Comments by "" (@shauncameron8390) on "" video.

  1.  @scottknight8265  Translation: tax anyone who's not completely poor. That's what the USSR did to the kulaks and China did to the small shopkeepers.
    4
  2.  @FA-kt3is  <No one should be in a position to choose between life and death, or shelter or food just because of not enough money> Partly due to financial mismanagement.
    3
  3.  @cody709  More likely due to poor budgeting than the high living costs. If you're making 150K and still struggling, there's a good chance that you're the problem and not the major city's living costs.
    3
  4. Alberta.
    2
  5.  @WATCHLLS  At least they get medical help while in Canada you'll probably be dead before medical help can come in time.
    2
  6.  @dano3952  So did Pol Pot in Cambodia.
    2
  7. LOL. No they won't.
    2
  8.  @methatguy5996  Venezuela. That free money from oil Chavez handed out helped destroy whatever private sector and local industry it had having to rely on imports to feed itself.
    1
  9.  @rigg4146  It was redistributed all right. Namely to Party elites.
    1
  10.  @methatguy5996  <but they're not a failed country.> Thanks to Deng's capitalist reforms in the 80's and Clinton's outsourcing of US manufacturing jobs on the 90's.
    1
  11.  @methatguy5996  No. The UBI helped undermine the local economy and industry. <The fact is Norway and Finland are the closest thing this planet has ever seen to a UBI, and they're doing just fine.> Was it implemented nationwide? Or was it just implemented on a handful of people as was the case with Finland?
    1
  12. LOL. Aside from Pierre-Karl Peladeau and whoever runs Saputo, there are not that many wealthy folks in Quebec.
    1
  13. Corporations are the biggest private employer in the country.
    1
  14. <Canadians with disabilities need out help from fellow Canadians.> That's what MAID is for.
    1
  15. Like they already did with EI.
    1
  16. Eliminate or really perpetuate poverty by (co-)dependency.
    1
  17. Wrong! Governments do. Corporations have nothing to do with high taxes and reckless spending .
    1
  18. LOL
    1
  19. Children are not old enough to work.
    1
  20. Mostly likely the latter.
    1
  21.  @dano3952  Not really. It's only so if you don't have the skills, ambition or smarts for anything better.
    1
  22. LOL <1000 get 100 dollars and we all spend it in no time, so the economy moves $100,000 forward.> You all spend it only to cry about being broke and hungry the next day. There's a reason why whatever successes socialism achieve are short-lived.
    1
  23. Like it saved the average Venezuelan's?
    1
  24.  @Ryan-vc4lr  But will have little to buy as there's no longer any industries that produce or sell anything.
    1
  25.  @Ryan-vc4lr  <That's just not the case..> Yes it is. See Venezuela.
    1
  26. <There has to be a point in society where working to live is no longer a part of survival.> But no society survived on laziness. Even animals have to work.
    1
  27.  @RDGray  <There will be a time in the future when robotics, automation and AI will do most of the work for us.> That is until they break down requiring human repair and maintenance. <It's about having the ability and resources to discover your passions and being given the ability to pursue and fulfill them.> Only to end up creating a soft society that cannot feed or defend itself.
    1
  28.  @dano3952  Europe is just barely a generation removed from its fascist/communist days. It figures.
    1
  29. To the delight of the government.
    1
  30. Very much.
    1
  31. <167 Billions collected from Canadians in 2020 in income tax > With a good portion of those Canadians employees of said corporations you want to tax.
    1