same time, both of these countries are only attacking countries which don't belong to any alliance an seamingly have multiple times smaller military capabilities. No idea what Trump has todo with anything here. If Trump becomes president and somehow manages to get US from NATO... Ok... Like, what can you do about it? Creating another alliance? Why? NATO is a thing already... With or without US, its the strongest alliance at the moment. Europe is independent... Your entire argument is just... Weird... Again, you are trying to say that Europe needs to defend itself with some sort of defense aliance because US could leave NATO and Europe should create new alianse when we already have one... Like... What is your actual argument here? NATO has bunch of countries, including US, what better alliance can you dream in creating? Europe has its own laws and its own rules, US has no actual impact here. Can you give actual examples where US had impact in affecting negatively Europe? We as NATO countries are not vulnerable, ESPECIALLY after Ukraine/Russia war which demonstrated that so called 2nd strongest army in the world failed to conquer a country which should have fallen in 3 days. This war showed how weak enemy is and how strong NATO can be. Heck, NATO countries give out like a less than 1% of its military equipment to Ukraine and still it was enough to kick Russian butt's. If Russia started war with NATO then war would end in 3 days, but not in Russian favor. Biggest slowdown would be military equipment transportation to front lines, but after that it would be straight march to Moscow. Diplomatic solution was made in 1991, Russia broke that one. What else are you suggesting here? Diplomacy ended when Russia attacked. You do not negotiate with terrorists... its like having someone breaking into your house and you like "Well, lets negotiate, you can take this TV of mine, but you should leave PlayStation. Is that ok for you? Should we talk about alternatives?" No... You are not negotiating with criminals...
1
Biggest range photo was at around 400km, taken from one big mountain of another big mountain. Light refraction can add extra couple km, but in general at normal conditions and at sea level you ships will start disappearing bottoms up quite quickly.
1
@UmQasaann He lived in America when this was done, got education in there and so on. Its as american product as it comes.
1
What that would be? Going against mainstream independent if its true?
1
@OneOneThree-wl7ml Why cant you simply present actual meaning of flat earthers instead of tap dancing around? One sentence can be enough and would save allot of time of this back and forth.. .
1
@OneOneThree-wl7ml What you observe and what is actually real are different things by itself. You cant create gap between separate things, they already are separate. Science deals with reality, flat earth claim deals with feelings and personal opinions based on ignorance about reality. You cant really even compare them...
1
Is this attempt to redirect attention from current issue? War crime is war crime.
1
If Ukraine army was all gone then this war would have ended already.
1
Buck Baker The fact that Russia being ruled by a dictator says more than you need to know which side is more likely to be lying here.
1
@Rome-z6q "1) in YouTube there are many videos of the referendum with happy people" Just like there are happy people in North Korea... What's your point? Brainwashed people can't be happy?... "2) use your logics and critical thinking (something you Europeans haven’t been doing lately):" Do you want to join us with some logical and critical thinking? Its quite nice you know, would strongly recommend to try it out, atleast once in your life. "if another country annexes you (millions of you) and most of you are against it, wouldn’t you resist and revolt en masse" So people should go against Russia annexing Crimea, got it. "as well as carry out sabotage operations and wage guerrilla (partisan) war or insurgence..." Yes, this is what Russia was doing for past 8 years in Ukraine, got it. "something which has not been the case in Crimea since “annexation”" Maybe because Russia stopped that when it annexed it?
1
Hydrogen could work for such use cases like trains, ships, planes, maybe city buses, anything what requires higher energy density, but will never take off in regular cars.
1
First hydrogen combustion engine invented in 1806, first hydrogen fuel cell invented in 1966. How is that in infancy exactly? There are simply basic fundamental limitations of hydrogen, there is set amount of energy you could ever get out of hydrogen and there is set amount of pressure you could use to store that hydrogen and so on and on and on and on... Hydrogen technology basically hit its ceiling like 20 years ago
1
Nothing, basically completely nothing. Its a read only device for specific basic tasks. Worse case, someone hacks into it somehow and records random signals from your brain which could be interpreted into some mouse movements.
1
Sher A Bangla Who cares? Earth is a globe not because NASA said so... 100% of what NASA presented could be shown to be made up, will not mean that earth is not a sphere... And we have dozens of space agencies across entire globe, so why the hell do people even mention it?
1
Or maybe because there were no changes inside of it so there is no point in showing it? Its like you want to invent things you could claim to be true just because you don't like one specific person... Its so weird....
1
You do know that you can recycle like 97% of batteries? Right?
1
@s.c.6157 "but I don't see people helping others in undeveloped countries" First of all, they do. Second and main thing, there is huge difference between simply educating some one across entire world on internet which costs you basically nothing and actually going to a country to some remote village, learning their language and trying to convince them that they need to know why earth is a globe and why earth rotates around sun. One of those actions requires allot more time and money. " but to survive,they die constantly hungry,sick.." Yes, and educating people in those areas could help out with finding food or curing diseases. "there are some much worse things in the world then lacking some classes of geometry..." And? Should we ignore every single issue in the world and concentrate in one biggest one? Because in that case we will have quite few issues in not time... Like "Och my house have been flooded by bursted pipe, well who cares, children in africa starving, lets ignore this issue and concentrate on more important one"... Well you could do that, but you will be homeless in no time and its gonna be you who needs help with world view like that... "first we need to work to end racism,hunger,illnesses,war,discrimination..." Cool, do that. But ironically enough racism was resolved by educating people that everyone is the same because we all are humans. Hunger can be solved with better knowledge how to make more food. Illness can be cured with knowledge how to do that. War is... Well that one is driven by stupid ideas. Discrimination again, can be solved by educating people. Do you notice pattern here? "and yet here we are,nothing has changed only evolve in sophisticated slavery..." Slavery got banned (in most countries), because people got educated on it. "still lies,wars,and controling the stupid masses..." Yes, like a flat earth movement... How do you think wars start? From putting 2 groups of people with opposing world views... So if you want to avoid wars, again, educate people. "I've seen too much bad thing in the world and so little good things..." Then you need to educate yourself on some basic human psychology where you will only notice bad things while ignoring good ones because bad ones will leave bigger impact on your than good ones. You could witness 100 people sacrificing their lives for others, but if you have seen ONE instance where some one kills some one just because he can, you will think that we are doomed, while in reality this is not the case.
1
Russia already run out of equipment, what is has left is bunch of untrained cannon fodder.
1
Weird people. You do know that you could do both things at same time? Repair earth AND colonize Mars?
1
@billhassall1586 "you confused me with a FE guy" When people make dumb statements/questions its hard to not mistaken some one as one. "Gravity should be net Strong at the poles and decreasing to the equator." There is centrifugal force... You will weight 0.4% less on equator than on poles. Centrifugal force vs gravity is a TINY force, its just 0.4% of what gravity produces, even tho gravity itself is a weak force.
1
Nuking entire country you supposedly should be liberating? Duno how brainwashed Russians are, but this might be hard to sell to them.
1
Craig I guess all those sanctions on Russia, its name being ruined for decades to come was just a Putin's big plan while he was just playing around in a war which should have ended in 3 days? If Putin could have won this war in 3 days, he would have done it without "playing", but clearly he is not capable of doing it, this is why he is asking help from China and other countries, he is doing best he can and still failing.
1
@effigy42 That's not how charging works... You should definitely stop commenting about something you clearly have no idea about.
1
From which magical place do you think energy required to make hydrogen comes from?... And just FYI you need around 60% MORE of it to travel same distance in comparison to pure BEV's.
1
@d3d952 So now you shift to lithium mines?... Will make is really simple here, by actual research done, end to end, BEV's are still better than hydrogen when it comes to pollution, this includes all those nasty lithium mines.
1
@d3d952 "the way he described in the video and said that evs are way more efficient" Because they are... Its a fact that BEV's are more efficient. Direct electricity storage is more efficient than converting it into hydrogen and then converting it back to electricity. Its non debatable fact. " i have to ask you where the f do evs get the energy ?" Same place Hydrogen plants gets theirs... "why haven't you answered my question about Lithium batteries," Because battery production has nothing to do with cars efficiency... What you are trying to say here is that battery PRODUCTION creates pollution, ok, cool, we can agree on that one. But at same time you are trying to argue about cars EFFICIENCY, those are not the same thing. Will explain it simply here. End to end, including everything, from production to recycling, BEV's are still slightly cleaner than hydrogen cars. But BEV's uses around 60% less electricity to drive your same distance in comparison to hydrogen cars, which was your original attempt to complain here. Hydrogen production uses electricity from same EXACT places BEV's would, difference is that hydrogen cars needs 60% more of that which quickly offsets any benefits you could get by not having all those "dangerous" mines.
1
"Where else in daily life do little old ladies or kids talking on their cell phones attach/detach 150 amp circuits with arc-drawing 500 volts behind them?" Its not like charger keeps supplying 150 amps when you disconnect... How much it carries have no actual impact here. Current stops at the moment you disconnect, its not like you have actual live connectors while you carrying it to and from car charging port... "What matters is the person manipulating the charging plug in a blinding rain storm isn't found dead on the pavement from electrocution as a result of using it." Ok, and which plug increases chances of that happening? Your point is mute here... "The CCS plug is physically larger because it offers greater arc tracking space and reduces the likelihood of an arc-over event." No, CCS plug is physically larger because it was made that way. Its quick slam on existing thing to get new functionality. Best example would be USB-B Micro superspeed connector. You had existing one and then you just add extra stuff on it to increase its capabilities. Tesla uses same wires for AC and DC, while CCS added additional connector to existing to have AC and DC wires. And clearly Tesla managed to prevent arcing with their connector without any troubles here. Have you ever heard of reports about arcing with Tesla connectors? "The Tesla plug's design has a much smaller grounding pin than its supply pins, a no-no in high voltage/high power system design." "Weirdly" enough this "unsafe" connector passed safety checks. "There was no legal barrier to the CCS committee adopting a smaller lighter plug like Tesla" No legal barrier, yes, doesn't mean that they had any interest in making one. Why do you need plug with separate wires for AC/DC when you could have same ones? "and more than 100 years of engineering practices to be considered" Yes... Old tech... This is why Tesla reinvented plug instead of using 100 year old engineering practices... Do you have like real point here? Or like actual reports from someone actually testing this and confirming that Tesla plugs are less safe or anything? Some basic googling here CCS can handle around 350kw while Tesla plug should handle around 900kw, so weirdly enough Tesla not only made smaller plug, but it can output more current, so clearly Tesla invested more time and money in their plug than CCS board meeting managed.
1
Ask Drumpf...
1
It definitely looks like one tho.
1
@eat_ze_bugs They don't. There is wide range of rockets and their configurations, but this one looks like a product from Wish store based on actual real thing. It's a cheaper copy of falcon 9 rocket. Why? Because China doesn't care about intellectual property. It's not the first or last time something is being copied in china. 9 engines on both rockets, fuel type used on both rockets are the same, type of combustion is the same, randin gear is the same, size is basically identical, both will have grid fins...
1
Generation Noise So when you fly with a plane which goes at 700km/h after you jump inside of it you slam at 700km/h speed at back of it? Seriously? Do you even use your head?
1
Generation Noise That your complain is invalid on a fundamental level... Helicopter moves with earth same as you move with a plane... You can make slightly different analogy here: get into plane which goes lets say 700km/h, then inside of it launch a small drone, hover it. Would that drone shoot to the back of the plane or would is stay in same place? This demolished your original complain and silly argument that helicopters could simply hover and wait until destination comes to it...This is not how reality works...
1
Actually you would not. It can be 500km long or 5cm, it will still be balanced on a center of it, which would be that same table on a plane, which remains on same relative exact point above earth and would show same exact thing.
1
@HarryElmore-jl2p Any video you see mentioning water engine is 100% full of crap. I dare you to find official statement from Toyota mentioning your magical engine.
1
I'm usually giving 50/50 chance that they are as its more or less impossible to know if some one actually believes that nonsense or just trolling, both sound exactly same.
1
Ok, we will not google it.
1
@eugenehuyser Its not education, its brainwashing. Earth is a globe, this is simply a fact, you have no right to your own facts. No one debates shape of the earth, we only have videos like this one for entertainment purposes, nothing more.
1
@just_man209 Yes, and production process makes petroleum from crude oil too, does mean that you can just fill up on crude oil, doesn't it?... There is no such thing as cars powered by water, never was and never will be. And due to first law of thermodynamics you can't have hydrogen production on board, basic physics 101.
1
Ekule Nwaiku Ok, do basic experiment, this will take you one day. Get a camera, get an actual sun filter so you can take a photo of suns actual size. Then, start from the morning, take suns picture every hour with same zoom level for entire day, get your photos in photoshop or any other photo editing software, super expose one over another and compare size... And you know what? SIZE DOESN'T CHANGE DURING THE DAY. This is only possible on globe model and would never happen on flat one. So yea, next time you try to make "smart" comment, do some basic research before hand...
1
Ekule Nwaiku "When next you see a gigantic moonrise or sunset..." Like seriously... Do you think that having light glare actually represents actual size of light source? You do know that you need actual sun filter to see actual size of sun and not stare at it with naked eye?... Please tell me that you know this... "The info can be seen with organs on your face...your eyes." Go to google, enter "visual illusions" and your argument just got debunked. Science doesnt work on peoples opinions... Use actual measurement tools, not your flipping eyes to measure size of something what is 149.6 million km away from you... Damn... https://flatearth.ws/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/solar-filter.jpg This is why you use flipping sun filter...
1
@Globeisahoax Can you imagine gravity?
1
Aliens!
1
@mattmantrell5708 Everything Russia says is a lie, but it's besides the point. There are allot more actual evidence pointing out that Russia did it and not some childish points mentioning that Ukraine blow up nord stream, which is not even really proven to be the case, at this point in time there are only talks that Ukraine wanted to do it, but it's again, not a proof that they did it... And not even relevant point to prove that they blew up dam... Just use basic logic here next time...
1
Khairul Azhar Because to say "I don't know" when you don't know is the most honest answer you can always get... People who asserts that its aliens are the problem, not the people who say that they don't know. Especially when what you only have is random videos showing UFO's and please, learn what UFO stands for before screaming "Its aliens!!!"
1
So basically what you are saying is that entire world needs to surrender to biggest bully without any fight? Not a good plan...
1
@sidl834 That literally did not answer to my question here... What is your solution here? Russia attacks Ukraine, what should have Ukraine done here? Roll over and surrender?
1
@sidl834 Do you seriously feel that special? I'm not sitting here and waiting for a response every second of my life... Your response is less important than taking a s**t. "They should have done it because they are totally power less" After 200+ days of war and substantial gains in last weeks doesn't look like they are powerless here... Did you even fallowed this war to make such childish claims of yours? "They are showing some resistance only because of America is fuelling it" So you are admitting that they are not powerless then, yes? You cant have it both ways here. "What Ukrainen must have done is immediately involve in negotiations with Russia" Why? Russia attacks and tries to take over entire country and you just like "Lets negotiate"? Do you even understand how war works? "and get the War ended which would have prevented all the migration and distribution in the country." Or... Just hear me out here... Or Russia should not have started this war to begin with?... Your solution here is as stupid as Russia attacking Ukraine and pretending that its not a war but special military operation... "This is what Japan did in WW2, see where it is today." See where Ukraine today? On the way to reclaim every single piece of land while Russia got cut off from rest of the world. "Ukraine is making no sense in getting involved in a endless fight just because US wants them to which will benifit US not Ukrainen." Are you really stupid or just pretending to be one? Russia started this war, Ukraine asked for help and countries provided that. Like seriously, do you live under the rock or just in Russia? You have no idea what's going on here...
1
Mars colony will happen, its only a question of when. Trip to mars is like comparing trip to moon with trip to local grocery shop, one is exponentially harder to achieve and requires completely different equipment.
1
Weird comment.
1
Good luck with that, you will need it.
1
Thing is that earth's shape can be determined from your backyard and moon landing is irrelevant.
1
@edpottinger849 Yes, but issue is that your comment looks exactly like it does from those who actually believe it to be true. Jokes need to be obvious, when it comes to flat earth believers, those need to be extra obvious as those already sound like a joke while people trying to be serious with their silly beliefs.
1
@edpottinger849 You went into relevant tangent here... My point was that what you said was said by actual believers in flat earth, so your joke wasn't as obvious as it needs to be in this case when we talk about this silly belief.
1
@GuardianSoulkeeper In fairness, I have seen more crazy comments from those who actually believe all that. And to be fair, I'm always giving 50/50 chance that someone who claims to be flat earther actually is one. While his original comment looked weird, it was in the limits of being actually genuine from someone who actually believes it, where we have this general issue with jokes like that, it written conversation, you cant just convey meaning of this text with intonation, you need to make it obvious that its a joke when it comes to belief which is basically a joke on itself.
1
@bafumat Will repeat it again, as you failed to understand it first time: Doesn't make him wrong tho. You could be paid shill, he could have IQ of 50, yet that doesn't make him wrong by default. if you want to actually make some useful argument here then go for it, but now you just complaining about something what is irrelevant.
1
@bafumat "But you should realize that you are being advertised too" He is not preaching here... He stating established scientific facts, what he is would be completely irrelevant. If you want to actually address anything he said instead of attacking him, then go for it, but now you just engaging into ad hominem fallacy at best. "Always follow the money" There are 2 types of flat earthers: Those who sell t-shirt with text "earth is flat" and those who buys it. Just saying. "And realize that just before Global warning was a hot topic" Its still is, we just got used to it. "The same scientific minds said there would be an ice age" And most likely there will be one at some point in the future. Earth goes over its cycles, ice age is one of those. But you conveniently forgot to mention when this ice age should happen exactly. Why? "Global warming hasn't worked out and now we are on to the ambiguous term of climate change" Politicians decided that global warming label is too scary and more or less forced to use "climate change" instead which sounds better while not changing the fact that impact it will have. Global warming dint go anywhere, it just changed label to less scary one, which in general miss represents what it will do to earth and life on it. And just to drive the nail all the way, fact check basic things, like hotest years from past 200 years. Top 20 have like 15 of those from past 20 years... Do you see pattern? Because smartest people on earth does see pattern. "These guys are nothing more thanTV evangelists selling threats of hell and promises of heaven to old women." Are you drunk? He promotes science... He promotes reality... And you complain here?... Are you drunk?
1
@bafumat "dude they said there would be an ice age before 1990. In the 70's" No idea what you are talking about here. 20 years for ice age to happen? Which dumb ass scientist would make such claim? You need to be a moron to think that ice age could happen in 20 years... Like literally, a moron... So can you provide citation? " Al Gore and his buddies cooked numbers, removed data from certain years, and told out and out lies to get this Global warming train rolling" What numbers? Are you saying that by all current data from todays world you cant see pattern that we have warming climate? Is this your claim? "They started preaching about a hole in the ozone layer." Yes, and there was one, we stopped using chemicals which makes it worst and due to this it healed over time. Its like nothing can make you happy... I guess we should have went extinct for you to be happy or something... "But they never show a picture of the ozone layer when it was whole" ? What? Picture of ozone?... Ozone is not visible by cameras... What are you talking about? "This shit makes money. A lot of it" What shit? To say that current aerosol products cant be used anymore and we need to come up with new ones? That costed allot of money for manufacturer's and not for customer. "One could have assumed it was always there just as easily but that wouldn't have paid for any mansions" How deep are you into conspiracies?... You seriously think that scientists across entire world decided to make this conspiracy just so that some few guys could build few mansions?... Ozone and global warming is not a claim made by single institution, its made by like 99.9% of experts from entire world. "Mankind's actual contribution to total greenhouse gas in negligible at best" Experts disagree with your personal opinion. Why? "You are obviously sheeple" You talk like a flat earther... Are you? But like seriously, i always wonder why people like you even exist. Lets assume that global warming is not real, lets just ignore reality and say that its a lie. Now, lets think about what actions we are being "forced" to perform to battle none existing global warming? We are forced to use CLEANER energy sources, cleaner cars... And you think that this is conspiracy which needs to be demolished because some one wants to have cleaner air to breath?... C'mon... How dense are you? If you want a conspiracy then look at oil companies, coal companies and anything what contributes to pollution who fights against anything providing better alternatives like electrical cars. On top of this, due to recent pandemic you should have noticed how much cleaner air have gotten in most polluted cities in the world. This is what you can get by transitioning to cleaner energy sources, yet you are here claiming that its conspiracy because some one wants a mansion... Jebus... Get your head out of conspiracy ass and look around.
1
@bafumat I'm not trusting him, i know what is true and he just says that same thing. What he says is irrelevant, if you want to debunk anything he said, go for it, debunk. But now you just look like some one who complains for sake of complaining. Was he wrong on anything he said here?
1
@bafumat "Why do they need to play on the emotions of those who grew up watching his kids science show in order to sell it?" Do you seriously think that he is the only one who says that earth is not flat?... Are you seriously trying to imply that if person is famous he should not say anything about reality because that would be playing with feelings?... C'mon... "Why won't these things stand for themselves on their own merit?" They do... Earth is a globe which is fact which is not dependent on any person saying anything. Just because Nye says that earth is flat doesn't mean that it cant stand on its own... Liek seriously, what the hell are you even complaining here about? "Why isn't a trained, real, qualified scientist able to deliver this message without a paid actor making the sell?" Because they have work to do... And we have more than enough scientists saying that earth is not flat already, Nya is just one of many. So again, what the hell are you complaining here about? "It just feels like one of those shitty predatory commercials on Fox News with Tom Selleck trying to hock reverse mortgages on old people who trust an actor to guide their financial decisions." Its a video about silly belief that earth is flat by some one who is known in science and entertainment sectors. He is not a single one who does this, and what he says is quite irrelevant, earth is still a globe ether way. Its like you are complaining that just because person who is good as conveying general news is not allowed to do so because he is good at doing so... So will repeat my question: Was he wrong on anything he said? Answer me this simple question and then we will see if your complain was even relevant here.
1
@bafumat Basic education for you: Arguments stand on their own and not on who said it. Your silly attack that some one who doesn't have 50 degrees in specific area cant ever speak about it is just silly at best. Do you have scientific expertise in evaluating people? No? So you have no right to be here and talk about it? Right? Just using your logic here.
1
@bafumat So are NOT ALLOWED (by your logic) to talk about anything you don't have scientific degree off. How many topics you could talk about? Zero?
1
@eikoalixander3736 What is ironic is that due to Putin's actions NATO got new country and one is under way, while at same time Putin said that this has no real meaning, so all this nonsense about US having anything todo with any of this was debunked by Putin himself. Putin's words "There is nothing to be afraid about a possible membership of Finland or Sweden in NATO" so either he is lying now or he was before, pick your poison.
1
@godisgreat219 "How long is a "theory" allowed to stay a theory before it must obtain the title of "law" or cease being relevant or considered?" ? Are we talking about scientific theory here? Because if we are then there is no time limit for it... Scientific theory is current best explanation by all current evidence and contradicted by none of that. It can remain same theory for eternity... And "law" is from completely different category... Theory doesn't become law... "Should there not be a general consensus in the scientific community regarding this?" Regarding what? "I do not believe that even you know how gravity works or what it is" And i know that you have no idea what Gravity is... Will explain that one too... Gravity is a label put on observable fact that objects with mass attract objects with mass, this is gravity. What exactly causes it we have (currently) no idea, but we know that object needs to have mass to create gravitational field, bigger mass results into bigger field/stronger field. And what is your point here in general? What have you tried to prove here? That we don't have answers to everything?... Yes, we don't have answers to everything... So what? We still know that earth is a globe. So what point you tried to make here?
1
@godisgreat219 "There is no swaying you or showing you anything." Its cool excuse when you cant present any actual evidence for your claims. "But not everyone is willing or capable of having an open mind in this life, so all I can do is pray that something occurs in yours that allows you to see clearly." Ironically enough I would change my mind at moment some one managed to present any actual evidence for their claims. As you clearly have none of that at this moment, how the hell did you went to this road of yours? If you are truly open minded, what evidence do you actually have to support your position? Present your BEST one and lets see who of us is actually reasonable and open minded.
1
Weird comment. What pollution is being moved out of city? Why would that be bad thing?
1
He isint hating flat earthers, he hates trolls who pretends to be one for the sake of making money from gullible people.
1
In average male body is around 20% stronger, that's just a fact based on genetics and all that fancy stuff. There is physical advantage, in some areas female body has advantage over male, that's just simple reality...
1
@jaysteinke6629 I don't... Just pointing out why you are factual incorrect here.
1
@jaysteinke6629 Do you want to object to genetics not being real or something? Like is there, on average, advantage from male genetics vs female when it comes to amount of muscle one will have?
1
@MikeSF5 He died 8 years after his initial scam claim he never proved to actually have... What is more likely: There is lizard people controler secret government who goes around killing random people, or someone lied?
1
@bijan426 How do you know that technology was lost?
1
@amillio1612 Cool beans, so why exactly can't someone just accidentally leak that magical tech online? It seems that no one is stopping people who wants to claim that they have magical technology, so who stopping those with actual technology? And are you seriously saying that government prevents magical technology by having secret patents?... If i had cure from cancer and government said "You can publish it because we have secret patent on it", what do you think my next action would be?... I would have released all the schematics/blueprints on it accidentally/anonymously and that's that. What is more likely to be true: Government which is made of people who gets replaced every few years hiding magical technology or one single person lying about having magical technology?
1
So much wrong in your comment... "Don't compare hydrogen to electricity" Hydrogen gets converted to electricity which then gets used to turn same electrical motors. "Batteries are dangerous and toxic" Then we can solve this problem with a sticker "Do not eat" "Batteries require rare earth metals" Some do, some don't and more new battery technologies come out every year. So its a mute argument. "These batteries will need to be recycled for these metals and there is currently no way to do that" There are dozens of companies which recycle old BEV batteries and more are coming out... Have you been living under the rock? "Mining rare earth metals is an environmental and humanitarian disaster." Just like producing Hydrogen... You will need 60% more energy to drive your car same distance, not even talking about environmental damage in building expensive refueling stations, their maintenance, constant transportation of Hydrogen to those stations and so on. Hydrogen isint magic, it has its own flaws. "The cost of creating hydrogen is high because there are no economies of scale" Because it scales poorly... There is a reason why hydrogen flopped before it started. "Making hydrogen at each refueling station is ridiculous" It is, at same time its less ridiculous than to transport it. "If the state really doesn't need this electrical power, use it to make hydrogen and the cost will be far cheaper." Or use it to directly power BEV's. "Hydrogen is a perfect storage solution to bleed off excess electricity" Not at the moment, there is a reason why you have basically zero companies who uses hydrogen as a storage method for excess energy. Excess energy from solar panels and wind farms is an issue, but no one is using Hydrogen to offset that, why? Because it not viable option. "Hydrogen is the best solution short term and long term" Its better solution short term to replace ICE cars, its not the best solution. Best solution is to store energy directly and then reuse it in most efficient way without least power loss during entire process, aka BEV's.
1
You do understand that there are more than one batter chemistry? Right?
1
@galixypawerpack Do you believe that earth is round because bible "said" it or because you actually know that it is? And just FYI bible never said that earth is round, but multiple times implied it to be flat pancake. And for evolution, well, its a fact, evolution is a fact, but i have no idea why theist so desperate to reject basic reality which doesn't even impact their god believe ether way... You might not hold flat earth silly belief, but you definitely have few left of your own.
1
To be fair, Making Hydrogen is allot simpler and in general anyone can do it in their garage, differently than oil. So it would be allot more independent solution from big corp's. But yes, BEV's is the better option here.
1
@nightshocker6908 Hydrogen might still become a thing in sectors where energy density is more important than efficiency. Hydrogen cars had their chance to become relevant, its too late now, BEV's basically winning across all fronts except (for now) on energy density
1
@nightshocker6908 I can imagine that Hydrogen cars have higher profit than BEV's as those require less initial ingredients while still can be sold for quite a big sum of money. Which would explain why some companies trying to push hydrogen cars even tho its lost cause at this point. 10 years ago I would have screamed from the rooftop for everyone to switch towards Hydrogen, but now... Not so much. Hydrogen is in between ICE and BEV's, closer to BEV's than ICE, but still, in between. So if humanity is ready to make a switch then why not go all the way and pick best possible option which will be more or less last one unless someone manages to create arc reactor we could put inside cars or something.
1
"what i am saying just get a telescope and wait until you are no longer able to see the ship then look in the telescope and guss what now you can see the ship again" ? Your evidence is to use your bad eye sight?... Ships disappear OVER horizon bottoms up and no matter how good is your telescope, it will never bring that ship back into view. But your eye usage is just... Silly... I have bad eye sight, i need glasses, so for me that ship will disappear allot sooner then it would be for you even tho we would be standing near each other, but thats not how reality works... Just because you cant see it doesn't mean its actually disappeared...
1
@ericb3157 Actually it does say that earth is a circle, and what is a circle?... Flat disk... Just saying... Doesn't make it flat tho just because book said so.
1
What's the difference between inventor who got silences and inventor who never invented anything and just claimed that he had?
1
@ivancorea7229 You haven't answered to my actual question here. What would be the actual difference here between someone inventing magical technology and someone who just claims to have invented magical technology? Just FYI saying that they got silenced doesn't answer to my question. How do you know that they got silenced? I can even put it into yet another question: What's the difference between people who invented magical technology and got silenced for some reason and someone who claimed to invented magical technology but never had one and then when he got his 15 minutes fame just disappeared from radar on his own? I can even give some examples, which you might have even went with without realizing how silly it actually is. There was a scammer guy Mayers who claimed to have water engine. People like to use this guy and claim that government offed him because he supposedly said that someone poisoned him before dying. Tiny issue here, he died 13 years after his initial scam claim. Duno how it is in your country, but in ours government isn't that slow. He appeared in public programs and boasted his magical tech he never allowed to be independently verified to exist, then 13 years later dies and someone just claimed that government offed him... Now decades later we have conspiracy nuts who uses this story as some proof that government is out there killing random people just because they claimed to have laws of physics breaking tech... C'mon...
1
True that, but at this point Ukrainians don't really want anything relating to Russia in any shape or form
1
Are you drunk? Who is suffering here? And how could Russian economy be blooming while losing import/export to/from other countries? That simply not possible... And yes, Russia took over bunch of land in first days, its nothing surprising when you have war like this, but they failed to capture more than that when Ukraine gathered its forces, after that Russia got pushed back. So why is Russia so weak and cant take more than that?
1
Basic observation proves that we dont live on flat pancake...
1
Sun: Doesn't change size, moves in straight line and then you have sunset... All those are not possible on flat earth... And this is only 3 examples about sun... If you can explain this then we can move to other 100+ things you will need to explain why flat earth model (Which you dont really even have) doesn't match reality.
1
Randal Fracasse "Due to our perspective on the ground" You mean flurspective? Because its definitely not a perspective.In reality, because of perspective objects moving away from you becomes visually smaller, which sun should do it if moves in a circle over circular earth. Right? basic perspective 101. Next, if you have a flat plane and you have object above it, it will NEVER go under its plane... Perspective doesnt hide object behind something... This is not how perspective works, or reality in general... "the sun moves closer (rise) away (set)" Yet its not. If sun was moving closer its size would change and its perceived speed would change, not even talking about the fact that it should move in circular motion not in a straight line... So you have 4 issues now: size, speed, movement path and sunset/sunrise. None of those works on flat earth model... All of those works on globe model. So yea, ether you have no understanding what perspective is and you simply repeating what some numbnuts said to you, or you simply trying to troll here. Duno which is worst...
1
So you don't believe that Australia is real because you haven't seen it with your own eyes? What about penguins? Are those real? Do you believe that I am real? You never seen me, so maybe I'm just part of your imagination?
1
@PLANET-_-TRUMP You said that you can't believe in something to be real if you never seen it with your own eyes, so have you seen Australia with your own eyes? Try to be consistent with your own rules here... Is Australia real? Yes or No. And how do you know that?
1
You do understand that CT hitch is rated at 1100 and it failed at 10400? That's more than 9x its rating... Yet people call this a failure... It went over 9x, yet it still failed? CT is stupid product, but people who says this to be a big deal gets put into same group.
1
"no innovation in batteries" ? Have you lived under the rock?
1
Water doesn't burn. Stan Meyer's wasn't assassinated, he was a scam artist. And put away your tin foil hat.
1
Which verse in Quran talks about earth being spherical exactly? And there isint middle ground when it comes to observable reality.
1
Batteries are not explosive... But highly pressurized hydrogen tanks are...
1
@davidsc4680 Funny enough first Roadster was based on existing car, Lotus Elise, which was one of the worst decisions Elon made by his own admission. Too many changes have been made, that it would have been simpler to start from scratch than to use existing one and modify it to your own needs.
1
What?
1
Riiiiiight, what could go wrong with that...
1
Where?
1
This is one of the weirdest arguments. Modern petroleum cars hardly makes any noise already, yet no one requires them to make any noise to be noticed. And if you can't even look around when crossing roads, then maybe you should not be allowed near one?
1
@orangemanbad och those meaningless words before word "but", always amusing to see. You might not be flat earther, but you are conspiracy nutcracker who is one step away from accepting that you are a flat earther. Earth's shape can be determined from your backyard, its not even close to anything relating to what "government" said to you...
1
R&D isn't funded by taxpayer money... Please do basic research before you talk.
1
@citysaverthrift1262 "its true because my ancient book of fables said so" isn't a proof. I can write word on a napkin that world is a globe, would that debunk your peace of paper?
1
@citysaverthrift1262 What's your favorite ice cream? Irrelevant question you say? Yes indeed it is, just like asking someone's age. So will ask again: I can write word on a napkin that world is a globe, would that debunk your peace of paper?
1
It will be explained by "Vatnik smoking near explosives, again!"
1
What now?
1
Measured flat? With what?
1
Where the end of the war in 3 days?
1
@TomW-ks3gp China allows companies to copy someone else's intellectual property, and as of this test you can clearly see that they don't really care about people's safety either. So maybe, just maybe there is a reasonable explanation why people are against China in this particular instance?...
1
That is true, i would guess its like 50% of them, but rest of them... Well...
1
This is the issue with US in general, if you are labeled as Right then you should disagree with everything Left does, and vice versa.
1
that would be production cost, not a cost for you as a customer.
1
Then it would be a time for you to get appropriate education... You might learn one or two things... maybe even 10 001 245 things...
1
Every expert disagrees with you, but ok.
1
@kevinlee7678 Looking at stocks doesn't seem that he is.
1
Riiight and Russia is the one who really want to cut of gas supply even tho its making trillions in revenue. Its not like only user will suffer if gas supply gets turned off...
1
Ok, so Russia should just stop this war and everything goes back as it was... Simple solution.
1
Weirdest comment ever.
1
But like, while he might be late to deliver what he promised, he still delivers quite amazing things
1
@fifski We got Starlink, Neuralink, soon TeslaBot, FSD looks to be promising with latest updates, Tesla cars are still leading BEV adoption and are the best bang for the buck option... Generally list of cool things this guy provided is quite long. I mean, there are things to not like him for, I have plenty of that I could list, but at the end of the day, he still delivers quite amazing things even if you don't like some things about him.
1
Definition of "round": shaped like a sphere. "a round glass ball" Why do people complain about words which mean exactly what they want them to mean while thinking that they dont mean that? Do you even bother to double check definition of words? Och, i have better question: Do you know that words can have more than one meaning?
1
So you too deny climate change?
1
Real number is around 2% of people are flat earthers from entire population. And yea, wording of that questions is stupid and might even be made intentionally to increase number of people who "believed" that earth is flat.
1
They literally give up territory back to Ukraine... Thats literally Russia retreating... What you can only reasonably argue is the reason why they retreated here. And using nukes? How the hell would Putin explain using nukes to liberate people who got nuked?
1
be the first flat earther which actually explains what method he used to determine that image is CGI. Go!
1
Learn difference between towing capacity and vertical load.
1
They are not. And... Water isint free already... No idea how would tax on a water you are already paying for would look like...
1
We call that: Gravity. and thing is, globe and physics simply work, while flatlandia doesnt even have working model to present.
1
You wanted to say oblate spheroid?
1
Depression time?
1
it can be used where energy density is a priority, but regular cars will not become mainly hydrogen, to many drawbacks from this entire thing.
1
@a_mustache_of_great_repute "how do we know what's at the center of the earth?" I'm sorry, do i look like a teacher for you? If you want to know something, use google, there are more then enough information at your finger tips which was brought to you by science... I'm not here to teach you what reality is. Lets put it into simpler terms. You have over 3 million scientists, wast majority accepts evolution as an explanation for diversity of life, well its 97% of them. Then when you remember that average scientists IQ is around 25 points higher then general public that would conclude that smart people realizes something to be true while random people on youtube comment section cant even explain what they are trying to debunk and fails on each step. Sorry if this is insulting, but leave things which require intellect for people with one. And return when you understand what scientific theory is, your ignorance is not evidence for anything, it will only demonstrate your as some ignorant one who tries to push some fantasy on others, which is not cool...
1
Bend water in its natural state? What?
1
@garyb9585 For sake of everyone around you, read some basic science books about reality, like that one which explains what is vacuum... And just FYI, nuclear fusion reactor has gas in a vacuum, yet its perfectly fine... You have prime example how gas can be in a vacuum without actually being "sucked" in... Because vacuum doesn't suck... This was part of middle school class, you clearly missed that one...
1
@garyb9585 What truth? That you are ignorant?
1
When was he losing popularity with both sides exactly?
1
Satellite photos are out, there are clear indications of rocket impacts.
1
You talk like someone who never actually looked into any of this... Nothing you said here was true or even rational. Should I demolish all of your statements or will you be good without being embarrassed?
1
Whataboutism?
1
You haven't watched any videos with FSD v13 don't you? It was already proven that FSD can work with cameras alone, now its only of question when it will be good enough for full autonomous usage.
1
@seha6391 I'm not a flat earther, just explaining to you how fundamentally confused your are.
1
Sitting on 3 pressurized bombs!
1
Put away your tin foil hat.
1
There are no winners in war, only different degrees of loosers. And Russia will be the one which lost most.
1
Its true because Putin said so!
1
Yet with latest FSD versions we can see that cars can actually operate with vision only, its not perfect yet, just like any other system out there even with 250k costing sensors, but its getting there.
1
Why?
1
There is difference between fighting for a country and fighting against a country. There are more than one reason to help Ukraine to win this war even if it was actually corrupt its still better for Ukraine to take back its lands then allow Russia to take over.
1
@Hrollief1 Why? You think that having monopoly on something is a good thing? Why do you think it was a big deal when Russia was biggest natural gas supplier and entire europe had to change that in short notice? You do know that Ukraine has 2 natural gas pools which could be utilized instead of Russia? One of the reasons why Russia wanted to take over Ukraine... And what are you even asking here? Starting a war is never good thing, never... Russia started this one, it needs to end. If Russia is allowed to take over Ukraine then I can bet it wont stop there... Russia is already taking over neighbouring countries for the past few decades, which is non ironically matches Putin being in power for the same time... Russia is the parasite here, it needs to be stopped before it done even more damage than it did already. War on Ukraine was last drop and rest of the world united to help out Ukraine to win it even tho its not really our war to be part of we are better people than some out there and we will help out those in need.
1
J. Larsen So you picked some out of context papers which doesnt even say that earth is flat but that they modeled some scenarios based on that as it was simpler at that time with those potato type computers they had at that time, and you think this is proof that earth is actually flat?... Damn... Cherry picking at its finest... You ignored 1000x more papers by NASA which actually says that earth is globe and picked one which doesn't even assume that earth is flat... damn...
1
Maybe because woke mafia wants to eliminate him just like they tried with Trump? Lefties want's total and full control of what you see and what you think, Musk wants opposite of that, so you have huge conflict of interest.
1
Yea, TF would be like that
1
That's not how it works... Hydrogen cars uses Hydrogen... Water is just a thing we can use to convert it into hydrogen and oxygen, after which it will convert back into water which will be needed to be converted again into Hydrogen. Its not running on water...
1
Define scientist.
1
@calco5482 Its funny that you mentioned google, so lets use it. Searching for "science definition" we are getting "a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences." while Nye has Mechanical Engineering degree which makes him expert in Mechanical Engineering which is one of the natural/physical sciences which makes Nye a scientist by this definition. You dig your own grave here by suggesting to use official definition. I would agree that if you would want to filter out more people and have more strict definition of scientist then Nye wont be one. Its on same line as being "Astronaut", basic definition is "a person who is trained to travel in a spacecraft" but no one really wants to call Bezos an astronaut, he is space tourist, yet by official definition he should be called astronaut. So yea, definitions matter and you can call it both ways and be technically correct in any case.
1
@calco5482 Again, by basic definition of scientist Nye would be one, if you want to apply more strict definition then he will not be one. Did you missed entire analogy about astronaut? I could agree with you that it would be more convenient to avoid calling some one as Nya a scientist due to his low contribution towards science progress, but by definition if scientist he is one, same as Bezos would be an astronaut by generic definition of astronaut, but we always attributed that label for some one who puts more effort into than paying bills for ticket to space so we call Bezos a space tourist and not astronaut even tho technically he is astronaut. To sum it up, Bye is scientist and not at same time, it only depends on which definition you will go by.
1
@calco5482 Wil repeat it again... By generic degintino (use google or dictionary) Nye would be scientist. Its quite useless label and same what inaccurate in a sense that we tend to put this label on people who actually does some scientific work, but by definition he is scientist. And arguments stand on their own and not on who said it. Earth is a globe not because Nye said it, earth is a globe and Nye said it. Try to understand difference here between those.
1
@calco5482 "I don't know whats worse, assuming the Earth is flat, or assuming Bill Nye is someone worth listening to on scientific matters." Is Nye wrong? Does what he say gets impacted by his personality or his personal knowledge? I can bet that Nye knows more than majority of teachers in schools/universities who are there to teach you and you have to listen to them, yet you want to dismiss Nya just because he is not "real" scientist by your criteria.
1
@calco5482 He know s more about science than average Joe, he has actual scientific degree and by basic definition of scientist he would qualify to be one. What you are doing here is just complaining for sake of complaining.
1
@calco5482 I'm not fanboying here, i dont even really like Nye, never seen his shows. It wasn't me who decided to come here and complain about irrelevant things, it was you.
1
@calco5482 I'm not defending Nye, i'm objecting to your initial comment, if you cant see difference here then its your problem and not mine.
1
My fear is that Russia might simply destroy nuclear power plant and use that as excuse to run away from this war without being directly defeated.
1
Keep in mind that Waymo only works in tiny areas in few cities and it will have meltdown if there is something in on the road what wasn't there when roads got full 3D scan. In general you can't even compare waymo with FSD, its like comparing trains with helicopters, both can get you from point A to point B, but in general are not really comparable.
1
They actually are behind of their time at this point, even BEV's are behind. Hydrogen cars had their chance, now its time for BEV's to take the spot.
1
@notatrap6586 I will respond to troll or not, there is really small difference between real flat earther and some sad troll like you who want to pretend to be dumber then he actual is. Few comments later its getting more clear if you just looking for attention or are you serious, but in any case its not hard to put people into place. Tho is your entire purpose here to get attention from people while pretending to be moron?
1
Or you could go to your backyard, observe sun over few hours and get same results without spending anything or wasting your time
1
McDonalds
1
Thunderf00t videos are just plain... Stupid... He will complain about everything whats relating to Elon in any shape or form because he knows that this attracts allot of views and makes him rich and famous, ironically. I watched his videos before, liked them, but it went down quickly when he started to bash Elon related things for sake of bashing them. One is richest person in the world, another one makes youtube videos bashing on richest person in the world...
1
@fr9714 That's the funny thing, people don't reality how much more they are paying to refuel tiny bit faster, its like saving 10 minutes to pay 100 bucks extra on fuel
1
@dugan6056 Generally speaking, there is no real way to actually explain flat earther why they are wrong without using crayons. No, like seriously. I never seen flat earther who understand BASIC geometry, let alone have money to travel to Antarctica, there is simply no way for you to explain them anything, what you can do is just amuse yourself by debunking their stupidity.
1
@dugan6056 I tend to avoid concentrations of stupidity as those get overwhelming to quickly. Like in here you will have one in ten stupid comment, so you can see bunch of reasonable people and only tiny portion being stupid, but if you would go to actual nest of theirs.... Och boy...
1
How often do you ask people if they believe earth to be flat or not?
1
Can you figure it out?
1
People 2300 years ago estimated earths size with sticks... If experiment like that is beyond your personal capabilities, then nothing would prove that earth is actually a globe...
1
@SashaArsic Reliable partners? Like China which refused to support Russia in its war? That sort of reliable partners?
1
@avibhagan "you seem highly uneducated in this topic" Irony is strong with you. "we already have hydrogen tanks" Like... Yes... I could fill balloon from 1 buck store with hydrogen and call it hydrogen tank... Issue isn't with hydrogen tank, issue is with hydrogen embrittlement screwing over that tank... "The issues have been sorted out and hydrogen resistant liners are OLD tech" I mean, yea, when you can't achieve anything new and technology stagnates, then yea, it eventually becomes old technology, it still doesn't perform as it should tho. Why do you think that hydrogen tanks have expiration dates printed on them? Could there be some weird reason for it? "LNG transport is very analogous to Hydrogen" But its not... You can pipe LNG through pipes, quite simple pipes, while hydrogen would require expensive ceramic coated pipes. Do you see tiny difference? And your own video indicates that LNG is being chilled to -162C, which is tade shy of -252C hydrogen would need to remain in liquid form, that's a 90 degree difference... "You do need to cool NG to about -200 C to turn it into liquid" So you didn't even watched your own video? 20 seconds into video it says -162C... In which reality did you got your magical -200C number? "We are not trying to liquify Hydrogen." ? Then what are you trying to even say here? It not liquification of hydrogen, then what the hell are you talking about here? What was the point? "And you stated something which is a logical fallacy" Och this will be fun. Please, name the logical fallacy and point to an actual sentence I made which was that logical fallacy, I will wait. "BECAUSE there was not enough DEMAND , it became too expensive to keep the plants running" I can keep my wall socket available at any notice even if there will be zero users of it, aka demand can be non existing but I can keep it working and available, why? Because it costs nothing for me to achieve it. With hydrogen stations you have constant expenses. Why do you think those are constantly under maintenance? Because those break like hell and that costs money to keep them running with or without customers, heck, with less customers those tend to break less often driving maintenance costs down, but as these are not profitable, cost crap ton to maintain, it just gets shutdown. Hydrogen stations are burning money independent how many uses those. "THIS is an economic problem, and not a Physics problem" I mean, sure, if you can burn billions then you could transport hydrogen in tiny canisters by hand... It's a business, its always about economics... Like, its the entire point of it. That said, why do you think that economics doesn't work out so well when it comes to hydrogen? Because of physics... Because of how hard it is to store hydrogen and how much investment you need to put into it, so physics drives your economics, if you could store hydrogen in solid stable chunks, like water is, then your economics would be way better, but now, reality is that physics is a bitch and it makes hydrogen non viable option and extremely expensive by default. "Hydrogen is STILL BEING PRODUCED , sir. HYDROGEN IS BEING SHIPPED IN TANKS, SIR. HYDROGEN IS BEING USED EVERYDAY ! " And? Like seriously, and? Did you wanted to make some sort of point here? Someone somewhere will be using hydrogen for rest of human history... Like... Who was even arguing against that? Like, we have cars, but someone still rides a horse... So like, what's your point? I can make some hydrogen with a battery, cup of water and 2 metal plates, what's your point? "Chemistry labs in the oil sector use hydrogen (and helium) ALL DAY. " And who cares?... Hydrogen will be useful somewhere and we will keep using it for some specific purposes... No one ever argued against that... Are you now trying to create straw man fallacy and beat that one because you can't beat an actual one? What's going on here? "The stuff is shipped in steel tanks with plastic liners, at 10,000 PSI." Cool beans, just like I said... Extreme pressures, works somewhat for bigger applications, doesn't work for smaller ones and doesn't scale economically. What's your point here?
1
@avibhagan And just FYI hydrogen cars are not new, first combustion engine invented in like 1806, while hydrogen fuel cell in like 1960. It had its fair share of time to mature, but it didn't, it's basically identical to what it was 6 years ago. So no, i'm not repeating history, I'm pointing out that YOU trying to bring back something what died before it got started.
1
@avibhagan Yes, first car was battery powered. But there is HUGE difference here. Battery technology keeps improving without actually limit in sight, while hydrogen technology is limited by basic laws of physics. You can only put that much of it in given area and you can only get that much of energy back from it. There is no magical technological advancement which could improve those aspects. While witn batteries, well, we even have the holy grail battery based on graphene, its clean, its really good at storing energy, charges fast, well basically perfect energy storage, but there is the catch, its extremely complicated to make, so at the moment we simply can't mass produce it and it's only being tested in labs in small quantities. Now hydrogen remained same from its inception, it might have gotten few % of efficiency here and there, but its negligible, because it his basic limits of the laws of physics. EV's failed because battery technology wasn't good enough for those to be viable. What was the range of first BEV's? 100 miles? What it is now? 300-500 miles? Thats 3-5x increase, while cost of batteries are dropping rapidly too. These technologies are not comparable.
1
@avibhagan And first hydrogen combustion engine got invented 1806, that's way more time for it to be anything more than someones expensive hobby. Why is it only a hobby after more than a century?
1
@avibhagan Hydrogen cost is mainly due to its production and its storage/transportation complications. Those can't be resolved, maybe somewhat mitigated and cost could be driven down if you had mass production of things, but for that to happen you would need actual existing supply and demand already existing, but this can't happen without there actually being real demand... But that one will not happen because there is no cheap supply... Chicken and egg issue. Ignoring the fact that hydrogen simply isn't a good idea for passenger cars in general. Hydrogen cars are not CNG.... You seriously don't know nothing about this topic... First of all, CNG cars are combustion cars, this is already red flag as hydrogen combustion cars are HALF the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell ones, which means that its non started to have hydrogen combustion cars. Then you get same issue with storage tanks not being compatible, so you have to replace that, we already established that you would need to replace engine with fuel cell... So compatibility is only in a sense that you will have car frame with 4 wheels, that's it... And even then you will struggle to showe in multiple hydrogen tanks just to get decent range. Why do you think Mirai has 3 of those? " The only difference is that CNG is almost 1/10th the cost of hydrogen. " Seriously... Do basic google search... You are way way out in the fields on this topic... "If Hydrogen was a cheap as CNG , then all CNG cars could be replaced by hydrogen immediately." No... Just no... No chance... Like... NO! Even hydrogen combustion engines need to be made from specialized alloys and use special lubricants made specifically for hydrogen engines... Those are not interchangeable... Never been and never will be. Well, you could use it, for short period of time, then you would need to replace entire engine. Its like using jet fuel in ICE car, you could technically use it, but it wont be for long. "Please educate yourself." Irony is strong. Please read about hydrogen embrittlement, that alone will explain to you why you can't use regular engines to burn hydrogen. "India has a huge CNG car infrastructure." And I have red shoes... This is how relevant your comment was. "If Indian Nuclear plants could produce cheap hydrogen , that could compete with CNG , they could swtich from CNG to Hydrogen. " You know where you could use power produced from nuclear plant? To power BEV's... Shocker... I know... "It is not a technical problem. Sabine is WRONG." Och yes yes yes, you who thinks that you can just replace CNG with hydrogen and engine will run just fine knows more than actual scientists who spent more than 2 minutes on google... C'mon... Please educate yourself here.
