General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Biographics
comments

Comments by "" (@shauncameron8390) on "Biographics" channel.

Including Karl Marx himself.
35
Pol Pot gave them a good run for their money.
7
Its founder, Karl Marx didn't work much throughout his adult life. It figures.
5
@hb2495 Okay, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
4
No we weren't. Even the tribal and communal societies of the past had hierarchies and "inequality."
4
Exactly.
4
And if anything, history proved Robespierre right as revolutionaries consistently become even bigger oppressors than the people they overthrew ever were and eventually eat their own. Castro - Batista Lenin and Stalin - Tsar Nicholas Mao - Chiang Pol Pot - Sianhouk Mugabe - Smith Mengistu - Selassie
4
@seasalt489 Is that you, Pol Pot?
4
Case in point: every socialist/communist regime that ever existed.
3
But Pol Pot killed 20% of Cambodia's overall population.
3
True.
3
@charlespayne1707 And a lot of the problems Black people have been suffering post-CRA have been under Democrat leadership. Broken families with no father around (Johnson), mass incarceration (Clinton, and Biden was the actual genius behind the 1994 Crime Bill), the erosion of Black wealth (Obama). And speaking of Obama, police brutality reached an all-time high under him. Ghetto housing (any Democrat mayor).
3
@westernscythian8677 How about the liberal as defined by Vladimir Lenin?
3
<He referred to the Russian people as " useful idiots."> No. That's what he referred to the Western leftist liberals who support communism/socialism yet were clueless to the state tyranny it entailed as.
3
LMAO
3
Tree bark, grass, feces, etc.
3
Case in point: every other socialist/communist regime that ever existed.
3
@Death To capitailists Are you talking about yourself?
3
@viracocha6093 Communism is a greater evil than Islam. Islam's crimes against humanity pale in comparison to communism's.
2
Yes it does as socialism was the reason Venezuela no longer had a diversified economy. Chavez price-controlled and nationalized it out of existence in the process of depending entirely on oil to keep the country afloat and buy votes from the poor to ensure his re-election. He was just fortunate enough to die before SHTF which left Maduro to bear the brunt of his policies that resulted in what you're seeing now. Shortages of virtually everything including toilet paper, mass migrations, famine, hyper-inflation and going from the wealthiest country in South America to officially the poorest country in South America with the world's highest crime rate to boot.
2
@vwgames49 BLM is funded by a Marxist. <Bernie is a Democratic Socialist, which is completely different> Not really. He's just a reformed commie. Abd by the way, how did this democratic socialism work out for Venezuela and Greece?
2
And what would that be?
2
That's because they haven't lived long enough to know any better.
2
Who live in capitalist democracies no less.
2
@mutualaltruism6658 Not really. Land redistribution is not a conservative economic policy but par for the Marxist/socialist/communist course.
2
@fidelcastro8481 Says communism's biggest beneficiary.
2
As usual.
2
That sounds like much of post-colonial Africa when its liberators became the new oppressors treating the people even crueler than their former colonizers did.
2
What about the French, Spaniard, Portuguese, Dutch and Belgians?
2
And from the same bourgeoisie they denounce.
2
@caindecarias2856 Um. No. The French Revolution and every other communist regime will suffice. No mainstream media needed.
2
@WarCrimeGaming And he paid off that IMF loan he took to build the presidential palace on the backs of his own citizens by letting them starve and freeze to death.
2
@nickmoser7785 Like the average revolutionary. Nor did he impose one-party rule, state-controlled economies or established labor/re-education camps or had hundreds of thousands of productive citizens killed/jailed/exiled in the name of "the people."
2
@nickmoser7785 Most notably Angola and the Congo. And one of the richest people in the continent is the daughter of a Cuban puppet.
2
@PoweredByLS2 Only to become an even bigger oppressor than the colonizers ever were. Like every other revolutionary.
