Comments by "" (@shauncameron8390) on "South Sudan Is Collapsing Thanks to Corruption Over Oil" video.

  1. Both of which ran by Marxists once White rule came to an end.
    2
  2. Qatar has far better leadership.
    2
  3. This is what happens when humanity turns its back on God foolishly thinking it can lead itself.
    1
  4. And how exactly do you do that without basic infrastructure or a thriving economy?
    1
  5. The North is Muslim.
    1
  6. Not really. And what people in Las Vegas are dying of hunger?
    1
  7. South Sudan was George W Bush's idea.
    1
  8. No it doesn't.
    1
  9. Diversity is overrated. And Africa has plenty of that to go around.
    1
  10. Oil corruption = Black and Brown elites enriching themselves while letting their countries crumble and starve.
    1
  11. Wrong! South Sudan and by extension Sudan are ex-British colonies.
    1
  12. No. It will just be squandered and then it's back to square one as the leadership is just too corrupt and incompetent to do anything useful with it.
    1
  13. Um. South Sudan is ran by leftist social democrats. Try again.
    1
  14. That's because Westerners have forfeited family-making and their futures in favor of their careers and lifestyles.
    1
  15. George Clooney = Hollywood leftist.
    1
  16. Meh. George Clooney is just another virtue-signalling Hollywood leftist.
    1
  17. Marxism is for government bureaucrats, not the average worker.
    1
  18. Children = extra labor and social safety net.
    1
  19. South Sudan is not capitalist. It has no functioning economy.
    1
  20. <Each day I slowly wonder if anarchy is a good ideology. Abolish government, people live free, police ourselves. Would.it work? Would it cause chaos? Is order and a hierarchy system that a few elite enjoy the suffering of the lower classes worth that order?> No. And Somalia already has some experience in that. It had no functioning government. People lived free albeit at the mercy of warlords and pirates. What is it do you have against hierarchy and order?
    1
  21. Chicago is a White-majority city. You mean Detroit or Baltimore.
    1
  22. It lasted a grand total of 4 years.
    1
  23. Not really. The people are largely illiterate and low-skilled and the money would have been squandered.
    1
  24. That's Zimbabwe and South Africa.
    1
  25. You know it was the mistreatment they suffered at the hands of Northerners that caused them to seek independence, right?
    1
  26. No. Greed is.
    1
  27. South Sudan has only existed since 2011.
    1
  28. No. Greed and selfishness will always be around even in the absence of money.
    1
  29. South Sudan is anything but capitalist.
    1
  30. Into the bank accounts of the elite.
    1
  31. Tribalism. Africans don't see each other as brothers but strangers.
    1
  32. No.
    1
  33. What about Equatorial Guinea?
    1
  34. China's system as in state-imposed unity like what the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia had?
    1
  35. <I speak from experience when I say the only way South Sudan can thrive is with a matriarchal society> LOL. Not really. Matriarchies are regressive by nature and South Sudan doesn't need anymore regression.
    1
  36. South Sudan was a US-supported idea courtesy of George W Bush and George Clooney.
    1
  37. No it won't. South Sudan's problem is the lack of an actual functioning economy.
    1
  38. No. Developed nations are not responsible for South Sudan's inability to support itself.
    1
  39.  PineApplePen  Plus they just got rid of its own corrupt leader.
    1
  40. Bad leadership and policies, foreign meddling and the general lack of human capital.
    1
  41. But the people in South Sudan were treated like non-entities by the people in North Sudan, hence the demand for independence.
    1
  42. The AU was founded by tyrants and despots. Do you honestly expect accountability from such a place?
    1
  43. No. Africa already did socialism and is responsible for a lot of its political and economic problems it suffered post-independence.
    1