1
eadora You are not wrong here, Ukraine soldiers have done strategic retreats for quite some time now in bakhmut, just to drain Russian army as they have been desperate to take it. But now, its counter attack time.
1
Keep in mind that Ukrainian soldiers will need to use that same bridge moving forwards, so destroying it completely isint option, but damaging it enough to no longer be usable by heavy machinery without additional work on it is good enough.
1
@ralfbender1728 Go to google and enter "ships over horizon" and you will have actual examples of curvature. Your claim that laser hit same point at same altitude at 4km distance is just an empty claim. Explain pictures like that, how can objects disappear bottom up further they go over horizon?
1
Battery reaching its limits? Then why it keeps improving every year wit quite few battery technologies which showed huge potential in lab setting? Carbon nanotube batteries are exponentially better than any other battery out there, issue is with its production scalability. So no, its not reaching its limits, its just starting.
1
That's the thing, Hydrogen had its chance to take over when there was a need to have efficient and less polluting options, but now we have EV's which is better option, so there is no real reason why would hydrogen take over anymore, it's too late, so while its barely started its already flopped, well, because its barely started, this is why it flopped.
1
Care to prove that it was staged?
1
Winning war? You didn't watched this video?... Russian own army goes against Russia itself... And you think that Russia is still winning?...
1
Why?
1
Musk doesn't want hydrogen... He said it multiple times that hydrogen is stupid option.
1
"This is why both THEORY are still today described as such and far from becoming a science fact" Earth is a globe, thats a fact, not a theory. Flat earth is just a claim, false claim by itself as we can prove that earth is a globe. Try to avoid comparing something like that in future. "Each day we expand our knowledge of the universe and with it, we get closer to the day where our science will fail to stay standing, forcing us to rewrite it from a to z" You seam to not even know what science is if you made statement like this. Science gets more accurate results as time goes, we don't rewrite everything with something completely new, we refine current understanding. "A smart person like you otherwise, won't be so ashamed of sharing his feeling towards a minority of people who think differently..." You can think differently about best tasting ice creams, but at moment you start saying that 2+2=banana, we will have issue with that. As now you are trying to redefine reality which is not the same as to simply have different opinion about some trivial topic. "considering that what you believe came from a mirrored story and the same is valid for anything we known today" Earths shape can be proven by anyone at any time with some spare time and minimal amount of equipment. You don't need 5billion equipment to determine shape of earth... For flipping sake, first people determined approximate size of earth with sticks... "No matter how crazy the ideas are, there is no wrong doing and instead we should listen, discuss and be always ready to agree to disagree without closing any door." Are you seriously saying that we should waste time in discussing if 2+2=banana or not?...
1
@RS-ij8id "I have studied computer science and software eng" Congrats?... " The Globe model is and stays a theory and the reason why it is simple" First globe appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece, people at that time quite accurately estimated earths size with sticks... Earth is a globe, factual, testable and observable globe. Its not a theory, its not a opinion or claim, its simply a fact. Your personal incredulity will not prove anything here. "get the attention of someone who may financial them etc." Why? To put into analogy, you are saying that we should fund research in determining if chopping some ones head would kill him... It will... We know that it will... No need to waste money, time and human resources into research like that... " It is not a reason to simply dismissed those and simply refer to them as "stupid, ignorant, less intelligent, reason to feel sad for them or for the world" etc. etc." Why not? Again, analogy, if some one makes a claim that chopping humans head will not kill him, what would you call hi? Smart? Educated? All knowing?... Or simply stupid?... You said allot, while at same time nothing... Congrats with that too... There is difference between being open minded, what you seam to try to say with all this ramble, and simply behaving stupid. Earths shape is not a question, you might have slipped through if you lived 500 years ago in some remote village without any education, but now... Anyone on internet has access to all human knowledge, so there is no rational justification to even say that earth is flat. You might question it, for like 5 minutes, but at some point you have to realize that its just not a questionable thing. And then it comes to people who actually claims that it is... Not that it could be, but that it actually is... FYI definition for stupid: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. Flat earthers who screams that earth is flat matches this definition, so by definition they are stupid. You might not like this word, but lets call it as it is.
1
@RS-ij8id "I agree to disagreed with you" You cant agree to disagree on fact, you can agree to disagree on best tasting ice creams, but when it comes to the facts, you cant have personal facts... " You may want to claim your "it is not a theory" theory" Earths shape is not a theory... Its a fact... And even then, scientific theory is not some simple theory, its a best current explanation supported by all evidence we have and contradicted by none. "in every science book you will find most of the modern science and more, always presented as a THEORY" Again, your personal ignorance is evidence for nothing. Please learn what scientific theory is, because now you sound like a young earth creationist. "All the biggest discovery came from those who questioned the "unquestionable"" Those are not comparable, not even close. Questioning origins of universe is not the same as to question shape of earth. There are no more debate about the shape, its a globe, provable and testable fact. If you start questioning facts from reality you basically claiming that reality is not real, which opens new can of worms for you to deal with... "Questioning it is not wrong as long as it possible to identify "weaknesses" to allow and justify that." Cool, identify weakness in a globe model... I will wait... "It is always possible to find a multiple if not infinite possible description that produce the same results.." Are we still talking about shape of earth or are you now just making some general unrelated statements here? "so again, questioning a given knowledge is A) Sign of intelligence" False. Just because you question something doesn't make you intelligent, it might simply indicate you having paranoia. "B) Train the brain and learn how to reach the same conclusion " Thats false too. You should not learn how o reach same conclusion, you should learn how to reach correct one. Even if conclusion changes every single time you do same thing, you still need to get correct conclusion and not dismiss it just because you dint got what you wanted... You literally trying to say that we should try to find evidence for conclusion we already made instead of following where evidence leads... Being flat earther 101. "C) Make the knowledge your own instead of confusing science with religion. " Science isint religion, it never was and it will never be. And your personal knowledge is anecdotal evidence at best. What seams real to you might not be real at all... Like people claiming to be abducted by aliens... Is that a knowledge about reality or delusion? How would you know? "you are having faith in someone else and the entire system built on it." I have reasonable expectations from previous experiences when it comes to claims. At moment my personal understanding of reality mismatch the claim presented, i will investigate it further, but i cant research every single thing from every single topic in the world. Should we not believe that atoms are real just because we never created our own equipment to see them? "No difference with any other religion. " Its like you desperately trying to lower science to religions level just to have fighting chance here.. Will not work. "This is very important, because gave us the chance to understand that our educational system is failing to provide everyone with a clear understanding of the teaching provided." Well, this is only issue with some countries, after all, majority of flat earthers seam to be located in US which has terrible educational system. "valid argument regarding the transparency of the information behind the current science" Who the f**k cares? Its like you are trying to imply that just because some where at some time some one behind label of science presented some invalid information that because of this now everything in science can be questionable even tho something like a shape of earth can be verified by anyone with IQ above 80? "mistakes currently still present in our science book" Like what? "while their model does not have a clear description and while offering interesting and valid (within the model)" If you don't have valid model how can explanation fit within that model? Flat earthers can even present world map without distance distortions, not even talking about dozens of other issues. Flat earthers doesn't even have what to defend, this is why their main thing was to attack globe, because in their delusion they think that debunking globe would some how prove flat... "answers to those void left by the globe model" Making shit up just to fill up gap is not an answer, its literally making shit up. If globe model can't explain something (what exactly it cant?) then it means there isint enough evidence to get to one or another conclusion. So how the hell would flatardian model provide any better explanation? Is taking something out of your ass makes it more valid than simply saying "we dont know, lets investigate"?
1
@RS-ij8id You wrote allot, so will be skipping some random nonsense. "like Einstein, with the intent of proving the globe model have produced unexpected results forcing them to find quickly possible reasons to justify those values so that the theory could stay standing" Are you drunk? Earths shape was determined 3 century BCE in Greece, what the hell are you talking about here? When did Einstein tried to prove that earth is a globe?... " Plus, do not forget that the globe model has been chosen for its simplicity" Or maybe because earth is a globe?... "That's why, as an example, the maps for navigation are all projections of the globe model on a flat version" False... We have flat maps not because it produces better results, those actually produce allot worst ones, but we use them for convenience sake. After all having think sheets of paper is allot better than having huge globe. And when it comes to smaller areas, you can use flat maps without terrible issues, those will have some distortions in distances, but for smaller areas its fine. " And how do you classified your beliefs any better than a creationist one?" Rational. "But the chances for it to be correct are the same (if not less) than being created by the Creator." False... You cant even prove that creator could possible be real, while Big Bang theory is based on all current evidence and contradicted by none of those while uses natural laws without any magic involved. Your creation claim doesn't even fall into bucket of possible explanations, because you cant even prove that it is possible. "I am not inn, but this does not stop me to be rational when comparing the two" But you are not rational.. not even close... You literally saying that option which cant even be shown to be possible is more possible then something what was shown to be atleast possible... That's not rational... "So...It will always be a theory, no matter how close to the answer you may get." It might always be a theory, but its atleast a scientific theory and not a empty religious claim which has no supporting evidence. "And yet it is not correct to claim even the globe model (part of the heliocentric theory) as testable fact since many experiments still now have produced unwanted results" What unwanted results from which experiments? And how would that be relevant when earths shape can be determined from your backyard? "The globe is not a perfect sphere but rather like a damaged ball" False again... Can you get anything correct here? On grand scale globe is a perfect sphere, its rounder than bowling ball. That tiny difference between equator and poles are like 0.4%. Earths surface would be hardly noticeable if you would shirk it down and tried to touch it with your fingers. Do you even know how tiny all of those differences are?... "it is often justifiable a wrong predicted result and so really not possible to prove or disprove the model description" False again. Tests do produce predictable results, your inability to perform them correctly isnt proof of anything. "There is not a valid globe model with globally accepted math" Are you drunk? Now you talk like generic flat earther... Should I literally do this 2minute google search and give you globally accepted math? "The Ones available in different sources including Wikipedia are incorrect and approximated" First of all, how do you know that those are incorrect? Second, due to huge variation of variables, like light refraction which cant be 100% accounted for, you will get results with some margin of error, but that doesn't mean that calculations are incorrect. And now you simply trying to do hair splitting here... Its like you are complaining that results is 123.25456 and not 123.25456789563... C'mon... "Again, Globe means "Sphere", and the name of the model is by itself a weakness." Playing word game? Earth is oblate spheroid, slightly wider on "bottom". But in general its a sphere. Its labeled as sphere for laymen, if you will start talk about earth with 100% accurate description of it, this might take few minutes... Do you even know how words work? "Other weaknesses are several phenomenal events observable in time like the "two suns in the sky"" Never happened. On top of this, even if it happened, that would not disprove globe... How the hell you even got to conclusion that having magical second sun would disprove globe? "the second moon" Same irrelevant point as it was with suns. "the ability of seen from one city, another city which is located more than should be allowed to using the globe mode" And? This at worst would prove that earth is bigger and not that its flat... "Being a globe, you will always be falling off the sphere... so I need gravity" Yearth is a globe because there is such thing as gravity... And while gravity is provable fact, you have extra thing to put into evidence bucket for globe. Damn... Your ignorance is just... Damn... "And when considering gravity, we must also apply gravity in space.. but the math won't work. " What? Which math doesn't work in space and why? How often to you take stuff our of your arse without fact checking? " For example the ship disappearing behind the curve of the globe." Yes, objects disappearing bottoms up while going over horizon indicates curvature, while having curvature to all sides you will have a globe. This another evidence into globe bucket. "You don't feel like you are constantly moving together with the earth at high speed" Why should you? You CAN'T feel motion, only changes in it. "while getting a push and pull from gravitational force" And what do you expect to observe here? That you would be flying all over the place while we do spin every 24 hours?... "This does not mean I don't agree with it, but it is fair to say that it is the least to be considered logical, experienced and observable" Your personal ignorance isint evidence for anything. "The lack of transparency from Nasa regarding the data obtain from out of space is another weakness" NASA is relevant here as much as caramel ice cream... You as some one who claims not to believe in flat earth you make silly flat earth claims left and right... "In fact, 2021 and we have yet not given one single real picture of the earth." So you are ether a flat earther, troll or just to stupid to have decent conversation. As dozens of flat earthers i have asked, i will ask you same thing: Which method you used to determine that photo X is fake and photo Y is not? Be the first one who manages to answer this and show that you are smarter than generic flat earther. Skipping rest of that... So yea... You are no rational thinking skills, you have no critical thinking skills, you lack of basic knowledge about basic things, you are ignorant on multiple topics and you dint presented anything in value here... Should we continue this pointless conversation or are we done?
1
@RS-ij8id " "A perfect sphere" lol The Giotto Earth Theory" Do you not understand what "on grand scale" means? Should i explain it? " Ignorance is bliss, that's why I decided to ignore you from now on." Yes, ignorance is a bliss, maybe this is why you believe in god and you dont care what is actually true? And yea, you can ignore me as its clear that you cant defend your position here and we are done.
1
@RS-ij8id "And yes, I do understand "grand scale" bu it is still not so." Is bowling ball a sphere? Your first though would be: yes. But its less a sphere than earth if you would shrink it to the size of bawling ball. So your failure to understand what "on grand scale" means will not change the fact that earth is a sphere. If you want to go into hair splitting, then nothing in reality is a sphere, as there is no such thing which would have its entire surface perfectly at same distance from its center, you will still have atleast one atom slight close or further away which would make it not a perfect sphere or a sphere by definition of a sphere, but yet we would still call it that way. "It is not a perfect sphere and even from space it won't look as such" FALSE. Again... Listen... Closely... Difference between "width" and "height" is 0.4%, without specialized measurement tools you will NEVER notice that difference, NEVER. ""The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge" by Stephen Hawking" Correct, and you are prime example of this. You seriously think that you could notice 0.4% difference... Your illusion of knowledge is just... sad... ""The important thing is to never stop questioning" by Albert Heinstein" That would only apply to none factual things. Do you exist? Is your existence factual? Ask yourself if you exist. Och wait, as you can ask yourself if you exist, that means you do exist. So why would you question your existence? Being open minded is fine and you should be, but questioning basic facts is just stupid.
1
@RS-ij8id "It is not a perfect sphere. Because of the force caused when Earth rotates, the North and South Poles are slightly flat. Earth's rotation, wobbly motion and other forces are making the planet change shape very slowly, but it is still round" by NASA" Riiight, maybe not a perfect sphere, yet its still a sphere... your entire argument was that earth is not a spherical, but by your own quote its a sphere... And like I said, if you want to hair split here, then nothing is a perfect sphere anyways. ""It is not even a perfect oblate spheroid, because mass is distributed unevenly within the planet. The greater a concentration of mass is, the stronger its gravitational pull, "creating bumps around the globe," says geologist Joe Meert at the University of Florida in Gainesville." by scientificamerican" And? How big are those bumps? 0.1%? 0.0001%? You keep quote mining here in attempt to find any quote with some key words while missing entire point of this quote... "From space it is less but still very much observable" Nope. Will make it simple for you. If you have 1080p monitor, enlarge earth to fit its height, difference between height and width will be HALF of the pixel. HALF. And this would be on a screen where you could actually observe pixilation and maybe notice some difference where earths edge ends, but in reality you will NEVER notice that without specialized equipment, NEVER. "This is why NASA officially mentioned that the picture of the earth offered by them, are in fact made from collection of different pictures on a 3d perfect spherical model of the earth." No idea what this should even mean or imply... Like i said, multiple times already, there is no big difference if you will use perfect 3d sphere on your computer to project earths surface or if you would use sphere which is 0.4% wider than taller for that same purpose. You will still get visually a perfect sphere. " It is actually really interesting how you not just only decided to believe whatever you have been told, but also have no even a clue of what you actually been told." Says some one who fails to understand that 0.4% difference cant be noticed by naked eye and claims that this should be visible on photos... C'mon... "Anyway, I will respect your religion - alternative version of what actual science means. First of all, not a religion, basic fact you failed to rebut here. Second, your silly attempt to lower my position to religion is just, silly, at best. Third, ask any scientist if earth is flat, 99.9% will say that its not. Would that mean that scientists are not using science? Your entire argument is one big pile of ignorance with sprinkles of personal incredulity and you think that you know more than me... C'mon... Your failure to understand basic geometry isint my problem, its yours.
1
@RS-ij8id "But it was about how unfair was to talk about people with different opinion from the mass as they were stupid" Lets fact check here, definition for stupid: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. While every single flat earther fails with basic geometry, not even talking about actual more complex calculations, we can safely call people like that stupid. You might not like this word and we could use something else, but facts remain facts, by definition of stupid flat earthers are stupid. "Also how illogical is it to do so when modern science came from the same logic from people who were revolutionary at their time" There is difference between creating new ideas for answers we currently dont have and questioning actual facts... You could have gotten away with flat earth claim few hundred years ago, but now you cant, questioning it only makes you look ignorant, at best. "you use the "Perfect Sphere" which now you can put as you like.. but finally, you agreed." Agreed on what exactly? That earth is spherical? Well yes, it is. "Since you love Nasa" Never said I love NASA or even care what they have to say in this matter... Avoid making straw man fallacies here... "I do suggest you review the apollo 11 video" Who the f**k cares? Like seriously, even if some one could demonstrate that 100% of everything NASA ever produced is fake, that will NOT disprove globe earth... We know that earth is a globe not because NASA said so... NASA only adds extra information in addition to dozens of other space agencies located across entire world. We knew that earth is a globe 2300 years ago, NASA isint that old... " Even Thou, they are so far and the Earth looks that small, you clearly can still see the Earth Shape Irregularity and "asymmetric" characteristic as explained and aspected" Do you not know what shadow is?... "Quoting is a very known and widely used way to add more value to the content" Quote mining isint. In general you can find quote for any position from any person if you will take quote out of context or try to miss interpret it in your own way to fit your personal needs. "Well answered in the previous quote/reply" What answered? You made a claim that you should notice earth not being perfect sphere, yet you failed to explain how would you notice HALF of pixel difference even when is a photo on your monitor, not even talking about real observation where you will not have any pixels you could use to count that difference... So explain to me instead of avoiding it. "As explained earlier... you are incorrect." As explained earlier... you are incorrect. "Yet many things remain unexplained and need more digging." Its like saying "Well I see this car, but I cant accept its existence because we dint explained how quarks behave in absolute zero environment"... You seam to want ALL answers to EVERYTHING what is slightly related to earths shape for you to accept that earth is a globe/sphere. Why? Earth is a globe even if we have no idea how rest of the world works, we know for a fact that its a globe, everything else is irrelevant here. "The theory of Gravity is not the only one" Which is relevant as caramel ice cream... You could debunk gravity and earth would still be a spherical... You can explain gravity and its still a sphere... You could prove that gravity is not a attraction force earth would still be a spherical... And this would be actual example of red herring fallacy. "That is not it there are many other theories with equal resulting predictions" Of what? Earths shape is not a theory, its a fact. Anything else is just your attempt to make red herring fallacy.
1
And? You people (Americans) failing to understand difference between stricter laws and laws which bans guns entirely... Will try to ask you as I asked multiple people by now and ALL of them failed to answer. Where do you draw a line? Can I own RPG? Land mine? C4? Minigun? A tank? Maybe nuke? Where is your magical line where you say "No, you can't own that"?
1
Make right what exactly? Its rated for 1100 load, it survived up to 10400, that's 9x more than it was rated for. Do you want it to be 50x?
1
Yes, he thinks like some weird conman who tries to take all positions at same time, that's not how most people think, as they are sane.
1
At the moment we have short launch window every 2 years to get to mars, so either it happens next year or in 3. Its highly unlikely that SpaceX will be ready for this launch window, they should be ready for the next. So they missed this one, they will do on the next one.
1
Rocket surgeon? How high are you?
1
Which web site is independent by your opinion?
1
@alexserov4180 Issue is that Russian side likes to exaggerate everything to infinity and beyond, so even if you tried to compare both side you will still get skewed results
1
@alexserov4180 Do you know what anecdotal evidence is? Its like me going to ex Russian base finding 100 dead Russians, zero Ukrainians and claiming that its one sided fight with zero Ukrainian casualties... Stuff like this skews stats exponentially more than any other source, ironically.
1
Its read only device of basic brain electrical signals... How do you imagine this could be used against you exactly?
1
Troll?
1
Self deception?
1
Russia and Putin constantly threatens with nukes... Its like weekly thing by now and no one cares anymore. And yea, its a low number because if you refuse you go straight to jail for 10 years... Not really an option, isint it? And you have quite few Russians fleeing Russia now. How many it is by now from the announcement of mobilization? 500 000?
1
Congrats! You have been duped!!! You win!!! Nothing!!! There is no such thing as car running on water, anyone saying that there is either has no idea what they are talking about or just plain lying.
1
Is this one of those scam things or something?
1
Just curious of much does the Putin pay you to shill for Russia?
1
@BeRobn Name 1 what? First globe model appeared in 3 century BCE in Greece, this is oldest known one, its safe to assume that maybe few years back some one thought about earth being a globe, but point remains that waste majority dint even considered that, especially when consider education level at that time, people knew jack shit and it would have been natural conclusion by ignorant people to assume that earth is flat because it looks like one from their backyard. Do I seriously need to provide actual names here for you?
1
@BeRobn Even in modern history, even today, there are people who believes that earth is flat... Its simply a fact that we have people with stupid beliefs... c'mon, look at majority of humanity, they still believe in magic and wizards just because book said so, why its so hard to believe that some one would think that earth is a pancake?
1
@BeRobn Why do you ask me this?... I'm not flat earther, i'm baffled how they could be so ignorant myself, but my point was that there are those who believe that earth is flat, why they believe that is separate question.
1
@BeRobn They do mean it LITERRALY... They do think that earth is a flat pancake, some think that it has actual edge, some think that its infinite, but main thing about that belief is that there isint any actual curvature. I have no idea why i should explain to you here what flat earthers believe, ask them. But at the end of day your original claim what that no one ever believed that earth is flat, hen you changed that claim to only include present time and now you just talking about belief that maybe they believe that earth is less curved or something... You failed with your original claim and you keep digging bigger hole here for yourself, simply admit that you made a mistake and be done with that as now you remind me of some generic flat earther who will start moving goal post after their initial claim gets debunked.
1
@BeRobn Whats going on with you? Now you changed topic to something completely random? I dont even understand what you tried to imply here, what agenda? Whose agenda? What people? Are you trying to claim that in entire human history nobody believed in flat earth? Is this your attempt to troll or something? Because you are failing it ether way. Your original statement that "Nobody in History thought the Earth was Flat" is factually false, provably false. Then you switched to todays world, which is still false, now you talk about who knows what. Are you ok?
1
You know what is weird here? It would have been cheaper for Russia to relocate every Russian from Ukraine who wanted that and avoid this war to begin with... Not even talking about all those deaths it caused... Stop making excuses for Putin...
1
@SkMan1989 1. Its their problem to not wanting to live in the country. If they wanted to join Russia they could have organized voting to do it legally, just like USSR split into many countries, it could have happen with Ukraine. 2. USSR acknowledged Ukraine as independent country, it can do whatever it wants. Tho its weird that you think oppressing people is on same line as actually starting full blown war and killing hundreds of thousands in the process... While you could not even prove that Ukraine oppressed Russians to begin with... 3. This conflict was instigated by Putin in hopes to take over entire country without big fuss, just like he did with Crimea. He wanted more... Because he is morally bankrupt person. This war isn't useful, Putin expected it to end quickly without causing big troubles, just like he did with Crimea, but it backfired. Countries realized that Russia will not stop with Ukraine and if its not stopped now it will continue marching forwards. It was the last straw which broke the camel's back. All this blood is 100% on Russia, this was could end today by Russia simply going home. This was continues because Russia aka Putin wants it. Just go and listen all those threats Russia did over last years, those are the threats of immorally bankrupt society, we don't want them in around backyard... No one does...
1
You do understand that you could have extra expensive drones which could be really good at performing spy missions but be extra expensive and you would only be able to have only few of those at one time?... Have you ever considered this possibility?... And how the hell would you even conquer countries with those magical drones? Like use your few brain cells you still have, US has fire power to conquer majority of the world if it wanted, yet its not doing that, which proves that your argument is silly at best.
1
Because magic isint real.
1
What was the provocation which justifies Putin attacking another country and causing 100k+ deaths so far?
1
Put away your tin foil hat... There never was car running on water...
1
Or they actually know more than anyone here and you simply being fooled by Russian propaganda? Could that be the case? I mean, Putin few weeks ago said that sanctions does nothing, that it's basically helping Russia, now he said that sanctions will have negative effect... Like... If Putin started to backpedal on his own words in such short time, then how liable are those words from Wagner groups...
1
@Kalani_Boi To be fair, majority of flat earthers are believers in god and quite few of them tried to use bible as evidence that its flat. And if earth was flat then you would need magic to be real. Its a deep rabbit hole.
1
Its basically like bully in the school beating a child, he thinks that is fine to do it until someone hits back, then he gets angry and thinks to be mistreated. That's the Russian mentalitate.
1
Not possible as FSD works without internet connection and it needs to work in real time. It's not amazon grocery shop.
1
@LewisFriend1 Not anything... If you need for a thing to work with low latency and with internet connection and... You don't have it... Clearly it would not be possible for it to still work in that situation.
1
@alphaschneider2468 First law of thermodynamics disagrees with you.
1
Hydrogen has so many drawbacks that no one wants to deal with it. Its non starter. Synthetic fuel sound cool and all, but it costs crap ton of money to produce. Best option is electrification. More charging stations, better battery technology, more recycling plants and so on. There is no point to invest money in multiple technologies and waste your time on those when you already have a best solution at hand.
1
you do understand that this video is just a scam made by a bot? Right?
1
Why are you so desperate to defend Putin's war? And saying "wanting to stop the war" in a sense that Ukraine should just surrender to invader is stupid at best. War could have ended yesterday if Putin stopped attacking Ukraine... It's that simple. Ukraine is defending, not attacking... Do you understand that much?
1
@glennrobards585 "he setting sun can be zoomed in on by anyone, and show you it's the sun that is moving away." But its not. Seriously, you never seen sunset where you can see half of the sun? Are you blind? "Nobody can take a video of our observably flat and stationary earth." What you feel in your balls doesn't determine reality. "Anyone that says that the earth is a spinning globe is lying." Or maybe they are just some one with basic education. Who knows... "You can allege anything you want, but it's impossible for the earth to be rotating." Why? Which laws of physics does spinning earth break? "I would love to go to court with anyone that actually believes in the spinning globe." Why would anyone want to do that? I mean, it would be hard to believe that anyone even allow for court case as stupid as this to even be accepted, but even then, what would we get from you? You clearly dont have money as you would already spent 2k on plane ticket witch goes over south pole or 5k for cruise ship around or 50k for 2 week trip to south pole on your own feet. So what can we gain from that? To prove that you are incorrect? We did that already... For free... "I could sue some of these fight the flat earth people for libel who have called flat earthers liars" Flat earthers are not liars, they are simply ignorant or uneducated. Well some are just trolls, pretend to be flat earthers for sake of attention. " but I have observable proof of a flat and stationary earth." Then come back when you get your Nobel's prize for your "evidence" that we live on space frisbee... Och wait, you don't even believe in space?... "It would be like being offended if somebody called me a liar for saying that the sky is blue." no no no, you are not sayin that sky is blue, you are saying that sky is made of flying elephants made of candies and they are pink and they are magical and evidence for that is your feelings in you balls!!!... There is a reason why 99.9% of smartest people on earth are not flat earthers... Go figure...
1
@squadabingo7290 "who the heck really knows." People who knows what basic geometry is. "Are you an astronaut?" Are you a pilot? Does that mean planes are not real and are powered by magical pixies? And why do you keep coming back to unrelated things? Earth is a globe not because we have seen it from space... it was known to be spherical 3 century BCE in Greece... I can bet they dint had any astronauts... "I love how ppl say that statement with such certainty because they learned it in public schools" yea, some of us learned geometry in public school, you seam to be home schooled... Which explains allot. "I definitely don’t believe something just because someone says it’s true" Riiiiiiight... Are you by any change theist? By any chance you believe in something you cant prove to be true just because some one said so? And in general yea, you should not believe something just because some one said so, this is why i mentioned sun, which proves that earth is a globe not a flat by basic observation which doesn't involve any calculations and just basic sun filter you can get for 1 buck in a local home depo. "By the way. I could care less what shape it is. " That's a lie. Maybe you even don't realize, but this is a lie. People who actually don't care what shape earth is don't watch videos about it and especially never comment about it. If you truly dint cares then you would not be here. "I just love how emotional ppl get when talking about this subject." yea, we have allergies to stupidity.
1
Yes, just look at Russian propaganda from the start of war...
1
Oblate spheroid, slightly wider on bottom. Tho on bigger scale earth is a perfect sphere. I mean, earth can be rounder than a bowling bawl and no one says that those are not spherical.
1
Majority of humans still believe in magic and wizards while CIA isint that old to being origin of all religions out there... Its cool conspiracy theory (cha) that CIA is behind creation of flat earth claim, but well, you get into conspiracy theory which could have been made by CIA which says that CIA made conspiracy about flat earther to hide real stuff, conspiracy inception.
1
@bigboyrambo2009 So jins and magic is real? Which conspiracy theory is that? Was it made by CIA too? Or is this one "real" deal? What do you smoke? I want some too.
1
That doesn't mean that such small space companies should blow up rockets 2km from someone's house..
1
Well someone clearly ding learned anything from previous thread. If you want to troll, atleast make up something more interesting than your failure of understanding how words work.
1
@TheHistoryofPropaganda "Where did you disappear to.??" No where, simply haven't had any reason to respond. Its basically reaching that point where you realize that this conversation is boring and you wont get anywhere with person on another end, so just deciding to look for better conversations. Did you thought that you got something reasonable to say just because I dint responded? Seriously? "I love when everyone finally sees what Im saying and them never comments again after being proved an idiot." Irony is strong with this one. "Can we move on to the fact Nye is NOT a scientist?" Definition of scientist: a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences Bill Nye is an American science educator and mechanical engineer, so he qualifies to be called scientists. So can we move on to the fact Nye is a scientist? Its weird when people are so nick picky about someone calling Nye a scientist... What difference does it make? Lets pretend that Nye is not scientist, how does that change anything what was said in this video?
1
Putin supporter?
1
@1stsampan Putin? Duno if he is liberal, definitely a war monger.
1
What does that has todo with anything?
1
Hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, so no, it's not new technology...
1
Shape of earth can be determined from your backyard with 1 dolar solar filter and some spare time and basic geometry knowledge... There isint issue with rich people, or government, entire issue is with ignorant people.
1
@LYC_44 I would definitely go with nuclear power if it was up to me, but people got scared from all those accidents and general negative stigma surrounding "Nuclear" word even tho nuclear killed least amount of people than any other power generation method, not even talking about current nuclear power plants being exponentially more safe than those have been in the past. We could definitely benefit from few extra nuclear power plants across entire planet, just to help get rid of fossil fuel ones and those could be powered for a century or so which would be enough time to fully shift to something different or even finally get that holy grail of nuclear fusion power.
1
They can't beat laws of physics independent how good their cars are.
1
@championknife From where are you even getting those numbers from? So when Russia started this war and tried to take over entire Ukraine they did this knowing that they are outnumbered by seven to one? Its either really brave (none existent thing in Russia) or really stupid (Quite believable). And for cannon fodder, the fact that Russia wants yet another mobilization of 300+k soldiers indicates that previous one failed miserably and it needs yet another 300+k soldiers to fill in that gap, aka cannon fodder.
1
@championknife I wonder why they went with a system which can't be ignored... Now they will be able to force even more people into service and become cannon fodder for this stupid war Putin started. Congrats, dictatorship became more modern and now people will have less options to avoid being drafted.
1
So are you saying we should send more military aid or less?
1
Non pedestrian safe, too heavy and size isn't really made to be usable in EU countries.
1
Its not fear mongering, its educating people on basic reality. Combustion engines are half the efficiency in comparison to fuel cell type ones, so its straight away no go. But this one is V8, and I don't think that its a mystery of some sorts to have higher fuel consumptions with more V's, so you have double no go. There is a fuel cell hydrogen car Mirai, it has 3 huge tanks to achieve 400 mile range. Try to imagine how far you would go with V8 with same amount... It would be like 100 miles... Its non starter. Could be fine as a hobby, maybe even for racing, but non starter for daily use.
1
So just being generic Musk hater?
1
@Gluosnis9 This is what generic Musk hater means, you despise everything relating to him just for the sake of it and not because that product/service is actually bad. Evaluate products on their own, not on the basis that you don't like CEO of the company.
1
@Gluosnis9 So if Musk invents cure from cancer, you would boycott that too?
1
@anita.b What is your source for your claim that Tesla cars are most dangerous car brand? AS of my knowledge Tesla cars keep getting top scores on safety. Your half decent point here would be about cybertruck, as its not allowed to be used in Europe due to more strict pedestrian safety regulations. Other than this, are you living in different reality than I am?
1
Tristan White And there you go... Generic Trump supporter... Skipped everything i said, made shit up and accused me of saying something i did not said... Why? Why did you skipped entire point i made in my comment about that giving money to child's family which is unsupported assertion you made and now you accusing me of saying that Trump was unwelcome in el paso? Are you kidding me?... Do you even read?...
1
Tristan White Interesting, its second time when you completely forgot to read what i write... Where did i condemned anything? I was addressing your empty assertion that they give money to that family and you have 100% certainty for it... How long will you try to twist this?
1
" i believe the government helped that family" And i believe i can fly, does that make it true? Can i fly just because i believe?... No... " if you dont thats on you" Whats on me? Reality?... "and i was asking you a question zrips not condemning you of anything" So when i made a question/statement about your empty assertion, your response was to ask me a question about another topic?... "you condemn yourself with your mouth" How? "you are trying to play the victim card within a victim card its like victimception over here" When did i played victim card?... If you are incapable of supporting your original comment, then its not my problem, i will gladly point that one out until you run away, cant really expect you to admit that you took that out of your ass and apologize for making empty assertions... Can I? "where did i say you condemned something?" When you asked that strange question "are you condemning the president for doing something..." when topic was about your empty assertion that they give money to that family... So you broth up that condemning topic for some strange reason, did you wanted to imply that i condemned, did you wanted to ask me, i have no idea, but it was quite out of topic... "i asked are you condemning the president for doing something he was asked to do by the family" Family asked president to take a photo with a child who lost his parents?... Should i condemn now that family for doing such immoral thing or should we stay with Trump?... "of course you cant provide a yes or no answer you instead choose to act as if im attacking you" Trump is proven liar, he constantly makes comments which are embarrassment for everyone... He does nonsensical things constantly... There is not much you could do about him, but only condemn... What was purpose of that picture? To show that he cares?... Does he? Is taking picture makes you care by default?... Person who is not prioritizing a pictures is some one who could be actually caring, not some one who looks for good profile picture... "pathetic" If you say so, it must be true... I heard that on internet, so it must be true too...
1
" and Gods judgement will be on you before you know it" Prove it... Och wait, you cant... Because this is only your personal opinion which is independent from reality... "Pray for mankind and pray for your sins" What sins? "we all are sinners some just recognize it" So you think that by prying to imaginary friend in sky will fix what you did wrong?... Afraid to take responsibility by yourself for shit you done?..
1
"clearly you know nothing about praying because the main part about praying is admiting to your sins? " I know that prying doesn't work. You clearly think that it does. Can you prove that? And why the hell i would need to pray to realize that i did something wrong? "That's taking responsibility for them" By praying?... Why do you need to pray? Its useless action... "This is what happens when man has no God he thinks he is God" I'm atheist... By definition i don't believe in god's... So are you saying that i don't believe that i exist?... "and can clear himself of all wrong doing" So you are saying that some one else should fix your mistakes and not you? Damn, you are digging your hole deeper and deeper with each sentence... "What an ignorant godless man you are" Ignorant about what? "Go back to asking babies for opinions you weirdo." Damn, you still failing to understand what i was saying by that... Damn... "you claim to be a perfect man?" Well you claimed that i have sins, so what sins do i have? "Can you prove to me that you are perfect and have never done anything wrong?" Can you prove to me that i'm not a perfect and have done anything wrong? "Never lusted for woman or man?" Though police? From when we are punishing people for their thoughts? I'm not talking about what your bible claims to be immoral action, otherwise we could not eat shrimps or wear cloths with different fabrics, and we would be going around killing homosexuals and adulterous, because by bible we should do that and it fiiiiiiiiine, book said so after all... So which laws in this reality we have which punishes you for lusting for woman or man? "Clearly this is not true" Clearly you have no idea what is clearly... No wonder you believe in something you cant prove to be true: god. So now you are making presuppositions who i'm without knowing who i'm... Why are you so dishonest? "disgusting immoral to almost anyone even to people who dont believe in God" How is belief in god related to who i'm? Och wait, it is. Take prisons, you have under representation of atheists in them, which shows that atheists makes less crimes. Then you have secular countries which have lower crime rates then religious countries... Interesting... Its like not believing in god gives you better morals... Strange... Not...
1
Tristan White "you are the mankind's gift to the world" Not really, but thanks anyways! Weeeee! "the moral compass of the universe" My moral compass is allot better then that one presented in a bible. Do you disagree? Is killing homosexuals moral or not? Question you cant answer because you will loose in any case. "why you should go to the pope right now, take his job and start preforming miracles" When did pope performed miracles? And why would i need to take his place to be able (if i'm able) to perform miracles? "as God is the only other perfect being" Damn... Dint your god performed that mass genocide with global flood because he fu***ed up with man kind? So he is not so perfect after all? "oh wait you are God i forgot ive been worshiping a false one this whole time" There are 50 000 proposed god's over human history, so presupposing that god is real and that he is on of those, you literately have 0.02% chance to get correct one... And this is presupposing 2 magical things... " humanity should be worshiping you zrips since you are indeed the perfect man" Why? Why would you need to worship anyone? "I will start my shrine to you immediately so that hopefully one day I can live my life in your Image." Why? Again... Why would you worship anyone? "at least prisoners have the decency to humble themselves before God because they know his judgement is the one they really need" Nice one, trying to save bad theistic reputation? So you basically trying to forget that theists commits more crimes then atheists? Why? You do know this will not work with me? After all, by your words, i'm perfect man ^.^ "most usually convert while they are in there" Its called indoctrination. And god's have been created to make you feel better in terrible situations. And prison is quite terrible situation. Another reasoon people made up god's is to explain something they have no explanation for. This is why we "have" god's like: god of fire, god of oceans, god of sun and on and on and on... "the reasons why nobody in prison is aethists is because you live in america where about 70%-80% of Americans believe in some form of religion or God" Ok, will help you out here. In America you have ~4% of atheists in general public. So you should see ~4% atheists in prisons. I'm not talking about their conversion, i'm talking about people who gets into prison, not who leaves it. So as you are expecting 4%, in reality you have ~0.1%. Which means that atheists perform less crimes then theists. Why? Why would those "immoral" atheists behave more morally then those "moral" theists with their "perfect" moral book? "thats like saying 80% of nurses are woman therefor woman must be better nurses than man." Irony... I know... Yes, woman are better then man in being nurses... Being nurse requires you to be more calm, have more gentle touch and more warm face when you deal with people in pain. So its interesting that you broth a fact about reality like its not a reality... Should i google for you out some articles why woman nurse is better suited for this work then men? Or maybe you can do this by yourself?...
1
Tristan White "thats fucking hilarious you took all that seriously " Actually i don't, but you failed to see irony in my comments. And its cool that your best counter argument to say that i'm sniffing my own farts... Are you a child? Because this is what child could have come up as some what attempt to insult or something. Try harder next time...
1
Its not around because this technology is not scalable... Car companies tried to make hydrogen cars before, all of those flopped because people are simply not buying them... There isint any lizardmen conspiracy here...
1
Yes yes yes, rubble strong, everyone else weak... I guess Putin constant threats and asking to lift sanctions is for nothing... Rubble value remained higher because market was closed and it was Russia which reported how much rubble is worth while no one wanted to trade in it anymore. Now its catching up.
1
@vojislavdragic5090 I asked one simple question of dozens flat earthers, every single one of them failed, lets test you now What method you used to determine that pictures of earth from space are fake? Be the first one!
1
@vojislavdragic5090 "how d9 you determine that those photographs are authentic?" Because they don't contradict reality? because we have photos of earths decades before we had computer graphics? Because there is no actual reason for multiple organisations across entire world to lie about it? Why would they be? There are no indications that they are not authentic. "they ( scientists)" Aka Smart people "keep changing their mind of what is actual shape of the earth.." Yes, its getting refined more and more with each new technology have been invented to measure earths actual size in every direction... That earth was a globe was known 3BCE in Greece, but it took over 2000 years to get to technological level to accurately measure it. Fundamental shape of earth doesn't change, its a sphere. On grand scale its a perfect sphere. On more accurate scale its a oblate spheroid, slightly wider on bottom. And before you scream that pictures doesn't show that... Basic math of provided distances shows that difference between how high and how wide earth is would be around 0.33% where for you to notice difference on monitor you would need something like 1000 wide and 1000 tall picture to have difference by one pixel which is more or less impossible to detect by simply looking at it... "and even recently extending atmosphere beyond moon.." And? Did you even bothered to look it up? Like actual story beyond this eye catching title? Will make it short: particles from earths atmosphere can be dragged out to the distance of moon due to solar flares or some shit like that. Its not an actual atmosphere you have on earths surface, its like almost perfect vacuum with couple atoms of earths atmosphere... "assumptions that those stellar objects exist in 3d.." Moon is not 3d? Mars? Any other planet anyone can observe with telescope is not in 3d? Is earth 3d?... Do you even understand what 3d is? "so they made up the model of spinning earth going aroung sun, going through space.. all which is only hipothesis.. " Its confirmed fact, just because you dont like it, will not make it false. But as i suspected and predicted, you dint answered to my question but you tried to redirect conversation. So will ask again: What method you used to determine that pictures of earth from space are fake? FYI I will keep asking this question until you ether answer to it or you stop responding while running away with your tail between your legs.
1
@vojislavdragic5090 Science you want to lower to your fantasy beliefs provided you means to make this silly comment. Earth is globe, you cant prove your flat one and we can disprove it. Deal with that and no need to go further in this discussion..
1
@vojislavdragic5090 "i*m not proving flat...i never said earth was flat or a sphere..." But you made a claim that there is no photos of earth, which means that you are claiming that all the photos which we actually have of earth are fake. So you will need to support that claim with actual evidence. "neil de ass tyson even said that the earth was pear shaped.." And you just said that you dont claim earth to be flat but you behave like generic flatard... Why? slightly
1
@vojislavdragic5090 it always was spheroid, its exact shape might have been refined over the years, doesn't mean they have been wrong at the time... And for you to make a claim that all images are fake... Well, its silly at best. So will ask you again: What method you used to determine that pictures of earth from space are fake? As you failed first time and redirected conversation, can i conclude that you dont have one and you simply make shit up here when you call them fake? Cool, i will do that, feel free to prove me wrong tho.
1
@vojislavdragic5090 "And i will ask you same thing ; what method was used to take those photos?" You made claim that those are fake, prove that they are or retract your claim. Which one will it be? "blue marble is a composit image..confessed by guy from nasa that made it.. " Panorama images taken by your phone are composites too, doesn't mean that image you see is not real... Do you even know what composite is? "yet it*s used world wide as a official represetation .." yes, because most people understand what "composite" is... " today is 2020 and there is still no real image of earth from distance.." Yet there is. Issue is not with the images of earth, issue is with you. There is even live feed from space, but you simply screaming that its fake. So your words are meaningless until you can provide method which you used to determine that it is fake. "all the satellites and missions bullshit..." So ISS which can be seen from earth is what exactly? Weather balloon flying 24/7 at 400km distance? " did you know that nasa is number one buyer of helium in the world..a lot of baloons ." Yes, they called: weather balloons. Whats your point? You do know that they are launching quite few of those? Right?
1
@vojislavdragic5090 Lets make something crystal clear here, as this will be quite huge time waste if you continue making empty assertions about NASA. Even if you could magically prove some how that 100% of everything NASA presented ever decades is fake that would not disprove glove and would not prove flat earth model. You do understand that NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth?
1
@vojislavdragic5090 I know that its a globe due to basic observations i made myself. Bringing up NASA only shows that you have no actual evidence for your position, you just trying to disprove some ones in hopes that this some how proves yours... It will not, ever... You can disprove everything from NASA, you can prove that NASA lied about everything, will not disprove globe earth, not a tiny bit. You need to learn what you have to prove/disprove to make actual point here...
1
@vojislavdragic5090 1. Sun doesn't change perceived size 2. Sun doesn't change perceived speed while moving across sky 3. Sun moves in straight line across the sky. 4. Sun sets and rises from under horizon All four basic observations matches 100% to globe model and fails on all fronts with flat one. And this is only issues with sun...
1
@vojislavdragic5090 "if sun was local and was follow following* flat earth bowl * it would still be going straigh while not changing size.." False... Demonstrably false... Do you even understand how reality works? Objects getting closer to you will get bigger, while going away from you, smaller. On flat earth model sun goes in circle over earth, which means that not only it should move in circular way, it should get closer to you under midday and then further away until sunset. This is not how we see sun in reality. It doesn't change size or speed, and moves in straight line across sky. "do the experiment your self with a ball attached to string, while you being pivot( center).." Yes, and it fails. ball changes size, you can always see ball, so no sunset or sunrise and it moves in circular way and its changing perceived speed... So your experiment proves that earth is not flat. "therefore, your observation can be applied in flat earth mdel as well.." It cant... if you seriously think that they can, then you need to go back to middle school and learn how geometry works... We are not even talking now about shape of earth, we are trying to educate you on geometry...
1
@vojislavdragic5090 Yes, sun doesn't get close on a globe model, it does on flat one. Like seriously, what type of flat earth model do you have in your mind? Because now you are talking about half sphere... Which makes even less sense...
1
Paranoid much?
1
@KangenAlec Its called "argument from authority logical fallacy" you literally trying to say that earth is flat because some dude said so... C'mon... Och, and he sells books... Ofcorse he does... How else would he get his riches from brainwashing people like you...
1
"there is nothing Musk has done that NASA/Russia/China or India have not done already and better" ? So please, tell me when did NASA/Russia/China or India launched the rocket as big and powerful and landed it back to earth, I will wait... If you want to make up stories, try making believable ones...
1
@Sultani92 Crappy suspension? Teslas have wide range of suspensions, duno in which reality they are crappy. Tight rear seat entry? Sorry to ask, but how fat are you? No idea about insurance and why it would be high, care to elaborate? Musk isn't spying on you, why would he care what you are doing? And are you seriously think that no other car company could spy on you? If you are so paranoid, you should ditch your smartphone. You have regen control as you can pick one of two options, tho duno why would you want anything else than the highest one and keep it at it. Och no, 19" wheels... Think about children... By the way, there are options to get 21", you know, optional stuff. Tight seats? Again, how fat are you?
1
ScienceMadeFunner "Why the slight anger and also does that sound like a threat?" No anger and no threats. "can facts be wrong?" Facts remain facts, opinions can change. "why can’t we use science for proving whatever we want to prove?" That's not how science works... Scientific method is when you go where evidence leads you too and not that you will lead evidence where you want to go. "Science is available to everyone to use isn’t that the idea?" Science is a method, so yes, its available to everyone. "why does this video have nothing but famous people?" Because that attracts more attention than having 3 random people from street. Famous people are more restricted by what they say as they need to keep their reputation, having 3 random people would only increase chances for them to lie for sake of lying. Tho everything they said in this video is not dependent on how famous they are. "why don’t more people go to Antarctica?" Because its most dangerous place on earth... You need special training and special equipment to go there, and there isnt many who actually wants to go to such cold place to see snow... " Can we even go?" Yes, 20k for 2 week trip to Antarctica pole and back on your own feet. "Why did people back then think the world was flat?" Ignorance. Mainly ignorance. "The people who built magnificent structures did they believe the earth was flat?" Not relevant. People who build pyramids could have thought that earth is pyramid, would not change anything about their structures. "Also I Believe Jesus/God made the earth to be a very special place for us why couldn’t he make it look different too?" No idea what you even asking here, but earth is a spherical, yoru god exists or not, he made it or not, its still spherical independent of your personal beliefs, thats simple fact from actual reality.
1
@wolfganglaun2319 Wait... What about sun?... Or stars and galaxies? You might wanted to say that particles in atmosphere will limit how far you can see in atmosphere itself and not how far we can see in general. But at same time, in really clearly conditions you should be able to see quite a distance ahead of earth was flat even from sea level, where initial experiment is out of place, if earth is flat then altitude should not effect how far you can see.
1
This is the cheapest war US was part of. So how exactly is it loosing?
1
Do tell me, does Peterson believe in god?
1
For what?
1
17 gallon fuel tank is a meaningless number as those usually are in most compact shape possible, while hydrogen tanks need to be cylindrical without exceptions. Hydrogen basically uses existing car technology to increase its efficiency, its not like its some weird 100% new tech, you could repurpose existing car engines, atleast for short time, due to how similar all of it is. So efficiency will not go that much higher than it is already, as its already using decades of technological advancements.
1
As I understood it, it's better electricity savings, might have been small enough difference, but if you want to have car which will be driving crap ton then it needs to be as efficient as it can get
1
Ukraine blow up dam on russian controlled side while Russia raised water levels to record levels just for shits and giggles just before it got nuked?... This sounds logical to you?... I mean, you support Russia, so logic is not something you have, but still...
1
3 days war, after almost 200 days Ukraine pushing back and reclaiming land, so who is actually winning?
1
Reality disagrees with you.
1
Main reason is lack of basic education, aka ignorance. You can determine shape of earth from your backyard, you wont even need to pretend that photos from space presented by dozens different sources are fake just because you dont like reality.
1
@TheOfficialJacksonville So is it governments fault or citizens? On one hand you say that it government at fault for not enforcing metric system, on another hand you are saying that citizens would be confused if they had to switch to metric due to for how long they used imperial system... Its a chicken and egg issue, government can't enforce it (they already tried it and failed) because people (especially Americans) will not like this change, this government enforced new thing, so it will be pushed away. So government can't enforce it and citizens will keep living with imperial system because they lived with one for their entire lives and they will not allow for government to enforce metric...
1
@TheOfficialJacksonville Yet switch to metric was at same time... All countries experienced same inconvenience as US, yet that one decided to stick with outdated method, just like it does with basically everything...
1
Promoting delusional scammers is not out thing.
1
It's on same line as "We have this BEV which will ruin Tesla and every BEV on entire planet!!! Release date: Around 2050"
1
They can still do it on foot, if they really want it.