2
@WarCrimeGaming Vietnam and China only after adopting some capitalist reforms in the 80's. Laos is a Chinese client state. So North Korea and Cuba are the only pure socialist countries still in existence. North Korea surviving as a buffer between China and the US via South Korea propped up by China. And Cuba is surviving on US remittances and food aid, Canadian tourism, Venezuelan oil and renting out its doctors to other countries.
2
If your schools weren't run by Marxists and other far-left types.
2
@seasalt489 Typical tankie response.
2
Tyranny is perfectly fine if the tyrant in question is left-wing/Marxist/socialist/far-left/communist/freedom-fighter/liberator/etc.
2
Or Tanzania under Nyerere turning it from one of the top food-exporters to the world's #1 foreign-aid recipient thanks to his forced collectivization policies.
2
@Death To capitailists Yet you're advocating for a system that literally works for the 1% in socialism as anyone who isn't part of the ruling elite and well-connected is SOL.
2
Apparently, neither do you. What slavery? You voluntarily sought those corporations for a job, submitting your resume/application form and all, accepted an interview and job along with whatever salary and position they were offering. Let me not forget to mention that you're also free to quit if you don't like the job as there's another person all too happy to take your place. It's not the corporation's fault you don't have the savvy, acumen, balls, etc. to start your own business.
2
Whatever, tankie!
2
<because they dared to be different.> By adopting an idea that have consistently turned once-prosperous countries into hellholes like Zimbabwe, North Korea and Cuba?
2
@JagmasterGeneral12374 That makes him communist. It's not that far off from Lenin, Castro, Mao, etc. used to do. It falls in line with general state control and collectivization.
2
@EugeneAyindolmah Land redistribution falls in line with the state control consistent with socialism/communism. Seize the land, kill the "kulak/bourgeoisie" farmers and redistribute it to political henchmen. It's also called collectivization.
2
Exactly.
2
They're both collectivist ideas and were founded by Marx disciples.
2
Lenin was every bit a brutal. It's just he didn't live long enough to see it through like Stalin.
2
@shebbs1 Exactly. All he cared about was making Black people a permanent underclass which he succeeded at by displacing Black men from the family/community with welfare.
2
Like Thomas Sankara and Patrice Lumumba.
1
He may not have actually ruined the country, but he definitely set the country up for failure as Maduro was left holding the bag.
1
Ditto for Castro.
1
Indeed.
1
Apparently, Kim Il-Sung was his idol.
1
@Josep_Hernandez_Lujan Most of what he did was during peace time. If Batista = Hitler, then Castro = Mao.
1
@Josep_Hernandez_Lujan You first, commie!
1
@bobyk87 Exactly.
1
The only Black people Mugabe gave land to were regime loyalists. The Black people who were actually competent were killed off.
1
@CaptainDiaspora Agreed.
1
When yesterday's liberators become tomorrow's oppressors.
1
Namely the Black and Latino communities situated there.
1
Marxists control the education system and the media.
1
@karlg5697 If you're part of the ruling class.
1
@vwgames49 Who cares? The results they have produced are more or less identical. Talk is cheap.
1
@vwgames49 Capitalist welfare states.
1
@vwgames49 <Democratic Socialism (What Bernie is) has inspired the policies for some of the happiest countries on earth> The same Bernie who once praised the likes of Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega? The same Bernie who once campaigned on taxing the rich only to change his tune when he became the rich? The same Bernie who got checked by the Danish PM on the claim of Denmark being a democratic socialist country?
1
Zimbabwe = Venezuela without the oil or the high crime.
1
They were no more severe than the sanctions the West imposed on Rhodesia at the tail end of Ian Smith's rule.
1
@carllarsen But the family unit has a hierarchy.
1
@kittenmastermind660 <this normally translates into business owners take most of the profits they did not work for this is also the 1# leading cause of poverty in the world.> But they risked the most money in getting that business off the ground and provide the workers the means to do their jobs with which cost more than a worker's yearly salary. The workers didn't show up until the company was established enough to hire outside help. <Socialists just want the worker to own and democratically control the companies they work for. > Only to run them into the ground due to mismanagement, general lack of savvy or organizational acumen.