1
Like Russia cares about war crimes... What would rest of the world do if Russia commits 50 other war crimes? Not much else todo at this point.
1
@kuunoooo7293 Well we know that Russia already lost independent of the final outcome of this war.
1
@kuunoooo7293 They lost in general, not even talking about their original objectives. They not only lost those, they lost everything else. Now is only question how much more they will loose until this war ends.
1
@kuunoooo7293 Lost reputation, whatever it was before war. Lost existing buyers for gas and oil. Lost credibility in general. Lost any existing friends, if they had any. Even losing support from Russians. Lost everything. Their best hope at this point is to keep land they have claimed and quietly suffer consequences for decades to come. Basically what happen with Germany and Hitler, same story and even today saying name "Hitler" automatically brings in negative aspects, same thing happening with Putin and will happen with "Russia" for next few decades until normal people takes over Russia and fixes it. There are only 2 types of countries which support Russia: Dictatorships and 3rd world countries with non existing education or access to internet to be able to fact check. Rest of the world is against Russia and will be for quite some time...
1
@itachi6523 Sadly there are too many who actually thinks that diesel or petroleum powered cars are more clean than hydrogen ones... You would think that they are joking, but sadly they are not...
1
Isn't this applies to all metals? Having higher melting point would push that weakening further away. Its like, implied in that point about higher melting point.
1
@aneticus9337 He wasn't saying that he is ok getting metal to that point, he was saying that its safer to use metal with higher melting point as it doesn't require to be kept colder to prevent structural integrity. Every known substance turns into liquid if enough heat is applied, there is no magical material which could survive extensive heating, but having materials which can survive higher temperatures makes entire protection process simpler.
1
So your solution is to just have... Hybrid car?... 2 cars in one and then pay double the maintenance costs and get double the issues?... Not a good plan. Battery technology is getting better with every generation, most batteries can be more or less fully recycled and reused, so you can keep using same lithium over and over and over and over again until different type of battery comes along. Hydrogen will never become a thing even as Hybrid, too many issues with it.
1
@AkashYadavOriginal Hydrogen powered car's could only be an option if we had excessive amount of energy we could utilize to produce it in those needed amounts. Sad reality is that this isint happening. On top of this, storage of Hydrogen is extremely difficult and in most cases impossible to be 100% sealed as it will leak into atmosphere, where it will cause more damage than CO2 would have... So we will start from square one here... There is good reason why Hydrogen cars never took over and lost this battle to the BEV's independent what those "saint" car companies want to claim now... You can't beat physics here. What we need is improvements on battery technology, that's it. Even with current technology is good enough to put Hydrogen into its place, not even talking about future batteries...
1
@nwogamesalert You started with "Rationality Rules? No it certainly doesn't!" so are you saying that being irrational is better than being rational? And you need to learn to be short, no need to create wall of text where you say allot and say nothing at same time. And no, homophobia isint propaganda... Its "homo-phobia", aka fear of homosexuals, thats literally what this word means by its structure... Just like Arachno-phobia
1
@nwogamesalert " I only showed that youtuber Rationality Rules actually was not so rational after all!" Och so you are claiming that author of this video isint rational, cool, can you present argument to support this statement? Make it short. "A "phobia" is an IRRATIONAL fear of something; so, some kind of psychological problem or mental illness. You need to learn to read, try again." And yet you stated that homophobia is propaganda term. You need to learn to read, try again.
1
But like, Russians are fighting against Ukrainian soldiers who are not really known with their LGBT things... Right?
1
you can recycle batteries you know...
1
If toyota remains stuck with idea to go with hydrogen, they will go bankrupt.
1
Then you should actually fact check and realize that you are not paying for Starships development...
1
Even Russian propaganda admitted that Russian troops left Kherson... What is truth by your opinion?
1
@billyt4164 Earths shape can be determined from your backyard, your personal ignorance is not an excuse to put globe and flatardia on same level.
1
After 800+ days of this 3 day war? I don't think that Russians have been underestimated here, but Ukrainians.
1
Yea, its funny when you realize that you can run electric motor by simply plugging it into the wall. We had that for quite some time now. There are more complicated motors with require some drivers, but those are tiny with small amount of code just to properly time it, but generally you need just few lines of code. Besides that rest of the code is for UI and other convenient things and are not directly related to car being able to drive. Like in Tesla and some other EV's you can literally reload entire system while still driving your car.
1
@cosmiclife6488 So is earth a spherical or flat pancake?
1
There is 0 pure hydrogen on earth, every single "hydrogen" deposit is some another mineral which needs to be processed to extract that actually usable hydrogen from it. We have entire oceans, aka water, which is made of hydrogen, but extracting it costs quite a bit of money.
1
@floridaman6716 He is just a sad troll, you can ignore him.
1
Why do you need 500 mile range? Do you often doing 500 mile drives without ever stopping?
1
How many hydrogen capsules you will need to "fill up" tank? Those hydrogen tanks are already massive to be on similar range as ICe or even EV's, if you split that into small capsules which could be removable and have their own casings and safe connectors, that would be one huge step back in general for hydrogen cars.
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
@vgrepairs Nah, we call it Whataboutism because people keep trying to redirect attention from Russia doing currently something bad to something what might have been bad in the past. If you want to argue about Bush then go and find video about that and comment under its video with your sound and valid arguments why current actions should be counted as hypocrisy. Not defending US here in any shape or form, but tired of seeing people like you with all those silly meaningless comments about what US did few decades back...
1
As someone claiming that comments here are made by A.I. you heck of a like to repeat same comment over and over and over again like some sort of... A.I....
1
Some do believe and by some research its around 2% of people from entire population, which is nothing surprising, after all, majority still believes in sky wizards so belief in flat earth is not that far fetched.
1
if you watched full video you would known that Cox presented another graph which was in hundreds of thousands of years and not only the one from 1850. Why are you so against having cleaner future? You don't like fresh air or something?
1
by Russian propaganda bakhmut was taken over like 5 times.
1
He is using his own companies money to fund his own dreams, if you don't like it, then nothing happens. No one is forcing you to relocate to Mars...
1
Its easy to integrate controllers like that to any software, its cheap to buy in any shop, its already refined to be accurate and survive abuse to it. But still, its just weird to see multi million equipment being controlled with 60 buck controlled from local shop.
1
@GloHamed This needs a correction. Every object with mass generates gravity, so rock does have its own gravity, but in comparison to what earth creates it would be basically irrelevant even tho it does have it.
1
@GloHamed Any amount of mass generates gravity, there isint a magical line after which you got gravity, if you have mass, you have gravity. Rock on itself gets defined as an object with a mass, which means that any rock will have gravity of its own.
1
@GloHamed Did you read what I said?
1
To be fair, his stats are misrepresentation. he took all deaths and placed against all death with tesla, this would only work if you have same amount of cars on the road. While i know that Tesla is allot safer car then rest of them, this is quite incorrect way to compare them.
1
What's your point here exactly?
1
@freak94able You do know that dam controls have been on Russian side and not Ukrainian? Right? You are aware of that much?...
1
So nothing happen in Russia? In which reality do you live in?
1
And how exactly is hydrogen made? Scooped from thin air with a bucket?
1
@IraFox84 Damn you are silly... Will do basic education here, for free. There are 0 pure hydrogen on earth, 100% of it needs to be made from something. At the moment biggest source is natural gas, which is obviously not sustainable. Alternative is making it from water, electrolysis is a thing. Issue with that is that you need around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance as you would with BEV's. So now, as you tried desperately to bring up (coal?) energy sources for BEV's, now add extra 60% to your hydrogen production and realize that you just made your own position worse by your own words. FYI renewables is a thing too and world is shifting towards that.
1
buffuzo What is weird about your comment is that you failed to understand that all this destruction is because Russia started a war, destroyed civilian infrastructure or not, all of this destruction is because of Russian aggression... And then you have people wondering why people hate russians for 20+ years... This is exactly why... And this will only make this hate last another 30+ years...
1
It doesn't belong to Russia independent what its democratic ideals are.
1
@MrMichiel1983 But this was my point... Conspiracy is the thing which has no supporting evidence, ridiculous or not, they are just conspiracies... There simply are no such thing as true conspiracies, there are only a conspiracies.
1
People said exactly same thing about riding horses... Why are you not complaining about that? And you can still do it if you really want it. Same will be with manually driven cars, those will fake out but you will have option to drive one in specialized places or with special permit, but this is decades away.
1
And yet this video is just a scam.
1
What lies?
1
"that trump was there for political purpose?" Everything he does is for political purpose... "that the baby was 'brought back' like it was a forced situation" Did you asked baby if he wants to go back to hospital? What was the purpose of bringing him back to hospital? To make bunch of pictures as a political move... If it was not a political move, you would never heard about it... Now you have bunch of pictures and people prising him for doing something like that... Because it was a political move... Everyone knows... Well, most know that, some one like you thinks that he did this because he is good person... "the family of the baby wanted him to meet the president" So they actually asked baby what he wants?... Even if he was able to speak, even if he was like 20 year old grown up, i don't think he would want to meat anyone after loosing his parents... Atleast i would not want too... "as should you zrips this is disgusting" What? I asked what lies and you are accusing me of something?... Are you kidding me?... "pakman is telling you half truths and you guys are eating it up like golden corral." Damn... So when Trump says lies is fine, but when you see some one saying (while he did not) half truths, that is bad?... In which reality do you live in? And before you scream that Trump dint lied. There is "short" list for you: https://www.nrdc.org/trump-lies
1
Tristan White "i forgot you live in a world where a baby should be able to make there own choices." And previously you said "the family of the baby wanted him to meet the president" so new family of that baby wanted this political move then? Did they used that baby which lost his parents just to meat with president?... I mean, we can go with that... Trump will look slightly better, but then you have shitty new family that baby got... "which as ill mention a 3rd time condemn people like you for trying to think for a child and promote more negativity to an already negative situation" What was purpose to bring that baby back? Like seriously, shut that Trump door for a second and think. What was benefit for that baby to go back to hospital after losing parents? He will not even grasp concept of a president for next couple years, not even talking that if he is rised as some one who thinks, he will not even be proud to meat that lying a**hole. So you have 2 options: Shitty new family or shitty president action. Or both?... "please re think your flawed logic of trying to think for infants and implant thoughts and feelings on to them. its utterly disturbing." I have no idea what you tried to say here, but ok... Whatever floats your boat... "did the baby ask to be taking to the hospital? is this a joke we are talking about an infant." Damn, you seriously missed the point... No wonder you are Trump supporter... What i was saying that new babies family took him into hospital for their personal gain or they have been asked by people who works for Trump to create this political move and make him look good. Well they failed, but thy tried. And you failed to understand what i was saying... "also the link you provided me was 80% about climate change." Fiiiine... Lets say for sake of argument 80% of lies he said is irrelevant... Are you fine with rest 20%?... "which in my opinion is irrelevant climate has been changing since the beginning of time duh" ... ... ... I would insert face palm here... Whatever... " the fact is the trump is right the mainstream media is lieing about climate change" BASED ON WHAT? Like seriously, we can stop on this point and lets see what you can present to support Trumps words... och wait, you have nothing... While on my side is entire scientific world... Are you even serious here? "its not getting warmer its getting colder" Do you live under the rock?... 1880–2018 guess which are hottest years... Like top 10... Well 9 of them are from last 14 years... So are you so ignorant or trying to promote your alternative facts?... "DID you read any of links i sent you probably not...." Well definitely not, because i cant see any post with links... So youtube removed them as spam. Repost them in a post itself, and try using less of them in one post, this will give better chance for not being removed automatically as a spam. "that has to be one of the dumbest thing ive ever heard come out of a human beings brain" Yes, because you failed to understand what i was trying to say by that... "no of course they didnt ask the infant what its opinion was. ITS AN INFANT!!!!!" Exactly! This is why infant was used as a tool to get this political move. Ask anyone who is not crazy if its ok to take infant back to hospital just to take couple pictures with president after he lost his parents... You wont get many agreeing with this move...
1
"I didnt use any tool" And you should have stopped your comment here...
1
@KangenAlec Flat earth is not even a theory, its just an opinion...
1
@KangenAlec What's what? Earth is a globe, that's a fact, provable fact by basic observations anyone can perform, while flat earth claim is as real as magical space pixies farting out BWM cars on weekends in local home depo....
1
@KangenAlec Some people in power do lie, but when you realize that majority of them are religious... Well... Which is biggest lie we ever had? Religions. But thats besides the point. Earth is a sphere not because some one in power said so, but because its observable and testable fact from reality anyone with basic geometry understanding can confirm. While flat earthers cant even present flat map of flat world without distance distortions which should have been simplest thing ever, yet you cant even come up with that... Why is that? Maybe because you have been duped and lied that earth is flat and you believed that without fact checking?
1
@theycallmethesoandso If all this was done by humans, then it's completely not impressive, basic generic robotics.
1
Bigger than reported? Care to elaborate on that?
1
You failed to understand entire point here?...
1
Because it should produce same exact results on both models...
1
@mafleoo0 But this video was about flat earthers in general, like why they believe that and not to debunk them.
1
@chrisdonish His fine, he is ready to release new never seen video with tile "Musk debunked! For sure this time! #523"
1
@randyschissler5791 "After sunset, can you bring the sun back with binoculars and telescope?" Is this a question or statement? Because you cant bring back anything back whats behind horizon... No level of zoom will add ability to see around the corner...
1
Brainwashing 101
1
Yes, because they DON'T make hydrogen combustion cars for the reasons he mentioned in this video.
1
Combustion engines reached their peak few decades back. You might have got few tiny improvements here and there, but that's it, it wont go any higher than it is already. You might still squeeze out few extra miles by making cars more aerodynamic or making those lighter, but its not related to actual combustion engine anymore.
1
BEV's are less polluting than Hydrogen cars.
1
? BEV car fires are not being put out with water...
1
TF is here to make money, so if Musk offers job with good enough pay, then I can bet he would accept it.
1
@shmh6002 "It's in the Bible people." Bible is not evidence, its a book and nothing more. "I'm so sorry if none of you are believers but there's literal proof in the Bible and that's all I need." Again, bible is the one which makes the claim, you need evidence to actually prove this claim to be true without using source of claim, otherwise you are just doing circular argument fallacy here. "Not once does it say in there that there are even planets or that we live on a round earth spinning at astronomical speeds through outer space" Exactly, while we know that we do live on a globe and we do fly through space and spin around, that would mean that your book is wrong. "does anyone not realize how silly that sounds?" Do you? Have you ever looked at your bible objectively and realized how silly that one sounds? "How about we think for ourselves...." Says some one who blindly believes what his book says because book said that its correct one... C'mon... How dont you see irony here? " It was something that was made up by man all put into place to control" Are we talking about globe earth or bible? Because this perfectly applies to bible, so now i'm comfused. "Try doing research on your own and open your mind and be smart..." Please, do that. "Not everything we've been told in school is true" Not everything we've been told in church/bible is true " the " scientific" evidence to back up what I'm saying" So can you present your BEST evidence for what you are saying here? "I'm not claiming to be smarter than others or know things that others don't LOL just plain facts is all..." Yet you want to claim to know more than smartest people on earth... I mean... C'mon... Majority of scientists are not even theists, waste majority of smartest people on earth knows that earth is a globe, yet you are here saying that its not because your book said so... "God bless" Which god?
1
Weight isn't that better, check Mirai car, its hydrogen car, its weight is actually higher (1,920 kg) than Tesla model Y (1,909). So you are not winning anything here when it comes to weight.
1
@akhdareldjamai1333 "aerospace depends on the flat model" What? Care to elaborate this for us and explain how exactly aerospace depends on the flat model?
1
Amount of water vapor you will be producing here is nothing. I'm not for a hydrogen cars due to long list of issues, but water vapor is like the least impactful thing from entirety of it... Where do you people even learned to repeat this silly thing as I keep seeing it being mentioned like its a big deal...
1
Hydrogen engine was invented in 1806, it worked this way for past 218 years, on what basis you can say that it will work any differently now?
1
@rawman5000 Yes, because phones are not cars... Hydrogen engines already utilizes all the advancements gasoline engines made in past century or so, yet those engines stopped meaningfully improving for past few decades. There isn't much to improve anymore as its all limited by basic laws of physics. Smartphones on another hand still can go further as there is still some areas where it can improve, not much tho, as those are already quite close to the peak performance. Sooner or later every technology hits its peak, ICE engines did that 2 decades ago, smartphones starting to get there too.
1
Yea, that pool seams to be intentionally made in a way to get as many "flat earthers" as possible. Child for first 2-3 years cant even understand that there are other minds, so it cant even grasp idea of earth being spherical of flat, so in any case, if you are honest you could not say that you always believed that earth is round. Its a bullshit pool. By better one it was shown that there are around 2% of people who believes earth to be flat, like a normal one, where you ask what they currently believe and it was asking grownups and not like some 3 year olds or something like that
1
To expensive and no point in doing so.
1
http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif There you go, demonstration of curvature.
1
Mik C You dint noticed my link which proves that we live on a globe? What happen there? I can repost it... http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif there you go... This is not related to a school or anything like that, its simple demonstration that we do have curvature. After we agree on that we can move on in proving that we do spin and that we do fly throw space. Agreed?
1
Even if it was as long as earth, it still wont move... Length of level will not change actual outcome.
1
Hydrogen technology is extremely old by this point, it didn't flopped, because it never been an actual thing to flop. It's nothing burger. And future is the BEV type car's, direct electricity storage with direct conversion into motion.
1
You do know that Hydrogen cars require like 60% more energy to drive car same distance as EV's does? And you do know that electrical cars have more than one chemistry where some of those don't need all those rare materials from that country you think its only found in? And you can recycle majority of battery and make new one from it. BEV's is the future... What we only need is improve or invent new battery chemistries, which are already being done and this invention and improvement have been kick started with BEV's adoption. Having option to just plug your car into wall socket and get full "tank" will ALWAYS win against anything what requires specialized refueling stations.
1
@buckrodgers1162 There isint much to progress on the side of Hydrogen, what we can get is better and cheaper ways to convert water/salt water into hydrogen, but you will still have same issues with its transportation, its storage and its extra energy cost in comparison to BEV's. It can improve and it will, but it will not overtake BEV's, atleast not for regular cars. Where Hydrogen can be useful is where energy density is a main priority. BEV's remained stagnant for decades, first BEV was made in 1890 and its main limiting factor was battery technology and its cost. Only when we started to get cheaper and better batteries this became actual viable option and more money was put into battery technology improvement. This was mainly caused by the need to have portable electronic devices and not by a need to have BEV's. Hydrogen doesn't have need like this and there isnt much to improve, it will, but it will not outperform improvements done on battery technology. No idea why you mentioned people without private house not being able to own BEV. You can always charge it at any charging station, its not like you can have Hydrogen refueling station at your private house. BEV's are not perfect at the moment and cold weather will have negative impact, but this on itself is being worked on and will be improved in time. We already got few improvements for BEV's specifically when it comes to lower temperatures and its efficiency, its only question of time until it becomes none issue. Any apartment complex has capabilities... You can plug your car into basic wall socket... If your apartment complex can handle microwave then it can charge your BEV. Point is that it can do it overnight while you sleep, which will charge enough for you next day driving needs in most cases. Electrical grid is none issue, it was already investigated and research done on it, electrical grid can and is expanding faster than BEV adoption rate could ever be. Its completely none issue.
1
@buckrodgers1162 "they take a long time" How long do you think it takes to charge car battery from 20 to 80%? " And don't work in cold weather. " EV market in Canada and Norway and other colder countries disagree with you. "HFCs can refuel in the same time that a normal petroleum vehicle can." And? Again, how long do you think it takes to charge EV? "the costs of building new stations will go down" Building might go down, maintaining cost will hardly change. Hydrogen stations are quite expensive to be maintained properly due to all this complexity involved in how hydrogen behaves in general. This cost will never be less than BEV charging stations, NEVER. "And because it can be made onsite, the cost of hydrogen will drop." Can it?... And you do understand that this would only increase complexity of station, cost of it to build and to maintain by quite a bit? "Plus, because of it's comparable refuel time rate to petroleum, the current fueling station infrastructure can be used to install the new pumps" Not really, entire infrastructure for Hydrogen is quite different than it is for petroleum. What is common is only the need to have some storage tank and then refueling stations near it, all of that should be swapped entirely, so what you actually will have is only a land which you could maybe reuse, again, maybe. Not all stations would have enough space to include "on site production" or even legal requirements for safety reasons to even be a thing. "No need to drop them in parking lots like was done with the EV charging stations." But that's the thing... You can drop BEV charging stations in parking lots... That's the beauty of it all, you can have charging cables at any supermarket, your car could be charged while you are buying milk, or it could be charged while you are at work... You just need a cable from any outlet. Its simplest and most independent form of fueling your transportation. There are even serious talk about wireless charging where your car would automatically start charging when you park your car without you doing anything, you could literally never visit charging station or even have a need to plug in your car at home manually.
1
@buckrodgers1162 . "And have you not heard of the charging station failures across the US a few deep freezes back?" Whose? Tesla or another company? And have you heard about none working Hydrogen refueling stations? Its not like stations are immune to being broken from time too time... No idea what you tried to say here exactly. "Well, not all of us can drive over to Norway just to recharge a vehicle." What the what now? "So you can just keep on arguing against every point I make, and blindly accepting the propaganda that you are spoon fed. " My exact thoughts. You look more like someone who actually believes that cars can be fueled with water... "But that still don't make you, in any way shape or form, factually correct." Which part of what I said wasn't factually correct? if you want to make such accusations you will have to support that with evidence. So, good sir, please point to a factual error I made here.
1
@fanamlawuli6761 Do you really think Putin can threaten with his gas? We dont care anymore, we got different supply. While this transition will effect economy in a bad way, it wont have as bad effect as Russia will. Europe was basically paying a billion every month for Russian gas, this is now gone for good. So Putin can shove this gas up his own ass and be happy with that.
1
Liquid hydrogen could potentially be used for bigger equipment which can utilize it straight away until full depletion, but its really narrow use case and cooling hydrogen to such extremes is quite expensive on its own, so not many will want to even attempt doing it.
1
Oled Oled Do you have any valid sources indicating that Ukraine loses 20 times more than Russia besides Russian propaganda news channels? And if Ukraine loses so much, then why the hell Russia fails to take over Ukraine? Something doesn't add up here... Maybe reality isint the one you live in?
1
its not a new technology and it barely improved over the decades it was around, and no one is even promising improvements on it, let alone introducing ones...
1
But giving easy to use tool to cause most damage isint a solution...
1
So clearly people decide to be clean 4x more often in Norway than in US which is the result of better prison system.
1
FG PT Congrats, you have been scammed. Earth's shape can be determined from your backyard and Dubay spits out lies (he isint a real flat earther) just to create fallowing and make money from that. After all, there are only 2 types of flat earthers: Those who sells t-shirts with text "earth is flat" and those who buys them.
1
Far-leftist says that Musk is bad... Shocker... Never seen this one before.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Noticed you didn't prove him right, TF cult member
1
You have no idea how ironic your comment is.
1
First globe model of earth was introduced in 3 BCE in Greece... So yea, thousands of years...
1
There isn't much to evaluate: its fake.
1
How often do you do 800 miles trips without stopping? Waiting for response.
1
@Brad_Fallon It's far far away from being safe...
1
Hows that 3 day war going on?
1
Why?
1
Why its only 60 miles and not 600? Could there be some hard limit how far you can aim with that by some strange reasons like curvature getting in the way?
1
@bisonchief304 Your comment literally makes zero sense... First of all, you could theoretically shoot at yourself from behind by sending projectile at high enough speed for it to basically get into orbit, so in general there is no distance limit how far you can shoot on a globe, atleast theoretically, in reality air resistance would play big role in limiting how far you can actually shoot, but 60 miles is nothing... Second, while you might have horizon line at 40 miles, no one prevents you from shooting beyond that due to the FACT that projectiles fly in an arc which can happily go way over the horizon line... have you ever thrown a ball over fence in your entire life or something?...
1
If its robotaxi then you don't really need infrastructure to be all over the place until 2027. Get 30 cars, get few chargers located at your property, cars would return to recharge when needed. Additionally Tesla could place few wireless charges at existing charging stations for initial robotaxis if needed. Its non issue.
1
Jim Thorhauge Or... Russians simply lied?... Its not like Russians are known for saying truth... Right?
1
Should we list for you failed projects in the past? If you plant survives a decade, then we can talk about it, until then it's just expensive experiment at best.
1
Why should there be?
1
I guess this new Putin declaration about forced drafting into war is because this war going on by the plan?
1
Flat earther?
1
Hydrogen combustion engines are HALF the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell engines... HALF... Its not even a question if combustion engine could be better, we know that it can't, basic laws of physics.
1
Issue with that is that Russian doesn't care if their soldiers are geared up or not, they would send same troops back with a spoon in hands.
1
Miroslav ignorance
1
Just like he crushed Tesla or SpaceX?
1
Its some what stupid statistic, in general we have around 2% of flat earthers from general population.
1
His data was about people using auto pilot, which is used on highways... While Waymo is ONLY inside city. Do you see possible cause of those different casualty numbers?
1
You seriously don't want to own hydrogen car, wagon or not...
1
But its not.
1
You look confused and ignorant beyond belief, so will fix some mistakes. Batteries can be toxic, but those are contained and smart people say that you should not eat them. After their service time expires you can recycle more or less entire battery and reuse materials to make new one. Funny enough BEV batteries lasted longer than expected and there is still not enough old BEV batteries for bigger recycling plants to be built, and this tech ACTUALLY is improving every single year with like a dozen new alternative chemistries in the works. While your hydrogen basically remained same for past few decades. There are basically ZERO hydrogen storages in entire world, why do you think this is the case? Because hydrogen is extremely bad as energy storage... All the complications, issues and costs associated with it makes it completely bonkers solution for energy storage. You should spend more than 5 minutes investigating hydrogen and especially its downfalls before you start preaching how good it is, because its not.
1
@fuckingdrummachinez "I speak more about the ways these batteries are produced and the whole industry of lithium etc" Cool beans and all, but every single manufacturing process is toxic on some level. Battery production isn't that bad and it can be controlled and it can and is being improved, on top of new chemistries being created every single year. "It's very polluting and whole communities are suffering from being near to these excavation sites" Just like you would if you lived near any excavation site... Are you trying to imply that its better to stick with current petroleum or go with hydrogen which is not scalable in general to avoid some potential issues with someone maybe living to close to the excavation site? Maybe its an issue with excavation sites being to close to population and not an issue with actual excavation sites? " This stuff happens in 3rd world countries in Africa/Asia" Education for ignorant one. Biggest lithium exporter is Australia. What now? Your entire argument just shattered into tiny pieces. You are barking on the wrong tree here, its not an issue with lithium mining, its an issue with countries exploiting people with lithium mining. "Basically cheap DIY hydrogen storage" Yes yes yes, and we have water engine too... If there was cheap DIY hydrogen storage then it would have been implemented as a cheap hydrogen storage across the board, but its not, so clearly something doesn't add up here. "And don't you assume things about me and time I put in research" Clearly you didn't put as much as you think you did. Watching 2 youtube videos will not make you educated on this topic. You didn't even know that Australia exports most Lithium and wanted to complain about 3rd world countries... C'mon... Let's be real here, you just want for battery technology to fail just because you could have your hydrogen combustion car to make that old school sound or something. "Hydrogen is better in many terms, first of all because it's clean" Most hydrogen currently is being produced from natural gas. There is 0 pur hydrogen on earth, ZERO. 100% of it needs to be produced. Some smart people without free time calculated actual carbon footprint of petroleum, hydrogen fuel cell and pure BEV's, and still, BEV's came first as least polluting closely followed by hydrogen cars. So no, it's not a clean solution, its polluting slightly more than BEV's from start to end. Do you know why? Well you don't, but will educate you here. Even most efficient hydrogen cars consume around 60% MORE electricity to move your car same distance as BEV does, aka you need to produce more electricity to move that car same distance. Now add additional costs of maintenance, additional costs of actual hydrogen production, storage and distribution and you will quickly realize that hydrogen cars makes zero sense. If BEV's didn't exist, then yea, we could have went with hydrogen, but now, no chance, as we can see from real world examples of multiple attempts to bring in hydrogen cars into market and it failing miserably every single time. "And there's a house in Sweden that stores energy in solid-state hydrogen built by Hans-Olaf Nilsson" Ok, and what is the cost of that system? What is the cost to maintain that system? How does it compare to basic battery technology? As just having example of technology being applied somewhere doesn't make it a viable option in general. "The point on recycling is good though, I don't know enough about liion recycling" Because you haven't researched it long enough... Even tho you want to claim that you did... you can't object to technology you know little to nothing. Batteries are being recycled to like 97-98%, aka 97-98% of all materials can be reused, in some cases reusing materials makes even better batteries as you are getting more pure ones. And this recycling can be done in closed system, aka no actual waste being produced, and its quite in early stages where recycling technology is being perfected, improving its speed and performance. So once you mine lithium it stays in circulation basically for ever. "mothafucka" I like you too.
1
Announcement? Och, that changes everything... All those 12 cars will fill the roads and promote hydrogen to infinity and beyond...
1
Use more than 2 brain cells here...
1
@ Same for you.
1
@ Och so you are saying that no one cares what you think is necessary? We can agree on that one.
1
@nevermoreexoblivione6597 Will try to explain situation in basic words, just for you. We have OP saying that using "cis men" isn't needed and basic "men" should be used. Then you got reply to that asking if he has problem with "adjectives" then I replied to that with basic statement that those are not needed so it should not be used, then you complained about that like its the most evil thing someone ever said... I guess you are here to hate things for the sake of hating.
1
Maybe in perfect utopia world
1
Aren't you basically admitting that it flopped due to there already being better alternatives? And there is a long list of issues relating to hydrogen from end to end which prevents it to become anything more than just someones expensive hobby.
1
@BrotherAzrael What's no? Which part you disagree? Because hydrogen cars at the moment are just an expensive hobby... People are not that happy with their cars, best thing about some cars is that you can get 15k on your fuel when you buy one, but after it runs out people tend to just sell the car and never go back to it... Why do you think shell closed its hydrogen stations? Because no one wants to use hydrogen cars except few hard core fans who just wants to be special.
1
You dont want that... If Ukraine becomes nato country now, that would automatically trigger article 5 and we will have ww3 on our hands...
1
So instead of using electricity from renewable to recharge your car directly it needs to be converted into hydrogen, then transported who knows how far, put into another container for storage, then use that to refuel your car and then you can use it? And this somehow solves something?... You will either have hydrogen being made at some centralized place and then transported with big trucks as huge hydrogen bombs all the time across entire country, or you will be making it locally which defeats your entire point about electric network reliance as hydrogen production needs more electricity than simply charging BEV. Hydrogen simply doesn't scale, it can work for bigger dedicated equipments like trains, ships, semi, maybe buses, but it will never work out for regular passenger cars.
1
@taylorbrooks5856 Your argument falls apart when you realize that majority of mass shootings happen with legally acquired guns... But I guess by your logic even toddlers should have a handgun, just in case another toddler has one, right?
1
@KnightOfLiberty4267 Mass shooters uses legally acquired guns, so like... Yea... Having more strict vetting process would have stopped quite few mass shootings.
1
@taylorbrooks5856 Why not tho? Second Amendment doesn't apply to toddlers? So there is a limitation on who can own gun? What?! How dare you to say that toddler has no right to own gun!!! This is his constitutional right!!! Ok, lets do it this way. Where do you draw a line? Can I own RPG? Land mines? Mini gun? A tank? Maybe nuke? I think you would draw this line somewhere? Right? You already said that toddlers can own one, so you already limiting it by age. So what other limitations do you agree upon?
1
@taylorbrooks5856 So you never actually answered to my main question. Where do you draw a line? And why would you not allow for toddler to carry handgun? Is there something you might feel to be unsafe? Is there something related to person mental state? By any chance this could be limited by performing some magical special test or training? Majority of mass shootings happen by using legally acquired guns, your solution is to just arm more people with more guns... Which will lead to more gun deaths... Americans becoming paranoid as anyone can be armed and can be serious danger to them or their family, so when mass shootings will become as rare as sunrise in your area, don't complain, accept reality and buy more guns, because that will definitely solve this problem...
1
@taylorbrooks5856 I know why toddler should not have firearm, for same reason I know that gun ownership should be vetted allot more strictly than it is now. Som toddlers can be more trust worthy than some grownups who gets access to assault rifles. But I can see that you just like every other gun supporter miserably failed to answer to my question here, atleast this should make you think about your own position. Right? Cool, so my job is done here. Have a nice day! Lets hope its not mass shooting day, once more, but heck, your solution is to just introduce more guuuuuunnnnzzzz because this worked out so well so far!
1
Flat earther by any chance?
1
@bco-fm5qu Actually both are quite similar, both believes in something what can't be proven to be true and in some cases can be proven to be false, yet they still believe
1
What if people who claimed to have magical technology lied?
1
Atleast people who claims to see aliens (not UFO's, as those doesn't default to aliens) you cant really prove/disprove it, while earths shape can be proven to be spherical in no time.
1
@tupacolypse1 Sunset. Should I go into detail here or are we good?
1
@wasawizard Which part of "sunset" you dint understood? Its not my fault that you cant even understand basic geometry here. If you cant grasp idea why sunset is not possible on flat earth, then anything more complex than this rudimentary middle school geometry will fly over your head even more. Learn how o walk before you attempt to run with your light reflections... And IU think you wanted to say "refraction" and not "reflection"...
1
@tupacolypse1 Dont use logic and reason with flat earthers, that will only insult them... Like seriously, you can poke issues on every claim they make, that will not make them to think that they are wrong. I have seen countless times some one trying to say that we have sunsets because atmosphere blocks light, that we have perspective and vanishing point and all that stupid stuff, but when you try to ask like "Why we can see stars which are allot further away than sun, but not sun some how disappears at night?" you only get cricket noise. Or when you hear that you can bring ships back by zooming in, but when asked for actual evidence for that, best thing i ever got was a video which simply showed ship which was too small for camera to see and then zoomed in... Like that proves that earth is flat... But never video where ship disappears over horizon and when you zoom in it comes back... Logic and flat earthers are not compatible.
1
Or... Musk isn't that bad as TF says him to be? The fact that TF is pumping videos about same person every single week atleast once should indicate something isn't right here. You couldn't even do it with Hitler as your main topic. What could be the other reason? Well, its easy money for TF, which is ironic, as he is basically scamming his fan base while saying that someone else is a scammer.
1
Well it's not the first place which was retaken... And last 6 months have been more or less one sided, Ukraine retaking their lands, one bit at the time, while Russia moving backwards, one step at the time.
1
What?
1
Why its always whataboutism with people like you?
1
China isint magical country, it can't just buy or provide everything Russia was selling or getting from rest of the world. It might help out to prolong sinking Russian economy, but it is sinking either way.
1
Science and Christianity are not compatible.
1
@KangenAlec From reality, i get my information from reality... So from whose ass you got those numbers from?
1
@peytongross9970 "I do not believe in science as far as evolution" Evolution is provable and observable fact from reality. " Big Bang " Its current BEST explanation for origins of our local universe based on ALL evidence we have and contradicted by none. "and believing that the Earth is round does not mean I’m not a Christian" And no one said that you are not. You can believe in globe, flat, triangle or cube earth, you can still be a Christian, that's completely unrelated from each other. "All Christians are not “flat earthers” like this dude" Correction: Most Christians are not flat earthers, but most flat earthers are Christians, or atleast religious based on bible.
1
@peytongross9970 "Please tell me how a big explosion caused that" Big bang dint caused that... Natural processes did, like gravity, ground erosion, evolution and so on. Everything, i mean, everything we have confirmed about our world or reality excludes god as requirement for anything. All this complexity you talk doesn't require god, none of it does. "How did the complexity of the way the world works come from an explosion" Correction: Expansion. To give you simple analogy here to explain all this "complexity" and how it came "from" Big Bang. Take a bucket full of water, put in some dirt, shake it, it will represent Big Bang, leave it be for couple minutes, and you will get nice order, where dirt will be on bottom, some twigs on top and water in middle. Why? Because we have gravity which "arranged" all that mess into nice order. No god required for that. "In my opinion" Correct, your opinion, but majority of actual experts who spends their entire lives exploring all this doesn't agree with you. Why? Why is your 5 minute google search opinion should be taken more serious then people who spends their entire lives doing actual research and experiments? "In my opinion it takes MUCH more faith to believe that happened" But its not. None of that requires for magic to be real, your position does. And just take a note that you used "faith" as some attempt to LOWER actual scientific position which would mean that you do realize that your position which is based on faith is in allot worst position. Well, big bang is not based on faith, but thanks for admitting that your opinion is just bad on its core which is based on faith. "than to believe there was a creator that intentionally created us." You cant even prove that creator is real or that he could even be possible to be real. So how did you determined that one is more likely than another option if you cant calculate probability? Is X more than Y? Or its less? Or equal? Answer me this: IS X MORE THAN Y?
1
Peace starts when Russia leaves Ukraine territory
1
SpaceX, that's what Starlink is for.
1
@deepakkamuz Evaluation of the company isn't equal to what it can actually make over the years you know. Currently Starlink is making around 6 billion in a year, it should double in next year. SpaceX doesn't need entire trillion today, they only need to gather enough funds to start colonization and keep it going few decades to come. Fun side not. There are asteroids (like 16 Psyche) with minerals on them worth $10 quintillion bucks. Try to guess which company could actually build space facilities to start mining? Its way in the future, but point being that space can be highly profitable, you just need infrastructure for that. Musk said it multiple times that Starlink is the main money source for Mars colonization plan. "We think Starlink is a key steppingstone towards establishing a self-sustaining city on Mars and a base on the moon. The revenue generated from providing global internet coverage will help fund the development of Starship and other technologies necessary for interplanetary travel." "Something tells me he might need a lot of public money to fund this" He doesn't, he already generates crap ton of money across all of his companies. Happy holidays
1
Some people call the solution for it a "recycling"
1
And perpetual motion engine is a real thing too...
1
"moeron"? Irony....
1
@TheRealKela I'm to old to understand this "reference", what does your reply as single dot should mean?
1
Russia lost huge portion of its revenue... You can't just decide to sell 100x more oil or gas to remaining countries which still wants to do business with you without a loss...
1
I think you wanted to say: If the Earth is flat how come the sun DOES go in a straight line?
1
@BaselNajdawi Goodluck waiting...
1
Even if this is a simulation, earth is still oblate spheroid.
1
Do you even know what UFO stands for?...
1
Do you speak english?
1
Its not being accepted blindly, we have crap ton of supporting evidence, heck basic observation of sun from your backyard proves that earth is a globe. Someone being ignorant and dumb doesn't make them open minded. And you know what? Her position is based on her religious brainwashing, aka result of her cult.
1
Thy do.. Some of them... As there is no flat earh model, there is no agreed upon earth characteristics or methods determining that. So you have WIDE range of crazy ideas and methods in supposedly determining shape of earth.
1
What?
1
No, book makes a claim that god is real and that he so, doesn't mean that any of this is actually true.
1
Russia withdrew and got pushed back, how the hell did they won anything at this point?
1
Ukraine exploits Russian desperate want to take entire Bakhmut, they are depleting Russian forces by playing it safe, slow small retreats if it becomes dicy while taking out bunch of Russian forces. To defend something is allot simpler and safer than to try attack it, so its a smart move to just keep Russians attack it while Ukraine can be maximally safe in their defensive positions.
1
It would be quite stupid to send millions of flat earthers into space by itself. So not only flat earthers would feel stupid...
1
Future of hobbyists, 100% not a future for regular passenger cars.
1
Irony is strong with rus bots.
1
@KangenAlec Why is your magical map has incorrect representation of reality? Take Australia for example. Why its so wide when in reality it should not be? Why does flat earthers even fail in producing flat map of flat surface if earth is actually flat? Are you not even capable in performing most simplest task possible?...
1
@KangenAlec That's not how angles work...
1
@amirhasanbasic2193 Con-man? Really? Stop being blind thunderf00t fanboy and actually check reality.
1
@amirhasanbasic2193 "where are all the robo taxis, " FSD is still in beta, but its now quite often drives from point A to point B without human intervention. While date when it comes out wont be when Elon said, it will come out. "Where are solar roofs" Being installed. "where is the "very simple air hockey tunnel train"? " Being developed? "Oh and where the fuck is "rail beating" electric semi, not one to be seen yet alone convoys of them." Being built?... Like seriously... They are starting deliveries of those this or at the start of next year... You do know that there was small issue relating to chips across the planet?... "It's all a load of crap" Which one? You dint present anything here what is actually crap. "Tesla being valued so high and boasting about big factories is all thanks to dumb american tesla fanboys that never saw how Volkswagen factory looks" How does Volkswagen factory look like? And should we care about Volkswagen?... have you heard about dieselgate?... You want to point out con-artists, then you have prime example here: Volkswagen. Do you have any real objections here or are you just being buthurt just because Elon does something you will never be able to do?
1
@amirhasanbasic2193 Beat rail? You literally failed to understand basics here? It's not about physics, it's about costs... You know... Money... Cost to transport X amount of things with rail and with semis. You failed on this too? Damn... "The hyperloop is also not possible, because physics. " Hyperloop is possible, it's just not really that practical. As you are so smart (cha) give us ONE thing which makes hyperloop imposible. Just one thing will do and we will see how smart you are. "Unrealistic deadlines do jack shit. Lies are lies" Unrealistic deadlines are just that, unrealistic deadlines, at best where you can cry is about missed deadline, that's it. So your BEST complain is that Elon missed deadline... Wow... I guess that does it, Elon should be put into jail for missing deadlines... Do you even hear yourself while you make such comments?
1
@danparsons8831 learn the difference between doing something because you have particular religious beliefs and doing something while you have particular religious beliefs. Those are not the same... Tho I have no actual idea what exactly you tried to imply here. Big Bang theory could have been proposed by Hitler himself, would not change anything here...
1
Just like Russians ended this war in 3 days...
1
Joke seen 50 000 times by now.
1
It was controlled by Russia, so no, there won't be any actual video evidence of it.
1
Bots hard at work I see
1
Are you drunk? Russia attacks another country and you want for Ukraine to surrender its lands?... Russia started this war, Russia will suffer consequences of it independent if it managed to take any land in Ukraine or not.
1
There are only Hydrogen fuel cell cars as a real world example, you have 3 huge tanks in a car, which means that you have HUGE middle console, tiny back seat, and tiny trunk. This is to give you 400 miles of range. But keep in mind that this is with hydrogen fuel cells which are TWICE as efficient as HICE type engines, efficient HICE engines, so with this V8 you would need 6+ tanks to get 400 mile range, basically you will have Universal chasi with only 2 seats without any actual free space. Not a good deal...
1
Did you skipped over the part where he mentions price difference?
1
@michaelpierre208 Again, did you skipped over price difference? There is a reason why Tesla have lower quality interior and at same time lower price, those are directly related to each other. He could have atleast compared Plaid model which is atleast somewhat closer to same price range and is latest iteration of interior, but still, having 20-50k extra money for Tesla interior would improve it quite a bit too.
1
@KangenAlec I'm not smoking, so not tripping. You might check your gas pipes, it might be leaking as you clearly hallucinating and seeing something what doesn't exist.
1
@KangenAlec Its might be because you smoked something strange... When you start seeing something what doesn't exist, you have issues.
1
How many companies did he bankrupted? So if you want him to run government as he runs his business, then well, US will be in hard spot. Just FYI I'm not for Biden, I'm not even American, both options are extremely bad. Good luck, you will need it.
1
formerlyn So you will rather pick sweet lie than harsh truth?...
1
You do know that you can see ISS from earth? Right? Cant really decide if you are just trolling here your so confused that you look like one.
1
Russia failing to take over none NATO country... In whose dreams it has any chances to take over anything else?
1
Yea, you are flat earther, atleast you think like that, aka not think. I can determine shape of earth from my backyard without using any math, just basic observations, but you think that you need to literally go into space to know this... I guess you think that Australia isint real too just because you never been there personally?...
1
@MrMichiel1983 Which side you will pick is usually driven by your already existing beliefs. For example, majority of bible believers are no flat earthers, but majority of flat earthers are bible believers. Why you ask? Because bible in multiple places imply earth to be flat pancake, so people who tries to take that book more seriously simply needs to accept that earth is flat and then goes around looking for confirmation about this from any source posible. Earths shape can be determined from your backyard with basic understanding of geometry and basic observations without any math, so simply believing that earth is a globe because some authority said so isint a good solution here. Like for example I believe in Big Bang, but i have no way to actually confirm that by myself, so I have to evaluate how likely this claim would be true even without having access to the information or understanding most of it. But it's quite on different level here and has quite little to no impact on my life in general, so i can just accept it without any real impact.
1
Did you got lost?... This is video about war in Ukraine, not some generic christian propaganda channel.
1
Driving car will be as popular as riding a horse on streets. You can still do it, but with few limitations and in some cases you need a permit to do so. There is no escape from technology going forwards, at some point cars will be fully self driving removing majority of road markings and cleaning up them by quite a big while at same time speeding up actual travel time due to the fact that cars can coordinate with each other and create most optimal route based on every car in entire town where they are now and where they will be in the future. For you, well, this transition will take some time, maybe 20 years, so you have time to enjoy your car.
1
Get a bicycle then... And just FYI there is no such thing as car powered by water... Never was and never will be. You need to put in more energy to separate hydrogen from water than you will get back out of it, so anyone who makes claim "Car runs on water" are either just making clickbait title or full of shit.
1
Are you saying that they need to use 3D globe on 2D map?
1
Congrats, you got basically everything wrong here. "hydrogen is more efficient" False. Hydrogen requires around 60% MORE energy to more your car same distance than BEV. "more renewable" False. You can charge BEV with solar, which is more than renewable. If you want to talk about batteries, then that argument isint valid either, new chemistries are coming out every single year and even existing servers would last for quite some time, not even talking about the fact that you can recycle majority of old battery and make new one from it. "easier to make stations for" False again... Hydrogen stations are extremely more difficult to build... Those are more difficult than gasoline stations to built... While for electrical charging stations you only need power cable...
1
Entertainment. Its not for real debate when it comes to the shape of earth, its spherical, its fact, no one gets their own opinion about facts. But its just entertaining to talk with ignorant people and educate them at same time.
1
You do understand that same things apply to Hydrogen, just that Hydrogen cars uses like 60% more energy for same amount of miles?...
1
Combustion engines are half the efficiency in comparison to hydrogen fuel cell engines, so not an option straight away.
1
@nightshade7240 A true generic Musk hater counts missed and ignores hits, you got that idea correctly. I can bet that if Musk comes out and say that he personally made cure from cancer you would still complain about him taking to long to do it or something. And no, I'm not Musk fanboy, he does bunch of stupid, borderline moronic things, but there is a difference between complaining about actually valid points and just spitting random shit around and checking what will stick. Do you remember TF claims about SpaceX going bankrupt few years back? How did that turned out? You can't have cake without breaking few eggs.
1
@nbafanboy8146 So are you for segregation? Because this is what you want to promote here. ironically enough people like you who says to be against racism wants to have most racist things out there... At the moment you have anything which includes race in it, its racist. Black only universities? Then why would you scream against white only universities? What's next? Black only bathrooms?... You didn't learn anything from the past, aren't you now? If you want to stop racism stop including race into every single thing out there.
1
@Monica_OnTime So why do you want racist laws here? Why does it matter if black enrollment is lower? Why does it matter what skin color you have when you enroll? Why do you people keep being so racist?... Stop mentioning race... if person have good grades, then he will enroll, if he doesn't, then he will not. Again, at the moment you bring in race into conversation, it becomes racist, by definition... "You are focusing on who the policies were intended for, rather than the actual results" Intended for? Non whites and non asians? Right? What do you call a thing when you separate groups of people by their race? Racism... Or maybe you have different definition of it? If your policies are racist, result doesn't matter anymore, you simply have racist policies. "If you were considering the outcomes" What is your goal of outcome? To be racist? " The reality is that ignoring the role of race in fair treatment is harmful" So you do want to be racist... "It’s clear from this comment section that this very point is being proven." I agree, this comment section proves that people like you are racist in their core while thinking that they are not, which is ironic and sad at same time. Stop being racist, please.
1
@TheCrucialQ Do you understand that any policies which includes separation of people based on their skin color is racism by definition?
1
@TheCrucialQ There is no difference why it was created, it remains the fact that it is racist. It could have been created for good reasons, it could have been for bad ones, at the end of the day its still racist.
1
So you defend one conspiracy with another?... Ok...
1
@timneilson5812 0+0 is still 0... You cant make up one conspiracy to "explain" another one... You still need to actually prove atleast one of those if you want to use one to prove another...
1
@timneilson5812 "so you with an open mind have looked at all these different theories cuz they are just theories" There is reason why its called "Conspiracy theory"... Its no longer conspiracy theory when you can actually prove it. " if you have studied the mud floods can you please explain to me why it's not in our history books and it only happened 200 to 250 years ago" How is that related to anything? Even if this conspiracy was shown to be true, that doesn't change the fact that earth is a globe. I dont have time to go around and fact check every single conspiracy theory out there... We have thousands of those floating all over the place... But independent what that one says earth is still a globe... "why it's not in our history books and it only happened 200 to 250 years ago" Maybe because it never happen?... You literally asking me to explain why your unproven conspiracy theory is true... Its not... First of all, its not proven, second, we can present counter evidence for that, third, nobody really cares... This conspiracy is just slightly better then flat earth one, because flat earth is demonstrably false, while for this mud conspiracy you would actually need to look into evidence... But like seriously, which argument you think is the best to prove your mud flood conspiracy? "go to your own city and find those buildings in your own city" What buildings? Building with windows near ground? That's what you think proves mud flood?... Are you kidding me? My parents house has those, and house was built like 30 years ago... Not because mud flood, but because its convenient to have natural light in basement... Damn...
1
@timneilson5812 " no with full entrances full windows everything buried underground sometimes two stories but they're everywhere around the world" So because you seen photos of buildings with doors which are in wrong place you decided that it because of some magical mud flood?... Really?... "you can't prove without a reasonable doubt that the Earth is round" basic observation of sun proves that earth is spherical. "please explain why it's not in the history book" Because there never was global mud flood... It literally could not have been... Just because you can find some buildings buried in the ground proves jack shit. "go watch every rocket launch ever filmed they all go left or right none of them go straight out of space" That's literally how they should go if they want to go into orbit around earth... Jebus... Do you even understand how orbit works?... That's LITERRALY what they SHOULD do to go into orbit... "t we've never seen pictures of the back side of the moon" We have... We have entire map of the moon surface... Google it out...
1
You clearly dint watched this video, dint you now?
1
"right now EV's winning out because they came first and there for the infrastructure is largely in place" Well... Kind of, but not really. While electric car came out before hydrogen one did, those have been terrible for long time while hydrogen cars basically got their peak performance from the start. Thing is that BEV infrastructure is all over the place and it costs little to nothing in comparison to hydrogen stations. "they say at least in my home country that if just 10% of people on a street get a EV car, and they charge them at the same time, the power net will go out because the capacity is not there" Maybe, because people fail to understand that electric grids expand over time, especially with increased demand. So what those people are saying is extremely wrong. They are talking about TODAY'S grid no being able to handle BEV's charging at same time. First of all, 10% of all cars charging at same time would be basically the peak requirement when you have 100% of cars as on the road as BEV's, that aside, it will take years, maybe decades to get to the point where this 10% charging at same time would become reality. "So what needs to happen, is it pulling up the streets in all major cities to get cables down that can support it, this to me seems like it will get very expensive" One BEV charging station costs around 50k, one hydrogen station costs over 1 million. On top of this, hydrogen needs around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance, so if you are afraid of BEV's charging at same time and grid not being able to handle it, then there is zero chance for hydrogen cars. "Also, it is probably about how much the hydrogen technology gets to develop" It wont, hydrogen fuel cell technology is at its peak due to basic laws of physics. There might be few % increase i performance, but nothing dramatical. "In my country EV infrastructure gets way more subsidies than hydrogen" Because there is no point in having hydrogen cars and there is no point in subsidizing those. "As it is now the people that earn the least cannot afford the EV cars already, so I do not see EV cars taking the whole market." BEV's are relatively new and new technology is always more expensive. Prices are going down and for people who uses their cars more often to get BEV is cheaper than to use any other car.
1
Towing capacity is not the same as vertical load... Please educate yourself.
1
@ ? Once again, read this part slowly: Towing capacity isn't the same as vertical load on the hitch. Aka one is horizontal load the other is vertical. CT towing capacity rated at 11000, while vertical hitch load rated at 1100, which is normal rating which usually is 10-15% of towing capacity. So CT failed at more than 9x of its rated vertical hitch load, not half way, but 9x. Do you get it now why this video received so much negative comments? Because its dishonest and makes people like you to misunderstand basic things here. it didn't fail before it rated load, it failed more than 9x.
1
You missed entire point of colonizing Mars here...
1
And I have red shoes
1
Still going around with your nonsense?
1
@ihatemainstream1461 Once again, no actual video proving you point... Why are you not capable in doing so? You made specific claim here, ether provide evidence for it or concede that its full of shit and you are wrong here. And just FYI Dubay is con artist who makes money from people like you. His nonsensical video got debunked so many times that I lost count at this point. His first point is moronic, at best, rest of them fall under same category.
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke If I would fail with IQ test then I should not own a gun. So we agree on that one. Cool beans.
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke If you would fail to answer (not even selecting one of the possible answers) to all question from IQ test, that's a failure... Right? How do you define failed test?
1
@MartinMartin-bh4ke So your definition of failed test is "No"? Kind of short one... Do you have longer one?
1
And yet China refused to provide ammunition, go figure.
1
Loose your car keys and you are gone... How is this even an argument? And as mentioned, you still have keycard as backup in case you don't have your phone, and that keycard is just in shape of credit card which can be in your wallet just in case you forgot to charge your phone or something
1
Because technology like this CAN'T exist... There is no such thing as creating hydrogen on demand, anyone saying otherwise are either lying or just repeating a lie.
1
Would agree on stalks, while instrument cluster in front is for more expensive cars, as that part alone ad's quite a bit of expenses on entire production line, so not really happening on cheaper end models. Tho there are 3d party options you can install and get similar or even better results.
1
@lilyalilyam8328 I mean, in general screen at back can be more useful than redundant screen in front. And yes, there are cheap cars which have instrument cluster... Tho it has nothing to do with my point here. Extra hardware increases price of the car in any case. For me its enough to have one central screen, it's not like you have to keep watching at your screen 24/7... You are generally only interested in your speed, maybe navigation could be more convenient on that screen, but redundant either way. Secondary screen if nice to have, but not necessary. And Tesla tends to simplify options in how many ways you can customize your car to avoid having bunch of production lines just for few cars they might need to make this month. In short: If you want instrument cluster, buy more expensive car version.
1
Exaggerating much? if he actually lied about something then you can feel free to sue him. So maybe what you think that he lied about isint actually a lie as he is still running around and doing his stuff?
1
@amelliamendel2227 It's out already, people are using it happily for quite some time. When is SpaceX going into bankruptcy as TF claimed it will 2 years ago?
1
Maybe, it depends if existing prices are in net positive or negative for the producers. You can buy some cars which gives you like 15k in free hydrogen refueling, so who knows. In general scaling up production of anything will lower its price, but it would be hard to guess how much it would go down.
1
Studies have been done to compare end to end pollution and BEV's came on top as least polluting, closely followed by Hydrogen cars.
1
@maurer3d Going down? Where? Because it was rising for this entire year... Started this year at 100, now its at 250... Did I missed something here?
1
Its copycat because entire rocket is basically a copy of Falcon 9. And this is a failure because it supposed to be static fire test, but it wasn't. Exploding rockets when you attempt to launch them is fine, heck its even fine for them to explode on standing pad for static or launch tests, but to have static fire test and have it just fly away isn't good...
1
And I like caramel ice cream!
1
Its not zero pollution either... How do you think hydrogen is being sourced?
1
Multitasking? Its a really weird concept I once heard, but someone said crazy idea that you can do multiple things at once.... Crazy, I know...
1
He a shill?
1
@lebaneeze "so should globe manufacturers should stop labeling the Earth north and south?" Why? Its just basic arbitrary label for directions. Like every single map uses North as reference point to always be on top, its just convenient... Same thing goes to the globe, north is uses as "top" part of globe for convenience sake. "Should they not spin also because it doesn’t exist ?" What doesn't exist? Spin exists, so no idea what are you talking here. "These anomalies only apply to earth ?" What anomalies? "Can we replicate the idea that north and south don’t exist and somehow spinning a globe has no effect ?" What? Earths spin does have effect, but is like 0.4% of what gravity does, so while you can be 0.4% lighter on equator than on poles, that small difference doesn't really have meaningful effect. You look confused here beyond belief, even you comments are confusing and hard to fallow.
1
You do realize that by globe model results should have been the same? Right?
1
You do realize that for something to exist it should exist for some time period? Right? What do you call something what existed for 0 seconds?... Imaginary... And is your argument that in heaven there will not be such thing as time? How the hell would that even work? And how the hell do you know that this is the case?...
1
Yes, in the headlines... Just like some BEV companies have been with titles "Next Tesla killer is here!!!" and never got realized...
1
So you are not against BEV's, you are simply against some countries exploiting people... And just FYI biggest lithium exporter is Australia.
1
To liquefy hydrogen you would need to cool it down, way way below 0C, which is impossible to be maintained for regular cars, so not an option and basically will never be one.
1
Correction: Russia is trying to kill every single Ukrainian.
1
No, tax payers are not paying for any of that... Do you even understand how contracts work in general?
1
Why do you think NATO or EU was established in the first place? It was due to countries like Russia. Its a protection from being invaded, not a group of countries who will attack someone, but well, Putin uses this as excuse to invade another country, but now he will get 2 new NATO members right beside his borders.
1
@commonsenseskeptic US military buying starlink for Ukraine aid, so like, I guess your claim that US army doesn't need it isn't factually correct? Right? Laggy and gappy internet beats the one which doesn't work at all... And you are complaining about system which was barely deployed that its not perfect by your standards... C'mon... You're more than welcome to take down your confusing post to clear things up.
1
@Antares2 Legacy systems are either in geocentric orbit or you will have only short periods of time when you have internet connection... So no, US military can and is using Starlink as its better solution than what they have now. And just FYI geocentric orbiting satellites will introduce crap tone of latency and you will need better transmitters to actually send strong enough signal from earth to reach one. And low orbit ones will wizz over the area in few minutes at best and after that you will loose connection until another one goes over that same area, which isn't happening that often due to how little of those are currently being used by US military. There is only single thing which prevents US military from using Starlink, its that its a private company and US military would be dependent on private companies provided support, which is no go unless they make special deal with them.
1
@Antares2 When you have war zone, you will not have cables all over the place... Especially if you are in the middle of sea... So your argument is mute here. And they can fly drone over there by simply putting it into auto pilot mode which will do the 99% of flying and then pilot would take over for the main part of the mission when there is actual satellite over the head for this to actually work. Which on itself is a big limitation as you will have short window for attack before it goes back into autonomous mode. Having stable internet connection with low latency across entire planet 100% at the time is a huge benefit which US military currently doesn't have. Its either extra spoty or has long latency which will not work for any faster actions. Light bulb was answer for the question no one asked either... But look where we are now... You will never get 100% coverage of land with fibers... That's a pipe dream... Heck, even today like 50% of humans has no access to any type of internet, let alone fiber... And how long fiber cable will need to be for cruise ships?... Its a snarky remark, but again, this is where starlink comes into play. There are crap tone of places where people wants to have internet access but no company in the world will spend literal millions of dollars to create this infrastructure for five people in rome remote areas... Well clearly someone did some actual math here to justify this insanely big satellite swarm to be actually profitable in a long run.... Isn't it? Its not like there are just dumb people working for space companies who have no idea about a need to have satellite internet... I live in a country which is extremely good when it comes to fiber optics, but even then we have crap tone of places where you can barely get decent mobile internet. And those places will NEVER see actual fiber optics and there isn't enough people to justify investment into one. There are 1.5 million current starlink customers, and their growth is basically at the start of S curve, which is mainly limited by produced starlink dishes and approval from countries to actually allow it inside their territory. Its going up and its going fast.
1
@rodfriesen4370 I'm guessing you are Christian, but then, how is evolution being true actually works with your religion? If there never been Adam and Eve, then there never been first sin and then entire Christ story has no meaning and never happen and so on. So how did you worked around that small detail?
1
@rodfriesen4370 But then again. Why are you so desperate to keep that religion? Why do you need it at all if you already trying to find loopholes to keep believing it? It's not only an issue with Adam and Eve in light of evolution being true, entire book has extreme amounts of issues and claims which are either factually incorrect or just plain empty assertions about something no one can ever verify. So why not simply ditch it entirely?
1
@rodfriesen4370 You will get backlash from people around you if they are hard core believers, but this doesn't prevent you from simply stopping believing it and just pretending that you still do. Jesus story is one of those empty assertions made by bible no one could prove to be true. Just keep in mind that I'm talking about Christ here and not Jesus, those are separate claims. And, by bible itself Jesus supposedly said that he came to not abolish old laws but to fulfil them, so anything what was present in old testament applies in new one. No one, besides religious people, said that something came from nothing. This is just generic lie/misrepresentation being spread around by religious people. I'm guessing you are talking about Big Bang here. First of all, its not fully established that it actually happen, but even then, entire Big Bang only talks about ALREADY existing energy/matter expanding from single point into what we have now, it doesn't make any claims about what happen before it. Its religious people who wants to claim that universe was created from nothing by god when he got bored existing outside space and time. And on top of this... Origins of universe isn't known by all parties here, so why is simply saying "We don't know" is a bad option here? Your entire argument looks more like "I can't explain X, so i will go with random empty assertions my religion made up" Not having explanation for something doesn't make you rational when you pick random one. This is how we got god's like Thor to explain lightning or Zeus to explain oceans, people had no explaining for a thing and they just made things up to fill in that gap. It's called god of the gaps fallacy. You just want to either believe in your religion or you are scared of not having answer for a question. This is your issue here. Stop being scared of unknown, actually start investigating it.
1
@rodfriesen4370 You should start by questioning your base beliefs, get a question you are interested and if its being answered by your religion, think about it, why are you picking answer from your religion when we either have better one from scientific standpoint which has some actual evidence supporting that answer or simply you have answer to a question no one can have answer too at this moment in time. Picking random answer you like to a question doesn't actually provide correct answer here, you simply can't handle not having any answer to a question, it other words, you are afraid of saying "I don't know, let's investigate". How universe started? I don't know, let's investigate. What was before this universe? I don't know, let's investigate. But if you have question like "How universe started?" and your answer is "God did it because this 2000 year old book said so" isn't the honest position you can hold here. Claims need supporting evidence, what bible does is only makes claims, empty assertions and quite often false ones on top of all of that. You do remember that entire story about global flood? Well that one factually did not happen and could not have happen based on actual objective evidence, so you have atleast one major story which is provably false. Then question remains: How much of remaining bible is false?
1
First of all, guy in this video miss used Tesla AutoPilot system, basically he has no idea how to use it. Second, just do basic research before you comment on things you have no idea about.
1
You can feel free to make actual counter argument here if you can.
1
@vLadimir333-dodji-i-vidi Reality check: Ukraine people wants to defend their own country, at the moment they will decide to stop everyone will stop providing military supplies. Its not rocket science, yet you people still fail on basic logic here.
1
@huntercook6605 About to hit the wall when its 3.5' away? You mean 9 centimeters away? Isn't that an accurate representation?
1
@huntercook6605 I like normal units.
1
@huntercook6605 You should start using normal units, to avoid confusion with people who likes normal measuring system.
1
@huntercook6605 Was talking in generals here, even if you are talking with hard core US citizen, using normal measuring units would be more beneficial than sticking with outdated ones. It's time to move on.
1
One more rus bot detected.
1
@mattmantrell5708 As there are dozens if not hundreds accounts posting basically exact same thing over and over again without ever replying, that makes them a bot. They can always challenge my claim here, but we both know they will not as this is not what Putin paying them for.
1
@reneechery9903 No one really complains, you are watching news channel which wants to show you something interesting. While there will be some issues with such fast transition, its not that big of a deal as someone wants to put it. issue is only that this needs to happen in less than a year while such transition usually would take a decade. But well, sooner we get rid of Russia, sooner we can ignore it entirely and forget that such country even exists.
1
@jermainegray5502 ? In my dreams what? NATO is getting 2 new members due to this war and basically entire Europe got unified against Russia due to this war... So what is in my dreams exactly?
1
To provide internet for Ukraine? Hard to say...
1
Then go to your garage if you have one, close it, turn on your car and wait there (sarcasm, don't actually do it)... Lets see how it will end up for you, after all CO2 is a scam... So you should be juuuuuust fine. Right?
1
Just like horses...
1
How can you same money? One thing would be vertical integration, basically doing all of it yourself with your own equipment you make yourself. Second big thing would be scale, in this instance he is making way smaller tunnels which means that you need smaller equipment and its way simpler to build. So nothing special about tunnels which are 10x cheaper, you could drive that price even more.
1
@grogery1570 It happen in las vegas, but funny thing is that Tesla itself basically negated a need to have those tunnels with Tesla FSD where you could have one car for multiple users, aka removing cars from the roads and parking lots while giving more free time for the ex drivers to do their own thing which would mean that getting faster to destination is no longer a big priority thing. Those tunnels are fine'ish, issue is that you only getting point to point driving, so you can't really have actual web of those underground, so it makes it way less practical. Its one of those things where you like "Yea, it does work, but like, should we really invest so much time and money into it to negate small inconvenience?" its borderline between useful and useless. It's like having solar panel on your BEV's roof, do you really want extra inconveniences just to gain small benefit from it? Not really, even if it is benefit, its so small that it makes it meaningless
1
You cant have gravity on flat earth, not the gravity we know about.
1
@ceychungyu7462 "cowards tend to hide behind skirts" Exactly! This is why Russia keeps threatening everyone with nukes. Irony, isint it?
1
You want WW3?
1
@asimrashid8963 We are near, but its not guaranteed to happen, you wanting for NATO to attack Russia would guarantee WW3. So again, do you want WW3?
1
Show us working prototype and we will arrange some donations and investors. Sounds good?
1
@freakattack6890 So when prototype gets presented then investors will appear, not sooner. I mean, you can still find gullible people who will give you money for empty promises, but like, his comment here is more than weird.
1
@wispererflame7286 And? Should we now switch from petroleum to liquified coal?... Like, what's your point here?
1
@wispererflame7286 Old infrastructure is made for, well, old infrastructure. Having new type of fuel will not be as simple as just putting it into existing fuel tanks. Now conversion of co2 waste while might sound cool on paper it will not work on actual real world scales. How much would fuel like that cost 10x more than current one? 50? It wont be cheaper, that's for certain.
1
Because Putin said so?
1
Because he is normal?
1
@3xefx8x Your silly "analogy" has TINY flaw in it... You want to use ferris wheel as a globe earth model to test gravity WHILE having it on top of earth... Like... Do you people even use tiny amount of that thing between your ears before you make silly comments like that? By which model you should remain attached to ferris wheel while it turns around? Its not on a globe model, and its not on a flatardian one either, so which earth model are you trying to debunk here? Just to be clear here, your ferris wheel stands on 5.972 × 10^24 kg mass object while in reality, aka globe one, down is towards earth's center. Why? Because objects with mass attract object with mass and that 5.972 × 10^24 kg one will win over your ferris wheel all day every day. If you want for you "analogy" to make any sense you would need to perform this test in 0G environment, aka space. But I guess you don't believe in that one either. You people (flat earthers and trolls) are just weird.
1
Whats your point?
1
@bobbobber4810 God is good? Which one is that exactly? Tho this presupposing that god is real... So maybe lets start from beginning. Can you prove that god is actually real?
1
@bobbobber4810 Och sorry, dint realized that you are not the same person. You have same colored avatar and from your comment it looked like the same person answering to my comment.
1
@danielbailey5849 When Russia starts knocking at your doorstep should everyone else say the same? This is stopping cancer from spreading before it did any more serious damage.
1
Danny Michelle "'I think' well sheep can't think. " Funny enough only conspiracy nuts uses word "sheep", its like water mark in how to spot conspiracy nut. "Ball Earth is denied not just by Americans but people all over the world" Yes, we have ignorant people across entire globe... Shocker... I know... "It's not America-based." Strange enough (not really) education level directly correlates to flat earther amount in that area and America isint known by its excellent schools... "But you are a murican so I don't expect you to know that" I'm not Murican, so maybe not assume something without knowing it to be actually true? "you guys believe in whatever you are taught" No, we simply know how to verify shit and so far it give correct results. Earth is a globe not because someone said so. Let me guess: Earth is flat because bible said so?
1
Simple: Low production rates and free advertisement from everyone mentioning Stellantis. Majority of car manufacturers have some sort of eco friendly option, but majority are just there for the show and for them to be able to tick box "eco friendly option" and nothing more.
1
@albangautier9245 China isn't the only one which can make batteries, while it can pump out higher numbers of cars this doesn't mean that those cars are actually good or wanted by anyone else outside China. Heck there are plenty of videos showing graveyards of China BEV's just stacked in parking lots and left to rot. So either people didn't wanted those or manufacturer just made more to boost its numbers for the sake of being #1. There is a reason why "Made in China" doesn't have a good name behind it. And yea, 10k cars in a year is completely and absolutely nothing. When they start making any reasonable amount of those cars we will know that they are actually serious about it, until then, its just cheap advertisement.
1
And this is why no one likes Russians.
1
So generic "whataboutism" comment? Not even being original here?
1
@imsid7851 Convenience... I am like 99.9% of time behind the wheel when we are going somewhere, sometimes I just want to relax and actual observer something else besides grey asphalt in front of me for the next 5 hours of driving... You are making similar argument people made about horse riding, that dint age too well.
1
Did you tried to make red herring fallacy here?
1
Its not always about winning territory, its about depleting enemies weapon and man supplies. At this point Russia is desperate to take territory from Ukraine, so they will send forced into suicide missions, Ukraine can use that against them by taking defensive positions and having smallest risk in loosing their own during this fight. It's better to retreat slightly than to risk losing entire battalions.
1
@pmoney2 Och now I'm just curious, as you seem to be so lost and without any actual counter argument to anything anyone says. So just curious what is your deal here.
1
@Ozhull Isn't that convenient? its like self fulfilling prophesy "Pig can fly. People will not believe this." and then when people don't believe you, its somehow proves that its actually true?... Just check how many videos TF made about Elon this year alone... There is obvious factual obsession here...
1
EV's are on rise... How the hell are those failing?
1
@packedandready5693 Now go and find statistics on how many % wise BEV's freeze and fail and burn in comparison to any other car. You will be surprised... But you never fact checked, didn't you?
1
Because they vote...
1
@jefferywise1906 Point is that they belong to same society you are in, so educating people and making them less ignorant will be beneficial in a long run. Voting example was just a basic one, but it indicates main reason why you should care.
1
Don't bring in imaginary friends into conversation.
1
@iskindersam7834 Explain what?
1
@ Atleast you thought, that's a progress.
1
@ Do you seriously think that I'm sitting here all day long and preparing responses when I come up with something?... You are not the center of the world, I will respond when I get time and get notification about it, you are extremely unimportant part of my life, so why are you surprised that it took some time to respond?
1
@iskindersam7834 I need to rub 2 brain cells when your original argument was to appeal to your imaginary friend based on some old book of fables? Maybe its not me who needs to sit and think things through?
1
And this is why no one likes Russians.
1
@trees6543 You look more like a troll than a genuine religious nutcase at this point. Your ignorance is like taken directly from a book "how to pretend to be dumb 101"
1
have you seen Russian propaganda news channels?...
1
You could, if you can keep that hydrogen at -252C temperature. Just a reminder that absolute zero is at −273.15C, so you can imagine how difficult and impractical it is.
1
@CiaraPipi In china even videos about fake things in china are fake. Ironic.
1
He does need it to be in weight and not volume. You can have liquids in volume or weight, as there is no difference between those numbers, but with gas type materials you can only go with weight.
1
Russians are coping from day 3 of this war...
1
Point remains that back seat is way smaller for the car this size. This is one of many issues with hydrogen cars, you simply can't have spacious interior with them
1
It's called "natural obstacle"... Rivers are the one of the best natural things to be used as a front line for you to hold. It would be stupid for Russia to allow Ukraine taking positions on another side, but then again, we are talking about Russians here...
1
@eduardopena5893 I have no idea what you are complaining here about... You have video about earth being flat where Bill here explaining why its not, but you instead of actually staying on the topic started to talk about "Pushing transgender and the LBGTQ agenda on little children" which is not related to an actual topic... I honestly have no idea what his position is on LGBTQ and what is this all about children, but I honestly don't care as its completely irrelevant to this topic.
1
Vaporware.
1
There isn't much of R&D to be done anymore, there are basic limitations of hydrogen which can't really be solved, like the fact that hydrogen is really bad when it comes to energy density per volume, or that thing where hydrogen will corrode metals. Hydrogen barely improved from the first car models, while BEV's keeps improving every single year with quite few battery technologies which could make any other transportation method obsolete.
1
@Marcg-b4n Dealerships literally add extra on top of cars price. How does that actually help out with production tho? Same with repair shops.
1
@Marcg-b4n Yes, but that has nothing to do with original comment here.
1
@KangenAlec Research? facebook search?...
1
If NATO joins this war directly its officially WW3 and allot more people will die. And there are basic rules joining NATO, one of those is that you should not have war in your country to join. While at this moment there might be made exception and Ukraine might be allowed to join NATO skipping multiple criteria. War politics 101. If governments dint cared then Ukraine would have received zero support.
1
Yes yes yes, just like GM is leading BEV adoption, Biden said so, so it must be true...
1
Which source is not a propaganda by your opinion?
1
@m16ty You could call it 30cm... those 5mm will not make any difference here, but now you have nice clean number to work with. And what you are talking here is simply using some random object to measure a thing and then use same object to transfer that distance to another place, you are not actually measuring distance in feet here, you just using your feet to measure distance for quick transfer, there is difference. I can do the same thing with random stick I pick from the ground, or do it in my steps,which is roughly 1 meter, If I don't care about accuracy and just want to get more or less approximate distance transfer.
1
Why i'm not surprised that you are promoting paid book?
1
Irony is that you are "protecting" yourself from some one who got gun to protect themselves from some one with a gun.
1
TheBookWorm1718 Was it to hard for you too understand what i said? I'm simply pointing out that you want gun to protect yourself from exactly same person who got gun protect himself from some one like you who got a gun to protect himself. Its snow ball effect. You got gun because your neighbor got a gun, and your neighbor got a gun because his neighbor got a gun and so on and on and on.
1
TheBookWorm1718 Issue is that people like abusive husbands can get hands on guns without any trouble what will lead to shooting sooner or later. More guns will always lead to more shootings, yes some one may need protection, but... If you give easy access to guns for everyone, you are giving access to guns for everyone, including abusive husbands. Should you have a right to own gun? Yes. Should it be hard to get? Yes. Currently it looks like you could have gun vending machine with current laws, put in quarter and get ak-47...
1
TheBookWorm1718 So lets see facts. Does gun shops perform background checks? Yes. Ok, that's cool. But... You have so called "gun shows" where you don't need any background checks to buy a gun. And you don't need background checks when you buy a gun from second hand. And i'm not even talking about situations when guns are being stolen. And i'm not talking about situations when you can have 0 criminal records on you, but you are going to buy gun for one... And what more funny that you can buy automatic rifle at age 18 while beer is been sold only from 21... Isint this slightly backwards?...
1
Hi Bye Well i know that... And more guns will only lead to more shootings and deaths by guns.
1
TheBookWorm1718 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3hCe7vX0gE Do you even fact check before commenting? 2. Will clarify this one, was talking about semi-automatic, not fully automatic ones. And you can buy AR-15 in Florida. Because, you know... Self defence and stuff...
1
Hi Bye "a NRA person stoped a shooter for killing a bunch of people because he had a gun" Yes, but... You don't see big picture here... That or many other shootings could be prevented before it even happen if getting guns would be allot harder and with normal background checks. You want guns to protect yourself from people with guns. Do you see irony here? More guns you have in circulation, bigger chance for some one with mental illness or bad intentions to get hands on one of them, and that will lead in multiple deaths. "You also don’t know that automatic rifles have been banned already" Din't i clarified that i was talking about semi-automatic and not fully automatic ones?... "The ones you see in shooting are made or got from out of country" That would not make any sense as you can buy guns like those in any gun shop with basic background check or at gun show without any. "So let’s ban guns so people can not protect them selves for the people who make or get automatic rifles for out of the country" That narrow thinking... Short story about one of the shootings "The 19-year-old had made threats and was expelled from school, bragged about killing animals, posed with guns on social media and went to a clinic for mental health treatment before took an AR-15-style rifle he had bought legally to a Florida high school and killed 17 people." "That is what your saying right now." What i'm saying that you need allot more strict laws for owning guns, allot better background check, no open carry nonsense and so on. Us has most guns per capita in entire world and one of most loose laws for owning guns and it has most mass shootings in a world. Those things have connection you know... If you have person with mental issues and he has access to a gun, you will have bunch of dead people, this is simple reality you choose to ignore for some strange reason.
1
Hi Bye Allot more strict background checks. No gun reselling without changing registration who owns a gun which should include same strict background check. And flipping hell, not semi-automatic purchases before age of like 25... Its should be: beer - 21, hand guns - 23, semi automatic - 25. Not a way around. Just look at other countries and what they have in place for gun ownership and background checks. Its not like you need to invent bicycle, just use existing and successful methods already present some where else.
1
Hi Bye If you can buy a gun without background checks or official registration, then anybody can get hands on one. Background check is not equal to background check. In other countries this means full check with psychological evaluation and you need to have good reason for owning a gun. Analogy would be: buying a pack of gum and buy a car. One requires only your money, other requires you to have drivers license, official registration and so on. US laws is that pack of gums, in my country its in level of buying car by that analogy. You can still get a gun, but you will have to go throw allot more checks before you can get one. And on another side we still have issue with people himself. How often do you hear that some one shot some one because they had suspicion of something? Often enough. While in my country it just doesn't happen, ofcorse its for 2 reasons, different attitude for others and obvious reason, guns are not a common thing.
1
Hi Bye So by your logic, lets create gun wending machines on each street corner where you can put a dime and ak-47 cames out, just in case you will need to protect yourself...
1
Hi Bye And when did i said you should ban all guns?... And you are afraid of some one with gun because its terribly easy to get one for anybody. Current rules for guns are as loose as they can get as next step would be no rules at all...
1
Hi Bye So we back to that "Make guns accessible throw vending machines as i will need to shoot some one". What would be less likely to happen: teenager imports guns from different country illegally or teenager buys a gun legally in local gun shop?
1
Hi Bye You are not getting my point... Like at all... Simpler methods in getting guns for good people makes simpler methods for getting guns for bad people... Do you have technology which would separate good person from bad one before buying gun? I don't thinks so... And more guns in homes will increase accidents, children will more often take it without permission or some one will steal it and use it. Increasing gun amount will only increase shooting count. This is simple connection between them. "Just like I said what would you do if your in your house alone and a bad guy comes in with a gun what will you do" And from where did he got his gun? In gun shop around the corner... "So I bet you if we stop bullying then there will be less shootings" Well yes, this is one part of all that huge problem with US and constant shootings. Its people attitude towards others. That would lower shooting amount, but to prevent bullying is 1 000 000 harder than implementing more strict gun laws. And you know what, we had in my school bullying, guess how many shooting did we had... In entire country... None... Guess how many we would have if kids who have been bullied had access to guns... "What would you do if a bad gun comes into your house and he has a gun and you don’t?" So that means i need to buy a tank! But in case he has javelin, i need something more serious, maybe automatic turrets around my house to shoot anything who enters territory! Mine field would be nice too. And maybe in worst case scenario, nuke in basement, just to threaten to blow up everything if they try to come in! Where is that limit? More guns to protect from more guns?... Should you need a gun to protect from some one with a gun. Yes. Fine. But that was not my point entire conversation... That person who tries to rob you, got his gun from local dealer, legally or not. But when you have millions of guns circulating around, its really simple to get hands on one of them.
1
@divermike8943 I was afraid of situation like this like a year ago when this war went sideways for the Russians. They could start meltdown on NPP and use that as excuse to withdraw and end this war without actually losing it. I hope I'm wrong here.
1
thing is that most mass shootings are done by the people who got their gun for "self defense". More guns = higher chance in someone using it to cause harm. Its really simple and obvious correlation.
1
@Sahlooochi This entire issue is multi layered one, easy access to firearms is just one of many. I don't think there is a country in the world which doesn't allow you to own fire arms, yet country like US is suffering from mass shootings on daily basis which will only grow as its on snowball effect at the moment. More shootings more people will want to protect themselves which will introduce more guns into circulation which will increase chances in someone getting hands on a gun which will increase shootings... Rinse and repeat. You can get 1 000 000 valid honest gun owners, but you only need ONE to cause quite a bit of damage. Make it harder to get hands on a gun will filter out quite a bit of people who are now getting one without any training or any background checks, yes, this is a thing, you can buy legally a gun in US without ANY background checks. How to do it? Go to gun shows... Buy from second hand... Its not required legally for you to present any papers, so you can have one clean buyer which can then legally resell all those guns all over the place. Answering to your question. Yes, it went down. Mass shooting count went down. Violent crimes went down in general. Guns on their own causes more harm in shorter period of time with less effort put into it. Like that saying goes "don't bring a knife to a gunfight", because one will always win over the other. I would rather take criminal with a knife than the one with a gun, even if in first case I didn't had a gun and in second one I did. Gun is still more dangerous independent what you have for self defense. And more people you have with guns around you more on edge you will be yourself by knowing that anyone at any point could just lose their marbles and start shooting everyone. Solution? More guns?... Well, that doesn't work as of clear example with US.
1
@anfieldreds_1892 They think that there is global conspiracy to hide real shape of earth so people in power could some how control others because of this... I dont know... Its bonkers... Entire movement doesn't make any sense... 9/11 atleast is possible as there is nothing preventing it to be inside job. While shape of earth is not really debatable when its a factually spherical. All conspiracies boil down to one most common reason: its against mainstream. How often did you heard "argument" for the earth being flat because you have been brainwashed by government from childhood? Or that your are a sheep? Or any other nonsensical statement related to mainstream understanding of world... They want it to be true because they want to feel special and not because they can prove it.
1
@TheDCGuitar13 I guess Putin threatening and demanding for sanctions to be lifted is not relevant and those actually doesn't work? If everything is so good in Russia then you should not fear anything here, you stronk rubble will be stronk! And yes, it's a rubble and not ruble.
1
Its usually: "Because bible said so"
1
First of all, it wasn't shadow storm missile, second, it hit its target way behind enemy lines which means that Russian air defense failed here, so same thing can be repeated over and over again if needed. And no, its not a pothole... You can't just poor some asphalt on it and call a day...
1
But like why? There are allot more deserving people who wants to go to mars for actual purpose and not some nutjobs which would be waste of time and money to send even one of them out there for sake of showing that they are wrong.
1
@serpico1616 Thing is that hitch capacity is rated at 1100 while it failed at what? 10000? So it exceeded 9x the rating, yet this video still tries to say that it was utter failure... Do you see tiny issue here?
1
@ But this video doesn't show that, this is the issue. If there is issue with small fractures appearing in CT frame, THAT would be news worthy, but to show CT hitch fail under 9x the weight it was rated for isn't. Like seriously, if hitch failed at 50x the rated value, would it still be a failure? How many X you need for it to be success? Issue is with this video making fuss about something what isn't an issue, atleast not in this video. Its like rolling over CT with a tank, observing its frame failing spectacularly and screaming how bad it is... Like... What did you expected? But if you could show that frame accumulates small fractures over time which could lead to critical breaking point, THAT would be worth mentioning. Dude is simply salty at Elon and wants to find anything he can to shit on him, which isn't the same as to just present objectively bad things in objective way. Just go and read comments here, majority are pointing out the same thing independent if they like Musk or not, independent if they like CT or not, simply put this test was stupid.
1
Why? Like, this would be the actual question. Why did he cut that one? Because if that child cancer thing was just money laundering scheme, then it would be warranted to be cut, right? If it was legit one which done something actually good, then it would be bad thing. So question remains: Why?
1
Majority of hydrogen is made from natural gas... So like... What?...
1
People literally believe that universe was created by a wizard after he got bored existing outside space and time... Belief in flat earth is not that far fetched...
1
@philaypeephilippotter6532 It is silly, i mean i could argue that theists are even more rational, after all you cant prove that god is not real, while we can disprove flat earth and prove globe, but both are based on personal feelings, some random opinions and none of them have actual evidence to support their claims.
1
@philaypeephilippotter6532 But are you theist or atheist? You did said that you are not atheist, which would mean that you are theist. Can you define your god you believe in?
1
@philaypeephilippotter6532 "Beyond that I'm not prepared to discuss my spiritual beliefs on the 'Net" Not asking about your spiritual beliefs, asking about your beliefs in god... "You might prefer to think of me as an atheist as nothing in the atheist definition doesn't apply to me" So you are atheist? This basic label is quite simple and basic, but for some reason you keep jumping on and off it. Why? If you dont believe in god(s) then you are atheist, that's it. There are no other baggage. "But I'm definitely not an anti-theist and I don't consider myself an atheist." Its doesn't matter what you consider yourself to be as... I could consider myself an apache attack helicopter, will not make any difference in the fact that I'm a human being and not helicopter... And you don't need to be anti-theist to be atheist, they are separate labels. "I don't know if this helps you at all but I can't/won't expand on it unless we run across each other socially" Thats quite strange. You are here on public internet forum expressing your opinions, but when asked about something you simply reply that you will not engage unless we meet eye to eye... If you want that, you are in wrong place...
1
@philaypeephilippotter6532 "Since my beliefs go beyond atheism it isn't semantically the right word." What? Beyond atheism?... You can't have anything beyond atheism... You ether believe in god(s) or you dont, there are only 2 options here. Why its so hard for you to simply realize that you are atheist and then on top of that you have some extra beliefs which are not tided directly to atheism which are not relevant to my actual question?... "But you limit yourself to either/or definitions (theist or atheist) which isn't semantically unreasonable but I've never limited myself that way" And i'm not limiting myself to one single label... Its like for me to ask if you are a man and you answer with "I cant label myself as a man because i have more things about myself which requires more labels"... OK... I dint asked that... You can be something else on top of being an atheist, that label only indicates ONE thing about you, nothing else. If you want to add your new fancy word "apistevist" cool. Majority has no idea what that word even means, but yet you want to label yourself with that one instead of simply answering to the given question... Why? Why do you tap dance like a religious person instead of simply answering to an actual question? "Why so aggressive and didactic?" Not aggressive, just trying to figure out why are you so afraid to label yourself with some generic label and you want to tap dance all over the place. "Have I offended you?" You cant really offend me on internet, like seriously, you can talk anything you want here, will not get offended, i might get frustrated when people keep avoiding answer and i have to repeat myself multiple times in a row, but you will never offend me here. "But there's no point in trying to get more information from me about my beliefs as none will be forthcoming." In general i'm no longer interest in your actual beliefs, i'm more interested to know why you cant label yourself with a basic label which fits your current beliefs. For some strange reason you think that labeling yourself with "atheist" prevents you from having any extra beliefs or positions. Why?
1
@philaypeephilippotter6532 Wait wait wait, you want to report me for harassment? Wasn't you who responded to my comment first? Shouldn't I report you for harassment then?... Damn... Its public forum, if you dont want to engage in conversations, then don't... I dint asked you to respond to my comment, yet you did, i responded to your response, we engaged in a conversation and now you want to report me for harassment?... Are you ok? Like seriously, think about it. You see 2 people talking on a street, you come to them and start talking with them and when you no longer like where conversation goes you start threatening that you will call police and accuse one of those people of harassment... What? Going back to actual topic, what i was explaining to you is that you can only be one of two things: theist or atheist. If you dont like those labels, fine by me, wont change the fact that you are one of those things. You can label yourself in any way you want, but by general most common definitions of atheism/theism you will fall under one of those categories. Its like you would object that I labeled you "some one who is alive" and you responded with "But I'm not alive or not alive, I'm giblegook"... Well... Cool... You can say that, but you are still one of those things, ether alive or not, what you want to label yourself with will not change that fact... So yea, good luck...
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 " I don't think there's any evidence that scientist were just to afraid to say they were atheist" ?... Go outside of your basement... We have 13 countries TODAY where atheist can be killed legally... How brave would you be to admit publicly to be atheists in heavily muslim countries?... Bible based religions are less immoral on that front, currently, but you can still find quite few people having anger against atheists just because they don't believe in same imaginary friend they do. Its nothing new... "from what I've read it's pretty concrete that they were theist because it made sense to them." If I lived at that time I would have screamed from the roof that I'm theist and I love this god dude everyone around me worships just to avoid consequences... It would have been STUPID to announce yourself as atheist at that time, scientists are not stupid, go figure. " 51% of scientist profecessed a belief in some sort of diety or higher power. " Och that study... I would suggest to actually read it and realize that you adding atheistic scientists to theist group. What qualifies you to be atheist? Disbelief in god(s). What was the questions? Add those numbers correctly and you will realize that even that outdated research shows majority of scientists to be atheists. And just FYI if aliens visited us and they had (duh) better technology than us, that would count as higher power too. So belief in "higher power" is meaningless expression as it can mean anything, what we only care is if they believe in god. "So the claim that the majority of scientist are atheist really doesn't hold water." It does when you learn to read graphs. ONLY one of 4 sections belongs to theists, 2 of those belong to atheists, and last one to neither. So 33% theists, 59% atheists and 7% undecided. Welcome to reality, majority of scientists are atheists. Shocker, isint it?... "But I'd say the majority of atheist scientist were probably atheist before they started studying their fields, so correlation once again is not causation" False, and that would make little to no sense and would only hurt your own position... By your logic here due to the fact that your failure to read graphs would indicate that we have atleast 41% of atheists from all scientists while only having 5% of atheists from entire population, so basically atheists are so good at science that they will beat odds like hell. Right? You do realize that you just implied this? And no, most people believed in a god at some point in their live, fact remains simple, smarter you are more likely you will stop believing in this empty assertion some ancient book made. Nothing complicated here.
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 "If I didn't think there was a god and I was to be killed for it I would speak up and fight for what I thought was true." Well if you want to die, then yea, this is the way to go, but if you want to actually continue living and continue, for example, your scientific work, you will be quite and you will say that you believe in this locally believed imaginary friend. Its not rocket science you know... "stating 49% were atheist and 51% believed in something" Believing in something doesn't make you theist... Like seriously... Will have to copy paste question here for you to realize how much you failed "Who don't believe in god, but believes in universal..." key part is the beginning of it, people who dont believe in god, that's ATHEIST. Welcome to reality. "They never spoke about aliens " Yes, and they never spoke about god either... Because question was about people believing in higher power, which isint a god, just higher power... For some aliens can be higher power, for some black holes could be, but its not the point here, point is that they dont believe in god... "if we're counting aliens I think a lot more atheist scientist would believe in aliens." Quite few do, maybe even majority, including theists. Life can originate on itself from one life materials, we know this for a fact at this point. And we know that there are billions of solar systems in our galaxy and there are billions of galaxies in our observable corner of the universe, so it would be naive to say that we are the only life form in entire existence... "Scientist make up a very small percentage of the population" And? What was my original point?... Was it related in any shape of form in how many scientists we have?... Are you grasping straws now? "atheist are more likely to go into science therefore they end up making up a larger percentage of that field than they do the population" Its like atheists could have higher average IQ or something... Its like people who does science are not that easily brainwashed with religious nonsense... Its like exactly what I said at the beginning... Which is weird, as you dont even realize that you are saying that i'm correct in what I said but at same time you think that you actually disagreeing with me... "I don't think you really thought that point all the way through." Irony is strong with theists.
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 So do you admit that majority of scientists are atheists by that research? You can just run away when your ass got on fire, you won't learn anything here if you do it.
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 Answer to this simple question: By that research, do we have majority of scientists as atheists by definition of atheism which is "lack of belief in god(s)"? You making excuses won't make you correct here, being offended by my tone won't make you right here either. You know that i'm correct and you are scared to admit that after your constant push back that majority are theists, which is factually incorrect. Prove me wrong here.
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 Will try it in different way: What does category indicate? What does it say?
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 Ok, I guess will have to do more homework for you here. Will list all categories here. #1. Who believe in God (33%) #2. Who DON'T believe in God, but do believe in a universal spirit or higher power (18%) #3. Who DON'T believe in either (41%) #4. Don't know (7%) Now, atheist is the one who DON'T believe in a god. Now, again, can you count categories and their percentages which include "DON'T believe in God"? It's not rocket science you know... If you can't even admit to this obvious FACT from numbers presented to you, then there is no chance for you even being open minded here... You cant even admit to be wrong when you have basically 3 numbers in front of your face which contradict what you are saying... Why is that? Why is your religion makes you so irrational and defensive?
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 Damn... You dont even know what agnostic is... Ok, short educational thing here. Theist is someone who believes in god(s), A-Theist is NOT that, its by words structure where you add "A" and it becomes not what original words means, in this case its "someone who doesn't believe in god(s)". Now, gnosticism addresses your knowledge, theism addresses your beliefs. Those are separate labels... For example, i'm agnostic atheist, which means that i don't believe in god and i don't claim to have knowledge about his existence. So going back to the pool. 2 out of 4 categories are for atheists, those which indicate people who "DON'T believe in god" puts them automatically into category of atheists, because this is what atheists is... Do you get it now? And just FYI you are not stupid, you are brainwashed, there is huge difference here. Just notice how long it takes for you to admit that you have been wrong on such basic thing here which was in front of your eyes and you even started to create excuses for it even tho it wont even affect your beliefs or your religion. Why is that? I was theist, my IQ dint changed when I deconverted, what changed is my understanding of the world, my critical thinking. You are just an echo of your religious upbringing, you are not talking as a person, you are just blindly repeating and defending your religion just because it said you to do it.
1
@patrikioskoskinas3308 "so agnostic just means without knowledge" So exactly what I said... gnosis, its about knowledge, that research was done about beliefs and not knowledge... That second category addresses belief in god... Not knowledge... Yet you wanted to put them into agnostic category for some weird reason... Why? If you know what this word means, then why the hell you tried to do it? At best it would have been agnostic atheists in that second category, which doesn't change a tiny bit what I said... Majority of scientists are atheists... We are not talking about their knowledge here, we are talking about their beliefs, aka theism/atheism. So will try to ask again. How many atheists do you have based on that research? Stop dodging this question and be honest for this tiny moment in your life. Count percentages, add them up and answer. "and then I started reading philosophy which made me realize the folly of atheism especially after reading aristotle" Funny enough majority of philosophers are atheists. Why is that? "but you didn't consider that a person has the ability to believe because they think for themselves." You cant think for yourself because you intentionally or not cant even admit to be wrong on such tiny thing. You have facts in front of you, you have basic 3 numbers you fail to add up properly and you keep avoiding to admit that most scientists are atheists. So what's going on here exactly? You being dishonest intentionally or is this some subconscious thing you are not even aware of? And just FYI no idea how you used philosophy to get to conclusion that "folly of atheism" when atheism is just rejection of god claim and nothing more... You have claim you cant support with evidence, heck, you cant even provide sound and valid argument that he is real, but for some reason you think that rejecting empty assertion is a "folly"? Care to elaborate on that?
1
Riiiiiight, and that electrolysis just happens naturally? You do know that you need around 60% more electricity to produce enough hydrogen to move your car same distance BEV's could?
1
You don't need to wait 40 plus minutes to charge your car... And you can charge it overnight at your home so each morning you have full tank.
1
You do know what civil war is, right?...
1
@DimaRakesah Exactly... Its not like Musk could send bunch of people to calm down civil war on another planet... Taking control of something like that would be extremely hard. Its like in old times having ship with 50 people and trying to become a king, what do you think how that would go? Mutiny is the word used for a thing which was happening on quite regular basis, so its not like you can just do it and expect no blowback. And king? This colonization will take decades... Musk will be long dead before Mars will have reasonable amount of people there to be ruled over... So your argument falls on its face rom the start
1
@boterlettersukkel That would be low intellect thing.
1
Is Trump praising Putin makes him harsher? Weird thing to do, but ok.
1
Reality disagrees. Studies have been done on this topic and for end to end pollution BEV's still win over Hydrogen.
1
Duno about which cylinder you are talking in particular here. Booster is 72 meters tall, starship like 50. Can you imagine forces applies to the side of that cylinder when it hits the ocean? Rockets are not built to sustain side forces, so its quite likely for booster to explode when it tips over. On TOP of this, there is special charge placed on both stages to detonate shortly after it splashes to avoid having huge floating can in the ocean, not even talking about technological secrets floating in someones ocean. So either it explodes on its own or it gets detonated shortly after, either way it explodes. None of those scenarios is actually bad, this is how it should be with these test flights. And this is why people cheered when it happen, because people actually knew what happen and not like TF here was more than ignorant to make shit up of his own.
1
@donquixote8092 No idea what you even tried to say here... Are you trying to complain that test rockets do not perform as end product? Do you not understand meaning of word "test"?
1
In my country more or less every house has countries flag and its being rised at specific dates. Majority of them look new. So why would it be so strange to see people in Ukraine having flags like that?...
1
If you think that you need iphone or social media to survive then its an issue with you and not with iphone and social media.
1
He will not dare to do the same test on Rivian
1
I'm not a flat earther, but damn... They atleast have more original posts then yours...
1
So then you should not worry about thing Europe does? Righ? It has no effect on Russia! Sanctions doesn't work even if Putin demands for those to be lifted! All is going by the plan!
1
In another words, people want's BEV's even if its just a hybrid and no one is buying actual hydrogen cars. So what's new?
1
friendly advice, actually research how much pollution each technology creates from END TO END and realize that BEV's are the cleanest option. Old batteries can be recycled to lie 97%+ of its contents and then reused to make new ones. There is no issue currently with old BEV's in landfills, because there are non of those to talk about.
1
@Obelixlxxvi You can just try googling it or simply ask ChatGPT, tho that one can be... Well... Bias... Point is that hydrogen isint that magical when you actually dive into it. For example, did you know that each hydrogen tank in hydrogen cars have expiration dates printed on them? And hydrogen has that thing called "hydrogen embrittlement" which will, well, embritel metals it gets in contact with. So hydrogen cars are by its nature high maintenance and you can't escape that. Another thing, there is ZERO pure hydrogen on earth, 100% of hydrogen needs to be produced and currently most of it is being sourced from natural gas. It simply doesn't work as much as you (and me) would like it to work.
1
@Mescherje It always was for past few years, it always was...
1
War politics 101.
1
@KangenAlec By your tiny logic light stops at certain distance, after all, sun should always be above earth independent of the time. So what is the distance? 500km? 5000km? And what about stars? Those seam to be even further than sun, but we can still see them... Soooooo, does stars emit magical light which doesn't stop like suns light? Are you drunk?
1
@KangenAlec How the hell is geocentric model even related here? I'm asking about light stopping at some magical distance which should happen if you want to have it always being above earth but seeing it only for specific times... So provide explanation how that should work before you go with another empty assertion...
1
Just like there won't be self driving cars... Och wait...
1
@johnburck5039 Nya is a scientist, he might not be that hard core white coat lab scientist, but he does have are requirements to be labeled as one
1
Engineers are still limited by laws of physics... No amount of IQ will beat those.
1
Depends how you look at it. He did invested his own money into it, he did worked out his ass to get that company out of ground and so on. So like, what would qualify you as a maker of the company by you?
1
You do know that it was Russia who attacked Ukraine? Right?
1
You do understand that this is a war started and maintained by Russia and not by Ukraine? Right? You do know that much?
1
@avex3903 No actual counter argument?
1
Some say that moon is just hologram, some say that sun is not real... Talking about Venus or any other planet is meaningless with those brain dead people.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Lets test your intellectual capabilities here. I will make a claim, try proving it wrong, here I come "Universe was created by magical pixies which farted it out by eating hot tacos" now prove it wrong, will wait.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee "Lack of pixies " Prove that there a no magical pixies, don't assert prove it. Like presente evidence that you investigate ENTIRE universe and found no magical pixies "No farts in vacuum" ? You don't even understand how fart's work... And I never said that they farted in a vacuum, the did it in their magical house, then moved this universe turn outside of it, with magical shovel. Prove me wrong here. "Tacos existed in earth not on any other planet" Its magic... It's literally the magical pixies doing magic... And how do you know that it wasn't pixies who shared taco recipe to humans in the first place? Tacos are pixie invention, prove me wrong. "That took 5 sec" And you failed miserably, so you are fast at failing.
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee "I simply showed there no pixies die to lack of evidence" Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. We are talking about literal magical pixies which can use magic to hide behind your keyboard without you being able to detect them. So your "counter" argument makes ZERO logical sense. "If you think I am wrong (you don't) them show pixies " Why should I show you pixies? This convo with you started when you demanded OP to show TF wrong, my point was that this is not how burden of proof works. We don't need to show TF wrong, TF needs to show to be correct. "F@rts won't work on vacuum due to lack of pressure" ? That's not how farts work... And those are, obviously, magical farts. You don't even understand how magic works... "0 understanding of science" Och, sweet summer child, I can bet I know more about science than you do, but again, we are not talking about science here, we are talking about MAGIC. By the way, please, explain scientifically why farts could not work in a vacuum, because as of my knowledge farts would be higher pressure gas going to lower one throught your buthole. Maybe you tried to imply that there wont be a sound due to vacuum, well, then, have you ever heard of silent farts? And due to the fact that there would be expelled gas during farting you would have medium where sound waves could be formed, aka making it a legit farting by all criteria you cold come up. Now, which part did I got wrong here MR. science guy? "Also in your previous comments you didn't mention any shovels or house" It was implied when I mentioned magic... " thanks for contradicting yourself. " ? That's not how contradictions work... I said that universes ws farted out by magical pixies, I never said where they were locale at when they did it... Can't you even read? Doesn't TF cult not have school were it teaches basic reading skills? "Bcz magic doesn't exist . " Prove it. "Standard musk bots believing in magic" Is this magic in a room with us right now? Its like you failed so much with your own argument that his is what's left for you to do, sad, honestly this is just sad to see people like you being so desperate.