1
His people = himself, his family, friends and regime staff. The average Zimbabwean could eat grasshopper for all he cared.
1
Exactly.
1
@whatthehell1338 And they certainly didn't do it at peace time either.
1
It figures why Atheism would be their religion of choice. That way, they can always excuse and trivialize their actions no matter how heinous. Hence, the higher body count and human rights violations.
1
Is that commiespeak for inconvenient facts and truths about your sacred idea you don't like?
1
Not in Chile.
1
Including Atheism in Jonestown's case.
1
The White farmers were to Zimbabwe what the kulaks were to Lenin-era USSR.
1
LOL.
1
@Lionfish5656 Its social views are no consequence as its economic and political views are far-left.
1
@marxismleninismkanyeism6440 You mean Friedrich Engels. Marx worked as a journalist, but didn't make enough to live off of.
1
Exactly.
1
But capitalism still beats communism any day of the week in spite of its flaws.
1
You mean everyone except themselves.
1
Especially the UK.
1
Like Somalia after its socialist experiment came to an end?
1
That's because Chavez destroyed whatever diversified economy Venezuela had on its way to being oil-dependent with price control and nationalization.
1
@Hammerhead547 Eh. Jonestown was more Cambodia-lite.
1
@DieGamerAG But he was socialist. He was a Marxist. He was far-left like most communists.
1
Duvalier. Haiti.
1
@Chris Ramos And judging by your last name, you'd probably also get deported back to Mexico or whichever Latin American country you're from.
1
@avorysamsin5509 No. Why don't you do that?
1
They had no problem backing Tito, Ceausescu and Pol Pot.
1
@kittenmastermind660 Typical communist response every other time the communist experiment fails and is rightfully bashed.
1
Communism is just about everything capitalism is accused of being and then some. And plays the victim when rightfully called out for its crimes against humanity.
1
He's a leftist.
1
Like Benito Mussolini?
1
On Stalin's orders. That Scorched Earth policy.
1
@techsavvy8522 Not really. And who were those rich pricks?
1
And his daughter is now the richest person in the country.
1
Judging by how the French treated the slaves doing likewise, I don't blame him.
1
That's because the education system the general political discourse and the media is ran by the far left.
1
Exactly.
1
@TimmyCherry Chile? A lot better than Venezuela and Nicaragua. Ghana? A lot better than Zimbabwe. Philippines? A lot better than North Korea and Cambodia.
1
@officialburrito3874 While you keep spitting KGB propaganda.
1
Exactly.
1
Not surprising when Marx himself came from the upper class and Engels was a card-carrying member of the very bourgeoisie he wanted abolished.
1
@Alex1010Flyboy Arguably the only guy who cared about economic development which truly benefited the people as opposed to being a a run-of-the-mill power-monger.
1
Not to mention more Black people were killed by police under Obama than any other President.
1
The only people who see him as a hero are either ZANU-PF loyalists or not from Zimbabwe.
1
Pretty much.
1
@jimsagubigula7337 So you can become the new capitalist exploiting the poor worker in the form of a government official.
1
Jesus él McNuggetCunt Maybe not, but they did invent terms racism and racist to quash dissent and kill any ethnic group that dared resist them.
1
@muslimmetalman Social democrat/democratic socialist = Marxist. Same difference. After all, it was a term coined by an actual communist.
1
@LjuboCupic1912 Both of which are communist ideas as a way to repackage communism.
1
Only to become the new upper ruling class exploiter and looter of the workers. Yesterday's liberator, tomorrow's tyrant.
1
Good question.
1
Maybe so, but some Latin American countries actually prospered under right-wing leadership. Chile and Dominican Republic
1
Lee Kwan Yew (Singapore).
1
That's if you were part of Mugabe's entourage.
1
@daddyquatro Become a brothel-holiday for everybody except Americans. Namely Canadians and Europeans.
1
@Death To capitailists Ordinary shopkeepers and entrepreneurs deserve death? LOL.
1
His real name was Francois.
1
@olehsztul6177 <Well not really, economic sabotage did for oil monopoly by Saudi oil companies> Then how come none of the other oil-rich countries suffered as badly as Venezuela did?