1
Weird people. You do know that you could do both things at same time? Repair earth AND colonize Mars?
1
Yes, please... Consider ALL factors here... And people who consider all of them come up with number which says that Hydrogen cars produce more pollution over its life time in comparison to BEV's. Welcome to reality. Hydrogen isint some magical thing you could scoop out of thin air, you actually need to produce it... So you need around 60% more electricity to move your car same distance as BEV's. So that means you will need 60% more power plants. Then you have issue with actually producing hydrogen, ideal you would use distilled water, but that one is expensive. Then maybe fresh water, which is in quite high demand already in quite few parts in the world, so not ideal even then. You can't really use ocean water due to its composition. But lets say you can actually produce it in reasonable amounts. Now you need not only to store it, but to transport it to the fueling stations, then store it there. So you need complex refueling stations which cost arm and leg to build and maintain. Then you have issue with hydrogen tanks literally having expiration dates written on them, it's around 5 years. Then you have expiration date on fuel cell... Its not all sunshine and rainbows you know... And just FYI, modern car batteries no longer uses cobalt and biggest lithium supplier is Australia while US is ready to start mine its own on its own land, which on itself isn't that damaging to environment. On top of this, you can recycle batteries more or less fully and reuse materials for a new batteries more or less indefinitely.
1
Then why its not finished war? If Ukraine is done then why frontline dint change for past 6 months?
1
Difference was that oil is relatively easy to handle, its just a liquid, you can carry some with paper cup if you wanted. But when it comes to hydrogen, that just skyrockets in costs and complexity. And just FYI we have equally ZERO pure hydrogen on earth, so 100% of it needs to be produced from somewhere.
1
And yet every single time this magical technology being "invented" no one ever shares it while knowing that inventor will be killed? Why? Why are those lizard people allowing videos like this even exist if they are ready to kill inventors of magical technology? Could it be that this technology is just a scam?
1
Liquid hydrogen needs to be under -252C, arctic gets at most to -68C (record, it way warmer than this), so realistically you would still have around 200 degree difference
1
They only reject things which contradict their fantasy, they can even attempt to use NASA data to disprove NASA data...
1
Not possible. You need more energy than you will get back from entire process. In simplest explanation would be: you need 2000g hydrogen to make 1000g of hydrogen.
1
Your arguments against colonizing Mars is that he should remove plastic from oceans?... C'mon...
1
@halnogaies1256 Honestly I'm not expecting Lucid even surviving, but if they do it will be years until anything cheaper than 150k car. When it comes to electrical cars most expensive part will be battery and motors, which on itself would make most if not all 25k price and such small company needs allot more income to start expanding before thinking about mass producing cars which give 1k revenue per car. Again, this is 150k'ish car, to slice down 125k from it is more or less not possible.
1
It's weirder than that. It's not actually xbox controller as joystick locations not the ones used for xbox but for playstation, but at same time button colors are from xbox. It looks to be Logitech F310
1
How so?
1
@arfermo853 Cool none answer, now try again actually explain it properly.
1
@arfermo853 Well, that's only opinion, but is it ACTUALLY truth?
1
@arfermo853 Something is true independent of your personal opinion or feelings. So is god actually real?
1
@arfermo853 Can you provide actual evidence that he is real?
1
@arfermo853 I said evidence, not quote from immoral self contradictory book of fables... Should I quote Harry Potter books and "prove" that Voldemort is real?
1
@arfermo853 Again... We are not talking about beliefs, we are talking about what is ACTUALLY real. Whats the difference between your god being real which can be proven to be real and your god just being result of your imagination?
1
@arfermo853 You keep quoting your book... Why? Why do you think that some ancient text has any real value? How do you know that your god is actually real?
1
@arfermo853 You do realize that i'm not even looking up those verse or even reading you comments if I see indication of it being a quote from bible? I skip it entirely automatically as it most worthless comments out there. Explain to me why should I actually care what your ancient immoral self contradictory book of fables says... After that you can start quoting it... Not before it.
1
@arfermo853 Who is Roman? I only know Bob from 3A apartment.
1
@arfermo853 Romania?
1
@arfermo853 But like, what about Peter?
1
@arfermo853 Pikachu 420:69
1
@arfermo853 It's me, Mario!
1
@arfermo853 But Hagrid said....
1
@arfermo853 Voldemort
1
@arfermo853 Potato
1
@arfermo853 But Jebus said!!!
1
@arfermo853 Do you think that repeating quote from your book of fables would make any difference here? Because I have Harry Potter book on side... Should I quote that too you? Like seriously, how delusional are you to think that you are achieving anything else here besides showing your own brainwashing to entire internet?
1
@arfermo853 Why?
1
@arfermo853 Why?
1
@arfermo853 Still question: Why? Are you a bot of some sorts?
1
ICE to PZE? In which reality do you live in? You can't have zero emissions on ICE car... You literally burning shit which will always produce something. Where have you read about this PZE nonsense? And if its possible, then why the hell its not here yet? ICe car manufacturers are desperate to remain relevant and switches to EV's to avoid bankruptcy, but if there is this magical technology which can produce zero emissions then why the hell would anyone want to switch to EV? Because I would not... If this magical technology actually exists then hell, screw EV's I am buing clean ICE car... But doesn't look like such technology actually exists and you just repeating some propaganda from some legacy auto which tried to remain relevant for little bit longer... Dieselgate anyone?...
1
They can and some of them are. Some are trolling some actually believe in that... C'mon, majority of world still believes in wizards...
1
Brett Reality check. Explosion happen on Russian controlled side, there are no report about any missile attack actually happening, so clearly it was blown up by planted explosions. What Russia gains is that Ukraine now can't attack from Kherson side and wont be able to to do for months if not until next summer, so Russia now can redeploy its army to other defensive positions and shorten front line drastically. Russia don't care about Crimea or its people, it simply wants to win this war whatever cost it would be. Ukraine gains nothing here, cut off water to Crimea wont do any real damage as it survived for years when it was annexed by Russia and Ukraine cut off water supply, so why the hell would Ukraine do it? It would not... Stop defending immoral actions here, Russia is not worth defending...
1
First life forms on earth appeared around 3.7 billion years ago, i mean, he did some mistake if he wanted to include most primitive life forms, but in general its more than enough to say that we evolved over millions of years... Unless you are saying that we did not evolved...
1
@marcob9124 "how do you know?" Evidence. "And is age automatically connected with evolution in your belief system." Its not a belief system. And evolution requires allot of time. "are you saying that you believe that you evolved?" I know that i'm result of evolution.
1
@marcob9124 "what evidence? " I'm not getting paid to educate people here about evolution. "Yes, it requires more time then you got" Evolution had 3.7 billion years... I think its more than enough time... "So you believe that all your software in your dna has evolved?" Software? Is it an attempt to call it software and them imply that you need a coder for software?... "Have you thought this thru or is it just kind of cultural religious upbringing you have faith in?" Not a religion and not a faith. Tho it is interesting that you still trying so desperately compare my position with yours. You do realize that by doing this you admitting that you have shitty position and for you to have any chance in winning this argument you need to try and lower my position? Will not work, but thanks for admitting that. Evolution is proven fact, you might want to start adapting your religion and your belief system to reality we have here as you cant keep this fantasy of yours afloat. I can even help you out here: Having evolution doesn't disprove god, you can still have god and evolution and as evolution is factual you will need to change your position to fit facts or you will look silly when arguing with others. I'm not here to educate your, but you can always use google... Enter "evidence for evolution" and check couple links, read them, try to understand what evolution actually is and after that we can talk about your wizard creating us from nothing when he got bored existing outside space and time...
1
@marcob9124 "did you know that you can educate yourself with google why evolution is impossible? " Did you know that i can find "evidence" on google that magical forest pixies are real? There is difference between finding random post on google and actually having capabilities to sort information and figure out which is based on bullshit and which is not. "I am not get paid to help you out off your education cage. " And i'm not asking, its clear that you cant teach me anything here when it comes to evolution anyways. "So you are saying that the program" So you changed "software" to "program" in hopes to imply that program requires a programmer?... "hat organizes the development of a human body for the first nine month has put itself together by random mutation and natural selection, right?" No idea why you mention nine months here... DNA is a part of you... It always was and it will be until you die and your body decomposes... And DNA is a result of evolution and natural selection over billions of years. "Thats your faith. " Still not a faith, but thanks for confirming that your position is shitty one. "I mean you do know that evolution cant even account for minimal non connected appearance of mutation below the threshold of ns, right? " What? You need to learn to make appropriate sentences here... What ns? Based on what evidence? Do you have citation for this claim of yours? From which creationist web page you took this information? Do you understand how argument work, right? "I envy your faith." Don't, I don't have any of that shit so no need to envy me of something I don't have, but thanks for confirming that your position is shitty one.
1
@Random_hero47 Its true because Putin said so or maybe you have actual evidence of it?
1
So Musk was forced to sell non geofenced starlink and then you act surprised how Russians uses starlink in their own territory?... You either geofence it or you don't... If you don't then you have no actual reason to complain that Russians use it, after all, its not geofenced. On top of this, front lines change, front lines can be quite thin and you would need up to date information and constantly update geofence to precision of meters. Musk doesn't want for his starlink to be used as war equipment, even tho he enabled starlink in Ukraine and provided first batches for free. That said, again, its a business, up keep of starlink costs millions and honestly Ukraine war isint Musk's war... Yet you still complain that he isint doing something...
1
Yea, who cares about environment we live in, lets just wait and see what happens... And I think you are talking about 2035 and not 2030.
1
you ca always test your claim by jumping throw window or something...
1
When you talk to god, its being religious, when god talks to you its schizophrenia
1
Said that pool taken AFTER it was annexed?...
1
@xxmobstrxx8535 What does European studies say about that annexation in general? Legal or not?
1
@jmtake85 Then get your Jerry to do the same test on Rivian and lets see how much better it is. By the way, what this video showed is that CT exceeded hitch load by more than 9x than what it was rated for
1
@tusse67 They are, NASA is still building rockets, extremely expensive one time use rockets (SLS). So they are competitors in that aspect.
1
@dr.elvis.h.christ You have no idea what is the difference between going to Moon and building reusable rockets? Don't you? It's like saying to the first firearm built in like 10th century that they are like 10 000 years behind bows and arrows... While both shoot projectiles, clearly one is way more complex and is on completely different level. You TF cult members are so weird... Flat earther IQ level arguments.
1
If Russia leaves Ukraine then well, Ukraine joins NATO and Russia will not have any actual country to invade besides Belarus.
1
Not really. People can recharge their cars at home over night and always have full "tank" for the cheapest price possible. There are instances when you are doing long trips and you need to visit superchargers, but those usually take around 20 minutes to get additional 200miles or so, which is more than enough until your next stop. Its already non issue and it becomes less of it with every single battery improvement and with new recharging stations being built.
1
@TheArb6 smartphone vs electric car isint the same. Its like saying that you are forgetting to refuel your car and you get stuck in the middle of the road, well, you are not. You sit in your car, you see remaining distance you could travel, if its enough, you are just leaving and forgetting about it, if not, then you will plan to refill, same as with ICE cars, you would either recharge at home or you would visit charging station in case you forgot to do it at home for multiple days in a row. Just a reminder that BEV's usually have over 300miles of range, so you would need to be heavy user to have this issue or you would need to constantly forget to plug in your car when you come back home. Car isint smartphone, you comeback home, you simply plug it in and it remains that way until you go out. With smartphone, well, that one tends to constantly move around, in your pocket or anywhere else, being left alone for long periods of time and so on, so yes, you can forget to charge your phone, but its alot harder to do the same with a car.
1
Hydrogen cars never became a thing due to their drawbacks... BEV's charge times are getting shorter and ranges becoming higher, so its none issue created by people who doesn't understand what they are talking about.
1
@JiForceful So like I just said... "none issue created by people who doesn't understand what they are talking about" Hydrogen stations are completely different from current gas ones... You will need to redo EVERYTHING in it... Nothing is compatible with Hydrogen stations. So should we invest trillions in remaking all those ticking bombs? Or can we invest some money in improving electrical grid? Which... If you didn't know, electrical grid is being expanded by some rate constantly, introducing electrical cars would only slightly increase its expansion rate, nothing more... Hydrogen car's uses like double the energy to drive same distance. So to offset that you will need additional power plants. Not much changes there. Then you have expenses where you have to either transport Hydrogen from huge plants or try to produce it locally. But you know what? Hydrogen leaks... Its basically impossible to make completely sealed container for Hydrogen to remain in one, it leaks and it goes into atmosphere. We have ZERO natural hydrogen, all of it needs to be produced from fresh water, which is already in high demand, so it's not like it would be a good idea to eliminate bunch of that just to power our cars. Storage of Hydrogen is extremely complicated thing, you either store it in gas form, which will be tiny amount, or you do it in liquid form which need to be chilled to extreme temps under extreme pressures, not something you would want to have across entire city... In short, Hydrogen cars will never be a thing for regular cars, at best it can become some niche thing for factories or somewhere where energy density is most important thing to have, which is not a lot of areas.
1
@JiForceful One hydrogen station costs around 2million (lower end), there are around 150 000 gas stations in US alone, its higher number, but whatever. So to replace those you would need around 300 000 000 000 bucks, for US alone, for stations only. This would increase quite a bit for bigger Hydrogen stations. But yea, 300 billion, for US. Hard to say how many gas stations in entire world, but you will go past few trillion to upgrade all of them. Power grids are generally localized, you wont need fat ass cables across entire planet to charge EV's... Heck, you can charge one from your solar panels which are on your roof... EV's will happen, Hydrogen will not, it's only question how we solve existing small issues surrounding transition towards EV's
1
@JiForceful Its so weird that you went with trucks having long charge times... You know what you could do in that case?... Just... Wait... And... Charge... Quoting here "With less than 2 kWh per mile of energy consumption, Semi can travel up to 500 miles on a single charge. Recover up to 70 percent of range in 30 minutes using Tesla's Semi Chargers." how often semi drivers would go more than 500 miles without stopping? if it can recover 70% in 30 minutes, then I can't see any issues with charging times or range in general... Its a mute point at best even with todays technology, which will obviously will get better and better with each new generation. Again... 🤦, mute point. On top of this, electric trucks are allot cheaper to be operated, so companies will be able to not only get extra few trucks to offset that tiny difference in charging times, but to hire extra people to drive those if needed. So if you are talking about efficiency then you will get it for less. Hydrogen cars are not happening, current (not really) generation of hydrogen semi's have basically same range as BEV's with slightly shorter refueling times, while cost of those are exponentially higher. So not really winning here against BEV's. And for companies to have simple "plug overnight and have full 'tank' in the morning" is better option than needing to get to closest Hydrogen station to fill up before you start you trip. This is efficiency...
1
Fuel cell is around 2x the efficiency in comparison to just burning it, this is why all mass produced hydrogen cars are based on this technology.
1
@nobbynobbs8182 ? You don't understand how any of this works? Don't you? By your logic EVERYONE uses taxpayer money because all of it at some point was spent to pay taxes to government... When government pays for a service or a product, it's no longer tax payer money. And what is more funny/sad is your failure to understand that if NASA didn't used SpaceX then they would be paying like 4x more of those same "taxpayer" money for same services to someone else, like Russia... Can you, TF cult members, ever be happy? At this point I think that even if SpaceX not only provided free service but paid NASA for ability to do it you would still find things to complain about something... Get better arguments, as this is weak sauce even for people like you.
1
Zelensky not like bunker boy, he is not running, he is charging.
1
For normal conversation is would be reasonable to answer "Yes" or "Its a globe", going into details for generic conversation has no real purpose.
1
@therealzilch Can even agree with that. Even if you needed to calculate something based on earths curvature, that tiny difference doesn't really make that much of a difference between equator or poles, result will still be in a range of error which is more or less irrelevant. Only people who talks about exact shape of earth cares to make it completely accurate description, for everything else its just a perfect sphere.
1
@anciagabe7804 Earth is still spherical and as engineer that tiny difference wont get into play, ever. So that answer "I'd say no" would only happen when you would want to look like an ass explaining to people why earth is actually and oblate spheroid and slightly wider on bottom part while earth doesn't really have bottom part because that only how we decided to define which is bottom and which is top due to some generic reasons like north always being to the top and so on... Or you could simply say "Yes" and be done with that. There is no real reason to go into details for majority of conversations, so when some one asks if its round, you simply say "Yes".
1
SpaceX isint money pit, starlink alone generates more money for entire spacex company. And yes, Musk's main goal is to make humans multiplanetary and main money supplier for that would be that same Starlink system which should generate crap ton of money.
1
Fun fact, Hydrogen cars uses around 60% mor electricity to drive same distance as BEV's, so no, its not zero emissions. There is equally 0% of pure hydrogen on earth, ZERO PERCENT. Which means that 100% of it needs to be produced in one or the other way, currently most common way is natural gas, which isn't zero emissions, obviously. And while some BEV's could be stranded, funny enough those are simpler save than hydrogen cars, after all you can't just pump few KG's of hydrogen into car from canister, you would need quite expensive and dedicated hydrogen compressor to fill that tank. Not even talking about the fact that you can charge BEV from basically any wall socket, while you can ONLY refill at dedicated hydrogen stations. Go figure.
1
Well... No... Issue with nuclear power plants is that those need specific fuel which on itself is in quite limited amounts which simply shifts issue from one to the other. Nuclear power plants work as long as you have only few of those, if entire world started to use those we would run out of needed fuel in few decades. So not really an option. Nuclear fusion could be an answer, if that one can be solved. Then we could have abundance of energy which could be used to generate hydrogen.
1
Actually hydrogen makes more profit than BEV's and big corps would have more control over you with you having additional maintenance costs. Hydrogen cars contain multiple highly pressurized hydrogen tanks which are extremely flammable. Hydrogen cars have literal expiration dates on their tanks printed out due to hydrogen embrittlement. Around 5 years. Fuel cells have its own too, that one is around 8 years. Good luck replacing those. Charging times for BEV's can be as low as 10 minutes and that time only going down. Unless you as everyone else who doesn't understand reality thinks that you have to charge your car from 0% to 100% every single time, then yes, it will take longer, but this should only be done when you actually need that extra range for some reason, but then you can simply charge your car at home from wall socket overnight... BEV's and hydrogen cars have around same amount of carbon footprint, in some cases hydrogen has more. Biggest lithium provider is Australia and now there will be lithium mines in US. So none argument. Hydrogen lacks power and convenience. Check any hydrogen car and check its interior volume, its abismal... Yes, hydrogen is extremely expensive, like 5 times more expensive than electricity. Hydrogen isn't carbon free, you need around 60% more electricity to produce amount of hydrogen to move same distance. On top of this, you need extensive supply and storage infrastructure which will produce crap ton of carbon on itself. Maybe it can be as fast, but its not. It can reach range as BEV's, but you will sacrifice interior space. Refill is fast if you are the first in the line, otherwise you will be waiting 15 minutes until system pressurizes.
1
Simply speaking if you have someone who doesn't want to live in your country you can simply give them one way ticket to the country they want to live in. Keeping people like that in your country or even worst, puttin in jail and using taxpayers money to feed them is allot worst option.
1
@shinyredbutton3842 You do realize that things like plane flights, or ships routes are using globe do determine where they need to go?... Even bridge builders might need to take into consideration earths curvature when building bigger ones... There are dozens of things which are directly effected by earths shape, so just because it doesn't effect you personally doesn't mean its useless information.
1
This video is 1 year old, how did that toyota v8 engine end up?
1
Yea, Russia does that.
1
@cindygardener-collinsmimi531 Its not sudden change, lack of love for Russia was there for decades, now we just got example why there was this lack of love for this country... And there wont be one for decades to come, thanks to Putin. There is a reason why 1991 seen bunch of new free countries pooping up like shrooms after rain... No one liked it... And for good reason. Why would you like dictatorship country over free ones?
1
End of world is here because there are wars in the world?... I guess you never heard of WW or sequel named WW2...
1
This entire war is one big humiliation for the Russia and this is not the first time Russia retreated with their tail between their legs. And not the last time either.
1
When? Because at the moment it's rapidly growing.
1
When? When did that happen in the history of Ukraine?
1
@duanenavarre7234 Its not schemes, its called "Scams"... Water powered cars never existed and will not exist without some extremely major breakthroughs in relativate technologies, if its even possible.
1
"I dont understand" Well we can see that. I have no idea how is bringing up some wrong ideas from science makes your argument worth while... Its like saying that just because science was wrong once then that means that everything else is wrong too... Science corrects itself if new evidence comes along which doesn't match current model. And earth is a globe not because science said so, but because its demonstrable and observable fact from reality anyone can verify by simple observation of sun. I have no idea where you are getting this "hypocrite" nonsense... We literally have people who claims that reality is not real, because we cant have flat earth while we have such basic observations. So what was so hypocritical here exactly?
1
Ukraine attacks military air bases... What is your point here? Russia shelling entire city is fine, but Ukraine bombing military base isint?
1
Even with coal EV produces less pollution than ICE cars. That said, countries are shifting towards clean renewables, so your comment is more than weird.
1
So basically we should have never went to moon either as people lived in tincan for 2 weeks? No need of ISS as its uncomfortable? Just ignore anything involving inconvenience?
1
You could, but its half the efficiency in comparison to hydrogen fuel cell
1
Good luck with that...
1
For your first point, yes, there is no 100% green car as all of them needs some sort of production which creates waste in one ot the other way, but its besides the point, what green means is the cleaner solution than what we have now. For your second point, well, no, while CO2 is needed for plants, issue is with amount of it... And the fact that we keep deforesting makes this issue even bigger one. Planting more trees will not solve fundamental issue, as you would need to basically cover entire earth with trees to offset how much CO2 we are spitting out at the moment.
1
BEV's? Ever heard about those?
1
@Hiromae33 Still have no idea what your point is here... Are you trying to say that Ukrainians killed their own or what? Finding mass graves and digging out bodies freshly put there is as hard as ordering pizza... You just need to look up for number and do it... Its not rocket science to dig out bodies... Are you ok?
1
buuuurn!
1
@DavideCosmaro So you are against free speech? You do realize that if there was an option to silence specific idea that would be recipe for disaster? Right? Who will decide what needs to be silenced and what's not?
1
We are defensive because we encountered bunch of ignorant people, just like you, who thinks that NASA is even relevant to the shape of earth... Damn... You cant get lower than this... Can you?
1
@markusmohr1692 I take my words back, you do have ability to go lower than that...
1
By Russian propaganda Bakhmut was taken over 5 times by now
1
Yea, lets see what you will say when your free miles end and you will have to pay like 200 bucks for 400 miles of range.
1
Who doesn't allow who to live?
1
Not even close... Propane is wildly different from hydrogen. There are less than 1000 hydrogen stations in ENTIRE WORLD, quite few are being shut down due to high maintenance costs and low usage. If you think that propane is on same level as hydrogen, then you have no idea what you are talking about here...
1
So I guess we agree that Russia is evil here?
1
What you believe and what is actually true are 2 separate things. Earth is still a globe, demonstrably provable fact from reality.
1
Pretty much prove wrong or give hope? So basically it doesn't do anything special at all? Which part was proven wrong exactly?
1
At this point children should have right to carry hand grenade, just incase... I'm so happy to not live in America...
1
So basically lay down and die? Surrendering would only mean that they would be ether shoot on spot or taken as prisoners which could be even worst punishment that being shot, or used as bargaining chip against Ukraine down the road. There isn't any good outcome with it comes to Russians and surrendering, unless its Russians who surrenders.
1
Are you drunk or something?
1
NO such thing as creation on demand.
1
Hydrogen is already energy dense, atleast by weight. And it burns as efficiently as it can, already. Storing it in liquid form is extremely inconvenient thing to do, as it will need to remain under -252C which is physically impossible to happen for longer periods of time. Basically it would boil off in like 3 days, so once you filled up your tank you would need to use it up in next few days or it would start venting out, not a good thing to have, especially if your car is in a some enclosed space.
1
@akiali2632 ICE engines aren't really getting any more efficient, we are talking about tiny percentage improvements over the years, as there isn't much to improve anymore.
1
@akiali2632 With combustion engines its more or less always huge jump in performance at the start, then it slowly gets tiny boosts here and there, but nothing special. Hydrogen combustion engine is non started from the start, as hydrogen fuel cell engines already offer 2x the range.
1
Metal band?
1
This was quick retrofit, changing cable length would would require alot more work and change in chargers constructions to accommodate this new length of cable. Its quite likely that in the future this will be done or next generation chargers will come out with longer cables, but for this quick and cheap change it will be good enough.
1
Copium running out?
1
First of all Ukraine still have access to internet over other means than Starlink, second, Starlinks are being paid mostly by 3rd party at this point, Poland, US, and so on. Musk only provided initial dishes, after that he asked for payment... Just do basic google search here, its not that hard...
1
Because Putin said so?
1
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise half of them are stupider than that." George Carlin
1
Solar roadways!
1
issue is with complexity involved in producing hydrogen, storing it and then using it. It simply not worth the effort. You can look up energy storages in the world, and their types. You will hardly find any hydrogen production based ones, as it's simply doesn't work that well.
1
Not really, no more satellites, no more space travel, entire scientific world would turn over and die. Can't say that there would be any cool things about it.
1
Why?
1
Circle is not a sphere... By definition circle is a flat disk...
1
@williammeadows3965 So every single translator who translated bible from original Hebrew is wrong by you then? I will suggest for you to go and fix it before making a claim that it actually should be different thing than it actually says... Will make it simpler for you. "Revelation 7:1 1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV) " "Job 38:13 13 That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? (KJV) " ""He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"" ""He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble. (From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"" ""Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"" ""that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"" ""He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 40:22)"" All of those implies that earth is flat, your best thing you have to say that bible says that earth is sphere would be Isaiah 40:2 where you would pick different translation option which fits with reality better independent that actual expert scholars used different word for it. Bible was written by ignorant people from that time, so its not surprising and natural to see that people implied that earth is flat because it was common belief at that time. There is no real reason to defend that in any shape or form. You have bigger issues with bible than making statements about earths shape.
1
@williammeadows3965 "Most languages lose something going from one language to another it is the way of things" Correct, yet actual expert scholars used word "circle" instead of "sphere"... Why? Maybe because this is more accurate word from a context? You might not like it because it contradicts actual reality, but again, it was written by ignorant people so mistakes are expected. "Which is why U have to go back to the original languages to see what they really say" So you want to claim that actual scholars made mistake translating?... Why are you here then? Go and fix bible... "In the original language it say Sphere" In original it says word which can be translated to circle or sphere or few other meanings. So on what basis you want to claim it to be "sphere"? "We globe not a pancake. The old ones knew this." They don't. Book of Isaiah is from 8 century BCE, while first globe model appeared around 3 century BCE in Greece. It wasn't common knowledge that earth is globe for long long time... And due to wage verses you "forgot" to address which talks about earth having pillars, corners and so on, its clear that people who wrote those verses thought that earth is flat. Again, your best argument here is that one word might be translated to sphere if you use different translation meaning while actual scholar experts disagree with your personal opinion... C'mon... "If U really need to believe the Earth is flat then U go a head then U go a head and believe that" When did i said that i believe that earth is flat?... Earth is a sphere, oblate spheroid to be more accurate, but that doesn't change the fact that bible implies earth to be flat. " U can also believe there are workshops at the north pole too" Says some one who believes in wizards and magic because book said so.. C'mon... Lets not make insults... Och wait, too late.
1
@williammeadows3965 "to call Ancient people primiive is very arrogant on your part" Its not arrogance, its a fact. People at that time knew least amount about reality than at any time after that. Our knowledge increases with time, so in comparison to todays world they have been primitive. Most people at that time dint even know how to write or read... If this is not primitive for you then i have no idea what is... "They were a lot smarter than u are" How? And on what basis would you claim that? "Cirlcle does mean globe" Circle by DEFINITION means flat disk. Avoid making shit up to justify something. "the four corners means the four direction" Making shit up. "I must have stuck a nerv with u when i started using scripture" No one struck my nerv, you can get annoying if you start spitting random silly nonsense. And scriptures are completely irrelevant, like completely... Bible is book of fables, its worthless when it comes to reality. So when i see some one quoting bible like it has any worth, its just annoying. "I was mearly showing the the Bible says the Earth is a globe" Which is incorrect, which what i was explaining to you. Bible doesn't say that earth is a globe, bible implies it to be flat. There is another story in your bible where it says that you can see entire earth from big tree/mountain which is only possible if earth is flat. "Now in your mind if it needs to be a flat disc okay. The rest of us know it is a globe" You seam to not even read anything i write here... Earth is a globe... I know... I'm not flat earther... Will repeat: I'M NOT FLAT EARTHER. Surprised? Because i'm not. "Arguing back and forth is not going to change that" Correct, even after weeks of us arguing here bible will still say that earth is flat, that wont change as much as you would like it. "At the end of the day you are still going to have your beliefs and I will still have mine." Yet only one of us have rational beliefs based on reality.
1
But it requires 60% less electricity.
1
@alexkhuri3967 And both seemingly having investments in competing companies, weird weird weeeeeird.
1
Interestingly enough that only the one who voted for Kamala brings in race into conversation, racist much? Besides you being racist, world laughed at US when Trump was president, then world was still laughing while it was under Biden, then world realized that its going down the drain even faster with these people in power and its no longer funny, but borderline sad and dangerous. Trump is really bad choice for president, but when you have country which can't have more than 2 options for some reason, picking Trump over Kamala became the only sensible option, even tho Trump is a really bad choice, its still better than alternative. Lesser evil.
1
But I can bet you believe in some ancient book? Right?
1
Och right, that excuse of NATO wanting war... Yes yes yes... Its all NATO fault for Russia invading, starting a war which caused like 400k dead and over million injured... yes yes yes... NATO looked at Russia with angry face and it was enough to justify all those murdering we have now...
1
There is zero pure hydrogen on earth, 100% of is being produced.
1
6 billion? earths population 7.594 billion, by some studies we have around 2% of flat earthers, so that makes around 151 million people who believes in flat earth, which means that we have 7.44 billion who doesn't. Just a basic math here, but well, as you believe in flat pancake earth thingy i cant really expect you to understand math like that. And no opalige will be needed for believing something what is actually true. Do you care to prove that its flat and not something you made up?
1
Didn't people been scamming others with magical promises of technology which breaks basic laws of physics?...
1
Without ISS we wouldn't have battery powered tools... There is huge list of technological advancements driven by need of it. Mars is a HUGE goal to achieve requiring quite few technological advancements to be made.
1
Electrolysis uses craptone of energy, aka electricity, so you will be spending more energy to convert water into Hydrogen which could then be used to move your car, which is extremely inefficient way to do it. Hydrogen cars are not running on water, Hydrogen cars run on Hydrogen.
1
Said who? Putin?
1
@Aljosef6366 "Logical" and "flat earther" cant really be used in same sentence. I know I know, i just did it, but you got basic idea.
1
I do know that hydrogen cars are non starter, but for your "issue" here is really simple solution, simply don't allow discharge of water when its cold outside and you drive faster than X k/h speeds, as most hydrogen cars do have separate tank for water until you decide to eject it.
1
Flat earth movement raised due to simplicity in gathering flat earthers from entire world into one place. Even tho they make tiny portion of human population, having simple means to group up, like internet, makes them look bigger than they actually are.
1
If your enemy occupies hospitals then this hospital becomes valid military target by the rules of international war law. Its not that complicated.
1
Why?
1
Says who?
1
Mohammed Earth is a globe which is proven by basic observations anyone can perform, NASA says that its a globe because we know that it is, we agree with NASA because they are not wrong, then you have flat earthers who say that earth is pancake which is demonstrably false so some one calls them dumb because it is dumb to claim that something is true when its demonstrably false. Did that cleared thing out for you?
1
For 20x price? How many sedans (independent of price) who can do that?
1
@NICKCAMP04 Which ones? Give me a SINGLE example and we will have actual topic here, as now you just keep making empty claims...
1
@ROkkstar1687 Electric cars are more fun to drive than Hydrogen... if you want that sound then record a mp3 and play it or something... You people are so weird... Its like back in the day people complained that cars are not horses, that its not alive thing, that it can't get you back home when you are drunk and bunch of other nonse excuses. You can have your hydrogen car with 10 refueling stations across entire country, rest of us will use BEV's.
1
First law of thermodynamics.
1
It can be done because it was written in news paper of some sorts?... Have this magical tech was actually ever tested and not just "Its real because this guy said so"?
1
@springbloom5940 Cool personal opinion and all... But reality is different, you will have defensive lines where you have, well, defensive positions prepared for you to, well, defend it... Its not a zone, its a line, usually in a form of trenches. Sooner or later Russians will not have remaining ones to reatrete too. And I have no idea what you tried to imply he by saying that Ukraine is going "lots of lives" route here... What the hell does this even mean in your head? Its counter offensive, people will die, so what are you talking about here?
1
@springbloom5940 Scared of reality? Hard to answer basic questions? So maybe you should use your own advice here?
1
God said nothing, what you have is some ancient book of fables written by common ignorant people who claimed that those words came from god. Basic observations from your backyard disproves flat earth... So maybe its time to adjust your ancient religion to fit actual reality instead of trying to twist reality to fit your fantasy?
1
@dainiusvysniauskas2049 Is it tho? There are no actual tests done, atleast none I know off which actually tested durability of aluminum used in CT, so either i'm not aware of one or you are just here to hate the thing for the sake of hating and not because its actually a bad thing. Be objective.
1
Its not god who sends HIMARS to Ukraine...
1
Because its not real.
1
it's not like Russia is known for their master strategist excellent moves or something...
1
@solofourohsixgaming "also what exactly made you apply filters to see it correctly?" Having IQ above room temperature. You are looking at sun without sun filter? That's a recipe how to get blind... "You are only proving me right by saying you have to look at the sun through a camera with certain settings to see it correctly." Damn... You are even more ignorant then I thought... Sun filter isint a setting in camera... Its basically tinted glass... Damn... I would give your friendly suggestion and stop engaging in this discussions before you actually educate yourself on basics here... Jebus... This is just sad...
1
I mean, EV market could be slowing down, but atleast there is an actual EV market while you have hydrogen cars which are being sold in dozens... Like, only dozens... Aka non existing market and due to how many hydrogen refueling stations being closed down it doesn't look that hydrogen will ever be anything more than someones expensive toy they can't use.
1
@KangenAlec You look like a cartoon character...
1
Its both. To get more money you need better technology and for that to be better you need to invest crap ton of money with hopes that its possible to improve this technology in general.
1
Riiiiiiiiight... But like... What's the price of that hydrogen made from plastic? How much of that can be made? What impact this technology will have in general for entire industry?... Like we have extremely good battery technologies already, like the ones based on carbon nanotubes. But it's not really scalable and its price is insane, atleast not at the moment, so having technology which has no impact on industry isn't something to be happy about, come back when it can actually reach everyone.
1
That would basically mean that women has no chance in winning any prizes anymore in most sports. Even box is separated in categories by weight just to get more even matches, removing gender segregation would be just terrible...
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
Because Putin said so?
1
around 50% of humans still don't have any access to internet, so that's quite a bit of potential subscribers.
1
First of, i'm atheist too. But you cant say that there is a 0 chance. Second, only science though us about surrounding things, god dint did a shit, atleast we have no evidence that he did or that even exists, so your wording is strange here. Third, bible was written by ancient people who thought that earth is flat. And bible itself contains bunch of self contradictions and bunch of false claims, so its safe to assume that its man made fairy tale. Just wanted to clear some things up.
1
How do you think blue hydrogen is produced?... You are spending around 60% MORE energy to produce hydrogen which will drive your car same distance as it would be with EV's. So if you can spend so much energy on producing hydrogen with clean solutions, then why the hell you could not do it with EV's directly? Your argument is invalid here. And blue hydrogen is produced from natural gas, which is limited, so its not future proofed in any way, it would only push deadline slightly further away while keeping worlds dependency on fossil fuel for decades. Its time to get rid of that one.
1
How do you think Hydrogen is made?... How much electricity do you think hydrogen needs?... This is crazy...
1
@the80h You might be missing some basic things here... BEV's are the most efficient ones from all alternatives, no one ever claimed that BEV's are 100% efficient, but you will use up least amount of energy to move same amount of distance. For example, comparing BEV with Hydrogen fuel cell cars, you will need 60% MORE electricity to move car same distance, which means that Hydrogen cars are atleast 60% less efficient than BEV's. It both cases you will need to get electricity from somewhere, it doesn't really matter if its burning coal or using wind power, point remains that BEV's are the most efficient option here.
1
@the80h Wait, are you one of those who doesn't know that we are not scooping petroleum out of the ground with buckets but rather ding it over drilling, extracting oil and then heavily processing it to get it? Like seriously, do you even understand how much work/energy needs to be put into oil processing?... Actual smart people done studies which included end to end pollution, BEV's win. If you can muster out some actual scientific studies which supports your assertions, cool, give it us, otherwise you just parroting random nonsense you have seen on facebook...
1
Good luck with that.
1
You do know that to produce hydrogen and to use it in hydrogen car needs around 50-60% more energy in total in comparison to EV's?... You do know this, right?
1
And your evidence for that is...?
1
? Hydrogen uses around 60% more energy from start to finish to drive same distance... What the hell are you talking about?
1
@babyshanks396 You could make your own petroleum dirt cheap too in your garage... But like... Is it actually dirt cheap when you count i all the equipment you will need, all the time and everything in between? Making hydrogen isn't just showing 2 electrodes into water, there is more to it...
1
Not really, if it was low cost then most of currently produced hydrogen would not come from natural gas. Sea water is salty, duh, and for electrolysis you generally want as clean water as possible to avoid damaging your equipment with all that stuff which remains after it. Is it doable? Yea, kind of, but not really. Its like desalination could be a thing to provide fresh water, but by product of that is brine, which is, well, quite damaging to environment.
1
Getting territory? Then why this 3 day war is over 2 years by now with front lines basically unchanging for past 1.5 years... Something doesn't add up here.
1
Too expensive and too costly when it comes to maintenance. Wont happen on highways, could happen in parking lots.
1
And why exactly is it bad to look at a thing from engineering side and realize that it makes no sense? If it doesn't even make sense on engineering side, how would it make any sense on practical one?
1
It would be extremely delayed between a need to increase amount of hydrogen being pumped and it actually being pumped. And this brings out base issue with liquid hydrogen, it WILL boil off on its own over few days, aka at the moment you fill up your car with it, you better use it constantly, and trips to refueling station would be like every 3 days or so, without exceptions, or you will be stranded with empty tank.
1
As it was stated int this video, ALL flat earthers claims have been already debunked, for him to go trow all of them again would be pointless and it wasnt the point of this video in general... If you want a video which debunks flat earthers, then just use search window, you will get dozens or even hundreds of results.
1
Hydrogen had its chance, but its flooped now. And you can recycle majority of BEV's battery and reuse it... There is no need to retrofit 50 year old cars... ICE car's will remain legal for quite some time, in some sense it might remain legal for as long as it can still drive, but you won't be able to buy new ICE car, just like you cant just hope on a horse and ride to your local grocery shop, you might need permit for that, but you can still do it.
1
Removal of dislike button was allot more stupid than hiding number of flat earhers here. And you can still see those numbers with chrome extension
1
So we agree that Russia something bad here?
1
@Melikegames3100 So again, we agree that Russia is bad? Can we concentrate on CURRENT issue and avoid diving into past? Wait until this war resolved and then you can complain about US war crimes or something? Lets imagine that US nuked half of the world 2 years ago. Would this justify or change anything about this war?
1
Because their book said so... Or they want to feel special... Or basic ignorance...
1
@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463 Actually it is. When you perform experiment incorrectly and then scream out that it proves something what its not, that just plain old ignorance. And even if that one single experiment done by this single group of people matched flat earth, you would still need correctly done experiment without any bias, on top of that you would still need to disprove dozens if not hundreds of things which prove globe and disprove flat one. So yea, you are prime example of ignorance even when it comes to youtube video.
1
@scienceworksinmysteriouswa9463 "this matches every visual example of seeing too far." But why its always only few extra miles which can be explained by basic light refraction and not something like seeing Eifel tower from New York? And seeing too far would only imply that earth could be bigger and not that it is flat... "refraction needs conditions and you can see they accounted for it" How? And i can give you multitude of experiments which shows that you are wrong. So i mean... We can post video links all day long, i will present 10x more of those with better test methods, but what will that prove? Would it convince you that earth is globe if i give you link to video showing that same experiment but proving globe? "this observation is corroborated by all of amatuer photography. " Key word would be "amateur" "were you aware we have tech that establishes line of sight?" What? Like seriously, what? Tech that establishes line of sight?... Like a light tower?... What? What special tech do you need? Or are you calling basic light source some special tech? What?
1
@KangenAlec Do you know how reality works?
1
If science isint best source for knowledge, then what is?
1
@SarabjeetSanghera What? How the hell you know that its not the best one if you dont have alternative? On what basis did you concluded that there can be better method?
1
@SarabjeetSanghera Your original comment was expression of your opinion that science isint best source for knowledge. For you to make such claim you would need actual alternative which is better. Maybe science isint perfect, but it is current best way in determining reality.
1
Talks about peace start at the moment Russia leaves Ukraine territory.
1
@DeepNorth Based on what information? And in reality, amount of soldiers lost so far will not indicate who will win at the end. But like... Russia is starting second Official draft of soldiers, so clearly its not doing that well if it needs to do it for the second time, officially.
1
Why do you think Putin is so scared now? Exactly for this reason.
1
Danny Michelle There isint any real debate here. Everything we observe in reality matches globe earth and doesn't flat one. Just because you dropped from school and you lack of basic education will not mean that earth is flat. Sun alone has 4 things about it which proves earth to be a globe which can be verified by anyone with cheap solar filter and some spare time on hands.
1
Or you could just use solar to charge BEV. In any case you will be used around 60% more energy to drive same distance with Hydrogen cars than with BEV's
1
Funny enough that ONLY flat earthers and trolls bring in NASA into conversation
1
Its like saying "I know that Russia is a genocidal maniac, but look at what America did!"
1
Well atleast you got one of two correctly. Half way there.
1
World loves Russia? Which part of it? Because last time I checked majority of world condemns Russian actions here...
1
@ritmaha I'm just always baffled with comments like yours, its a video about hydrogen flopping, yet you straight away trying to attack BEV's... Why? Lets assume that BEV's are 10000000x more dangerous than ICE cars, 10000000x more poluting than ice cars, lets assume that by making one BEV you have to kill 500 children. Now, with all of those assumptions, how does it make hydrogen cars not a flop?
1
Because 100% of hydrogen needs to be produced and you will be wasting electricity on making hydrogen to use that to make electricity.
1
Millions? Wow... He is fighting Russia for third year to make millions? I mean, even if that was true it would be quite cheap salary for a president of a country attacked by supposed second most powerful army in the world. And just FYI he could have made quitely more than this by simply being president and moving money around if he wanted.
1
@alfredmakaveli6622 And you know this how exactly? Putin said so?
1
You haven't listen? It was pointed out that Russia is extremely inefficient when it comes to oil extraction and its cost is allot higher than other countries...
1
Yet we know what is the shape of earth... Whats your point?
1
@Truthforjesus97 There are more than enough videos debunking flat earth claim, this video is about explaining why people believe in such ridiculous idea, not why they are fundamentally wrong. You can't even provide reasonable explanation why we have sunsets... how do you even dream in proving that we live on flat pancake world?
1
Space if huge... Even 50000 new satellites will not overcrowd it. And no idea what's up with this argument that it will ruin your view, how often do you look up at night? is it better to get people out of dark ages and provide accessible internet access to remaining 50% of humanity or is it better to have nice view you could look at?... It's really weird argument you have here.
1
@Globeisahoax Flat earthers in general are ether brainwashed ignorant people or just trolls who wants to get attention for pretending to be brainwashed ignorant people. Look in particular look more like a troll and not real flat earther.
1
@Globeisahoax Projecting much?
1
@johnchristiansen5968 At the end of day in best case scenario (for you) what you will be left with is "US blow up a pipe, while Russia started a war which already took hundreds of thousands lives" so like... Seriously, is this best argument you have? Whataboutism? Russia didn't started this war because Ukraine blow up a pipe or invaded Russia... That pipe blow up way into war, so no matter who blow it up, it changes NOTHING. Heck, it could have even blow up on its own due to poor maintenance... It changes nothing.
1
Lost? If it lost, then why there are still fighting?... Losing a war is when fighting stops and you are the one on the side which lost... If fighting is still going on then clearly its not a lost war... Ukraine was in worse situation first few weeks of this war, 800 days later they are still fighting back...
1
You do realize that Musk only shortly talked about hyperloop and never actually funded it? Right? Basically hyperloop is just one day side hobby for Musk which for some magical reason became attached to him like its the primary project or something... Why do you people live in this echochamber?
1
Electric cars provides most freedom you could ever dream about... So what the hell are you talking about?
1
@IraFox84 How do you think car with 3 tanks pressurised up to 10 000 PSI would behave if you would puncture one of those? Vaporize everything around it in instant?
1
Se what truth? That all religious books are bonkers?
1
@abdiaziizkhalif907 Explain to me how is reading some book show the truth?
1
@jackwillson9797 "I said that the Blitz stops there" Do you know why? Because they advanced so much in such short time that heavy support needs time to catch up. Additionally due to Russians running away to all directions without any good plan there have been (maybe still are) pockets of russian soldiers inside Ukraine controlled territory, so those need to be cleared out before advancing further. Defensive lines need to be established on newly controlled territory. Supply lines need to be established. And yes, natural barriers like rivers slow down progress due to those point being heavily guarded, but doesn't look like it actually stopped Ukraine to push forwards, it just slowed them down for time being.
1
@jackwillson9797 "That's exactly how the Nazi's lost so badly in WW2 at the later phases of the war, they stretched all the way across Europe without good supply lines, exactly what Ukraine is doing now." Except that its not WW2 times where it would take weeks to resupply front lines. Movement of Russian army is known all the time, so it Ukraine wont suffer from some surprised attack. While this push was quick and there was brief time when Ukraine front lines dint had much of a support from back, this window closed in few days and that's that. "That is, of course, assuming that the Russian retreat was actually a panic retreat and not a pre-planned tactical retreat." They left ALLOT of ammunition and military equipment, this was panic retreat. If it was planned one then they would have taken ammunition with them and would never left military equipment without destroying it as a worst case scenario. I mean, attach grenade to ammunition box, attach longer rope to take out pin and you are done, they dint even done this, so it wasn't planed, they just realized that this war is stupid and they will be killed if they stay there, so it was panic retreat to save their asses. "And in that case, Ukraine gonna have a big trouble in advancing." Not as big as Russia will have trying to defend it. Ukraine is pushing back currently, steady pace with additional blitz moves. Entire Blitz stopped at the river, so Ukraine cant progress further as fast as before and Russia cant push back due to lack of access point where Ukraine only needs to concentrate on specific points to defend entire region. But Ukraine already got control over a territory on another side of river, so when reclaimed region gets cleared out of remaining scattered Russian troops Ukraine will march forwards. Or, Ukraine will push forwards on another point. As this information wont be disclosed to the public for obvious reasons we can only sit and wait, but it doesn't look to good for Russia here.
1
@jackwillson9797 "It nonetheless opens a time length for Russians to organize themselves while Ukraine is resupplying themselves" Too late for that, and Russia left quite a bit of ammo for Ukraine while doing this panic retreat, so no need to wait for resupply. "Once Ukraine is done, Russia is well ready to pounce back and counter the counter-offensives." When will that happen? Like seriously, how much territory Ukraine should take back before you can say that Russia screwed over here? ""A lot" is a relative term, dependant on who you are referring to" I'm referring in general sense. Planned retreat will not leave any ammunition. Panic retreat will leave everything they cant carry in a hurry, which what happen here. "Like how Ukrainians like to claim that they have "taken back 6000 squared km" to make it sound like it's big, and while it's true, it's less than 80km squared." ? Nothing you said here made any real sense... Its 6000 squared km... so its area of 80x80km, its big chunk... And the fact remains that Russians had to leave their defensive positions and run away, was it 6000 or 100 squared km. "Yeah, as if the Americans in the retreat from Afghan certainly did destroy their military equipments and ammunitions..." Cool whataboutism you have here. "Maybe they were wasteful/careless like the Americans? " So what you are saying that Russian army is incompetent? "Maybe they didn't think the capturement of the equipment is vital to them, or to the Ukrainians for that matter, as the ammunitions and weapons might not match, and they might not be experienced in using Russian weapons." So what you are saying is that Russian army is dumb? "Maybe they intended to make a facade that they are having a panic attack? " So what you are saying is that Russia likes to look like cowards? "Maybe they were anticipating either a small managable force or an entire onslaught and abandon at the latter?" So what you are saying is that Russian army is incompetent? "Maybe it would be too much to carry back alongside the retreat?" So what you are saying is that Russian army has no real supply lines? Which would make them incompetent. "1. If ammunitions/equipments are easy to destroy, they could've easily had one retreating throw the grenade and run away causing the entire ammunition depot to explode in a chain-reaction (or at least rendering most unusable)." Yes, they could have, but they dint, so either Russian army is incompetent to even destroy ammunition to avoid it falling into enemy hands or they had no time to do it while running away. Pick your poison. "2. These are professional soldiers," Riiiiiiiight, professional soldiers... That would mean that they got scared and run away as professional soldiers would know to destroy military equipment and ammunition before leaving it to enemy... So either they are not professional soldiers or once again, they dint had time to do their professional stuff while running for their lives. Which one was it? "And can they even retreat without orders from the higher commanders?" Yes, because its not real war, they can literally turn around and go home without any LEGAL punishment. If this was officially a war then every single soldier would need to fallow their commanders say so, but as this isint real war (by Russians) then they can run away like little children and no one will care. "As they have been known for staging several "corpses in Bucha"" Och, conspiracy theories... This will be fun. "since there is a video where one of the "corpse" stood up after the truck containing the camera passed by and decided that he is done being dead as seen in the reflection of the truck." Then I guess you will have no trouble providing this video link? Right? And side thing: If you have enemies around you, your best bet to pretend to be dead, but as you will DEFINITELY provide link to this video, we can talk about it after I see it, to have better understanding about what you are talking here. "Lastly, we aren't even accounting the possibility that Ukrainians might've staged it." And like... WTF should this even mean? Staged what? Russians running away?... Or left Russian equipment and ammo? Why would they even bother doing this? Rest of the world already supports Ukraine, so why would they risk doing something like this? Why is it so hard for you to believe that Russia is so shit when it comes to war? You have war which should have ended in 3 days which now is at like 210th day with Russia running away from occupied territories and you think that Ukraine is lying here?... How brainwashed are you?
1
@jackwillson9797 God damn what a wall of text. Its interesting to see that you are now trying to down play all left ammunition by Russian army. In planned retreat this will not happen, simple as that. In planet retreat all ammunition you have should be taken with you and not left to the enemies, especially left for enemies, if you cant take ammunition or military equipment while reatreting your one of the main goals, in every military book, is to destroy it. Its simple as that.
1
@jackwillson9797 Cool, so now you go with whataboutism approach... Read any military guide book and what it says about ammunition and military equipment you can't take with you and what you should do with it. Any person with any brain would realize that leaving ammunition or military equipment to be taken by enemies is really bad thing, unless you don't care about that or you want to do it, otherwise you SHOULD destroy it before retreating. This is basic war 101. But I guess as now Putin decided to escalate this special military operation to be an actual war and starting to draft people into this war by force, this debate is meaningless. War isint going by Putin plans, clearly, otherwise they would not have escalated it to new levels, isint it?
1
I guess this 3 day war being over 1 year old is in his grand plan.
1
Unless VPN denies connections from Russia to their servers, problem solved.
1
Anti-vaxxer and flat earther? What else? 5G is brainwashing method? Government is ruled by lizardmen?
1
How much Putin is paying you to say such lies?
1
Patreon money well spent? For videos like these you are spending money? Seriously?
1
Ever heard about tides? Even on flatardia you would have water which is bent... So nice try, but big fail.
1
Ok, so lets list logical fallacies you made here: Argument from personal incredulity, argument from authority, red herring fallacy and argument from ignorance fallacy. And all this in one big word salad you call response... Anyways, was nice "talking"...
1
Russia already invaded Ukraine... How the hell is journalist provoking already outgoing war?...
1
Hows Bakhmut? Was worth it? Tactically important village? If you like your Russia so much, why not stay there and leave us alone?
1
We call that: Whataboutism.
1
If following god is not a blind, then you should be able to prove that god is real, right? but you cant, so that makes it blind following.
1
No, we don't.
1
@fabianelliott96 And I will... Just like majority of people will. That sound is ONLY relevant for tiny amount of people, TINY. And what's funny that you straight away went to BEV's when I objected to HICE engines, why not go with Hydrogen fuel cell instead?
1
Lying about earth's shape would be the biggest lie in entire human history... Not even talking about the fact that anyone can determine earth's shape from their backyard. It's like the lie which is impossible to hide without involving some magic into mix. But yes, flat earthers usually go with "Is it because government said it?!" or "Is it because NASA said it?!" they just want to feel special by going against grain, or just want to follow their magical ancient book and use that as main evidence.
1
That's why they watch TF videos
1
Its because gasoline cars efficiency basically didn't change in last few decades, its at its peak.
1
@Dustin227 Technically he is scientist, tho most would not really call him one. Just like going into "space" with blue origin makes you, technically, an astronaut, but that word has more weight and higher meaning than just "someone who reached 100km altitude" even if by definition you could be classified as astronaut. At the end of the day, it makes no difference here, he is or not a scientist, he is still factually correct on what he said.
1
@Dustin227 Do you have degree from scientific field? No? So you are not classified to be scientist. On top of this, even if you have been actual scientist, you can disagree all day long, wont make Bill wrong here.
1
@Dustin227 Ok. And? Like what exact point are you trying to make here? Lets say Bill is not scientist, lets say he never finished middle school, lets say he can't add 2+2, what does that change of what he said in this video? Did earth became flat because of that or is it still a globe and Bill was factually correct on everything he said here independently of his scientific status?
1
@Dustin227 If in 21st century, where you have access to internet, aka entire knowledge of humankind, you are over 5 years old and you still believe in flat earth, you are an idiot. Ok, lets say Bill isint accredited scientist... What's now? What changed?
1
And?
1
You like dictatorships? You don't like freedom? Good for you leave free world for the free people, stay in Russia and stop complaining about things you dont have.
1
But it is suitable for towing, this test in this video is stupid at best, it tested vertical load on a hitch and compared results to towing capacity, those are not the same things.
1
Could they tho? At this point I would not be even tiny bit surprised is this is best what Russia can do. This war got dragged for too long already and Russia is just getting ass kicked across the board. If they could crush Ukraine, they why would they not do it? There is literally no reason to hold back, quicker you can finish war less you will lose in general. If Russia managed to capture Ukraine in 3 days, barely any sanctions would have been applied to Russia, but now its just down hill for it
1
@samzx81 I could sadly make a prediction how Putin would try to save his ass and stop this war without losing it... Destroy nuclear plant in Ukraine... use that as excuse to retrieve all their soldiers like they are good guys and it's not because they are starting to lose this war. " Also I don't agree with your assertion that they wouldn't have had the same sanctions put on them." Sanctions came along way later and way after it was clear that Russia isint taking Ukraine in 3 days. If Russia took Ukraine, then thats that. Some sanctions might have been applied, but not on this scale as it would have been after the fact. Now its a punishment for Russia while at same time keep pointing out that if you continue we will increase sanctions more and more. "You think if they took over all of Ukrain in a few days that the counties that have sanctioned them would have just gone "oh well I guess there's no need to sanction them now."" Not what I said... I said that sanctions would have been applied but not on this scale. Will try to make basic analogy here: You see someone beating another person, but you are too far to help directly, what you can only do it point out that continuing to do such thing will result in punishment. Longer that lasts more and more things you will come up to punish that person who keeps beating someone, because we are humans and we tend to become more and more angry/passionate if we see same crime over and over again. If you put video of this on internet you will get astronomic support behind this, especially if it's continue happening. If that was only basic beating and you just found out about it after the fact, then that's that, you will call police and people might get general punishment and no one would care much about it as it happens from time to time. Entire support to Ukraine came later on, after invasion was weeks old, people gathered together, people got more and more pissed about what Russia is doing, more and more support started to flow, more and more people started to talk about harsher sanctions and so on. That's how humans work, not perfect, but better than nothing.
1
@dontjustbeanotherbrickinthewal "God Bless you" Best counter argument ever!!! Call in imaginary friend for a help, that will show those globe heads who is the boss!
1
@dontjustbeanotherbrickinthewal Right, so god dint created everything from nothing then? Right? Did he borrowed stuff from another universe or did he just rearranged existing one? Tho who said that everything came from nothing? And how is that even relevant to the shape of earth?
1
Its multilevel issue. 2 main issues are mentality of Americans and how easy it is to get weapons in general. You can't solve this issue by only addressing one side and not both. You have plenty of countries where you have gun control which doesn't prevent you from getting gun, but prevents everyone who just decided to get one to actually get it in 5 minutes while buying milk (exaggeration, I know). Introducing more guns into system will not solve issue, this will only increase want to have more guns than your neighbor, which will create (it already does) a snowball effect, more guns for you to "protect" against the one who got more guns to "protect" himself against someone else, and on and on and on and on.
1
Which part in this video was wrong and why?
1
@danielkotzer636 Wait, are you one of those who thinks that it's possible to have hydrogen on demand? To address some points you made here, while you can use different combustible gases in engines, every single one needs something slightly different, while with hydrogen that list of needs is extra long. Have you ever heard of hydrogen embrittlement? It's a thing where hydrogen will eat through metals its in contact with, this is why all hydrogen tanks are being coated with ceramics, which helps out with that, but doesn't resolve issue entirely. Considering that, you will need special engine made of special metal alloy which is more resistant to hydrogen embrittlement, which means that you can't just use any engine out there, atleast not for longer use times. Even ceramic coated hydrogen tanks have literal expiration dates printed on them and you will HAVE to replace them after few years. Will try asking again, what was actually wrong in this video and why? Like actual tell me which statement you are addressing here and what is the "correct" answer.
1
@danielkotzer636 "There is a material from which hydrogen balloons can be made, but whoever made them was forbidden to sell them because it is a "military secret"" And your source for this is...? "Just trust me bro"? " I guess for the engine as well, after all the engine is almost never exposed to hydrogen, it reaches the piston and immediately burns." In which magical way do you think this hydrogen would reach engine? And i'm hoping here that you do know how engines actually work... Right? One cycle to draw in hydrogen into cylinder and then compress it, next one would be the burning one and excusing remains from that combustion, so you have half of the cycle not only with hydrogen in it, but with compressed hydrogen... So yea, you are obviously wrong here. "There are welding machines that use electrolysis to produce hydrogen and immediately it burns" Cool beans, now, did you noticed slight difference between this welding machine and a car? Maybe that electrical cable going to the wall?... Will make it really simple for you. To make 1 kg of hydrogen you will need 2kg of hydrogen, and no, those numbers are not backwards. You will need twice as much hydrogen to use it as energy source to produce half of it as return, and this is only for self production, this doesn't even include ability to use any excess for actual car propulsion and this is with hydrogen fuel cell technology which is twice the efficiency of combustion engines. Do you see potential issue here? "if they didn't find a solution for it, they wouldn't sell it" Every single part in your car has some sort of expiration date as it wears down naturally, difference between hydrogen tanks and those parts is that hydrogen tank wears out based on time. Just like there are no instructions to replace any part you buy, there might not be one specifically for the tank, but you should actually check tank itself as it should have expiration date printed on it. "but not to claim that it is not possible as in this video" No one said that it's not possible, entire issue boils down to it being impractical and extremely expensive to use. This entire video talks about required space for hydrogen only, is it possible to utilize entire interior of the car for hydrogen tanks? Well yes. Would anyone want car like that? No. Same thing with price per mile driven. Cost of maintenance is astronomical due to hydrogen embrittlement. Cost of hydrogen itself is extreme too as we have 0% of it on earth in its pure form, aka 100% of hydrogen needs to be produced. Hydrogen only sounds cool on paper but doesn't work as viable option in actual reality. You should actually do more research on this topic than just watching AI auto generated videos on youtube on how Toyota is breaking laws of physics because they (video creators) said so...
1
@danielkotzer636 Its not my job, its my hobby to educate people. Toyota might present this magical v8 car, cool beans, they will sell like 10 of them and that's that. It's a hobby car, a car which is used to show off to your friends and not to use it for daily driving. The fact that you failed to counter any of my arguments shows that you either don't care what is actually true or you know it and just pretend that you don't
1
Then don't buy one... You do you and everyone else will pick something better.
1
So much wrong here... Depending on country electricity source can be easily from renewables, coal gets fazed out. On top of this, you need around 60% MORE energy for hydrogen cars, so any objection for BEV's would be 60% worse for hydrogen cars. Mining of minerals is way less damaging than something like extracting oil, and it can be quite easily mitigated, as its only digging the dirt. And for child labor... This is one of those extremely weird points. Its like saying that because there are child exploitations while making shoes means that we should stop using shoes in general... No... First of all, Australia is the biggest exporter of Lithium, and for child labor its an issue with country, not with technology.
1
Is it really being scammed when you never bother to double check if you have options of refueling nearby before you buy it? Its like buying actual rocket and then saying that you got scammed because you need bunch of permissions and specific fuel to launch one...
1
No, he just dumb with some good positions. You can't be open minded about basic reality... Earth is a globe... Its like being "open minded" about Australia being real or not... Its just dumb...
1
To be fair here alternative to Trump wasn't that good either, at least at that time, knowing with what's going on now Trump would have never won.
1
Pavle Pavlovic Then I guess when Russia said to send 300k troops after that first officiel draft was a one more lie?... You spitting out random nonsense is just weird... Please check reality before you speak...
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee Yes to what? And once more, give me EXACT example here, preferably with actual source and not some random webpage claiming that Musk exploits people because they feel it in their balls or something
1
Because it's replacing older version of Model 3. Its under same category, same size, same general shape, same price and so on. So instead of coming up with new name and discontinuing older model 3 entirely, it's simply replaces it. Quite few automakers does the same, tho with 100x less changes... So you have to go by build year, which at same time could not even indicate what you are getting...
1
That's what ammunition is for... To stop this war by defeating aggressor...
1
Hydrogen combustion engines are around 50% the efficiency in comparison to hydrogen fuel cell engines. Now go and look up hydrogen cars and check how "spacious" their interior are even with double the efficiency of engine...
1
@markiankchik1338 Point is simple, as you said that those things i listed are not real because you cant touch or feel them, same exact thing applies to god claim. All of them, including god claim, is just a claim without any supporting evidence and as you cant prove that there is no such thing as magical space pixies or prove that there is no god, you have same exact situation here. So by your own words, as we cant touch or feel god he is not real, or atleast there is no reason to believe that he is.
1
@markiankchik1338 Your funny thing makes fun of your beliefs, just saying...
1
@Lux Did you missed entire point i made in all of those comments? Do you even read?
1
@Lux Sun can be proven to be real independent of people. Just because some one says that god is real doesn't mean he is. Mark original comment was to make a fun my saying that just because we cant see or feel something doesn't mean it not real, i give couple examples with things which can be seen or felt, yet he straight away rejected all of that. Why? Pixies and god fall under same exact category and has same amount of evidence: None. Yet he rejects one and believes other... So yea, you missed entire point i made here... And English is my 3rd language, what i know i learned myself, so sorry if i cant meet you standards here, but not everyone are fluent in English by default...
1
Revolutionary? Yet those two things are not compatible, atleast no one ever drew a connection. Even tho science deals with anything what is in reality, it never produced any evidence for even a possibility that god could be real.
1
Revolutionary? Yea, thats a religion for you, belief that something is true while it was never been shown to be true. Tho if you understand that, why do you keep believing it?
1
@Lux "Science cannot explain certain phenomena." Cannot or dint? Science could not explain why you have brown eyes couple hundred years ago... Doesn't mean reason behind your brown eyes is magic... "they even lock you up without your own consent" If you are some one who can cause harm to others, then well, there isint any other option here. Ether lock you up or risk in having injured or dead people. Cant say that everyone deserves that who got locked, but when you have unstable mind state its better to be safe then sorry. "When I was battling with those demons" You mean when you had broken mind state? "they imposed me pills when I was clear about the fact that I am christian" How is you being Christian makes you expert in human brain work? Do you seriously think that being Christian makes you a neurologist or psychiatrist? "because I know from where it comes from" Your brains, everything you do comes from your brains... Proven fact from actual reality... "So what's your point about saying that what science tells you is objective and credible?" Evidence. While your claim that your fu**ed up state was caused by demons living in spiritual plane is just... Well... Delusions of yours... Tho its just result of your brainwashing done by your parents or local church or whatever did that to you. "For example, "schiz*******" is not a mental issue, but demonic" Based on what evidence? Like seriously, do you even know what evidence is? Or reality? " The victim claim to hear voices" yes... We have plenty of those... From different religions... Claiming to hear voices from dozens of different sources... Its like they are victims of their own mind making shit up... Do you even believe that humans can experience hallucinations? Now i'm just curious here... "but Jesus after a lot of prayers and certain spiritual procedures." So when you will break your leg you will not go to hospital but you will pray and it will get healed? Or not? When does your praying actually works? Can we test it? Because some one already did test pray, it failed... Miserably... "Believe what you want, this is my testimony and some people know about my spontaneous change." And some people say that Elvis is still alive and some say that they got abducted by aliens and some say that forest pixies are real because they seen them with their own eyes... So i guess we should believe ALL of them just because they say that its true... Well sorry, this is not how reality works.
1
Revolutionary? Ok, just replied to Lux comment... I do suggest to read his reply and try to realize why religions are dangerous... He is a prime example of that...
1
Revolutionary? Not saying that all religious are like that, but this is prime example what religions can do to some one who could actually reason if only he wasn't brainwashed before hand.
1
@Lux 4 long comments?... And then you accuse me of not addressing your every single claim... C'mon... I have better things to do then writing essay on youtube comment sections... "Redundant. Check the meaning of "ancestor", we humans use it." ? You claimed that by evolutionary view we evolved from monkeys, this is factually wrong, its not redundant, its just wrong... Humans and monkeys share common ancestor, that doesn't mean we came from monkeys... "you claim is the ardipithecus ramidus (a monkey, check)" Ardipithecus ramidus is not a monkey, its a primate... Check... "So, basically, we have animal features because our (great(x1M)-grandmother) experimented with one of them? " What the what now? We are animals, by definition of animals, we are animals. We don't have features of animals, we are animals... Check... "Do I?" Yes. "graphical explanation (which is more accurate) shows the EVOLUTION of a monkey becoming a man" Once again, false. Not a monkey, primate. You could say it was an ape, that that would actually be redundant, because humans are apes. So yea... You not only have no idea what evolution is but you have no idea what some words mean... ""Who did create you?" lethal weapon is: "no, we are descendants of the monkeys". LOL" First of all, that's a loaded question. Who said that we are created? Second, cherry picking random atheists who miss use word are not representation of atheism or evolution in general... If you have some one saying that we evolved from monkeys, then they are factually wrong. So i have no idea what are you getting to here. I can point you to theists who says that magical forest pixies are real, does that mean its your position too?... Lets talk between us and avoid bringing up some one else... Otherwise you will loose even more then you did already. "According to the dictionary, it means gradual change and there is no such thing as passing from one specie to another." Just a friendly suggestion to you. When you try to present definition of a word, actually present definition of a word... Like this Evolution: "is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations" Speciation is just a label put on groups of animals which cant inter breed. And we have actual speciation recorded. Check "ring species" or fruit fly experiment... And just FYI your personal opinion doesnt define reality. Present evidence that change in gene pool cant result in speciation. I will wait. " The caterpillars are born insects and even when they pass metamorphosis to become butterflies, they are still insects" ? Insect is not even a species... Its a whole category... Like mammals... Or fish... And you terrible understanding what evolution is, is just... sad... "Even in the animal kingdom itself, cats don't turn into tigers" Yes, because that would be stupid... Luckily this is not what evolution says to be true... Who could known... " So I'm not wrong when I refer to hominid theory as a "mutation"" What? Theory is a mutation? What the what now? Do you speak english? "I didn't call it that way, your illuminated scientists did." I have no idea what you called it, but it was as scientific as to call Ardipithecus ramidus a monkey... Damn... Ok, as you can see, even one comment resulted into esey. Will not bother to address anything else. Lets stay on ONE topic.
1
@Lux "Repeat with me: humans and monkeys share a common ancestor." Yes, and whats your point? You repeating what i said... "Why are we humans related to animals?" Humans are animals. Dint you get that first time i said it? How many times i need to repeat same thing before you understand it? "do we have a shared gen because of our grand(x1M)-father had king kong complexes?" We have shared genes, not one, quite few of them, because we have common ancestor. "I'm glad those we mention here are theories, imagine if they were universal laws." Och, you one of those.... Sorry, dint realized that you dont even understand what scientific theory is... Sorry about that... Well, homework for you then: learn what scientific theory is. If you fail with next replay, i can educate you, just to make you look less ignorant on basic things. "It's a fact gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, whatever... don't turn into humans." evolutionary
1
@Lux "I made a question, so stop making assumptions, develope your texts." Ironically i have no idea what was your question as you never developed your own text properly... Irony... " That assumption makes me realize how traumatized you are after watching Tarzan a lot of times." What? Tarzan is a animated movie (original one) which depicts fictional story. Tho i have no idea why should i be traumatized... Can you develop your text more properly? Like actually explain why should i be traumatized? "Oh really? so tell the scientists to stop categorizing us as exclusively humans" ? Just because you got categorized as human doesn't mean you don't share same genes as other animals.... Damn... Your sentence makes as much sense as for me to complain that house and motel doesn't share similar things when they have different labels... They are different, but at same time they have similar stuff in them... Same as Humans and monkeys are different but share quite allot of same DNA... "(because as far as I know there are 3 kingdoms)" ? Are you trolling here? Like seriously, are you just trying to troll me here? Well i will assume that you are, you cant be that ignorant... "or to invent a new word to define a mixture between an animal and a human" That's how reality works... We literally are making labels to separate one animal from another... bonobos have 98.7% DNA what humans have. That tiny 1.3% defines them as different species and due to that bonobos got different labels than humans... Its just a label...We are always putting it on a new species we discover even if it looks like another, if it cant interbreed, its a new species for which we will make a new word... Welcome to reality... "I am going to use my ace up my sleeve to challenge and expose science" I can bet this will be gooooood! "Yes, then if it's a LAW, explain why the members of the rainbow flag (code words) break that supposed LAW." Yeap, i was correct, this one was a gooooood crazy one. "Yes, they can't explain it because demons hate original nature and love to create chaos" Wait, dint you just tried to make a joke by saying "Yes, you love fairy tales a lot. " and you continue this with talks about demons?! Ok... "So, they will never finish developing that answer because science doesn't believe in demons." Yes, stupid questions should not be answered, just a waste of time. "And going back to the main theme "what I don't see or touch doesn't exist", I already beat you apparently." I dint see that... Where was it? Can i touch it? "You don't see the wind and oxygen, but you feel them going in and out of your nose, PERIOD." Yet i can detect wind and oxygen, measure it and so on. And in general, you can touch wind (like literally, wind creates pressure difference which is same thing as touching) and i can touch oxygen, ever seen liquid oxygen? What about solid oxygen? PERIOD. Damn, that was easy do demolish your card house. Lets do it again!
1
@Lux "Go back to school and then you will to be able to conclude an idea." I see you have experience with that... "atheists die and nobody will remember them" Which is obviously false statement. Do you remember guy named Stephen Hawking? That one was an atheist... What about Christopher Hitchens? Atheist and his name will is remembered and will be. So yea, you are wrong, again. "meanwhile God's name" God is just a label, abstract label. Zeus is a god too, yet you would not say that he is same as god you believe in. And making argument from popularity will not get you anywhere. You would know this is you ever went back to school and learned some basics about reality. "What happens here is that some people like you are angry because he doesn't save children that are suffering right now" Och no no no, i have no anger towards Voldemort, i dont have any towards your god ether. I LITERRALY dont believe that he is real, i cant be angry about his actions... Do you even understand what atheism is?... "Life is well designed" First of all, who said that its designed? And second, life is good at killing people... Do you know what average life expectancy was like 2000 years ago? Around 30 years... Do you know what it is right now? 72.6 years. Do you know why? Science. Due to progress in science we have learned how to live longer and better lives, not because your sky wizard did something, but because humans learned how to do shit. "the problem is that a rebel angel wants" The problem is that you still presuppose that magic is real without actually proving that it is... "you're fleshly and I am spiritual" ? Are you saying you are not human? If i damage your brain, will you remain you? What is the difference between being this "fleshy" and "spiritual"? Is this just a mental state? Belief system?... C'mon... Use your own advice "Go back to school and then you will to be able to conclude an idea." "flesh dies and spirit not, because it's energy." PROVE IT. "Demons won't show their horrible faces if they don't possess a body" PROVE IT. "but they can fly around a house breaking objects" PROVE IT. "they're fallen angels who turned themselves into demons " PROVE IT. "Their energies stay in the earth's crust and they can go up and down as long as humans want." PROVE IT. "that's the purpose of the devil, to corrupt you" Does that mean that devil is more powerful then your god or your god just like to watch how devil does this to humans? It needs to be one of those options. Well, presupposing bunch of shit before hand, but if we do, you have to pick one of those. "The consequences of the path you chose will be yours, not mine, I already warned you." Why does this sound more like a threat? You cant even prove anything you said to be true, yet you are here saying that i should believe you because otherwise i will be punished... C'mon...
1
That's the entire point, they dint begun while those had chance to do so, now EV's overtaking Hydrogen cars by a mile and gap is only increasing between those.
1
@REAL-UNKNOWN-SHINOBI Because of news articles like "Car runs on water" or "Hydrogen is the cleanest solution" or anything like that while never actually looking any deeper into it. I was on same boat and was thinking that hydrogen is the answer for everything, but after few videos and some research realized that there is a reason why hydrogen never become a thing, it ONLY sounds cool on paper and its only saving grace would be to use it on a bigger equipment where you have plenty of spare space, like buses, semi, trains, boats, maybe even planes, but passenger cars... Well, it's just doesn't work. Too many issues and complications surrounding this entire tech for it to win against BEV's and at the moment we need to transition away from petroleum based cars, transitioning to hydrogen makes no sense due to those same complications, its just more complicated and more expensive solution which could have only worked as a short term solution while we transition to BEV's, but its too late for that too, we are transitioning to BEV's and hydrogen become just some weird middle man which never got utilized.
1
@james4299 We need solution today and not for our "kids kids". Only only positive thing is that summer came just in time, so we have couple months to think of some alternatives before heating season hits, but its still not enough time o properly transition to any alternatives besides getting something extra expensive in such short time.
1
Monopoly is bad, but having country like Russia controlling oil/gas is debatably even worst than that. There isint any actually good solution, but due to current situation countries will need to find alternatives, ether buy from US or any other country which can provide needed oil and gas, which basically is exactly same situation as to have US controlling russian oil/gas except price goes up due to higher cost for import.
1
They threaten with nukes every second day... By this point sneezing will warrant a nuke by Russian mindset.
1
50KW is already extremely high for regular person to be producing, so yes, government or whoever is in charge will limit how much you can inject electricity of your own back into grid. It's not that it can't handle it, it's just that having bunch of private people randomly injecting random amounts of electricity makes it more and more difficult to balance out. Why you ask? Well, if you inject 50KW into grid, well, the thing which was previously producing those same 50KW now needs to be shutdown or you have to just "burn" that extra 50KW somewhere. Now imagine 1000+ private people doing that...
1
You do know that you need approval from government to be allowed to launch rockets? Right? And you do understand that if someone at government who issues those approvals isn't a big fan of Musk he/she could easily extend that period to hamper their progress? Right?
1
David You are missing entire point here with eye limited distance... Yes, your eyes do have limited distance, but no one in their sane mind talks about things you can see with your eyes... For example i need glasses because my eyes sight is rubbish, doesn't mean that object disappears 50 meters away just because i cant see it anymore. What people are talking about is objects disappearing bottoms up over the horizon, this is not related to your eyes, its just basic geometry...
1
Then I guess Russia just decided to stop advancement for past 6+ months without any good reason?... Reality disagrees with your claim here...
1
@1do2likeU To make it short as possible? No problem: Sunset. There are 4 glaring issues with sun if earth would be flat. 1. Sun doesn't change speed. 2. Sun doesn't change size. 3. Sun moves in straight line 4. And, sunset, sunrise. All 4 things matches globe earth model, none of them matches flat one. Now question to you: Which ones of those four things about sun matches reality?.... Exactly... Its a globe... And this is only issues with sun... There are couple dozen other glaring issues which disprove flat earth...
1
I guess Ukraine should just roll over and surrender?...
1
What exactly is psycho about his "right wing" position you don't like?
1
@deemo5245 Not using X. So will ask again, what exactly from his "right wing" you don't like?
1
@KangenAlec I wonder what would happen if you tried to cross country border... Would some one stop you or can you just do it?
1
My question would be: Will your next car be hydrogen?
1
Wrecked? How? Why should it be? You think allowing Russia to invade other countries is a better option?
1
Yea, without dedicated refueling station it's basically not possible. No in case of disaster you will be stranded without any options to keep moving.
1
Half way there then.
1
What is "fairly" cheaply? As you could transport hydrogen in... Well.. Water form too... And its conversion is "fairly" cheap too...
1
Because Toyota builds hydrogen fuel cell cars and not combustion ones. Those are twice the efficiency, and even then you have 2 huge hydrogen tanks just to get that max 400 mile range.
1
Green hydrogen is just a name for hydrogen produced in specific way... Green Hydrogen Blue Hydrogen Grey Hydrogen Brown Hydrogen Black Hydrogen Pink Hydrogen Yellow Hydrogen Turquoise Hydrogen White Hydrogen That's all of them...
1
@wsbill14224 You are not that good at your job if you think that petrol, which is limited resource, is the future. Like, what do you smoke? Because I might want some of that to have such a good trip to fantasy land like you are going through right now...
1
"Russia never throws anything away .." That explains WW2 weapons Russians are getting while going to front lines...
1
That what made you skeptical?! The part about free energy or water powered engine didn't?
1
Yes, because Russia usually lies and without ability to verify its claims, it's just that, a claim. While another side can be actually investigated and verified if you wanted.
1
Really weird comment. Yes, you could produce hydrogen, but like, to produce hydrogen you need electricity and you need more of that than you would need to simply charge your car.
1
@Resomius "But it´s more enteresting WHEN you produce it." But its not. It maybe could be more interesting as some middle school science experiment, but its not interesting for general use case. "If you want to charge an EV at night you need the energy at that moment." Usually there is plenty of that, this is why electricity prices are lowest at night. "With hydrogen you can produce it whenever you want and store it." Then why we have ZERO energy storage plants based on hydrogen? Because its not a good option for that. "But since at day the energy usage is less and also there is SO much renewable coverage in germany especially the wind turbines are often stopped and switched of to not overload the electric system." So like, more demand during day when you have solar panels to offset that? "But since at day the energy usage is less" But its not less... Peak hours are during the day... "Produce your fuel when energy is cheap and redily available and then store it when you actually need it." Or... Charge your car at off peak hours, like, during night, while you sleep...
1
@Resomius I would be more than happy if hydrogen worked as viable option, sadly more you read about it less viable it becomes in your eyes. It's just surrounded by soooooo many issues that it's ridiculous. Like for example one of the biggest issues is hydrogen embrittlement, basically metals in contact with hydrogen will lose their structural integrity over time, this is why all hydrogen tanks in cars have expiration date printed on them, which is like 5-7 years. Powering your car with fuel produced from water sounds extremely good, this is why news papers usually put titles like "car powered by water" or something nonsensical like that. But it just doesn't work. Best case would be to use it for bigger equipments, like ships, planes, trains, semi, which would have their own dedicated refueling stations with production plants near them and have their own in house repair to lower costs of maintenance, but its non starter for regular passenger cars.
1
So basically its fault of US even tho it was Russia which attacked Ukraine?... Sounds legit...
1
Any gains are substantial. The fact that Russian soldiers have been pushed back from their established defensive positions is a big deal on itself even if it was 100 square km of a desert.
1
@glennrobards585 Earth rotates at whooping 1 rotation in 24 hours... Do you seriously expect to notice it spinning?... Any videos from space demonstrating earth spin will get dismissed by your as "CGI" because reasons, while on earth surface you literally have no way to notice earth you stand on to spin... You can take stars as reference point and observe them going around the earth in a nice predictable way it would if we lived on spherical earth. But like seriously, in your mind if earth is spinning, what the hell should we observe?
1
@glennrobards585 "What part of it's impossible for the earth to be rotating are you not getting?" All of it... Simply screaming out that something is not possible without providing actual valid explanation is that will not prove anything. There are no reasons for rotating earth not to be possible. "You can't take an actual video of impossible things." Like flat earth? "Anyone that says that the earth is rotating is lying." Or not... If its actually is rotating... "Anyone can observe a stationary earth from a helicopter or an airplane." That's not how physics work... Ever heard of "Conservation of momentum"? By your logic if I'm inside plane which goes at 700km/h and i fly a drone inside it it should slam at 700km/h at its back?... "It's impossible for the earth to be spinning because the earth doesn't have the ramifications/effects of said spin." It does. Coriolis effect is one of those. Then you have that "strange" effect where tornados twist always to one direction, opposite directions on opposite hemispheres and they never cross equator... " because the spin and curved water are impossible." No idea how is water spin is even rational thing in this sentence... For curved water... Ever seen tides?... Even if earth was flat you still have curved water... Please, for you own sake, use your head before you talk... "The truth doesn't fear investigation." Correct, this is why flat earth was debunked long time and you are failing on debunking globe earth on every single step here. You can investigate globe, nobody fears that and we will always debunk your "arguments"
1
@phildavenport4150 I know, but I can still put him into his place regardless of that.
1
You cant have round square... Earths is ether flat or not, you cant have both at same time. And what you believe to be true and what actually is true can be (and is in this case) completely different stories.
1
@mohammedrehansoudagar507 If you cant even explain it here without creating logical contradiction, then you dint understood it yourself. And why would we care what Quran says?
1
Cannon fodder. Russia is desperate to take it, Ukraine can utilize this and do it safely, stay in cover always, take exponentially more enemies and when your cover gets dangerous, just retreat back little bit, rinse and repeat. At this point Russia only has more soldiers, so Ukraine needs to save as many their own soldiers as possible until counter attack can be done. I mean, if Russia so powerful and all that jazz, then why is it struggling to take over this tiny town?
1
@Gottum365 "it's also apparent that stars have movement and also rotate over the course of one night so it could very well be the stars rotating around the earth" Except the fact that you have 2 points around which stars rotate... Its like earth is a globe and its spinning around its axis... Who could knew... And just a thought here, why can you only see half of the stars at a time and not all of them? Or like 60% Or 70 or something like this. If 100% of stars are above horizon, why cant we see them? What magic prevents that?
1
@Gottum365 You dint answered to my actual question here... If you have on a flat surface and 100% of stars are located above this flat surface, what magic prevents you from seeing all of them? And to address your " you can't see the whole U.S. from your front porch" yes, you can't, because there is such a thing we call: curvature. You literally proving my point here, you cant see whole U.S. because you have curvature, while if we lived on a flat plane there would not be any reason why you could not see whole earth in some perfect weather conditions. So thanks for that.
1
@Gottum365 " limitation meaning there's a limit of what you can see with your own two eyes" And? buy a 1 million telescope, will you be able to see entire US with it?... Nope... Your eye limitation is irrelevant here because we can't see entire earth not because your had bad eye sight, but because we have curvature. Yet you dint addressed my question, again, why cant we see more than 50% of stars? How the hell does it work when entire sky, from horizon to horizon, is covered with stars but its only 50% of those... How the hell would that work on flat earth? " we do have Valleys mountains and Hills plus countless trees all of these things could obstruct your field of view" Yet that doesn't explain why you cant see entire earth from Mount Everest... Or from a plane... Or from anything what flies above your mentioned obstructions... We still have that same limitations which slightly increases with your increased altitude matching 100% to globe model, its like earth is actually a globe... " but the Earth's curvature I have never seen it but I have seen the flat Horizon" Horizon is not flat... Get any photo editor, even MS Paint will do... Draw a line representing you as human, then draw a circle in same scale to be 1:1 matching globe model and realize that you need to zoom out quite a bit before you start noticing any curvature in that circle... And just FYI give me ANY image/video taken from high altitude without fish eye lens distortion and i will show you curvature in that photo, I dare you!
1
Use solar panels which generate electricity to then use that electricity to make hydrogen which would then be used to create electricity to boil water which then gets used to turn turbines which then generates electricity?... Sound logical...
1
Its not a theory, its hypothesis at best. And yes, some places allowing you to spread lies, some do try to prevent it.
1
Where?
1
Because breaking laws of physics is quite hard... Will make it really simple here, you need around 2kg of hydrogen to make around 1kg of hydrogen, and no, those numbers are not backwards. You might see potential issue here.
1
By this rate Russia will collapse sooner than Ukraine will retake its own lands back. But we will see how it will end up after Ukraine starts attacking instead of defending
1
Why?
1
@quang922 Will make this really easy for your brain to grasp. Imagine you having ak-47 with infinite amount of ammo and you are facing 100 angry people armed with sticks. What would you do? Try to take out as many as possible before being beaten to death? Running forwards blindly just because you have better fire power will end up poorly, just look how Russia failed with its initial attack... Perfect example of how you should not do it. There is no real rush for Ukraine to sacrifice soldiers just so that they could take as much territory as possible in shortest amount of time, while Russia is desperate to end this war as soon as possible. And just FYI good counter offensive is the one you never seen coming and when you do it's already too late to do anything about it.
1
@HooDatDonDar What?
1
@herrschaftg35 He is more of an engineer than TF here, yet you will blindly listen what your cult leader has to say over thousands of actual rocket scientists who disagree with TF here. Why is that?
1
@ARCSTREAMS What you seen was a scam video claiming stuff Toyota never said. There are entire channels spreading nonsense videos like that.
1
@ARCSTREAMS There are strict rules for posting links in here, usually comments gets removed automatically independent where this link leads you too. So avoid doing that or expect it to be auto removed with high probability. There are no official videos from Toyota to support your statement here, there are only bunch of fake channels making those claims. Conversion of hydrogen from water takes (as example) 100kW, while using this amount of hydrogen with most efficient hydrogen cell engine you will get back around 500kW, which means that you are loosing half of energy by trying to convert hydrogen from water onboard, which means... Water powered cars do not exist and anyone who claims that those do are simply either lying or have no idea what they are talking about. Like seriously, if you could power car with water, then instead of coal electric plants we would have water electric plants... But we don't, because technology like that doesn't exist. And no, there is no grand conspiracy here...
1
Don't think so, its more like their deep religious brainwashing makes them believe that earth is flat because bible said so. I don't think that any of them have even sliver of doubt that their religion is actually bollocks
1
Because problem actually exist and we are trying to solve it
1
@axoneer7806 Pollution?
1
@cgwworldministries83 You cant have gravity and a flat surface earth... Those are not compatible...
1
Or... Water powered engine never existed because we have a thing we call first law of thermodynamics?
1
? Obsessed with the country which decided to go with Putin in a war which is on our door step? Like, seriously, do you think that we are obsessed by your because there is something good about you or because its an actual threat to security costing countless lives?
1
Its read only device.
1
He literally did not made military decision here by not turning on starlink in areas which never had internet access... Do you even understand how reality works?
1
@KangenAlec Cartoon balls? So snow globe world is not a cartoon?
1
@KangenAlec Yes, we have cartoons on TV and in school books... Your point? Have you ever seen a cartoon? Tom and Jerry is a cartoon...
1
Are you drunk?
1
95% from how much? As there is difference between atmospheric densities. And you know what? Mars has 1% of earth's atmospheric density... So now your 95% becomes 0.95%. Tho duno why you even complaining here, you yourself mentioned extreme swings between temperatures, so either its caused by CO2 or Mars have different atmospheric conditions in general?...
1
Businesses close due to pandemic and low traffic, nothing surprising here. Churches are mass gathering objects which are hot spots for spreading viruses. How do you even fail to realize this basic reality? Masks have been mandatory, currently in my country we went back to normal as it was before all this pandemic, no more masks, no more other limitations. So how does that fit your fantasy world exactly? Who censors who? On top of this, there is always some censorship in place, like you have no right to post how to cook meth on facebook, or how to make bomb with household items on twitter, or say that some one needs to be killed and so on. So what are you talking here exactly about? What censor, where? Do you believe that 5G is a method to brainwash people too? Just checking if you are full crazy package or not.
1
People die in war... Well that's new...
1
Maybe because dam blew up at Russian controlled side and we know for a fact that Russia raised water levels to highest ever recorded before blowing it up to cause most damage?... You don't need to be rocket scientist to realize who did it and who benefited most from it...
1
@JohnDoe-ss1vp I never had a LEGO set, might be fun to play with one even in my age. But well, as you seem to be childish enough to have multiple LEGO sets, can I borrow one?
1
Is it only me who noticed AC unit at 3:47 mark being incorrectly installed? I know its not related to the main topic, but how the hell did that one got installed so poorly...
1
@adozera8714 How to debunk it? You dont need to... People who claims that it is needs to prove it, like present method how to verify that what this child is drawing is actually heaven and not something this child made up in its head.
1
Then prove that it is.
1
How would you ask every citizen in entire country what they think about some basic pool question? You can hardly gather people to vote for new president.
1
@thephilosopher7173 You dont need to question every single person to get basic idea. If you have 1 000 000 people and you ask 1000 random ones, you will get general idea about rest of them, It wont be perfect, but asking all of them would only, maybe, shift result to one or another side by a small amount. Its not perfect but its good enough for general idea whats going on.
1
Said Putin?
1
@Donbass__Live Why? Will Putin treat with yet another nuke?... Why so angry? Is it because rest of the world don't like Russia and will not like it for decades to come?
1
Zechariah Williams I will change your mind when you learn what scientific theory is.
1
Zechariah Williams Scientific theory is best current explanation for given question based on all evidence we have and contradicted by none of them. You dont need to be witness of murder to figure out who did it from evidence... So yea, you have no idea what scientific theory is, cant say i'm surprised tho. " However, when they make the leap of faith" I find it quite cute when theists try to lower scientific position to religions level just to have fighting chance. Sadly for you, will not work. "It is possible for two people to make an observation and come to two completely different conclusions. Who's right?" This is where evidence comes in, and something is true or false not based on 2 individuals and what they think to be true... Again, science is not religion... "The big bang was invented by a priest from the Vatican. Did you know that?" Why should it even mater? it could have been proposed by flipping homeless uneducated man who cant even make 2+2 calculation... Would not make any difference to actual claim here... " A person of faith came up with the big bang theory" Maybe because he realized that something is true independent of his religious views? " To make the assumption that all mass has some form of gravity, even though this cannot be observed or demonstrated is not scientific (although the observations can be). " Cavendish experiment demonstrates that any object with mass attracts any other object with mass. So nice argument from ignorance you have there. "Evolution is the same as well. We can go down these lines of thought if you like" Evolution is change in gene pool over populations, which is observable and testable fact from reality. Ring species, silver fox experiment... To name a two... After that i can name 50 other things which was direct proof of evolution if you can grasp those two to begin with...
1
Zechariah Williams Well i see some one got fired up... "What part of the big bang is scientific?" Everything. "What part of an explosion from nothing, that created everything is logical? " Its complete bullshit, because this is not a big bang theory. So you ether some one who has 0 understanding what Big Bang theory is in general or you intentionally trying to mislead with this nonsensical information. Ok, will not bother to even read rest of your comment, dont have time for that now and its already getting out of hand. So lets settle one thing here: Big Bang. Do you ever FACT CHECKED what Big Bang theory actually says? Because you failed on every single front here. So you never actually read about it? You simply parroting what your local preacher told you? Then why should i even listen to you if you dont even know what you are trying so desperately to debunk?
1
Zechariah Williams " I understand the theory quite well" But you dont... You demonstrated that with that nonsensical "What part of an explosion from nothing, that created everything is logical? " question you made... So did you intentionally created straw man here while knowing that it is straw man? What happen? "I was taught the theory on a collegiate level" Sadly you dint learned anything and never listened what it was told to you... " Whether they say nothing exploded and created everything" Said who? Because this is not a scientific stance in any shape or form "Where did the singularity come from? " Why do you even ask this? Big Bang doesn't even try to answer this question... So why do you even bring it up? And is this should be argument from personal incredulity? "Big bang requires something came from nothing" Once again, stop with this stupid straw man... Big Bang talks about ALREADY EXISTING ENERGY AND MATTER EXPANDING FROM A POINT. Do you not understand this basic concept? Whats going on with you? Skipping bunch of irrelevant blabbering... "So yes.. something from nothing. " Wha is that? Is this your new theory you want to present to scientific world? Because this is not a Big bang, so we now talking about your personal claim you have? Ok. Fine by me. As this is your personal claim, can you support that with evidence? Not some mumbo jumbo argument, but like actual evidence? "You can stop with the 'no true scottsman fallacy' and moving the goal posts" You could stop with the straw man fallacy and avoid creating nonsensical arguments. "Big bang is a religion" ? It literally cant be religion... Like literally... Tho its cute that you are trying to lower science to religions level as you do understand that you have shitty position here and you cant defend it in current situation. "A dumb one at that" Supported by smartest people on earth? If you say so it must be true... " You're just a weak little boy, who is falling in line due to the social pressures and ostricism of going against the grain" You do realize that you just define yourself and your religion? "Watch that. Explain it to me." Why? lets pretend that you managed to prove that 100% of what NASA ever presented, or any other space agency presented, is fake. So what? You seriously think that disproving NASA will prove that earth is flat? You are kidding? Right?
1
@abudabi178 Ironically, how would you know that YOU don't belong to the last one?
1
@abudabi178 basic observation of sun from your backyard disproves flat earth, so question, why do you think that earth is flat when its not?
1
Och you are one of those... While there is always carbon in air, issue isn't with it being there, issue is with AMOUNT of it in there... Aka EVERYTHING in high doses isint healthy, heck you can even overdose on drinking water or breathing pure oxygen. There is simply to much of CO2 in the air. And what is really weird is that you claiming that global warming is a hoax and that we should not go with cleaner solutions is basically 101 big oil company propaganda. In which reality going with cleaner solutions is bad?
1
Is it actually a claim from Toyota? Like, have you fact checked?
1
World rotates only around you?
1
@thomasjones4570 You talk like true American.
1
Did you got paid by oil company?
1
It will have its cost, this is result of a war. But getting increased prices on electricity or fuel will have smaller impact than Russians will experience for next decades.
1
How is it better? To fill up hydrogen car you will be paying like 200 bucks for 350mile range, while with BEV's you will be paying like 20 bucks for that same 350 mile range. Not even talking about allot more space in your car in general due to lack of huge hydrogen tanks.
1
No Putin, No war.
1
So not doing anything is bad, starting to do something about things is bad too? Is by your logic because before no one from side countries intervened in some war that means that they should follow same behavior for eternity? Can we talk about actual current war and what's going on instead of diving into 50-60's wars?...
1
Dont listen to Snappy_One, he is Russian spy who spreads lies and propaganda! We can play this childish game too you know, just make random empty claims because why not, who cares about actual evidence when you can simply say it and pretend that its true because you said it.
1
What expert views? On which topic in Jordan an expert?
1
What do you smoke? I want some.
1
"I gave everyone of sphere heads a chance to talk science" If it was science, then why like 99.9% of scientists disagree with your opinion? "last I checked, an assumption is a guess and u rock heads know it." We do, this is why you never provided actual evidence for flat earth, only assumptions. "U all say the same thing" So 2+2 is not equal 4? Or is it? If you ask how much is 2+2, should we say "banana" just to spice things up? "you have made up names" yes, its called: internet privacy
1
USA doesn't want to fight against Tesla, who wants to fight against them is other car brands and big oil companies who have more than enough money to spread stupid lies about them in hopes to slow down EV adoption.
1
@CrookedSkew It's ironic when you have TF cult going on at full swing
1
Placebo effect?
1
Your math is weird. Starship should be able to carry 150T into orbit, that would be 6,666 launches of starship on it full reusability.
1
@afterthestorm7012 "If I remember correctly, gravity is still considered a theory" Yea, same as germ theory or any other theory... Issue is not with the name, issue is with your ignorance about this labels meaning in scientific context. Theory is a model based on observable, testable facts from reality which has no contradictions. So it only demonstrates how ignorant you are on this topic, not that gravity is not real... FYI Gravity is a fact even tho its labeled misleading for simple people... "Gravity is just objects fall through the air, because they are heavier(denser)," False. Gravity is attraction between 2 objects with mass. This is testable with things like Cavendish experiment. And as you are using generic flat earth ignorant argument here i will have to ask you one simple question: Why its down? What i mean by this question is: why objects fall down and not up? What FORCE defines direction of fall? Density is not a force, so what defines direction?
1
@afterthestorm7012 "Why do most globe earthers have to get abusive" Because we are allergic to ignorance. "while they try to defend the ball earth?" We dont defend globe earth, we educate people like you about reality. I rarely need to actually prove that earth is globe, 90% of time i have to educate people about basic geometry and basic physics and so on. "Air pressure because we live under a dome" Why? Air should be dense equally on all altitudes, why does it have different density? It does make sense on globe earth with gravity, but it makes 0 sense on flat one... What force crates this gradient of presure? "Here watch these" Eric Dubay? Are you kidding me?... He is one of the worst ones who tried to prove flat earth... Tho i don't even think he is actually a flat earther but simply makes living from selling snake oil to people like you. "He has many vids to look at" And? Quantity is not equal to quality. And instead of pointing to bunch of videos, why would you simply present your best argument from flat earth and lets see if it holds or not?... "Until you've watched them, stop your aggressive attitude. " Why do you think that i'm not familiar with flat earhers claims? I can bet i have seen more of them then you did and i can debunk all of them in no time... So present YOUR argument here or go home. "You're going to look silly, when you finally succumb to the truth." You have no idea how ironic this one sounds. "I posted a long reply with videos for you to watch. It all got removed" Well actually i can see it. But in general avoid making comments with bunch of links, youtube tends to filter those ones out automatically. "ask yourself why would U-tube do that" It did not did that... And if it did its a basic content filter to avoid people coming here and posting advertisements. Youtube doesnt care about your flat earth opinion, if it did you would not have Dubay videos on youtube... You do realize that you contradict yourself here? You literally have hundreds if not thousands of videos promoting flat earth on youtube and you think that its removing your comments about flat earth?.... THINK BEFORE YOU POST. "watch the over 6 hour vodeo" Are you kidding me?... You seriously think that i will waste 6 hours of my life watching some propaganda when even his first point from any video is demonstrably false?... "Stop your condescending attitude" Cant stop myself to talk with people in this way when they think that they are smarter than 98% of human population because Dubay said so... C'mon, lets be real here...
1
@afterthestorm7012 Yes, you do have right to your own opinion, but you don't have right to your own facts.
1
@afterthestorm7012 Yes, tho my opinion is based on facts, yours is based on ancient book written by people who literally thought that earth is flat when its demonstrably is not... C'mon... Lets be real here...
1
@afterthestorm7012 "Look, I am being real" And you ended your comment with a quote from your ancient book... C'mon... Lets be real here... "There is so much deception in the material that NASA has put out" Who cares even if this empty assertion of yours was true? Earth is globe not because NASA said it... "Not one full image of the earth, is real" Provide method which you used to determine that. Be first flat earther who does that from literally dozens who i asked and 100% of them failed. "In the earth photos, they are using photoshop, copying clouds" its called: composites... Just like you have with panorama photos you make with your phone... And not all photos of earth are composites, we do have single shot photos. "n one of the cloud groups, it says the word "sex", this is no accident" Seeing recognizable objects or patterns in otherwise random or unrelated objects or patterns is called pareidolia "Over the years, all the different countries are all different sizes" yes, because it depends from which altitude you take photo of earth... Should i seriously teach you basic geometry? "They have supposedly lost the telemetry data, to the moon. So they can't get back there" Cant go back there? From whose ass you took this information? "They talk about the big problem of getting through the Van Allen Belt. Yet, supposedly they did it in 1969, in an aluminum can. " Do you even know what belt is?... Its a strip... If you cant go throw it, you can... Wait for it... GO AROUND IT... What they actually did in 69... They are not lying and not contradicting what happen, you simply failing to understand basic reality... Belt is not a dome, you can go around it... Not so convenient as to go throw it, as you need more time and fuel, but as we cant go throw it, we have to go around it... Do you understand? " How does a plane land on this moving object 19 mp/sec?" Basic physics... Conversation of momentum... For same exact reason if you jumped inside of plane which goes at 700km/h you will not be smashed at end of it... Same exact principle... PHYSICS. "How come a flight from the east coast of the US, to the west coast, take about the same time" Cha... About... Yea, about, not exact. Travel times are slightly different, you can check any longer flights to both sides and compare times. One way will be slightly faster. "There are many more questions you should ask yourself, concerning these areas, I have identified" I did, differently than you i got basic education how physics or geometry work and i know that everything about global earth is correct and doesnt contradict reality. Flat earth on another hand... Doesn't even have working model... "You have no idea of all the information I have seen pertaining to this subject" Is this information you have seen is similar to what you just presented... Then sorry, but you have nothing. "Absolutely, nothing YOU can say, will change my mind" Its called: being closed minded. You dont care what is true, you simply want it to be true independent if it is. This is literally what you just said. Think about it. "Calling me names and others" What names? Which part was insulting to you? "with my new (approximately 5 years) understanding. " So basically like i said, 5 year old arguments... And then you listed bunch of quotes... Ok... Good for you... How this helps your case exactly?