1
millsub xxx LMAO
1
Commies and their delusions of grandeur just never cease to amaze me.
1
I didn't know ordinary shopkeepers had power like that.
1
No he didn't. He just simply threw money at the problem in exchange for votes.
1
Interestingly, Duterte is a leftist.
1
Yet you benefit from capitalism, hypocrite.
1
@nesbistrampol And yet all of them resulted in the same things. Tyranny, genocide, poverty, etc.
1
<You’re clearly an anti-communist, too bad that communists gave russians shelter, education and lifted millions out of poverty.> Only to send them right back to poverty once the economy came apart. And of the supposed millions that were lifted out of poverty, how many managed to stay out of poverty?
1
@artemesaulkov2010 And rightfully so after the communist ran those means of production into the ground with no other people's money to subsidize their mismanagement.
1
Blame Jean-Pierre Boyer for agreeing to repay it.
1
Jim Jones with political power.
1
It didn't help that Chavez killed off whatever diversified economy Venezuela had with price control and nationalization in the process of becoming solely reliant on oil.
1
The UN even then was ran by left-wingers and West-haters.
1
@TheFandrian And even communists don't practice equality.
1
Indeed.
1
Namely the Labour Party-led UK. This was a product of its decolonization efforts.
1
@puhpuh3037 That they hardly knew how to farm resulting in food shortages and eventual famine. <freeing them from slavery.> Only to subject them to forced labor.
1
@mxgregoly8969 His people as in who? The average Zimbabwean (at least the ones who knew how to farm) the ZANU-PF members and supporters?
1
Also Latin America. Case in point: Venezuela.
1
Like Thomas Sankara and like Robert Mugabe.
1
@mizanulhaque8476 Paul Kagame embraced free-market capitalism. Robert Mugabe, like many post-colonial African leaders, rejected it in favor of Marxist socialism.
1
No. They joined NATO on their own volition.
1
@Netrune07 <However they have now adopted a new system known as Juche.> Which is a oxymoron as North Korea lives off of Chinese subsidies and exist as a buffer to keep the US via South Korea at bay. It doesn't have much of an economy of its own.
1
@Netrune07 Communism is trash and so are the leaders it produced. Any idea that advocates the wholesale destruction of the individual and the things that make an individual a human being is worthy of ridicule and scorn.
1
@Netrune07 <dont be brainwashed by the american propaganda> Says a poster brainwashed by communist propaganda. If communism is so great, why did millions risk their lives to flee from it?
1
@Netrune07 LOL. Actually the leaders executed it to the letter.
1
Even Robespierre said it himself.
1
Exactly.
1
How's Atheism working out in North Korea?
1
Predictable shallow pro-communist response.
1
The ultimate useful idiot.
1
Pol Pot. He was on a whole nother level of brutal.
1
But that didn't stop Pol Pot from killing millions.
1
Chavez price-controlled and nationalized it out of existence along with killing off the middle class.
1
Amin wasn't a socialist.
1
With the 5th Brigade trained by North Korea.
1
To leverage power for their cause while weakening the power of the existing regime.
1
With Pol Pot being the unsung "hero."
1
He set a negative precedent for post-independence Africa.
1
@caindecarias2856 He's right, though. Most rebels and revolutionaries are aspiring tyrants.
1
@E-101-Beta Indeed.
1
And nothing spells self-reliance like running to China with its hand out.
1
@14598175 And that's why the American Revolution is the only successful revolution to date.
1
@mithunkumar25557 Like Soviet imperialism?
1
He is, just like every other socialist.
1
Himself and Party henchmen.
1
@jpmonin7429 That's if they're even allowed to give an honest opinion without getting hauled off to jail.
1
@keydaniels Che was half-White, though.
1
So how did Yugoslavia under Tito and Somalia under Barre manage to get US support?
1
@slavicemperor8279 Nope. That would be Deng Xiaoping.
1
@Death To capitailists Yes they did in the form of a hyper-devalued currency.
1
@renegadeace1735 Especially Eastern Europe.
1
Yes.
1
Due to its first 4 leaders being tyrants who had no economic viable plan. And one of them (Boyer) reinstated slavery to get the production levels up.
1
Socialism summed up.
1
Yes it did. Sanctions are just a cop-out for the price controls and wholesale nationalizations and destruction of the middle class along with corruption, mismanagement and well-intentioned but short-sighted policies that did far more to put Venezuela in its current dismal state of affairs.
1
In other words, intentions matter more than results.
1
It's more about vote-buying than actually helping people as free money (really, money taken from the productive and efficient of society) and social programs are designed to keep people dependent.
1
But Pol Pot gave him a decent run for his money killing 20% of Cambodia.
1
Because a lot of countries are too weak to defend themselves especially against their bigger neighboring enemies.
1
@alerixv Jim Jones was an Atheist, though.
1
@KamikazeChinaman Case in point: all those educated folks in Cambodia.
1
Wrong. Most wars are fought over politics and resources, not religion.
1
@littleoldlady873 No. They're capitalist welfare states. And Sweden hasn't been socialist since the '70's.
1
Also AOC and Bernie Sanders.
1
Whatever, Chavista! <His economic diversification plan was unsuccessful due to American interference.> No. It was unsuccessful because of price controls and wholesale nationalizations of private business killing off the country's wealth-producers. <Venezuela's collapse is due to the oil coup by Obama and Saudi Arabia, in addition to economic embargoes.> How come none of the other oil-rich countries collapsed like Venezuela did despite suffering the same price-collapse?
1
@olehsztul6177 <Venezuela is a social democracy not a socialist country. Fact.> And a failed one at that. FACT!
1
@bedstuyrover Yet he had no problem accepting loan money from the West along with military protection to keep the Soviet Union at bay.
1
@Timoshemperoni LOL. Please! Communists hate the the wealthy although a lot of them came from wealthy backgrounds themselves.
1
@Timoshemperoni <What my original point was that the writings of Karl Marx and the Communist manifesto shouldn't be illegal just because it didn't work out well in practice under the circumstances of the USSR or China> Yes it should as more or less the same results were produced in every other country communism was practiced. North Korea, Cambodia, Cuba, Ethiopia, (insert Eastern European country name), etc.
1
@hellonhead5905 Even if it was tried, it would have imploded and it be right back to square one with factions and mini-states being formed like post-socialist Somalia.
1
@JagmasterGeneral12374 Since when did commies ever give anything back to the people? They always used the people to justify their tyranny.
1
Exactly.
1
Nah. Those would have fit in perfectly with Berniebots.
1
Yet another case of a revolution eating its own.
1
Mobutu wasn't anti-communist as much as he anti-USSR. He idolized Mao and imposed Chinese-styled communism on Zaire (DRC).
1
Oh yes it does. Karl Marx advocated violence against the bourgeoisie, otherwise known as the middle class, and the individual in order to make the "new man." What rich and powerful? The people that oppose communism/socialism are ordinary middle class people. Interestingly, communism/socialism's biggest advocates are from the upper class.
1
Nelson Mandela was soft and didn't have the balls to do what L'Ouverture did, especially after his stint in jail and losing his Soviet support.
1
You prefer Soviet propaganda?
1
Or Mohamed Siad Barre?
1
Or Papa Biden and Hunter?
1
But Mugabe was more like Hillary as he actually lost an election that he rigged.
1
His own people being his political henchmen.
1
Exactly.
1
Namely communists and theocrats.
1
MUH COMMUNISM = good intentions, wanting to make the world a "better place."
1
Lenin was right about liberals being useful idiots.
1
@john_smith_john Somalia is yet another failed socialist country. Its absolute freedom came after Barre got ousted and exiled.
1
@Charles-hy6gp AH YES! That "what about the other" excuse!
1
Exactly.
1
Exactly.
1
Communists love the poor only because the poor are easy to control and manipulate hence their obsession with social programs.
1
What real men? He came from a privileged upbringing.
1