1
Which magical power source will convert ammonia to hydrogen and nitrogen exactly?
1
@ianbottom7396 Yes yes yes, just like there are cars running on water... Conversion of hydrogen requires quite a bit of electricity, its not a free process. I'm yet to see actually working and practical car running on your ammonia converted into Hydrogen or simply one running on ammonia directly.
1
@ianbottom7396 Ammonia powered cars are as popular as pink flip flops with cat pictures on it, you can barely find any information about it even if you try... So clearly something doesn't work with that technology as it can't even beat basic hydrogen cars.
1
@BBEETTYYful I'm guessing you are just trolling for attention here. But well, ether way we can educate and put you into place. Earths shape can be determined by anyone with basic understanding of geometry and some free time. Who was the first one to determine earths shape has nothing to do with earth actually being a globe... Earth is still a globe even if first human who determined that was a goat horder without any education, its simply irrelevant. But as I can see another comment of yours about NASA... I will stick with idea that you are just some sad troll looking for any conversation on internet. Get a better hobby.
1
Hydrogen for passenger cars will fail, well, honestly it never became a thing for it to even fail, its nothing burger at the moment.
1
Putin, is that you?
1
@CarsSlavik-mt2rt And it always ends up like it did with you, people are not proving globe, they are explaining you how basic reality works as you have no idea. Conservation of momentum is a thing even if earth is a flat pancake, so your comment is just plain, well, stupid.
1
Who said that you need to produce and utilize batteries every 5-6 years?
1
Is there experimentation date on hydrogen tank? Is there expiration date on fuel cell? Just because you work on hydrogen car doesn't mean that you know everything about it. I can fix computer, doesn't mean that I know how to make CPU or what goes into ones production...
1
@paradelights Expiration date means that you want it or now you will have to replace those tanks and fuel cell refularry which will be enormous amount of money and waste. And yes, some companies invest crap ton of money into something, doesn't really make it a good choice by default, heck, there are more companies investing exponentially more money into BEV's than into Hydrogen cars, does that make BEV's exponentially better option if we would use your logic here?
1
@franceleeparis37 You do understand that Bakhmut is being controlled by Ukraine currently and their are using it as defensive position against Russia who are trying to take it over? Right? So then, why is your comment exactly backwards?
1
Forced? Which part sounded like he was forced? And 99.9% of videos like that are done with prewritten script for efficiency sake
1
@Globeisahoax Why objects fall "down"? What magical force defines direction on your flat pancake world?
1
@Ninjaeule97 You were asked why car park i stupid, you never actually explained and went on tirade repeating what you said in original comment... Why do TF cult members engage with people on the same intellectual level as generic flat earther? By the way, its called "Las Vegas Loop" and not "Hyperloop" those are not the same thing...
1
@Ninjaeule97 You don't understand how answering to the questions work? Someone asks you a question, your response should an actual answer to the question and not "Well its obvious, by the way you should work for TF to save him money!!!" do you see potential issue here?
1
@Ninjaeule97 If person who watched the video didn't fail to understand why its stupid he would not be asking why its stupid... Right? Its like, in the question itself... When someone asks to clarify why its stupid you should not just say "its obvious, duh" if you respond then actually explain why TF/You think it to be stupid. Not that hard to understand. I could turn this round and say "TF is wrong here" then you would be like "What did he said is wrong?" and I respond with "Its obvious, duh, just watch video or google stuff up on internet, duh..." Do you see how worthless my response would be here? If it was obvious you would not be asking for clarification for it. By the way TF said that Spacex will go bankrupt in 2 years, which was like 3 years ago. He made crap ton of mistakes/lying over his hundreds of videos. He no longer has any actual credibility here and anything, and i mean ANYTHING TF says should be actually fact checked. Like do you remember when he claimed that NASA picking SpaceX vs Russians increases costs, while on the second page of what he referenced was said that picking SpaceX is actually like 4x cheaper? Stuff like that indicates that TF isn't interested in actual reality and objective information, he is just looking for ANYTHING what could look like a bad thing for anything what is somehow related to Musk, this is why he is still crying about hyperloop failure while it never was a thing Musk invested into. But I guess he needs to make living and best way is to make stupid videos rehashing a thing he already said 500+ times before.
1
@Ninjaeule97 "I just thought it would be obvious why the Hyperloop was unrealistic from the start" Hyperloop economically isn't viable, share amount of maintenance would kill any profit or meaning to have one. While general idea works, it just not worth the trouble. And as always, reminder that hyperloop isn't Musk's project, what you have in mind is Las Vegas loop, which is different thing, tho faces similar issues with it makes little to no economical sense. "Musk might have proposed Hyperloop to Stop California High-Speed Rail. You can verify that with a quick Google search" Far left website saying that Musk killed high-speed rail when he had no power to do it? Shocker... "but even Elon's investors are beginning to question him." While having stock at highest prices ever?... Doesn't make much sense. And just FYI having few investors who started to question something doesn't actually prove anything, there are ALWAYS someone who is investor and questions things. "If you think everything TF said should be scrutinized why not apply the same logic to Musk?" Who said that it isn't the case? " TF said in his video that using Rockets for point-to-point travel on Earth is kind of stupid" Ok. And? So basically we have 2 main "arguments" here #1 Musk is late #2 Musk makes some stupid ideas. Ok. And? Did you know that Edison failed like 1000 times before successfully making lightbulb? Failure is part of progress. Some things might make no sense at the moment, so you will simply invest money and time into it to check if it could work or not, if it doesn't then you no longer pursuing it, if it actually works, well then you have something like reusable SpaceX rockets which now dominates entire space industry. You have to fail if you want to learn something. "but if it's just what he recorded for that video, I don't think it was worth the time and money invested" I heard that he is charging PER video on his patreon, so I think he got his money back. "Maybe he keeps repeating the same points because people don't seem to listen to him" No, he keeps repeating points because that creates new videos and new videos generate income for him. It's ALL about money. TF would take your offer if you did it for free, after all better quality (visually) videos would make him more money, so he could repeat same nonsense over and over again more frequently. After all this entire complain now is "Musk is late"...
1
Attie Pollard At this point this war will end when Ukraine takes back Crimea.
1
@attiepollard7847 He is already humiliated, what he is left with is shred of dignity which can be taken away if he goes nuke route. And it might be quite hard to brainwash Russians by saying that he had to nuke Ukraine to liberate its people. Their entire current propaganda tactic is to claim that they are the good guys who tries to save people, recent retreat was claimed to be for the protection of people, this might be hard to be used as excuse if you nuke a country.
1
@Sam-lj9vj Because meter isn't for robots... Meter is made to be simplified, its basically opposite to what you said, robots don't care how messed up measuring system is, they would have no trouble calculating what they need to calculate, while metric system is simplified one, it's easy to use for anyone. So you either scared of meter or you have no idea what meter is and how its used.
1
@Sam-lj9vj So why do you think that imperial is for humans and metric is for robots while metric is the simpler one to use for humans?
1
There are no winners in war, there are only different degrees of losers. Russia will be biggest loser here independent how war ends.
1
@-gemberkoekje-5547 Its because you see what YOU want to see. What broken companies? And broken promises? Like, are you so weak spined that you start crying in the corner just because someone didn't deliver on his promise? Please point to the place where Musk hurt you! What broken labor laws?
1
Electric version is 2x the efficiency... Aka you can travel twice the distance. No idea how that makes it more expensive, especially when fuel cell technology doesn't involve moving parts or explosions which need to be managed with hundreds of moving parts... Did you got your comment completely backwards accidentally?
1
What was wrong with what he said here?
1
Like what?
1
@chadsupporter4093 I could ask same question, as you needed 2 comments to write one sentence.
1
All this is based on your empty assertion that god is actually real and that your religion is actually true. Maybe start by proving any of that before tossing around accusations?
1
@ronfrederico7251 "Knowing God is real has nothing to do with religion it’s about faith." Which position you CAN'T take based on faith? Can I say that your entire comment is 100% false based on faith? Because I can, which would mean that your entire argument got demolished by using your own broken rules here. "My faith and knowledge comes from the Holy Spirit." Which you cant prove to be true. So what is the difference between your knowledge and some one having delusions? "Your the one claiming to have a religion which is based upon your selfish feelings upon a foundation of “me, I , my feelings”" Isint your entire religion based on the idea that god created everything just for you? "I have heard about your religion and you did not create it." Yes, because I dont have religion, so there is nothing to be created. "Satan is it’s creator and you are blinded by the veil of satan who is the king of lies." Dint your god created lies? By the way, in bible, garden of eden story, when god says that if Adam eats the apple that he will die and when he doesn't, did god lied? "God will deal with your blasphemy" If god cant handle Satan, then he has no chance with me. And, is this a threat? "In the end you will be pulling your hair and gnashing your teeth!!!" Why? "Don’t respond this is between you and God then you will know He is God." Which god? You never proved that there is god... So why are you saying all this? Why should I even care what you are saying here while you never proved that anything in your words is worth listening too? "I’m blocking you" You might want to read your own book of fables, there is a verse which says that you should obey your master and be ready to present your reasons why you believe, otherwise you will burn in hell, so if you block me you will burn in hell, right? Soooo, using your own religion against you. Explain to me your reasons why you believe. Obey your master!
1
Why does it include religions in to this? We are talking about reality, not some old stories...
1
2 meters? in which reality do you live in? Normally opening doors would require way more space to be comfortable to get in and out, doors like these do save some required space and avoids issues where it would open into a high curb or something like that.
1
@soundslight7754 Who is deleting your messages? Lizard people?
1
@soundslight7754 Clearly lizard people are not deleting your comments now... So what happen? Youtube can and does remove comments if they break basic rules, especially if you have links to other sites or even youtube itself, so no links in replies. It could remove it if you have stronger language in those too. Or something else. Its a mystery what criteria they actually have. Point being, stop being paranoid, just make simple comments and it will be seen.
1
So basically "Pick your own god you believe to be real just because"? Isint that basically self brainwashing at this point?
1
Hydrogen cars are not that sustainable, atleast not practical for multiple reasons. Not saying that ICE cars are good thing, just saying that hydrogen isint viable alternative.
1
@RainbowRising Hydrogen embrittlement
1
@RainbowRising Hydrogen cars do sound cool, ability to create fuel from water sounds like a dream, we have plenty of that in the oceans... But... At the moment you start diving deeper into all of this you will start realizing why hydrogen cars never became anything more than just someone's expensive hobby and why each time someone tried to push this technology to the masses it just died out, and no its not due to some lizardmen conspiracy... It just doesn't work as alternative. Like, you can make hydrogen from water, but that process is expensive, from equipment side and from maintenance side and from storage side and so on. We have zero pure hydrogen on earth, ALL of it needs to be produced and that production isn't cheap. Then you have general issue with energy density per volume, not per kg, but per volume. As people who promotes hydrogen cars likes to say that its most energy dense per weight, while in reality forgetting to mention that its extremely bad when it comes to volume. This is why hydrogen cars usually have 3 huge tanks pressured up to 10 000 psi, which isint a good option to have during car crash or in general. Not only you need expensive sturdy tanks to handle such pressures, you need pumps at refueling stations which could pump this hydrogen at those pressures which drives costs up and makes you fully dependable on refueling stations not only being near you, but actually working. Och, another thing, going to my previous comment. Each hydrogen tank has expiration date printed on them, not by mileage, but by time. When it expires you will NEED to replace all of them. Same thing with fuel cell itself, tho that one has slightly longer work time. I think this is enough for now.
1
"I don't have prove of one or the other " Sun has 4 glaring issues with flat model while matching globe one perfectly... Just saying... " But I'm open to operating under both models" What models? There isint even a flat earth model which would not contradict basic observations from reality. There are no 2 models, there is only one. "You people spend too much time venting about other people just because those have doubts about the models you operate under" maybe because its unhealthy to deny reality?... Earth is a globe based on observable testable facts, if you have people who think otherwise... Well... They ether lack basic education or they have more serious issues with their mental state, in ether way, we should help out with that. " it upsets you tremendously to have your map of the universe questioned" Yes, it upsets to know that there are people who deny reality and tries to spread their delusion on others... Should it not?
1
@statinskill "But the problem is I haven't observed these testable "facts" yet" And i never went to Australia... Should we conclude that Australia is not real?... "I have those facts only on hearsay and can't vouch for them" False. 1. Sun moves at constant perceived speed 2. Sun doesn't change perceived size 3. Sun set/sun rise 4. Sun moves in a straight line All those 4 basic observations can be done by anyone with a 1 buck solar filter and some spare time... Its not that those facts are outside your reach, you simply don't want to reach them. " I'll let you know that I consider that kind of thing grounds to torture someone to death with nothing but a common night-table lamp" So you simply want to put your fingers into year ears and avoid hearing what is actually true? FYI This is public forum section, i'm not forcing you to do anything here, you can stop responding, you can avoid reading my comments, so your analogy is as dishonest is it gets, as you literally trying to compare physical torture with youtube comment section... "I suppose I'm also in the business of correcting certain kinds of thinking." Like what?
1
@statinskill Cool, you have right to your beliefs, but you don't have right to your own facts. And your beliefs does effect people around you in one or other way, i mean, you literally made public comment on basis of your personal opinion which effected atleast one person here. So if you want to keep your personal view of reality, then keep it to yourself. Spreading misinformation will not do any good.
1
@statinskill "even if it means I might end up saying something that offends you" You can try offending me all day long, dont really care about that, issue would you people like that brainwashing their children or some naive enough to believe you on face value. "I have a right to offer these ideas." Do people have right to offer idea in performing mass genocide? Yes, its extreme example, but just try to think about it, if you will have some one spreading idea in doing some mass genocide, you will gather quite few people who thinks same and you will convert some new ones into that and this can lead to actual action based on this idea. Spreading false or harmful ideas is never a good idea... You have your fantasy, cool, keep it to yourself and we will not have any issues here.
1
@statinskill "what makes you think you or anyone like you should be the arbiter of what is right or harmful information?" Do you think that in general spreading misinformation is more harmful then spreading truth? "What is to you right information" Correct one. Information based on reality, not on fantasy. "what is to you harmful information?" Information which can cause more harm then good?... its like self explanatory... "I don't like the idea to be held back just to suit you, and more so, I won't allow it." Why do you think that this needs to be about me or you? We live in society, your actions needs to be acceptable in society, not just for you. I never said that you should do what suits me, what i actually said is that you need to avoid spreading misinformation which will more likely cause harm to others then bring any good. " it takes a lot more than one man agitating a mass of unconcerned people to bring that about" Correct, but all ideas start from one source and spreads from that. I have no idea what you objection is here... Are you saying that there are no one else in entire world who shares same views as you? Are you saying that you by spreading this misinformation will not convince anyone? "not on the speech of even a thousand men" Do you remember Hitler?... One man which was main source of mass genocide...
1
@statinskill "Hitler was a movement of millions with a million of grievances" You do know that Hitler was a person in power?... "I wonder why Germans never did anything to them?" Red hearing fallacy? "I'm asking people to critically evaluate information and to distrust" Thats cool and dandy, but only when you apply this to something what was not factually confirmed... Earth is a globe, thats a fact, you might lack of basic understanding of it, but it doesnt change the fact. "Alleged, because I really have no way of knowing whether that really happened" You do know that they left reflectors on the moon which can and are used to measure distance to the moon with lasers? With some basic knowledge an some what expensive tools, as you need relatively powerful laser, you can test that yourself. Tho this is besides the point. We know that humans can go to space, ISS is prime example of that. Going to the moon isint extremely more difficult than this, so there is no good reason to think that some one would create such conspiracy, there is no point in doing so. Especially when this was done to piss off russians and beat them to the moon. If this was a hoax, Rusians would have happily exposed that to entire world and humiliated US with that. But it never happen, because we actually went to the moon... "All you have is a bunch of greyish pictures" Yes, moon landing was in 69... What do you expect, 8k video?... There are plans from NASA to go back to the moon in 2024, so you might actually get 8k 60fps video from that trip. After all, spacex made space travel allot cheaper now, so we can start planing bigger trips to the moon and eventually to mars. "And they're not even the originals because NASA supposedly "lost" those" Is loosing original makes copies fake? Because if this is the case, you might want to talk with Christians, they might be quite unhappy with this view, after all, bible is based on copies of original texts, which would make bible a fake book. "This singular most notable and exceptional accomplishment of the twentieth century, bug nobody took care to preserve it?" You do know that we went to the moon more than once?... You do know this? "my friend are sharp daggers that poke holes into the official narrative" Not really, well, not at all. In general, nobody cares what some tiny portion of uneducated people claim to be true, reality is independent from those individuals. We might spend some time with them, but in general, moon landing did happen, earth is a globe and what is your personal opinion about that will not change anything. "And it seems the official narrative is also your personal comfort zone, so I think I'm looking holes into that as well. And I really like that idea." Lets get this straight, because i'm encountering quite few people like you here. Lets for sake of argument say that: moon landing never happen, NASA lied 100% times, government lied 100% times, there is global conspiracy which is made of 2 billion people. Lets just say that this is the reality, for sake of argument. Even if all this was true, that would NOT disprove shape of the earth. You can dismiss moon landing, dont really care, that doesnt change actual point of this video and this conversation, shape of the earth. Your attempt to redirect conversation in attempts to present some nick pick and say something like "See, they said that X is true, but its false, so that means that everything they said is lie", sorry, but this is not how reality works. If you want to disprove moon landing, then do that, you will need to disprove every reported moon landing and avoid making irrelevant points about lost tapes from original one... Even if they dint filmed original landing that would not make it false. So yea, earth is still demonstrably a globe, moon landing is still irrelevant and you still dont have a valid argument here. So whats new?
1
@komolkovathana8568 Now use same calculation for Hydrogen cars.
1
@TruthSeeker223-b Why i'm not surprised that you believe in fairy tales?
1
"How to drive through heavy fog?" In same way you do... How do you drive in heavy fog with your 2 eyes?
1
Quite few of them do fake it, its quite nice business when you think of, as its really easy to get money from gullible person then from smart one. Tho i dont think that anyone would send any flatard to space, it would be quite big waste of money and time, after all, they would most likely after returning scream "CGI!"
1
it would be an art if it wasn't used as a factual thing representing actual reality, that's the issue.
1
@thousandtreesartstud Personal opinion are not truths, there is no such thing as true to you, its either true or not, objectively.
1
@martinuribe4722 It's called autism... He openly said that quite few times by now, it's just how he speaks, there is nothing special behind it
1
You do understand that in majority people who are in power believes in that same book of fables you are talking about? So then, why the hell would people who should believe in flat pancake world try to hide its shape? And you do understand that basic observation from your backyard disproves flat earth which makes this "hiding" literally impossible task even if 99.9% of humans tried to do it?
1
Ryan Edwards First of all... Facebook post? Are you kidding me?... Second, there are no agreed upon flat earth model. There are as many of those as we have flat earthers. Every single one will bring in their own opinion, so it would be hard to get "correct" flat earth representation to please every flat earther... Third, you need to be allot higher then a mountain to see curvature... Fourth, how the hell you know that horizon stays at eye level? Where should it be when you are on mountain? Have you used actual tools for that or just looked at horizon and declared that its on same level? Fifth, ships disappear over the horizon bottoms up, i can google you out some pictures/videos if you are too lazy to do this yourself. You asked why would they fake it? They would not, because it would be stupid to do so...
1
@spiritofclay3758 Liar? Jumping to some baseless assertions straight away?... "However the illustrated image shows a mixture of what looks like a flat model with your bogus "outer space" beyond the dome" And? As you just stated yourself "there is no "agreed upon" flat earth model" so in general any model with earth being depicted as flat will do just fine... So what are you objecting here exactly? "it's because what you are presenting as our theory is ridiculous" And? First of all, again, you already stated that there are no agreed upon flat earth model, so there is no difference in which one you will pick, all of them are ridiculous anyways, so doesn't really make any actual difference here which one you will use. "But thanks for misrepresenting to suit your agenda..." What did I miss represented?
1
@spiritofclay3758 "Ships dissapear INTO the horizon from bottom up, not over the horizon" Its "over" and not into... And when you have objects disappearing bottoms up you have confirmation that there is a curvature which causes this. "The law of perspective" You mean, flurspective? Because actual perspective never mentions about objects disappearing bottoms up... "in combination with the moisture" Then why this "bottoms up" are observed in any conditions independent of moisture? And how the hell would moisture even cause something to disappear like that? "This is why on clearer days you may be able to see objects further out as there will be less lensing" Yes, tiny amount, but you will never see objects after certain point in ANY atmospheric conditions... You know why? Because you cant see through solid objects: earth. ""The model that I present is not ridiculous
1
@spiritofclay3758 "The model that I present is not ridiculous" What model did you presented? Do you even have one which doesn't contradict basic observations? "Do you know there has never been a successful experiment to measure the motion of the earth?" There was. Ring laser gyroscope one of those things which can show you 15 degree drift every hour. Coriolis effect? Looking at night sky?... "All constellations have magically kept their form over the ages in our (supposed) expanding universe. " First of all... They are not in same place... Like seriously, do you have photos of night sky from 100 000 years ago to compare?... No? Its silly question? Yes, it is silly, because we dint had photography at that time... So how the hell you decided that those dint changed? Because basic google search shows that stars do move, like Bernard's star which was observed for past decade or so and countless others. Closest star is 4 LIGHTYEARS away, that's faaaaaaaaar. So what the hell do you expect to observe here? "I digress there is way to much to show" Yet you cant even present ONE single evidence that earth is flat... Why is that? You keep trying to debunk globe while never proving that earth is flat... You do realize that even if you managed to disprove globe you would still need to prove flat earth?... You do know this? Right? "Eric Dubay" CHA CHA CHA!!! You went with most ridiculous one... C'mon... You could not presented worst example than this... Damn... "Don't be too quick to judge." I'm not, i have talked with flat earthers for quite some time now and investigate quite a few things all across the board, relating to globe and flat earth and every single time flat earth model (which you cant even present here) fails and every single time globe wins...
1
Nah, because it was accident caused by incompetent Russian soldier smoking near fuel tanks. Russia literally cant admit that Ukraine managed to hit something 250km into their territory, that would mean that they would admit that nothing is safe from being blown into peaces while Russia having no counter measures for it. So what they can do is just sit and enjoy fireworks.
1
Russia always had bad name due to that same USSR, now Putin made it worse and it will put Russia's name back into shit list for another 30+ years even if Putin gets taken away and actual democratic government gets established. Red flags started to fly at third Putins term... At the moment Russia became dictatorship it was clear where its going.
1
Because laws of physics... Will simplify it here, you need around 2kg of hydrogen to make 1kg of hydrogen, and no, these numbers are not backwards. You would literally need double the battery size to travel half the distance of what it actually could do if you simply used its power directly. EVERYONE who claims to have water powered car is lying.
1
And this is why he is richest person on earth and you are not even rocket scientist. Cite me a scientific paper which says that we can't colonize Mars, I will wait.
1
@DoubleMrE Can't even say that I'm surprised here. after all you are just generic Musk hater who belongs to TF cult. Have a nice day!
1
@WilhelmSallsten Wait, do you like, think that people on Mars will be walking around without a spacesuit?...
1
Frost Earths shape can be determined from your backyard with basic understanding of geometry, you as some one who claims to not be flat earther you look definitely look like one with comments like that. Flat earthers fail on all fronts, they cant even grasp basic geometry. Over few years I have had conversations with people who claimed to be flat earther, I never encountered ONE which actually understands basic geometry.
1
@Globeisahoax "They refuse to add Block the Troll option like FB and IG has." Freedom of speech? Ever heard about that one? Do you seriously want to be blocked here? Yes, you, as you are here trying to troll and promote stupidity and ignorance, so you could be blocked in few seconds if people dint allowed for you to express your own silly beliefs... Be careful what you wish for...
1
First globe model was made in 3 BCE in Greece.
1
Tesla roadster was never actually made, so that 600 mile range at the moment is just a claim made by Tesla, it's a concept. I'm all for electric cars, but lets not use a thing which was never made as example.
1
Why not?
1
WW3? Someone decides to launch all nukes and poison earth surface with radiation for next few hundred years? Asteroid bigger than the one which wipes dinosaurs hitting earth? Some rogue radiation wave from outside of solar system hitting earth? Point being that we still need to spread out to increase our chances in surviving. You say it like its a huge negative to colonize another planet.
1
Ok, so instead of 80% efficiency it would be what? 79%? And I have no idea why you failed to understand that Power Plant efficiency applies to Hydrogen and BEV's equally as both uses electricity... So which part exactly was comparison of apples to oranges?
1
Yes yes yes, this 3 day war will be over soon... Just that now front line started to move backwards for Russia... So I guess its yet another strategic retreat... Right?
1
@sarstenstahlsarsten6577 Smart people are not rushing forwards like chickens without heads and hoping for the best... That 40km Russian convoy is excellent example of what stupid people do. Differently than Russia, Ukraine actually wants to avoid as many casualties as possible, which makes all of this slower to achieve that. No worriers, it will happen.
1
@zircon256ua That's not how laws of physics work...
1
So when some one gets shoot we can thumb up that because victim was a Trump supporter? Is that what you are saying here?...
1
Because you voted for Kamala?
1
@kyleoates6367 Tell me you know nothing about rocket science without telling me you know nothing about rocket science.
1
BEV's start from like 35k, from which magical place you got that 100k number? By the way, from which magical place do you get hydrogen? Because there is 0% of hydrogen in its pure form on earth, so that means 100% of it is being produced and any production requires power and power requires power production plant of some sorts, so like, how?
1
Its not and I have no idea how this is related to hydrogen cars exactly
1
@mitchbradshaw2084 Norway? I mean, we have quite few countries which are mostly powered by renewables or some basic clean sources like nuclear, and this number is only growing. The fact that fossil fuels on its nature are limited source, like you know, missing part of "renewable" in "oil", this alone should indicate that we will shift to fully renewable at some point. Its not question if we will, its only a question when this will happen.
1
@rhyswilliams7884 First HICE engine 1806, first Fuel Cell engine 1966. And from that moment it barely improved. Hydrogen isn't behind BEV's, BEV's are behind Hydrogen. Every single year we are getting better and better battery technology without any actual limitations in sight, while hydrogen is basically at the peak performance now, there can still be few % improvement here and there, but it's basically done deal.
1
BEV's don't explode.
1
Everyone is involved, is that a problem?
1
NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth...
1
@StormCrownSr They do, but they are irrelevant to the shape of earth... We can determine it without NASA. Having pictures from space is just a cherry on top of cake, its nice to have it but not necessary.
1
Whats your point?
1
What?
1
@chrisross4898 "Question what are reading or studying from?" What? "To call everything you see as false or fake, what kind of education do you have?" When did I made such claim? And how is my education relevant here? I could be some one who never went to school or some one with 10 Nobel prizes, would not make any difference in what i'm saying here... " This again lets me know you not to bright" Riiiiiight, and some one who blindly believes some con artists that there are magical portals because they said so in their paid book is the bright one... "to me gaia.com is way more accurate to me than everyone in this chat." Yes, because you have no idea how to evaluate actual evidence or what counts as evidence. I can bet that you cant present any actual evidence for your portal claims, cant you now? And how do you know that their claims are accurate? Because they said so? Have you fact checked their claims or just blindly believing? "The only reason they make people pay, is cuz they want to oppress the knowledge" Riiiiiight... Most important information about our universe should be behind paywall... Sounds legit... Not... "You want too want to suppress people knowledge, saying that not true" Do i have knowledge behind paywall or your gaia? I'm not suppressing anything. You failure to realize that gaia is just con artists making a buck from people like you is just... Sad... Well, my suspicion is that you have spent on them couple hundred bucks by now and you simply cant face possibility that you might have been conned. Em I wrong here? How much did you spent on their "information"? 10? 100? More than 1000? I dont need exact number, just approximation, if you brave enough to disclose that.
1
Do you seriously think that repeating lies will make it true by default or something?
1
@avex3903 Fascist lover? From the one who praises a dictator?... Seriously?
1
@mrmattyy So are you saying that people need to be ignorant? FYI Earth is a globe, its basic observation from reality anyone can do. There is no rational justification, besides ignorance, to even consider earths shape to be flat...
1
Thing is that US provides long range missiles with agreement that it won't be used to attack Russia, but to just retaka Ukraine territory. Starting to attack Russia directly would give legal precedent for Putin to start real war and release even more cannon fodder to the front lines by force. Currently as its only "special military operation" any reasonable Russian can reject and not participate in this war, if its gets escalated into official war in Russia then everyone can be forced to go and fight. Its just not worth it.
1
This video is made to explore why flat earthers believe and not to prove them wrong. Earth was proven to be globe like 2300 years ago, we dont need to disprove flat earth, people who claim that it is needs to prove that it is.
1
We already did that, this rocket entire point is to send people to mars... Feel the difference.
1
After more than 6 months of war russia made tactical retreat to prepare for the winter?... Seriously? This is your excuse? When Russia gets kicked out of Ukraine entirely, what will be your excuse then? Going back home until winter ends?...
1
4a4arA Brainwashing 101?
1
Regular gas tank gets to like 3000psi, hydrogen one goes to 10000. Do you see tiny difference here? And hydrogen is extremely flammable and explosive in certain conditions, one of those is the pressure... So no, it is more dangerous... 10 is more than 3... By more than 3 times...
1
How? Hydrogen price is extremely high, every station costs like 20x more than BEV's charging station. Hydrogen car's ONLY have one benefit over BEV's is a refueling times at the refueling/charging stations, but that saves you 20 minutes max while not taking into consideration that you have option to charge BEV at home over night and have it at max every morning. Hydrogen cars are basically veganism, it only gives you bragging rights while having bunch of negatives attached to it.
1
From whose a** did you got those numbers from? In 5 years battery loses 35-40%? Because actual official numbers are more like 5-10%... Not even talking about your confusion with battery waste... Those can be recycled, more or less fully. While going back to hydrogen, you are using around 60% more energy for same distance traveled, not even talking about complexity of producing, transporting and storing of it. Please, for your own sake, do some basic research here before you talk.
1
Toyota will go bankrupt in few years if they keep that "All into Hydrogen" nonsense... Hydrogen could be used in areas where energy density is more important, but that excludes regular cars, aka biggest market.
1
How do you train child if you don't have direct control of him? Its self learning AI, it will learn to do things correctly in time. Currently main game stopper is processing power, mainly for the "mothership" servers which processes raw data and trains neural network, but this is being worked on, heavily.
1
@andreylukyanov2179 "Humans have millions of years of evolution behind in their genes." What the hell has this todo with anything in here? Are you saying that 2 things cant be compared if they are not same age? Neural networks of AI are based on brains, we skipped quite a few million years of evolution here while creating AI... We dont need to wait another few million years for us to be able to compare those things... "Tesla has massive infrastructure that involves humans at different stages (drivers input, labeling and classification of images), huge offline NN training farms. " Yes... Just like you went to school and you got someone else teaching you things, yet you are still capable and you did self learning part on your own... There are multiple stages to this... Self learning is one of them. Just check videos on youtube about AI learning how to perform task over multiple generations... You can train network, or you can release AI into real/simulated world and allow it to learn on itself, or do both things. " and we do not have the date when it will be solved." Because there wont be one... Its gradual improvement, not on/off switch. Robotics is based on AI understanding environment, what is what and what is where. If AI can understand this then it can perform appropriate tasks without big issues even if you have 5000 limbs. Moving limbs is easy, understanding where this limb is in relation to an object you want to interact isint.
1
@andreylukyanov2179 Will ask really simple question here, you might even pass Youtube University. Is self learning been used in some AI's?
1
Do you even grasp basic idea how gravity works?
1
Yes yes yes and pigs can fly too... Just because Putin decided to annex those regions doesn't mean that those regions belong to Russia now... You cant annex region when you dont even have full control over it, let alone when you have active war still going on in that region... Take your head out of Putins ass and you might see some light.
1
Gravity.
1
@doctorgorgomel Maybe that's the issue? Making video about same person every week or multiple times in a week is no longer a sign of healthy obsession. But heck, it makes him easy money from people like you.
1
@terranhealer Your comment is the basically perfect example of why people voted against Kamala. Like, if it was Trump vs some normal person who isn't woke as shit, then most would have voted for that person and not Trump, but when you have to pick one shit over the bigger one, you kind of left without any options here. People didn't voted for Trump, they voted against Kamala.
1
You can't have a cure for cancer... Cancer is just your regular cells replicating uncontrollably due to basic error in DNA replication, to "cure" cancer you would need to modify humans in some weird way where replication of cells would have ZERO changes in DNA, which is realistically impossible.
1
Some of them are, some of them are real, sadly.
1
@BioluminescenceOfTheSpirit 100%? Do you even understand how reality works?... Majority of people still believes in sky wizards and you think that 100% of flat earthers are fake?... Sorry, but you need to perform some basic reality checks before you comment.
1
@BioluminescenceOfTheSpirit Do you want to support your claim that 100% of those who claim to believe in flat earth just pretends to? Prove me wrong, don't assert shit, prove it.
1
BEV's are allot more independent than Hydrogen, buy BEV and you can completely disconnect from everyone else by simply charging it with your own solar panels, while with Hydrogen you will remain dependent on supplier of this Hydrogen, which is better than ICE car dependencies, but still is a dependency. And yes, you could make some of that hydrogen at home, but that would be extremely slow and would require expensive and heavy on maintenance equipment to be fully independent.
1
Where is your magical line then? Can I own RPG? What about C4? Maybe actual tank? Can I own minigun? Like, at which point would you say "This is too much, this is not allowed" and can you explain why it should not be allowed while other guns should be?
1
First of all, this video was made 3 years ago, second, if it didn't flopped, when why there are basically no hydrogen cars on the road? You can barely find one in California, the one place in the world where you have most hydrogen stations, people are still not buying those cars...
1
Even Musk said that this is what they are making in this event, just like he said about cybertruck, people still think that it will change... Well, maybe they will make some small changes to some tiny things, like stop painting tires in gold, but design is there and they are making it as it is.
1
It wasn't recalled for this silly test...
1
You do know that NASA is 100% irrelevant to the shape of earth? Right?
1
It's fine to question things, it's not fine to deny reality. And to put it simply, majority of flat earthers are bible believers while majority of bible believers are not flat earthers. See the pattern here.
1
@therealzilch But like, what is the real difference between those?
1
@carsonkendall1924 "You guys always get hung up on the model.." Maybe because its a core thing?... If you don't even have model, then everything else flies throw window... I could literally make a claim that earths surface is convex, or that earth is donut or that earth is shaped as unicorn... That will never fly if i cant provide actual model how earth like this could exist while at same time this model would not contradict reality. " Don't worry about how it works, we will never fully know" But we do, this is why we know that its a globe. Your ignorance if not proof of anything. "No one is saying they have it all figured out.." I do and billions of others... "You should try and first prove we are on a ball" Sunset. Boom, done. "Try and prove the curvature over long distances using the earth curve formula, 8 inches per mile square" Its a formula for parabola... And where do you insert altitude of observer and observed object in this formula?... Do you see issue here? Do you understand why flat earthers never prove their claim?... You dont even understand what you are trying to defend or debunk... So how could you achieve anything at all... And lets ignore formula, because its clear that you have no idea how those work, lets simply look at reality, that reality where objects at some distance start to disappear bottoms up over the horizon and even having 1000000x zoom will not bring them back. This is only possible on a globe, not on flat surface. So there you go, another proof that earth is a globe. " but just because we don't understand something, doesn't mean it can't work or isn't true" False. Your ignorance is not proof. We have people who do understand how reality works and do understand how to determine shape of earth. Just because you failed on 7th grade geometry doesn't mean that everyone else did too... Smartest people on earth knows that earth is a globe, majority of humanity knows that... So just because you dint understood something in school, doesnt make it false. "The top reasons are, lack of curvature over long distances" Which is false. http://stupidconspiracies.org/misc/toronto.gif Simple image, we have thousands of those. You are demonstrable wrong here... Still... "gyroscopes and plane travel in general," Gyroscopes in planes compensate for curvature, there are videos demonstrating that... Planes follow earths curvature due to basic physics... Gravity is a thing too... And if you looked at plane travel on a flat representation of earth, they do look strange, until you put those flight paths on a globe, then you have nice straight lines from point A to point B "the lack of movement in the stars" False again... Bernard's star, is one of those which got recorded movement over couple decades. Google that one out. "and the bible and how that describes the earth." Who cares what some book says? Bible was shown to be irrelevant for multiple reasons and one of this is that it claimed that earth is flat when its not. "Check out the michelson morley" Honestly, i dont care. Ether present your best evidence or dont mention some random people here.... Because i can mention you 100x more of those who will support normal position here... Globe... "Bedford Level experiment." Which proves globe... Try again... So i will ask again, what is the difference between flat earth society and flat earth movement? You literally presented 101 arguments from every single flat earther i ever encountered, you dint presented anything new here... nothing... Failed on every single point... Exposed your ignorance on basic geometry and math... So i still cant see any difference here...
1
No idea if your comment is sarcasm or not...
1
@johnblacksuperchemist2556 Yea you still sound like a troll or something... You cant be serious with sentences like that...
1
@johnblacksuperchemist2556 "Why what did i say that was not truthful?????" Your second sentence in OP. Some strange straw man argument. "So ONLY flat earthers are allowed to be called stupid when they are stupid???" Nah, you can be called stupid when you behave like one. "I sound like 90% of the post on this video with one difference" I know, we have quite few crazy/trolling people here... " I am not a hypocrite" Says who? "Are they all trolls too...or just me???" Not all, quite few are. Tho sometimes its hard to separate actual believers and just a troll, because both of them sound crazy.
1
@thecall0ut Videos pointing out issues with Elon can be good, if those actually point out actual real issues and not some made nonesense... TF here is just making videos which creates most views, aka creates most revenue for him. Which is ironic when you have TF complaining about Elon making money, while he is lying to your face and you just swallow it like hot candy.
1
@thecall0ut We can start from the start, 1:30 in this video, Musk sold Tesla stocks to... Might be shocking news, as this was never ever mentioned anywhere, or it might have been mentioned in this same dumb video 10 seconds ago... To buy Twitter... Shocker... I know... Someone who needed money sold something in value to get money to buy another thing... Shocker... And TF here want's to imply that this action somehow indicated poor value of Tesla stock?... He is either doing this intentionally or he is completely oblivious to how reality works. We could go on, as this almost 30 minute video, and its like one of 50'ish videos he made about Musk so far... So like... Yea... TF has some issues here...
1
They used this threat for everything... Soon it will be "if you dont allow us to take over entire world we will use nukes" and i'm not even joking here.
1
@Arbadee.PayZaLee Did you seriously thought that there is some plan to terraform Mars in 2 years or something?... Fastest rate would be in hundreds of years... So until then some domed habitats would be needed, nothing special about those. Point would be to make self sustaining colony on Mars and then expand on it and maybe work towards terraforming of mars by addressing all of your "issues". But it looks like you seriously thought that there is a plan to walk on Mars surface in yoru breaches in 2 years after it gets terraformed by magic or something...
1
And you are completely wrong assuming that NASA is relevant here...
1
Ellipsoid is round... Sooo... Like... Ok...
1
And?
1
@titotito3688 Nether do I, but i just wonder why you even mentioned that here...
1
Well one new tower is currently being built, which could be potentially used for catching only, like faster chopsticks as it doesn't need to lift that much, no need to fueling equipment as its only to catch, and no need to have actual launch platform. And in case catch fails it would damage less equipment due to it having less stuff on it.
1
You haven't been watching war map for last 2 weeks, aren't you now?
1
You will be spending like $160 to drive same distance. Or you could spend like $30 for same distance with BEV. And who said that you would need to spend thousands on new battery every 8 years?
1
Hard to say if this was a joke or are you serious. It kind of looks like a joke... Clarification is needed.
1
@cankhovich1796 You do know that earth shape can be proven by anyone? You do know that people estimated earths size with sticks like 2300 years ago?... Its not a lie, people are simply to ignorant to realize how they can confirm that earth is a globe and now we have flat earthers running around and screaming like they can prove a shit here.
1
@cankhovich1796 We have thousands of photos like that. Issue is not that we dont have those, as we do, issue is that people like you would reject every single one of them on basis "it looks fake to me" without managing to present actual method they determined that it is fake. And just FYI composite doesn't make photo fake. Did you known that panoramic pictures you take with your smartphone are composites? So does that mean that all of your panoramic pictures CGI and doesn't represent reality? On top of that, most photos are taken from low earth orbit, which means that you cant really get wide view without distortion if you will not take multiple pictures and put them together making one big, aka composite. On top of that, we have one shot pictures, like "blue marble", so explain to me why you think and what method you used to determine that its fake.
1
Stations like that would still cost like 80% of what full station does, as it would require same exact equipment, just some parts would be on slightly lower scale. Maintenance cost would be basically the same too.
1
What was a lie in this video?
1
@jacksmith-mu3ee TF cult members = room temperature IQ
1
Punctuation marks... Those could help out you here. No idea what you tried to say about moon landings. Those happen, back in the day. US wanted to beat Russia, they did, after 6 manned mission to the moon it was over, due to enormous costs involved and basically zero benefit remaining from doing it. Single trip cost was around 1 billion bucks... Not something you can keep doing.
1
Red hearing?
1
Youtube shows popular videos or videos which have actual meaningful content. Having some propoganda video about flat earth on top of the list will not get you anything beneficial...
1
10km altitude would change gravity force by like 0.3%, hardly any scales would notice that change, you would definitely not.
1
That's the point... Your forces should not be seen by enemy, let alone by some one on youtube... C'mon... What do you expect? Satellite photos of Ukrainian army with coordinates attached?...
1
@teddylee1218 Starting to redirect conversation after you got exposed on silly initial point?... C'mon... Have some integrity here.
1
Care to elaborate?
1
@joedominic9848 What silly statements?
1
You can believe in 2 different self contradictory claims, tho that one is called cognitive dissonance. Scientific theory is wildly different from just a theory... In science you can't go any higher than a theory, it's the final point in explaining something. To convert it in layman's terms it would be more like "Scientific fact", tho science doesn't like it and used different, more honest, word. I have no idea what you tried to say about that bar showed across planet... And no idea how that leads to capitalism... Do you even know what science is? And global warming? What the what now? Going all heads on into woods? Just under 3000 miles under your feet? JUST? And its more complicated question, at exact center of earth you will have ZERO G's, because gravity is caused by the mass and when you have all this mass all around you in more or less equal proportions, then you will have zero G's at exact center. Digging straight down would lower gravity until it hits Zero, gradually. No idea what that has todo with anything here, but there you go, you got your answer. G is just acceleration... If there is no acceleration then there is no G forces being applied to you... We are orbiting sun, aka falling towards it, aka experiencing zero G's from it. Moon dos have tiny amount of effect, this is why we have tides, but its so small effect hat you will never notice it on your own. For remaining planets, those are too far and too small to have any actual effect.
1
Why all this spam?
1
@waynegm777 You do know that you cant feel motion but only changes in it? And how is 1 rotation every 24 hours is more unlikely than snow globe world?
1
@waynegm777 "you dont feel motion because there is none" Listen, carefully now. Your complain was that earth is not spinning because it ridiculous, my rebuttal to that was that we cant feel motion in general, but only changes in it. After you admit to this basic reality fact we can go into proving that earth actually spins. Can you do this? "so I guess again, I'm right" And you are still wrong, even on guessing if you are right, you are still wrong. "and you can't trust your own 5 senses cause you've been brainwashed since day 1 of kindergarten" Do I seriously need to give you some links to visual illusions? Have you ever seen one? You might even seen on in kindergarten... So yea... Your fundamental ignorance on basic things is just baffling...
1
Basic reality? I mean, not even fan boy, CT looks like shit, it was a bad idea on its core, but you not understanding basic numbers doesn't make it garbage. So, TOWING capacity is what? 11000. While vertical load on tong is around 10-15%, well it's rated for 1100, that's 1/10 of TOWING capacity, this is common thing across all towing hitches. So, basic maff for you, limit was 1100, it broke at 10400, that's MORE than 9x of its rated capacity. Do you see how ridiculous you look now?
1
@MrSirhcsellor In general i assume that they are just trolling as a default position of mine. It really depends what they say after that if i will still think that they are trolling or just so ignorant on basic reality.
1
Its book of fables, no point in trying to see any meaning in those... Harry Potter books have more worth than bible, as historic book or/and fiction.
1
@chasleask8533 "Like , can they spell? Do they understand basic grammar?" You do realize that there are more than one country and more than one language in the world and people you are talking with might not be from your local area?... Its internet... It doesn't have borders... Unless you are in north Korea... " 'When you go up in a plane you can see the curve' . Go and get a ball and see why you don't" What the what now? Ball is flat? What the hell did you tried to imply here? "'Ships disappear over the horizon'. Until you view them through a suitable optical device" False. Ships which actually disappear over horizon and not those which got too small for you to see will not be broth back into view. This is generic flatardian claim 101 which is as childish as it gets. Disappearing OVER horizon already defines that ship is partially or completely hidden by horizon, getting 10000000x zoom will not make it go back... Do you even know how zoom works?... " Unlike you people , I haven't made up my mind yet" Because you are too ignorant on basic reality, like how zoom works... "That's because I'm extremely intelligent" Its a joke? Right? "and I realise that I am not yet in possession of all the facts." Well you are right about that... " Consider that I may be stupid" Och, and we are, all of us consider that. "Reality ALWAYS makes sense. ...........Unless you're stupid , of course." Yes, like thinking that we live on flatardia while basic observation of sun with a solar filter which costs 1 buck disproves it... So yea, globe model is not stupid, your questions are.
1
Why would that matter? Is his math wrong?
1
You should do basic research here. While hydrogen fuel cell will expel water, this doesn't mean that hydrogen production was free of charge... And how do you think a system which produces water would behave in a sub zero temperatures?... Poorly... BEV's are on steep climb at the moment while hydrogen cars are... Well... Just there... Expensive hobby for rich people.
1
@paradelights That you need to MAKE hydrogen and not just scoop it out of hydrogen ocean. While hydrogen is most common element in the universe, on earth it doesn't exist in its pure form, it's always bonded to another element, in our case we have water, H2O, so you have to produce hydrogen by splitting water molecules by introducing crap ton of energy into that process. There is long list of issues relating to hydrogen, it only sounds cool on paper, but if you start actually digging deeper you will realize why it never took off even tho we had hydrogen engines as of 1806 and hydrogen fuel cell as of 1966. It's just... Not good enough to be scalable...
1
@Yggdrasill8 Hydrogen sounds cool on paper, but when it comes to realization of it you will start noticing issues surrounding it. I would be more than happy if hydrogen was viable option, but all that production, storage, transportation and everything in between just make its... Mech....
1
Where do you get electricity to make hydrogen?... Doe it grow on trees?! You didn't know that hydrogen in its pure form doesn't exist on earth, didn't you now?
1
@dannynorman4666 Well if you want to have equality then you will have to allow for anyone to vote, even if their IQ is in single digits.
1
Not wanted? Why are they not wanted? Because their grades are worse than someone else's... Its not that they are not wanted because they are black, they are not wanted because there is more suitable candidate independent of his skin color.
1
@woytekkopacki What's your point? That we need recycling plants? Ok. We do need those, but it's besides the entire point. We can recycle batteries over and over again if needed. Batteries not being recycled in some cases is the side point and not really relevant here. It's only now when you start getting increase in outdated car batteries which needs to be recycled, so there isn't many dedicated plants to do it yet, as there wasn't real demand. There are few in some places, which does recycle as many as they can get hands on, but we still need more.
1
@deerichardz How much less of a gravity is fine for human body? Like serious question here, as we ONLY have data from 0g environment on ISS which we know to be problematic for longer periods of time, but what about 38%? Is it good enough? Would that cause any concerns? More data needs to be collected, but from what we know about life on ISS it looks like 38% would be enough to have healthy life as long as you just add extra specialized exercises and I suspect that human body would adapt to lower g environment in few generations on its own. Its a either small or non issue, without trying to live there we will never know.
1
@deerichardz Again, how much is enough? 99% 98%... At this moment in time we ONLY know that 0g isn't healthy, zero is way less than 38%... Right? You do understand that much? The fact that we ONLY have examples when it comes to 0g and 1g doesn't say anything else in between. Even tiny amount of gravity could prevent all those negative effects humans body experience in 0g. How do you TF cult members not understand it?
1
@deerichardz I mean, you are not wrong, due to all this damage we are causing to the earth we will go extinct before earth itself is in actual real danger, but it's like, the devil is in the details. And you yet to prove that human bodies can't handle long periods in 38% of gravity. Do you have a shred of common sense or none at all?
1
Where?
1
Present one fact here and we will come for rest of it. But you cant, cant you now?
1
I just cant understand people like you... Russia attacks Ukraine and you complain that Ukraine defends itself... Is your suggestion to just roll over and surrender at the moment someone decides to attack you?
1
Well Russia is corrupt, we agree, but like, it did started war, so not much we can do about it...
1
Who exactly started a war in Europe?
1
@Julian-ez3iq Funny enough NATO isint even in this war, but even more funny that now NATO will have 2 new members besides Russian border, so I guess its all by the Putin's plan? Right? 3 day invasion being 150+ days long, getting their economy demolished, cutting off main money maker and adding extra countries to the group they are so afraid off? Everything goes by the plan...
1
@Julian-ez3iq Och, so its NATO fault that Russia decided to invade another country and start full blown war... Riiiiiight... Lets blame NATO for all those killed people by Russia... Riiiiiight... And just FYI NATO is a defence aliens and not attack one. So your beloved dictator is afraid that he no longer will be able to take countries by force if they join one big group which will defend each other, but well, lets blame NATO for this war, because why not...
1
@deepbluesea4647 Bakhmut is falling for past multiple months... Clearly something isint going by the Russian plan... Right?
1
Which one?
1
You dont need garage to charge your electrical car... You can literally plug it into any general wall socket over extension cord... Or install dedicated charger on a wall near your car. On top of this, by actual data we know that only like 5% of times people use charging stations while rest of the time its being charged at home. On top of this, you can have allot more electrical stations than you have for gasoline cars. On top of this, you dont need to sit there for 45 minutes to charge your car, you can recharge big chunk in 10-15 minutes and be on your way. How often do you fully fill up your gas tank? Not that often I can assume... I never do that, only times I would fully charge is before actual extra long trip where i'm not planning to stop, but even then, how often do you drive for 5h without a brake? Point being, you complains here are invalid, simple as that.
1
I guess we should open russian history books? Because those definitely do not lie... Just like Russian officials never lie...
1
Why do you think dictator Putin wants to take Ukraine? For its natural resources... This includes 2 new natural gas spots, brain production and so on. Putin doesn't care about NATO, he simply wants power and money.
1
What US spending on this war is pocket change in comparison how much it spends on keeping existing military functional. US is basically obliterating Russia with minimal investment, its cheapest approach to a war.
1
@pearltears8039 Because earth spins... Centrifugal force is a thing too... Even tho it makes around 0.4% of gravitational force, its enough to create tiny bulge at the middle of earth, which makes it oblate spheroid. And to be crystal clear here, that difference between width and height is extremely small and you will NEVER notice it in a photo of earth. At the end of the day, earth remains oblate spheroid and there is no real debate here, you have no right to your own facts.
1
@pearltears8039 Still confused as hell what point you are trying to make here... On grand scale earth is rounder than billiard ball, that label of it being oblate spheroid is only when you want to be pedantic about its extremely accurate shape and if you tried to draw earth from the "side", like 1 meter in diameter and represent "height" to "width" proportionally to what it is, 100% of people would say that it's a perfect circle, even if you used ruller... So again, what is your point here?
1
There is no such thing as water powered cars... Never was and never will be.
1
Would say its 50/50
1
What?
1
Earth is round, its testable fact from reality. And Stanley Kubrick is dead, so he can't really laugh.
1
If only you could prove that its CGI...
1
My guess would be that it was due to both factors, Russia filled it and then weakened with explosives which caused it to collapse.
1
Evolution is a fact, observable and testable fact. Dare to argue against it? Just a warning, you will loose, badly.
1
Ring species, google that one out. Silver fox experiment, another one. Evolution is change in gene pool over time, which is observable and testable fact from reality. This is why you will lose (misspell, not my primary language after all). You never check it out or simply failed to understand it, tho will not make it false in any way shape or form.
1
So when experts in the field says that it is and when people suggest for us to stop polluting environment, all of that is bad/incorrect why exactly? Like, lets assume that climate change isint a thing, lets just live in that fantasy world for a moment, why is it bad for humanity to shift towards cleaner and more sustainable means?
1
Afrige Singer At the moment you can provide OBJECTIVE definition of woman, only then you can have any say here. If your entire argument is based on personal opinions and personal feelings then we wont get anywhere. FYI I identify as apache attack helicopter. Reductio ad absurdum
1
You can't just decide to break basic laws of physics...
1
@ShaolinMonk95 Law of density? Which part of this none existent law of density says that objects should fall down and not up? What defines direction?
1
Do you think that ICE cars have no issues?... By all reports ICE cars require most maintenance for obvious reasons. So its allot more likely that you will be buying a new car due to major issues in you ICE car than EV
1
Hydrogen stations are completely different and existing petrol stations would need complete rebuild, basically nothing would remain and everything would be changed. Welcome to reality. Electric charging stations doesn't need complete rebuilding, this is why one BEV charging station costs as low as 50k, while one Hydrogen refueling station is over 1 million... One of them clearly requires more work to be done than the other... And while hydrogen is most abundant element, we have ZERO pure hydrogen on earth, at his moment 100% of all hydrogen is being produced, and its production requires around 60% more electricity than it does for BEV's.
1
What will Russia gonna do? Attack Ukraine? Start a war?...
1
People simply want to be special and most simplest way you can be one is to object established reality with your own "alternative facts", its an era of attention seeking brain dead people who shouts as loud as 1000000x educated people put together.
1
Starship will be economical workhorse for earths orbit delivery, it will be used for moon and mars too. One of the short fallings of Falcon9 is that its upper stage isn't reusable and it has its payload limit which is like 10% of what Starship should be capable in doing. By the way, starship will be expanded in its size, as of what it was planned years ago. Why do you people complain about things you clearly have no understanding about?
1
@saumyacow4435 "First of all, the largest cost factor in providing a launch is operations" Largest cost is the actual rocket. And what does "operations" actually include? Would that include building a rocket? "If you don't believe me on this you can go google what Peter Beck from Rocket Lab had to say about this" A guy who is direct competitor says that his competitor isn't doing the right thing? Shocker... I would never thought of this happening... "Thus you double the size and cost of everything else" While getting fully reusable upper stage which can be refurbished and reused who knows how many times. Just like how first stage get reused and saves crap ton of money, second stage will do the same. " If you can't turn the vehicle around quickly, you're paying for a lot of stuff that isn't doing much and requires more money to maintain" Paying for what? Parking spot? And we yet to get actual times on reusability. Falcon 9 started with months in between re flights, now its like 2 weeks. How long will it take with Starship both stages we yet to see. "Tiles that fall off." Do they? Haven't notice any from last 3 flights. And are you still complaining about TEST thing not performing at 100% peak performance? Which part of word "test" you didn't understood? SpaceX is working on optimal solution, at the start tiles were falling off while starship was sitting in the bay, then those were falling off during static fires, then some fall of during launch, now I can't see any of those falling off. Do you see pattern here? "Stuff that gets overheated" Again, meaning of "Test"... "Stuff that needs people to stand on a multi-storey access platform to check out" Once more... Test... Do you not understand how R&D works? You do a thing, you check what happen with the thing afterwards... R&D... Heck, even basic planes gets regular checks before each flight... What the hell are you even complaining about here? "And what do you do when your tiles fall off?" Call TF so the he could make one more clickbait video to drain his fan base from the money, what else, duh... TEST flights on TEST rocket which uses TEST equipment. Which part of word "test" you fail to understand? "About 40 tonnes." Is it tho? And on which build? Current one? With Raptor 2 engines? But can't find any actual reference to support your statement here about 40 ton payload. After all current version still have hot stage which gets ejected which should not be present in final product which adds like 10 tonnes of extra weight. "But the obsession with full reusability doesn't translate to optimal economics." Why not? How is recovering upper stage makes it less economically optimal than burning it in upper atmosphere? And yes, physics will create diminishing return loop which is visible on how many rocket engines starship has in comparison to alternatives, but starship isn't being made to be optimal, its made to be most capable rocket to launch heaviest cargos into space while still being fully reusable, that's the ENTIRE point of it, big ass rocket which is fully reusable. If you want to send 20kg payloads with fully reusable rocket, it might be more economically viable, doesn't mean that its the goal of SpaceX. "to satisfy elon's Mars delusion" Just like it was a "delusion" more than a decade ago to have reusable rockets, just look where we are now... If your space company ising using reusable rockets, you are going bankrupt in no time. Clearly something is good with all of this reusability and clearly its achievable. "The clueless one is you." Because i'm not just generic Musk hatter like you are?
1
@herrschaftg35 So your best counter is that SpaceX is late?... NASA said to be on mars like 40 years ago... Do you TF cult members have any worthwhile arguments here or was this your best shot?
1
You misspelled Russian with Ukrainian, it happens, but try to be more careful next time.
1
False, this technology never existed and can't exist due to basic first law of thermodynamics... You need to input more energy to convert water into hydrogen than you will get back out. Cars running on water NEVER existed...
1
Hydrogen is at peak performance already... Not much to improve there. While battery technology keeps improving every single year. Hydrogen technology doesn't scale, this is one of main issues with this entire thing.
1
Glenn De Jong There is difference between religious beliefs and their talk about wizards and talks about flatardia which is factually incorrect. Tho I'm not aware of youtube banning flat earthers discussions as we have hundreds of videos from them with open comments... So ether they are terrible at their job or you just making shit up here to feel special. Which one it is?
1
Interestingly enough we have neuralink currently working on a tech which could potentially stream video into your brains and use your brains to control things with your mind, so this in general could allow somewhat SAO experience, even tho it would require risky surgery. But yea, its decades away until its actually a thing which can be used properly for what it is meant to be.
1
Like/dislike ratio disagrees with your personal opinion.
1
What about them? Can those handle 10 000 psi?
1
@kuunoooo7293 Progress in last 2 weeks and how there is actual war inside Russian actual territory shows it otherwise.
1
@kuunoooo7293 The fact that 200 (wont even bother to fact check here) managed to invade Russian territory from the side shared with attacked country says more than you think.
1
There are plenty uses for humanoid robots, especially when you can use those in multiple tasks and not be just dedicated in one
1
@henrycgs Why would humanoid robot need to be faster? It could be 3x slower and still achieve same amount of work. After all robot like that could work 24/7 while humans have 8 hour shifts. So getting it to 33% of speed would be equal to human speed already. Robots are way more precise than humans, this is why any task requiring actual precising is being tasked to the robots and not humans. Like I said, robots can work 24/7 No idea what you mean with being more adaptable. Most tasks are preset ones, you just repeat same thing over and over again, this is especially the case on the factory floor. So teach robot how to do that thing once and it can do it for the rest of its life. if you need for this robot to do something else, just teach him how to do that task, or upload instructions of it into it. And robots are easier to maintain, and they do not complain, they don't have sick days, or vacations, you don't need HR department for them and so on. Entire maintenance would be a technician or even different service center to fix your robot when it breaks. Entire industry is already heavily automated with robots, while humanoid robot would be a more universal solution which could use and operate in areas any human can. Basically if you have task performed by human, it could be replaced with a robot. This is especially relevant for repeating tasks and tasks for which building huge automated dedicated robots might not be an option. There are plenty of instances where something needs to be done as specific spot for like an hour then move to another spot and do something else for another, rinse and repeat. You could easily move robot like this between those tasks, you can't do the same with dedicated stationary robots, atleast not that easily.
1
Rus bot detected.
1
Question: is it because they are racist or is it because Asians are simply better suited for that role? Like, how surprised are you when you see like 95% of fastest sprinters in the world being a black person? Do you straight away scream "racism" or maybe you realize that certain people are more suitable for certain things?
1
Then why no one wants to buy hydrogen cars?
1
Its not like Australia lacks of empty space to put those solar panels. Placing those on top of battery packs would not really save anything, you still need to clean those panels from time too time, service them and so on. And battery pack isint that big, so you wont really put many of those panels on top anyways. Simply not worth the hassle.
1
To the last Russian.
1
Biggest Lithium supplier in the world is... Australia... I don't think that Australia suffers from terrible mining conditions...
1
@Nisowyd People forget that you need to produce 100% of hydrogen as there is 0% of it in pure form on earth. Actual smart people did the actual research and calculate pollution done from END TO END and BEV's still came first as the lowest polluting, not by much in comparison to hydrogen, but still a cleaner solution. What you people keep forgetting is that most of the battery you can recycle, so once you mined the materials you can reuse those over and over again.
1
@notsaying543 Now go and google actual pollution by BEV and Hydrogen car, END TO END. Avoid picking one single thing and scream "Look, its polluting!!!" but actually look at entire thing...
1
@notsaying543 Once again, forget about your personal experience which is limited to your own personal views, actually google actual research which have been done to calculate ACTUAL pollution done by each car from END TO END Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs): Approximately 30-40 metric tons CO2e Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles: Approximately 120-150 metric tons CO2e Hydrogen Combustion Vehicles: Approximately 140-160 metric tons CO2e Diesel Vehicles: Approximately 200-250 metric tons CO2e Petroleum (Gasoline) Vehicles: Approximately 220-260 metric tons CO2e Asked ChatGPT for quick summary. Where do you get your idea what diesel is cleaner than BEV's?
1
@notsaying543 Again, you just pointing out specific issues and not looking into entirety of it. So please, provide a citation from a research which indicated that diesel cars are less polluting from END TO END than BEV's, because every single one I can find indicates opposite of what you are claiming. Its like just parroting some weird facebook post you seen once and never fact checked... If diesel cars have been actually more cleaner than BEV's or hydrogen cars, hell, how the hell would any activist survive this blow? Why doesn't big oil companies spread this enormous news with rest of the world?... We were (apparently) doing it all wrong, we don't need alternative fuels, we have cleanest of them all: diesel!!!...
1
He is paying... Government pays for provided services...
1
And we believe in real things. Whats your point?
1
@leonevans629 My point is simple: You believe in your fantasy land and i believe in what is actually real. In other words, you dont care what is true, you simply want it to be true, while i dont care what i want it to be, i care what is true. Do you get difference here between us?
1
@Люба-б7ы "Why people blaming God but not devil? " ? I'm not blaming god... I dont believe that he is even real... But by your religious beliefs everything what happens is a result of your god's grand plan and as devil isint more powerful than your god then it means that god ether doesn't give a f**k what devil does or he likes what he does, or your god is less powerful than devil, so he cant do a sh*t about devils actions, or nether of them are actually real. Pick one. "The poor hungry kids are not from God it’s from devil. " So god likes watching poor hungry kids? He will intervene and fix your depression, but he will not help out hungry children?... Seriously? What monster do you worship here? "I’ve tried everything with my own power to change and couldn’t!! " Placebo effect is a real thing you know. And there are countless examples of none believers getting over depression without any praying, so how does that exactly work out by your logic? "All the bad things happening around the world is from Devil not from God." Dint your god created EVERYTHING? Which would include Devil and things like hunger and your depression?
1
@Люба-б7ы "if God wasn’t real then tell me why biblical prediction of end times are coming true??" Because they are not? This "end times" things have been screamed out for past hundreds of years... Still nothing... All of your predictions for end times can be applied across basically entire human history, which makes it meaningless. "Bible says the world will go crazy before Jesus comes back!" And bible said that Jesus will come back in the same generation, like in first 60 CE years or something, he is late by like 1990 years, give it or take few decades. Did he got lost or did bible lied? "Don’t you think the world is going nuts right now??" Not a tiny bit. We had allot worst situations in the world, allot worst times, like dark ages, with crusades and all. Todays world is basically best one we had, yet, so by your own rules Jesus will not come if he dint came during dark ages
1
@Люба-б7ы "for Jesus to come come back everything has to be for fulfilled" Which was said for hundreds of years by those screaming people... You are not original here, everyone said exactly same thing you are saying now, all of them failed, why do you think that you are correct? "Look back how the world use to be and how it’s now??" So you think that dark ages have been better times than today's world? WW2? Bubonic Plague from 1346 to 1353? And you think that having corona is worst than that?... Have you ever opened history book? "Look at how many Christians fallen away from God??" Thank god... Pun intended. Luckily religions are on downfall and this is mainly due to easy access to information so any empty assertion you will make can be fact checked, just like you claiming that its the worst times we live in can be fact checked and shown to be false in no time. " Bible predicted it, it will happen so it’s happening." Bible predicted that in 2022 there will be less Christians? Which verse are you talking about here exactly? " Keep on waiting and thinking it will get better, it won’t!!!" And when it does get better, will you become atheist or will you change your tune and simply push this end time date few decades down the line just like every other theist until now did? "I have a feeling you were also religious person part of those millions that had fallen away from God" Yes, I was brainwashed into being religious, luckily my parents haven't been hard core believers and we haven't been forced to attend church and similar noesnese, so all this religious nonsense just faded away over the years and one day realized that i'm an atheist. Getting rid of brainwashing takes time. "will you still love him in the dark times or not? " I dont believe that he is real... Why do you even asking me question like that?... Its like me asking "Would you worship Voldemort in dark times?" it just makes no sense... "How it’s better? Crime has increased, is that called better? " Global crime rates are basically at its lowest in entire human history... What the hell are you talking about? "People don’t socialize with each other like they use to, is that called better? " Like you mentioned before, people change, socialization changed too. Now you can talk with people across entire world without leaving your house, just because you tend to have less eye to eye meatings doesn't change the fact that currently you know more people than before. And is this seriously your criteria for your Jesus guy to end the world, Facebook?... I mean... Facebook is a cancer, so maybe... "You can’t go for a walk in a beautiful peaceful night, is that called better??" You can, if you live in shitty country with shitty community and you cant do that, then yea, it bad for you personally, but in overall its none issue, its none issue for me, i can go outside at any time without any fear to be shoot in a head. "In fact world gone worse!!" Your "facts" doesn't match reality... "The way world is going i hope i die soon!! Don’t wanna wait till I’m 50,80 or 100." So world wont end for next 50+ years? How long should I wait until I can call bullshit on your claim that its "end times"? "nearly every single thing has been for filled in the bible and you still don’t believe that there is God??" First of all, nothing was fulfilled from your book what counts as actual prophesy, but aside of that, even if your book had actual predictions, like it said "In 2019 by Gregorian calendar there will be world wide pandemic" that would still not prove that god is real, you would need to determine that it wasnt self fulfilling prophesy, like some believer releasing virus just to make this "prophecy" come true, aside of this, it could also be just a lucky guess, because atleast lucky guess can happen, your god wasnt even shown to be possible, let alone that he is real. "That is trying to talk to us and it is God! " If he is real and he is actually trying to talk with us, he is shitty at it... Even I could give more clear signs that i'm real, heck, this comment is better proof that i'm real than anything else you have to show that your god is real. "God show me that he is real!!" How do you know that it wasnt delusion? Because Muslims will say exact same thing about Allah, so who is correct here?
1
ALL of them fall under same category at this point: Imaginary friend.
1
*flat And no, its not.
1
Hydrogen combustion engine was invented in 1806, its extremely old technology. So they are not finding the way, they are just desperate to use anything they can in hopes that people will buy their overpriced toys which still has that outdated sound.
1
Hydrogen cars are not running on water...
1
"Secondly it only been about 500 uears that people have believed in a spherical earth" First globe model appeared in 3century BCE in Greece. Just saying... Tho its quite irrelevant to earth being spherical... It could have been 5 minutes, its still spherical... "once you go flat theres no going back" Sadly... But well, we cant fix ignorance for everyone...
1
@petercat4481 Mercury? Why should we care?... I cant really understand people who tried to pick some one of the most complex topics in hopes that just because some one lack of understanding in answering would some how prove them correct... You could see mercury 24/7 would not change the fact that earth is globe... First of all lets start by establishing that each is globe and then we can go figure out why you can see mercury for 1.5 hours after sunset... Deal?... Learn to walk before you attempt to run.
1
@petercat4481 "So you have no proof no model no" Globe model? have you forgotten about that? And what is more interesting that you completely skipped my entire point about teaching YOU to walk before we start running. Your irrelevant nonsensical question about mercury is a fifth step after we agree on earth being a globe. So if you cant even grasp basic things like earth being a globe, then you have no chance in understanding allot more complex things like your original question. So, learn to walk before you start running. "that how science work" ironically enough by science earth is a globe. "You could not even establish basic geometry and are thus condemded to remain INGORANT while practicing your relifion of scientism not science" Did you wrote this sentence while looking at mirror? You literally going against established scientific data from entire scientific world and you claim that we are not scientific? Are you kidding me? Well atleast i can have some nice laughs from ironic comments like yours.
1
@petercat4481 "3D model in sketch up make arrangement for its reciept" From when does sketcup includes atmospheric refractions and similar shit? Is there a option to simulate that? Or is this a extra plugin i need to install? Och wait, there is none... Because its not made to do that... So you literally using tools to try figure out something what it was never made for... Do you even know how to science?... And ironically enough you said "that how science work" och no no no, that's not how science works, this is how you work when you are far far far away from being a scientist or even using scientific method. "Your answer is devoid of any Geometery or reason" Ok, lets check your knowledge about geometry: Should sun change perceived size over flat earth? Should it change over globe? What does reality say about sun? Does it change size? " its amazing all you scientism religious" Its fun to see people trying to lower science to religions level just to have fighting chance while at same time admitting that their position is in shitty place and they need to do that in order to keep floating. Thanks. "How convienent you have no 3d model showing how its possibe to see mercury 22.5 degrees after sunset" And you will not have it. There are multiple complex things involved into this and your basic model in sketchup will not demonstrate a shit... You could have atleast used some decent 3d software which could simulate light refraction... But no, you picked generic 3d modeling software which is made to create chairs and you complain that it doesn't match reality... C'mon... Are you joking here? And the fact that at some point you can no longer see it shows that it does hide behind curvature. So, as you admitted that we live on a globe, lets talk about more complex things: light refraction. What do you know about this phenomenon? "There is a reason for this its not possible" Like what? "The are of course other tell tell signs the heliocentic model and globe are BS such as gyroscopes" Care to elaborate? You keep making shit arguments here while never supporting them with actual evidence... You do realize that for you to prove something you actually need to... Prove it?... You do know this? Right? "thanks for the chat and lack of any evidence caluations or model " Not my job to teach you basics about reality. If you skipped middle school, then i would suggest to go back there and learn something... Then we can talk like grownups. "Guess people should just believe in your religion because you insult people" Not a religion, cant be a religion by definition. And my insults are irrelevant to the fact that you are demonstrably wrong on all fronts. Like seriously, by using your "scientific" method i can pick a earths map, lay it on table, turn on lights in a room, realize that entire map is lit evenly 24/7 and call flatardia bullshit. Done, i did your "scientific" experiment and proved that we dont live on space pancake. Tho you already admitted that we live on a globe, so maybe that one was not needed to do, but well, dint hurt. Sooo, light refraction, what do you know about that?
1
@petercat4481 "See your loosing your religion." Id don't have religion, so maybe you are right and i'm not only loosing, i completely lost it which was called: Catholicism. " As a scientist find you religious ferver is very tragic especially as you claim to be scientific lol" Yea, lol, when i see people claiming that my position is not scientific when entire scientific world supports my position. Lol. " to do so either running away at the first hint of getting into actual mathematics or true reviewable models." You literally using incorrect tools for your "experiment" and you want to call me none scientific one? Are you joking? FYI I used your method and disproved flatardia already. Yet your experiment only rises question why we see something for longer period of time then we should and not that earth is not a globe. "Despite years of time it appears no Glober (preprogrammed NPC) has produced a working 3D model that can be examined and scrutinised" Google maps? "Offering you the same you try to distract with BS are you claiming we see a reflection of mercury in the DOME at 22.5 degrees after sunset ?" What dome? What reflection? Are you drunk? I said REFRACTION not reflection... Do you even read? Can you read? "When you or your ilk want to demonstrate something by producing models maths ie a scientific explination go ahead" I'm not here to teach some ignorant people something more complex than + when you cant even understand basics about geometry. Earth is a globe, observable fact. After we will agree on this basic reality then we can move to something more complex. Light refraction, like i said before, is like fifth step, we currently are at step 0 you still failing to understand. So, step by step we will get to your silly question, but we cant answer it if you cant understand first 4 steps. It will be waste of time if we will skip steps. So yea, do you agree that earth is a globe? "Suggest you go back to school and learn how to argue your case" Exactly, please do that. " to examine an actual 3D model which destorys your religion (the heliocentirc model)" Like i said, learn to walk before you try to run. We dint got to the heliocentric model, that would be step 7 or step 8. Soooo, lets try it slowly this time: Is earth a globe?
1
@petercat4481 "Your religion is the heliocentic model " Still not a religion. Tho its cute that your still trying to imply that. "We can agree that a 3D to scale model will not show how its possible to observe Mercury 22.5 degrees (1.5 hours) after sunset." Did you sketchup model included light refraction? No? So your model is invalid, case closed. See how its simple to destroy your silly experiments? "the heliocentic globe model does not represent reality" How would you know this? How would reality look like if it was heliocentric? Would we see unicorns flying around?... Like seriously, you are trying to argue against something what by your words doesnt make sense while you cant even explain why it doesnt make sense... And... What makes sense to you and what is actually real are completely different things. "you fail to produce any mathmatics, model or data to support your case." Once again, light refraction. I already provided this couple comments back... Your failure to realize that light refraction resolves your main issue is not my problem, its yours. "Thats why your loosing your religion because your belief dont align with reality" Damn... Atleast you make me laugh. "Incidently this is just one of many failings of the heliocentric globe model" You have more ignorant argument to present?... Ok... Go for it!!! We can debunk those too. FYI You need to prove flatardia and not to look for possible issues with globe model. After all, even if your issues with globe model would even been correct you would still need to actually disprove globe model and that in general could only be done by proving that earth is a space pancake. So good luck with that. "RIP globe theory" If that helps you sleep at night, ok. So yea, no idea if your are just some sad troll here or just some religious nutjob. Your sketchup model doesn't disprove anything, not a tiny bit. You can repeat it over and over again, will not disprove globe model, because globe is a fact, observable and testable fact from reality and not your sketchup model... I still cant stop smirking while realizing that you tried to disprove globe model with sketchup... Make a chair in it, will be more usefull.
1
@petercat4481 "Yes you are part of a religious indocrinated cult" Still cute as f**k that you are trying to lower our position to religions. Sorry, will not work. "fails to substanitate there claims through maths" False. It was supported by evidence and maths and all that jazz, just because you failed to understand it will not mean it wasnt. "Anytime you want to show the geometiric proofs or an actual 3D model that works go for it" Its not my job to educate you. Use google, looks for videos on youtube... There are more than enough correct 3d models out there, but just because you are too lazy to look it up, its not our problem. "Are you being paid to?" ? Do you seriously think that like 98Į of human population who believes in globe gets paid?... Are you stupid?... Like serious question: are you stupid? "Once you Go Flat theres no going back" Yea, science still cant fix stupid, maybe in the future... "your failure to demonstrate the most basic geometric problem with the heliocentic globe model?" Like i said before and you failed to understand: Light refraction Your continuous failure to understand basic words will not disprove anything.
1
@petercat4481 "Given your on going failure to answer in an empriical way why dont you step aside an let a component member of the globe community provide mathematical proof or a working model" Its not my problem that your brains cant understand, so will repeat once again, answer to your question would be light refraction. Just because you dont like my answer doesnt make it incorrect or invalid, its not my problem. "Thus you resort to name calling and insults" When people act stupid, we can call them stupid. "Sorry your part of a religious sect " Still not a religion, or sect. "has no scientific basis for its belief system" Yet strangely like 99% of scientists are on out side... Strange, isint it? That like entire scientific world is on our side yet you want to say that we dont have scientific basis. Its like you have no idea what science is or what evidence is or what reality is or anything in general. "Why not post a link to one of your non working models" Why? You cant even grasp basic concept as light refraction, why do you think you could understand entire globe model? Learn to walk before you try to run... "Lol RIP globe" If that helps you sleep at night. Ok.
1
@petercat4481 "A) There is no Heliocentic glodbebworking model that will show why Mercury can be seen at night 22.3 degree after sunset" Once again, light refraction. Or something. But in general your failure to understand that earth is a globe ether way is just amusing. You still falling on your face each time you bring this nonsensical and completely irrelevant question of yours. After we can agree that earth is a globe we can dive into your Mercury issue. But if you will try to dismiss globe model on something you dont understand, well, amusing it is. "B) You cannot even link to the models you popurt to exist" I don't need to. Basic observation of sun proves that earth is globe. "C) As a protagonist of the globe and heliocentirc model you have failed to answer the most basic gemoetric question" Nope. I dint failed to provide answer, you failed to understand answer. "Once you go Flat there no going Back" Yes, science still cant fix stupidity. Maybe one day...
1
@petercat4481 "So your sayingthat in order to believe in your religion" Still trying to compare science with religion? That's cute. "to believe in your religion I must accept the globe" No, first of all you need to understand basic observations and what they mean. Like a sunset. Only possible on a globe. And couple other dozen things which can be confirmed by you independent from any sketchup models and similar. If you cant even understand how basic reality works, then there are no chance for you to understand explanation for your original question and at this point, your original question is irrelevant. Earth is globe even if you could see Mercury 24/7... Why you can see that would be separate question AFTER we can agree on the shape of earth, not before that. its like trying to teach 5 year old about rocket science when he cant even understand what is fire... Or combustion... Or rockets... Learn to walk before you try to run. "Are there any members of your religious sect who are more intelegent than you that are capable of showing their workings out?" I just wondering why you behave so childish. Your original question is irrelevant here, you dont understand basic geometry, you dont understand basic reality. Providing detailed explanation of globe model will not get us far if you cant grasp basic things about basic observable facts which prove that earth is a globe. "what are your angles of incident and refraction where are your calculations ?" Damn... You still trying to understand rocket science while failing on basic math... Lets try it simple, like really simple and lets see if you can handle anything more complex. If earth was flat, should perceived sun size change throw day? If earth was flat, should perceived sun movement speed change throw day? If earth was flat, should perceived sun movement across sky should be circular? If earth was flat, can sun ever hide under horizon? 4 really basic questions from geometry, lets see if you can handle those and then lets see if your answer matches reality and what we should observe if earth was flat. Good luck.
1
@petercat4481 "ou are practicing religious belief" Still not a religion by definition of religion. I wonder how many times i will need to repeat this until you realize how badly you are failing with it here. And what is more ironic that it only exposes that you understand how shitty religions position is as you are trying to lower my position to its level just to have fighting chance. So thanks for that. "No science" Says person who used sketchup to check why we can see mercury.... Riiiiiight, you are the science guy here... "Also you premise is flawed in that only light from Mercury is magically refracted" Who said its only mercury? And who cares? it could only be mercury, would not change the fact that earth is still a globe... "Why dont you get a proponent of the globe and heliocentirc model who is capable of basic maths to respond rather than yourself" Please, dont make me laugh even more than i already em. You cant even address basic geometry questions which doesn't even involve calculations, and you want some one with equations? Are you kidding me? "who despite rumours of woring models does not have the ability to provide a link to one" Why? Go outside for once in your life... You have real life model under your feet... C'mon, its not so scary to leave your basement... Just go outside, get a solar filter, do some basic observations of sun, then realize how badly you failed in your life and try to fix that while its not too late. Do we have a deal? Cool. See ya later.
1
@petercat4481 "You are loosing your scientism religion" Damn, its like you cant even think of better insult than repeating same one for the 10th time in a row... C'mon, use your brain and imagination, you can think of something better which would not be nonsensical statement by itself. I believe in you! "Just provide a link to a model that can be reviewed to explain why we can see Mercury up to 22.5 degrees after sunset" Don't care, earth is still a globe even if you could see Mercury 24/7 "or show you workings out with Mathematics " To whom? Definitely not to you, as you have no idea how that thing works. So who else? "Whilst these are difficult concepts for you even though you claim such models exist if you cannot do the above " Riiiiight, says some one who cant even understand basic geometry which proves that earth is a globe independent if you can see mercury 24/7 or not... Riiiiiiiight, its me who have difficulties understanding... "Go home get yourself a nice warm glass of milk tuck yourself back in to you delusional dream world and go back to sleep poppet" Well atleast this insult is some what better than first one, so congrats on that, couple more weeks of this talking and you might even make one which could actually insult me. Now i just wondering if you are a troll or just some one who cant even read. How do you explain sun matching 100% globe model and mismatching 100% flat one? No need to have some model put on internet, no need to use this magical sketchup which is made to create chairs to use in checking if you could see mercury, you can simply do some basic observations by yourself in actual reality. So why even basic sun observation proves that earth is a globe and not flatardia?
1
@petercat4481 Your counter argument is a link to some childish video?... C'mon... Entire video is as cringe as it gets... What did you hoped by posting this?
1
@petercat4481 "Exposing you religon" Still not a religion as much as you would wish that it was, it simply cant be. So its funny to see you still trying to imply that. "No Calculation No Mathematics No Geometry" Correct, this is why flatardian model was rejected, none of that exists in flatardian model. "Claims of models that dont exist" EXACTLY! There isint even a model of flat earth which would not contradict reality. Ironic, i know. "Expose the Truth that you are wither the victim of mind control or a Jesuit supporting Satanist" What the what now? Was this a conclusion from your SketchUp model you made? Is there a plugin for that?
1
@petercat4481 "Thanks for confirming your religion" Och, atleast you make me smile. "based of belief rather than science" Like entire scientific world is on my side, so if you want to talk about not being scientific, well, you lost with that already. FYI Sketchup is not a scientific tool for what you wanted to check. "enjoy the plane" What plane?
1
Nah, its all about religions, after all majority of bible believers are not flat earthers, but majority of flat earthers are bible believers.
1
This video is 100% AI generated, there are dozens of these. At the moment you start hearing AI voice, its 99.9% certainty to be full of shit and is there for the clicks.
1
@boterlettersukkel Wait, they are rounded, but its to opposite side then globe earth should be!!! Concave Earth Confirmed!!!
1
How do you know that it worked?
1
@RussianRuckets Because its forced diversity. If having diversity was a strength then it will come in naturally, no need to shove it up our throats.
1
@Memovox Let's verify something here: Is this a war/invasion or special military operation?
1
Yes yes yes, car manufacturers promise revolutionary cars every single day for past century or so... Not really happening...
1
@lagresomadsl "what is it for you want I believe or not believe?" Because you vote. In general, nobody gives a f**k what you believe, but you are part of society, so your beliefs will effect your actions and your actions will effect people around you. So fixing as many issues with your belief as possible will be beneficial not only for you, but for everyone near you. "If I believe the earth is a flat stationery plane, look up the word plane, how does this change anything in your life?" If you believe one silly thing then you will be more prone to believe another one. People who starts believing one conspiracy tend to accept bunch of others and then you have one nutcrack screaming on facebook and saying that people should not vaccinate because government lies or some stupid stuff like that. Again, you are part of society, if you lived alone in woods, no one will give a f**k what you believe, but you are not. "If I believe in science, big bang and pray to the sun, believing we are flying into space on a moving ball, what does this line of thought change in your life?" No idea why you would pray to sun, but if you would accept actual reality then you would live in actual one and not in fantasy. Having less false beliefs will lead to more correct actions. Do you remember 9/11? People believed in some specific fantasy idea and acted upon it, and what you got? Bunch of dead people. Yes, its extreme example but its on same exact line as belief in flat earth, might be different scale, but basic idea is the same.
1
@lagresomadsl "how does mine line of thoughts affect your daily life?" You are part of society, your actions will be determined by your beliefs. If we are sharing same space then your beliefs will have effect on everyone else in one or another form.
1
Now just imagine how much it will cost to fuel up our car with efuel... We already have hydrogen cars and those cost crap ton to fuel up, while efuel is hydrogen on steroids, aka even more complex to produce. And goodluck buying new house for 50k
1
You can't just make hydrogen at home and use it for your car... Not only you will need dedicated expensive equipment for it, it will cost you arm and leg to buy and maintain it... Heck, you even have option to make your own petroleum from crude oil, if you get bunch of expensive equipment... Why are you not doing that? Because it doesn't make any sense due to costs involved. And one of the hydrogen production methods is to burn natural gas which is controlled by big oil. What big oil doesn't want is BEV's due to your ability charge any of these from any power source and allows you to be 100% independent if you want it. Hydrogen cars are simply bad alternative
1
Maybe for people to have a hobby, but never as actually usable daily driver.
1
What do you mean? Can't find culprit? Its Russia.. Putin to be more exact... What else do you need?
1
And this is why its not a Musk's project. He only talked about it for brief moment
1
@KangenAlec Basic observation of sun proves that earth is a globe, NASA is as relevant here as caramel ice cream
1
@Ramen Lover Well there are dozens if not hundred things proving spherical earth, sun observation can be done without any equipment or one dollar solar filter. I tend to give examples of something flat earther can afford: costing zero bucks.
1
Trump is still a joke even if he correctly guessed something. Tho its not much of a guess, it's just adding 2+2 and getting basic 4 as a result.
1
Wokism isn't good.
1
I wonder, who is the one who is destroying Ukraine currently?
1
Coping much?
1
Because killing on the spot someone who surrendered would be inhumane...
1
Sharing information about what already happen isn't dangerous. And Russian army knows more than random youtuber anyways. What that video was about is to not share actual future plans.
1
Who are those? Lizardmen?
1
@IOneLia33 No idea what you are talking about here... To much nonsense and word salad to even try to understand what you tried to say here.
1
@KangenAlec Now I'm just wondering if you are trying to troll here or are you just so ignorant even on basic things... People don't live upside down... Down is towards center of earth, filming Australians upside is just moronic at best. Its like saying "Film me upside down and prove that earth is a globe"... Damn... I just hope you are a troll... You cant be serious here.
1
Waste of money even if it's one way trip.
1
Every technology has its own problems, at the moment BEV's are the best option including issues related to them, it's still the best option.
1
@Talemuse-Cyoa What you think doesn't determine reality. And just FYI you can and we do recycle batteries, in general once all of those metals are mined you can keep reusing those over and over again. On top of this, new battery chemistries are being introduced constantly which usually requires less of precious materials in general. You are desperate to create boogeyman here in hopes to scare yourself and others, nothing more.
1
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” ― George Carlin
1
Is Russia crying that it can't sell its gas anymore?
1
Are you drunk? Ukraine demolished? In whose dreams?
1
Blowing up bridge is a terrorist attack in your reality?... What do you think Putin was doing for past 500 days? How many missiles and drone attacks have been done which damaged Ukraine infrastructure?... is this is terrorist attack then och boy Russia should be level to the ground for what they did over all this time...
1
@theredscourge Are you trying to make big deal of something what isn't a issue to begin with?... People already charge their EV's with lvl1 or lvl2 chargers at their homes, no one complains that they can't use AC while car being charged... So that's none issue already. Then you started to talk about 200kw trucks... Like... Ok... Do the same as you did with 100km cars... it will take twice as long, but you can still charge at home... None issue... if you will need more charge you can always visit charging station for that, just like you would with ICE car...
1
@theredscourge Rolling blackouts are due to shitty electrical grid and not because people have EV's... Number of EV's has no effect on the grid at the moment... One hotter day will cause 10000x bigger load on entire grid than all EV's... And if you live on your farm... Then... Well... Maybe don't use your Tesla for manure transportation... Duno... Like what did you tried to even say here? You need charger for your tractor? Are you now grasping imaginary straws? You can fully charge your BEV's over night, fully, if you using up entire range of your passenger car going around your farm with it... Then maybe you are using it wrong?...
1
@theredscourge Show me actual data or evidence that BEV's causing blackouts or even adds to it or that BEV charging will be an issue in the future... You just speculating and expressing your personal opinion here will only be that, your personal opinion. People tend to charge their cars at night because its when electricity is cheapest due to lowest consumption rates. So like, it's definitely not that what causes those blackouts... Solar panels getting cheaper too, so you can offset most of that "issue" by having few extra solar panels which can charge your car at day time as cheap as it comes. It's none issue... There isn't enough production of BEV's for this to become and issue even if you tried to make one...
1
@theredscourge So now you complain about shitty chargers? Have you looked into Tesla charging network? That one is like 99% uptime, no issues with those entirely, quick and easy charging, basically always working and has bunch of chargers in one place so you get usually one free and working. Just because there are shitty companies with their shitty chargers in place will not mean that there aren't good ones. So this is mute argument too. And they are not banning everything except BEV's... They are banning everything whats powered by petroleum... See the difference? On top of this... Ban to sell petroleum cars will not mean that you can't just go to another state and buy one there... i can bet that atleast one state will keep selling petroleum cars for next 40 years... So its not like all those polluting cars will magically disappear just because you can't buy new one anymore in that state... Imports are a thing you know. If overnight charging becomes and issue then price of that electricity will be higher than it is during day, so people will shift their charging habits to be during day time... Like charging at your workplace... Again, none issue. Price does tell so something, but as you can charge your car at home from solar panels you own, that price becomes little to nothing. Right? "What do you call an EV that costs twice as much as a gas car to purchase and noticeably higher than a gas car to fill?" Fantasy. BEV's prices are going down, so like, would those actually cost more than gas powered ones? Unlikely. For electricity price... You can only speculate here at best. This transition to BEV's is happening, you like it or not, its simply happening. What we have to do is adapt to this change one way or the other, you have like 20+ years for it... You are not in a rush...
1
@theredscourge Tesla will provide information how many available stalls there are now or even how many there should be when you arrive. On top of this, again, Tesla stalls have extreme level of uptime, its extremely rare to see single stall not working... And Tesla usually installs bunch of those in one place, so its really rare to not get one for yourself. So again... Mute point you are trying to make here... Complaining about something what's none issue... And it is problem with companies, there isn't a problem with one problem at the moment, Tesla. That one has biggest network in the world with most reliable chargers. Everyone else just puts 2 charges per location and calls a day, from which usually atleast one isn't working... "No, there is no difference, unless you misinterpreted me, but what's your point?" How are you not understanding difference between banning every car except BEV's and banning only petroleum powered ones? Its straightforward one... You can still use Hydrogen powered, or even E-Fuel ones... Its about banning most polluting types of cars, rest of them will be allowed. "Sure you can buy a gas car in another state, but what do you do when they ban the gas stations, drive to Texas to fill up?" Then you go and buy BEV... Is that so scary for you? To own BEV? "you need to realize that not everyone has $20,000 in panels at home after they blow $60,000 on a daily driver, nor do they all work from home." Cool beans... First of all, we are talking about something what should be needed in like 20 years or so, which means that prices you are looking at will not be the same... Solar panel prices are going down, by quite a bit. On top of this, you can use those same solar panels to power your entire home, so its not like you are just gonna use it to charge your car, even now it can be cheaper to install solar panels and use that to power your house with some battery pack, in 20 years it will be no brainer... "It's $18 a day just to park downtown in my city, that's 10% of the average daily salary before taxes, imagine how much it will be to park AND recharge!" ? Seriously... You seem to like to make some weird unrelated statements... Over and over and over again... What I actually said was that you could charge at your work, but you started to talk about paid parking... Are you now using paid parking while working at your company?... Like... What are you even talking about? And delayed another 20-40 years?... It was already delayed to much... To delay it even more just because YOU don't like this transition will not mean anything, it should be faster than its happening, not slower... it will be decades to get rid of all of those petroleum cars from the roads... And you want to delay it even more while you failed to present single valid argument here for it?... C'mon... And please... For your own sake... Get actual evidence that BEV's as ANY effect on electrical grid in your California instead of repeating same claim over and over and over again... Give me peer reviewed scientific research which demonstrates that... I will wait... until that happens, stop complaining about something what isn't real.
1
@theredscourge "Because the difference between them banning "only petroleum cars" and "everything except BEVs" is about 12 cars." Then expand... Toyota tries to go with hydrogen, they will fail and go bankrupt, but hell, they are trying to do it. E-Fuel will be replacement for quite some time too, which basically allows you to use old cars with little modifications. But that's completely besides the point that there is HUGE difference between banning everything besides BEV's and only banning petroleum cars... "Yes, if I actually want to be able to drive when I want in 10 years, then owning a BEV is a scary prospect, as it should be for you, which is the entire point of what I am saying here." Why? first of all, as you can charge your car at home, you will have your car always at full, so with like 300-500 mile range you can go whatever you want... Right? Like, what will prevent you from going where you want? How far do you plan to go on daily basis? Do you just pack your stuff and start 50000 mile journey across the road without any wall sockets? Is this yet another none argument from you? "I know solar is going down in price, but $10 more than you have is $10 more than you have regardless if it used to be $20 more than you have." No idea what you tried to say here. Are you saying that you wont have 10$ to charge your car? You can always use public transportation... "If parking is too expensive for most, then parking plus charging is DEFINITELY going to be too expensive for most." ? Who said that you will be forced to pay for parking and be forced to charge while parked and pay for that too?... Your arguments are so weird... Are you paying now for parking? Do you need to charge your car each time you stop at paid parking? Do you pay for parking at your work? Like... Make actual reasonable argument here... " Pay attention and you'll understand why I say what I say, think harder and you will see why it is related." But its not... You just trying to create issues where there are none... And you keep doing that... Over and over and over and over again... Just waiting for an argument from you which sounds something like "So when world goes to solar and there is cloudy day, that will cause blackouts when people starts charging their BEV's!!!" "There's no such thing as "delayed too much" if the thing simply is not ready." Did you know that first car was actually electric? Yes... This is how much it was delayed. Instead of going full blown petroleum we should have invested more into battery development, but no, this was delayed. We are lucky that Tesla came along and pushes all this electrification forwards by few decades, otherwise this would not be happening. And it will take few decades to properly transition, so yea, it was delayed to much... "Give me peer reviewed papers for why I should put a second more of my time into trying to convince a clearly triggered EV fan that there might be massive downsides to completely ignoring the infrastructure side of the equation" Because until this point you presented NOTHING besides your own personal opinion... That's it... Present me actual evidence that transitioning to BEV's will be bad and we should delay it, not just scream out that its bad because you had a dream about it, but actual evidence... If you can then I will join your side and start saying that BEV adoption should be slowed down, until then... Stop making shit up... "I already explained why 2+2=4" No, you did not, you simply said what you think to be true without actual evidence that it is true. What you said is "X+2Y=69 and this equation is wrong" and I'm here "Why it is wrong?" and your response is "Because I dont like Y or 69 and I feel like X should not be here, lets replace it with B" and i'm like "What the what now???" "I don't need to go put on a labcoat and say "trust me, I'm a scientist"." That would atleast give some credibility to your comments here... it would not prove that your are correct, but atleast you would have some idea what you are talking about. "or you can dismiss it due to being too emotionally invested in the opposite being true," Och that irony... "when YOU are clearly not who I am trying to reach with what I am saying" Clearly, I'm not that gullible to just accept someone's "Trust me bro" argument "since it is clear that reaching you with it is impossible" It's REALLY easy to reach me, you just have to present actual evidence for your claims and I will be reached in a nanosecond, that's how simple it is. So do you have any evidence here or just that "Trus me bro" type of argument?
1
@theredscourge "so you are splitting hairs" I'm not splitting hairs... i'm here correcting YOU. It doesn't matter how viable alternatives are, what you claimed was that government bans every car except BEV's, and then I corrected you that government bans petroleum powered cars only. It makes no difference if we will have 5 hydrogen cars in 2035, makes zero difference here... " I laid out reasons why you won't be able to charge at home" Which was your personal opinion, which if fine, you have your opinion, I have mine. What's now? Do you have any actual data to support your opinion? Any scientific research which concluded that your opinion is the correct one? Anything more than just your opinion? "then you said then charge at work" I said to charge at work when you said that not all people are working from home... Try to keep up here... All that convo went from electricity potentially becoming more expensive at night... Again... Try to keep up here... " then I laid out reasons for why that won't work" What will not work? You just said that you can't be paying for paid parking spot and at same time pay for charging... Which had nothing todo with anything here... People who go to work usually have free parking spot at their work and even then, having paid parking spot has NOTHING to do with charging... It was YOU who brought that irrelevant point, not me... "Circular argument." You need to learn what circular argument is. "by saying that parking at work is already non-viable for many in cities, let alone parking plus charging?" Like... Do you have any actual argument here? You can charge your car where you want. Go and charge it at dedicated charging station. Do it at work if its available. Do it at home if that's an option... You keep desperately trying to make some weird issues where none exists... With BEV's you have exponentially more options where you can "refill" your car, yet it doesn't look like you are crying about current cars only have gas stations... Are you ok? "The average person who just drained the bank on a $60,000 commuter car" Like... You do know that there are such things are used cars? Right? And you do know that there are cheaper options too? Right?... It's like having person who buys 150k car and then complains about charging costing them whooping 20 bucks... There is wide range of BEV's already and their price is dropping and there should be new ones in near future which costs around 25k, new one. So like... AGAIN... Why are you so desperate to create issues where there are none? "There's no peer reviewed studies on what the grid looks like if everyone switches to EVs" Cool, then your opinion is just that, your personal opinion. Come back when you get actual supporting evidence for your opinion. "me to take you in a time machine to watch the disaster unfold? " Clearly that's not happening, so then, why are you so confident that you are correct if by your own words you have no supporting evidence? Why should anyone take your words seriously when you are on same level as people who claims to be abducted by aliens and probed over their anus? "and then maybe consider my actual arguments instead of immediately rejecting them, calling them "opinions"" But those are opinions... By definition of that... As you don't have supporting evidence that makes it a opinion... Like... What else it should be called? "as though opinions and truth never line up or something. " ? Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't... This is why it's a opinion and not a fact... I have opinion opposite to yours, so then, how should we go by determining which ones of outs is the correct one? Is your opinion has more value than mine? "I supplied actual numbers" What numbers? Did I missed something here? Which numbers proved/supports your point here? And what you have as a numbers is todays situation about a thing which should happen in 10-20 years or so... So like... What's now? You can't even provide supporting evidence that TODAY EV's causing trouble to the electrical grids anywhere... How the hell are you hopping to prove that those will cause issues in 10-20 years? " even if I jumped through whatever hoops you demanded me to jump through, you'd just say "I can't be bothered to read all that" or "I don't trust your source" anyway." That's a convenient excuse to not have any supporting evidence... "You just admitted that you'd be swayed by me putting on a labcoat." That would be better than you presented now, doesn't mean that I would blindly believe you even if you had lab coat on you, but atleast I would know that you are not just some random person on internet trying to claim random stuff you have no idea about. There are plenty of people with lab coats who are fundamentally wrong too you know... "personally emotionally invested in EVs" I don't. But what i'm personally invested into is prevention of misinformation spreading. It doesn't matter what you are claiming to say, can be for BEV's or against them, if its bollocks I will call it out. "easily swayed by appeal to authority fallacies. " Still false. I can be swayed by actual evidence, never said that I would blindly trust authorities... Tho, just FYI as you seam to not know this, appeal to authority is a fallacy ONLY when you appeal to none authority. I can appeal to quantum physicists without understanding quantum physics, that will not be fallacious because i'm appealing to actual authority in quantum physics. Now you know. " whereby EVs have no downsides" BEV's (there is distinction between EV and BEV) does have downsides, but in general BEV's are the best option we currently have to move forwards. Every technology has its own downsides, doesn't mean we should not invest into it... "the electric grid will handle it just fine despite our governments' complete lack of action on the infrastructure side to plan for it" It will handle it just fine. Actual research was done on this one as it was shown that electrical grid can happily sustain BEV's adoption rates without any issues. Electrical grid is being expanded at specific rate already, with or without BEV's, so it's none issue. "Perhaps it's my moral duty to try to warn people about the impending disaster" That just sounds more like "End times is near!!! Repent for your sins!!!" type thing... I guess everyone is wrong, but you with your none lab coat expertise know more... Why? Because you watched few videos on youtube?... I have no idea as you never presented any actual evidence and you admitted that you don't have any for that... So like... Ok...
1
Falcon 1 failed 3 times, Falcon 9 failed 3 times. None of those been failure during static fire where rocket just flew away. Surprisingly SpaceX rockets are one of the safest ones by their track record of how many launches they performed so far and how many failures it experienced.
1
Flying cars? You seriously want flying cars?... Go, buy one... There are few of those... There is a reason why we don't have those as a regular thing just flying around city... Hydrogen is dead for regular cars, it might still be usable for more specific things where energy density is more important, but Elon would never go with Hydrogen. Steam car?... Do you think steam just magically appears from thin air you could use to push your car forwards?... Or do you want to fuel your car with wood or coal directly while you drive it? How the hell do you think that steam cars would be any better than current ICE ones? And you can either order parts from Tesla directly or get those from a donor car, just like you would for any other car out there...
1